board of trustees the city university of new york · board of trustees the city university of new...

BOARD OF TRUSTEES THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK

BOARD COMMITTEE ON FACULTY, AGENDA STAFF AND ADMINISTRATION OCTOBER 2, 2017

I. ACTION ITEMS

A. Approval of the Minutes of June 7, 2017

B. POLICY CALENDAR 1. Revised Pre-Tenure Review Policy (I-B-1)

2. Amendments to the Governance Plan of The CUNY School of Law (I-B-2)

3. Adoption of New Governance Plan for Guttman Community College (I-B-3)

4. Amendment to Article 6.1 of the Bylaws (I-B-4)

5. Naming of The Raymond Erickson Music Reference Collection at Queens College (I-B-5)

6. Naming of the Mary E. O’Connor Conference Room at Queens College (I-B-6)

7. Naming of the Leonard Tow Chair for Journalism Innovation at the CUNY Graduate School of Journalism (I-B-7)

C. CHANCELLOR’S UNIVERSITY REPORT

1. Appointment of Laurie F. Dorf as Vice President for Institutional Advancement/ Alumni Relations at Queens College (I-C-1)

2. Appointment of Laura Ginn as Vice President for Policy and Strategic Initiatives at John Jay College of Criminal Justice (I-C-2)

3. Appointment of Wendy J. Thornton as Interim Vice President of Student Affairs at The City College of New York (I-C-3)

II. INFORMATION ITEMS

Reappointment with Early Tenure pursuant to §6.2.b.(2) of the Bylaws.

College Name Department Rank Justification Effective

A. NYCCT Justin Vazquez-Poritz Physics Associate Professor

Principal Investigator on two NSF grants. Former scholar at the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics

9/1/2017

III. QUARTERLY STAFF DIVERSITY REPORT


COMMITTEE ON MINUTES OF THE MEETING FACULTY, STAFF AND ADMINISTRATION JUNE 7, 2017

1

The meeting was called to order by Committee Chair Fernando Ferrer at 5:59 p.m. The following people were present: Committee Members: Hon. Fernando Ferrer, Chair Hon. Judah Gribetz, Vice Chair Hon. Rita DiMartino (left @ 7:10 p.m.) Hon. Jill O’Donnell-Tormey Hon. Ken Sunshine (left @ 7:17 p.m.) Prof. Michael Barnhart, faculty alternate President Marcia Keizs, COP member Trustee Observer: Hon. Kay Conway (joined @ 6:06 p.m.) Trustee Staff: Senior Advisor to the Chancellor and Secretary of

the Board Gayle M. Horwitz Interim General Counsel and Vice Chancellor

Jane Sovern Deputy to the Secretary Hourig Messerlian Ms. Towanda Lewis

University Staff: Vice Chancellor Gloriana Waters Senior Advisor to the Chancellor Marc V. Shaw

(joined @ 6:50 p.m.) University Dean for Recruitment and Diversity

Arlene Torres University Director Talent Acquisition Anne

Chamberlain

Cal. No. DISPOSITION

The agenda items were considered and acted upon in the following order:

I. ACTION ITEMS:

A. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF APRIL 3, 2017. The minutes were approved as submitted upon motion made by Trustee Rita DiMartino and seconded by Trustee Jill O’Donnell-Tormey.

B. POLICY CALENDAR

1. Amendments to the Guidelines for Presidential Searches. Interim General Counsel and Vice Chancellor (IGC&VC) Jane Sovern stated that this item was discussed at the Committee’s February 2017 meeting. The change that was the subject of discussion was essentially having external representatives to be potentially part of the search committee, as part of the group of trustees and senior level administrators. Also, there was a request from the Committee to define the change a little more precisely and to have some parameters. Therefore, the revised language states that the total number of appointed trustees and senior level administrators and/or external constituent representatives shall not exceed five, and external constituent representatives shall have a record of significant commitment to the campus, and may include alumni or donors, but may not be elected officials or staff members of elected officials. The other changes were essentially minimal cleanup, such as including the Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy in this process, and making the diversity language more current.

Prof. Michael Barnhart stated that the University Faculty Senate (UFS) is generally happy with the direction of the guidelines and thinks expanding the number of, or the



2

composition of people who can sit on the presidential search committees is a good thing but would like to suggest that there should be consultation with the campus. He added that some of the faculty would feel reassured if there was some consideration to the idea of campus consultation.

IGC&VC Sovern stated that it is her understanding that campus consultation happens when the search committees are being constituted. She added that since the individuals must have a record of significant commitment, there is no need for there to be a requirement in the guidelines.

In response to a question from Committee Vice Chair Judah Gribetz on whether the modifications to the guidelines mean that there can no longer be five trustees who can sit on the presidential searches: IGC&VC Sovern stated that there is flexibility in that category as all five members could be trustees.

In response to a follow-up question from Committee Vice Chair Gribetz on whether appointing an external constituent representative is at the expense of possibly a trustee:

IGC&VC Sovern stated that it is at the expense of a trustee or senior level administrator.

In response to another question from Committee Vice Chair Gribetz on why is this being done at the expense of a trustee vote:

IGC&VC Sovern stated that there were times when some trustees who had participated in a number of searches would have liked a little break so there was an interest in having some flexibility in this category.

Committee Chair Ferrer suggested that the Committee be provided with a clear meaning of external representatives as part of the search committee.

IGC&VC Sovern stated that Chancellor Milliken and others have expressed significant interest in having individuals who have a significant connection to the college—alumni and donors.

Committee Chair Ferrer noted that the only thing that could change from search to search is the mix of trustees, senior level administrators, and external constituents.

UFS Chair and Trustee Kay Conway stated that as Prof. Barnhart has already mentioned, the UFS supports the idea that there might be external constituents—as they are very valuable—who could be helpful to a search but would like the Exceptions to these Guidelines section to read, “if there are times when external constituents are needed that consultation would be made with the faculty and student governances of the related campus”.

Committee Vice Chair Gribetz stated that more flexibility should mean that if Chancellor Milliken wants to put an external representative on a search committee, he can do so in addition to having five trustees. He added that this proposal limits flexibility.

IGC&VC Sovern stated that part of the concern was that the proportion of faculty and students on the committee remain the same as they are of important value in these searches. There was not a desire to add another person to the total mix. It was a desire to keep the total mix the same and have a little bit more flexibility within the mix.



3

Committee Vice Chair Ferrer suggested that when a term is suggestive of a process, the Committee ought to know what it means before the term is accepted.

UFS Chair and Trustee Conway noted that presently campus involvement is limited to asking the campus for the faculty representatives. UFS is not consulted or considered about any of the other representatives.

IGC&VC Sovern stated that amending this document to address specific consultation with the faculty governance body would be a change from what is already being done.

UFS Chair and Trustee Conway stated that to Committee Chair Ferrer's point, in terms of language, campus consultation often means that the president has been spoken to. It does not mean anybody else has been spoken to.

In response to a question from Committee Chair Ferrer to UFS Chair and Trustee Conway on whether she has an explicit understanding that campus consultation does not imply consent:

UFS Chair and Trustee Conway stated that she agrees that is why the UFS thinks this request is pretty nominal.

IGC&VC Sovern stated that Chancellor Milliken is comfortable with campus consultation, rather than going to each specific governance body on every search.

President Marcia Keizs stated that there is a clear place for consultation with governance in terms of selecting faculty as there is a broader role for consultation with whomever is leading the institution at the time—the president, the president's cabinet, or foundation board members. She added that her position is that consultation currently takes place with the various sectors to select the particular sector representatives. For the general campus, the external person that the chancellery is attempting to add, would be the campus president or the foundation board representative. If this is what the Committee is trying to achieve, the governance role is for faculty and student representation.

UFS Chair and Trustee Conway stated that the faculty and students do not expect to be consulted over the choice of administrators or trustees but to the extent that the guidelines are expanding to include an external group, the UFS thought it will be shared governance so the faculty should be consulted.

Committee Vice Chair Gribetz stated that under the statutes that created the Board, the trustees have the ultimate responsibility. These guideline changes introduce a dilution of statutory responsibility.

Trustee Ken Sunshine noted that he was on one of the search committees, and stated that it was incredibly labor intensive so there was a real practical problem.

In response to a question from Committee Vice Chair Gribetz on whether the number of trustees can be reduced under this new configuration:

President Keizs stated that the explanation section of the resolution states, “The amendments ensure a minimum of three appointed trustees”.



4

Senior Advisor to the Chancellor and Secretary Gayle Horwitz noted that it is not in the actual guidelines; however, it is in the explanation section of the resolution.

In response to a question from Committee Vice Chair Gribetz on whether there is a concern that the faculty as a whole may want an opinion on a campus:

IGC&VC Sovern stated that the system has consultation as per President Keizs’ comment earlier. Saying more about consultation could suggest that there is additional formal governance consultation that is not necessary.

In response to a question from Committee Chair Ferrer to IGC&VC Sovern on what suggested words would clarify the intent of consultation:

IGC&VC Sovern stated that clarification is not needed. It is clear that there has to be consultation for faculty and student governance. Furthermore, it is clear that the campus is consulted about the senior administrators and external constituents.

Prof. Barnhart stated that campus consultation is not necessarily unrelated to governance at every campus. There is a governance body that represents the entire college. He added that the UFS understands the word consultation to mean a vote is not taken as it is only an informational item, so there is only a discussion. Prof. Barnhart suggested that he is willing to accept campus consultation with the understanding that a discussion might not always occur at every college.

IGC&VC Sovern stated that there is appropriate engagement with appropriate sectors in the way that the process already works.

UFS Chair and Trustee Conway agreed to withdraw the UFS request in regards to campus consultation because clarity was given on how the process should work.

Moved by Trustee O’Donnell-Tormey and seconded by Prof. Barnhart, and following discussion, the item was approved for submission to the Board, as amended as follows:

Guidelines for Presidential Searches | Paragraph 3, page 2, to read as follows: “Senior level administrators and/or representatives of external constituencies: up to two senior level administrators, one who is affiliated with the college and one who is from a different college, and/or representatives of external constituencies recommended by the Chancellor and appointed by the Chairperson of the Board. There will be a minimum of three and a maximum of five Trustees. The total number of appointed Trustees and senior level administrators and/or external constituent representatives shall not exceed five. External constituent representatives shall have a record of significant commitment to the campus, and may include alumni or donors, but may not be elected officials or staff members of elected officials.”

2. Amendments to the Charter for the Governance of Hunter College.

Moved by Trustee O’Donnell-Tormey and seconded by Prof. Barnhart, and following discussion, the item was approved for submission to the Board.

3. Amendment to the Governance Plan of Lehman College.



5

Moved by Trustee O’Donnell-Tormey and seconded by Trustee DiMartino, and following discussion, the item was approved for submission to the Board.

4. Naming of the Hannelore S. and Robert M. Bloch Commons at Hunter College.

5. Naming of the Elizabeth Hemmerdinger Screening Center at Hunter College.

6. Naming of the Dina Axelrad Perry Pool at Queens College.

Vice Chancellor Gloriana Waters stated that the three naming opportunities represent gifts to the University totaling $1.6 million: the Hannelore S. and Robert M. Bloch Commons at Hunter College, the Elizabeth Hemmerdinger Screening Center, also at Hunter College, and the Dina Axelrad Perry Pool at Queens College. The Bloch Commons is a student study area located in the Silverstein Student Success Center in Hunter College's library, which is being named for the Blochs in recognition of a $500,000 gift to the Hunter College Foundation. The Hemmerdinger Screening Center is also located in the Silverstein Student Success Center in Hunter College's library and it is being named in recognition of $100,000 gift. The Dina Axelrad Perry Pool is being named in honor of a member of the Board of Trustees of the Queens College Foundation, who has pledged $1 million to the college. These naming opportunities have been reviewed and approved by both the University Offices of General Counsel and Institutional Advancement.

Moved by Trustee DiMartino and seconded by Trustee O’Donnell-Tormey, and following discussion, items I.B.4 through I.B.6 were approved for submission to the Board.

C. CHANCELLOR’S UNIVERSITY REPORT

1. Appointment of Anne Lopes as Interim Provost and Senior Vice President of Academic Affairs at John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

2. Appointment of Reza Fakhari as Vice President for Workforce Development and Strategic Community Partnerships at Kingsborough Community College.

3. Appointment of Nireata Seals as Interim Vice President for Student Affairs at LaGuardia Community College.

4. Appointment of Gregory Mosher as Professor of Theatre at Hunter College with Waiver of §6.2.b. of the Bylaws.

5. Appointment of Carla Shedd as Associate Professor of Urban Education at the CUNY Graduate School and University Center with Waiver of §6.2.b. of the Bylaws.

6. Appointment of Jacqueline Clark as Vice President for Finance and Administration at Medgar Evers College.

Moved by Trustee O’Donnell-Tormey and seconded by Trustee DiMartino, and following discussion, items I.C.1 through I.C.6 were approved for submission to the Board.

II. INFORMATION ITEMS



6

Reappointment with Early Tenure pursuant to §6.2.b.(2) of the Bylaws.

College Name Department Rank Justification Effective

A. City Marit Dewhurst Art Associate

Professor Prolific author of multiple books and publications 9/1/2017

III. FACULTY DIVERSITY REPORT

University Dean Arlene Torres thanked key members of the CUNY community for launching critical conversations leading to a concerted effort. Chancellor Milliken, Executive Vice Chancellor and University Provost Vita Rabinowitz, and Vice Chancellor Waters are working strategically to respond to ongoing concerns about the recruitment and retention of faculty and staff at CUNY. The Board of Trustees and the Committee on Faculty, Staff and Administration (CFSA), in particular, have challenged the CUNY administration and the campuses to be more transparent and accountable for institutional change. The annual affirmative action plans for 2015 and 2016 have served this past year as key data points for the development of quarterly reports on diversity presented to the chancellery, CUNY Board of Trustees, and the general public. The data presented is instructive as it provides information on the status of the workforce, hires, market availability, and underutilization at CUNY by gender, ethnicity, and race, with additional information about disability and veteran status for each campus by rank and academic program. Also, comparative analyses are underway to pinpoint persistent problems and to identify areas where progress has been made. The Office of Recruitment and Diversity (ORD) is currently uploading data for the 2017 affirmative action plan to further advance ORD’s analyses and plans for actions in the future. The reporting process over the past year has helped ORD understand the need for better information systems, training, collection, and dissemination of data points, both quantitative and qualitative, that can help ORD promote change. Earlier this month, for example, ORD convened a group of eighty individuals including deans, department heads, faculty, and chief diversity officers committed to working together to provide training on the search recruitment and hiring process, and to access available resources to diversify the applicant pool and the professoriate at CUNY. While there are challenges, there are multiple strategies underway centrally and across the campuses to retain the University’s faculty.

The report provides an executive summary, the current status of the faculty workforce, and the underutilization of faculty by academic fields for race, ethnicity, and gender for each college.

See attached presentation on the Quarterly Report on Faculty Diversity by University Dean Torres.

In response to a question from Committee Chair Ferrer on whether the data collection is done manually:

University Dean Torres stated that the collection is undertaken manually.

In response to a question from UFS Chair and Trustee Conway on how are the categories created as they do not represent departments:

University Dean Torres stated that each college determines how to create these categories, including blending different departments to create a particular category.

In response to a question from Trustee O’Donnell-Tormey on whether regulation requirements mandate that this report be reviewed at the Board level:



7

Committee Chair Ferrer stated that when he was appointed chair of the Committee he wanted to look at the diversity of the CUNY faculty.

In response to a question from UFS Chair and Trustee Conway on where does the data come from:

Vice Chancellor Waters stated that the campuses draft yearly reports. ORD provides campuses with labor market data so that they compare their workforce to the labor market, and then they come up with their underutilization numbers. This is required as part of the federally mandated affirmative action plan. ORD is looking at ways to utilize information that is in CUNYfirst but the information is currently not accurate enough to produce reports. ORD has been working with the campuses to clean up the data.

Committee Chair Ferrer encouraged Vice Chancellor Waters to acquire the software needed to run relevant reports.

In response to a question from Trustee O’Donnell-Tormey on whether this process can be centralized:

Vice Chancellor Waters stated that the process is specific to each campus because applicants are hired by each campus.

UFS Chair and Trustee Conway, referring to the granularity of the report, stated that this is important information but the Committee does not need to view the report by discipline, by campus. If there are issues by campus, maybe ORD can tackle them one campus at a time.

Committee Chair Ferrer stated that this is an important task as the last time such a report was done, the Committee discovered that there were about a dozen departments across the University that had zero diversity.

Prof. Barnhart stated that he welcomes the granularity of the report, and he would like to be able to use it in terms of hiring.

In response to a question from Prof. Barnhart on how the data comes from the labor market:

Vice Chancellor Waters stated that the labor market data is received by discipline but it is just a preliminary place to look at information.

UFS Chair and Trustee Conway stated that this faculty diversity report should only be an update to follow-up on an earlier report.

Committee Chair Ferrer noted that Chancellor Milliken appointed a taskforce, and stated that he would extend an invitation to the presidents of the taskforce to attend the next CFSA meeting to share their work because the Committee and the taskforce should be on a parallel track.

In response to a question from UFS Chair and Trustee Conway on where does CUNY stand on the workforce in terms of the University’s ability to be competitive and hire faculty:

University Dean Torres stated that the department chairs need to ask their deans and provosts that question. If the salaries are such that CUNY cannot compete, then that conversation needs to be had.

In response to another question from UFS Chair and Trustee Conway on what would be the next steps, assuming the question has been asked:

President Keizs stated that those are some of the things the taskforce will be discussing.



8

Vice Chancellor Waters pointed out that this activity takes place on campus at the department level. ORD really needs department chairs to provide information and then give them the tools. It will vary from discipline to discipline. There is a lot of conversation that needs to take place. The faculty has to own this.

Prof. Barnhart stated that the faculty cares a great deal about this but there needs to be some required translational process whereby what is being presented at the Committee level gets reinterpreted at the campus level in such a way that it becomes a topic of discussion at the campus level.

Committee Chair Ferrer reiterated that Chancellor Milliken has appointed a presidential level taskforce, and stated that the Committee is now discussing concerns and beginning to measure them. The Committee will continue to measure concerns as it provokes conversation. He added that the numbers will get a little better because the Committee will look carefully at how the technology is serving or not serving CUNY.

University Dean Torres stated that ORD conducted a survey on how knowledgeable the faculty are on search guidelines. Over fifty percent of the faculty said they had never seen a search guide. There were faculty members who were search chairs, who had never carefully looked at the guidelines for an appropriate search. There were faculty members who had not looked at the multiple resources that are available to recruit in a particular field and they used standard recruiting sources, never having analyzed whether or not the money that they were spending on it was even effective. So the challenge is to be supportive and to indicate that the Central Office has some resources, and ORD is available to help, but the campuses also have resources, and they have to take ownership of the process. ORD has to encourage the ownership of the process at every level. Faculty governance is critical, and faculty involvement in the searches is key, but those very faculty members have to be informed, and they have to get the support of their deans, provosts, and presidents. It seems that there is not enough communication or basic training, and on where the resources are to be effective. This is just a first step.

UFS Chair and Trustee Conway stated that some of the community colleges are doing a good job but would hate to think that the University is only hiring diverse faculty at the community colleges where faculty are paid less. UFS Chair and Trustee Conway wants to ensure that CUNY is hiring diverse faculty everywhere, including making sure that the faculty leading searches are well-informed. UFS Chair and Trustee Conway stated that ORD should provide the CUNY faculty with the available resources so that it can be put in the hands of department chairs.

In response to a question from Prof. Barnhart on whether those leaving CUNY are disproportionately minority, or women:

University Dean Torres stated that as ORD looked at the separations—the number of faculty of color who are separating because of non-reappointment or resignation—there is no explanation as to why the resignations are at a much greater rate among faculty of color than their white counterparts.

In response to more questions from Prof. Barnhart on a) whether the non-reappointments are in the majority or whether the resignations are in the majority, and b) could the resignations be because better offers were received from elsewhere:

University Dean Torres stated that she has no way of knowing that but ORD is now conducting exit surveys to get a better sense of those resignations and the reasons for leaving the institution.

UFS Chair and Trustee Conway noted that she had a meeting with University Dean Torres and asked the same question as Prof. Barnhart. When she did the numbers, 40 percent of CUNY’s non-traditional or underrepresented faculty have resigned, compared to 29.2 percent for white faculty, and they retired at lower rates but resigned earlier and were not reappointed at almost double the rate. Also, she questioned about exit interviews and was told that they are not being done consistently across campuses.



9

University Dean Torres stated that ORD has made the Chancellor’s working group aware of this and they are extremely supportive of having mandatory exit surveys be required at all the campuses so that ORD gets better data.

President Keizs gave a brief statement about the importance of having early intervention through professional development at the campuses as they give solid guidance on what the evaluation expectations are.

UFS Chair and Trustee Conway reiterated President Keizs’ point and stated that there should be better training on how to write evaluations.

University Dean Torres stated that ORD recognizes some of the concerns but gets a great deal of pushback because there are faculty governance issues and concerns about the central administration making recommendations as opposed to mandating certain kinds of initiatives. She added that as University Dean, it is her responsibility to make sure that she works vigorously to retain the faculty and when she cannot make the interventions with a department head she teaches the faculty how to engage proactively for themselves. ORD has very limited resources at the Central Office to do that, and can only manage to support 50 to 60 faculty. University Dean Torres stated that it would be wonderful if CUNY supported all faculty across the campuses by partnering with the Central Office to have that level of mentorship. Retention would be a very different story.

Committee Chair Ferrer suggested that the Committee receive a fuller analysis of the issues that were previously discussed, and stated that the Committee needs to be prepared to propose new ideas at its next meeting.

President Keizs noted that the taskforce may very well be ready to give the Committee, at its next meeting, an idea of what is being done and to get some endorsement or expand ideas.

Upon motion duly made by Committee Chair Ferrer and seconded by Prof. Barnhart, the meeting was adjourned at 7:44 p.m.

I-B-1

THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK

Revised Pre-Tenure Review Policy WHEREAS, In 2011 the University adopted a pre-tenure review policy, following the lead of a number of CUNY colleges that had similar policies; and WHEREAS, Following the adoption of the 2011 policy, the Professional Staff Congress/CUNY filed an improper practice charge with the New York State Public Employment Relations Board, alleging that the pre-tenure review policy should have been a subject of collective bargaining; and WHEREAS, The University denied that it had engaged in an improper practice charge, but entered into discussions with the Professional Staff Congress/CUNY regarding the terms of the policy; and WHEREAS, The University and the PSC were able to reach a settlement agreement resolving the improper practice charge, pursuant to which the University agreed to make some modest changes to the original policy, therefore be it RESOLVED, That the Board of Trustees adopt the following revised policy for pre-tenure review of tenure-track faculty, effective immediately, which shall supersede the policy adopted on February 28, 2011: There shall be a Dean’s review for each untenured tenure-track faculty member in his/her third year of service. Such review will be conducted as follows:

1. Toward the end of the spring semester, after the department chair’s annual evaluation

memorandum but before the spring commencement, the dean of the appropriate school, division, or other academic unit in which the faculty member serves (or if there is no such dean, the appropriate academic administrator designated by the President) shall review the professional record of the faculty member.

2. The professional record shall consist of all materials used by the chair in creating the

third-year annual evaluation memorandum, plus the third-year evaluation and the contents of the faculty member’s personnel file. No additional documentation shall be required. The record will not include any external reviews.

3. If the Dean believes the total academic performance of the faculty member is not

sufficiently set forth in the third-year annual evaluation memorandum, the Dean shall prepare a draft memorandum to the department chair that specifies the strengths and weaknesses of the faculty member’s total academic performance in light of the criteria for tenure consistent with established University policies. The Dean shall share the draft with the department chair and discuss it, after which a copy of the draft memorandum shall be sent to the faculty member.

I-B-1

4. Thereafter, there shall be a meeting with the faculty member to discuss the draft memorandum. The college shall decide whether the meeting is with the Dean or the department chair. If the faculty member requests it, the Dean (if the meeting is with the chair) or the chair (if the meeting is with the Dean) shall also be included at the meeting.

5. Within ten (10) days after the meeting set forth in paragraph 4, the Dean shall issue a

final memorandum to the department chair with a copy to the faculty member. The department chair shall have the faculty member initial the Dean’s memorandum solely to show receipt of the Dean’s memorandum and place it in the faculty member’s personal personnel file. The faculty member shall retain all rights under Articles 19 and 20 of the PSC/CUNY collective bargaining agreement.

6. A College President may choose to conduct the Dean’s review for all affected faculty

in the fall or spring of the faculty member’s fourth year of service instead of the third year of service with notice to the faculty in which case all references to the third year in this procedure will refer to the year in which the evaluation is conducted.

EXPLANATION: In 2011, the University adopted a pre-tenure review policy, following the lead of a number of CUNY colleges that had similar policies. Faculty members are considered for tenure at the beginning of their seventh continuous year of service, and it is critical that they receive feedback well in advance of the tenure decision as to the strengths and weaknesses of their performance in light of the University’s tenure standards. The pre-tenure review, conducted at the end of the faculty member’s third year, is a mechanism for providing faculty members with such feedback, in addition to the performance reviews contained in the faculty member’s annual evaluations. Under the pre-tenure review process, a Dean reviews the faculty member’s record and writes a memorandum to the faculty member about his/her total academic performance; the memorandum is then discussed with the faculty member and placed in the faculty member’s personnel file. Following the adoption of the 2011 policy, the Professional Staff Congress/CUNY and the University entered into discussions about the policy and reached an agreement that involved some modest changes to the original policy. These changes are consistent with the purpose of the original policy and prior college policies. The revised policy also improves upon the original policy by providing flexibility for a college to conduct the pre-tenure review in a faculty member’s fourth year of service rather than the third year, and by having the Dean’s memorandum start as a draft and become finalized only after the meeting with the faculty member.

I-B-1 Redlined Attachment

[February 28, 2011]


Pre-Tenure Review Policy

There shall be a dean’s review for each untenured tenure-track faculty member in his/her third year of service. Such review will be conducted as follows:

1. Toward the end of the spring semester, after the department chair’s annual evaluation

memorandum but before the spring commencement, the dean of the appropriate school, division, or other academic unit in which the faculty member serves (or if there is no such dean, the appropriate academic administrator designated by the President) shall review the professional record of the faculty member.

2. The professional record shall consist of all materials used by the chair in creating the

third-year annual evaluation memorandum, plus the third-year evaluation and the contents of the faculty member’s personnel file. No additional documentation shall be required. The record will not include any external reviews.

In order to ensure that each tenure-track faculty member has adequate guidance on the progress he/she is making towards meeting the standards for tenure, the school, divisional or other appropriate dean or academic administrator designated by the President (hereinafter the "Dean") shall review each such faculty member at the end of his or her third year of service. 3. If the dean believes the total academic performance of the faculty member is not

sufficiently set forth in the third-year annual evaluation memorandum, the dean shall prepare a draft memorandum to the department chair that specifies the strengths and weaknesses of the faculty member’s total academic performance in light of the criteria for tenure consistent with established University policies. The dean shall share the draft with the department chair and discuss it, after which a copy of the draft memorandum shall be sent to the faculty member.

The Dean shall review the personal personnel file of each untenured tenure-track faculty member in the spring of his/her third year of service, following the annual evaluation conducted pursuant to the PSC/CUNY collective bargaining agreement. Thereafter, the Dean shall meet with the chairperson of the faculty member's department to discuss the faculty member's progress. After that meeting, the Dean shall prepare a memorandum to the department chairperson regarding the faculty member's progress toward tenure and setting forth recommendations for any additional guidance to be provided to the faculty member. 4. Thereafter, there shall be a meeting with the faculty member to discuss the draft

memorandum. The college shall decide whether the meeting is with the dean or the department chair. If the faculty member requests it, the dean (if the meeting is with the chair) or the chair (if the meeting is with the dean) shall also be included at the meeting.

I-B-1 Redlined Attachment

[February 28, 2011]

The Dean's memorandum shall be provided to the faculty member and discussed with him/her by the department chairperson and/or the Dean. Following the meeting, the Dean may, where appropriate, attach an addendum to the memorandum based on the Dean's participation in the meeting or the department chairperson's report of the meeting to the Dean. In accordance with the procedures set forth in the collective bargaining agreement between the University and the Professional Staff Congress, the faculty member shall be asked to initial the Dean's memorandum and addendum, if any, before it is placed in his/her file, and the faculty member shall have the right to include in his/her personnel file any comments he or she has concerning the Dean's memorandum. 5. Within ten (10) days after the meeting set forth in paragraph 4, the dean shall issue a

final memorandum to the department chair with a copy to the faculty member. The department chair shall have the faculty member initial the dean’s memorandum solely to show receipt of the dean’s memorandum and place it in the faculty member’s personal personnel file. The faculty member shall retain all rights under Articles 19 and 20 of the PSC/CUNY collective bargaining agreement.

6. The appropriate body at each college may adopt implementation procedures that are

consistent with this policy. Such procedures may provide, for example, whether the discussion of the Dean's memorandum with the faculty member will be conducted by the department chairperson, the Dean or both and whether the faculty member may have a choice in the matter. In addition, notwithstanding the provision as to the timing of the review set forth above, a college governance body may choose to provide for this review more than once prior to the year of tenure decision, in which case the review shall occur at appropriate intervals and not necessarily at the end of the third year.A college president may choose to conduct the dean’s review for all affected faculty in the fall or spring of the faculty member’s fourth year of service instead of the third year of service with notice to the faculty in which case all references to the third year in this procedure will refer to the year in which the evaluation is conducted.

I-B-2

THE CUNY SCHOOL OF LAW

Amendments to the Governance Plan WHEREAS, The CUNY School of Law formerly was affiliated with Queens College; and WHEREAS, The CUNY School of Law is no longer affiliated with Queens College; now therefore be it RESOLVED, That the proposed amendments to the Governance Plan of The CUNY School of Law be adopted, effective October 24, 2017. EXPLANATION: The proposed amendments to the Governance Plan of the CUNY School of Law consist of technical revisions to remove references to Queens College. At one time the Law School was affiliated with Queens College, but it is no longer part of the College. The current Governance Plan incorrectly refers to the Law School as “the CUNY School of Law at Queens College.” The revised plan would instead refer to “the CUNY School of Law.” These technical amendments are requested by the Dean of the Law School.

I-B-2 Redlined

GOVERNANCE PLANTH E C ITY U N IV E R S ITY O F N E W Y O R K SCHOOL OF LAW AT QUEENS COLLEGE

I. INTRODUCTION

A. PURPOSES

1. The central purpose of The City University School of Law at Queens College (the “Law School”) is to create an educational program that will train students for the practice of law in the service of human needs and honor students’ aspirations toward building a legal career that reflects their commitment toward justice, fairness, and equality. The organization of work and life at the Law School is designed to encourage students to think actively about their life choices, their evolving concept of professionalism, and the content and processes of the law itself, in ways that foster their capacity to practice law in a socially useful manner.

2. This Governance Plan is intended to provide a governance system for the Law School that facilitates the realization of this commitment. This Governance Plan should be read consistent with the Bylaws of the Board of Trustees of The City University of New York, and nothing in this Plan should be read as inconsistent with the Bylaws of the Board of Trustees unless specifically so stated in this Governance Plan. The procedures that follow seek to encourage a spirit of relationship, trust, and community that operates within a framework of rules. The rules are designed to provide a framework within which people motivated by a sense of shared mission can operate in a manner that encourages responsibility and participation by all members of the Law School community.

3. In order to serve these ends, a governance system needs to respect both democratic modes of participation and an institutional authority that enables the Law School to maintain a coherent and coordinated expression of its purpose.

B. STATUS WITHIN THE CITY UNIVERSITY

1. The City University School of Law at Queens College is a unit of The City University of New York (“The City University”). The Law School is a constituent element, similar to a college of The City University and shall have ties to all institutions within The City University.

C. TITLES AND DEFINITIONS

1. The Board or Board of Trustees means the Board of Trustees of The City University of New York.

[Amended Dec. 9, 2008, approved by CUNY Board of Trustees March 23, 2009. Amended by faculty on May 6, 2016, approved by CUNY Board of Trustees June 27, 2016, eff. July 1, 2016. Amended by faculty on September 9, 2016, approved by CUNY Board of Trustees January 20, 2017, eff. January 31, 2017.]

2

2. The authorization and definition of titles for faculty, permanent Instructional staff, other instructional staff, and classified (non-instructional) staff at the Law School shall include only those titles authorized and defined in the Bylaws of the Board of Trustees.

3. Notices of reappointment at the Law School shall be handled in accordance with the Bylaws of the Board.

4. The term “administrative staff” or “administrators” shall mean full-time members of the instructional staff within the meaning of Section 6.1 of the Board of Trustees’ Bylaws who are not members of the faculty.

5. The term “support staff” refers to persons, other than students enrolled at the Law School, who are working full-time at the School, or who have worked part-time, at least 10 hours per week, at the School for at least six months, and are not members of the instructional staff.

II. THE DEAN

A. AUTHORITY OF THE DEAN

1. The Dean of The City University School of Law at Queens College shall be the chief educational and administrative officer of the Law School. The Dean of the Law School shall be a member of the CUNY Council of Presidents and shall have, subject to the provisions and exceptions contained in this Governance Plan, the duties and responsibilities of a college president as stated in Section 11.4 of the Board of Trustees Bylaws and other policies and resolutions of the Board. The Dean of the Law School shall have, subject to the provisions and exceptions contained in this Governance Plan, all of the rights and responsibilities of a president relative to all collective bargaining agreements, rules and regulations of CUNY Classified Service and all other policies and procedures issued by the City University of New York.

2. The Dean may be removed by the Board upon the recommendation of the Chancellor after consultation with the faculty of the Law School. The Dean of the Law School shall be a tenured member of the Law faculty.


3

3. The Dean of the Law School shall exercise all the responsibilities customarily exercised by law school deans. He/she shall consult with and report to the Chancellor. He/she shall have the affirmative responsibility for developing the academic program, enhancing the educational standards and assuring the academic excellence of the Law School. Such responsibility shall include but not be limited to the following duties:

a. to recommend, as stated in this Governance Plan, the appointment, promotion, and tenure of persons who will contribute to the improvement of the Law School program. These recommendations shall be consistent with the immediate and long-range objectives of the Law School;

b. to advise the Chancellor and the Board of Trustees on matters concerning the program of the Law School;

c. to provide advice concerning other law-related programs within The City University and to make recommendations on the development and operation of such programs;

d. to supervise and manage the work of the Law School faculty and employees, and to carry into effect the Bylaws, resolutions and policies of the Board of Trustees;

e. to prepare and implement a long-range plan for the Law School;

f. to act as chairperson of the faculty of the Law School and the Law School Committee on Personnel and Budget;

g. to review and recommend to the Chancellor and other appropriate officials the actions of the Law School faculty on matters of curriculum and other matters falling under faculty jurisdiction;

h. to consult with appropriate faculty committees on matters of appointments, reappointments, and promotions, taking systemic student evaluations into account;

i. to develop Law School activities that enhance the Law School’s


4

involvement and reputation in the legal community;

j. to develop integrated courses of study with law-related disciplines;k. to prepare and present an annual Law School budget to the Chancellor; l. to appoint such ad hoc and/or special committees as appropriate.

