Building-Integrated Heat amp Moisture Exchange 2014 Building Technologies Office Peer Review

John E Breshears jbreshearsarchitecturalapplicationscom

Architectural Applications

Project Summary

Timeline Start date October 2012

Planned end date August 2014

Key Milestones

Mid- amp Full-scale Lab Tests June 2013

Full-scale Demo January 2014

System Documentation July 2014

Budget Total DOE $ to date $1037812

Total future DOE $ $0 (committed to date)

Target MarketAudience

Owners developers and operators of medium-large scale commercial institutional amp multi-use buildings in warm humid climates

Key Partners

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

dPoint Technologies Inc

Arup

ETH Zurich

Membrane Technology amp Research Inc

Project Goal

Design amp demonstrate at increasing scales the energy benefits of large-scale wall-integrated heat amp moisture exchangers

Characterize both the ventilation energy benefit as well as the insulation benefit of this hybrid envelopehvac technology

2

Purpose and Objectives Problem Statement

State-of-the-industry energy recovery ventilators (ERVrsquos) offer low humidity exchange (εlatent =045-065) with high attendant pressure penalties (200-350 Pa) resulting in low market penetration and limited impact

Integrated ERV solutions could leverage multiple advantages to produce better a better ROI and reap more of the nearly 3 quads of potential US savings available annually

Target Market and Audience

The target market for AirFlow PanelsTM includes developers owners and operators of commercial and multi-family residential buildings

Square Footage Energy Savings Potential

New Construction 108 B 072 Quads

Renovation 257 B 188 Quads

2013 US Market Size (maximum adoption potential)

3

Purpose and Objectives Problem Statement

State-of-the-industry energy recovery ventilators (ERVrsquos) offer low humidity exchange (εlatent =045-065) with high attendant pressure penalties (200-350 Pa) resulting in low market penetration and limited impact

Integrated ERV solutions could leverage multiple advantages to produce better a better ROI and reap more of the nearly 3 quads of potential US savings available annually

Target Market and Audience

The target market for AirFlow PanelsTM includes developers owners and operators of commercial and multi-family residential buildings

Square Footage Energy Savings Potential

New Construction 108 B 072 Quads

Renovation 257 B 188 Quads

2013 US Market Size (maximum adoption potential)

3

Purpose and Objectives Impact of Project

The key to achieving significant impact in energy savings is to overcome the resistance to adoption of decentralized outdoor air paths (as opposed to conventionally centralized) and combined hvac and envelope functions (as opposed to segregated)

Toward this goal project deliverables include

1 validated testing at various scales

2 operational installation demonstrating the benefits

near term

3 pilot installations

build awareness

certifications (ahri)

industry collaboration

Impact Trajectory

intermediate term long term

15 installations

sales partnership

manufacturing

supply chain

150+ installations

strategic partner

International sales

scale up manuf

4

Approach

Approach The technology is a hybrid of two building system functionsmdashHVAC and building envelopemdashintegrated into a unified whole to achieve lower energy use at better economic returns

Distinctive Characteristics bull Large-scale air-air exchanger

bull Polymeric membrane-based

bull Higher transfer surface area

bull Lower face velocity amp pressure loss

bull Manufactured in a panelized form

bull Integrated into modular wall panels

bull Simultaneous improvements to ventilation amp envelope performance

5

Progress and Accomplishments

Key Issues

I Validating the coupled ventilationenvelope

heat amp moisture exchange

II Assessing the feasibility of achieving

theoretically predicted performance in practice

III Identifying and resolving pragmatic design amp

operation issues including

a balance of system design

(eg fans filters dampers etc)

b coderegulatory issues

(eg intakeoutlet separation distances)

c manufacturing methods

(eg cross-leakage filer access etc)

6

MILESTONE

Dimensions

AirFlowRate

SupplyInlet 90F 90RH 66-89F 88-97

ExhaustInlet 72F 50RH 54-58F 54-85

εsensεlatentΔPUeff

Dimensions

AirFlowRate

SupplyInlet 90F 90RH

ExhaustInlet 72F 50RH

εsensεlatentΔPUeff

Dimensions

AirFlowRate

SupplyInlet 90F 90RHExhaustInlet 72F 50RH

FanEnergyReduction

CoolingEnergyReduction

1Medium-scale

laboratorytest

(Berkeley)

2Full-scale

laboratorytest

(Berkeley)

3Full-scale

operational

demonstration

(Singapore)

PROPOSED ACTUAL

gt088

gt082

lt80Pa

097-099

076-088

53-113Pa

5-3x6-6x3

gt088

gt082

3-3x5-3x3 3-0x4-0x10

22cfm 40-90cfm

Datameasurementsin

progress

Datameasurements

complete(April2014)

DataAnalyssinprocess

gt082

=085Uactual 075-11Uactual

=085Uactual

lt80Pa

3-3x12-0x3 5-3x12-0x3

22-44cfm

gt088

3-3x5-3x3

22-44cfm

Progress and Accomplishments

7

8

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments MILESTONE 1 Medium-scale Lab Test

0

200

400

600

800

1000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

Coolin

gLoad

[W]

FluxRate[CFM-deltaT]

Ven la onAirCoolingLoad

Control

AirFlowPanel

015

020

025

030

035

040

045

050

500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100

Ueff

[Wm

2K]

DeltaT[C]

