best practices in training private providers · 2016-11-22 · best practices in training private...
TRANSCRIPT
Best Practices in Training Private Providers
December 2008
1. INTRODUCTION Training of health care providers is one of the most common interventions used in development strategies to improve the quality of reproductive health and family planning (RH/FP) services in developing countries. Decades of experience have produced an abundance of information, guidelines, and best practices on how to effectively train health providers, but most of this relates to public sector providers. In recent years, however, private sector providers have been recognized increasingly as an important source for delivery of RH/FP and other health services in developing countries, even for the poor. Yet the inclusion of private providers in training interventions or even the acknowledgement of their unique needs in discussion forums on training are still not common practices.
The purpose of this primer is to document and promote best practices gleaned from worldwide experience in training private sector providers. The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)-funded Private Sector Partnerships-One (PSP-One) project has reviewed literature and developed case studies of recent private provider training events to collect and analyze lessons learned (see Table 1, Training Case Studies, at the end of this primer). The findings will aid donors, program managers, curriculum designers, and trainers to successfully design and implement training of private providers. Again, because
numerous resources exist on general aspects of training, this primer does not address those topics but rather focuses on aspects that are unique to training private providers.
2. HOW ARE PRIVATE PROVIDERS DIFFERENT? The first step in designing effective training programs for private health providers is understanding how they differ from public sector providers. In this primer, the term “private providers” refers to any formal or informal health provider who works in a private, for-profit (commercial) practice (see Box 1).
Box 1. Who are “private providers”?
In this primer, the definition of “private providers” includes only for-profit (commercial) providers of preventive or curative health services or products, such as:
Individual private providers – e.g., doctors, nurses, midwives, and traditional healers;
Staff in private, for-profit facilities – e.g., private clinics, hospitals, nursing, and maternity homes;
Private pharmacists and chemists; and
Staff in private, for-profit diagnostic facilities – e.g., laboratories and radiology units.
Although the term often is used for all providers outside the public (government) sector, including nonprofit entities such as nongovernmental and faith-based organizations, nonprofit entities are not addressed in this primer because their conditions of practice differ significantly from those of private commercial providers.
PRIMER
2
Several factors make private providers unique, and have implications for their training. The most salient is that, in addition to being health providers, the providers are business owners or employees of a for-profit business. Unlike public sector providers, who continue to receive their salary while attending training courses, private providers forgo revenue when they are away from their practice, particularly if they are sole practitioners or in a small practice, and this lost revenue cannot easily be recovered. Therefore, private providers must weigh the potential benefits of training against this opportunity cost. This directly influences the marketability of training (and quality improvement efforts in general) for private providers and underscores the need to have appropriate incentives in place to motivate private providers to attend a training event. As will be seen below, these incentives may be tied directly or indirectly to benefits to their practice, such as increased clientele or consumer satisfaction.
A second characteristic is the lack of effective supervisory structures in most private sector settings. Public health systems may not always operate optimally, but they nevertheless can mandate public sector staff to attend a training event. In contrast, many private providers own small, independent practices and even those who work in large private sector facilities such as hospitals and clinics likely have only an internal supervisory structure on site; while these providers may be licensed and regulated by the government, they do not report to a government authority. This means that mandating participation in a training event is usually not an option. Again, a program must rely on other incentives to attract providers to a training event.
The lack of a supervisory or organizational structure poses still other challenges: Prior to training, there is no obvious mechanism to help training organizers identify and access groups of potential training participants. Afterward, there is no structure to facilitate follow-up with participants, ensure application of knowledge learned, and build quality structures to monitor
the application of new practices. Nevertheless, there are alternative private sector structures that, even if less robust than public sector systems, may exert some influence on private providers’ knowledge, skills, and quality of care, and may help with training. These private sector structures—professional associations, provider networks or franchises, and health insurance or contracting mechanisms—are discussed in section 3.
It should be noted that some private providers also operate in the public sector. Thus, interventions targeting public sector providers, including training interventions, may reach some private providers. However, because different factors influence provider behavior in the different sectors, post-training, the same provider may perform differently in the public and private practices. In private practice, providers are more likely to perceive patients as customers they need to satisfy and they may be more sensitive and responsive to patient expectations, even when this requires they deviate from best treatment practices (Bruga and Zwi 1998). For example, in the public sector, a provider may prescribe oral rehydration solution for child diarrhea, whereas in a private clinic he/she may prescribe an antibiotic (Berman and Hanson 1993). Therefore, even public sector-oriented training events should be complemented with interventions specifically targeting private settings.
3. BEST PRACTICES This section describes the best and most promising practices identified in the case studies for each step in the process of planning and implementing a private provider training. Figure 1 outlines the steps in this process, which can begin when (1) a service gap is identified; or (2) a new skill or technology needs to be introduced into the private sector. Just as in the public sector, it is important to determine if training is indeed the most appropriate intervention to address the private sector service gap (see Learning for Performance for guidance on this process, Capacity Project 2007). If it is, the subsequent steps in Figure 1 can be taken to train private providers.
3
Figure 1. Steps to Planning and Implementing a Private Provider Training Program
The following sections discuss each of these steps. Box 2 summarizes the best practices and can be used as a quick reference.
3.1 How do you identify and access private providers?As discussed in section 2, the unique characteristics of private providers present challenges that can emerge at the very first step in planning a training event: how do you find and select the providers you want to train? While public sector providers work in government facilities and can be recruited through this structure, it is often a challenge to identify the universe of private providers and to access
and recruit them. Many strategies have been successfully applied to overcome this challenge.
The most common strategy is to work with and through professional associations. Most countries and provider cadres – physicians, midwives, pharmacists, and others – have some type of professional association, although their levels of activity and authority can vary greatly. Most associations can at least provide a list of members or registered providers for use in identifying the initial selection pool of providers for training and many of them can play a larger and crucial role in the training process. Pharmaceutical companies often hire professional
Identify service gap
Will training solve the problem?
If providers not known
If providers known
No Yes
Introduce a new skill or
technology
Identify and access providers
Assess training needs
Assess private provider
incentives
Determine training format and
methodology
Maximize attendance
Maximize sustainability
4
HOW DO YOU IDENTIFY AND ACCESS PRIVATE PROVIDERS?• Workwithprofessionalassociations• SelectproviderscontractedbyanNGOorthepublicsector• SelectproviderswhoparticipateinHMOsorhealthinsuranceschemes• Selectproviderswhoarepartofafranchiseornetwork• Obtainalistofregisteredprovidersfromthepublicsector• Beginwithaparticipantrosterfromprevioustrainingactivitiesofotherprojects• Partnerwithpharmaceuticalcompaniestousetheirsalesanddetailingforce
HOW DO YOU ASSESS THE TRAINING NEEDS OF PRIVATE PROVIDERS?• Conductarapidassessmentwithtargetproviders,usesurveys,focusgroups,keyinformants• Conductadesktopreviewofexistingresearch,statistics,orprojectreports• Collectinformationonoptimaltraininglogistics(day,time,location)• Determinewhichtopicsprovidersareinterestedinlearningabout• Involverepresentativesoftargetprovidersintheentireplanningprocess• Workcloselywithprofessionalassociations,NGOs,orHMOs• Hirealocalconsultantfamiliarwithtargetproviders
WHAT ARE INCENTIVES THAT ENCOURAGE PRIVATE PROVIDERS TO ATTEND TRAINING EVENTS?
Financial incentives:• Forfinancialmanagementtopics,clearlylinktrainingcontentandincreasedincome• Connectcompletionoftrainingwithmembershiptonetworkorfranchise• Highlightlinkbetweenimprovedservicequalityandpotentialtoincreasenumberofclients
Professional development:• Mostprivateproviderswelcometheopportunitytolearnanewskillorreceiveknowledgeupdates• Choosetrainingtopicofinteresttoproviders
WHICH TRAINING METHODOLOGIES ARE APPROPRIATE FOR PRIVATE PROVIDERS?• Minimizetimespentawayfrompractice
• Ifusingexistingcurriculum,separate,consolidateorotherwiseadapttoprivateprovidersetting• Usepeer-supportapproach• Useself-study• Useon-the-jobtraining
• Ifcaseloadisneededforclinicalskillstraining,usepublicsectororNGOfacilities• Useassociations,NGOs,orHMOstofollowupwithproviders
HOW DO YOU MAXIMIZE ATTENDANCE?• Selectconvenientday,time,andlocation• Invitewell-knownspeakers• Providecontinuingmedicaleducationcredits• Provideacertificateordiploma• Providereferencematerialssuchashandbooksandjobaids• Deliverinvitationsbyhand,inperson• Usevisuallyattractiveinvitationssignedbyrespectedleaders(i.e.,associationpresident)• Highlightthebenefitsofthetrainingintheinvitation• Followuponinvitationindividuallywithprovidersbyphone
HOW DO YOU ENSURE SUSTAINABILITY?• Applyrigorousselectioncriteriatofilteroutless-motivatedproviders• Trainseveralstaffperfacility,includingstaffwithauthoritytoimplementtrainingcontent• Createcapacityofprofessionalassociations,NGOs,HMOs,networks,orfranchisestotakeover
training• Chargeafeetoparticipants• Leverageinvestmentfrompharmaceuticalcompaniestofundtrainingevents• Institutionalizetrainingwithinexistingpre-servicetrainingprograms• Maketrainingavailableon-line• Linktrainingrequirementtolicensureorrelicensure
Box 2. Summary of Strategies and Best Practices for Training Private Providers
5
associations to help introduce a new drug therapy. The advantages to working with professional associations, beyond the issue of provider selection, are discussed throughout this primer.
InGuatemala,themedicalandthebiochemistassociations allowed PSP-One to attend some of their regularly scheduled meetings, where the project conducted sensitization talks about HIV/AIDS and recruited participants for its training course on HIV/AIDS. Population Services International (PSI)/Benin used a similar strategy: PSI organized pre-training information days with the pharmacists’ association to orient pharmacists to national RH guide/guidelines, sensitize them on FP/social marketing programs, and recruit potentialparticipants.InGhana,thelicensedchemicalsellers’(LCS)associationconductedtheinitialscreeningofparticipantsforaGhanaSocialMarketingFoundation(GSMF)trainingevent,by facilitating the completion of screening forms among its members.
In addition to professional associations, there may be other structures that link private providers and provide a way to identify and reach them. One is private doctors who are contracted by an nongovernmental organization (NGO): In Honduras, PSP-One used such a structure to gather participants for training on the no-scalpelvasectomy(NSV)technique.TheNGOwas responsible for selecting participants from among its contracted providers and for contacting and recruiting them. Similarly, in Nigeria, PSP-One trained private providers participating with Total Health Trust, a health maintenance organization (HMO) enrolled in the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS). The Trust provided a list of its participating private providers and played an active role in selecting and contacting potential participants. Other variations of these scenarios include private providers who are contracted by the public sector or those who are part of a franchise or network. Recruiting through these types of structures ensures that the providers have already met some performance criteria and facilitates the introduction to the providers.
The public sector may also be a vehicle for identifying private providers, as nearly all governments have some kind of registered provider list. However, the utility of these lists varies tremendously. In countries where the public sector plays a strong and active role regulating the private health sector, government registers of providers are more likely to be updated and to contain useful information. In Ethiopia, the Private Sector Program (PSP-Ethiopia) worked closely with regional health bureaus (RHBs), which provided PSP-Ethiopia a pre-selected list of potential providers to train. Training planners may refer to rosters from previous training activities from their own and other projects/organizations to identify and select trainees for the current training. In Romania, the Banking on Health project reached out to private doctors who had previously been trained on RH/FP by a different project to train them on business and management skills for their private practices. Recently, other innovative strategies for reaching private providers have emerged.InGuatemala,PSP-One brokered partnerships with pharmaceutical companies to identify and contact private doctors through their sales and detailing force.
The best strategy for identifying potential trainees will depend on the program objectives, selection criteria (see section 3.6), and the available resources and structures in the country. In many cases, a combination of strategies is most effective.InGuatemala,PSP-One’s multi-pronged approach to recruitment – using professional association lists and events and leveraging pharmaceutical companies’ reach of private providers – was very successful in attracting training participants.
Despite these options, challenges may remain. For example, even when professional associations exist, they may have relatively few members and limited reach, or may be unwilling to collaborate. Listsandregistriesprovidedbyassociationsorbythe public sector could be outdated in terms of provider names and/or contact information, and many include both public and private providers,
6
in a way that makes it difficult or impossible to tease out the private ones. When this is the case, the only solution may be a less efficient approach, conducting a field assessment of the appropriate private health facilities (e.g., clinics, hospitals, pharmacies, labs) in a pre-determined geographic area to define the universe of potential trainees.
3.2 How do you assess the training needs of private providers?A variety of methods can be used to determine the training needs of providers. In many cases, the instruments can be used to gather information to help decide training logistics.
Many of the training programs studied conducted a training needs assessment (TNA). In Romania, the Banking on Health project commissioned a TNA of the business development needs (particularly regarding finance and training) of private doctors. The TNA used desk research, focus group discussions and key informant interviews, and in-depth market research. The focus group discussions and interviews were conducted nationwide, with 1,215 family doctors in all districts of the country; in addition to surveying training needs, the TNA asked providers for the days of the week and hours when training would best fit theirschedules.InGhana,aTNAconductedbythePRIMEprojectandtheGhanaRegisteredMidwivesAssociation(GRMA)withGRMAmember midwives found the need for an RH/FP update, improved counseling and client−provider interaction skills, increasing adolescents’ access to services, and introduction and application of the national service policies, standards, and protocols.