B. APPOINTMENT AND REAPPOINTMENT OF THE DEAN

1. When a vacancy occurs or is expected in the office of the Dean of the Law School, a Search Committee shall be established under the Board guidelines for Presidential searches.

2. A committee which will be constituted in the same fashion as a Presidential Review Committee will be appointed at the beginning of every fifth year of a Dean’s term to serve as a Review Committee to review the Dean’s performance. This committee will make a report to the Chancellor.

III. THE FACULTY

A. ORGANIZATION AND DUTIES

1. The faculty of the Law School will meet monthly, during the academic year, on the dates set forth in a calendar distributed at the start of each semester by the Dean. The faculty shall also meet on call of the Dean or upon the petition of 1/3 of the faculty, and the Dean will preside at its meetings. Within general policies established by the Board of Trustees, through its Bylaws, resolutions, policies, rules, regulations, and this Governance Plan, the Dean and Faculty of the Law School shall have the responsibility for formulating and administering the program of the School including such matters as faculty selection, retention, promotion and tenure; curriculum; methods of instruction; admission policies; and academic standards of retention, advancement and graduation of students.

2. The presence of a majority of the voting faculty shall constitute a quorum. A quorum shall be necessary for the transaction of any business.


5

Business shall be conducted in accordance with Robert’s Rules of Order, latest edition. Minutes shall be kept of all meetings. The faculty may adopt such additional procedures for the discharge of its responsibilities under this Governance Plan, as it may deem necessary, subject to the approval of the Dean.

3. The agenda for the regular monthly faculty meeting shall be proposed by the Dean and distributed to the faculty within a reasonable time prior to the meeting. Any member of the faculty may add items to New Business. The proposed agenda shall be adopted by the faculty, by a vote of a majority of those present if a quorum is present, at the beginning of each faculty meeting and may be amended by the faculty by the same vote prior to its adoption. Once adopted the agenda may be amended in any manner by a 2/3 vote.

4. A faculty member who misses three regular faculty meetings during an academic year shall not be entitled to vote nor be counted towards a quorum at all faculty meetings for the remainder of the academic year in which the third absence occurs. Faculty members facing the loss of voting rights may appeal to the remaining voting faculty for a waiver of this rule by providing good and sufficient reasons. The waiver shall be granted if 2/3 of faculty present at a faculty meeting vote to approve the waiver.

5. The student government is authorized to elect three students, one from each class, who must be in good standing, to serve as ex-officio members of the faculty for the purpose of faculty meetings. The student government is also authorized to elect students in good standing to be the student members of faculty committees, except where otherwise specified by this Governance Plan or the Bylaws or resolutions of the Board of Trustees. All elected students must remain in good standing to retain their seats on committees or in student government; all serve for a one-year term and may be reelected. No student may serve in more than two elected positions under this Governance Plan, including student government, at a time. When a vacancy occurs, the student government may fill the vacant seat for the remainder of the term.

B. FACULTY COMMITTEES


6

The Faculty committees shall be those specified below and shall also include any additional committees created from time to time by action of the Faculty or the Dean.

1. The Personnel and Budget Committee

a. The Law School shall establish a Personnel and Budget Committee which shall be composed of five persons. Members of the Personnel and Budget Committee shall be Law School faculty members elected in accordance with the Bylaws and written policies of the Board of Trustees and one second or third year student elected by the students as a non-voting member. The manner of constituting the committee, and the procedure to be followed by it, shall be subject to the approval of the Dean of the Law School. This committee shall review all recommendations for appointment and reappointment, with or without tenure, to the faculty, and promotion in rank, special salary increases and increments, and applications for fellowship and other leaves. Additionally, the Committee on Committees may appoint other committees, when needed, to review faculty candidates and to develop reports, make factual findings, and make recommendations to the P & B on reappointment, tenure, and/or promotion. Upon receiving these reports and the factual record underlying them, the P & B shall make an independent assessment and recommendation to the Dean. These other committees shall review candidates’ qualifications under the policies and standards of the City University of New York as set forth in the Bylaws, personnel policies, and resolutions of the Board of Trustees of the City University of New York. It shall recommend action thereon to the Dean. The Dean of the Law School will be one of the five members of the Law School Personnel and Budget Committee and shall serve as Chair.

2. Faculty Search Committees and Faculty Appointments

The Dean, in consultation with the Personnel and Budget Committee, shall establish such Faculty Search Committees as are appropriate. All Faculty Search Committees shall adopt and follow appropriate procedures in order to assure compliance with The City University Affirmative Action policies and procedures. The Dean shall appoint a student member to each Search


7

Committee.

b. A Faculty Search Committee shall report its recommendations to the faculty for discussion and then to the Dean. The Dean shall review the recommendations and make his or her own recommendation regarding each faculty appointment to the Personnel and Budget Committee.

c. The Personnel and Budget Committee shall review the recommendations of the Dean, consult with the full-time tenured and tenure-track faculty, and shall make its own recommendation regarding each faculty appointment to the Dean.

d. The Dean shall review the recommendations of the Personnel and Budget Committee and shall recommend to the Chancellor for appointment, only those persons who he/she is reasonably certain will contribute to the improvement of the academic excellence of the Law School.

e. The Chancellor will review the Dean’s recommendations in accordance with Section C of this Article.

3. Faculty Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure Review Procedures

a. The Personnel and Budget Committee and all other committees charged with the review of faculty shall review all candidates’ qualifications under the policies and standards of The City University as set forth in the Bylaws, personnel policies, and resolutions of the Board of Trustees of The City University of New York.

b. The Dean shall review the affirmative recommendation(s) of the Personnel and Budget Committee and shall recommend to the Chancellor for reappointment, promotion, and tenure only those persons who he/she is reasonably certain will contribute to the improvement of the academic excellence at the Law School.

c. The Chancellor shall review the Dean’s affirmative recommendations in accordance with Section C of this Article.


8

4. The Admissions & Admissions Policy Committee

The Admissions & Admissions Policy Committee shall include the Assistant Dean for Enrollment Management and Director of Admissions, not fewer than three faculty, and two students who are members of the second or third year classes. Faculty appointments shall be for a term of two years.

a. The Admissions & Admissions Policy Committee shall review individual candidates for admission and recommend admissions policy, subject to the approval of the faculty, the Dean and the Chancellor.

b. No applicant may be admitted by the Law School except on the affirmative vote of the Admissions & Admissions Policy Committee. The Committee shall follow procedures that have been approved by the faculty and the Dean.

5. Scholastic Standards and Academic Standing Committee

a. The membership of the Scholastic Standards and Academic Standing Committee shall include an Associate Dean, who shall chair the Committee, not fewer than four faculty members and two third-year students.

b. The Committee shall review policies and procedures concerning scholastic standards and assist in the development of academic support systems for students.

c. The Committee shall apply the academic standards of the Law School to individual students from the time of admission until the granting of the Juris Doctor. The Committee will receive and act upon student appeals relating to academic matters.

6. The Curriculum Committee

a. The Curriculum Committee shall be composed of not fewer than four faculty and three student members. The term of all faculty members shall


9

be two years.

b. The Curriculum Committee shall have authority to consider all proposals to review, modify, or develop the course of study for each of the years of the program, and all proposals relating to the educational program; including, but not limited to, evaluation of student work and scheduling.

7. Committee on Committees

a. A Committee on Committees shall be constituted each year, consisting of the Dean, two faculty members elected by the faculty, one student elected by the student government and one staff member elected by the administrative and support staff.

b. The Committee shall recommend, except with respect to committees that consider personnel matters or where specified in this Governance Plan or the Bylaws of the Board of Trustees, how many, if any, members of the faculty, administrative staff, and support staff shall be nominated to each committee. The Committee shall also propose nominations for membership and chair for each committee that shall be submitted to the faculty for election, substitution or addition. Except where the Board of Trustee Bylaws or resolutions are to the contrary, the normal term of office for faculty members on committees shall be two years and for students, one year. Committee members may be reelected unless the charge of the committee or rules of the Board of Trustees limits a member's term.

C. APPOINTMENTS AND REAPPOINTMENTS TO, AND PROMOTIONS WITHIN, THE INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF PROCEDURE

1. All appointments and reappointments, including reappointments with tenure, to, and promotions within the instructional staff, except where otherwise provided, shall be recommended to the Dean who shall review the recommendations and recommend to the Chancellor only those persons who he/she is reasonably certain will contribute to the academic excellence of the Law School.

2. The Chancellor shall review the Dean’s affirmative recommendations


10

and shall recommend to the Board of Trustees for appointment, reappointment, promotion and/or tenure only those persons who he/she is reasonably certain will contribute to the improvement of the academic excellence at the Law School.

D. APPEALS

1. A Faculty member may appeal a negative decision of the Personnel and Budget Committee regarding his or her candidacy to the Dean, who shall consider, decide and notify the candidate regarding the appeal.


11

IV. APPOINTMENT AND REAPPOINTMENT OF EXECUTIVES AND ADMINISTRATORS

A. INITIAL PROCESS FOR APPOINTMENT AND REAPPOINTMENT OF ADMINISTRATORS OTHER THAN THOSE IN EXECUTIVE PAY PLAN TITLES

1. Proposed appointments, other than acting or substitute appointments, to positions on the administrative staff shall be reviewed initially, after a search, by the Dean.

There shall be an Administrative Screening and Review Committee. The Dean shall make his/her recommendations to the Administrative Screening and Review Committee. The members of the Administrative Screening and Review Committee shall be appointed by the Dean and shall consist of no fewer than five members, one of whom must be a classified staff member, and at least one of whom must hold a professorial appointment, and a majority of whom must be administrators. Service on this committee will be for two years. An Associate Dean shall chair the Administrative Screening and Review Committee.

2. The Committee will review proposed appointments and reappointments, and proposed title and salary recommendations, for administrative positions to assure that the applicable University standards have been met and that rates of pay for members of the Law School administrative staff take into account comparable rates at metropolitan area law schools and other institutions in The City University and, to the extent practicable, are commensurate for those with comparable tasks and comparable experiences within The City University. The Committee shall make its recommendation to the Dean. The Dean shall review those recommendations in making his/her own recommendation to the Chancellor for appointment or reappointment.

B. EVALUATION OF ADMINISTRATORS OTHER THAN THOSE IN EXECUTIVE PAY PLAN TITLES

Evaluation of the work of persons on the administrative staff is ultimately


12

the responsibility of the Dean. The Dean, in consultation with the Administrative Screening and Review Committee as outlined in Section A above, may recommend for appointment or reappointment persons holding such titles in accordance with established University procedures.

C. APPOINTMENT OF PERSONS HOLDING PROFESSORIAL TITLES TO ADMINISTRATIVE DUTIES OTHER THAN THOSE IN EXECUTIVE PAY PLAN TITLES

1. The Administrative Screening and Review Committee of the Law School may recommend to the Dean that an administrative position be filled by an individual whose title is law school instructor, law school assistant professor, law school associate professor, law school professor, or law school lecturer. Such recommendation may, but need not, include a recommendation that the person receive a change in remuneration for work in that title.

2. If the Dean concurs with their recommendation he/she may make such a recommendation to the Chancellor in accordance with the procedures for appointments to the instructional staff.

D. APPEALS

1. An administrator may appeal a negative decision of the Administrative Screening and Review Committee regarding his or her candidacy to the Dean, who shall consider, decide, and notify the candidate regarding the appeal.

V. BOARD OF VISITORS

A. There shall be a Board of Visitors for The City University School of Law at Queens College appointed by the Chancellor. The Board of Visitors shall be made up of distinguished jurists, lawyers, scholars, and other interested persons. Its role will be to advise the Law School about its academic program, its role in the community, placement of graduates and the like. It shall assist the Dean, the Chancellor and the Board of Trustees in all aspects of the Law School’s development efforts. It shall serve as a


13

liaison between the Law School, the legal profession, and the public and private groups, which are served by the legal profession and participate in the legal process.

B. Members of the Board of Visitors will be appointed for three-year terms upon the recommendation of the Dean of the Law School, with the concurrence of the Chancellor.

C. The membership of the Board of Visitors should reflect the Law School’s role in the Borough of Queens, in the City, the State, and the Nation. The Board of Visitors shall be governed by Bylaws promulgated by the Board of Visitors.

VI. AMENDMENTS

A. AMENDMENT PROCEDURE

1. Amendments to this Governance Plan may be recommended by the Faculty, the Dean, or the Chancellor. Any recommendations which originate in the Law School Faculty must be first submitted to the Dean for consideration. The Dean shall review the Faculty recommendation(s). Any recommendation in whole or in part approved by the Dean or any modification thereof that the Dean determines to be in the best interests of the Law School shall be recommended to the Chancellor for further consideration.

2. The Chancellor shall review the Dean’s recommendations. Any recommendation in whole or in part approved by the Chancellor or any modification thereof that the Chancellor determines to be in the best interests of the Law School shall be recommended to the Board for approval.

3. No change in this Governance Plan shall be implemented until it has been adopted by the Board.

[Amended Dec. 9, 2008, approved by CUNY Board of Trustees March 23,


14

2009. Amended by faculty on May 6, 2016, approved by CUNY Board of Trustees June 27, 2016, eff. July 1, 2016. Amended by faculty on September 9, 2016, approved by CUNY Board of Trustees January 20, 2017, eff. January 31, 2017.]

I-B-2 FINAL


THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK SCHOOL OF LAW

GOVERNANCE PLAN

I. INTRODUCTION

A. PURPOSES

1. The central purpose of The City University School of Law (the “Law School”) is to create an educational program that will train students for the practice of law in the service of human needs and honor students’ aspirations toward building a legal career that reflects their commitment toward justice, fairness, and equality. The organization of work and life at the Law School is designed to encourage students to think actively about their life choices, their evolving concept of professionalism, and the content and processes of the law itself, in ways that foster their capacity to practice law in a socially useful manner.

2. This Governance Plan is intended to provide a governance system for the Law School that facilitates the realization of this commitment. This Governance Plan should be read consistent with the Bylaws of the Board of Trustees of The City University of New York, and nothing in this Plan should be read as inconsistent with the Bylaws of the Board of Trustees unless specifically so stated in this Governance Plan. The procedures that follow seek to encourage a spirit of relationship, trust, and community that operates within a framework of rules. The rules are designed to provide a framework within which people motivated by a sense of shared mission can operate in a manner that encourages responsibility and participation by all members of the Law School community.

3. In order to serve these ends, a governance system needs to respect both democratic modes of participation and an institutional authority that enables the Law School to maintain a coherent and coordinated expression of its purpose.

B. STATUS WITHIN THE CITY UNIVERSITY

1. The City University School of Law is a unit of The City University of New York (“The City University”). The Law School is a constituent element, similar to a college of The City University and shall have ties to all institutions within The City University.

I-B-2 FINAL


C. TITLES AND DEFINITIONS

1. The Board or Board of Trustees means the Board of Trustees of The City University of New York.

2. The authorization and definition of titles for faculty, permanent Instructional staff, other instructional staff, and classified (non-instructional) staff at the Law School shall include only those titles authorized and defined in the Bylaws of the Board of Trustees.

3. Notices of reappointment at the Law School shall be handled in accordance with the Bylaws of the Board.

4. The term “administrative staff” or “administrators” shall mean full-time members of the instructional staff within the meaning of Section 6.1 of the Board of Trustees’ Bylaws who are not members of the faculty.

5. The term “support staff” refers to persons, other than students enrolled at the Law School, who are working full-time at the School, or who have worked part-time, at least 10 hours per week, at the School for at least six months, and are not members of the instructional staff.

II. THE DEAN

A. AUTHORITY OF THE DEAN

1. The Dean of The City University School of Law shall be the chief educational and administrative officer of the Law School. The Dean of the Law School shall be a member of the CUNY Council of Presidents and shall have, subject to the provisions and exceptions contained in this Governance Plan, the duties and responsibilities of a college president as stated in Section 11.4 of the Board of Trustees Bylaws and other policies and resolutions of the Board. The Dean of the Law School shall have, subject to the provisions and exceptions contained in this Governance Plan, all of the rights and responsibilities of a president relative to all collective bargaining agreements, rules and regulations of CUNY Classified Service and all other policies and procedures issued by the City University of New York.

2. The Dean may be removed by the Board upon the recommendation of

I-B-2 FINAL


the Chancellor after consultation with the faculty of the Law School. The Dean of the Law School shall be a tenured member of the Law faculty.

3. The Dean of the Law School shall exercise all the responsibilities customarily exercised by law school deans. He/she shall consult with and report to the Chancellor. He/she shall have the affirmative responsibility for developing the academic program, enhancing the educational standards and assuring the academic excellence of the Law School. Such responsibility shall include but not be limited to the following duties:

a. to recommend, as stated in this Governance Plan, the appointment, promotion, and tenure of persons who will contribute to the improvement of the Law School program. These recommendations shall be consistent with the immediate and long-range objectives of the Law School;

b. to advise the Chancellor and the Board of Trustees on matters concerning the program of the Law School;

c. to provide advice concerning other law-related programs within The City University and to make recommendations on the development and operation of such programs;

d. to supervise and manage the work of the Law School faculty and employees, and to carry into effect the Bylaws, resolutions and policies of the Board of Trustees;

e. to prepare and implement a long-range plan for the Law School;

f. to act as chairperson of the faculty of the Law School and the Law School Committee on Personnel and Budget;

g. to review and recommend to the Chancellor and other appropriate officials the actions of the Law School faculty on matters of curriculum and other matters falling under faculty jurisdiction;

h. to consult with appropriate faculty committees on matters of appointments, reappointments, and promotions, taking systemic student evaluations into account;

i. to develop Law School activities that enhance the Law School’s involvement and reputation in the legal community;

I-B-2 FINAL


j. to develop integrated courses of study with law-related disciplines;

k. to prepare and present an annual Law School budget to the Chancellor;

l. to appoint such ad hoc and/or special committees as appropriate.

B. APPOINTMENT AND REAPPOINTMENT OF THE DEAN

1. When a vacancy occurs or is expected in the office of the Dean of the Law School, a Search Committee shall be established under the Board guidelines for Presidential searches.

2. A committee which will be constituted in the same fashion as a Presidential Review Committee will be appointed at the beginning of every fifth year of a Dean’s term to serve as a Review Committee to review the Dean’s performance. This committee will make a report to the Chancellor.

III. THE FACULTY

A. ORGANIZATION AND DUTIES

1. The faculty of the Law School will meet monthly, during the academic year, on the dates set forth in a calendar distributed at the start of each semester by the Dean. The faculty shall also meet on call of the Dean or upon the petition of 1/3 of the faculty, and the Dean will preside at its meetings. Within general policies established by the Board of Trustees, through its Bylaws, resolutions, policies, rules, regulations, and this Governance Plan, the Dean and Faculty of the Law School shall have the responsibility for formulating and administering the program of the School including such matters as faculty selection, retention, promotion and tenure; curriculum; methods of instruction; admission policies; and academic standards of retention, advancement and graduation of students.

2. The presence of a majority of the voting faculty shall constitute a quorum. A quorum shall be necessary for the transaction of any business. Business shall be conducted in accordance with Robert’s Rules of Order, latest edition. Minutes shall be kept of all meetings. The faculty may adopt such additional procedures for the discharge of its responsibilities under this Governance Plan, as it may deem necessary, subject to the approval of the Dean.

I-B-2 FINAL


3. The agenda for the regular monthly faculty meeting shall be proposed by the Dean and distributed to the faculty within a reasonable time prior to the meeting. Any member of the faculty may add items to New Business. The proposed agenda shall be adopted by the faculty, by a vote of a majority of those present if a quorum is present, at the beginning of each faculty meeting and may be amended by the faculty by the same vote prior to its adoption. Once adopted the agenda may be amended in any manner by a 2/3 vote.

4. A faculty member who misses three regular faculty meetings during an academic year shall not be entitled to vote nor be counted towards a quorum at all faculty meetings for the remainder of the academic year in which the third absence occurs. Faculty members facing the loss of voting rights may appeal to the remaining voting faculty for a waiver of this rule by providing good and sufficient reasons. The waiver shall be granted if 2/3 of faculty present at a faculty meeting vote to approve the waiver.

5. The student government is authorized to elect three students, one from each class, who must be in good standing, to serve as ex-officio members of the faculty for the purpose of faculty meetings. The student government is also authorized to elect students in good standing to be the student members of faculty committees, except where otherwise specified by this Governance Plan or the Bylaws or resolutions of the Board of Trustees. All elected students must remain in good standing to retain their seats on committees or in student government; all serve for a one-year term and may be reelected. No student may serve in more than two elected positions under this Governance Plan, including student government, at a time. When a vacancy occurs, the student government may fill the vacant seat for the remainder of the term.

B. FACULTY COMMITTEES

The Faculty committees shall be those specified below and shall also include any additional committees created from time to time by action of the Faculty or the Dean.

1. The Personnel and Budget Committee

a. The Law School shall establish a Personnel and Budget Committee which shall be composed of five persons. Members of the Personnel and Budget Committee shall be Law School faculty members elected in

I-B-2 FINAL


accordance with the Bylaws and written policies of the Board of Trustees and one second or third year student elected by the students as a non-voting member. The manner of constituting the committee, and the procedure to be followed by it, shall be subject to the approval of the Dean of the Law School. This committee shall review all recommendations for appointment and reappointment, with or without tenure, to the faculty, and promotion in rank, special salary increases and increments, and applications for fellowship and other leaves. Additionally, the Committee on Committees may appoint other committees, when needed, to review faculty candidates and to develop reports, make factual findings, and make recommendations to the P & B on reappointment, tenure, and/or promotion. Upon receiving these reports and the factual record underlying them, the P & B shall make an independent assessment and recommendation to the Dean. These other committees shall review candidates’ qualifications under the policies and standards of the City University of New York as set forth in the Bylaws, personnel policies, and resolutions of the Board of Trustees of the City University of New York. It shall recommend action thereon to the Dean. The Dean of the Law School will be one of the five members of the Law School Personnel and Budget Committee and shall serve as Chair.

2. Faculty Search Committees and Faculty Appointments

The Dean, in consultation with the Personnel and Budget Committee, shall establish such Faculty Search Committees as are appropriate. All Faculty Search Committees shall adopt and follow appropriate procedures in order to assure compliance with The City University Affirmative Action policies and procedures. The Dean shall appoint a student member to each Search Committee.

b. A Faculty Search Committee shall report its recommendations to the faculty for discussion and then to the Dean. The Dean shall review the recommendations and make his or her own recommendation regarding each faculty appointment to the Personnel and Budget Committee.

c. The Personnel and Budget Committee shall review the recommendations of the Dean, consult with the full-time tenured and tenure-track faculty, and shall make its own recommendation regarding each faculty appointment to the Dean.

d. The Dean shall review the recommendations of the Personnel and

I-B-2 FINAL


Budget Committee and shall recommend to the Chancellor for appointment, only those persons who he/she is reasonably certain will contribute to the improvement of the academic excellence of the Law School.

e. The Chancellor will review the Dean’s recommendations in accordance with Section C of this Article.

3. Faculty Reappointment, Promotion, and Tenure Review Procedures

a. The Personnel and Budget Committee and all other committees charged with the review of faculty shall review all candidates’ qualifications under the policies and standards of The City University as set forth in the Bylaws, personnel policies, and resolutions of the Board of Trustees of The City University of New York.

b. The Dean shall review the affirmative recommendation(s) of the Personnel and Budget Committee and shall recommend to the Chancellor for reappointment, promotion, and tenure only those persons who he/she is reasonably certain will contribute to the improvement of the academic excellence at the Law School.

c. The Chancellor shall review the Dean’s affirmative recommendations in accordance with Section C of this Article.

4. The Admissions & Admissions Policy Committee

The Admissions & Admissions Policy Committee shall include the Assistant Dean for Enrollment Management and Director of Admissions, not fewer than three faculty, and two students who are members of the second or third year classes. Faculty appointments shall be for a term of two years.

a. The Admissions & Admissions Policy Committee shall review individual candidates for admission and recommend admissions policy, subject to the approval of the faculty, the Dean and the Chancellor.

b. No applicant may be admitted by the Law School except on the affirmative vote of the Admissions & Admissions Policy Committee. The Committee shall follow procedures that have been approved by the faculty and the Dean.

I-B-2 FINAL


5. Scholastic Standards and Academic Standing Committee

a. The membership of the Scholastic Standards and Academic Standing Committee shall include an Associate Dean, who shall chair the Committee, not fewer than four faculty members and two third-year students.

b. The Committee shall review policies and procedures concerning scholastic standards and assist in the development of academic support systems for students.

c. The Committee shall apply the academic standards of the Law School to individual students from the time of admission until the granting of the Juris Doctor. The Committee will receive and act upon student appeals relating to academic matters.

6. The Curriculum Committee

a. The Curriculum Committee shall be composed of not fewer than four faculty and three student members. The term of all faculty members shall be two years.

b. The Curriculum Committee shall have authority to consider all proposals to review, modify, or develop the course of study for each of the years of the program, and all proposals relating to the educational program; including, but not limited to, evaluation of student work and scheduling.

7. Committee on Committees

a. A Committee on Committees shall be constituted each year, consisting of the Dean, two faculty members elected by the faculty, one student elected by the student government and one staff member elected by the administrative and support staff.

b. The Committee shall recommend, except with respect to committees that consider personnel matters or where specified in this Governance Plan or the Bylaws of the Board of Trustees, how many, if any, members of the faculty, administrative staff, and support staff shall be nominated to each committee. The Committee shall also propose nominations for membership and chair for each committee that shall be submitted to the faculty for election, substitution or addition. Except where the Board of Trustee Bylaws or resolutions are to the contrary, the normal term of office

I-B-2 FINAL


for faculty members on committees shall be two years and for students, one year. Committee members may be reelected unless the charge of the committee or rules of the Board of Trustees limits a member's term.

C. APPOINTMENTS AND REAPPOINTMENTS TO, AND PROMOTIONS WITHIN, THE INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF PROCEDURE

1. All appointments and reappointments, including reappointments with tenure, to, and promotions within the instructional staff, except where otherwise provided, shall be recommended to the Dean who shall review the recommendations and recommend to the Chancellor only those persons who he/she is reasonably certain will contribute to the academic excellence of the Law School.

2. The Chancellor shall review the Dean’s affirmative recommendations and shall recommend to the Board of Trustees for appointment, reappointment, promotion and/or tenure only those persons who he/she is reasonably certain will contribute to the improvement of the academic excellence at the Law School.

D. APPEALS

1. A Faculty member may appeal a negative decision of the Personnel and Budget Committee regarding his or her candidacy to the Dean, who shall consider, decide and notify the candidate regarding the appeal.

I-B-2 FINAL


IV. APPOINTMENT AND REAPPOINTMENT OF EXECUTIVES AND ADMINISTRATORS

A. INITIAL PROCESS FOR APPOINTMENT AND REAPPOINTMENT OF ADMINISTRATORS OTHER THAN THOSE IN EXECUTIVE PAY PLAN TITLES

1. Proposed appointments, other than acting or substitute appointments, to positions on the administrative staff shall be reviewed initially, after a search, by the Dean.

There shall be an Administrative Screening and Review Committee. The Dean shall make his/her recommendations to the Administrative Screening and Review Committee. The members of the Administrative Screening and Review Committee shall be appointed by the Dean and shall consist of no fewer than five members, one of whom must be a classified staff member, and at least one of whom must hold a professorial appointment, and a majority of whom must be administrators. Service on this committee will be for two years. An Associate Dean shall chair the Administrative Screening and Review Committee.

2. The Committee will review proposed appointments and reappointments, and proposed title and salary recommendations, for administrative positions to assure that the applicable University standards have been met and that rates of pay for members of the Law School administrative staff take into account comparable rates at metropolitan area law schools and other institutions in The City University and, to the extent practicable, are commensurate for those with comparable tasks and comparable experiences within The City University. The Committee shall make its recommendation to the Dean. The Dean shall review those recommendations in making his/her own recommendation to the Chancellor for appointment or reappointment.

B. EVALUATION OF ADMINISTRATORS OTHER THAN THOSE IN EXECUTIVE PAY PLAN TITLES

Evaluation of the work of persons on the administrative staff is ultimately the responsibility of the Dean. The Dean, in consultation with the Administrative Screening and Review Committee as outlined in Section A above, may recommend for appointment or reappointment persons holding such titles in accordance with established University procedures.

I-B-2 FINAL


C. APPOINTMENT OF PERSONS HOLDING PROFESSORIAL TITLES TO ADMINISTRATIVE DUTIES OTHER THAN THOSE IN EXECUTIVE PAY PLAN TITLES

1. The Administrative Screening and Review Committee of the Law School may recommend to the Dean that an administrative position be filled by an individual whose title is law school instructor, law school assistant professor, law school associate professor, law school professor, or law school lecturer. Such recommendation may, but need not, include a recommendation that the person receive a change in remuneration for work in that title.

2. If the Dean concurs with their recommendation he/she may make such a recommendation to the Chancellor in accordance with the procedures for appointments to the instructional staff.

D. APPEALS

1. An administrator may appeal a negative decision of the Administrative Screening and Review Committee regarding his or her candidacy to the Dean, who shall consider, decide, and notify the candidate regarding the appeal.

V. BOARD OF VISITORS

A. There shall be a Board of Visitors for The City University School of Law appointed by the Chancellor. The Board of Visitors shall be made up of distinguished jurists, lawyers, scholars, and other interested persons. Its role will be to advise the Law School about its academic program, its role in the community, placement of graduates and the like. It shall assist the Dean, the Chancellor and the Board of Trustees in all aspects of the Law School’s development efforts. It shall serve as a liaison between the Law School, the legal profession, and the public and private groups, which are served by the legal profession and participate in the legal process.

B. Members of the Board of Visitors will be appointed for three-year terms upon the recommendation of the Dean of the Law School, with the concurrence of the Chancellor.

C. The membership of the Board of Visitors should reflect the Law School’s role in the Borough of Queens, in the City, the State, and the

I-B-2 FINAL


Nation. The Board of Visitors shall be governed by Bylaws promulgated by the Board of Visitors.

VI. AMENDMENTS

A. AMENDMENT PROCEDURE

1. Amendments to this Governance Plan may be recommended by the Faculty, the Dean, or the Chancellor. Any recommendations which originate in the Law School Faculty must be first submitted to the Dean for consideration. The Dean shall review the Faculty recommendation(s). Any recommendation in whole or in part approved by the Dean or any modification thereof that the Dean determines to be in the best interests of the Law School shall be recommended to the Chancellor for further consideration.

2. The Chancellor shall review the Dean’s recommendations. Any recommendation in whole or in part approved by the Chancellor or any modification thereof that the Chancellor determines to be in the best interests of the Law School shall be recommended to the Board for approval.

3. No change in this Governance Plan shall be implemented until it has been adopted by the Board.


I-B-3

GUTTMAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE

Adoption of New Governance Plan

WHEREAS, Guttman Community College, formerly known as “The New Community College,” has been operating under an Interim Governance Plan since June 25, 2012; and

WHEREAS, Guttman Community College has grown and developed and requires a new governance plan to reflect this growth and development; now therefore be it

RESOLVED, That the Board of Trustees repeal the Interim Governance Plan approved by the Board on June 25, 2012; and be it further

RESOLVED, That the Board of Trustees adopt a new governance plan for Guttman Community College as set forth in Attachment I, effective February 1, 2018.

EXPLANATION: Guttman Community College, formerly known as The New Community College, enrolled its first students in August 2012 and has been operating under an Interim Governance Plan approved by the Board of Trustees on June 25, 2012 (Attachment II). As noted in the Explanation to the June 2012 Resolution, “as with other educational units established by the Board, it [wa]s appropriate for the New Community College to have an initial governance plan to guide its operations during its early years, with the understanding that as it grows and develops, the College will likely amend the governance plan to meet new circumstances.” A task force of faculty, staff and administrators have worked for over a year to develop a new governance plan that was approved at the College Council on May 30, 2017 and amended on September 12, 2017. The new governance plan is recommended by the College President. The new plan calls for an elected body of representatives in a Council (rather than having all full-time faculty serve on the Council) and a separate Academic Senate, also elected, of faculty and student engagement staff. In accordance with the organizational structure of Guttman Community College, three faculty personnel committees would be established to represent the interdisciplinary practice areas of Social Science, STEM, and the Humanities (E. Personnel Committees, Articles I and II). The College has carefully developed and approved an implementation plan and timeline that would enable it to roll out the new governance plan following Board approval; the Governance Plan would be effective as of February 1, 2018. Until that date, the College will continue to utilize the existing Interim Governance Plan, College Council, and standing committees.

I-B-3 Attachment I

Stella and Charles Guttman Community College The City University of New York

Governance Plan

Approved by the Guttman College Council May 30, 2017 and September 12, 2017

STELLA AND CHARLES GUTTMAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE I-B-3 Attachment I GOVERNANCE PLAN

2

A. PREAMBLE The Stella and Charles Guttman Community College, founded in 2011, is committed to implementing innovative practices in community college education to best prepare its students with guided pathways to senior college and the world beyond. The curriculum is built on a first year experience (FYE), interdisciplinary programs of study, and methods of student engagement designed to ensure student success. Shared governance is a Guttman community commitment that encourages interdisciplinary and interdepartmental collaboration while honoring the strengths, interests, and responsibilities of our faculty, staff, administration, and students.

B. STAKEHOLDERS

The Faculty of Guttman Community College (College) shall consist of all full- and part-time persons holding professorial, instructor, lecturer, or adjunct titles. In consultation with the Provost, each faculty member shall join an interdisciplinary area of inquiry (“practice area”)—STEM, Social Science or Humanities—based on their disciplinary and pedagogical interests and experience. The positions reserved for the Office of Student Engagement (OSE) shall be limited to full-time Higher Education Officer (HEO) series members. In all other situations, traditional CUNY title designations shall apply.

C. COLLEGE COUNCIL

Article I Powers and Functions of the Council

The Council shall be the governing body of the College and, subject to the authority of the Bylaws of the CUNY Board of Trustees, shall be responsible for the establishment of College academic policy and goals pertaining to its operations and CUNY-mandated activities.

