brevard county, florida mid-reach - florida shore and ... candida.pdf · brevard county, florida...

18
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA Mid-Reach HURRICANE AND STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECT BUILDING STRONG® US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS | Jacksonville District A Planning Perspective February 10, 2011 Candida K. Bronson, P.E.

Upload: vuongtruc

Post on 17-Feb-2019

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

US Army Corps of Engineers

BUILDING STRONG®

BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

Mid-Reach HURRICANE AND STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECT

BUILDING STRONG® US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS | Jacksonville District

A Planning Perspective February 10, 2011

Candida K. Bronson, P.E.

BUILDING STRONG® US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS | Jacksonville District

Agenda

Mid-Reach

Project Area 7.8 miles

Flug Avenue

Pineda Causeway

•Background

•Plan Formulation

•The Recommended Plan

•The Corps Process

•Summary

BUILDING STRONG® US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS | Jacksonville District

PROJECT LOCATION: Port Canaveral

Patrick Air

Force Base

Mid-Reach

Project Area 7.8 miles

Flug Avenue

Pineda Causeway

BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

HURRICANE AND STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECT

Gulf of Mexico

Tallahassee

MID-REACH

Project

Atlantic Ocean

Jacksonville

Key West

Miami

A Feasibility Study was completed in 1996 leading

to the authorization of the North and South

Reaches.

The Mid-Reach was removed.

North Reach

Project Area

South Reach

Project Area

Background

HISTORY:

BUILDING STRONG® US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS | Jacksonville District

Flug Avenue

Pineda Causeway

Mid-Reach

Project Area 7.8 miles

Environmental Background

72 miles of sand and dune

10 miles rock

Brevard County

Nearshore Rock Habitat

Essential Fish Habitat

Other Species of Concern

Manatees Sea Turtles Whales Shorebirds

BUILDING STRONG® US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS | Jacksonville District

The Mid-Reach Study

Objectives

Purpose

•Reduce storm damages to shorefront structures

•Maintain environmental integrity of beach and nearshore area

•Maintain recreational beach

• Hurricane and Storm Damage Reduction

Mid-Reach

Project Area 7.8 miles

Flug Avenue

Pineda Causeway

BUILDING STRONG® US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS | Jacksonville District

Incremental Analysis

6 sub-Reaches

were identified

based on the acreage of

hardbottom

present

Acres of

Hardbottom

BUILDING STRONG® US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS | Jacksonville District

Flug Avenue

Pineda Causeway

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED

• No Action (future without)

• Beach Fill (10, 20, 30-foot beach widths)

• Conventional Fill (20 to 160-foot beach widths)

• Dune and Vegetation

• Other Structural and Non-Structural Alternatives

were formulated but were screened out prior to the development of the final array

BUILDING STRONG® US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS | Jacksonville District

Formulation Strategy

• Initial Alternatives Screening

•6 reaches x 12 measures = 72

measures and over 4 million

alternatives

•Need a strategy!

Step 1 Step 2

Step 3 Step 4

Result

BUILDING STRONG® US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS | Jacksonville District

Flug Avenue

Pineda Causeway

Storm Damage Reduction

Primary Benefits

Recreation

Secondary Benefits

Rough order

of magnitude

NET BENEFITS = BENEFITS - COSTS

Economics

Project Costs

BUILDING STRONG® US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS | Jacksonville District

Flug Avenue

Pineda Causeway

Hardbottom Impact

Mid-Reach

Project Area 7.8 miles

Existing shoreline

10 foot extension

20 foot extension

BUILDING STRONG® US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS | Jacksonville District

Cost Effectiveness Screening • Net Benefit vs. Hardbottom Impact

• Each sub-Reach and complete

alternatives

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

$7.0 $7.2 $7.4 $7.6 $7.8 $8.0 $8.2 $8.4

Ha

rdb

ott

om

Im

pa

ct

(ac

res)

Net Benefit ($ millions)

BUILDING STRONG® US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS | Jacksonville District

The Corps Process

• Model Certification

• Independent External Peer Review

• Multiple reviews – since draft report

dated Oct 2009, 8 reviews

BUILDING STRONG® US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS | Jacksonville District

Flug Avenue

Pineda Causeway

Mid-Reach

Project Area 7.8 miles

Public Involvement

• Scoping letter

• Scoping meeting

•Notice of Availability (draft report)

•Public workshop (draft report)

BUILDING STRONG® US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS | Jacksonville District

Locally Preferred Plan

• Similar but different plan

• Requires approval by ASA

• 2 designs, 2 costs, then compare

• Submittal package separate from

main report

BUILDING STRONG® US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS | Jacksonville District

Current Status

• In Corps HQ under review

• Scheduled for Washington level

review by State and Agencies spring

2011

• Directors’ Report (in lieu of Chief’s

Report)

• Engineering & Design 2012

• Construction 2013

BUILDING STRONG® US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS | Jacksonville District

Patrick Air

Force Base

Canaveral Shoals Borrow Areas

Flug Avenue

Pineda Causeway

The Recommended Plan (7.8 miles)

Hightower Park

Pelican Beach

Park

Bicentennial Park

Canova Beach

Park

Paradise Beach

Park

6

5

4

3

2

1

• Canaveral Shoals material

• Stockpiling at Poseidon

Dredged Material

Management Area

(DMMA) every 6 years

• Anticipated 3 year

renourishments

• 50 year maintenance

agreement

• Placement by truck haul

• 4.8 acres of mitigation reef

• Beach fill width:

10 foot fill

20 foot fill

dune fill only

Poseidon DMMA

BUILDING STRONG® US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS | Jacksonville District

Flug Avenue

Pineda Causeway

Mid-Reach

Project Area 7.8 miles

Mitigation • Avoided and minimized impacts to

the nearshore rock habitat to maximum extent practicable

• Developed mitigation reef design for unavoidable impacts in Reaches 1 – 5 (approximately10% of total rock)

Mitigation Materials Testing

Consists of articulated concrete mats

embedded with coquina placed in a

water depth of 14 to 16 feet

BUILDING STRONG® US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS | Jacksonville District

The Secret to Success

• Persistence

• The same planner, engineer,

biologist and project manager

• Consistent funding

• Transparency in reviews