autotune calibration technology and trinity test...

58
Presented at: RICOWI Fall Seminar Northbrook, IL October 3, 2018 By: Joshua New, Ph.D., CEM, PMP, CMVP Founder and CEO, Tunation, LLC 256-567-4639 (256-Josh-New) [email protected] Joshua New, CEO Aaron Garrett, COO Mark Adams, CTO

Upload: others

Post on 17-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

Presented at:

RICOWI Fall Seminar

Northbrook, IL

October 3, 2018

By:

Joshua New, Ph.D., CEM, PMP, CMVP

Founder and CEO, Tunation, LLC

256-567-4639 (256-Josh-New)

[email protected]

Joshua New,

CEOAaron Garrett,

COO

Mark Adams,

CTO

Page 2: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

Joshua New, Ph.D., C.E.M., PMP, CMVP

Career 2015+ Tunation, LLC, CEO (ORNL-approved OA)

2012+ The University of Tennessee, Joint Faculty

2009+ Oak Ridge National Laboratory, R&D staff

Education The University of TN, (2004-2009), Knoxville; Ph.D. Comp. Sci.

Jacksonville State University, AL (1997-2001, 2001-2004)M.S. Systems & Software Design, double-B.S. Computer Science and Mathematics, Physics minor

Professional Involvement AEE, Member, Certified Energy Manager,

Certified Measurement & Verification Professional

PMI, Project Management Professional

IEEE, Senior Member

ASHRAE○ TC1.5, Computer Applications, Voting member and officer

○ TC4.7, Energy Calculations, Voting member and officer

○ SSPC140 and ASHRAE Guideline 14 involvement

○ TC4.2, Climatic Information, Voting member and officer

○ SSPC169, Weather Data for Building Design Standards(24% of page count of 90.1-2016), Voting member

Page 3: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

OVERVIEW

Motivation

DOE’s Roof Savings Calculator (RSC)

RSC testing and publications

RSC latest additions and validation

Page 4: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

OVERVIEW

Motivation

DOE’s Roof Savings Calculator (RSC)

RSC testing and publications

RSC latest additions and validation

Page 5: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

40 years: Energy & Life

Page 6: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

40 years: Energy & Life

Page 7: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

Energy Use, Quality of Life,

Energy Security

Buildings in U.S. 45% of primary

energy & CO2;74% of electricity

Buildings in China 60% of building floor

space in 2030 has yet to be built

Buildings in India 67% of building floor

space in 2030 has yet to be built

Page 8: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

National Energy Use

Page 9: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

Energy Consumption and Production

Commercial Site Energy

Consumption by End Use

Buildings consume 74% of the nation’s electricity

124 million U.S. buildings$395 billion/yr energy bills

Goal of the DOEBuilding Technologies Office:

45% energy reduction per sq. ft.by 2030 compared to 2010 baseline

Building Energy Modeling – building descriptions + weather = estimated

building energy consumption

$9B/yr – ESCO; $7B/yr – utility EE$14B/yr – DR management systems0.3% modified, BEM < 10% of those

45% Buildings

Page 10: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

Figure 3. Commercial energy

loads attributed to envelope

and windowsSource: Building Energy Data Book, U.S. DOE,

Prepared by D&R International, Ltd., September

2008.

Figure 2. Residential

energy loads attributed to

envelope and windowsSource: Building Energy Data Book, U.S.

DOE, Prepared by D&R International, Ltd.,

September 2008.

-

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

Ro

of

Walls

Fo

und

atio

n

Infi

ltra

tio

n

Win

do

ws

(co

nd

uctio

n)

Win

do

ws

(so

lar g

ain

)

Inte

rnal

Gain

s

To

tal

Qu

ad

s

Cooling Heating

-

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

Ro

of

Walls

(2)

Fo

und

atio

n

Infi

ltra

tio

n

Ventila

tio

n

Win

do

ws

(co

nd

uctio

n)

Win

do

ws

(so

lar g

ain

)

Inte

rnal

Gain

s

To

tal

Qu

ad

s

Cooling Heating

Energy by Envelope (out of 97.7 quads)

Page 11: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

ASHRAE Climate Zones

Based on

weather

stations, most

w/ 18+ yrs of

quality data

(1961-1990)

Updated every 4 years (2021)

Climate Zone 0 (extremely hot):10,800 < CDD 50°FInt’l Energy Conservation Code (IECC)

adopts for 2018 code

Page 12: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

Improvement of climate zones

How could the nation's energy security and critical infrastructure resiliency be

improved by incorporating future scenarios into the built environment?