InGuatemala,thePSP-One project conducted a rapid assessment of the HIV counseling and testing (CT) training needs of private doctors and biochemists. The project administered a semi-structured questionnaire to 38 doctors and 21 biochemists using convenience sampling in its target geographic areas. Findings indicated low levels of knowledge of HIV CT norms and guidelines, and helped determine the most appropriate days and times for scheduling the
training events. In Jordan, after USAID identified a general area of concern – women’s health with emphasis on RH – the Private Sector Project for Women’s Health in Jordan (PSP-Jordan) staff designed and administered a questionnaire to identify the topics that private female doctors were interested in knowing more about, and then tailored training sessions to address those topics (e.g., hypertension and bleeding of women during pregnancy).
Other simple tools can be used to conduct rapid assessments, such as a survey, a quality improvement self-assessment tool to identify knowledge gaps, or observations of providers while interacting with patients. In Nigeria, a survey conducted with physicians belonging to an HMO revealed the need to build the providers’ skills on FP counseling and to highlight existing motivations for providing this service. Based on these findings, PSP-One designed a training program that covered both FP counseling and the NHIS capitation and reimbursement system.
In some cases, a desktop review of existing research, statistics, or project reports can be a very cost-effective way of assessing training needs. However, such information is not always available and up to date.
Regardless of the methods used, it is important to also involve representatives of the target providers in the entire assessment and planning process, so that the provider perspective is considered in every aspect of the training. This involvement can be done by contacting a sample of providers directly and/or by working closely with professional associations, NGOs, HMOs, or other organizations. For some countries, there may be consultants who have experience working with the target providers, and/or may themselves be providers. The challenges to assessing training needs and logistics and to involving target providers in the planning process are similar to those related to identifying and accessing private providers, discussed above. While it may not be feasible to incorporate into the training program
7
all of the suggestions collected from providers – organizers must balance their input with what is realistic to implement – their contribution to training design and implementation is vital.
3.3 What are incentives that encourage private providers to attend training events?Having the right incentives in place is crucial to getting private providers to participate in a training event. To ensure selection of the appropriate incentives, identification of providers’ motivations for participating should be done during the TNA. Ideally, incentives for private providers should address two levels of participation: (1) physical attendance to the training; and (2) learning the training material and applying it in their everyday practice.
Incentives for maximizing attendance are usually easier to address (see section 3.5). To pique provider interest in learning and applying the material, it is often assumed that the training must offer potential for financial gain, which appeals to private providers’ profit motive. Several case studies confirmed this, especially when training curricula included financial topics. The private doctors participating in the Banking on Health training in Romania clearly saw how their private practices could benefit from training on financial management and access to credit. Similarly, feedback from the private doctors in Nigeria who participated in the PSP-One HMO/NHIS training showed that they appreciated the link between better understanding and management of the NHIS’ capitation payment system and their own revenue stream. In both cases, providers cited financial benefit as the main incentive for participation.
Training programs don’t always have such direct financial incentives built in, but the case studies revealed other incentives that encourage private providers to participate in training events. Franchises and networks can offer members indirect financial benefits such as discounted prices on health products and increased clientele due to higher perceived quality (Chandani et al. 2006).InGhana,successfulcompletionofthe
GSMFtrainingforLCSresultedinmembershipto the CareShop franchise of chemical shops. The benefits of membership were clear to potential participants: easier access to products through the franchise and branding of their shop with the prestigious CareShop name, indicating high-quality services to customers. Other training programs that resulted in membership to a network include the PSP-One/India training events for obstetrician/gynecologists for the Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate (DIMPA) injectable network, as well as their trainings of chemists and indigenous systems of medicine providers (ISMPs) for the Saathiya network. However, these benefits work as incentives only if potential participants clearly see the linkage between training, membership, and financial gain; this may require significant educational and advocacy work until the franchise or network brand is well recognized.
It is important to clarify that the “financial incentives” discussed in this section relate to increasing the profitability of the private provider’s practice, and should not be interpreted as paying providers to attend a training event. Paying sitting fees is not recommended – while it may increase attendance in the short run, it is more likely to attract providers who are not interested in the training content and therefore not likely to apply it in their practice (see section 3.6 for a discussion of selection criteria and charging a fee to participants).
While financial incentives are important, the most-often cited incentive in all the case studies is the opportunity for professional development, and improved knowledge and skills. These incentives are often underemphasized by programs, donors, and governments, which assume the predominance of private providers’ profit motivation. In fact, private providers express a need and desire for clinical updates and professional development, and cite frustration over their exclusion from public sector training. In most of the case studies, the mere fact that someone was reaching out to private providers to improve their knowledge
8
and skills was enough of an incentive for them to participate, as many had not received any training on the particular health topic (or on any topic) since completing their formal education. Some private providers also recognized the link between a new skill, service, or quality improvement in existing services, and the potential to attract more clients; if they do not, training organizers should clearly explain the link.
Although the desire for professional development is an encouraging finding, the learning incentive usually is only effective when the providers find the training topic relevant to their practice. Often, providers do not find RH/FP topics of interest. Therefore, it is important to assess providers’ interest in the topic prior to planning the training. If that interest is low, one solution is to add to the curriculum topics that do interest the providers. Ultimately, the incentives must be strong enough to offset any costs or perceived costs for the private providers to participate in the training.
3.4 Which training methodologies are appropriate for private providers? Many of the methodologies that are used for public sector training events can be used with private providers. However, it is important to include private provider stakeholders when planning and developing a training event to ensure that the curriculum and methodology are appropriate to their unique characteristics (see section 2), especially the need to minimize time away from their practice. When using an existing public sector curriculum, it is imperative to adapt the curriculum to the specific private provider setting.
One way to adapt is to separate the training modules and deliver them at separate times. For example, instead of conducting training on six consecutive days, a program could hold day-long workshops, one day a week for six weeks. In Honduras, PSP-One adapted the NSV training module used in the public sector in Mexico to the private provider setting in Honduras. The original curriculum involved two weeks of full-
time training that included both theory and practice. Because the Honduran providers could not be away from their private practices for two weeks, the theory portion of the training was given in a 2.5-day workshop (Friday-Sunday), and the practical portion was stretched out over a period of several months and conducted individually with each doctor according to his or her availability. Another common strategy used to adapt public sector curricula to the private sector is consolidation. PSP-Ethiopia condensed three modules of a public sector training curriculum that took place over 10 days into six consecutive days. Whenever adapting a public sector curriculum, it is important to consult with public sector trainers and in some cases obtain their approval on the proposed changes to ensure that no essential material is lost. In terms of training methodologies, most case studies found that a combination of workshops and participatory adult learning principles are especially appropriate for private providers as they help minimize “in-classroom” time. Forexample,inGhanathePRIMEprojectandGRMAdevelopedaself-directed learning model for midwives that included multiple learning approaches: self-assessments, printed self-study modules, facilitator visits, group peer-review meetings, and paired learning with a nearby peer. The introduction of each trainingmoduletookplaceduringGRMA’smonthly meetings, where midwives were paired with a partner. In this approach, two midwives who were geographically close to one another completed the training material and then reviewed it together with occasional visits by a supervisor. This self-directed model with support from peers helped compensate for the lack of a constant supervision. It also greatly minimized the time the midwives had to spend away from their practices.
The midwife training by the ACQUIRE project in Kenya also relied heavily on the peer-support approach. Through peer-support clusters, the midwives provided each other with peer supervision, client referrals, joint problem-solving,
9
and even loans. PSP-Ethiopia is developing a self-study portion that providers will complete prior to the lectures. The self-study is designed to help minimize the duration of the lectures and engage theprovidersinthetrainingtopic.InGhana,theGSMFtrainingofCareShopLCSincludedfivemodules presented in workshops of 2-5 days each that alternated with one week of on-the-job training, when participants were expected to apply in their shops what they learned in the workshops, and to provide and share feedback with their peers.
When clinical skills are being taught, the private sector may not have an adequate caseload on which trainees can practice their new skills. In this situation, in addition to using models for initial practice, a program can arrange to conduct clinical training in public sector or NGO facilities, where the caseload is usually greater. Participants in the PSP-Jordan training completed the practical portion at Ministry of Health-approved training sites. In Honduras, participants in the PSP-One training conducted many NSVs at NGOfacilities,whichhadahigherpatientloadthan did private sector facilities. Practicums for private provider training can be complicated to arrange and are often the most challenging aspect of organizing a clinical training. It is important to have local staff available to coordinate the providers’ schedules and to stay flexible and adjust as needed.
Consistent follow-up with providers after training is another essential component of enhancing effectiveness and keeping providers engaged, in both the public and private sectors. However, it can be especially challenging to do with private providers in the absence of a professional organization or supervisory structure, or sufficient resources. Following the PSP-One training of private midwives on a quality improvement tool in Uganda, Uganda Private Midwives Association (UPMA) supervisors provided periodic support to midwives using the tool through monthly association meetings. InGuatemala,thePSP-One project sends out monthly newsletters to all training participants
describing project activities and training events to keep them informed and motivated.
3.5 How do you maximize attendance? To maximize attendance at training events, programs use various strategies aimed at reducing potential barriers and enhancing perceived benefits. Selecting a training time, duration, and location that minimizes providers’ time away from their practices is essential. A convenient location is one that minimizes travel distance and costs for providers. Some programs also take into account the overall attractiveness of the location and specific training venue. Most of the case studies found that the appropriate time and location often were determined early on, during the TNA, with input from local partner organizations such as professional associations and HMOs. Close monitoring and flexibility is also important, as some barriers to attendance emerge only after the training starts. PSP-Ethiopia found that attendance at workshops was inversely related to travel distance. In response, the program further decentralized training locations to decrease travel distance, and attendance improved. PSP-One/India noticed that many chemists arrived at their training workshop on time at 1 pm, but left halfway through, after lunch was served. The project changed the start time of subsequent workshops to after lunch, at 2 pm, and instead of lunch served high tea after the day’s training ended. Having well-known speakers, such as a well-respected and regarded peer, also boosts attendance. In PSP-One training events in Guatemala,themainlecturerisoneofthebest-known HIV experts in the country.
Private providers also value the ability to obtain continuing medical education (CME) credits for the training. Some countries require a certain number of CME credits to renew a professional license or to maintain membership in a professional association, so providers welcome events that allow them to earn credits. It is important to approach the organization that grants CME credits (usually a professional
10
association or council) early on, as the approval process may take time. PSP-One inGuatemalaand India obtained CME accreditation for their training programs from the medical and biochemist associations, and this proved to be a strong incentive for participation. Similarly, PSP-Jordan’s training of private doctors was accredited by the Jordan Medical Council. Whether or not CME credits are given, awarding a certificate or diploma that providers usually value and enjoy displaying in their practices encourages attendance. Providers also appreciate receiving educational materials such as handbooks and job aids at training events.
The importance of the mode of invitation to private provider training events should not be underestimated. While in the public sector a notification from a supervisor might suffice to ensure attendance, a simple notification to private providers most likely will not attract them – the invitation must convince them of the importance of the training. The case studies show that the invitation must make the provider feel valued, and sufficiently highlight the training benefits. PSP-One/India produced high-quality, attractive invitations for the ISMP and chemist training events, which communicated respect for the providers and prestige for the training. The invitations were signed by the heads of professional associations and hand-delivered by project staff to potential participants. The project staff then followed up with providers by phone prior to the training to encourage them to attend. The PSP-One projectinGuatemalaandPSP-Jordan also successfully used this strategy of personal follow-up by phone to recruit training participants. In Nigeria, PSP-One developed a marketing brochure to promote the Access to Finance training course and describe the benefits that providers could gain from attending.
3.6 How do you ensure sustainability?Sustainability of training programs is perhaps their most challenging aspect, and may be described at different levels:
Retention and use of the new skills learned by the participating providers;
Retention of the new skills at the facility level; and
Sustainability or continuation of the training program itself.
The level of sustainability that a training program strives to achieve will depend on the program objectives. All training programs should strive to attain at least the first level of sustainability: skill retention at the provider level. This can be especially challenging with private providers, who lack a supervisory structure. A good strategy to overcome this challenge is to apply rigorous criteria to participant selection. This immediately filters out participants who are less likely to retain and apply the new skills due to lack of interest, to lack of skill applicability to their practices, or to other barriers. By minimizing waste of resources on participants who will not deliver results, rigorous selection improves training efficiency.
While these selection criteria will depend on the context, it is advisable to include some kind of measurement of provider motivation and commitment to the training content. For example, the main selection criteria for participating in the PRIME project self-directed learning program onRH/FPformidwivesinGhanawasregularattendanceatGRMAmonthlymeetings.InKenya,the ACQUIRE project focused the selection of midwives for voluntary CT training on those with positive attitudes toward the topic. Another way to identify the more motivated providers is to use a “competitive” selection process whereby potential participants go through an application process.ProspectiveparticipantsintheGSMFCareShoptrainingofLCSinGhanahadtofillout an application form and attend an onsite interview.
Other selection criteria address issues other than provider motivation. In India, the private providers participating in the PSP-One DIMPA training were required to have a separate waiting room in their office/clinic so that clients could be counseled in privacy, as instructed in the training. It is a good idea to work closely with local
11
organizations such as professional associations, HMOs, or even the public sector to determine the most appropriate selection criteria for a particular training.
The next level of sustainability, skill retention at the facility level, can also be difficult to achieve. Just as in the public sector, high staff turnover in the private sector often leads to the loss of trained staff. To minimize this loss, the PSP-One project in Nigeria is training several staff per facility; if one of them leaves, some capacity is retained. The project also includes the medical director of the facility in the training; training such a person of authority helps to ensure that the training content is implemented and sustained at the facility level.
