b&p tunnel project · 2018-08-02 · b&p tunnel project consulting parties meeting #5 march...
TRANSCRIPT
B&P Tunnel ProjectConsulting Parties Meeting #5
March 23, 2016
2
Project Status and Updates
NEPA Milestones
3
Draft EIS: Completed December 2016
Public Open House: April 6 and 16, 2016
Initial response to DEIS comments Major themes of Noise, Air Quality, Vibration, Freight, Vent Plant Location
Present alternative refinements
Initiate mitigation discussion
Community Meetings: Summer 2016
Discuss potential mitigation for preferred alternative
Final EIS: October 2016
Record of Decision: March 2017
4
Revised Project Build Alternatives
5
Refinements to Project Build Alternatives Since DEIS
3A Revised
Refined to include narrower limits of disturbance. Track spacing narrowed near south portal.
3B Revised Refined to include narrower limits of disturbance. Revised alignment to narrow track spacing and reduce impacts to historic
properties near south portal.
3C
Refined to include narrower limits of disturbance. Alternative is being eliminated as a result of environmental impacts.
6
South Portal – Alternative 3A Revised
South Portal – Alternative 3B (DEIS)
7
South Portal – Alternative 3B Revised
8
9
Alternative 3B Revised
South Portal – Alternative 3B Revised
10
South Portal – Alternative 3C
11
12
Alternatives Evaluation Process
The DEIS contained Alternative 3A, Alternative 3B, Alternative 3C, and a No‐Build Alternative (Alternative 1).
Each of the Build Alternatives was revised based on opportunities to reduce environmental impacts.
Alternative 3A Revised is still under consideration because it has the least impacts of the Build Alternatives.
Alternative 3B and Alternative 3C best meet the Project Purpose and Need and have two additional benefits compared to Alternative 3A:
• Better travel times• Superior West Baltimore MARC Station location and accessibility
Alternative 3B and Alternative 3C were compared and Alternative 3C has been eliminated.
Rationale for Eliminating Alternative 3C
13
Alternative 3C was eliminated due to the following differences with Alternative 3B:
Alternative 3B Revised Alternative 3C
Capital Cost $4.0 billion $4.2 billion
Ward Baking Company building (historic property)
Building Avoided Demolished
Fire Department Engine Company No. 36 building (historic property)
Building Avoided Demolished
P. Flanigan & Sons, Inc. business and jobs
Minimal impact Substantial impact
Surface right‐of‐way required 12.0 acres 13.6 acres
14
Intermediate Ventilation Plant Locations
15
Intermediate Ventilation Plant Locations Considered
Potential Intermediate Ventilation Plant Locations: Whitelock Street
16
Community GardenSouth side of Whitelock Street between Mason Alley and Brookfield Avenue
17
Potential Intermediate Ventilation Plant Locations: W. North Avenue
Madison Park North Apartments850 W. North Avenue
Built in the early 1970s
Madison Park Medical Center920 W. North AvenueBuilt in circa 1970
18
1940s (www.kilduffs.com)
The Madison Park Medical Center is located where this
block of rowhouses once stood
Madison Park Medical Center: Then and Now
Today
Both views look northwest toward the north side of W. North Avenue at Jordan Street
Intermediate Ventilation Plant Comparison
19
Site Positive Negative920 W North Ave (Madison Park Medical Center)
Situated on periphery of Reservoir Hill neighborhood and historic district
No historic structure
Active businesses including medical facility, daycare, IT Company
Rowhome immediately adjacent Public perception of proximity to elementary school Greater cost relative to Whitelock St Longer distance of drill/blast relative to Whitelock St Drill/blast underneath homes Overall public perception unknown
850 W North Ave (Vacant Housing Complex)
Situated on periphery of Reservoir Hill neighborhood and historic district
All residential buildings vacant, could avoid use of Baltimore City Public Schools building
No homes immediately adjacent (roadway on all sides) No historic structures Large site, flexible boundaries Most of drill/blast could occur under Linden Ave ROW Potential for working in concert with private developer
to improve site
Public perception of proximity to elementary school Greater cost relative to Whitelock St Longer distance of Drill/Blast relative to Whitelock St Overall public perception unknown Uncertainty of availability of ROW due to developer
interest in site
Whitelock Street at Brookfield Ave (Community Garden)
Lowest cost Shortest distance of drill/blast Further from elementary school No structures, no historic building impact Recommended optimum location by Amtrak/PE
Situated in central area of Reservoir Hill neighborhood and historic district
Site occupied by community garden Substantial community opposition
20
Public Comments from DEIS / Hearing
21
DEIS Public Comments Summary
DEIS Comment Period ended February 26, 2016
Perceived potential for operational noise, vibration, air quality, property value impacts in Reservoir Hill
Intermediate vent plant: community farm, visual, noise, air quality impacts in Reservoir Hill
Questions on need for four tracks
General concern that low‐income and minority areas are targeted
Concerns about damage to historic houses/foundations due to vibration from construction and rail operations, questions about compensation for damage
