calhsr.comcalhsr.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/bp-urs-mpr-jan13v1.pdf · bakersfield-palmdale –...
TRANSCRIPT
Bakersfield-PALMDALE – URS/HMM/Arup JV Progress Report – January 2013
1
Regional Consultant
Monthly Progress Report
Bakersfield to Palmdale
For the Period of
December 29, 2012, through January 25, 2013
Prepared by
Russel Rudden, Project Manager
Submitted
February 8, 2013
Bakersfield-PALMDALE – URS/HMM/Arup JV Progress Report – January 2013
2
1) Key Issues and Areas of Concern
New Items
a) JV Accounts Receivable Status: As of mid-January 2013, the outstanding accounts receivables
for the JV contract are $17.6 million.
Ongoing Items a) FY 12/13 Revised Work Plan for Balance of FY 12/13: On December 7, 2012, the Joint-
Venture (JV) received direction from the California High-Speed Rail Authority (Authority) noting that the Fiscal Year (FY) 2012/2013 Annual Work Programs (AWPs) would need to be adjusted to
implement the Revised 2012 Business Plan. The JV was advised that the FY 12/13 budgets may change and we would be receiving further guidelines from the Program Management Team (PMT)
within the next few weeks. The JV received further guidance from the PMT during the first week of January culminating in the JV submitting to the PMT a revised scope, schedule and budget for FY
12/13 on January 11. Comments were received from the PMT and PMO on January 18 and a revised
scope schedule and budget for FY 12/13 was submitted on January 24. Additional comments were received from the PMT on January 29 and the JV has commenced preparing the final scope, schedule
and budget. An NTP from the Authority to proceed with the final proposed scope, schedule and budget is anticipated on January 31.
b) JV Contract Ceiling: The JV contract with the Authority, as modified, has a maximum dollar limit of
$119,985,612. Currently $118,257,094 has been authorized through Notice to Proceeds (NTPs) issued by the Authority. The JV currently projects that the authorized NTP amounts will be exhausted
in approximately April 2013. Written notice was given to the Authority on January 8, 2013 of this
impending contract limit issue. The JV will continue to monitor the remaining contract capacity. A contract modification to increase the contract maximum dollar limit has been requested as soon as
possible to avoid last-minute work slowdowns or stoppages related to the lack of contract capacity.
c) Potential Adjustment to Bakersfield to Palmdale Record of Decision/Notice of Determination Target Dates: The PMT advised the JV on December 12, 2012 and again on
January 8, 2013 that the revised Ready to List (RTL) schedule for FY 12/13 should reflect a Record of
Decision (ROD) milestone date of summer of 2015. The Notice of Determination (NOD) would therefore be at least one month before the ROD date.
d) Engineering and Environmental Deliverables: Engineering deliverables this period included the
alignment report, and several geotechnical reports plus 15% draft drawings for systems. Under the environmental task, the No Project Alternative and the EMI/EMF section of the draft EIR were
submitted. The remaining engineering and environmental reports and will continue to be submitted in February and March. Some of the environmental deliverables are awaiting information from the PMT
on rail passenger patronage to complete the analytic portion of the technical reports.
e) Geotechnical: A geotechnical investigation work plan was prepared for the Draft 15% submittal in November 2012. Site-specific geotechnical and tunneling conditions are needed to develop
procurement strategies, structural designs and costs. The PMT requested in their January 18, 2013
comments on AWP version 4 (v4), that the JV include initiating geotechnical investigations in FY 12/13 and that up to $1.4 million of the revised FY 12/13 budget could be used for such work.
f) Traction Power Source: On the basis of discussions with the PMT/EMT in August 2012, the JV
continued to develop two options for traction power supply systems (TPSS). The JV and EMT are working collaboratively to develop options for routing the transmission lines to help expedite the
process with Southern California Edison (SCE). The JV is waiting for the decision on power supply for the high-speed rail (HSR) substations. The JV prepared files showing proposed location of TPSS and
other power-related facilities to support the system. These files were submitted to the EMT/PMT for
SCE meetings in January 2013.
Bakersfield-PALMDALE – URS/HMM/Arup JV Progress Report – January 2013
3
2) Financial Reporting
On July 27, 2012, Notice to Proceed (NTP)-1 for the Bakersfield to Palmdale Section was
received, which provided a NTP budget of $6,000,000 for FY 12/13. On November 16, 2012, Limited Notice to Proceed (LNTP)-01A authorized an additional expenditure of $5,182,255, for a
total not-to-be-exceeded value of $11,182,255. The FY 12/13 AWP v3 budget of $16,296,411 was used as the basis for reporting in the invoice and in the tables and charts below.
a) Staff Hours Worked
The period of performance is December 29, 2012, through January 25, 2013. Actual labor hours
billed versus those planned by task for this reporting period and for the cumulative reporting period since July 1, 2012, are shown in the table and chart below. Figures for this current
reporting period include actual labor hours billed for subconsultants.
Hours Worked
PALMDALE
Task Plan Actual Pct Plan Actual Pct
Task 1 - Project Mgt. 1,441 810 56% 9,647 4,800 50%
Task 2 - Public Outreach 821 245 30% 5,499 1,851 34%
Task 4 - Engineering 6,512 3,141 48% 43,483 48,590 112%
Task 5 - Environmental 1,918 1,491 78% 32,027 14,415 45%
Task 7 - DEIR/EIS 691 - 0% 3,983 143 4%
Task 8 - Certification/ROD 561 - 0% 1,330 - 0%
Total 11,944 5,686 48% 95,969 69,799 73%
January 2013 Cumulative Since 7/1/12
Bakersfield-PALMDALE – URS/HMM/Arup JV Progress Report – January 2013
4
b) Dollars Spent
The period of performance is December 29, 2012, through January 25, 2013. Actual dollar
amounts versus those planned by task for this reporting period and for the cumulative reporting period since July 1, 2012, are shown in the table and chart below. Figures for this current
reporting period include actual expenditures for subconsultants. With the implementation of the revised reporting format, the amount reported for each task is for labor expenditures only. All
non-labor expenditures are grouped together and reported as other direct costs (ODCs).
Dollars Spent
PALMDALE
Task Plan Actual Pct Plan Actual Pct
Task 1 - Project Mgt. 165,235$ 109,337$ 66% 1,106,358$ 628,064$ 57%
Task 2 - Public Outreach 82,299$ 29,149$ 35% 551,047$ 221,145$ 40%
Task 4 - Engineering 1,015,534$ 400,944$ 39% 6,787,859$ 5,821,561$ 86%
Task 5 - Environmental 206,204$ 147,423$ 71% 3,453,733$ 1,337,019$ 39%
Task 7 - DEIR/EIS 69,997$ -$ 0% 397,270$ 10,242$ 3%
Task 8 - Certification/ROD 52,895$ -$ 0% 125,089$ -$ 0%
ODCs 81,485$ 4,822$ 6% 625,767$ 45,110$ 7%
Total 1,673,649$ 691,675$ 41% 13,047,123$ 8,063,140$ 62%
January 2013 Cumulative Since 7/1/12
Bakersfield-PALMDALE – URS/HMM/Arup JV Progress Report – January 2013
5
3) Deliverable Status and Summary Schedule
The attached supplemental tables and figures provide additional information on the current schedule
and status of the following deliverables:
a) BP-URS-Sch-Env Milestones-Jan 2013 v1.xls Environmental Milestones Report
b) BP-URS-Deliverables Status-Jan 2013 v1.xls Deliverables Status Table
c) BP-URS-Sch-Summary-Jan 2013 v1.pdf Summary Schedule
d) BP-URS-Earned Value Report-Jan 2013 v1.pdf/.xls Earned Value Report
Hours/Dollars for the Fiscal Year Hours/Dollars for the Entire Project
CH
STP
Envi
ronm
enta
l Mile
ston
es S
ched
ule
(Sta
tus D
ate:
Jan
25,
201
3)
Ass
igne
d W
eigh
t5%
15%
5%12
%13
%33
%5%
10%
2%10
0%
Sect
ion/
Act
ivity
Plan
Act
ual/F
orec
ast
%
com
plet
eSc
opin
g R
epor
t
Boa
rd B
riefin
g to
A
ppro
ve R
elea
se
of th
e A
A R
epor
t
Rel
ease
Pr
elim
inar
y
AA
Rep
ort
Boa
rd B
riefin
g to
App
rove
Su
pple
men
tal
AA
Rep
ort
Rel
ease
Su
pple
men
tal
AA
Rep
ort
Che
ckpo
int A
C
oncu
rren
ce
Dra
ft Te
chni
cal
Rep
orts
Che
ckpo
int B
C
oncu
rren
ce
Adm
in D
raft
EIR
/EIS
Su
bmitt
ed to
FR
A15
% D
esig
n
Dra
ft EI
R/E
IS
to P
ublic
R
evie
wC
heck
poin
t C
Con
curr
ence
Fina
l EIR
/EIS
NO
D/R
OD
Perc
ent
Com
plet
e To
war
d N
OD
/RO
DPE
P D
esig
n
Bak
ersf
ield
- P
alm
dale
Pla
nM
ar. '
10A
ug. 5
, 201
0 A
ug. '
10O
ct. 7
, 201
0 N
ov. '
10S
ep. '
11S
ep. '
11N
ov. '
11D
ec. '
11Ju
n. '1
2S
ep. '
12S
ept.
'12
85 m
iles
Act
ual/F
orec
ast
Mar
. '10
AS
ept.
2, 2
010
AS
ept.
'10
AFe
b. 2
, 201
2 A
Feb.
'12
(4) A
Aug
. '12
AM
ar. '
14A
ug. '
13Ju
l. '1
4M
ay '1
4O
ct. '
14Fe
b. '1
5Ju
l. '1
4S
ep. '
15Ja
n. '1
6
% C
ompl
ete
100%
100%
100%
62%
0%63
%0%
0%0%
54%
0%A
= A
ctua
l D
ates
Cha
nged
from
last
mon
th R
epor
t sho
wn
in re
d.
(4)
The
Supp
lem
enta
l AA
Rep
ort w
as c
ompl
eted
in M
arch
201
1; h
owev
er th
e G
rape
vine
Alte
rnat
ive
is b
eing
ana
lyze
d an
d m
ay a
ffect
the
Bak
ersf
ield
-Pal
mda
le a
nd P
alm
dale
-LA
Sup
plem
enta
AA
s. -
Prin
t Dat
e: 2
/7/2
013
RC
Mile
ston
e Ja
n 20
13B
P-U
RS-
Sch-
Env
Mile
ston
es- J
an 2
013
2013
-01-
10
Cal
iforn
ia H
igh-
Spe
ed T
rain
Pro
ject
Bak
ersf
ield
-Pal
mda
le S
ectio
nFY
12-1
3D
eliv
erab
le S
tatu
s
Last
upd
ated
: 1/
10/2
013
1
Task
W
BSN
umbe
rD
eliv
erab
leVe
rsio
nBa
selin
e D
ue D
ate
Dat
e D
eliv
ered
Proj
ectS
olve
Loc
atio
nCo
mm
ent
11.
11.
1.1
Revi
sed
Annu
al P
roje
ct M
anag
emen
t Pla
nSe
ptem
ber '
121
1.1
1.1.
2Ve
rsio
n 1
Annu
al W
ork
Prog
ram
1M
arch
'13
11.
11.
1.3
Vers
ion
2 Dr
aft F
Y An
nual
Wor
k Pr
ogra
m2
April
'13
11.
11.
1.4
Vers
ion
3 FY
Ann
ual W
ork
Prog
ram
3M
ay '1
3 1
1.1
NA
FY12
/13
AWP
3.01
7/27
/201
2Pr
grm
Mgm
t>45
>D2>
4>FB
FY
2012
-13/
FB F
Y 20
12-1
3>BP
FY
2012
-13
Vers
ion
3.01
11.
1N
AFY
12/1
3 AW
P 4
41/
11/2
013
CAHS
R 4
5>D1
>4>B
P FY
201
2-13
>P F
Y 20
12-1
3 Ve
rsio
n 4
Incl
udin
g W
orki
ng D
raft
SOW
s, EA
C, a
nd sc
hedu
le
11.
1N
AFY
12/1
3 AW
P 4
rev
1/24
/201
3CA
HSR
- 45>
D1>4
>BP
FY 2
012-
2013
Ver
sion
4>W
orki
ng D
raft
>201
3-01
-24
Upl
oad
Incl
udin
g W
orki
ng D
raft
SOW
s, EA
C, sc
hedu
le, a
nd
resp
onse
s to
com
men
ts
11.
1N
AM
eetin
g N
otes
: PM
T M
anag
emen
t Mee
ting
6/20
/201
27/
16/2
012
BP>0
81
1.1
NA
Mee
ting
Not
es: P
MT
Man
agem
ent M
eetin
g 7/
5/20
121
7/16
/201
2BP
>08
11.
1N
AM
eetin
g N
otes
: PM
T M
anag
emen
t Mee
ting
7/28
/201
21
7/30
/201
2BP
>08
11.
1N
AM
eetin
g N
otes
: PM
T M
anag
emen
t Mee
ting
8/1/
2012
18/
13/2
012
BP>0
81
1.1
NA
Mee
ting
Not
es: P
MT
Man
agem
ent M
eetin
g 8/
15/2
012
18/
16/2
012
BP>0
81
1.1
NA
Mee
ting
Not
es: P
MT
Man
agem
ent M
eetin
g 8/
29/2
012
19/
5/20
12BP
>08>
2012
11.
1N
AM
eetin
g N
otes
: PM
T M
anag
emen
t Mee
ting
9/12
/201
21
9/17
/201
2BP
>08
11.
1N
AM
eetin
g N
otes
: PM
T M
anag
emen
t Mee
ting
9/26
/201
21
10/3
/201
2BP
>08>
2012
Mee
ting
Not
es1
1.1
NA
Mee
ting
Not
es: P
MT
Man
agem
ent M
eetin
g 10
/10/
2012
110
/12/
2012
BP>0
8>20
12>B
P-PM
T-PM
O B
i-Wee
kly
Mee
tings
11.
1N
AM
eetin
g N
otes
: PM
T M
anag
emen
t Mee
ting
10/2
4/20
121
11/1
/201
2BP
>08>
2012
Mee
ting
Not
es1
1.1
NA
Mee
ting
Not
es: P
MT
Man
agem
ent M
eetin
g 11
/07/
2012
111
/26/
2012
BP>0
8 M
eetin
g N
otes
>201
2 M
eetin
g N
otes
>BP-
PMT-
PMO
Bi-W
eekl
y M
eetin
gsIn
clud
ing
actio
n ite
ms
11.
1N
AM
eetin
g N
otes
: PM
T M
anag
emen
t Mee
ting
11/0
7/20
121
12/1
4/20
12BP
>08>
2012
Mee
ting
Not
es>B
P-PM
T-PM
O B
i-W
eekl
y M
eetin
gsIn
clud
ing
actio
n ite
ms
11.
1N
ABa
kers
field
to P
alm
dale
Alig
nmen
t Mee
ting
Mat
eria
ls 12
/5/2
012
112
/18/
2012
BP>0
8>20
12 M
eetin
g N
otes
Incl
udes
age
nda,
pre
sent
atio
n, v
ideo
s, tu
nnel
and
vi
aduc
t pre
sent
atio
ns1
1.1
NA
BP H
ST A
lignm
ent A
ltern
ativ
es-B
LM L
ands
in th
e M
ojav
e Ar
ea 2
012-
12-1
71
12/1
8/20
12BP
>08>
2012
Mee
ting
Not
esFo
llow
-on
mat
eria
ls fr
om 1
2/5/
12 A
lignm
ent
mee
ting.
11.
1N
ABP
HST
Alig
nmen
t Alte
rnat
ives
-Bak
ersf
ield
to P
alm
dale
Sec
tion
2012
-12-
171
12/1
8/20
12BP
>08>
2012
Mee
ting
Not
esFo
llow
-on
mat
eria
ls fr
om 1
2/5/
12 A
lignm
ent
mee
ting.
11.
1N
AFo
otpr
int R
evie
w P
rese
ntat
ion
Mat
eria
ls 01
/16/
2013
11/
24/2
013
BP>0
8>20
13 M
eetin
g N
otes
Incl
udin
g al
ignm
ent a
nd fo
otpr
int .
kmz f
iles
11.
1N
AFo
otpr
int R
evie
w M
eetin
g N
otes
01/
16/2
013
11/
24/2
013
BP>0
8>20
13 M
eetin
g N
otes
Incl
udin
g al
ignm
ent a
nd fo
otpr
int .
kmz f
iles
11.
21.
2.1
Qua
lity
Assu
ranc
e/Q
ualit
y Co
ntro
l Pla
n U
pdat
eAn
nual
ly1
1.2
1.2.
2He
alth
and
Saf
ety
Plan
Upd
ate
Annu
ally
11.
41.
4.1
Requ
ests
to in
clud
e ad
ditio
nal s
taff/
subs
(i.e
., Pe
rson
nel R
eque
st F
orm
s)Pr
ior t
o en
gagi
ng in
pro
ject
wor
kSu
bmitt
ed v
ia e
mai
l
11.
