beard head v. stat - complaint
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
1/116
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
2/116
J U R I SD I C T IO N A N D V E N U E
4. This Court hasjurisdiction pursuantto 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338over the subject
matter of this Complaint for Declaratory Judgment as provided by 28 U.S.C. 2201 and
2 2 0 2 .
5. Venue properly exists in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391 and
1400.
6. This Court has personal jurisdiction over the defendants pursuant to Va. Rev. Stat.
Ann. 8.01-328.1 and FRCP Rule 4 directing federal distr ict courts to follow the law on
personal jurisdiction in the state where the federal court is located, because, on information
and belief, defendants transact business in Virginia and solicit business in this judicial
district. Furthermore, defendants have alleged in Civil Action 3:13-cv-00762 that Beard
Head's activities that are conducted within this judicial district constitute patent
infringement.
F A C T U A L A L L E G AT I O N S
7. Since 2007, Beard Head Corporation has been in the business of manufacturing and
selling quality novelty headwear that combines a knitted winter hat with a knitted beard
fea ture .
8. Beard Head's headwear products include beard caps having many variations,
including close-fitting caps, extended caps covering ears, neck and forehead, caps having
ornaments such as horns, poms, fringe, tassels, etc., caps having brims, cuffs, edge-rolls,
cabled and ribbed textured yarns, caps with branding spaces, and caps with various team
colors. Beard Head's headwear products include bearded caps having many variations of
beards, including close-fitting cropped beards, medium length beards, long length beards,
unitary cap and beard products, beards having a separate moustache and beard, and beards
having ornaments such as tassels, fringe, braiding, textures, etc.9. Beard Head is the first and the largest seller of bearded caps and sells in the United
Sta tes and a ro un d t he world.
10. Upon information and belief, Jeffrey Brian Phillips is the named inventor of U.S.
Design Patent D682186 entitled Combined Ski Face Mask and Hat filed Aug. 9, 2011 as
application 29/399,030, granted Oct. 22, 2013 (the '186 patent).
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 36 PageID# 2
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
3/116
11. Upon information and belief, the '186 patent claims the ornamental design for a
combinedski face maskand hat, as shown and described in Figures 1,2, and 3 of the design
patent, EXHIBIT A.
12. Upon information and belief, STAT Inc. of Stratford, Ontario is the listed assignee
of the ' 186 patent. EXHIBIT B.
13. On Nov. 13, 2013, STAT dba Beardo and Jeffrey Brian Phillips filed a patent
infringement lawsuit against plaintiff BEARD HEAD in the Alexandria Division of the
Eastern District of Virginia, civil action 3:13-cv-00762, removed to the Richmond
Divis ion . E X H I BI T C.
14. On Sept. 8, 2014 STAT filed a Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss the patent count 1,
without prejudice, which was granted by Judge Hudson on Sept. 9, 2014. EXHIBIT D.
15. BEARD HEAD and STAT remain in litigation against each other and the patent
claim may be raised against plaintiffs at any time, creating an actual and substantial
controversy between BEARD HEAD and STAT with respect to the '186 patent.
16. BEARD HEAD has not infringed and does not infringe any valid claim of the ' 186
patent.
17. BEARD HEAD is entitled to a judicial declaration and order that BEARD HEAD
has not infringed and does not infringe, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents,
any valid claim of the '186 patent, and that the '186 patent is invalid.
STAT '186 Invalidi ty due to Sta tu tory Bar 102(d)
18. STAT/Phillips both filed for, and received, a Canadian Patent to the same invention
before the U.S. application was ever filed, in violation of 35 U.S.C. 102(d). EXHIBIT E.
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 3 of 36 PageID# 3
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
4/116
Phillips Design Patent Application Filing& Grant Timeline
Gra n t D ate
C a n a d a
Granted
1 3 6 1 5 2
1/27/2011
Br i ti s h f i l ed
2/9/2011
British
Gran ted
4 0 1 8 7 8 4
3/7/2011
U.S.A. f i led
8/9/2011
U.S .A.
Gran ted
D692.186
10/22/2013
19. Upon information and belief, the '186 patent is statutorily barred by 35 U.S.C.
102(d), should not have been granted, and is invalid and unenforceable on its face since
the related Canadian patent issued before the filing of the application leading to ' 186
patent.
20. For a patent application to be barred pursuant to the pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(d),
there are four requirements as explained in the USPTO's Manual of Patent ExaminingProcedure (incorporated herein where referenced) (MPEP) 2135.01:
1. The foreign application must be filed more than 12 months before the
effective U.S. filing date (modified to six months by 35 U.S.C. 172).
2. The foreign applications must be filed by the same applicant.
3. The foreign patent must be granted before the filing date of the U.S.
Application.
4. The same invention must be involved. [Exhibit F].
21. Referring to 102(d) Requirement 1, STAT's foreign patent, Canada 136152, issued
from a Canadian application for patent filed morethan six months beforethe filing of the
application in the U.S.. STAT's Canada filing date of Jul. 2, 2010 is more than 6 months
before STAT's actual U.S. filing date of Aug. 9, 2011.
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 4 of 36 PageID# 4
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
5/116
22. Referring to 102(d)Requirement 2, each of the STATapplications for the U.S.
Patent, and the Canadian Patent disclose the same inventor, Jeffrey Phillips.
23. Referring to 102(d) Requirement 3, STAT's invention was first patented by the
applicant in a foreigncountry as Canadian patent 136152prior to the date of the application
for patent inthe U.S.. STAT's Canada grant date of Jan. 27, 2011 is before STAT's actual
U.S. filing date of Aug. 9, 2011.
24. Referring to 102(d)Requirement 4, each of the STAT applications for the U.S.
Patent, and the Canad ian Patent ar e directed to th e same invention.
25. 35 U.S.C. 102(d) is a statutory bar, therefore STAT cannot establish an earlier
date of invention to overcome the effect of Canada 136152 under 102(d). See In re
Kathawala, 9 F.3d 942, at 946 (Fed. Cir. 1993).
STAT '186 Unenforceability due to False Statement - Foreign Filing
26. 18 U.S.C. 1001 states that Whoever, in any mat ter within the jur isdiction of the
executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States,knowingly
and willfully (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a
material fact; (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or
representation; or (3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to
contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under
this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or
domestic terrorism (as defined in 2331), imprisonednot morethan 8 years, or both. If the
matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110,or 117,or 1591,then the term
of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.
27. Jeffrey Phillips signed an inventor's declaration in support of U.S. design
application 29/399,030,which application was later grantedas U.S. D692186. [Exhibit G].
28. The Phillips declaration declares under penalty of 18 U.S.C. 1001 that I do not
know and do not believe that the same invention was first patented or made the subject of
an inventor's certificate that issued in any country foreign to the United States of America
before the filing dateof this United States application if the foreign application was filed
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 5 of 36 PageID# 5
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
6/116
by me, or by my legal representatives or assigns, more than twelve months (six months in
the case of design patents) prior to the filing date of this United States application.
(Emphasis added).
29. The Phillips declaration further declares that all statements made herein of myown knowledge are true, and that all statements made on information and belief are
believed to be true; and further that these statements were made with the knowledge that
willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or
both, under 1001 of Title 18 o f the United States Code, and that such willful false
statements may jeopardize the validity of the application or any patent issuing thereon.
30. A patent is unenforceable if it is shown by clear and convincing evidence that the
inventor procured the patent by intentional deception of the patent examiner. Therasense,
Inc. v. Becton Dickenson & Co. 649 F3d 1276 (Fed. Cir. May 25, 2011). Inequitable
conduct must be material and intentional.
31. Signing of a false affidavit is evidence of materiality. Rohm & Haas Co. v. Crystal
Chem. Co., 722 F2d 1556 (Fed. Cir. 1983).
32. Upon informationand belief, STAT was aware of their own U.S. patent filing Aug.
9, 2011 and nonetheless attempted to make a false claim to priority to the Canadianapplication filed July 2, 2010 outside the mandatory 6-month window.
33. A priority claim to an earlier foreign application must satisfy 35 U.S.C. 119 and
37 C.F.R. 1.55 and 1.63. 35 U.S.C. 119(a) states: An application for patent for an
invention filed in this country by any person who has . . . previously regularly filed an
application for a patent for the same invention in a foreign country which affords similar
privileges in the case of applications filed in the United States or to citizens of the United
States, or in a WTO member country, shall have the same effect as the same application
would have if filed in this country on the dateon which the application for patent forthe
same invention was first filed in such foreign country, if the application in this country is
filed within twelve months from the earliest dateon which such foreign application was
filed. For design patents, 35 U.S.C. 172 modifies the twelve month time limit imposed
by35 U.S.C. 119, limiting such period to six months: The rightof priority provided for
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 6 of 36 PageID# 6
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
7/116
by subsections (a) through (d) of section 119 of this title and the time specified in section
102(d) shall be six months in the case of designs [Emphasis added].
34. U.S. applicants for patent and anyone associated with the application have an
affirmative duty of candor and good faith, which includes a duty to disclose any and allinformation material to patentability. 37 C.F.R. 1.56.
35. Applicants have a duty to bring to the attention of the Office any material prior art
or other information cited or brought to their attention in any related foreign application.
M P E P 2 0 0 1 .0 6 .
36. Upon information and belief, STAT did not notify the USPTO or the Examiner that
the Canadian application had matured Jan. 27, 2011 into a registered Canadian patent136152, even though this was more than 6 months before the U.S. filing date of Aug. 9,
2011. The file history of the U.S. patent shows that there was not even a single Information
Disclosure Statement (IDS) filed, which is the mechanism by which the duty owed to the
USPTO is discharged. [EXHIBIT H].
37. Upon information and belief, STAT's failure to notify the USPTO of the Canadian
patent avoided the consequences of the application for patent being denied as statutorily
barred and rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(d).
38. Upon information and belief, STAT's failure satisfies the but for materiality
required by Therasense - the patent would not have been granted but for the inventor's
deception.
39. Upon information and belief, STAT's Intent is shown by the affirmative signing of
the inventor's declaration on Aug. 30, 2013 whereby the inventor promises not to do
exactly what the inventor did, namely withhold evidence of unpatentability. Intent may beinferred where a patent applicant knew or should have known that withheld information
would be material o the PTO's consideration of the patent application. Critikon Inc. v.
Becton Dickenson Vascular Access Inc., 43 U.S.P.Q.2d 1666, 1668 (Fed. Cir. 1997).
