authoritarian and democratic data science in an experimenting society

91
Authoritarian & Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society MIT CMS/W, Feb 16, 2017 @natematias natematias.com civic.mit.edu /users/natematias J. Nathan Matias

Upload: natematias

Post on 22-Jan-2018

236 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Authoritarian & Democratic

Data Science in an

Experimenting SocietyMIT CMS/W, Feb 16, 2017

@natematias

natematias.com

civic.mit.edu/users/natematias

J. Nathan Matias

Page 2: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society
Page 3: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society
Page 4: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

McMillen, Andrew. Wikipedia Is Not

Therapy: How the online encyclopedia

manages mental illness and suicide

threats in its volunteer community.

Backchannel. Illustration by Laurent Hrybyk

Page 5: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Goldman, Adam. (2016). The Comet Ping Pong Gunman Answers Our Reporter’s Questions. New

York Times

Page 6: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Report to Law Enforcement

Report to reddit Platform

Report to Community Moderators

Up-Vote or Down-Vote

Page 7: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

negative feedback leads to significant

behavioral changes that are detrimental to

the community.

Not only do authors of negatively-evaluated

content contribute more, but also their future

posts are of lower quality, and are

perceived by the community as such.

Cheng, J., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C. & Leskovec, J. (2014). How Community Feedback Shapes User

Behavior. ICWSM 2014.

Page 8: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Downvote

Button

No

Downvote

Button

Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2012). Field experiments: Design, analysis, and interpretation. WW Norton.

Page 9: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Experiments Per Day on bing.com

Kohavi, R., Deng, A., Frasca, B., Walker, T., Xu, Y., & Pohlmann, N. (2013, August). Online controlled

experiments at large scale. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on

Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1168-1176). ACM.

Page 10: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Geiger, S. (2015). Does facebook have civil servants? On governmentality and computational social

science. In Workshop on Ethics for Studying Sociotechnical Systems in a Big Data World. Vancouver,

British Columbia, Canada.

academic and industry researchers who

work for institutions that build and operate our

digitally mediated public spaces are either

directly doing governance work themselves

or building systems that have been delegated

governance work.

In this sense, researchers can be said to

form a core part of the elite civil service

and bureaucratic corps of our era

Page 11: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society
Page 12: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

MacKinnon, R. (2012). Consent of the networked: The worldwide struggle for Internet freedom.

Basic Books

Companies act as the new sovereigns of

cyberspace… most companies’ failure to take

responsibility for their power over citizens’

political lives, and their lack of

accountability in the exercise of that

power, corrodes the Internet’s democratic

potential

Page 13: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

AUTHORITARIAN

& DEMOCRATIC

DATA SCIENCE

in an Experimenting

Society

Page 14: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society
Page 15: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

MANAGEMENT

&

POLICY

Page 16: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Tiziana Terranova (2000) Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy. Social Text

the Internet is about the extraction of value

out of continuous, updateable work

[consumption & production of culture]

[….]

Such means of production need to be

cultivated by encouraging the worker to

participate in a culture of exchange, whose

flows are mainly kept within the company

Page 17: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Prahalad, C. K., and Venkat Ramaswamy. 2004. Co-Creation Experiences: The next Practice in Value

Creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing 18 (3): 5–14.

the market is becoming a forum for

conversations

managers need to invest in building new

infrastructure capabilities, as well as new

functional and governance capabilities

Page 18: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of “platforms.” New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364.

[platform] choices about what can appear,

how it is organized, how it is monetized, what

can be removed and why, and what the

technical architecture allows and prohibits, are

all real and substantive interventions into

the contours of public discourse.

Page 19: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society
Page 20: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

JoAnne Yates (1989) Control Through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management.

Johns Hopkins University Press

Systematic management attempted to

improve control over–and thus the efficiency

of–managers, workers, materials, and

production processes

Page 21: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

JoAnne Yates (1989) Control Through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management.

Johns Hopkins University Press

Management

Theories for

Scaled

Operations

Growth in

Scale &

Complexity of

Industry

Comm & Info

Technology

Page 22: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

JoAnne Yates (1989) Control Through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management.

Johns Hopkins University Press

Systematicall

y-Defined

Roles

Stopwatch

Page 23: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Frank Bunker Gilbreth and Lillian M. Gilbreth (1910-1924) Original films of Frank & Lillian Gilbreth.

Source: Prelinger Archives, via Wikimedia Commons

Page 24: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

JoAnne Yates (1989) Control Through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management.

Johns Hopkins University Press

Performance

Monitoring

Statistics

Systematicall

y-Defined

Roles

Stopwatch

Page 25: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Chandler Jr, A. D. (1977). The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business.

Harvard University Press.