Article II Composition

Section 1. Membership The Council shall have the following members:

a. Faculty:

1. 24 full-time faculty representatives, eight from each practice area, elected from and by full-time faculty in that practice area

2. The Academic Senate Chair 3. One part-time faculty member elected from and by part-time faculty

b. Office of Student Engagement (OSE). Five representatives of OSE elected from and by OSE members.

c. Staff. Five full-time representatives of the non-OSE staff elected from and by non-OSE full-time staff members.


3

d. Students. The President of the Student Government Association and four students elected from and by the student body.

e. The chair from each Council standing committee. Committee chairs not elected to Council sit as non-voting members.

f. Administration: 1. The President, who shall appoint two additional administrative members to

the Council. The President shall serve in a non-voting role, except to break a tie.

2. Any Vice Presidents, each of whom shall appoint two additional administrative members to the Council.

In the event of structural or titular change, the equivalent functional titleholder shall serve in that capacity. Section 2. Alternates Alternates are individuals elected to fill a temporary absence or vacancy. Alternates are expected to attend all meetings of the Council, although they shall only be counted towards quorum and vote when seated. Two alternates for each practice area shall be elected from and by the full-time faculty in that area; two alternates for OSE shall be elected from and by members of OSE; two alternates for staff shall be elected from and by the staff; two alternates for the students shall be elected from and by the students; an alternate administrator may be appointed if necessary. Section 3. Term of Office The term of office of the newly elected Council members and alternates shall begin the first day of the Academic Year. Each Student Council member and student alternate shall have a one-year term; all other Council members and alternates shall have staggered three-year terms. Section 4. Recall of a Council Member All voting Council members are subject to recall. A Council member shall be subject to recall for neglect of duties, as outlined in the Council bylaws.

Article III Organization of the Council

Section 1. Officers and Responsibilities The President shall serve as the Council Chair and preside at all meetings. At the Council’s first meeting, a Vice-Chair and Secretary shall be elected from and by Council members for a three-year term. The Vice-Chair shall serve as acting Chair in the Chair’s absence. The Secretary shall take minutes and attendance during Council and Executive Committee meetings, maintain records of the proceedings, and attend to all correspondence. Section 2. Parliamentarian


4

The Executive Council shall appoint a Parliamentarian, who need not be a member of the Council. If the Parliamentarian is not a member, the Parliamentarian shall have all rights and privileges of Council membership, except the right to vote. Parliamentarian shall serve for a three year term. Section 3. College Council Committees There shall be seven standing committees of the Council: the Executive Committee, the Legislative Committee, the Curriculum Committee, the Academic Assessment and Learning Committee, the Strategic Planning and Budget Committee, the Academic Technology Committee, and the Student Services Committee. With the exception of the Executive Committee and the Strategic Planning and Budget Committee, all committees shall elect their own Chair by majority vote.

Article IV Meetings

Section 1. Time of Meetings The Council shall meet at least twice each semester. Section 2. Conduct of Meetings All Council meetings shall be conducted in conformance with Robert’s Rules of Order, latest edition, except as otherwise required by law or CUNY Bylaws. Council meetings are open to all members of the College community. A majority of the voting members of the Council must be present to constitute a quorum and for passage of a measure within the Council’s authority. Section 3. Special Meetings The petition of at least ten Council members shall be sufficient to mandate a special meeting, which shall be scheduled by the Council Chair within seven business days after receiving the petition. Section 4. Recordkeeping Minutes of all Council meetings shall be made available to members of the College community. The Secretary shall record the final vote of each member of the Council when votes are taken, a record of which shall be made available upon request.


5

Article V Repeal of Council Decisions

Upon petition of twenty percent of the total full-time faculty, full-time staff or student body, a petition of reversal of a Council decision may be presented to the President. A petition must be filed within four weeks after publication in Council minutes. A decision shall be reversed by a two-thirds vote of the full-time faculty, full-time staff and student body in which at least twenty percent of each constituency must participate. The vote will be coordinated by the Legislative Committee.

Article VI Powers and Duties of Standing Committees

Section 1. Executive Committee:

a. Membership. The Executive Committee shall consist of: 1. The President, who shall serve as Committee Chair 2. The Council Vice-Chair 3. The Council Secretary 4. The Academic Senate Chair 5. Three additional persons elected from and by Council members.

b. Charge. The Council Executive Committee shall:

1. Prepare and distribute annual schedule of Council meetings. 2. Prepare and distribute the agenda to the entire College community at least one

week before each meeting. On receipt of a written request endorsed by at least five Council members, the Executive Committee shall place on the agenda the item of concern.

3. Invite key persons to participate in Council meetings. 4. Review and coordinate the activities of all standing and ad hoc Council

committees, which oversight shall include: i. The timely referral of issues to the appropriate committee ii. The timely receipt of committee reports and recommendations iii. The collection of committee meeting schedules and minutes

5. Call Council into special session, with proper notice 6. Conduct such business as may be necessary in an emergency when the Council

is not in session or lacks a quorum, which action shall be subject to review and vote at the next scheduled Council meeting.

7. Exercise any further powers and duties that may be conferred on it by the Council.

Section 2. Legislative Committee:

a. Membership The Legislative Committee shall be composed of Council members and shall consist of:

1. The Council Vice-Chair 2. The Council Secretary 3. Four faculty representatives elected from and by the Council 4. One full-time non-teaching representative elected from and by the Council 5. One student representative elected from and by the Council


6

b. Charge. The Legislative Committee shall:

1. Facilitate nomination and election procedures for the Council. 2. Nominate, appoint, or facilitate the election of members to ad hoc or special

committees, as created by the Council. 3. Inform Council of vacancies in Council and its Standing Committees and fill those

vacancies through appointment or special election. 4. Receive and hear grievances relating to elections and make appropriate

recommendations to the Executive Committee. 5. Assess the governance plan on a biennial basis and make recommendations to

the Council. 6. Review and propose amendments to the bylaws of the Council and standing

committees in consultation with the committees. 7. Review and evaluate how changes to the CUNY Bylaws or PSC-CUNY

Collective Bargaining Agreement may impact the bylaws of the College Council or its standing committees and recommend changes as needed.

8. Act as custodian of all minutes, agenda and election results from College Council and all standing committees.

Section 3. Curriculum Committee:

a. Membership. The Curriculum Committee shall consist of: 1. The Vice President of Academic Affairs and Provost (Provost) or designee 2. Six faculty representatives, two from each practice area elected from and by full-

time faculty in that practice area 3. One faculty representative from Libraries, elected from and by members of the

Libraries 4. Three OSE representatives elected from and by OSE members 5. One student representative elected by the student body 6. The College Registrar or designee, without vote 7. The Chief Student Affairs Officer or designee, without vote 8. The OAA administrator responsible for curricular matters, without vote

b. Charge.

The Curriculum Committee shall review, evaluate and recommend programs of study, FYE concentrations, and course proposals received from any source and shall perform such other functions as the Council may assign.

c. Review.

The Curriculum Committee shall periodically report to the Council. Committee recommendations are subject to Council review, modification, approval or rejection.

Section 4. Academic Assessment and Learning Committee:

a. Membership. The Academic Assessment and Learning Committee shall consist of: 1. Six faculty representatives elected from and by all College full-time faculty 2. Two members of OSE elected from and by OSE members 3. The OAA administrator responsible for Assessment


7

b. Charge The Academic Assessment and Learning Committee shall: 1. Recommend procedures for institutional student learning outcomes assessment,

including student achievement of competencies and program quality. 2. Evaluate assessment results and report out institutional performance. The

Committee shall not evaluate individual faculty or staff. 3. Based on assessment, identify and recommend professional development

venues for faculty and staff, including distributing teaching and professional development resources and identifying grant and funding opportunities.

4. Work with the Center for College Effectiveness to provide support for student learning outcomes.

c. Review.

The Academic Assessment and Learning Committee shall periodically report to the Council. Committee recommendations are subject to Council review, modification, approval or rejection.

Section 5. Strategic Planning and Budget Committee:

a. Membership. The Strategic Planning and Budget Committee shall consist of: 1. The Vice President of Administration and Finance, who shall chair the committee 2. The Provost 3. The administrator responsible for Strategic Planning 4. Two faculty representatives elected from and by the College full-time faculty 5. One Higher Education Officer elected from and by the HEO staff 6. One classified staff member elected from and by members of the classified staff 7. One student representative elected from and by the student body 8. Each Vice President shall appoint up to two additional members

b. Charge. The Strategic Planning and Budget Committee shall:

1. Review the strategic and financial plans for the College to ensure alignment among planning budget and assessment.

2. Recommend strategic plan priorities to the Council. 3. Review and analyze the College's budget, aided by budget presentations from

the Office of the Vice President of Administration and Finance to ensure continued support of strategic priorities.

c. Review.

The Strategic Planning and Budget Committee shall periodically report to the Council. Committee recommendations are subject to Council review, modification, approval or rejection.

Section 6. Academic Technology Committee:

a. Membership. The Academic Technology Committee shall consist of: 1. The OAA administrator responsible for Academic Technology 2. The Chief Information Officer 3. Three faculty representatives, elected from and by the Collegefull-time faculty 4. The Chief Librarian or designee


8

5. Two representatives of OSE elected from and by OSE members 6. One student elected from and by the student body

b. Charge. The Academic Technology Committee shall:

1. Use evidence-based data and best practices research to recommend strategies to integrate use of technology into the curriculum.

2. Develop guidelines and best practices on the use of supported classroom technology.

3. Advise and assist faculty and staff on using technology to expand and improve student learning.

c. Review.

The Academic Technology Committee shall periodically report to the Council. Committee recommendations are subject to Council review, modification, approval or rejection.

Section 7. Student Services Committee:

a. Membership. The Student Services Committee shall consist of: 1. The Chief Student Affairs Officer 2. One representative from Student Government Association (SGA) leadership,

elected by and from SGA leadership 3. One representative from the SGA Board elected from and by SGA

representatives 4. Two representatives from OSE elected from and by OSE members 5. Two representatives of the non-OSE full-time staff elected from and by non-OSE

full-time staff 6. Two faculty representatives elected from and by all College full-time faculty

b. Charge. The Student Services Committee shall:

1. Review and recommend policies and procedures pertaining to student life and welfare, campus-wide cultural and educational events, professional opportunities and student engagement matters.

2. Further develop and advise student support services to promote student success academically, personally and professionally.

c. Review.

The Committee shall periodically report to the Council. Committee recommendations are subject to Council review, modification, approval or rejection.

Section 8. Committee Regulations

a. Each committee shall prepare and implement committee bylaws in accordance with the CUNY Bylaws and this governance plan.

b. With the exception of the Executive Committee and the Strategic Planning and Budget Committee, all chairs of standing committees shall be elected by majority vote of each committee.

c. Each committee shall meet as often as necessary, but at least once each semester, keep minutes of its meetings and send copies of minutes to the Council Secretary.


9

d. Standing committees may establish and abolish subcommittees as necessary. e. Committee members shall serve staggered three-year terms; each student member shall

serve a one-year term.

Article VII Amendments

Amendments to this governance document may be proposed and approved by a two-thirds affirmative vote of the members present, if that number also constitutes a majority of the members of the Council, which amendments shall then be subject to the approval of the President and the CUNY Board of Trustees. D. THE ACADEMIC SENATE

Article I Function

The College Academic Senate (Senate) shall serve as the voice of faculty and members of the Office of Student Engagement. Subject to the guidelines of the CUNY Board of Trustees and their own bylaws, the Senate shall provide a forum for discussion review, and recommendation of procedures, policies and practices related to academic matters. Senate recommendations shall be referred to the Council or standing committee, as appropriate, for review and action.

Article II Composition

Section 1. Membership

a. 24 full-time faculty, eight from each practice area, elected from and by the full-time faculty in that practice area

b. Three part-time faculty elected from and by the part-time faculty c. Eight representatives from the OSE elected from and by full-time OSE members d. One faculty representative Libraries, elected from and by the faculty members from

Libraries e. The President, without vote f. The Provost, without vote g. The Deans of the Office of Academic Affairs, without vote

Section 2. Term of Office The term of office of the newly elected Senators shall begin the first day of the academic year. Senators shall have staggered three-year terms.


10

Article III Organization of the Academic Senate

Section 1. Officers The Chair shall be a faculty member, elected by and from the Senate at its first meeting. The Chair shall be responsible for convening and presiding at Senate and Executive Committee meetings, and is a member of the College Council Executive Committee. The Vice Chair shall be elected by and from the Senate. In the absence of the Chair, the Vice Chair shall preside. In the absence of both the Chair and Vice Chair, the Chair shall appoint a member of the body to preside. The Secretary shall be elected by and from the Senate. The Secretary is responsible for notifying Senate members of all meetings, Senate action and for taking minutes in the Senate meetings. All officers shall have a three year term. Section 2. The Senate Executive Committee

a. Membership. The Senate Execute Committee shall consist of: 1. The Senate Officers 2. Two Senate representatives, elected from and by Senate members. At least one

of whom shall be from the Office of Student Engagement.

b. Charge. The functions of the Executive Committee are to: 1. Establish and publish a schedule for regular meetings of the Senate by or at the

beginning of each academic year. 2. Prepare the agenda for Senate meetings. 3. Create and coordinate the activities of ad hoc committees after consultation with

the Senate. 4. Coordinate faculty meetings. 5. Serve as the liaison to the Senate, the President and the College Council. 6. Keep minutes and report regularly to the Senate.

Article IV Meetings

Section 1. Time of Meetings The Senate shall meet at least once a semester. The time, location, and agenda of all Senate meetings shall be distributed to Senate members not less than a week prior to the time of the meetings. Section 2. Conduct of Meetings Senate meetings shall be conducted in conformance with Robert’s Rules of Order, latest edition, except as otherwise required by law or as may be provided in the bylaws.


11

Senate meetings are open to all members of the College community.

Section 3. Special Meetings Special meetings of the Senate may be called by the Chair, or on the petition of at least ten Senators, which meeting shall be scheduled by the Senate Chair within seven business days after receiving the petition. E. PERSONNEL COMMITTEES Faculty shall be evaluated based on their teaching (FYE and Guttman Programs of Study) service and scholarship. The following committees shall be responsible for reappointment, promotion and tenure (RPT) recommendations:

a. The College Personnel Committee b. Faculty Personnel Committees

Article I The College Personnel Committee


a. The College Personnel Committee (CPC) shall consist of: 1. One tenured faculty elected from and by full-time faculty in each academic

practice area, all of whom shall serve staggered three-year terms 2. The three Faculty Personnel Committee (FPC) Chairs, all of whom shall

serve staggered three-year terms 3. The Provost 4. The President, without vote

b. The CPC shall elect a Chair for a one year term Section 2. Function The CPC shall recommend to the President:

a. Faculty reappointment, promotion and tenure b. The grant of certificates of continuous employment to lecturers c. The grant of multi-year appointments to adjuncts d. The grant of fellowship and other instructional staff leaves e. Academic personnel procedures and policies


12

Article II The Faculty Personnel Committee


a. The Faculty Personnel Committee (FPC) shall consist of: 1. Three faculty personnel committees to represent the interdisciplinary practice

areas of Social Science, STEM and the Humanities. i. Each FPC shall consist of five full-time faculty members elected from and

by full-time faculty within the appropriate practice area, who shall serve staggered three-year terms. A minimum of two members on each FPC must be tenured. This requirement shall change to three, then four, tenured faculty members, at such times as the particular practice area has three, and, ultimately, four, tenured faculty members among its membership.

ii. Each FPC shall elect a Chair from its tenured members for a one year term.

Section 2. Function

a. Each FPC shall: 1. Coordinate and assign semester teaching observations for full- and part-time

faculty. 2. Either the chair or a committee designee shall assign a representative to

coordinate and conduct annual evaluations.” 3. Recommend reappointment, promotion and tenure to the College Personnel

Committee for full- and part-time faculty.

b. FPC faculty recommendations shall take into consideration performance within the faculty member’s discipline and interdisciplinary work performed in the First Year Experience.

I-B-3 – Attachment II

June 25, 2012

NEW COMMUNITY COLLEGE INTERIM GOVERNANCE PLAN

A. Administrative Officers

1. President. There shall be a President of the New Community College who shall be the chief

academic and administrative officer of the College and shall have the responsibilities and authorities set forth for Presidents in the Bylaws and policies of the CUNY Board of Trustees.

2. Provost, Vice Presidents and other administrative officers. The President may appoint a Provost, one or more Vice Presidents, and other administrative officers as are necessary in accordance with the established policies of the CUNY Board of Trustees for such appointments and may assign to them such duties and responsibilities as appropriate.

B. Faculty

1. The faculty of the College shall consist of all full-time and consortial faculty appointed to the

College. 2. The faculty shall be appointed to the College as a whole and shall be assigned to teach in one or

more programs, including the first-year experience. C. Governing Body

1. The New Community College Council. The Council shall be composed of the following members:

a) the President who shall serve as Chairperson and preside at meetings without vote except to break a tie. In the absence of the President, the Provost shall preside;

b) the Provost and three persons appointed by the President from among the professional and administrative staff;

c) all full-time faculty members appointed to the College; d) all faculty members from other campuses appointed as consortial faculty to the College; e) four members of the full-time non-teaching staff elected for two-year staggered terms by the

full-time non-teaching staff of the College; f) two students and two alternates elected by the student body.

2. The Council shall elect a Secretary who shall keep the minutes and perform such other duties as

may be assigned by the Council.

3. Meetings. The Council shall meet at least two times each semester. A majority of the members of the Council shall constitute a quorum. All members of the Council shall have one vote, except as provided above with respect to the President and except for votes on the awarding of degrees for which only faculty members may vote. Meetings of the Council shall follow Roberts Rules of Order Newly Revised, latest edition.

4. Duties. The Council shall be the governing body of the College and shall have the following duties

and powers: a) to advance the College’s mission and goals, formulate educational policy, develop standards

for admission, academic performance and degree requirements, as well as standards for the


June 25, 2012

appointment and reappointment of faculty consistent with and subject to the Bylaws and policies of the CUNY Board of Trustees and other CUNY policies and procedures;

b) to approve academic programs and curricula; c) to recommend the granting of associate degrees and program certificates to qualified

candidates; d) to establish a student academic appeals committee; e) to consider any other academic matters and make recommendations to the President; f) to establish and abolish such ad hoc committees as it deems necessary, elect members to such

committees for terms not to exceed three years as it deems proper, and consider the reports and recommendations of those committees.

5. Standing Committees a. Curriculum and Student Academic Support Committee

(1) The Curriculum Committee shall be composed of: (a) the Provost; (b) seven members of the faculty elected by the Council for staggered two-year terms; and, (c) three members of the full-time non-teaching staff elected by the Council for staggered two-year terms.

(2) The Committee shall have responsibility for the curriculum, advising, academic support, academic technology, co-curricular activities, and other activities as the Council may assign. (3) The Committee may establish and abolish subcommittees as it deems necessary. (4) The recommendations of the Committee shall be reviewed, amended, approved or rejected by the Council.

b. Agenda Committee (1) The Agenda Committee shall consist of:

(a) the President or his/her designee; (b) four members elected by the Council for staggered two-year terms. (c) The Secretary of the Council shall be an ex-officio, non-voting member of the Agenda Committee.

(2) The Agenda Committee shall prepare the agenda for each meeting of the Council and shall distribute the agenda to all members of the Council at least one week in advance of each meeting.

c. Assessment and Professional Development Committee. (1) The Assessment and Professional Development Committee shall consist of five (5) faculty and two (2) members of the full-time non-teaching staff elected by the Council for staggered three-year terms. (2) The Committee shall recommend procedures for institutional assessment, including student progress in achieving expected competencies and the quality of programs. It shall work with the President’s designee to evaluate student achievement and the quality of the academic programs and to present information describing performance against those measures. The Committee shall not be involved in matters pertaining to the evaluation of individual faculty or staff. The Committee shall also address professional development for both faculty and staff including, but not limited to, recommending an agenda and resource requirements for professional development, disseminating teaching resources, and identifying funding opportunities.


June 25, 2012

(3) The Committee may establish and abolish subcommittees as it deems necessary. (4) The recommendations of the Committee shall be reviewed, amended, approved or rejected by the Council.

D. College Personnel Committee 1. The College Personnel Committee shall consist of four full-time faculty elected by the Council

who shall serve staggered two-year terms and the Provost of the College. 2. The College Personnel Committee shall make recommendations to the President, following

searches conducted as per the CUNY guidelines, regarding the appointment of faculty with an appropriate functional title. The College Personnel Committee shall also make recommendations to the President regarding the appointment and reappointment of CLTs and the reappointment of teaching adjuncts.

E. Special Personnel Committee 1. Until such time as the Council elects four tenured faculty to the College Personnel Committee,

reappointment, reappointment with tenure and promotion of full-time faculty shall be recommended by a Special Personnel Committee consisting of tenured faculty established for that purpose.

2. The Special Personnel Committee shall consist of six tenured faculty from a range of academic disciplines and the Provost of the College.

3. The members of the Special Personnel Committee shall serve staggered two-year terms. 4. The College Personnel Committee shall, by a majority vote of its membership, make nominations

to the President of outside tenured faculty members to serve on the Special Personnel Committee. They shall nominate at least three persons for each position and the President may request additional nominees. The College Personnel Committee may also include among its nominees any NCC faculty member who has earned tenure.

5. The Special Personnel Committee shall make recommendations to the President regarding the personnel actions in E.1 in accordance with guidelines adopted by the Council and the Bylaws and policies of the CUNY Board of Trustees and other CUNY policies and procedures.

F. Amendments. Amendments to the governance document may be proposed by a two-thirds affirmative vote of the members present if that number also constitutes a majority of the members of the Council, which amendments shall then be subject to the approval of the President and the CUNY Board of Trustees.

I-B-4


Amendment to Article VI of the Bylaws WHEREAS, The establishment of a new instructional staff title at The City University of New York requires amendment of Article VI of the Bylaws of the Board of Trustees, now therefore be it RESOLVED, That Section 6.1 of the Bylaws of the Board of Trustees of The City University of New York be amended to establish the title “Assistant Vice Chancellor,” as follows:

NOTE: New material is highlighted. SECTION 6.1. INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF. The board hereby establishes the following instructional staff titles:

Chancellor Chancellor emeritus Executive vice chancellor Chief operating officer Senior vice chancellor Vice chancellor Associate vice chancellor Assistant vice chancellor University provost Secretary of the board University administrator University associate administrator University assistant administrator President Dean of the City University School of Law Dean of the Graduate School of Journalism Dean of the Sophie Davis School of Biomedical Education Senior vice president Vice president Assistant vice president Senior university dean University dean University associate dean University assistant dean Dean Associate dean Assistant dean Administrator Associate administrator Assistant administrator Distinguished professor University professor Professor Associate professor

I-B-4

Assistant professor Research professor Research associate professor Research assistant professor Einstein professor Visiting distinguished professor Clinical Professor Distinguished lecturer Distinguished lecturer – medical series Distinguished lecturer – law school series Medical professor (basic sciences) Associate medical professor (basic sciences) Assistant medical professor (basic sciences) Medical lecturer Adjunct medical professor (basic sciences) Adjunct associate medical professor (basic sciences) Adjunct assistant medical professor (basic sciences) Adjunct medical lecturer Medical professor (clinical) Associate medical professor (clinical) Assistant medical professor (clinical) Adjunct medical professor (clinical) Adjunct associate medical professor (clinical) Adjunct assistant medical professor (clinical) Law school distinguished professor Law school university professor Law school non-teaching adjunct Law school professor Law school associate professor Law school assistant professor Law school instructor Law school library professor Law school library associate professor Law school library assistant professor Law school adjunct professor Law school adjunct associate professor Law school adjunct assistant professor Law school adjunct instructor Law school lecturer Visiting professor Visiting associate professor Visiting assistant professor Adjunct professor Adjunct associate professor Adjunct assistant professor Adjunct lecturer Adjunct lecturer (doctoral student) Lecturer (full-time) Lecturer (part-time) Visiting lecturer Instructor Instructor (nursing science) Research associate Research assistant Graduate assistant (a-d)

I-B-4

Senior registrar Associate registrar Chief college laboratory technician Adjunct chief college laboratory technician Senior college laboratory technician Adjunct senior college laboratory technician College laboratory technician Adjunct college laboratory technician College physician Higher education officer Higher education associate Higher education assistant Assistant to higher education officer Continuing education teacher Non-teaching adjunct (I-V) Non-teaching adjunct (doctoral student) Affiliated professional Professor of Military Science Affiliated medical professor Associate affiliated medical professor Assistant affiliated medical professor Affiliated medical lecturer Affiliated medical teacher Clinical professor—medical series CLIP instructor CUNY Start instructor and in the Hunter College Elementary School and Hunter College High School Principal Chairperson of department Assistant principal Teacher Assistant Teacher Temporary teacher Campus schools college laboratory technician Campus schools senior college laboratory technician Guidance counselor Placement director Education and vocational counselor Librarian Substitute teacher Occasional per diem substitute teacher and in the childhood centers Teacher Assistant teacher And in the educational opportunity centers (EOC) Educational opportunity center adjunct lecturer Educational opportunity center adjunct college laboratory technician Educational opportunity center college laboratory technician Educational opportunity center higher education officer Educational opportunity center higher education associate Educational opportunity center higher education assistant

I-B-4

Educational opportunity center assistant to higher education officer Educational opportunity center lecturer *and in the School of Journalism and in the Executive MBA Programs of the Zicklin School of Business at Baruch College: Professional programs adjunct professor Professional programs adjunct associate professor Professional programs adjunct assistant professor Professional programs adjunct lecturer Professional programs professor (H) Professional programs associate professor (H) Professional programs assistant professor (H) Professional programs lecturer (H) Professional programs Non-Teaching Adjunct 1 Professional programs Non-Teaching Adjunct 2 Professional programs Non-Teaching Adjunct 3 and be it further RESOLVED, That the effective date for the creation of this title shall be July 1, 2017; and be it further RESOLVED, That the Board of Trustees hereby waives the requirement in Section 5.1 of the Bylaws that notice of the amendment to the Bylaws proposed in this resolution be presented at a meeting preceding the meeting at which a vote is taken. EXPLANATION: The title ”Assistant Vice Chancellor” was included in the list of titles in the Executive Salary and Compensation Plan resolution approved by the CUNY Board of Trustees at its meeting held on June 26, 2017. The adoption of a new instructional title requires an amendment of Article VI of the Bylaws. The Board is being asked to waive the requirement that this amendment to the Bylaws be noticed at a meeting preceding the meeting at which it is voted upon in order to make the new title available as soon as possible.

I-B-5

QUEENS COLLEGE

Naming of The Raymond Erickson Music Reference Collection

WHEREAS, Dr. Raymond Erickson has long been a strong supporter of Queens College and the Aaron Copland School of Music, and has donated more than $134,000 to the College, including a $100,000 charitable gift annuity created in 2016 specifically to benefit the music library reference collection; now therefore be it RESOLVED, That the Board of Trustees of The City University of New York approve the naming of “The Raymond Erickson Music Reference Collection” at the Aaron Copland School of Music at Queens College. EXPLANATION: Dr. Raymond Erickson, music historian and keyboardist, joined the Queens College faculty in 1971. He has served as Chair of the Music Department (1978-81), founding Director of the Aaron Copland School of Music (1981), and Dean of Arts and Humanities (1993-2000). He laid the groundwork for the Center for Preparatory Studies in Music and organized the first scholarship endowments for Queens College music majors. In recognition of Dr. Erickson’s generosity and service, the College requests Board approval to name the “The Raymond Erickson Music Reference Collection,” to be located in the Music Library of the Aaron Copland School of Music at Queens College.

I-B-6

QUEENS COLLEGE

Naming of the Mary E. O’Connor Conference Room WHEREAS, Mary E. O’Connor, who passed away in October 2016, was a dedicated donor to Queens College during her lifetime, regularly giving annual gifts totaling more than $24,000; and WHEREAS, As a member of the Jefferson Society, a recognition organization for those who have included Queens College in their estate plans, Ms. O’Connor had notified Queens College of her inclusion of a bequest to the College in her trust; and WHEREAS, Under the terms of Ms. O’Connor’s trust, she left 60% of her estate to the Queens College Foundation to create the “Mary E. O’Connor Endowment Fund” to provide scholarships to juniors and seniors majoring in Economics and/or Business Administration at Queens College; and WHEREAS, The Queens College Foundation has received $3,600,000 from Ms. O’Connor’s estate, with a small additional payment expected in the future when the estate is fully settled; now therefore be it RESOLVED, That the Board of Trustees of The City University of New York approve the naming of the “Mary E. O’Connor Conference Room” at Queens College. EXPLANATION: Mary E. O’Connor graduated from Queens College cum laude in June 1950 with a bachelor’s degree in Economics. Soon thereafter she joined The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States (now known as AXA Equitable), a major life, disability and health insurer in New York City, and spent her entire 41-year career with the company. A life-long resident of Queens and a loyal supporter of her alma mater, Ms. O’Connor was a regular attendee at Homecoming and alumni events. She often expressed appreciation for the excellent education she had receive—at no cost to her—and felt it was an obligation to help others enjoy the same benefits. In recognition of Mary E. O’Connor’s generosity to Queens College, the College requests approval to name the “Mary E. O’Connor Conference Room” in Room 347 of Powdermaker Hall, which is located near the Economics Department.

I-B-7

THE CUNY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF JOURNALISM

Naming of the Leonard Tow Chair for Journalism Innovation WHEREAS, In July 2017 the Tow Foundation pledged $1,500,000 to support outstanding faculty in the field of journalism innovation at the CUNY Graduate School of Journalism, now therefore be it RESOLVED, That the Board of Trustees of The City University of New York approve the naming of the “Leonard Tow Chair for Journalism Innovation” at the CUNY Graduate School of Journalism. EXPLANATION: Leonard Tow is a pioneer in the field of cable broadcasting and wireless communications. A graduate of CUNY’s Brooklyn College, Mr. Tow has been a generous supporter of public higher education. In 2008, he extended his support to the CUNY Graduate School of Journalism with a $3 million gift to launch the “Tow-Knight Center for Entrepreneurial Journalism.” Over the past nine years, through his family foundation, Mr. Tow has pledged a total of more than $7 million to the School. He has evinced a progressive vision for journalism at a time of industry disruption, becoming a valued partner to the CUNY J-School, which is built on a commitment to responsiveness and innovation. In recognition of the Tow Foundation’s continued generosity, the CUNY Graduate School of Journalism requests the Board’s approval to name the “Leonard Tow Chair for Journalism Innovation.”

I-C-1

QUEENS COLLEGE

Appointment of Laurie F. Dorf as Vice President for Institutional Advancement/Alumni Relations

WHEREAS, Following a nation-wide search, Queens College has recommended the appointment of Laurie F. Dorf as Vice President for Institutional Advancement/Alumni Relations, now therefore be it RESOLVED, That the Board of Trustees of The City University of New York approve the appointment of Laurie F. Dorf as Vice President for Institutional Advancement/Alumni Relations at Queens College, effective October 3, 2017. EXPLANATION: Ms. Dorf has served as Interim Vice President since January 2016, and as Assistant Vice President and Executive Director of the Queens College Foundation since January 2008. In these roles Ms. Dorf has led the fundraising efforts for the College while overseeing funding for the strategic plan and establishing the necessary operational support to lead the College’s $150 million capital campaign. She has collaborated with the Queens College Foundation board to develop and implement a fundraising plan that includes endowment, annual fund, planned giving and major gifts. To date, $162 million has been raised. In addition, Ms. Dorf was active in securing seven new Foundation board members. Prior to joining Queens College, Ms. Dorf served in a number of progressively responsible leadership positions where her skills in management, planning and development were enhanced. As Executive Director for Development at Columbia University’s Teachers College, she managed day-to-day operations and provided strategic leadership for a capital campaign that raised over $154 million. As Director of Alumni Affairs and Special Events at New York Law School, she implemented programs serving an alumni base of 15,000. Ms. Dorf served as Director of Citywide Annual Fund Campaigns for the YMCA of Greater New York, overseeing the implementation of a $6 million citywide and branch annual support fundraising campaign that included major donor solicitation, corporation and foundations, special events and direct mail. Ms. Dorf’s educational background includes a Master’s Degree in Public Administration from New York University and a Bachelor of Arts in Sociology from Long Island University. As Vice President for Institutional Advancement/Alumni Relations, Ms. Dorf will be able to continue to nurture the groundwork that she has established at Queens College. Her invaluable work in outreach and engagement will continue to grow. She will carry on with her vision of connecting alumni with academic program leaders thereby fostering positive relationships. For all these reasons, the appointment of Laurie F. Dorf is a positive step that ensures that the College will continue to strengthen its presence in the development arena. The President strongly recommends her appointment.

LAURIE F. DORF PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Queens College, City University of New York

Acting Assistant Vice President, Institutional Advancement January 2008 – May 2008

Assistant Vice President, Institutional Advancement May 2008 – December 2015 Executive Director, Queens College Foundation Interim Vice President, Institutional Advancement January 2016 - Present

Reporting to the President lead the fundraising efforts for the College. Oversee the funding for the strategic plan and establish the necessary operational support to lead the colleges’ capital campaign. Work with the Queens College Foundation board of trustees to implement a fundraising plan to include endowment, planned giving, annual fund, planned giving and major gifts.

• Oversee $16.5 million annually from all sources including planned giving; annual fund; major gifts and corporations and foundations

• Identify, cultivate and solicit a portfolio of 150+ donors for seven figure gifts

• Manage 13 staff of the office of institutional advancement and 4 in alumni relations office; establish systems to track donors, prepare annual fund mailings, manage telemarketing programs and ensure the president make the necessary visits to alumni

• Prepare proposals and reports for the President and Queens College Foundation board

• Led the capital campaign developing strategies for building the colleges’ endowment, annual fund, and planned giving programs; Goal $150 million - raised $162 million

• Overhauled the colleges’ scholarship program including scholar/donor stewardship and acknowledgements; Developed Presidents Leadership Society

• Establish system-wide designated giving programs for the four academic divisions.

Columbia University, Teachers College

Executive Director for Development 2004 – January 2008

Reporting to the Vice President for Development and External Affairs manage the day-to day operations of the Department. Provided leadership and strategy for a capital campaign which raised over $154 million. Work closely with Board of Trustees and other volunteers to identify and solicit major gifts. Manage the office’s $5 million operating budget and oversee $25 million raised in contributions annually.

• Collaborate with the Vice President to create strategy for implementing development goals and assist in overseeing the Strategic Plan for the College adopted by the Board of Trustees.

