bay people, june 2012 report

7/31/2019 Bay People, June 2012 Report

1/15

BayPeopleInc1421SheepsheadBayRd.PostMailBox288Brooklyn,[email protected]

June27,2012

MayorMichael

R.

Bloomberg

CityHall

NewYork,NY10007

HonorableMayorBloomberg,

BayPeopleInc.isaNewYorkbasedorganizationthatwascreatedbyresidentsofSheepsheadBaywitha

goalofprotectingthequalityoflifeinourresidentialneighborhood.

Wearewritingtoyouinconnectionwithaconstructiongoingonat2812VoorhiesAvenue,Brooklyn,NY

11235. Theprop0sedMosque/CommunityCenterisbeingbuiltinplaceofasinglefamilyhomepreviously

occupiedby

an

elderly

couple.

Once

completed,

it

will

be

able

to

accommodate

up

to

1,500

people

daily,

yet

notasingleparkingspothasbeenallocatedforitsuse. Thisfacilityisbeingconstructedwithoutanyregard

totheimpactonthesurroundingcommunity. Religionmustnotbeanexcuseforzoningviolationsandinappropriatedevelopment. Asresidentsofthecommunity,wedemandthatourrightsbeprotectedaswell.

AttachedpleasefindBayPeoplesreportNo:2,detailingtheproblemwiththecurrentzoningregulations,

whichinsteadofprotectingthecommunity,createdloopholesthatarebeingexploitedbythisandsimilar

constructionprojects. Theseprojectswillcreatenuisanceandwilldestroythequalityoflifeoftheresidents.

Thankyou.

cc:D.StorobinNYSSenator,M.MarkowitzBrooklynBoroughPresident,R.Turner Congressman,L.FidlerNYC

Councilman,S.CymbrowitzNYSAssemblyman,T.Scavo CommunityBoardNo:15,M.NelsonNYCCouncilman,

M.GoldenNYSSenator,H.WeinsteinNYSAssemblywoman,


2/15

Currentzoningregulationsareindireneedofrevision. Theneighborhoodresidentsobjecttotheautomatic

asofrightstatusthisconstructionreceivedfromthecity. Theprop0sedMosque/CommunityCenteris

beingbuiltinplaceofasinglefamilyhomepreviouslyoccupiedbyanelderlycouple.Oncecompleteditwill

beabletoaccommodateupto1,500peopledaily,yetnotasingleparkingspothasbeenallocated. This

facilityisbeingconstructedwithoutanyregardtotheimpactonthesurroundingcommunity.AllowingsuchconstructionstobesitedinthecurrentlocationjeopardizesthefundamentalpurposeoftheZRto"promote

andprotectpublichealth,safetyandgeneralwelfare."AssetforthintheZR,"thezoningdistrictsestablished

inthisResolution...aredesignedtoguidethefutureuseoftheCity'slandbyencouragingthedevelopment

ofdesirableresidential,commercialandmanufacturingareaswithappropriategroupingsofcompatibleandrelatedusesandthustopromoteandtoprotectpublichealth,safetyandgeneralwelfare."

Before - 1,200 sq/ft. 2 People Siteoftheproposedcommunityfacility

UnfinishedMosque/CommunityCenter. Oncecompleted,itwillstandover35ft.tall,over8,500sq.ftandthisstructurewillbeabletoaccommodateupto1,500peopledaily,yetnotasingleparkingspothasbeenallocated


3/15

ResidentsofSheepsheadBayhaveconstitutionalrightstoenjoytheirpropertyandprotecttheirqualityof

life,yetDepartmentofBuildings(DOB)ignoredallofitwhenitsignedoffonthisproject.DOBhasthepower

andauthoritytorejectapplications,BoardofStandardsandAppeal(BSA)hasthepowerandauthorityto

affirmsuchrejectionsinordertopreventabusesthatwouldgoagainstthepurposeoftheZR.

DOB OurVision1:TheNewYorkCityBuildingsDepartmentiscommittedtobecomingapremiermunicipal

buildingorganization,dedicatedtoenhancingthequalityoflifeforallNewYorkersandmakingourcitysafer

Boardof

Standards

and

Appeal

Authority

and

Composition

2:The

Board

is

empowered

by

the

City

ChartertointerpretthemeaningorapplicabilityoftheZoningResolution,BuildingandFireCodes,Multiple

DwellingLaw,andLaborLaw.Thispowerincludestheabilitytovaryincertaininstancestheprovisionsof

theseregulations.

