author's personal copy - savitribai phule pune...

15
This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright

Upload: vananh

Post on 13-May-2019

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attachedcopy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial researchand education use, including for instruction at the authors institution

and sharing with colleagues.

Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling orlicensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party

websites are prohibited.

In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of thearticle (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website orinstitutional repository. Authors requiring further information

regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies areencouraged to visit:

http://www.elsevier.com/copyright

Author's personal copy

Journal of Ethnopharmacology 134 (2011) 851–864

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Journal of Ethnopharmacology

journa l homepage: www.e lsev ier .com/ locate / je thpharm

Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants commonly used by Kani tribals inTirunelveli hills of Western Ghats, India

Muniappan Ayyanara,∗, Savarimuthu Ignacimuthub

a Department of Botany, Pachaiyappa’s College, Chennai 600 030, Tamil Nadu, Indiab Entomology Research Institute, Loyola College, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034, Tamil Nadu, India

a r t i c l e i n f o

Article history:Received 17 July 2010Received in revised form 16 January 2011Accepted 22 January 2011Available online 1 February 2011

Keywords:Data analysisFolk medicineKani tribalsTirunelveli hillsWestern Ghats

a b s t r a c t

Ethnopharmacological relevance: For thousands of years, medicinal plants have played an important rolethroughout the world in treating and preventing a variety of diseases. Kani tribal people in Tirunelvelihills still depend on medicinal plants and most of them have a general knowledge of medicinal plantswhich are used for first aid remedies, to treat cough, cold, fever, headache, poisonous bites and somesimple ailments.Aim of the study: The present study was initiated with an aim to identify traditional healers who arepracticing herbal medicine among the Kani tribals in Tirunelveli hills of Western Ghats, India and quan-titatively document their indigenous knowledge on the utilization of medicinal plants particularly mostcommon ethnomedicinal plants.Methods: Field study was carried out over a period of 4 years in Tirunelveli hills. The ethnomedicinalinformation was collected through interviews among the Kani traditional healers. The collected datawere analyzed through use value (UV), informant consensus factor (Fic), fidelity level (FL) and relativeimportance (RI).Results: A total of 90 species of plants distributed in 83 genera belonging to 52 families were identified ascommonly used ethnomedicinal plants by the Kani traditional healers in Tirunelveli hills for the treatmentof 65 types of ailments. These ailments were categorized into 15 ailment categories based on the bodysystems treated. Leaves were the most frequently used plant parts and most of the medicines wereprepared in the form of paste and administered orally. Fic values of the present study indicated thatthere was a high agreement in the use of plants in the treatment of jaundice and diabetes among theusers. Dermatological infections/diseases and gastro-intestinal disorders had highest use-reports and 29species of plants had the highest fidelity level of 100%. The most important species according to their usevalue were Gymneme sylvestre (2.00), Melia azedarach, Murraya koenigii, Syzygium cumini and Terminaliachebula (1.83).Conclusion: As a result of the present study we can recommend the plants Alpinia galanga, Azadirachtaindica, Calophyllum inophyllum, Gymnema sylvestre, Leucas aspera, M. azedarach, Mollugo nudicaulis, Oci-mum tenuiflorum, S. cumini, T. chebula and Tribulus terrestris (with high UV and RI values), Bambusaarundinacea, Datura metel, Evolvulus nummularius, Opuntia dillenii and Physalis minima (newly reportedclaims with highest FL) for further ethnopharmacological studies for the discovery of potential new drugs.

© 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction

According to the World Health Organization (WHO) about65–80% of the world’s population in developing countries dependsessentially on plants for their primary healthcare due to povertyand lack of access to modern medicine (Calixto, 2005). In recent

∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 44 2664 0793/+91 99403 76005 (mob.);fax: +91 44 2642 6900.

E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Ayyanar).

years, use of ethnobotanical information in medicinal plantresearch has gained considerable attention in segments of the sci-entific community (Heinrich, 2000). Interest in medicinal plants hasbeen fuelled by the rising costs of prescription drugs in the main-tenance of personal health and well-being and the bioprospectingof new plant-derived drugs (Hoareau and DaSilva, 1999).

Historically all medicinal preparations were derived fromplants, whether in the simple form of plant parts or in the morecomplex form of crude extracts, mixtures, etc. The primary benefitsof using plant-derived medicines are that they are relatively saferthan synthetic alternatives, offering profound therapeutic bene-

0378-8741/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/j.jep.2011.01.029

Author's personal copy

852 M. Ayyanar, S. Ignacimuthu / Journal of Ethnopharmacology 134 (2011) 851–864

fits and more affordable treatment (Iwu et al., 1999). About 200years ago our pharmacopoeia was dominated by herbal medicines(Ernst, 2005) and almost 25% of the drugs prescribed worldwidewere come from plants. Of the 252 drugs considered as basic andessential by the WHO, 11% are exclusively of plant origin and asignificant number are synthetic drugs obtained from natural pre-cursors (Rates, 2001).

During the last few decades there has been an increasing inter-est in the study of medicinal plants and their traditional use indifferent parts of India. In the recent years number of reports onthe use of plants in traditional healing by either tribal people orindigenous communities of India is increasing (Savithramma et al.,2007; Pattanaik et al., 2008; Kosalge and Fursule, 2009; Namsa et al.,2009; Upadhyay et al., 2010). A few reports on ethnomedicinal usesof plants in the forests of Tirunelveli hills and its adjoining areaswere available (Janaki Ammal and Prasad, 1984; Prasad et al., 1987,1996; Ignacimuthu et al., 1998; Viswanathan et al., 2001; Ayyanarand Ignacimuthu, 2005, 2009a,b, 2010) and all these studies wereconducted qualitatively with a lacuna in data analysis. The presentstudy was initiated with an aim to identify knowledgeable resourcepersons among the Kani tribals in Tirunelveli hills of Western Ghatsin Tamil Nadu, India and quantitatively analyze their indigenousethnomedicinal knowledge through various ethnobotanical toolson the utilization of commonly used medicinal plants.

2. Methods

2.1. Study area and people

Tirunelveli hills occupy Tirunelveli and Kanyakumari districtsof Tamil Nadu (southern Western Ghats) and cover an area ofnearly 3200 sq. km and lies between 8◦25′–8◦53′N latitude and77◦10′–77◦35′E longitude (Fig. 1). The vegetation is floristicallyrich compared to other regions of Western Ghats and representsseveral unique habitats. The study was conducted in five villagesof Tirunelveli hills (Agasthiyar Kani kudiiruppu, Chinna Mayi-lar, Periya Mayilar, Inchikuzhi and Servalar in Tirunelveli district)which are inhabited by Kani tribals each consisting of 5–56 familiesdisbursed in the deep forest areas.

The indigenous people of the study area are Kani or Kanikaran,the oldest group of the branch of ethnic group in South India. Theylive predominantly in and around the Tirunelveli hills of Tamil Nadu(for details refer Ayyanar and Ignacimuthu, 2005). Many Kani peo-ple trace their community’s knowledge of medicinal plants back tothe Hindu saint and holy man, Agasthiyar Muni, who is credited asthe founder of Siddha, the Tamil system of medicine. Agasthiyar issaid to have lived in the southern Western Ghats approximately2000 years ago. Most of the Kani tribals have a general knowl-edge of medicinal plants that are used for first aid remedies, totreat cough, cold, fever, headache, poisonous bites and some othersimple ailments.

2.2. Data collection

The study area was investigated to get information from tribalpractitioners and also to cross check the information provided bythe other tribal practitioners during the earlier visits. During eachfield survey at least 10 days were spent with the local people intheir tribal hamlets. In order to document the utilization of medici-nal plants, a total of eight field surveys were carried out from August2003 to October 2007 in Tirunelveli hills. A total of six resource per-sons or informants or traditional healers were identified to get theethnomedicinal information through direct interviews/oral con-versations. They have sound knowledge on medicinal plants foundin their surrounding areas and they practice medicine within their

Fig. 1. Location map of Tirunelveli hills in Tamil Nadu, southern India.

families and neighbors. A field datasheet has been prepared torecord the plant details with ethnomedicinal information gath-ered from the traditional healers (Fig. 2). Information on localname of plant, plant part used for curing, method of preparation,any other plants/agents used as ingredients, modes of adminis-tration and etc. were recorded for each collected ethnomedicinalplant.

Identity of the collected plant species were done with the vol-umes of The Flora of Presidency of Madras (Gamble, 1935) and TheFlora of Tamil Nadu Carnatic (Matthew, 1983). Angiosperm Phy-logeny Group III (APG III, 2009) was followed to classify the speciesand binomial was checked with the International Plant NamesIndex (IPNI). Herbarium specimens were collected in triplicates;one set of voucher specimens were deposited in the herbariumof Entomology Research Institute (ERIH), Loyola College, Chennai,Tamil Nadu and the duplicate voucher specimens were depositedin Regional Medical Research Centre (RMRC–ICMR), Belgaum (Kar-nataka) and Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi,India for future reference.

2.3. Ailment categories

Based on the information obtained from the traditional healersin the study area, all the reported ailments were categorized into15 categories (Table 1) viz. gastro-intestinal ailments (GIA), der-matological infections/diseases (DID), respiratory systems diseases(RSD), genito-urinary ailments (GUA), fever (Fvr), skeleto-muscularsystem disorders (SMSD), poisonous bites (PB), circulatory sys-tem/cardiovascular diseases (CSCD), endocrinal disorders (ED),liver problems (LP), dental care (DC), hair care (HC), ear, nose, throatproblems (ENT), cooling agents (CA) and general health (GH). Sev-

Author's personal copy

M. Ayyanar, S. Ignacimuthu / Journal of Ethnopharmacology 134 (2011) 851–864 853

Fig. 2. Format of field datasheet used to record the plant details with ethnomedicinalinformation.

eral diseases were placed in one ailment category based on the bodysystems treated.

2.4. Data analysis

2.4.1. Informant consensus factor (Fic)The informant consensus factor (Fic) was used to see if there was

agreement in the use of plants in the ailment categories betweenthe plant users in the study area. The Fic was calculated using thefollowing formula (Heinrich et al., 1998):

Fic = Nur − Nt

Nur − 1

Where Nur refers to the number of use-reports for a particularailment category and Nt refers to the number of taxa used for aparticular ailment category by all informants. The product of thisfactor ranges from 0 to 1. A high value (close to 1.0) indicates thatrelatively few taxa are used by a large proportion of the informants.A low value indicates that the informants disagree on the taxa tobe used in the treatment within a category of illness.

2.4.2. Use value (UV)The relative importance of each plant species known locally to

be used as herbal remedy is reported as use value (UV) and it wascalculated using the following formula (Phillips et al., 1994):

UV = ˙U

n

Where UV is the use value of a species, U is the number of use-reports cited by each informant for a given plant species and n isthe total number of informants interviewed for a given plant. TheUV is helpful in determining the plants with the highest use (mostfrequently indicated) in the treatment of an ailment. UVs are high

Table 1Ailments grouped by different ailment categories.