Effec veWallUValue

Control

AirFlowPanel

Measured Performance

bull 076 lt εlatent lt 088

bull 53 lt ΔP lt 113 Pa

bull Ueff improved 4-25 when ΔT= 12 C

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments MILESTONE 2 Full-scale Lab Test

-500

000

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

32214000

32214224

32214448

32214712

32214936

322141200

322141424

322141648

322141912

322142136

32314000

LocalFlux1(W)

LocalFlux2(W)

LocalFlux3(W)

LocalFlux4(W)

LocalFlux5(W)

LocalFlux6(W)

LocalFlux7(W)

LocalFlux8(W)

LocalFlux9(W)

LocalFlux10(W)

LocalFlux11(W)

LocalFlux12(W)

-3000

-2000

-1000

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

32214000

32214224

32214448

32214712

32214936

322141200

322141424

322141648

322141912

322142136

32314000

Intake-DeltaT(C)

Exhaust-DeltaT(C)OverallDeltaT(C)

Measured Air Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data

Measured Envelope Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data

9

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments MILESTONE 3 Full-scale Demonstration

ETH Zurich Singaporendash

currently collecting raw data

10

]

]

]

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION

AirFlow Panels TMConventional Air Con

x10x

[high condensation [low condensation] [1000m2 in 45-floor office]

Indoor Concentration of Airborne Mold Increased Leasable Floor Area

Source Harvard School of Public Health 2001 Source Hudson Yards New York

11

Progress and Accomplishments

$4000

$6000

$8000

$10000

$12000

$14000

$16000

$18000

$20000

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

OrderQuan ty

ScaleUpAdjustedCostCurve

CostUnit

PriceUnit

Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION

ORDERQUANITITY5

START-UP PERORDER FIXEDMONTH VARIABLEUNITLABOR 9415$ 8209$ 3377$ 406$

MATERIAL NA NA NA 8667$

EQUIPMENT 4618$ NA NA NA

OVERHEAD 3450$ NA 2841$ NA

TOTAL 17483$ 8209$ 6218$ 9073$

Pilot-scale Manufacturing Plan bull bills of materials bull labor bull equipment bull cost targets for manufacturing 5-100 units

12

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments SPIN-OFF PRODUCT

13

Progress and Accomplishments

Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence

1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156

2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200

4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144

7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Temperature[C]

TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office

OutdoorAir

ZoneSupply

ERVSupply

ZoneAir

ERVExhaust

Projected annual savings

[KWhm2 ( below baseline)

EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads

near term

4 pilot installation discussions

strategic industry partner discussions

Impact Trajectory

intermediate term long term

manuf study built into supply chain

sales partnership discussions

international sales partnership

scale up manuf

14

Project Integration and Collaboration

Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)

bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)

bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning

bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)

Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants

Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies

National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering

bull HVAC Engineering

Portland Ten bull Commercialization

15

Next Steps and Future Plans

Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012

AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012

Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)

bull Build sales pipeline

bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods

bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)

16

REFERENCE SLIDES

17

Project Budget DOE Cost Share

Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120

Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated

Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)

Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)

Budget History

FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)

FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)

FY2015 (planned)

DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd

18

Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded

ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4

Milestones

1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications

2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication

3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination

4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project

19

Approach

Approach The technology is a hybrid of two building system functionsmdashHVAC and building envelopemdashintegrated into a unified whole to achieve lower energy use at better economic returns

Distinctive Characteristics bull Large-scale air-air exchanger

bull Polymeric membrane-based

bull Higher transfer surface area

bull Lower face velocity amp pressure loss

bull Manufactured in a panelized form

bull Integrated into modular wall panels

bull Simultaneous improvements to ventilation amp envelope performance

5

Progress and Accomplishments

Key Issues

I Validating the coupled ventilationenvelope

heat amp moisture exchange

II Assessing the feasibility of achieving

theoretically predicted performance in practice

III Identifying and resolving pragmatic design amp

operation issues including

a balance of system design

(eg fans filters dampers etc)

b coderegulatory issues

(eg intakeoutlet separation distances)

c manufacturing methods

(eg cross-leakage filer access etc)

6

MILESTONE

Dimensions

AirFlowRate

SupplyInlet 90F 90RH 66-89F 88-97

ExhaustInlet 72F 50RH 54-58F 54-85

εsensεlatentΔPUeff

Dimensions

AirFlowRate

SupplyInlet 90F 90RH

ExhaustInlet 72F 50RH

εsensεlatentΔPUeff

Dimensions

AirFlowRate

SupplyInlet 90F 90RHExhaustInlet 72F 50RH

FanEnergyReduction

CoolingEnergyReduction

1Medium-scale

laboratorytest

(Berkeley)

2Full-scale

laboratorytest

(Berkeley)

3Full-scale

operational

demonstration

(Singapore)

PROPOSED ACTUAL

gt088

gt082

lt80Pa

097-099

076-088

53-113Pa

5-3x6-6x3

gt088

gt082

3-3x5-3x3 3-0x4-0x10

22cfm 40-90cfm

Datameasurementsin

progress

Datameasurements

complete(April2014)

DataAnalyssinprocess

gt082

=085Uactual 075-11Uactual

=085Uactual

lt80Pa

3-3x12-0x3 5-3x12-0x3

22-44cfm

gt088

3-3x5-3x3

22-44cfm

Progress and Accomplishments

7

8

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments MILESTONE 1 Medium-scale Lab Test