TheCourtofAppealshasmadeclearthattheinterpretationoftheZRbyBSAandDOBmustbe"givengreat

weightandjudicialdeference,"ithasalsomadeclearthatsuchdeferenceisonlyafforded"solongasthe

interpretationisneitherirrational,unreasonable,norinconsistentwiththegoverningstatute."Appelbaum,66

N.Y.2dat97778.

BSAignored

the

evidence

as

well

as

the

intent

of

the

ZR

and

related

regulations

in

order

to

affirm

DOB's

approvalofthisMosque/Communitycenter. BSA'sdeterminationisirrational,unreasonable.Thus,BSA's

decisionisarbitraryandcapriciousandaffectedbyanerroroflawandshouldbeannulled.

InFischerv.Taub,127Misc.2d518,52526(1stDept1984),theFirstDepartmentstatedthattheplainmeaningoftherelevanttermsmadeclearthat:facilityisthesumofitspartsandnotamanifestationofany

oneofthem. Accordingly,theMosque/CommunityCentershouldbelookedatasumofallpartsandnotany

singleonetakenseparately. Thefacilityat2812VoorhiesAvenuehasbeenadvertisingitselfasacommunity

centerandaspartofthecommunityfacility,theyareplanningtoprovideprayerspace,knownasaMosque,

butthefacilityitselfisnotaMosque. IfisaCommunityCenter,henceitshouldbetreatedlikeoneand


4/15

parkingshouldbecalculatedbasedonrequirementsapplicabletoaCommunityCenter,notahouseof

worship. ThebuildershavespecificallyrefrainedfromidentifyingthefacilityasaMosque.Infact,theonly

documentslistingthisfacilityasahouseofworshiparethedocumentsfiledwiththeDOB,whichwere

intendedtocircumventtheparkingrequirements.Theparkingrequirementsforahouseofworshiprequire

onespotper15people,whiletherequirementsforaCommunityCenterareonespotper10people. The

facilityisclearlymotivatedtofilepaperworkasahouseofworshiptotakeadvantageofthelowerrequired

numberofparkingspots.However,onlytworoomsonfloors1and2arelistedastheprayerfacility.

Basementfloorandthethirdfloorarelistedasaccessoryspace,andwillbeusedforthecommunitycenter

purposes.Thereisnothingpreventingthefacilityfromallowingcommunitycenterusageonfloors1and2.Alternatively,thereisnothingpreventingthefacilityfromopeningupallspaceforprayerandattractinga

muchlargerthanprojectednumberofworshippers,whichwouldalsorequiremanymoreparkingspotsthan

currentlyallotted.

CITYOFFICIALS/ELECTEDPOLITICIANS

Despitehavingcontactedthelocalpoliticianswithourconcernsabouttheeffectsoftheproposed

constructiononthecommunity,BayPeoplehavebeenrepeatedlyignored. BayPeopleareappalledbythe

lackofconcernfortheproblemsoftheneighborhood,andsuspectthatthepoliticiansareafraidand

unwillingto

be

perceived

as

opposing

areligious

group,

when

in

fact

they

are

being

asked

to

address

aquality

oflifeproblem. Thecityofficialsareturningablindeyeonthesituation. BayPeopleacknowledgetheright

ofareligiousgrouptobuildahouseofworshipandsupportthisright,howeverBayPeoplealsosupportthe

rightoftheneighborhoodresidentstoenjoytheirpropertyandmaintainacertainqualityoflife. Therightsof

theneighborhoodresidentsarenolessimportantthantherightsoftheworshipersandmustbetakeninto

accountwhendeterminingthesizeandeffectsoftheproposedfacility.Whowillprotecttheirrightstoenjoy

propertyandrightstocontinuedqualityoflife,safety?

BayPeoplewouldliketoinvitecityofficialsandelectedpoliticianstotakealookattheactualbuildingin

questionandthesurroundingarea,andtoseeforthemselveshowthisfacilityovershadowsthewholeblock

andwill,oncecompleted,destroythequalityoflifeintheneighborhood.Seeingthewallsofthestructure

almostcomplete,

its

size

became

that

much

real

for

everyone

living

nearby.