• Served as acting Vice President for four months in 2005 during sabbatical of VP.

• Working closely with the President, Vice President and faculty, to raise $25 million annually in gifts in support of scholarship, endowment and other College priorities.

• Identify donors, cultivate and solicit major gifts ($50,000 +) for a select group of alumni and friends.

• Oversee a staff of 17 including the Directors of four operating units: the Annual Fund; Gifts and Records, Alumni and Donor Relations for 63,000 alumni. Manage the Office of Event Planning to implement cultivation events and all events emanating from the Office of the President.

• Institute alumni affinity programs in coordination with the academic departments and programs.

• Oversee $5 million operating budget and serve as human resources administrator for 37 staff

• Manage daily operations of the department including financial reporting, board reports and budget reports.

New York Law School 1997 – 2004

Director of Alumni Affairs and Special Events

Working with the Associate Dean directed and implemented programs serving an alumni base of 15,000. Supervised alumni relations and special events and raised annual funds through personal solicitation and direct mail. Coordinate computer fund raising systems to support cultivation and stewardship activities. Work with 40 member Alumni Association Board of Directors managing budget and development strategies to keep alumni connected to the School.

• Administered annual support activities through personal solicitation (2-3 visits per week), direct mail and special events.

• Conducted class gift and phonation fund raising programs reaching 5,000 students and alumni.

• Created and managed several school-wide events including class reunions, symposia, continuing legal education programs, networking programs and industry specific events.

• Recruited and managed alumni volunteers, donors and friends to serve on various committees.

• Coordinated the planning, construction and implementation of the web-based alumni online directory

YMCA of Greater New York

Director of Citywide Annual Fund Campaigns 1992 – 1997

Responsible for the overall strategy, direction, and implementation of a $6 million citywide and branch annual support fund raising campaign that included major donor solicitation, corporation and foundations, special events and direct mail. Coordinated and supervised 19 local YMCA branch campaigns. Worked directly with Vice-President and Board of Directors to achieve fund raising goals. Served as interim Vice President from April 1997 – December 1997.

• Worked with Vice President on $30 million capital campaign and major gift imitative to raise $5.5 million for after school programs

• Developed campaign plans and strategies in conjunction with 19 Executive Directors. Strategies involved personal solicitation and direct mail from board members, individuals, corporations and foundations.

• Designed, directed and implemented all aspects of the Greater New York special events campaigns including annual dinner grossing first ever $1 million event. Worked with various board and volunteer committees to solicit corporate sponsorships.

• Supervised direct mail campaign including list management, acquisition and renewal programs.

• Worked with Board of Education to implement after-school literacy programs and solicited gifts of $25,000+.

Director of Human Resource Administration 1990 – 1992

Responsible for the overall development and delivery of comprehensive compensations packages, performance

Review programs and health benefits to 2,500 employees.

• Conducted research and market survey to restructure $31 million salary compensation program

• Coordinated all health benefits, introduced low-cost health plan; determined corporate/employee cost sharing contributions

• Developed policy manual and conducted various training program for over 750 professional staff

West Side YMCA

Senior Associate Executive Director 1983 - 1990

Responsible for the strategic development and delivery of all youth, adult and community development programs,

staff training, facility management and administration. Responsible for management of a $12 million budget

• Administered community-based programs and services to more than 10,000 members, including pre-school, after-school, day camps, teen centers and adult programs and services.

• Supervised 560 room residents including transient, long term and youth hostel programs.

• Hired and supervised staff of 24 professionals and 230 support staff

• Directed policy-level committees for the Board of Managers

Long Island Jewish Hillside Medical Center

Assistant Administrator 1980 – 1983

• Administered seven departments with $4.5 million budget including medical records, food services, and social services departments.

• Developed strategic operational plans and evaluation programs to meet standards of federal, state and municipal agencies, increasing reimbursements.

Brookdale Hospital Medical Center

Assistant Director of Unit Management Services 1976 – 1980

• Coordinated and supervised all support services for the operation of three inpatient units.

EDUCATION

New York University

Masters in Public Administration, Health Care Administration

CUNY, College of Staten Island

B.A., Sociology

AFFILIATIONS

Board of Directors, Women in Development

National Society for Fund Raising Executives

Member, Association of Fundraising Professionals

I-C-2

JOHN JAY COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE

Appointment of Laura Ginns as Vice President for Policy and Strategic Initiatives

WHEREAS, President Karol V. Mason joined John Jay College of Criminal Justice on August 1, 2017 and since then has been building a senior team; and WHEREAS, the College has been granted a search waiver to appoint a senior administrator to implement the President’s master plan for improving policy and strategic initiatives; and WHEREAS, Laura Ginns has been identified as the individual best qualified for this senior level position; now therefore be it RESOLVED, That the Board of Trustees of The City University of New York approve the appointment of Laura Ginns as Vice President for Policy and Strategic Initiatives at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, effective October 3, 2017. EXPLANATION: Laura Ginns brings to this position more than seventeen years of professional experience in teaching, litigation, and strategy and policy development. From October 2014 to January 2017, she held several high-level positions in the U.S. Department of Education, including Chief of Staff in the Office of the Secretary. She is a visionary executive with a distinguished career path and a strong reputation for leadership and collaborative decision-making. Ms. Ginns received her J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center, an M.S.T. from Pace University’s School of Education, and a B.A. from Georgetown University. The President strongly recommends her appointment.

I-C-3

THE CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK

Appointment of Wendy J. Thornton as Interim Vice President of Student Affairs

WHEREAS, The former Vice President of Student Affairs at The City College of New York left the College in May 2017; and WHEREAS, Wendy J. Thornton currently serves as Interim Dean of Student Affairs at The City College of New York and has been a dedicated Student Affairs professional at the College for more than two decades; now therefore be it RESOLVED, That the Board of Trustees of The City University of New York approve the appointment of Wendy J. Thornton as Interim Vice President of Student Affairs at The City College of New York, effective October 3, 2017. EXPLANATION: City College is pleased to recommend the appointment of Wendy J. Thornton to the position of Interim Vice President of Student Affairs. Ms. Thornton has substantial experience in the field of Student Affairs, with more than 26 years of experience in student services and administration. Ms. Thornton is a tremendous asset to the City College community. In addition to her Deanship, she has served as the Executive Director of Student Services and Conduct, Director of Student Life and Leadership Development, and as an Instructor. Among her many professional affiliations, Ms. Thornton is a member of the National Association of Student Personnel Administration, the National Clearinghouse for Leadership Programs, and the CUNY Council of Student Conduct Directors. She holds a Master of Arts in Social Science and a Bachelor of Science in Applied Social Science, both from The State University of New York at Binghamton. The Interim President strongly recommends her appointment.

Wendy].

ornton

Over twenty-five years of administrative and managerial experience in Student Affairs, specifically in strategic planning,

program development, staff and budget management, project rnanagement, and the creation of productive collaborations with important academic and student support programs that impact student retention and success. Core strengths: excellent communication and interpersonal relation skills, strong leadership and supervision, student learning and development, team dynarnics, fiscal rnanagement, program management.

EXPERIENCE

Acting Vice President for Student Affairs

The City College of New York 05/17 •!• Serve as the Chief Student Affairs C )fficer responsible for the oversight, management, and leadership of the

Division of Student Affairs. Plan, organize and direct student services and operational programs in the following areas Career & Professional Development Institute, International Student & Scholar Services, Athletics &

Recreation, Student Life, Child Care Center, Accessibilities, Wellness & Counseling, Veterans Affairs, The Towers and Community Standards.

Provide executive leadership and vision in administering a comprehensive range of programs and services

Participate in various aspects of institutional planning

Monitor division's budgets to ensure efficient administration and allocation of resources

Responsible for the development of positive cross-campus partnerships that will enhance the student experience

Dean for Student Development The City College of New York 02/13-05/17 •!• Responsible for assisting the Vice President in the planning, implernentation and evaluation of student development

and retention programs and services managed by the Division, and to recommend the development and implementation of new programs and services that support the College's strategic plan.

..

"

"

Working as Deputy to the Vice President, supervise and represent the Division in the absence of the Vice

President

Manage the efficient operation of the student development area to deliver services to students to achieve success

Provide managerial leadership and supervision to direct reports and their respective staff to ensure that a cohesive and collaborative team effort exists in all student affairs and college services

Direct reports consist of Professional Development Institute, International Student & Scholar Services, and Community Standards. Ensure that managerial leadership and supervision are provided to direct

reports

Assist with the vision, development, implementation and leadership of the new Professional Development Institute (PD I)

Oversee the management and design of programs and services to enhance the transition, retention and professional success of students in the early stages of enrollment

Collaborate with Academic Affairs on retention activities and special population programs that foster the intellectual, social, professional, and personal development of a diverse student population

Assist the Vice President in overseeing the development, administration and coordination of Student ,\ffairs policies, programs and procedures related to retention, accountability, student behavior, and emergency protocols

Provide leadership and oversight in implementing continuous improvement efforts, formulating divisional goals and objectives, and evaluating the Division's targets and goals and Performance Management

Process

Recommend strategies to meet the needs of a diverse student body

Quarterly Report on Staff Diversity (Executive Summary)

Office of Human Resources ManagementOctober, 2017

Gloriana B. Waters, Vice Chancellor for Human Resources ManagementDr. Arlene Torres, Dean of Recruitment, Diversity and Compliance

Contents

This report summarizes the staff workforce characteristics based on the 2017 Affirmative Action Plan and other reports

Sections: A. Assessment – Total Workforce B. Assessment – New Hires C. Assessment – Retirement D. Changes to AAP E. Programming F. Discussion of Labor Market Availability

Appendix: Staff Underutilization Report 2017

Page 1 of 164

Assessment

A. Staff Workforce Assessment

B. Staff New Hire Assessment

Page 2 of 164

A. StaffWorkforceAssessmentExcludes Faculty Titles

A-1:

A-2:

A-3:

A-4:

Staff Ethnicity and Gender Representation, 2017

Staff by Ethnicity and Gender, 2016 - 2017

Staff by Ethnicity, Gender and College, 2017

Staff by Disability and Military Status, 2016 - 2017

Staff by Ethnicity, Gender and Job Group, 2017

Staff by Ethnicity, Gender, College and Job Group, 2017

*Data is based on the 2016 and 2017 Affirmative Action Plans

A-5:

A-6:

Page 3 of 164

# %Female 6,670 53.1%

Male 5,882 46.9%Total Minority

Federal Protected Groups 8,385 66.8%Amer. Ind./Al. Nat. 30 0.2%

Asian/Nat. Haw./Other Pac. Isl. 1,309 10.4%Black 3,871 30.8%

Hispanic 3,062 24.4%Two or More Races 113 0.9%

White 3,512 28.0%Italian American 655 5.2%

TOTAL 12,552

Table A-1

Staff Ethnicity and Gender RepresentationFall 2017

Source: CUNYfirst June 1, 2017 - AAP 2017

Full-Time

Page 4 of 164

# % # % # %

Female 6,589 52.5% 6,670 53.1% 81 1.2%

Male 5,955 47.5% 5,882 46.9% -73 -1.2%

Total MinorityFederal Protected Groups 8,336 66.5% 8,385 66.8% 49 0.6%

Amer. Ind./Al. Nat. 31 0.2% 30 0.2% -1 -3.2%Asian/Nat. Haw./Other Pac. Isl. 1,291 10.3% 1,309 10.4% 18 1.4%

Black 3,871 30.9% 3,871 30.8% 0 0.0%Hispanic 3,033 24.2% 3,062 24.4% 29 1.0%

Two or More Races 110 0.9% 113 0.9% 3 2.7%

White 3,533 28.2% 3,512 27.9% -21 -0.6%

Italian American 675 5.4% 655 5.2% -20 -3.0%

TOTAL 12,544 12,552 8 0.1%

2016 2017Change

2016-2017

Table A-2Staff by Ethnicity and Gender

Fall 2016 - Fall 2017Source: CUNYfirst June 1, 2017 - AAP 2017

Page 5 of 164

TOTAL# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # %

30 0.2% 1,309 10.4% 3,871 30.8% 3,062 24.4% 113 0.9% 8,385 66.8% 3,512 28.0% 655 5.2% 12,552 6,670 53.1% 5,882 46.9%19 0.2% 935 10.7% 2,716 31.1% 1,895 21.7% 76 0.9% 5,641 64.5% 2,614 29.9% 485 5.5% 8,740 4,629 53.0% 4,111 47.0%

Baruch College 0.0% 94 13.1% 200 27.8% 181 25.2% 1 0.1% 476 66.2% 217 30.2% 26 3.6% 719 384 53.4% 335 46.6%Brooklyn College 2 0.3% 59 8.1% 260 35.7% 102 14.0% 7 1.0% 430 59.1% 239 32.8% 59 8.1% 728 387 53.2% 341 46.8%Central Office 2 0.2% 134 14.0% 234 24.4% 161 16.8% 16 1.7% 547 57.1% 341 35.6% 70 7.3% 958 519 54.2% 439 45.8%City College 3 0.4% 93 11.1% 308 36.7% 210 25.0% 4 0.5% 618 73.6% 196 23.3% 26 3.1% 840 355 42.3% 485 57.7%College of Staten Island 2 0.4% 33 5.9% 44 7.9% 71 12.8% 5 0.9% 155 27.9% 311 56.0% 89 16.0% 555 304 54.8% 251 45.2%CUNY School of Law 0.0% 11 12.0% 17 18.5% 16 17.4% 0.0% 44 47.8% 44 47.8% 4 4.3% 92 64 69.6% 28 30.4%CUNY School of Medicine 0.0% 11 15.7% 27 38.6% 17 24.3% 2 2.9% 57 81.4% 11 15.7% 2 2.9% 70 54 77.1% 16 22.9%Graduate School 1 0.3% 38 13.1% 74 25.5% 51 17.6% 2 0.7% 166 57.2% 113 39.0% 11 3.8% 290 179 61.7% 111 38.3%Hunter College 3 0.3% 109 11.0% 254 25.6% 277 27.9% 11 1.1% 654 65.9% 297 29.9% 41 4.1% 992 489 49.3% 503 50.7%Hunter Campus Schools 0.0% 2 9.1% 2 9.1% 1 4.5% 0.0% 5 22.7% 14 63.6% 3 13.6% 22 13 59.1% 9 40.9%John Jay College 2 0.3% 47 7.7% 190 30.9% 172 28.0% 6 1.0% 417 67.9% 176 28.7% 21 3.4% 614 360 58.6% 254 41.4%Lehman College 0.0% 50 8.4% 146 24.5% 231 38.8% 0.0% 427 71.8% 135 22.7% 33 5.5% 595 291 48.9% 304 51.1%Macaulay Honors College 0.0% 3 6.4% 12 25.5% 5 10.6% 1 2.1% 21 44.7% 24 51.1% 2 4.3% 47 37 78.7% 10 21.3%Medgar Evers College 0.0% 15 3.7% 316 78.4% 37 9.2% 4 1.0% 372 92.3% 25 6.2% 6 1.5% 403 197 48.9% 206 51.1%NYC College of Technology 1 0.2% 46 8.9% 228 44.1% 120 23.2% 2 0.4% 397 76.8% 102 19.7% 18 3.5% 517 288 55.7% 229 44.3%Queens College 1 0.1% 101 15.0% 147 21.8% 130 19.3% 7 1.0% 386 57.3% 231 34.3% 57 8.5% 674 364 54.0% 310 46.0%School of Journalism 0.0% 1 2.4% 8 19.0% 10 23.8% 2 4.8% 21 50.0% 19 45.2% 2 4.8% 42 19 45.2% 23 54.8%School of Professional Studies 0.0% 11 9.6% 19 16.7% 32 28.1% 2 1.8% 64 56.1% 44 38.6% 6 5.3% 114 84 73.7% 30 26.3%School of Public Health 0.0% 5 11.6% 14 32.6% 10 23.3% 0.0% 29 67.4% 14 32.6% 0.0% 43 30 69.8% 13 30.2%York College 2 0.5% 72 16.9% 216 50.8% 61 14.4% 4 0.9% 355 83.5% 61 14.4% 9 2.1% 425 211 49.6% 214 50.4%

11 0.3% 374 9.8% 1,155 30.3% 1,167 30.6% 37 1.0% 2,744 72.0% 898 23.6% 170 4.5% 3,812 2,041 53.5% 1,771 46.5%Borough of Manhattan CC 3 0.4% 95 12.2% 283 36.4% 206 26.5% 12 1.5% 599 77.1% 155 19.9% 23 3.0% 777 398 51.2% 379 48.8%Bronx CC 1 0.2% 28 4.7% 203 34.0% 267 44.7% 3 0.5% 502 84.1% 80 13.4% 15 2.5% 597 295 49.4% 302 50.6%Guttman CC 0.0% 10 9.3% 31 29.0% 29 27.1% 2 1.9% 72 67.3% 29 27.1% 6 5.6% 107 69 64.5% 38 35.5%Hostos CC 2 0.5% 19 4.6% 108 26.0% 221 53.3% 8 1.9% 358 86.3% 46 11.1% 11 2.7% 415 227 54.7% 188 45.3%Kingsborough CC 3 0.5% 35 6.1% 184 32.0% 98 17.0% 5 0.9% 325 56.5% 199 34.6% 51 8.9% 575 300 52.2% 275 47.8%LaGuardia CC 2 0.3% 101 13.5% 217 29.1% 234 31.4% 4 0.5% 558 74.8% 165 22.1% 23 3.1% 746 441 59.1% 305 40.9%Queensborough CC 0.0% 86 14.5% 129 21.7% 112 18.8% 3 0.5% 330 55.5% 224 37.6% 41 6.9% 595 311 52.3% 284 47.7%

Table A-3

Amer. Ind./Al. Nat.

Asian/Nat. Haw./

Other Pac. Isl. Black HispanicTwo or More

Races WhiteItalian

American Female Male

Community Colleges Total

The CUNY School of Medicine has been separated from The City College. Data for The William E. Macaulay Honors College is combined with data for The Graduate School and University Center.Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding.

Staff by Ethnicity, Gender and College Fall 2017 Source: CUNYfirst June 1, 2017 - AAP 2017

Senior Colleges Total

University-wide Total

Seni

or C

olle

ges

Com

mun

ity C

olle

ges

Total MinorityFederal Protected

Groups

Page 6 of 164

# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # %468 3.7% 611 4.9% 11,885 94.7% 11,764 93.7% 191 1.5% 177 1.4% 898 7.2% 960 7.6% 11,475 91.5% 11,427 91.0% 171 1.4% 165 1.3% 12,544 12,552156 1.8% 209 2.4% 8,463 96.6% 8,401 96.1% 138 1.6% 130 1.5% 644 7.4% 682 7.8% 7,988 91.2% 7,937 90.8% 125 1.4% 121 1.4% 8,757 8,740

Baruch College 50 7.1% 61 8.5% 651 91.8% 651 90.5% 8 1.1% 7 1.0% 26 3.7% 26 3.6% 668 94.2% 682 94.9% 15 2.1% 11 1.5% 709 719Brooklyn College 0 0.0% 1 0.1% 712 97.0% 706 97.0% 22 3.0% 21 2.9% 87 11.9% 110 15.1% 633 86.2% 603 82.8% 14 1.9% 15 2.1% 734 728Central Office 1 0.1% 1 0.1% 988 98.6% 947 98.9% 13 1.3% 10 1.0% 194 19.4% 201 21.0% 783 78.1% 734 76.6% 25 2.5% 23 2.4% 1,002 958City College 4 0.5% 5 0.6% 838 98.1% 821 97.7% 12 1.4% 14 1.7% 27 3.2% 26 3.1% 824 96.5% 811 96.5% 3 0.4% 3 0.4% 854 840College of Staten Island 1 0.2% 2 0.4% 554 98.1% 544 98.0% 10 1.8% 9 1.6% 61 10.8% 61 11.0% 493 87.3% 484 87.2% 11 1.9% 10 1.8% 565 555CUNY School of Law 17 18.1% 21 22.8% 77 81.9% 71 77.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 4.3% 3 3.3% 89 94.7% 88 95.7% 1 1.1% 1 1.1% 94 92CUNY School of Medicine 0 0.0% 1 1.4% 63 100.0% 69 98.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 6.3% 4 5.7% 58 92.1% 65 92.9% 1 1.6% 1 1.4% 63 70Graduate Center 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 292 98.6% 285 98.3% 4 1.4% 5 1.7% 25 8.4% 26 9.0% 268 90.5% 260 89.7% 3 1.0% 4 1.4% 296 290Hunter College 0 0.0% 1 0.1% 953 98.7% 981 98.9% 13 1.3% 10 1.0% 41 4.2% 41 4.1% 920 95.2% 946 95.4% 5 0.5% 5 0.5% 966 992Hunter Campus Schools 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 22 100.0% 22 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 4.5% 1 4.5% 21 95.5% 21 95.5% 0.0% 0.0% 22 22John Jay College 2 0.3% 4 0.7% 575 97.6% 598 97.4% 12 2.0% 12 2.0% 21 3.6% 22 3.6% 557 94.6% 581 94.6% 11 1.9% 11 1.8% 589 614Lehman College 64 10.7% 88 14.8% 529 88.2% 501 84.2% 7 1.2% 6 1.0% 42 7.0% 47 7.9% 545 90.8% 535 89.9% 13 2.2% 13 2.2% 600 595Macaulay Honors College 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 47 100.0% 47 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9 19.1% 8 17.0% 38 80.9% 39 83.0% 0.0% 0.0% 47 47Medgar Evers College 12 3.0% 13 3.2% 377 93.8% 377 93.5% 13 3.2% 13 3.2% 9 2.2% 9 2.2% 391 97.3% 392 97.3% 2 0.5% 2 0.5% 402 403NYC College of Technology 1 0.2% 1 0.2% 513 98.8% 512 99.0% 5 1.0% 4 0.8% 18 3.5% 17 3.3% 500 96.3% 499 96.5% 1 0.2% 1 0.2% 519 517Queens College 4 0.6% 6 0.9% 682 98.1% 660 97.9% 9 1.3% 8 1.2% 30 4.3% 37 5.5% 655 94.2% 626 92.9% 10 1.4% 11 1.6% 695 674School of Journalism 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 39 97.5% 41 97.6% 1 2.5% 1 2.4% 1 2.5% 3 7.1% 39 97.5% 39 92.9% 0.0% 0.0% 40 42School of Professional Studies 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 112 99.1% 113 99.1% 1 0.9% 1 0.9% 15 13.3% 17 14.9% 95 84.1% 94 82.5% 3 2.7% 3 2.6% 113 114School of Public Health 0 0.0% 3 7.0% 29 96.7% 39 90.7% 1 3.3% 1 2.3% 5 16.7% 5 11.6% 24 80.0% 37 86.0% 1 3.3% 1 2.3% 30 43York College 0 0.0% 1 0.2% 410 98.3% 416 97.9% 7 1.7% 8 1.9% 24 5.8% 18 4.2% 387 92.8% 401 94.4% 6 1.4% 6 1.4% 417 425

312 8.2% 402 10.5% 3,422 90.4% 3,363 88.2% 53 1.4% 47 1.2% 254 6.7% 278 7.3% 3,487 92.1% 3,490 91.6% 46 1.2% 44 1.2% 3,787 3,812Borough of Manhattan CC 14 1.9% 19 2.4% 727 96.8% 748 96.3% 10 1.3% 10 1.3% 38 5.1% 38 4.9% 707 94.1% 733 94.3% 6 0.8% 6 0.8% 751 777Bronx CC 31 5.2% 46 7.7% 550 92.7% 540 90.5% 12 2.0% 11 1.8% 24 4.0% 27 4.5% 567 95.6% 568 95.1% 2 0.3% 2 0.3% 593 597Guttman CC 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 107 97.3% 106 99.1% 3 2.7% 1 0.9% 9 8.2% 8 7.5% 98 89.1% 96 89.7% 3 2.7% 3 2.8% 110 107Hostos CC 3 0.7% 8 1.9% 411 96.3% 397 95.7% 13 3.0% 10 2.4% 77 18.0% 79 19.0% 339 79.4% 326 78.6% 11 2.6% 10 2.4% 427 415Kingsborough CC 45 7.5% 51 8.9% 548 91.2% 516 89.7% 8 1.3% 8 1.4% 34 5.7% 33 5.7% 560 93.2% 536 93.2% 7 1.2% 6 1.0% 601 575LaGuardia CC 156 21.5% 194 26.0% 566 78.0% 549 73.6% 4 0.6% 3 0.4% 30 4.1% 31 4.2% 689 94.9% 709 95.0% 7 1.0% 6 0.8% 726 746Queensborough CC 63 10.9% 84 14.1% 513 88.6% 507 85.2% 3 0.5% 4 0.7% 42 7.3% 62 10.4% 527 91.0% 522 87.7% 10 1.7% 11 1.8% 579 595

Seni

or C

olle

ges

Community Colleges Total

Com

mun

ity C

olle

ges

2016 20172016 2017

University-wide Total

Senior Colleges Total

2016 20172016 20172016 2017

Disability Status

2017

TOTAL

Table A-4

Staff by Disability and Military Status Fall 2016 - Fall 2017Source: CUNYfirst June 1, 2017 - AAP 2017

VeteransNo MilitaryService

Not Indicated/Blank

Not Indicated/Blank

No

Military Status

Yes

201620172016

Page 7 of 164

Total

# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % % # % # %

Total 30 0.2% 1,309 10.4% 3,871 30.8% 3,062 24.4% 113 0.9% 8,385 66.8% 3,512 28.0% 655 5.2% 12,552 6,670 53.1% 5,882 46.9%Accountant 26 24.5% 32 30.2% 17 16.0% 3 2.8% 78 73.6% 27 25.5% 1 0.9% 106 75 70.8% 31 29.2%Accountant Assistants 22 20.8% 41 38.7% 20 18.9% 83 78.3% 19 17.9% 4 3.8% 106 88 83.0% 18 17.0%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 29 5.2% 97 17.5% 63 11.4% 6 1.1% 195 35.3% 295 53.3% 63 11.4% 553 275 49.7% 278 50.3%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 1 0.0% 231 10.3% 539 24.0% 394 17.5% 16 0.7% 1,181 52.6% 885 39.4% 180 8.0% 2,246 1,448 64.5% 798 35.5%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 10 0.3% 331 11.0% 938 31.1% 770 25.5% 40 1.3% 2,089 69.3% 807 26.8% 120 4.0% 3,016 2,127 70.5% 889 29.5%Administration 4 ‐ College Lab Techs 1 0.2% 91 17.0% 101 18.9% 111 20.7% 4 0.7% 308 57.6% 199 37.2% 28 5.2% 535 189 35.3% 346 64.7%Administration 5 ‐ Engineers/Architects 13 23.6% 7 12.7% 9 16.4% 29 52.7% 21 38.2% 5 9.1% 55 14 25.5% 41 74.5%Basic Crafts‐Buildings and Grounds 1 0.9% 8 7.0% 21 18.3% 29 25.2% 59 51.3% 48 41.7% 8 7.0% 115 3 2.6% 112 97.4%Broadcast‐Media Technicians 5 6.2% 23 28.4% 13 16.0% 1 1.2% 42 51.9% 36 44.4% 3 3.7% 81 19 23.5% 62 76.5%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 3 0.4% 76 9.2% 458 55.5% 214 25.9% 9 1.1% 760 92.1% 59 7.2% 6 0.7% 825 206 25.0% 619 75.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐2 1 1.5% 2 2.9% 36 52.9% 20 29.4% 59 86.8% 9 13.2% 68 22 32.4% 46 67.6%Campus Public Safety Sergeant 9 4.5% 93 46.5% 67 33.5% 1 0.5% 170 85.0% 23 11.5% 7 3.5% 200 47 23.5% 153 76.5%CUNY Administrative Asst 1 0.3% 14 3.8% 110 29.6% 76 20.4% 6 1.6% 207 55.6% 125 33.6% 40 10.8% 372 356 95.7% 16 4.3%CUNY Office Asst 2 0.2% 119 9.6% 475 38.4% 339 27.4% 16 1.3% 951 76.9% 225 18.2% 61 4.9% 1,237 1,081 87.4% 156 12.6%Custodial 63 7.0% 385 42.7% 381 42.2% 1 0.1% 830 92.0% 63 7.0% 9 1.0% 902 313 34.7% 589 65.3%Custodial ‐ Supervisory 2 1.4% 82 58.6% 48 34.3% 1 0.7% 133 95.0% 5 3.6% 2 1.4% 140 40 28.6% 100 71.4%Disability Accommodation Specl 2 20.0% 3 30.0% 2 20.0% 7 70.0% 3 30.0% 10 5 50.0% 5 50.0%Engineering Technician 1 7.7% 3 23.1% 6 46.2% 10 76.9% 3 23.1% 13 5 38.5% 8 61.5%Facilities ‐ Manager 6 10.2% 12 20.3% 14 23.7% 32 54.2% 21 35.6% 6 10.2% 59 8 13.6% 51 86.4%Info Tech ‐ Managerial 2 1.4% 33 23.1% 23 16.1% 22 15.4% 2 1.4% 82 57.3% 51 35.7% 10 7.0% 143 34 23.8% 109 76.2%Info Tech ‐ Professional 3 0.4% 172 24.9% 138 19.9% 185 26.7% 4 0.6% 502 72.5% 164 23.7% 26 3.8% 692 196 28.3% 496 71.7%Info Tech ‐ Technician 1 0.8% 14 11.3% 36 29.0% 55 44.4% 2 1.6% 108 87.1% 13 10.5% 3 2.4% 124 51 41.1% 73 58.9%Laborers and Helpers 1 0.5% 7 3.8% 73 39.2% 52 28.0% 133 71.5% 42 22.6% 11 5.9% 186 4 2.2% 182 97.8%Mail Services Worker 3 3.2% 34 36.6% 37 39.8% 1 1.1% 75 80.6% 14 15.1% 4 4.3% 93 19 20.4% 74 79.6%Nurse 2 25.0% 3 37.5% 5 62.5% 3 37.5% 8 8 100.0%Print Shop‐Media 9 11.7% 22 28.6% 29 37.7% 60 77.9% 15 19.5% 2 2.6% 77 20 26.0% 57 74.0%Security ‐ Managerial 1 1.6% 27 42.2% 16 25.0% 44 68.8% 13 20.3% 7 10.9% 64 11 17.2% 53 82.8%Skilled Trades 3 0.6% 19 4.0% 53 11.2% 65 13.8% 140 29.7% 292 61.9% 40 8.5% 472 5 1.1% 467 98.9%Skilled Trades‐Supervisor 1 1.9% 7 13.0% 5 9.3% 13 24.1% 32 59.3% 9 16.7% 54 1 1.9% 53 98.1%

Table A‐5


GroupsAmer. Ind./Al. Nat.

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races White Italian American Female Male

Staff by Ethnicity, Gender and Job Group ‐ Fall 2017Source: CUNYfirst June 1, 2017 ‐ AAP 2017

Page 8 of 164

Total

# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % % # % # %Baruch College 94 13.1% 200 27.8% 181 25.2% 1 0.1% 476 66.2% 217 30.2% 26 3.6% 719 384 53.4% 335 46.6%Accountant 5 100.0% 5 100.0% 5 4 80.0% 1 20.0%Accountant Assistants 4 50.0% 1 12.5% 1 12.5% 6 75.0% 2 25.0% 8 5 62.5% 3 37.5%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 3 9.7% 4 12.9% 1 3.2% 8 25.8% 21 67.7% 2 6.5% 31 16 51.6% 15 48.4%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 19 12.8% 22 14.8% 23 15.4% 64 43.0% 73 49.0% 12 8.1% 149 100 67.1% 49 32.9%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 26 15.2% 43 25.1% 42 24.6% 1 0.6% 112 65.5% 56 32.7% 3 1.8% 171 120 70.2% 51 29.8%Administration 4 ‐ College Lab Techs 2 28.6% 2 28.6% 4 57.1% 3 42.9% 7 3 42.9% 4 57.1%Administration 5 ‐ Engineers/Architects 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 4 2 50.0% 2 50.0%Basic Crafts‐Buildings and Grounds 1 12.5% 2 25.0% 2 25.0% 5 62.5% 2 25.0% 1 12.5% 8 8 100.0%Broadcast‐Media Technicians 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 4 100.0% 4 4 100.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 4 6.8% 34 57.6% 18 30.5% 56 94.9% 3 5.1% 59 15 25.4% 44 74.6%Campus Peace Officer L‐2 3 42.9% 3 42.9% 6 85.7% 1 14.3% 7 1 14.3% 6 85.7%Campus Public Safety Sergeant 8 66.7% 3 25.0% 11 91.7% 1 8.3% 12 2 16.7% 10 83.3%CUNY Administrative Asst 2 8.3% 10 41.7% 5 20.8% 17 70.8% 6 25.0% 1 4.2% 24 21 87.5% 3 12.5%CUNY Office Asst 7 10.8% 22 33.8% 17 26.2% 46 70.8% 15 23.1% 4 6.2% 65 57 87.7% 8 12.3%Custodial 9 10.5% 27 31.4% 47 54.7% 83 96.5% 3 3.5% 86 27 31.4% 59 68.6%Custodial ‐ Supervisory 8 61.5% 5 38.5% 13 100.0% 13 2 15.4% 11 84.6%Facilities ‐ Manager 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 2 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Managerial 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 2 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Professional 10 41.7% 4 16.7% 6 25.0% 20 83.3% 4 16.7% 24 5 20.8% 19 79.2%Info Tech ‐ Technician 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 3 3 100.0%Laborers and Helpers 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 3 3 100.0%Mail Services Worker 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 100.0% 3 1 33.3% 2 66.7%Security ‐ Managerial 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Skilled Trades 1 4.0% 1 4.0% 3 12.0% 5 20.0% 19 76.0% 1 4.0% 25 25 100.0%Skilled Trades‐Supervisor 3 100.0% 3 3 100.0%

Staff by Ethnicity, Gender, College and Job Group ‐ Fall 2017Source: CUNYfirst June 1, 2017 ‐ AAP 2017

Table A‐6

Amer. Ind./Al. Nat.

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races


Groups White Italian American Female Male

Page 9 of 164

Total

# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % % # % # %


Table A‐6

Amer. Ind./Al. Nat.