40. A holding of inequitable conduct renders all claims of the patent unenforceable.
Kingsdown Med. Consultants Ltd v. Hollister, Inc. 863 F2d 867 (Fed. Cir. 1988).
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 7 of 36 PageID# 7
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
8/116
Inequitable conduct is an equitable defense to patent infringement, and is therefore for the
court to decide, not the jury. Kingsdown at 876.
41. Upon information and belief, because of STAT/Phillip's false statement, the patent
is required to be held as unenforceable.
STAT '186 Invalidity due to Sta tu tory Bar Admission
in STAT's Trademark Filing
42. Upon information and belief, STAT's patent is invalid due to Statutory Bars under
35 U.S.C. 102.
43. 35 U.S.C. 102(a), and 102(b) entitled Novelty; Prior Art states that: A person
shall be entitled to a patent unless(a) the invention was known or used by others in this
country, or patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country, before
the invention thereof by the applicant for patent, or (b) the invention was patented or
described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in
this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United
States .
44. 35 U.S.C. 102, Novelty, defines eight statutory bars to patentability. The eight
statutory bars can be interpreted as whether the claimed invention was:
BEFO RE TH E DA I E O F INVENTION
(1) Known by someone other than the inventor, in the United States, 102(a);
(2) Used by someone other than the inventor, in the United States, 102(a);
(3) Patentedby someone other than the inventor, anywhere in the world, 102(a);
(4) Published by someone other than the inventor, anywhere in the world, 102(a);
o r wa s
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 8 of 36 PageID# 8
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
9/116
MORE THANA YEAR BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE FILING DA TE OF U.S.
APPLICATION
(5) Patented by the inventor or anyone else, anywhere in the world, 102(b);
(6) Published by the inventor or anyone else, anywhere in the world, 102(b);
(7) Used by the inventor or anyone else, in the United States, 102(b); or
(8) Sold by the inventor or anyone else, in the United States, 102(b).
45. The Invention was published in STAT's own trademark application and
constitutes a 102(a) and (b) Statutory Bar against STAT's patent application. In U.S.
Trademark Application Serial Number 85/392,844, STAT submitted a photographic
image of a bearded hat as a trademark specimen. The photographic image of a bearded
hat submitted in STAT's trademark application is the same as or substantially the same as
th e invention c la imed in D 692 18 6. E XH IB IT I.
46. STAT filed a Sworn Statement of Use in Commerce to support Stat's Trademark
Application Serial Number 85/392,844, now Trademark Registration 4,128,503.
E X H I B I T J.
47. STATallegeda date of first use in commerce at least as early as Apr. 1,2010 .
E X H I B I T K.
48. The use or sale of the invention at least as early as Apr. 1, 2010 is more than a
year beforethe actual U.S. filing date of Aug. 9, 2011 forthe STAT patent application.
49. STAT's U.S. Trademark ApplicationSerial Number 85/392,844 was filed by Phillips, Jeffrey B. EXHIBIT L
50. STAT's U.S. Trademark Application Serial Number 85/392,844 lists Daniel S.
Ward as the domestic representative. EXHIBIT M.
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 9 of 36 PageID# 9
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
10/116
51. STAT's Publication, or Use, or Sale, or O ffer for S ale as submitted as evidence in
STAT's trademark application is an admission that the invention was published before the
date of invention, or used, sold, or offered for sale morethan a year beforethe U.S. filing
date of Aug. 9,2011.
52. Because 35 U.S.C. 102(a) and 35 U.S.C. 102(b) are both statutory bars to
patentability, STAT cannot establish an earlier date of invention to overcome the effect of
STAT's Publication, or Use, or Sale, or Offer for Saleunder 102(a)and 102(b).
STAT '186 Invalidity due to Tara Duff Prior Art Provided by STAT
53. STAT provided in co-pending civil lawsuit 3:13-cv-00762 a document entitled
Tara Duffs internet blog dated Dec. 27, 2009 (1 year and 8 months before their U.S.
filing date), which shows multiple photographic images of bearded hats for sale by third
party Ms. Tara Duff, and which is in effect an admission and acknowledgement of the
unpatentability and unenforceability of D692186. STATDiscovery Document 000219 in
C iv il A c ti o n 3:13-cv-00762. Exhibit N.
54. The photographic images of bearded hats on Tara Duffs internet blog publicationdated Dec. 27, 2009 are the same as or substantially the same as the invention claimed in
D 6 9 2 1 8 6 .
55. Dec. 27, 2009 is morethan a year beforethe filing date of Aug. 9, 2011.
56. In violation of 35 U.S.C. 102(a) and (b), Tara Duffs Publication, or Use, or Sale,
or Offer for Sale constitutes invalidating prior art and shows that the invention was
published before the date of invention, or used, sold, or offered for sale more than a yearbefore the U.S. filing date of Aug. 9, 2011.
57. Because 35 U.S.C. 102(a) and 35 U.S.C. 102(b) are both statutory bars to
patentability, STAT cannot establish an earlier date of invention to overcome the effect of
Tara Duffs Publication, or Use, or Sale, or Offer for Saleunder Section 102(a)and 102(b).
10
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 10 of 36 PageID# 10
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
11/116
STAT '186 Unenforceability du e to Fraud & False Statement
58. A patentis unenforceable if it is shown by clear and convincing evidence that the
inventor procured the patent by intentional deception of the patent examiner. Therasense,
Inc. v. Becton Dickenson & Co. 649 F3d 1276 (Fed. Cir. May 25, 2011). Inequitableconduc t must b e material and intentional.
59. U.S. applicants for patent, and anyone associated with the application, have an
affirmative duty of candor and good faith, which includes a duty to disclose any and all
information material to patentability. 37C.F.R. 1.56.
60. Upon information and belief, STAT, Phillips, and/or Attorney Daniel Ward was
aware of STAT's own U.S. trademark filing and submitted a Statement of Use admittingto the sale of the invention more than a year before application for patent. EXHIBIT K.
61. Upon information and belief, STAT and/or Phillips was aware of sales of prior art
products such as Tara Duff et al. EXHIBIT M, and STAT's own sales in 2009. EXHIBITQ.
62. Upon information and belief, STAT did not notify the USPTO or the Examiner
about either the trademark submission, the Tara Duff sales, or STAT's sales. EXHIBIT N.
63. Upon informationand belief, STAT's failureto notifythe USPTO of the trademarksubmission, the Tara Duff sales, or STAT's own sales, avoided the consequences of the
application for patent being denied as statutorily barred and rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102.
64. Upon information and belief, STAT's failure satisfies the but for materiality
required by Therasense - the patent would not have been granted but for the inventor's
deception.
65. Upon information and belief, STAT's Intent is shownby the affirmative signing ofaninventor's declaration on Aug. 30,2013 whereby theinventor promises nottodo exactly
what the inventordid, namelywithhold evidence of unpatentability. Intent may be inferred
where a patent applicant knew or should have known that withheld information would be
material o the PTO's consideration of the patent application. Critikon Inc. v. Becton
Dickenson Vascular Access Inc., 43 U.S.P.Q.2d 1666, 1668 (Fed. Cir. 1997).
11
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 11 of 36 PageID# 11
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
12/116
66. A holding of inequitable conduct renders all claims of the patent unenforceable.
Kingsdown Med. Consultants Ltd v. Hollister, Inc. 863 F2d 867 (Fed. Cir. 1988.
67. Upon information and belief, because of STAT/Phillip's fraud on the patent office
and false statement, the patent is required to be held as unenforceable.
STAT '186 Invalidity du e to Additional Tara Duff Prior Art from 2010
as 102(a) an d (b) Sta tu to ry Bar
68. Tara Duffs internet blog publications dated Jan. 5,2010 (BH 000600), Jan. 7,2010
(BH 000601), Jan. 15, 2010 (BH 000602), Feb. 5, 2010 (BH 000603), Feb. 22, 2010 (BH000604), and Mar. 15, 2010 (BH 000605), show multiple photographic images of bearded
hats. Beard Head Discovery Documents BH 000600-000605. EXHIBIT O.
69. The photographic images of bearded hats on Tara Duffs internet blog publication
are the same as or substantially the same as the invention claimed in D692,186.
70. Publication dates for Jan. 5,2010 (BH 000600), Jan. 7, 2010 (BH 000601), Jan. 15,
2010 (BH 000602), Feb. 5, 2010 (BH 000603), Feb. 22, 2010 (BH 000604), and Mar. 15,
2010 (BH 000605) are all more than a year before the filing date of Aug. 9, 2011.
71. Tara Duffs Publication, or Use, or Sale, or Offer for Sale constitutes invalidating
prior art and shows that the invention was published before the date of invention, or used,
sold, or offered for sale more than a year before the U.S. filing date of Aug. 9, 2011.
72. Because 35 U.S.C. 102(a) and 35 U.S.C. 102(b) are both statutory bars to
patentability, STAT cannot establish an earlier date of invention to overcome the effect of
TaraDuffs Publication, or Use,or Sale, or Offerfor Saleunder Section 102(a)and 102(b).
The STAT U.S. Design Patent is Obvious under 35 U.S.C. 103
12
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 12 of 36 PageID# 12
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
13/116
73. Regarding patentability of an invention, 35 U.S.C. 103 entitled Obviousness
states that: A patent may not be obtained through the invention is not identically disclosed
or described as set forth in Section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject
matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole
would have beenobvious at the time the invention was madeto a person havingordinary
skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shallnot be negatived by
t he m a nn er in which th e invent ion was made.
74. To establish primafacie obviousness, all the claim limitations must be taught or
suggested by the prior art. In determining primafacie obviousness, the proper standard is
whether the design would have been obvious to a designer of ordinary skill with the
claimed type of article. /// re Nalbandian, 661 F.2d 1214, 211 USPQ 782 (CCPA 1981)and M P E P 1504.03.
75. As a whole, a design must be compared with something in existence, and not
something brought into existence by selecting and combining features from prior art
references. /// re Jennings, 182 F.2d 207, 86 USPQ 68 (CCPA 1950) and MPEP 1504.03.
The something in existence referred to in Jennings has been defined as ...a reference...
the design characteristics of which are basically the same as the claimed design... /// re
Rosen, 673 F.2d 388, 391, 213 USPQ 347, 350 (CCPA 1982) and MPEP 1504.03. (theprimaryreference did ...not give the same visual impression... as the design claimed but
had a ...different overall appearance and aesthetic appeal... )
76. Upon information and belief, STAT's U.S. D692,186 Patent is obvious in view of
STAT's own Canadian Patent 136152 since STAT's effective U.S. filing date is Aug. 9,
2011, but STAT's Canadian patent 136152was registered as a patent Jan. 27, 2011 before
their U.S. filing date.