Bay

People

stand

even

more

convincedthattheMosque/CommunityCenterwillcreateparking,traffic,noiseandpollutionproblemsthat

thecommunityistryingtoprevent.

Thezoninglawaswrittenallowshousesofworshiptogetaroundtheoccupancythresholdwhichwould

otherwiserequirethemtoprovideparkingspaces. BoroughpresidentMartyMarkowitzagreedwithBay

Peoplesassessmentthatthelawispoorlywrittenandinsteadofprotectingtherightsoftheneighborhood

residentsendedupallowingthecreationofthisoversizedstructure.

BSA'sdeterminationwasaffectedbyanerroroflaw,wasarbitraryandcapriciousandwasanabuseof

discretion. Therefore,DOB'sapprovalsandissuedpermitsshouldberevoked.


5/15


6/15


7/15

Allcongregantswillcometothehouseofworshipatthesametimeforthesamepurpose.Thetotalnumberwill

292asLamisDeek(builderslawyer)statedduringBSAhearing.Theyallfillthemainroomandasecondaryarea

Themainroomisassignedformenandthesecondroomisassignedforwomen.Duetothissegregationofmen

andwomenonlynumberofoccupants(men)ofthemainroomwentintocalculationfortheparking.Thewomen

congregateswerenotaccounted. Thusthenumberoftheoccupantsthatcometothehouseofworshipatthe

sametimeforthesamepurpose(maximumsimultaneousoccupancy)issignificantlyreduced. Itisalsopossible

thatthecongregantswillgatherinthecellarandnotonlyonthefirstandsecondfloors. APAapplicationwasfile

forthecellartobeusedasagatheringroomfor89people,whichcanbehappeningatthesametimeasthe

services

on

the

first

and

second

floor.

These

people

are

not

included

in

the

parking

requirements

calculations,

whichonlytakeintoconsiderationtheoccupantsofthemainroom.

Theprayertimescheduledoesntlistdifferentprayertimesformenandwomen.Men,womenandchildrenwill

prayingatthesametimetogether,5timesaday

ThepresentwaiverwaswrittenfortheLocallyOrientedHousesofWorship. AsstatedintheZoningLawZR253

cangetwaiverforcongregationoflessthan150people:10spotsx15carsperoneperson.DuringhearingLamis

Deekstatedthattherewillbe292personsinthemosque. Sothe2812Voorhiesistoobigforalocalhouseof

worship.Unreducedsimultaneousoccupancywouldrequiremorethentencarspotsallowedbywaiver.

TheZoningResolutioninthesectionZR12wheredefinitionsoftermsarestateddoesnotgivedefinitionforthe

roomof

assembly.

The

ZR12

refers

to

the

definition

of

rooms

as

it

given

in

the

Multiple

Dwelling

Law.

The

MultipleDwellingLawrecognizestwotypesofroomslivingroomandpublicroom

TheLivingroomasdefinedintheroomthatisusedforsleepingpurposes.Noneoftheroomsinthe2812Voorhiesavenueusedissuch

Thesecondtypeofroomsispublicroom. Thepublicroomisdefinedasapaceusedincommonbytheoccupantsorbypersonswhoarenottenants. Therefore,theroomsthatareinincommonandthata

usedforthesamepurposeshouldbeconsideredasonespaceoronepublicroom. Theareaofthese

roomsshouldbecombinedandusedforthecalculationofthemaximumsimultaneousoccupancy.

Themainpurposeoftheparkingregulationsistominimizetrafficandtrafficcongestioninthearea. Ascommun

facilitieshavegrowninnumberandsize,oftenservingregionalpopulations,landuseconflictshavedevelopedan

localresidents,communitygroupsandelectedofficialshavethereforeaskedthatzoningforcommunityfacilities

residentialareasbeadjustedtomeetchangedconditions.Thechangesareintendedprimarilytolimitthesizeof

certaincommunityfacilities,andparkingandtrafficproblems,inthecity'slowestdensityneighborhoods.3

ThiscommunityfacilityisbeingconstructedinaR4zone. AsperCityPlanningR1R5zonesareconsideredLowe

DensityDistrictsandtheseareasarecharacterizedbylowbuildingheights,landscapedyardsand high

automobileownership.Somelowerdensityneighborhoodsare comprisedentirelyofsinglefamilydetache

homesonlargelots;othershaveone andtwofamilydetachedhomesonsmallerlots.


