can you measure social cohesion in south africa? - oecd a.pdf · can you measure social cohesion in...

28
Can you measure social cohesion in South Africa? And can you fix what you don’t measure? Alan Hirsch The Presidency, South Africa and University of Cape Town 1

Upload: vanduong

Post on 13-Sep-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Can you measure social cohesion in South Africa?

And can you fix what you don’t measure?

Alan Hirsch

The Presidency, South Africa and

University of Cape Town

1

Findings of the OECD Development Centre Global Development Report -

• Social cohesion is made up of social inclusion, social capital and social mobility

• Social cohesion supports economic growth • Key areas of policy to support cohesion are:

– Fiscal and tax design – Employment – Social protection – Civic participation – Education – Gender and – Migration

2

Findings in terms of the OECD Global Development Report –South Africa

• South Africa is ahead of the pack in fiscal and tax design • Social protection is relatively well developed; South Africa is

one of the leaders amongst developing countries • South Africa has positive indicators for trends of employment

of women and women’s political representation • Civic participation is good • On education, participation is good, but quality is poor for the

poor • On employment, the market has done poorly but there are

good public employment programmes • On migration, there is a hostility towards immigrants from

other parts of Africa

We will explore these indicators in more detail

3

Political participation Table Voter participation in national and provincial elections

1994 % 1999 % 2004 % 2009 %

Voting age population (VAP) 22 709 152 22 798 845 27 436 898 27 574 414

VAP registered no registration 18 172 751 79.7% 20 674 926 75.4% 23 181 997 84.1%

Turnout 19 533 498 16 228 462 15 863 558 17 919 966

% Turnout of VAP 86.0% 71.2% 57.8% 65.0%

% Turnout of registered VAP no registration 89.3% 76.7% 77.3%

Under 35 years

VAP under 35 11 768 544 14 162 663 13 923 366

VAP under 35 registered 8 667 832 73.7% 9 193 845 64.9% 9 253 537 66.5%

No turnout data

4

Mortality rate

48.0

50.0

52.0

54.0

56.0

58.0

60.0

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Years

LIFE EXPECTANCY

LE male StatsSA LE female StatsSA

LE combined StatsSA LE combined ASSA

5

Female representation

Table 1 Women members of Parliament and Provincial Legislatures

Female Total % Female Total % Female Total % Female Total %

Parliament 111 400 27.8% 120 400 30.0% 131 400 32.8% 173 400 43.3%

Provincial

Legislatures

Eastern Cape 13 56 23.2% 15 63 23.8% 21 63 33.3% 28 63 44.4%

Free State 7 30 23.3% 7 30 23.3% 8 30 26.7% 12 30 40.0%

Gauteng 25 86 29.1% 26 73 35.6% 31 73 42.5% 33 73 45.2%

Kw aZulu-Natal 11 81 13.6% 22 80 27.5% 21 80 26.3% 30 80 37.5%

Limpopo 11 40 27.5% 16 49 32.7% 16 49 32.7% 23 49 46.9%

Mpumalanga 6 30 20.0% 8 30 26.7% 9 30 30.0% 12 30 40.0%

North West 9 33 27.3% 9 33 27.3% 11 33 33.3% 14 33 42.4%

Northern Cape 7 30 23.3% 8 30 26.7% 9 30 30.0% 13 30 43.3%

Western Cape 10 42 23.8% 11 42 26.2% 13 42 31.0% 14 42 33.3%

Total 210 828 25.4% 242 830 29.2% 270 830 32.5% 352 830 42.4%

1994 1999 2004 2009

6

Social Assistance Support

Grant type 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08* 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11

Old Age Grant 1 848 726 1 900 406 1 903 042 1 943 348 2 050 572 2 124 984 2 146 344 2 195 018 2 229 550 2 390 543 2 546 657 2 678 554

War Veterans

Grant 7 908 5 617 5 336 4 638 3 996 2 963 2 817 2 340 1 924 1 500 1 216 958

Disability Grant 607 537 655 822 694 232 840 424 1 228 231 1 293 280 1 315 143 1 422 808 1 408 456 1 286 883 1 264 477 1 200 898

Foster Child

Grant 49 843 66 967 67 817 83 574 120 571 195 454 317 434 400 503 454 199 474 759 510 760 512 874