In addition to sustainability at the provider and facility levels, some programs attempt to put in place a sustainability strategy that will allow the training program to continue once project funding ceases. The most common approach to maximize training program continuity is to work closely with professional associations, building their ownership and capacity to continue the training ontheirown.InGhana,thePRIMEprojectinitialtrainingofmidwiveswasimbeddedwithinGRMA,which then conducted an additional training round after the project ended. The same approach was used by PSP-One in Uganda to train members of UPMA on using a quality improvement self-assessment tool.
HMOs and franchises may also have the capacity to take over training activities. The financial incentives that are usually built into these structures may make them more viable providers of sustained training programs than associations, although a strong professional association with an active dues-paying membership may also be able to sustain training activities. In Nigeria, PSP-One worked closely with partner HMOs from the beginning of the program and trained at least one trainer per HMO to conduct future trainingevents.TheGSMFtraininginGhanawasconducted under the CareShops franchise. In Romania, where the Banking on Health training
of private doctors included access to credit, the project was able to leverage interest from financial institutions to continue funding the course after project funding ended.
Although structures such as professional associations, HMOs, and franchises/networks usually have membership fees and a budget, this is often not enough to cover the costs of training activities. Charging a fee to the training participants provides some cost recovery. Doing this is only feasible when private providers recognize the value of the training. PSP-Jordan charged a small fee to doctors to cover clinical supplies required for training related to Pap smearsandultrasounds.InGhana,GSMFchargedafeetoparticipatingLCS,whicheventuallycovered an increasing share of the training costs. Even if charging a fee is not feasible initially, it should be explored in the mid to long term, once the training is well known and valued.
InRomania,theNGOthatimplementedtheBankingon Health training of private doctors used an exit survey to determine how much doctors would be willing to pay for the training if it were offered on a fee basis, and determined it was a price that would cover the training costs. The HMOs working with the PSP-One project in Nigeria plan to charge a training fee to doctors, once the HMOs take over the program and it is valued and recognized more broadly. (The HMOs currently cover the part of the training costs that eventually will be covered by provider fees.) To prepare the private providers for this approach, the project requires providers to pay their own transport to the workshop and does not pay the per diems or “sitting fees” that are usually paid to providers in public sector training programs. In addition to enhancing the financial sustainability of a training program, charging a fee for participation can also act as a rigorous selection criterion, as providers who are willing to pay are much more likely to be genuinely interested in the training topic and in applying their new knowledge and skills.
When existing structures and training fees cannot sustain training, private investment may be an option. PSP-Jordan and the PSP-One
12
projectsinGuatemalaandIndiahavesuccessfullyleveraged investment from pharmaceutical companies for their current training programs; they hope to expand this investment to cover an increasing proportion of training costs. The companies’ incentives for contributing can be to market their products through the training, or contribute to their corporate social responsibility program. The marketing incentive may provide a more sustainable source of funding, as it relates to the company’s commercial interests, but it may also be more difficult to accomplish.
The PSP-One projectinGuatemalaisalsoexploring two other strategies to ensure that the HIV training program for doctors and biochemists continues beyond the life of the project. Project staff are currently in talks with professional associations and universities to explore the possibility of institutionalizing the course within the pre-service training programs at the universities, making it part of the medicine and biochemistry programs. The project is also considering developing an online version of the training modules, and housing it on the professional associations’ Web site so that it is widely available to anyone with an Internet connection.
Perhaps the most robust sustainability strategy for training programs, and also one of the most difficult to achieve, is making it a training requirement for licensure or relicensure. InGhana,theNationalPharmacyCouncilwasinterestedinmakingtheGSMFCareShoptrainingarequirementforobtainingaLCSlicense.Todate this has not been achieved, as it requires a change in legislation. In Nigeria, PSP-One is devoting significant effort to obtain CME credits for its training program and link this CME requirement to relicensure of doctors.
These strategies to improve sustainability of training programs for private providers each have limitations, and it remains to be seen whether any of them show results in the long term. The most common strategy, working
with professional associations, may work well at first, but experience shows that the level of engagement and commitment often diminishes in the face of competing priorities, change or lack of leadership, or lack of resources. The most promising new strategies appear to be those that are tied to financial incentives, such as working with HMOs and franchises, using the commercial interest of private companies (often pharmaceutical) to invest, and tying training to licensing requirements.
4.SUMMARY:COMMONELEMENTSOFSUCCESSFULPRIVATEPROVIDERTRAININGThis primer illustrates the many issues to consider at each step of planning and implementing a successful private provider training program. Perhaps the most universal element found in the PSP-One case studies is addressing private provider motivations and incentives. Because private providers cannot be obliged to attend training, they must be persuaded. When motivation is properly assessed and incentives are effectively incorporated into every aspect of the training and communicated to providers, the chances of achieving success are greatly increased.
Another common element is collaboration with local organizations or structures, such asprofessionalassociations,NGOs,orHMOs.Such collaborations greatly facilitate each step in implementing a private provider training program:
Identifying and accessing providers;
Assessing their training needs;
Assessing and applying appropriate incentives;
Implementing the best training methodologies;
Maximizing attendance; and
Achieving sustainability.
Finally, the case studies showed the importance of conducting a needs assessment and of consulting with, and involving the target private providers in the planning process.
13
Doing so will ensure that the first element, motivations and incentives, is properly addressed.
Many strategies are discussed in this primer for developing a successful private provider training program. As no two programs are the same, the key to success is to assess each context and apply or adapt the relevant strategies. It is important to note that training alone may not suffice to achieve improved quality of RH/FP and other health services offered by private providers (Peters et
al. 2004). As stressed earlier, it is important to assess whether training is the appropriate solution for an identified service quality gap (see Figure 1). Programs should examine all of the factors that may influence private provider behavior and service provision (Brugha and Zwi 1998) and determine which interventions, such as health financing or policy and regulatory reform, instead of or in addition to training, are likely to have a positive impact on quality of care.
14
Tab
le 1
. Sum
mar
y o
f Tra
inin
g C
ase
Stu
dies
Basic
Info
rmat
ion
Trai
ning
Nee
ds A
sses
smen
t (T
NA)
and
Rec
ruitm
ent
Trai
ning
Str
uctu
re a
nd L
ogistics
Ince
ntiv
esSu
stai
nabi
lity
of
Trai
ning
Pro
gram
Less
ons
Lear
ned
Co
untr
y: B
enin
Yea
r: 1
998
Org
aniz
atio
n/P
roje
ct:
PRIM
E an
d Po
pula
tion
Serv
ices
Intl.
(PS
I)/Be
nin
Lo
cal P
artn
er: N
atio
nal
Ass
ocia
tion
of P
harm
acis
ts
Tra
inee
s (#
): P
harm
acy
agen
ts (
80)
To
pics
: Con
trac
eptiv
e T
echn
olog
y U
pdat
e (C
TU
), qu
ality
of c
are
and
acce
ss t
o se
rvic
es
as a
pplie
d to
pha
rmac
y se
ttin
g
Dur
atio
n: 3
hal
f-day
s
A s
hort
ass
essm
ent
indi
cate
d th
at p
harm
acis
ts w
ere
not
avai
labl
e fo
r tr
aini
ng a
nd t
hat
phar
mac
y ag
ents
are
the
mos
t pr
esen
t pe
rson
nel i
n th
e ph
arm
acy
duri
ng t
he d
ay. P
RIM
E an
d PS
I/Ben
in t
hen
cond
ucte
d an
“in
form
atio
n da
y” fo
r 76
pr
ivat
e ph
arm
acis
ts t
o di
scus
s R
H, i
nfor
m t
hem
of u
pcom
ing
phar
mac
y ag
ent
trai
ning
, and
en
cour
age
them
to
send
the
ir
staf
f to
the
trai
ning
.
Com
bina
tion
of s
elf-s
tudy
and
st
anda
rd c
lass
room
ses
sion
s (3
hal
f-da
ys).
Tra
inin
g do
cum
ents
sen
t to
pa
rtic
ipan
ts p
rior
to
trai
ning
to
read
be
fore
eac
h se
ssio
n to
red
uce
time
away
from
wor
k.
Part
icip
ants
rec
eive
d tr
aini
ng m
ater
ials
, lu
nch
follo
win
g ha
lf-da
y tr
aini
ng s
essi
on, a
nd
tran
spor
tatio
n. M
ain
ince
ntiv
es w
ere
foun
d to
be
val
ue o
f kno
wle
dge
acqu
ired
, und
erst
andi
ng
that
impr
oved
ser
vice
qu
ality
cou
ld b
ring
mor
e cl
ient
s to
sho
p, a
nd b
eing
pa
rt o
f a n
etw
ork
that
was
to
rec
eive
PSI
sup
port
.
The
invo
lvem
ent
of
PSI/B
enin
tra
iner
s an
d av
aila
bilit
y of
tra
inin
g m
ater
ials
was
the
mai
n st
rate
gy fo
r su
stai
nabi
lity.
PS
I tra
iner
s w
ere
coac
hed
by In
traH
ealth
st
aff f
or s
ome
refr
eshe
r co
urse
s fo
r th
e ph
arm
acy
agen
ts. P
SI/B
enin
tr
aine
rs h
ave
cond
ucte
d fu
rthe
r re
fres
her
cour
ses
with
out
outs
ide
assi
stan
ce.
Use
a t
rain
ing
appr
oach
th
at m
inim
izes
tim
e aw
ay o
f pr
ovid
ers
from
the
ir w
ork
site
; inv
olve
pha
rmac
ists
or
the
asso
ciat
ion
in p
rovi
ding
in
cent
ives
for
exce
llent
le
arne
rs.
Co
untr
y: E
thio
pia
Yea
r: 2
007-
2008
Org
aniz
atio
n/P
roje
ct:
Priv
ate
Sect
or P
rogr
am
PSP-
Ethi
opia
Lo
cal P
artn
er: R
egio
nal
heal
th b
urea
us (
RH
Bs)
Tra
inee
s (#
): P
hysi
cian
s,
nurs
es, a
nd la
b te
chs
(306
)
To
pics
: Pre
vent
ion
and
trea
tmen
t of
TB
and
HIV
ca
re
Dur
atio
n: 6
day
s
Ass
essm
ent
cond
ucte
d in
180
pr
ivat
e fa
cilit
ies
in 3
reg
ions
to
det
erm
ine
inte
rest
in a
nd
need
for
trai
ning
, to
expa
nd
acce
ss t
o af
ford
able
HIV
and
T
B he
alth
car
e. R
HBs
hav
e a
list
of a
ll re
gist
ered
pri
vate
he
alth
faci
litie
s. F
acili
ties
that
m
et p
re-d
eter
min
ed s
elec
tion
crite
ria
wer
e in
clud
ed in
the
as
sess
men
t; a
seco
nd s
et o
f cr
iteri
a sh
ortli
sted
the
faci
litie
s an
d th
ose
part
icip
ants
wer
e se
nt
a le
tter
of i
nvita
tion.
In-c
lass
room
lect
ures
with
on-
the-
job
trai
ning
and
men
tori
ng. P
SP-E
thio
pia
also
pla
ns t
o ad
d se
lf-st
udy
prio
r to
le
ctur
es.L
ectu
res
are
sche
dule
don
6
cons
ecut
ive
days
(co
nsid
erab
ly
shor
ter
than
sim
ilar
wor
ksho
p of
fere
d to
pub
lics
ecto
rst
aff).
Loc
atio
nof
w
orks
hop
dece
ntra
lized
to
regi
ons
to
min
imiz
e tr
avel
tim
es.
Part
icip
ants
rec
eive
d pe
r di
em, t
rans
port
atio
n co
sts,
tra
inin
g m
ater
ials
, re
sour
ce m
ater
ials
suc
h as
nat
iona
l gui
delin
es a
nd
man
uals
, and
cer
tifica
te
of a
tten
danc
e si
gned
by
pro
ject
and
RH
Bs.
Cer
tifica
tes
wer
e fo
und
to b
e st
rong
ince
ntiv
e.
Com
petit
ive
proc
ess
to
part
icip
ate
also
con
veye
d va
lue
to t
rain
ing.
PSP-
Ethi
opia
is w
orki
ng
clos
ely
with
RH
Bs t
o bu
ild t
heir
cap
acity
to
cont
inue
tra
inin
g st
aff.
Mak
e th
e tr
aini
ng lo
catio
n as
nea
r an
d co
nven
ient
as
poss
ible
to
min
imiz
e co
st t
o pa
rtic
ipan
ts; a
pre
-wor
ksho
p se
lf-st
udy
port
ion
on
back
grou
nd t
opic
s is
a g
ood
stra
tegy
to
redu
ce t
rain
ing
time
and
allo
w in
-cla
ssro
om
time
to fo
cus
on c
ore
topi
cs
of in
tere
st.
15
Basic
Info
rmat
ion
Trai
ning
Nee
ds A
sses
smen
t (T
NA)
and
Rec
ruitm
ent
Trai
ning
Str
uctu
re a
nd L
ogistics
Ince
ntiv
esSu
stai
nabi
lity
of
Trai
ning
Pro
gram
Less
ons
Lear
ned
Co
untr
y: G
hana
Yea
r: 1
999-
2001
Org
aniz
atio
n/P
roje
ct:
PRIM
E
Lo
cal P
artn
er: G
hana
R
egis
tere
d M
idw
ives
A
ssoc
iatio
n(G
RM
A)
Tra
inee
s (#
): M
idw
ives
(5
9)
To
pic:
Ado
lesc
ent
RH
and
clie
nt-p
rovi
der
inte
ract
ion
Dur
atio
n: 5
mon
ths
(abo
ut 1
mod
ule
per
mon
th)
A T
NA
was
con
duct
ed in
19
97 b
y pa
rtne
r or
gani
zatio
ns.