41.
4.2
Mon
thly
pro
gres
s rep
ort w
ith sc
hedu
le/s
cope
/bud
get u
pdat
es10
th d
ay o
f the
follo
win
g m
onth
11.
41.
4.2
MPR
with
supp
lem
enta
l inf
orm
atio
n: Ju
ne 2
012
17/
13/2
012
CHSR
A>45
>D1>
8>12
-06
11.
41.
4.2
MPR
with
supp
lem
enta
l inf
orm
atio
n: Ju
ly 2
012
18/
10/2
012
CAHS
R>45
>D1>
81
1.4
1.4.
2M
PR w
ith su
pple
men
tal i
nfor
mat
ion:
Aug
ust 2
012
19/
10/2
012
CAHS
R 45
>D1>
8>12
-08
11.
41.
4.2
MPR
with
supp
lem
enta
l inf
orm
atio
n: S
epte
mbe
r 201
21
10/1
1/20
12CA
HSR
45>D
1>8>
12-0
91
1.4
1.4.
2M
PR w
ith su
pple
men
tal i
nfor
mat
ion:
Oct
ober
201
21
11/1
2/20
12CH
SRA
- 45>
D1>8
>12-
101
1.4
1.4.
2M
PR w
ith su
pple
men
tal i
nfor
mat
ion:
Nov
embe
r 201
21
12/1
0/20
12CA
HSR
45>D
1>8>
12-1
11
1.4
1.4.
2M
PR w
ith su
pple
men
tal i
nfor
mat
ion:
Dec
embe
r 201
21
1/10
/201
3CH
SRA>
45>D
1>8>
12-1
21
1.4
1.4.
3M
onth
ly in
voic
e w
ith tw
o co
pies
of t
he m
onth
ly p
rogr
ess r
epor
t10
th d
ay o
f the
follo
win
g m
onth
11.
41.
4.3
Mon
thly
invo
ice:
Jun
e 20
121
7/16
/201
2CA
HSR>
45>D
2>9>
and
D1>
9 (li
nk)
11.
41.
4.3
Mon
thly
invo
ice:
Jul
y 20
121
8/13
/201
2CA
HSR>
45>D
2>9
and
D1>9
(lin
k)1
1.4
1.4.
3M
onth
ly in
voic
e: A
ugus
t 201
21
9/11
/201
2CA
HSR
45>D
2>9>
7.02
11.
41.
4.3
FNO
-BFD
-URS
-JV In
voic
e De
cem
ber 2
011
2nd
Resu
bmitt
al v
12
9/24
/201
2CA
HSR
45>D
2>9>
6.06
11.
41.
4.3
FNO
-BFD
-URS
-JV-In
voic
e O
ct 2
012-
v1.p
df1
11/1
2/20
12CA
HSR>
45>D
2>9
and
D2>9
(lin
k)1
1.4
1.4.
3FN
O-B
FD-U
RS-JV
-Invo
ice
June
201
2-Su
p-v1
211
/27/
2012
CAHS
R>45
>D2>
9 an
d D1
>9 (l
ink)
11.
41.
4.3
FNO
-BFD
-URS
-JV-In
voic
e M
ay 2
012-
Sup-
v1.p
df2
11/2
7/20
12CA
HSR>
45>D
2>9
and
D1>9
(lin
k)1
1.4
1.4.
3M
onth
ly in
voic
e: S
epte
mbe
r 201
21
10/1
2/20
12CA
HSR>
45>D
2>9>
and
CAH
SR>4
5>D1
>9 (l
ink)
11.
41.
4.3
Mon
thly
invo
ice:
Oct
ober
201
21
11/1
2/20
12CA
HSR>
45>D
2>9
and
D2>9
(lin
k)1
1.4
1.4.
3M
onth
ly in
voic
e: N
ovem
ber 2
012
112
/11/
2012
CAHS
R 45
>D2>
9>7.
05
Cal
iforn
ia H
igh-
Spe
ed T
rain
Pro
ject
Bak
ersf
ield
-Pal
mda
le S
ectio
nFY
12-1
3D
eliv
erab
le S
tatu
s
Last
upd
ated
: 1/
10/2
013
2
Task
W
BSN
umbe
rD
eliv
erab
leVe
rsio
nBa
selin
e D
ue D
ate
Dat
e D
eliv
ered
Proj
ectS
olve
Loc
atio
nCo
mm
ent
11.
41.
4.3
Mon
thly
invo
ice:
Dec
embe
r 201
21
1/14
/201
3CA
HSR
- 45>
D2>9
>7.0
6 De
cem
ber 2
012
w-li
nk
to C
AHSR
- 45
>D1>
9>7.
06 D
ecem
ber 2
012
11.
41.
4.4
Mon
thly
(com
plet
e) sc
hedu
le su
bmitt
als
10th
day
of t
he fo
llow
ing
mon
th1
1.4
1.4.
4M
onth
ly (c
ompl
ete)
sche
dule
: Jun
e 20
121
7/11
/201
2CA
HSR
45>D
1>7>
2012
>06
June
11.
41.
4.4
Mon
thly
(com
plet
e) sc
hedu
le: J
uly
2012
18/
10/2
012
CAHS
R>45
>D1>
71
1.4
1.4.
4M
onth
ly (c
ompl
ete)
sche
dule
: Aug
ust 2
012
19/
10/2
012
CAHS
R 45
>D1>
7>20
12>0
8 Au
gust
11.
41.
4.4
Mon
thly
(com
plet
e) sc
hedu
le: S
epte
mbe
r 201
21
10/1
1/20
12CA
HSR
45>D
1>8>
12-0
91
1.4
1.4.
4M
onth
ly (c
ompl
ete)
sche
dule
: Oct
ober
201
21
11/1
2/20
12CH
SRA
- 45>
D2>7
>201
2>10
Oct
ober
11.
41.
4.4
Mon
thly
(com
plet
e) sc
hedu
le: N
ovem
ber 2
012
112
/10/
2012
CAHS
R 45
>D1>
71
1.4
1.4.
4M
onth
ly (c
ompl
ete)
sche
dule
: Dec
embe
r 201
21
1/10
/201
3CH
SRA
- 45>
D1>7
>201
2>12
Dec
embe
r1
1.4
1.4.
5Bu
dget
Rea
lloca
tion
Requ
est F
orm
sAs
nee
ded
11.
41.
4.6
Trav
el R
eque
st F
orm
sAs
nee
ded
Subm
itted
via
em
ail
11.
41.
4.6
1212
-27
1/7/
2013
11.
41.
4.6
1212
-28
1/7/
2013
11.
41.
4.6
0113
-02
1/7/
2013
11.
41.
4.6
0113
-02
1/7/
2013
11.
41.
4.6
0113
-06
1/7/
2013
11.
41.
4.6
0113
-13
1/14
/201
31
1.4
1.4.
7Ch
ange
Req
uest
For
ms/
Chan
ge Im
plem
enta
tion
Form
sAs
nee
ded
Subm
itted
via
em
ail
11.
41.
4.7
CR 1
37 B
RRF
for S
ierr
a En
gine
erin
g8/
1/20
121
1.4
1.4.
7CR
151
T3
Alte
rnat
ive
Alig
nmen
t Tec
h R
epor
ts9/
12/2
012
11.
41.
4.7
Out
line
Site
Sel
ectio
n fo
r MO
I10
/2/2
012
11.
41.
4.7
CR 1
61 V
BN B
RRF
to su
ppor
t City
of L
anca
ster
10/3
/201
21
1.4
1.4.
7CR
0165
BRR
F fo
r BRI
10/3
1/20
121
1.5
1.5.
1U
pdat
es to
Risk
Reg
ister
Mon
thly
, as n
eede
d1
1.5
1.5.
1BP
DRA
FT P
rogr
am R
isk R
egist
er Ju
ne 1
201
2 BP
Upd
ate
2012
-09-
129/
13/2
012
BP>0
5>50
11.
51.
5.1
BP R
isk R
egist
er U
pdat
e 20
12-1
2-5
112
/12/
2012
BP>0
5>50
22.
12.
1.1
PIM
App
roac
h Pl
anJu
ly '1
2 an
d '1
32
2.1
2.1.
2TW
G A
ppro
ach
Plan
July
'12
and
'13
22.
12.
1.3
Envi
ronm
enta
l Jus
tice
Out
reac
h Pl
anJu
ly '1
2 an
d '1
32
2.1
2.1.
4Dr
aft E
IR/E
IS P
ublic
Hea
ring’
s App
roac
h Pl
anDe
cem
ber '
12 a
nd '1
32
2.1
NA
BP O
utre
ach
Appr
oach
Mem
oran
dum
201
2-12
-14
112
/17/
2012
BP>3
5>10
22.
22.
2.1
Wee
kly
BP o
utre
ach
sche
dule
and
mee
tings
snyp
osis
to S
outh
ern
Calif
orni
a Re
gion
al O
utre
ach
Man
ager
Wee
kly
22.
32.
3.1
Stak
ehol
der/
Publ
ic R
eque
sts T
rack
ing
Repo
rtM
onth
ly2
2.3
2.3.
1BP
Sta
ndar
d Co
rres
pond
ence
Res
pons
es9/
12/2
012
BP>3
5>20
>Cor
resp
onde
nce
22.
32.
3.2
BP P
roje
ct M
ailin
g Li
sts
Upd
ated
Mon
thly
22.
32.
3.3
Resp
onse
s to
Stak
ehol
der/
Publ
ic R
eque
sts
With
in 1
0 bu
sines
s day
s of r
eque
st,
base
d on
Aut
horit
y re
view
and
ap
prov
al2
2.3
2.3.
4St
akeh
olde
r Sup
port
/Opp
ose
Trac
king
Rep
ort
Qua
rter
ly2
2.5
2.5.
1St
akeh
olde
r/El
ecte
d O
ffici
al/A
genc
y Co
ordi
natio
n/Pu
blic
Mee
ting
Not
es
and
Reco
rd
Post
to P
roje
ctSo
lve
7 bu
sines
s day
s af
ter e
ach
mee
ting
22.
52.
5.1
BP M
tgN
otes
LAD
WP
2012
-06-
281
8/14
/201
2BP
>08>
2012
Mee
ting
Not
es2
2.5
2.5.
1BP
Mtg
Not
es M
etro
link
2012
-06-
191
8/14
/201
2BP
>08>
2012
Mee
ting
Not
es2
2.5
2.5.
1BP
Mtg
Not
es P
lant
42-
Def
ense
Con
trac
tors
201
2-06
-26
18/
14/2
012
BP>0
8>20
12 M
eetin
g N
otes
22.
52.
5.1
BP M
tgN
otes
SC
Ediso
n 20
12-0
6-27
18/
14/2
012
BP>0
8>20
12 M
eetin
g N
otes
22.
52.
5.1
BP M
tgN
otes
Sem
pra
2012
-06-
261
8/14
/201
2BP
>08>
2012
Mee
ting
Not
es2
2.5
2.5.
1BP
Mtg
Not
es C
ity o
f Lan
cast
er 2
012-
08-2
31
9/6/
2012
BP>0
8>20
12 M
eetin
g N
otes
22.
52.
5.1
BP M
tgN
otes
Ker
n W
ind
Ener
gy A
ssoc
iatio
n 20
12-0
8-23
19/
6/20
12BP
>08>
2012
Mee
ting
Not
esIn
clud
ing
atta
chm
ent
22.
52.
5.1
BP M
tgN
otes
Ros
amon
d CS
D an
d M
AC 2
012-
08-2
31
9/6/
2012
BP>0
8>20
12 M
eetin
g N
otes
22.
52.
5.1
BP M
tgN
otes
San
itatio
n Di
stric
ts o
f LA
Coun
ty 2
012-
08-2
81
9/6/
2012
BP>0
8>20
12 M
eetin
g N
otes
Incl
udin
g at
tach
men
t2
2.5
2.5.
1BP
Mtg
Not
es S
uper
viso
r Ant
onov
ich
staf
f 201
2-08
-28
19/
6/20
12BP
>08>
2012
Mee
ting
Not
es2
2.5
2.5.
1BP
Mtg
Not
es U
S Ai
r For
ce P
lant
42
2012
-10-
091
10/2
3/20
12BP
>08>
2012
Mee
ting
Not
es2
2.5
2.5.
1BP
Mtg
Not
es R
osam
ond
CSD
2012
-10-
101
10/2
3/20
12BP
>08>
2012
Mee
ting
Not
es2
2.5
2.5.
1BP
Mtg
Not
es C
ity o
f Pal
mda
le 2
012-
10-1
11
10/2
3/20
12BP
>08>
2012
Mee
ting
Not
es2
2.5
2.5.
1BP
Mtg
Not
es C
ity o
f Lan
cast
er 2
012-
10-1
01
10/2
3/20
12BP
>08>
2012
Mee
ting
Not
es
Cal
iforn
ia H
igh-
Spe
ed T
rain
Pro
ject
Bak
ersf
ield
-Pal
mda
le S
ectio
nFY
12-1
3D
eliv
erab
le S
tatu
s
Last
upd
ated
: 1/
10/2
013
3
Task
W
BSN
umbe
rD
eliv
erab
leVe
rsio
nBa
selin
e D
ue D
ate
Dat
e D
eliv
ered
Proj
ectS
olve
Loc
atio
nCo
mm
ent
22.
52.
5.2
PIM
, TW
G M
eetin
g, a
nd P
ublic
Hea
ring
Mee
ting
Not
esPo
st to
Pro
ject
Solv
e 14
bus
ines
s day
s af
ter e
ach
mee
ting
22.
5N
ABP
Titl
e VI
Rep
ort_
Fina
l_20
12-1
0-30
110
/31/
2012
BP>3
5>20
>Titl
e VI
22.
72.
7.1
Proj
ect b
roch
ure
July
'12
22.
72.
7.2
FAQ
Pro
ject
Info
rmat
iona
l Mat
eria
lsAu
gust
, Nov
embe
r '12
; Feb
ruar
y '1
3
22.
72.
7.3
Fact
She
ets
As n
eede
d2
2.7
2.7.
4Sp
eake
r’s B
urea
u Po
wer
Poin
t Pre
sent
atio
n U
pdat
esM
onth
ly2
2.7
2.7.
5U
p to
100
Pub
lic M
eetin
g Di
spla
y Po
ster
Boa
rds
As n
eede
d2
2.7
2.7.
5Ro
sam
ond
CSD
Pres
enta
tion
Draf
t8/
20/2
012
BP>3
5>20
>Pre
sent
atio
ns2
2.7
2.7.
5Ro
sam
ond
CSD
Pres
enta
tion
Fina
l8/
22/2
012
BP>3
5>20
>Pre
sent
atio
ns2
2.7
2.7.
5BP
Pla
nt 4
2 Vi
brat
ion
Test
Loc
atio
n M
ap 2
012-
10-2
51
10/2
5/20
12BP
>35>
202
2.7
2.7.
5BP
City
of L
anca
ster
Alig
nmen
t Map
201
3-01
-14.
11/
14/2
013
BP>3
5>20
>Out
reac
h M
aps
22.
72.
7.5
BP C
ity o
f Pal
mda
le A
lignm
ent M
ap 2
013-
01-1
4.pd
f1
1/14
/201
3BP
>35>
20>O
utre
ach
Map
s2
2.7
2.7.
5BP
LA
Coun
ty S
ectio
n M
ap 2
013-
01-1
4.pd
f1
1/14
/201
3BP
>35>
20>O
utre
ach
Map
s2
2.7
2.7.
5BP
Pla
nt 4
2 Al
ignm
ent M
ap 2
013-
01-1
4.pd
f1
1/14
/201
3BP
>35>
20>O
utre
ach
Map
s2
2.7
2.7.
6U
p to
65
New
spap
er D
ispla
y N
otifi
catio
nsDe
pend
ent u
pon
publ
ic m
eetin
g da
tes
22.
72.
7.7
Stak
ehol
der E
-mai
l Not
ifica
tions
Mon
thly
22.
72.
7.8
BP H
ST W
ebsit
e U
pdat
esM
onth
ly2
2.7
2.7.
9U
p to
15
Dire
ct M
ail P
iece
sAt
key
pro
ject
mile
ston
es a
nd sp
ecifi
c pu
blic
mee
ting
date
s4
4.1.
24.
1.2.
115
% In
-Pro
gres
s Alig
nmen
t Pla
n an
d Pr
ofile
Dra
win
gsIn
-pro
gres
sAu
gust
'12
8/20
/201
2BP
>45>
80>1
0>Al
ignm
ents
Alig
nmen
ts E
1, E
2, C
C1, C
C2, K
E1, T
H1, T
H2, M
O1,
AE
1, A
E2, A
W1,
AW
2, A
P1, A
P2, A
P3, A
P44
4.1.
24.
1.2.
215
% In
-Pro
gres
s Des
ign
Varia
nce
List
In-p
rogr
ess
Augu
st '1
24
4.1.
24.
1.2.
