bolsa - moving towards 1989 newest
DESCRIPTION
In 2011 I explained Cristina Kirchner's government could save $20 billion between 2012-2020 if it settled its various disputes and reaccessed global markets but that the window was closing. In November 2012, at the Bolsa in Argentina, I Presented the attached ppt highlighting the opportunity was dwindling and the crisis was at hand within 6 months if they didn't refocus. The path they are moving down is disastrous and will rob precisely those in society CFK wants to help most. Time for her to push her advisors to take a rational path and reengage with the world before it is too late.TRANSCRIPT
1
• After 2003 the economy put up exceptional indicators: GDP grew almost 70% • Formal employment increased more than 30% • Reduced reliance on debt funding • Fiscal restraint • Increasing tax revenues from the nominal increase in prices • Devaluation of the peso increased the value of foreign holdings • Exports drove the recovery
"El Modelo-K”: A Post Default Success
2
To address a weakening global economy: • Increased taxes on soybean exports by 44% • Increased use of central bank reserves to support the dollar/
peso exchange rate • Use of central bank reserves to make debt payments • Increased the monetary base & stoked inflation
"El Modelo-K": After the Drought & Global Financial Crisis
President Kirchner is Appropriately Trying to Transition to a Value-Added Economy
• Exports of Argentina’s vast natural commodity resources supported growth over the past decade, funding economic & social improvements.
• Easy growth of emerging, commodity export economy, are behind us & can’t support the past pace of economic growth.
• Argentina is a major exporter of raw goods but her imports are primarily value-added finished goods.
• Today, even with huge-natural gas & energy resources, the country must rely on imported energy.
• Transition from a commodity economy to a value-added economy is necessary for resumption of & sustainable growth.
Exports Remain Less Value Added
9%
32%
7%
31%
21%
Exports -‐ Primarily Natural Resource Related
Fuels & Energy
Industrial Goods (Equipment, Chemicals, DerivaDves & Other)
Industrial Goods (Basic Materials)
Agricultural Goods
Primary Products
Source: Ministry of Economy (MECON) Ð 2010 Exports, USD billions; Measured on a CIF basis (cost, insurance, & freight included) whereas, for Balance of Payments purposes, measured on a FOB basis
Imports – Are Largely Value Added
2% 3.0% 6%
6%
9%
15%
21%
28%
10%
Imports are Diversified, but Weighted Towards Value-‐Added Equipment & Goods
OpDcal Instruments
TexDles
Common Metals
PlasDc, Rubber
Mineral Products
Industrial Products
Transport Equipment
Machines, Instruments and Electric Materials
Other
Source: Ministry of Economy (MECON) Ð 2010 Exports, USD billions; Measured on a CIF basis (cost, insurance, & freight included) whereas, for Balance of Payments purposes, measured on a FOB basis
The Costs of Development Require Investment • Nationalization of YPF was recognition of the need for massive
investments in the development of the energy sector (& other sectors). – Government is correct to criticize the underinvestment &
expatriation of profits. – Repsol is also correct, a lack of policy stability & historic failures to
adhere to contracts makes Argentina unattractive for real investment.
– Net result, this leads to short-term rather than longer-term foreign direct investment (FDI) & expatriation of profits rather than further investment.
• Necessary investments for transition of the economy to a value-added export economy are too large to fund without foreign direct investment.
• FDI increases supply of dollars & reduces economy’s reliance on potentially excessive consumption.
Underinvestment Has Consequences (Argentina is a Importer of Value-added Energy
Source: EIA, International Energy Statistics
Investment Requires Policy Stability
• Policy interventions are having the opposite affect – Capital controls. – Use of central bank reserves for dollar funding needs. – Reductions in support for essential services in the
provinces. – Placement of increasing amounts of internal government
debt with ANSES & other public sector dependencies. – New regulations on local dollar law bonds.
Trade Concerns
• Criticism from trade partners: “In many cases, the export tax for raw materials is set higher than the sale price of the processed product to encourage development of domestic value-added production” - NOPA, ASA, NAEGA comments to the USTR (September 2011) (dumping) – Examples
• Soybeans at 35 percent; soybean oil & soybean meal at 32 percent
• Sunflower seeds at 32 percent; sunflower meal & sunflower oil at 30 percent
10
• Uruguay: Argentina “becoming increasingly protectionist & returning to the imports substitution policies of the 1950s.”