Ailment categories Biomedical terms Tamil terms

Circulatory sys-tem/cardiovasculardiseases (CSCD)

Blood purificationHeart strengthMemory power

Rattha sutthigarippuIdhaya valimaiGnabaga sakthi

Cooling agents (CA) Body cooling Udal kulircchiDental care (DC) Foul odour

Teeth strengthToothacheWorms in gums and teeth

Vai thurnatramPal valimaiPal valiPal sotthai

Dermatologicalinfections/diseases(DID)

BurnsCutsFelonFungal infection on headItchingPimplesScabiesSkin irritationWound in lips and tongueWounds

TheekkayamVettukkayamNagacchutthiPuluvettu/poocchikadiArippu/namaicchalMugapparuSori/siranguThol ericchalVaippunKaayam

Ear, nose, throatproblems (ENT)

Colour blindnessEaracheEye coolingEye painNasal infectionsThroat pain

NirakkuruduKaadhu valiKan kulircchiKan valiSuvasha thottruThondai vali

Endocrinal disorders(ED)

Diabetes Sarkkarai/neerilivu noi

Fever (Fvr) Fever KaicchalGastro-intestinal

ailments (GIA)ConstipationDysenteryGastric complaintsIndigestionIntestinal ulcerStomachache

MalacchikkalSeedhabaethiVayvu kolaruAjeeranamKudal punVayitru vali

General health (GH) Body refreshmentBody shiningBody strengthDisease resistantWeight loss

Udal puthunarcchiUdal palapalappuUdal valimaiNoi ethirppu sakthiUdal paruman kuraitthal

Genito-urinaryailments (GUA)

AbortionBreast painDelivery painLactationMale fertilityOver bleedingSexual powerSperm productionVenereal diseases

Karu kalaippuMarbaga valiPirasava valiPaal suratthalAnmai sakthi perukkuthalRatthapokkuViraippu sakthi (Male)Uyiranu urpatthiPaalvinai noi

Hair care (HC) DandruffGraying of hairHair growthHair loss

PoduguNarai, ilanaraiMudi valardhalMudi uthirdhal

Liver problems (LP) Jaundice Manjal kaamalaiPoisonous bites (PB) Poison bites

Scorpion stingSnake bite

VishakkadiThaelkkadiPambukkadi

Respiratory systemsdiseases (RSD)

AsthmaBronchitisChest painColdCough

Moocchu thinaralChali and irumalNenju valiJalathoshamIrumal

Skeleto-muscularsystem disorders(SMSD)

Body painHeadacheJoint painMuscle painRheumatismSwellings

Udal valiThalai valiMoottu valiThasai pidippuMoottu vadhamVeekkam

when there are many use-reports for a plant and low when thereare few reports related to its use.

2.4.3. Fidelity level (FL)To determine the most frequently used plant species for treating

a particular ailment category by the informants of the study area,

Author's personal copy

854 M. Ayyanar, S. Ignacimuthu / Journal of Ethnopharmacology 134 (2011) 851–864

we calculated the fidelity level (FL). The FL was calculated using thefollowing formula (Friedmen et al., 1986):

FL(%) = Np

N× 100

Where Np is the number of use-reports cited for a given speciesfor a particular ailment category and N is the total number of use-reports cited for any given species. Generally, high FLs are obtainedfor plants for which almost all use-reports refer to the same way ofusing it, whereas low FLs are obtained for plants that are used formany different purposes (Srithi et al., 2009).

2.4.4. Relative importance (RI)We calculated the relative importance (RI) of each medicinal

plant based on the normalized number of pharmacological prop-erties (PH) attributed to it and the normalized number of bodysystems (BS) it treated. Data on medicinal uses were organizedaccording to the PH attributed to each taxon (e.g. analgesic, anti-inflammatory etc.) and to the specific body systems treated (e.g.skin diseases, fever, asthma etc.). The RI was calculated using thefollowing formula (Bennett and Prance, 2000):

RI = Rel PH + Rel BS2

× 100

Where RI is the relative importance, PH is the number ofreported pharmacological properties for the given plant, Rel PH isthe relative number of pharmacological properties (PH of a givenplant/maximum PH of all reported species), BS is the number ofbody systems treated and Rel BS is the relative number of bodysystems treated (BS of a given plant/maximum BS of all reportedspecies).

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Documentation of indigenous ethnomedicinal knowledge

The present study revealed the use of 90 species of plantsdistributed in 83 genera belonging to 52 families which were com-monly used by most of the Kani traditional healers for the treatmentof 65 types of ailments. The prominent family was Fabaceae withnine species, followed by Solanaceae and Euphorbiaceae with sixand four species respectively. For each reported species we pro-vided the botanical name of the plant, family, voucher specimennumber, local (Tamil) name, life form, use value, parts used, ail-ments treated, method of preparation, mode of administration andrelative importance (Table 2).

The medicinal uses of plants gathered in our study were com-pared with the previously published information from other partsof India. We found that there were 25 claims from the plants suchas Abutilon indicum, Aerva lanata, Allium cepa, Ananus comosus, Ata-lantia monophylla, Bambusa arundinacea, Calophyllum inophyllum,Cleome viscosa, Datura metel, Evolvulus nummularius, Ficus religiosa,Leucas aspera, Mangifera indica, Melia azedarach, Michelia champaca,Mimusops elengi, Morinda pubescens, Opuntia dillenii, Pandanus fas-cicularis, Physalis minima, Sanseviera roxburghiana and Tephrosiapurpurea were reported for the first time from the study area (newclaims were given with asterisk mark in Table 2). However, noplants were reported as a new medicinal plant as all the plantswere reported with different uses.

3.2. Life form and parts used

Herbs were the primary source of medicine (41%) followed bytrees (31%), shrubs (18%) and climbers (10%) (Fig. 3). The frequentuse of herbs among the indigenous communities is a result ofwealth of herbaceous plants in their environs (Tabuti et al., 2003;

Fig. 3. Life forms of reported common medicinal plants.

Ayyanar and Ignacimuthu, 2005; Uniyal et al., 2006; Ragupathyet al., 2008; Giday et al., 2010) and Tirunelveli hills harboursmore number of herbs as compared to trees, shrubs and climbers(Manickam et al., 2004). Among the different plant parts used,the leaves (50%) were most frequently used for the preparation ofmedicine solely or mixed with other plant parts. It was followed byfruit (17%), whole plant (6%), stem bark and flower (5%), stem (4%),seed (3%, including seed oil), rhizome (3%), bulb (2%), latex, root,root bark, resin and young twig (1% each) (Fig. 4). Many indige-nous communities elsewhere also utilized mostly leaves for thepreparation of herbal medicines (Mahishi et al., 2005; Ignacimuthuet al., 2006, 2008; Teklehaymanot et al., 2007; Srithi et al., 2009;Giday et al., 2010; Cakilcioglu and Turkoglu, 2010; Gonzalez et al.,2010). The reason why leaves were used mostly is that they are col-lected very easily than underground parts, flowers and fruits etc.(Giday et al., 2009) and in scientific point of view leaves are activein photosynthesis and production of metabolites (Ghorbani, 2005).

Fig. 4. Percentage of plant parts used for the preparation of medicine.

Author's personal copy

M. Ayyanar, S. Ignacimuthu / Journal of Ethnopharmacology 134 (2011) 851–864 855

Tab

le2

List

ofco

mm

only

use

dm

edic

inal

pla

nts

byK

anit

riba

lsin

Tiru

nel

veli

hil

ls,I

nd

ia.

Bot

anic

aln

ame

(Fam

ily)

,vou

cher

spec

imen

nu

mbe

rLo

caln

ame

Life

form

Use

valu

ePa

rts

use

dA

ilm

ent

cate

gory

:n

o.of

use

-rep

orts

(ail

men

tstr

eate

d)

Prep

arat

ion

Ap

pli

cati

onR

I

Abu

tilo

nin

dicu

mG

.Don

.(M

alva

ceae

)ER

IH-0

3Th

utt

hi

Sh0.

67Lf

,Sb

GU

A:

2(v

ener

eald

isea

ses* ,

over

blee

din

g* )Pa

ste

Ora

l47

.5

CA

:2

(bod

yco

olin

g)*

Past

eO

ral

Aca

cia

nilo

tica

(L.)

Del

.(Fa

bace

ae)

ERIH

-19

Kar

uve

lam

Tr0.

83Sb

DC

:3

(fou

lod

our,

toot

hac

he)

Dec

octi

onM

outh

was

h45

.0

Aca

lyph

ain

dica

L.(E

up

hor

biac

eae)

ERIH

-445

Ku

pp

aim

eni

He

0.83

LfD

ID:

5(i

tch

ing,

wou

nd

s)Pa

ste

Ora

l32

.5A

chyr

anth

esas

pera

L.(A

mar

anth

acea

e)ER

IH-6

5N

aayu

ruvi

He

0.33

LfD

C:

2(t

ooth

ach

e)Pa

ste

Toot

hp

owd

er32

.5A

dhat

oda

vasi

caM

edic

us

(Aca

nth

acea

e)ER

IH-3

7A

dat

hod

aiSh

1.67

LfR

SD:

5(a

sth

ma,

cold

)Pa

ste

Ora

l47

.5SM

SD:

2(h

ead

ach

e)Pa

ste

Ora

lEN

T:3

(ear

ach

e)Pa

ste

Ora

lA

erva

lana

taJu

ss.(

Am

aran

thac

eae)

ERIH

-412

Kan

nu

pee

lai

He

0.67

Wp

RSD

:3

(ast

hm

a* ,ch

est

pai

n* )

Pow

der

Ora

l47

.5

PB:

1(p

oiso

nbi

tes)

Juic

eO

ral

Alli

umce

paL

(All

iace

ae)

ERIH

-48

Ch

inn

ave

nga

yam

He

1.33

Bb

SMSD

:3

(rh

eum

atis

m* ,

hea

dac

he)

Juic

eTo

pic

al60

.0

DID

:5

(bal

dn

ess

du

eto

fun

gali

nfe

ctio

n)

Juic

eTo

pic

al

Alo

eve

ra(L

.)B

urm

.f.(

Asp

hod

elac

eae)

ERIH

-49

Sott

hu

katt

hal

aiH

e0.

83Lf

GIA

:5

(sto

mac

hac

he)

Past

eO

ral

22.5

Alp

inia

gala

nga

Sw.(

Zin

gibe

race

ae)

ERIH

-84

Ch

itth

arat

tai

He

1.67

Rh

RSD

:4

(ast

hm

a,co

ld,

cou

gh)

Pow

der

Ora

l/To

pic

al62

.5

SMSD

:2

(hea

dac

he)

Past

eO

ral/

Top

ical

Fvr:

4(f

ever

)Pa

ste

Ora

l/To

pic

alA

lter

nant

hera

sess

ilis

(L.)

R.B

r.ex

.DC

.(A

mar

anth

acea

e)ER

IH-5

0Po

nn

anka

nn

ikee

rai

He

0.83

LfEN

T:5

(eye

pai

n)

Juic

eTo

pic

al17

.5

Ana

card

ium

occi

dent

ale

L.(A

nac

ard

iace

ae)

ERIH

-53

Mu

nth

iri

Tr0.

