broadband access - beyond learning from the us
DESCRIPTION
Seminar to China cable and telecom operators about the evolution of broadband industry.TRANSCRIPT
Xiaolin Lu
CEO
Morning Forest, LLC
Broadband Business
beyond learning from the US
February 26, 2004
What is this all about?What is this all about?
China Cable Industry is being “unleashed” from
government but still a “spoiled” baby in the cradle.
MBA does not help, but the street-smart might.
What and where is the business, and does it have
to repeat everything US did?
AGENDAAGENDA
Business Environment: US Example
Video Business
High-speed Data Business
Voice Business
Networks
Our Perspectives
Moore’s Law of NasdaqMoore’s Law of Nasdaq
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
30-J
ul-82
11-F
eb-8
3
26-A
ug-8
3
09-M
ar-
84
21-S
ep-8
4
05-A
pr-
85
18-O
ct-
85
02-M
ay-8
6
14-N
ov-8
6
29-M
ay-8
7
11-D
ec-8
7
24-J
un-8
8
06-J
an-8
9
21-J
ul-89
02-F
eb-9
0
17-A
ug-9
0
01-M
ar-
91
13-S
ep-9
1
27-M
ar-
92
09-O
ct-
92
23-A
pr-
93
05-N
ov-9
3
20-M
ay-9
4
02-D
ec-9
4
16-J
un-9
5
29-D
ec-9
5
12-J
ul-96
24-J
an-9
7
08-A
ug-9
7
20-F
eb-9
8
04-S
ep-9
8
19-M
ar-
99
01-O
ct-
99
14-A
pr-
00
27-O
ct-
00
12-M
ar-
01
20-A
pr-
01
31-M
ay-0
1
11-J
ul-2001
Doubles in 8 years
Doubles in 4 years
Doubles in 2 years
Doubles in 1 year
1983 - 2001
Source: CSFB
The Present State of TelecomThe Present State of Telecom
Telecom was more tightly linked to the dot-com
industry than most people realized
Unrealistic optimism set in everywhere Disproportionate cost structure and revenue opportunity
Abundant available capital along with major shift
of regulatory policy resulted in: Fierce competition
Over capacity
“Innovative” practices fueled the fire: Vendor financing, capacity swaps, round trips
Revenue = receivable + inventory
Business Environment: Business Environment:
US ExampleUS Example
COMMUNICATION IN USCOMMUNICATION IN US
AT&T
Worldcom
Spring
Qwest
AT&T
Worldcom
Spring
Qwest
“Unregulated” “Unregulated” Regulated or
Semi-Regulated
Long-Haul Metro Access
MSO
ILEC
CLEC
MSO
ILEC
CLEC
REGULATION AND BUSINESSREGULATION AND BUSINESS
Communication
Services
Title 2
Regulation
Requirement
VOICE DATA VIDEO
Open Pipe Franchising
Business Selling Minutes Flat rate
+ Usage
Information
Services
Title 1
Content
Service
Title 6
None
Flat rate
THE RESIDENTIAL PIE THE RESIDENTIAL PIE -- 20002000
Cable ILECs Other
Video Voice Data
Source: Paul Kagan Associates
Cable Dominates
Video Market
ILECs Dominates
Voice Market
Cable Leads
High-Speed Data
Market
Ten Year Performance Ten Year Performance
ImprovementImprovement
WAN Bandwidth 2
Processor Power 2
Router Engine Performance/Price 1
Internet Traffic 2
Bandwidth to Homes 3 13
2000
1000
1000
1000
Sources: 1. Business Communications Reviews, Sept. 1997
2. AT&T
3. Dataquest
NETWORK TRAFFICNETWORK TRAFFIC
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Tra
ffic
(G
b/s
)
Voice
Data
Total
K.G. Coffman and A. Odlyzko AT&T Labs
LOOKING FORWARD: TRIPLE PLAYLOOKING FORWARD: TRIPLE PLAY
Video
$128B
Voice
$75B
Data
$28B
CableCable VoIPVoIP
ILECILEC SDVSDV
VDSLVDSL
Standard based equipment
IP Infrastructure
OSS/BSS
New Services
Standard based equipment
IP Infrastructure
OSS/BSS
New Services
2002
OPPORTUNITIES: OPPORTUNITIES: TRIPLE PLAYTRIPLE PLAY
Create a customer destination Reduce churn
Create differentiation