8/15

Housesrightacrossthe streetfromthe construction Housesfeetawayfromthe constructionEnvironmentalAssessmentStatement040202ZRY4

The1961ZoningResolutionpermittedcommunityfacilityusesinresidentialdistrictsincreasedbulkbeyondwhawasavailableforresidentialdevelopment.Communityfacilitybuildingsareallowedtohavemorefloorarea,can

encroachonrearyards,canhavealargerbuildingenvelope.Whilethecityscommunityfacilityzoningregulatio

haveremainedlargelyunchanged,communityfacilitieshaveproliferatedandareoftendifferenttodaythanthey

werein1961.Thesefacilitiesaffectthequalityoflifeinmanyofthecity'sresidentialareasandtheCityhasreceiv

complaintsregardingthelocation,size,traffic,andparkingassociatedwiththem.Asaresponsetovarious

communityconcerns

regarding

the

zoning

regulations

for

community

facilities,

astudy

of

these

issues

was

relea

byCityPlanningin1993.Thestudywasfurtherrefinedfollowingthecompletionofacommunityfacilitiesparkin

study.Inanefforttorespondtosomeoftherecommendationsfromthestudy,anapplicationforazoningtext

amendmenttomodifythecommunityfacilitiesregulationsoftheZoningResolutionwassubmittedin1992(CEQNo.92621Y).Apositivedeclarationwasissuedfortheinitialproposal;however,anumberofissuesemergedtha

requiredfurtherstudy.ResourcelimitationsprecludedCityPlanningfrompursuingtheapplication,anditwas

subsequentlywithdrawn.Morerecently,inconsultationwiththeCityCouncilsLandUseCommittee,CityPlanni

identifiedsomeofthemostcommoncommunityconcernsrelatingtoambulatoryhealthcarefacilitiesinonean

twofamilyresidentialareas,housesofworshipthatdonotprovidesufficientparking,andcommunityfacilitiest

obstructrearyards.CityPlanningwillcontinuetostudythebroaderrangeofissuesraisedinthe1993study.

ThepresentrulesintheZoningResolutiondetermineoffstreetparkingrequirementsbasedonthelargestroom

ofassembly.Usingthelargestroomruledoesnotcontrolthemultiusecommunityfacilitiesandtheirsecondary

uses.Theparkingshouldbecalculatedbasedonthetotalpublicassemblyoccupancyofthebuilding.Thiswillso

multiplepublicassembliesinmultiplerooms. Currentlytherearenorulesforthecommunityfacilitytoprovide

parkingforitsownvehicles(vans,buses)oritsemployees,sotheytakeupstreetparking.

PotentialImpactsoftheProposedAction:

NeighborhoodCharacter Thecharacterofaneighborhoodisestablishedbynumerousfactors,includinglandusepatterns,thescaleofitsdevelopment,thedesignofbuildings,thepresenceofnotablelandmarks,andavari

ofotherfeatures.Thereisapotentialforneighborhoodcharacterimpactsasaresultoftheproposedaction.


9/15

Infrastructure Theproposedtextamendmentcouldresultindevelopmentthatwouldaffectthedemandfor

waterand/orsanitarysewageandstormwaterdisposal.Thereisapotentialforaninfrastructureimpactasaresu

oftheproposedaction.

SolidWasteandSanitationServices Theproposedactionmayaffectdemandforsolidwasteandsanitationservices.Thereisapotentialforasolidwasteandsanitationservicesimpactasaresultoftheproposedaction.

Trafficand

Parking

The

proposed

text

amendment

to

community

facilities

zoning

regulations

might

result

inanincreaseinvehiculartrafficintheaffectedareasandincreaseddemandsforparking. Thereisapotentialfora

trafficandparkingimpactasaresultoftheproposedaction.

TransitandPedestrians Becausethesechangescouldaffecttransitandpedestrianconditions,thereisapotentialforatransitandpedestriansimpactasaresultoftheproposedaction.