77. Upon information and belief, STAT's U.S. D692,l 86 Patent is obvious in view of
STAT's British patent 4018784, since the British patent was registered as a patent Mar. 7,
2011 before STAT's U.S. filing date of Aug. 9, 2011. EXHIBIT P.
13
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 13 of 36 PageID# 13
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
14/116
Th e STAT U.S. Design Patent is Invalid for Functionality
78. The design patentstatute restrictsdesign patentsto ornamental designs, and cannot
includefunctional elementswithin the scope of protection. LA . Gear v.ThomMcAn Shoe
Co. 988 F.2d 1117 (Fed. Cir 1993) and cases discussed therein.
79. STAT's design of a detachable beard face maskon a ski hat representsthe sine qua
non of a functionality problem. It has been shown, per the many pieces of prior art listed
herein above, that bearded masks were known over a year prior to the effective filingdate
of Plaintiffs DesignPatent. Since the sole remaining feature is detachability, which is a
purelyfunctional feature, the designitselfis notentitled to protection undera designpatent.
BEARD HEAD'S Noninfringement of D692186
80. Upon information and belief, BEARD HEAD products do not infringe any valid
claim o f D692186.
81. Upon information and belief, STAT U.S. Design D692186 Figures 1,2 and3 require
the following design features:
C A P B E A R D M A S K
CI: Close fitting style Ml: Short, croppedC2: Shape covers ears, partial forehead, M2: Unitary piece, e.g. no attachedpartial nape mustache, etc.C3: No ornaments, e.g. horns, poms, fringe, M3: Attached to Cap, outside of mask totassels, etc. inside of capC4: No brim and no cuffor edge roll M4: Unobstructed mouth apertureC5: No texture, e.g. cables, ribbing M5: No ornaments, e.g. fringe, tassels, etc.C6: No banner-space on forehead M6: Mustache double-peak designC7: No color banding/stripes
82. Upon information and belief, BEARD HEAD'S products, when compared to the
'186 Figures 1, 2, and 3, have the following non-infringing features, according to the
following Tables and accompanying legend of distinguishing features:
1 4
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 14 of 36 PageID# 14
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
15/116
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
16/116
B E A R D Non-infringement Chart list U.S. Design B E A R D H E A D - 7 6H E A D of Features missing; reason D692,186 DESIGNSassert ion re
infringementfor non-infringement
BH-001
Denied
C3
C5
C 7
M 2
I . ( W ^ m a x . W* * 1
-. > V l |
#61 _ _
B H - 0 0 2 M l
Denied M 4 - gGr
M 5 l *M 6
4j
*B H-003
De n ie d
C 4
C 7
M l C aM 4 1 0M 5 wM 6
4 tH - 0 0 4 M lDe nie d M 5 ^
M 6
1 6
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 16 of 36 PageID# 16
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
17/116
B E A R D Non-infringement Chart list U.S. Design B E A R D H E A D - 76H E A D of Features missing; reason D692,186 D E S I G N Sasser t ion re for non-infringementinfringement
BH -0 0 5 C5
D en ied C 7
M 2
M 6
&iH - 0 0 6 M l
Denied M 4 ^M 5 fcM 6
mV; * :
KMH - 0 0 7 C 3
Denied C 4
C6 , C7 J i tM l MM 4 GLM 5
v mM 6
WO
B H - 0 0 8
Denied
C 5
C7
M l . -
\ I 1
M 5
M 6
i 11
17
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 17 of 36 PageID# 17
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
18/116
B E A R D Non-infringement Chart list U.S. Design B E A R D H E A D - 7 6H E A D of Features missing; reason D692,186 D E S I G N Sa s se r ti o n r e for non-infringementinfringement
B H - 0 0 9 C I &Denied C 2 a
C4 , - j . ^ - - - . - . m u kC7 la PM l
M 2
M 4 B H - 0 1 0 C6
Denied M l
M 4
M 5 i
. .
BH-0 11 C2
Denied C3 * '
C4
C6, C7 J kM l A imM 4
4 i rM 5
H - 0 1 2 C 7
D en ied M l
M 2. . -
M 4
k
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 18 of 36 PageID# 18
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
19/116
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
20/116
B E A R D
H E A D
a s se r ti o n r e
infringement
BH -0 1 7
Denied
B11-018
Denied
B H - 0 1 9
Denied
B H - 0 2 0
Denied
Non-infringement Chart listof Features missing; reasonfor non-infringement
C7
M l
M 2
M 4
C4
M 2 - mu s tach e
M 6
C 6
M l
M 4
M 5
C 7
M l
M 4
M 5
M 6
U.S. DesignD692.186
^.^ .-^^.-r. - .
2 0
B E A R D H E A D - 7 6
D E S I G N S
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 20 of 36 PageID# 20
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
21/116
B E A R D
H E A D
asser t ion re
infringement
BH-0 2 1
Denied
B H - 0 2 2
Denied
B H - 0 2 3
Denied
B H - 0 2 4
Denied
Non-infringement Chart listof Features missing; reasonfor non-infringement
C 7
M l
M 2
M 4
M 6
C I
C2
C4
C 7
M 6
C6
M l
M 4
M 5
C 7
M l
M 4
M 5
M 6
U.S. DesignD692.186
Ml ~t fc*
. .
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
22/116
B E A R D
H E A D
a s s e r t ion re
infringement
B H - 0 2 5
Denied
B H - 0 2 6
De nie d
B I I - 0 2 7
De nie d
BH -0 2 8
De nie d
Non-infringement Chart listof Features missing; reasonfor non-infringement
C 7
M l
M 2
M 4
C6
C7M 5 - t ex tu r e
M 6
C I
C2
C3
C4, C7
M l
M 4
M 5
C 7
M l
M 4
M 5
M 6
U.S. DesignD692.186
l - n v W n w - -
? ?
B
B E A R D H E A D - 7 6
D E S I G N S
- - - - -. :
:
: ? : - *
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 22 of 36 PageID# 22
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
23/116
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
24/116
B E A R D Non-infringement Chart list U.S. Design B E A R D H E A D - 7 6H E A D of Features missing; reason D692,186 D E S I G N Sa s s e r t ion re for non-infringementinfringement
B H - 0 3 3 C 7 fDenied M l ^ i
M 4
M 5makl/mtmtfmm y
M 6- .: : i
. .. . . ^ _
BH -0 3 4 C 7
Denied M l i-;
^M 2 B |M ^M 4 y
^ p
B H - 0 3 5 M l
Denied M 2
M 4
IH IBH -0 3 6De nie d C 7M 5 - tex tureM 6
2 4
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1 Filed 11/14/14 Page 24 of 36 PageID# 24
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
25/116
B E A R D Non-infringement Chart list U.S. Design B E A R D H E A D - 7 6H E A D of Features missing; reason D 6 9 2 J 8 6 D E S I G N Sa s se r ti o n r e for non-infringementinfringement
B H - 0 3 7 C7 ^
Denied M l m kM 2
M 4
m M m
M1i
as
. -
BH -0 3 8 C7
Denied M l j ^ ^M 4 a ^ ^M 5 Mv.rfM 6 ^1$
-kilace mask and hat in det ached pos it ion, showing my newdesign;I 'Ki. 2 isa lell side perspective view ol a combined ski laceinu k and hat ina used portion, and.FKi. h a front perspective view thereofInthedrawings, the broken lines in FIG.2 of a human headlomi no part o f theclaimed design. 1he broken lines shown in1-UiS 1 and 3 represent thread stitching.All surfaces not shown form no pari of the claimed design.
1 Claim* 3 Drawing Shvvfc
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-4 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 5 PageID# 41
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
42/116
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
43/116
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
44/116
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
45/116
E X H I B I T B
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-5 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 45
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
46/116
( . J . VJ ^ I W. g , < -> V/ O J J i 0 .
EXHIBIT B
U n i t e d S t a te s P a te n t a n d T r a d e m a r K u r t i c e
Home | Si te Index | Search | Guides | Contacts | eBusiness | eBiz alerts | News | Help
Assignments on th e We b > P a t e n t Q u e r y
P a t e n t A s s ig n m e n t A b s tr a ct o f Tit leNQTE:Resul ts d is p la y o n ly fo r i ss u e d p a te n ts a n d p u b l i s h e d app l i ca t ions . For p en di ng o r
a b a n d o n e d app l ica t ions p l e a s e c o n s u l t USPTO staff .
^ ^ / ^
To ta l Ass i g n men t s : 2Patent S : D 6 9 2 1 8 6
I n v e n t o r : leifery Brian Phillips
Ti t l e : COMBINED s i a FACE MASK AN D HAT
A s s i g n m e n t : 1R e e l / F r a m e : 031123/0240 R e c o r d e d : 09/03/2313
Co n v e y a n c e : ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS).
A s s i g n o r : PHILLIPS. JEFFERY BRIAN
Assignee: BEARDO INC.13 9 MCIIAB S T R E E T
STRATFORD, ONTARIO, CANADA MSA 1Z 5C o r r e s p o n d e n t : FANELLIHAAG6 KILGERPLLC
1 3 0 9 K S T R EE T, N . W., SUITE 1120
WASHINGTON, DC 20006
As s ignme n t : 2R e e l / F r a m e : 031998/0216 R e c o r d e d : 11/12/2313
Issue D t: 1 0 / 2 2 / 2 0 1 3 Application * : 29399030 Fil ing Dt : 0H/O9/2011
P a g e s : 3
E x e c D t: 0 8 / 3 0 / 2 0 1 3
P a g e s : G
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED 0 \ REEL 031128 FRAME 3243. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBVCo n v e y a n c e : CONFIRMS THE NAMEANDADDRESS OF THE ASSIGNEE SHOULDBE STAT LTD. DBA BEARDO, P.M.B. 2, CARIBBEAN PLACE PROVIDENOALES
TURKS & CAICOS .
