beard head v. stat - complaint

Upload: sarah-burstein

Post on 02-Jun-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    1/116

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    2/116

    J U R I SD I C T IO N A N D V E N U E

    4. This Court hasjurisdiction pursuantto 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338over the subject

    matter of this Complaint for Declaratory Judgment as provided by 28 U.S.C. 2201 and

    2 2 0 2 .

    5. Venue properly exists in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391 and

    1400.

    6. This Court has personal jurisdiction over the defendants pursuant to Va. Rev. Stat.

    Ann. 8.01-328.1 and FRCP Rule 4 directing federal distr ict courts to follow the law on

    personal jurisdiction in the state where the federal court is located, because, on information

    and belief, defendants transact business in Virginia and solicit business in this judicial

    district. Furthermore, defendants have alleged in Civil Action 3:13-cv-00762 that Beard

    Head's activities that are conducted within this judicial district constitute patent

    infringement.

    F A C T U A L A L L E G AT I O N S

    7. Since 2007, Beard Head Corporation has been in the business of manufacturing and

    selling quality novelty headwear that combines a knitted winter hat with a knitted beard

    fea ture .

    8. Beard Head's headwear products include beard caps having many variations,

    including close-fitting caps, extended caps covering ears, neck and forehead, caps having

    ornaments such as horns, poms, fringe, tassels, etc., caps having brims, cuffs, edge-rolls,

    cabled and ribbed textured yarns, caps with branding spaces, and caps with various team

    colors. Beard Head's headwear products include bearded caps having many variations of

    beards, including close-fitting cropped beards, medium length beards, long length beards,

    unitary cap and beard products, beards having a separate moustache and beard, and beards

    having ornaments such as tassels, fringe, braiding, textures, etc.9. Beard Head is the first and the largest seller of bearded caps and sells in the United

    Sta tes and a ro un d t he world.

    10. Upon information and belief, Jeffrey Brian Phillips is the named inventor of U.S.

    Design Patent D682186 entitled Combined Ski Face Mask and Hat filed Aug. 9, 2011 as

    application 29/399,030, granted Oct. 22, 2013 (the '186 patent).

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 36 PageID# 2

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    3/116

    11. Upon information and belief, the '186 patent claims the ornamental design for a

    combinedski face maskand hat, as shown and described in Figures 1,2, and 3 of the design

    patent, EXHIBIT A.

    12. Upon information and belief, STAT Inc. of Stratford, Ontario is the listed assignee

    of the ' 186 patent. EXHIBIT B.

    13. On Nov. 13, 2013, STAT dba Beardo and Jeffrey Brian Phillips filed a patent

    infringement lawsuit against plaintiff BEARD HEAD in the Alexandria Division of the

    Eastern District of Virginia, civil action 3:13-cv-00762, removed to the Richmond

    Divis ion . E X H I BI T C.

    14. On Sept. 8, 2014 STAT filed a Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss the patent count 1,

    without prejudice, which was granted by Judge Hudson on Sept. 9, 2014. EXHIBIT D.

    15. BEARD HEAD and STAT remain in litigation against each other and the patent

    claim may be raised against plaintiffs at any time, creating an actual and substantial

    controversy between BEARD HEAD and STAT with respect to the '186 patent.

    16. BEARD HEAD has not infringed and does not infringe any valid claim of the ' 186

    patent.

    17. BEARD HEAD is entitled to a judicial declaration and order that BEARD HEAD

    has not infringed and does not infringe, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents,

    any valid claim of the '186 patent, and that the '186 patent is invalid.

    STAT '186 Invalidi ty due to Sta tu tory Bar 102(d)

    18. STAT/Phillips both filed for, and received, a Canadian Patent to the same invention

    before the U.S. application was ever filed, in violation of 35 U.S.C. 102(d). EXHIBIT E.

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 3 of 36 PageID# 3

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    4/116

    Phillips Design Patent Application Filing& Grant Timeline

    Gra n t D ate

    C a n a d a

    Granted

    1 3 6 1 5 2

    1/27/2011

    Br i ti s h f i l ed

    2/9/2011

    British

    Gran ted

    4 0 1 8 7 8 4

    3/7/2011

    U.S.A. f i led

    8/9/2011

    U.S .A.

    Gran ted

    D692.186

    10/22/2013

    19. Upon information and belief, the '186 patent is statutorily barred by 35 U.S.C.

    102(d), should not have been granted, and is invalid and unenforceable on its face since

    the related Canadian patent issued before the filing of the application leading to ' 186

    patent.

    20. For a patent application to be barred pursuant to the pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(d),

    there are four requirements as explained in the USPTO's Manual of Patent ExaminingProcedure (incorporated herein where referenced) (MPEP) 2135.01:

    1. The foreign application must be filed more than 12 months before the

    effective U.S. filing date (modified to six months by 35 U.S.C. 172).

    2. The foreign applications must be filed by the same applicant.

    3. The foreign patent must be granted before the filing date of the U.S.

    Application.

    4. The same invention must be involved. [Exhibit F].

    21. Referring to 102(d) Requirement 1, STAT's foreign patent, Canada 136152, issued

    from a Canadian application for patent filed morethan six months beforethe filing of the

    application in the U.S.. STAT's Canada filing date of Jul. 2, 2010 is more than 6 months

    before STAT's actual U.S. filing date of Aug. 9, 2011.

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 4 of 36 PageID# 4

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    5/116

    22. Referring to 102(d)Requirement 2, each of the STATapplications for the U.S.

    Patent, and the Canadian Patent disclose the same inventor, Jeffrey Phillips.

    23. Referring to 102(d) Requirement 3, STAT's invention was first patented by the

    applicant in a foreigncountry as Canadian patent 136152prior to the date of the application

    for patent inthe U.S.. STAT's Canada grant date of Jan. 27, 2011 is before STAT's actual

    U.S. filing date of Aug. 9, 2011.

    24. Referring to 102(d)Requirement 4, each of the STAT applications for the U.S.

    Patent, and the Canad ian Patent ar e directed to th e same invention.

    25. 35 U.S.C. 102(d) is a statutory bar, therefore STAT cannot establish an earlier

    date of invention to overcome the effect of Canada 136152 under 102(d). See In re

    Kathawala, 9 F.3d 942, at 946 (Fed. Cir. 1993).

    STAT '186 Unenforceability due to False Statement - Foreign Filing

    26. 18 U.S.C. 1001 states that Whoever, in any mat ter within the jur isdiction of the

    executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States,knowingly

    and willfully (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a

    material fact; (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or

    representation; or (3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to

    contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under

    this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or

    domestic terrorism (as defined in 2331), imprisonednot morethan 8 years, or both. If the

    matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110,or 117,or 1591,then the term

    of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.

    27. Jeffrey Phillips signed an inventor's declaration in support of U.S. design

    application 29/399,030,which application was later grantedas U.S. D692186. [Exhibit G].

    28. The Phillips declaration declares under penalty of 18 U.S.C. 1001 that I do not

    know and do not believe that the same invention was first patented or made the subject of

    an inventor's certificate that issued in any country foreign to the United States of America

    before the filing dateof this United States application if the foreign application was filed

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 5 of 36 PageID# 5

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    6/116

    by me, or by my legal representatives or assigns, more than twelve months (six months in

    the case of design patents) prior to the filing date of this United States application.

    (Emphasis added).

    29. The Phillips declaration further declares that all statements made herein of myown knowledge are true, and that all statements made on information and belief are

    believed to be true; and further that these statements were made with the knowledge that

    willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or

    both, under 1001 of Title 18 o f the United States Code, and that such willful false

    statements may jeopardize the validity of the application or any patent issuing thereon.

    30. A patent is unenforceable if it is shown by clear and convincing evidence that the

    inventor procured the patent by intentional deception of the patent examiner. Therasense,

    Inc. v. Becton Dickenson & Co. 649 F3d 1276 (Fed. Cir. May 25, 2011). Inequitable

    conduct must be material and intentional.

    31. Signing of a false affidavit is evidence of materiality. Rohm & Haas Co. v. Crystal

    Chem. Co., 722 F2d 1556 (Fed. Cir. 1983).

    32. Upon informationand belief, STAT was aware of their own U.S. patent filing Aug.

    9, 2011 and nonetheless attempted to make a false claim to priority to the Canadianapplication filed July 2, 2010 outside the mandatory 6-month window.

    33. A priority claim to an earlier foreign application must satisfy 35 U.S.C. 119 and

    37 C.F.R. 1.55 and 1.63. 35 U.S.C. 119(a) states: An application for patent for an

    invention filed in this country by any person who has . . . previously regularly filed an

    application for a patent for the same invention in a foreign country which affords similar

    privileges in the case of applications filed in the United States or to citizens of the United

    States, or in a WTO member country, shall have the same effect as the same application

    would have if filed in this country on the dateon which the application for patent forthe

    same invention was first filed in such foreign country, if the application in this country is

    filed within twelve months from the earliest dateon which such foreign application was

    filed. For design patents, 35 U.S.C. 172 modifies the twelve month time limit imposed

    by35 U.S.C. 119, limiting such period to six months: The rightof priority provided for

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 6 of 36 PageID# 6

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    7/116

    by subsections (a) through (d) of section 119 of this title and the time specified in section

    102(d) shall be six months in the case of designs [Emphasis added].

    34. U.S. applicants for patent and anyone associated with the application have an

    affirmative duty of candor and good faith, which includes a duty to disclose any and allinformation material to patentability. 37 C.F.R. 1.56.

    35. Applicants have a duty to bring to the attention of the Office any material prior art

    or other information cited or brought to their attention in any related foreign application.

    M P E P 2 0 0 1 .0 6 .

    36. Upon information and belief, STAT did not notify the USPTO or the Examiner that

    the Canadian application had matured Jan. 27, 2011 into a registered Canadian patent136152, even though this was more than 6 months before the U.S. filing date of Aug. 9,

    2011. The file history of the U.S. patent shows that there was not even a single Information

    Disclosure Statement (IDS) filed, which is the mechanism by which the duty owed to the

    USPTO is discharged. [EXHIBIT H].

    37. Upon information and belief, STAT's failure to notify the USPTO of the Canadian

    patent avoided the consequences of the application for patent being denied as statutorily

    barred and rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(d).

    38. Upon information and belief, STAT's failure satisfies the but for materiality

    required by Therasense - the patent would not have been granted but for the inventor's

    deception.

    39. Upon information and belief, STAT's Intent is shown by the affirmative signing of

    the inventor's declaration on Aug. 30, 2013 whereby the inventor promises not to do

    exactly what the inventor did, namely withhold evidence of unpatentability. Intent may beinferred where a patent applicant knew or should have known that withheld information

    would be material o the PTO's consideration of the patent application. Critikon Inc. v.

    Becton Dickenson Vascular Access Inc., 43 U.S.P.Q.2d 1666, 1668 (Fed. Cir. 1997).

