asymmetric organocatalysis by chiral br ø nsted acids : focus on chiral phosphoric acids
DESCRIPTION
Asymmetric Organocatalysis By Chiral Br ø nsted Acids : Focus on Chiral Phosphoric Acids Maryon Ginisty Pr. A.B. Charette Literature Meeting - November 6 th , 2007. Organocatalysis: an Old Story…. « Acceleration of chemical reactions through the addition of a substoechiometric - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Asymmetric Organocatalysis
By Chiral Brønsted Acids :
Focus on Chiral Phosphoric Acids
Maryon Ginisty
Pr. A.B. CharetteLiterature Meeting - November 6th, 2007
Role in the formation of prebiotic key building blocks, such as sugars
Introduction and spread of homochirality in living organisms.
Enantiomerically enriched amino acids L-Alanine and L-Isovaline: Present up to 15 % ee in carbonaceous meteorites Catalysis of dimerization of glycal and aldol-type reaction between glycal and formaldehyde.
Term introduced in 1900 by Ostwald 1 to distinguish small organic molecules-mediated reactions from enzymatic or inorganic catalyzed reactions.
Organocatalysis: an Old Story…
« Acceleration of chemical reactions through the addition of a substoechiometric quantity of an organic compound which does not contain a metal atom »
OHO
OHOH
H
O
H
+ Sugar derivatives
1) Ostwald W. Z. Phys. Chem. 1900, 32, 509.
+
NMe
NH (7 mol%)
MeOH/ H2O
99 %
O
O
Bn
Ph
CHO +
CHO
Ph
exo
93 % ee
endo
93 % ee
1904-1908 First publications= Desymmetrization of prochiral substrates by alkaloids1,2
1932 Early treatise on « organic catalysis » : reaction mechanism, kinetics and catalyst optimization for amine-catalyzed decarboxylations3
2000-2006 Increase in publications containing the words « organocatalysis »,« organocatalytic » or « organocatalyst »
LIST - Cross-aldol reactions between acetone and different aldehydes catalyzed by the simple proline4
MacMILLAN- Diels-Alder reactions activated by chiral imidazolidinium salts5
Organocatalysis: Development and Fast Evolution
1) Marckwald W. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1904, 37, 349. 2) Bredig G.; Fajans K. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1908, 41, 752. 3) Langenbeck W. Angew. Chem. 1932, 45, 97. 4) List B.; Lerner A.; Barbas III C. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2395. 5) Ahrendt K. A.; Borths C. J.; MacMillan D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4243.
+
O O NH
CO2H
(30 mol%)
DMSO/ acetone
97 %
O OH
96 % ee
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Year
Nu
mb
er o
f p
ub
licat
ion
s
Scope Typical transition metal-mediated coupling reactions: Suzuki, Sonogashira, Ullmann, Heck-type and Tsuji-Trost reactions
Organocatalysis Features Evolved essentially from the ligand chemistry of organometallic reactions
The most effective organocatalysts are ligands developed for metal-mediated enantioselective catalytic reactions.
More closely related to enzyme- or antibody-catalyzed reactions than to organometallic processes.
The organocatalysts often show some characteristic features of bioorganic reactions (e.g. Michaelis-Menten kinetics)
Organocatalysis: Reaction Characteristics
H
N
CN
NF3C
O
1/ Catalyst, toluene,TBSCN
2/ TFAA
O
M
N
R R'
O
R''
linker 1amino acid linker 2 N
R R'
N
M
O
R''
tridentate Schif f
base complexNH
OHN
O
NH
NH
O
R2
N
HO
tBu tBu
5
R2
Library Size : 12 Compounds
Metal (M)
M None Ti Mn Fe Ru Co Cu Zn Gd Nd Yb Eu
ee (%) 19 4 5 10 13 0 9 1 2 3 0 5
Conversion (%) 59 30 61 69 63 68 55 91 95 84 94 34
Organocatalysis: a New Orientation of Organometallic Processes
Sigman M. S.; Jacobsen E. N.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 4901.