67Fr

RSD

:2

(ast

hm

a* )Ju

ice

Ora

l47

.5SM

SD:

1(h

ead

ach

e)Ju

ice

Ora

lD

ID:

1(w

oun

ds* )

Juic

eO

ral

Ana

nus

com

osus

(L.)

Mer

r.(B

rom

elia

ceae

)ER

IH-5

6A

nn

ach

iH

e0.

17Fr

GU

A:

1(v

ener

eald

isea

ses)

Juic

eO

ral

20.0

Are

caca

tech

uL.

(Are

cace

ae)

ERIH

-62

Kot

taip

akku

Tr0.

83Fr

DID

:(b

urn

s)Po

wd

erTo

pic

al27

.5G

H:

2(b

ody

refr

esh

men

t)R

awO

ral

Ata

lant

iam

onop

hylla

(L.)

Cor

r.(R

uta

ceae

)ER

IH-7

9K

attu

elu

mit

chai

Tr0.

83Lf

RSD

:3

(col

d* )D

ecoc

tion

Ora

l30

.0Fr

PB:

2(p

oiso

nbi

tes* )

Dec

octi

onO

ral

Aza

dira

chta

indi

caA

.Ju

ss.(

Mel

iace

ae)

ERIH

-67

Vem

buTr

1.67

SbPB

:3

(poi

son

bite

s)Pa

ste

Ora

l62

.5Lf

GIA

:5

(sto

mac

hac

he)

Past

eO

ral

DID

:2

(sca

bies

)Pa

ste

Top

ical

Bam

busa

arun

dina

cea

(Ret

z.)W

illd

.(Po

acea

e)ER

IH-3

94M

oon

gil

Sh0.

83Sd

SMSD

:5

(rh

eum

atis

m* )

Past

eO

ral

50.0

Bego

nia

mal

abar

ica

Lam

.(B

egon

iace

ae)

ERIH

-75

Thee

nd

aM

aniy

anSh

0.33

LfR

SD:

2(n

asal

infe

ctio

ns)

Past

eTo

pic

al20

.0Ca

loph

yllu

min

ophy

llum

L.(C

lusi

acea

e)ER

IH-7

2Pi

nn

aim

aram

Tr1.

33Sd

,Lf

SdD

ID:

3(b

ald

nes

sd

ue

tofu

nga

lin

fect

ion

* ,sk

inir

rita

tion

)

Past

eTo

pic

al75

.0

ENT:

1(e

arac

he* )

Past

eO

ral

SMSD

:2

(hea

dac

he)

Past

eO

ral

HC

:1

(hai

rgr

owth

* ,gr

eyin

gof

hai

r)Pa

ste

Ora

l

Caps

icum

frut

esce

nsL.

(Sol

anac

eae)

ERIH

-373

Kaa

nth

arim

ilag

aiH

e1.

00Fr

GU

A:

6(d

eliv

ery

pai

n)

Past

eO

ral

35.0

Card

iosp

erm

umha

licac

abum

L.(S

apin

dac

eae)

ERIH

-361

Mu

dak

kath

anC

l1.

00Lf

GU

A:

1(d

eliv

ery

pai

n)

Juic

eO

ral

42.5

SMSD

:5

(bod

yp

ain

,rh

eum

atis

m)

Dec

octi

onp

aste

Top

ical

(bat

h)

Ora

lCa

rica

papa

yaL.

(Car

icac

eae)

ERIH

-614

Pap

pal

iTr

0.83

FrG

IA:

3(c

onst

ipat

ion

)R

awO

ral

45.0

LxD

C:

2(t

ooth

ach

e)Pa

ste

Toot

hp

aste

Cari

ssa

cara

ndas

L.(A

poc

ynac

eae)

ERIH

-83

Kal

akka

iSh

1.33

FrG

IA:

4(s

tom

ach

ach

e)A

sp

ickl

eO

ral

30.0

CA

:4

(bod

yco

olin

g)A

sp

ickl

eO

ral

Cass

iaal

ata

L.(F

abac

eae)

ERIH

-89

Seem

aiag

ath

iSh

0.33

FlG

UA

:2

(abo

rtio

n)

Juic

eO

ral

20.0

Author's personal copy

856 M. Ayyanar, S. Ignacimuthu / Journal of Ethnopharmacology 134 (2011) 851–864

Tabl

e2

(Con

tinu

ed)

Bot

anic

aln

ame

(Fam

ily)

,vou

cher

spec

imen

nu

mbe

rLo

caln

ame

Life

form

Use

valu

ePa

rts

use

dA

ilm

ent

cate

gory

:n

o.of

use

-rep

orts

(ail

men

tstr

eate

d)

Prep

arat

ion

Ap

pli

cati

onR

I

Cass

iaau

ricu

lata

L.(F

abac

eae)

ERIH

-86

Ava

ram

poo

Sh1.

17Fl

GIA

:2

(sto

mac

hac

he)

Past

eO

ral

32.5

LfD

ID:

5(s

kin

irri

tati

on,

itch

ing)

Past

eTo

pic

al

Cent

ella

asia

tica

(L.)

Urb

an.(

Mac

kin

laya

ceae

)ER

IH-9

7V

alla

rai

He

1.67

LfC

SCD

:6

(mem

ory

pow

erfo

rch

ild

ren

)Po

wd

erO

ral

47.5

HC

:2

(hai

rgr

owth

)Po

wd

erO

ral

SMSD

:2

(hea

dac

he)

Past

eO

ral

Ciss

usqu

adra

ngul

aris

L.(V

itac

eae)

ERIH

-99

Pira

nd

aiSh

1.00

St,L

fG

IA:

6(s

tom

ach

ach

e)Po

wd

er,p

aste

Ora

l17

.5Ci

trus

aura

ntif

olia

(Ch

rist

m.&

Pan

z.)

Sw.(

Ru

tace

ae)

ERIH

-109

Elu

mit

cah

iTr

0.67

LfG

IA:

4(i

nd

iges

tion

)Ju

ice

Ora

l32

.5

Cleo

me

visc

osa

L.(C

leom

acea

e)ER

IH-7

8N

aive

lai

He

1.67

LfD

ID:

3(w

oun

ds)

Past

eTo

pic

al57

.5SM

SD:

5(s

wel

lin

gs,

hea

dac

he* )

Past

e,ju

ice

Top

ical

Fvr:

2(f

ever

* )Ju

ice

Top

ical

Clit

oria

tern

atea

L.(F

abac

eae)

ERIH

-206

San

gup

ush

pam

Cl

0.83

LfEN

T:3

(th

roat

pai

n)

Past

eO

ral

32.5

SMSD

:2

(sw

elli

ngs

)Pa

ste

Trop

ical

Cocc

inia

indi

ca(L

.)V

oigt

.(C

ucu

rbit

acea

e)ER

IH-2

26K

ovai

paz

ham

Cl

1.50

LfG

H:

5(b

ody

stre

ngt

h)

Past

eO

ral

42.5

GU

A:

4(t

oin

crea

sese

men

pro

du

ctio

n)

Past

eO

ral

Com

mel

ina

beng

hale

nsis

L.(C

omm

elin

acea

e)ER

IH-6

0Th

enga

ich

edi

He

0.50

StD

ID:

3(w

oun

ds)

Juic

eTo

pic

al22

.5Co

stus

spec

iosu

sSm

ith

.(C

osta

ceae

)ER

IH-1

03K

otta

k-ki

lan

guH

e1.

17R

hED

:5

(dia

bete

s)Pa

ste

Juic

eO

ral

40.0

LfD

ID:

2(w

oun

ds)

Juic

eTo

pic

alCy

nodo

nda

ctyl

on(L

.)Pe

rs.(

Poac

eae)

ERIH

-118

Aru

gam

pu

lH

e0.

83W

pD

ID:

2(i

tch

ing)

Dec

octi

onO

ral

45.0

SMSD

:2

(bod

yp

ain

)D

ecoc

tion

Ora

lR

SD:

1(a

sth

ma)

Dec

octi

onO

ral

Dat

ura

met

elL.

(Sol

anac

eae)

ERIH

-123

Um

atth

aiH

e0.

67Lf

ENT:

4(e

arac

he* )

Juic

eTo

pic

al17

.5El

etta

ria

card

amom

um(L

.)M

aton

.(Zi

ngi

bera

ceae

)ER

IH-1

29El

amH

e0.

67Fr

SMSD

:2

(hea

dac

he,

rheu

mat

ism

)Po

wd

err

Ora

l55

.0

RSD

:2

(ast

hm

a)Po

wd

erO

ral

Euph

orbi

ahi

rta

L.(E

up

hor

biac

eae)

ERIH

-104

Am

man

pac

char

isi

He

0.83

Lx,L

fD

ID:

5(w

oun

ds)

Raw

,pas

teTo

pic

al35

.0Ev

olvu

lus

num

mul

ariu

sL.

(Con

volv

ula

ceae

)ER

IH-2

17V

ella

ivis

hn

ukr

anti

He

0.50

Lf,F

l,R

tG

IA:

3(d

ysen

tery

* )Pa

ste

Ora

l15

.0Fi

cus

beng

hale

nsis

L.(M

orac

eae)

ERIH

-130

Ala

mar

amTr

1.67

LfD

ID:

4(w

oun

ds)

Pow

der

Top

ical

47.5

Yt

DC

:6

(to

stre

ngt

hen

the

teet

h)

Raw

Toot

hbr

ush

Ficu

sre

ligio

saL.

(Mor

acea

e)ER

IH-1

34A

rasa

mar

amTr

1.33

Lf,S

bG

IA:

4(s

tom

ach

ach

e,In

dig

esti

on)

RSD

:4

(bre

ast

pai

n* )

Pow

der

Ora

l47

.5

SbPo

wd

erO

ral

Gym

nem

asy

lves

tre

(L.)

R.B

r.(A

poc

ynac

eae)

ERIH

-409

Siru

kuri

nch

anC

l2.

00Lf

ED:

6(d

iabe

tes)

Pow

der

Ora

l65

.0PB

:3

(sco

rpio

nst

ing,

snak

ebit

e)Po

wd

erO

ral

DID

:3

(itc

hin

g)Po

wd

erO

ral

Hib

iscu

sro

sa-s

inen

sis

L.(M

alva

ceae

)ER

IH-1

41C

hem

baru

tth

iSh

1.17

FlC

SCD

:2

(to

stre

ngt

hen

the

hea

rt)

Raw

Ora

l47

.5

LfG

UA

:2

(ven

erea

ldis

ease

s)Po

wd

erO

ral

GIA

:2

(sto

mac

hac

he)

Pow

der

Ora

lH

ygro

phila

auri

cula

ta(S

chu

m.)

Hei

ne.

(Aca

nth

acea

e)ER

IH-6

55N

eerm

ull

ich

edi

Sh0.

50Lf

RSD

:3

(cou

gh)

Juic

eO

ral

25.0

Jatr

opha

goss

ypif

olia

L.(E

up

hor

biac

eae)

ERIH

-416

Ath

alai

He

1.00

Rs

DC

:4

(fou

lod

our,

toot

hac

he)

Pow

der

Toot

hp

owd

er45

.0

DID

:2

(wou

nd

sin

lip

san

dto

ngu

e)To

pic

al

Kal

anch

oepi

nnat

a(L

am.)