    40. A holding of inequitable conduct renders all claims of the patent unenforceable.

    Kingsdown Med. Consultants Ltd v. Hollister, Inc. 863 F2d 867 (Fed. Cir. 1988).

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 7 of 36 PageID# 7

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    8/116

    Inequitable conduct is an equitable defense to patent infringement, and is therefore for the

    court to decide, not the jury. Kingsdown at 876.

    41. Upon information and belief, because of STAT/Phillip's false statement, the patent

    is required to be held as unenforceable.

    STAT '186 Invalidity due to Sta tu tory Bar Admission

    in STAT's Trademark Filing

    42. Upon information and belief, STAT's patent is invalid due to Statutory Bars under

    35 U.S.C. 102.

    43. 35 U.S.C. 102(a), and 102(b) entitled Novelty; Prior Art states that: A person

    shall be entitled to a patent unless(a) the invention was known or used by others in this

    country, or patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country, before

    the invention thereof by the applicant for patent, or (b) the invention was patented or

    described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in

    this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United

    States .

    44. 35 U.S.C. 102, Novelty, defines eight statutory bars to patentability. The eight

    statutory bars can be interpreted as whether the claimed invention was:

    BEFO RE TH E DA I E O F INVENTION

    (1) Known by someone other than the inventor, in the United States, 102(a);

    (2) Used by someone other than the inventor, in the United States, 102(a);

    (3) Patentedby someone other than the inventor, anywhere in the world, 102(a);

    (4) Published by someone other than the inventor, anywhere in the world, 102(a);

    o r wa s

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 8 of 36 PageID# 8

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    9/116

    MORE THANA YEAR BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE FILING DA TE OF U.S.

    APPLICATION

    (5) Patented by the inventor or anyone else, anywhere in the world, 102(b);

    (6) Published by the inventor or anyone else, anywhere in the world, 102(b);

    (7) Used by the inventor or anyone else, in the United States, 102(b); or

    (8) Sold by the inventor or anyone else, in the United States, 102(b).

    45. The Invention was published in STAT's own trademark application and

    constitutes a 102(a) and (b) Statutory Bar against STAT's patent application. In U.S.

    Trademark Application Serial Number 85/392,844, STAT submitted a photographic

    image of a bearded hat as a trademark specimen. The photographic image of a bearded

    hat submitted in STAT's trademark application is the same as or substantially the same as

    th e invention c la imed in D 692 18 6. E XH IB IT I.

    46. STAT filed a Sworn Statement of Use in Commerce to support Stat's Trademark

    Application Serial Number 85/392,844, now Trademark Registration 4,128,503.

    E X H I B I T J.

    47. STATallegeda date of first use in commerce at least as early as Apr. 1,2010 .

    E X H I B I T K.

    48. The use or sale of the invention at least as early as Apr. 1, 2010 is more than a

    year beforethe actual U.S. filing date of Aug. 9, 2011 forthe STAT patent application.

    49. STAT's U.S. Trademark ApplicationSerial Number 85/392,844 was filed by Phillips, Jeffrey B. EXHIBIT L

    50. STAT's U.S. Trademark Application Serial Number 85/392,844 lists Daniel S.

    Ward as the domestic representative. EXHIBIT M.

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 9 of 36 PageID# 9

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    10/116

    51. STAT's Publication, or Use, or Sale, or O ffer for S ale as submitted as evidence in

    STAT's trademark application is an admission that the invention was published before the

    date of invention, or used, sold, or offered for sale morethan a year beforethe U.S. filing

    date of Aug. 9,2011.

    52. Because 35 U.S.C. 102(a) and 35 U.S.C. 102(b) are both statutory bars to

    patentability, STAT cannot establish an earlier date of invention to overcome the effect of

    STAT's Publication, or Use, or Sale, or Offer for Saleunder 102(a)and 102(b).

    STAT '186 Invalidity due to Tara Duff Prior Art Provided by STAT

    53. STAT provided in co-pending civil lawsuit 3:13-cv-00762 a document entitled

    Tara Duffs internet blog dated Dec. 27, 2009 (1 year and 8 months before their U.S.

    filing date), which shows multiple photographic images of bearded hats for sale by third

    party Ms. Tara Duff, and which is in effect an admission and acknowledgement of the

    unpatentability and unenforceability of D692186. STATDiscovery Document 000219 in

    C iv il A c ti o n 3:13-cv-00762. Exhibit N.

    54. The photographic images of bearded hats on Tara Duffs internet blog publicationdated Dec. 27, 2009 are the same as or substantially the same as the invention claimed in

    D 6 9 2 1 8 6 .

    55. Dec. 27, 2009 is morethan a year beforethe filing date of Aug. 9, 2011.

    56. In violation of 35 U.S.C. 102(a) and (b), Tara Duffs Publication, or Use, or Sale,

    or Offer for Sale constitutes invalidating prior art and shows that the invention was

    published before the date of invention, or used, sold, or offered for sale more than a yearbefore the U.S. filing date of Aug. 9, 2011.

    57. Because 35 U.S.C. 102(a) and 35 U.S.C. 102(b) are both statutory bars to

    patentability, STAT cannot establish an earlier date of invention to overcome the effect of

    Tara Duffs Publication, or Use, or Sale, or Offer for Saleunder Section 102(a)and 102(b).

    10

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 10 of 36 PageID# 10

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    11/116

    STAT '186 Unenforceability du e to Fraud & False Statement

    58. A patentis unenforceable if it is shown by clear and convincing evidence that the

    inventor procured the patent by intentional deception of the patent examiner. Therasense,

    Inc. v. Becton Dickenson & Co. 649 F3d 1276 (Fed. Cir. May 25, 2011). Inequitableconduc t must b e material and intentional.

    59. U.S. applicants for patent, and anyone associated with the application, have an

    affirmative duty of candor and good faith, which includes a duty to disclose any and all

    information material to patentability. 37C.F.R. 1.56.

    60. Upon information and belief, STAT, Phillips, and/or Attorney Daniel Ward was

    aware of STAT's own U.S. trademark filing and submitted a Statement of Use admittingto the sale of the invention more than a year before application for patent. EXHIBIT K.

    61. Upon information and belief, STAT and/or Phillips was aware of sales of prior art

    products such as Tara Duff et al. EXHIBIT M, and STAT's own sales in 2009. EXHIBITQ.

    62. Upon information and belief, STAT did not notify the USPTO or the Examiner

    about either the trademark submission, the Tara Duff sales, or STAT's sales. EXHIBIT N.

    63. Upon informationand belief, STAT's failureto notifythe USPTO of the trademarksubmission, the Tara Duff sales, or STAT's own sales, avoided the consequences of the

    application for patent being denied as statutorily barred and rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102.

    64. Upon information and belief, STAT's failure satisfies the but for materiality

    required by Therasense - the patent would not have been granted but for the inventor's

    deception.

    65. Upon information and belief, STAT's Intent is shownby the affirmative signing ofaninventor's declaration on Aug. 30,2013 whereby theinventor promises nottodo exactly

    what the inventordid, namelywithhold evidence of unpatentability. Intent may be inferred

    where a patent applicant knew or should have known that withheld information would be

    material o the PTO's consideration of the patent application. Critikon Inc. v. Becton

    Dickenson Vascular Access Inc., 43 U.S.P.Q.2d 1666, 1668 (Fed. Cir. 1997).

    11

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 11 of 36 PageID# 11

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    12/116

    66. A holding of inequitable conduct renders all claims of the patent unenforceable.

    Kingsdown Med. Consultants Ltd v. Hollister, Inc. 863 F2d 867 (Fed. Cir. 1988.

    67. Upon information and belief, because of STAT/Phillip's fraud on the patent office

    and false statement, the patent is required to be held as unenforceable.

    STAT '186 Invalidity du e to Additional Tara Duff Prior Art from 2010

    as 102(a) an d (b) Sta tu to ry Bar

    68. Tara Duffs internet blog publications dated Jan. 5,2010 (BH 000600), Jan. 7,2010

    (BH 000601), Jan. 15, 2010 (BH 000602), Feb. 5, 2010 (BH 000603), Feb. 22, 2010 (BH000604), and Mar. 15, 2010 (BH 000605), show multiple photographic images of bearded

    hats. Beard Head Discovery Documents BH 000600-000605. EXHIBIT O.

    69. The photographic images of bearded hats on Tara Duffs internet blog publication

    are the same as or substantially the same as the invention claimed in D692,186.

    70. Publication dates for Jan. 5,2010 (BH 000600), Jan. 7, 2010 (BH 000601), Jan. 15,

    2010 (BH 000602), Feb. 5, 2010 (BH 000603), Feb. 22, 2010 (BH 000604), and Mar. 15,

    2010 (BH 000605) are all more than a year before the filing date of Aug. 9, 2011.

    71. Tara Duffs Publication, or Use, or Sale, or Offer for Sale constitutes invalidating

    prior art and shows that the invention was published before the date of invention, or used,

    sold, or offered for sale more than a year before the U.S. filing date of Aug. 9, 2011.

    72. Because 35 U.S.C. 102(a) and 35 U.S.C. 102(b) are both statutory bars to

    patentability, STAT cannot establish an earlier date of invention to overcome the effect of

    TaraDuffs Publication, or Use,or Sale, or Offerfor Saleunder Section 102(a)and 102(b).

    The STAT U.S. Design Patent is Obvious under 35 U.S.C. 103

    12

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 12 of 36 PageID# 12

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    13/116

    73. Regarding patentability of an invention, 35 U.S.C. 103 entitled Obviousness

    states that: A patent may not be obtained through the invention is not identically disclosed

    or described as set forth in Section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject

    matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole

    would have beenobvious at the time the invention was madeto a person havingordinary

    skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shallnot be negatived by

    t he m a nn er in which th e invent ion was made.

    74. To establish primafacie obviousness, all the claim limitations must be taught or

    suggested by the prior art. In determining primafacie obviousness, the proper standard is

    whether the design would have been obvious to a designer of ordinary skill with the

    claimed type of article. /// re Nalbandian, 661 F.2d 1214, 211 USPQ 782 (CCPA 1981)and M P E P 1504.03.

    75. As a whole, a design must be compared with something in existence, and not

    something brought into existence by selecting and combining features from prior art

    references. /// re Jennings, 182 F.2d 207, 86 USPQ 68 (CCPA 1950) and MPEP 1504.03.

    The something in existence referred to in Jennings has been defined as ...a reference...

    the design characteristics of which are basically the same as the claimed design... /// re

    Rosen, 673 F.2d 388, 391, 213 USPQ 347, 350 (CCPA 1982) and MPEP 1504.03. (theprimaryreference did ...not give the same visual impression... as the design claimed but

    had a ...different overall appearance and aesthetic appeal... )

    76. Upon information and belief, STAT's U.S. D692,186 Patent is obvious in view of

    STAT's own Canadian Patent 136152 since STAT's effective U.S. filing date is Aug. 9,

    2011, but STAT's Canadian patent 136152was registered as a patent Jan. 27, 2011 before

    their U.S. filing date.