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races



Brooklyn College 2 0.3% 59 8.1% 260 35.7% 102 14.0% 7 1.0% 430 59.1% 239 32.8% 59 8.1% 728 387 53.2% 341 46.8%Accountant 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 4 100.0% 4 4 100.0%Accountant Assistants 2 28.6% 2 28.6% 4 57.1% 2 28.6% 1 14.3% 7 6 85.7% 1 14.3%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 8 25.8% 1 3.2% 9 29.0% 17 54.8% 5 16.1% 31 13 41.9% 18 58.1%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 7 6.7% 24 23.1% 15 14.4% 46 44.2% 45 43.3% 13 12.5% 104 67 64.4% 37 35.6%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 19 12.4% 52 34.0% 24 15.7% 2 1.3% 97 63.4% 40 26.1% 16 10.5% 153 99 64.7% 54 35.3%Administration 4 ‐ College Lab Techs 2 4.4% 7 15.6% 6 13.3% 15 33.3% 24 53.3% 6 13.3% 45 12 26.7% 33 73.3%Administration 5 ‐ Engineers/Architects 4 80.0% 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 5 3 60.0% 2 40.0%Basic Crafts‐Buildings and Grounds 3 42.9% 3 42.9% 3 42.9% 1 14.3% 7 7 100.0%Broadcast‐Media Technicians 2 100.0% 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 1 1.9% 39 72.2% 8 14.8% 48 88.9% 5 9.3% 1 1.9% 54 10 18.5% 44 81.5%Campus Peace Officer L‐2 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 100.0% 3 3 100.0%Campus Public Safety Sergeant 6 54.5% 1 9.1% 1 9.1% 8 72.7% 2 18.2% 1 9.1% 11 2 18.2% 9 81.8%CUNY Administrative Asst 2 6.1% 10 30.3% 3 9.1% 2 6.1% 17 51.5% 15 45.5% 1 3.0% 33 33 100.0%CUNY Office Asst 7 7.1% 40 40.8% 9 9.2% 1 1.0% 57 58.2% 33 33.7% 8 8.2% 98 91 92.9% 7 7.1%Custodial 4 8.0% 28 56.0% 15 30.0% 47 94.0% 3 6.0% 50 17 34.0% 33 66.0%Custodial ‐ Supervisory 1 14.3% 3 42.9% 2 28.6% 6 85.7% 1 14.3% 7 2 28.6% 5 71.4%Facilities ‐ Manager 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 4 4 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Managerial 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 4 1 25.0% 3 75.0%Info Tech ‐ Professional 5 13.5% 9 24.3% 6 16.2% 20 54.1% 16 43.2% 1 2.7% 37 13 35.1% 24 64.9%Info Tech ‐ Technician 4 80.0% 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 5 3 60.0% 2 40.0%Laborers and Helpers 1 7.7% 4 30.8% 3 23.1% 8 61.5% 5 38.5% 13 13 100.0%Mail Services Worker 4 100.0% 4 100.0% 4 2 50.0% 2 50.0%Print Shop‐Media 1 16.7% 4 66.7% 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 6 2 33.3% 4 66.7%Security ‐ Managerial 4 66.7% 1 16.7% 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 6 2 33.3% 4 66.7%Skilled Trades 1 3.1% 2 6.3% 4 12.5% 4 12.5% 11 34.4% 19 59.4% 2 6.3% 32 1 3.1% 31 96.9%Skilled Trades‐Supervisor 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 3 3 100.0%

Page 10 of 164

Total

# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % % # % # %


Table A‐6

Amer. Ind./Al. Nat.

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races



Central Office 2 0.2% 134 14.0% 234 24.4% 161 16.8% 16 1.7% 547 57.1% 341 35.6% 70 7.3% 958 519 54.2% 439 45.8%Accountant 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 4 100.0% 4 4 100.0%Accountant Assistants 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 100.0% 2 2 100.0%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 4 4.9% 6 7.3% 7 8.5% 1 1.2% 18 22.0% 51 62.2% 13 15.9% 82 45 54.9% 37 45.1%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 27 10.7% 51 20.2% 35 13.8% 3 1.2% 116 45.8% 117 46.2% 20 7.9% 253 149 58.9% 104 41.1%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 31 12.8% 78 32.1% 53 21.8% 7 2.9% 169 69.5% 60 24.7% 14 5.8% 243 177 72.8% 66 27.2%Administration 5 ‐ Engineers/Architects 4 20.0% 3 15.0% 2 10.0% 9 45.0% 8 40.0% 3 15.0% 20 3 15.0% 17 85.0%Broadcast‐Media Technicians 3 7.3% 13 31.7% 6 14.6% 22 53.7% 19 46.3% 41 16 39.0% 25 61.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 4 100.0% 4 4 100.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐2 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Campus Public Safety Sergeant 3 27.3% 6 54.5% 9 81.8% 2 18.2% 11 3 27.3% 8 72.7%CUNY Administrative Asst 1 11.1% 5 55.6% 1 11.1% 7 77.8% 2 22.2% 9 9 100.0%CUNY Office Asst 5 13.9% 14 38.9% 6 16.7% 25 69.4% 7 19.4% 4 11.1% 36 29 80.6% 7 19.4%Custodial 2 66.7% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 1 33.3% 2 66.7%Custodial ‐ Supervisory 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 100.0% 3 3 100.0%Engineering Technician 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Facilities ‐ Manager 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 3 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Managerial 2 2.7% 19 25.7% 13 17.6% 4 5.4% 2 2.7% 40 54.1% 29 39.2% 5 6.8% 74 23 31.1% 51 68.9%Info Tech ‐ Professional 38 28.8% 24 18.2% 28 21.2% 90 68.2% 35 26.5% 7 5.3% 132 52 39.4% 80 60.6%Info Tech ‐ Technician 6 42.9% 6 42.9% 12 85.7% 1 7.1% 1 7.1% 14 5 35.7% 9 64.3%Laborers and Helpers 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Mail Services Worker 6 42.9% 3 21.4% 9 64.3% 3 21.4% 2 14.3% 14 14 100.0%Print Shop‐Media 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 4 4 100.0%Security ‐ Managerial 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 1 33.3% 2 66.7%

Page 11 of 164

Total

# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % % # % # %


Table A‐6

Amer. Ind./Al. Nat.

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races



City College 3 0.4% 93 11.1% 308 36.7% 210 25.0% 4 0.5% 618 73.6% 196 23.3% 26 3.1% 840 355 42.3% 485 57.7%Accountant 2 40.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 5 100.0% 5 4 80.0% 1 20.0%Accountant Assistants 3 27.3% 8 72.7% 11 100.0% 11 9 81.8% 2 18.2%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 7 26.9% 3 11.5% 10 38.5% 12 46.2% 4 15.4% 26 10 38.5% 16 61.5%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 14 9.9% 38 26.8% 30 21.1% 1 0.7% 83 58.5% 50 35.2% 9 6.3% 142 81 57.0% 61 43.0%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 26 14.9% 49 28.0% 52 29.7% 127 72.6% 47 26.9% 1 0.6% 175 98 56.0% 77 44.0%Administration 4 ‐ College Lab Techs 14 31.1% 4 8.9% 4 8.9% 22 48.9% 21 46.7% 2 4.4% 45 15 33.3% 30 66.7%Administration 5 ‐ Engineers/Architects 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Basic Crafts‐Buildings and Grounds 1 6.7% 3 20.0% 4 26.7% 8 53.3% 6 40.0% 1 6.7% 15 15 100.0%Broadcast‐Media Technicians 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 10 11.5% 51 58.6% 23 26.4% 84 96.6% 3 3.4% 87 17 19.5% 70 80.5%Campus Peace Officer L‐2 4 50.0% 4 50.0% 8 100.0% 8 4 50.0% 4 50.0%Campus Public Safety Sergeant 10 43.5% 9 39.1% 19 82.6% 2 8.7% 2 8.7% 23 4 17.4% 19 82.6%CUNY Administrative Asst 1 5.6% 8 44.4% 8 44.4% 17 94.4% 1 5.6% 18 16 88.9% 2 11.1%CUNY Office Asst 1 1.5% 5 7.7% 37 56.9% 15 23.1% 2 3.1% 60 92.3% 5 7.7% 65 54 83.1% 11 16.9%Custodial 1 1.3% 52 65.0% 26 32.5% 79 98.8% 1 1.3% 80 19 23.8% 61 76.3%Custodial ‐ Supervisory 9 69.2% 2 15.4% 11 84.6% 1 7.7% 1 7.7% 13 4 30.8% 9 69.2%Disability Accommodation Specl 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%Facilities ‐ Manager 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Managerial 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 4 100.0% 4 4 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Professional 1 2.8% 12 33.3% 8 22.2% 10 27.8% 31 86.1% 5 13.9% 36 11 30.6% 25 69.4%Laborers and Helpers 7 77.8% 2 22.2% 9 100.0% 9 1 11.1% 8 88.9%Mail Services Worker 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 3 100.0%Nurse 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Print Shop‐Media 2 40.0% 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 5 100.0% 5 3 60.0% 2 40.0%Security ‐ Managerial 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 4 4 100.0%Skilled Trades 2 4.0% 6 12.0% 7 14.0% 15 30.0% 32 64.0% 3 6.0% 50 3 6.0% 47 94.0%Skilled Trades‐Supervisor 1 10.0% 2 20.0% 3 30.0% 6 60.0% 1 10.0% 10 10 100.0%CUNY School of Medicine 11 15.7% 27 38.6% 17 24.3% 2 2.9% 57 81.4% 11 15.7% 2 2.9% 70 54 77.1% 16 22.9%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 1 11.1% 1 11.1% 2 22.2% 4 44.4% 4 44.4% 1 11.1% 9 6 66.7% 3 33.3%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 2 15.4% 7 53.8% 2 15.4% 11 84.6% 1 7.7% 1 7.7% 13 8 61.5% 5 38.5%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 5 19.2% 11 42.3% 5 19.2% 1 3.8% 22 84.6% 4 15.4% 26 23 88.5% 3 11.5%Administration 4 ‐ College Lab Techs 3 42.9% 2 28.6% 1 14.3% 6 85.7% 1 14.3% 7 3 42.9% 4 57.1%CUNY Administrative Asst 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 4 100.0% 4 4 100.0%CUNY Office Asst 5 45.5% 4 36.4% 1 9.1% 10 90.9% 1 9.1% 11 10 90.9% 1 9.1%

Page 12 of 164

Total

# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % % # % # %


Table A‐6

Amer. Ind./Al. Nat.

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races



College of Staten Island 2 0.4% 33 5.9% 44 7.9% 71 12.8% 5 0.9% 155 27.9% 311 56.0% 89 16.0% 555 304 54.8% 251 45.2%Accountant 1 11.1% 2 22.2% 3 33.3% 6 66.7% 9 8 88.9% 1 11.1%Accountant Assistants 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 2 40.0% 1 20.0% 5 4 80.0% 1 20.0%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 1 5.0% 2 10.0% 1 5.0% 4 20.0% 13 65.0% 3 15.0% 20 10 50.0% 10 50.0%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 8 8.2% 10 10.2% 8 8.2% 1 1.0% 27 27.6% 57 58.2% 14 14.3% 98 64 65.3% 34 34.7%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 2 2.1% 3 3.1% 7 7.2% 15 15.5% 27 27.8% 49 50.5% 21 21.6% 97 65 67.0% 32 33.0%Administration 4 ‐ College Lab Techs 5 16.7% 2 6.7% 5 16.7% 12 40.0% 17 56.7% 1 3.3% 30 15 50.0% 15 50.0%Administration 5 ‐ Engineers/Architects 2 100.0% 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%Basic Crafts‐Buildings and Grounds 1 14.3% 1 14.3% 6 85.7% 7 7 100.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 1 4.0% 3 12.0% 4 16.0% 2 8.0% 10 40.0% 14 56.0% 1 4.0% 25 5 20.0% 20 80.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐2 3 100.0% 3 1 33.3% 2 66.7%Campus Public Safety Sergeant 2 22.2% 1 11.1% 3 33.3% 5 55.6% 1 11.1% 9 2 22.2% 7 77.8%CUNY Administrative Asst 2 3.3% 2 3.3% 3 5.0% 7 11.7% 35 58.3% 18 30.0% 60 60 100.0%CUNY Office Asst 1 2.6% 2 5.3% 1 2.6% 4 10.5% 23 60.5% 11 28.9% 38 37 97.4% 1 2.6%Custodial 6 12.0% 6 12.0% 13 26.0% 1 2.0% 26 52.0% 21 42.0% 3 6.0% 50 17 34.0% 33 66.0%Custodial ‐ Supervisory 4 100.0% 4 100.0% 4 2 50.0% 2 50.0%Engineering Technician 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Facilities ‐ Manager 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 2 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Managerial 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 2 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Professional 5 14.3% 3 8.6% 4 11.4% 12 34.3% 17 48.6% 6 17.1% 35 5 14.3% 30 85.7%Laborers and Helpers 4 22.2% 5 27.8% 9 50.0% 8 44.4% 1 5.6% 18 1 5.6% 17 94.4%Mail Services Worker 2 100.0% 2 2 100.0%Nurse 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Print Shop‐Media 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 4 2 50.0% 2 50.0%Security ‐ Managerial 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 4 4 100.0%Skilled Trades 2 8.7% 2 8.7% 16 69.6% 5 21.7% 23 23 100.0%Skilled Trades‐Supervisor 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 6 1 16.7% 5 83.3%

Page 13 of 164

Total

# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % % # % # %


Table A‐6

Amer. Ind./Al. Nat.

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races



CUNY School of Law 11 12.0% 17 18.5% 16 17.4% 44 47.8% 44 47.8% 4 4.3% 92 64 69.6% 28 30.4%Accountant 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 1 9.1% 2 18.2% 3 27.3% 6 54.5% 2 18.2% 11 9 81.8% 2 18.2%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 4 14.8% 4 14.8% 4 14.8% 12 44.4% 15 55.6% 27 21 77.8% 6 22.2%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 4 16.0% 6 24.0% 4 16.0% 14 56.0% 11 44.0% 25 19 76.0% 6 24.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%CUNY Administrative Asst 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 5 5 100.0%CUNY Office Asst 1 11.1% 2 22.2% 3 33.3% 6 66.7% 2 22.2% 1 11.1% 9 8 88.9% 1 11.1%Info Tech ‐ Managerial 2 100.0% 2 2 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Professional 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 2 40.0% 1 20.0% 5 1 20.0% 4 80.0%Info Tech ‐ Technician 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Laborers and Helpers 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 3 3 100.0%Mail Services Worker 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Security ‐ Managerial 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%

Page 14 of 164

Total

# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % % # % # %


Table A‐6

Amer. Ind./Al. Nat.

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races



Graduate Center 1 0.3% 38 13.1% 74 25.5% 51 17.6% 2 0.7% 166 57.2% 113 39.0% 11 3.8% 290 179 61.7% 111 38.3%Accountant 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 1 5.3% 1 5.3% 17 89.5% 1 5.3% 19 9 47.4% 10 52.6%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 13 17.6% 5 6.8% 7 9.5% 1 1.4% 26 35.1% 43 58.1% 5 6.8% 74 53 71.6% 21 28.4%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 1 1.1% 12 13.6% 28 31.8% 15 17.0% 56 63.6% 29 33.0% 3 3.4% 88 72 81.8% 16 18.2%Administration 4 ‐ College Lab Techs 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 3 60.0% 1 20.0% 5 5 100.0%Basic Crafts‐Buildings and Grounds 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Broadcast‐Media Technicians 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 4 4 100.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 12 66.7% 5 27.8% 17 94.4% 1 5.6% 18 6 33.3% 12 66.7%Campus Peace Officer L‐2 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Campus Public Safety Sergeant 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 3 100.0% 3 1 33.3% 2 66.7%CUNY Administrative Asst 5 71.4% 1 14.3% 6 85.7% 1 14.3% 7 6 85.7% 1 14.3%CUNY Office Asst 1 6.7% 6 40.0% 5 33.3% 12 80.0% 3 20.0% 15 13 86.7% 2 13.3%Facilities ‐ Manager 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 100.0% 2 2 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Managerial 2 25.0% 1 12.5% 3 37.5% 6 75.0% 1 12.5% 1 12.5% 8 3 37.5% 5 62.5%Info Tech ‐ Professional 8 24.2% 7 21.2% 7 21.2% 22 66.7% 11 33.3% 33 14 42.4% 19 57.6%Info Tech ‐ Technician 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 100.0% 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%Mail Services Worker 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 5 100.0% 5 1 20.0% 4 80.0%Print Shop‐Media 2 66.7% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 3 100.0%Security ‐ Managerial 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Macaulay Honors College 3 6.4% 12 25.5% 5 10.6% 1 2.1% 21 44.7% 24 51.1% 2 4.3% 47 37 78.7% 10 21.3%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 3 100.0% 3 1 33.3% 2 66.7%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 3 21.4% 2 14.3% 5 35.7% 8 57.1% 1 7.1% 14 11 78.6% 3 21.4%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 3 11.5% 8 30.8% 2 7.7% 1 3.8% 14 53.8% 11 42.3% 1 3.8% 26 24 92.3% 2 7.7%Info Tech ‐ Professional 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 4 1 25.0% 3 75.0%

Page 15 of 164

Total

# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % % # % # %


Table A‐6

Amer. Ind./Al. Nat.

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races



Hunter Campus Schools 2 9.1% 2 9.1% 1 4.5% 5 22.7% 14 63.6% 3 13.6% 22 13 59.1% 9 40.9%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 1 7.7% 1 7.7% 2 15.4% 9 69.2% 2 15.4% 13 8 61.5% 5 38.5%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 1 14.3% 1 14.3% 5 71.4% 1 14.3% 7 5 71.4% 2 28.6%Administration 4 ‐ College Lab Techs 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 100.0% 2 2 100.0%Hunter College 3 0.3% 109 11.0% 254 25.6% 277 27.9% 11 1.1% 654 65.9% 297 29.9% 41 4.1% 992 489 49.3% 503 50.7%Accountant 5 31.3% 3 18.8% 2 12.5% 10 62.5% 6 37.5% 16 10 62.5% 6 37.5%Accountant Assistants 2 18.2% 5 45.5% 1 9.1% 8 72.7% 3 27.3% 11 11 100.0%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 1 3.2% 3 9.7% 3 9.7% 1 3.2% 8 25.8% 20 64.5% 3 9.7% 31 16 51.6% 15 48.4%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 14 9.5% 24 16.3% 30 20.4% 1 0.7% 69 46.9% 64 43.5% 14 9.5% 147 86 58.5% 61 41.5%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 27 11.5% 46 19.7% 56 23.9% 5 2.1% 134 57.3% 92 39.3% 8 3.4% 234 147 62.8% 87 37.2%Administration 4 ‐ College Lab Techs 9 24.3% 3 8.1% 5 13.5% 17 45.9% 18 48.6% 2 5.4% 37 15 40.5% 22 59.5%Administration 5 ‐ Engineers/Architects 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Basic Crafts‐Buildings and Grounds 2 25.0% 2 25.0% 1 12.5% 5 62.5% 3 37.5% 8 8 100.0%Broadcast‐Media Technicians 2 100.0% 2 2 100.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 1 1.1% 7 8.0% 52 59.8% 17 19.5% 1 1.1% 78 89.7% 8 9.2% 1 1.1% 87 26 29.9% 61 70.1%Campus Peace Officer L‐2 1 10.0% 1 10.0% 5 50.0% 3 30.0% 10 100.0% 10 2 20.0% 8 80.0%Campus Public Safety Sergeant 1 5.9% 9 52.9% 5 29.4% 15 88.2% 2 11.8% 17 4 23.5% 13 76.5%CUNY Administrative Asst 15 38.5% 15 38.5% 1 2.6% 31 79.5% 5 12.8% 3 7.7% 39 35 89.7% 4 10.3%CUNY Office Asst 8 9.5% 31 36.9% 33 39.3% 72 85.7% 10 11.9% 2 2.4% 84 69 82.1% 15 17.9%Custodial 7 8.3% 21 25.0% 53 63.1% 81 96.4% 3 3.6% 84 32 38.1% 52 61.9%Custodial ‐ Supervisory 1 5.9% 8 47.1% 8 47.1% 17 100.0% 17 5 29.4% 12 70.6%Engineering Technician 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 3 100.0%Facilities ‐ Manager 1 12.5% 2 25.0% 3 37.5% 5 62.5% 8 1 12.5% 7 87.5%Info Tech ‐ Managerial 3 100.0% 3 1 33.3% 2 66.7%Info Tech ‐ Professional 16 25.8% 13 21.0% 17 27.4% 2 3.2% 48 77.4% 13 21.0% 1 1.6% 62 21 33.9% 41 66.1%Info Tech ‐ Technician 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 5 5 100.0%Laborers and Helpers 2 20.0% 1 10.0% 6 60.0% 9 90.0% 1 10.0% 10 10 100.0%Mail Services Worker 1 10.0% 3 30.0% 5 50.0% 9 90.0% 1 10.0% 10 2 20.0% 8 80.0%Print Shop‐Media 3 60.0% 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 5 1 20.0% 4 80.0%Security ‐ Managerial 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 4 4 100.0%Skilled Trades 1 1.9% 2 3.8% 7 13.5% 9 17.3% 19 36.5% 28 53.8% 5 9.6% 52 52 100.0%Skilled Trades‐Supervisor 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 2 40.0% 5 5 100.0%

Page 16 of 164

Total

# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % % # % # %


Table A‐6

Amer. Ind./Al. Nat.

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races



John Jay College 2 0.3% 47 7.7% 190 30.9% 172 28.0% 6 1.0% 417 67.9% 176 28.7% 21 3.4% 614 360 58.6% 254 41.4%Accountant 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 4 100.0% 4 3 75.0% 1 25.0%Accountant Assistants 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 100.0% 3 3 100.0%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 2 9.1% 2 9.1% 2 9.1% 6 27.3% 13 59.1% 3 13.6% 22 12 54.5% 10 45.5%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 13 8.7% 36 24.2% 29 19.5% 1 0.7% 79 53.0% 61 40.9% 9 6.0% 149 106 71.1% 43 28.9%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 2 1.1% 9 5.0% 55 30.7% 51 28.5% 3 1.7% 120 67.0% 53 29.6% 6 3.4% 179 130 72.6% 49 27.4%Administration 4 ‐ College Lab Techs 2 16.7% 5 41.7% 7 58.3% 5 41.7% 12 9 75.0% 3 25.0%Administration 5 ‐ Engineers/Architects 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Basic Crafts‐Buildings and Grounds 3 37.5% 3 37.5% 6 75.0% 2 25.0% 8 8 100.0%Broadcast‐Media Technicians 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 5 1 20.0% 4 80.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 4 10.8% 17 45.9% 13 35.1% 1 2.7% 35 94.6% 2 5.4% 37 18 48.6% 19 51.4%Campus Public Safety Sergeant 5 45.5% 3 27.3% 8 72.7% 2 18.2% 1 9.1% 11 2 18.2% 9 81.8%CUNY Administrative Asst 2 25.0% 6 75.0% 8 100.0% 8 8 100.0%CUNY Office Asst 4 11.1% 16 44.4% 11 30.6% 1 2.8% 32 88.9% 4 11.1% 36 32 88.9% 4 11.1%Custodial 2 4.7% 19 44.2% 18 41.9% 39 90.7% 4 9.3% 43 20 46.5% 23 53.5%Custodial ‐ Supervisory 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 6 100.0% 6 1 16.7% 5 83.3%Facilities ‐ Manager 1 14.3% 2 28.6% 3 42.9% 4 57.1% 7 2 28.6% 5 71.4%Info Tech ‐ Managerial 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 4 1 25.0% 3 75.0%Info Tech ‐ Professional 6 23.1% 12 46.2% 4 15.4% 22 84.6% 3 11.5% 1 3.8% 26 7 26.9% 19 73.1%Info Tech ‐ Technician 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 2 40.0% 5 100.0% 5 3 60.0% 2 40.0%Laborers and Helpers 5 35.7% 7 50.0% 12 85.7% 2 14.3% 14 14 100.0%Mail Services Worker 1 20.0% 3 60.0% 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 5 5 100.0%Print Shop‐Media 1 14.3% 4 57.1% 5 71.4% 2 28.6% 7 1 14.3% 6 85.7%Security ‐ Managerial 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Skilled Trades 1 5.0% 4 20.0% 5 25.0% 15 75.0% 20 20 100.0%Skilled Trades‐Supervisor 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%

Page 17 of 164

Total

# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % % # % # %


Table A‐6

Amer. Ind./Al. Nat.

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races



Lehman College 50 8.4% 146 24.5% 231 38.8% 427 71.8% 135 22.7% 33 5.5% 595 291 48.9% 304 51.1%Accountant 1 14.3% 2 28.6% 3 42.9% 6 85.7% 1 14.3% 7 4 57.1% 3 42.9%Accountant Assistants 1 16.7% 4 66.7% 1 16.7% 6 100.0% 6 4 66.7% 2 33.3%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 3 12.0% 4 16.0% 4 16.0% 11 44.0% 12 48.0% 2 8.0% 25 12 48.0% 13 52.0%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 5 4.5% 29 26.4% 30 27.3% 64 58.2% 39 35.5% 7 6.4% 110 64 58.2% 46 41.8%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 10 8.1% 26 21.1% 61 49.6% 97 78.9% 23 18.7% 3 2.4% 123 84 68.3% 39 31.7%Administration 4 ‐ College Lab Techs 2 9.1% 4 18.2% 3 13.6% 9 40.9% 11 50.0% 2 9.1% 22 9 40.9% 13 59.1%Administration 5 ‐ Engineers/Architects 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Basic Crafts‐Buildings and Grounds 1 14.3% 4 57.1% 5 71.4% 1 14.3% 1 14.3% 7 1 14.3% 6 85.7%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 1 2.7% 13 35.1% 23 62.2% 37 100.0% 37 10 27.0% 27 73.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐2 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Campus Public Safety Sergeant 2 22.2% 7 77.8% 9 100.0% 9 2 22.2% 7 77.8%CUNY Administrative Asst 4 30.8% 7 53.8% 11 84.6% 1 7.7% 1 7.7% 13 12 92.3% 1 7.7%CUNY Office Asst 3 4.3% 24 34.3% 31 44.3% 58 82.9% 7 10.0% 5 7.1% 70 57 81.4% 13 18.6%Custodial 14 27.5% 18 35.3% 17 33.3% 49 96.1% 2 3.9% 51 16 31.4% 35 68.6%Custodial ‐ Supervisory 1 16.7% 4 66.7% 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 6 1 16.7% 5 83.3%Facilities ‐ Manager 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 3 100.0% 3 1 33.3% 2 66.7%Info Tech ‐ Managerial 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 100.0% 3 1 33.3% 2 66.7%Info Tech ‐ Professional 5 14.7% 2 5.9% 16 47.1% 23 67.6% 8 23.5% 3 8.8% 34 9 26.5% 25 73.5%Info Tech ‐ Technician 4 80.0% 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 5 2 40.0% 3 60.0%Laborers and Helpers 1 8.3% 2 16.7% 2 16.7% 5 41.7% 3 25.0% 4 33.3% 12 12 100.0%Mail Services Worker 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 4 100.0% 4 4 100.0%Print Shop‐Media 2 100.0% 2 100.0% 2 2 100.0%Security ‐ Managerial 3 75.0% 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 4 1 25.0% 3 75.0%Skilled Trades 1 2.9% 6 17.1% 3 8.6% 10 28.6% 23 65.7% 2 5.7% 35 35 100.0%Skilled Trades‐Supervisor 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 5 5 100.0%

Page 18 of 164

Total

# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % % # % # %


Table A‐6

Amer. Ind./Al. Nat.

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races



Medgar Evers College 15 3.7% 316 78.4% 37 9.2% 4 1.0% 372 92.3% 25 6.2% 6 1.5% 403 197 48.9% 206 51.1%Accountant 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 4 1 25.0% 3 75.0%Accountant Assistants 2 100.0% 2 100.0% 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 12 70.6% 3 17.6% 15 88.2% 2 11.8% 17 9 52.9% 8 47.1%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 3 3.9% 60 78.9% 6 7.9% 69 90.8% 6 7.9% 1 1.3% 76 47 61.8% 29 38.2%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 2 1.9% 88 83.0% 10 9.4% 3 2.8% 103 97.2% 3 2.8% 106 75 70.8% 31 29.2%Administration 4 ‐ College Lab Techs 4 19.0% 15 71.4% 1 4.8% 20 95.2% 1 4.8% 21 8 38.1% 13 61.9%Administration 5 ‐ Engineers/Architects 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Basic Crafts‐Buildings and Grounds 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Broadcast‐Media Technicians 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 4 4 100.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 1 3.3% 23 76.7% 4 13.3% 1 3.3% 29 96.7% 1 3.3% 30 6 20.0% 24 80.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐2 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Campus Public Safety Sergeant 1 16.7% 4 66.7% 1 16.7% 6 100.0% 6 1 16.7% 5 83.3%CUNY Administrative Asst 5 100.0% 5 100.0% 5 5 100.0%CUNY Office Asst 29 93.5% 2 6.5% 31 100.0% 31 29 93.5% 2 6.5%Custodial 30 88.2% 3 8.8% 33 97.1% 1 2.9% 34 8 23.5% 26 76.5%Custodial ‐ Supervisory 4 100.0% 4 100.0% 4 4 100.0%Facilities ‐ Manager 2 66.7% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 3 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Managerial 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 3 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Professional 3 33.3% 5 55.6% 1 11.1% 9 100.0% 9 2 22.2% 7 77.8%Info Tech ‐ Technician 6 100.0% 6 100.0% 6 3 50.0% 3 50.0%Laborers and Helpers 6 85.7% 1 14.3% 7 100.0% 7 1 14.3% 6 85.7%Mail Services Worker 4 100.0% 4 100.0% 4 4 100.0%Print Shop‐Media 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 3 3 100.0%Security ‐ Managerial 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 3 1 33.3% 2 66.7%Skilled Trades 10 52.6% 3 15.8% 13 68.4% 3 15.8% 3 15.8% 19 19 100.0%Skilled Trades‐Supervisor 2 66.7% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 3 100.0%

Page 19 of 164

Total

# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % % # % # %


Table A‐6

Amer. Ind./Al. Nat.

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races



NYC College of Technology 1 0.2% 46 8.9% 228 44.1% 120 23.2% 2 0.4% 397 76.8% 102 19.7% 18 3.5% 517 288 55.7% 229 44.3%Accountant 2 28.6% 3 42.9% 5 71.4% 2 28.6% 7 4 57.1% 3 42.9%Accountant Assistants 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 2 66.7% 1 33.3%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 3 15.8% 4 21.1% 3 15.8% 10 52.6% 8 42.1% 1 5.3% 19 10 52.6% 9 47.4%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 6 9.8% 22 36.1% 8 13.1% 36 59.0% 20 32.8% 5 8.2% 61 38 62.3% 23 37.7%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 8 7.0% 48 41.7% 30 26.1% 86 74.8% 26 22.6% 3 2.6% 115 85 73.9% 30 26.1%Administration 4 ‐ College Lab Techs 7 19.4% 8 22.2% 6 16.7% 21 58.3% 14 38.9% 1 2.8% 36 11 30.6% 25 69.4%Administration 5 ‐ Engineers/Architects 2 100.0% 2 100.0% 2 2 100.0%Basic Crafts‐Buildings and Grounds 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 3 3 100.0%Broadcast‐Media Technicians 2 66.7% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 3 100.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 3 8.3% 25 69.4% 6 16.7% 34 94.4% 1 2.8% 1 2.8% 36 9 25.0% 27 75.0%Campus Public Safety Sergeant 6 75.0% 2 25.0% 8 100.0% 8 3 37.5% 5 62.5%CUNY Administrative Asst 9 64.3% 1 7.1% 1 7.1% 11 78.6% 3 21.4% 14 13 92.9% 1 7.1%CUNY Office Asst 8 8.2% 55 56.7% 21 21.6% 1 1.0% 85 87.6% 10 10.3% 2 2.1% 97 83 85.6% 14 14.4%Custodial 27 62.8% 15 34.9% 42 97.7% 1 2.3% 43 14 32.6% 29 67.4%Custodial ‐ Supervisory 3 42.9% 3 42.9% 6 85.7% 1 14.3% 7 3 42.9% 4 57.1%Facilities ‐ Manager 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Managerial 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%Info Tech ‐ Professional 4 20.0% 7 35.0% 7 35.0% 18 90.0% 2 10.0% 20 3 15.0% 17 85.0%Info Tech ‐ Technician 1 12.5% 3 37.5% 3 37.5% 7 87.5% 1 12.5% 8 5 62.5% 3 37.5%Laborers and Helpers 2 33.3% 2 33.3% 4 66.7% 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 6 6 100.0%Mail Services Worker 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 3 100.0% 3 1 33.3% 2 66.7%Print Shop‐Media 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 4 2 50.0% 2 50.0%Security ‐ Managerial 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 4 100.0% 4 1 25.0% 3 75.0%Skilled Trades 1 7.1% 1 7.1% 3 21.4% 5 35.7% 7 50.0% 2 14.3% 14 14 100.0%Skilled Trades‐Supervisor 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%

Page 20 of 164

Total

# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % % # % # %


Table A‐6

Amer. Ind./Al. Nat.

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races



Queens College 1 0.1% 101 15.0% 147 21.8% 130 19.3% 7 1.0% 386 57.3% 231 34.3% 57 8.5% 674 364 54.0% 310 46.0%Accountant 2 40.0% 1 20.0% 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 5 4 80.0% 1 20.0%Accountant Assistants 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 4 3 75.0% 1 25.0%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 5 18.5% 5 18.5% 1 3.7% 11 40.7% 14 51.9% 2 7.4% 27 12 44.4% 15 55.6%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 1 0.9% 17 15.5% 16 14.5% 12 10.9% 3 2.7% 49 44.5% 38 34.5% 23 20.9% 110 66 60.0% 44 40.0%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 21 16.0% 28 21.4% 22 16.8% 2 1.5% 73 55.7% 49 37.4% 9 6.9% 131 93 71.0% 38 29.0%Administration 4 ‐ College Lab Techs 6 15.8% 7 18.4% 5 13.2% 18 47.4% 15 39.5% 5 13.2% 38 8 21.1% 30 78.9%Administration 5 ‐ Engineers/Architects 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 3 100.0% 3 1 33.3% 2 66.7%Basic Crafts‐Buildings and Grounds 1 12.5% 1 12.5% 7 87.5% 8 8 100.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 6 24.0% 16 64.0% 3 12.0% 25 100.0% 25 5 20.0% 20 80.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐2 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 4 100.0% 4 2 50.0% 2 50.0%Campus Public Safety Sergeant 2 28.6% 3 42.9% 2 28.6% 7 100.0% 7 3 42.9% 4 57.1%CUNY Administrative Asst 2 9.1% 1 4.5% 3 13.6% 14 63.6% 5 22.7% 22 22 100.0%CUNY Office Asst 21 19.6% 17 15.9% 25 23.4% 63 58.9% 38 35.5% 6 5.6% 107 95 88.8% 12 11.2%Custodial 5 7.5% 28 41.8% 26 38.8% 59 88.1% 8 11.9% 67 37 55.2% 30 44.8%Custodial ‐ Supervisory 6 85.7% 6 85.7% 1 14.3% 7 4 57.1% 3 42.9%Disability Accommodation Specl 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Facilities ‐ Manager 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 100.0% 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%Info Tech ‐ Managerial 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 5 1 20.0% 4 80.0%Info Tech ‐ Professional 10 38.5% 4 15.4% 5 19.2% 19 73.1% 5 19.2% 2 7.7% 26 2 7.7% 24 92.3%Info Tech ‐ Technician 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 1 20.0% 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 5 1 20.0% 4 80.0%Laborers and Helpers 2 11.8% 7 41.2% 4 23.5% 13 76.5% 4 23.5% 17 17 100.0%Mail Services Worker 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 4 2 50.0% 2 50.0%Nurse 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Print Shop‐Media 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 2 100.0%Security ‐ Managerial 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 3 100.0% 3 1 33.3% 2 66.7%Skilled Trades 2 5.0% 2 5.0% 6 15.0% 10 25.0% 26 65.0% 4 10.0% 40 40 100.0%Skilled Trades‐Supervisor 3 100.0% 3 3 100.0%

Page 21 of 164

Total

# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % % # % # %


Table A‐6

Amer. Ind./Al. Nat.