Organocatalysis: Evidence of Lewis Acid Efficiency
CCl3CO2H
Hexanes or Benzene
+
O
O
O
Wasserman A. J. Chem. Soc. 1942, 618.
Brønsted Acid Catalysis
Lewis Acid Catalysis
AlCl3
Benzene, 1 h 30
+ O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O+
HOH5C6
Yates P.; Eaton P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 4436.
« Third order reaction »
≈ 3200 x increase
Metal Lewis Acid
Product InhibitionStrong bonding between LA and basic sites
Limited use in aqueous media
Stoichiometric amountdue to presence of a basic moietyon the product that binds the LA
High priceToxicity
Product contamination
Difficult to immobilize onpolymers or other stationary
phases for easier catalyst removaland flow processes without washout
Lewis Acids vs Brønsted Acids: Application to Asymmetric Catalysis
Metal-free catalysis through hydrogen bonding interactions offers attractive alternatives to metal-catalyzed reactions.
Lewis Acids vs Brønsted Acids: Application to Asymmetric Catalysis
M
Y
YY
Y
X
H
X
A L**L
X XMetal Lewis Acid Brønsted Acid
Y = O, P, N, S or Y4 = diene
Organizational role of the metal by translating chiral information and activating the reagents
Multiple coordination opportunities available
Catalytic activity relative to the formation of a donor-acceptor complex
Tunable electronic properties between electron-deficient metal sites and excess electron densities Tunable steric parameters
TS formed by passive interactions (hydrophobic, VDW, electrostatic…) or dynamic interactions (between cata--lysts and substrates at the reaction centers)
One valence orbital and spherical symmetry
Catalytic activity relative to the establishment of anionic hydrogen bond (1-6 kcal/ mol)
Supramolecular design required for steric control: formation of rigid three-dimensional structures
Contribution to affinity and selectivity of molecular recognition
Brønsted Acids : Powerful Catalysts for Addition Reactions to C=O, C=C and C=N Double Bonds
R1 H
XH Y
X = O, NR2R1 H
XH
Y
R1 H
XH
YH
Y
Brønsted acid catalysisSingle hydrogen bonding Double hydrogen bonding
Monofunctional and bifunctional thiourea catalysts
TADDOL derivatives
BINOL derivatives
Phosphoric acids
Diene Dienophile Temp. (°C)
Time % Product Formation Product(s)
Without BWith B
(mol. equiv. B)
r.t.10
min3 90 (0.4)
r.t.30
min10 76 (0.4)
55 2 h 16 97 (0.5)
55 45 h 21 95 (0.5)
55 48 h 5 60 (0.5)
55 120 h 7 10 (0.5)
Early Bidentate Catalysts
OHOH
X X
X= H, NO2
OHOH
NO2 NO2
A
B
Applications in Diels-Alder Reactions
CH3
O
H
O
H
O
H3C
H
O
H3C
H
O
H3C
CH3
O
COCH3
CHO
CH3
CHO
CHO
CH3
H3C
H3C CHO
CH3
H3C
H3C CO2CH3
Kelly T. R.; Meghani P.; Ekkundi V. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 3381.
Entry Solvent Additive trans/ cis (yield, %)
1 benzene - 2.5/ 1 (60)
2 DCM - 5.5/ 1 (62)
3 EtOH - 4.9/ 1 (87)
4 AcOH - 6.7/ 1 (51)
5 CF3CH2OH - 8.1/ 1 (83)
6 benzene A (0.2 equiv) 3.7/ 1 (57)
7 benzene A (0.6 equiv) 5.8/ 1 (72)
8 benzene A (1.0 equiv) 7.0/ 1 (81)
Early Bidentate Catalysts
Applications in Allylation Reactions of Phenylseleno Sulfoxide
NO2NO2
O O
C3H7C3H7
H HO
OH H
O OHH
trans/ cis : 6 .6/ 1
SSePh
O
SnBu3 S
O
S
O
+
S
O
trans cis
NO2
N
H
O
N
H
NO2
C8H17O2C CO2C8H17
O
S
H
1 Severance D. L.; Jorgensen W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10966. 2 Curran D. P.; Kuo L. H. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 3259.