315
% D
raft
Alig
nmen
t Pla
ns a
nd P
rofil
eDr
aft
Nov
embe
r '12
12/1
4/20
12BP
>45>
80>2
0>10
>Des
ign
Draw
ings
44.
1.2
4.1.
2.3
15%
Dra
ft A
lignm
ent R
epor
tDr
aft
1/18
/201
3BP
>45>
80>2
0>10
>Alig
nmen
t Rep
ort
44.
1.2
4.1.
2.4
15%
Dra
ft D
esig
n Va
rianc
e Li
stDr
aft
Nov
embe
r '12
12/1
4/20
12BP
>45>
80>2
0>10
>Des
ign
Draw
ings
44.
1.2
4.1.
2.5
15%
Rec
ord
Set A
lignm
ent P
lans
and
Pro
file
Reco
rd S
etFe
brua
ry '1
34
4.1.
24.
1.2.
615
% R
ecor
d Se
t Des
ign
Varia
nce
List
Reco
rd S
etFe
brua
ry '1
34
4.1.
2N
ABP
15p
ct W
ork-
in-P
rogr
ess R
EPO
RT S
ubm
ittal
- Ex
trac
t Alig
nmen
ts
Teha
chap
iIn
-pro
gres
s10
/10/
2012
BP>4
5>80
>10>
Repo
rts
44.
1.3
4.1.
3.1
15%
Dra
ft C
onst
ruct
abili
ty A
sses
smen
t Mem
oran
dum
Draf
tN
ovem
ber '
1212
/21/
2012
BP>4
5>80
>20>
10>C
onst
ruct
abili
ty
Asse
ssm
ent M
emo
44.
1.3
4.1.
3.2
15%
Rec
ord
Set C
onst
ruct
abili
ty A
sses
smen
t Mem
oran
dum
Reco
rd S
etFe
brua
ry '1
34
4.1.
54.
1.5.
115
% In
-Pro
gres
s Brid
ges a
nd E
leva
ted
Stru
ctur
es D
raw
ings
In-p
rogr
ess
Augu
st '1
28/
27/2
012
BP>4
5>80
>10>
HST
Stru
ctur
es4
4.1.
54.
1.5.
215
% D
raft
Brid
ges a
nd E
leva
ted
Stru
ctur
es D
raw
ings
Draf
tN
ovem
ber '
1212
/17/
2012
BP>4
5>80
>20>
10>D
esig
n Dr
awin
gs4
4.1.
54.
1.5.
315
% R
ecor
d Se
t Brid
ges a
nd E
leva
ted
Stru
ctur
es D
raw
ings
Reco
rd S
etFe
brua
ry '1
34
4.1.
54.
1.5.
415
% D
raft
Com
plex
Str
uctu
res R
epor
tDr
aft
Nov
embe
r '12
44.
1.5
4.1.
5.5
15%
Rec
ord
Set C
ompl
ex S
truc
ture
s Rep
ort
Reco
rd S
etFe
brua
ry '1
34
4.1.
5N
A15
% D
raft
Des
ign
Subm
ittal
- St
ruct
ures
Rep
ort
Draf
t12
/14/
2012
BP>4
5>80
>20>
10>S
truc
ture
s Rep
ort
44.
1.5
NA
BP 1
5pct
Dra
ft T
all S
truc
ture
s Wor
k Pl
anDr
aft
7/27
/201
2BP
>45>
10>4
04
4.1.
5N
ABP
Fin
al T
all S
truc
ture
s Wor
k Pl
an C
ompl
ete
Fina
l9/
7/20
12BP
>45>
10>4
04
4.1.
5N
ABP
Fin
al T
all S
truc
ture
s Wor
k Pl
an E
MT
Com
men
ts a
nd M
arku
p9/
14/2
012
BP>4
5>10
>40
44.
1.6
4.1.
6.1
15%
In-P
rogr
ess T
unne
l Des
ign
and
Cons
truc
tion
Repo
rtIn
-pro
gres
sAu
gust
'12
9/14
/201
2BP
>45>
80>R
epor
tsIn
clud
ing
Draw
ings
SS0
002-
SS00
194
4.1.
64.
1.6.
215
% D
raft
Tun
nel D
esig
n an
d Co
nstr
uctio
n Re
port
Draf
tN
ovem
ber '
1212
/20/
2012
BP>4
5>80
>20>
10>T
unne
l Rep
ort
44.
1.6
4.1.
6.3
15%
Rec
ord
Tunn
el D
esig
n an
d Co
nstr
uctio
n Re
port
Reco
rd S
etFe
brua
ry '1
34
4.1.
64.
1.6.
415
% In
-Pro
gres
s Tun
nel D
raw
ings
In-p
rogr
ess
Augu
st '1
28/
27/2
012
BP>4
5>80
>10>
Tunn
els
44.
1.6
4.1.
6.5
15%
Dra
ft T
unne
l Dra
win
gsDr
aft
Nov
embe
r '12
12/1
7/20
12BP
>45>
80>2
0>10
>Des
ign
Draw
ings
44.
1.6
4.1.
6.6
15%
Rec
ord
Set T
unne
l Dra
win
gsRe
cord
Set
Febr
uary
'13
44.
1.8
NA
15%
Ear
thw
ork
Man
agem
ent R
epor
tDr
aft
12/2
1/20
12BP
>45>
80>2
0>10
>Ear
thw
ork
Man
agem
ent
Repo
rtIn
clud
es te
xt a
nd a
ppen
dice
s
44.
1.9
4.1.
9.1
15%
Dra
ft H
ydro
logy
, Hyd
raul
ics,
and
Dra
inag
e Re
port
Draf
tN
ovem
ber '
1212
/17/
2012
BP>4
5>80
>20>
10>H
ydro
logy
Hyd
raul
ics
Drai
nage
Rep
ort
44.
1.9
4.1.
9.2
15%
Dra
ft F
lood
plai
n Im
pact
Rep
ort
Draf
tN
ovem
ber '
1212
/17/
2012
BP>4
5>80
>20>
10>F
lood
plai
n Im
pact
Rep
ort
44.
1.9
4.1.
9.3
15%
Dra
ft S
torm
wat
er Q
ualit
y M
anag
emen
t Rep
ort
Draf
tN
ovem
ber '
1212
/17/
2012
BP>4
5>80
>20>
10>S
torm
wat
er Q
ualit
y M
anag
emen
t Rep
ort
44.
1.9
4.1.
9.4
15%
Rec
ord
Set H
ydro
logy
, Hyd
raul
ics,
and
Dra
inag
e Re
port
Reco
rd S
etFe
brua
ry '1
3
Cal
iforn
ia H
igh-
Spe
ed T
rain
Pro
ject
Bak
ersf
ield
-Pal
mda
le S
ectio
nFY
12-1
3D
eliv
erab
le S
tatu
s
Last
upd
ated
: 1/
10/2
013
4
Task
W
BSN
umbe
rD
eliv
erab
leVe
rsio
nBa
selin
e D
ue D
ate
Dat
e D
eliv
ered
Proj
ectS
olve
Loc
atio
nCo
mm
ent
44.
1.9
4.1.
9.5
15%
Rec
ord
Set F
lood
plai
n Im
pact
Rep
ort
Reco
rd S
etFe
brua
ry '1
34
4.1.
94.
1.9.
615
% R
ecor
d Se
t Sto
rmw
ater
Qua
lity
Man
agem
ent R
epor
tRe
cord
Set
Febr
uary
'13
44.
1.9
NA
15%
Wor
k-In
-Pro
gres
s REP
ORT
- Fl
oodp
lain
Impa
ctIn
-pro
gres
s9/
14/2
012
BP>4
5>80
>Rep
orts
44.
1.9
NA
15%
Wor
k-In
-Pro
gres
s REP
ORT
- Hy
drol
ogy
Hydr
aulic
s and
Dra
inag
eIn
-pro
gres
s9/
14/2
012
BP>4
5>80
>Rep
orts
44.
1.9
NA
15%
Wor
k-In
-Pro
gres
s REP
ORT
- St
orm
wat
er Q
ualit
y M
anag
men
tIn
-pro
gres
s9/
14/2
012
BP>4
5>80
>Rep
orts
44.
1.10
4.1.
10.1
15%
Dra
ft U
tility
Sum
mar
y Re
port
Draf
tN
ovem
ber '
124
4.1.
104.
1.10
.215
% R
ecor
d Se
t Util
ity S
umm
ary
Repo
rtRe
cord
Set
Febr
uary
'13
44.
1.10
NA
15%
Util
ity Im
pact
Rep
ort
Draf
t12
/19/
2012
BP>4
5>80
>20>
10>U
tility
Rep
ort
44.
1.11
4.1.
11.1
15%
Dra
ft P
relim
inar
y G
eote
chni
cal D
esig
n Re
port
Draf
tN
ovem
ber '
124
4.1.
114.
1.11
.115
% D
raft
Pre
limin
ary
Geo
tech
nica
l Des
ign
Repo
rt-S
truc
ture
sDr
aft
1/18
/201
3BP
>45>
80>2
0>10
>Pre
lim G
eote
chni
cal R
epor
t - S
truc
ture
s4
4.1.
114.
1.11
.115
% D
raft
Pre
limin
ary
Geo
tech
nica
l Des
ign
Repo
rt-T
unne
lsDr
aft
1/22
/201
3BP
>45>
80>2
0>10
>Pre
lim G
eote
chni
cal D
esig
n Re
port
- Tu
nnel
s4
4.1.
114.
1.11
.215
% D
raft
Geo
logi
c an
d Se
ismic
Haz
ard
Eval
uatio
n Re
port
Draf
tN
ovem
ber '
121/
24/2
013
BP>4
5>80
>20>
104
4.1.
114.
1.11
.315
% D
raft
Geo
tech
nica
l Inv
estig
atio
n W
ork
Plan
Draf
tN
ovem
ber '
124
4.1.
114.
1.11
.415
% D
raft
Hist
oric
al G
eote
chni
cal D
ata
Repo
rtDr
aft
Nov
embe
r '12
44.
1.11
4.1.
11.5
15%
Dra
ft G
eolo
gic
Fiel
d Re
conn
aiss
ance
Rep
ort
Draf
tN
ovem
ber '
124
4.1.
114.
1.11
.615
% R
ecor
d Se
t Pre
limin
ary
Geo
tech
nica
l Des
ign
Repo
rtRe
cord
Set
Febr
uary
'13
44.
1.11
4.1.
11.7
15%
Rec
ord
Set G
eolo
gic
and
Seism
ic H
azar
d Ev
alua
tion
Repo
rtRe
cord
Set
Febr
uary
'13
44.
1.11
4.1.
11.8
15%
Rec
ord
Set G
eote
chni
cal I
nves
tigat
ion
Wor
k Pl
anRe
cord
Set
Febr
uary
'13
44.
1.11
4.1.
11.9
15%
Rec
ord
Set D
raft
Hist
oric
al G
eote
chni
cal D
ata
Repo
rtRe
cord
Set
Febr
uary
'13
44.
1.11
4.1.
11.1
015
% R
ecor
d Se
t Geo
logi
c Fi
eld
Reco
nnai
ssan
ce R
epor
tRe
cord
Set
Febr
uary
'13
44.
1.11
NA
15%
Wor
k-In
-Pro
gres
s REP
ORT
- Fa
ult H
azar
d Ev
alua
tion
In-p
rogr
ess
9/14
/201
2BP
>45>
80>R
epor
ts4
4.1.
11N
A15
% D
raft
Des
ign
Subm
ittal
- Fa
ult H
azar
d Ev
alua
tion
Draf
t12
/18/
2012
BP>4
5>80
>20>
10>F
ault
Haza
rd E
valu
atio
n Re
port
44.
1.11
NA
15%
Wor
k-In
-Pro
gres
s REP
ORT
- G
eote
ch In
vest
igat
ion
Wor
kpla
nIn
-pro
gres
s9/
14/2
012
BP>4
5>80
>Rep
orts
Incl
udes
App
endi
x A
44.
1.11
NA
15%
Dra
ft D
esig
n Su
bmitt
al -
Geo
tech
Inve
stig
atio
n W
orkp
lan
Draf
t12
/21/
2012
BP>4
5>80
>20>
10>G
eote
chni
cal
Inve
stig
atio
nal W
orkp
lan
44.
1.11
NA
15%
Wor
k-In
-Pro
gres
s REP
ORT
- G
eolo
gic
Fiel
d Re
conn
aiss
ance
In-p
rogr
ess
9/14
/201
2BP
>45>
80>R
epor
ts4
4.1.
11N
A15
% D
raft
Des
ign
Subm
ittal
- G
eolo
gic
Fiel
d Re
conn
aiss
ance
Draf
t12
/18/
2012
BP>4
5>80
>20>
10>G
eolo
gic
Fiel
d Re
con
Repo
rt4
4.1.
11N
A15
% W
ork-
In-P
rogr
ess R
EPO
RT -
Geo
logi
c Se
ismic
Haz
ard
In-p
rogr
ess
9/19
/201
2BP
>45>
80>1
0>Re
port
sIn
clud
es a
ppen
dice
s A a
nd B
.4
4.1.
134.
1.13
.115
% D
raft
Pre
limin
ary
Righ
t-of
-Way
Req
uire
men
ts R
epor
tDr
aft
Nov
embe
r '12
44.
1.13
4.1.
13.2
15%
Rec
ord
Set P
relim
inar
y Ri
ght-
of-W
ay R
equi
rem
ents
Rep
ort
Reco
rd S
etFe
brua
ry '1
34
4.1.
154.
1.15
.115
% In
-Pro
gres
s Roa
dway
and
Gra
de-S
epar
atio
n Dr
awin
gsIn
-pro
gres
sAu
gust
'12
9/5/
2012
BP>4
5>10
>130
44.
1.15
4.1.
15.2
15%
Dra
ft R
oadw
ay a
nd G
rade
-Sep
arat
ion
Draw
ings
Draf
tN
ovem
ber '
1212
/17
and
12/1
9/20
12BP
>45>
80>2
0>10
>Des
ign
Draw
ings
44.
1.15
4.1.
15.3
15%
Rec
ord
Set R
oadw
ay a
nd G
rade
-Sep
arat
ion
Draw
ings
Reco
rd S
etFe
brua
ry '1
34
4.1.
154.
1.15
.4Dr
aft C
altr
ans P
roje
ct R
epor
tDr
aft
Nov
embe
r '12
44.
1.15
4.1.
15.5
Reco
rd S
et C
altr
ans P
roje
ct R
epor
tRe
cord
Set
Febr
uary
'13
44.
1.15
NA
15%
Dra
ft D
esig
n Su
bmitt
al -
Acce
ss R
oads
Rep
ort 1
1-20
12Dr
aft
12/1
4/20
12BP
>45>
80>2
0>10
>Acc
ess R
oads
Rep
ort
44.
2.1
4.2.
1.1
15%
Dra
ft P
relim
inar
y Sy
stem
s Dra
win
gs a
nd R
epor
tDr
aft
Nov
embe
r '12
44.
2.1
NA
BP 1
5pct
Dra
ft D
esig
n Su
bmitt
al -
Syst
ems 2
TPS
S O
ptio
n 11
-201
2Dr
aft
1/25
/201
3BP
>45>
80>2
0>10
>Sys
tem
Pla
ns4
4.2.
1N
ABP
15p
ct D
raft
Des
ign
Subm
ittal
- Sy
stem
s 3 T
PSS
Opt
ion
11-2
012
Draf
t1/
25/2
013
BP>4
5>80
>20>
10>S
yste
m P
lans
44.
2.1
4.2.
1.2
15%
Rec
ord
Set S
yste
ms D
raw
ings
and
Rep
ort
Reco
rd S
etFe
brua
ry '1
34
4.2.
1N
A15
% W
ork-
In-P
rogr
ess R
EPO
RT -
Syst
ems
9/14
/201
2BP
>45>
80>R
epor
ts4
4.2.
1N
A15
% In
-Pro
gres
s Dra
win
g - S
yste
ms -
2 T
PSS
Sche
mat
ic9/
4/20
12BP
>45>
20>1
04
4.2.
1N
A15
% In
-Pro
gres
s Dra
win
g - S
yste
ms -
3 T
PSS
Sche
mat
ic9/
4/20
12BP
>45>
20>1
04
4.2.
1N
ABP
B-P
-LA
Alig
nmen
t and
Sys
tem
s DRA
FT-G
IS S
hape
File
sDr
aft
1/10
/201
3BP
>45>
20>1
0.z
ip fi
le4
4.2.
1N
ABP
B-P
-LA
Alig
nmen
t and
Sys
tem
s DRA
FT-K
MZ
File
Draf
t1/
10/2
013
BP>4
5>20
>10
44.
7.1
4.7.
1.1
15%
Dra
ft B
asis
of Q
uant
ities
Est
imat
e Re
port
Draf
tN
ovem
ber '
124
4.7.
14.
7.1.
215
% R
ecor
d Se
t Bas
is of
Qua
ntiti
es E
stim
ate
Repo
rtRe
cord
Set
Febr
uary
'13
44.
9.7
4.9.