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races



School of Journalism 1 2.4% 8 19.0% 10 23.8% 2 4.8% 21 50.0% 19 45.2% 2 4.8% 42 19 45.2% 23 54.8%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 4 100.0% 4 2 50.0% 2 50.0%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 1 7.1% 1 7.1% 5 35.7% 1 7.1% 8 57.1% 4 28.6% 2 14.3% 14 11 78.6% 3 21.4%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 2 66.7% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 3 100.0%Broadcast‐Media Technicians 2 28.6% 1 14.3% 1 14.3% 4 57.1% 3 42.9% 7 7 100.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 2 100.0% 2 100.0% 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐2 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Custodial 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 2 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Managerial 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 2 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Professional 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 5 83.3% 6 1 16.7% 5 83.3%Security ‐ Managerial 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%School of Professional Studies 11 9.6% 19 16.7% 32 28.1% 2 1.8% 64 56.1% 44 38.6% 6 5.3% 114 84 73.7% 30 26.3%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 7 100.0% 7 5 71.4% 2 28.6%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 5 12.5% 3 7.5% 8 20.0% 1 2.5% 17 42.5% 19 47.5% 4 10.0% 40 33 82.5% 7 17.5%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 6 11.5% 9 17.3% 19 36.5% 34 65.4% 16 30.8% 2 3.8% 52 40 76.9% 12 23.1%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 4 100.0% 4 3 75.0% 1 25.0%Campus Public Safety Sergeant 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%CUNY Office Asst 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Engineering Technician 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Facilities ‐ Manager 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Professional 4 57.1% 2 28.6% 6 85.7% 1 14.3% 7 1 14.3% 6 85.7%School of Public Health 5 11.6% 14 32.6% 10 23.3% 29 67.4% 14 32.6% 43 30 69.8% 13 30.2%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 5 83.3% 6 3 50.0% 3 50.0%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 1 7.1% 4 28.6% 3 21.4% 8 57.1% 6 42.9% 14 13 92.9% 1 7.1%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 2 20.0% 4 40.0% 3 30.0% 9 90.0% 1 10.0% 10 7 70.0% 3 30.0%Basic Crafts‐Buildings and Grounds 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 5 100.0% 5 3 60.0% 2 40.0%Campus Public Safety Sergeant 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%CUNY Office Asst 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Custodial ‐ Supervisory 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Managerial 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Professional 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 3 2 66.7% 1 33.3%

Page 22 of 164

Total

# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % % # % # %


Table A‐6

Amer. Ind./Al. Nat.

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races



York College 2 0.5% 72 16.9% 216 50.8% 61 14.4% 4 0.9% 355 83.5% 61 14.4% 9 2.1% 425 211 49.6% 214 50.4%Accountant 2 40.0% 2 40.0% 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 5 4 80.0% 1 20.0%Accountant Assistants 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 100.0% 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 10 50.0% 3 15.0% 13 65.0% 5 25.0% 2 10.0% 20 8 40.0% 12 60.0%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 6 12.0% 29 58.0% 5 10.0% 1 2.0% 41 82.0% 9 18.0% 50 32 64.0% 18 36.0%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 16 18.0% 45 50.6% 14 15.7% 1 1.1% 76 85.4% 12 13.5% 1 1.1% 89 67 75.3% 22 24.7%Administration 4 ‐ College Lab Techs 7 30.4% 8 34.8% 2 8.7% 1 4.3% 18 78.3% 5 21.7% 23 6 26.1% 17 73.9%Administration 5 ‐ Engineers/Architects 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Basic Crafts‐Buildings and Grounds 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 3 100.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 7 17.5% 29 72.5% 2 5.0% 38 95.0% 2 5.0% 40 11 27.5% 29 72.5%Campus Peace Officer L‐2 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 4 100.0% 4 4 100.0%Campus Public Safety Sergeant 1 16.7% 3 50.0% 2 33.3% 6 100.0% 6 1 16.7% 5 83.3%CUNY Administrative Asst 6 60.0% 1 10.0% 7 70.0% 3 30.0% 10 10 100.0%CUNY Office Asst 1 1.6% 10 15.9% 40 63.5% 7 11.1% 1 1.6% 59 93.7% 3 4.8% 1 1.6% 63 52 82.5% 11 17.5%Custodial 1 4.0% 14 56.0% 9 36.0% 24 96.0% 1 4.0% 25 6 24.0% 19 76.0%Custodial ‐ Supervisory 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 100.0% 3 1 33.3% 2 66.7%Disability Accommodation Specl 2 66.7% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 2 66.7% 1 33.3%Facilities ‐ Manager 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 3 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Managerial 2 66.7% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 3 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Professional 14 50.0% 5 17.9% 6 21.4% 25 89.3% 3 10.7% 28 6 21.4% 22 78.6%Info Tech ‐ Technician 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 100.0% 3 2 66.7% 1 33.3%Laborers and Helpers 9 90.0% 1 10.0% 10 100.0% 10 10 100.0%Mail Services Worker 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 100.0% 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%Print Shop‐Media 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 4 4 100.0%Security ‐ Managerial 2 100.0% 2 100.0% 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%Skilled Trades 2 9.5% 3 14.3% 1 4.8% 6 28.6% 14 66.7% 1 4.8% 21 21 100.0%Skilled Trades‐Supervisor 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 2 100.0%

Page 23 of 164

Total

# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % % # % # %


Table A‐6

Amer. Ind./Al. Nat.

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races



Borough of Manhattan CC 3 0.4% 95 12.2% 283 36.4% 206 26.5% 12 1.5% 599 77.1% 155 19.9% 23 3.0% 777 398 51.2% 379 48.8%Accountant 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 3 100.0% 3 2 66.7% 1 33.3%Accountant Assistants 3 20.0% 7 46.7% 3 20.0% 13 86.7% 2 13.3% 15 13 86.7% 2 13.3%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 2 9.5% 4 19.0% 4 19.0% 1 4.8% 11 52.4% 8 38.1% 2 9.5% 21 9 42.9% 12 57.1%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 16 16.3% 28 28.6% 11 11.2% 1 1.0% 56 57.1% 34 34.7% 8 8.2% 98 65 66.3% 33 33.7%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 2 0.9% 24 11.1% 82 37.8% 54 24.9% 5 2.3% 167 77.0% 46 21.2% 4 1.8% 217 148 68.2% 69 31.8%Administration 4 ‐ College Lab Techs 5 13.5% 12 32.4% 12 32.4% 29 78.4% 7 18.9% 1 2.7% 37 12 32.4% 25 67.6%Basic Crafts‐Buildings and Grounds 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 2 40.0% 1 20.0% 5 5 100.0%Broadcast‐Media Technicians 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 12 17.9% 40 59.7% 9 13.4% 61 91.0% 6 9.0% 67 16 23.9% 51 76.1%Campus Peace Officer L‐2 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 100.0% 3 3 100.0%Campus Public Safety Sergeant 6 54.5% 5 45.5% 11 100.0% 11 4 36.4% 7 63.6%CUNY Administrative Asst 1 10.0% 5 50.0% 2 20.0% 8 80.0% 1 10.0% 1 10.0% 10 10 100.0%CUNY Office Asst 8 8.7% 36 39.1% 33 35.9% 5 5.4% 82 89.1% 7 7.6% 3 3.3% 92 80 87.0% 12 13.0%Custodial 3 4.8% 22 35.5% 35 56.5% 60 96.8% 1 1.6% 1 1.6% 62 23 37.1% 39 62.9%Custodial ‐ Supervisory 11 73.3% 4 26.7% 15 100.0% 15 3 20.0% 12 80.0%Disability Accommodation Specl 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Engineering Technician 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Facilities ‐ Manager 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 4 4 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Managerial 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Professional 1 3.8% 9 34.6% 6 23.1% 6 23.1% 22 84.6% 4 15.4% 26 2 7.7% 24 92.3%Info Tech ‐ Technician 2 33.3% 1 16.7% 3 50.0% 6 100.0% 6 2 33.3% 4 66.7%Laborers and Helpers 1 8.3% 6 50.0% 3 25.0% 10 83.3% 2 16.7% 12 12 100.0%Mail Services Worker 1 16.7% 2 33.3% 3 50.0% 6 100.0% 6 6 100.0%Nurse 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Print Shop‐Media 2 25.0% 1 12.5% 4 50.0% 7 87.5% 1 12.5% 8 4 50.0% 4 50.0%Security ‐ Managerial 3 42.9% 2 28.6% 5 71.4% 2 28.6% 7 7 100.0%Skilled Trades 3 6.8% 3 6.8% 8 18.2% 14 31.8% 28 63.6% 2 4.5% 44 44 100.0%Skilled Trades‐Supervisor 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 3 3 100.0%

Page 24 of 164

Total

# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % % # % # %


Table A‐6

Amer. Ind./Al. Nat.

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races



Bronx CC 1 0.2% 28 4.7% 203 34.0% 267 44.7% 3 0.5% 502 84.1% 80 13.4% 15 2.5% 597 295 49.4% 302 50.6%Accountant 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 4 100.0% 4 2 50.0% 2 50.0%Accountant Assistants 2 20.0% 3 30.0% 3 30.0% 8 80.0% 2 20.0% 10 8 80.0% 2 20.0%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 9 42.9% 5 23.8% 1 4.8% 15 71.4% 6 28.6% 21 10 47.6% 11 52.4%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 5 7.6% 21 31.8% 17 25.8% 43 65.2% 18 27.3% 5 7.6% 66 41 62.1% 25 37.9%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 5 4.1% 43 35.5% 56 46.3% 104 86.0% 15 12.4% 2 1.7% 121 85 70.2% 36 29.8%Administration 4 ‐ College Lab Techs 1 3.2% 1 3.2% 8 25.8% 17 54.8% 1 3.2% 28 90.3% 3 9.7% 31 11 35.5% 20 64.5%Administration 5 ‐ Engineers/Architects 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 100.0% 2 2 100.0%Basic Crafts‐Buildings and Grounds 4 50.0% 3 37.5% 7 87.5% 1 12.5% 8 2 25.0% 6 75.0%Broadcast‐Media Technicians 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 2 4.2% 12 25.0% 31 64.6% 1 2.1% 46 95.8% 2 4.2% 48 10 20.8% 38 79.2%Campus Peace Officer L‐2 6 60.0% 4 40.0% 10 100.0% 10 2 20.0% 8 80.0%Campus Public Safety Sergeant 5 45.5% 6 54.5% 11 100.0% 11 3 27.3% 8 72.7%CUNY Administrative Asst 9 60.0% 3 20.0% 12 80.0% 1 6.7% 2 13.3% 15 14 93.3% 1 6.7%CUNY Office Asst 5 6.2% 38 46.9% 35 43.2% 78 96.3% 3 3.7% 81 69 85.2% 12 14.8%Custodial 17 36.2% 29 61.7% 46 97.9% 1 2.1% 47 16 34.0% 31 66.0%Custodial ‐ Supervisory 6 66.7% 3 33.3% 9 100.0% 9 3 33.3% 6 66.7%Disability Accommodation Specl 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Facilities ‐ Manager 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 100.0% 2 2 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Managerial 3 75.0% 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 4 1 25.0% 3 75.0%Info Tech ‐ Professional 4 14.8% 5 18.5% 17 63.0% 26 96.3% 1 3.7% 27 11 40.7% 16 59.3%Info Tech ‐ Technician 1 6.7% 2 13.3% 11 73.3% 14 93.3% 1 6.7% 15 4 26.7% 11 73.3%Laborers and Helpers 1 5.9% 4 23.5% 7 41.2% 12 70.6% 4 23.5% 1 5.9% 17 17 100.0%Mail Services Worker 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 100.0% 2 2 100.0%Print Shop‐Media 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 4 100.0% 4 1 25.0% 3 75.0%Security ‐ Managerial 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 2 100.0%Skilled Trades 6 17.6% 6 17.6% 12 35.3% 19 55.9% 3 8.8% 34 1 2.9% 33 97.1%Skilled Trades‐Supervisor 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 4 4 100.0%

Page 25 of 164

Total

# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % % # % # %


Table A‐6

Amer. Ind./Al. Nat.

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races



Guttman Community College 10 9.3% 31 29.0% 29 27.1% 2 1.9% 72 67.3% 29 27.1% 6 5.6% 107 69 64.5% 38 35.5%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 1 12.5% 1 12.5% 2 25.0% 5 62.5% 1 12.5% 8 3 37.5% 5 62.5%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 5 15.2% 8 24.2% 9 27.3% 22 66.7% 11 33.3% 33 24 72.7% 9 27.3%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 2 4.9% 14 34.1% 15 36.6% 31 75.6% 7 17.1% 3 7.3% 41 34 82.9% 7 17.1%Administration 4 ‐ College Lab Techs 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 4 50.0% 2 25.0% 6 75.0% 1 12.5% 1 12.5% 8 2 25.0% 6 75.0%Campus Public Safety Sergeant 2 66.7% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 3 100.0%CUNY Office Asst 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 100.0% 3 3 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Managerial 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 2 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Professional 2 40.0% 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 5 1 20.0% 4 80.0%Info Tech ‐ Technician 2 100.0% 2 100.0% 2 2 100.0%Security ‐ Managerial 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%

Page 26 of 164

Total

# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % % # % # %


Table A‐6

Amer. Ind./Al. Nat.

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races



Hostos CC 2 0.5% 19 4.6% 108 26.0% 221 53.3% 8 1.9% 358 86.3% 46 11.1% 11 2.7% 415 227 54.7% 188 45.3%Accountant 2 100.0% 2 100.0% 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%Accountant Assistants 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 3 60.0% 5 100.0% 5 4 80.0% 1 20.0%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 2 11.8% 1 5.9% 10 58.8% 13 76.5% 2 11.8% 2 11.8% 17 9 52.9% 8 47.1%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 6 9.0% 11 16.4% 30 44.8% 1 1.5% 48 71.6% 14 20.9% 5 7.5% 67 43 64.2% 24 35.8%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 4 3.5% 35 30.4% 64 55.7% 3 2.6% 106 92.2% 8 7.0% 1 0.9% 115 84 73.0% 31 27.0%Administration 4 ‐ College Lab Techs 3 23.1% 8 61.5% 11 84.6% 2 15.4% 13 5 38.5% 8 61.5%Basic Crafts‐Buildings and Grounds 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 2 33.3% 4 66.7% 6 6 100.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 1 3.6% 1 3.6% 12 42.9% 12 42.9% 26 92.9% 2 7.1% 28 9 32.1% 19 67.9%Campus Peace Officer L‐2 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Campus Public Safety Sergeant 1 14.3% 3 42.9% 3 42.9% 7 100.0% 7 1 14.3% 6 85.7%CUNY Administrative Asst 5 50.0% 4 40.0% 1 10.0% 10 100.0% 10 8 80.0% 2 20.0%CUNY Office Asst 2 4.1% 12 24.5% 32 65.3% 1 2.0% 47 95.9% 2 4.1% 49 45 91.8% 4 8.2%Custodial 12 37.5% 20 62.5% 32 100.0% 32 9 28.1% 23 71.9%Custodial ‐ Supervisory 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 6 100.0% 6 1 16.7% 5 83.3%Disability Accommodation Specl 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Facilities ‐ Manager 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 2 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Professional 2 12.5% 11 68.8% 2 12.5% 15 93.8% 1 6.3% 16 2 12.5% 14 87.5%Info Tech ‐ Technician 1 16.7% 5 83.3% 6 100.0% 6 1 16.7% 5 83.3%Laborers and Helpers 2 33.3% 2 33.3% 4 66.7% 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 6 6 100.0%Mail Services Worker 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 3 3 100.0%Nurse 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Print Shop‐Media 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 3 100.0% 3 2 66.7% 1 33.3%Security ‐ Managerial 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 3 100.0% 3 3 100.0%Skilled Trades 1 7.1% 1 7.1% 3 21.4% 5 35.7% 9 64.3% 14 14 100.0%Skilled Trades‐Supervisor 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 2 100.0%

Page 27 of 164

Total

# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % % # % # %


Table A‐6

Amer. Ind./Al. Nat.

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races



Kingsborough CC 3 0.5% 35 6.1% 184 32.0% 98 17.0% 5 0.9% 325 56.5% 199 34.6% 51 8.9% 575 300 52.2% 275 47.8%Accountant 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 4 66.7% 1 16.7% 6 5 83.3% 1 16.7%Accountant Assistants 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 4 4 100.0%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 2 11.8% 5 29.4% 1 5.9% 8 47.1% 5 29.4% 4 23.5% 17 7 41.2% 10 58.8%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 5 5.0% 27 26.7% 28 27.7% 60 59.4% 39 38.6% 2 2.0% 101 73 72.3% 28 27.7%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 3 2.5% 9 7.5% 43 35.8% 13 10.8% 3 2.5% 71 59.2% 42 35.0% 7 5.8% 120 87 72.5% 33 27.5%Administration 4 ‐ College Lab Techs 3 8.6% 6 17.1% 6 17.1% 1 2.9% 16 45.7% 17 48.6% 2 5.7% 35 17 48.6% 18 51.4%Administration 5 ‐ Engineers/Architects 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 3 1 33.3% 2 66.7%Basic Crafts‐Buildings and Grounds 1 10.0% 2 20.0% 1 10.0% 4 40.0% 4 40.0% 2 20.0% 10 10 100.0%Broadcast‐Media Technicians 2 100.0% 2 2 100.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 21 72.4% 6 20.7% 27 93.1% 1 3.4% 1 3.4% 29 6 20.7% 23 79.3%Campus Peace Officer L‐2 2 100.0% 2 2 100.0%Campus Public Safety Sergeant 1 7.1% 5 35.7% 6 42.9% 12 85.7% 1 7.1% 1 7.1% 14 5 35.7% 9 64.3%CUNY Administrative Asst 3 16.7% 3 16.7% 11 61.1% 4 22.2% 18 18 100.0%CUNY Office Asst 1 2.0% 6 12.2% 3 6.1% 1 2.0% 11 22.4% 26 53.1% 12 24.5% 49 45 91.8% 4 8.2%Custodial 6 10.0% 33 55.0% 13 21.7% 52 86.7% 7 11.7% 1 1.7% 60 15 25.0% 45 75.0%Custodial ‐ Supervisory 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 6 100.0% 6 2 33.3% 4 66.7%Engineering Technician 2 100.0% 2 100.0% 2 2 100.0%Facilities ‐ Manager 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 3 3 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Managerial 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 4 80.0% 5 5 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Professional 3 13.0% 9 39.1% 2 8.7% 14 60.9% 8 34.8% 1 4.3% 23 6 26.1% 17 73.9%Info Tech ‐ Technician 2 18.2% 1 9.1% 4 36.4% 7 63.6% 3 27.3% 1 9.1% 11 5 45.5% 6 54.5%Laborers and Helpers 11 64.7% 3 17.6% 14 82.4% 2 11.8% 1 5.9% 17 17 100.0%Mail Services Worker 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 4 1 25.0% 3 75.0%Nurse 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Print Shop‐Media 2 28.6% 2 28.6% 4 57.1% 2 28.6% 1 14.3% 7 7 100.0%Security ‐ Managerial 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 3 100.0%Skilled Trades 1 4.8% 2 9.5% 3 14.3% 6 28.6% 11 52.4% 4 19.0% 21 21 100.0%Skilled Trades‐Supervisor 2 100.0% 2 2 100.0%

Page 28 of 164

Total

# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % % # % # %


Table A‐6

Amer. Ind./Al. Nat.

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races



LaGuardia CC 2 0.3% 101 13.5% 217 29.1% 234 31.4% 4 0.5% 558 74.8% 165 22.1% 23 3.1% 746 441 59.1% 305 40.9%Accountant 1 11.1% 4 44.4% 3 33.3% 8 88.9% 1 11.1% 9 7 77.8% 2 22.2%Accountant Assistants 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 3 50.0% 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 6 6 100.0%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 1 4.2% 6 25.0% 1 4.2% 8 33.3% 13 54.2% 3 12.5% 24 10 41.7% 14 58.3%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 17 11.6% 42 28.8% 27 18.5% 86 58.9% 52 35.6% 8 5.5% 146 94 64.4% 52 35.6%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 35 16.4% 67 31.5% 62 29.1% 1 0.5% 165 77.5% 42 19.7% 6 2.8% 213 157 73.7% 56 26.3%Administration 4 ‐ College Lab Techs 8 19.5% 4 9.8% 14 34.1% 26 63.4% 12 29.3% 3 7.3% 41 21 51.2% 20 48.8%Administration 5 ‐ Engineers/Architects 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 2 33.3% 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 6 1 16.7% 5 83.3%Broadcast‐Media Technicians 4 100.0% 4 100.0% 4 1 25.0% 3 75.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 1 1.8% 10 17.9% 31 55.4% 9 16.1% 1 1.8% 52 92.9% 4 7.1% 56 14 25.0% 42 75.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐2 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%Campus Public Safety Sergeant 5 50.0% 3 30.0% 8 80.0% 2 20.0% 10 2 20.0% 8 80.0%CUNY Administrative Asst 3 15.0% 3 15.0% 8 40.0% 14 70.0% 6 30.0% 20 20 100.0%CUNY Office Asst 9 13.0% 22 31.9% 29 42.0% 60 87.0% 9 13.0% 69 57 82.6% 12 17.4%Custodial 2 5.9% 7 20.6% 24 70.6% 33 97.1% 1 2.9% 34 17 50.0% 17 50.0%Custodial ‐ Supervisory 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 3 2 66.7% 1 33.3%Engineering Technician 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 100.0% 3 3 100.0%Facilities ‐ Manager 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 3 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Managerial 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 4 1 25.0% 3 75.0%Info Tech ‐ Professional 1 1.9% 9 17.0% 5 9.4% 26 49.1% 41 77.4% 10 18.9% 2 3.8% 53 14 26.4% 39 73.6%Info Tech ‐ Technician 3 14.3% 5 23.8% 9 42.9% 1 4.8% 18 85.7% 3 14.3% 21 6 28.6% 15 71.4%Laborers and Helpers 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Mail Services Worker 1 8.3% 7 58.3% 1 8.3% 9 75.0% 3 25.0% 12 8 66.7% 4 33.3%Nurse 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Print Shop‐Media 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 100.0% 2 2 100.0%Security ‐ Managerial 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 3 1 33.3% 2 66.7%

Page 29 of 164

Total

# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % % # % # %


Table A‐6

Amer. Ind./Al. Nat.

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races



Queensborough CC 86 14.5% 129 21.7% 112 18.8% 3 0.5% 330 55.5% 224 37.6% 41 6.9% 595 311 52.3% 284 47.7%Accountant 2 40.0% 1 20.0% 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 5 3 60.0% 2 40.0%Accountant Assistants 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 2 100.0%Administration 1 ‐ Executives 1 4.5% 1 4.5% 2 9.1% 4 18.2% 13 59.1% 5 22.7% 22 11 50.0% 11 50.0%Administration 2 ‐ Managers 12 13.3% 14 15.6% 10 11.1% 36 40.0% 42 46.7% 12 13.3% 90 58 64.4% 32 35.6%Administration 3 ‐ Administrators 22 16.2% 22 16.2% 26 19.1% 2 1.5% 72 52.9% 59 43.4% 5 3.7% 136 99 72.8% 37 27.2%Administration 4 ‐ College Lab Techs 10 21.3% 4 8.5% 11 23.4% 25 53.2% 20 42.6% 2 4.3% 47 8 17.0% 39 83.0%Administration 5 ‐ Engineers/Architects 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 2 100.0%Basic Crafts‐Buildings and Grounds 3 33.3% 1 11.1% 1 11.1% 5 55.6% 4 44.4% 9 9 100.0%Campus Peace Officer L‐1 6 15.8% 17 44.7% 12 31.6% 35 92.1% 3 7.9% 38 4 10.5% 34 89.5%Campus Peace Officer L‐2 4 66.7% 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 6 2 33.3% 4 66.7%Campus Public Safety Sergeant 1 11.1% 3 33.3% 2 22.2% 6 66.7% 3 33.3% 9 1 11.1% 8 88.9%CUNY Administrative Asst 1 3.6% 2 7.1% 4 14.3% 7 25.0% 17 60.7% 4 14.3% 28 27 96.4% 1 3.6%CUNY Office Asst 14 20.9% 18 26.9% 15 22.4% 1 1.5% 48 71.6% 17 25.4% 2 3.0% 67 64 95.5% 3 4.5%Custodial 3 6.1% 21 42.9% 18 36.7% 42 85.7% 5 10.2% 2 4.1% 49 19 38.8% 30 61.2%Custodial ‐ Supervisory 6 60.0% 3 30.0% 9 90.0% 1 10.0% 10 4 40.0% 6 60.0%Disability Accommodation Specl 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Engineering Technician 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Facilities ‐ Manager 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 1 33.3% 2 66.7%Info Tech ‐ Managerial 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 5 5 100.0%Info Tech ‐ Professional 6 40.0% 4 26.7% 1 6.7% 11 73.3% 3 20.0% 1 6.7% 15 4 26.7% 11 73.3%Info Tech ‐ Technician 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Laborers and Helpers 2 20.0% 3 30.0% 5 50.0% 4 40.0% 1 10.0% 10 1 10.0% 9 90.0%Mail Services Worker 2 100.0% 2 100.0% 2 2 100.0%Nurse 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%Print Shop‐Media 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 4 100.0% 4 2 50.0% 2 50.0%Security ‐ Managerial 2 66.7% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 3 3 100.0%Skilled Trades 1 3.6% 1 3.6% 2 7.1% 23 82.1% 3 10.7% 28 28 100.0%Skilled Trades‐Supervisor 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%

Page 30 of 164

Notes to the Charts

Charts include data derived from the Affirmative Action Plans (AAP). The 2017 AAP is from July 1, 2016 to June 1, 2017.

Unless otherwise noted, “White” does not include Italian Americans.

“Total Minority” includes: Asian/Other Pacific Islander, Black/African American, Hispanic (including Puerto Rican), American Indian/Alaska Native, and Two or More Races.

This report excludes the following types of leaves -Authorized/Unauthorized without Pay; Disability without Pay; Total Disability; Terminal/Travia (Retirement Leaves)

Page 31 of 164

B. StaffNew HireAssessment

B-1: New Hires by Ethnicity, Gender, and Title (Summary), 2017

B-2a: New Hires by Ethnicity, Gender and College, 2017

B-2b: New Hires by Ethnicity, Gender, College and Job Group, 2017

B-3: New Hires by Military and Disability Status, 2017

Page 32 of 164

JOB GROUP

Asian/Nat. Haw./

Other Pac. Isl. Black Hispanic Two or More

Races


Groups White Italian

American TOTAL Female Male

TOTAL 135 396 317 16 864 325 33 1,222 690 532 Accountants 1 2 3 6 6 3 3 Accounting Assistants 3 3 2 8 8 8 Admin1 - Executives 3 12 8 23 27 2 52 28 24 Admin2 - Managers 12 34 22 1 69 65 9 143 97 46 Admin3-Administrators 55 142 119 8 324 129 10 463 328 135 Admin4-College Lab Techs 1 6 12 19 18 37 11 26 Admin5-Engineers/Architects 1 1 2 2 Basic Crafts-Buildings & Grounds 3 3 2 5 5 Broadcast-Media Technicians 3 1 4 1 5 5 Campus Peace Officer-L-1 5 42 32 1 80 3 83 21 62 Campus Peace Officer-L-2 1 1 1 2 1 1 Campus Public Safety Sergeant 1 2 3 6 1 7 3 4 CUNY Administrative Asst 2 1 3 3 3 CUNY Office Asst 29 65 45 3 142 20 5 167 133 34 Custodial 9 50 31 1 91 5 1 97 30 67 Custodial - Supervisory 8 4 12 12 1 11 Disability Accommodation Specl 1 1 1 1 Engineering Technician 1 1 1 2 1 1 Facilities - Managerial 1 1 3 4 4 Info Tech - Managerial 3 1 3 7 1 8 1 7 Info Tech - Professional 8 8 10 26 11 37 13 24 Info Tech - Technician 3 4 7 2 9 3 6 Laborers & Helpers 1 2 3 1 4 4 Mail Message Services Workers 2 1 3 1 4 4 Nurses 1 1 1 1 Print Shop-Media 1 1 1 1 Security - Managerial 2 1 3 3 Skilled Trades 5 7 9 1 22 31 3 56 56

Table B-1

New Hires by Ethnicity, Gender and Title Fall 2017Source: CUNYfirst June 1, 2017 - AAP 2017

Page 33 of 164

TOTAL# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # # % # %

135 11.0% 396 32.4% 317 25.9% 16 1.3% 864 70.7% 325 26.6% 33 2.7% 1,222 690 56.5% 532 43.5%101 12.5% 258 32.0% 179 22.2% 10 1.2% 548 67.9% 235 29.1% 24 3.0% 807 430 53.3% 377 46.7%

Baruch College 10 11.9% 21 25.0% 21 25.0% 1 1.2% 53 63.1% 27 32.1% 4 4.8% 84 53 63.1% 31 36.9%Brooklyn College 7 11.9% 19 32.2% 13 22.0% 1 1.7% 40 67.8% 17 28.8% 2 3.4% 59 28 47.5% 31 52.5%Central Office 11 22.9% 14 29.2% 8 16.7% 1 2.1% 34 70.8% 13 27.1% 1 2.1% 48 25 52.1% 23 47.9%City College 17 17.3% 34 34.7% 27 27.6% 1 1.0% 79 80.6% 17 17.3% 2 2.0% 98 44 44.9% 54 55.1%College of Staten Island 1 2.9% 5 14.7% 4 11.8% 1 2.9% 11 32.4% 20 58.8% 3 8.8% 34 14 41.2% 20 58.8%CUNY School of Law 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 2 33.3% 4 66.7% 0 0.0% 6 4 66.7% 2 33.3%CUNY School of Medicine 2 18.2% 2 18.2% 5 45.5% 1 9.1% 10 90.9% 1 9.1% 0 0.0% 11 10 90.9% 1 9.1%Graduate Center 3 11.5% 7 26.9% 3 11.5% 0 0.0% 13 50.0% 12 46.2% 1 3.8% 26 19 73.1% 7 26.9%Hunter Campus Schools 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0% 0 0.0%Hunter College 12 11.4% 21 20.0% 22 21.0% 2 1.9% 57 54.3% 47 44.8% 1 1.0% 105 53 50.5% 52 49.5%John Jay College 6 7.7% 21 26.9% 18 23.1% 1 1.3% 46 59.0% 31 39.7% 1 1.3% 78 42 53.8% 36 46.2%Lehman College 6 9.5% 17 27.0% 27 42.9% 0 0.0% 50 79.4% 11 17.5% 2 3.2% 63 30 47.6% 33 52.4%Macaulay Honors College 1 14.3% 2 28.6% 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 4 57.1% 2 28.6% 1 14.3% 7 5 71.4% 2 28.6%Medgar Evers College 1 2.7% 29 78.4% 3 8.1% 0 0.0% 33 89.2% 4 10.8% 0 0.0% 37 17 45.9% 20 54.1%NYC College of Technology 3 7.3% 23 56.1% 8 19.5% 0 0.0% 34 82.9% 5 12.2% 2 4.9% 41 26 63.4% 15 36.6%Queens College 7 17.5% 13 32.5% 9 22.5% 0 0.0% 29 72.5% 10 25.0% 1 2.5% 40 22 55.0% 18 45.0%School of Journalism 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 0 0.0% 6 3 50.0% 3 50.0%School of Professional Studies 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 3 60.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 5 4 80.0% 1 20.0%School of Public Health 1 6.7% 7 46.7% 4 26.7% 0 0.0% 12 80.0% 3 20.0% 0 0.0% 15 8 53.3% 7 46.7%York College 10 23.3% 21 48.8% 3 7.0% 0 0.0% 34 79.1% 7 16.3% 2 4.7% 43 22 51.2% 21 48.8%

34 8.2% 138 33.3% 138 33.3% 6 1.4% 316 76.1% 90 21.7% 9 2.2% 415 260 62.7% 155 37.3%Borough of Manhattan CC 12 11.0% 33 30.3% 33 30.3% 2 1.8% 80 73.4% 25 22.9% 4 3.7% 109 72 66.1% 37 33.9%Bronx CC 4 4.5% 32 36.4% 38 43.2% 0 0.0% 74 84.1% 14 15.9% 0 0.0% 88 55 62.5% 33 37.5%Guttman Community College 0 0.0% 4 33.3% 6 50.0% 0 0.0% 10 83.3% 2 16.7% 0 0.0% 12 8 66.7% 4 33.3%Hostos CC 2 4.3% 15 32.6% 21 45.7% 0 0.0% 38 82.6% 7 15.2% 1 2.2% 46 32 69.6% 14 30.4%Kingsborough CC 1 3.4% 14 48.3% 3 10.3% 3 10.3% 21 72.4% 8 27.6% 0 0.0% 29 16 55.2% 13 44.8%LaGuardia CC 13 17.6% 25 33.8% 23 31.1% 0 0.0% 61 82.4% 10 13.5% 3 4.1% 74 45 60.8% 29 39.2%Queensborough CC 2 3.5% 15 26.3% 14 24.6% 1 1.8% 32 56.1% 24 42.1% 1 1.8% 57 32 56.1% 25 43.9%