Build a common platform for innovation and
gain economy of scale
Increase ARPU (Average Revenue Per Unit)
Offensively and defensively change the nature
of services and products
BUSINESS COMPARISONBUSINESS COMPARISON
Comcast x Cox x Gehua
Subscriber (M) 21.0 2.3 6.1 0.7 9.0
Revenue ($M) 8,079.0 169.0 5,038.6 105.4 47.8
Operation Cost ($M) 3,511.0 131.7 2,130.9 80.0 26.7
Gross Margin 57% 58% 44%
EBITDA Margin 35% 35% 24%
Revenue/Sub ($) 384.7 72.4 826.0 155.4 5.3
EBITDA/Sub ($) 134.9 79.0 291.7 170.7 1.7
OPPORTUNITIES AND ISSUESOPPORTUNITIES AND ISSUES
Basic: $13.44
Ext Basic: $40.49
Digital Tier $50.44, $60.44, $68.44,
$78.99, $93.99
HDTV: extra $5
VOD& DVR: $9.95
HSD: $52.95
Telephony: $25
Basic: $2.5
HSD: $15
US China
Network/HHP $175 $175
CMTS/Sub $8 $35
CM/Sub $40 $100
US China
BUSINESS VALUATIONBUSINESS VALUATION
US x China
ARPU/month 57.34 3.8 15.00
Gross Margin 57% 44%
EBITDA Margin 35% 1.5 24%
Multiple 16 1.6 10
Value/Sub ($) 3,853.2 8.92 432.0
EBITDA/Sub 150.00 88.2 1.70
Debt/EBITDA 4 4
Debt/Sub 600.00 88.2 6.80
KEY ISSUESKEY ISSUES
Cost Structure ( technology platform)
Regulatory
Environment
Op
era
tio
ns
Rea
lity
Business Opportunities
VIDEOVIDEO
5
59
30
89
22
45
25
70
36
82
106100
111
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Total Households
Analog Only Houses
Total Digital
Digital Cable
Satellite Digital
Analog Only
VIDEO: GOING DIGITAL!VIDEO: GOING DIGITAL!
Source = Kagan 2000 Databook
Today
DIGITAL CABLE SUBSCRIPTIONDIGITAL CABLE SUBSCRIPTION
0
5
10
15
20
25
4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q
Cablevision
Cox
Adelphia
Charter
Comcast
AOL TW
AT&T
00 01
Millio
n
Source: UBS Warburg
US CABLE DIGITAL PENETRATIONUS CABLE DIGITAL PENETRATION
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q
% o
f B
asic
Su
b
00 01 02
Source: UBS Warburg
VIDEO DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMVIDEO DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Hubs
Analog
Video
Services
Application
Servers
Network
Control
Conditional Access,
Multiplexing,
Modulation
Interactive
Communication
Servers
Interactive
Set-top
Television
Video Services
Return
Data
Channel
Internet
Back-Office
Systems
Customer
Premise
Digital
Headend
Analog
Video
Services
Digital
Video
Services
Video
On
Demand
Server
Inband
Gateway
Terrestrial
Digital
Services
HFC
Network
Forward
Data
Channel
Nodes
OPENCABLE ARCHITECTUREOPENCABLE ARCHITECTURE OPENCABLE ARCHITECTUREOPENCABLE ARCHITECTURE
Supporting
Hardware
and Software
OpenCable Device
Consumer
Devices
OCI-C1
Headend
OCI-N
Security
Module(s) OCI-C2
Operations
OCI-H2
OCI-H1
Video
Content
Internet
Content
Other
Content
STRATEGIES
“Video”
“Video”
Growth
Strategies
Expand Expand
“Video”
Pie
Capture Capture
“Video”
Share
Recapture DBS Subs
Increase Subscription Rev$ Increase Subscription Rev$
Recapture Tape Rental
Get Ad Share From B’Cast
Own The Content
Non-TV Ad Market
Get Paid To Carry Content
Transaction Revenue
PRODUCT EVOLUTIONPRODUCT EVOLUTION PRODUCT EVOLUTIONPRODUCT EVOLUTION D
igit
al P
en
etr
ati
on
VOD VOD
Digital Plus Digital Plus
Digital Basic Digital Basic
Time
Extended VOD/PVR Extended VOD/PVR
ITV ITV
HDTV HDTV
INTERACTIVE TV MARKETINTERACTIVE TV MARKET
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011
Interenet TV
Direct Response
Internet Portals
IPG
VOD
T-Comm
$M
Source: Kagan
WHAT’S CHANGED?WHAT’S CHANGED?