0

200

400

600

800

1000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

Coolin

gLoad

[W]

FluxRate[CFM-deltaT]

Ven la onAirCoolingLoad

Control

AirFlowPanel

015

020

025

030

035

040

045

050

500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100

Ueff

[Wm

2K]

DeltaT[C]

Effec veWallUValue

Control

AirFlowPanel

Measured Performance

bull 076 lt εlatent lt 088

bull 53 lt ΔP lt 113 Pa

bull Ueff improved 4-25 when ΔT= 12 C

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments MILESTONE 2 Full-scale Lab Test

-500

000

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

32214000

32214224

32214448

32214712

32214936

322141200

322141424

322141648

322141912

322142136

32314000

LocalFlux1(W)

LocalFlux2(W)

LocalFlux3(W)

LocalFlux4(W)

LocalFlux5(W)

LocalFlux6(W)

LocalFlux7(W)

LocalFlux8(W)

LocalFlux9(W)

LocalFlux10(W)

LocalFlux11(W)

LocalFlux12(W)

-3000

-2000

-1000

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

32214000

32214224

32214448

32214712

32214936

322141200

322141424

322141648

322141912

322142136

32314000

Intake-DeltaT(C)

Exhaust-DeltaT(C)OverallDeltaT(C)

Measured Air Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data

Measured Envelope Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data

9

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments MILESTONE 3 Full-scale Demonstration

ETH Zurich Singaporendash

currently collecting raw data

10

]

]

]

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION

AirFlow Panels TMConventional Air Con

x10x

[high condensation [low condensation] [1000m2 in 45-floor office]

Indoor Concentration of Airborne Mold Increased Leasable Floor Area

Source Harvard School of Public Health 2001 Source Hudson Yards New York

11

Progress and Accomplishments

$4000

$6000

$8000

$10000

$12000

$14000

$16000

$18000

$20000

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

OrderQuan ty

ScaleUpAdjustedCostCurve

CostUnit

PriceUnit

Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION

ORDERQUANITITY5

START-UP PERORDER FIXEDMONTH VARIABLEUNITLABOR 9415$ 8209$ 3377$ 406$

MATERIAL NA NA NA 8667$

EQUIPMENT 4618$ NA NA NA

OVERHEAD 3450$ NA 2841$ NA

TOTAL 17483$ 8209$ 6218$ 9073$

Pilot-scale Manufacturing Plan bull bills of materials bull labor bull equipment bull cost targets for manufacturing 5-100 units

12

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments SPIN-OFF PRODUCT

13

Progress and Accomplishments

Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence

1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156

2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200

4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144

7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Temperature[C]

TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office

OutdoorAir

ZoneSupply

ERVSupply

ZoneAir

ERVExhaust

Projected annual savings

[KWhm2 ( below baseline)

EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads

near term

4 pilot installation discussions

strategic industry partner discussions

Impact Trajectory

intermediate term long term

manuf study built into supply chain

sales partnership discussions

international sales partnership

scale up manuf

14

Project Integration and Collaboration

Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)

bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)

bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning

bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)

Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants

Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies

National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering

bull HVAC Engineering

Portland Ten bull Commercialization

15

Next Steps and Future Plans

Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012

AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012

Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)

bull Build sales pipeline

bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods

bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)

16

REFERENCE SLIDES

17

Project Budget DOE Cost Share

Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120

Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated

Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)

Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)

Budget History

FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)

FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)

FY2015 (planned)

DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd

18

Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded

ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4

Milestones

1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications

2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication

3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination

4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project

19

Progress and Accomplishments

Key Issues

I Validating the coupled ventilationenvelope

heat amp moisture exchange

II Assessing the feasibility of achieving

theoretically predicted performance in practice

III Identifying and resolving pragmatic design amp

operation issues including

a balance of system design

(eg fans filters dampers etc)

b coderegulatory issues

(eg intakeoutlet separation distances)

c manufacturing methods

(eg cross-leakage filer access etc)

6

MILESTONE

Dimensions

AirFlowRate

SupplyInlet 90F 90RH 66-89F 88-97

ExhaustInlet 72F 50RH 54-58F 54-85

εsensεlatentΔPUeff

Dimensions

AirFlowRate

SupplyInlet 90F 90RH

ExhaustInlet 72F 50RH

εsensεlatentΔPUeff

Dimensions

AirFlowRate

SupplyInlet 90F 90RHExhaustInlet 72F 50RH

FanEnergyReduction

CoolingEnergyReduction

1Medium-scale

laboratorytest

(Berkeley)

2Full-scale

laboratorytest

(Berkeley)

3Full-scale

operational

demonstration

(Singapore)

PROPOSED ACTUAL

gt088

gt082

lt80Pa

097-099

076-088

53-113Pa

5-3x6-6x3

gt088

gt082

3-3x5-3x3 3-0x4-0x10

22cfm 40-90cfm

Datameasurementsin

progress

Datameasurements

complete(April2014)

DataAnalyssinprocess

gt082

=085Uactual 075-11Uactual

=085Uactual

lt80Pa

3-3x12-0x3 5-3x12-0x3

22-44cfm

gt088

3-3x5-3x3

22-44cfm

Progress and Accomplishments

7

8

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments MILESTONE 1 Medium-scale Lab Test

0

200

400

600

800

1000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

Coolin

gLoad

[W]