A :
Jorgensen’s hydration model
Bidentate Catalysts : a Short Lineage
R2R2
O O
R1R1
H HX
RR
R1
N
H
X
N
H
R1
R2 R2
X
RR
a : R1 = NO2, R2 = H, X = O
Etter urea catalyst
b : R1 = R2 = CF3, X = S
Schreiner thiourea catalyst
RN
O
N N
StBuMe
N
OCOtBu
HO
tBu
H HX
RR
1990
1994-2003
1998
T. R. KellyP. R. Scheiner
M. C. EtterD. P. Curran
E. N. Jacobsen
1 Etter M. C.; Reutzel S. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 2586. 2 Schreiner P. R.; Wittkopp A. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 217.
Catalysis by Hydrogen Bond
Monofunctional Thiourea and Urea Catalysts
Asymmetric hydrocyanation of N-allyl- or N-benzylaldimines (Strecker reaction)
HCN, toluene, -78°C
85-99 % (70-99 % ee)
R1 R2
N R3R1 = alkyl, arylR2 = H, MeR3 = aryl, alkyl, heteroatom
R1
R2
HN R3
CN
1c (1 mol%)
High degree of generalityHigh enantioselectivity
RN
O
NH
NH
YtBuMe
N
X
HO
tBu1a : R = Bn, X = OCOtBu, Y = O
1b : R = Bn, X = tBu, Y = O
1c : R = Me, X = OCOtBu, Y = S
Vachal P.; Jacobsen E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10012.
Michaelis-Menten kinetics 1st order dependance on catalyst and HCN Saturation kinetics with respect to the imine
Reversible formation of an imine-catalyst complex
Synthesis of a series of analogues of the catalyst Only urea protons essential for catalytic activity
NMR studies of a model solution of a ketoimine derivative Downfield shift of the Z-imine methyl group exclusively Interaction between catalyst and Z-isomer
Me
N
PMB
E: Z = 20: 1
TBS > TMS
Better reactivity
and catalyst loading
Entry R imine Catalyst Temp. (°C) Yield (%) ee (%)
1 Ph 1a (10 mol%) r.t. 92 47
2 Ph 1b (5 mol%) r.t. 93 68
3 Ph 1b (5 mol%) -40 90 91
4 Ph 1c (5 mol%) -40 95 97
Catalysis by Hydrogen Bond
Asymmetric Mannich-type reaction of N-Boc aldimines with silylketene acetals
Goal Catalyst capable of activating imines toward nucleophilic attack, yet resistant to inhibition by the strongly Lewis-basic amine products
68-98 % ee
R H
NBoc
NH
+OR'
OTBS 1/ 1b (5 mol%), toluene
2/ TFA R
Boc
OR'
O
BnN
O
NH
NH
XtBuR1
N
R2
HO
tBu
1a : R1 = H, R2 = OCOtBu, X = O
1b : R1 = H, R2 = OCOtBu, X = S
1c : R1 = Me, R2 = tBu, X = S
Wenzel A. G.; Jacobsen E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12964.