For the middle and top managers, control

through statistics quickly became both a

science and an art. This need for accurate

information led to the devising of improved

methods for collecting, collating, and

analyzing a wide variety of data generated

by the day-to-day operations of the enterprise.

Page 26: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

16" Barbette Carriage Model 1919. Watertown Arsenal. Source: Watertown Free Library

Page 27: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Valentine, R. (1916). The progressive relation between efficiency and consent. Bulletin of Taylor

Society, 2(1)

Page 28: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Valentine, R. (1916). The progressive relation between efficiency and consent. Bulletin of Taylor

Society, 2(1)

A free man—a consenting man— is the more

desirable worker…

organized consent as well as individual

consent is the basis of a more efficient

group.

…build up a finer texture of democracy

through self-training groups, constantly growing

in strength through the consideration of

scientifically-accurate data.

Page 29: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Marshall, Edward. (1913) Industrial Psychologist’ to Prevent Labor Troubles. The New York Times,

April 27, 1913: Magazine Section Part Five, 11

Page 30: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Adolf Hitler delivers a speech at the Kroll Opera House,

Dec 11, 1941. Image source: Wikimedia Commons

Page 31: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Lewin, K. (1944). The dynamics of group action. Educational Leadership, 1(4), 195–200.

Efficient democracy means

organization, but it means

organization and leadership on

different principles than

autocracy.

It is essential that a

democratic commonwealth

and its educational system

apply the rational procedures

of scientific investigation to

its own processes of group

living.

Kurt Lewin. Image source: Wikipedia

Page 32: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Burnes, B. (2007). Kurt Lewin and the Harwood Studies The Foundations of OD. The Journal of Applied

Behavioral Science, 43(2), 213-231.

continue

autocratic

management

Harwood Pajama Factory Experiments

• Increasing Productivity

• Reducing Employee Turnover

workers

discuss &

vote

on

management

changes

Page 33: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Wikimedia CommonsCoch, L., & French, J. (1948). Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations, 1, 512–532.

Page 34: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Intervention

Design

Goal

Setting &

Variable

Definition

Analysis &

Interpretatio

n

Group

Discussions

Group

Votes

Marrow, A. J. (1977). The Practical Theorist: The Life and Work of Kurt Lewin. Pubn Dev Co.

Page 35: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Adelman, C. (1993). Kurt Lewin and the origins of action research. Educational action research, 1(1),

7-24.

the residents of the affected community

must be involved in the research process

from the beginning

Page 36: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

we will build the Great Society. It is a

Society where no child will go unfed,

and no youngster will go unschooled

Johnson, Lyndon. 323 -

Remarks in Athens at Ohio

University. May 7, 1964

Image source: Wikipedia: First Lady

Lady Bird Johnson visits a Head

Start class in 1966

Page 37: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

US National Security Agency System/360 85 Console in 1971. Image source: NSA via Wikimedia Commons

Page 38: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Campbell, D. T. (1998). The experimenting society. In The experimenting society: Essays in honor of

Donald T. Campbell (p. 35). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

Can the open society be an

experimenting society?

Page 39: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Popper, K. (1947). The open society and its enemies. Routledge.

Closed Societies

“the learned should rule”

Open Societies

the public evaluates &

criticizes government

“so that bad or

incompetent rulers can

be prevented from doing

too much damage”

Page 40: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Popper, K. (1947). The open society and its enemies. Routledge.

the social engineer conceives as the

scientific basis of politics something like a

social technology

the Utopian engineer will have to be deaf to

many complaints ; in fact, it will be part of his

business to suppress unreasonable

objections. But with it, he must invariably

suppress reasonable criticism also

Page 41: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Popper, K. (1947). The open society and its enemies. Routledge.

The piecemeal engineer will, accordingly,

adopt the method of searching for, and

fighting against, the greatest and most

urgent evils of society…

There will be a possibility of reaching a

reasonable compromise and therefore of

achieving the improvement by democratic

methods.

Page 42: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Image source: Wikipedia: First Lady

Lady Bird Johnson visits a Head

Start class in 1966

Page 43: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Williams, W., & Evans, J. W. (1969). The Politics of Evaluation: The Case of Head Start. The ANNALS

of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 385(1), 118–132

the absolute power of analysis was

oversold

the conflicts in the system between the

analytical staff and the operators of the

programs was underestimated.

Page 44: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Williams, W. (1971). Social Policy Research and Analysis: The Experience in the Federal Social

Agencies. American Elsevier Publishing Company.