• European Commission, Canada, Colombia, Australia, Japan, Switzerl&, Norway, & the United States, raise concerns over Argentina’s import limitations
• Global Trade Alert named Argentina the second most protectionist economy
• “From the Chinese government’s point of view, the fact that Argentina launches anti-dumping investigations so frequently against one country is totally abnormal & discriminatory”
• the Economic Commission for Latin America & the Caribbean, “in recent years Argentina & Brazil have been involved in more trade dispute settlements than any other two neighboring countries.” • Fiat recently announced that it would be reducing production in
both Argentina & Brazil because of these issues.
Trading Partner Alienation
Fiscal Problems Will Increase
• Fiscal position has gone from sustainable surpluses to over a year of deficits & growing inflation.
• Fiscal balance turned from surplus to deficit in Q2’11 • Without GDP growth & sub-inflationary growth in fiscal expenses, it
will be difficult to avoid fiscal deficits for next several years. • “In summary, the sharp real business cycle slowdown observed
during 1H2012 was a reflection of further real ARS appreciation, softening external demand &, the negative impact of restrictive FX & import controls on a number of production & distribution chains, & market-unfriendly policy measures that have hurt consumer & business sentiment. That is, the business cycle slowdown drivers were mostly domestic rather than external & mostly due to exogenous policy moves rather than endogenous macro dynamics.” - Alberto Ramos, Goldman Sachs - July 27, 2012
Consumer Sentiment Reflects Policy Approaches: Leads to Decreased Consumption Increased Capital Flight
Universiidad Torcuato di Tella
-‐
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
Apr-‐01
Jul-‐0
1 Oct-‐01
Jan-‐02
Apr-‐02
Jul-‐0
2 Oct-‐02
Jan-‐03
Apr-‐03
Jul-‐0
3 Oct-‐03
Jan-‐04
Apr-‐04
Jul-‐0
4 Oct-‐04
Jan-‐05
Apr-‐05
Jul-‐0
5 Oct-‐05
Jan-‐06
Apr-‐06
Jul-‐0
6 Oct-‐06
Jan-‐07
Apr-‐07
Jul-‐0
7 Oct-‐07
Ene-‐08
Apr-‐08
Jul-‐0
8 oct-‐08
ene-‐09
abr-‐09
jul-‐0
9 oct-‐09
ene-‐10
abr-‐10
jul-‐1
0 oct-‐10
ene-‐11
abr-‐11
jul-‐1
1 oct-‐11
ene-‐12
abr-‐12
jul-‐1
2 oct-‐12
Consumer Confidence Index (ICC)
Fiscal Position Deteriorating
Argentina Nominal Fiscal Surplus / (Deficit) - Rolling Twelve Month Period
(45.0)
(40.0)
(35.0)
(30.0)
(25.0)
(20.0)
(15.0)
(10.0)
(5.0)
--
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Q1'11 Q2'11 Q3'11 2011 Q1'12 Q2'12
Peso
Bill
ions
Primary Surplus / (Deficit) Fiscal Surplus / (Deficit)Source: Ministry of Economy (MECON) for historical figures
Despite Strict Capital Controls the Balance of Payments has Turned Negative
Source: Ministry of Economy (MECON) for historical figures
Balance of Payments (USD Billions)
($14.0)
($12.0)
($10.0)
($8.0)
($6.0)
($4.0)
($2.0)
--
$2.0
$4.0
$6.0
$8.0
$10.0
$12.0
$14.0
$16.0
$18.0
$20.0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Q1'11 Q2'11 Q3'11 2011 Q1'12
Trade Surplus Current Account Surplus / (Deficit) Balance of Payments
GDP Falling toward Zero + ���(20%+ Inflation) = Stagflation
Stagflation
(4.0%)
(2.0%)
--
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
20.0%
22.0%
24.0%
26.0%
28.0%
Jan-05 Jul-05 Jan-06 Jul-06 Jan-07 Jul-07 Jan-08 Jul-08 Jan-09 Jul-09 Jan-10 Jul-10 Jan-11 Jul-11 Jan-12
EMAE Growth (GDP Proxy) Market CPI
Source: Ministry of Economy (MECON), GlobalSource Partners
Monetary Base Expansion + Declining Access to Hard Currencies = Deposit Flight & Lower Tax Base
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
19/10/2012
7/8/12
24/05/2012
8/3/12
22/12/2011
7/10/11
28/07/2011
17/05/2011
28/02/2011
16/12/2010
1/10/10
22/07/2010
7/5/10
23/02/2010
11/12/09
29/09/2009
20/07/2009
5/5/09
17/02/2009
4/12/08
23/09/2008
14/07/2008
30/04/2008
14/02/2008
30/11/2007
19/09/2007
10/7/07
25/04/2007
9/2/07
28/11/2006
15/09/2006
6/7/06
24/04/2006
8/2/06
29/11/2005
19/09/2005
8/7/05
27/04/2005
14/02/2005
3/12/04
23/09/2004
14/07/2004
30/04/2004
17/02/2004
4/12/03
23/09/2003
14/07/2003
30/04/2003
14/02/2003
Monetary Base Money Outside the Financial System InternaDonal Reserves Excluding 2009 SDRs allocaDon
Source: BCRA
Risking the Model: Pesification, Devaluation – A 1994 Move toward 1989?