FluxRate[CFM-deltaT]

Ven la onAirCoolingLoad

Control

AirFlowPanel

015

020

025

030

035

040

045

050

500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100

Ueff

[Wm

2K]

DeltaT[C]

Effec veWallUValue

Control

AirFlowPanel

Measured Performance

bull 076 lt εlatent lt 088

bull 53 lt ΔP lt 113 Pa

bull Ueff improved 4-25 when ΔT= 12 C

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments MILESTONE 2 Full-scale Lab Test

-500

000

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

32214000

32214224

32214448

32214712

32214936

322141200

322141424

322141648

322141912

322142136

32314000

LocalFlux1(W)

LocalFlux2(W)

LocalFlux3(W)

LocalFlux4(W)

LocalFlux5(W)

LocalFlux6(W)

LocalFlux7(W)

LocalFlux8(W)

LocalFlux9(W)

LocalFlux10(W)

LocalFlux11(W)

LocalFlux12(W)

-3000

-2000

-1000

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

32214000

32214224

32214448

32214712

32214936

322141200

322141424

322141648

322141912

322142136

32314000

Intake-DeltaT(C)

Exhaust-DeltaT(C)OverallDeltaT(C)

Measured Air Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data

Measured Envelope Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data

9

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments MILESTONE 3 Full-scale Demonstration

ETH Zurich Singaporendash

currently collecting raw data

10

]

]

]

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION

AirFlow Panels TMConventional Air Con

x10x

[high condensation [low condensation] [1000m2 in 45-floor office]

Indoor Concentration of Airborne Mold Increased Leasable Floor Area

Source Harvard School of Public Health 2001 Source Hudson Yards New York

11

Progress and Accomplishments

$4000

$6000

$8000

$10000

$12000

$14000

$16000

$18000

$20000

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

OrderQuan ty

ScaleUpAdjustedCostCurve

CostUnit

PriceUnit

Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION

ORDERQUANITITY5

START-UP PERORDER FIXEDMONTH VARIABLEUNITLABOR 9415$ 8209$ 3377$ 406$

MATERIAL NA NA NA 8667$

EQUIPMENT 4618$ NA NA NA

OVERHEAD 3450$ NA 2841$ NA

TOTAL 17483$ 8209$ 6218$ 9073$

Pilot-scale Manufacturing Plan bull bills of materials bull labor bull equipment bull cost targets for manufacturing 5-100 units

12

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments SPIN-OFF PRODUCT

13

Progress and Accomplishments

Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence

1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156

2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200

4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144

7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Temperature[C]

TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office

OutdoorAir

ZoneSupply

ERVSupply

ZoneAir

ERVExhaust

Projected annual savings

[KWhm2 ( below baseline)

EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads

near term

4 pilot installation discussions

strategic industry partner discussions

Impact Trajectory

intermediate term long term

manuf study built into supply chain

sales partnership discussions

international sales partnership

scale up manuf

14

Project Integration and Collaboration

Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)

bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)

bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning

bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)

Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants

Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies

National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering

bull HVAC Engineering

Portland Ten bull Commercialization

15

Next Steps and Future Plans

Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012

AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012

Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)

bull Build sales pipeline

bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods

bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)

16

REFERENCE SLIDES

17

Project Budget DOE Cost Share

Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120

Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated

Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)

Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)

Budget History

FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)

FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)

FY2015 (planned)

DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd

18

Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded

ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4

Milestones

1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications

2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication

3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination

4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project

19

MILESTONE

Dimensions

AirFlowRate

SupplyInlet 90F 90RH 66-89F 88-97

ExhaustInlet 72F 50RH 54-58F 54-85

εsensεlatentΔPUeff

Dimensions

AirFlowRate

SupplyInlet 90F 90RH

ExhaustInlet 72F 50RH

εsensεlatentΔPUeff

Dimensions

AirFlowRate

SupplyInlet 90F 90RHExhaustInlet 72F 50RH

FanEnergyReduction

CoolingEnergyReduction

1Medium-scale

laboratorytest

(Berkeley)

2Full-scale

laboratorytest

(Berkeley)

3Full-scale

operational

demonstration

(Singapore)

PROPOSED ACTUAL

gt088

gt082

lt80Pa

097-099

076-088

53-113Pa

5-3x6-6x3

gt088

gt082

3-3x5-3x3 3-0x4-0x10

22cfm 40-90cfm

Datameasurementsin

progress

Datameasurements

complete(April2014)

DataAnalyssinprocess

gt082

=085Uactual 075-11Uactual

=085Uactual

lt80Pa

3-3x12-0x3 5-3x12-0x3

22-44cfm

gt088

3-3x5-3x3

22-44cfm

Progress and Accomplishments

7

8

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments MILESTONE 1 Medium-scale Lab Test

0

200

400

600

800

1000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

Coolin

gLoad

[W]

FluxRate[CFM-deltaT]

Ven la onAirCoolingLoad

Control

AirFlowPanel

015

020

025

030

035

040

045

050

500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100

Ueff

[Wm

2K]

DeltaT[C]

Effec veWallUValue

Control

AirFlowPanel

Measured Performance

bull 076 lt εlatent lt 088

bull 53 lt ΔP lt 113 Pa

bull Ueff improved 4-25 when ΔT= 12 C

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments MILESTONE 2 Full-scale Lab Test