Revenue Projections
• Advertising
• T-Commerce
• Walled Garden Fees
Services
• Consumers Like
• Consumers Will Pay for
Costs
• Integration
• Maintenance 1999 View 2002 View
Revenue Cost
Profit Loss
There Still is a Model, it’s Just DifferentThere Still is a Model, it’s Just Different
Minimize Cost of Receiver
• Small Footprint Implementations
• Offload Processing to Proxy Servers for Low Cost Receivers
• H2O for HTML / JavaScript on Very Low Cost Receivers
• Minimize Code Size
Network Solutions
• Balance Traffic Between In-band Push and out-of-Band Pull
• Monitor Traffic and Performance
Maximize Integration with OSS and BSS
• Minimum Infrastructure, Integration and Operation Costs
• Evangelize Server Side Standardization
• DVB, Cable Labs, BSS Vendors
THE NEW FOCUSTHE NEW FOCUS
Information, Weather, Stocks, Sports Scores
Enhanced TV, Player Stats, Multiple Camera Angles
Shopping on Shopping Channels
Games of Skill and Parlor Games
Voting
Communication Services
Focus on Services that Provide High Value to Consumer, but Low Cost to Provide:
Focus Must be Simple, Fast, and Remain TV Centric
COMMUNICATIONSCOMMUNICATIONS
Multi-Platform Communications, Provides Interesting Opportunity:
- SMS
- Unified Messaging
- Instant Messaging
- Voice Mail
Messaging
- Voice Activated Dialing
- Voice Controlled
Messaging
Voice Solutions
SHORT MESSAGE SERVICESHORT MESSAGE SERVICE
75% of Mobile Users in Europe Use SMS
Currently, Over 12b SMS Messages are Sent Each Month
European Wireless Operators Generate 5%-15% of Their Revenues from SMS Services
Source: Forrester, January 2002
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
UK
Germany
France
Italy
Spain
Sweden
Current Likely
TV Based Messaging
FUTUREFUTURE
Television on Demand
VoD, SVoD, Network and Local PVR
Convergence of Voice, Data and Television Offering
Beyond Digital TV Infrastructure
• Roaming Between Digital TV and Other Networks (e.g. Cell Phone, Internet)
• Universal Messaging, Single Sign-in, Digital Passport and Wallet
• Extension to New Networks
• Home Area Network, Car Information and Entertainment Systems
Beyond Entertainment
• In-house Health Care, Distance Learning
CRITICAL ISSUESCRITICAL ISSUES
The ITV Model has Changed, but is Still Attractive
• Revenue
• Reduce Churn
• Fits Well and can Promote Other Services
• High Speed Data
• Voice
• Maintaining Simple, Fast, TV Centric Service is a Must
• Cost Effective Hardware and Middleware is Required
• Scale Platforms is Essential to Keep Costs Down and to Facilitate Application Development
HIGH SPEED HIGH SPEED
DATADATA
Global DOCSIS High Speed Data
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
Q1-
1999
Q3-
1999
Q1-
2000
Q3-
2000
Q1-
2001
Q3-
2001
Q1-
2002
Q3-
2002
Q1-
2003
Q3-
2003
Q1-
2004
Q3-
2004
Q1-
2005
Q3-
2005
Q1-
2006
Q3-
2006
Q1-
2007
Q3-
2007
Su
bs
cri
be
rs (
M)
HIGH SPEED ACCESSHIGH SPEED ACCESS
North AmericanNorth American