Mid
wiv
es w
ho r
egul
arly
pa
rtic
ipat
ein
GR
MA
mon
thly
m
eetin
gs w
ere
recr
uite
d.
A “
self-
dire
cted
lear
ning
” m
odel
ad
min
iste
red
thro
ugh
GR
MA
co
mbi
ned
prac
tice
exer
cise
s, s
elf-
asse
ssm
ents
, pai
red
lear
ning
with
a
near
by p
eer,
faci
litat
or v
isits
, and
m
onth
ly g
roup
pee
r-re
view
mee
tings
. T
his
appr
oach
min
imiz
ed t
he t
ime
for
grou
p le
arni
ng t
o on
ce a
mon
th
mee
tings
, aft
er a
2-d
ay k
ick-
off
mee
ting.
Part
icip
ants
rec
eive
d pr
int
mat
eria
ls (
6 m
odul
es),
info
rmat
ion,
edu
catio
n an
d co
mm
unic
atio
n (IE
C)
and
FP s
uppl
ies,
and
faci
litat
or
visi
ts. M
ain
ince
ntiv
e fo
r pa
rtic
ipat
ion
was
foun
d to
be
incr
ease
d kn
owle
dge
that
was
the
n us
ed t
o at
trac
t bo
th n
ew c
lient
s as
w
ell a
s a
new
typ
e of
cl
ient
(ad
oles
cent
s).
The
tra
inin
g pr
ogra
m w
as
to b
e in
stitu
tiona
lized
w
ithin
GR
MA
.It
is
know
nth
atG
RM
A
cond
ucte
d on
e m
ore
roun
d of
tra
inin
g fo
r an
ad
ditio
nal 5
2 m
idw
ives
an
d of
fere
d th
e or
igin
al
6 m
odul
es p
lus
a ne
w
one
GR
MA
dev
elop
edo
nH
IV C
T.
Con
duct
TN
A s
o th
at t
he
trai
ning
pro
gram
res
pond
s to
id
entifi
ed n
eeds
; inv
olve
all
stak
ehol
ders
in t
he d
esig
n of
th
e tr
aini
ng p
rogr
am; b
uild
on
an e
xist
ing
stru
ctur
e(G
RM
A
and
its m
onth
ly m
eetin
gs),
whi
ch c
an p
rovi
de t
he t
rain
ers
and
supe
rvis
ory/
faci
litat
ion
visi
ts; b
uild
in p
eer
supp
ort
to
keep
par
ticip
ants
eng
aged
.
Co
untr
y: G
hana
Yea
r: 2
002-
2004
Org
aniz
atio
n/P
roje
ct:
Gha
naS
ocia
lMar
ketin
gFo
unda
tion
(GSM
F),S
EAM
pr
ojec
t
Lo
cal P
artn
er: L
icen
sed
Che
mic
alS
elle
rs(
LCS)
A
ssoc
iatio
n
Tra
inee
s (#
): L
icen
sed
chem
ical
sel
lers
(ap
prox
. 23
0)
To
pics
: Car
eSho
p fr
anch
ise
busi
ness
mod
el,
busi
ness
and
man
agem
ent,
drug
man
agem
ent,
man
agin
g si
mpl
e ai
lmen
ts,
busi
ness
pla
nnin
g
Dur
atio
n: 1
6 da
ys
dist
ribu
ted
over
10
wee
ks
GSM
Fus
eda
nex
tens
ive
TN
A
cond
ucte
d by
a p
rior
pro
ject
an
d de
velo
ped
cont
ent
to
resp
ond
to t
hose
nee
ds. T
hey
wor
ked
clos
ely
with
the
LC
San
d lo
cal t
radi
tiona
l pol
itica
l st
ruct
ure
(vill
age
chie
fs)
to
pres
ent
Car
eSho
p co
ncep
t an
d sc
reen
pot
entia
l app
lican
ts,
usin
g an
app
licat
ion
proc
ess
to
scre
en a
nd r
ecru
it pa
rtic
ipan
ts.
Con
tent
was
org
aniz
ed in
to 5
m
odul
es o
f 2-5
day
s ea
ch. M
odul
es
wer
e of
fere
d du
ring
the
wee
k (M
onda
y th
roug
h Fr
iday
or
a po
rtio
n of
the
wee
k in
con
secu
tive
days
), 4
hour
s/da
y. A
fter
eac
h m
odul
e, t
here
w
as a
1-w
eek
brea
k w
hen
part
icip
ants
w
ere
expe
cted
to
appl
y w
hat
they
le
arne
d (o
n-th
e-jo
b tr
aini
ng),
then
pr
ovid
e fe
edba
ck t
he fo
llow
ing
wee
k.
The
firs
t m
odul
e w
as o
ffere
d fo
r fr
ee, a
fter
whi
ch t
hose
inte
rest
ed
coul
d ch
oose
to
pay
and
cont
inue
the
tr
aini
ng t
o be
par
t of
the
fran
chis
e.
Part
icip
ants
rec
eive
d ho
tel
acco
mm
odat
ion,
food
, tr
aini
ng m
ater
ials
, and
pr
otoc
ols.
A c
ertifi
cate
an
d m
embe
rshi
p in
the
C
areS
hop
fran
chis
e w
ere
awar
ded
upon
co
mpl
etio
n of
tra
inin
g.
Part
icip
ants
als
o re
ceiv
ed
sign
age
to b
rand
the
ir
shop
s as
Car
eSho
ps
and
a lic
ense
num
ber.
Q
ualit
y of
the
tra
inin
g pr
ogra
m a
nd C
areS
hop
bran
ding
wer
e fo
und
to
be t
he m
ain
ince
ntiv
es fo
r pa
rtic
ipat
ion.
Par
ticip
ants
pa
id a
tok
en fe
e.
Dec
entr
aliz
ed t
rain
ing
to m
inim
ize
cost
s (e
limin
ated
nee
d fo
r ho
tel a
ccom
mod
atio
n),
so t
hat
toke
n fe
e ch
arge
d to
par
ticip
ants
cov
ered
m
ost
of t
he t
rain
ing
cost
s in
curr
edb
yG
SMF.
Cle
arly
exp
lain
the
pro
fit-
rela
ted
bene
fits
of t
he t
rain
ing
to in
tere
st p
riva
te p
rovi
ders
; un
ders
tand
the
ince
ntiv
es fo
r pr
ovid
ers
– on
e of
the
mai
n be
nefit
s of
the
Car
eSho
p m
embe
rshi
p is
free
pro
duct
de
liver
y to
the
sho
ps –
thi
s w
as a
str
ong
ince
ntiv
e fo
r ru
ralL
SCs,
less
so
for
peri
-ur
ban
LSC
s,a
sth
eyc
ane
asily
ob
tain
pro
duct
s el
sew
here
.
16
Basic
Info
rmat
ion
Trai
ning
Nee
ds A
sses
smen
t (T
NA)
and
Rec
ruitm
ent
Trai
ning
Str
uctu
re a
nd L
ogistics
Ince
ntiv
esSu
stai
nabi
lity
of
Trai
ning
Pro
gram
Less
ons
Lear
ned
Co
untr
y: G
uate
mal
a
Yea
r: 2
007-
pres
ent
Org
aniz
atio
n/P
roje
ct:
PSP-
One
Lo
cal P
artn
er:
Prof
essi
onal
ass
ocia
tions
Tra
inee
s (#
): D
octo
rs
(267
+)
and
bioc
hem
ists
(8
6+)
To
pics
: HIV
CT
Dur
atio
n: 4
hou
rs
Rap
id a
sses
smen
t co
nduc
ted
thro
ugh
inte
rvie
ws
with
do
ctor
s an
d bi
oche
mis
ts
indi
cate
d th
e ne
ed t
o im
prov
e th
eir
know
ledg
e of
HIV
CT
no
rms
and
prot
ocol
s. U
sed
mul
ti-pr
onge
d ap
proa
ch t
o id
entif
y an
d re
crui
t pa
rtic
ipan
ts:
obta
ined
a li
st o
f pro
vide
rs
from
pro
fess
iona
l ass
ocia
tions
, th
en “
snow
balle
d” fr
om t
here
to
rea
ch a
dditi
onal
pro
vide
rs;
cond
ucte
d “s
ensi
tizat
ion”
ta
lks
in a
ssoc
iatio
n m
eetin
gs
whe
re m
uch
recr
uitin
g al
so
occu
rred
; and
par
tner
ed w
ith
phar
mac
eutic
al c
ompa
nies
to
leve
rage
the
ir s
ales
/det
ailin
g fo
rce
to d
istr
ibut
e in
vita
tions
to
trai
ning
s to
the
pri
vate
pro
vide
rs
they
nor
mal
ly v
isit.
Stan
dard
wor
ksho
p, w
ith v
ery
part
icip
ator
y ap
proa
ch in
clud
ing
case
st
udie
s, q
uest
ion
and
answ
er, a
nd a
ga
me
show
-like
dev
ice
that
lets
the
do
ctor
s se
lect
the
ir a
nsw
er fr
om
a re
mot
e, w
hich
the
n di
spla
ys t
he
colle
ctiv
e an
swer
s on
a s
cree
n.
Proj
ect
staf
f con
sulte
d w
ith t
he
prov
ider
s on
tim
e/da
y th
at is
co
nven
ient
for
them
, as
wel
l as
loca
tion
and
type
of w
orks
hop
sett
ing.
Se
lect
ed t
imes
whe
n ph
ysic
ians
w
ere
not
wor
king
, lik
e W
edne
sday
af
tern
oons
. Whe
n fe
asib
le, p
lann
ed
trai
ning
to
coin
cide
with
an
exis
ting
even
t/co
nfer
ence
.
Part
icip
ants
rec
eive
d tr
aini
ng m
ater
ials
(p
rese
ntat
ions
, ref
eren
ce
mat
eria
ls)
and
a sn
ack.
C
ME
cred
its w
ere
give
n fo
r al
l wor
ksho
ps. M
ain
ince
ntiv
es w
ere
foun
d to
be
wel
l-kno
wn
expe
rts
who
led
the
wor
ksho
ps
and
part
icip
ants
’ ow
n in
tere
st in
lear
ning
mor
e ab
out
HIV
.
Mod
ules
are
bei
ng h
ande
d ov
er t
o pr
ofes
sion
al
asso
ciat
ions
, so
that
ev
entu
ally
the
y ca
n ta
ke
this
tra
inin
g on
. Pro
ject
st
aff i
s pa
rt o
f a p
ublic
-pr
ivat
e co
mm
issi
on
that
is d
eter
min
ing
the
best
way
to
inco
rpor
ate
this
info
rmat
ion
into
th
e pr
e-se
rvic
e m
edic
al
curr
icul
um. P
roje
ct is
al
so w
orki
ng w
ith a
do
ctor
who
is d
esig
ning
a
cour
se (
“Dip
lom
ado”
) on
thi
s to
pic
for
priv
ate
prov
ider
s, w
hich
will
m
ost
likel
y ch
arge
for
part
icip
atio
n. F
inal
ly,
proj
ect
will
mak
e th
e m
odul
es a
vaila
ble
onlin
e.
Con
duct
a T
NA
to
lear
n to
pics
of i
nter
est
to
phys
icia
ns; k
eep
sess
ions
sh
ort
(not
mor
e th
an 4
ho
urs)
; use
wel
l-kno
wn
expe
rts
as s
peak
ers;
tai
lor
wor
ksho
ps t
o di
ffere
nt
phys
icia
n sp
ecia
lties
; fol
low
up
indi
vidu
ally
(as
by
phon
e) w
ith
prov
ider
s to
ens
ure
that
the
y sh
ow u
p to
the
tra
inin
g.
Co
untr
y: H
ondu
ras
Yea
r: 2
006-
2007
Org
aniz
atio
n/P
roje
ct:
PSP-
One
Lo
cal P
artn
er:
ASH
ON
PLA
FA(
NG
O)
Tra
inee
s (#
): P
hysi
cian
s (9
)
To
pics
: No-
scal
pel
vase
ctom
y (N
SV)
Dur
atio
n: A
ppro
x. 2
m
onth
s fo
r ea
ch p
hysi
cian
to
com
plet
e, d
epen
ding
on
cas
eloa
d
A d
ecis
ion
was
mad
e to
in
trod
uce
the
NSV
met
hod
into
the
pri
vate
sec
tor.
The
co
ntra
ctin
gN
GO
sel
ecte
ddo
ctor
s ba
sed
on t
heir
loca
tion,
sk
ill, a
nd m
otiv
atio
n.
Pha
se 1
: Sta
ndar
d w
orks
hop
form
at fo
r th
eore
tical
par
t (2
.5 d
ay
wor
ksho
p on
wee
kend
)P
hase
2: M
aste
r tr
aine
r ob
serv
ed
5 lo
cal p
hysi
cian
s w
ho h
ad b
een
prev
ious
ly t
rain
ed a
s th
ey p
erfo
rmed
N
SV, a
nd t
hen
cert
ified
the
m a
s tr
aine
rs.