    77. Upon information and belief, STAT's U.S. D692,l 86 Patent is obvious in view of

    STAT's British patent 4018784, since the British patent was registered as a patent Mar. 7,

    2011 before STAT's U.S. filing date of Aug. 9, 2011. EXHIBIT P.

    13

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 13 of 36 PageID# 13

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    14/116

    Th e STAT U.S. Design Patent is Invalid for Functionality

    78. The design patentstatute restrictsdesign patentsto ornamental designs, and cannot

    includefunctional elementswithin the scope of protection. LA . Gear v.ThomMcAn Shoe

    Co. 988 F.2d 1117 (Fed. Cir 1993) and cases discussed therein.

    79. STAT's design of a detachable beard face maskon a ski hat representsthe sine qua

    non of a functionality problem. It has been shown, per the many pieces of prior art listed

    herein above, that bearded masks were known over a year prior to the effective filingdate

    of Plaintiffs DesignPatent. Since the sole remaining feature is detachability, which is a

    purelyfunctional feature, the designitselfis notentitled to protection undera designpatent.

    BEARD HEAD'S Noninfringement of D692186

    80. Upon information and belief, BEARD HEAD products do not infringe any valid

    claim o f D692186.

    81. Upon information and belief, STAT U.S. Design D692186 Figures 1,2 and3 require

    the following design features:

    C A P B E A R D M A S K

    CI: Close fitting style Ml: Short, croppedC2: Shape covers ears, partial forehead, M2: Unitary piece, e.g. no attachedpartial nape mustache, etc.C3: No ornaments, e.g. horns, poms, fringe, M3: Attached to Cap, outside of mask totassels, etc. inside of capC4: No brim and no cuffor edge roll M4: Unobstructed mouth apertureC5: No texture, e.g. cables, ribbing M5: No ornaments, e.g. fringe, tassels, etc.C6: No banner-space on forehead M6: Mustache double-peak designC7: No color banding/stripes

    82. Upon information and belief, BEARD HEAD'S products, when compared to the

    '186 Figures 1, 2, and 3, have the following non-infringing features, according to the

    following Tables and accompanying legend of distinguishing features:

    1 4

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 14 of 36 PageID# 14

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    15/116

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    16/116

    B E A R D Non-infringement Chart list U.S. Design B E A R D H E A D - 7 6H E A D of Features missing; reason D692,186 DESIGNSassert ion re

    infringementfor non-infringement

    BH-001

    Denied

    C3

    C5

    C 7

    M 2

    I . ( W ^ m a x . W* * 1

    -. > V l |

    #61 _ _

    B H - 0 0 2 M l

    Denied M 4 - gGr

    M 5 l *M 6

    4j

    *B H-003

    De n ie d

    C 4

    C 7

    M l C aM 4 1 0M 5 wM 6

    4 tH - 0 0 4 M lDe nie d M 5 ^

    M 6

    1 6

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 16 of 36 PageID# 16

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    17/116

    B E A R D Non-infringement Chart list U.S. Design B E A R D H E A D - 76H E A D of Features missing; reason D692,186 D E S I G N Sasser t ion re for non-infringementinfringement

    BH -0 0 5 C5

    D en ied C 7

    M 2

    M 6

    &iH - 0 0 6 M l

    Denied M 4 ^M 5 fcM 6

    mV; * :

    KMH - 0 0 7 C 3

    Denied C 4

    C6 , C7 J i tM l MM 4 GLM 5

    v mM 6

    WO

    B H - 0 0 8

    Denied

    C 5

    C7

    M l . -

    \ I 1

    M 5

    M 6

    i 11

    17

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 17 of 36 PageID# 17

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    18/116

    B E A R D Non-infringement Chart list U.S. Design B E A R D H E A D - 7 6H E A D of Features missing; reason D692,186 D E S I G N Sa s se r ti o n r e for non-infringementinfringement

    B H - 0 0 9 C I &Denied C 2 a

    C4 , - j . ^ - - - . - . m u kC7 la PM l

    M 2

    M 4 B H - 0 1 0 C6

    Denied M l

    M 4

    M 5 i

    . .

    BH-0 11 C2

    Denied C3 * '

    C4

    C6, C7 J kM l A imM 4

    4 i rM 5

    H - 0 1 2 C 7

    D en ied M l

    M 2. . -

    M 4

    k

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 18 of 36 PageID# 18

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    19/116

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    20/116

    B E A R D

    H E A D

    a s se r ti o n r e

    infringement

    BH -0 1 7

    Denied

    B11-018

    Denied

    B H - 0 1 9

    Denied

    B H - 0 2 0

    Denied

    Non-infringement Chart listof Features missing; reasonfor non-infringement

    C7

    M l

    M 2

    M 4

    C4

    M 2 - mu s tach e

    M 6

    C 6

    M l

    M 4

    M 5

    C 7

    M l

    M 4

    M 5

    M 6

    U.S. DesignD692.186

    ^.^ .-^^.-r. - .

    2 0

    B E A R D H E A D - 7 6

    D E S I G N S

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 20 of 36 PageID# 20

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    21/116

    B E A R D

    H E A D

    asser t ion re

    infringement

    BH-0 2 1

    Denied

    B H - 0 2 2

    Denied

    B H - 0 2 3

    Denied

    B H - 0 2 4

    Denied

    Non-infringement Chart listof Features missing; reasonfor non-infringement

    C 7

    M l

    M 2

    M 4

    M 6

    C I

    C2

    C4

    C 7

    M 6

    C6

    M l

    M 4

    M 5

    C 7

    M l

    M 4

    M 5

    M 6

    U.S. DesignD692.186

    Ml ~t fc*

    . .

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    22/116

    B E A R D

    H E A D

    a s s e r t ion re

    infringement

    B H - 0 2 5

    Denied

    B H - 0 2 6

    De nie d

    B I I - 0 2 7

    De nie d

    BH -0 2 8

    De nie d

    Non-infringement Chart listof Features missing; reasonfor non-infringement

    C 7

    M l

    M 2

    M 4

    C6

    C7M 5 - t ex tu r e

    M 6

    C I

    C2

    C3

    C4, C7

    M l

    M 4

    M 5

    C 7

    M l

    M 4

    M 5

    M 6

    U.S. DesignD692.186

    l - n v W n w - -

    ? ?

    B

    B E A R D H E A D - 7 6

    D E S I G N S

    - - - - -. :

    :

    : ? : - *

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 22 of 36 PageID# 22

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    23/116

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    24/116

    B E A R D Non-infringement Chart list U.S. Design B E A R D H E A D - 7 6H E A D of Features missing; reason D692,186 D E S I G N Sa s s e r t ion re for non-infringementinfringement

    B H - 0 3 3 C 7 fDenied M l ^ i

    M 4

    M 5makl/mtmtfmm y

    M 6- .: : i

    . .. . . ^ _

    BH -0 3 4 C 7

    Denied M l i-;

    ^M 2 B |M ^M 4 y

    ^ p

    B H - 0 3 5 M l

    Denied M 2

    M 4

    IH IBH -0 3 6De nie d C 7M 5 - tex tureM 6

    2 4

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 24 of 36 PageID# 24

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    25/116

    B E A R D Non-infringement Chart list U.S. Design B E A R D H E A D - 7 6H E A D of Features missing; reason D 6 9 2 J 8 6 D E S I G N Sa s se r ti o n r e for non-infringementinfringement

    B H - 0 3 7 C7 ^

    Denied M l m kM 2

    M 4

    m M m

    M1i

    as

    . -

    BH -0 3 8 C7

    Denied M l j ^ ^M 4 a ^ ^M 5 Mv.rfM 6 ^1$

    -kilace mask and hat in det ached pos it ion, showing my newdesign;I 'Ki. 2 isa lell side perspective view ol a combined ski laceinu k and hat ina used portion, and.FKi. h a front perspective view thereofInthedrawings, the broken lines in FIG.2 of a human headlomi no part o f theclaimed design. 1he broken lines shown in1-UiS 1 and 3 represent thread stitching.All surfaces not shown form no pari of the claimed design.

    1 Claim* 3 Drawing Shvvfc

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-4 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 5 PageID# 41

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    42/116

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    43/116

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    44/116

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    45/116

    E X H I B I T B

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-5 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 45

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    46/116

    ( . J . VJ ^ I W. g , < -> V/ O J J i 0 .

    EXHIBIT B

    U n i t e d S t a te s P a te n t a n d T r a d e m a r K u r t i c e

    Home | Si te Index | Search | Guides | Contacts | eBusiness | eBiz alerts | News | Help

    Assignments on th e We b > P a t e n t Q u e r y

    P a t e n t A s s ig n m e n t A b s tr a ct o f Tit leNQTE:Resul ts d is p la y o n ly fo r i ss u e d p a te n ts a n d p u b l i s h e d app l i ca t ions . For p en di ng o r

    a b a n d o n e d app l ica t ions p l e a s e c o n s u l t USPTO staff .

    ^ ^ / ^

    To ta l Ass i g n men t s : 2Patent S : D 6 9 2 1 8 6

    I n v e n t o r : leifery Brian Phillips

    Ti t l e : COMBINED s i a FACE MASK AN D HAT

    A s s i g n m e n t : 1R e e l / F r a m e : 031123/0240 R e c o r d e d : 09/03/2313

    Co n v e y a n c e : ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS).

    A s s i g n o r : PHILLIPS. JEFFERY BRIAN

    Assignee: BEARDO INC.13 9 MCIIAB S T R E E T

    STRATFORD, ONTARIO, CANADA MSA 1Z 5C o r r e s p o n d e n t : FANELLIHAAG6 KILGERPLLC

    1 3 0 9 K S T R EE T, N . W., SUITE 1120

    WASHINGTON, DC 20006

    As s ignme n t : 2R e e l / F r a m e : 031998/0216 R e c o r d e d : 11/12/2313

    Issue D t: 1 0 / 2 2 / 2 0 1 3 Application * : 29399030 Fil ing Dt : 0H/O9/2011

    P a g e s : 3

    E x e c D t: 0 8 / 3 0 / 2 0 1 3

    P a g e s : G

    CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED 0 \ REEL 031128 FRAME 3243. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBVCo n v e y a n c e : CONFIRMS THE NAMEANDADDRESS OF THE ASSIGNEE SHOULDBE STAT LTD. DBA BEARDO, P.M.B. 2, CARIBBEAN PLACE PROVIDENOALES

    TURKS & CAICOS .