R’ = Me → Et → iPr
reaction rate
R’ = tBu
ee (51 %)
Monofunctional Thiourea and Urea Catalysts
N N
S
F3C
CF3 CF3
CF3
H HO
HPh
N N
S
F3C
CF3 CF3
CF3
H HO
R3N
O
H H
NN
Ar
S
Ph
HOHHN
NS
Ar
R3N
N N
S
F3C
CF3 CF3
CF3
H HO
H
Ph
O
R3N
O
Ph
OH
R
R3N + 1b
ArAr
33-99%, 22-61 % ee
R H
O
OH
+(40 mol%) R
O
F3C
CF3
HN NH
S
HN
S
HN CF3
CF3
O
amine, neat, r.t., 72 h - 120 h
Catalysis by Hydrogen Bond
Monofunctional Thiourea Catalysts
Baylis-Hillman reaction
1a : X = O
1b : X = S
NH
NH
X
F3C
CF3 CF3
CF3
Sohtome Y.; Tanatami A.; Hashimoto Y.; Nagasawa K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 5589.
NMR studies
Interaction of the thiourea 1b
with both the enone and aldehyde
1b involved in 2 steps of the
BH reaction
Hetero-Michael reaction
Aldol reaction
Aldehyde Yield (%)ee (%)
88 33
38 30
88 19
99 33
63 60
72 90
Catalysis by Hydrogen Bond
Bifunctional Thiourea Catalysts
33 - 99 % (19 - 90 % ee)
R H
O
OH
+A (40 mol%) R
O O
DMAP , neat, -5 °C, 72 h
NH
NH
S
CF3
CF3NHS
NH
CF3
F3C
A
Sohtome Y.; Tanatami A.; Hashimoto Y.; Nagasawa K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 5589.
H
O
H
OCF3
H
O
F3C
H
O
CH3(CH2)5
H
O
H
O
F3C
O
H H
NN
Ar
S
Ph
HOH
HN
NS
Ar
R3N
O
R
OH
R
Baylis-Hillman Reaction
Nagasawa’s Catalyst
Catalysis by Hydrogen Bond
Bifunctional Thiourea Catalysts
Michael Reactions of Malonates to Nitroolefines
Ph+ R'O2C CO2R'
catalyst, toluene, r.t.
Ph
R'O2C
NO2
NO2
CO2R'
O
NH
NH
StBu
NMe2
F3C
CF3
Okino T.; Hoashi Y.; Furukawa T.; Xu X.; Takemoto Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 119.McCooey S. H.; Connon S. J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6367.Ye J.; Dixon D. J.; Hynes P. S. Chem. Commun. 2005, 4481.
X
O
N N
StBu
NH H
O ON
Ph
R2R1
HO
EtO OEt
O
Takemoto : R’ = Et72-99 % yield, 81-93 % ee
NH
NH
S N
Et
N
MeO
H
CF3
F3C
Connon : R’ = Me75-99 % ee
(10 mol%)
(2-5 mol%)
O
NH
NH
StBu
F3C
CF3
N
Et
N
MeO
H
Dixon : R’ = Me82-97 % ee
(10 mol%)
Takemoto’s Transition State
9
8
R Yield (%) ee (%)
Ph 92 47
4-MeOC6H4 93 68
4-MeC6H4 90 91
2-thienyl 95 97
Me 70 98
nBu 78 95
Catalysis by Hydrogen Bond
Bifunctional Thiourea Catalysts
Michael Reactions of Ketones to Nitroolefines
Huang H.; Jacobsen E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7170.