How much energy and $ could be saved by having a forward-looking

climate-aware building code?

Page 13: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

A1FI Scenario

Page 14: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

OVERVIEW

Motivation

DOE’s Roof Savings Calculator (RSC)

RSC testing and publications

RSC latest additions and validation

Page 15: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

Website (web-based calculator) Input: details of base-case versus cool-roof (or

support roof/attic technology)

Output: energy and cost savings

Web Service Used by companies to automate creation of input files

and processing of output files (without having to select options)

Most common use: include RSC results in quotation-generation system for return-on-investment (ROI) of different products or services your company offers

What is RSC?

Page 16: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

INDUSTRY

COLLABORATIVE

R&D

Marc LaFrance

DOE BT

R. Levinson,

H. Gilbert,

H. Akbari

Chris Scruton

CEC

A. Desjarlais,

W. Miller,

J. New

WBT

Joe Huang,

Ender Erdem

Roof Savings Calculator (RSC)

Web-based building energy model tool

Page 17: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

Replaces:

EPA Roof Comparison Calc

DOE Cool Roof Calculator

Minimal questions (<20)

Only location is required

Building America defaults

Help links for unknown

information

RSC

Page 18: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

AtticSim - ASTM C 1340 Standard For Estimating Heat Gain or Loss

Through Ceilings Under Attics

RSC = AtticSim + DOE-2.1E

Page 19: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

AtticSim

DOE-2

Roof Savings Calculator Screenshots

Page 20: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC non-roof inputs – postcode envy

Page 21: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC non-roof inputs

Page 22: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC roof inputs

Page 23: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC roof inputs

Page 24: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC roof inputs

Page 25: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC roof inputs

Page 26: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC roof inputs – what’s wrong?

Page 27: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC roof inputs – what’s wrong?

Page 28: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC roof inputs

Page 29: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC roof inputs

Page 30: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC outputs

Page 31: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC outputs

Page 32: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RoofCalc.com impact

Average: 64

visitors/day

100,000+ visitors, 200+ feedback

Page 33: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

Leveraging resources to facilitate deployment of building energy efficiency technologies

Software Development Public Website/service Industry & Building Owners

Roof Savings Calculator (RSC) web

site/service developed and validated

[estimates energy and cost savings

from roof and attic technologies]

CentiMark, the largest nation-wide

roofing contractor (installs 2500

roofs/mo), is integrating RSC into

their proposal generating system

(20+ companies now interested)

AtticSim

DOE-2

Engine (AtticSim/DOE-2) debugged

using HPC Science assets enabling

visual analytics on 3x(10)6 simulations

Science-enabled business solutions

Page 34: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply
Page 35: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

OVERVIEW

Motivation

DOE’s Roof Savings Calculator (RSC)

RSC testing and publications

RSC latest additions and validation

Page 36: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

Large DataVisualization

Knowledge

36

Page 37: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

Example finding

Selection of heating outliers

All have box building type and

in Miami, FL

Climate Zone

Building Type

Jan Dec

Energ

y to

heat th

e b

uild

ing

Jul

Page 38: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

New, Joshua R. (2016). Invited Speaker. “How to use DOE’s Roof Savings Calculator." International Reflective Insulation Manufacturers

(I-RIM) Conference, Hollywood, FL, June 1, 2016. [web]

1. New, Joshua R., Miller, William A., Huang, Yu (Joe), and Levinson, Ronnen. (2016). "Comparison of Software Models for Energy Savings

from Cool Roofs" [Special issue]. Journal of Energy and Buildings on Countermeasures to Urban Heat Island, volume 114, issue 0, pp. 130-

135, February 2016. [ENB] [PDF]

2. Huang, Yu (Joe), New, Joshua R., Miller, William A., and Levinson, Ronnen (2015). "A Web-Based Simulation Tool on The Performance of