    A ss i g n o r : PHILLIPS. JEFFREY BRIAN

    A ss i g n e e : STAT LTD. DBA BEARDO

    P.M.B. 2, CARIBBEAN PLACE

    PROVIDENCIALES, TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS

    C o r r e s p o n d e n t : FANELU HAAG& KILGER PLLC

    1909 K S TR EE T, NW

    SUITE 1120

    WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 20006

    E x e c D t: 1 1/ 09 /2 01 3

    S e a r c h R e s u l t s OS of 11(14 3 0 1 4tfyou ha w any comm e n s or questions concerning the data dJtpfayvtf,

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    47/116

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    48/116

    EXHIBIT C

    Case l:13-cv-01404-TSE-TCB Document 1 Filed 11/13/13 Page 1 of 21 PagelD# 1

    U N I T E D S T AT E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T

    F O R T H E E A S T E R N D I S TR I C T O F V I R G I N I A

    A L E X A N D R I A D I V I S I O N

    S T AT LT D . d b a B E A R D OP.M.B. 2, Caribbean PlaceProvideociales, Turks Caicos Is lands

    P l a i n t i f f

    HL E D

    anion3 pu:35Ci??MSrai3T3'CTCOURALEXAHCaiA.VIRGINIA

    V . CaseNo. I ' l t f -ClHW

    BEARD H E AD , I NC .880 Apol lo Stree t , Suite 140EI Segundo, CA 90245

    B E A R D E D A P PA R E L L L C816 S. Bundy Avenue, No. 11Los Angeles, C 90049

    D AV I D S T A N K U N A S

    816 S. Bundy Drive, Suite 11Lo s Angeles, CA 90049

    NEON EATERS, LLC16 5 No r t h 1330 We s t Sui te A 7

    O re m, U T 84057

    D e f e n d a n t s .

    C O M P L A I N T

    Plaintiffslates the following for its Complaintagainst defendants BEARD HEAD, INC.,

    BEARDED APPAREL LLC, DAVID STANKUNAS, and NEON EATERS (collectively

    Defendants ):

    N A T U R E O F T H E A C TI O N

    1. This is an action for injunctive relief and damages arising from Defendants'design patent infringement, tradedress infringement,and unfair competition in violation of the

    laws of the United States and the lawsof the Commonwealthof Virginia.

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-6 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 48

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    49/116

    E X H I B I T D

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-7 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 49

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    50/116

    Case 3:13-cv-00762-HEH Document 55 Filed 09/10/14 Page 1 of 3 PagelD# 574

    EXHIBIT D

    IN T H E U N IT E D S TAT E S D IS T RI CT C O U RTF O R T H E E A ST ER N D IS TR IC T O F V I R G I N I A

    R i c h m o n d Divis ion

    STAT LTD.,

    Plaintiff,

    v .

    BEARD HEAD, INC., e t a i ,

    Defendants .

    M E M O R A N D U M O R D E R

    (Granting Plaintiffs Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss)

    THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff STAT, Ltd.'s ( Plaintiff ) Motion

    to Voluntarily Dismiss (ECF No. 49), filed on September 8, 2014, whereby Plaintiff

    moves to voluntarily dismiss Count One of Plaintiffs Complaint against all defendants,

    pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ( Rule 41(a)(2) ). In

    light of Defendant's pending motion for summaryjudgment, the Court will consider the

    potentialprejudice of granting the Plaintiff's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal pursuant to

    Rule 41(a)(2). For the reasons set forth herein, the Motion is GRANTED.

    Rule 41(a)(2) provides that once theopposing party has filed a summary judgment

    motion, an action may be dismissed at the plaintiffs request only by court order, on

    termsthat the courtconsidersproper. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Rule 41(a)(2)

    empowers] district courts to exercise discretion over voluntary dismissals. Go

    Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., 508 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2007). The purpose of

    Rule 41(a)(2) is to freely allow voluntary dismissals unless the parties will be unfairly

    Civil Action No. 3 : I 3 C V 7 6 2 - H E H

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-7 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 4 PageID# 50

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    51/116

    Case 3:13-cv-00762-HEH Document 55 Filed 09/10/14 Page 2 of 3 PagelD# 57 5

    prejudiced. Davis v. USXCorp., 819 F.2d 1270, 1273 (4th Cir. 1987). A district court

    should grant a Rule 41(a)(2) motion absent plain legal prejudice to the defendant.

    Bridge Oil, Ltd. V Green Pacific A/S, 321 F. App'x 244,245 (4th Cir. 2008).

    The Fourth Circuit has identified four general factors this Court will consider in

    assessing prejudice: (1) the opposing party's effort and expense in preparing for trial; (2)

    excessive delay or lack of diligence on the part of the movant; (3) insufficient explanation

    o f the need fora dismissal; and (4) the present stage o f the litigation, i.e., whether a

    motion for summary judgment is pending. Gross v. Spies, 133 F.3d 914, 1998 WL

    8006, at *5 (4th Cir. 1998) (unpublished table decision). But the pendency of a summary

    judgment motion or the prospect of subsequent litigation does not constitute plain legal

    prejudice of the sortto defeat a Rule 41(a)(2) motion. Bridge Oil, 321 F. App'x at 245.

    Considering these factors, granting Plaintiffs motionwill not unfairly prejudice

    the Defendant. Proceedings in the case have been stayed to facilitate settlement

    discussions (ECF No. 48). When negotiations proved futile, Plaintiff punctually filed its

    motion to voluntarily dismiss Count One of the Complaint and has presented a reasonable

    explanation as to the need for dismissal. Specifically, Plaintiffexplains that dismissal will

    streamline this litigation and will not harm the remaining trademark infringement or

    cybersquatting claims of the Defendant (ECF No. 50). By Order (ECF No. 41) the Court

    stayed all proceedings, discovery, and deadlines pursuant to the parties' Joint Motion

    (ECF No. 40).

    While the Court has now partially lifted the stay (ECF No. 46) to allow the

    Defendants to file a motion for summary judgment, such a limited advance of this case

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-7 Filed 11/14/14 Page 3 of 4 PageID# 51

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    52/116

    Case 3:13-cv-00762-HEH Document 55 Filed 09/10/14 Page 3 of 3 PagelD# 576

    does not constitute the plain legal prejudice envisioned by the Fourth Circuit when

    balanced against the opposing party's effort and expense in preparing for trial.

    Moreover, as the Fourth Circuit has explained, merely filing a motion for summary

    judgment is not enough to establish unfair prejudice. Most importantly, this Court by

    Order (ECF No. 43) granted Defendant's motion to voluntarily dismiss its Antitrust

    counterclaim against Plaintiffafter Plaintiff fully briefed its 12(b)(6) motion (ECF No.

    15).There is simply no basis for finding that Defendant will be unfairly prejudiced by

    granting the Plaintiffs motion to voluntarily dismiss its patent infringement claim.Accordingly, Count One of Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT

    PREJUDICE; Defendant's motion for summary judgment is denied as MOOT regarding

    only Count One of Plaintiffs Complaint. Any other claims discussed therein shall be

    developed and fully briefed in accordance with the Order (ECF No. 53) of this Court.

    The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Memorandum Order to all counselo f record.

    It is so O R D E R E D .

    Datei;^7>ff 10MRichmond, Virginia

    M / s /Henry E. HudsonUnited States District Judge

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-7 Filed 11/14/14 Page 4 of 4 PageID# 52

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    53/116

    E X H I B I T E

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-8 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 53

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    54/116

    BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT E CanadianPatent-IDI36152-eng(2).pdf

    D e t a i l s

    Third-Party Information Liability Disclaimer

    Some of the information on diis We b pageliasbeen provided by exicrnal sources. The Government of Canadais not responsible for the accuracy,reliabilityor currency of the information supplied by external sources.Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the sourceof the information.Content providedby external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibilityrequirements.

    Regist ra t ion n u m b e r : 136152

    Date of Registration:2011-01-27

    S t a t u s :

    Registered

    T it le : C O M BI N ED S K I FA C F M A S K A N D H A T

    C a n a d i a n Classif ication :

    006-04-01-Hats & A ccesso r ie s

    0 0 6 - 0 4 - 0 3 - Mask s & A c c e s s o r i e s

    O t h e r C la s s e s S e a r c h e d :

    N /A

    Description:The design consists of the features of confirmation and shape of the combined ski facemask and hat Thestippledlinesshownin figure 3 represent stitching and forms part of thedesign.The stippledlinesshowninfigure 2 illustrate environmentonly and form no part of theclaimed design. Figure 1isa view from analternate detached perspective; Figure 2 is a left side perspectiveview of the design; Figure 3 i s a frontperspective view of the design.

    I n t e r e s t e d P a r t i e s

    Applicants) as Filed:JE F F P H I LLI P S

    Registered Prnprietnris)l E F F P i n L L I P S

    I 3 9 M C N A B S T R E F T

    S T R AT FO R D , N 5 A 1 Z5

    O N TA R I O . C A N A D A

    Details

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-8 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 4 PageID# 54

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    55/116

    BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT E CanadianPatent-IDI 36152-eng(2).pdf

    C u r r e n t O w n e r t s ) :

    JEFF P H I LI . IPS

    139 M C N AB S T RE E T

    STRATFORD. N5 A I Z5

    ONTARIO, C A N A D A

    Term nf Protection: 10years, subject to payment of a maintenance fee.

    M a i n t e n a n c e F ee Pa id :

    N o

    F i l in g D a t e :

    2 0 1 0 - 0 7 - 0 2

    C n r r e c t i n n t s l :

    N o

    Third-Party Information Liability Disclaimer

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-8 Filed 11/14/14 Page 3 of 4 PageID# 55

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    56/116

    BEARD HEAD EXEHBiBIt002-CanadianPatent-ID136152-eng(2).pdf

    F I G 1

    FIG 2

    FI G 3

    Third-Party Information Liability Disclaimer

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-8 Filed 11/14/14 Page 4 of 4 PageID# 56

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    57/116

    E X H I B I T F

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-9 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 57

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    58/116

    BEARD H EA D E XH IB IT F MPEP2135-01-102d.pdf

    PATENTABILITY 2135 .01

    IV. D IS C L O S U R E W I T H O U T C L A IM IN G IN

    A P R IO R I S SU E D PAT E NT

    A ny i nf er en ce o f abandonment (i.e. . intern to

    dedicate to the public) of subject matter disclosedlull not claime d in a previously issued paieni is

    rebuttable by an applicationriled at any lime beforea Statutory burarises. Accordingly, a rejectionof aclaim of a patent application under p i v - \ l \.15 I' .S.C. 1021c] predicated solely on ihc issuanceof a patentwhichdiscloses thesubject mailerof theclaim m the application without claiming it wouldbe improper, regardless of whether there iscopcndcncy between the applicationat issue and theapplicationwhich issuedas the patent. Iii i< Gibla.43 7 F 2d -186. 168 U SPQ 5 7 8 (CCPA l711.

    V. ONLY W H E N T H E R E IS A PRI O RI T Y

    C O N T E S T ( A N A L A P S E O F T I M E BA R A

    PATENT

    The mere lapse of tune will not bar a patent. Theonly e xc eption is w he n there is a pnoiiiy contestunder prc-AIA 35 l .S.rr tlic hlingul Ihc application in Ihc United Stales.

    GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OF 35 L'.S.C.102(d )

    I'rc-AIA 35 I .S.('._ J 02 Id) establishes fourconditions which, if all are present, establish a baragainst the grainingol a patent inthis country :

    lAi The foreign application must be filed morethan 12months before the effective U.S. filing dale(See MPEP 5 706.02 regarding effective U.S. lilingdale of an application):

    III) The f or ei gn a ppl ic at io n musl have beenHied by the same applicant as in the United Statesor by his or her legal representativesor assigns,

    (C) The foreign patent or inventor's certificatemust be actually granted (e.g.. by sealing of thepapers in Great Britain) before the U.S. lilingdale.Ilneed nol be published

    (O i T he same invention must be involved.

    Il such a foreign patent 01 inventor' s cer ti fica te isdiscovered hy the examiner, the rejection is madeunder pre- \l \ 35 I'.S.C. HI2idi on the ground ofstatutory bar. See MPF.P S 2133.01 lor furtherclarification of each of the four requirements ofpri-AI \ 35 I'.S.C. 102(d).

    2135.01 The Font Requirements of Pre-AIA35U.S.C. 102(d) |R-11.2013]

    (Editor Note: This MPEP section is nutapplicableto applications subject to examination underthefirstinventorto file (FITF) provisions of the A Aas sclforth m 35 U S . C . 10 0 (note) . S ee MPF.P 2 1 5 9 el

    set/ lo determinewhetheran application is subjccilo examination under the FITF provisions, ami\II'll[

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    59/116

    E X H I B I T G

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-10 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 59

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    60/116

    BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT G -29399030-lnventorsDeclaration.pdf

    D E C L A R AT I O N

    As a belownamed inventor, IAVF. HEREBYDECLARE:

    THAT my/our residences), pest office address{cs),and citizenship(s) are as stated belownext to my/our namc(s);

    THAT I/WE believe I/'we ant/are the original, first, and sole inventor (i f only oneinventor is named below) or an original, first, and joint inventor (i f plural inventors are namedbelowor in an attached Declaration) of thesubjectmatterwhichis claimedand for which apatent is sought on the invention entitled

    C O M B I N E D S KI F AC E M A SK A N D H A T

    (AttorneyDocket No. 0I47-0002DES)

    the specification of which (check one)

    is attached hereto.

    _X was filed on Augustft.2011 as United States Application Number29/3ft9,0?0.

    T H AT l /W E do not know an d do not believe that th e same invention wa s ever known orused byothers in the United States of America, or was patented or described in any printedpublication in any country, before I (we) invented it;

    THAT 1AVE do not know and do not believe that the same invention was patented ordescribed inany printed publication in any country, or in public use or on sale in the UnitedStates of America, for morethan one yearpriorto the filingdate ol this United Statesapplication;

    THAT I/WE do not know and do not bel ieve that the same invention was first patented or

    made the subject of an inventor's certificate that issued in any country foreign to the UnitedStates of America before the filing date of this United States application if the foreignapplication was filed by me (us), or by my (our) legal representatives or assigns, more thantwelve months (six months for design patents) prior to the filing date of this United Statesapplication:

    T H AT l /W E have r evi ewed an d u nd e rs tan d t h e contents o f the above-ident if i ed

    specification, inducing the claim(s),as amendedby any amendment specificallyreferred toabove;

    THATl/WE believe thatthe above-identified specificationcontains a writtendescriptionof the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it. in such full , clear,concise,and exact terms as to enableany person skilled inthe art to which it pertains,or with

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-10 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 4 PageID# 60

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    61/116

    BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT G -29399030-lnventorsDeclaration.pdf

    0147-0002OES

    which itis most nearly connected, to make and use the invention, and sets forth thebest modecontemplated by ine ot carryingout the invention;and

    THAT l/WE acknowledge, the duty to disclose tothe U.S. Patent andTrademark Officeall information knownto me tobe material to patentabilityas defined inTitle37, Code ofFederalRegulations, 1.56.

    LAVEHEREBY CLAIM foreign priority benefits underTitle35, United States Code119(a)-(d) or 365(b) of any foreign application ) forpatentor inventor's certificate,or365(a)of any PCT international applicationwhich designated at least one country other than theUnitedStates of America,listedbelowand haveaiso identifiedbelow any foreign applicationforpatent or inventor's certificateorof any PCT international application having a filing date beforethatof theapplication on whichpriority is claimed.

    Prior ForeignApplication Number Country ForeignFiling Date

    PriorityClaimed?

    Cert i f ied

    Copy

    Attached?

    l/WE HEREBY CLAIM the benefit underTitle 35, United States Code i 19(e) of anyUnited Statesprovisional applications) listed below.

    U.S. Provisional ApplicationNumber Piling Date

    I'WE HEREBYCLAIM the benefit underTitle 35, United States Code, 120of anyUnitedStates application(s),or S 365(c) of any PCTinternationalapplicationdesignatingtheUnitedStatesof America, listedbelowand, insofar as the subjectmatterof eachof theclaimsofthis application isnot disclosed inthe prior United States or PCI' International applicationinthemanner providedby the firstparagraph of Title35, United States Code, 112,1acknowledge thedutyto discloseinformation whichis material topatentability as definedin Title37, CodeofFederal Regulations, 1.56which became available between (he filingdate of the priorapplication and the national or PCT international filing date of this application.

    U.S . Parent

    Application NumberP CT Parent

    ApplicationNumberParent

    Filing DateParent

    Patent Number

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-10 Filed 11/14/14 Page 3 of 4 PageID# 61

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    62/116

    BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT G 29399030-lnventorsDeclaration.pdf

    0 U 7 -0 0 0 2 D E S

    l/WE FURTHER DECLARE THAT all statements made herein of my own knowledgeare true,andthat all statements madeon information and beliefare believed to be true; andfurther that these statements were made with theknowledge that willful false statements andthe

    like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment,or both, under Section )001 of Title 18 oftheUnited StatesCode, and that such willful falsestatementsmayjeopardize thevalidit)applicationor any patent issuing thereon.

    Name of f irst /sole inventor Jeffery Brian PHILLIPS

    Residence

    Citizenship

    Post Off ice Address

    Inventor's signature

    Date

    4B22-l6SS-M93,v. I

    Canada

    Ca n a d a

    13 9 M c N a b S t re e tStratford. Ontario. Canada N5A IZ 5

    -7 z r

    Aug 302013

    ^ 2 =

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-10 Filed 11/14/14 Page 4 of 4 PageID# 62

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    63/116

    E X H I B I T H

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-11 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 3 PageID# 63

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    64/116

    EXHIBIT Hk f j . / / f js j t l u i . u j p t w . g w * / yt J

    29/399,030 COMBINED SKI FACE MASK AN D HAT 0147-0002DES 11-14-2014::09:18:54

    This application is officially maintained in electronic form. To View: Click the desiredDocument Description. To Download and Print: Check the desired document(s) and click StartDownload.Available D o c u m e n t s. . . . .. D o c u m e n tMail Room Date rode1 0 - 0 2 - 2 0 1 3 I S S U E . N T F

    0 9 -0 4 -2 0 1 3 IFEE

    0 9 - 0 4 - 2 0 1 3 W F E E

    0 9 - 0 4 - 2 0 1 3 N 4 1 7

    0 9 - 0 3 - 2 0 1 3 OATH

    0 9 - 0 3 - 2 0 1 3 N 4 1 7

    0 7 - 3 1 - 2 0 1 3 T R A N . L E T

    0 7 - 3 1 - 2 0 1 3 D R W

    0 7 -3 1 -2 0 1 3 N 4 1 7

    0 7 -3 1 -2 0 1 3 S C O R E

    0 7 - 1 8 - 2 0 1 3 N O A

    0 7 - 1 8 - 2 0 1 3 S R F W

    0 7 -1 8 -2 0 1 3 BIB

    0 7 - 1 8 - 2 0 1 3 S R N T

    0 7 -1 8 -2 0 1 3 IIFW

    0 7 -0 1 -2 0 1 3 N 5 7 0

    0 6 - 2 5 - 2 0 1 3 A.QU

    0 6 - 2 5 - 2 0 1 3 S P E C

    0 6 - 2 5 - 2 0 1 3 REM

    0 6 -2 5 -2 0 1 3 N D RW

    0 6 -2 5 -2 0 1 3 D RW. N O N B W

    0 6 -2 5 -2 0 1 3 W F E E

    0 6 -2 5 -2 0 1 3 N 4 1 7

    0 6 - 2 5 - 2 0 1 3 T R A N . L E T

    0 6 -2 5 -2 0 1 3 X T/

    0 6 -2 5 -2 0 1 3 S C O R E

    0 6 -2 1 -2 0 1 3 PA..

    0 6 - 2 1 - 2 0 1 3 N 4 1 7

    0 4 -11 -2 0 1 3 S P E C

    0 4 - 11 - 2 0 1 3 D RW

    04-11-2013 S C O R E

    0 3 -2 5 -2 0 1 3 C T E Q

    03-25-2013 ANE. I

    0 6 -2 8 -2 0 1 2 S P E C

    0 6 -2 8 -2 0 1 2 D R W

    0 6 - 2 0 - 2 0 1 2 A . N E

    0 6 -2 0 -2 0 1 2 D R W

    D o c u m e n t Descript ion

    I s s u e N o t i f i c a t i o n

    Issue Fe e Payment (PTO-85B)

    Fe e Worksheet (SB06)

    EFS Acknowledgment Receipt

    O a t h o r D e c l a r a t i o n f i led

    EFS Acknowledgment Receipt

    T r a ns m i tt a l L e t te r

    Drawings-only black and white line drawings

    EFS Acknowledgment ReceiptPlaceholder shee t indicating presence ofsupplemental content in SCORENotice of Allowance an d Fees Du e (PTOL-85)Search information including classification,d a t a b a s e s a n d o t h e r s e ar c h r e l a t ed n o t e s

    Bibliographic Data Shee t

    Examiner's sea rch s t ra tegy a nd r es ul ts

    Issue Information including classification,examiner, name, claim, r enumber ing , e t c.