7.1
Draf
t EIR
/EIS
, Vol
ume
III (A
lignm
ents
and
Roa
dway
s) D
raw
ings
Fina
lJu
ne '1
34
4.99
4.99
.M
eetin
g N
otes
As n
eede
d4
4.99
4.99
.M
tg N
otes
15p
ct E
ngin
eerin
g De
sign
Wor
ksho
p 6
20 2
012
17/
12/2
012
BP>0
8In
clud
es sc
hedu
le, C
apab
le F
ault
Eval
uatio
n Su
mm
ary,
Teh
acha
pi T
all S
truc
ture
s Pre
sent
atio
n
Cal
iforn
ia H
igh-
Spe
ed T
rain
Pro
ject
Bak
ersf
ield
-Pal
mda
le S
ectio
nFY
12-1
3D
eliv
erab
le S
tatu
s
Last
upd
ated
: 1/
10/2
013
5
Task
W
BSN
umbe
rD
eliv
erab
leVe
rsio
nBa
selin
e D
ue D
ate
Dat
e D
eliv
ered
Proj
ectS
olve
Loc
atio
nCo
mm
ent
44.
994.
99.
Mtg
Not
es 1
5pct
Tal
l Str
uctu
res a
nd T
unne
ls W
orks
hop
2012
-08-
011
9/6/
2012
FB>0
8>20
12 M
eetin
g N
otes
Incl
udes
tral
l str
uctu
res p
rese
ntat
ion,
tunn
el
pres
enta
tion,
faul
t eva
luat
ion
anne
x pr
esen
tatio
n,
in-p
rogr
ess d
raw
ings
44.
994.
99.
Mtg
Not
es 1
5pct
Env
iro F
ootp
rint R
econ
cilia
tion
with
PLA
201
2-09
-06
19/
17/2
012
BP>0
8
44.
994.
99.
Mtg
Not
esCa
ltran
s Roa
dway
Coo
rdin
atio
n M
eetin
g 20
12-0
6-14
19/
27/2
012
BP>0
8>20
12 M
eetin
g N
otes
44.
994.
99.
BP M
tgN
otes
15p
ct S
yste
ms D
esig
n W
orks
hop
with
EM
T 20
12-0
9-10
110
/5/2
012
BP>0
8>20
12 M
eetin
g N
otes
44.
994.
99.
BP M
tgN
otes
15p
ct E
MT
Ope
ratio
ns M
aint
enan
ce M
eetin
g 20
12-0
9-21
110
/10/
2012
BP>0
8>20
12 M
eetin
g N
otes
44.
994.
99.
Mtg
Not
es C
ity o
f Bak
ersf
ield
Pub
lic W
orks
Wor
ksho
p 20
12-1
2-03
112
/11/
2012
BP>0
8>20
12 M
eetin
g N
otes
55.
15.
1.1.
1M
eetin
g N
otes
With
in 7
day
s of m
eetin
g5
5.1
NA
BP M
emo
Alte
rnat
ives
With
draw
n an
d N
amin
g Co
nven
tion
2012
-09-
269/
26/2
012
BP>7
0>40
>10
55.
1N
ABP
Tra
nmiss
ion
Line
Opt
ions
App
roac
h 20
12-1
0-10
10/1
1/20
12BP
>70>
60>5
05
5.1
NA
BP B
aker
sfie
ld-E
diso
n Cu
t Poi
nts F
igur
e 20
12-1
2-19
12/1
9/20
12BP
> M
aps a
nd R
esou
rces
>12-
19-2
012
Cut
Poin
t Fig
ures
55.
1N
ABP
Ant
elop
e Va
lley-
Palm
dale
Sub
sect
ion
Figu
re 2
012-
12-1
912
/19/
2012
BP>
Map
s and
Res
ourc
es>1
2-19
-201
2 Cu
t Po
int F
igur
es5
5.1
5.1.
1.2
GIS
Map
sM
onth
ly5
5.1
5.1.
4.1
Draf
t Fin
al C
heck
poin
t B P
acka
ge fo
r EPA
/USA
CE R
evie
wDr
aft
July
'12
55.
1N
ACh
eckp
oint
B In
itiat
ion
Pres
enta
tion
Draf
t8/
3/20
12BP
>35>
40>1
0>Ch
eckp
oint
B5
5.1
NA
BP C
heck
poin
t B S
umm
ary
Repo
rtDr
aft
10/5
/201
2BP
>35>
40>1
0>Ch
eckp
oint
BIn
clud
ing
Appe
ndix
A-1
55.
15.
1.4.
2Fi
nal C
heck
poin
t B P
acka
geFi
nal
Nov
embe
r '12
55.
25.
2.0
No
Proj
ect A
ltern
ativ
eDr
aft
1/16
/201
3BP
>70>
40>2
05
5.2.
25.
2.2.
1Dr
aft A
ir Q
ualit
y Te
chni
cal R
epor
tDr
aft
Nov
embe
r '12
55.
2.2
5.2.
2.2
Fina
l Air
Qua
lity
Tech
nica
l Rep
ort
Fina
lDe
cem
ber '
125
5.2.
35.
2.3.
1Dr
aft N
oise
and
Vib
ratio
n Te
chni
cal R
epor
tDr
aft
Augu
st '1
25
5.2.
35.
2.3.
2Fi
nal N
oise
and
Vib
ratio
n Te
chni
cal R
epor
tFi
nal
Sept
embe
r '12
55.
2.4
5.2.
4.3
Draf
t Bio
logi
cal R
esou
rces
Tec
hnic
al R
epor
tDr
aft
Augu
st '1
25
5.2.
45.
2.4.
4Dr
aft W
etla
nd D
elin
eatio
n Re
port
Draf
tAu
gust
'12
55.
2.4
5.2.
4.5
Fina
l Bio
logi
cal R
esou
rces
Tec
hnic
al R
epor
tFi
nal
Sept
embe
r '12
55.
2.4
5.2.
4.6
Fina
l Wet
land
Del
inea
tion
Repo
rtFi
nal
Sept
embe
r '12
55.
2.4
NA
BP D
eser
t Tor
toise
Sur
vey
Resu
lts M
emo
Draf
t9/
19/2
012
BP>6
0>40
>20>
Dese
rt T
orto
ise M
emo
Incl
udes
app
endi
ces A
and
B.
55.
2.4
NA
BP P
relim
inar
y Ju
risdi
ctio
nal W
etla
nds a
nd W
ater
Del
inea
tion
Repo
rtDr
aft
10/1
9/20
12BP
>60>
40>2
0In
clud
ing
appe
ndic
es
55.
2.4
NA
BP R
eque
st fo
r List
of A
JD F
inal
201
2-12
-18
12/2
1/20
12BP
>35>
40>1
0>U
SACE
/USE
PA S
ectio
n 40
45
5.2.
7N
ADr
aft H
azar
dous
Mat
eria
l Tec
hnic
al R
epor
tDr
aft
10/1
9/20
12BP
>60>
70>2
0In
clud
ing
appe
ndic
es5
5.2.
85.
2.8.
1Dr
aft C
omm
unity
Impa
ct A
sses
smen
t Tec
hnic
al R
epor
tDr
aft
Oct
ober
'12
55.
2.8
5.2.
8.2
Fina
l Com
mun
ity Im
pact
Ass
essm
ent T
echn
ical
Rep
ort
Fina
lN
ovem
ber '
125
5.2.
95.
2.9.
1Dr
aft R
eloc
atio
n Im
pact
Rep
ort
Draf
tO
ctob
er '1
25
5.2.
95.
2.9.
2Fi
nal R
eloc
atio
n Im
pact
Rep
ort
Fina
lN
ovem
ber '
125
5.2.
105.
2.10
.1Dr
aft A
esth
etic
s and
Visu
al R
esou
rces
Tec
hnic
al R
epor
tDr
aft
Augu
st '1
25
5.2.
105.
2.10
.2Fi
nal A
esth
etic
s and
Visu
al R
esou
rces
Tec
hnic
al R
epor
tFi
nal
Sept
embe
r '12
55.
2.11
5.2.
11.1
Draf
t Pal
eont
olog
y Re
port
, ASR
, HAS
R, a
nd H
PSR
Draf
tSe
ptem
ber '
125
5.2.
115.
2.11
.2Re
vise
d Dr
aft P
aleo
ntol
ogy
Repo
rt, A
SR, H
ASR,
and
HPS
R fo
r SHP
O re
view
Revi
sed
Nov
embe
r '12
55.
2.11
5.2.
11.3
Fina
l Pal
eont
olog
y Re
port
, ASR
, HAS
R, a
nd H
PSR
Fina
lJa
nuar
y '1
35
5.3.
15.
3.1.
1Dr
aft T
rans
port
atio
n Se
ctio
n of
EIR
/EIS
Draf
tAu
gust
'12
55.
3.1
5.3.
1.2
Fina
l Tra
nspo
rtat
ion
Sect
ion
of E
IR/E
ISFi
nal
Sept
embe
r '12
55.
3.2
5.3.
2.1
Draf
t Air
Qua
lity
Sect
ion
of E
IR/E
ISDr
aft
Dece
mbe
r '12
55.
3.2
5.3.
2.2
Fina
l Air
Qua
lity
Sect
ion
of E
IR/E
ISFi
nal
Janu
ary
'13
55.
3.3
5.3.
3.1
Draf
t Noi
se a
nd V
ibra
tion
Sect
ion
of E
IR/E
ISDr
aft
Sept
embe
r '12
55.
3.3
5.3.
3.2
Fina
l Noi
se a
nd V
ibra
tion
Sect
ion
of E
IR/E
ISFi
nal
Oct
ober
'12
55.
3.4
NA
BP C
H 3.
5 EM
I and
EM
FDr
aft
1/11
/201
3BP
>70>
50>2
05
5.3.
55.
3.5.
1Dr
aft P
ublic
Util
ities
and
Ene
rgy
Sect
ion
of E
IR/E
ISDr
aft
Sept
embe
r '12
55.
3.5
5.3.
5.2
Fina
l Pub
lic U
tiliti
es a
nd E
nerg
y Se
ctio
n of
EIR
/EIS
Fina
lO
ctob
er '1
25
5.3.
65.
3.6.
1Dr
aft B
iolo
gica
l Res
ourc
es a
nd W
etla
nds S
ectio
n of
EIR
/EIS
Draf
tO
ctob
er '1
2
Cal
iforn
ia H
igh-
Spe
ed T
rain
Pro
ject
Bak
ersf
ield
-Pal
mda
le S
ectio
nFY
12-1
3D
eliv
erab
le S
tatu
s
Last
upd
ated
: 1/
10/2
013
6
Task
W
BSN
umbe
rD
eliv
erab
leVe
rsio
nBa
selin
e D
ue D
ate
Dat
e D
eliv
ered
Proj
ectS
olve
Loc
atio
nCo
mm
ent
55.
3.6
5.3.
6.2
Fina
l Bio
logi
cal R
esou
rces
and
Wet
land
s Sec
tion
of E
IR/E
ISFi
nal
Nov
embe
r ’12
55.
3.7
5.3.
7.1
Draf
t Hyd
rolo
gy a
nd W
ater
Qua
lity
sect
ion
of E
IR/E
ISDr
aft
Oct
ober
'12
55.
3.7
5.3.
7.1
Fina
l Hyd
rolo
gy a
nd W
ater
Qua
lity
sect
ion
of E
IR/E
ISFi
nal
Nov
embe
r '12
55.
3.8
5.3.
8.1
Draf
t Geo
logy
, Soi
ls, a
nd S
eism
icity
Sec
tion
of E
IR/E
ISDr
aft
Oct
ober
'12
55.
3.8
5.3.
8.2
Fina
l Geo
logy
, Soi
ls, a
nd S
eism
icity
Sec
tion
of E
IR/E
ISFi
nal
Nov
embe
r '12
55.
3.9
5.3.
9.1
Draf
t Haz
ardo
us M
ater
ials
and
Was
tes s
ectio
n of
EIR
/EIS
Draf
tJu
ly '1
210
/26/
2012
BP>7
0>50
>100
>20
55.
3.9
5.3.
9.2
Fina
l Haz
ardo
us M
ater
ials
and
Was
tes s
ectio
n of
EIR
/EIS
Fina
lAu
gust
'12
55.
3.10
NA
CH 3
.11
Safe
ty a
nd S
ecur
ity S
ectio
n of
EIR
/EIS
Revi
sed
10/2
4/20
12BP
>70>
50>1
10>3
0In
clud
ing
appe
ndic
es5
5.3.
115.
3.11
.1Dr
aft C
omm
uniti
es a
nd E
nviro
nmen
tal J
ustic
e Se
ctio
n of
EIR
/EIS
Draf
tN
ovem
ber '
125
5.3.
115.
3.11
.2Fi
nal C
omm
uniti
es a
nd E
nviro
nmen
tal J
ustic
e Se
ctio
n of
EIR
/EIS
Fina
lDe
cem
ber '
125
5.3.
13N
ACH
3.1
4 Ag
ricul
tura
l Lan
ds S
ectio
n of
EIR
/EIS
Revi
sed
10/2
3/20
12BP
>70>
50>1
40>3
05
5.3.
14N
ABP
CH
3.15
Par
ks, R
ecre
atio
n, a
nd O
pen
Spac
e 20
12-1
1-2
Revi
sed
11/5
/201
2BP
>70>
50>1
50>3
05
5.3.
155.
3.15
.1Dr
aft A
esth
etic
s and
Visu
al Q
ualit
y Se
ctio
n of
EIR
/EIS
Draf
tSe
ptem
ber '
125
5.3.
155.
3.15
.2Fi
nal A
esth
etic
s and
Visu
al Q
ualit
y Se
ctio
n of
EIR
/EIS
Fina
lO
ctob
er '1
25
5.3.
165.
3.16
.1Dr
aft C
ultu
ral R
esou
rces
Sec
tion
of E
IR/E
ISDr
aft
Nov
embe
r '12
55.
3.16
5.3.
16.2
Fina
l Cul
tura
l Res
ourc
es S
ectio
n of
EIR
/EIS
Fina
lDe
cem
ber '
125
5.3.
175.
3.17
.1Dr
aft R
egio
nal G
row
th S
ectio
n of
EIR
/EIS
Draf
tO
ctob
er '1
25
5.3.
175.
3.17
.2Fi
nal R
egio
nal G
row
th S
ectio
n of
EIR
/EIS
Fina
lN
ovem
ber '
125
5.3.
185.
3.18
.1Dr
aft C
umul
ativ
e Im
pact
s Sec
tion
of E
IR/E
ISDr
aft
Nov
embe
r '12
55.
3.18
5.3.
18.2
Fina
l Cum
ulat
ive
Impa
cts S
ectio
n of
EIR
/EIS
Fina
lDe
cem
ber '
125
5.3.
195.
3.19
.1Dr
aft S
ectio
n 4(
f) an
d 6(
f) Se
ctio
n of
EIR
/EIS
Draf
tO
ctob
er '1
25
5.3.
195.
3.19
.2Fi
nal S
ectio
n 4(
f) an
d 6(
f) Se
ctio
n of
EIR
/EIS
Fina
lN
ovem
ber '
127
7.1
7.1.
1.1
Draf
t Adm
inist
rativ
e Dr
aft S
umm
ary
Draf
tDe
cem
ber '
127
7.1
7.1.
1.2
Fina
l Adm
inist
rativ
e Dr
aft S
umm
ary
Fina
lDe
cem
ber '
127
7.1
7.1.
2.1
Purp
ose
and
Nee
dAu
gust
'12
77.
17.
1.3.
1Dr
aft C
hapt
er 2
(Alte
rnat
ives
)Dr
aft
Dece
mbe
r '12
77.
17.
1.4.
1Dr
aft C
hapt
er 3
(Affe
cted
Env
ironm
ent,
Cons
eque
nces
, and
Miti
gatio
n)Dr
aft
Janu
ary
‘13
77.
17.
1.5.
1Se
ctio
n 4
(f) a
nd S
ectio
n 6(
f) Ev
alua
tion
Dece
mbe
r '12
77.
17.
1.6.
1Dr
aft C
hapt
er 5
(Cos
ts a
nd O
pera
tions
)Dr
aft
Dece
mbe
r '12
77.
17.
1.7.
1Dr
aft C
hapt
er 6
(Una
void
able
Adv
erse
Impa
cts)
Draf
tDe
cem
ber '
127
7.1
7.1.
8.1
Draf
t Cha
pter
7 (P
ublic
and
Age
ncy
Invo
lvem
ent)
Draf
tDe
cem
ber '
127
7.1
7.1.
9.1
Draf
t Cha
pter
8 (L
ist o
f Rec
ipie
nts)
Draf
tDe
cem
ber '
127
7.1
7.1.
10.1
Draf
t Cha
pter
9 (L
ist o
f Pre
pare
rs)
Draf
tDe
cem
ber '
127
7.1
7.1.
11.1
Draf
t Cha
pter
10
(Ref
eren
ces)
Draf
tDe
cem
ber '
127
7.1
7.1.