Child

Dependency

Grant 22 789 33 574 34 978 42 355 76 494 86 917 90 112 98 631 102 292 107 065 110 731 112 185

Child Support

Grant 150 366 1 111 612 1 277 396 1 998 936 2 996 723 4 165 545 7 075 266 7 863 841 8 189 975 8 765 354 9 570 287 10 371 950

Total 2 687 169 3 773 998 3 982 801 4 913 275 6 476 587 7 869 143 10 947 116 11 983 141 12 386 396 13 026 104 14 004 128 14 877 419

Growth Rate 5.8% 40.4% 5.5% 23.4% 31.8% 21.5% 39.1% 9.5% 3.4% 5.2% 7.5% 6%

Grant-in-aid 8 570 10 107 10 332 12 625 17 528 25 667 26 960 31 918 37 343 46 069 53 237 58 413

7

Public employment programmes

Expanded Public Works

Programme Work Opportunities per sector per year

Sector 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 Q3

Environmental & Culture 95 942 107 189 117 679

Infrastructure 263 457 277 100 302 679

Non-State 60 039 126 848 126 991

Social 206 421 131 979 139 584

Total 625 859 643 116 686 933

8

Poverty levels

Percentage of population living

below R422 poverty line (in 2008

constant Rand)

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

R422 a month

poverty line (AMPS) 50.1% 50.5% 51.7% 53.1% 51.2% 51.0% 52.1% 50.8% 51.4% 49.0% 47.6% 46.9% 44.5% 43.9% 38.2% 33.9% 34.5%

Percentage of population living below various poverty lines (in 2009 constant Rand from GHS)

2005 2009

Expenditure Poverty Line [R551.78 per person per month] 70% 65%

Income Poverty Line [R551.78 per person per month] 59% 46%

Expenditure Poverty Line [R298.17 per person per month] 54% 49%

Income Poverty Line [R298.17 per person per month] 40% 27%

Expenditure Poverty Line [R149.08 per person per month] 31% 25%

Income Poverty Line [R149.08 per person per month] 23% 12%

9

Gender parity at school

10

0.90

0.95

1.00

1.05

1.10

1.15

1.20

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

index

GENDER PARITY INDEX

Primary GPI Secondary GPI

Pre-School participation

5.0

15.0

25.0

35.0

45.0

55.0

65.0

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

%

CHILDREN ATTENDING ECD FACILITIES

0-4 year olds 3-5 year olds 5 year olds

11

Decline in child and infant mortality

12

Access to electricity

0

2 000 500

4 001 000

6 001 500

8 002 000

10 002 500

12 003 000

1994/9

5

1995/9

6

1996/9

7

1997/9

8

1998/9

9

1999/0

0

2000/0

1

2001/0

2

2002/0

3

2003/0

4

2004/0

5

2005/0

6

2006/0

7

2007/0

8

2008/0

9

2009/1

0

2010/1

1

num

ber

HOUSEHOLDS WITH ACCESS TO ELECTRICITY

Total number of households

HH with access to electricity

13

Why, then, is society not cohesive?

• Unemployment level

• Inequality

• Race and class (Irish coffee)

• Poor services to the poor

• Structural legacies of colonialism and apartheid (initial conditions matter)

14

Unemployment Level

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Sep Mar Sep Mar Sep Mar Sep Mar Sep Mar Sep Mar Sep Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

%

Unemployment rate by age group and gender

15 - 24 25 - 34 35 - 44 45 - 54 55 - 64 Male Female

15

Inequality

GHS Gini Coefficient for Income and Expenditure

Province Income Expenditure

2005 2009 2005 2009

Eastern Cape 0.70 0.68 0.66 0.63

Free State 0.68 0.69 0.66 0.67

Gauteng 0.67 0.67 0.64 0.65

KwaZulu-Natal 0.70 0.69 0.68 0.64

Limpopo 0.69 0.71 0.62 0.64

Mpumalanga 0.68 0.68 0.66 0.67

Northern Cape 0.71 0.71 0.69 0.66

North West 0.68 0.70 0.64 0.68

Western Cape 0.66 0.61 0.63 0.64

16

Class and race

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

May Nov May Nov May Nov May Nov May Nov May Nov May Nov May Nov May Nov May Nov May Nov May Nov

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

%

Number of those who were of the opinion that race relations are improving expressed as a proportion of the total population