    Communication - Re: Power of Attorney(PTOL-308)Response after Ex Parte Q uayle ActionSpecification

    Applicant Arguments/Remarks Made in anA m e n d m e n t

    New or Additional DrawingsDrawings-other than black a nd w hi te linedrawings

    Fe e Worksheet (SB06)

    EFS Acknowledgment ReceiptT r a ns m i tt a l L e t te r

    E x te n si o n o f Tim e

    Placeholder sheet indicating presence ofsupplementa l content in SCOREPower of Attorney

    EFS Acknowledgment ReceiptSpecification

    Drawings-only black an d white line drawingsPlaceholder sheet indicating presence ofsupp lemen ta l con ten t in SCOREEx Parte Quayle ActionAmendment After Final or under 37CFR 1.312,initialed by the examiner.Specification

    Drawings-only black and white line drawingsResponse After Final Action

    Drawings-only black and white line drawings

    D o c u m e n t C a t e g o r y P a ge C o un t

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    PROSECUTI ON 2

    P R O S E C U T IO N 2

    P R O S E C U T IO N 2

    P R O S E C U T IO N 3

    P R O S E C U T IO N 2

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    P R O S E C U T IO N 3

    P R O S E C U T IO N 2

    P R O S E C U T IO N 1

    P R O S E C U T I O N 11

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    P R O S E C U T I O N 4

    P R O S E C U T I O N 3

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    P R O S E C U T I O N 2

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    PROSECUTI ON 3

    PROSECUTI ON 2

    P R O S E C U T IO N 3

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    PROSECUTI ON 2

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    P R O S E C U T I O N 3

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    P R O S E C U T I O N 7

    PROSECUTI ON 1

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    P R O S E C U T I O N 4

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    P R O S E C U T I O N 4

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-11 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 3 PageID# 64

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    65/116

    0 4 - 11 - 2 0 1 2 C T F R

    01-25-2012 SA. .

    01-25-2012 S P E C

    0 1 - 2 5 - 2 0 1 2 D R W

    0 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 2 C A D

    0 1 - 1 2 - 2 0 1 2 T R A N . L E T

    01-12-2012 A.. .

    0 1 - 1 2 - 2 0 1 2 S P E C

    01-12-2012 D R W

    11 -0 9 -2 0 11 C T N F

    11-09-2011 8 9 2

    11-09-2011 S R F W

    11-09-2011 S R N T

    08-12 -201 1 A PP .FIL E .R E C

    0 8 - 1 2 - 2 0 11 W F E E

    08-09 -2011 P E T S P R E . A C X

    08-09 -2011 W F E E08-09-2011 N 4 1 7

    08-09 -2011 D R W

    08-09 -2011 F R P R

    0 8 - 0 9 - 2 0 11 F R P R

    08-09 -2011 S P E C

    08-09 -2011 OATH

    0 8 - 0 9 - 2 0 11 S C O R E

    C l o s e W i n d o w

    Final Reject ion

    S u pp l em e nt al R es po ns e o r S u pp le m en ta lA m e n d m e n t

    Specif icat ion

    Drawings-only black an d white line drawings

    C ha nge of Address

    T r a n s m i t t a l L e t t e r

    Ame ndme n t /R e q . Reconsideration-After

    Non-Final RejectSpecification

    Drawings-only black an d white line drawings

    Non-Final Rejection

    List of references c it ed b y examinerSearch information including classification,d a t a b a s e s a n d o t h e r s e a r c h r e l a t e d n o t e s

    Examiner 's s e a rc h s trategy and resul ts

    Filing Receipt

    Fe e Worksheet (SB06)

    P e t i t i o n f o r 1 2 - m o n t h A c c e l e r a t e d E x a m

    Fee Worksheet (SB06)EFS Acknowledgment Receipt

    Drawings-only black an d white line drawings

    Cer ti fi ed Cop y of Foreign Priority Application

    Certified Copy of Foreign Priority ApplicationSpecification

    O a t h o r D e c l a r a t i o n f i led

    Placeholder sheet indicating presence ofs u p pl e m en t al c o n te n t in SCORE

    \ jj\jk \j q\j / \ - -> i '

    P R O S E C U T I O N 9

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    P R O S E C U T I O N 3

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    P R O S E C U T I O N 3

    P R O S E C U T I O N 8

    P R I O R A RT 3

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    P R O S E C U T I O N 4

    P R O S E C U T I O N 3

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    P R O S E C U T I O N 4

    P R O S E C U T I O N 2P R O S E C U T I O N 3

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    P R O S E C U T I O N 5

    P R O S E C U T I O N 7

    P R O S E C U T I O N 1

    P R O S E C U T I O N 4

    P R O S E C U T I O N

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-11 Filed 11/14/14 Page 3 of 3 PageID# 65

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    66/116

    E X H I B I T I

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-12 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 66

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    67/116

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    68/116

    E X H I B I T J

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-13 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 68

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    69/116

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    70/116

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    71/116

    BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT J Beardo allege tm use stmt.pdf

    M A R K : B E A R D O

    Usage: Winter clothing, mainly headwcar

    Attached, pleasefindthe applied-formaikin actual '' QJ _J y 2. o 4 4use in commerce on the goods, as requested.

    Declaration: Th e substitute specimen was in use incommerceai least as early as the filing date of theapplication.

    Signed: jeffPhillipsd a te : D ec IS 2 0 11

    C O R R E S P O N D E N T A D D R ES S :

    PHI LIPS. JEFFERY B;

    1 3 9 M CN A BST

    STRATFORD

    N5AIZ5

    C A N A D A

    Applicant Name: Jeffery B PhillipsCompany: Beardo

    FORM F I L E N A M E S )

    F o r m Fi le I

    F o r m Fi le2

    SIGNATURE(S)Declaration SignatureThe undersigned, being hereby warned thai willful false statements and die like so made are punishable Infine or imprisonment,or both, under 18 L.S.C. Section 1001. andthatsuch willful false .statementsmay

    jeopardize the validity of the applicationor any resulting registration, declares that he/she is properly

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-13 Filed 11/14/14 Page 4 of 4 PageID# 71

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    72/116

    E X H I B I T K

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-14 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 72

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    73/116

    BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT K -Beardo tm first use stmt.pdf

    Trademark/Service Mark Application, Principal Register

    TEAS Plus Application

    Serial Number: 85392844

    Filiim Date: 08/09/2011

    NOTE:Datafields with the are mandatory underTEASPlus. The wording (ifapplicable) appearswhere the field is only mandatory under the fails of the particular application.

    The table below presents the data as entered.

    ritpui Field Li H i r e d

    T E AS P l us YE S

    M A R K I N FO R M A T IO N

    M A R K

    STANDARD

    CHARACTERS

    USPTO-tiENERATEDI M A G E

    LITERAL ELEMENT

    MARK STATEMENT

    REGISTER

    I', i : \ rdo

    Y ES

    YE S

    B E A R D O

    Themark consists of Standard characters, without claimto any particularstyle, size, or color.

    Principal

    APPLIC ANT I N F O R M AT I O N

    OWNER OFMARK Phillips, Jeflcry B

    ni l \ AK \ TA/FORMERLY DB A Beardo

    STREET

    CITY

    COUNTRY

    ZIP/POSTAL CODERequired lo r t ' .S.applicants only)

    PHONE

    13 9 Mcnab si

    Stratford

    C an ad a

    i O a l 7 D

    61 I I 3 6 6 6 2 4 6

    l o u t .

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-14 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 4 PageID# 73

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    74/116

    BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT K Beardo tm first use stmt.pdf

    EM MI. ADDRESS phiilipsplaccd ymail.com

    A U TH O R IZED T OCO MMU N I CATE VTA Y esEMA I L

    WEBSITE ADDRESS www.lhcbeardo .com

    LEGAL ENTITY INFORMATION

    TYPE S O LE P RO P RI ETO RSH I P

    - STATE/COUNTRYW H E R E L E G A LLY C a n a d aO R G A N I Z E D

    GOODS AND/OR SERVICES AND B ASIS INFORMATION

    'INTERNATIONAL _,,CLASS

    IDENTIFICATION Hals; Headgear,namely, hats with facial coverings

    FILING BASIS SECTION 1(a)

    FIRST US EANYWHERE DATE

    FIRST US E IN

    I I I M M E R I E D AT E

    At least as early as 04/01/2010

    At least as early as 04/01/2010

    SPECIMEN FILE NAMEISl

    ORIGINAL PDF FILE spccoS [06-12?j-072225255 . bcardnlnuo.pdf

    CO N V ERTED PD F

    FILE'S i \ \TICRS\l: .XPORTIIMMAGEOLTII \}

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    75/116

    BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT K Beardo tm first use stmt.pdf

    N A M E \ Phillips.Jclfcry B

    F I RM N A M E ;Phillips. Jeffery B

    S T R E E T ; B9Mcnabsi

    ; CITY : s tra t t 'ord

    ' C O U N T R Y ; C a n a d a

    1'ZIP/POSTAL CODK n 5 a l z 5

    i PHONE 6 1 4 1 3 6 0 6 2 4 6

    I'KMAH.ADDRESS [email protected]

    ' A U T H O R IZ E D T O

    ; C O M M U N I C AT E V IA

    [EMAIL;Yes

    FE E I N F O R M AT I O N

    N U M BE R O F C L A S S E S 1

    F E E P ER C L A S S 27 5

    T O TA L F E E P A ID 27 5

    S I G N AT U R E I N F O R M AT I O N

    SIGNATURE [/JclTPhillips/ SIGNATORY'SNAME \Jeffery Brian Phillips

    : O w n er* S I G N ATO RY ' SP O S I T I O N

    D AT E S I GNE D I08/09/2011

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-14 Filed 11/14/14 Page 4 of 4 PageID# 75

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    76/116

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    77/116

    BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT L -tm app.pdf

    Trademark/Service Mark Application, Principal Register

    TEAS Plus Application

    S e r ia l N u m b e r: 85392844

    Filmy Date: 08/09/2011

    NOTE: Datafields withthe are mandatory under TEAS Plus. The wording (i f applicable) appearswhere the field is only mandatary under thefacts of the particular application.

    The table below presents the data a.s entered.

    lupin Field Entered

    IF . \ S P l u s

    M A RK I N FO R M AT IO

    MARK

    YE S

    N

    H FA R D O

    S TANDAR D

    CHARACTERSYE S

    USPTO-tiENERATEDIMAGE

    Y FS

    LITERALELEM ENT BEARDO

    MARK S TAT E M E N TThe mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particulai font.style, size, or color.