12.1
Draf
t Cha
pter
11
(Glo
ssar
y of
Ter
ms)
Draf
tDe
cem
ber '
127
7.1
7.1.
13.1
Draf
t Cha
pter
12
(Inde
x)Dr
aft
Dece
mbe
r '12
77.
17.
1.13
.2Dr
aft C
hapt
er 1
3 (A
cron
yms a
nd A
bbre
viat
ions
)Dr
aft
Dece
mbe
r '12
77.
17.
1.13
.3Dr
aft A
ppen
dice
sDr
aft
Janu
ary
'13
77.
17.
1.15
.1Ad
min
istra
tive
Draf
t EIR
/EIS
to P
MT
Adm
in D
raft
Janu
ary
'13
77.
27.
2.2.
1Re
vise
d Ad
min
istra
tive
Draf
t EIR
/EIS
for A
genc
y an
d Le
gal R
evie
wRe
vise
dFe
brua
ry '1
3
77.
27.
2.5.
1Dr
aft E
IR/E
IS fo
r Pub
lic C
ircul
atio
nFi
nal
April
'13
77.
27.
2.7.
1N
otic
e of
Com
plet
ion
May
'13
77.
27.
2.7.
2Fe
dera
l Reg
ister
Not
ice
May
'13
77.
27.
2.7.
3N
ewsp
aper
Not
ice
May
'13
77.
27.
2.7.
4Pu
blic
Dra
ft E
IR/E
IS (H
ard
Copi
es a
nd C
Ds)
Fina
lM
ay '1
37
7.2
7.2.
8.1
Pres
enta
tion
mat
eria
ls an
d su
ppor
t doc
umen
tsJu
ne '1
37
7.3
7.3.
4.1
Prel
imin
ary
Draf
t Aud
it Ad
min
istra
tive
Reco
rdDr
aft
Mar
ch ‘1
37
7.4
7.4.
1.1
Draf
t Che
ckpo
int C
Doc
umen
tatio
nDr
aft
April
'13
77.
47.
4.1.
2Re
vise
d Ch
eckp
oint
C In
form
atio
n Pa
ckag
eRe
vise
dM
ay '1
38
8.4.
18.
4.1
Draf
t USA
CE –
404
Per
mit
Appl
icat
ion
Draf
tFe
brua
ry '1
38
8.4.
28.
4.2
Revi
se U
SACE
– 4
04 P
erm
it Ap
plic
atio
n –
Clie
nt R
evie
wRe
vise
dAp
ril '1
38
8.4.
38.
4.3
USA
CE –
Rev
ised
404
Perm
it Ap
plic
atio
n –i
ncor
pora
te a
genc
y co
mm
ents
Revi
sed
May
'13
88.
4.4.
18.
4.4.
1.1
Draf
t Fin
ding
s of E
ffect
Rep
ort
Draf
tAp
ril '1
38
8.4.
4.1
8.4.
4.1.
2Fi
nal F
indi
ngs o
f Effe
ct R
epor
tFi
nal
May
'13
88.
4.4.
48.
4.4.
4.1
Draf
t USF
WS
Biol
ogic
al A
sses
smen
tDr
aft
Mar
ch '1
38
8.4.
4.4
8.4.
4.4.
2Re
vise
d U
SFW
S Bi
olog
ical
Ass
essm
ent
Revi
sed
April
'13
Cal
iforn
ia H
igh-
Spe
ed T
rain
Pro
ject
Bak
ersf
ield
-Pal
mda
le S
ectio
nFY
12-1
3D
eliv
erab
le S
tatu
s
Last
upd
ated
: 1/
10/2
013
7
Task
W
BSN
umbe
rD
eliv
erab
leVe
rsio
nBa
selin
e D
ue D
ate
Dat
e D
eliv
ered
Proj
ectS
olve
Loc
atio
nCo
mm
ent
88.
4.4.
68.
4.4.
6.1
Prep
are
and
revi
ew m
ater
ials
to R
esou
rce
owne
rs fo
r Sec
tion
4(f)
July
'13
Task D
escription
Pla
nned S
tart
Date
Pla
nned
Fin
ish D
ate
Actu
al/F
ore
cast
Sta
rt D
ate
Actu
al/F
ore
cast
Fin
ish D
ate
Tota
l P
hys
ical %
Com
ple
teT
ota
lP
lanned T
oD
ate
%
FY
Pla
nned
% C
om
ple
teF
Y A
ctu
al %
Com
ple
te
Ta
sk
1 -
Pro
jec
t M
an
ag
em
en
tT
as
k 1
- P
roje
ct
Ma
na
ge
me
nt
Ta
sk
1 -
Pro
jec
t M
an
ag
em
en
tT
as
k 1
- P
roje
ct
Ma
na
ge
me
nt
Ta
sk
1 -
Pro
jec
t M
an
ag
em
en
tT
as
k 1
- P
roje
ct
Ma
na
ge
me
nt
Ta
sk
1 -
Pro
jec
t M
an
ag
em
en
tT
as
k 1
- P
roje
ct
Ma
na
ge
me
nt
Ta
sk
1 -
Pro
jec
t M
an
ag
em
en
t
1 -
Pro
ject
Managem
ent
12-F
eb-0
728-J
an-1
612-F
eb-0
7 A
27-J
an-1
637%
58%
58%
58%
Ta
sk
2 -
Pu
blic
Pa
rtic
ipa
tio
n P
rog
ram
Ta
sk
2 -
Pu
blic
Pa
rtic
ipa
tio
n P
rog
ram
Ta
sk
2 -
Pu
blic
Pa
rtic
ipa
tio
n P
rog
ram
Ta
sk
2 -
Pu
blic
Pa
rtic
ipa
tio
n P
rog
ram
Ta
sk
2 -
Pu
blic
Pa
rtic
ipa
tio
n P
rog
ram
Ta
sk
2 -
Pu
blic
Pa
rtic
ipa
tio
n P
rog
ram
Ta
sk
2 -
Pu
blic
Pa
rtic
ipa
tio
n P
rog
ram
Ta
sk
2 -
Pu
blic
Pa
rtic
ipa
tio
n P
rog
ram
Ta
sk
2 -
Pu
blic
Pa
rtic
ipa
tio
n P
rog
ram
2 -
Public
Part
icip
ation P
rogra
m12-F
eb-0
730-S
ep-1
512-F
eb-0
7 A
29-S
ep-1
539%
61%
58%
58%
Ta
sk
3 -
Pro
jec
t D
efi
nit
ion
/ A
lte
rna
tive
s A
na
lys
isT
as
k 3
- P
roje
ct
De
fin
itio
n / A
lte
rna
tive
s A
na
lys
isT
as
k 3
- P
roje
ct
De
fin
itio
n / A
lte
rna
tive
s A
na
lys
isT
as
k 3
- P
roje
ct
De
fin
itio
n / A
lte
rna
tive
s A
na
lys
isT
as
k 3
- P
roje
ct
De
fin
itio
n / A
lte
rna
tive
s A
na
lys
isT
as
k 3
- P
roje
ct
De
fin
itio
n / A
lte
rna
tive
s A
na
lys
isT
as
k 3
- P
roje
ct
De
fin
itio
n / A
lte
rna
tive
s A
na
lys
isT
as
k 3
- P
roje
ct
De
fin
itio
n / A
lte
rna
tive
s A
na
lys
isT
as
k 3
- P
roje
ct
De
fin
itio
n / A
lte
rna
tive
s A
na
lys
is
3 -
Pro
ject
Definitio
n/A
ltern
atives A
naly
sis
10-J
un-0
907-J
un-1
210-J
un-0
9 A
01-A
ug-1
389%
100%
0%
5%
3.1
- N
otice o
f P
repara
tion/N
otice o
f In
tent
10-J
un-0
901-S
ep-0
910-J
un-0
9 A
31-A
ug-0
9 A
100%
100%
0%
0%
3.2
- P
roje
ct
Scopin
g16-J
ul-09
26-F
eb-1
016-J
ul-09 A
26-F
eb-1
0 A
100%
100%
0%
0%
3.3
- R
efine P
roje
ct
Purp
ose a
nd N
eed
15-J
ul-09
30-J
un-1
115-J
ul-09 A
30-J
un-1
1 A
100%
100%
0%
0%
3.4
- A
ltern
ative A
naly
sis
12-O
ct-
09
02-F
eb-1
212-O
ct-
09 A
02-F
eb-1
2 A
100%
100%
0%
0%
3.4
.5 -
Pre
limin
ary
AA
01-M
ar-
10
27-A
ug-1
001-M
ar-
10 A
27-A
ug-1
0 A
100%
100%
0%
0%
3.4
.7 -
Pre
limin
ary
AA
Board
Briefing
02-S
ep-1
002-S
ep-1
002-S
ep-1
0 A
02-S
ep-1
0 A
100%
100%
0%
0%
3.4
.9 -
Supple
menta
l A
A02-S
ep-1
002-F
eb-1
202-S
ep-1
0 A
02-F
eb-1
2 A
100%
100%
0%
0%
3.4
.9 -
Supple
menta
l A
A28-J
an-1
328-A
ug-1
331-D
ec-1
2 A
01-A
ug-1
35%
0%
0%
5%
3.4
.10 -
Board
Briefing f
or
Supple
menta
l A
A24-F
eb-1
202-F
eb-1
2 A
100%
100%
0%
0%
3.4
.10 -
Board
Briefing f
or
Supple
menta
l A
A01-A
ug-1
301-A
ug-1
30%
Ta
sk
4 -
Pre
lim
ina
ry E
ng
ine
eri
ng
Ta
sk
4 -
Pre
lim
ina
ry E
ng
ine
eri
ng
Ta
sk
4 -
Pre
lim
ina
ry E
ng
ine
eri
ng
Ta
sk
4 -
Pre
lim
ina
ry E
ng
ine
eri
ng
Ta
sk
4 -
Pre
lim
ina
ry E
ng
ine
eri
ng
Ta
sk
4 -
Pre
lim
ina
ry E
ng
ine
eri
ng
Ta
sk
4 -
Pre
lim
ina
ry E
ng
ine
eri
ng
Ta
sk
4 -
Pre
lim
ina
ry E
ng
ine
eri
ng
Ta
sk
4 -
Pre
lim
ina
ry E
ng
ine
eri
ng
4 -
Pre
limin
ary
Engin
eering
19-J
un-0
918-J
un-1
401-J
ul-09 A
22-J
an-1
633%
50%
93%
74%
4.1
- 1
5%
Pre
limin
ary
Engin
eering
01-J
ul-09
15-F
eb-1
301-J
ul-09 A
22-M
ay-
14
63%
96%
93%
74%
4.1
1 -
30%
Pre
limin
ary
Engin
eering
01-J
ul-14
19-J
un-1
501-J
ul-14
22-J
an-1
60%
0%
0%
0%
Ta
sk
5 -
EIR
/EIS
An
aly
sis
Ta
sk
5 -
EIR
/EIS
An
aly
sis
Ta
sk
5 -
EIR
/EIS
An
aly
sis
Ta
sk
5 -
EIR
/EIS
An
aly
sis
Ta
sk
5 -
EIR
/EIS
An
aly
sis
Ta
sk
5 -
EIR
/EIS
An
aly
sis
Ta
sk
5 -
EIR
/EIS
An
aly
sis
Ta
sk
5 -
EIR
/EIS
An
aly
sis
Ta
sk
5 -
EIR
/EIS
An
aly
sis
5 -
EIR
/EIS
Analy
sis
20-J
ul-09
03-D
ec-1
220-J
ul-09 A
04-F
eb-1
456%
99%
98%
43%
5.2
- T
echnic
al R
eport
s20-J
ul-09
06-M
ar-
14
20-J
ul-09 A
05-M
ar-
14
62%
96%
97%
37%
5.3
- E
IR/E
IS B
aselin
e/A
ffecte
d E
nvironm
enta
l A
naly
sis
24-A
ug-0
920-J
un-1
424-A
ug-0
9 A
19-J
un-1
434%
98%
99%
28%
Checkpoin
t A
: C
heckpoin
t A
Concurr
ence
03-A
ug-1
203-A
ug-1
2 A
Checkpoin
t B
: F
RA
Clo
se O
ut
Lett
er
for
Checkpoin
t B
04-A
ug-1
304-A
ug-1
3
Ta
sk
7 -
Dra
ft a
nd
Fin
al E
IR/E
IST
as
k 7
- D
raft
an
d F
ina
l E
IR/E
IST
as
k 7
- D
raft
an
d F
ina
l E
IR/E
IST
as
k 7
- D
raft
an
d F
ina
l E
IR/E
IST
as
k 7
- D
raft
an
d F
ina
l E
IR/E
IST
as
k 7
- D
raft
an
d F
ina
l E
IR/E
IST
as
k 7
- D
raft
an
d F
ina
l E
IR/E
IST
as
k 7
- D
raft
an
d F
ina
l E
IR/E
IST
as
k 7
- D
raft
an
d F
ina
l E
IR/E
IS
7 -
Dra
ft a
nd F
inal E
IR/E
IS21-M
ar-
14
28-A
ug-1
521-M
ar-
14
24-J
ul-15
0%
28%
37%
0%
7.1
- P
repare
Adm
inis
trative D
raft
EIR
/EIS
21-M
ar-
14
07-J
ul-14
21-M
ar-
14
07-J
ul-14
0%
81%
69%
0%
7.2
- P
repare
Dra
ft E
IR/E
IS08-J
ul-14
02-O
ct-
14
08-J
ul-14
02-O
ct-
14
0%
3%
3%
0%
7.3
- P
repare
Dra
ft F
inal E
IR/E
IS12-D
ec-1
406-M
ay-
15
12-D
ec-1
401-A
pr-
15
0%
0%
0%
0%
7.6
- F
inal E
IR/E
IS02-A
pr-
15
24-J
ul-15
02-A
pr-
15
24-J
ul-15
0%
0%
0%
0%
Checkpoin
t C
: F
RA
Clo
se O
ut
Lett
er
for
Checkpoin
t C
20-F
eb-1
520-F
eb-1
5
Ta
sk
8 -
Ce
rtif
ica
tio
n o
f E
IR/E
IS a
nd
RO
DT
as
k 8
- C
ert
ific
ati
on
of
EIR
/EIS
an
d R
OD
Ta
sk
8 -
Ce
rtif
ica
tio
n o
f E
IR/E
IS a
nd
RO
DT
as
k 8
- C
ert
ific
ati
on
of
EIR
/EIS
an
d R
OD
Ta
sk
8 -
Ce
rtif
ica
tio
n o
f E
IR/E
IS a
nd
RO
DT
as
k 8
- C
ert
ific
ati
on
of
EIR
/EIS
an
d R
OD
Ta
sk
8 -
Ce
rtif
ica
tio
n o
f E
IR/E
IS a
nd
RO
DT
as
k 8
- C
ert
ific
ati
on
of
EIR
/EIS
an
d R
OD
Ta
sk
8 -
Ce
rtif
ica
tio
n o
f E
IR/E
IS a
nd
RO
D
8 -
Cert
ific
ation o
f E
IR/E
IS a
nd R
OD
12-M
ay-
14
02-M
ar-
16
12-M
ay-
14
27-J
an-1
60%
3%
0%
0%
8.2
- N
otice o
f D
ete
rmin
ation/R
ecord
of
Decis
ion
03-J
ul-15
29-S
ep-1
503-J
ul-15
30-S
ep-1
50%
0%
0%
0%
Ta
sk
9 -
RO
W P
res
erv
ati
on
an
d A
cq
uis
itio
nT
as
k 9
- R
OW
Pre
se
rva
tio
n a
nd
Ac
qu
isit
ion
Ta
sk
9 -
RO
W P
res
erv
ati
on
an
d A
cq
uis
itio
nT
as
k 9
- R
OW
Pre
se
rva
tio
n a
nd
Ac
qu
isit
ion
Ta
sk
9 -
RO
W P
res
erv
ati
on
an
d A
cq
uis
itio
nT
as
k 9
- R
OW
Pre
se
rva
tio
n a
nd
Ac
qu
isit
ion
Ta
sk
9 -
RO
W P
res
erv
ati
on
an
d A
cq
uis
itio
nT
as
k 9
- R
OW
Pre
se
rva
tio
n a
nd
Ac
qu
isit
ion
Ta
sk
9 -
RO
W P
res
erv
ati
on
an
d A
cq
uis
itio
n
9 -
RO
W P
reserv
ation a
nd A
cquis
itio
n05-M
ar-
15
20-M
ay-
15
05-M
ar-
15
20-M
ay-
15
0%
0%
0%
0%
To
tal S
ec
tio
n P
rog
res
s C
om
ple
teT
ota
l S
ec
tio
n P
rog
res
s C
om
ple
teT
ota
l S
ec
tio
n P
rog
res
s C
om
ple
teT
ota
l S
ec
tio
n P
rog
res
s C
om
ple
teT
ota
l S
ec
tio
n P
rog
res
s C
om
ple
teT
ota
l S
ec
tio
n P
rog
res
s C
om
ple
teT
ota
l S
ec
tio
n P
rog
res
s C
om
ple
teT
ota
l S
ec
tio
n P
rog
res
s C
om
ple
teT
ota
l S
ec
tio
n P
rog
res
s C
om
ple
te
Tota
l S
ection P
rogre
ss C
om
ple
te12-F
eb-0
703-M
ar-
16
12-F
eb-0
7 A
27-J
an-1
63
5%57%
80%
61%
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Se
cti
on
Su
mm
ary
Sc
he
du
leB
AK
ER
SF
IEL
D T
O P
AL
MD
AL
E -
BP
JA
NU
AR
Y 2
01
3
Pro
ject
ID:
BP
Layo
ut
Nam
e: 0-R
C P
SS
- R
2 (
BP
)
Report
Nam
e: S
um
Sch R
pt
- B
P,
Jan13.p
df
Pr o
ject
Sta
rt:
12-F
eb-0
7
Pro
ject
Fin
ish:
27-J
an-1
6
Data
Date
: 25-J
an-1
3
Sec
tio
n S
um
ma
ry S
ched
ule
Pag
e 1
of
1
06-F
eb-1
3 1
6:4
3
Rem
ain
ing L
evel of
Eff
ort
Actu
al Level of
Eff
ort
Baselin
e
Actu
al W
ork
Rem
ain
ing W
ork
Baselin
e M
ilesto
ne
Mile
sto
ne (
Actu
al/F
ore
cast)
% C
om
ple
te
To
tal B
ud
get
Pla
nn
ed
Valu
e
Ph
ysic
al
% C
om
pE
arn
ed
Valu
eA
ctu
al C
ost
Fo
recast
To
tal at
Co
mp
Bu
dg
et
Vari
an
ce
CV
SV
CP
IS
PI
AB
CD
=A
*CE
FG
=E
+F
H=
A-G
I=D
-EJ=
D-B
K=
D/E
L=
D/B
1P
roje
ct M
anag
em
en
t6
,44
8,8
07
3,7
34
,43
43
7%
2,3
86
,70
32
,48
1,4
98
4,3
13
,06
06
,79
4,5
58
(34
5,7
51
)(9
4,7
94
)(1
,34
7,7
30
)0
.96
0.6
4
2P
ub
lic /
Age
ncy
Par
tici
pat
ion
2,3
04
,90
31
,40
9,0
42
39
%8
98
,22
18
76
,16
01
,34
4,3
34
2,2
20
,49
48
4,4
09
22
,06
1(5
10
,82
1)
1.0
30
.64
3P
roje
ct D
efi
nit
ion
96
2,2
60
96
2,2
60
89
%8
56
,83
51
,18
1,9
38
15
0,0
01
1,3
31
,93
9(3
69
,67
8)
(32
5,1
02
)(1
05
,42
5)
0.7
20
.89
4P
relim
inar
y En
gin
ee
rin
g2
8,4
69
,56
61
4,2
05
,32
13
3%
9,2
98
,34
41
0,8
11
,26
72
0,1
84
,41
63
0,9
95
,68
3(2
,52
6,1
16
)(1
,51
2,9
23
)(4
,90
6,9
77
)0
.86
0.6
5
4.1
Infr
ast
ruct
ure
15
%1
4,7
31
,21
71
4,2
05
,32
16
3%
9,2
98
,34
41
0,8
11
,26
7.0
46
,44
6,0
67
17
,25
7,3
34
(2,5
26
,11
6)
(1,5
12
,92
3)
(4,9
06
,97
7)
0.8
60
.65
4.1
1In
fra
stru
ctu
re 3
0%
13
,73
8,3
49
00
%0
0.0
01
3,7
38
,34
91
3,7
38
,34
90
00
N/A
N/A
5EI
R/E
IS A
nal
ysis
9,9
70
,06
39
,86
8,5
88
55
.9%
5,5
69
,27
76
,24
1,4
55
4,8
55
,59
61
1,0
97
,05
1(1
,12
6,9
88
)(6
72
,17
7)
(4,2
99
,31
1)
0.8
90
.56
6St
atio
n A
rea
Pla
nn
ing
00
0%
00
00
00
0N
/AN
/A
7D
raft
an
d F
inal
EIR
/EIS
2,4
35
,58
46
84
,10
90
%0
10
,24
22
,42
4,4
45
2,4
34
,68
78
97
(10
,24
2)
(68
4,1
09
)0
.00
0.0
0
8C
ert
ific
atio
n o
f EI
R/E
IS a
nd
RO
D3
,86
5,4
73
12
5,0
89
0%
00
3,8
64
,77
43
,86
4,7
74
69
90
(12
5,0
89
)N
/A0
.00
9R
OW
EIR
/EIS
Pro
cess
10
,38
60
0%
00
10
,38
61
0,3
86
00
0N
/AN
/A
10
RO
W A
ctiv
itie
s0
00
%0
00
00
00
N/A
N/A
54
,46
7,0
42
30
,98
8,8
44
34
.9%
19
,00
9,3
81
21
,60
2,5
59
37
,14
7,0
12
58
,74
9,5
70
(4,2
82
,52
8)
(2,5
93
,17
8)
(11
,97
9,4
63
)0
.88
0.6
1
OD
CO
the
r D
ire
ct C
ost
s *
1,7
93
,45
04
5,1
10
1,2
57
,35
51
,30
2,4
65
49
0,9
85
56
,26
0,4
92
21
,64
7,6
68
38
,40
4,3
67
60
,05
2,0
35
(3,7
91
,54
3)
Def
init
ion
s
ATo
tal B
ud
get:
Th
e to
tal p
lan
ned
co
st f
or
the
Task
/Su
bta
sk.
This
incl
ud
es a
ll p
ast
and
pre
sen
t au
tho
riza
tio
ns
as w
ell a
s fu
ture
un
fun
ded
exp
ecte
d c
ost
s.
BP
lan
ned
Val
ue:
Th
e to
tal p
lan
ned
co
st t
o d
ate
for
the
Task
/Su
bta
sk.
CP
hys
ical
% C
om
p:
The
tota
l per
cen
t o
f ac
tual
wo
rk c
om
ple
ted
. Th
is is
bes
t d
eter
min
ed a
s th
e ef
fort
to
dat
e /
the
tota
l exp
ecte
d e
ffo
rt.
This
is n
ot
inte
nd
ed t
o b
e a
fin
anci
al %
co
mp
lete
.
DEa
rned
Val
ue:
Th
e am
ou
nt
of
the
Tota
l Bu
dge
t co
mp
lete
d t
o d
ate
bas
ed o
n t
he
Ph
ysic
al %
Co
mp
.
EA
ctu
al C
ost
: Th
e am
ou
nt
spen
t to
dat
e o
n t
he
Task
/Su
bta
sk.
This
can
incl
ud
e in
voic
ed a
mo
un
ts a
s w
ell a
s ac
cru
als
of
wo
rk c
om
ple
ted
an
d n
ot
yet
invo
iced
.
FFo
reca
st:
The
exp
ecte
d c
ost
nee
ded
to
co
mp
lete
th
e Ta
sk/S
ub
task
. Th
is is
ind
epen
den