7
13
22
30
3640
4448
5156
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
'00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09
HP
(M
illi
on
s)
Marketed Cable HSD HP Marketed DSL HP Other Subs Total HSD Subs
Source: Kagan
SPLIT THE PIE: 2001SPLIT THE PIE: 2001
US OnlyUS Only
32%
2%
66%
Cable
DSL
Other
Source: Kinetic Strategies
CABLE MODEM SUBSCRIBERCABLE MODEM SUBSCRIBER
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q
Adelphia
Cablevision
Charter
Cox
Comcast
AT&T
TW
00 01
Millio
n
Source: UBS Warburg
Why is DOCSIS 2.0 CompellingWhy is DOCSIS 2.0 Compelling
Can Reduce Overall Capital Investment of
Upgrade
Even in Upgraded Plant, Larger Statistical
Area is Superior Design
Reduces CMTS Cost Burden on HSD and
VoIP Amortize router blade across more customers
Plants are Achieving High Penetrations How will they perform
• Without filters
• With Voice and other low latency services
MARKET DYNAMICS OF DATA BUSINESSMARKET DYNAMICS OF DATA BUSINESS
A Land Grab For 40 Million Existing Narrowband SubscribersA Land Grab For 40 Million Existing Narrowband Subscribers
0.32
0.240.6
13.9
7.9
5.4
4.119.8
15.7
15.4
1994
$0.6 B 2002
$28 B 2007
$55 B
$5.0B
18% Cable 57% 57%
E-Commissions
Advertising
Content
Access 50% 50%
36% 36% $9.9B
18% Cable
Increasingly difficult to capture value merely with access fee
Key sources of future value in the data business Advertising
Ability to close the transaction
Data business starts to look a lot like the video business
Increasingly difficult to capture value merely with access fee
Key sources of future value in the data business Advertising
Ability to close the transaction
Data business starts to look a lot like the video business
IP INFRASTRUCTUREIP INFRASTRUCTURE
CMTS HFC Network
(DOCSIS)
Managed
IP Network
CM
OSS
Server
Farm
MPLS/VPN/BGP
Optical Networking
Advanced OSS/BSS
MPLS/VPN/BGP
Optical Networking
Advanced OSS/BSS
Many IP Technologies DOCSIS Standard
Packet Cable Standard
Standard based end-to-end solution
Operation and scalability are the keys
New business model
Standard based end-to-end solution
Operation and scalability are the keys
New business model
VOICEVOICE
Voice Isn’t What It Used To Be…Voice Isn’t What It Used To Be…
13.7
39.3 39.7
73.7
30.844.323.743.6
103
1994
$93 B 2002
$149 B 2007
$170 B
15% 15%
Residential
LD
Residential
local
Total
Cellular 50% 50% 60% 60%
Cellular has already captured 50% of the value in a decade
Cellular has blurred the traditional residential-business segmentation
The residential wireline business is under significant pressure
Cellular has already captured 50% of the value in a decade
Cellular has blurred the traditional residential-business segmentation
The residential wireline business is under significant pressure
REDEFINE VOICE SERVICEREDEFINE VOICE SERVICE
Access to voice
network (Local,
Toll, LD, etc)
Vertical Services
CallerID, VoiceMail,
Integration, etc.