A ss i g n o r : PHILLIPS. JEFFREY BRIAN
A ss i g n e e : STAT LTD. DBA BEARDO
P.M.B. 2, CARIBBEAN PLACE
PROVIDENCIALES, TURKS AND CAICOS ISLANDS
C o r r e s p o n d e n t : FANELU HAAG& KILGER PLLC
1909 K S TR EE T, NW
SUITE 1120
WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 20006
E x e c D t: 1 1/ 09 /2 01 3
S e a r c h R e s u l t s OS of 11(14 3 0 1 4tfyou ha w any comm e n s or questions concerning the data dJtpfayvtf,
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
47/116
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
48/116
EXHIBIT C
Case l:13-cv-01404-TSE-TCB Document 1 Filed 11/13/13 Page 1 of 21 PagelD# 1
U N I T E D S T AT E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T
F O R T H E E A S T E R N D I S TR I C T O F V I R G I N I A
A L E X A N D R I A D I V I S I O N
S T AT LT D . d b a B E A R D OP.M.B. 2, Caribbean PlaceProvideociales, Turks Caicos Is lands
P l a i n t i f f
HL E D
anion3 pu:35Ci??MSrai3T3'CTCOURALEXAHCaiA.VIRGINIA
V . CaseNo. I ' l t f -ClHW
BEARD H E AD , I NC .880 Apol lo Stree t , Suite 140EI Segundo, CA 90245
B E A R D E D A P PA R E L L L C816 S. Bundy Avenue, No. 11Los Angeles, C 90049
D AV I D S T A N K U N A S
816 S. Bundy Drive, Suite 11Lo s Angeles, CA 90049
NEON EATERS, LLC16 5 No r t h 1330 We s t Sui te A 7
O re m, U T 84057
D e f e n d a n t s .
C O M P L A I N T
Plaintiffslates the following for its Complaintagainst defendants BEARD HEAD, INC.,
BEARDED APPAREL LLC, DAVID STANKUNAS, and NEON EATERS (collectively
Defendants ):
N A T U R E O F T H E A C TI O N
1. This is an action for injunctive relief and damages arising from Defendants'design patent infringement, tradedress infringement,and unfair competition in violation of the
laws of the United States and the lawsof the Commonwealthof Virginia.
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-6 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 48
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
49/116
E X H I B I T D
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-7 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 49
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
50/116
Case 3:13-cv-00762-HEH Document 55 Filed 09/10/14 Page 1 of 3 PagelD# 574
EXHIBIT D
IN T H E U N IT E D S TAT E S D IS T RI CT C O U RTF O R T H E E A ST ER N D IS TR IC T O F V I R G I N I A
R i c h m o n d Divis ion
STAT LTD.,
Plaintiff,
v .
BEARD HEAD, INC., e t a i ,
Defendants .
M E M O R A N D U M O R D E R
(Granting Plaintiffs Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss)
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff STAT, Ltd.'s ( Plaintiff ) Motion
to Voluntarily Dismiss (ECF No. 49), filed on September 8, 2014, whereby Plaintiff
moves to voluntarily dismiss Count One of Plaintiffs Complaint against all defendants,
pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ( Rule 41(a)(2) ). In
light of Defendant's pending motion for summaryjudgment, the Court will consider the
potentialprejudice of granting the Plaintiff's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal pursuant to
Rule 41(a)(2). For the reasons set forth herein, the Motion is GRANTED.
Rule 41(a)(2) provides that once theopposing party has filed a summary judgment
motion, an action may be dismissed at the plaintiffs request only by court order, on
termsthat the courtconsidersproper. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Rule 41(a)(2)
empowers] district courts to exercise discretion over voluntary dismissals. Go
Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., 508 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2007). The purpose of
Rule 41(a)(2) is to freely allow voluntary dismissals unless the parties will be unfairly
Civil Action No. 3 : I 3 C V 7 6 2 - H E H
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-7 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 4 PageID# 50
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
51/116
Case 3:13-cv-00762-HEH Document 55 Filed 09/10/14 Page 2 of 3 PagelD# 57 5
prejudiced. Davis v. USXCorp., 819 F.2d 1270, 1273 (4th Cir. 1987). A district court
should grant a Rule 41(a)(2) motion absent plain legal prejudice to the defendant.
Bridge Oil, Ltd. V Green Pacific A/S, 321 F. App'x 244,245 (4th Cir. 2008).
The Fourth Circuit has identified four general factors this Court will consider in
assessing prejudice: (1) the opposing party's effort and expense in preparing for trial; (2)
excessive delay or lack of diligence on the part of the movant; (3) insufficient explanation
o f the need fora dismissal; and (4) the present stage o f the litigation, i.e., whether a
motion for summary judgment is pending. Gross v. Spies, 133 F.3d 914, 1998 WL
8006, at *5 (4th Cir. 1998) (unpublished table decision). But the pendency of a summary
judgment motion or the prospect of subsequent litigation does not constitute plain legal
prejudice of the sortto defeat a Rule 41(a)(2) motion. Bridge Oil, 321 F. App'x at 245.
Considering these factors, granting Plaintiffs motionwill not unfairly prejudice
the Defendant. Proceedings in the case have been stayed to facilitate settlement
discussions (ECF No. 48). When negotiations proved futile, Plaintiff punctually filed its
motion to voluntarily dismiss Count One of the Complaint and has presented a reasonable
explanation as to the need for dismissal. Specifically, Plaintiffexplains that dismissal will
streamline this litigation and will not harm the remaining trademark infringement or
cybersquatting claims of the Defendant (ECF No. 50). By Order (ECF No. 41) the Court
stayed all proceedings, discovery, and deadlines pursuant to the parties' Joint Motion
(ECF No. 40).
While the Court has now partially lifted the stay (ECF No. 46) to allow the
Defendants to file a motion for summary judgment, such a limited advance of this case
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-7 Filed 11/14/14 Page 3 of 4 PageID# 51
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
52/116
Case 3:13-cv-00762-HEH Document 55 Filed 09/10/14 Page 3 of 3 PagelD# 576
does not constitute the plain legal prejudice envisioned by the Fourth Circuit when
balanced against the opposing party's effort and expense in preparing for trial.
Moreover, as the Fourth Circuit has explained, merely filing a motion for summary
judgment is not enough to establish unfair prejudice. Most importantly, this Court by
Order (ECF No. 43) granted Defendant's motion to voluntarily dismiss its Antitrust
counterclaim against Plaintiffafter Plaintiff fully briefed its 12(b)(6) motion (ECF No.
15).There is simply no basis for finding that Defendant will be unfairly prejudiced by
granting the Plaintiffs motion to voluntarily dismiss its patent infringement claim.Accordingly, Count One of Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE; Defendant's motion for summary judgment is denied as MOOT regarding
only Count One of Plaintiffs Complaint. Any other claims discussed therein shall be
developed and fully briefed in accordance with the Order (ECF No. 53) of this Court.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Memorandum Order to all counselo f record.
It is so O R D E R E D .
Datei;^7>ff 10MRichmond, Virginia
M / s /Henry E. HudsonUnited States District Judge
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-7 Filed 11/14/14 Page 4 of 4 PageID# 52
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
53/116
E X H I B I T E
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-8 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 53
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
54/116
BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT E CanadianPatent-IDI36152-eng(2).pdf
D e t a i l s
Third-Party Information Liability Disclaimer
Some of the information on diis We b pageliasbeen provided by exicrnal sources. The Government of Canadais not responsible for the accuracy,reliabilityor currency of the information supplied by external sources.Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the sourceof the information.Content providedby external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibilityrequirements.
Regist ra t ion n u m b e r : 136152
Date of Registration:2011-01-27
S t a t u s :
Registered
T it le : C O M BI N ED S K I FA C F M A S K A N D H A T
C a n a d i a n Classif ication :
006-04-01-Hats & A ccesso r ie s
0 0 6 - 0 4 - 0 3 - Mask s & A c c e s s o r i e s
O t h e r C la s s e s S e a r c h e d :
N /A
Description:The design consists of the features of confirmation and shape of the combined ski facemask and hat Thestippledlinesshownin figure 3 represent stitching and forms part of thedesign.The stippledlinesshowninfigure 2 illustrate environmentonly and form no part of theclaimed design. Figure 1isa view from analternate detached perspective; Figure 2 is a left side perspectiveview of the design; Figure 3 i s a frontperspective view of the design.
I n t e r e s t e d P a r t i e s
Applicants) as Filed:JE F F P H I LLI P S
Registered Prnprietnris)l E F F P i n L L I P S
I 3 9 M C N A B S T R E F T
S T R AT FO R D , N 5 A 1 Z5
O N TA R I O . C A N A D A
Details
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-8 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 4 PageID# 54
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
55/116
BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT E CanadianPatent-IDI 36152-eng(2).pdf
C u r r e n t O w n e r t s ) :
JEFF P H I LI . IPS
139 M C N AB S T RE E T
STRATFORD. N5 A I Z5
ONTARIO, C A N A D A
Term nf Protection: 10years, subject to payment of a maintenance fee.
M a i n t e n a n c e F ee Pa id :
N o
F i l in g D a t e :
2 0 1 0 - 0 7 - 0 2
C n r r e c t i n n t s l :
N o
Third-Party Information Liability Disclaimer
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-8 Filed 11/14/14 Page 3 of 4 PageID# 55
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
56/116
BEARD HEAD EXEHBiBIt002-CanadianPatent-ID136152-eng(2).pdf
F I G 1
FIG 2
FI G 3
Third-Party Information Liability Disclaimer
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-8 Filed 11/14/14 Page 4 of 4 PageID# 56
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
57/116
E X H I B I T F
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-9 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 57
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
58/116
BEARD H EA D E XH IB IT F MPEP2135-01-102d.pdf
PATENTABILITY 2135 .01
IV. D IS C L O S U R E W I T H O U T C L A IM IN G IN
A P R IO R I S SU E D PAT E NT
A ny i nf er en ce o f abandonment (i.e. . intern to
dedicate to the public) of subject matter disclosedlull not claime d in a previously issued paieni is
rebuttable by an applicationriled at any lime beforea Statutory burarises. Accordingly, a rejectionof aclaim of a patent application under p i v - \ l \.15 I' .S.C. 1021c] predicated solely on ihc issuanceof a patentwhichdiscloses thesubject mailerof theclaim m the application without claiming it wouldbe improper, regardless of whether there iscopcndcncy between the applicationat issue and theapplicationwhich issuedas the patent. Iii i< Gibla.43 7 F 2d -186. 168 U SPQ 5 7 8 (CCPA l711.