Pha
se 3
: Tra
iner
s th
en a
ssis
ted/
obse
rved
the
9 t
rain
ees
perf
orm
NSV
un
til t
hey
felt
that
the
doc
tors
wer
e re
ady
to b
e ce
rtifi
ed a
s tr
aine
d, u
sing
a
chec
klis
t an
d th
eir
own
judg
men
t. T
his
phas
e to
ok s
ever
al m
onth
s an
d cl
ose
coor
dina
tion
to c
ompl
ete,
sin
ce
case
load
for
NSV
is lo
w. I
n so
me
inst
ance
s tr
aine
es h
ad t
o le
ave
thei
r pr
actic
ean
dgo
to
the
NG
Ofa
cilit
ies
whe
re t
here
is a
hig
her
case
load
.
Wor
ksho
p w
as h
eld
at a
nic
e lo
catio
n, a
nd
all l
odgi
ng, m
eal,
and
tran
spor
tatio
n co
sts
wer
e co
vere
d. M
ain
ince
ntiv
es
for
part
icip
atio
n w
ere
foun
d to
be
inte
rest
in
lear
ning
a n
ew c
linic
al
skill
; per
sona
l inv
itatio
n fr
omt
heN
GO
’sM
edic
al
Dir
ecto
r, w
ho is
in
char
ge o
f con
trac
ting
for
ster
iliza
tion
serv
ices
; kn
owin
g th
at t
he N
SV
they
per
form
will
als
o be
cov
ered
und
er t
he
cont
ract
with
NG
O(
i.e.,
poss
ibly
mor
e re
venu
e du
e to
thi
s ad
ditio
nal s
ervi
ce).
With
the
pre
para
tion
of c
ertifi
ed t
rain
ers,
th
ere
is n
ow in
-cou
ntry
ca
paci
ty t
o tr
ain
othe
r pr
ovid
ers
in N
SV. O
ne o
f th
e tr
aine
rs h
as a
lrea
dy
trai
ned
an a
dditi
onal
pu
blic
sec
tor
doct
or
as r
eque
sted
by
the
Min
istr
y. O
ne t
rain
er
was
als
o ce
rtifi
ed a
s a
supe
rvis
or, s
o th
at h
e ca
n m
onito
r th
e qu
ality
of
the
NSV
ser
vice
s pr
ovid
ed b
y th
e 9
trai
ned
doct
ors.
Con
sult
with
pro
vide
rs p
rior
to
sch
edul
ing
the
wor
ksho
p;
follo
w u
p w
ith t
hem
pri
or
to w
orks
hop
to e
nsur
e at
tend
ance
; cho
ose
a ni
ce
and
cent
ral l
ocat
ion
for
the
wor
ksho
p; s
tay
flexi
ble
whe
n im
plem
entin
g cl
inic
al s
kill
trai
ning
– it
tak
es in
tens
ive
coor
dina
tion
to e
nsur
e th
at
both
the
tra
iner
and
tra
inee
ar
e av
aila
ble
and
pres
ent
whe
reve
r an
d w
hene
ver
ther
e ar
e pa
tient
s; s
ched
ules
cha
nge
cons
tant
ly; e
nfor
ce s
tric
t se
lect
ion
crite
ria
to s
elec
t ou
t pr
ovid
ers
who
are
not
tru
ly
mot
ivat
ed t
o us
e th
e ne
w
skill
.
17
Basic
Info
rmat
ion
Trai
ning
Nee
ds A
sses
smen
t (T
NA)
and
Rec
ruitm
ent
Trai
ning
Str
uctu
re a
nd L
ogistics
Ince
ntiv
esSu
stai
nabi
lity
of
Trai
ning
Pro
gram
Less
ons
Lear
ned
Co
untr
y: G
uate
mal
a
Yea
r: 2
007-
pres
ent
Org
aniz
atio
n/P
roje
ct:
PSP-
One
Lo
cal P
artn
er:
Prof
essi
onal
ass
ocia
tions
Tra
inee
s (#
): D
octo
rs
(267
+)
and
bioc
hem
ists
(8
6+)
To
pics
: HIV
CT
Dur
atio
n: 4
hou
rs
Rap
id a
sses
smen
t co
nduc
ted
thro
ugh
inte
rvie
ws
with
do
ctor
s an
d bi
oche
mis
ts
indi
cate
d th
e ne
ed t
o im
prov
e th
eir
know
ledg
e of
HIV
CT
no
rms
and
prot
ocol
s. U
sed
mul
ti-pr
onge
d ap
proa
ch t
o id
entif
y an
d re
crui
t pa
rtic
ipan
ts:
obta
ined
a li
st o
f pro
vide
rs
from
pro
fess
iona
l ass
ocia
tions
, th
en “
snow
balle
d” fr
om t
here
to
rea
ch a
dditi
onal
pro
vide
rs;
cond
ucte
d “s
ensi
tizat
ion”
ta
lks
in a
ssoc
iatio
n m
eetin
gs
whe
re m
uch
recr
uitin
g al
so
occu
rred
; and
par
tner
ed w
ith
phar
mac
eutic
al c
ompa
nies
to
leve
rage
the
ir s
ales
/det
ailin
g fo
rce
to d
istr
ibut
e in
vita
tions
to
trai
ning
s to
the
pri
vate
pro
vide
rs
they
nor
mal
ly v
isit.
Stan
dard
wor
ksho
p, w
ith v
ery
part
icip
ator
y ap
proa
ch in
clud
ing
case
st
udie
s, q
uest
ion
and
answ
er, a
nd a
ga
me
show
-like
dev
ice
that
lets
the
do
ctor
s se
lect
the
ir a
nsw
er fr
om
a re
mot
e, w
hich
the
n di
spla
ys t
he
colle
ctiv
e an
swer
s on
a s
cree
n.
Proj
ect
staf
f con
sulte
d w
ith t
he
prov
ider
s on
tim
e/da
y th
at is
co
nven
ient
for
them
, as
wel
l as
loca
tion
and
type
of w
orks
hop
sett
ing.
Se
lect
ed t
imes
whe
n ph
ysic
ians
w
ere
not
wor
king
, lik
e W
edne
sday
af
tern
oons
. Whe
n fe
asib
le, p
lann
ed
trai
ning
to
coin
cide
with
an
exis
ting
even
t/co
nfer
ence
.
Part
icip
ants
rec
eive
d tr
aini
ng m
ater
ials
(p
rese
ntat
ions
, ref
eren
ce
mat
eria
ls)
and
a sn
ack.
C
ME
cred
its w
ere
give
n fo
r al
l wor
ksho
ps. M
ain
ince
ntiv
es w
ere
foun
d to
be
wel
l-kno
wn
expe
rts
who
led
the
wor
ksho
ps
and
part
icip
ants
’ ow
n in
tere
st in
lear
ning
mor
e ab
out
HIV
.
Mod
ules
are
bei
ng h
ande
d ov
er t
o pr
ofes
sion
al
asso
ciat
ions
, so
that
ev
entu
ally
the
y ca
n ta
ke
this
tra
inin
g on
. Pro
ject
st
aff i
s pa
rt o
f a p
ublic
-pr
ivat
e co
mm
issi
on
that
is d
eter
min
ing
the
best
way
to
inco
rpor
ate
this
info
rmat
ion
into
th
e pr
e-se
rvic
e m
edic
al
curr
icul
um. P
roje
ct is
al
so w
orki
ng w
ith a
do
ctor
who
is d
esig
ning
a
cour
se (
“Dip
lom
ado”
) on
thi
s to
pic
for
priv
ate
prov
ider
s, w
hich
will
m
ost
likel
y ch
arge
for
part
icip
atio
n. F
inal
ly,
proj
ect
will
mak
e th
e m
odul
es a
vaila
ble
onlin
e.
Con
duct
a T
NA
to
lear
n to
pics
of i
nter
est
to
phys
icia
ns; k
eep
sess
ions
sh
ort
(not
mor
e th
an 4
ho
urs)
; use
wel
l-kno
wn
expe
rts
as s
peak
ers;
tai
lor
wor
ksho
ps t
o di
ffere
nt
phys
icia
n sp
ecia
lties
; fol
low
up
indi
vidu
ally
(as
by
phon
e) w
ith
prov
ider
s to
ens
ure
that
the
y sh
ow u
p to
the
tra
inin
g.
Co
untr
y: H
ondu
ras
Yea
r: 2
006-
2007
Org
aniz
atio
n/P
roje
ct:
PSP-
One
Lo
cal P
artn
er:
ASH
ON
PLA
FA(
NG
O)
Tra
inee
s (#
): P
hysi
cian
s (9
)
To
pics
: No-
scal
pel
vase
ctom
y (N
SV)
Dur
atio
n: A
ppro
x. 2
m
onth
s fo
r ea
ch p
hysi
cian
to
com
plet
e, d
epen
ding
on
cas
eloa
d
A d
ecis
ion
was
mad
e to
in
trod
uce
the
NSV
met
hod
into
the
pri
vate
sec
tor.
The
co
ntra
ctin
gN
GO
sel
ecte
ddo
ctor
s ba
sed
on t
heir
loca
tion,
sk
ill, a
nd m
otiv
atio
n.
Pha
se 1
: Sta
ndar
d w
orks
hop
form
at fo
r th
eore
tical
par
t (2
.5 d
ay
wor
ksho
p on
wee
kend
)P
hase
2: M
aste
r tr
aine
r ob
serv
ed
5 lo
cal p
hysi
cian
s w
ho h
ad b
een
prev
ious
ly t
rain
ed a
s th
ey p
erfo
rmed
N
SV, a
nd t
hen
cert
ified
the
m a
s tr
aine
rs.
Pha
se 3
: Tra
iner
s th
en a
ssis
ted/
obse
rved
the
9 t
rain
ees
perf
orm
NSV
un
til t
hey
felt
that
the
doc
tors
wer
e re
ady
to b
e ce
rtifi
ed a
s tr
aine
d, u
sing
a
chec
klis
t an
d th
eir
own
judg
men
t. T
his
phas
e to
ok s
ever
al m
onth
s an
d cl
ose
coor
dina
tion
to c
ompl
ete,
sin
ce
case
load
for
NSV
is lo
w. I
n so
me
inst
ance
s tr
aine
es h
ad t
o le
ave
thei
r pr
actic
ean
dgo
to
the
NG
Ofa
cilit
ies
whe
re t
here
is a
hig
her
case
load
.
Wor
ksho
p w
as h
eld
at a
nic
e lo
catio
n, a
nd
all l
odgi
ng, m
eal,
and
tran
spor
tatio
n co
sts
wer
e co
vere
d. M
ain
ince
ntiv
es
for
part
icip
atio
n w
ere
foun
d to
be
inte
rest
in
lear
ning
a n
ew c
linic
al
skill
; per
sona
l inv
itatio
n fr
omt
heN
GO
’sM
edic
al
Dir
ecto
r, w
ho is
in
char
ge o
f con
trac
ting
for
ster
iliza
tion
serv
ices
; kn
owin
g th
at t
he N
SV
they
per
form
will
als
o be
cov
ered
und
er t
he
cont
ract
with
NG
O(
i.e.,
poss
ibly
mor
e re
venu
e du
e to
thi
s ad
ditio
nal s
ervi
ce).
With
the
pre
para
tion
of c
ertifi
ed t
rain
ers,
th
ere
is n
ow in
-cou
ntry
ca
paci
ty t
o tr
ain
othe
r pr
ovid
ers
in N
SV. O
ne o
f th
e tr
aine
rs h
as a
lrea
dy
trai
ned
an a
dditi
onal
pu
blic
sec
tor
doct
or
as r
eque
sted
by
the
Min
istr
y. O
ne t
rain
er
was
als
o ce
rtifi
ed a
s a
supe
rvis
or, s
o th
at h
e ca
n m
onito
r th
e qu
ality
of
the
NSV
ser
vice
s pr
ovid
ed b
y th
e 9
trai
ned
doct
ors.
Con
sult
with
pro
vide
rs p
rior
to
sch
edul
ing
the
wor
ksho
p;
follo
w u
p w
ith t
hem
pri
or
to w
orks
hop
to e
nsur
e at
tend
ance
; cho
ose
a ni
ce
and
cent
ral l
ocat
ion
for
the
wor
ksho
p; s
tay
flexi
ble
whe
n im
plem
entin
g cl
inic
al s
kill
trai
ning
– it
tak
es in
tens
ive
coor
dina
tion
to e
nsur
e th
at
both
the
tra
iner
and
tra
inee
ar
e av
aila
ble
and
pres
ent
whe
reve
r an
d w
hene
ver
ther
e ar
e pa
tient
s; s
ched
ules
cha
nge
cons
tant
ly; e
nfor
ce s
tric
t se
lect
ion
crite
ria
to s
elec
t ou
t pr
ovid
ers
who
are
not
tru
ly
mot
ivat
ed t
o us
e th
e ne
w
skill
.
Basic
Info
rmat
ion
Trai
ning
Nee
ds A
sses
smen
t (T
NA)
and
Rec
ruitm
ent
Trai
ning
Str
uctu
re a
nd L
ogistics
Ince
ntiv
esSu
stai
nabi
lity
of
Trai
ning
Pro
gram
Less
ons
Lear
ned
Co
untr
y: In
dia
Yea
r: 2
007-
2008
Org
aniz
atio
n/P
roje
ct:
PSP-
One
Indi
a
Lo
cal P
artn
er: N
one
Tra
inee
s (#
): O
b/G
yns
(1,0
00)
and
nurs
es (
500)
To
pics
: CT
U
with
em
phas
is o
n D
IMPA
(de
pot
med
roxy
prog
este
rone
ac
etat
e) in
ject
able
met
hod
Dur
atio
n: 3
hou
rs
TN
A d
one
thro
ugh
focu
s gr
oup
disc
ussi
ons,
fiel
d te
st o
f Qua
lity
Impr
ovem
ent
(QI)
tool
tha
t id
entifi
ed p
erfo
rman
ce g
aps,
an
d ob
serv
atio
ns. P
roje
ct s
taff
iden
tified
all
Ob/
Gyn
sw
how
ere
wor
king
in p
riva
te c
linic
s in
a
set
geog
raph
ic a
rea
and
field
re
ps fo
llow
ed u
p at
the
ir o
ffice
to
invi
te t
hem
to
the
trai
ning
an
d ex
plai
n ab
out
the
DIM
PA
Net
wor
k.