Table B-2a

Asian/Nat. Haw./

Other Pac. Isl. Black Hispanic Two or More Races Total Minority

Federal Protected Groups White Italian American Female

Com

mun

ity C

olle

ges

Seni

or C

olle

ges

New Hires by Ethnicity, Gender and College - Fall 2017Source: CUNYfirst June 1, 2017 - AAP 2017

Male

COMMUNITY COLLEGES

SENIOR COLLEGES

UNIVERSITY-WIDE TOTALS

Page 34 of 164

TOTAL# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # # % # %

Accounting Assistants 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 2 100.0% 0 0.0%Admin1 - Executives 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 2 66.7% 1 33.3%Admin2 - Managers 0 0.0% 2 13.3% 2 13.3% 0 0.0% 4 26.7% 9 60.0% 2 13.3% 15 11 73.3% 4 26.7%Admin3-Administrators 5 16.1% 9 29.0% 6 19.4% 1 3.2% 21 67.7% 10 32.3% 0 0.0% 31 26 83.9% 5 16.1%Admin5-Engineers/Architects 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 2 100.0% 0 0.0%Broadcast-Media Technicians 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0 0.0% 2 100.0%Campus Peace Officer-L-1 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0% 0 0.0%CUNY Administrative Asst 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 2 100.0% 0 0.0%CUNY Office Asst 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 3 60.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 5 4 80.0% 1 20.0%Custodial 0 0.0% 5 55.6% 4 44.4% 0 0.0% 9 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9 1 11.1% 8 88.9%Custodial - Supervisory 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0 0.0% 2 100.0%Facilities - Managerial 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0% 1 100.0%Info Tech - Managerial 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0% 1 100.0%Info Tech - Professional 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 2 100.0% 0 0.0%Skilled Trades 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 2 33.3% 4 66.7% 0 0.0% 6 0 0.0% 6 100.0%

Borough of Manhattan CCAccounting Assistants 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0% 0 0.0%

Admin1 - Executives 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0% 0 0.0%

Admin2 - Managers 2 20.0% 3 30.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 50.0% 3 30.0% 2 20.0% 10 6 60.0% 4 40.0%

Admin3-Administrators 5 8.1% 18 29.0% 21 33.9% 1 1.6% 45 72.6% 15 24.2% 2 3.2% 62 47 75.8% 15 24.2%

Admin4-College Lab Techs 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0 0.0% 2 100.0%

Campus Peace Officer-L-1 2 18.2% 5 45.5% 3 27.3% 0 0.0% 10 90.9% 1 9.1% 0 0.0% 11 3 27.3% 8 72.7%

CUNY Office Asst 3 20.0% 5 33.3% 3 20.0% 1 6.7% 12 80.0% 3 20.0% 0 0.0% 15 12 80.0% 3 20.0%

Custodial 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 2 100.0% 0 0.0%

Custodial - Supervisory 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0 0.0% 2 100.0%

Security - Managerial 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0% 1 100.0%

Skilled Trades 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 2 0 0.0% 2 100.0%

Table B-2b

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races


Groups White Italian American Female

New Hires by Ethnicity, Gender, College and Job Group - Fall 2017Source: CUNYfirst June 1, 2017 - AAP 2017

Male

Baruch College

Page 35 of 164

TOTAL# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # # % # %

Table B-2b

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races




Male

Accountants 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 2 100.0% 0 0.0%

Accounting Assistants 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0% 0 0.0%


Admin2 - Managers 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 0 0.0% 4 2 50.0% 2 50.0%



Basic Crafts-Buildings & Grounds 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 0 0.0% 2 100.0%


CUNY Office Asst 4 14.3% 16 57.1% 8 28.6% 0 0.0% 28 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 28 24 85.7% 4 14.3%

Custodial 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%

Info Tech - Managerial 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 0 0.0% 2 100.0%

Info Tech - Professional 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0% 0 0.0%

Info Tech - Technician 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 1 33.3% 2 66.7%

Laborers & Helpers 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0% 1 100.0%

Skilled Trades 0 0.0% 1 14.3% 2 28.6% 0 0.0% 3 42.9% 4 57.1% 0 0.0% 7 0 0.0% 7 100.0%



Admin2 - Managers 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 3 2 66.7% 1 33.3%




CUNY Office Asst 2 15.4% 6 46.2% 1 7.7% 0 0.0% 9 69.2% 4 30.8% 0 0.0% 13 10 76.9% 3 23.1%

Custodial 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 1 33.3% 2 66.7%


Facilities - Managerial 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0% 1 100.0%




Skilled Trades 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 4 0 0.0% 4 100.0%

Bronx CC

Brooklyn College

Page 36 of 164

TOTAL# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # # % # %

Table B-2b

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races




Male


Admin2 - Managers 1 9.1% 3 27.3% 1 9.1% 1 9.1% 6 54.5% 5 45.5% 0 0.0% 11 4 36.4% 7 63.6%



Campus Public Safety Sergeant 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0% 0 0.0%

CUNY Office Asst 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0% 0 0.0%



Accountants 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0% 1 100.0%



Admin2 - Managers 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 4 44.4% 0 0.0% 5 55.6% 4 44.4% 0 0.0% 9 7 77.8% 2 22.2%





CUNY Office Asst 2 13.3% 6 40.0% 4 26.7% 1 6.7% 13 86.7% 2 13.3% 0 0.0% 15 11 73.3% 4 26.7%

Custodial 0 0.0% 12 75.0% 3 18.8% 0 0.0% 15 93.8% 1 6.3% 0 0.0% 16 5 31.3% 11 68.8%



Skilled Trades 1 12.5% 2 25.0% 2 25.0% 0 0.0% 5 62.5% 2 25.0% 1 12.5% 8 0 0.0% 8 100.0%


Admin2 - Managers 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 4 66.7% 1 16.7% 6 4 66.7% 2 33.3%





Custodial 0 0.0% 2 33.3% 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 3 50.0% 3 50.0% 0 0.0% 6 3 50.0% 3 50.0%


Skilled Trades 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0% 1 100.0%

Central Office

City College

College of Staten Island

Page 37 of 164

TOTAL# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # # % # %

Table B-2b

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races




Male

Admin2 - Managers 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 3 60.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 5 4 80.0% 1 20.0%






CUNY Administrative Asst 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0% 0 0.0%

CUNY Office Asst 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 2 100.0% 0 0.0%


Admin2 - Managers 1 11.1% 1 11.1% 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 3 33.3% 5 55.6% 1 11.1% 9 7 77.8% 2 22.2%





Mail Message Services Workers 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0% 1 100.0%


Admin2 - Managers 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 2 66.7% 1 33.3%


CUNY Office Asst 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0% 0 0.0%


CUNY School of Medicine

Graduate Center

Guttman Community College

School of Public Health

Page 38 of 164

TOTAL# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # # % # %

Table B-2b

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races




Male


Admin2 - Managers 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 0 0.0% 4 3 75.0% 1 25.0%




CUNY Office Asst 2 16.7% 5 41.7% 4 33.3% 0 0.0% 11 91.7% 1 8.3% 0 0.0% 12 10 83.3% 2 16.7%

Custodial 0 0.0% 2 50.0% 2 50.0% 0 0.0% 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 2 50.0% 2 50.0%


Nurses 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0% 0 0.0%

Print Shop-Media 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0% 0 0.0%



Admin2 - Managers 1 7.1% 3 21.4% 1 7.1% 0 0.0% 5 35.7% 9 64.3% 0 0.0% 14 9 64.3% 5 35.7%





CUNY Office Asst 3 21.4% 4 28.6% 5 35.7% 0 0.0% 12 85.7% 2 14.3% 0 0.0% 14 10 71.4% 4 28.6%

Custodial 3 42.9% 0 0.0% 4 57.1% 0 0.0% 7 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 1 14.3% 6 85.7%

Engineering Technician 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0% 1 100.0%





Skilled Trades 0 0.0% 1 14.3% 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 2 28.6% 5 71.4% 0 0.0% 7 0 0.0% 7 100.0%

Hunter Campus Schools

Hunter College

Hostos CC

Page 39 of 164

TOTAL# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # # % # %

Table B-2b

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races




Male


Admin2 - Managers 0 0.0% 2 20.0% 3 30.0% 0 0.0% 5 50.0% 5 50.0% 0 0.0% 10 6 60.0% 4 40.0%





CUNY Office Asst 2 33.3% 1 16.7% 2 33.3% 0 0.0% 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 6 4 66.7% 2 33.3%

Custodial 1 10.0% 5 50.0% 3 30.0% 0 0.0% 9 90.0% 1 10.0% 0 0.0% 10 3 30.0% 7 70.0%


Skilled Trades 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 2 33.3% 4 66.7% 0 0.0% 6 0 0.0% 6 100.0%


Admin2 - Managers 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 4 80.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 5 3 60.0% 2 40.0%



CUNY Office Asst 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0% 0 0.0%


Skilled Trades 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0% 1 100.0%

Accountants 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%


Admin2 - Managers 0 0.0% 3 60.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 60.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 5 5 100.0% 0 0.0%





CUNY Office Asst 4 36.4% 2 18.2% 5 45.5% 0 0.0% 11 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 11 6 54.5% 5 45.5%

Custodial 1 14.3% 1 14.3% 4 57.1% 0 0.0% 6 85.7% 0 0.0% 1 14.3% 7 3 42.9% 4 57.1%



John Jay College

Kingsborough CC

LaGuardia CC

Page 40 of 164

TOTAL# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # # % # %

Table B-2b

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races




Male


Admin2 - Managers 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%



Accountants 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0% 1 100.0%



Admin2 - Managers 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 4 3 75.0% 1 25.0%





CUNY Office Asst 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 3 50.0% 0 0.0% 4 66.7% 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 6 5 83.3% 1 16.7%

Custodial 3 27.3% 4 36.4% 4 36.4% 0 0.0% 11 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 11 1 9.1% 10 90.9%




Skilled Trades 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 2 0 0.0% 2 100.0%


Admin2 - Managers 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0% 0 0.0%



CUNY School of Law

Lehman College

Macaulay Honors College

Page 41 of 164

TOTAL# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # # % # %

Table B-2b

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races




Male


Admin2 - Managers 0 0.0% 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 4 100.0% 0 0.0%





Custodial 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0% 0 0.0%




Skilled Trades 0 0.0% 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 0 0.0% 3 100.0%

Admin2 - Managers 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0% 1 100.0%




CUNY Office Asst 2 11.1% 12 66.7% 2 11.1% 0 0.0% 16 88.9% 0 0.0% 2 11.1% 18 15 83.3% 3 16.7%

Custodial 0 0.0% 5 83.3% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 6 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 1 16.7% 5 83.3%


Skilled Trades 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0 0.0% 1 100.0%


Admin2 - Managers 0 0.0% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 3 100.0% 0 0.0%




CUNY Office Asst 2 33.3% 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 0 0.0% 6 5 83.3% 1 16.7%

Custodial 0 0.0% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 1 33.3% 2 66.7%


Skilled Trades 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 3 0 0.0% 3 100.0%

Medgar Evers College

NYC College of Technology

Queens College

Page 42 of 164

TOTAL# % # % # % # % # % # % # % # # % # %

Table B-2b

Asian/Nat. Haw./


Races




Male


Admin2 - Managers 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 5 83.3% 0 0.0% 6 4 66.7% 2 33.3%




CUNY Office Asst 2 25.0% 2 25.0% 3 37.5% 0 0.0% 7 87.5% 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 8 8 100.0% 0 0.0%

Custodial 0 0.0% 8 88.9% 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 9 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9 3 33.3% 6 66.7%


Skilled Trades 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 2 0 0.0% 2 100.0%

Admin2 - Managers 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 2 100.0% 0 0.0%

Broadcast-Media Technicians 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 3 0 0.0% 3 100.0%


Admin2 - Managers 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0% 0 0.0%


Engineering Technician 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0% 0 0.0%

Admin2 - Managers 1 16.7% 2 33.3% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 0 0.0% 6 3 50.0% 3 50.0%




CUNY Office Asst 0 0.0% 3 60.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 60.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 5 4 80.0% 1 20.0%

Custodial 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0% 0 0.0%


Disability Accommodation Specl 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1 100.0% 0 0.0%


Skilled Trades 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 3 0 0.0% 3 100.0%

School of Journalism

School of Professional Studies

York College

Queensborough CC

Page 43 of 164

JOB GROUP

Not Indicated/

Blank

No Military Service VETERANS TOTAL No

Not Indicated/

Blank Yes TOTAL

Grand Total 146 1,059 17 1,222 165 1,048 9 1,222 Accountants 1 5 6 1 5 6 Accounting Assistants 1 7 8 8 8 Admin1 - Executives 3 49 52 8 44 52 Admin2 - Managers 5 137 1 143 32 108 3 143 Admin3-Administrators 45 413 5 463 86 372 5 463 Admin4-College Lab Techs 6 30 1 37 11 26 37 Admin5-Engineers/Architects 2 2 2 2 Basic Crafts-Buildings & Grounds 1 4 5 5 5 Broadcast-Media Technicians 1 4 5 1 4 5 Campus Peace Officer-L-1 22 57 4 83 83 83 Campus Peace Officer-L-2 2 2 2 2 Campus Public Safety Sergeant 1 5 1 7 7 7 CUNY Administrative Asst 3 3 2 1 3 CUNY Office Asst 28 138 1 167 5 161 1 167 Custodial 22 73 2 97 97 97 Custodial - Supervisory 12 12 2 10 12 Disability Accommodation Specl 1 1 1 1 Engineering Technician 2 2 2 2 Facilities - Managerial 4 4 1 3 4 Info Tech - Managerial 8 8 3 5 8 Info Tech - Professional 1 36 37 6 31 37 Info Tech - Technician 2 7 9 1 8 9 Laborers & Helpers 1 3 4 1 3 4 Mail Message Services Workers 1 2 1 4 4 4 Nurses 1 1 1 1 Print Shop-Media 1 1 1 1 Security - Managerial 3 3 1 2 3 Skilled Trades 5 50 1 56 4 52 56

Table B-3

New Hires by Military and Disability Status by Job Group - 2017Source: CUNYfirst June 1, 2017 - AAP 2017

MILITARY STATUS DISABILITY STATUS

Page 44 of 164

C. StaffRetirement

C-1: Retirement Projections of ECP and HEOTitles by Age and Years of Service, University-wide, Fall 2017

C-2: Retirement Projections of ECP and HEOTitles by Age and Years of Service for Senior andCommunity Colleges, Fall 2017

C-3: Retirement Projections of ECP and HEOTitles by Age, Years of Service, and Titles,University-wide, Fall 2017

Page 45 of 164

10 Yrs of serv &

less 11 Yrs of

Serv 12 Yrs of

Serv 13 Yrs of

Serv 14 Yrs of

Serv

15 Yrs of Serv or

More

% of employees 62 & older with 15 or

more years of service


more years of service TOTAL

University-Wide TOTALS 757 46 51 54 33 573 1,514 51 & younger 443 24 23 22 16 107 635 52 to 54 68 1 4 11 3 50 137 55 to 59 94 7 7 7 5 113 233 60 24 1 1 1 24 51 61 22 1 4 1 3 24 55 62 & older 106 12 12 12 6 255 16.8% 403

Executive Compensation Plan 291 12 18 16 14 195 546 51 & younger 124 6 3 7 7 26 173 52 to 54 35 3 3 16 57 55 to 59 46 2 5 1 3 41 98 60 16 8 24 61 9 2 1 10 22 62 & older 61 4 5 5 3 94 17.2% 172

HEO Title 466 34 33 38 19 378 968 51 & younger 319 18 20 15 9 81 462 52 to 54 33 1 1 8 3 34 80 55 to 59 48 5 2 6 2 72 135 60 8 1 1 1 16 27 61 13 1 2 1 2 14 33 62 & older 45 8 7 7 3 161 16.6% 231

Table C-1U

NIV

ERSI

TY-W

IDE

TOTA

LS

27.5%

28.0%

27.2%

Retirement Projections of Executive Compensation Plan Titles and HEO Title byAge and Years of Service - University-Wide Fall 2017

Source: CUNYfirst Current Active Employee report run 9/1/2017. Age and Years of Service Calculation as of 9/11/2017.

Page 46 of 164

10 Yrs of serv & less

11 Yrs of Serv

12 Yrs of Serv

13 Yrs of Serv

14 Yrs of Serv

15 Yrs of Serv or

More





757 46 51 54 33 573 1,514 SENIOR COLLEGE TOTALS 567 36 39 35 28 414 1,119 Executive Compensation Plan 227 8 10 12 13 144 414

51 & younger 88 3 2 3 7 20 123 52 to 54 27 2 3 12 44 55 to 59 41 1 3 1 3 29 78 60 10 8 18 61 8 1 8 17 62 & older 53 4 3 5 2 67 16.2% 134

HEO Title 340 28 29 23 15 270 705 51 & younger 232 15 17 10 6 58 338 52 to 54 24 1 1 4 2 25 57 55 to 59 34 4 2 2 2 55 99 60 7 1 1 1 13 23 61 9 1 2 1 2 10 25 62 & older 34 6 6 5 3 109 15.5% 163

COMMUNITY COLLEGE TOTALS 190 10 12 19 5 159 395 Executive Compensation Plan 64 4 8 4 1 51 132

51 & younger 36 3 1 4 6 50 52 to 54 8 1 4 13 55 to 59 5 1 2 12 20 60 6 6 61 1 2 2 5 62 & older 8 2 1 27 20.5% 38

HEO Title 126 6 4 15 4 108 263 51 & younger 87 3 3 5 3 23 124 52 to 54 9 4 1 9 23 55 to 59 14 1 4 17 36 60 1 3 4 61 4 4 8 62 & older 11 2 1 2 52 19.8% 68

Com

mun

ity C

olle

ges

31.1%

28.9%

Retirement Projections of Executive Compensation Plan Titles and HEO Title byAge and Years of Service - Senior and Community Colleges Fall 2017

Source: CUNYfirst Current Active Employee report run 9/1/2017. Age and Years of Service Calculation as of 9/11/2017.

Table C-2

UNIVERSITY-WIDE Totals

Seni

or C

olle

ges 27.1%

26.5%

Page 47 of 164


11 Yrs of Serv

12 Yrs of Serv

13 Yrs of Serv

14 Yrs of Serv

15 Yrs of Serv or

More





757 46 51 54 33 573 1,514291 12 18 16 14 195 546

Administrator 36 1 2 2 26 67 51 & younger 19 1 1 6 2752 to 54 4 2 655 to 59 4 1 1 2 860 2 1 361 1 1 262 & older 7 14 20.9% 21

Assc Administrator 35 3 1 15 54 51 & younger 19 1 1 2 2352 to 54 2 2 3 755 to 59 7 5 1260 1 1 261 1 1 262 & older 5 3 5.6% 8

Asst Administrator 30 1 11 42 51 & younger 16 2 1852 to 54 5 1 655 to 59 4 2 660 1 161 1 2 362 & older 3 1 4 9.5% 8

Asst Dean 21 2 2 2 2 7 36 51 & younger 16 2 1 1 2052 to 54 2 1 1 455 to 59 1 1 1 3 662 & older 2 1 3 8.3% 6

Asst Vice President 44 3 1 1 4 20 73 51 & younger 18 1 3 2252 to 54 8 1 2 1155 to 59 9 1 1 1 8 2060 2 1 361 1 162 & older 6 2 2 6 8.2% 16

Chancellory 5 1 5 11 51 & younger 1 1 2 455 to 59 2 1 360 1 162 & older 1 2 18.2% 3

Table C-3

Executive Compensation Plan

26.9%

18.5%

TOTAL

Retirement Projections of Executive Compensation Plan Titles and HEO Title byAge, Years of Service, and Titles - University-Wide Fall 2017

Source: CUNYfirst Current Active Employee report run 9/1/2017. Age and Years of Service Calculation as of 9/11/2017

19.0%

16.7%

20.5%

27.3%

Page 48 of 164


11 Yrs of Serv

12 Yrs of Serv

13 Yrs of Serv

14 Yrs of Serv

15 Yrs of Serv or

More





Table C-3

Retirement Projections of Executive Compensation Plan Titles and HEO Title byAge, Years of Service, and Titles - University-Wide Fall 2017

Source: CUNYfirst Current Active Employee report run 9/1/2017. Age and Years of Service Calculation as of 9/11/2017

Dean 39 1 2 2 4 39 87 51 & younger 11 1 3 5 2052 to 54 6 5 1155 to 59 8 1 1 6 1660 2 1 361 1 1 1 362 & older 11 1 1 21 24.1% 34

Dean of Schools 3 2 5 61 1 162 & older 3 1 20.0% 4

President 8 1 1 10 20 51 & younger 1 1 252 to 54 1 1 255 to 59 2 260 1 161 1 162 & older 5 1 6 30.0% 12

Secy to Board 1 1 52 to 54 1 1

Sr Assc Dean/Assc Dean 25 1 3 3 21 53 51 & younger 12 1 2 1 2 1852 to 54 2 1 1 455 to 59 5 5 1060 5 1 361 1 1 262 & older 4 1 11 20.8% 16

Sr VP/Vice President 44 3 7 2 2 39 97 51 & younger 11 2 2 1 3 1952 to 54 4 1 555 to 59 6 2 7 1560 4 3 761 5 2 762 & older 14 1 5 1 23 23.7% 44

466 34 33 38 19 378 968HE Officer 466 34 33 38 19 378 968

51 & younger 319 18 20 15 9 81 46252 to 54 33 1 1 8 3 34 8055 to 59 48 5 2 6 2 72 13560 8 1 1 1 16 2761 13 1 2 1 2 14 3362 & older 45 8 7 7 3 161 16.6% 231

34.0%

40.0%

36.1%

HEO Title

27.2%

33.3%

45.0%

Page 49 of 164

D. Changesto 2017 AAP

Reviewed job groupings, adjusted labor market availability factors, and calculated availabilities

Documented business rules for greater uniformity between campuses

Streamlined exhibits for clarity, including combining certain exhibits to highlight comparisons

Reviewed outlines against federal Affirmative Action Plan (compliance) requirements

Updated process of gathering, cleaning, and reporting data to expedite summary reporting

Prepared additional communications/training materials for Chief Diversity Officers

Updated Labor Market Availability as scheduled for alternate years

Page 50 of 164

E.TrainingandProfessionalDevelopment

SAGE Program, OHRM Executive Leadership Development Program, OHRM CUNY/Harvard Leadership Program, OAA and ORD Other Important Staff Training Initiatives

Page 51 of 164

F. LaborMarketAvailability

Definition of Labor Market Availability

Factors to Determine Availability Geographic and Qualification Focus Other Important Benchmarks

Page 52 of 164

Labor Market Availability is a key benchmark to review progress and create plans

Federal guidance (CFR 60-2.14 on Affirmative Action Planning):

“Availability is an estimate of the number of qualified minorities or women available for employment in a given job group, expressed as a percentage of all qualified persons available for employment in the job group. The purpose…is to establish a benchmark against which the demographic composition of the contractor’s incumbent workforce can be compared in order to determine whether barriers to equal employment opportunity may exist within particular job groups.”

Further information is available in the October, 2016 Quarterly Report, available on the CUNY website.

Page 53 of 164

Factors Used to Determine Availability

• External - Percentage of members of protected groups with requisite skillsin a reasonable geographic area (the area(s) from which the contractorseeks, or reasonably could seek, candidates).

• Internal - Percentage of members of protected groups who are eligible forplacement in the job groups (promotable or transferable), or reasonablycould be eligible were the employer to provide training (trainable).

Page 54 of 164

Determining External Factors

Geographic Focus

• National• Four-State (Regional) – NY, NJ, PA,

CT• Local – New York City

Qualification Focus

• Earned Degrees Conferred(2013-2014) as identified by theUS Department of Education

Page 55 of 164

Other Important Hiring Benchmarks

• Overall Selection Rate – regardless of utilization/underutilization, do we hire anyone group disproportionally to any other?

• Selection Rate of Protected Groups – are we making selections in a way thatcould eventually reverse underutilization – are we hiring/promoting at a rate thatwould allow us to “catch up” to the desired utilization?

Page 56 of 164

AppendixStaff Underutilization Reports from 2017 Affirmative Action Plans and other sources

Page 57 of 164

Contents

- Staff Job Groups/and Labor Market Availability Factors

- Summary of Utilization by College and Job Group

- Summary of Utilization of Job Groups by College

Page 58 of 164

STAFF JOB GROUPS / LABOR MARKET AVAILABILITY FACTORS

This exhibit provides detail on job groups for employees other than faculty. It provides a brief description, information on the Labor Market Availability factors and weighting for both Federal and Italian American Affirmative Action Plans, the Labor Market Availability calculations for each protected group, and a list of titles included in each group.

Job Groups are grouped into larger EEO Categories, as are the underutilization reports which follow.

Page 59 of 164


EEO Category: Executive/Administrative/Managerial

528 Employee(s) in GroupAdministration 1 (Executive)

Executive Compensation Plan (Other Than Chief Executive)

Titles Included in Group

Factor 1 Earned Degrees Conferred (EDC) US ‐ Ph.D., M.A., B.A., 2013‐14 Weighted At 40.00%

Factor 2 Promotable, Transferable, Trainable employees within contractors organization. ‐ CUNY Survey ‐ selected titles, service requirement and criteria ‐Source Spring 2013.

Weighted At 60.00%

Executive Compensation Plan; Chief Executives (Presidents, Deans of Major Schools) are excluded

2007‐2011 American Community Survey (ACS) ‐ U.S. ‐ Italian American Ph.D., M.A., B.A. holders, ages 28‐65; 100% First Ancestry and 50% Second Ancestry

Italian‐Amer

Female 49.3%

Total Minority 29.7% Asian 8.5% Black/AfAm 11.1% Hispanic 8.9% Ital‐Amer 6.9%

Labor Market Availability

Administrator

Assc Administrator

Assc Dean

Asst Administrator

Asst Dean

Asst Vice President

Dean

Exec Vice Chancellor

HCCS Asst Principal

HCCS Asst Principal Admin

HEO/Asst Admin

Principal

Prof School Assoc Admin

Prof School Assoc Dean

Prof School Asst Admin

Prof School Asst Dean

Prof School Sr Assoc Dean

Professor/Asst Admin

Secy to Board

Sr Vice Chancellor

Sr Vice President

Univ Administrator

Univ Assc Administrator

Univ Assc Dean

Univ Asst Administrator

Univ DeanPage 60 of 164



2,246 Employee(s) in GroupAdministration 2 (Manager)

Manager‐Level Administrators


Factor 1 Earned Degrees Conferred (ECD) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA); B.A., 2013‐2014 Weighted At 40.00%


Weighted At 60.00%

2007‐2011 American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA) Italian American B.A. holders, ages 21‐65; 100% First Ancestry and 50% Second Ancestry

Italian‐Amer

Female 59.9%



Assc Registrar

EOC HE Associate

EOC HE Officer

HE Associate

HE Officer

Page 61 of 164



59 Employee(s) in GroupFacility Manager

Facility Superintendents (Managerial)


Factor 1 2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), First Line Supervisor/Managers of Housekeeping and Janitorial Workers (4200)

Weighted At 100.00%

Factor 2 NA Weighted At 0.00%

In 2017, combined Admin Superintendent and Chief Admin Superintendent groups.

2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), First Line Supervisor/Managers of Housekeeping and Janitorial Workers (4200); 100% First Ancestry and 50% Second Ancestry for Italian Americans

Italian‐Amer

Female 29.0%



Admin Supt Builds Grds

Chief Admin Supt ‐ Competitive

Page 62 of 164



143 Employee(s) in GroupIT Computer Manager

Information Technology Managers (Managerial)


Factor 1 2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), Computer and Information Systems Managers (1110)

Weighted At 100.00%


2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), Computer and Information Systems Managers (1110); 100% First Ancestry and 50% Second Ancestry for Italian Americans

Italian‐Amer

Female 28.5%



IT Computer Operations Mgr

IT Computer Systems Mgr

Page 63 of 164



64 Employee(s) in GroupSecurity Manager

Campus Security Managers (Managerial)


Factor 1 2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) ‐ Residence Geography, New York City ‐ Police and Sheriffs Patrol Officer (3850)

Weighted At 100.00%


2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) ‐ Residence Geography, New York City ‐ Police and Sheriffs Patrol Officer (3850); 100% First Ancestry and 50% Second Ancestry for Italian Americans

Italian‐Amer

Female 28.4%



Campus Security Asst Dir

Campus Security Dir

Page 64 of 164


EEO Category: Professional Non‐Faculty

106 Employee(s) in GroupAccountant

Accountants (Professionals)


Factor 1 Internal Only Weighted At 0.00%

Factor 2 CUNY Survey Fall 2013, Permanent College Accounting Assistants. On September 19, 2013 College Accounting Assistants received an opportunity for promotion based on service and educational qualifications.

Weighted At 100.00%

Internal OnlyItalian‐Amer

Female 82.4%



Finance Accountant

Purchasing Agent

Page 65 of 164



3,016 Employee(s) in GroupAdministration 3 (Professional)

Administrators (Professionals)


Factor 1 Earned Degrees Conferred (ECD) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA); B.A., 2013‐2014 Weighted At 70.00%


Weighted At 30.00%

2007‐2011 American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA) Italian American B.A. holders, ages 21‐65; 100% First Ancestry and 50% Second Ancestry

Italian‐Amer

Female 61.1%



Asst Registrar

Asst to HEO

EOC Assistant to HEO

EOC HE Assistant

HCCS Guidance Couns

HE Assistant

Research Assc

Research Asst

Page 66 of 164



55 Employee(s) in GroupAdministration 5 (Engineer‐Architect)

Engineers and Architects and related professional staff


Factor 1 2007‐2011 American Community Survey (ACS) for NY State only; Engineering Managers (300) and Architects, Except Naval (1300)

Weighted At 100.00%


2007‐2011 American Community Survey (ACS) for NY State only; Engineering Managers (300) and Architects, Except Naval (1300); 100% First Ancestry and 50% Second Ancestry for Italian Americans

Italian‐Amer

Female 22.6%



Architect

Architect Asst

Engineer

Engineer Asst

Interior Designer

Project Mgr

Univ Assc Chief Engineer

Univ Chief Architect

Page 67 of 164



10 Employee(s) in GroupDisability Accomm. Specl

Disability Accommodation Specialists


Factor 1 As no unit has a minimum of five employees, no availability was calculated. Weighted At 100.00%


As no unit has a minimum of five employees, no availability was calculatedItalian‐Amer

Female 0.0%



Disability Accommodations Spec

Page 68 of 164



692 Employee(s) in GroupIT Computer Professional

Information Technology Professionals


Factor 1 2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), Computer Scientist Systems Analyst (1000); Computer Programmer (1010); Computer Software Engineers (1020); Database Administrator (1060); Network Systems & Data Communication Analysts (1110); Computer Hardware Engineers (1400); Computer Operators (5800); and Computer Control Programmers and Operators (7900)

Weighted At 100.00%


In 2017, split from IT Technicians and moved to Professionals' group

2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), Computer Scientist Systems Analyst (1000); Computer Programmer (1010); Computer Software Engineers (1020); Database Administrator (1060); Network Systems & Data Communication Analysts (1110); Computer Hardware Engineers (1400); Computer Operators (5800); and Computer Control Programmers and Operators (7900); 100% First Ancestry and 50% Second Ancestry for Italian Americans

Italian‐Amer

Female 26.4%



EOC IT Assistant

EOC IT Associate

IT Associate

IT Asst

IT Bus Data Rep Analyst

IT Software Dev‐PeopleSoft

IT Sr Associate

Page 69 of 164



8 Employee(s) in GroupNurse

Nurses


Factor 1 As no unit within CUNY has a minimum of five employees, no availability was calculated Weighted At 100.00%


As no unit within CUNY has a minimum of five employees, no availability was calculatedItalian‐Amer

Female 0.0%



Nurse

Page 70 of 164


EEO Category: Technicians

2,675 Employee(s) in GroupAdministration 4 (College Lab Tech)

College Laboratory Technicians (abbrev CLT).


Factor 1 2007‐2011 American Community Survey (ACS) ‐ 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), weighted by function weighted at 90% and 4STATES Earned Degrees Conferred (EDC) ‐ Bachelors 2013‐14 weighted at 10%

Weighted At 100.00%


For utilization analyses reviewed by sub‐group: Science/Technical/Engineering; Other Lab Techs.

2007‐2011 American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA); 100% First Ancestry and 50% Second Ancestry for Italian Americans, weighted by function

Italian‐Amer

Female 16.5%



Chief College Lab Tech

College Lab Tech

EOC College Lab Tech

HCCS Sr College Lab Tech

Sr College Lab Tech

Page 71 of 164



81 Employee(s) in GroupBroadcast/Media

Broadcast and Mass Media Technicians


Factor 1 2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), Broadcast and Sound Engineer Technicians and Radio Operators and Other Media and Communications Equipment Workers (2900)

Weighted At 100.00%


2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), Broadcast and Sound Engineer Technicians and Radio Operators and Other Media and Communications Equipment Workers (2900); 100% First Ancestry and 50% Second Ancestry for Italian Americans

Italian‐Amer

Female 12.9%



Broadcast Assc

Media Svcs Tech

Theatre Lead Tech

Page 72 of 164



13 Employee(s) in GroupEngineering Technician

Engineering and Architectural Technicians


Factor 1 2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), Engineering Technicians (1550)

Weighted At 100.00%


2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), Engineering Technicians (1550); 100% First Ancestry and 50% Second Ancestry for Italian Americans

Italian‐Amer

Female 17.0%



Facilities Coord

Page 73 of 164



124 Employee(s) in GroupIT Support Technician

IT Technical Support Workers


Factor 1 2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), Computer Support Specialists (1050)

Weighted At 100.00%


In 2017, split from the Professional IT Staff

2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), Computer Support Specialists (1050); 100% First Ancestry and 50% Second Ancestry for Italian Americans

Italian‐Amer

Female 29.0%



EOC IT Support Asst

IT Support Asst

Page 74 of 164



77 Employee(s) in GroupPrint Shop

Print Shop and Related Tech Workers


Factor 1 2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), Miscellaneous Media & Communication Workers (2860) and Printing Machine Operators (8255)

Weighted At 100.00%


2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), Miscellaneous Media & Communication Workers (2860) and Printing Machine Operators (8255); 100% First Ancestry and 50% Second Ancestry for Italian Americans

Italian‐Amer

Female 28.9%



Graphics Designer

Print Shop Assistant

Print Shop Associate

Print Shop Coordinator

Page 75 of 164


EEO Category: Administrative Support Workers

106 Employee(s) in GroupAccountant Assistant

Accounting Support Staff


Factor 1 2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS)‐NY/NJ/CT/PA, Accountants and Auditors (code 800) and Purchasing Managers (150)

Weighted At 100.00%


In 2017, incorporated new CUNY Payroll Clerk title

2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS)‐NY/NJ/CT/PA, Accountants and Auditors (code 800) and Purchasing Managers (150); 100% First Ancestry and 50% Second Ancestry for Italian Americans

Italian‐Amer

Female 50.8%



Asst Purchasing Agent

EOC Accounting Assistant

Finance Accountant Asst

Page 76 of 164



372 Employee(s) in GroupAdministrative Assistant

Administrative Support Staff‐Senior Level



Factor 2 CUNY Survey Spring 2011 ‐ CUNY Administrative Assistant title is strictly promotional from the Permanent CUNY Office Assistant (level 3 or above).