AirQuality Anairqualityanalysisdeterminesaproposedactionseffectsonambientairquality,oreffectsontheprojectbecauseofambientairquality.Ambientairquality,orthequalityofthesurroundingair,canbeaffect

byairpollutantsproducedbymotorvehicles(mobilesources);andbyfixedfacilities(stationarysources).The

changescouldaffectmobilesourceandstationarysourceairquality. Thereisapotentialforanairqualityimpac

asaresult

of

the

proposed

action

Noise thereisapotentialforanoiseimpactasaresultoftheproposedaction

COMMUNITYFACILITIESREFORMTOPROTECTLOWDENSITYNEIGHBORHOODCHARACTERIS

PASSEDBYCITYPLANNINGCOMMISSION5

July28, 2004 TheCityPlanningCommission(CPC)todayunanimouslyvotedtoapprovezoningreformto

betterregulatecommunityfacilitiessuchasmedicalofficesandhousesofworshipand reducetheirundesir

effectsonlowdensityresidentialneighborhoods.

Itchangesparkingrequirementsfor housesofworshipthathavebecomeincreasinglymoreregionalbut ha

notprovidedadequateparking,burdeninglowerdensityneighborhoods.

"Weare delightedtopartnerwiththeCouncilonthiszoningtextchangetoprotectthe characterofour

neighborhoodsbyreducinglanduse conflictsfromcommunityfacilitiessuchashealthcareofficesand hou

ofworship.Asthenatureandsizeofhealthcarepracticeshas changed,sotoomustthezoningadaptto

accommodateneededfacilitiesinwaysthatare lessproblematicforresidentialcommunities.Itisimportan

toprotectourlowestdensityresidentialneighborhoodsfromfacilitiesthathaveexpandedtoregional

proportions,"saidMs. Burden,ChairofthePlanningCommission."Inputreceivedduringthe publicreview

processhas helpedusimprovetheproposal,whichisanimportantfirststepinsolvingthe conflictsbetwee

suchfacilities

and

their

surrounding

communities."

CityCouncilLandUse CommitteeChairMelindaKatz,said,"Thisisagreatstepinprovidingmuchneeded

relieftoourcommunities.Iamproudoftheexchangebetweenthe council,theadministrationand thepub

inordertogenerateasolidsolutionthatbenefitssomanyofourneighborhoods.Adaptingzoningchanges

ensurethestabilityofourcity'severchangingcommunitiesis, and mustcontinuetobe, acitypriority."

"Todayisabigstepforwardinamendingthe"CommunityFacilities"partofthe zoningcodetoimprovethe

qualityoflifeinlowdensityresidentialcommunitiesthroughoutthecity,"saidCouncilMemberTonyAvella

ChairofZoningand FranchisesfortheCityCouncil


10/15

Thekeychangesinthecitywidecommunityfacilitiesregulationsinclude:

Increasingoffstreetparkingrequirementsforhousesofworship,distinguishingbetweenthosethatserve

localvs.regionalaudienceand addingflexibilityforhousesofworshiptomeetthesenewrequirements;

Eliminatingorreducingpermissionfor certaincommunityfacilitiestoobstructrearyards;

Thechangesareintendedprimarilytolimitthe sizeofcertaincommunityfacilities,andtheirrelatedparkin

andtrafficimpacts,inthecity'slowestdensityresidentialneighborhoodswhilecontinuingtoallowthem

ampleopportunitiestolocatewherelanduse conflictswouldbeminimized.

HousesofWorship Theparkingproblemsoftenassociatedwithhousesofworshipinlowdensity

neighborhoodswouldbealleviatedunderthenewrules,resultinginabettermatchbetweenthe demanda

facilitycreatesfor offstreetparking,and the amountofparkingprovided.Inlowerdensityresidence(R1

throughR5) districts. Yet thesefacilitiesoftenattractlargenumbersofpeoplewhotravelbycar fromwell

beyondtheneighborhood,creatingtrafficand parkingproblems.

RearYardConstruction Inordertobetterpreservelightand air toadjoiningresidencesand rearyardview

aswellaspreserveneighborhoodcharacter,the proposalwouldextendthecurrentprohibitionson

communityfacilitiesbuildinginarequiredrearyardinthe lowestdensitydistrictsto. Certaintypesof

communityfacilities

in

higher

density

residence

districts

would

also

be

subject

to

greater

restrictions

on

rea

yearobstructions.

CONCLUSION:Surroundingresidentsmustbeabletoevaluateandcommentontheconstructionofthisentity.

BayPeopledontthinkanycommunityfacilityshouldbebuiltatthatlocation. Thefutureoccupantofthisfacility

couldhavefoundamoresuitablelocationwhichhasenoughroomforabuildingandparking. Thereareplentyo

availablelotswithinthecommunity;somearenexttopublictransportationvscurrentlocationwhichis12blocks

awayfromtheB/Qtrainandblocksawayfrombusstops.