t o
f au
tho
riza
tio
n a
nd
fu
nd
ing.
GTo
tal a
t C
om
p:
The
sum
of
the
Act
ual
Co
st a
nd
th
e Fo
reca
st, w
hic
h r
epre
sen
t th
e to
tal e
xpec
ted
co
st f
or
the
Task
/Su
bta
sk.
HB
ud
get
Var
ian
ce:
The
dif
fere
nce
bet
wee
n t
he
Tota
l Bu
dge
t an
d t
he
Tota
l at
Co
mp
. Th
is r
epre
sen
ts t
he
exp
ecte
d u
nd
erru
n o
r o
verr
un
of
the
Tota
l Bu
dge
t.
IC
V:
Co
st V
aria
nce
is t
he
dif
fere
nce
bet
wee
n t
he
Earn
ed V
alu
e an
d t
he
Act
ual
Co
st.
Po
siti
ve v
alu
es in
dic
ate
the
Task
/Su
bta
sk is
bei
ng
pro
du
ce m
ore
co
st e
ffic
ien
tly
than
pla
nn
ed.
JSV
: Sc
hed
ule
Var
ian
ce is
th
e d
iffe
ren
ce b
etw
een
th
e Ea
rned
Val
ue
and
th
e P
lan
ned
Val
ue.
Po
siti
ve v
alu
es in
dic
ate
the
Task
/Su
bta
sk is
bei
ng
pro
du
ced
fas
ter
than
pla
nn
ed.
KC
PI:
Co
st P
erfo
rman
ce In
dex
is t
he
fact
or
of
the
Earn
ed V
alu
e /
Act
ual
Co
st.
Val
ues
gre
ater
th
an 1
.0 in
dic
ate
the
Task
/Su
bta
sk is
bei
ng
pro
du
ce m
ore
co
st e
ffic
ien
tly
than
pla
nn
ed.
LSP
I: S
ched
ule
Per
form
ance
Ind
ex is
th
e fa
cto
r o
f th
e Ea
rned
Val
ue
/ P
lan
ned
Val
ue.
Val
ues
gre
ater
th
an 1
.0 in
dic
ate
the
Task
/Su
bta
sk is
bei
ng
pro
du
ced
fas
ter
than
pla
nn
ed.
CA
HSR
A P
rogr
amEa
rne
d V
alu
e A
nal
ysis
Bak
ers
fie
ld t
o P
alm
dal
eTo
tal w
/OD
C's
Bak
ers
fie
ld t
o P
alm
dal
e L
abo
r To
tal
Bak
ers
fie
ld t
o P
alm
dal
eU
RS/
HM
M/A
rup
Task/S
ub
task
WB
S
BP
-UR
S-Ea
rned
Val
ue
Rep
ort
-Jan
201
3 v1
2/7
/20
13
Dollar amounts in thousands
WBS Task
Total Labor
Budget*
(BAC)
Planned
(PV)
Actual Cost
(AC)
Earned
(EV)
Forecast
(ETC)
Total Cost
(EAC) CPI SPI
1 Project Management $6,449 $3,734 $2,481 $2,387 $4,313 $6,795 0.96 0.64
2 Public / Agency Participation $2,305 $1,409 $876 $898 $1,344 $2,220 1.03 0.64
3 Project Definition $962 $962 $1,182 $857 $150 $1,332 0.72 0.89
4 Preliminary Engineering $28,470 $14,205 $10,811 $9,298 $20,184 $30,996 0.86 0.65
4.1 Infrastructure 15% $14,731 $14,205 $10,811 $9,298 $6,446 $17,257 0.86 0.65
4.11 Infrastructure 30% $13,738 $0 $0 $0 $13,738 $13,738 NA NA
5 EIR/EIS Analysis $9,970 $9,869 $6,241 $5,569 $4,856 $11,097 0.89 0.56
6 Station Area Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 NA NA
7 Draft and Final EIR/EIS $2,436 $684 $10 $0 $2,424 $2,435 0.00 0.00
8 Certification of EIR/EIS and ROD $3,865 $125 $0 $0 $3,865 $3,865 NA 0.00
9 ROW EIR/EIS Process $10 $0 $0 $0 $10 $10 NA NA
10 ROW Activities $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 NA NA
ODC Other Direct Costs * $1,793 $0 $45 $0 $1,257 $1,302 0.00 NA
$56,260 $30,989 $21,648 $19,009 $38,404 $60,052 0.88 0.61
* Total Labor Budget - is the planned cost of all work less Other Direct Costs (ODC's).
Current Cost Variance (CV) to Date (EV - AC): ($2,638) Percent under (+) or over (-) budget -12.2%
Current Schedule Variance (SV) to Date (EV - PV): ($11,979) Percent ahead (+) or behind (-) schedule -38.7%
OVER BUDGET
BEHIND SCHEDULE
Cost Performance Report
Total
Bakersfield to PalmdalePlanned Progress
Actual Progress
56.9%
34.9%
January 2013
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan Mar May
FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14
$ (
000)
Earned Value Analysis
Cumulative Planned Value (PV)
Cumulative Earned Value (EV)
Cumulative Actual Cost (AC)
Cumulative Forecast (AC + ETC)
0.75
0.85
0.95
1.05
1.15
1.25
Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan
Cummulative Performance Trends to Date
CPI SPI Linear (CPI) Linear (SPI)
(7,000)
(6,000)
(5,000)
(4,000)
(3,000)
(2,000)
(1,000)
0
1,000
2,000
Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan
Monthly Cost & Schedule Variances
CV SV Linear (CV) Linear (SV)
California High Speed Rail Authority
$(000)
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr
Last 9 Months - Next 3 Months
Section:
Regional Consultant
Hour Summary FY 2012 -2013
HOURS Budgeted Total July August September October November December January February March April May June
1 1 Project Management 16,942 1,378 1,441 1,253 1,441 1,378 1,315 1,441 1,253 1,410 1,568 1,639 1,425
2 2 Public / Agency Participation 9,284 786 821 714 821 786 750 821 714 750 786 821 714
3 3 Alternative Analysis - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4 Engineering
4.1 15% Preliminary Engineering 46,927 6,116 6,466 5,703 6,512 6,229 5,945 6,512 3,146 73 76 80 69
4.11 30% Preliminary Engineering - - - - - - - - - - - - -
5 5 EIR / EIS Analysis 32,728 7,376 7,780 4,981 4,071 3,521 2,380 1,918 132 139 146 152 132
6 6 Station Area Planning - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7 7 Draft & Final EIR/EIS 11,311 207 32 - - 701 2,352 691 910 1,333 1,426 1,857 1,802
8 8 Certification of EIR/EIS & ROD 6,729 - - - - 257 512 561 652 857 897 1,145 1,848
9 9 ROW EIR/EIS Process - - - - - - - - - - - - -
10 10 ROW Activities - - - - - - - - - - - - -
OD ODC ODCs - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Totals 123,921 15,863 16,540 12,651 12,845 12,872 13,254 11,944 6,807 4,562 4,899 5,694 5,990
Actual / Forecast Total July August September October November December January February March April May June
1 1 Project Management 10,203 628 726 797 631 418 792 810 1,081 1,081 1,081 1,081 1,081
2 2 Public / Agency Participation 5,165 201 386 332 363 153 173 245 663 663 663 663 663
3 3 Alternative Analysis 964 - - - - - - - 182 191 200 209 182
4 Engineering
4.1 15% Preliminary Engineering 65,702 5,505 7,619 8,234 8,363 9,370 6,358 3,141 3,422 3,422 3,422 3,422 3,422
4.11 30% Preliminary Engineering - - - - - - - - - - - - -
5 5 EIR / EIS Analysis 33,427 996 1,159 2,476 3,844 2,631 1,819 1,491 3,802 3,802 3,802 3,802 3,802
6 6 Station Area Planning - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7 7 Draft & Final EIR/EIS 143 - - 88 30 4 22 - - - - - -
8 8 Certification of EIR/EIS & ROD - - - - - - - - - - - - -
9 9 ROW EIR/EIS Process - - - - - - - - - - - - -
10 10 ROW Activities - - - - - - - - - - - - -
OD ODC ODCs - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Monthly Totals 115,604 7,329 9,889 11,927 13,229 12,575 9,164 5,686 9,150 9,159 9,168 9,177 9,150
Cumulative Totals 7,329 17,218 29,145 42,374 54,950 64,113 69,799 78,949 88,108 97,277 106,454 115,604
Cost Summary FY 2012 -2013
DOLLARSBudgeted Total July August September October November December January February March April May June
1 1 Project Management $1,984,101 $158,051 $165,235 $143,683 $165,235 $158,051 $150,867 $165,235 $143,683 $167,689 $191,695 $200,408 $174,268
2 2 Public / Agency Participation $930,338 $78,721 $82,299 $71,564 $82,299 $78,721 $75,143 $82,299 $71,564 $75,143 $78,721 $82,299 $71,564
3 3 Alternative Analysis $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
4 Engineering
4.1 15% Preliminary Engineering $7,313,755 $959,257 $1,010,865 $888,063 $1,015,535 $971,380 $927,227 $1,015,534 $489,499 $8,888 $9,311 $9,734 $8,464
4.11 30% Preliminary Engineering $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
5 5 EIR / EIS Analysis $3,525,414 $782,712 $814,554 $534,593 $460,363 $395,959 $259,347 $206,204 $13,525 $14,201 $14,877 $15,553 $13,525
6 6 Station Area Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
7 7 Draft & Final EIR/EIS $1,086,299 $19,198 $2,953 $0 $0 $73,983 $231,139 $69,997 $87,866 $126,858 $135,819 $172,739 $165,747
8 8 Certification of EIR/EIS & ROD $652,653 $0 $0 $0 $0 $23,899 $48,295 $52,895 $62,190 $82,304 $86,223 $111,529 $185,317
9 9 ROW EIR/EIS Process $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
10 10 ROW Activities $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
OD ODC ODCs $803,850 $98,013 $100,285 $79,657 $80,791 $85,951 $99,585 $81,485 $47,708 $28,925 $30,302 $36,137 $35,011
Totals $16,296,411 $2,095,952 $2,176,191 $1,717,561 $1,804,223 $1,787,944 $1,791,603 $1,673,649 $916,035 $504,008 $546,948 $628,400 $653,896
Actual / Forecast Total July August September October November December January February March April May June
1 1 Project Management $1,318,124 $82,029 $93,763 $104,240 $80,524 $52,813 $105,358 $109,337 $138,012 $138,012 $138,012 $138,012 $138,012
2 2 Public / Agency Participation $620,529 $21,798 $46,694 $40,041 $41,490 $19,490 $22,483 $29,149 $79,877 $79,877 $79,877 $79,877 $79,877
3 3 Alternative Analysis $150,001 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000
4 Engineering
4.1 15% Preliminary Engineering $7,837,209 $704,592 $900,465 $1,006,850 $985,106 $1,090,001 $733,603 $400,944 $403,130 $403,130 $403,130 $403,130 $403,130
4.11 30% Preliminary Engineering $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
5 5 EIR / EIS Analysis $3,077,718 $92,102 $110,973 $224,455 $351,897 $246,678 $163,491 $147,423 $348,140 $348,140 $348,140 $348,140 $348,140
6 6 Station Area Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
7 7 Draft & Final EIR/EIS $10,242 $0 $0 $5,967 $1,922 $333 $2,020 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
8 8 Certification of EIR/EIS & ROD $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
9 9 ROW EIR/EIS Process $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
10 10 ROW Activities $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
OD ODC ODCs $235,332 $1,448 $3,219 $23,949 $5,499 $4,215 $1,957 $4,822 $46,474 $53,428 $20,658 $35,289 $34,373
Monthly Totals 13,249,154 $901,970 $1,155,114 $1,405,501 $1,466,437 $1,413,531 $1,028,912 $691,675 $1,045,632 $1,052,586 $1,019,816 $1,034,447 $1,033,531
Cumulative Totals $901,970 2,057,084 3,462,585 4,929,023 6,342,554 7,371,465 8,063,140 9,108,772 10,161,359 11,181,175 12,215,622 13,249,154
Bakersfield to Palmdale
URS/HMM/Arup
Section:
Regional Consultant
Hour Summary FY 2006 -201806/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18
HOURS Budgeted Total 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
1 1 Project Management 52,346 - - - 5,304 717 13,133 16,942 16,250 - - - -
2 2 Public / Agency Participation 21,740 - - - 1,654 856 5,000 9,284 4,946 - - - -
3 3 Alternative Analysis 9,990 - - - 6,106 2,364 1,520 - - - - - -
4 Engineering
4.1 15% Preliminary Engineering 95,841 - - - 12,948 2,284 33,682 46,927 - - - - -
4.11 30% Preliminary Engineering 111,948 - - - - - - - 111,948 - - - -
5 5 EIR / EIS Analysis 85,723 - - - 5,579 5,468 41,668 32,728 280 - - - -
6 6 Station Area Planning - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7 7 Draft & Final EIR/EIS 24,374 - - - - - 1,875 11,311 11,188 - - - -
8 8 Certification of EIR/EIS & ROD 40,434 - - - - - - 6,729 33,705 - - - -
9 9 ROW EIR/EIS Process 60 - - - - - - - 60 - - - -
10 10 ROW Activities - - - - - - - - - - - - -
OD ODC ODCs - - - - - - - - - - - - - Totals 442,456 - - - 31,591 11,689 96,878 123,921 178,377 - - - -
Actual / Forecast Total 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/181 1 Project Management 40,223 - - - 5,583 1,895 6,292 10,203 16,250 - - - -
2 2 Public / Agency Participation 21,506 - - - 1,677 1,078 2,457 5,165 4,946 4,946 1,237 - -
3 3 Alternative Analysis 11,261 - - - 5,621 2,536 2,140 964 - - - - -
4 Engineering
4.1 15% Preliminary Engineering 137,486 - - - 12,626 3,485 18,061 65,702 37,613 - - - -
4.11 30% Preliminary Engineering 223,897 - - - - - - - 111,948 70,704 41,244 - -
5 5 EIR / EIS Analysis 124,424 - - - 5,602 14,375 37,001 33,427 34,020 - - - -
6 6 Station Area Planning - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7 7 Draft & Final EIR/EIS 11,329 - - - - - - 143 11,186 - - - -
8 8 Certification of EIR/EIS & ROD 38,540 - - - - - - - 5,340 26,692 6,508 - -
9 9 ROW EIR/EIS Process 60 - - - - - - - 60 - - - -
10 10 ROW Activities - - - - - - - - - - - - -
OD ODC ODCs - - - - - - - - - - - - - Monthly Totals 608,726 - - - 31,109 23,368 65,950 115,604 221,363 102,342 48,989 - -
Cumulative Totals - - 31,109 54,477 120,427 236,031 457,394 559,737 608,726
Cost Summary FY 2008-2014
DOLLARSBudgeted Total 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
1 1 Project Management $6,448,807 $0 $0 $0 $682,216 $186,488 $1,759,372 $1,984,101 $1,836,630 $0 $0 $0 $0
2 2 Public / Agency Participation $2,304,903 $0 $0 $0 $215,626 $95,693 $546,676 $930,338 $516,570 $0 $0 $0 $0
3 3 Alternative Analysis $962,260 $0 $0 $0 $693,393 $120,558 $148,309 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
4 Engineering
4.1 15% Preliminary Engineering $14,731,217 $0 $0 $0 $2,076,893 $384,064 $4,956,505 $7,313,755 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