V. ONLY W H E N T H E R E IS A PRI O RI T Y
C O N T E S T ( A N A L A P S E O F T I M E BA R A
PATENT
The mere lapse of tune will not bar a patent. Theonly e xc eption is w he n there is a pnoiiiy contestunder prc-AIA 35 l .S.rr tlic hlingul Ihc application in Ihc United Stales.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OF 35 L'.S.C.102(d )
I'rc-AIA 35 I .S.('._ J 02 Id) establishes fourconditions which, if all are present, establish a baragainst the grainingol a patent inthis country :
lAi The foreign application must be filed morethan 12months before the effective U.S. filing dale(See MPEP 5 706.02 regarding effective U.S. lilingdale of an application):
III) The f or ei gn a ppl ic at io n musl have beenHied by the same applicant as in the United Statesor by his or her legal representativesor assigns,
(C) The foreign patent or inventor's certificatemust be actually granted (e.g.. by sealing of thepapers in Great Britain) before the U.S. lilingdale.Ilneed nol be published
(O i T he same invention must be involved.
Il such a foreign patent 01 inventor' s cer ti fica te isdiscovered hy the examiner, the rejection is madeunder pre- \l \ 35 I'.S.C. HI2idi on the ground ofstatutory bar. See MPF.P S 2133.01 lor furtherclarification of each of the four requirements ofpri-AI \ 35 I'.S.C. 102(d).
2135.01 The Font Requirements of Pre-AIA35U.S.C. 102(d) |R-11.2013]
(Editor Note: This MPEP section is nutapplicableto applications subject to examination underthefirstinventorto file (FITF) provisions of the A Aas sclforth m 35 U S . C . 10 0 (note) . S ee MPF.P 2 1 5 9 el
set/ lo determinewhetheran application is subjccilo examination under the FITF provisions, ami\II'll[
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
59/116
E X H I B I T G
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-10 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 59
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
60/116
BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT G -29399030-lnventorsDeclaration.pdf
D E C L A R AT I O N
As a belownamed inventor, IAVF. HEREBYDECLARE:
THAT my/our residences), pest office address{cs),and citizenship(s) are as stated belownext to my/our namc(s);
THAT I/WE believe I/'we ant/are the original, first, and sole inventor (i f only oneinventor is named below) or an original, first, and joint inventor (i f plural inventors are namedbelowor in an attached Declaration) of thesubjectmatterwhichis claimedand for which apatent is sought on the invention entitled
C O M B I N E D S KI F AC E M A SK A N D H A T
(AttorneyDocket No. 0I47-0002DES)
the specification of which (check one)
is attached hereto.
_X was filed on Augustft.2011 as United States Application Number29/3ft9,0?0.
T H AT l /W E do not know an d do not believe that th e same invention wa s ever known orused byothers in the United States of America, or was patented or described in any printedpublication in any country, before I (we) invented it;
THAT 1AVE do not know and do not believe that the same invention was patented ordescribed inany printed publication in any country, or in public use or on sale in the UnitedStates of America, for morethan one yearpriorto the filingdate ol this United Statesapplication;
THAT I/WE do not know and do not bel ieve that the same invention was first patented or
made the subject of an inventor's certificate that issued in any country foreign to the UnitedStates of America before the filing date of this United States application if the foreignapplication was filed by me (us), or by my (our) legal representatives or assigns, more thantwelve months (six months for design patents) prior to the filing date of this United Statesapplication:
T H AT l /W E have r evi ewed an d u nd e rs tan d t h e contents o f the above-ident if i ed
specification, inducing the claim(s),as amendedby any amendment specificallyreferred toabove;
THATl/WE believe thatthe above-identified specificationcontains a writtendescriptionof the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it. in such full , clear,concise,and exact terms as to enableany person skilled inthe art to which it pertains,or with
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-10 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 4 PageID# 60
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
61/116
BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT G -29399030-lnventorsDeclaration.pdf
0147-0002OES
which itis most nearly connected, to make and use the invention, and sets forth thebest modecontemplated by ine ot carryingout the invention;and
THAT l/WE acknowledge, the duty to disclose tothe U.S. Patent andTrademark Officeall information knownto me tobe material to patentabilityas defined inTitle37, Code ofFederalRegulations, 1.56.
LAVEHEREBY CLAIM foreign priority benefits underTitle35, United States Code119(a)-(d) or 365(b) of any foreign application ) forpatentor inventor's certificate,or365(a)of any PCT international applicationwhich designated at least one country other than theUnitedStates of America,listedbelowand haveaiso identifiedbelow any foreign applicationforpatent or inventor's certificateorof any PCT international application having a filing date beforethatof theapplication on whichpriority is claimed.
Prior ForeignApplication Number Country ForeignFiling Date
PriorityClaimed?
Cert i f ied
Copy
Attached?
l/WE HEREBY CLAIM the benefit underTitle 35, United States Code i 19(e) of anyUnited Statesprovisional applications) listed below.
U.S. Provisional ApplicationNumber Piling Date
I'WE HEREBYCLAIM the benefit underTitle 35, United States Code, 120of anyUnitedStates application(s),or S 365(c) of any PCTinternationalapplicationdesignatingtheUnitedStatesof America, listedbelowand, insofar as the subjectmatterof eachof theclaimsofthis application isnot disclosed inthe prior United States or PCI' International applicationinthemanner providedby the firstparagraph of Title35, United States Code, 112,1acknowledge thedutyto discloseinformation whichis material topatentability as definedin Title37, CodeofFederal Regulations, 1.56which became available between (he filingdate of the priorapplication and the national or PCT international filing date of this application.
U.S . Parent
Application NumberP CT Parent
ApplicationNumberParent
Filing DateParent
Patent Number
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-10 Filed 11/14/14 Page 3 of 4 PageID# 61
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
62/116
BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT G 29399030-lnventorsDeclaration.pdf
0 U 7 -0 0 0 2 D E S
l/WE FURTHER DECLARE THAT all statements made herein of my own knowledgeare true,andthat all statements madeon information and beliefare believed to be true; andfurther that these statements were made with theknowledge that willful false statements andthe
like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment,or both, under Section )001 of Title 18 oftheUnited StatesCode, and that such willful falsestatementsmayjeopardize thevalidit)applicationor any patent issuing thereon.
Name of f irst /sole inventor Jeffery Brian PHILLIPS
Residence
Citizenship
Post Off ice Address
Inventor's signature
Date
4B22-l6SS-M93,v. I
Canada
Ca n a d a
13 9 M c N a b S t re e tStratford. Ontario. Canada N5A IZ 5
-7 z r
Aug 302013
^ 2 =
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-10 Filed 11/14/14 Page 4 of 4 PageID# 62
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
63/116
E X H I B I T H
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-11 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 3 PageID# 63
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
64/116
EXHIBIT Hk f j . / / f js j t l u i . u j p t w . g w * / yt J
29/399,030 COMBINED SKI FACE MASK AN D HAT 0147-0002DES 11-14-2014::09:18:54
This application is officially maintained in electronic form. To View: Click the desiredDocument Description. To Download and Print: Check the desired document(s) and click StartDownload.Available D o c u m e n t s. . . . .. D o c u m e n tMail Room Date rode1 0 - 0 2 - 2 0 1 3 I S S U E . N T F
0 9 -0 4 -2 0 1 3 IFEE
0 9 - 0 4 - 2 0 1 3 W F E E
0 9 - 0 4 - 2 0 1 3 N 4 1 7
0 9 - 0 3 - 2 0 1 3 OATH
0 9 - 0 3 - 2 0 1 3 N 4 1 7
0 7 - 3 1 - 2 0 1 3 T R A N . L E T
0 7 - 3 1 - 2 0 1 3 D R W
0 7 -3 1 -2 0 1 3 N 4 1 7
0 7 -3 1 -2 0 1 3 S C O R E
0 7 - 1 8 - 2 0 1 3 N O A
0 7 - 1 8 - 2 0 1 3 S R F W
0 7 -1 8 -2 0 1 3 BIB
0 7 - 1 8 - 2 0 1 3 S R N T
0 7 -1 8 -2 0 1 3 IIFW
0 7 -0 1 -2 0 1 3 N 5 7 0
0 6 - 2 5 - 2 0 1 3 A.QU
0 6 - 2 5 - 2 0 1 3 S P E C
0 6 - 2 5 - 2 0 1 3 REM
0 6 -2 5 -2 0 1 3 N D RW
0 6 -2 5 -2 0 1 3 D RW. N O N B W
0 6 -2 5 -2 0 1 3 W F E E
0 6 -2 5 -2 0 1 3 N 4 1 7
0 6 - 2 5 - 2 0 1 3 T R A N . L E T
0 6 -2 5 -2 0 1 3 X T/
0 6 -2 5 -2 0 1 3 S C O R E
0 6 -2 1 -2 0 1 3 PA..
0 6 - 2 1 - 2 0 1 3 N 4 1 7
0 4 -11 -2 0 1 3 S P E C
0 4 - 11 - 2 0 1 3 D RW
04-11-2013 S C O R E
0 3 -2 5 -2 0 1 3 C T E Q
03-25-2013 ANE. I
0 6 -2 8 -2 0 1 2 S P E C
0 6 -2 8 -2 0 1 2 D R W
0 6 - 2 0 - 2 0 1 2 A . N E
0 6 -2 0 -2 0 1 2 D R W
D o c u m e n t Descript ion
I s s u e N o t i f i c a t i o n
Issue Fe e Payment (PTO-85B)
Fe e Worksheet (SB06)
EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
O a t h o r D e c l a r a t i o n f i led
EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
T r a ns m i tt a l L e t te r
Drawings-only black and white line drawings
EFS Acknowledgment ReceiptPlaceholder shee t indicating presence ofsupplemental content in SCORENotice of Allowance an d Fees Du e (PTOL-85)Search information including classification,d a t a b a s e s a n d o t h e r s e ar c h r e l a t ed n o t e s
Bibliographic Data Shee t
Examiner's sea rch s t ra tegy a nd r es ul ts
Issue Information including classification,examiner, name, claim, r enumber ing , e t c.