Pers

.(C

rass

ula

ceae

)ER

IH-6

8K

utt

ipod

um

ched

iH

e0.

50Lf

CA

:3

(bod

yco

olin

g)D

ecoc

tion

Ora

l17

.5La

wso

nia

iner

mis

L.(L

yth

race

ae)

ERIH

-155

Mar

uth

ani

Sh1.

67Lf

DID

:5

(hee

lcra

cks,

felo

n)

Past

eTo

pic

al60

.0

Author's personal copy

M. Ayyanar, S. Ignacimuthu / Journal of Ethnopharmacology 134 (2011) 851–864 857

SMSD

:4

(rh

eum

atis

m)

Past

eTo

pic

alG

H:

1(d

isea

sere

sist

ance

inch

ild

ren

)Pa

ste

Top

ical

(bat

h)

Leuc

asas

pera

(Wil

ld.)

Lin

k(L

amia

ceae

)ER

IH-6

6Th

um

bai

He

1.00

LfG

IA:

2(d

ysen

tery

)Ju

ice

Ora

l70

.0Fl

Fvr:

2(f

ever

)Ju

ice

Ora

lSM

SD:

1(h

ead

ach

e)Pa

ste

Top

ical

ENT:

1(e

yep

ain

* ,co

lou

rbl

ind

nes

s* )Pa

ste

Ora

l/To

pic

al

Man

gife

rain

dica

L.(A

nac

ard

iace

ae)

ERIH

-59

Maa

mar

amTr

0.50

SbSM

SD:

2(b

ody

pai

n* )

Pow

der

Ora

l55

.0G

UA

:1

(del

iver

yp

ain

* )Pa

ste

Ora

lM

elia

azed

arac

hL.

(Mel

iace

ae)

ERIH

-57

Mal

aive

mTh

ottl

suru

ngi

buTr

1.83

LfG

IA:

4(s

tom

ach

ach

e)Ju

ice

Ora

l75

.0St

,Rb

DID

:4

(ski

nir

rita

tion

)Ju

ice

Trop

ical

LfSM

SD:

2(b

ody

pai

n* )

Past

eTr

opic

alG

UA

:1

(to

incr

ease

sper

mp

rod

uct

ion

)Pa

ste

Ora

l

Mic

helia

cham

paca

L.(M

agn

olia

ceae

)ER

IH-3

91Sh

enba

gam

Tr0.

33Lf

ENT:

2(e

yep

ain

* )D

ecoc

tion

Top

ical

40.0

Mill

etia

pinn

ata

(L.)

Pan

igra

hi.

(Fab

acea

e)ER

IH-2

5Pu

nga

mar

amTr

0.67

SdD

ID:

4(w

oun

ds)

Raw

Top

ical

35.0

Mim

osa

pudi

caL.

(Fab

acea

e)ER

IH-2

38Th

otta

lsu

run

giH

e0.

50Lf

DID

:3

(pim

ple

s)Pa

ste

Top

ical

35.0

Mim

usop

sel

engi

L.(S

apot

acea

e)ER

IH-1

62M

agil

am

aram

Tr0.

33Fl

GH

:2

(to

get

shin

ing

bod

y* )Ju

ice

Ora

l22

.5

Mol

lugo

nudi

caul

isLa

m.(

Mol

lugi

nac

eae)

ERIH

-413

Parp

adag

amH

e1.

33W

pFv

r:2

(fev

er)

Dec

octi

onO

ral

67.5

LfR

SD:

2(c

ough

)D

ecoc

tion

Ora

lSM

SD:

2(h

ead

ach

e)D

ecoc

tion

Ora

lG

IA:

1(s

tom

ach

ach

e)Po

wd

erO

ral

GU

A:

1(v

ener

eald

isea

ses)

Pow

der

Ora

lM

omor

dica

dioi

caR

oxb.

(Cu

curb

itac

eae)

ERIH

-46

Kaa

ttu

pag

arka

iC

l1.

00Lf

GIA

:6

(sto

mac

hac

he)

Dec

octi

onO

ral

32.5

Mor

inda

pube

scen

sR

oxb.

(Ru

biac

eae)

ERIH

-100

Man

jan

atth

iTr

0.67

LfSM

SD:

1(r

heu

mat

ism

* )Ju

ice

Top

ical

55.0

GIA

:2

(in

dig

esti

on)

Dec

octi

onO

ral

DID

:1

(wou

nd

s)Pa

ste

Top

ical

Mor

inga

olei

fera

Lam

.(M

orin

gace

ae)

ERIH

-171

Mu

ran

gai

Tr1.

00Fl

GU

A:

6(t

oin

crea

sesp

erm

pro

du

ctio

n)

Pow

der

Ora

l60

.0

Muk

iam

ader

aspa

tana

(L.)

M.R

oem

.(C

ucu

rbit

acea

e)ER

IH-4

27M

usu

-mu

sukk

aiC

l0.

50Lf

GH

:3

(bod

yst

ren

gth

)Pa

ste

Ora

l22

.5

Mur

raya

koen

igii

(L.)

Spre

ng.

(Ru

tace

ae)

ERIH

-172

Kar

uve

pp

ilai

Tr1.

83Lf

ENT:

5(e

yep

ain

,eye

cool

ing)

Past

eO

ral

37.5

HC

:6

(dan

dru

ff,h

air

loss

)Pa

ste

Top

ical

Oci

mum

tenu

iflor

umL.

(Lam

iace

ae)

ERIH

-114

Nal

lath

ula

siH

e1.

67Lf

RSD

:5

(col

d,c

ough

)Ju

ice

Ora

l67

.5Fv

r:5

(fev

er)

Juic

eO

ral

Opu

ntia

dille

niiH

aw.(

Cac

tace

ae)

ERIH

-183

Sap

pat

hik

alli

Sh0.

50St

DID

:3

(wou

nd

s* )Pa

ste

Top

ical

15.0

Pand

anus

fasc

icul

aris

Lam

.(Pa

nd

anac

eae)

ERIH

-672

Thaa

lai

Sh0.

33Y

t,Lf

LP:

2(j

aun

dic

e* )R

awO

ral

32.5

Phoe

nix

sylv

estr

is(L

.)R

oxb.

(Are

cace

ae)

ERIH

-38

Pere

ech

aiTr

1.33

FrG

UA

:4

(mal

efe

rtil

ity)

Raw

Ora

l32

.5G

H:

4(b

ody

stre

ngt

h)

Raw

Ora

lPh

ylla

nthu

sam

arus

Sch

um

&Th

onn

.(Ph

ylla

nth

acea

e)ER

IH-8

2K

eela

nel

liH

e1.

00Lf

LP:

6(j

aun

dic

e)Ju

ice

Ora

l37

.5

Phyl

lant

hus

embl

ica

L.(P

hyl

lan

thac

eae)

ERIH

-184

Peri

yan

elli

Tr1.

00Fr

GH

:6

(bod

yst

ren

gth

)Po

wd

erO

ral

37.5

Phys

alis

min

ima

L.(S

olan

acea

e)ER

IH-1

3So

dak

kuth

akka

liH

e0.

67Lf

GU

A:

4(v

ener

eald

isea

ses* ,

toin

crea

sela

ctat

ion

)D

ecoc

tion

Ora

l30

.0

Pipe

rbe

tle

L.(P

iper

acea

e)ER

IH-2

15V

etri

lai

Cl

0.67

LfD

ID:

4(i

tch

ing,

skin

irri

tati

on)

Past

eTo

pic

al27

.5

Pipe

rni

grum

L.(P

iper

acea

e)ER

IH-2

30M

ilag

uC

l1.

17Fr

RSD

:5

(cou

gh,b

ron

chit

is)

Pow

der

Ora

l55

.0PB

:2

(sn

akeb

ite)

Pow

der

Ora

lPu

nica

gran

atum

L.(L

yth

race

ae)

ERIH

-185

Mad

hu

lai

Sh0.

33Fr

GIA

:2

(sto

mac

hac

he)

Pow

der

Ora

l42

.5R

icin

usco

mm

unis

L.(E

up

hor

biac

eae)

ERIH

-438

Am

anak

kuSh

0.67

SdSM

SD:4

(joi

nt

pai

n,m

usc

lep

ain

)R

awTo

pic

al32

.5

Sans

evie

ria

roxb

urgh

iana

Sch

ult

.f.(

Asp

arag

acea

e)ER

IH-1

86M

aru

lH

e0.

33St

ENT:

2(e

arac

he* )

Juic

eTo

pic

al22

.5

Sant

alum

albu

mL.

(San

tala

ceae

)ER

IH-3

53Sa

nth

anam

Tr1.

33St

DID

:4

(pim

ple

s)Pa

ste

Top

ical

47.5

CA

:4

(bod

yco

olin

g)Pa

ste

Top

ical

Sesa

mum

indi

cum

L.(P

edal

iace

ae)

ERIH

-210

Ellu

He

0.33

SdD

ID:

2(s

kin

irri

tati

on,

itch

ing)

Past

eTo

pic

al35

.0

Author's personal copy

858 M. Ayyanar, S. Ignacimuthu / Journal of Ethnopharmacology 134 (2011) 851–864

Tabl

e2

(Con

tinu

ed)

Bot

anic

aln

ame

(Fam

ily)

,vou

cher

spec

imen

nu

mbe

rLo

caln

ame

Life

form

Use

valu

ePa

rts

use

dA

ilm

ent

cate

gory

:n

o.of

use

-rep

orts

(ail

men

tstr

eate

d)

Prep

arat

ion

Ap

pli

cati

onR

I

Sesb

ania

gran

diflo

raPe

rs.(

Faba

ceae

)ER

IH-2

22A

gath

iTr

0.33

LfC

A:

2(b

ody

cool

ing)

Dec

octi

onO

ral

27.5

Sola

num

nigr

umL.

(Sol

anac

eae)

ERIH

-198

Man

ath

akka

liH

e0.

50Lf

GIA

:3

(in

test

inal

ulc

er)

Dec

octi

onO

ral

40.0

Sola

num

sura

tten

seB

urm

.f.(

Sola

nac

eae)

ERIH

-216

Kan

dan

-kat

thir

iH

e1.

00Fr

DC

:6

(too

thac

he,

toki

llw

orm

sin

gum

san

dte

eth

)R

awIn

hal

atio

n(m

outh

)30

.0

Sola

num

trilo

batu

mL.

(Sol

anac

eae)

ERIH

-606

Thu

dh

uva

lai

Cl

0.83

FlG

UA

:3

(mal

efe

rtil

ity)

Raw

Ora

l25

.0Lf

GIA

:2

(con

stip

atio

n)

Past

eO

ral

Spha

eran

thus

indi

cus

L.(A

ster

acea

e)ER

IH-3

70K

otta

ikar

anth

aiH

e0.

33W

pD

ID:

2(s

kin

irri

tati

on)

Past

eTo

pic

al35

.0St

rych

nos

nux-

vom

ica

L.(L

ogan

iace

ae)

ERIH

-420

Etti

/Kan

chir

amTr

0.33

LfSM

SD:

2(r

heu

mat

ism

)Pa

ste

Top

ical

32.5

Syzy

gium

cum

iniS

keel

s.(M

yrta

ceae

)ER

IH-3

88N

aval

Tr1.