4.11 30% Preliminary Engineering $13,738,349 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,738,349 $0 $0 $0 $0
5 5 EIR / EIS Analysis $9,970,063 $0 $0 $0 $584,360 $1,028,197 $4,802,298 $3,525,414 $29,794 $0 $0 $0 $0
6 6 Station Area Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
7 7 Draft & Final EIR/EIS $2,435,584 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $286,839 $1,086,299 $1,062,445 $0 $0 $0 $0
8 8 Certification of EIR/EIS & ROD $3,865,473 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $652,653 $3,212,820 $0 $0 $0 $0
9 9 ROW Effort EIR/EIS Process $10,386 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,386 $0 $0 $0 $0
10 10 ROW Activities $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
OD ODC ODCs $1,793,450 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $803,850 $989,600 $0 $0 $0 $0Totals $56,260,492 $0 $0 $0 $4,252,488 $1,815,000 $12,500,000 $16,296,411 $21,396,594 $0 $0 $0 $0
Actual / Forecast Total 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/181 1 Project Management $6,794,558 $0 $0 $0 $725,383 $281,431 $846,620 $1,318,124 $1,476,000 $1,356,000 $791,000 $0 $0
2 2 Public / Agency Participation $2,220,494 $0 $0 $0 $217,108 $132,266 $305,641 $620,529 $516,570 $392,380 $36,000 $0 $0
3 3 Alternative Analysis $1,331,939 $0 $0 $0 $646,116 $299,172 $236,650 $150,001 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
4 Engineering
4.1 15% Preliminary Engineering $17,257,334 $0 $0 $0 $2,051,257 $482,784 $2,455,665 $7,837,209 $4,430,419 $0 $0 $0 $0
4.11 30% Preliminary Engineering $13,738,349 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,676,852 $5,061,497 $0 $0
5 5 EIR / EIS Analysis $11,097,051 $0 $0 $0 $603,909 $1,245,104 $3,055,422 $3,077,718 $3,114,897 $0 $0 $0 $0
6 6 Station Area Planning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
7 7 Draft & Final EIR/EIS $2,434,687 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,242 $1,918,445 $506,000 $0 $0 $0
8 8 Certification of EIR/EIS & ROD $3,864,774 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $535,470 $2,676,652 $652,652 $0 $0
9 9 ROW EIR/EIS Process $10,386 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,386 $0 $0 $0 $0
10 10 ROW Activities $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
OD ODC ODCs $1,302,465 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $235,332 $1,067,133 $0 $0 $0 $0
Monthly Totals $60,052,035 $0 $0 $0 $4,243,773 $2,440,758 $6,899,997 $13,249,154 $13,069,320 $13,607,884 $6,541,149 $0 $0
Cumulative Totals $0 $0 $4,243,773 $6,684,531 $13,584,528 $26,833,682 $39,903,002 $53,510,886 $60,052,035
Italics = Forecast
Physical Percent Complete - Program Total* (Actual/Forecast)2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
1 Project Management 0% 0% 0% 11% 15% 27% 47% 68% 88% 100% 100% 100%2 Public / Agency Participation 0% 0% 0% 10% 16% 29% 57% 81% 98% 100% 100% 100%3 Alternative Analysis 0% 0% 0% 49% 71% 89% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%4 Engineering
15% Preliminary Engineering 0% 0% 0% 12% 15% 29% 74% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%30% Preliminary Engineering 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 63% 100% 100% 100%
5 EIR / EIS Analysis 0% 0% 0% 5% 17% 44% 72% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%6 Station Area Planning N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A7 Draft & Final EIR/EIS 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 79% 100% 100% 100% 100%8 Certification of EIR/EIS & ROD 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 14% 83% 100% 100% 100%9 ROW Effort EIR/EIS Process 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
10 ROW Activities N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ATOTAL Annual PROGRESS 0% 0% 0% 7% 11% 23% 45% 66% 89% 100% 100% 100%
*Physical Percent Complete = Actual Cost / (Actual Cost + Estimate Cost to Completion)
Bakersfield to Palmdale
URS/HMM/Arup
Bakersfield-PALMDALE – URS/HMM/Arup JV Progress Report – January 2013
6
4) Key Developments and Accomplishments
Task 1 Management
1.1 PM/PM Plan/Meetings/Coordination
a) Continued to work with the PMT, including responding to requests for information/analysis and conducting bi-weekly management team meetings.
1.2 QA/QC/Safety/Risk
a) Continued to conduct quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) activities for
deliverables, including verification of adherence to QA/QC Plan before submittal.
b) Reviewed footprint development process guidance for JV team.
c) Participated in PMT’s surveillance audit at Natomas Park on January 29, 2013.
1.3 Document Control
a) Conducted additional website refresher training for the JV team, as needed.
b) Continued to manage posting and internal review of draft documents and work
products, as specified in the JV’s Document Control Plan.
c) Continued to post documents for PMT and Authority review on ProjectSolve.
1.4 Schedule, Budget, and Progress Reports
a) Submitted invoice, progress reports and supplemental information, and schedule.
b) Worked with the Authority to clarify the process for approval and payment of outstanding non-labor items (such as travel and field supplies).
c) Prepared and submitted personnel request forms (PRFs) travel request forms (TRFs),
and change request forms (CRFs), as needed.
1.5 Risk Management
a) No activity took place this period
Task 2 Public Outreach
2.1 Participation Plan
No activity this period.
2.2 California HST Project (CHSTP) Agency Coordination Plan
a) Participated in bi-weekly coordination conference calls, hosted by Valerie Martinez,
with the Southern California regional outreach team.
b) Participated in the bi-weekly PMT/EMT/PMO/JV BP Management Meeting
c) On January 8, participated in a BP outreach strategy workshop with the regional consultant (RC) outreach team and the Southern California Regional Manager and
Regional Communications Manager.
Bakersfield-PALMDALE – URS/HMM/Arup JV Progress Report – January 2013
7
2.3 Maintain Stakeholder Database
a) Continued ongoing response to stakeholder requests for information and public
correspondence.
b) Prepared and submitted the monthly CommentSense Report.
2.4 Memoranda of Understanding
Not applicable.
2.5 Stakeholder Meetings and Briefings
a) On January 8, participated in a joint BP/PLA stakeholder meeting with the City of
Palmdale. This meeting addressed proposed alignments through Palmdale and issues regarding the proposed Palmdale station.
b) On January 9, participated in the quarterly Antelope Valley Transportation Summit.
The Authority’s Southern California Regional Manager gave a brief project update regarding the proposed alignments through the Antelope Valley.
c) On January 14, participated in a joint BP/PLA stakeholder meeting with Los Angeles
County Supervisor Mike Antonovich’s staff. The meeting provided a project update briefing on the proposed alignment alternatives through the Antelope Valley and the
alignments south of Palmdale.
d) On January 15, facilitated a stakeholder meeting with the City of Lancaster. The
meeting addressed proposed alignment alternatives through Lancaster and to identify potential roadway impacts from the proposed alignments.
e) On January 15, facilitated a stakeholder meeting with the City of Palmdale. The
meeting addressed proposed alignment alternatives through Palmdale and identified potential roadway impacts from the proposed alignments.
f) Planned stakeholder meetings in the Edison, Tehachapi, and Antelope Valley sub-
sections for February 2013.
2.6 Other Outreach
a) Held weekly BP outreach team coordination/strategy conference call.
b) Participated in the weekly Central Valley outreach team call.
c) Planned and coordinated logistics for future stakeholder outreach activities, including
activities with the PLA outreach team.
d) Provided ongoing public outreach support to the BP engineering and environmental team.
2.7 Create/Distribute Media/Newsletters
No activity took place during this period.
Task 3 Project Definition
Task is complete.
Bakersfield-PALMDALE – URS/HMM/Arup JV Progress Report – January 2013
8
Task 4 Engineering
4.1 Infrastructure 15%
4.1.1 Survey and Mapping
No activity took place during this period.
4.1.2 Alignment
a) Submitted the Draft 15% Alignment Report.
b) Submitted updated footprints to the environmental team for the supplemental alternatives analysis (SAA) analysis.
c) Attended a review of the footprint with the environmental team and the PMT on
January 16. Assisted in the preparation of exhibits and narratives for the SAA Report, accessing the viability and making recommendations of alignments to be advanced
for further consideration in the 15% Design.
d) Prepared exhibits for stakeholders in the Antelope Valley.
e) Commenced the review of requirement and locations for the TSMF and associated connections to the California High-Speed Rail mainline.
f) Investigated alternative sites for the TSMF.
4.1.3 Temporary Construction Facilities
No activity took place during this period.
4.1.4 Stations
No stations are located in this section.
4.1.5 Bridges and Elevated Structures
a) Responded to EMT Comments on the Draft 15% Structures Drawings and Structures Report.
b) Finalized calculations for tall structures to address EMT comments arising from the
in-progress submittal.
4.1.6 Tunnels
a) Continued to evaluate geotechnical parameters at cuts to reduce the extent of slopes
at portals.
b) Continued to develop portal details and sections.
4.1.7 Buildings
4.1.8 Grading/Earthworks and Borrow Sites
a) Continued to perform earthwork quantity calculations for inclusion in the Basis of Quantities Report.
Bakersfield-PALMDALE – URS/HMM/Arup JV Progress Report – January 2013
9
4.1.9 Hydrology/Hydraulics/Drainage (HH&D)
a) Continued investigating impacts of the stormwater quality, flooding, hydrology,
hydraulics, and drainage along the HST alignments, as necessary.
4.1.10 Utilities
a) Continued investigating utility impacts along the HST alignments, as necessary.
4.1.11 Geotechnical
a) Submitted Draft 15% Geologic and Seismic Hazards Report with verified responses.
b) Submitted Draft 15% Preliminary Geotechnical Design Report: Tunnels.
c) Submitted Draft 15% Preliminary Geotechnical Design Report: Structures.
d) Provided preliminary locations and costing for Advanced Geotechnical Investigation
to be completed in FY 12/13.
4.1.12 Seismic
No activity was undertaken during this fiscal year.
4.1.13 Right-of-Way (ROW)
a) No work is anticipated due to the deferment of the ROW Report into FY 13/14.
4.1.15 Roadway Plans and Structures
a) Continued to review and modify the environmental footprint, as required.
b) Attended outreach meetings with the City of Palmdale (two meetings), City of
Lancaster, and Los Angeles Supervisor Mike Antonovich’s staff.
c) Continued planning for outreach meetings with the California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans), Kern County, Los Angeles County, Rosamond, Tehachapi,
Edison, etc.
d) Attended footprint workshop with environmental team and the PMT.
e) Continued planning for workshops with the PMT/EMT.
Task 4.2 Systems 15%
4.2.1 Traction Power
a) Continued working collaboratively with the EMT to determine sites for the TPSS.
b) Submitted Draft 15% Systems drawings.
c) Continued preparing the Systems Report.
4.2.2 PUC/Connections
No activity took place during this period.
Bakersfield-PALMDALE – URS/HMM/Arup JV Progress Report – January 2013
10
4.2.3 OCS – Not used
4.2.4 Communications
No activity took place during this period.
4.2.5 Trackside Services
No activity took place during this period.
Tasks 4.3 through 4.6 - Not used
Tasks 4.7 Capital Cost Estimates
a) Continued with cost-estimating support for the 15% design.
b) Continued development of Draft 15% Quantities Basis of Estimate Report and master
spreadsheets.
Task 4.99 Engineering Task Management
a) Managed work required for completion of Draft 15% deliverables.
b) Assisted in planning of the balance of FY 12/13 work plan.
c) Led engineering team coordination meetings.
d) Attended outreach meetings.
Integration Management
a) Conducted a review meeting with environmental and engineering teams of the
updated footprint based on the Draft 15% engineering submittal.
b) Developed and presented a footprint training session to the management team.