BayPeople,Inc.collectedmorethanathousandofsignaturesfromneighborhoodresidentswhooppose

constructionunderitscurrentdesignandlocation. ThisMosque/CommunityCentercreatesanobjectionable

influencein

aresidential

area.

This

construction

arouses

disapproval

of

local

residents

because

of

increased

traff

tothearea,lackofparking,loweringofpropertyvalues,increasednoisebyautoandpedestriantrafficandan

amplifiedcalltoprayer5timesperday.Theplan,design,size,andscopeofthisprojectisdrasticallydifferenttha

surroundingresidentialhomes.Residentsvoicetheirobjectionstounreasonableinterferencewithenjoymentan

useoftheirpropertiesbycontactingcityofficialandalloftheseattemptswereignored.Wedemandan

investigationintothesituationandprotectourrightsandsafety.Wehavearighttoknowwhyaprojectthatis

clearlyunsafeandunsuitablefortheareaisallowedtocontinuewithnooversight.Thewelfareofthe

neighborhoodresidentsisbeingignoredundertheguiseofpoliticalcorrectness,wheninfactallweareaskingis

attentiontoaqualityoflifeproblemandourpropertyrightsarebeingtrampleduponwithnoresponsefrom

electedofficials.Thousandsoftheneighborhoodresidentsviewthisconstructionforwhatitis:aDOBassisted

manipulationof

zoning

laws

and

building

codes

by

the

developer

who

is

trying

to

squeeze

an

enormous

structure

aquietresidentialblock.Membersofthecommunity,includingBayPeople,havebeenaccusedofIslamophobia,

bigotry,racialintolerance,whileallwearetryingtodoistodefendourrights.Wearenotopposedtoanyone

exercisingtheirrighttofreelypracticetheirreligion.Weare,however,opposedtoaconstructionprojectthatis

puttingourlivesandthelivesofourchildrenindanger.Thisisanillconceivedstructurethatisbeingbuiltinthe

wrongplace,aplacethatistoosmalltoaccommodatethegrandioseplansofthedevelopers.VoorhiesAvenueis

small,twolanestreet,thatcannothandletheincreaseintrafficandhasnospaceforparkingofalltheadditional

vehiclesthatwillcometotheneighborhoodoncetheprojectiscompleted. Thestructurewillbeableto

accommodateupto1,500peopledaily,yetnotasingleparkingspothasbeenallocated.


11/15

BSAignoredallevidenceastothetruenatureandpurposeofthepartition,includingthefactthattherooms

separatedbythepartitionareintendedtobeusedconcurrentlyforthesamepurpose. Thisseparationdefieslog

andcommonsense.Theroomsshouldbeconsideredseparateiftheyarenotonlyphysicallyseparate,but

practically"separateanddistinct"intheservicestheyprovide.Thisfacilityfailsatestablishinga"separateand

distinct"purposeforthesetworooms. BSA'sacceptanceofthebuilders'proposalallowedforthefacilitytobeb

whereitwouldotherwisebeprohibited. BSA'sdeterminationwasaffectedbyanerroroflaw,wasarbitraryand

capriciousandwasanabuseofdiscretion.DOB'sapprovalsandissuedpermitsshouldberevoked.

Bay

People

didnt

have

a

choice

but

to

file

Article

78

proceeding

is

used

to

appeal

the

decision

of

a

New

York

Storlocalagency. BPanditsmemberswillbedirectlyandadverselyaffectedbyanerrorofthelawaswellasthe

irrevocablechangetothecharacteroftheneighborhoodthatwillresultfromconstructionofthisfacility.More

specifically,BPanditsmemberswillbeharmedbytrafficcongestion,noise,andreducedpropertyvaluesthatwi

resultfromoperationofthisfacility.

1http://www.nyc.gov/html/dob/html/about/mission.shtml

2http://www.nyc.gov/html/bsa/html/mission/mission.shtml3http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/cfzp/commfac1.shtml4http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/pdf/cfzp/cf_eas.pdf5http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/about/pr072804.shtml


12/15

LETTER FROM ZONING LAWYER TO BSA:


13/15


14/15

TRAFFIC REPORT


15/15

bay people, june 2012 report

Documents