Communication - Re: Power of Attorney(PTOL-308)Response after Ex Parte Q uayle ActionSpecification
Applicant Arguments/Remarks Made in anA m e n d m e n t
New or Additional DrawingsDrawings-other than black a nd w hi te linedrawings
Fe e Worksheet (SB06)
EFS Acknowledgment ReceiptT r a ns m i tt a l L e t te r
E x te n si o n o f Tim e
Placeholder sheet indicating presence ofsupplementa l content in SCOREPower of Attorney
EFS Acknowledgment ReceiptSpecification
Drawings-only black an d white line drawingsPlaceholder sheet indicating presence ofsupp lemen ta l con ten t in SCOREEx Parte Quayle ActionAmendment After Final or under 37CFR 1.312,initialed by the examiner.Specification
Drawings-only black and white line drawingsResponse After Final Action
Drawings-only black and white line drawings
D o c u m e n t C a t e g o r y P a ge C o un t
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
PROSECUTI ON 2
P R O S E C U T IO N 2
P R O S E C U T IO N 2
P R O S E C U T IO N 3
P R O S E C U T IO N 2
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
P R O S E C U T IO N 3
P R O S E C U T IO N 2
P R O S E C U T IO N 1
P R O S E C U T I O N 11
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
P R O S E C U T I O N 4
P R O S E C U T I O N 3
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
P R O S E C U T I O N 2
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
PROSECUTI ON 3
PROSECUTI ON 2
P R O S E C U T IO N 3
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
PROSECUTI ON 2
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
P R O S E C U T I O N 3
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
P R O S E C U T I O N 7
PROSECUTI ON 1
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
P R O S E C U T I O N 4
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
P R O S E C U T I O N 4
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-11 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 3 PageID# 64
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
65/116
0 4 - 11 - 2 0 1 2 C T F R
01-25-2012 SA. .
01-25-2012 S P E C
0 1 - 2 5 - 2 0 1 2 D R W
0 1 - 2 3 - 2 0 1 2 C A D
0 1 - 1 2 - 2 0 1 2 T R A N . L E T
01-12-2012 A.. .
0 1 - 1 2 - 2 0 1 2 S P E C
01-12-2012 D R W
11 -0 9 -2 0 11 C T N F
11-09-2011 8 9 2
11-09-2011 S R F W
11-09-2011 S R N T
08-12 -201 1 A PP .FIL E .R E C
0 8 - 1 2 - 2 0 11 W F E E
08-09 -2011 P E T S P R E . A C X
08-09 -2011 W F E E08-09-2011 N 4 1 7
08-09 -2011 D R W
08-09 -2011 F R P R
0 8 - 0 9 - 2 0 11 F R P R
08-09 -2011 S P E C
08-09 -2011 OATH
0 8 - 0 9 - 2 0 11 S C O R E
C l o s e W i n d o w
Final Reject ion
S u pp l em e nt al R es po ns e o r S u pp le m en ta lA m e n d m e n t
Specif icat ion
Drawings-only black an d white line drawings
C ha nge of Address
T r a n s m i t t a l L e t t e r
Ame ndme n t /R e q . Reconsideration-After
Non-Final RejectSpecification
Drawings-only black an d white line drawings
Non-Final Rejection
List of references c it ed b y examinerSearch information including classification,d a t a b a s e s a n d o t h e r s e a r c h r e l a t e d n o t e s
Examiner 's s e a rc h s trategy and resul ts
Filing Receipt
Fe e Worksheet (SB06)
P e t i t i o n f o r 1 2 - m o n t h A c c e l e r a t e d E x a m
Fee Worksheet (SB06)EFS Acknowledgment Receipt
Drawings-only black an d white line drawings
Cer ti fi ed Cop y of Foreign Priority Application
Certified Copy of Foreign Priority ApplicationSpecification
O a t h o r D e c l a r a t i o n f i led
Placeholder sheet indicating presence ofs u p pl e m en t al c o n te n t in SCORE
\ jj\jk \j q\j / \ - -> i '
P R O S E C U T I O N 9
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
P R O S E C U T I O N 3
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
P R O S E C U T I O N 3
P R O S E C U T I O N 8
P R I O R A RT 3
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
P R O S E C U T I O N 4
P R O S E C U T I O N 3
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
P R O S E C U T I O N 4
P R O S E C U T I O N 2P R O S E C U T I O N 3
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
P R O S E C U T I O N 5
P R O S E C U T I O N 7
P R O S E C U T I O N 1
P R O S E C U T I O N 4
P R O S E C U T I O N
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-11 Filed 11/14/14 Page 3 of 3 PageID# 65
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
66/116
E X H I B I T I
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-12 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 66
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
67/116
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
68/116
E X H I B I T J
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-13 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 68
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
69/116
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
70/116
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
71/116
BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT J Beardo allege tm use stmt.pdf
M A R K : B E A R D O
Usage: Winter clothing, mainly headwcar
Attached, pleasefindthe applied-formaikin actual '' QJ _J y 2. o 4 4use in commerce on the goods, as requested.
Declaration: Th e substitute specimen was in use incommerceai least as early as the filing date of theapplication.
Signed: jeffPhillipsd a te : D ec IS 2 0 11
C O R R E S P O N D E N T A D D R ES S :
PHI LIPS. JEFFERY B;
1 3 9 M CN A BST
STRATFORD
N5AIZ5
C A N A D A
Applicant Name: Jeffery B PhillipsCompany: Beardo
FORM F I L E N A M E S )
F o r m Fi le I
F o r m Fi le2
SIGNATURE(S)Declaration SignatureThe undersigned, being hereby warned thai willful false statements and die like so made are punishable Infine or imprisonment,or both, under 18 L.S.C. Section 1001. andthatsuch willful false .statementsmay
jeopardize the validity of the applicationor any resulting registration, declares that he/she is properly
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-13 Filed 11/14/14 Page 4 of 4 PageID# 71
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
72/116
E X H I B I T K
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-14 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 72
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
73/116
BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT K -Beardo tm first use stmt.pdf
Trademark/Service Mark Application, Principal Register
TEAS Plus Application
Serial Number: 85392844
Filiim Date: 08/09/2011
NOTE:Datafields with the are mandatory underTEASPlus. The wording (ifapplicable) appearswhere the field is only mandatory under the fails of the particular application.
The table below presents the data as entered.
ritpui Field Li H i r e d
T E AS P l us YE S
M A R K I N FO R M A T IO N
M A R K
STANDARD
CHARACTERS
USPTO-tiENERATEDI M A G E
LITERAL ELEMENT
MARK STATEMENT
REGISTER
I', i : \ rdo
Y ES
YE S
B E A R D O
Themark consists of Standard characters, without claimto any particularstyle, size, or color.
Principal
APPLIC ANT I N F O R M AT I O N
OWNER OFMARK Phillips, Jeflcry B
ni l \ AK \ TA/FORMERLY DB A Beardo
STREET
CITY
COUNTRY
ZIP/POSTAL CODERequired lo r t ' .S.applicants only)
PHONE
13 9 Mcnab si
Stratford
C an ad a
i O a l 7 D
61 I I 3 6 6 6 2 4 6
l o u t .
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-14 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 4 PageID# 73
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
74/116
BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT K Beardo tm first use stmt.pdf
EM MI. ADDRESS phiilipsplaccd ymail.com
A U TH O R IZED T OCO MMU N I CATE VTA Y esEMA I L
WEBSITE ADDRESS www.lhcbeardo .com
LEGAL ENTITY INFORMATION
TYPE S O LE P RO P RI ETO RSH I P
- STATE/COUNTRYW H E R E L E G A LLY C a n a d aO R G A N I Z E D
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES AND B ASIS INFORMATION
'INTERNATIONAL _,,CLASS
IDENTIFICATION Hals; Headgear,namely, hats with facial coverings
FILING BASIS SECTION 1(a)
FIRST US EANYWHERE DATE
FIRST US E IN
I I I M M E R I E D AT E
At least as early as 04/01/2010
At least as early as 04/01/2010
SPECIMEN FILE NAMEISl
ORIGINAL PDF FILE spccoS [06-12?j-072225255 . bcardnlnuo.pdf
CO N V ERTED PD F
FILE'S i \ \TICRS\l: .XPORTIIMMAGEOLTII \}
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
75/116
BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT K Beardo tm first use stmt.pdf
N A M E \ Phillips.Jclfcry B
F I RM N A M E ;Phillips. Jeffery B
S T R E E T ; B9Mcnabsi
; CITY : s tra t t 'ord
' C O U N T R Y ; C a n a d a
1'ZIP/POSTAL CODK n 5 a l z 5
i PHONE 6 1 4 1 3 6 0 6 2 4 6
I'KMAH.ADDRESS [email protected]
' A U T H O R IZ E D T O
; C O M M U N I C AT E V IA
[EMAIL;Yes
FE E I N F O R M AT I O N
N U M BE R O F C L A S S E S 1
F E E P ER C L A S S 27 5
T O TA L F E E P A ID 27 5
S I G N AT U R E I N F O R M AT I O N
SIGNATURE [/JclTPhillips/ SIGNATORY'SNAME \Jeffery Brian Phillips
: O w n er* S I G N ATO RY ' SP O S I T I O N
D AT E S I GNE D I08/09/2011
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-14 Filed 11/14/14 Page 4 of 4 PageID# 75
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
76/116
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
77/116
BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT L -tm app.pdf
Trademark/Service Mark Application, Principal Register
TEAS Plus Application
S e r ia l N u m b e r: 85392844
Filmy Date: 08/09/2011
NOTE: Datafields withthe are mandatory under TEAS Plus. The wording (i f applicable) appearswhere the field is only mandatary under thefacts of the particular application.
The table below presents the data a.s entered.
lupin Field Entered
IF . \ S P l u s
M A RK I N FO R M AT IO
MARK
YE S
N
H FA R D O
S TANDAR D
CHARACTERSYE S
USPTO-tiENERATEDIMAGE
Y FS
LITERALELEM ENT BEARDO
MARK S TAT E M E N TThe mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particulai font.style, size, or color.