Task 5 Environmental Analysis
Task 5.1 Management and Coordination
a) Attended the bi-weekly BP PMT meeting on January 16, 2013.
b) Attended biweekly Statewide Environmental Updates on January 14, 2013.
c) Continued management of environmental tasks and team coordination.
d) Continued data and other coordination with engineering, the Palmdale to Los Angeles
team, and the PMT.
e) Prepared draft revisions of scope, schedule, and budget for AWP v4 FY 12/13.
Administrative Record
a) See Task 7.1.
Checkpoint B
No activity took place during this period.
Bakersfield-PALMDALE – URS/HMM/Arup JV Progress Report – January 2013
11
SAA
a) Defined the SAA scope and process for alignments and the TSMF. In following
months this work will be reported under Task 3 which will be reopened.
Task 5.2 Technical Reports (TRs)
5.2.0 No Action/No Project Alternative
a) Submitted final draft to the PMT.
5.2.1 Transportation and Traffic Analysis TR
No activity took place during this period.
5.2.2 Air Quality TR
a) Created a table to include sensitive receptors within a 1000’ buffer of the project
alignment and conducted a distance analysis on these locations. 5.2.3 Noise and Vibration TR
a) Completed impacts and mitigation sections, and responded to ITR comments.
5.2.4 Biological Resources and Wetlands TR
a) Responded to ITR comments and revised Biological TR as necessary.
b) Continued to draft the Wetlands TR.
5.2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality TR
a) Incorporated information from the updated Engineering Report.
5.2.6 Geology, Soils, and Seismicity TR
a) The TR Draft is complete, pending revised project summary.
5.2.7 Hazardous Materials and Wastes TR
No activity took place during this period.
5.2.8 Community Impact Assessment TR
a) Attended project team meetings.
5.2.9 Relocation Impact Assessment TR
No activity took place during this period.
5.2.10 Aesthetics and Visual Quality TR
No activity took place during this period.
5.2.11 Cultural Resources TR
a) Continued to prepare the Architectural Survey Report (ASR), Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR), Historic Architecture Survey Report (HASR), and draft Paleontological
Report.
Bakersfield-PALMDALE – URS/HMM/Arup JV Progress Report – January 2013
12
Task 5.3 EIR/EIS Chapter 3 Sections
5.3.1 Transportation and Traffic Analysis
No activity took place during this period.
5.3.2 Air Quality
No activity took place during this period.
5.3.3 Noise and Vibration
No activity took place during this period.
5.3.4 EMI/EMF
a) Submitted the EIR/EIS Chapter 3 section to the PMT.
5.3.5 Public Utilities and Energy
a) Revised the analysis of effects to utility infrastructure based on Utility Impact Report
data.
b) Continued drafting revised language in Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences sections to include data consistent with the Utility Impact Report.
5.3.6 Biological Resources and Wetlands
No activity took place during this period.
5.3.7 Hydrology and Water Quality
No activity took place during this period.
5.3.8 Geology, Soils, and Seismicity
No activity took place during this period.
5.3.9 Hazardous Materials and Wastes
No activity took place during this period.
5.3.10 Safety and Security
No activity took place during this period.
5.3.11 Community Impact Assessment
No activity took place during this period.
5.3.12 Growth, Station Planning, and Land Use
a) Drafted Land Use summary for Cumulative Impacts section (see 5.3.18)
5.3.13 Agricultural Land
No activity took place this period.
Bakersfield-PALMDALE – URS/HMM/Arup JV Progress Report – January 2013
13
5.3.14 Parks, Recreation, and Open Space
No activity took place during this period.
5.3.15 Aesthetics and Visual Quality
No activity took place during this period.
5.3.16 Cultural Resources
No activity took place during this period.
5.3.17 Regional Impacts
a) Held weekly Team meetings to communicate ongoing changes to the project.
5.3.18 Cumulative Impacts
a) Continued to revise the technical memo per reviewer comments, and continued
drafting the EIR/EIS section.
b) Coordinated with task leads to draft their cumulative impacts analysis.
c) Continued to follow up with contacts regarding missing cumulative projects information and to format projects lists for the cumulative appendices (Sections
3.19.A and 3.19.B).
5.3.19 Section 4(f) and 6(f) Evaluations
a) Continued preparation of the EIR section (affected environment and environmental setting).
Task 7 Draft/Final EIR/EIS
7.1 Administrative Draft
No activity took place this period.
Bakersfield-PALMDALE – URS/HMM/Arup JV Progress Report – January 2013
14
5) Planned Activities for Next Period
The activities reported in this section as “planned” are based on the scope of work established in
FY 12/13 AWP v3 V. Additional work identified that was not included in FY 12/13 AWP v3 will be documented in Section 6 of this Monthly Progress Report.
Task 1 Management
1.1 PM/PM Plan/Meetings/Coordination
a) Continue to work with the PMT, including responding to requests for
information/analysis and conducting bi-weekly management team meetings.
1.2 QA/QC/Safety/Risk
a) Continue to conduct QA/QC activities for deliverables, including verification of
adherence to QA/QC Plan before submittal.
b) Facilitate management team workshop and team-building exercises tentatively planned for February 12, 2012.
1.3 Document Control
a) Conduct additional website refresher training for the JV team, as needed.
b) Continue to manage posting and internal review of draft documents and work
products as specified in the JV’s Document Control Plan.
c) Continue to post documents for PMT and Authority review on ProjectSolve.
1.4 Schedule, Budget, and Progress Reports
a) Submit invoice, progress reports and supplemental information, and schedule.
b) Work with the Authority to clarify the process for approval and payment of outstanding non-labor items (such as travel and field supplies).
c) Prepare and submit PRFs, TRFs, and CRFs, as needed.
1.5 Risk Management
a) Accumulate information for next quarterly update of risk register.
Task 2 Public Outreach
2.1 Participation Plan
a) Update Participation Plan, as necessary.
2.2 California HST Project (CHSTP) Agency Coordination Plan
a) Continue coordination with the PMT and Southern California outreach team.
2.3 Maintain Stakeholder Database
a) Maintain database of stakeholder comments and inquiries, and respond to public
requests for information.
Bakersfield-PALMDALE – URS/HMM/Arup JV Progress Report – January 2013
15
2.4 Memoranda of Understanding
Not applicable.
2.5 Stakeholder Meetings and Briefings
a) Plan, schedule, and facilitate additional stakeholder meetings with identified stakeholder groups, as appropriate, to support preparation of the Administrative
Draft EIR/EIS.
b) Support the Palmdale to Los Angeles regional outreach team in stakeholder outreach and coordination with Antelope Valley stakeholders.
2.6 Other Outreach
a) Continue to provide outreach support to the management, engineering, and
environmental task teams.
b) Continue planning and coordination of conference calls with the regional public outreach team and Southern California regional outreach team.
c) Continue to respond to requests for project information from stakeholders and
members of the public.
2.7 Create/Distribute Media/Newsletters
a) Update BP collateral materials, as necessary.
Task 3 Project Definition
Task is complete.
Task 4 Engineering
Task 4.1 Infrastructure 15%
4.1.1 Survey and Mapping
No work is planned for this period.
4.1.2 Alignment
a) Commence alignment studies based on feedback from cities and public agencies.
Continue review of the footprint for (PTE) authorizations.
4.1.3 Temporary Construction Facilities
a) Respond to any comments from the PMT on the Draft CAM Report and update the
report, as necessary.
4.1.4 Stations
No stations are in this section.
4.1.5 Bridges and Elevated Structures
a) Review and respond to comments from the PMT/EMT on the Draft 15% drawings and report.
Bakersfield-PALMDALE – URS/HMM/Arup JV Progress Report – January 2013
16
b) Schedule comment/response/resolution meeting with the PMT and EMT.
4.1.6 Tunnels
a) Respond to comments on the Draft 15% deliverables.
b) Solicit concurrence from the EMT/PMT on design variances.
c) In anticipation of focused engineering workshops with the EMT, activities will be continued to:
Developing sections along each portal, specifying details of facilities and utilities
provided.
Developing access roads in portal areas for maintenance and evacuation.
Highlighting drainage issues at portal areas and possible solutions at specific
locations.
Designing development of municipal water sources at tunnel portals.
4.1.7 Buildings
a) Submit footprints for the TMSF for analysis in the SAA.
4.1.8 Grading/Earthworks and Borrow Sites
a) Respond to comments on the Draft 15% deliverable.
4.1.9 Hydrology/Hydraulics/Drainage (HH&D)
a) Continue investigating impacts of the stormwater quality, flooding, hydrology,
hydraulics, and drainage along the HST alignments, as appropriate per stakeholder feedback. Respond to comments on the Draft 15% deliverables.
4.1.10 Utilities
a) Continue investigating utility impacts along the HST alignments, as necessary.
4.1.11 Geotechnical
a) Submit responses to comments on the Draft 15% Fault Hazard Evaluation Report.
b) Submit responses to comments on the Draft 15% Preliminary Geotechnical Design
Report: Tunnels.
c) Submit responses to comments on the Draft 15% Preliminary Geotechnical Design Report: Structures.
d) Submit responses to comments on the Draft 15% GI Work Plan for Preliminary
Engineering for Procurement.
e) Submit responses to comments on the Draft 15% Geologic and Seismic Hazards Report.
f) Submit responses to comments on the Draft 15% Geologic Field Reconnaissance
Report.
g) Provide support for upcoming stakeholder meetings.
Bakersfield-PALMDALE – URS/HMM/Arup JV Progress Report – January 2013
17
h) Provide support for other disciplines, as needed.
4.1.12 Seismic
a) Assess required activities for developing PEP-level maximum considered earthquake and Operating Basis Earthquake (OBE) ground motions to inform and advance
enhanced 15% design of complex structures.
4.1.13 Right-of-Way
a) No work is anticipated due to the deferment of the ROW Report into FY 13/14.
4.1.15 Roadway Plans and Structures
a) Respond to comments on the Draft 15% deliverables.
b) Continue to review and modify the environmental footprint, as required.
c) Assist in the preparation of the quantities estimate and report.
d) Support the outreach team with exhibits, as needed.
e) Attend outreach meetings with Caltrans, Kern County, Los Angeles County,
Rosamond, Tehachapi, and Edison.
f) Meet with the PMT/EMT to review access road designs and design criteria.
Task 4.2 Systems 15%
4.2.1 Traction Power
a) Continue working collaboratively with the EMT to determine sites for the TPSS. Prepare files to assist the EMT/PMT with SCE discussions.
b) Submit the Systems Report for 15% design.
4.2.2 PUC/Connections
a) Continue working on the strategy to determine high-voltage connections between
SCE transmission line points and TPSS facilities.
4.2.3 OCS – Not used
4.2.4 Communications
a) Continue 15% design for radio sites.
4.2.5 Trackside Services
a) Continue 15% design for interlocking houses.
Tasks 4.3 through 4.6 – Not used
Tasks 4.7 Capital Cost Estimates
a) Continue with cost-estimating support for the 15% design.
b) Submit the Draft 15% Quantities Basis of Estimate Report and master spreadsheet on February 8, 2013.
Bakersfield-PALMDALE – URS/HMM/Arup JV Progress Report – January 2013
18
Task 4.99 Engineering Task Management
a) Assist in the preparation of the work plan for the remaining FY 12/13.
b) Lead engineering team coordination meetings.
c) Attend outreach meetings.
Integration Management
a) Weekly meetings with engineering and environmental teams.
Task 5 Environmental Analysis
Task 5.1 Management and Coordination
a) Continue management of environmental tasks and team coordination.
b) Continue data and other coordination with engineering, the Palmdale to Los Angeles
team, and the PMT.
c) Continue weekly URS team conference calls.
d) Continue bi-weekly BP PMT HST team meetings.
e) Continue bi-weekly statewide conference calls.
Administrative Record
a) See Task 7.1
Checkpoint B
No work is planned for this period.
SAA
a) Developing draft report materials for alignment SAA report.
b) Obtain definition of the TSMF footprint and potential sites in the Lancaster/Palmdale
area from engineering.
Task 5.2 Technical Reports
5.2.0 No Action/No Project Alternative
No work is planned for this period.
5.2.1 Transportation and Traffic Analysis TR
a) Update the TR when the revised traffic analysis is received, revise the TR based on
ITR comments, and submit the TR for DCR. The revised traffic analysis is pending revised passenger patronage data.
5.2.2 Air Quality TR
a) Continue revisions to figures and tables, and write the environmental settings and
methodology sections of the TR. The Air Quality Technical Report is pending a revised traffic analysis.
Bakersfield-PALMDALE – URS/HMM/Arup JV Progress Report – January 2013
19
5.2.3 Noise and Vibration TR
a) Incorporate the revised project summary and submit the TR to the PMT.
5.2.4 Biological Resources and Wetlands TR
a) Incorporate the revised project summary and submit the TR to the PMT.
b) Complete TR and submit it to the PMT.
5.2.5 Hydrology and Water Quality TR
a) Incorporate the revised project summary and submit the TR to the PMT.
5.2.6 Geology, Soils, and Seismicity TR
a) Incorporate the revised project summary and submit the TR to the PMT.
5.2.7 Hazardous Materials and Wastes TR
No activity is planned for this period.
5.2.8 Community Impact Assessment TR
a) Complete the impact analysis for property tax and sales tax.
b) Perform additional analysis to complete the community impact analysis after the
input analysis required from other resources and after construction cost data are received.
5.2.9 Relocation Impact Assessment TR
No activity is planned for this period.
5.2.10 Aesthetics and Visual Quality TR
a) Continue the impact analysis and visual simulations.
b) Continue coordination with the Palmdale to Los Angeles team on the Palmdale section.
5.2.11 Cultural Resources TR
a) Continue to prepare ASR, HPSR, HASR, and the draft Paleontological Report for ITR.
Submit these reports to the FRA and Authority for review.
Task 5.3 EIR/EIS Chapter 3 Sections
5.3.1 Transportation and Traffic Analysis
No activity is planned for this period.
5.3.2 Air Quality
No activity is planned for this period.
5.3.3 Noise and Vibration
No activity is planned for this period.
Bakersfield-PALMDALE – URS/HMM/Arup JV Progress Report – January 2013
20
5.3.4 EMI/EMF
No activity is planned for this period.
5.3.5 Public Utilities and Energy
a) Continued drafting revised language in Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences sections to include data consistent with the Utility Impact Report.
5.3.6 Biological Resources and Wetlands
No activity is planned for this period.
5.3.7 Hydrology and Water Quality
No activity is planned for this period.
5.3.8 Geology, Soils, and Seismicity
No activity is planned for this period.
5.3.9 Hazardous Materials and Wastes
No activity is planned for this period.
5.3.10 Safety and Security
No activity is planned for this period.
5.3.11 Community Impact Assessment
No activity is planned for this period.
5.3.12 Growth, Station Planning, and Land Use
No activity is planned for this period.
5.3.13 Agricultural Land
No activity is planned for this period.
5.3.14 Parks, Recreation, and Open Space
No activity is planned for this period.
5.3.15 Aesthetics and Visual Quality
No activity is planned for this period.
5.3.16 Cultural Resources
No activity is planned for this period.
5.3.17 Regional Impacts
No activity is planned for this period.
5.3.18 Cumulative Impacts
a) Continue to coordinate with task leads to draft their cumulative impacts analysis.
Bakersfield-PALMDALE – URS/HMM/Arup JV Progress Report – January 2013
21
b) Continue to follow up with contacts regarding missing cumulative projects
information, and format projects lists for the cumulative appendices (Sections 3.19.A and 3.19.B).
5.3.19 Section 4(f) and 6(f) Evaluations
a) Continue drafting Affected Environment section. Continue communication with
Cultural Resources team regarding data needs.
Task 7 Draft/Final EIR/EIS
7.1 Administrative Draft
No activity is planned for this period.
Bakersfield-PALMDALE – URS/HMM/Arup JV Progress Report – January 2013
22
6) Additional Scope to FY 12/13 AWP-Version 3
Since the submittal of AWPv3, the RC has tracked additional work scope that was or was planned to
be submitted via CR forms to adjust the FY12/13 budget to fund the work. However, during this reporting period, the RC received direction from the PMT to incorporate all approved and pending
CRs that affect the AWPv3 scope, schedule, or budget into an FY12/13 AWPv4, which will be finalized and submitted for Authority approval in February 2013. The summary table presented below lists the
work items identified for CRs and the status of these CRs prior to their incorporation into AWPv4. All
pending CRs have been incorporated into AWPv4, per PMT and Authority direction.
Authority # Title of Change RequestTotal
Change
Submitted
Date
PMT
Approval CCB Approval
CR0137 BRRF for Sierra Engineering - 1-Aug 19-Nov
CR0151 T3 Alternative Alignments (Tech Reports) 157,276 12-Sep 19-Sep
Outline Site Selection for MOI 49,000 2-Oct -
CR0161 VBN BRRF to support City of Lancaster 40,000 3-Oct -
System Site Tours 65,000 - -
Liaison to UPRR for ROW Issues 50,000 - -
CR0165 BRRF for BRI - 31-Oct 13-Nov