Different Roofing Systems." In Proceedings of the Building Simulation 2015 Conference, Hyderabad, India, December 7-9, 2015. [IBPSA]

[PDF] [PPT]

3. New, Joshua R., Miller, William A., Huang, Yu (Joe), and Levinson, Ronnen. (2014). "Comparison of Software Models for Energy Savings

from Cool Roofs." In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Countermeasures to Urban Heat Island (IC2UHI), Venice, Italy,

October 13-15, 2014. [PDF] [PPT]

4. New, Joshua R., Levinson, Ronnen, Huang, Yu (Joe), Sanyal, Jibonananda, Miller, William A., Childs, Kenneth W., and Kriner, Scott

(2013). "In-Depth Analysis of Simulation Engine Codes for Comparison with DOE's Roof Savings Calculator and Measured Data." ORNL

internal report ORNL/TM-2014/218, June 27, 2014, 69 pages. [ORNL] [PDF]

5. Mellot, Joe, New, Joshua R., and Sanyal, Jibonananda. (2014). "Cool Roofing: Analysis of Energy Consumption for Cool Roofing." In

Western Roofing - Insulation and Siding, issue January/February, volume 37, number 1, pp. 50-56, February, 2014. [PDF]

6. New, Joshua R., Huang, Yu (Joe), Levinson, Ronnen, Sanyal, Jibonananda, Miller, William A., and Childs, Kenneth W. (2013). "Analysis of

DOE's Roof Savings Calculator with Comparison to other Simulation Engines." ORNL internal report ORNL/TM-2013/501, November 1,

2013, 63 pages. [ORNL] [PDF]

New, Joshua R. (2013). Invited Speaker. "Science Behind ORNL's Building Technology Research Integration Center (BTRIC)." Roof

Coating Manufacturer's Association, Oak Ridge, TN, October 8, 2013. [PPT]

7. Mellot, Joseph W., New, Joshua R., and Sanyal, Jibonananda. (2013). "Preliminary Analysis of Energy Consumption for Cool Roofing

Measures." In RCI Interface Technical Journal, volume 31, issue 9, pp. 25-36, October, 2013. [RCI] [PDF]

8. Mellot, Joseph W., Sanyal, Jibonananda, and New, Joshua R. (2013). "Preliminary Analysis of Energy Consumption for Cool Roofing

Measures." Presented at the International Reflective Roofing Symposium, the American Coating Association's (ACA) conference, and

in Proceedings of the ACA's Coating Regulations and Analytical Methods Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, May 14-15, 2013. [PDF] [PPT]

9. New, Joshua R., Miller, William (Bill), Desjarlais, A., Huang, Yu Joe, and Erdem, E. (2011). "Development of a Roof Savings Calculator."

In Proceedings of the RCI 26th International Convention and Trade Show, Reno, NV, April 2011. [PDF] [PPT]

Publications

Page 39: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

Description

Reflect

ance

Emis

sivity SRI

Houston

$ saved …13

BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42

Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103

Single Ply 32 90 35 230

Mineral Mod Bit 33 92 35 197

Metal 35 82 35 60

Aluminum Coating 43 58 35 279

Mineral Mod Bit 45 79 55 291

Coating over BUR 49 83 55 433

Metal 49 83 55 208

…14

Cost savings for offices – local utility prices,

14 cities, 22 roof types

Heating-dominated

Northern climates

Cooling-dominated

Southern climates

Mellot, Joseph W., New, Joshua R., and Sanyal, Jibonananda. (2013). "Preliminary Analysis of Energy Consumption for

Cool Roofing Measures." In RCI Interface Technical Journal, volume 31, issue 9, pp. 25-36, October, 2013.

Nationwide studies

Page 40: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

Nationwide studies

Page 41: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC different than previous studies

Average ~3x

heating penalty

Page 42: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC different than previous studies

Page 43: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

Duct heat transfer – radiation!