Average Monthly Phone Bill: Constant
Time
$
Price competition Product Differentiation
Convenient
Lower cost
More service value
Convenient
Lower cost
More service value
Benefit to Consumer
Differentiation
Customer retention
Additional revenue
Differentiation
Customer retention
Additional revenue
Benefit to Cable
Low-cost bundled offering
Web based provisioning
Persistent voice
Low-cost bundled offering
Web based provisioning
Persistent voice
VoIP
VoIP OVER CABLE NETWORKVoIP OVER CABLE NETWORK
CMTS HFC Network
(DOCSIS)
Managed
IP Network
CM MTA CMS
MG
SG
HFC Network
(DOCSIS)
CM MTA
CMTS
MGC
PSTN
SS7
MS
OSS
Server
Farm
TGS
DHCP & DNS
TFTP or HTTP
RKS
Provisioning
CMS: Call Management server MGC: Media Gateway Controller
MS: Media Server MG: Media Gateway
SG: Signaling Gateway
CABLE TELEPHONY SUBSCRIBERCABLE TELEPHONY SUBSCRIBER
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q
Cablevision
Cox
AT&T
00 01
Millio
n
Source: UBS Warburg
Worldwide VoIP ForecastWorldwide VoIP Forecast
PacketCable 1.x ArchitecturePacketCable 1.x Architecture
PacketCable VoIP SolutionPacketCable VoIP Solution
E-MTA
PSTN
Gateway
LDS
E-MTA
OSS Functions:
Provisioning,
Security,
Record Keeping
Announcement
Server
Announcement
Controller
Announcement
Player
Media Gateway
Controller
Media
Gateway
Signaling
Gateway
Managed IP
Network DOCSIS 1.1
HFC Network
PSTN
CMTS
CMTS
DOCSIS
1.1
HFC
Network
RKS
DHCP
TFTP
CMS
GATE
Ctrl
SNMP
TOD
KDC
DNS
SYSLOG
GR-303
V5.2
Gateway
UPGRADE
EVOLUTIONEVOLUTION
DWDM
RF
DSP
Capacity
Quality
Reliability
DOCSISDOCSIS
High speed High speed
cable modemcable modem
Open CableOpen Cable
Universal set Universal set
top boxtop box
Packet CablePacket Cable
EndEnd--toto--end IP end IP
platformplatform
Broadband Full Service Platform
NETWORKSNETWORKS
IN THE PAST ...IN THE PAST ...
LEC
Twist Pair Star
Feature rich POTS
$84B “toll collection”
Voice = Communication
Cable
Coax Tree-and-Branch
Broadcast video
$24B “$1 buffet”
DLC, ISDNDLC, ISDN
FTTHFTTH
Monopoly
Voice-oriented
Video = Entertainment
PERSPECTIVESPERSPECTIVES
NetworkNetwork
ConnectivityConnectivity
Resource SharingResource Sharing
Media
Copper
Coax
Fiber
Radio
Topology
Star
Bus
Ring
Control
Central
Distributed
Self
Service
Communication
Entertainment
Convergence
Mind-Set
Bell-Head
Net-Head
“Cable Guy”
CHANGING PERSPECTIVESCHANGING PERSPECTIVES
RF Modem
DSP Performance
Fiber Optics
BellBell--CentricCentric MosaicMosaic
NetworkNetwork
“Proprietary”“Proprietary”
CircuitCircuit
Standard based
Capacity
Service enabler
BroadbandBroadband
Service PackageService Package
Network enabled or Network enabled or
independent independent
CompetitionCompetition
ApplicationsApplications
FeatureFeature--rich rich
VoiceVoice
ConnectionConnection
BusinessBusiness
MonopolyMonopoly
Bandwidth Internet
Multimedia
Router performance
LAN extension
Telecom Reform
Market maturity &
growth
OPTIONSOPTIONS
LEC
Narrowband
Switched DLC
Rebuild
Network Upgrade
Cable modem
Deep Fiber Deep Fiber
PenetrationPenetration
Wireless
Mobility
Broadband
Cable
Broadband
Broadcast
FTTH
CHALLENGESCHALLENGES
FN
FN
FN HE
HE
HE
Analog TV
5 50 500 750 1G
Emerging Services
Bandwidth Capacity: 5-40MHz/1000s HHP upstream
Transport Integrity: Ingress noise, dynamic range
103-to-1 Architecture: Centrally-mediated MAC
SOLUTIONSSOLUTIONS
103-to-1
Architecture
Bandwidth
Capacity
Transport
Integrity
UPGRADE
Fiber Node
Segmentation
DWDM Trunk
DOCSIS
High level
modulation
Centrally-
mediated MAC
NetworkNetwork
ModemModem
Fiber Node SegmentationFiber Node Segmentation
FN
Long cascade coax bus shared by many users
(1000s)
1,200 Homes
HE
Fiber Node SegmentationFiber Node Segmentation
HE
1,200 HHP/FN with 300 HHP/Bus
FN
300 Homes 300 Homes
300 Homes 300 Homes
DISTRIBUTED HEADDISTRIBUTED HEAD--ENDEND
Operation complexity
Cost of CMTS at lower take rate
Primary
Ring
Primary
Hub
HE
HE FN
FN
HE
CMTS SCALABILITYCMTS SCALABILITY
Chassis-based CMTS has
the most advanced
features & can simplify the
metro routing architecture
Desired configuration favor
centralized approach
150
250
350
450
550
650
750
850
2 LCs Chassis Rack
ADC Arris Cisco
Motorola Juniper Terayon
$$
/M
bp
s
* Cost is calculated based on combined upstream and
downstream capacity, and core-redundancy
configuration
Minimum Medium Maximum
80-400Mbps 400-1600Mbps 1200-3840Mbps
DWDM TRUNKDWDM TRUNK
FN
FN
SH
DWDM transport for end-to-end transparency
Route diversity for service protection
Consolidate high-end terminals (CMTS)
Primary
Ring
Primary
Hub
SH
SH
DWDM TRUNKDWDM TRUNK
1 x
8 D
WD
M
1 x
8 D
WD
M
RCV
RCV
RCV
. . . . . .