    REGISTER Principal

    A P P L I C A N T I N F O R M AT I O N

    - OW N E R O F M A R K Phillips. JclTery B

    DBA/AKA/TA/FORMERLV D B A B e a r d o

    STREET 13 9 M cn ah si

    C ITY Stratford

    ZIP/POSTAI. CODEiUri | i i i rc i l fur V S.

    applicants only)

    PHONE

    n 5 a l z 5

    61413666246

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-15 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 8 PageID# 77

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    78/116

    Bm

    E

    A

    C

    E

    w

    LN

    E

    S

    W

    O

    GO

    0

    IDO

    I

    C

    F

    EC>M

    cd

    SM

    O

    C

    POMOU1

    SMD

    V

    T(

    C

    Ri

    ((

    CM

    l

    C

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-15 Filed 11/14/14 Page 3 of 8 PageID# 78

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    79/116

    BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT L -tm app.pdf

    N A M E

    F I R M N A M E

    ; STREET

    C I T Y

    COUNTRY

    'Z I P /P O S TA L CODE

    :PHONE

    ; >KMAn. ADDRESS

    - A U T H O R I Z E D T O

    C O M M U N I C AT E V IA

    ' EMAIL

    FE E I N F O R M AT I O N

    ;Phillips. IcffcryB

    ;Phillips. lefferyB

    : l 3 9 M c n a b s l

    i Stratford

    : Canada

    n 5 a l z 5

    6 4 3666246

    [email protected]

    Y e s

    | NUMBEROFCLASSES ; i

    F EEP ER CLASS 27 5

    ' TO TA L F EE PA ID 27 5

    S I G N AT U R E I N F O R M AT I O N

    : SIGNATURE i/JcJTPhillips/; SIGNATORY'SNAME jJeffery Brian Phillips

    SIGNATORY'S nPOSITION Uwner

    D AT E S I GNE D 08/09/2011

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-15 Filed 11/14/14 Page 4 of 8 PageID# 79

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    80/116

    BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT L tm app.pdf

    Trademark/Service Mark Application. Principal Register

    TKAS Plus Application

    Se r i a l N u m b e r : 85392844

    Filing Date: 08/09/2011

    T o I li e C o m m i s si o n er f o r T r a d e m a r k s :

    MARK: BEARDO (Standard Characters, .secmarl;iT h e literal e l emen t ol the mark consis ts oi BF.ARDO.

    The markconsists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font, style, size, or color.

    The applicant. Phillips. Jeffery B. DBA Beardo, a Mile proprietorship legallyorganized underthe laws olCanada, havingan address ol

    13 9 Mcnab st

    Stratford nSalz5Canada

    requests registration of the trademark/service mark identified above in the United States Patent andTrademark Office on the Principal Register established by the Act of July 5. 1146 (15 U.S.C. Section 1 OS Iel seq.),as amended, for the following:

    For specific filingbasis information for each item, you must viewthe display within the Input Table.International Class025: Hals; Headgear, namely, hatswith facial coverings

    In International Class 025. the mark was fitsi used al Icasl as early as 04/01/2010, and first used incommerce at least as early as 04/01/2010. and is now inuse in such commerce. The applicant issubmittingone spccinieii(s)showing the mark as used in commerce on or inconnection with any item in

    the class ol listed goods and/oi services, consisting of a(n i The mark consists of the word Beardo with abonie r. .

    Original PDF file:spec-581064253-072225255 . hcardo luao .pd l

    Converted PDF file(s) (I page)S p ec i me n F i le l

    Fot informational purposes only, applicant's website address is: www.thebeardo.comThe applicant's current Correspondence Information:

    Phillips.Jeffery BPhillips,Jeffery B13 9 Mcnab st

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-15 Filed 11/14/14 Page 5 of 8 PageID# 80

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    81/116

    BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT L tm app.pdf

    Stratford n5; i l /5 . Canada

    614l3666246(phone)[email protected] (authorized)

    A fee payment in the amount of $275 has been submitted with the application, representing payment foi Iclassics).

    Declarat ion

    The undersigned, being hereby warned that willful false statements and the like so made arc punishable byfineor imprisonment,or both, under 18U.S.C. Section 1001.and that such willful false statements, andthe like, mayjeopardize the validity of Iheapplication or any resulting registration, declares that he/she isproperly authorized to execute ibisapplication on behalfof the applicant; he/she believes theapplicant tobe the owner of the trademark/service mark sought lo be registered, or. if the application is being tiledunder 15U.S.C. Section 105Kbi. he/she believes applicant to he entitled lo use such mark in commerce:lo the best of his/her knowledge and belief no olhei pelsou. firm, corporation, or association has the rightto us e th e m a r k in co m m ei ce , e i ther in th e ident ical form thereof o r in such near resemblance thereto as to

    be likely, when used on or in connection Withthe goods/services of such other person, to cause contusion,or to cause mistake, or to deceive: and thai all statements made of his/her own knowledge arc true: andt ha t a ll s t a t emen t s m a de o n i n fo rmat ion an d b e li e f a r c b e li e ve d to be true .

    Signature: /Jcfl Phillips/ Dale Signed: 08/01/201Signatory's Name: Jeffery Brian PhillipsSignatory's Position:Owner

    R A M S a le Number: 7211

    RAM AccountingDale: 08/09/201 I

    S e ri a l N u m be r : S 5 3 92 8 44

    internet Transmission Date: Tuc Aug 09 07:50:03 EDT 2011TEAS Stamp: USPTO/FTK-58.106.42.53-20110809075003736355-85392844-480a844db455ec3e9daa288d91966446a-CC-72 l 1-201 108091172225255634

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-15 Filed 11/14/14 Page 6 of 8 PageID# 81

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    82/116

    BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT L tm app.pdf

    B E A R D O

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-15 Filed 11/14/14 Page 7 of 8 PageID# 82

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    83/116

    B E A R D H E A D EXHIBIT L tm app.pdf

    BEARDO

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-15 Filed 11/14/14 Page 8 of 8 PageID# 83

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    84/116

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    85/116

    B EAR D HEAD EXHIBIT M Ward.pdf

    CA %A D A

    P h o n e : Bt41 i t . ( / ? 4 ) (

    Ce-FFeapondente-mail: | Co-respondente-rn*il VaA u l h o * i d :

    Domestic Representative - No Found

    P r o s ec u t io n H i s to r y

    D ale

    May 14 2 0 1 4

    Apr. 17. 2012

    Jan. 31. 2 0 1 2

    Jan. 31. 2 0 1 2

    Jan 11. 2 0 1 2

    Dec. 28.2011

    Dec. 28 2011

    Dec.27. 2011

    Dec. 27 2011

    Dec. 2 2011

    Dec. 19. 2011

    Dec. 02. 2011

    Dec. 02 2011

    Dec. 02. 20:1

    Dec. 01 2011

    Aug. 3 2011

    Aug. 2 2011

    Aug 2 2 0 11

    Description

    AUTOM ATI C UP DATE O F ASSIGNMENT O F O W N E R SH I P

    REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER

    OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E MAILED

    PUBLISHED F O R O P P O S IT I O N

    NOTIFICATION C F NOTICE O F P U B L IC AT I O N E - M AI L E D

    L AW O F F IC E . P UBLI CATI ON RE VI E W COMPLETED

    A P PR O VE D F O R P U B - PRINCIPAL REGISTER

    TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED

    C O R R ESPO N D EN C E RECEIVED IN LA W OF F I C E

    ASSIGNED TO LIE

    TEAS R E S PO N S E TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED

    NOTIFICATION O F NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED

    NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED

    NON- Fl NAL ACT ION W RI T TE N

    ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

    NOTICE O F P S EU D O M A RK M A IL E D

    NE W APPLICATION OF F I C E S UP P L I E D DATA ENTERED IN TRAM

    NEWAPPLICATION ENTERED IN [RAM

    T M S t a l l ' a n d Locat ion In fo rmat i o n

    T M S UM I n lo r ma l io n - N o n e

    File Lo ca t io n

    Current location: PUBLiC.VnoNAND ISSUE SECTION DateInlocation: Ap 17,8(11

    Summary

    t o t n l A s s i ' i m n r n ' . s .

    Assignment Abstract Of Title Information

    ltflfl.siF.int: Pfcfflfe

    Assignment 1 ot 1

    P i c m :

    ; ;

    Evecutloi. D-iio: MayUI, 201*1

    P r o c e e d

    N u m b e r

    G8552

    68562

    68552

    68552

    6 3 2 5

    6 3 2 5

    8 0 8 1 5

    8 0 3 1 5

    Cwivry*nco:

    R - . ' i F i . - r n r :

    Date R e c o r d e d :

    Supporting Document*.:

    Mama:

    Ln;al Entity Typr:

    N i m e '

    Ls*.Entity Typo:

    A d d r e s s :

    DBA, AKA, TA.Foimerly:

    Cotr*spondnt t ame.

    W QNS rHG ENTIRE INTEREST

    Ml) 03. SOt-*

    awt anm af t Mn- sa / f t o. 'M pc '

    JSFPERV BRIAN PH ILIPS DBA BEARDO

    STAT. LTD

    LIMITEDUABUi FYCOMPANY

    State or Country Wtiio u$ Ptaca WhafiO rg a n l i fd

    Assignee

    Slate of Country Whn* IL'RKS,AND CA.C05 ISLANDSO'flanUcU:

    2. CARIBBEANPLACE' MC1ALE5, TliR^S ANDCAtCOS ISLANDS

    nB A B E A R D O

    CoFrespondrnl

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-16 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 85

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    86/116

    E X H I B I T N

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-17 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 86

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    87/116

    BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT N BEARDO000219TaraDuff2009.pdf

    Fjradulf s crochet a n d o t h er stuff: thi- beard ha t

    sa r a d u f f ;c r o c h e t a n d

    o t h e r s t u ff

    t a I A I) I l' i - ' : :I- r: : V :; II o I'

    SrL

    4 . -

    .

    hu p //iarjduffiiuff.blogspoi.com/2009/12/btard-hal.himl

    1 1 / 3 / 1 1 12:28 PM

    I II I A V, DI' .CKM II K U ; , :

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    88/116

    E X H I B I T O

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-18 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 17 PageID# 88

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    89/116

    BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT OtaradufTon Klsv - Sold Items

    Tara Duff 2010-2011 blog.pdfhttps: www.cisy.com^shop/iarodufTy'sold?pagc 254&vicu type list

    I o f 3

    Soli Roiji '.Iry Community Stags

    Register

    k n . U ' * - ii i l 1 S .d Kama

    S h o p S e c l l o n t

    101 - ,-.

    b c u r C l *

    I

    fa*h*;i< ' * M f * i m n r i 21

    c r % r * '

    t C J V > n - .

    Cloaranoi ?

    c o n v a r t ib l a r u l / c o w ts 5

    Alevari UT Un*Bd SWW

    Have a quest ion?' . '

    N a t d a c u s t o m o r d e r ?