Perception that the project will increase freight through the City and new tunnel, safety concerns for derailments or explosions
Support for better passenger rail service and new connections in Baltimore
22
Effects on Historic Properties
Alternatives Evaluation
23
* Contributing resources counted once per element; includes buildings and structural elements of historic districts
Criterion Alternative 3A (DEIS) Alternative 3A Revised Alternative 3B (DEIS) Alternative 3B Revised
Travel Time Savings over No‐Build (Min:Sec)
Acela: 1:56Regional: 1:46MARC: 1:26
Acela: 2:00Regional: 1:55MARC: 1:38
Acela: 2:32Regional: 2:26MARC: 1:53
Acela: 2:31Regional: 2:32MARC: 1:49
Capital Cost Estimate (YOE $) $3.7 billion $3.8 billion $4.0 billion $4.0 billion
Surface Right‐of‐Way Acreage Required
7.8 acres 7.2 acres 17.1 acres 12.0 Acres
Number of Surface Parcels Impacted
10 9 100 51
Section 4(f) Properties Impacted 5+3 (No Use)
5+3 (No Use)
8(+2 No Use)(+3 De Minimis)
8(+1 No Use)(+2 De Minimis)
Likely Adverse Effects for Historic Properties *
6 (8 contributing elements impacted, including 2 demolitions)
6 (7 contributing elements impacted, including 1 demolition)
8 (83 contributing historic elements impacted, including 51 demolitions)
9 (62 contributing historic elements impacted, including 30 demolitions)
Area of Surface Disturbance within Historic District
14.2 Acres – Baltimore & Potomac Railroad and Midtown Edmondson Historic Districts
14.2 Acres – Greater Rosemont, Baltimore & Potomac Railroad, and Midtown Edmondson Historic Districts
25.3 Acres – Edmondson Avenue, Baltimore & Potomac Railroad, Greater Rosemont, and Midtown Edmondson Historic Districts
19.8 Acres – Baltimore & Potomac Railroad, Edmondson Avenue, Greater Rosemont, Midtown Edmondson Historic Districts
Residential Displacements 0 0 46 22Business Displacements 2 2 9 6Community Facility Displacements 0 0 5 4
Average Depth of Tunnel 130 feet 120 feet 130 feet 115 FeetPermanent On‐Street Parking spaces lost
0 0 150 85
ROW Impacts within Minority and Low Income Areas
Minority: 5.8 AcresLow Income: 0.9 Acres
Minority: 5.8 AcresLow Income: 0.9 Acres
Minority: 15.1 AcresLow Income: 2.4 Acres
Minority: 10.8 AcresLow Income: 2.0 Acres
Alternative 3B Section 106 Adverse Effects
24
# Name MIHP/NR #NRHP Criteria 3A Revised 3B Revised
1Baltimore and Ohio Belt Line Railroad
B‐5287 A and C
Direct Adverse Effect Limestone pier of the bridge over Jones Falls Valley (see directly below) demolished and/or relocated
Direct Adverse Effect Limestone pier of the bridge over Jones Falls Valley (see directly below) demolished and/or relocated
2Baltimore and Ohio Belt Line Bridge over Jones Falls Valley
B‐5288 A and CDirect Adverse Effect Limestone pier demolished and/or relocated
Direct Adverse Effect Limestone pier demolished and/or relocated
3Baltimore & Potomac Railroad (Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad)
B‐5164 A and C
Direct Adverse Effect Railroad catenary lines removedand railroad track bed alignments widened
Direct Adverse Effect Railroad catenary lines removed; railroad track bed alignments widened; B&P Railroad Edmondson Avenue Station demolished; and direct effects to W. Mulberry Street Bridge, W. Franklin Street Bridge, and possibly N. Warwick Avenue Bridge
4 Reservoir Hill Historic District B‐1379 A and C
Direct and Indirect Adverse Effect Physical, visual, atmospheric, and audible changes to the streetscape and surrounding area, with the potential to diminish integrity
Direct and Indirect Adverse Effect Physical, visual, atmospheric, and audible changes to the streetscape and surrounding area, with the potential to diminish integrity
25
Alternative 3B Section 106 Adverse Effects (cont.)
# Name MIHP/NR # NRHP Criteria
3A Revised 3B Revised
5Midtown Edmondson Historic District A and C
Direct Adverse Effect The American Stores Company Warehouse clipped and Bridge BC 2410 altered (see directly below for details)
Direct and Indirect Adverse Effect27 buildings demolished: including the rear building at the Atlas Safe Deposit and Storage Company Warehouse Complex and the lumber warehouse on Mosher Street2 bridges altered: Bridge BC 2410 (see directly below for details) and the Edmondson Avenue Bridge over Amtrak
6Bridge BC 2410 (Lafayette Avenue over Amtrak)
B‐4553 CDirect Adverse Effect Bridge superstructure elevated and substructure potentially modified
Direct and Indirect Adverse Effect Bridge superstructure elevated and substructure potentially modified
7Atlas Safe Deposit and Storage Company Warehouse Complex
B‐5188‐2 A and CDirect Adverse Effect The rear warehouse building demolished
8 Greater Rosemont Historic District B‐5112 A and C
Direct Adverse Effect 5 buildings demolished, including the B&P Railroad Edmondson Avenue Station and rowhouses
9 Edmondson Avenue Historic District B‐5187 A and CDirect Adverse Effect2 rowhouses demolished
TOTAL HISTORIC PROPERTIES WITH ADVERSE EFFECT6 9
26
Minimization and Mitigation Measures
27
Project Design Construction Protection Plans Documentation Interpretive Material and Education Community Preservation Efforts/Stabilization and Rehabilitation
In addition, stipulations would include additional Section 106 identification and evaluation efforts for archeology.
Section 106 Mitigation Ideas
28
Advancing the Programmatic Agreement or Memorandum
of Agreement
29
Next Steps