-500

000

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

32214000

32214224

32214448

32214712

32214936

322141200

322141424

322141648

322141912

322142136

32314000

LocalFlux1(W)

LocalFlux2(W)

LocalFlux3(W)

LocalFlux4(W)

LocalFlux5(W)

LocalFlux6(W)

LocalFlux7(W)

LocalFlux8(W)

LocalFlux9(W)

LocalFlux10(W)

LocalFlux11(W)

LocalFlux12(W)

-3000

-2000

-1000

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

32214000

32214224

32214448

32214712

32214936

322141200

322141424

322141648

322141912

322142136

32314000

Intake-DeltaT(C)

Exhaust-DeltaT(C)OverallDeltaT(C)

Measured Air Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data

Measured Envelope Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data

9

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments MILESTONE 3 Full-scale Demonstration

ETH Zurich Singaporendash

currently collecting raw data

10

]

]

]

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION

AirFlow Panels TMConventional Air Con

x10x

[high condensation [low condensation] [1000m2 in 45-floor office]

Indoor Concentration of Airborne Mold Increased Leasable Floor Area

Source Harvard School of Public Health 2001 Source Hudson Yards New York

11

Progress and Accomplishments

$4000

$6000

$8000

$10000

$12000

$14000

$16000

$18000

$20000

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

OrderQuan ty

ScaleUpAdjustedCostCurve

CostUnit

PriceUnit

Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION

ORDERQUANITITY5

START-UP PERORDER FIXEDMONTH VARIABLEUNITLABOR 9415$ 8209$ 3377$ 406$

MATERIAL NA NA NA 8667$

EQUIPMENT 4618$ NA NA NA

OVERHEAD 3450$ NA 2841$ NA

TOTAL 17483$ 8209$ 6218$ 9073$

Pilot-scale Manufacturing Plan bull bills of materials bull labor bull equipment bull cost targets for manufacturing 5-100 units

12

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments SPIN-OFF PRODUCT

13

Progress and Accomplishments

Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence

1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156

2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200

4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144

7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Temperature[C]

TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office

OutdoorAir

ZoneSupply

ERVSupply

ZoneAir

ERVExhaust

Projected annual savings

[KWhm2 ( below baseline)

EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads

near term

4 pilot installation discussions

strategic industry partner discussions

Impact Trajectory

intermediate term long term

manuf study built into supply chain

sales partnership discussions

international sales partnership

scale up manuf

14

Project Integration and Collaboration

Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)

bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)

bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning

bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)

Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants

Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies

National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering

bull HVAC Engineering

Portland Ten bull Commercialization

15

Next Steps and Future Plans

Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012

AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012

Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)

bull Build sales pipeline

bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods

bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)

16

REFERENCE SLIDES

17

Project Budget DOE Cost Share

Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120

Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated

Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)

Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)

Budget History

FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)

FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)

FY2015 (planned)

DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd

18

Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded

ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4

Milestones

1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications

2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication

3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination

4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project

19

8

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments MILESTONE 1 Medium-scale Lab Test

0

200

400

600

800

1000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

Coolin

gLoad

[W]

FluxRate[CFM-deltaT]

Ven la onAirCoolingLoad

Control

AirFlowPanel

015

020

025

030

035

040

045

050

500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100

Ueff

[Wm

2K]

DeltaT[C]

Effec veWallUValue

Control

AirFlowPanel

Measured Performance

bull 076 lt εlatent lt 088

bull 53 lt ΔP lt 113 Pa

bull Ueff improved 4-25 when ΔT= 12 C

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments MILESTONE 2 Full-scale Lab Test

-500

000

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

32214000

32214224

32214448

32214712

32214936

322141200

322141424

322141648

322141912

322142136

32314000

LocalFlux1(W)

LocalFlux2(W)

LocalFlux3(W)

LocalFlux4(W)

LocalFlux5(W)

LocalFlux6(W)

LocalFlux7(W)

LocalFlux8(W)

LocalFlux9(W)

LocalFlux10(W)

LocalFlux11(W)

LocalFlux12(W)

-3000

-2000

-1000

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

32214000

32214224

32214448

32214712

32214936

322141200

322141424

322141648

322141912

322142136

32314000

Intake-DeltaT(C)

Exhaust-DeltaT(C)OverallDeltaT(C)

Measured Air Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data

Measured Envelope Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data

9

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments MILESTONE 3 Full-scale Demonstration

ETH Zurich Singaporendash

currently collecting raw data

10

]

]

]

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION

AirFlow Panels TMConventional Air Con

x10x

[high condensation [low condensation] [1000m2 in 45-floor office]

Indoor Concentration of Airborne Mold Increased Leasable Floor Area

Source Harvard School of Public Health 2001 Source Hudson Yards New York

11

Progress and Accomplishments

$4000

$6000

$8000

$10000

$12000

$14000

$16000

$18000

$20000

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

OrderQuan ty

ScaleUpAdjustedCostCurve

CostUnit

PriceUnit

Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION

ORDERQUANITITY5

START-UP PERORDER FIXEDMONTH VARIABLEUNITLABOR 9415$ 8209$ 3377$ 406$

MATERIAL NA NA NA 8667$

EQUIPMENT 4618$ NA NA NA

OVERHEAD 3450$ NA 2841$ NA

TOTAL 17483$ 8209$ 6218$ 9073$

Pilot-scale Manufacturing Plan bull bills of materials bull labor bull equipment bull cost targets for manufacturing 5-100 units