Discard

Neutrality

Government Social

Scientists Should

Propose

Policy

Manage

Policies

Advocate

for Policy

Page 45: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

RESEARCH is

DESIGN

& we can

REDESIGN our

METHODS to follow

DEMOCRATIC VALUES

Page 46: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Campbell, D. T. (1998). The experimenting society. In The experimenting society: Essays in honor of

Donald T. Campbell (p. 35). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

Participation in policy experiments is more

akin to participating in democratic political

decision making than to participating in the

psychology laboratory. These restrictions all

have costs in the validity of experimental

inference.

the task of first priority for the methodologists

of the experimenting society is to design

experimental arrangements that obviate

these difficulties

Page 47: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Campbell, D. T. (1998). The experimenting society. In The experimenting society: Essays in honor of

Donald T. Campbell (p. 35). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

The Contagious Cross-Validation Model for

Local Programs…

national funding would support adoptions that

included locally designed cross-validating

evaluations…

Page 48: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Campbell, D. T. (1998). The experimenting society. In The experimenting society: Essays in honor of

Donald T. Campbell (p. 35). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

it is those who have situation-specific

information who make the best critics, and

the best judges, of the plausibility of most of

the rival hypotheses…

we must provide these nonprofessional

observers with the self-confidence and

opportunity to publicly disagree with the

conclusions of the professional applied social

scientists.

Page 49: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society
Page 50: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

JoAnne Yates (1989) Control Through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management.

Johns Hopkins University Press

Management

Theories for

Scaled

Operations

Growth in

Scale &

Complexity

Comm & Info

Technology

Page 51: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Geiger, S. (2015). Does facebook have civil servants? On governmentality and computational social

science. In Workshop on Ethics for Studying Sociotechnical Systems in a Big Data World. Vancouver,

British Columbia, Canada.

In this sense, researchers can be said to

form a core part of the elite civil service

and bureaucratic corps of our era

Page 52: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Most Policy

& Platform

Experiments

Arnstein, Sherry R. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of

Planners 35 (4): 216–24.

Page 53: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

MacKinnon, R. (2012). Consent of the networked: The worldwide struggle for Internet freedom.

Basic Books

Companies act as the new sovereigns of

cyberspace… most companies’ failure to take

responsibility for their power over citizens’

political lives, and their lack of

accountability in the exercise of that

power, corrodes the Internet’s democratic

potential

Page 54: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

civilservant.io

Page 55: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Laws Platform

Policies

Community

Policies

Page 56: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Logo images via Wikipedia

conference hosts

moderators

community leaders

administrators

moderators

moderators

admins

enforcement united

Page 57: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

52k subreddit

communities

200m monthly

visitors

148k moderator

rolesJuly 2015

Page 58: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Most Platforms

& Users

Online

Communities

Arnstein, Sherry R. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of

Planners 35 (4): 216–24.

Page 59: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

13.5 million subscribers1,200+ moderator roles

989 newcomers/day77 discussions per day

Page 60: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society
Page 61: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

0 1250 2500 3750 5000

Remove Post

Approve Post

Remove Comment

Approve Comment

Ban User

Unban User

Revise Wiki

Recategorize Post

Automated Systems Humans

8,298 Moderation Actions, May 23 - 29, 2016

Page 62: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Does making participants aware of rules

by posting them increase norm-

compliance of first-time commenters?

Page 63: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

• Design Experiments

• Coordinate Policy

Interventions

• Monitor Outcomes

• Estimate Experimental Results

Civil ServantCommunity-Led Field Experiments in

Community Governance Online

Page 64: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Civil ServantCommunity-Led Field Experiments in

Community Governance Online

Page 65: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

x Only routine interventions

x No high risk communities

(markets, mental health)

x No groups that organize

to harm others

Civil ServantCommunity-Led Field Experiments in

Community Governance Online

Page 66: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Open Archive of

Moderation Studies

Community

Experiments

Civil ServantCommunity-Led Field Experiments in

Community Governance Online

Page 67: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Community

Suggests

Study

Refine

Study

Designs

Deploy Experiment

With Community

Interpret

Results

Debrief

Participants

Debate Policy

Decisions

Publish &

Replicate

Process for Community Experiments

CivilServant.io

Page 68: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

New Sticky Comment

Ask-Me-Anything Sticky Comment

Page 69: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Matias, J. N. (2016) Posting Rules in Online Discussions Prevents Problems & Increases

Participation. CivilServant

“Sticking” a Rule Comment to Threads

Increased a Newcomer’s Probability of

Posting a First Comment Within the Rules

Page 70: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Posting the rules increases the incidence

rate of newcomer comments by 38.1% on

average.

If the community adopts sticky comments,

they could prevent 1,838 people a month

from engaging in unacceptable behavior.

They would also gain 9,631 new

commenters per month, on average.