REGISTER Principal
A P P L I C A N T I N F O R M AT I O N
- OW N E R O F M A R K Phillips. JclTery B
DBA/AKA/TA/FORMERLV D B A B e a r d o
STREET 13 9 M cn ah si
C ITY Stratford
ZIP/POSTAI. CODEiUri | i i i rc i l fur V S.
applicants only)
PHONE
n 5 a l z 5
61413666246
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-15 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 8 PageID# 77
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
78/116
Bm
E
A
C
E
w
LN
E
S
W
O
GO
0
IDO
I
C
F
EC>M
cd
SM
O
C
POMOU1
SMD
V
T(
C
Ri
((
CM
l
C
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-15 Filed 11/14/14 Page 3 of 8 PageID# 78
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
79/116
BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT L -tm app.pdf
N A M E
F I R M N A M E
; STREET
C I T Y
COUNTRY
'Z I P /P O S TA L CODE
:PHONE
; >KMAn. ADDRESS
- A U T H O R I Z E D T O
C O M M U N I C AT E V IA
' EMAIL
FE E I N F O R M AT I O N
;Phillips. IcffcryB
;Phillips. lefferyB
: l 3 9 M c n a b s l
i Stratford
: Canada
n 5 a l z 5
6 4 3666246
Y e s
| NUMBEROFCLASSES ; i
F EEP ER CLASS 27 5
' TO TA L F EE PA ID 27 5
S I G N AT U R E I N F O R M AT I O N
: SIGNATURE i/JcJTPhillips/; SIGNATORY'SNAME jJeffery Brian Phillips
SIGNATORY'S nPOSITION Uwner
D AT E S I GNE D 08/09/2011
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-15 Filed 11/14/14 Page 4 of 8 PageID# 79
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
80/116
BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT L tm app.pdf
Trademark/Service Mark Application. Principal Register
TKAS Plus Application
Se r i a l N u m b e r : 85392844
Filing Date: 08/09/2011
T o I li e C o m m i s si o n er f o r T r a d e m a r k s :
MARK: BEARDO (Standard Characters, .secmarl;iT h e literal e l emen t ol the mark consis ts oi BF.ARDO.
The markconsists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font, style, size, or color.
The applicant. Phillips. Jeffery B. DBA Beardo, a Mile proprietorship legallyorganized underthe laws olCanada, havingan address ol
13 9 Mcnab st
Stratford nSalz5Canada
requests registration of the trademark/service mark identified above in the United States Patent andTrademark Office on the Principal Register established by the Act of July 5. 1146 (15 U.S.C. Section 1 OS Iel seq.),as amended, for the following:
For specific filingbasis information for each item, you must viewthe display within the Input Table.International Class025: Hals; Headgear, namely, hatswith facial coverings
In International Class 025. the mark was fitsi used al Icasl as early as 04/01/2010, and first used incommerce at least as early as 04/01/2010. and is now inuse in such commerce. The applicant issubmittingone spccinieii(s)showing the mark as used in commerce on or inconnection with any item in
the class ol listed goods and/oi services, consisting of a(n i The mark consists of the word Beardo with abonie r. .
Original PDF file:spec-581064253-072225255 . hcardo luao .pd l
Converted PDF file(s) (I page)S p ec i me n F i le l
Fot informational purposes only, applicant's website address is: www.thebeardo.comThe applicant's current Correspondence Information:
Phillips.Jeffery BPhillips,Jeffery B13 9 Mcnab st
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-15 Filed 11/14/14 Page 5 of 8 PageID# 80
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
81/116
BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT L tm app.pdf
Stratford n5; i l /5 . Canada
614l3666246(phone)[email protected] (authorized)
A fee payment in the amount of $275 has been submitted with the application, representing payment foi Iclassics).
Declarat ion
The undersigned, being hereby warned that willful false statements and the like so made arc punishable byfineor imprisonment,or both, under 18U.S.C. Section 1001.and that such willful false statements, andthe like, mayjeopardize the validity of Iheapplication or any resulting registration, declares that he/she isproperly authorized to execute ibisapplication on behalfof the applicant; he/she believes theapplicant tobe the owner of the trademark/service mark sought lo be registered, or. if the application is being tiledunder 15U.S.C. Section 105Kbi. he/she believes applicant to he entitled lo use such mark in commerce:lo the best of his/her knowledge and belief no olhei pelsou. firm, corporation, or association has the rightto us e th e m a r k in co m m ei ce , e i ther in th e ident ical form thereof o r in such near resemblance thereto as to
be likely, when used on or in connection Withthe goods/services of such other person, to cause contusion,or to cause mistake, or to deceive: and thai all statements made of his/her own knowledge arc true: andt ha t a ll s t a t emen t s m a de o n i n fo rmat ion an d b e li e f a r c b e li e ve d to be true .
Signature: /Jcfl Phillips/ Dale Signed: 08/01/201Signatory's Name: Jeffery Brian PhillipsSignatory's Position:Owner
R A M S a le Number: 7211
RAM AccountingDale: 08/09/201 I
S e ri a l N u m be r : S 5 3 92 8 44
internet Transmission Date: Tuc Aug 09 07:50:03 EDT 2011TEAS Stamp: USPTO/FTK-58.106.42.53-20110809075003736355-85392844-480a844db455ec3e9daa288d91966446a-CC-72 l 1-201 108091172225255634
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-15 Filed 11/14/14 Page 6 of 8 PageID# 81
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
82/116
BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT L tm app.pdf
B E A R D O
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-15 Filed 11/14/14 Page 7 of 8 PageID# 82
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
83/116
B E A R D H E A D EXHIBIT L tm app.pdf
BEARDO
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-15 Filed 11/14/14 Page 8 of 8 PageID# 83
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
84/116
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
85/116
B EAR D HEAD EXHIBIT M Ward.pdf
CA %A D A
P h o n e : Bt41 i t . ( / ? 4 ) (
Ce-FFeapondente-mail: | Co-respondente-rn*il VaA u l h o * i d :
Domestic Representative - No Found
P r o s ec u t io n H i s to r y
D ale
May 14 2 0 1 4
Apr. 17. 2012
Jan. 31. 2 0 1 2
Jan. 31. 2 0 1 2
Jan 11. 2 0 1 2
Dec. 28.2011
Dec. 28 2011
Dec.27. 2011
Dec. 27 2011
Dec. 2 2011
Dec. 19. 2011
Dec. 02. 2011
Dec. 02 2011
Dec. 02. 20:1
Dec. 01 2011
Aug. 3 2011
Aug. 2 2011
Aug 2 2 0 11
Description
AUTOM ATI C UP DATE O F ASSIGNMENT O F O W N E R SH I P
REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER
OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E MAILED
PUBLISHED F O R O P P O S IT I O N
NOTIFICATION C F NOTICE O F P U B L IC AT I O N E - M AI L E D
L AW O F F IC E . P UBLI CATI ON RE VI E W COMPLETED
A P PR O VE D F O R P U B - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
C O R R ESPO N D EN C E RECEIVED IN LA W OF F I C E
ASSIGNED TO LIE
TEAS R E S PO N S E TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED
NOTIFICATION O F NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED
NON- Fl NAL ACT ION W RI T TE N
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
NOTICE O F P S EU D O M A RK M A IL E D
NE W APPLICATION OF F I C E S UP P L I E D DATA ENTERED IN TRAM
NEWAPPLICATION ENTERED IN [RAM
T M S t a l l ' a n d Locat ion In fo rmat i o n
T M S UM I n lo r ma l io n - N o n e
File Lo ca t io n
Current location: PUBLiC.VnoNAND ISSUE SECTION DateInlocation: Ap 17,8(11
Summary
t o t n l A s s i ' i m n r n ' . s .
Assignment Abstract Of Title Information
ltflfl.siF.int: Pfcfflfe
Assignment 1 ot 1
P i c m :
; ;
Evecutloi. D-iio: MayUI, 201*1
P r o c e e d
N u m b e r
G8552
68562
68552
68552
6 3 2 5
6 3 2 5
8 0 8 1 5
8 0 3 1 5
Cwivry*nco:
R - . ' i F i . - r n r :
Date R e c o r d e d :
Supporting Document*.:
Mama:
Ln;al Entity Typr:
N i m e '
Ls*.Entity Typo:
A d d r e s s :
DBA, AKA, TA.Foimerly:
Cotr*spondnt t ame.
W QNS rHG ENTIRE INTEREST
Ml) 03. SOt-*
awt anm af t Mn- sa / f t o. 'M pc '
JSFPERV BRIAN PH ILIPS DBA BEARDO
STAT. LTD
LIMITEDUABUi FYCOMPANY
State or Country Wtiio u$ Ptaca WhafiO rg a n l i fd
Assignee
Slate of Country Whn* IL'RKS,AND CA.C05 ISLANDSO'flanUcU:
2. CARIBBEANPLACE' MC1ALE5, TliR^S ANDCAtCOS ISLANDS
nB A B E A R D O
CoFrespondrnl
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-16 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 85
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
86/116
E X H I B I T N
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-17 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 86
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
87/116
BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT N BEARDO000219TaraDuff2009.pdf
Fjradulf s crochet a n d o t h er stuff: thi- beard ha t
sa r a d u f f ;c r o c h e t a n d
o t h e r s t u ff
t a I A I) I l' i - ' : :I- r: : V :; II o I'
SrL
4 . -
.
hu p //iarjduffiiuff.blogspoi.com/2009/12/btard-hal.himl
1 1 / 3 / 1 1 12:28 PM
I II I A V, DI' .CKM II K U ; , :
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
88/116
E X H I B I T O
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-18 Filed 11/14/14 Page 1 of 17 PageID# 88
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
89/116
BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT OtaradufTon Klsv - Sold Items
Tara Duff 2010-2011 blog.pdfhttps: www.cisy.com^shop/iarodufTy'sold?pagc 254&vicu type list
I o f 3
Soli Roiji '.Iry Community Stags
Register
k n . U ' * - ii i l 1 S .d Kama
S h o p S e c l l o n t
101 - ,-.
b c u r C l *
I
fa*h*;i< ' * M f * i m n r i 21
c r % r * '
t C J V > n - .
Cloaranoi ?
c o n v a r t ib l a r u l / c o w ts 5
Alevari UT Un*Bd SWW
Have a quest ion?' . '
N a t d a c u s t o m o r d e r ?