l
l
Co
arse
WD
M
RCV
Primary Hub Secondary Hub
Fiber Node
XTR 1.3mm
l
l
l
1 x
8 D
WD
M . . .
1 x
8 D
WD
M
. . . 1.5mm
4 PRIMARY HUBS
64 SYSTEM HEADENDS
0 SECONDARY HUBS
TRADITIONAL HFC INTERCONNECTIONTRADITIONAL HFC INTERCONNECTION
2 MASTER HEADENDS
56 SECONDARY HUBS
9 PRIMARY HUBS
SECONDARY RING HFC INTERCONNECTSECONDARY RING HFC INTERCONNECT
Segmentation
4X capacity
SH
SH
MODERN HFC NETWORKMODERN HFC NETWORK
SH Primary
Ring
Primary
Hub
FN
FN
DWDM Transport
End-to-end Transparency
ARCHITECTURESARCHITECTURES
FN
Tree-and-Branch
Broadcast
Cascaded
Cell-Based
Narrowcast
Clustered
RN
???
FIBER OPTICS ?FIBER OPTICS ?
Node 2,000+HP 1,200HP 600HP 200HP 100HP
Size
HOW Deep ?
HOW To ?
EVOLUTIONEVOLUTION EVOLUTIONEVOLUTION
Demand
Take Rate
Applications
User Behavior
Demand
Take Rate
Applications
User Behavior
Ban
dw
idth
per
Cu
sto
mer
Push Fiber
Deeper
Push Fiber
Deeper
Split Nodes Split Nodes
Higher RF
Efficiency
Higher RF
Efficiency
Time
Fiber Optics for CableFiber Optics for Cable
102
107
106
105
104
103
86 06 92 00
108
FSA (103 HP/node)
FTTC (102 HP/node)
FTTH
40 ch AM
100 ch AM
Broadcast Two-way Broadband
Fib
er t
erm
inati
on
mFNmFN
CMTS
PH
mFN mFN
mFN mFN
mFNs replace all coax amplifiers Less active components
More bandwidth and flexibility
Deep fiber penetration with cell structure
Optical add/drop to daisy chain mFNs Reduced fiber management & labor
Provisioning for growth
Distributed processing at mFN
SH
SH
SH
XTR XTR XTR
WDM PON
S
ADVANTAGESADVANTAGES
Operation Savings
61% reduction in active components
Reduced power consumption
Simplification of maintenance
Improved Performance
Reduced ingress noise funneling (10-48MHz operation)
Increased RF bandwidth
Improved reliability
Future Proof
Flexibility between current track and future opportunities
Improved QoS and further cost reduction
OPERATION SAVINGSOPERATION SAVINGS
Current Network: 5.5 actives/mile
OPERATION SAVINGSOPERATION SAVINGS
61% reduction in active components
21+% improvement in reliability
COST COMPARISONCOST COMPARISON
Category Fiber Deep 860 Fiber Deep 600 HFC
Headend/Hub Optronics $3 $3 $3
Field Optronics $6 $6 $6
Pow er Supplies w ith Pow er Coax $1 $1 $2
Actives $0 $0 $6
Passives $7 $7 $7
Coax $20 $20 $20
Hardw are $0 $0 $0
Splice & Activate Coax $2 $2 $2
Turn up and Test $1 $1 $2
Project Mgmt & Design Engineering $1 $1 $1
Taxes & Freight $1 $1 $2
Labor $23 $23 $25
Material $19 $19 $26
Cost Total $42 $42 $51
Saving 17% 18%
Network ComparisonNetwork Comparison
20,000 Home Example20,000 Home Example
Item
Traditional
mFN
Power Supplies
60
19
RF Amplifiers
905
0
Optical Nodes
42
225
Total Active Devices
1,007
244
Active Per Mile
>4
<1
Cascaded RF
Amplifiers
5
0
Network Reliability
99.98%
99.999%
Power Cost 10 Years
$762,260
$244,680
Maintenance Cost 10
Years
$4,693,333 $1,173,333
Network Reliability
10 Year Operating Costs ($M)
99.970%
99.975%
99.980%
99.985%
99.990%
99.995%
100.000%
Traditional mFN
$0.00
$1.00
$2.00
$3.00
$4.00
$5.00
$6.00
Traditional mFN
Network Buildouts Network Buildouts -- CableCable