• Recent actions risk greater reliance on increasing internal debt. • Recent Central Bank regulation over local law bonds will reduce risk
appetite for local & corporate debt issuances (crowding out). • ANSES & other public agencies will be increasingly pushed to raise
holdings of government debt (but risks posed by devaluation & fiscal stress rises).
• Currency controls make it difficult for provinces & corporations to sell new local law dollar bonds. – Chaco – Buenos Aires City – Formosa – Tucuman
Lessons from 1989
“The consequent increase in internal interest bearing debt further deteriorates the fiscal situation of the government adding inflationary pressure especially in the context of indexed government debt. The higher the inflation rate, it is argued, the lower will be real cash balances & tax receipts. Once the (operational) fiscal deficit as a percentage of GDP becomes greater than the maximum attainable with the inflation tax, the government will have to continuously accelerate the rate of money growth & thus push the economy into a hyperinflation.” – John Walsh US Federal Reserve (1991)
1989
• High proportion of internal rather than external debt • July
– Devalued the currency by 54% – Increased public services rates 200% – Imposed wage controls & price guidelines
• December – Another 34.5% currency devaluation – Two-year postponement of payments on their state-issued debts – 60% increase in public service fees & gas prices – M&atory exchange of certificates of deposit over $1000 for 10-
year USD bonds (Bonex 89)
Steps Necessary to Attract Much Needed FDI
• Finish the work started with the IMF to create a new national CPI & take the INDEC issue off the table (a basket of provincial CPI?).
• Smooth relations with IFIs & thus facilitate a favorable rescheduling of the Paris Club debt.
• Paying the final ICSID awards would eliminate a major irritant in Argentina’s relationship with the World Bank.
• Exploring settlements with Spain & others. • Settlement of issues attracts FDI (hard currency), drives GDP
and allows reduction of debt and ongoing refinancing of existing debt at lower rates.
November 2011 Presentation
• Argentina could save U$S 28 billion between 2012 & 2020 if it reengaged with international capital markets &, thus, lowered the country’s risk premium.
• Warned the economy was in danger of a significant decline within six months if it did not begin to quickly attract the capital it needed.
• Today the slowdown is here, fiscal and monetary environment are difficult.
• Argentina has room to avoid another 1989 crisis but time is short.
• More debt (internal or external) is not the answer. • Foreign direct investment & development is THE answer.
22
A year ago I demonstrated the results would be: • An increase in investor confidence & reduction in dollar flight; • Increasing Foreign Direct Investment toward the peer group
average; • Increases in Central Bank Reserves; • International recognition of Argentina’s low debt relative to
borrowing capacity. Total debt to GDP is currently 37% & interest on those debts amounts to only 2% of GDP. Nearly half of the public debt held by public sector agencies & foreign currency debt represents only about 55% of the total.
"El Modelo-K": Proving the Model
A History of Default
• Argentina’s history of default has not all been about too much external debt. – The history of default represents the mismanagement of
excessive amounts of internal & external debt. • The Kirchner government has recognized this & done
an excellent job of reducing government debt during times of surplus and positive trade environment.
– Unfortunately, deficit funding will be increasingly difficult & put the country back on a 1989 path.
History Must Change – It is a “both &” rather than an “either or” world.
“Decision makers in Argentina have quite consistently attempted to adopt policy positions that seemed designed to tear society apart rather than to forge new coalitions. . . . Major policy disagreements in modern Argentine history have their main roots in the conflict between two divergent streams of thought: liberalism of the British Manchester School variety & what can be called national populism . . . . In general, the liberals have stood for the virtues of a society open to international opportunities & influences, whereas, the national populists have emphasized indigenous, autonomous development. – Mallon & Sourouille (1975)