17

Maternal mortality

Estimated MMR, deaths per 100 000 live births

Region 1990 1995 2000 2005 2008

Australia 10 13 9 8 8

Brazil 120 98 79 64 58

Chile 56 40 29 26 26

Colombia 140 120 110 85 85

Malysia 56 46 39 34 31

Mauritius 72 67 28 32 36

Mexico 93 85 90 87 85

Nigeria 1100 1100 980 900 840

South Africa 230 260 380 440 410

Thailand 50 52 63 51 48

Africa 780 590

Sub-Sahara 870 640

World Total 400 260

18

Sexual Assault Reported Cases

2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11

Eastern Cape 8 238 8 626 10 312 9 117 9 087 9 456 9 047 9 380

Free State 4 734 4 972 4 559 4 386 4 396 4 523 4 581 4 838

Gauteng 16 402 16 333 15 676 15 124 15 398 18 176 15 645 13 987

KwaZulu-

Natal 11 378 12 122 11 932 11 649 11 355 13 279 13 269 12 793

Limpopo 4 491 5 070 4 671 4 780 4 528 4 675 4 905 4 883

Mpumalanga 4 375 4 674 4 756 4 631 4 169 4 695 4 603 4 442

North West 4 519 4 610 4 546 4 588 4 513 5 021 4 759 4 706

Northern

Cape 2 191 2 212 1 993 1 957 1 749 1 917 1 845 1 868

Western

Cape 9 751 10 498 9 631 8 969 8 623 8 772 9 678 9 299

Reported

cases 66 079 69 117 68 076 65 201 63 818 70 514 68 332 66 196

19

The system of accountability is leaky

• Poor forms of representation (constitution, list system and the liberation dividend)

• Weak leadership in parts of government, especially local government, corruption, nepotism and incompetence

• Stagnation of politics

Let’s look at inverse measurements of social cohesion….

20

Service delivery protests

21

J. De Visser & D. Powell (2012) Service Delivery Protest Barometer 2007-2012 Cape Town: Multi-level Government Initiative, Community Law Centre.

Protest growth rate

22

J. De Visser & D. Powell (2012) Service Delivery Protest Barometer 2007-2012 Cape Town: Multi-level Government Initiative, Community Law Centre.

Nature of grievances

J. De Visser & D. Powell (2012) Service Delivery Protest Barometer 2007-2012 Cape Town: Multi-level Government Initiative, Community Law Centre.

23

Violence trend

24

J. De Visser & D. Powell (2012) Service Delivery Protest Barometer 2007-2012 Cape Town: Multi-level Government Initiative, Community Law Centre.

Marikana-revealing structural faults

Marikana erupted due to structural fissures in South African society that threaten social cohesion—deep fissures, with roots in colonialism and apartheid, that don’t appear to threaten the overall integrity of the society in the short-term, but weaken growth and development prospects through undermining social cohesion

25

Marikana-Why?

The cleavages are about colonial-style migrant labour, unions that represent white collar, not blue collar workers in a weakening industrial relations environment, extreme inequality of rewards in the mining sector (and elsewhere), poor living conditions and inferior services for the relatively poor—not absolute poverty See Gavin Hartford: http://groundup.org.za/content/mining-industry-strike-wave-what-are-causes-and-what-are-solutions

26

Need to look beyond general data to structural fractures in society

• Indicators on inclusion, mobility and social capital are important and provide valuable insights

• In many respects, South African achievements after only 18 years of democracy are impressive: declining poverty, improved access to infrastructure, services, health and education

• But in societies that are deeply fractured, its not enough to reform at a macro-programme level and aggregates of data don’t work

• We need to address issues like: – the continuation of old-fashioned migrant labour – Poor forms of political representation/accountability – Extreme manifestations of inequality – The quality of social services for the poor vs. the rest

27

“The risks of focusing on what we can measure”

• In most important ways South Africa is a well managed country: – Democratic rights – Rule of law – Fiscal and monetary management – Even, significantly declining crime levels and improving health

indicators

• Many social and social security interventions were introduced to address inequality—social transfers, public employment programmes, compulsory education, the largest government ARV programme etc.

• But, there are structural faults in the society that wont be repaired by general programmes and they are not reflected traditional aggregated indicators

• Suitable indicators are important, but so are policies which accept that there is a lot that benchmark social programmes cant fix

28