Thr
ee-h
our
wor
ksho
p (d
ay o
f th
e w
eek
and
loca
tion
sele
cted
in
cons
ulta
tion
with
pro
vide
rs)
usin
g st
ruct
ured
tra
inin
g m
ater
ial f
acili
tate
d by
tec
hnic
al t
rain
ing
dire
ctor
.
Follo
w-u
p fr
om w
orks
hop
with
on-
site
tec
hnic
al s
uppo
rt v
isits
to
supp
ort
coun
selin
g an
d us
e of
inje
ctab
le
met
hod.
Part
icip
ants
rec
eive
d m
eals
, tra
inin
g m
ater
ials
; FP
Glo
balH
andb
ook,
ot
her
job
aids
, DIM
PA
case
reg
iste
r an
d cl
ient
fo
llow
-up
card
s, a
nd
cert
ifica
te a
nd r
ecog
nitio
n as
DIM
PA-t
rain
ed d
octo
r.
Wor
ksho
p to
ok p
lace
in
a n
ice
loca
tion.
Mai
n in
cent
ives
wer
e fo
und
to b
e pe
rcei
ved
valu
e of
ski
ll/kn
owle
dge,
pr
esen
ce o
f exp
erie
nced
, kn
owle
dgea
ble,
and
wel
l-kn
own
doct
or a
nd t
rain
er,
and
inte
ract
ive
sess
ions
.
Ob/
Gyn
ass
ocia
tion
expr
esse
d in
tere
st
in c
ontin
uing
the
tr
aini
ng a
nd t
ying
it t
o ce
rtifi
catio
n, b
ut n
eeds
ou
tsid
e fu
nds
to d
o th
is.
Som
e di
scus
sion
on
offe
ring
CM
E cr
edits
for
the
trai
ning
and
cha
rgin
g a
fee
to p
hysi
cian
s;
how
ever
, sin
ce C
ME
is n
ot m
anda
tory
for
relic
ensu
re, t
here
is li
ttle
in
cent
ive
for
phys
icia
ns
to p
ay t
o le
arn.
Kee
p th
e se
ssio
ns s
hort
(no
t m
ore
than
3 h
ours
); m
ake
sess
ions
inte
ract
ive
to e
nabl
e ph
ysic
ians
to
lear
n ho
w t
o us
e th
e in
tern
atio
nal m
ater
ials
an
d to
ols
and
to d
evel
op t
he
skill
of c
ontin
uous
lear
ning
on
thei
r ow
n.
Co
untr
y: In
dia
Yea
r: 2
007-
2008
Org
aniz
atio
n/P
roje
ct:
PSP-
One
Lo
cal P
artn
er: C
hem
ists
an
d IS
MP
Ass
ocia
tions
Tra
inee
s (#
): C
hem
ists
(1
50)
and
ISM
Ps (
150)
To
pics
: You
th-fr
iend
ly
com
mun
icat
ion
skill
s,
over
view
of c
ontr
acep
tive
met
hods
app
ropr
iate
for
yout
h, b
asic
s of
sex
ually
tr
ansm
itted
infe
ctio
ns a
nd
HIV
/AID
S
Dur
atio
n: 2
day
s
Form
ativ
e re
sear
ch id
entifi
ed a
sp
ecia
l nee
d fo
r co
ntra
cept
ive
know
ledg
e an
d co
mm
unic
atio
n sk
ills
of c
hem
ists
and
ISM
Ps fo
r ad
oles
cent
s an
d m
arri
ed y
outh
(a
ge 1
8-25
). PS
P-O
ne m
appe
d th
e ta
rget
geo
grap
hic
area
and
ob
tain
ed li
sts
of p
rovi
ders
from
pr
ofes
sion
al a
ssoc
iatio
ns. P
roje
ct
dete
rmin
ed a
% o
f pro
vide
rs it
w
ante
d to
tra
in a
nd a
ssoc
iatio
ns
help
ed w
ith o
utre
ach
to s
elec
t pr
ovid
ers.
Proj
ect
field
tea
m v
isite
d ea
ch
prov
ider
to
pers
onal
ly in
vite
hi
m/h
er t
o th
e tr
aini
ng, a
nd
follo
wed
up
with
a p
hone
cal
l th
e ni
ght
befo
re t
rain
ing.
Tw
o 3-
4 ho
ur w
orks
hops
on
cons
ecut
ive
days
in t
he a
fter
noon
(T
hurs
day-
Frid
ay o
r Fr
iday
-Sat
urda
y),
offe
red
sepa
rate
ly fo
r ea
ch p
rovi
der
cadr
e. E
xper
ienc
ed t
rain
ing
cons
ulta
nt
was
in c
harg
e of
tra
inin
g lo
gist
ics
and
desi
gned
wor
ksho
p to
be
offe
red
duri
ng “
less
bus
y” t
ime
for
part
icip
ants
. Site
was
con
veni
ently
lo
cate
d at
loca
l res
taur
ants
or
café
s.
Part
icip
ants
rec
eive
d lu
nch
and
prod
uct
sam
ples
. Mai
n in
cent
ives
wer
e fo
und
to
be p
rofe
ssio
nal i
nter
est
to
incr
ease
kno
wle
dge
and
perc
eptio
n of
opp
ortu
nity
to
att
ract
mor
e cl
ient
s by
be
com
ing
a m
embe
r of
the
Sa
athy
ia n
etw
ork
of y
outh
-fr
iend
ly F
P se
rvic
es, w
hich
in
clud
ed b
rand
ing
and
prom
otio
n of
faci
litie
s.
Sust
aina
bilit
y of
effo
rt
was
not
an
issu
e at
the
tim
e th
e pr
ojec
t w
as
impl
emen
ting
this
tra
inin
g as
a lo
t of
fund
ing
was
av
aila
ble.
Inve
st t
ime
and
effo
rt t
o pe
rson
ally
invi
te p
artic
ipan
ts;
invo
lve
and
wor
k cl
osel
y w
ith p
rofe
ssio
nal a
ssoc
iatio
ns
to h
elp
with
att
enda
nce,
pa
rtic
ular
ly w
ith t
he
chem
ists
; use
inte
ract
ive
trai
ning
tec
hniq
ues
to
keep
the
tra
inee
s en
gage
d an
d pa
rtic
ipat
ing;
use
a
wel
l-kno
wn,
rec
ogni
zed
prof
essi
onal
to
add
cred
ibili
ty
to t
he t
rain
ing.
18
Basic
Info
rmat
ion
Trai
ning
Nee
ds A
sses
smen
t (T
NA)
and
Rec
ruitm
ent
Trai
ning
Str
uctu
re a
nd L
ogistics
Ince
ntiv
esSu
stai
nabi
lity
of
Trai
ning
Pro
gram
Less
ons
Lear
ned
Co
untr
y: Jo
rdan
Yea
r: 2
004-
pres
ent
Org
aniz
atio
n/P
roje
ct:
Jord
an P
riva
te S
ecto
r Pr
ojec
t fo
r W
omen
’s
Hea
lth (
PSP)
Lo
cal P
artn
er:
Prof
essi
onal
med
ical
as
soci
atio
ns a
nd Jo
rdan
M
edic
al C
ounc
il
Tra
inee
s (#
): P
hysi
cian
s (6
00+
)
To
pics
: FP
upda
tes
and
IUD
inse
rtio
n
Dur
atio
n: 3
-4 d
ays
USA
ID p
roje
ct id
entifi
ed
goal
of i
ncre
asin
g co
uple
-ye
ars
prot
ectio
n. P
roje
ct s
taff
desi
gned
que
stio
nnai
re t
o id
entif
y to
pics
on
wom
en’s
he
alth
tha
t ph
ysic
ians
wer
e in
tere
sted
in k
now
ing
mor
e ab
out.
Initi
al p
roje
ct (
Com
mer
cial
M
arke
t St
rate
gies
) de
velo
ped
a lis
t of
phy
sici
ans
in p
riva
te
prac
tice;
sub
sequ
ent
proj
ect
cont
inue
dto
use
list
.Lis
tup
date
d by
con
tact
ing
prof
essi
onal
med
ical
as
soci
atio
ns a
nd Jo
rdan
Med
ical
C
ounc
il (w
hich
reg
iste
rs a
ll ne
w
grad
uate
s) a
nd w
ord
of m
outh
.
Stan
dard
wor
ksho
p fo
rmat
with
in
tera
ctiv
e se
ssio
ns fo
r FP
tra
inin
g, 4
ho
urs
on F
rida
y. F
or IU
D in
sert
ion,
3
days
: 1 d
ay o
f the
ory
and
2 da
ys o
f pr
actic
um. P
ract
icum
s w
ere
arra
nged
at
faci
lity
near
doc
tor’
s lo
catio
n (a
ppro
ved
trai
ning
site
of t
he M
inis
try
of H
ealth
) so
par
ticip
ants
wou
ld n
ot
have
to
trav
el fa
r. P
riva
te p
hysi
cian
s w
ere
aske
d fo
r pr
efer
ence
s on
whe
n to
offe
r co
urse
s; t
hey
indi
cate
d Fr
iday
s (t
heir
day
off)
and
to
be
kept
sho
rt (
not
mor
e th
an 4
hou
rs).
Cou
rses
wer
e of
fere
d at
3 lo
catio
ns
(nor
th, c
entr
al, a
nd s
outh
of c
ount
ry)
to m
inim
ize
trav
el.
Part
icip
ants
rec
eive
d tr
aini
ng m
ater
ials
, lun
ch
and
coffe
e br
eaks
, and
lab
coat
and
oth
er m
ater
ials
fo
r th
eir
prac
tice.
Cou
rse
was
acc
redi
ted
by Jo
rdan
M
edic
al C
ounc
il. M
ain
ince
ntiv
e fo
r pa
rtic
ipat
ion
was
foun
d to
be
perc
eptio
n th
at c
ours
e co
nten
t w
as v
alua
ble
and
wou
ld h
elp
them
pr
ovid
e be
tter
car
e to
th
eir
patie
nts.
Par
ticip
ants
fe
lt th
ey w
ould
get
mor
e cl
ient
s be
caus
e th
ey w
ould
pr
ovid
e be
tter
car
e an
d be
ab
le t
o of
fer
mor
e se
rvic
es
such
as
IUD
inse
rtio
n.
Dis
cuss
ions
with
tw
o or
gani
zatio
ns in
itiat
ed t
o co
ntin
ue w
ith t
his
type
of
tra
inin
g an
d pr
ovid
ing
cert
ifica
tion:
Jord
an
Gen
eral
Pra
ctiti
oner
sA
ssoc
iatio
n an
d Jo
rdan
M
edic
al C
ounc
il, w
hich
cu
rren
tly p
rovi
des
the
site
whe
re t
rain
ing
is c
ondu
cted
and
si
gns
the
cert
ifica
te
of p
artic
ipat
ion.
A
phar
mac
eutic
al c
ompa
ny
that
has
a p
rodu
ct
asso
ciat
ed w
ith t
he
trai
ning
may
sup
port
so
me
trai
ning
s co
urse
s.
Kee
p th
e co
nten
t fo
cuse
d on
kn
owle
dge
that
is o
f int
eres
t to
pro
vide
rs; c
ondu
ct a
TN
A
to d
eter
min
e w
hich
top
ics
inte
rest
the
m; k
eep
the
sess
ions
sho
rt a
nd p
ract
ical
; em
phas
ize
the
need
for
cont
inuo
us le
arni
ng a
nd w
hy
it’s
impo
rtan
t; m
anag
ing
the
prac
tical
por
tion
of c
linic
al
trai
ning
is m
ore
diffi
cult
than
th
e th
eore
tical
(w
orks
hop)
tr
aini
ng d
ue t
o cl
ose
coor
dina
tion
need
ed w
ith
doct
ors’
sch
edul
es t
o le
ave
thei
r cl
inic
s an
d go
whe
re t
he
patie
nts
are.
Co
untr
y: K
enya
Yea
r: 2
001-
2006
Org
aniz
atio
n/P
roje
ct:
PRIM
E an
d A
CQ
UIR
E
Lo
cal P
artn
er: N
atio
nal
Nur
sing
Ass
ocia
tion
of
Ken
ya
Tra
inee
s (#
): N
urse
s an
d m
idw
ives
(63
5)
To
pics
: Pre
vent
ion
of m
othe
r-to
-chi
ld
tran
smis
sion
(PM
TC
T),
volu
ntar
y co
unse
ling
and
test
ing
(VC
T),
post
-ab
ortio
n ca
re (
PAC
), an
d FP
and
con
trac
eptiv
e te
chno
logy
upd
ate
Dur
atio
n: 2
-6 w
eeks
de
pend
ing
on t
he t
opic
Proj
ects
and
USA
ID/K
enya
se
lect
ed t
arge
t ge
ogra
phic
are
as
and
prov
ider
s ba
sed
on k
now
n pe
rfor
man
ce g
aps.