Page 44: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

OVERVIEW

Motivation

DOE’s Roof Savings Calculator (RSC)

RSC testing and publications

RSC latest additions and validation

Page 45: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

Validation Project Approval

DOE moved solely to EnergyPlus,

OpenStudio, and SOEP

Fraunhofer working on AtticSim for

EnergyPlus

Validation project to fix known issues

Thanks to the efforts of Andre

Desjarlais

Thanks for financial support from 15

organizations

Each organization has a member on

the project steering committee

1 American Iron and Steel Institute

2

Asphalt Roofing Manufacturers

Association

3

Chemical Fabrics and Film

Association

4 Cool Roof Rating Council

5 Copper Development Association

6 EPDM Manufacturers Association

7

Metal Building Manufacturers

Association

8 Metal Construction Association

9 National Coil Coaters Association

10

Polyisiocyanurate Insulation

Manufacturers Association

11

Roof Coating Manufacturers

Association

12 Spray Polyurethane Foam Alliance

13 SPRI

14 Tile Roofing Institute

15 RCI, Inc.

Thanks to RICOWI for handling

the finances!

Page 46: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC – New Features

ASV gap sizes (11/1/16)

Dynamic roof properties – when a new roof type is

selected, the default reflectance and emittance are

dynamically changed to the average 3-year aged

values for that roof type (from referenced studies);

the user can still change these for their specific roof

Page 47: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC – New Features

Copper roof (11/1/16) – a roof type of

“Copper” is now available in both the

residential and commercial calculator

Mouse-over tooltip for roof type shows

the aging of copper from 1-30 years

Page 48: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC – New Features

Peak Demand

Reduction Calculation

(12/1/16)

Page 49: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC web service (for businesses)

…download example building and batch script from rsc.ornl.gov/web-service.shtml

Try for free, license, install, change 1 line of code

Page 50: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC web service (for businesses)Download files, have system write to this format, run batch

script

Page 51: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC – Analysis

All non-configurable model inputs (e.g. envelope materials, internal heat sources) were assigned closely to the buildings used in Akbari & Konopacki for comparison

Python analysis file evolved over 43 iterations for conducting parametric analysis of multiple RSC revisions and generating statistics & charts for analysis of RSC simulations

Iterations of ~139 Excel workbooks were generated to aid in the analysis of energy performance and trends as revisions to RSC were made

Page 52: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC – Engine modifications

Modification to DOE-2+AtticSim executable

Dynamic duct-sizing

DOE-2 duct model replaces AtticSim’s duct model

AtticSim’s duct model (inspec-R-8, 4% leaky; uninspec-R-5.5,

14% leaky) was changed out for DOE-2’s duct model (inspec-

deltaT 4-degrees, 4%; uninspec-deltaT 6-degrees, 14% leaky)

30+ updated tooltips – text, hyperlinks, images, publications

Page 53: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC – Engine modifications

Modifications to all prototype buildings Commercial buildings’ “existing” vintage was changed from PSZ (constant volume system) to PVAVS in order to eliminate inordinate heating penalties; this taints equipment efficiencies compared to earlier versions of RSC

Sizing runs were added to the base case and used in the comparison case so that the same-sized HVAC is used in determining energy savings

Issues under investigation: Energy savings (or penalties) and indoor air temperatures still being investigated

Simulated heating penalties and indoor air temperatures higher than expected, especially in warm climates

Page 54: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC more similar to EnergyPlus

than DOE-2

Page 55: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC – Comparison to measured data

Standard House (Fresno, CA) Cool Roof House (Fresno, CA)

Page 56: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

RSC – Comparison to measured data

Page 57: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

1. RSC validated against measured data from

homes and offices (full lit review provided)

2. RSC warning removed

3. Provide all data - comparative parametrics (all

types, locations, ages) as well as measured vs.

simulated data for home & office in Fresno, CA

4. Cool Roof and Cool Peak to remain online

5. DOE-2 (without AtticSim) used for little or no

attic space

http://bit.ly/RSC_QA

RSC Questions and Answers

Page 58: Autotune Calibration Technology and Trinity Test Evaluationweb.eecs.utk.edu/~jnew1/presentations/2018_RICOWI.pdf · BUR No Coating 10 90 6 42 Mineral Mod Bit 25 88 25 103 Single Ply

Discussion

Joshua New, Ph.D., C.E.M., PMP, CMVP

Founder and CEO, Tunation, LLC

256-567-4639 (256-Josh-New)

[email protected]