^equesl CustomOrder
laxadufl
Re* m
(1.047)
A c t i o n *
&eemofa
than10Eny
Siyn In Swm*
^ taraduff ...._your s o u r c e o f c r o c h e t g o o d n es s
MWp
taraduflTariHMi Hand CmcheWfl Appara. and Accaivm*
Favonlo LIM i; . fOHOW MJfl
TaraduTamop a thehome c* r OFFICIAL. AUTHENTIC. AM)THE CRIG'NAL BEARDBEAN E' Ourtocues, stockingtiati and lumteoac*. hats wBh beards arv made n and snapped from the USA' nw d -> >
Th**shop accepts Etsy Gfl Card*
t . i r. i d u f \ -. S o ld I te m s
Sort Ly Most Racent
V-st.tch Crochet Kuft ha i PATTERN - All su
C U S TO M bf-rtrtr--1 bo w -
m b lu e an d b r o w n b e a r d e d b an ie
tarvdufl
black arfl gray b*anJed lumberjack hatl a t ad u f f
_ black at'd gray beG'dud lun>tn:ij.i .- tatH n d u f l
CUSTOM b ea r ded bcaruo
V-Mitch Ciocliet KuS ha i PAT T E R N Al l t o s s
CUSTOM b ea r ded bca r ue
m UacJt .trd gray heatfnri liimhefjac*lullU r a d u l f
F f h ' l . . ' 0 1 0
Fe b a . '010
Fe b 8. ? 0 t 0
Fe b 1' W 0
F ob 7 . 2 0 1 0
T e b 7 . ^ 0 1 0
Fe b 7. 2010
S '21 /2014 ' 50 I' M
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-18 Filed 11/14/14 Page 2 of 17 PageID# 89
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
90/116
BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT 0 -Tara Duff 2010-2011 blog .pdfImps:/ www.ctsy.com shop uiradufr'.-: ad lumberjack hat
SC U S TO M b e a r d e d b ean io
laradtal
CUSTOM b e v e e be
t a n K -
B War* ar d yraybuaiew. lumucnackhait an d u ff
Ion twuud bearded lumberjack hat' . , r . ( - ; . 'i
gf-nn F*,vd-d b^wtrun YlXJTHlanjdufl
insnrvrtd listing tru aloox2
I . m c V i
&bUck .trd gray bearded lumberjack hait a rad u f l
*
V-sMeh Crn rh r t KuC h.-.t PATTERN - A ll s i;*?,
LarwMI
Greenand orangebearded beanie.tankduS
13 tweed bearded lumberjack hatt a r a f u f f
bruwn beorded biuu lumberjack haiT I M i ' . f l
Fphfi . 2010
Fe b 5 . 2 0 1 0
Fe b 5 ? 0 1 0
Fe b S, 2010
Fe b 5. 2 0 1 0
FubS.VOIQ
F r b 4 . 2 0 l 0
F e b 3 . 2 0 10
Fe b 3. 2010
V 2 I / 2 O 1 4 . V S 0 P M
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-18 Filed 11/14/14 Page 3 of 17 PageID# 90
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
91/116
BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT 0 -Tara Duff 2010-2011 blog.pdfImps:/ www.ctsy.com/shop'laradulT/'sold'.'pagc>254&view typc=listnradufTon Etsy - Sold Items
l .1 i
~*\ lumber jackbuardud stocking capu r ad ,'i
Fe b 3. 2 0 1 0
1 ... 2S 0 25 1 252 253 254 255 256 257
Follow Etsy Browse Elsy
AH Gift Id oa t J .w-Uy Had U A cces s o r * Wo ' n n
O J ' l S u p p l i e s G r a d ua t i on O l f U KMs Vintage:
P i t M a a : 1Day Grfit H j T ( A, Dvtf ' J M We d J . r u *
O 2 0 H i r*y. Ic - ' ' ^U*i About C o n tec l Ped es r*teu D9voD'fc Cu ec u Terms 1 I q > Ccr>)i ff-t
5 ' 2 I / 2 ( I M 3:5(1 P M
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-18 Filed 11/14/14 Page 4 of 17 PageID# 91
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
92/116
BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT 0lar.uhM. on Rtsy- Shop Rcmcwn
-Tara Duff 2010-2011 blog.pdfhwps: www.ctsy.coni shop LaradurT/rcvic\vs?pagc II7
1 0 1 2
Sen R eqi- .B y r.nn r a m , Sic,-, V
Reglwicr Siyn In
HnT?etU'.i'-tirti ShopRi .1
S h o p Section*
M l tem
p ag an -. /1
fasret.i> h o i s ' n j r ^ j m ' t j f B /t
c h t l d -
s c a v e v c u w * * C
Dearaw 7
: . . :
mTa r a l e o O u t t mt open ui jn tad Statu*
Have a q u es t io n ?
.
N e e d a c u s t o m o r d e r ?
3cQuest Custom Order
S h o p In to
Optw-n 1.1May ?1. 700S
.
A c t i o n s
Se c w i 3 f* .o r tes th s
r*inva hn toEny
taraduff......your s o u rce o f c r o c h e t goodness
t a radul lI a ' # d j 1 i t a n d C r o c h t l c d Appa 'e i OW . ) . ' . / ( .1 ,-
TaraduTl s-i p -s to linn..- n*3i->OFFICIAL,AUTHENTIC.AHOTHE ORIGINALBEARDBEAN IE' Ou't^uc-,hats, a n d u r r te r ja c k nat svaO- t e J r d s a*e TiaC* rr a 'ds . '- 'pped t r a m t h e USA1... r e a d m o r e
I tem R e v i e w s
Average Item Review [1 M7]
Ravevred by Aiv.-^rr...;-
O B . i . idod K ni t Ha n d b a g FR EE SH IPPINGI ..ely t ur se I absolutelylove Wl
- . a wed I i ' r yn eo us o n J an ua ry M. 2D1G
h o a rd ed s l ou chy b ean i e lor youth
ILOVEDMYSTOCKINGCAP I asked Taraiee lucustom make one formysun with
the specs for his coat. Itv/as PERFECT ) Actually, it wa s BETTER than perfect It fits
rjreat. looks incredible, an d is a hoot I cannot qel over how wonderful it ts I hove
been asked where we gel it. and Iwas more than happy 10tellothers1Thank
youso much TaraUIlove it And willmore than likelyend up ordering morn tor olhtsrs
that I know
fteweeajdby Anonymou*an January 31. 7itf
b lu e an d browii bearded lumbcijack ha i
Thank you so much. I LOVEthishalf n 11-Spocedog's husband John
RevitwtadbyAnonymou*onlanueryO rntri
5 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 4 3 : 42 I' M
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-18 Filed 11/14/14 Page 5 of 17 PageID# 92
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
93/116
BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT 0 -Tara Duff 2010-2011 blog.pdfliii.ulull on Eisy - Shop Review* hups: www.etsy.com/shop'laradufl /review s?pagc 11
Yellow Croche t Ruffled Ba y - FR EE SH IPPIN G
Wowl Th e price was a steal for how prerty Ihis purse isl Even me flower is sooo
special Just love the ruffles' Shipped really fast too' Thanks so much'
Revewed by AnyynousO January?. ?Q10
lumberjack b ea rd ed s t ock in g cap
The stocking ca p was a h itw ith my boyfnend. I bought it to rh is b ir thday, and he
thought it was the best ni 'l ' could have ever g iven him (men lol ) I twas shipped
quickly and seems to f ita var ietyof headsizes (I have a small head an d tned i ton f or
r' . * ( , ' ymoUSOri Decrr-*** it , 2009
**ja_v l i lr i* i: (odCleT sirred ta'dffja I-RM-SHIPPING
Revr*-rd hy Ananyinouac Qecenr- i
id Ha t^ H CandyCornCruthel
Rn H tdby An--yinctj\ry tiCCf'l
hand-croche t c h il d 's p i nk c o t to n h o o d ie v e s t
WOWSo much prettierInperson than the photocan show' SUPERhighqualityrrochnl sweate r veal. SO CUTE on ) THANKS SO MUCH*
1 ... 112 113 114 115 11G 117 118 119
Follow Ctsy Browse Eu y
Ar t J . . * ,
' w e n * C n ' l Supp In Qradaat
- t l . .y G m * l i i a l iv in g Mm
MjbW *c u s e art
Vtntagi
Wedding*
Wu-. t -
Trawdinj nrim
O t* EtsjtIre. ' - ) Atm: CofKad Peg-* Prat*. D^w-to rs Ca-r-n TrrM IVva'.y Cfpft&t
V 2 I / 2 0 M S:42 VX\
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-18 Filed 11/14/14 Page 6 of 17 PageID# 93
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
94/116
l \ . l M-l H O J / l t / S '
o i o j '9Z uv r
( n o * r. ue r
0 1 0 c ' 9 Z W
0 1 0 J ' I C ' T
O l O I ' I Q d
O MK ' t -q n d
B t ip u t l
1P(|jfji-Duquinipopjevq Xvi [u p )peiq
npjt]
o n iv aq p.-.piecq uaaitJ pu y ab i iv jo
gi pen i
U03 >irr3 abmij y,&* ye w jur* iuoo | Ajjaq
t9i
unpeuai ^iuui jaMov/ ifeu.pctia. |.unptie sieijBuepott 'rnnboi .no i3inv39oavaa tvMOtao 3h i qnv 'miN3Hinv 'tvihi jj o -mi* i*m * *hh BAnpesei
i -m . i H O d o * e n * >(--auCSS'jTlv &J9 ra. fddy paiJj jXUQ SuTl, l T * ' 1
n p c j c |
I -
ssaupoog w q o o a o j o aoanos anox' i inpeae^
i?ll=3d
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
95/116
BlwTp
2
i
mU
gJ
o
B
:
im
l
J
ab
J
b
t
Cm n
af
a
t
MJ
^l
i
JK
^m
b
/L
b
l
J
5
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-18 Filed 11/14/14 Page 8 of 17 PageID# 95
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
96/116
BEARD HEAD EXHIBIT 0 -Tara Duff 2010-2011 blog.pdfhups:/ www.cisy.com shop laraduff/sold'.'pnge*5235&vicwlype=lislnradulTonEisy - Sold Items
^b r o w n b e a r d b e a n i e
iv. rs. . '
1 ... 25 0 25 1 252 253 25 4 25 5 25G 25 7
3 o f -
Follow Eisy Browse Etsy A, l Girt Ueea
Cnfl i u p p i
Father's Day Grfu Hjrrc 4 Uvir.g
R/om tsy Ik I t / j P {I . -
U o l i A c c t S M l e * Warner
- . - i- i | i, eees a
W r d J ^ g s
Uoo Abao? C y& KI P uq M PtsH Dgv.oovt C o w l l-e-.i H -u cy C tp y 0 I
- 21 2 01 4 v -l 'l I'M
Case 2:14-cv-00588-RGD-LRL Document 1-18 Filed 11/14/14 Page 9 of 17 PageID# 96
-
8/10/2019 Beard Head v. STAT - Complaint
97/116
i v i K r: i H O c V lt /s
r . u u - t s# q
0 0 0 / S a s Q
600? 'I I a
600< ' 0 a a r j
0107 ' S UtT
lueievjisoaj *q JJCJ
I j n o e j e i
(jnpv) puw Aasjsj
npi .< i
iuui iptnq qnv. j ims Ab.d sue t u
r w u eaq p a p j e a q i m j o o j a
I I