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Ho
me
s (
Millio
ns
)
AT&T AOL-TW Comcast Charter Cox Adel Cblvsn Rogers Mcom Insight Classic
2-Way Homes Homes Not Upgraded Source: Kagan
Majority cable networks complete upgrade by EOY 2003.
Next network frontier is to establish scalable interconnection.
Intelligent optical networking technology will play important role
OUR OUR
PERSPECTIVESPERSPECTIVES
GENERAL OBSERVATIONSGENERAL OBSERVATIONS
UK leads Europe and World in Digital
Penetration
US is more Focused on VOD and SVOD
Europe Leads on ITV applications Interactive Voting, Gaming, Multiple Camera Angles,
Theater Tickets
TRIPLE PLAYTRIPLE PLAY
Triple Play and Double
Play is Predominant in
Europe
UK is Projecting to be
90% Double or Triple
Play by 2010
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
UK Europe
Triple Double Single
2010 Projections
OUR FOCUSOUR FOCUS
Financial Focus Can the operation generate enough cash to service the
debt, cover ongoing capital needs and ultimately build
equity
Service Offering We Believe in the Triple Play
• However, service mix is extremely situation dependent
– Capital structure
– Regulatory
– Competition
– Demographics and income
Critical Technology Investment Timing
SERVICE APPROACHSERVICE APPROACH
Digital Video Favor an open approach
Precise investment that can be returned varies
Low level interactivity and gaming is interesting
SVOD also shows opportunity
High Speed Data Favor converged platform based upon DOCSIS
Huge Proponents of DOSCIS 2.0 capabilities
• More Mbps per Line Card = Lower Cost Per Mbps and
Lowe Cost Per line for VoIP
SERVICE APPROACH SERVICE APPROACH -- contcont
Voice Favor a disruptive approach to voice
VoIP as a transport
Not a one for one match for ILEC
Feature rich, i.e., web based features, whisper alerts,
persistent voice applications
Minimize powering exposure
Flat rate billing
TECHNOLOGY TIMINGTECHNOLOGY TIMING
Lead/manage
innovation
Standardize
/De facto
Improve
the scale
Migrate to
next
CO
ST
Cap
ab
ilit
y
Technology platform is time dependent Time to lead, time to push standards, time to extend E-o-
Scale.
Cardinal Consideration for Cardinal Consideration for
Technology InvestmentTechnology Investment
Matching capital investment to market potential 150+ startups for cable @ $400M+/year burn-rate
CMTS revenue < 30% CMTS vendors R&D spending
VC and technology communities need to understand service companies’ business and operations
GLOBAL PESPECTIVESGLOBAL PESPECTIVES
Communication Industry recovery relies on both the cost structure and revenue opportunities.
We Strongly Believe in Cable Broadband Business Think That Europe and Asia Offer Some Attractive Opportunities
Changing the nature of services and the dynamics of service delivery is key to expand the market and achieve economy of scale
The Triple Play is a Powerful Offering, But Is situation dependent (e.g., infrastructure, legacy issues, etc)
Needs additional fine tuning (ITV strategy, Voice strategy, HSD strategy)
Technology deployment is time-critical