12

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments SPIN-OFF PRODUCT

13

Progress and Accomplishments

Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence

1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156

2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200

4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144

7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Temperature[C]

TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office

OutdoorAir

ZoneSupply

ERVSupply

ZoneAir

ERVExhaust

Projected annual savings

[KWhm2 ( below baseline)

EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads

near term

4 pilot installation discussions

strategic industry partner discussions

Impact Trajectory

intermediate term long term

manuf study built into supply chain

sales partnership discussions

international sales partnership

scale up manuf

14

Project Integration and Collaboration

Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)

bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)

bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning

bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)

Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants

Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies

National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering

bull HVAC Engineering

Portland Ten bull Commercialization

15

Next Steps and Future Plans

Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012

AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012

Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)

bull Build sales pipeline

bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods

bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)

16

REFERENCE SLIDES

17

Project Budget DOE Cost Share

Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120

Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated

Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)

Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)

Budget History

FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)

FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)

FY2015 (planned)

DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd

18

Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded

ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4

Milestones

1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications

2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication

3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination

4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project

19

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments MILESTONE 2 Full-scale Lab Test

-500

000

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

32214000

32214224

32214448

32214712

32214936

322141200

322141424

322141648

322141912

322142136

32314000

LocalFlux1(W)

LocalFlux2(W)

LocalFlux3(W)

LocalFlux4(W)

LocalFlux5(W)

LocalFlux6(W)

LocalFlux7(W)

LocalFlux8(W)

LocalFlux9(W)

LocalFlux10(W)

LocalFlux11(W)

LocalFlux12(W)

-3000

-2000

-1000

000

1000

2000

3000

4000

32214000

32214224

32214448

32214712

32214936

322141200

322141424

322141648

322141912

322142136

32314000

Intake-DeltaT(C)

Exhaust-DeltaT(C)OverallDeltaT(C)

Measured Air Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data

Measured Envelope Temperature Differentials ndash currently processing raw data

9

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments MILESTONE 3 Full-scale Demonstration

ETH Zurich Singaporendash

currently collecting raw data

10

]

]

]

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION

AirFlow Panels TMConventional Air Con

x10x

[high condensation [low condensation] [1000m2 in 45-floor office]

Indoor Concentration of Airborne Mold Increased Leasable Floor Area

Source Harvard School of Public Health 2001 Source Hudson Yards New York

11

Progress and Accomplishments

$4000

$6000

$8000

$10000

$12000

$14000

$16000

$18000

$20000

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

OrderQuan ty

ScaleUpAdjustedCostCurve

CostUnit

PriceUnit

Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION

ORDERQUANITITY5

START-UP PERORDER FIXEDMONTH VARIABLEUNITLABOR 9415$ 8209$ 3377$ 406$

MATERIAL NA NA NA 8667$

EQUIPMENT 4618$ NA NA NA

OVERHEAD 3450$ NA 2841$ NA

TOTAL 17483$ 8209$ 6218$ 9073$

Pilot-scale Manufacturing Plan bull bills of materials bull labor bull equipment bull cost targets for manufacturing 5-100 units

12

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments SPIN-OFF PRODUCT

13

Progress and Accomplishments

Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence

1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156

2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200

4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144

7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Temperature[C]

TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office

OutdoorAir

ZoneSupply

ERVSupply

ZoneAir

ERVExhaust

Projected annual savings

[KWhm2 ( below baseline)

EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads

near term

4 pilot installation discussions

strategic industry partner discussions

Impact Trajectory

intermediate term long term

manuf study built into supply chain

sales partnership discussions

international sales partnership

scale up manuf

14

Project Integration and Collaboration

Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)

bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)

bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning

bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)

Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants

Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies

National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering

bull HVAC Engineering

Portland Ten bull Commercialization

15

Next Steps and Future Plans

Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012

AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012

Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)

bull Build sales pipeline

bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods

bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)

16

REFERENCE SLIDES

17

Project Budget DOE Cost Share

Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120

Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated

Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)

Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)

Budget History

FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)

FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)

FY2015 (planned)

DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd

18

Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded

ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4

Milestones

1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications

2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication

3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination

4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project

19

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments MILESTONE 3 Full-scale Demonstration

ETH Zurich Singaporendash

currently collecting raw data

10

]

]

]

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION

AirFlow Panels TMConventional Air Con

x10x

[high condensation [low condensation] [1000m2 in 45-floor office]

Indoor Concentration of Airborne Mold Increased Leasable Floor Area

Source Harvard School of Public Health 2001 Source Hudson Yards New York

11

Progress and Accomplishments

$4000

$6000

$8000

$10000

$12000

$14000

$16000

$18000

$20000

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

OrderQuan ty

ScaleUpAdjustedCostCurve

CostUnit

PriceUnit

Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION

ORDERQUANITITY5

START-UP PERORDER FIXEDMONTH VARIABLEUNITLABOR 9415$ 8209$ 3377$ 406$

MATERIAL NA NA NA 8667$

EQUIPMENT 4618$ NA NA NA

OVERHEAD 3450$ NA 2841$ NA

TOTAL 17483$ 8209$ 6218$ 9073$

Pilot-scale Manufacturing Plan bull bills of materials bull labor bull equipment bull cost targets for manufacturing 5-100 units