83Lf

,Fr

ED:

6(d

iabe

tes)

Juic

e,ra

wO

ral

57.5

GIA

:5

(in

dig

esti

on,

stom

ach

ach

e)Pa

ste

Ora

l

Tam

arin

dus

indi

caL.

(Fab

acea

e)ER

IH-6

10Pu

liya

mar

amTr

0.50

FlC

A:

2(b

ody

cool

ing)

Dec

octi

onO

ral

40.0

LfEN

T:1

(eye

cool

ing)

Past

eTo

pic

alTe

cton

agr

andi

sL.

f.(V

erbe

nac

eae)

ERIH

-414

Thek

kum

aram

Tr0.

33Sd

HC

:2

(hai

rlo

ss,d

and

ruff

)Pa

ste

Top

ical

35.0

Teph

rosi

apu

rpur

ea(L

.)Pe

rs.(

Faba

ceae

)ER

IH-2

36K

olu

nch

iH

e0.

33Lf

GIA

:2

(gas

tric

pro

blem

s* )Pa

ste

Ora

l25

.0Te

rmin

alia

cheb

ula

Ret

z.(C

ombr

etac

eae)

ERIH

-607

Kad

ukk

aiTr

1.83

FrG

IA:

3(i

nte

stin

alu

lcer

)Po

wd

erO

ral

67.5

GU

A:

5(t

ost

imu

late

sexu

alp

ower

tom

en)

Raw

Ora

l

DC

:3

(too

thac

he)

Raw

Toot

hp

owd

erTr

iant

hem

apo

rtul

acas

trum

L.(A

izoa

ceae

)ER

IH-6

02Sa

aran

atth

iH

e0.

33Lf

,Rt

GH

:2

(dis

ease

resi

stan

ce)

Past

eTo

pic

al27

.5Tr

ibul

uste

rres

tris

L.(Z

ygop

hyl

lace

ae)

ERIH

-410

Ner

un

chil

He

1.00

Wp

Fvr:

2(f

ever

)Pa

ste

Top

ical

67.5

FrSM

SD:

2(h

ead

ach

e)Pa

ste

Top

ical

DID

:1

(hee

lcra

cks)

Past

eTo

pic

alG

H:

1(b

ody

shin

ing)

Pow

der

Top

ical

Tric

hopu

sze

ylan

icus

Gae

rtn

.su

bsp

.tra

vanc

oric

us(B

edd

.)B

urk

ill.

(Tri

chop

odac

eae)

ERIH

-81

Aro

kya

pac

chil

aiH

e1.

50Fr

RSD

:2

(ast

hm

a)R

awO

ral

37.5

LfG

H:

6(b

ody

stre

ngt

h)

Raw

Ora

lG

UA

:1

(ven

erea

ldis

ease

s)Pa

ste

Ora

lTr

idax

proc

umbe

nsL.

(Ast

erac

eae)

ERIH

-10

Vet

tuka

yap

oon

du

He

0.50

LfSM

SD:

3(s

wel

lin

gs)

Past

eTo

pic

al25

.0V

itex

negu

ndo

L.(V

erbe

nac

eae)

ERIH

-372

Not

chi

Tr0.

83Lf

SMSD

:1

(bod

yp

ain

)D

ecoc

tion

Top

ical

(bat

h)

47.5

PB:

4(p

oiso

nbi

tes)

Past

eO

ral

Wed

elia

cale

ndul

acea

Less

.(A

ster

acea

e)ER

IH-3

83M

anja

lkar

isal

anka

nn

iH

e1.

00Lf

HC

:6

(hai

rlo

ss,g

rayi

ng

ofh

air)

Pow

der

Top

ical

25.0

Zizi

phus

zizy

phus

(L.)

H.K

arst

.(R

ham

nac

eae)

ERIH

-212

Elan

dai

Sh1.

33Fr

CSC

D:

2(t

op

uri

fybl

ood

)R

awO

ral

55.0

GH

:4

(wei

ght

loss

)R

awO

ral

Part

su

sed

:Lf

–le

af,S

b–

stem

bark

,Wp

–w

hol

ep

lan

t,B

b–

bulb

,Rh

–rh

izom

e,Fr

–fr

uit

,Sd

–se

edan

dse

edoi

l,Lx

–la

tex,

Fl–

flow

er,S

t–

stem

,Rt

–ro

ot,R

b–

root

bark

,Rs

–re

sin

,Yt

–yo

un

gtw

ig;

Life

form

:H

e–

her

b,Sh

–sh

rub,

Cl–

clim

ber,

Tr–

tree

;R

I–re

lati

veim

por

tan

ce.

*N

ewcl

aim

s.

Author's personal copy

M. Ayyanar, S. Ignacimuthu / Journal of Ethnopharmacology 134 (2011) 851–864 859

Fig. 5. Categories of Kani’s mode of utilization for the preparation of medicine.

3.3. Method of preparation and mode of administration of plants

The preparation and utilization of plant parts were grouped intofive categories (Fig. 5). Of these, most commonly used method ofpreparation was paste (42%) followed by powder (18%), juice (17%),raw (13%, taken as raw and plant part prepared as pickles) anddecoction (10%). Preparation of paste for the treatment of ailmentsis a common practice among the other tribal communities in India(Ignacimuthu et al., 2006; Ragupathy et al., 2008; Perumal Samyet al., 2008; Poonam and Singh, 2009; Rajakumar and Shivanna,2009; Tushar et al., 2010; Upadhyay et al., 2010) and other parts ofthe World (Giday et al., 2007, 2010; Roosita et al., 2008). The pastewas prepared by grinding the fresh or dried plant parts with oil orwater. The powder was prepared by the grinding of shade driedplant parts. The decoction was obtained by boiling the plant partsin water until the volume of the water reduced to minimum orrequired amount. The inhalation was done by the burning of plantparts and inhaled the smoke through nose or mouth.

Internal uses (64%) were predominating over external or topicaluses (32%) and nasal application. For topical use, the most impor-tant methods used were direct application of paste or medicatedoil (with oil) and mostly dealt with diseases like skin disorders,wounds, heel cracks, poison bites, rheumatism, body pain andheadache. Most of the medicines were given orally which is inagreement with some other studies conducted elsewhere (Ssegawaand Kasenene, 2007; Perumal Samy et al., 2008; Lee et al., 2008;Poonam and Singh, 2009; Andrade-Cetto, 2009).

3.4. Ingredients added

The medicinal preparations were made out of a single plant partor in combination of several plant parts. In case of Kani’s medicinalpreparations, multiple modes (57 plants) of preparation were dom-inating over the single mode (33 plants) of preparations (Table 3).Kani traditional healers used more than two or three plant parts forthe preparation of medicine in the treatment of single or multipleailments; the similar findings were reported by several researchers(Teklehaymanot et al., 2007; Ignacimuthu et al., 2008; Tabuti et al.,2010; Upadhyay et al., 2010). The frequent use of multiple plantremedies among the traditional healers could be attributed to thebelief of synergic reactions where one plant could have a potenti-ating effect than other (Giday et al., 2010). It is believed that the

multiple prescriptions contain a range of pharmacologically activecompounds and poly-herbal treatment has more healing powerthan single medicinal plant treatment, since each medicinal plantused in the mixture is a remedy (Teklehaymanot et al., 2007).

As reported by Poonam and Singh (2009), Kani traditional heal-ers too frequently use some adjuvants such as honey, cow/goat’smilk, sugar, ghee, salt, boiled rice and butter milk to improve theacceptability and medicinal property of certain remedies. The oilsof castor, coconut, gingelly, mustard, neem and pongam were com-monly used for the preparation of paste/medicated oil. They wereusing specific plant parts and specific dosages for the treatmentof diseases and the dose given to the patient depended on age,physical status and health conditions. Before giving treatment thecondition of the patient was observed deeply and then they gavethe prepared medicines.

3.5. Plant use values

The most commonly used species was Gymnema sylvestre with12 use-reports by 6 informants, giving the highest use value of2.00. G. sylvestre is attributed to its use in the treatment of vari-ous diseases and it is well recognized by all the informants as anantidiabetic plant. Many Irulas tribal families in Thanjavur districtof Tamil Nadu, India are growing G. sylvestre as a climbing vine intheir home and it was a household custom to consume one leaf aday (Ragupathy and Newmaster, 2009).

Other important plants with high use value were M. azedarach,Murraya koenigii, Syzygium cumini and Terminalia chebula (11 use-reports by 6 informants with a UV of 1.83), Adhatoda vasica, Alpiniagalanga, Azadirachta indica, Centella asiatica, C. viscosa, Ficus beng-halensis, Lawsonia inermis and Ocimum tenuiflorum (10 use-reportsby 6 informants with a UV of 1.67), Coccinia indica and Trichopuszeylanicus (nine use-reports by six informants with a UV of 1.50).Most of these plants were frequently used by the Paliyar tribals inTheni district of Tamil Nadu (Ignacimuthu et al., 2008) and tribalpractitioners of Eastern Rajasthan (Upadhyay et al., 2010), India forthe treatment of various ailments.

The plant with very low use value was Ananas comosus which isreported by only one informant with a UV of 0.17, but the informantis regularly using this plant in the treatment of venereal diseases.Similar to our study, tender leaves of the plant is used to cure irreg-ular menstruation and sterility in women by the Indian, Mangoloidand Indo Aerian tribal people of Northeast India (Purkayastha et al.,2005). While tribal people in Cuba (Cano and Volpato, 2004) andGhana (Asase et al., 2010) were using the plant for the treatment ofmalaria and liver pain respectively.

In general, scarce availability of the plants in the study area leadsthem to low UV (Rokaya et al., 2010) as in the case of Tirunelvelihills. In the present study, plants reported with a low use value(two use-reports by six informants with a UV of 0.33) were Achyran-thes aspera, Begonia malabarica, Cassia alata, M. champaca, M. elengi,P. fascicularis, Punica granatum, Sansevieria roxburghiana, Sesamumindicum, Sesbania grandiflora, Sphaeranthus indicus, Strychnos nux-vomica, Tectona grandis, T. purpurea and Trianthema portulacastrum.Among these P. granatum is reported to have a very low UV of 0.23among the local people of Mujib area in Jordan for treating gastro-intestinal ailments (Hudaib et al., 2008) similar to Kani tribals.

3.6. Informant consensus factor

Generally Fic of local knowledge for disease treatment dependedon the availability of the plant species in the study area (Rajakumarand Shivanna, 2009). In order to use the informant consensus fac-tor (Fic), we classified the illnesses into broad disease categories.The Fic values in our study are ranged from 0.63 to 0.88. The usecategories with more than 50 use-reports were dermatological

Author's personal copy

860 M. Ayyanar, S. Ignacimuthu / Journal of Ethnopharmacology 134 (2011) 851–864

Table 3Ingredients added for the preparation of herbal medicines by the Kani traditional healers.

