biomass bioaugmentation in a single- stage nitritation

11
HEADER TEXT UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA Water & Energy Sustainable Technology Center Biomass Bioaugmentation in a Single-Stage Nitritation-Anammox Reactor for Mainstream Deammonification Partners Funding Jim Field 1 , Jeff Prevatt 2 , Guangbin Li 1 and Reyes Sierra 1 Award#1705671 1 , Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Arizona 2 , Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 04-Jan-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

HEADER TEXTUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA

Water & Energy Sustainable Technology Center

Biomass Bioaugmentation in a Single-Stage Nitritation-Anammox Reactor for

Mainstream Deammonification

Partners Funding

Jim Field1, Jeff Prevatt2, Guangbin Li1 and Reyes Sierra1

Award#1705671

1, Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Arizona2, Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD)

[email protected]

HEADER TEXTUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA

Water & Energy Sustainable Technology CenterThe N Cycle

NH4+N2

NO2-

NO3-

Org-Nmineralizationas

sim

ilatio

nO2

O2e-

e-

N-fixation

nitrification-denitrification

Conventional Nutrient N Removal Costs

Nitrification:

Denitrification:

NO3- + 5 e- eq → 0.5 N2

64 g O2 / mol N

40 g COD/ mol N

AOB

NOB

HEADER TEXTUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA

Water & Energy Sustainable Technology CenterThe Missing Link In The N Cycle

NH4+N2

NO2-

NO3-

Org-N

Anammox

mineralizationas

sim

ilatio

nO2

O2e-

e-

N-fixation

Anammox

Discovered in Late 1980’s in The Netherlands

Simplified Stoichiometry

N2NH4+ NO2-ammonia nitrate dinitrogen gas

+

Anaerobic Ammonium Oxidation

Year1995 2015

Full

scal

e in

stal

latio

n

Scie

ntifi

c pu

blic

atio

ns

120 1,400

Lackner et al., 2014

HEADER TEXTUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA

Water & Energy Sustainable Technology CenterCosts and Savings of Anammox

Anammox Reaction (Detailed Stoichiometry)

NH4+

(100% N)

57% flow

43% flow

57% less O2

no O2 needed for anammox

NitritationAnammox

N2 89% NNO3

- 11% NAOB

NO2-

no COD needed for anammox

Anammox is combined with AOB as a technology

O2 No COD

HEADER TEXTUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA

Water & Energy Sustainable Technology CenterMoving-Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR)

Wastewater

Treated Effluent

Aeration Mixer

MediaANAM

MOX

AOB

NO2-

NH4+

DO

NO2-

NH4+

N2

The ANITA Mox is based on developing an Anammox biofilm on a plastic carrier material in a Moving-Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR)

A variant of the ANITA Mox process is to integrate suspended activated sludge (A/S) biomass in the process to help catalyze the PN by AOB. (IFAS)

Vol. 145 L

HEADER TEXTUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA

Water & Energy Sustainable Technology CenterMBBR Control and Operational Strategy

Upper limit

Lower limit

pH-DO Control strategyAOB consume ALK vs. Anammox generate ALK

Low DO for AOB & High DO for NOB

Air

pH

Phase Purpose Influent Ammonium-NI Startup (unstable influent quatity) Centrate 300-1600 ppmII Sidestream I: MBBR Centrate 1000 ppmIII Sidestream II: MBBR and IFAS Centrate 1000 ppmIV Mainstream: MBBR and IFAS Mainstream 40 ppm

Operational Plan

pH: upper limit = 7.2 and lower limit = 6.6

HEADER TEXTUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA

Water & Energy Sustainable Technology CenterMBBR Performance

Influent pH = 7.5 Temp. 86 F (30 degree C) Current Nitrogen Loading Rate (NLR): 1.0 g N/L reactor/day

HEADER TEXTUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA

Water & Energy Sustainable Technology CenterUpflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB)

The UASB is based on Anammox biomass forming compact granular sludge with high specific activity.

Slud

ge B

ed

AOB: Ammonium oxidizing bacteriaAOB: Ammonium oxidizing archaea

Treated Effluent

Centrate/Mainstream WW Aeration

Reci

rcul

atio

n

Three-phase separator

AirN2Granule

Vol. 65 L

HEADER TEXTUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA

Water & Energy Sustainable Technology CenterUASB Control and Operational Strategy

Phase Purpose Influent Ammonium-N Nitrite-N Total-NI Startup Synthetic 80-200 ppm 90-225 ppm 170-425 ppmII Sidestream I: Anammox Synthetic 200-480 ppm 225-540 ppm 425-1000 ppmIII Sidestream II: PN/A Synthetic 1000 ppm 0 ppm 1000 ppmIV Sidestream III: PN/A Centrate 1000 ppm 0 ppm 1000 ppmV Mainstream: PN/A Mainstream 40 ppm 0 ppm 40 ppm

Operational Plan

Control strategy in Anammox Stage

pH vs. Anammox Activity pH vs. Anammox Growth

Effect of pH on the anammox activity of a granular enrichment culture (●) and a suspended enrichment culture (○)

Nor

mal

ized

Anam

mox

Act

ivity

(NAA

, %)

Effect of pH on the anammox growth rateHEPES: 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid

HEADER TEXTUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA

Water & Energy Sustainable Technology CenterUASB Performance

Influent pH = 7.7Temp. 86 F (30 degree C)HRT = 0.25 daySRT = 230 dayALK = 800 mg/L as CaCO3Nitrogen Loading Rate (NLR)

NLRv = 2.8 g N/L reactor/dayNLR = 0.5 g N/g VSS/day

DO interruption (> 6 mg/L)

Loading Shock (TN > 2000 mg/L)

pH interruption (> 8.0)

Performance Interruption

Other Operational ParametersUASB

HEADER TEXTUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA

Water & Energy Sustainable Technology Center

PARTNERS FUNDING

Collaborative Research: WERF: GOALI (##1705674)

AcknowledgementProf. Jim Field Jeff Prevatt Prof. Reyes Sierra

Prof. Mark Krzmarzick Steve King Jack ParkerJeffrey Bliznick Mallory Rae McMurray Joleen Maile Iwako Liftee Shiroma

Jesus Alejandra Fraijo Arce Jacob Smutzer