Weighted At 100.00%


Female 91.1%



CUNY Admin Asst

EOC Admin Asst

Page 77 of 164



93 Employee(s) in GroupMail Services Worker

Mail Services Workers


Factor 1 2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), Mail Clerks/Mail Machine Operators, Except Postal Service (5850)

Weighted At 100.00%


2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), Mail Clerks/Mail Machine Operators, Except Postal Service (5850); 100% First Ancestry and 50% Second Ancestry for Italian Americans

Italian‐Amer

Female 41.5%



EOC Mail Message Svcs Worker

Mail Message Svcs Worker

Page 78 of 164



1,237 Employee(s) in GroupOffice Assistant

Administrative Support Staff‐Entry Level


Factor 1 2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), Secretaries, and Administrative Assistants (5700); Word Processors and Typists (5820); and Office Administrative Support Workers, all other (5940), Office Clerks, General (5860)

Weighted At 100.00%


2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), Secretaries, and Administrative Assistants (5700); Word Processors and Typists (5820); and Office Administrative Support Workers, all other (5940), Office Clerks, General (5860); 100% First Ancestry and 50% Second Ancestry for Italian Americans

Italian‐Amer

Female 89.9%



Clerical Associate

CUNY Office Assistant

EOC Office Assistant

Page 79 of 164


EEO Category: Craft Workers

115 Employee(s) in GroupBasic Crafts‐Buildings and Grounds

Buildings and Grounds Workers


Factor 1 2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/PA/CT), Grounds Maintenance (4250), Janitors and Buildings and Grounds (4220), Motor Vehicle Operators (9150), Maintenance and Repair Workers, General (7340)

Weighted At 100.00%


In 2017, Maintenance Workers moved from Skilled Trades into this group

2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/PA/CT), Grounds Maintenance (4250), Janitors and Buildings and Grounds (4220), Motor Vehicle Operators (9150), Maintenance and Repair Workers, General (7340); 100% First Ancestry and 50% Second Ancestry for Italian Americans

Italian‐Amer

Female 20.0%



Exterminator

Gardener‐CUNY

Maintenance Worker

Motor Vehicle Mechanic

Motor Vehicle Operator

Park Princ Supv

Page 80 of 164



186 Employee(s) in GroupLaborers and Helpers

Entry‐Level Craft Workers


Factor 1 2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), Laborers (53‐7062) and Helpers (47‐3010)

Weighted At 100.00%


In 2017, split from Skilled Trades

2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), Laborers (53‐7062) and Helpers (47‐3010); 100% First Ancestry and 50% Second Ancestry for Italian Americans

Italian‐Amer

Female 17.0%



Electrician Helper

Laborer

Plumber Helper

Steamfitter Helper

Stock Worker

Stock Worker Supervisor

Page 81 of 164



472 Employee(s) in GroupSkilled Trades

Skilled Tradespeople


Factor 1 2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), Stationary Engineer & Boiler Operator (8610), Carpenters (6230), Electricians (6355), Painters, Construction Maintenance (6420), Pipelayers, Plumbers, Pipefitters (6440), Machinist (8030), Construction Manager (220), Automotive Service Technicians & Mechanics (7200), Elevator Installer & Repairer (6700), Roofer (6515), Cement Mason, Concrete Finishers & Terrazzo Worker (6250), Locksmith and Safe Repairers (7540), Plasterers and Stucco Masons (6460), Maintenance Workers, Machinery (7350)

Weighted At 100.00%


2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), Stationary Engineer & Boiler Operator (8610), Carpenters (6230), Electricians (6355), Painters, Construction Maintenance (6420), Pipelayers, Plumbers, Pipefitters (6440), Machinist (8030), Construction Manager (220), Automotive Service Technicians & Mechanics (7200), Elevator Installer & Repairer (6700), Roofer (6515), Cement Mason, Concrete Finishers & Terrazzo Worker (6250), Locksmith and Safe Repairers (7540), Plasterers and Stucco Masons (6460), Maintenance Workers, Machinery (7350), 100% First Ancestry and 50% Second Ancestry for Italian Americans

Italian‐Amer

Female 2.5%



Carpenter

Cement Mason

Electrician

Elevator Mechanic

High Pressure Plant Tender

Locksmith

Oiler

Painter

Plasterer

Plumber

Stationary Engineer

Steamfitter

Thermostat Repairer

Page 82 of 164



54 Employee(s) in GroupSkilled Trades‐Supervisor

Skilled Trades Supervisors



Factor 2 CUNY Survey Spring 2011, Skilled Trades ‐ selected titles with permanency and appointment to title with years of service requirement.

Weighted At 100.00%


Female 0.9%



Carpenter Supervisor

Electrician Supervisor

Mechanic Supervisor

Painter Supervisor

Plumber Supervisor

Stationary Engineer Sr

Supervisor (Maint&Labor)

Thermostat Repairer Supv

Page 83 of 164


EEO Category: Service Workers and Others

825 Employee(s) in GroupCampus Peace Officer‐Level 1

Campus Security‐Entry Level Staff


Factor 1 2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) ‐ Residence Geography, New York City ‐ Police and Sheriffs Patrol Officer (3850)

Weighted At 100.00%


2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) ‐ Residence Geography, New York City ‐ Police and Sheriffs Patrol Officer (3850); 100% First Ancestry and 50% Second Ancestry for Italian Americans

Italian‐Amer

Female 28.4%



Campus Peace Officer

Campus Security Asst

Campus Security Officer

Page 84 of 164



68 Employee(s) in GroupCampus Peace Officer‐Level 2

Campus Security‐Mid Level Staff



Factor 2 CUNY Survey Spring 2011 ‐ Permanent Campus Peace/Security Officer Level 1 ‐ The Campus Peace/Security Officer Level 2 title is strictly promotional from the Permanent Campus Peace/Security Officer Level 1 title with years of service requirement.

Weighted At 100.00%


Female 22.0%



Campus Peace Officer

Page 85 of 164



200 Employee(s) in GroupCampus Peace Officer‐Sergeant

Campus Security Supervisors



Factor 2 CUNY Permanent Campus Peace Officer Level 1 and 2 Weighted At 100.00%


Female 22.6%



Campus Pub Safety Sergeant

Campus Security Specialist

Page 86 of 164



902 Employee(s) in GroupCustodial

Custodians‐Entry Level


Factor 1 2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), Janitors and Building Cleaners (4220)

Weighted At 100.00%


2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), Janitors and Building Cleaners (4220); 100% First Ancestry and 50% Second Ancestry for Italian Americans

Italian‐Amer

Female 27.3%



Custodial Assistant

Custodial Assistant‐OLD TITLE

EOC Custodial Asst

Page 87 of 164



140 Employee(s) in GroupCustodial Supervisor

Custodial Supervisors


Factor 1 2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), First Line Supervisors/Managers of Housekeeping/Janitorial Workers (4200)

Weighted At 100.00%


2007‐2011 US Census‐American Community Survey (ACS) 4‐State (NY/NJ/CT/PA), First Line Supervisors/Managers of Housekeeping/Janitorial Workers (4200); 100% First Ancestry and 50% Second Ancestry for Italian Americans

Italian‐Amer

Female 29.0%



Custodial Asst Principal Supv

Custodial Principal Supv

Custodial Sr Supervisor

Custodial Supervisor

EOC Custodial Supv

Page 88 of 164

Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group

This report contains a summary of utilization, and underutilization, of protected groups by staff job group, organized by College. Only those groups with five or more employees are included here.

This version compares the underutilization numbers by job group for Executive, Administrative, and Staff positions to 2016 findings as reported to the CUNY Trustees over this past year. It is based on 2016 Affirmative Actions Plans that were edited and corrected during the Winter and Spring of 2017.

This chart reflects changes to groups in 2017. Laborers and Helpers and IT Support Technicians are new groups in 2017; 2016 underutilization is included under Skilled Trades and IT Professional groups, respectively. The Facility Manager group combines 2016 groups of Admin Superintendent and Chief Admin Superintendent; 2016 results for these groups were

Note that College Laboratory Technicians (Administration 4) have sub‐categories and are presented on a separate page for those colleges reporting staff in that group.

Page 89 of 164

Category: Executive/Administrative/Managerial

Administration 1 (Executive)

Administration 2 (Manager)

Category: Professional Non‐Faculty

Accountant

Administration 3 (Professional)

IT Computer Professional

Category: Administrative Support Workers

Accountant Assistant

Administrative Assistant

Office Assistant

Category: Craft Workers

Basic Crafts‐Buildings and Grounds

Skilled Trades

Category: Service Workers and Others

Campus Peace Officer‐Level 1


Campus Peace Officer‐Sergeant

Custodial


Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group Baruch College

This is a summary of utilization, and underutilization, of protected groups by job group. Only those groups with five or more employees are included here.


This chart reflects changes to groups in 2017. Laborers and Helpers and IT Support Technicians are new groups in 2017; 2016 underutilization is included under Skilled Trades and IT Professional groups, respectively. The Facility Manager group combines 2016 groups of Admin Superintendent and Chief Admin Superintendent; 2016 results for these groups were combined.

Job Category and Group 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016

UNDERUTILIZATION

Total Staff Female Total Min Asian Black Af‐Am Hisp‐Latino Ital‐Amer.

30 26

149 140

2

2 1

4

2 2 1

3

5

171 161

24 26 1 1

1 1

17 19

3 3

8 8

24 26

65 70

2

1

1 1 2

1 1

2

7 12

8

25 31

2

1 1 2 1 2 2 2 3

59 63

7 7

12 11

86 82

13 10

2

1 1

1 1

2 2

1 1

1 1

7 8

7 7

2 1

Page 90 of 164

1

Category: Technicians

Job Group: Administration 4 (College Lab Tech)

College Lab Tech ‐ Science, Tech, Eng.

Summary Utilization of Staff by College and Job Group Baruch College


This version compares the underutilization numbers by job group for College Laboratory Technicians as reported to the CUNY Trustees over this past year. It is based on 2016 Affirmative Actions Plans that were edited and corrected during the Winter and Spring of 2017.

In 2016, a single underutilization was calculated for all College Lab Technicians based on a blended rate of up to six categories. In 2017, CUNY began to calculate two utilization figures to represent only two categories. In the chart below, the 2016 figures represent total College Lab Technicians regardless of category. As a result, prior year results should be considered informational but not comparable.

Job Category 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016

UNDERUTILIZATION


5 8 1 1

Page 91 of 164




Security Manager







Mail Services Worker

Office Assistant



Laborers and Helpers

Skilled Trades


IT Support Technician

Print Shop




Custodial


Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group Borough of Manhattan CC





UNDERUTILIZATION


20 20

98 92

7 5

2

2 1

5

1 1

217 185

26 37 5 5

21 19

3 4

15 15

10 9

6 6

92 87

2 2

1

1 1

2 1

1 1

12 11

5

12

44 59

1

2

1 1

1

4 4

6

8 7

1

1 1

67 66

11 12

62 59

15 14 1 1

1 1 1

11 12 8 7

4 4

2 2

Page 92 of 164




College Lab Tech ‐ Other

Summary Utilization of Staff by College and Job Group Borough of Manhattan CC




Job Category 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016

UNDERUTILIZATION


20 35 1 3

17 35 1 3 2 1

Page 93 of 164










Office Assistant




Skilled Trades







Custodial


Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group Bronx CC





UNDERUTILIZATION


20 17

66 62

1

2 1

2

1 1

3

121 109

27 37

7 6

1 2

12 10

3 4

10 9

15 15

81 57 3

1 1

1

1 2

2 1

14 9

8 6

17

34 48

1

3

1 1

1

1

2 4

15 1 2

48 60

10 9

11 15

47 50

9 9

4 8 1 1

1 1

1

1 1

3

6 7

4 4

1 1

Page 94 of 164





Summary Utilization of Staff by College and Job Group Bronx CC




Job Category 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016

UNDERUTILIZATION


23 28 3 3

8 28 1 3

3 2

3 2

Page 95 of 164




Security Manager



Administration 5 (Engineer‐Architect)





Office Assistant




Skilled Trades



Print Shop




Custodial


Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group Brooklyn College





UNDERUTILIZATION


30 33

104 105

6 6

1 3 3

4 3

2 2

1 2 1 1

153 148

5 5

37 39 2 4

3

1 1

3 4

7 6

33 36

98 102

7 10 1 3 3 6 6

1

1

8 8

7 5

13

32 47

1 1

2

1

2 2

1

2 4

5

6 8

1

1

1

1 1

54 55

11 17

50 48

7 6

5 5 3 3

1 1

8 10

2 3

1

6 6

4 4

Page 96 of 164





Summary Utilization of Staff by College and Job Group Brooklyn College




Job Category 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016

UNDERUTILIZATION


25 44

20 44

6 2 2

4 6 2

Page 97 of 164




IT Computer Manager








Office Assistant


Broadcast/Media




Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group Central Office





UNDERUTILIZATION


81 88

253 265

74 82

6 8 3 4 3 4 1

5

6 5

243 250

20 20

132 148

2 2

14 13

9 10

9 10

14 14

36 41

6 6

3

1 1

1 2 1

2 3

41 46

14 1

7 7

1

11 9 1 1 1 3 3

Page 98 of 164





Accountant






Office Assistant




Skilled Trades

Skilled Trades‐Supervisor


Print Shop





Custodial


Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group City College





UNDERUTILIZATION


25 38

142 145

9

2 2

3 6

5 5

175 195

36 33

5 19 21

4 4

11 10

18 22

65 77 1

1

1 2 2

1 1

11 13

15 8

9

50 68

10 10

3 2

1

1

2 3

1

4 7

5 5 1 1

87 102

8 8

23 21

80 78

13 13

8 6

1 2

1

3

1 1

1 2

1 1

3 1

6

1

11 10

7 7

1 1

Page 99 of 164





Summary Utilization of Staff by College and Job Group City College




Job Category 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016

UNDERUTILIZATION


1 32 53 3 1

1 1 13 53 1

3 3

3

Page 100 of 164





Accountant






Office Assistant




Skilled Trades





Custodial

Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group College of Staten Island





UNDERUTILIZATION


19 19

98 98

2 1

14 13

1 1

2 3 6 7

1 1

5 3

9 9

97 92

35 38 4 3

3 3

9 14

2 2

6 6

2

7 8

1 1

5 5

60 59

38 44

37 36

6 6

3 2

1 2

21 21

3 4

13 12

2

7

18

23 46

6 6

1

2

1

2

5 3

1 1

1 1

1

2

1

1

2 2

1 1

1

1

25 24

9 9

50 50

2 2 7 8

5 4

1 1

1 1

4 4

3 2

2 3

3 4

1 1

2 2

1 1

Page 101 of 164





Summary Utilization of Staff by College and Job Group College of Staten Island




Job Category 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016

UNDERUTILIZATION


2 1 23 28 2 3

1 7 28 1 3 2

Page 102 of 164








Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group CUNY GradSch ofPub H and H Pol





UNDERUTILIZATION


5 6

14 9

1 1 1

1

1

1 1

10 5 1 1

5 1

Page 103 of 164







Office Assistant

Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group CUNY School of Medicine





UNDERUTILIZATION


8

13

1

26 3

11 2

Page 104 of 164




Summary Utilization of Staff by College and Job Group CUNY School of Medicine




Job Category 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016

UNDERUTILIZATION


5 1

Page 105 of 164




IT Computer Manager







Office Assistant



Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group Graduate Center





UNDERUTILIZATION


18 19

74 70

8 6

4 3

7

2 2 2 1

7 9

1 1

3 1 3

88 90

33 37

7 7

4 4

7 7

5 5

15 17

1 1

1 2 2

1 1

3 3

18 17 1 2 2

Page 106 of 164




Summary Utilization of Staff by College and Job Group Graduate Center




Job Category 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016

UNDERUTILIZATION


1 5 5 1 2 1 1

Page 107 of 164









Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group Guttman Community College





UNDERUTILIZATION


7 9

33 32

1 1 1 1 1

3 2

41 44

5 6 1

2 1 2 1

1 1

8 8 1 1

Page 108 of 164










Office Assistant




Skilled Trades






Custodial


Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group Hostos CC





UNDERUTILIZATION


16 15

67 66

1

1 1

2

115 117

16 26 2 2

7 6

1 1 1 1

12 13

2 3

5 5

10 9

49 47

1 1 1

1

1 1

1 1

8 8

6

6

14 26

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

2 3

6 1 1 1

28 28

7 9

32 35

6 6

1

1

1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

3 3

3 3

1 1

Page 109 of 164




Summary Utilization of Staff by College and Job Group Hostos CC




Job Category 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016

UNDERUTILIZATION


9 14 1 2 1 1

Page 110 of 164





Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group Hunter Campus Schools





UNDERUTILIZATION


13 2 1

7 2 1 1

Page 111 of 164




Facility Manager


Accountant







Office Assistant




Skilled Trades




Print Shop





Custodial


Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group Hunter College





UNDERUTILIZATION


30 41

147 149

8 8

1

1 1

2 2 2

2

1

6

1 1 1 1

16 17

234 213

62 59

3 3 1 1 1

19 17

7 6

11 12

39 40

10 9

84 86

2 2

4

3 3

2 2

1 1

12 12

8

10

52 71

5 6

2

2

1 2

1

1 1

1

2 5

5

5

1

1

87 92

10 7

17 18

84 86

17 18

1

2

8 10 10 10

7 7

2 2

Page 112 of 164





Summary Utilization of Staff by College and Job Group Hunter College




Job Category 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016

UNDERUTILIZATION


29 38 4 3

1 8 38 3 1

Page 113 of 164




Facility Manager







Office Assistant




Skilled Trades


Broadcast/Media


Print Shop




Custodial


Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group John Jay College





UNDERUTILIZATION


21 21

149 145

7 6

1

1

1

2 1

4 4

1 1

179 153

26 29

8 8 15 10

2 3

8 7

5 6

36 36

2 2

1 1 2

1 1

6 6

8

14

20 37

2

2

1 1 1

1

1

3 5

5 9

5

7 5 1

1 2

1

1 1

37 40

11 11

43 33

6 5

2

1

2 1 1 1

5 5

4 3

1 1

Page 114 of 164




Summary Utilization of Staff by College and Job Group John Jay College




Job Category 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016

UNDERUTILIZATION


1 12 12 2 2

Page 115 of 164




IT Computer Manager


Accountant





Office Assistant




Skilled Trades



Print Shop




Custodial


Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group Kingsborough CC





UNDERUTILIZATION


16 17

101 101

5 5

2

1 1

6 5

1 1

7 7

1 1

6 8

120 121

23 34

3 4 2 1

3 3

2 2

2 2

7 5

2 2

18 15

49 57 1

10 10 1 1

1

4 5 5 4

2 2

10

17

21 47

2

3

1 1

2

1 3

1

11

7 8 2 1 1

1

29 33

14 12

60 64

6 7

2 5

1

1

2 1

3 3

2 5

4 6

3 3

4 4

1 1

Page 116 of 164





Summary Utilization of Staff by College and Job Group Kingsborough CC




Job Category 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016

UNDERUTILIZATION


17 39 2

18 39 1 2

1

1 1

Page 117 of 164





Accountant








Office Assistant






Custodial

Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group LaGuardia CC





UNDERUTILIZATION


23 21

146 147

2 1

1 1 1

5 8

9 8

213 197

6 6

53 74

2 1

6

18 18

1 1

4 7

6 6

20 20

12 11

69 63 3

1 1

5 5

1 2

1 1

1 1

1 1

12 11

21 3

56 60

10 10

34 29

2

1 1 1 1

7 10 7 7

2 2

Page 118 of 164





Summary Utilization of Staff by College and Job Group LaGuardia CC




Job Category 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016

UNDERUTILIZATION


31 37 3

1 10 37 1

Page 119 of 164









Office Assistant

Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group Law School





UNDERUTILIZATION


10 11

27 28

1 1

2 3

25 27

5 6 1

3 2

5 5

9 9

2 2 1 1

1 2

Page 120 of 164





Accountant






Office Assistant




Skilled Trades







Custodial


Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group Lehman College





UNDERUTILIZATION


24 27

110 109

2

1 7 6 2 4

7 6

123 116

34 36

2 3 1 1

1

2 2 1

11 10

1 1

6 5

13 15

70 77 5

1

1 1 2

1 1

7 9

7

12

35 54

5 6

2

1 1 4 1 3

5 1 1 1

37 38

9 9

51 50

6 6

2

1 2

2 1

1 1 3 3

5 5

4 4

1 1

Page 121 of 164





Summary Utilization of Staff by College and Job Group Lehman College




Job Category 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016

UNDERUTILIZATION


12 22 1 1

10 22 1

1

1 1

Page 122 of 164





Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group Macaulay Honors College





UNDERUTILIZATION


14 14 1 1 1 1

26 25 1 2 2 2

Page 123 of 164









Office Assistant



Skilled Trades






Custodial

Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group Medgar Evers College





UNDERUTILIZATION


16 16

76 76

1

5 2 4 5

1

6 8

106 94

9 15

8 4

1

3 6 12 11

1 2

5 5

31 35 1

1 1

1 3 5 6

7

19 32 1

1

2

6 1 1 1

30 33

6 5

34 37

3 1

2

1 1

1 1

5 7

1

7 9

4 4

3 3

Page 124 of 164




Summary Utilization of Staff by College and Job Group Medgar Evers College




Job Category 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016

UNDERUTILIZATION


1 17 22 2 3 3

Page 125 of 164





Accountant





Office Assistant



Skilled Trades






Custodial


Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group NYC College of Technology





UNDERUTILIZATION


18 18

61 64

1

1

7 6

115 113

20 25

2 1

2

3 1

1

1 1

10 10

2 2

14 14

97 88 2

1 1 3 3 1 1

14 15

6

14 23

1

1 1

8 1

36 39

8 8

43 43

7 6

1

1

1 1

5 6 3 4

4 4

1 1

Page 126 of 164





Summary Utilization of Staff by College and Job Group NYC College of Technology




Job Category 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016

UNDERUTILIZATION


30 37 4 4

6 37 4

1

1 1

Page 127 of 164




IT Computer Manager


Accountant





Office Assistant




Skilled Trades






Custodial


Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group Queens College





UNDERUTILIZATION


26 27

110 118

5 5

2

1

2 2

7 2

1 1

5 5

131 123

26 31 5 6

1 1 1

6 3

1 2

22 26

107 109

13 15 8 10 5 6

12 13

8

17

40 64

2

3

1 2

2 1

1

1

1

1

2

1 6

5 1 1

25 33

7 7

67 67

7 9

2 1

1 1

4 3

2 1

3 4

6 6

1 1

Page 128 of 164





Summary Utilization of Staff by College and Job Group Queens College




Job Category 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016

UNDERUTILIZATION


25 38

1 13 38

2 7

2 7

Page 129 of 164




IT Computer Manager


Accountant





Office Assistant




Skilled Trades





Custodial


Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group Queensborough CC





UNDERUTILIZATION


21 22

90 87

5

1

1

2 1

1

1 1 1 1

2 1

5

136 116

15 16

1 1

11 8

1

28 30

67 65

14 15 1 1 9 10 4 4

9 9

9 6

10

28 42

2

1

1 1

1

6 2

1

1

1 2

5 4

1 1

1 2

38 40

6 6

9 9

49 43

10 11

7 6

1 1

1 1

2 2 2 2

1

1 1

5 5

2 1

1 1

Page 130 of 164





Summary Utilization of Staff by College and Job Group Queensborough CC




Job Category 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016

UNDERUTILIZATION


1 32 47 2 4

1 15 47 1 4

3 4

4 4

Page 131 of 164






Broadcast/Media

Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group School of Journalism





UNDERUTILIZATION


14 12 1 1

6 1 1 1 1

7 1 1

Page 132 of 164







Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group School of Professional Studies





UNDERUTILIZATION


7 6

40 43

2 2

1

1 1 1

4 5

1 1

52 49

7 7 1 1 1 1

4 5

1 1

Page 133 of 164





Accountant





Office Assistant



Skilled Trades




Custodial

Summary Utilization of Staff By College and Job Group York College





UNDERUTILIZATION


19 19

50 45

2

2 2

2 2 4 5

5 5

89 85

28 28

1 1

9 9

3 3

10 10

63 64 5

1 1 2 3 1 1

10 11

10

21 33

2

1 1

1

3 2

1

2 5

40 39

6 7

25 27

1

1

10 9 5 5

1 1

Page 134 of 164





Summary Utilization of Staff by College and Job Group York College




Job Category 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016

UNDERUTILIZATION


14 23 2 3

9 23 1 3

3

2 3

Page 135 of 164

This report contains a summary of utilization, and underutilization, of protected groups by staff job group, organized by College. Only those groups with five or more employees are included here.


This chart reflects changes to groups in 2017. Laborers and Helpers and IT Support Technicians are new groups in 2017; 2016 underutilization is included under Skilled Trades and IT Professional groups, respectively. The Facility Manager group combines 2016 groups of Admin Superintendent and Chief Admin Superintendent; 2016 results for these groups were

Summary Utilization by Job Group

Note that the College Laboratory Tech group (Administration 4) has sub‐categories and is presented in a slightly different format.

Page 136 of 164




This section summarizes utilization and underutilization of protected groups by job group. Only those groups with five or more employees are included here.



Female Total Min Asian Black Af‐Am Hisp‐Latino2017 20172017201720172016 2016201620162016Job Category and Group

Ital‐Amer.2017 2016

Total Staff2017 2016

UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group

22 2 1 230 126Baruch College

220 20Borough of Manhattan CC

21 120 1117Bronx CC

3 21 3 230 33Brooklyn College

6 3 38 4 4 181 88Central Office

2 225 38City College

2 1 11 1 119 19College of Staten Island

11 1 15 6CUNY GradSch ofPub H and H Pol

8 1CUNY School of Medicine

4 2 2 13 2 1 118 19Graduate Center

1 11 1 17 9Guttman Community College

1 116 15Hostos CC

2 113Hunter Campus Schools

22 2 130 41Hunter College

1 121 21John Jay College

216 17Kingsborough CC

2 1 11 123 21LaGuardia CC

1 110 11Law School

224 27Lehman College

116 116Medgar Evers College

18 118NYC College of Technology

22 226 27Queens College

2 1 11 1 1 121 22Queensborough CC

2 1 1 12 1 17 6School of Professional Studies

2 2 219 19York College

Page 137 of 164










UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group

4149 3140Baruch College


266 362Bronx CC

4 3104 105Brooklyn College

253 5265Central Office

9142 63145City College

14 2 6 513 3 7 398 98College of Staten Island

114 119CUNY GradSch ofPub H and H Pol

13CUNY School of Medicine

7 37 974 3170Graduate Center

33 2332Guttman Community College

167 266Hostos CC


1149 44145John Jay College

6 5101 77101Kingsborough CC

146 85147LaGuardia CC

27 3228Law School

71 6110 42109Lehman College

11 114 114Macaulay Honors College

5 42 576 8676Medgar Evers College


1 7 2110 118Queens College

1 2 190 87Queensborough CC

1114 12School of Journalism

41 540 43School of Professional Studies

2 250 5445York College

Page 138 of 164



Facility Manager







UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group



Page 139 of 164



IT Computer Manager







UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group


8 6Graduate Center

1 11 15 115Kingsborough CC

5 115Queens College

15Queensborough CC

Page 140 of 164



Security Manager







UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group

2 17 115Borough of Manhattan CC


Page 141 of 164



Accountant







UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group

1 15Baruch College

5 5City College


3 13 1 116 17Hunter College

3 2 24 1 26 8Kingsborough CC

2 19 8LaGuardia CC

2 13 17 6Lehman College

2 11 17 6NYC College of Technology


1 15Queensborough CC

1 15 5York College

Page 142 of 164










UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group



7 6121 1012109Bronx CC

153 3148Brooklyn College






88 7790Graduate Center

2 141 1244Guttman Community College

7 6115 1312117Hostos CC

2 1 17Hunter Campus Schools

234 1719213Hunter College




25 2327Law School


1 226 2225Macaulay Honors College


3 1115 1010113NYC College of Technology

131 36123Queens College


52 5449School of Professional Studies

89 9985York College

Page 143 of 164










UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group


2 220 20Central Office

6 116LaGuardia CC

Page 144 of 164










UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group

1 124 3326Baruch College


1 227 4337Bronx CC



36 4433City College

4 2335 38College of Staten Island


15 116Guttman Community College

2 1 12 1 116 3226Hostos CC





15 6Law School






1 1 16 1School of Journalism

1 11 17 117School of Professional Studies

28 3328York College

Page 145 of 164










UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group

8 118Baruch College


10 129Bronx CC

7 6Brooklyn College


5 5College of Staten Island

5 115Hostos CC


6 116LaGuardia CC


Page 146 of 164










UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group

12 1 224 226Baruch College


1 11 215 15Bronx CC

7 1 3 610 3 633 136Brooklyn College

1 29 110Central Office



1 2 27 7Graduate Center

11 110 119Hostos CC

3 339 40Hunter College

1 1 28 7John Jay College

10 1 4 510 1 5 418 15Kingsborough CC

5 520 1120LaGuardia CC

2 12 15 5Law School


1 15 5Medgar Evers College

1 31 314 1114NYC College of Technology

13 8 515 10 622 26Queens College

14 1 9 415 1 10 428 30Queensborough CC


Page 147 of 164










UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group


6 16 114 14Central Office

1 15 115Graduate Center



1 11 212 1111LaGuardia CC

Page 148 of 164



Office Assistant







UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group



3 181 91457Bronx CC




6 1 3 26 2 438 44College of Staten Island



149 8847Hostos CC





9 219Law School






563 111064York College

Page 149 of 164










UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group

28Baruch College

15Borough of Manhattan CC

18 16Bronx CC


3 2 115 8City College

1 2 1 17 1College of Staten Island

1 1 16 1Hostos CC




7Lehman College

2 2 1 18 1Queens College

2 11 1 29 116Queensborough CC

Page 150 of 164










UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group


317 1Bronx CC


19 1City College

218 1College of Staten Island

16Hostos CC

210 1Hunter College



212Lehman College


16NYC College of Technology

317 2Queens College

110Queensborough CC

2 110 1York College

Page 151 of 164



Skilled Trades







UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group

1 2 1 21 225 3231Baruch College


1 134 4248Bronx CC




1 114 3226Hostos CC








1 6 1 51 2 428 2142Queensborough CC


Page 152 of 164










UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group

10 10City College

1 11 1 16 6College of Staten Island

15 6Hunter College

5 6Lehman College

Page 153 of 164

Summary Utilization of Job Groups by College


Administration 4 (College Lab Tech)Job Group:




Female Total Min Asian Black Af‐Am Hisp‐Latino2017 20172017201720172016 2016201620162016Job Category



UNDERUTILIZATION

Baruch College

15College Lab Tech ‐ Science, Tech, Eng. 1 18

Borough of Manhattan CC


2 117College Lab Tech ‐ Other 1 335

Bronx CC

3 223College Lab Tech ‐ Science, Tech, Eng. 3 328


Brooklyn College

26 225College Lab Tech ‐ Science, Tech, Eng. 44

4 6 220College Lab Tech ‐ Other 44

City College

3 3 132College Lab Tech ‐ Science, Tech, Eng. 3 153

13 113College Lab Tech ‐ Other 153

College of Staten Island



CUNY School of Medicine

5College Lab Tech ‐ Science, Tech, Eng. 1

Graduate Center

1 12 1 15College Lab Tech ‐ Science, Tech, Eng. 5

Hostos CC

1 19College Lab Tech ‐ Science, Tech, Eng. 1 214Page 154 of 164










UNDERUTILIZATION

Hunter College



John Jay College


Kingsborough CC



LaGuardia CC



Lehman College



Medgar Evers College


NYC College of Technology



Queens College

2 725College Lab Tech ‐ Science, Tech, Eng. 38


Queensborough CCPage 155 of 164










UNDERUTILIZATION

Queensborough CC



York College



Page 156 of 164



Broadcast/Media







UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group



17 1School of Journalism

Page 157 of 164










UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group


115 2Bronx CC


114 1Central Office

1 16 1Hostos CC

5 1Hunter College

5 1John Jay College

11 1Kingsborough CC

21 3LaGuardia CC


1 16 1Medgar Evers College

18NYC College of Technology

15 1Queens College

Page 158 of 164



Print Shop







UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group



5 115City College

5 1Hunter College



Page 159 of 164










UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group



4 18 148 7660Bronx CC

5 3 85 3 1054 6655Brooklyn College

8 6 687 1011102City College

2 7 1 4 32 8 1 4 425 2224College of Staten Island



1 18 8Guttman Community College

11 128 3328Hostos CC



2 2 25 1 529 3333Kingsborough CC

72 1056 7760LaGuardia CC


3 1 51 1 730 4433Medgar Evers College




101 940 5539York College

Page 160 of 164










UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group


1 110 9Bronx CC

1 18 8City College

110 7Hunter College


Page 161 of 164










UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group


1 1 111 12Borough of Manhattan CC

1 311 15Bronx CC

1 21 311 17Brooklyn College

1 31 1 311 9Central Office

1 1 32 2 123 21City College


1 1 17 9Hostos CC


12 2 1 111 11John Jay College


11 1 110 10LaGuardia CC





1 2 21 2 29 9Queensborough CC

6 7York College

Page 162 of 164



Custodial







UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group



1 147 4450Bronx CC



2 350 1150College of Staten Island

11 132 3335Hostos CC




34 2229LaGuardia CC


1 72 1 934 3337Medgar Evers College




125 1127York College

Page 163 of 164










UNDERUTILIZATION

Job Group

2 213 1210Baruch College


9 119Bronx CC

7 6Brooklyn College


1 16 116Hostos CC








Page 164 of 164

board of trustees the city university of new york · board of trustees the city university of new...

Documents