Botanical name Other plants added in medicinal preparation Other ingredients added

A. indicum Asparagus racemosus, Cassia auriculata, Cynodon dactylon, M. koenigii Neem oilA. indica Albizia lebbeck, A. indica, M. pudica –A. aspera A. nilotica, Carmona retusa, Hibiscus tiliaceus, Wrightia tinctoria –A. vasica Piper nigrum (headache, earache, cold), Solanum trilobatum (asthma) HoneyA. lanata Cynodon dactylon, Hemidesmus indicus, Solanum trilobatum, Cassia auriculata, S.

nux-vomica (asthma, chest pain)Honey/milk

A. cepa Santalum album, Scilla indica Gingelly oilA. vera – Ghee, sugarA. galanga A. vasica, Piper nigrum, Zingiber officinale –A. sessilis A. vera, A. occidentale, Elephantopus scaber Castor oilA. occidentale A. comosus, Withania somnifera (asthma) –A. comosus Baccaurea courtallensis SugarAreca catechu P. betle (refreshment) Sunnambu for refreshment (calcium

mix); coconut oil (burns)A. monophylla A. vasica, Eucalyptus globules, L. aspera, Ocimum basilicum (cold)

P. amarus, Psidium guajava, Thespesia populnea, Vitex negundo (poison bites)–

A. indica Ficus retusa, Hibiscus rosa-sinensis, Pedalium murex, Pergularia daemia, P.granatum (poison bites, stomachache)Amorphophallus campanulatus, Elephantopus scaber (scabies)

Pungam oil (M. pinnata)

Mustard oilB. arundinacea A. indicum, A. vasica, B. malabarica, Clitoria ternatea, S. cumini, Withania

somnifera–

B. malabarica Cardiospermum halicacabum, Elephantopus scaber –C. inophyllum A. vasica, E. hirta, Toddalia asiatica (fungal infection on head, earache,

headache, hair care)–

Capsicum frutescens – Coconut, honeyCardiospermum halicacabum M. koenigii, Pedalium murex, S. surattense (rheumatism) Boiled rice (delivery pain)Carica papaya – Salt (toothache)Carissa carandas – FoodC. alata Carica papaya, P. granatum, S. surattense –Cassia auriculata –

A. indicum, Acorus calamus, Alpinia calcarata, Hibiscus rosa-sinensis, Lippianodiflora, M. pinnata (skin diseases)

Honey (stomachache)Coconut oil

C. asiatica Cleome viscosa, Cynodon dactylon, E. hirta (headache, hair care) Salt, milkC. quadrangularis – Honey (stomachache)C. aurantifolia Coriandrum sativam –C. viscosa A. indica, Mirabilis jalapa, Pergularia daemia (fever, headache) Mustard oil

Castor oil (wounds, swellings)Clitoria ternatea Aristida setacea, C. indica (swellings) –C. indica Canna indica, P. emblica, T. zeylanicus, Ziziphus zizyphus GheeC. benghalensis Areca catechu, Canna indica –Costus speciosus Canna indica, Cynodon dactylon, Glycerrhiza glabra, P. granatum (wounds) –Cynodon dactylon A. nilotica, A. vasica, S. cumini (asthma) –D. metel – Gingelly oilElettaria cardamomum A. galanga, Piper nigrum, Zingiber officinale (headache, asthma) SugarE. hirta A. indica, Begonia fallox, Cissampelos pareira, C. benghalensis (wounds) –E. nummularius Bidens pilosa, Datura innoxia, R. communis, Vitex altissima –F. religiosa Ficus retusa, Acacia pennata, B. malabarica, Cocculus hirsutus (indigestion, breast

pain)Honey

G. sylvestre – MilkHibiscus rosa-sinensis –

A. sessilis, C. asiatica, Hemidesmus indicus, Pavetta indica, Vetiveria zizanioides(venereal diseases, stomachache)

HoneyMilk

H. auriculata – HoneyJatropha gossypifolia A. nilotica, Carica papaya (foul odour, toothache) –L. inermis B. malabarica, Costus speciosus, Hibiscus rosa-sinensis (disease resistance in

children)–

M. indica Asparagus racemosus, A. indica, S. nux-vomica (delivery pain) Gingelly oilM. azedarach Aristolochia indica, Mirabilis jalapa, Mucuna pruriens (to increase sperm

production)Ghee

M. champaca A. sessilis, Cocculus hirsutus, Cynodon dactylon, Tabernaemontana divaricata –M. pudica C. indica, Evolvulus alsinoides, Hemidesmus indicus –M. elengi A. sessilis, Hibiscus rosa-sinensis, Solanum melangena, Wedelia calandulacea –M. nudicaulis A. vera, C. asiatica, Coldenia procumbens, Madhuca longifolia, P. emblica

(stomachache, venereal diseases)Sugar

M. dioica A. galanga, Piper hymenophyllum, Piper nigrum –M. pubescens A. vasica (rheumatism) Gingelly oilM. oleifera A. cepa, Cuminum cyminum –M. koenigii A. vera, A. sessilis, Solanum trilobatum (hair care) –O. tenuiflorum Andrographis lineata, Andrographis paniculata, Sesbania sesban –O. dillenii A. vera –Phoenix sylvestris – HoneyP. amarus – MilkP. emblica Terminalia bellirica, T. chebula GheeP. betle Piper nigrum –Piper nigrum – HoneyS. indicum – Coconut oil

Author's personal copy

M. Ayyanar, S. Ignacimuthu / Journal of Ethnopharmacology 134 (2011) 851–864 861

Table 3 (Continued)

Botanical name Other plants added in medicinal preparation Other ingredients added

S. grandiflora – ButtermilkS. nigrum A. cepa, Cuminum cyminum –Solanum trilobatum A. cepa, C. asiatica (constipation) –S. cumini – Honey/milk (diabetes); goat’s milk

(indigestion)T. grandis A. vera, Cocculus hirsutus, Helicteres isora (hair care) Coconut oilT. purpurea Carmona retusa, Piper hymenophyllum, Piper nigrum (gastric problems) –T. chebula – Ghee (ulcer); honey (to stimulate

sexual power)T. portulacastrum Azima tetracantha, Cocculus hirsutus, Cuminum cyminum, Madhuca longifolia –T. terrestris A. indica, F. religiosa, L. aspera, M. indica, Vitex negundo (fever, heel cracks) –T. zeylanicus subsp. travancoricus M. indica (venereal diseases) Honey (asthma, body strength)T. procumbens Cocculus hirsutus, Scilla indica Castor oilVitex negundo A. vasica (body pain); Thespesia populnea (poison bites) –

infections/diseases (81 use-reports, 26 species), gastro-intestinaldiseases (70 use-reports, 21 species) and skeleto-muscular sys-tem disorders (61 use-reports, 23 species) (Fig. 6). In the presentstudy, endocrinal disorders and liver problems had the highest Ficof 0.88 and 0.86 respectively and it is in agreement with the pre-vious studies among the neighboring indigenous communities inTamil Nadu, India; diabetes and jaundice had the highest Fic of 1.00among the Irulas in Thanjavur district (Ragupathy and Newmaster,2009), jaundice has the highest Fic of 0.92 among the Malasar trib-als in Coimbatore district (Ragupathy et al., 2008) and 0.923 amongthe Paliyar tribals in Theni district (Pandikumar et al., 2011). Phyl-lanthus amarus and G. sylvestre were very commonly used for thetreatment of jaundice and diabetes correspondingly in these stud-ies.

The least agreement between the informants was observed inthe skeleto-muscular system disorders with a Fic of 0.63 followedby poisonous bites with a Fic of 0.64, genito-urinary ailments andear, nose, throat problems with a Fic of 0.65 each (Table 4). In thestudy by Rokaya et al. (2010) the highest Fic is 0.40 and the lowestFic is 0.00, on the contrary our survey exemplified the lowest Fic is0.63. Thus the study indicated the degree of knowledge shared bythe users in the study area regarding the use of medicinal plants inthe treatment of ailments is high.

We found that dermatological infections/diseases, skeleto-muscular system disorders and gastro-intestinal ailments

employed the most plants with 26, 23 and 21 species respec-tively which was in agreement with the study of Andrade-Cetto(2009). Skeleto-muscular system disorders had the lowest Fic of0.63, but this ailment category ranks third in the number of use-reports (61) and number of taxa (23) attributed to this category. Itmay be due to the lack of communication among the informantsin the study area who are practicing this ailment category (Rokayaet al., 2010) or it may due to the lack of skeleto-muscular systemdisorders among the studied tribal people (Ragupathy et al., 2008).Heinrich et al. (1998) reported that gastro-intestinal, dermato-logical and respiratory diseases have a high informant consensusamong the Maya, Nahua and Zapotech people in Mexico. Ourfindings showed that these ailment categories had high number ofuse-reports among the Kani tribals with moderate Fic values.

3.7. Fidelity level

We analyzed the categories with major agreements to high-light the most important plants in each category (Table 5). Ofthe reported plants, 29 species had highest fidelity level of 100%,most of which were used in single ailment category with multipleinformants. For this analysis the plants with less than three use-reports were not considered. The plants with highest FL of 100%were Acacia nilotica, Solanum surattense (DC), Acalypha indica, Com-melina benghalensis, Euphorbia hirta, Mimosa pudica, O. dillenii, Piper

Fig. 6. Categories of ailments treated by Kani tribals arranged by number of use-reports.

Author's personal copy

862 M. Ayyanar, S. Ignacimuthu / Journal of Ethnopharmacology 134 (2011) 851–864

Table 4Informant consensus factor for commonly used medicinal plants.

Ailment category Number of use-reports (Nur) Number of taxa (Nt) Informant consensus factor (Fic)

Endocrinal disorders 17 3 0.88Liver problems 8 2 0.86Circulatory system/cardiovascular disorders 10 3 0.78Dental care 26 7 0.76Hair care 17 5 0.75Gastro-intestinal ailments 70 21 0.71General health 35 11 0.71Dermatological infections/diseases 81 26 0.69Respiratory system diseases 43 14 0.69Fever 17 6 0.69Cooling agent 16 6 0.67Ear, nose, throat problems 27 10 0.65Genito-urinary ailments 44 16 0.65Poisonous bites 15 6 0.64Skeleto-muscular system disorders 61 23 0.63

Total 487 159*

* A taxa may be reported in more than one ailment category.

betle, Milletia pinnata (DID), Aloe vera, Cissus quadrangularis, Cit-rus aurantifolia, E. nummularius, Momordica dioica, Solanum nigrum(GIA), Alternanthera sessilis, D. metel (ENT), B. arundinacea, Ricinuscommunis, Tridax procumbens (GUA), Hygrophila auriculata (RSD),Kalanchoe pinnata (CA), Mukia maderaspatana, Phyllanthus emblica(GH), P. amarus (ED) and Wedelia calendulacea (HC).

The maximum FL for the above plants indicated the 100% choiceof the interviewed informants for treating specific ailments and

this could be an indication of their healing potential. In support toour study, 100% FL was reported in P. amarus for jaundice amongthe herbal healers in Shimoga district of Karnataka (Rajakumar andShivanna, 2009) and Malasar tribals in Velliangiri hills of TamilNadu (Ragupathy et al., 2008), India. On the contrary, R. commu-nis and P. granatum were documented to have 50% of FL for skindiseases and digestive disorders respectively by the local people ofPalestine (Ali-Shtayeh et al., 2000).