Matias, J. N. (2016) Posting Rules in Online Discussions Prevents Problems & Increases

Participation. CivilServant

Page 71: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

13.7 million subscribers70+ moderator roles

23 tabloid discussions per day

/r/worldnews

Page 72: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

[Misleading Title] Bavaria passes new law to

make migrants respect ‘dominant’ local

culture

[Misleading Title | Not Appropriate Subreddit]

Spanish Terror Attack: Gunman enters

supermarket, shouts Allahu Akbar

[Editorialized Title] A last kiss for mama:

Jihadi parents bid young daughters

goodbye… before one walks into a

Damascus police station and is blown up

by remote detonator

Matias, J. N. (2016) Posting Rules in Online Discussions Prevents Problems & Increases

Participation. CivilServant

Page 73: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Unreliable News

Submitted

Suggest Fact-

Checking

reddit

Algorithms

Notice

Algorithms

Promote

Unreliable

News?

People

Fact-Check

Articles

Page 74: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Can we increase the rate that commenters

question unreliable news without

making unreliable news trend on social

media algorithms?

Page 75: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society
Page 76: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Pre

dic

ted

In

cid

en

ce o

f C

om

men

ts W

ith

Lin

ks

Encouraging Fact-Checking Causes Unreliable News

To Receive 2x More Comments with Links on Average Tabloid links in r/worldnews receive a 2.01 to 2.03x increase in the number of comments including

links to further evidence when moderators use sticky comments to encourage fact-checking.

Source: J. Nathan Matias, MIT Media Lab. Experiment by r/worldnews, 11/27/2016 – 1/20/2017

n = 840 posts from sites that moderators consider tabloids, 2.4% of submissions on average.

This negative binomial model predicts incidence rates; the effect is larger for more popular posts.

Fact-checking: p = 0.0083. Fact-checking + Voting: p = 0.0073 *** p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0.05

For full details on the findings, which were not yet peer reviewed by Jan 2017, see civilservant.io

1.44**

0.71

1.46**

No Action

Taken

Suggest Fact-

Checking

Suggest Fact-

Checking & Voting

Page 77: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Encouraging Fact-Checking Causes Unreliable News

To Be Promoted Less by reddit’s Algorithms on AverageTabloid links in r/worldnews receive a 2.04x reduction in the scores that shape reddit’s rankings

when moderators encouraged fact-checking, but not when they also suggested voting

Source: J. Nathan Matias, MIT Media Lab. Experiment by r/worldnews, 12/07/2016 – 1/20/2017

n = 696 posts from sites that moderators consider tabloids, 2.4% of submissions on average.

The reddit algorithms use the “score” to determine the ranking of a link. On average, between

links of similar age, the submission with a higher score will be ranked more highly.

This negative binomial model predicts incidence rates; the effect is larger for more popular posts.

Fact-checking intervention p = 0.000562. Voting p = 0.198 *** p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0.05

For full details on the findings, which were not yet peer reviewed by Jan 2017, see civilservant.io

50.56***

103.07

134.37

No Action

Taken

Suggest Fact-

Checking

Suggest Fact-

Checking & Voting

Pre

dic

ted

Sco

re I

ncid

en

ce R

ate

Aft

er

24 h

rs

Page 78: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Community Discussion

Page 79: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Community Discussion

Policy Discussion:

What if lack of conflict & increased participation is bad?

Can this cause censorship if taken to an extreme?

How generalizable is this to other subs?

Intervention Design:

I imagine the wording is extremely important.

Page 80: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Community Discussion

Personal Stories of Outliers:

I don't think I've ever read any subreddit's rules ever.

Experiment Design & Implications:

I bet that the rules comment increases participation

because it makes it say “(1 comment)” on the forum

index so people click the link to read the comment

Page 81: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Community Discussion

Research Ethics:

Did you get the informed consent?

[IRBs] have no authority, legal or ethical, to make

decisions about consent.

you're objecting to this study as an excuse to critique

the moderators

Page 82: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Open Archive of

Moderation Studies

Community

Experiments

CivilServantCommunity-Led Field Experiments in

Community Governance Online

Page 83: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society
Page 84: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society
Page 85: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Data Sampled July 2015

15,300

1,795Eligible Communities

3,000 + comments/month

Moderator Roles

How Far Might Community Experiments

Scale on the reddit Platform?

Page 86: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society
Page 87: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

RESEARCH is

DESIGN

& we can

REDESIGN our

METHODS to follow

DEMOCRATIC VALUES

Page 88: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

civilservant.io

Page 89: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Ethan ZuckermanAssociate Professor of the Practice

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Elizabeth Levy PaluckAssociate Professor, Department of Psychology

Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University

Tarleton GillespiePrincipal Researcher

Microsoft Research

Merry MouM.Eng Student

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Page 90: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Elinor OstromAnne Oakley Donna Haraway

Catherine Squires Ellen Swallow Richards

Page 91: Authoritarian and Democratic Data Science in an Experimenting Society

Authoritarian & Democratic

Data Science in an

Experimenting SocietyMIT CMS/W, Feb 16, 2017

@natematias

natematias.com

civic.mit.edu/users/natematias

J. Nathan Matias