Pot
entia
l pa
rtic
ipan
ts w
ere
cont
acte
d to
ass
ess
thei
r in
tere
st in
the
tr
aini
ng t
opic
s an
d se
lect
ion
crite
ria
focu
sed
on t
hose
who
ha
d po
sitiv
e at
titud
es t
owar
d th
e to
pics
.
Stan
dard
app
roac
h of
cla
ssro
om
pres
enta
tions
with
clin
ical
ski
lls
trai
ning
at
gove
rnm
ent
hosp
ital,
5 da
ys
per
wee
k fo
r 2-
6 w
eeks
. Fol
low
-up
to a
ssis
t pa
rtic
ipan
ts fo
rm a
“pe
er-
supp
ort
clus
ter.
” A
ctiv
ities
of p
eer-
supp
ort
clus
ter
incl
uded
1)
peer
su
perv
isio
n; 2
) co
ntin
uous
pro
fess
iona
l de
velo
pmen
t; 3)
fina
ncia
l loa
n pr
ogra
m
with
rep
aym
ent
by m
embe
rs a
fter
loan
re
ceiv
ed; 4
) re
ferr
al o
f clie
nts
amon
g m
embe
rs; 5
) jo
int
prob
lem
-sol
ving
; an
d 6)
lega
l sup
port
to
mem
bers
. Pa
rtic
ipan
ts h
ad t
o ar
rang
e an
d pa
y fo
r an
othe
r nu
rse/
mid
wife
to
man
age
thei
r pr
actic
es w
hile
the
y w
ere
away
.
Part
icip
ants
rec
eive
d tr
ansp
orta
tion,
mea
ls,
acco
mm
odat
ion,
and
kits
to
impl
emen
t co
urse
co
nten
t (b
ooks
on
FP, t
est
kits
for
VC
T, N
evir
apin
e fo
r PM
TC
T).
Mai
n in
cent
ives
for
part
icip
atio
n w
ere
foun
d to
be
a ce
rtifi
cate
aw
arde
d up
on
com
plet
ion
and
incr
ease
d re
cogn
ition
and
val
ue in
th
eir
com
mun
ity d
ue t
o th
e ne
w a
nd im
prov
ed
serv
ices
pro
vide
d.
New
pro
ject
(A
PHIA
II)
will
con
tinue
to
supp
ort
this
initi
ativ
e of
pe
er-s
uppo
rt c
lust
ers,
as
it w
as p
erce
ived
as
bene
ficia
l and
low
cos
t to
su
ppor
t.
Ensu
re t
hat
cont
ent
is
perc
eive
d as
bei
ng v
alua
ble;
su
ppor
t de
velo
pmen
t of
m
eani
ngfu
l rel
atio
nshi
ps
betw
een
peer
s to
furt
her
add
valu
e to
pro
vide
rs in
pri
vate
pr
actic
e.
19
Basic
Info
rmat
ion
Trai
ning
Nee
ds A
sses
smen
t (T
NA)
and
Rec
ruitm
ent
Trai
ning
Str
uctu
re a
nd L
ogistics
Ince
ntiv
esSu
stai
nabi
lity
of
Trai
ning
Pro
gram
Less
ons
Lear
ned
Co
untr
y: N
iger
ia
Yea
r: 2
007-
pres
ent
Org
aniz
atio
n/P
roje
ct:
PSP-
One
Lo
cal P
artn
er: H
ealth
m
aint
enan
ce o
rgan
izat
ions
(H
MO
s)
Tra
inee
s (#
): P
hysi
cian
s,
nurs
es, a
nd H
MO
co
ordi
nato
rs (
643)
To
pics
: Man
aged
car
e (c
apita
tion
syst
em),
FP,
nutr
ition
, pre
vent
ion
& R
x of
mal
aria
, fam
ily w
elln
ess
Dur
atio
n: 2
day
s
Nee
d de
term
ined
by
cond
uctin
g a
surv
ey w
ith p
rovi
ders
and
an
alyz
ing
enco
unte
r da
ta
form
s fr
om H
MO
s. O
rgan
izer
s w
orke
d cl
osel
y w
ith t
he H
MO
s to
sel
ect
priv
ate
prov
ider
s re
gist
ered
with
the
Nat
iona
l H
ealth
Insu
ranc
e Sc
hem
e w
orki
ng in
tar
get
regi
ons
and
invi
ted
the
trai
nees
thr
ough
the
H
MO
s.
Wor
ksho
p on
2 c
onse
cutiv
e da
ys,
usua
lly b
etw
een
Tue
sday
and
T
hurs
day,
as
Mon
days
wer
e “b
usy”
da
ys a
nd s
taff
finis
h ea
rly
on F
rida
ys.
Tri
ed t
o ha
ve t
rain
ing
at t
rain
ee
wor
ksite
s to
min
imiz
e tr
avel
tim
e an
d tr
ansp
orta
tion
cost
s.
Part
icip
ants
rec
eive
d ce
rtifi
cate
of p
artic
ipat
ion,
C
ME
cred
its, t
rain
ing
mat
eria
ls, c
omm
unic
atio
n m
ater
ials
for
thei
r cl
inic
s,
and
snac
ks. M
ain
ince
ntiv
es
for
part
icip
atio
n w
ere
foun
d to
be
oppo
rtun
ity
for
prof
essi
onal
de
velo
pmen
t an
d fo
r be
tter
in
com
e th
roug
h be
tter
un
ders
tand
ing
of H
MO
ca
pita
tion
paym
ent
syst
em.
Proj
ect
is w
orki
ng
very
clo
sely
with
the
H
MO
s, w
hich
cov
ered
so
me
of t
he c
ost
of
the
wor
ksho
ps a
nd a
re
inte
rest
ed in
tak
ing
over
th
e tr
aini
ng. P
rofe
ssio
nal
asso
ciat
ions
(m
edic
al
and
dent
al)
are
also
in
tere
sted
. HM
Os
are
cons
ider
ing
char
ging
a fe
e to
par
ticip
ants
in fu
ture
tr
aini
ngs.
Invo
lve
loca
l org
aniza
tions
(H
MO
s an
d pr
ofes
siona
l as
soci
atio
ns) f
or s
usta
inab
ility;
in
clud
e so
meo
ne w
ith a
utho
rity
in m
edic
al fa
cilit
y in
the
trai
ning
to
incr
ease
cha
nces
that
new
m
ater
ial w
ill be
impl
emen
ted;
se
t min
imum
att
enda
nce
stan
dard
to r
ecei
ve c
ertifi
cate
(7
5% o
f ses
sions
in th
is ca
se).
Co
untr
y: R
oman
ia
Yea
r: 2
006-
2007
Org
aniz
atio
n/P
roje
ct:
Bank
ing
on H
ealth
(Bo
H)
Lo
cal P
artn
er:
Rom
ania
n So
ciet
y fo
r Ed
ucat
ion
in
Con
trac
eptio
n an
d Se
xual
ity (
SEC
S) a
nd
Nat
iona
l Ins
titut
e fo
r H
ealth
Res
earc
h an
d D
evel
opm
ent
(NIH
RD
)
Tra
inee
s (#
): F
amily
do
ctor
s (1
40)
To
pics
: Fin
anci
al
man
agem
ent
incl
udin
g ac
cess
to
cred
it
Dur
atio
n: 3
day
s
Proj
ect
cond
ucte
d a
TN
A u
sing
m
ultip
le m
etho
ds: 1
) fo
cus
grou
ps, 2
) de
sk r
esea
rch,
and
3)
key
info
rman
t in
terv
iew
s as
wel
l as
4) in
-dep
th m
arke
t re
sear
ch w
ith fa
mily
doc
tors
, O
b/G
ynp
ract
ices
,rur
al
phar
mac
ies,
dis
trib
utor
s, a
nd
med
ical
clin
ics.
Fam
ily d
octo
rs
and
othe
r pr
ovid
ers
of R
H/
FP in
rur
al a
nd u
nder
serv
ed
area
s w
ere
iden
tified
as
mos
t in
ne
ed o
f sup
port
in t
he a
reas
of
acce
ss t
o fin
ance
and
fina
ncia
l m
anag
emen
t sk
ills
in o
rder
to
sus
tain
and
impr
ove
thei
r de
liver
y of
qua
lity
serv
ices
. Ba
sed
on t
hese
find
ings
, BoH
de
velo
ped
a co
urse
with
co
ntri
butio
ns fr
om S
ECS
and
NIH
RD
.
Stan
dard
wor
ksho
p w
ith ti
me
for
case
ex
ampl
es th
at in
clud
ed F
P ex
ampl
es/
case
stu
dies
. Wor
ksho
ps w
ere
sche
dule
d at
a ti
me
that
was
con
veni
ent
for
part
icip
ants
and
did
not
take
th
em a
way
from
thei
r pr
actic
e. B
oH
arra
nged
trai
ning
with
2 o
ptio
ns s
o to
be
flex
ible
: Opt
ion
1: 3
full
days
(Frid
ay,
Satu
rday
, Sun
day)
or
Opt
ion
2: 4
4-
hour
seg
men
ts (3
:00-
7:00
pm
– ti
mes
w
hen
doct
ors
are
not r
equi
red
by th
e go
vern
men
t to
be in
thei
r pr
actic
es).
Tra
iner
s w
ere
med
ical
pra
ctiti
oner
s by
tr
aini
ng, a
nd h
ad b
een
trai
ning
thes
e sa
me
fam
ily d
octo
rs in
the
area
of R
H/
FP. T
hus,
they
kne
w th
e pa
rtic
ipan
ts
and
wer
e ab
le to
spe
ak to
them
in
term
s th
ey c
ould
und
erst
and
and
rela
te
to th
eir
spec
ific
circ
umst
ance
s in
the
trai
ning
roo
m.
Part
icip
ants
rec
eive
d lu
nch,
cof
fee,
and
sna
cks.
T
he t
rain
ers
and
trai
ning
or
gani
zatio
n w
ere
wel
l kn
own
and
resp
ecte
d.
Gue
sts
peak
ers
from
lo
cal fi
nanc
ial i
nstit
utio
ns
wer
e av
aila
ble
at t
he e
nd
to a
nsw
er q
uest
ions
and
pr
ovid
e lo
an a
pplic
atio
ns t
o pa
rtic
ipan
ts.
Mai
n in
cent
ive
was
tha
t th
e tr
aini
ng r
espo
nded
to
a lo
ng-n
egle
cted
nee
d fo
r fin
anci
al a
nd b
usin
ess
skill
s to
ena
ble
phys
icia
ns in
ru
ral c
omm
uniti
es w
ho a
re
serv
ing
the
poor
to
grow
an
d im
prov
e th
eir
prac
tices
in
to v
iabl
e bu
sine
sses
.
Sust
aina
bilit
y st
rate
gy
incl
uded
: ide
ntify
ing
an
inst
itutio
n (C
olle
ge o
f Ph
ysic
ians
) to
acc
redi
t th
e tr
aini
ng c
ours
e so
th
at p
rovi
ders
cou
ld e
arn
CM
E cr
edits
; det
erm
inin
g ho
w m
uch
the
prov
ider
s w
ere
will
ing
to p
ay fo
r th
e tr
aini
ng if
offe
red
on a
fee
basi
s, a
nd t
he
logi
stic
s an
d su
btop
ics
that
wou
ld m
ake
the
cour
se a
ttra
ctiv
e. T
he im
plem
entin
g N
GO
(SE
CS)
ach
ieve
dac
cred
itatio
n fo
r th
e co
urse
with
the
Col
lege
of
Phy
sici
ans
and
dete
rmin
ed t
hat
the
pric
e
Priv
ate
prov
ider
s ar
e in
tere
sted
in b
usin
ess
man
agem
ent
and
part
icul
arly
fin
anci
al m
anag
emen
t tr
aini
ng;
trai
ning
in t
hese
top
ics
(fina
nce,
fina
ncia
l man
agem
ent,
acce
ssin
g lo
ans,
etc
.) in
a
non-
thre
aten
ing
envi
ronm
ent
amon
g ot
her
doct
ors
can
be
very
em
pow
erin
g to
pri
vate
pr
ovid
ers;
con
duct
a T
NA
w
ith fo
cus
grou
ps o
f pot
entia
l pa
rtic
ipan
ts a
nd k
ey in
form
ants
to
tai
lor
the
stru
ctur
e an
d co
nten
t of
the
cou
rse
to t
heir
ne
eds;
the
re a
re p
ros
and
cons
to
usi
ng d
octo
rs a
s tr
aine
rs fo
r fin
anci
al t
opic
s: t
hey
can
rela
te
to t
he p
artic
ipan
ts, a
nd “
spea
k th
eir
lang
uage
,” b
ut t
hey
can
be c
halle
nged
by
the
tech
nica
l
(Rom
ania
Con
t'd)
20
Basic
Info
rmat
ion
Trai
ning
Nee
ds A
sses
smen
t (T
NA)
and
Rec
ruitm
ent
Trai
ning
Str
uctu
re a
nd L
ogistics
Ince
ntiv
esSu
stai
nabi
lity
of
Trai
ning
Pro
gram
Less
ons
Lear
ned
Part
icip
ants
wer
e se
lect
ed
from
the
fam
ily d
octo
rs w
ho
atte
nded
a p
revi
ous
cour
se o
n ba
sic
FP (
this
was
a p
rere
quis
ite
for
part
icip
atio
n).
the
phys
icia
ns w
ere
will
ing
to p
ay w
ould
co
ver
thei
r co
sts.
BoH
w
as a
ble
to le
vera
ge
inte
rest
from
3 fi
nanc
ial
inst
itutio
ns in
Rom
ania
to
con
tinue
fund
ing
the
trai
ning
cou
rse.