Table 5Fidelity level (FL) values for common medicinal plants used by Kani traditional healers by ailment category.

Ailment category Most preferred species with specific ailment FL (%)

Circulatory system/cardiovascular disorders Ziziphus zizyphus (weight loss) 66.67Cooling agent K. pinnata

Tamarindus indica100.0066.70

Dental care A. nilotica (foul odour, toothache)S. surattense (toothache, to kill worms in gums and teeth)Jatropha gossypifolia (foul odour, toothache)F. benghalensis (to strengthen the teeth)

100.00100.0066.6760.00

Dermatological infections/diseases A. indica (itching, wounds)C. benghalensis, E. hirta, O. dillenii, M. pinnata (wounds)M. pudica (pimples)P. betle (itching, skin irritation)Cassia auriculata (skin irritation, itching)

100.00100.00100.00100.0071.50

Ear, nose, throat problems A. sessilis (eye pain)D. metel (earache)Clitoria ternatea (throat pain)

100.00100.0060.00

Endocrinal disorders Costus speciosus (diabetes) 71.40Fever A. galanga

O. tenuiflorum40.0050.00

Gastro-intestinal ailments A. vera, C. quadrangularis, M. dioica (stomachache)C. aurantifolia (Indigestion)E. nummularius (dysentery)S. nigrum (intestinal ulcer)

100.00100.00100.00100.00

General health M. maderaspatana, P. emblica (body strength)T. zeylanicus (body strength)

100.0066.70

Genito-urinary ailments Capsicum frutescens (delivery pain)M. oleifera (to increase sperm production)P. minima (venereal diseases, lactation)Solanum trilobatum (male fertility)

100.00100.00100.0060.00

Hair care W. calendulacea (hair loss, greying of hair)M. koenigii (dandruff, hair loss)

100.0054.50

Liver problems P. amarus (jaundice) 100.00Poisonous bites Vitex negundo (poison bites) 80.00Respiratory system diseases H. auriculata (cough)

Piper nigrum (cough, bronchitis)100.0071.40

Skeleto-muscular system disorders B. arundinacea (rheumatism)R. communis (joint pain, muscle pain)T. procumbens (swellings)Cardiospermum halicacabum (body pain, rheumatism)M. indica (body pain)

100.00100.00100.0083.0066.70

Author's personal copy

M. Ayyanar, S. Ignacimuthu / Journal of Ethnopharmacology 134 (2011) 851–864 863

3.8. Relative importance

The collected medicinal plants possessed number of pharmaco-logical properties (Khare, 2007). The plant with more number ofpharmacological properties (PH) was Moringa oleifera (20 PH); so,it had a normalized PH value of 1.00 (20/20). Mollugo nudicauliswas employed to treat five body systems and had a normalized BSvalue of 1.00 (5/5). C. inophyllum and M. azedarach had the highestRI of 75.0 and it was followed by Leucas aspera (70.0), M. nudi-caulis, T. chebula, O. tenuiflorum, Tribulus terrestris (each with theRI of 67.5), G. sylvestre (65.0), A. galanga and A. indica (62.5), L. iner-mis and A. cepa (60.0), C. viscosa and S. cumini (57.5). These plantswere also used to treat more body systems and were consideredas most versatile taxa in the study area. According to Upadhyayet al. (2010) A. indica was recognized as most versatile taxa since itwas mentioned by most of the informants among the tribal prac-titioners in Eastern Rajasthan, India. Many of the most versatilespecies reported in this study were similar for some neighboringindigenous communities in India (Muthu et al., 2006; Ignacimuthuet al., 2006, 2008; Poonam and Singh, 2009; Pandikumar et al.,2011).

3.9. Reliability of reported uses

According to Trotter and Logan (1986), plants which are used inrepetitive fashion in any ailment could be more likely to have bio-logically active component or pharmacologically active. The Kanitribals used the fruit of T. zeylanicus for body strength and to treatasthma and venereal diseases with a use value of 1.5, RI of 37.5and FL of 66.7%. It is claimed that one can live for days togetherwithout food and still be able to perform rigorous physical work byeating a few fruits of Arokyapachilai everyday and they named theplant as ‘Arokyapachilai’ (greener of health). Due to its vital role intraditional medicine and nutritional efficiency it was recognized as‘Ginseng’ of Kani tribals (Pushpangadan, 1988).

Most of the plants reported in this study has good evidenceof effectiveness and were scientifically validated as significantpharmacological agents. For example, A. vasica is one of the mostfrequently used medicinal plants among various indigenous com-munities all over the World for respiratory problems, especiallycold, cough and asthma and drugs with this plant has been usedfor a long period of time which does not has serious adverse effects(Claeson et al., 2000), and most of the studied Kani traditional heal-ers using this plant for treating asthma and cold as well as headacheand earache; G. sylvestre has been used in the treatment of diabetesfor a long time in Indian traditional medicine and elsewhere in theWorld and it claimed to has blood glucose lowering activity bothin vitro and in vivo by a number of reports (Mukherjee et al., 2006)and all the informants in the present study using this plant in thetreatment of diabetes as well as poisonous bites and skin diseases.In support of our study, P. amarus has been scientifically provedto control hepatitis B and C viruses and possess hepatoprotective,immunomodulating and anti-inflammatory activity (Thyagarajanet al., 2002). A. indica, Anacardium occidentale, C. viscosa, E. hirta, O.dillenii and M. pinnata were used in the treatment of wound andrelated injuries by the Kani traditional healers and these plantsshowed significant wound healing and anti-inflammatory activityin experimental animals (Ayyanar and Ignacimuthu, 2009a).

The ethnomedicinal studies evidently pointed out that, insteadof trying to identify the active components and pharmacologicalactions of plants through massive collection of plants from naturalsources, it is better to start investigating the efficacy of the plantbased on their use in folk medicine, since most of the commer-cially proven drugs used in modern medicine were initially triedin crude form in traditional or folk healing practices (Fabricant andFarnsworth, 2001).

4. Conclusion

The present study revealed that traditional medicines were stillin common use by the Kani tribal communities and accurate knowl-edge of the plants and their medicinal properties were held by onlya few individuals in this community. Hence a need for detailedinvestigation of ethnobotanical knowledge held by each tribal com-munity is required before such valuable knowledge vanishes. Thus,our work would be useful in preventing the loss of ethnomedici-nal traditions of Kani tribal communities. The new claims which arerecorded from the study area showed that still much can be learnedfrom investigating herbals available abundantly in the forests. Theplants with highest fidelity level and use values in the present studymay indicate the possible occurrence of valuable phytochemicalcompounds and it requires a search for potential new drugs to treatvarious ailments.

The efficacy and safety of all the reported ethnomedicinal plantsneeds to be evaluated for phytochemical and pharmacological stud-ies especially the plants with high informant consensus factor, usevalue, fidelity level and relative importance should be given priorityto carry out bioassay and toxicity studies. As a result of the studywe are suggesting the plants A. galanga, A. indica, C. inophyllum,G. sylvestre, L. aspera, M. azedarach, M. nudicaulis, O. tenuiflorum, S.cumini, T. chebula and T. terrestris for further ethnopharmacologi-cal studies, since these plants had the high UV and RI values. Of thenewly reported claims in the present study B. arundinacea, D. metel,E. nummularius, O. dillenii and P. minima had highest FL of 100% forspecific ailments and these plants can also be further analyzed forthe associated pharmacological studies.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Indian Council of MedicalResearch (ICMR), New Delhi, India (Ref. No. 52/2-2000/BMS/TRM)for providing fund for this project. The first author gratefullyacknowledges University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi forfinancial support in the form of Dr. D. S. Kothari Post DoctoralFellowship (Ref. No. F.4-2/2006(BSR)/13-98/2008(BSR)) for prepa-ration of this manuscript. We specially express our thanks to Kanitribals in the study area for revealing their traditional knowledge.We are also grateful to two anonymous referees for their criticalreviews and useful comments on the manuscript.

References

Ali-Shtayeh, M.S., Yaniv, Z., Mahajna, J., 2000. Ethnobotanical survey in the Pales-tinian area: a classification of the healing potential of medicinal plants. Journalof Ethnopharmacology 73, 221–232.

Andrade-Cetto, A., 2009. Ethnobotanical study of the medicinal plants from Tlanchi-nol, Hidalgo, Mexico. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 122, 163–171.

Angiosperm Phylogeny Group III, 2009. An update of the Angiosperm PhylogenyGroup classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III.Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161, 105–121.

Asase, A., Akwetey, G.A., Achel, D.G., 2010. Ethnopharmacological use of herbal reme-dies for the treatment of malaria in the Dangme West District of Ghana. Journalof Ethnopharmacology 129, 367–376.

Ayyanar, M., Ignacimuthu, S., 2005. Traditional knowledge of Kani tribals in Koutha-lai of Tirunelveli hills, Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 102,246–255.

Ayyanar, M., Ignacimuthu, S., 2009a. Herbal medicines for wound healing: eth-nobotanical and scientific evidence from south Indian traditional medicine.International Journal of Natural Products in Applied Research 2, 29–42.

Ayyanar, M., Ignacimuthu, S., 2009b. Some less known ethnomedicinal plants ofTirunelveli hills, Tamil Nadu. Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany 33(Suppl.), 73–76.

Ayyanar, M., Ignacimuthu, S., 2010. Plants used for non-medicinal purposes by thetribal people in Kalakad Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, Southern India. IndianJournal of Traditional Knowledge 9, 515–518.

Bennett, B.C., Prance, G.T., 2000. Introduced plants in the indigenous pharmacopoeiaof northern South America. Economic Botany 54, 90–102.

Cakilcioglu, U., Turkoglu, I., 2010. An ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants inSivrice (Elazig-Turkey). Journal of Ethnopharmacology 132, 165–175.

Author's personal copy

864 M. Ayyanar, S. Ignacimuthu / Journal of Ethnopharmacology 134 (2011) 851–864

Calixto, J.B., 2005. Twenty five years of research on medicinal plants in Latin America:a personal review. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 100, 131–134.

Cano, J.H., Volpato, G., 2004. Herbal mixtures in the traditional medicine of EasternCuba. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 90, 293–316.

Claeson, U.P., Malmfors, T., Wikman, G., Bruhn, J.G., 2000. Adhatoda vasica: a criticalreview of ethnopharmacological and toxicological data. Journal of Ethnophar-macology 72, 1–20.

Ernst, E., 2005. The efficacy of herbal medicine – an overview. Fundamental andClinical Pharmacology 19, 405–409.

Fabricant, D.S., Farnsworth, N.R., 2001. The value of plants used in traditionalmedicine for drug discovery. Environmental Health Perspectives 109, 69–75.

Friedmen, J., Yaniv, Z., Dafni, A., Palewitch, D., 1986. A preliminary classificationof the healing potential of medicinal plants, based on a rational analysis of anethnopharmacological field survey among Bedouins in the Negev desert, Israel.Journal of Ethnopharmacology 16, 275–287.