    ^equesl CustomOrder

    laxadufl

    Re* m

    (1.047)

    A c t i o n *

    &eemofa

    than10Eny

    Siyn In Swm*

    ^ taraduff ...._your s o u r c e o f c r o c h e t g o o d n es s

    MWp

    taraduflTariHMi Hand CmcheWfl Appara. and Accaivm*

    Favonlo LIM i; . fOHOW MJfl

    TaraduTamop a thehome c* r OFFICIAL. AUTHENTIC. AM)THE CRIG'NAL BEARDBEAN E' Ourtocues, stockingtiati and lumteoac*. hats wBh beards arv made n and snapped from the USA' nw d -> >

    Th**shop accepts Etsy Gfl Card*

    t . i r. i d u f \ -. S o ld I te m s

    Sort Ly Most Racent

    V-st.tch Crochet Kuft ha i PATTERN - All su

    C U S TO M bf-rtrtr--1 bo w -

    m b lu e an d b r o w n b e a r d e d b an ie

    tarvdufl

    black arfl gray b*anJed lumberjack hatl a t ad u f f

    _ black at'd gray beG'dud lun>tn:ij.i .- tatH n d u f l

    CUSTOM b ea r ded bcaruo

    V-Mitch Ciocliet KuS ha i PAT T E R N Al l t o s s

    CUSTOM b ea r ded bca r ue

    m UacJt .trd gray heatfnri liimhefjac*lullU r a d u l f

    F f h ' l . . ' 0 1 0

    Fe b a . '010

    Fe b 8. ? 0 t 0

    Fe b 1' W 0

    F ob 7 . 2 0 1 0

    T e b 7 . ^ 0 1 0

    Fe b 7. 2010

    S '21 /2014 ' 50 I' M

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-18 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 17 PageID# 89

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    90/116

    BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT 0 -Tara Duff 2010-2011 blog .pdfImps:/ www.ctsy.com shop uiradufr'.-: ad lumberjack hat

    SC U S TO M b e a r d e d b ean io

    laradtal

    CUSTOM b e v e e be

    t a n K -

    B War* ar d yraybuaiew. lumucnackhait an d u ff

    Ion twuud bearded lumberjack hat' . , r . ( - ; . 'i

    gf-nn F*,vd-d b^wtrun YlXJTHlanjdufl

    insnrvrtd listing tru aloox2

    I . m c V i

    &bUck .trd gray bearded lumberjack hait a rad u f l

    *

    V-sMeh Crn rh r t KuC h.-.t PATTERN - A ll s i;*?,

    LarwMI

    Greenand orangebearded beanie.tankduS

    13 tweed bearded lumberjack hatt a r a f u f f

    bruwn beorded biuu lumberjack haiT I M i ' . f l

    Fphfi . 2010

    Fe b 5 . 2 0 1 0

    Fe b 5 ? 0 1 0

    Fe b S, 2010

    Fe b 5. 2 0 1 0

    FubS.VOIQ

    F r b 4 . 2 0 l 0

    F e b 3 . 2 0 10

    Fe b 3. 2010

    V 2 I / 2 O 1 4 . V S 0 P M

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-18 Filed 11/14/14 Page 3 of 17 PageID# 90

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    91/116

    BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT 0 -Tara Duff 2010-2011 blog.pdfImps:/ www.ctsy.com/shop'laradulT/'sold'.'pagc>254&view typc=listnradufTon Etsy - Sold Items

    l .1 i

    ~*\ lumber jackbuardud stocking capu r ad ,'i

    Fe b 3. 2 0 1 0

    1 ... 2S 0 25 1 252 253 254 255 256 257

    Follow Etsy Browse Elsy

    AH Gift Id oa t J .w-Uy Had U A cces s o r * Wo ' n n

    O J ' l S u p p l i e s G r a d ua t i on O l f U KMs Vintage:

    P i t M a a : 1Day Grfit H j T ( A, Dvtf ' J M We d J . r u *

    O 2 0 H i r*y. Ic - ' ' ^U*i About C o n tec l Ped es r*teu D9voD'fc Cu ec u Terms 1 I q > Ccr>)i ff-t

    5 ' 2 I / 2 ( I M 3:5(1 P M

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-18 Filed 11/14/14 Page 4 of 17 PageID# 91

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    92/116

    BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT 0lar.uhM. on Rtsy- Shop Rcmcwn

    -Tara Duff 2010-2011 blog.pdfhwps: www.ctsy.coni shop LaradurT/rcvic\vs?pagc II7

    1 0 1 2

    Sen R eqi- .B y r.nn r a m , Sic,-, V

    Reglwicr Siyn In

    HnT?etU'.i'-tirti ShopRi .1

    S h o p Section*

    M l tem

    p ag an -. /1

    fasret.i> h o i s ' n j r ^ j m ' t j f B /t

    c h t l d -

    s c a v e v c u w * * C

    Dearaw 7

    : . . :

    mTa r a l e o O u t t mt open ui jn tad Statu*

    Have a q u es t io n ?

    .

    N e e d a c u s t o m o r d e r ?

    3cQuest Custom Order

    S h o p In to

    Optw-n 1.1May ?1. 700S

    .

    A c t i o n s

    Se c w i 3 f* .o r tes th s

    r*inva hn toEny

    taraduff......your s o u rce o f c r o c h e t goodness

    t a radul lI a ' # d j 1 i t a n d C r o c h t l c d Appa 'e i OW . ) . ' . / ( .1 ,-

    TaraduTl s-i p -s to linn..- n*3i->OFFICIAL,AUTHENTIC.AHOTHE ORIGINALBEARDBEAN IE' Ou't^uc-,hats, a n d u r r te r ja c k nat svaO- t e J r d s a*e TiaC* rr a 'ds . '- 'pped t r a m t h e USA1... r e a d m o r e

    I tem R e v i e w s

    Average Item Review [1 M7]

    Ravevred by Aiv.-^rr...;-

    O B . i . idod K ni t Ha n d b a g FR EE SH IPPINGI ..ely t ur se I absolutelylove Wl

    - . a wed I i ' r yn eo us o n J an ua ry M. 2D1G

    h o a rd ed s l ou chy b ean i e lor youth

    ILOVEDMYSTOCKINGCAP I asked Taraiee lucustom make one formysun with

    the specs for his coat. Itv/as PERFECT ) Actually, it wa s BETTER than perfect It fits

    rjreat. looks incredible, an d is a hoot I cannot qel over how wonderful it ts I hove

    been asked where we gel it. and Iwas more than happy 10tellothers1Thank

    youso much TaraUIlove it And willmore than likelyend up ordering morn tor olhtsrs

    that I know

    fteweeajdby Anonymou*an January 31. 7itf

    b lu e an d browii bearded lumbcijack ha i

    Thank you so much. I LOVEthishalf n 11-Spocedog's husband John

    RevitwtadbyAnonymou*onlanueryO rntri

    5 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 4 3 : 42 I' M

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-18 Filed 11/14/14 Page 5 of 17 PageID# 92

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    93/116

    BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT 0 -Tara Duff 2010-2011 blog.pdfliii.ulull on Eisy - Shop Review* hups: www.etsy.com/shop'laradufl /review s?pagc 11

    Yellow Croche t Ruffled Ba y - FR EE SH IPPIN G

    Wowl Th e price was a steal for how prerty Ihis purse isl Even me flower is sooo

    special Just love the ruffles' Shipped really fast too' Thanks so much'

    Revewed by AnyynousO January?. ?Q10

    lumberjack b ea rd ed s t ock in g cap

    The stocking ca p was a h itw ith my boyfnend. I bought it to rh is b ir thday, and he

    thought it was the best ni 'l ' could have ever g iven him (men lol ) I twas shipped

    quickly and seems to f ita var ietyof headsizes (I have a small head an d tned i ton f or

    r' . * ( , ' ymoUSOri Decrr-*** it , 2009

    **ja_v l i lr i* i: (odCleT sirred ta'dffja I-RM-SHIPPING

    Revr*-rd hy Ananyinouac Qecenr- i

    id Ha t^ H CandyCornCruthel

    Rn H tdby An--yinctj\ry tiCCf'l

    hand-croche t c h il d 's p i nk c o t to n h o o d ie v e s t

    WOWSo much prettierInperson than the photocan show' SUPERhighqualityrrochnl sweate r veal. SO CUTE on ) THANKS SO MUCH*

    1 ... 112 113 114 115 11G 117 118 119

    Follow Ctsy Browse Eu y

    Ar t J . . * ,

    ' w e n * C n ' l Supp In Qradaat

    - t l . .y G m * l i i a l iv in g Mm

    MjbW *c u s e art

    Vtntagi

    Wedding*

    Wu-. t -

    Trawdinj nrim

    O t* EtsjtIre. ' - ) Atm: CofKad Peg-* Prat*. D^w-to rs Ca-r-n TrrM IVva'.y Cfpft&t

    V 2 I / 2 0 M S:42 VX\

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-18 Filed 11/14/14 Page 6 of 17 PageID# 93

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    94/116

    l \ . l M-l H O J / l t / S '

    o i o j '9Z uv r

    ( n o * r. ue r

    0 1 0 c ' 9 Z W

    0 1 0 J ' I C ' T

    O l O I ' I Q d

    O MK ' t -q n d

    B t ip u t l

    1P(|jfji-Duquinipopjevq Xvi [u p )peiq

    npjt]

    o n iv aq p.-.piecq uaaitJ pu y ab i iv jo

    gi pen i

    U03 >irr3 abmij y,&* ye w jur* iuoo | Ajjaq

    t9i

    unpeuai ^iuui jaMov/ ifeu.pctia. |.unptie sieijBuepott 'rnnboi .no i3inv39oavaa tvMOtao 3h i qnv 'miN3Hinv 'tvihi jj o -mi* i*m * *hh BAnpesei

    i -m . i H O d o * e n * >(--auCSS'jTlv &J9 ra. fddy paiJj jXUQ SuTl, l T * ' 1

    n p c j c |

    I -

    ssaupoog w q o o a o j o aoanos anox' i inpeae^

    i?ll=3d

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    95/116

    BlwTp

    2

    i

    mU

    gJ

    o

    B

    :

    im

    l

    J

    ab

    J

    b

    t

    Cm n

    af

    a

    t

    MJ

    ^l

    i

    JK

    ^m

    b

    /L

    b

    l

    J

    5

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-18 Filed 11/14/14 Page 8 of 17 PageID# 95

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    96/116

    BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT 0 -Tara Duff 2010-2011 blog.pdfhups:/ www.cisy.com shop laraduff/sold'.'pnge*5235&vicwlype=lislnradulTonEisy - Sold Items

    ^b r o w n b e a r d b e a n i e

    iv. rs. . '

    1 ... 25 0 25 1 252 253 25 4 25 5 25G 25 7

    3 o f -

    Follow Eisy Browse Etsy A, l Girt Ueea

    Cnfl i u p p i

    Father's Day Grfu Hjrrc 4 Uvir.g

    R/om tsy Ik I t / j P {I . -

    U o l i A c c t S M l e * Warner

    - . - i- i | i, eees a

    W r d J ^ g s

    Uoo Abao? C y& KI P uq M PtsH Dgv.oovt C o w l l-e-.i H -u cy C tp y 0 I

    - 21 2 01 4 v -l 'l I'M

    Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-18 Filed 11/14/14 Page 9 of 17 PageID# 96

  • 8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint

    97/116

    i v i K r: i H O c V lt /s

    r . u u - t s# q

    0 0 0 / S a s Q

    600? 'I I a

    600< ' 0 a a r j

    0107 ' S UtT

    lueievjisoaj *q JJCJ

    I j n o e j e i

    (jnpv) puw Aasjsj

    npi .< i

    iuui iptnq qnv. j ims Ab.d sue t u

    r w u eaq p a p j e a q i m j o o j a

    I I