T
oda
te,t
heN
GO
’s
relia
nce
on t
he d
onor
-fu
nded
bus
ines
s m
odel
ha
s pr
even
ted
it fr
om
follo
win
g th
roug
h on
in
itial
con
tact
s m
ade
with
co
mm
erci
al s
pons
ors
and
offe
ring
the
cou
rse
on a
com
mer
cial
bas
is t
o do
ctor
s.
cont
ent
of t
he m
ater
ial a
nd
over
ly r
ely
on r
esou
rce
spea
kers
; whe
n po
ssib
le,
obta
in e
arly
buy
-in fr
om
accr
edita
tion
agen
cies
an
d po
tent
ial c
omm
erci
al
spon
sors
to
boos
t lo
ng-t
erm
su
stai
nabi
lity;
ens
ure
that
im
plem
entin
g or
gani
zatio
n ha
s a
long
-ter
m v
isio
n of
in
corp
orat
ing
the
cour
se in
to
thei
r st
rate
gy t
o ac
hiev
e th
e su
stai
nabl
e of
feri
ng o
f the
co
urse
; a w
ell-t
ailo
red
trai
ning
co
urse
can
hav
e lo
ng-t
erm
bu
sine
ss g
row
th r
esul
ts a
s is
ev
iden
t in
the
fina
ncin
g an
d bu
sine
ss im
prov
emen
ts m
ade
by d
octo
rs a
fter
the
cour
se.
Co
untr
y: U
gand
a
Yea
r: 2
004-
2005
Org
aniz
atio
n/P
roje
ct:
PSP-
One
Lo
cal P
artn
er: U
gand
a Pr
ivat
e M
idw
ives
A
ssoc
iatio
n (U
PMA
)
Tra
inee
s (#
): M
idw
ives
an
d su
perv
isor
s (1
89)
To
pics
: Use
of q
ualit
y im
prov
emen
t (Q
I) se
lf-as
sess
men
t to
ol a
nd
prob
lem
-sol
ving
pro
cess
Dur
atio
n: 1
day
for
mid
wiv
es, 3
½ d
ays
for
supe
rvis
ors
UPM
A id
entifi
ed t
hat
serv
ice
qual
ity n
eede
d to
be
addr
esse
d,
so P
SP-O
ne d
evel
oped
the
QI
tool
and
the
tra
inin
g on
the
to
ol. A
ll m
embe
rs in
spe
cific
U
PMA
bra
nche
s w
ere
invi
ted
to
part
icip
ate
in a
1-d
ay w
orks
hop.
M
idw
ives
loca
ted
by h
irin
g m
otor
cycl
es w
ith d
rive
r an
d se
ndin
g no
tes
of in
vita
tions
.
Stan
dard
1-d
ay c
lass
room
tra
inin
g w
ith fo
llow
-up
by s
uper
viso
rs t
o su
ppor
t m
idw
ives
in p
robl
em-s
olvi
ng.
The
tra
inin
g pr
oces
s w
as b
uilt
arou
nd
the
conc
ept
of s
elf-e
mpo
wer
men
t w
ith fo
llow
-up
and
supp
ort
from
U
PMA
.
Plea
sant
wor
ksho
p si
te,
part
icip
ants
rec
eive
d lu
nch
and
tran
spor
tatio
n al
low
ance
, tra
inin
g m
ater
ials
, and
QI t
ool f
or
thei
r cl
inic
s. K
now
ledg
e th
at U
PMA
sup
port
ed t
he
trai
ning
and
app
roac
h to
qu
ality
.
PSP-
One
tra
ined
6 U
PMA
tr
aine
rs t
o bu
ild t
he
orga
niza
tion’
s ca
paci
ty
to c
ondu
ct a
dditi
onal
tr
aini
ng. U
PMA
has
a
stru
ctur
e of
reg
iona
l re
pres
enta
tives
org
aniz
ed
by b
ranc
h (d
istr
ict)
who
ca
n pr
ovid
e fo
llow
-up
to
trai
ned
mid
wiv
es. U
PMA
is
com
mitt
ed t
o th
e pr
oces
s an
d lo
okin
g fo
r fu
nds
to c
ondu
ct m
ore
trai
ning
and
pri
nt m
ore
copi
es o
f the
QI t
ool.
Ensu
re t
hat
part
icip
ants
find
tr
aini
ng t
opic
use
ful;
invo
lve
loca
l par
tner
(pr
ofes
sion
al
asso
ciat
ion)
and
obt
ain
thei
r su
ppor
t to
hel
p ac
cess
tr
aine
es a
nd c
onve
y ad
ditio
nal
valu
e to
tra
inin
g.
21
Basic
Info
rmat
ion
Trai
ning
Nee
ds A
sses
smen
t (T
NA)
and
Rec
ruitm
ent
Trai
ning
Str
uctu
re a
nd L
ogistics
Ince
ntiv
esSu
stai
nabi
lity
of
Trai
ning
Pro
gram
Less
ons
Lear
ned
Part
icip
ants
wer
e se
lect
ed
from
the
fam
ily d
octo
rs w
ho
atte
nded
a p
revi
ous
cour
se o
n ba
sic
FP (
this
was
a p
rere
quis
ite
for
part
icip
atio
n).
the
phys
icia
ns w
ere
will
ing
to p
ay w
ould
co
ver
thei
r co
sts.
BoH
w
as a
ble
to le
vera
ge
inte
rest
from
3 fi
nanc
ial
inst
itutio
ns in
Rom
ania
to
con
tinue
fund
ing
the
trai
ning
cou
rse.
T
oda
te,t
heN
GO
’s
relia
nce
on t
he d
onor
-fu
nded
bus
ines
s m
odel
ha
s pr
even
ted
it fr
om
follo
win
g th
roug
h on
in
itial
con
tact
s m
ade
with
co
mm
erci
al s
pons
ors
and
offe
ring
the
cou
rse
on a
com
mer
cial
bas
is t
o do
ctor
s.
cont
ent
of t
he m
ater
ial a
nd
over
ly r
ely
on r
esou
rce
spea
kers
; whe
n po
ssib
le,
obta
in e
arly
buy
-in fr
om
accr
edita
tion
agen
cies
an
d po
tent
ial c
omm
erci
al
spon
sors
to
boos
t lo
ng-t
erm
su
stai
nabi
lity;
ens
ure
that
im
plem
entin
g or
gani
zatio
n ha
s a
long
-ter
m v
isio
n of
in
corp
orat
ing
the
cour
se in
to
thei
r st
rate
gy t
o ac
hiev
e th
e su
stai
nabl
e of
feri
ng o
f the
co
urse
; a w
ell-t
ailo
red
trai
ning
co
urse
can
hav
e lo
ng-t
erm
bu
sine
ss g
row
th r
esul
ts a
s is
ev
iden
t in
the
fina
ncin
g an
d bu
sine
ss im
prov
emen
ts m
ade
by d
octo
rs a
fter
the
cour
se.
Co
untr
y: U
gand
a
Yea
r: 2
004-
2005
Org
aniz
atio
n/P
roje
ct:
PSP-
One
Lo
cal P
artn
er: U
gand
a Pr
ivat
e M
idw
ives
A
ssoc
iatio
n (U
PMA
)
Tra
inee
s (#
): M
idw
ives
an
d su
perv
isor
s (1
89)
To
pics
: Use
of q
ualit
y im
prov
emen
t (Q
I) se
lf-as
sess
men
t to
ol a
nd
prob
lem
-sol
ving
pro
cess
Dur
atio
n: 1
day
for
mid
wiv
es, 3
½ d
ays
for
supe
rvis
ors
UPM
A id
entifi
ed t
hat
serv
ice
qual
ity n
eede
d to
be
addr
esse
d,
so P
SP-O
ne d
evel
oped
the
QI
tool
and
the
tra
inin
g on
the
to
ol. A
ll m
embe
rs in
spe
cific
U
PMA
bra
nche
s w
ere
invi
ted
to
part
icip
ate
in a
1-d
ay w
orks
hop.
M
idw
ives
loca
ted
by h
irin
g m
otor
cycl
es w
ith d
rive
r an
d se
ndin
g no
tes
of in
vita
tions
.
Stan
dard
1-d
ay c
lass
room
tra
inin
g w
ith fo
llow
-up
by s
uper
viso
rs t
o su
ppor
t m
idw
ives
in p
robl
em-s
olvi
ng.
The
tra
inin
g pr
oces
s w
as b
uilt
arou
nd
the
conc
ept
of s
elf-e
mpo
wer
men
t w
ith fo
llow
-up
and
supp
ort
from
U
PMA
.
Plea
sant
wor
ksho
p si
te,
part
icip
ants
rec
eive
d lu
nch
and
tran
spor
tatio
n al
low
ance
, tra
inin
g m
ater
ials
, and
QI t
ool f
or
thei
r cl
inic
s. K
now
ledg
e th
at U
PMA
sup
port
ed t
he
trai
ning
and
app
roac
h to
qu
ality
.
PSP-
One
tra
ined
6 U
PMA
tr
aine
rs t
o bu
ild t
he
orga
niza
tion’
s ca
paci
ty
to c
ondu
ct a
dditi
onal
tr
aini
ng. U
PMA
has
a
stru
ctur
e of
reg
iona
l re
pres
enta
tives
org
aniz
ed
by b
ranc
h (d
istr
ict)
who
ca
n pr
ovid
e fo
llow
-up
to
trai
ned
mid
wiv
es. U
PMA
is
com
mitt
ed t
o th
e pr
oces
s an
d lo
okin
g fo
r fu
nds
to c
ondu
ct m
ore
trai
ning
and
pri
nt m
ore
copi
es o
f the
QI t
ool.
Ensu
re t
hat
part
icip
ants
find
tr
aini
ng t
opic
use
ful;
invo
lve
loca
l par
tner
(pr
ofes
sion
al
asso
ciat
ion)
and
obt
ain
thei
r su
ppor
t to
hel
p ac
cess
tr
aine
es a
nd c
onve
y ad
ditio
nal
valu
e to
tra
inin
g.
REFERENCES
Brugha R, A. Zwi. 1998. Improving the quality of private sector delivery of public health service: challenges and strategies. Health Policy and
Planning 13(2): 107-120.
Berman, Peter, Kara Hanson. 1993. Consultation on the private health sector in Africa: Summary of Proceedings, September 22-23, 1993, Washington, DC. Boston, MA: Data for Decision Making Project, Harvard School of Public Health. http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/ihsg/
publications/pdf/No-15.PDF
Capacity Project. April 2007. Learning for Performance: A Guide and Toolkit for Health Worker Training and Education Programs. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: IntraHealth International. http://www.capacityproject.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=
view&id=113&Itemid=129
Chandani T, S Sulzbach, M Forzley. April 2006.Private Provider Networks: The Role of Viability in Expanding the Supply of Reproductive Health and Family Planning Services. Bethesda, MD: Private Sector Partnerships-One Project, Abt Associates Inc. http://www.psp-one.com/content/
resource/detail/2941/
Peters D, G Mirchandani, P Hansen. 2004.Strategies for engaging the private sector in sexual and reproductive health: how effective are they? Health Policy and Planning 19(Suppl. 1): i5-i21.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors Denise Averbug and Mary Segall of the PSP-One project wish to thank Jeffrey Barnes, Marc Luoma,CathrynMurphy,MaggieFarrell,andPatriciaMengechfortheircarefulreview,valuableinput,and suggestions on the primer.
KEY INFORMANTS
Benin PRIME/PSI case study:Perle CombaryIntraHealth/PRIME
Ethiopia PSP case study:Wondwossen AssefaAbt Associates/PSP-Ethiopia
GhanaPRIME/GRMAcasestudy:Cathryn MurphyIntraHealth/PRIME
GhanaGSMF/SEAMcasestudy:John IdunGhanaSocialMarketingFoundation(formerly)
GuatemalaPSP-One case study:Ana Maria RodasAbt Associates/PSP-One Guatemala
Honduras PSP-One case study:Denise AverbugAbt Associates/PSP-One
India PSP-One DIMPA case study:Ravi Anand Abt Associates/PSP-One India
India PSP-One Saathyia case study:LenaKolyadaAbt Associates/PSP-One
Jordan PSP case study:Iten Ramadan Abt Associates/PSP-Jordan
Kenya PRIME/ACQUIRE case study:Jim McMahan IntraHealth/ACQUIRE
Nigeria PSP-One case study:Ayodele IrokoAbt Associates/PSP-One
Romania Banking on Health case study:LisaTarantinoBanyanGlobal/BankingonHealth
Uganda PSP-One/UPMA case study:Mary SegallIntraHealth/PSP-One
DISCLAIMERThe author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID)ortheUnitedStatesGovernment.
About PSP-One
The PSP-One project is USAID’s flagship project, funded underContractNo.GPO-I-00-04-00007-00,toincreasethe private sector’s provision of high-quality reproductive health and family planning (RH/FP) and other health products and services in developing countries. PSP-One is led by Abt Associates Inc. and implemented in collaboration with eight partners:
BanyanGlobal
Dillon,AllmanandPartners,LLC
Family Health International
Forum One Communications
IntraHealth International
O’Hanlon Health Consulting
Population Services International
Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine
For more information about PSP-One or current publications (available for download) please contact:
Private Sector Partnerships-OneAbt Associates Inc.4550 Montgomery Avenue, Suite 800 NorthBethesda, MD 20814 USA
Tel: (301) 913-0500Fax: (301) 913-9061E-mail: [email protected]://www.psp-one.com