Gamble, J.S., 1935. The Flora of the Presidency of Madras. Adlard & Son, Ltd., London.Ghorbani, A., 2005. Studies on pharmaceutical ethnobotany in the region of Turkmen

Sahra, north of Iran (Part 1): general results. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 102,58–68.

Giday, M., Teklehaymanot, T., Animut, A., Mekonnen, Y., 2007. Medicinal plants ofthe Shinasha, Agew-awi and Amhara peoples in northwest Ethiopia. Journal ofEthnopharmacology 110, 516–525.

Giday, M., Asfaw, Z., Woldu, Z., 2009. Medicinal plants of the Meinit ethnic group ofEthiopia: an ethnobotanical study. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 124, 513–521.

Giday, M., Asfaw, Z., Woldu, Z., 2010. Ethnomedicinal study of plants used by Shekoethnic group of Ethiopia. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 132, 75–85.

Gonzalez, J.A., Garcia-Barrriuso, M., Amich, F., 2010. Ethnobotanical study of medic-inal plants traditionally used in the Arribes del Duero, Western Spain. Journal ofEthnopharmacology 131, 343–355.

Heinrich, M., 2000. Ethnobotany and its role in drug development. PhytotherapyResearch 14, 479–488.

Heinrich, M., Ankli, A., Frei, B., Weimann, C., Sticher, O., 1998. Medicinal plantsin Mexico: healers’ consensus and cultural importance. Social Science andMedicine 47, 91–112.

Hoareau, L., DaSilva, E.J., 1999. Medicinal plants: a re-emerging health aid.Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 2, 56–70, http://www.ejbiotechnology.info/content/vol2/issue2/full/2/.

Hudaib, M., Mohammad, M., Bustanji, Y., Tayyem, R., Yousef, M., Abuirjeie, M.,Aburjai, T., 2008. Ethnopharmacological survey of medicinal plants in Jordan,Mujib Nature Reserve and surrounding area. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 120,63–71.

Ignacimuthu, S., Sankarasivaraman, K., Kesavan, L., 1998. Medico-ethnobotanicalsurvey among Kanikar Tribals of Mundanthurai Sanctuary. Fitoterapia 69,409–414.

Ignacimuthu, S., Ayyanar, M., Sankarasivaraman, K., 2006. Ethnobotanical investiga-tions among tribes in Madurai district of Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Ethnobi-ology and Ethnomedicine 11, 2, http://www.ethnobiomed.com/content/2/1/25.

Ignacimuthu, S., Ayyanar, M., Sankarasivaraman, K., 2008. Ethno-botanical study ofmedicinal plants used by Paliyar tribals in Theni district of Tamil Nadu, India.Fitoterapia 79, 562–568.

International Plant Names Index, in press. International Plant Names Index, Onlinedatabase. Accessible at http://www.ipni.org.

Iwu, M.W., Duncan, A.R., Okunji, C.O., 1999. New antimicrobials of plant origin. In:Janick, J. (Ed.), Perspectives on New Crops and New Uses. ASHS Press, Alexandria,VA, pp. 457–462.

Janaki Ammal, E.K., Prasad, P.N., 1984. Ethnobotanical findings on Costus speciosusamong the Kanikkars of Tamil Nadu. Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany5, 129–133.

Khare, C.P., 2007. Indian Medicinal Plants, An Illustrated Dictionary. Springer Science+ Business Media LLC, 233 Spring street, New York, NY10013, USA, p. 836.

Kosalge, S.B., Fursule, R.A., 2009. Investigation of ethnomedicinal claims of someplants used by tribals of Satpuda Hills in India. Journal of Ethnopharmacology121, 456–461.

Lee, S., Xiao, C., Pei, S., 2008. Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants at peri-odic markets of Honghe Prefecture in Yunnan Province, SW China. Journal ofEthnopharmacology 117, 362–377.

Mahishi, P., Srinivasa, B.H., Shivanna, M.B., 2005. Medicinal plant wealth of localcommunities in some villages in Shimoga District of Karnataka, India. Journal ofEthnopharmacology 98, 307–312.

Manickam, V.S., Jothi, G.J., Murugan, C., Sundaresan, V., 2004. Check-list of the Floraof Tirunelveli Hills, Southern Western Ghats, India. Centre for Biodiversity andBiotechnology, St. Xavier’s College, Palayamkottai, India, pp. i–ii.

Matthew, K.M., 1983. The Flora of the Tamil Nadu Carnatic. The Rapinat Herbarium,3. St. Josephs College, Tiruchirapalli, India (p. lxxxiv, 2154).

Mukherjee, P.K., Maiti, K., Mukherjee, K., Houghton, P.J., 2006. Leads from Indianmedicinal plants with hypoglycemic potentials. Journal of Ethnopharmacology106, 1–28.

Muthu, C., Ayyanar, M., Raja, N., Ignacimuthu, S., 2006. Medicinal plants usedby traditional healers of Kancheepuram district of Tamil Nadu, India. Jour-nal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2, 43, http://www. ethnobiomed.com/content/2/1/43.

Namsa, N.D., Tag, H., Mandal, M., Kalita, P., Das, A.K., 2009. An ethnobotanical study oftraditional anti-inflammatory plants used by the Lohit community of ArunachalPradesh, India. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 125, 234–245.

Pandikumar, P., Chellappandian, M., Mutheeswaran, S., Ignacimuthu, S., 2011. Con-sensus of local knowledge on medicinal plants among traditional healers inMayiladumparai block of Theni District, Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Ethnophar-macology, doi:10.1016/j.jep.2010.12.027.

Pattanaik, C., Reddy, C.S., Murthy, M.S., 2008. An ethnobotanical survey of medicinalplants used by the Didayi tribe of Malkangiri district of Orissa, India. Fitoterapia79, 67–71.

Perumal Samy, R., Thwin, M.M., Gopalakrishnakone, P., Ignacimuthu, S., 2008. Eth-nobotanical survey of folk plants for the treatment of snakebites in Southernpart of Tamilnadu, India. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 115, 302–312.

Phillips, O., Gentry, A.H., Reynel, C., Wilkin, P., Galvez-Durand, B.C., 1994. Quan-titative ethnobotany and Amazonian conservation. Conservation Biology 8,225–248.

Poonam, K., Singh, G.S., 2009. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used by theTaungya community in Terai Arc Landscape, India. Journal of Ethnopharmacol-ogy 123, 167–176.

Prasad, N.P., Ranjit Singh, A.J.A., Narayanan, L.M., Natarajan, C.R., 1996. Ethnobotanyof Kanikkars of south Tamil Nadu. Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany12, 292–298.

Prasad, P.N., Jabadhas, A.W., Janaki Ammal, E.K., 1987. Medicinal plants used bythe Kanikkars of south India. Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany 11,149–155.

Purkayastha, J., Nath, S.C., Islam, M., 2005. Ethnobotany of medicinal plants fromDibru-Saikhowa biosphere reserve of Northeast India. Fitoterapia 76, 121–127.

Pushpangadan, P., 1988. ‘Arogyappacha’ (Trichopus zeylanicus): the ‘Ginseng’ of Kanitribes of Agasthiyar hills (Kerala) for evergreen health and vitality. Ancient Sci-ence of Life 8, 13–16.

Ragupathy, S., Newmaster, S.G., 2009. Valorizing the ‘Irulas’ traditional knowledgeof medicinal plants in the Kodiakkarai Reserve Forest, India. Journal of Ethnobi-ology and Ethnomedicine 5, 10, http://www.ethnobiomed.com/content/5/1/10.

Ragupathy, S., Steven, N.G., Maruthakkutti, M., Velusamy, B., Ul-Huda, M.M., 2008.Consensus of the ‘Malasars’ traditional aboriginal knowledge of medicinal plantsin the Velliangiri holy hills, India. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 4,8, http://www.ethnobiomed.com/content/4/1/8.

Rajakumar, N, Shivanna, M.B., 2009. Ethnomedicinal application of plants in the east-ern region of Shimoga District, Karnataka, India. Journal of Ethnopharmacology126, 64–73.

Rates, S.M.K., 2001. Plants as source of drugs. Toxicon 39, 603–613.Rokaya, M.B., Munzbergova, Z., Timsina, B., 2010. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal

plants from the Humla district of western Nepal. Journal of Ethnopharmacology130, 485–504.

Roosita, R., Kusharto, C.M., Sekiyama, M., Fachrurozi, Y., Ohtsuka, R., 2008. Medicinalplants used by the villagers of a Sundanese community in West Java, Indonesia.Journal of Ethnopharmacology 115, 72–81.

Savithramma, N., Sulochana, C., Rao, K.N., 2007. Ethnobotanical survey of plantsused to treat asthma in Andhra Pradesh, India. Journal of Ethnopharmacology113, 54–61.

Srithi, K., Balslev, H., Wangpakapattanawong, P., Srisanga, P., Trisonthi, C., 2009.Medicinal plant knowledge and its erosion among the Mien (Yao) in northernThailand. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 123, 335–342.

Ssegawa, P., Kasenene, J.M., 2007. Medicinal plant diversity and uses in the Sangobay area, Southern Uganda. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 113, 521–540.

Tabuti, J.R.S., Lye, K.A., Dhillion, S.S., 2003. Traditional herbal drugs of Bulamogi,Uganda: plants, use and administration. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 88,19–44.

Tabuti, J.R.S, Kukunda, C.B., Waako, P.J., 2010. Medicinal plants used by traditionalmedicine practitioners in the treatment of tuberculosis and related ailments inUganda. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 127, 130–136.

Teklehaymanot, T., Giday, M., Medhin, G., Mekonnen, Y., 2007. Knowledge and use ofmedicinal plants by people around Debre Libanos monastery in Ethiopia. Journalof Ethnopharmacology 111, 271–283.

Thyagarajan, S.P., Jayaram, S., Gopalakrishnan, V., Hari, R., Jeyakumar, P., Sripathi,M.S., 2002. Herbal medicines for liver diseases in India. Journal of Gastroen-terology and Hepatology 17, S370–S376.

Trotter, R.T., Logan, M.H., 1986. Informants consensus: a new approach for iden-tifying potentially effective medicinal plants. In: Etkin, N.L. (Ed.), Plants inIndigenous Medicine and Diet. Redgrave Publishing Company, Bedford Hill, NY,pp. 91–112.

Tushar, Basak, S., Sarma, G.C., Rangan, L., 2010. Ethnomedical uses of Zingiberaceousplants of Northeast India. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 132, 286–296.

Uniyal, S.K., Singh, K.N., Jamwal, P., Lal, B., 2006. Traditional use of medicinal plantsamong the tribal communities Chhota, Western Himalaya. Journal of Ethnobi-ology and Ethnomedicine 2, 14, http://www.ethnobiomed.com/content/2/1/14.

Upadhyay, B., Parveen, Dhaker, A.K., Kumar, A., 2010. Ethnomedicinal andethnopharmaco-statistical studies of Eastern Rajasthan, India. Journal ofEthnopharmacology 129, 64–86.

Viswanathan, M.B., Premkumar, E.H., Ramesh, N., 2001. Ethnomedicines of Kanis inKalakad Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, Tamil Nadu. Ethnobotany 13, 60–66.