12

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments SPIN-OFF PRODUCT

13

Progress and Accomplishments

Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence

1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156

2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200

4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144

7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Temperature[C]

TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office

OutdoorAir

ZoneSupply

ERVSupply

ZoneAir

ERVExhaust

Projected annual savings

[KWhm2 ( below baseline)

EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads

near term

4 pilot installation discussions

strategic industry partner discussions

Impact Trajectory

intermediate term long term

manuf study built into supply chain

sales partnership discussions

international sales partnership

scale up manuf

14

Project Integration and Collaboration

Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)

bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)

bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning

bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)

Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants

Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies

National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering

bull HVAC Engineering

Portland Ten bull Commercialization

15

Next Steps and Future Plans

Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012

AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012

Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)

bull Build sales pipeline

bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods

bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)

16

REFERENCE SLIDES

17

Project Budget DOE Cost Share

Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120

Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated

Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)

Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)

Budget History

FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)

FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)

FY2015 (planned)

DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd

18

Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded

ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4

Milestones

1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications

2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication

3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination

4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project

19

]

]

]

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION

AirFlow Panels TMConventional Air Con

x10x

[high condensation [low condensation] [1000m2 in 45-floor office]

Indoor Concentration of Airborne Mold Increased Leasable Floor Area

Source Harvard School of Public Health 2001 Source Hudson Yards New York

11

Progress and Accomplishments

$4000

$6000

$8000

$10000

$12000

$14000

$16000

$18000

$20000

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

OrderQuan ty

ScaleUpAdjustedCostCurve

CostUnit

PriceUnit

Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION

ORDERQUANITITY5

START-UP PERORDER FIXEDMONTH VARIABLEUNITLABOR 9415$ 8209$ 3377$ 406$

MATERIAL NA NA NA 8667$

EQUIPMENT 4618$ NA NA NA

OVERHEAD 3450$ NA 2841$ NA

TOTAL 17483$ 8209$ 6218$ 9073$

Pilot-scale Manufacturing Plan bull bills of materials bull labor bull equipment bull cost targets for manufacturing 5-100 units

12

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments SPIN-OFF PRODUCT

13

Progress and Accomplishments

Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence

1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156

2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200

4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144

7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Temperature[C]

TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office

OutdoorAir

ZoneSupply

ERVSupply

ZoneAir

ERVExhaust

Projected annual savings

[KWhm2 ( below baseline)

EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads

near term

4 pilot installation discussions

strategic industry partner discussions

Impact Trajectory

intermediate term long term

manuf study built into supply chain

sales partnership discussions

international sales partnership

scale up manuf

14

Project Integration and Collaboration

Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)

bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)

bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning

bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)

Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants

Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies

National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering

bull HVAC Engineering

Portland Ten bull Commercialization

15

Next Steps and Future Plans

Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012

AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012

Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)

bull Build sales pipeline

bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods

bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)

16

REFERENCE SLIDES

17

Project Budget DOE Cost Share

Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120

Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated

Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)

Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)

Budget History

FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)

FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)

FY2015 (planned)

DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd

18

Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded

ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4

Milestones

1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications

2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication

3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination

4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project

19

Progress and Accomplishments

$4000

$6000

$8000

$10000

$12000

$14000

$16000

$18000

$20000

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

OrderQuan ty

ScaleUpAdjustedCostCurve

CostUnit

PriceUnit

Accomplishments COMMERCIALIZATION

ORDERQUANITITY5

START-UP PERORDER FIXEDMONTH VARIABLEUNITLABOR 9415$ 8209$ 3377$ 406$

MATERIAL NA NA NA 8667$

EQUIPMENT 4618$ NA NA NA

OVERHEAD 3450$ NA 2841$ NA

TOTAL 17483$ 8209$ 6218$ 9073$

Pilot-scale Manufacturing Plan bull bills of materials bull labor bull equipment bull cost targets for manufacturing 5-100 units

12

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments SPIN-OFF PRODUCT

13

Progress and Accomplishments

Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence

1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156

2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200

4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144

7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Temperature[C]

TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office

OutdoorAir

ZoneSupply

ERVSupply

ZoneAir

ERVExhaust

Projected annual savings

[KWhm2 ( below baseline)

EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads

near term

4 pilot installation discussions

strategic industry partner discussions

Impact Trajectory

intermediate term long term

manuf study built into supply chain

sales partnership discussions

international sales partnership

scale up manuf

14

Project Integration and Collaboration

Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)

bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)

bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning

bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)

Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants

Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies

National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering

bull HVAC Engineering

Portland Ten bull Commercialization

15

Next Steps and Future Plans

Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012

AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012

Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)

bull Build sales pipeline

bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods

bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)

16

REFERENCE SLIDES

17

Project Budget DOE Cost Share

Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120

Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated

Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)

Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)

Budget History

FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)

FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)

FY2015 (planned)

DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd

18

Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded

ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4

Milestones

1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications

2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication

3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination

4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project

19

Progress and Accomplishments

Accomplishments SPIN-OFF PRODUCT

13

Progress and Accomplishments

Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence

1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156

2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200

4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144

7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Temperature[C]

TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office

OutdoorAir

ZoneSupply

ERVSupply

ZoneAir

ERVExhaust

Projected annual savings

[KWhm2 ( below baseline)

EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads

near term

4 pilot installation discussions

strategic industry partner discussions

Impact Trajectory

intermediate term long term

manuf study built into supply chain

sales partnership discussions

international sales partnership

scale up manuf

14

Project Integration and Collaboration

Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)

bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)

bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning

bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)

Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants

Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies

National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering

bull HVAC Engineering

Portland Ten bull Commercialization

15

Next Steps and Future Plans

Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012

AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012

Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)

bull Build sales pipeline

bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods

bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)

16

REFERENCE SLIDES

17

Project Budget DOE Cost Share

Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120

Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated

Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)

Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)

Budget History

FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)

FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)

FY2015 (planned)

DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd

18

Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded

ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4

Milestones

1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications

2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication

3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination

4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project

19

Progress and Accomplishments

Market Impact Zone City Office School Hospital Residence

1 Miami 2512 5503 8926 2624224 380 275 156

2 Atlanta 3237 5846 9412 4784277 428 321 200

4 DC 3738 7476 12828 4904243 411 360 144

7 Minneapolis 3984 9181 16776 542310 501 485 160

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Temperature[C]

TemperatureProfileSummerTimeMiami-Office

OutdoorAir

ZoneSupply

ERVSupply

ZoneAir

ERVExhaust

Projected annual savings

[KWhm2 ( below baseline)

EnergyPlus simulation output Potential Annual US Savings = 272 Quads

near term

4 pilot installation discussions

strategic industry partner discussions

Impact Trajectory

intermediate term long term

manuf study built into supply chain

sales partnership discussions

international sales partnership

scale up manuf

14

Project Integration and Collaboration

Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)

bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)

bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning

bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)

Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants

Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies

National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering

bull HVAC Engineering

Portland Ten bull Commercialization

15

Next Steps and Future Plans

Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012

AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012

Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)

bull Build sales pipeline

bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods

bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)

16

REFERENCE SLIDES

17

Project Budget DOE Cost Share

Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120

Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated

Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)

Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)

Budget History

FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)

FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)

FY2015 (planned)

DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd

18

Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded

ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4

Milestones

1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications

2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication

3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination

4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project

19

Project Integration and Collaboration

Project Integration bull work with advanced building design teams (eg Rocky Mountain Inst)

bull collaborate with major building component manufacturers (confidential)

bull participate in industry amp regulatory road-mappingplanning

bull Present in major industry forums (eg International Green Building Conf)

Partners Subcontractors and Collaborators STTR Research Partner Consultants

Lawrence Berkeley dPoint Technologies

National Laboratory bull Membrane Engineering bull Theoretical Support bull Testing amp Validation Lead ARUP bull Whole Building Simulation bull Envelope Engineering

bull HVAC Engineering

Portland Ten bull Commercialization

15

Next Steps and Future Plans

Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012

AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012

Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)

bull Build sales pipeline

bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods

bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)

16

REFERENCE SLIDES

17

Project Budget DOE Cost Share

Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120

Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated

Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)

Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)

Budget History

FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)

FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)

FY2015 (planned)

DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd

18

Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded

ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4

Milestones

1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications

2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication

3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination

4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project

19

Next Steps and Future Plans

Communications bull Faccedilade Tectonics Conference University of Southern California 2011 bull International Green Building Conference Singapore 2012 bull Eco-Expo Asia Hong Kong 2012

AwardsRecognition bull NOVASaint-Gobain Innovation Competition-finalist 2012 bull Defense Energy Technology Challenge-finalist 2012 bull Asia Pacific Clean Energy Challenge finalist 2012

Next Steps and Future Plans bull Pilot project installations (goal = 3 installs in the coming year)

bull Build sales pipeline

bull Develop low-costhigh performance manufacturing methods

bull Execute manufacturing strategy (2013 pilot study forms the basis)

16

REFERENCE SLIDES

17

Project Budget DOE Cost Share

Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120

Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated

Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)

Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)

Budget History

FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)

FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)

FY2015 (planned)

DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd

18

Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded

ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4

Milestones

1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications

2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication

3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination

4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project

19

REFERENCE SLIDES

17

Project Budget DOE Cost Share

Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120

Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated

Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)

Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)

Budget History

FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)

FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)

FY2015 (planned)

DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd

18

Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded

ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4

Milestones

1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications

2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication

3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination

4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project

19

Project Budget DOE Cost Share

Project Budget Total $1037812 $202120 STTR Ph1 $ 99979 $ 0 STTR Ph2 $ 937833 $202120

Variances STTR Ph 2 Budget Period 1 (first year) was re-budgeted due to membrane manufacturing costs incurred earlier than anticipated

Cost to Date DOE $907900 (87) Cost Share $232700 ( 115)

Additional Funding Currently sought (US DoD US DOE private investment sales)

Budget History

FY2013-October 15 2013 (past)

FY2014-October 15 2013 (current)

FY2015 (planned)

DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share DOE Cost-share $562407 $140393 $475405 $92307 tbd tbd

18

Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded

ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4

Milestones

1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications

2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication

3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination

4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project

19

Project Plan and Schedule 7 Quarter (21 month) Project Currently Funded

ldquoGOrdquo Decision Made at Quarter 4

Milestones

1 Medium-scale prototype ndash 2-month delay due to designfabrication complications

2 Large-scale prototype ndash 3-month delay in membrane care fabrication

3 Full-scale demonstration ndash 5 months early due to host site schedule coordination

4 System documentation ndash Ongoing developmentrefinement throughout project

19