R+
A (10 mo%), PhCO2H (10 mol%),
toluene, r. t.NO2
NO2
O
RO
BnN
O
NH
NH
StBuMe
NH2
A
R+ R2
Catalyst
toluene, r. t.NO2
O
R1
O2NR2
O
R1
R
O2NMe
O
Me
Ph
O2N(CH2)4CH3
O
Me
Ph
97 % ee, 2: 1 rr,15: 1 dr, 53 % y
(+ regioisomer: 95 % ee, 25 % y)
98 % ee, > 30: 1 rr,20: 1 dr, 50 % y
O2N
OPh
O2N
O
97 % ee, > 30: 1 rr,71 % y
(+ r% ee, 25 % y)
96 % ee, 4: 1 rr,50 % y
O2N
O
97 % ee, > 30: 1 rr,56 % y
BnN
O
N N
StBuMe
HNH HO2N
R
R2
R1
BnN
O
N N
StBuMe
HNH HO2N
R
R2
R1Disfavored E-enamine
Favored Z-enamine
= poor catalysts
⇒ hydrogen bond crucial for the catalysis
O
O
O
O
OMe
O
O
O
O
70 %, > 99 : 1 er 68 %, 97 : 3 er 69 %, > 99 : 1 er 97 %, 97 : 3 er
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O Ph
68 %, 97 : 3 er 67 %, 96 : 4 er 64 %, 93 : 7 er 52 %, 97 : 3 er
CF3O
Catalysis by Hydrogen Bond
TADDOL Derived Catalysts
O
O
OH
Ar Ar
OH
Ar Ar
Ar = naphtylTMSO
NMe2
+ HR
O
A (20 mol%)
toluene, - 78 °C or - 40 °C
O
TMSO
NMe2
R
Ac-Cl,
DCM / toluene- 78 °C, 15 min
O
O R
Huang Y.; Unni A. K.; Thadini A. N.; Rawal V. H. Nature 2003, 424, 146.
Without A : no reaction
O
O
OMe
Ar Ar
OH
Ar Ar
O
O
OEt
Ar Ar
OEt
Ar Ar
A
Catalysis by Hydrogen Bond
TADDOL Derived Catalysts
Ar =
CH3
CH3
F
OH
OH
Ar Ar
ArAr
Unni A. K.; Takenaka N.; Yamamoto H.; Rawal V. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1336.
TBSO
NMe2
+ HR
O
BAMOL (20 mol%)
toluene, - 78 °C or - 40 °C
O
TBSO
NMe2
RAc-Cl,
DCM / toluene- 78 °C, 15 min
O
O R
BAMOL
Axial Chirality
Tweak of the chiral environment
O
O
O
O
70 %, > 98 % ee84 %, 98 % ee
69 %, > 98 % ee67 %, 97 % ee
O
O
O
O
O
67 %, > 92 % ee96 %, > 99 % ee
64 %, > 86 % ee99 %, 84 % ee
1 : 1 association between BAMOL and PhCHOPresence of an intramolecular H-bondPresence of an intermolecular H-bond to the carbonyl O of PhCHO
TADDOL Catalysis: C=O activation through a single-point H-bond
Ar = Ph
OH O
Ph
88 % (90 %ee)
OH O
72 % (96 %ee)
OH O
71 % (96 %ee)
OH O
82 % (95 %ee)
OH O
40 % (67 %ee)
OH O
O
O
70 % (92 %ee)
OH
OR
X
X
1: R = H, X = H2: R = H, X = Br3: R = H, X = Ph
7: R = CH3, X = H8: R = CH3, X = Br
4: R = H, X =
5: R = H, X =
6: R = H, X =
H3C
CH3
H3C
CH3
CH3
CF3
CF3
Catalysis by Hydrogen Bond
BINOL Derived Catalysts
Morita-Baylis-Hillman Reaction
69-84 % (32 - 88 % ee)
H
O
OH
+Cat (2 mol%)
O O
Et3P, THF, 0 °CPh
Ph
Catalyst Yield (%) ee (%)
- 5 -
(R) -BINOL 74 32
1 73 48
2 73 79
3 69 86
4 9 31
5 70 88
6 84 86
7 43 3
8 15 3
Bulky substituents on the 3,3’-positions essential for excellent ee
Mesityl group restricting rotation about the biaryl bond of the 3-substituent, prerequisite for catalysis
Removal of one BA equiv : no enantioselectivity and catalytic activity
Best results with 5 and 6
McDougal N. T.; Schaus S. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12094.
R
O
O
R
PO
OH
Chiral Phosphoric Acids: A New Class of Strong Brønsted Acids
Strong Brønsted Acid relied on one single proton(pKa (EtO)2PO3H = 1, 39)
Hydrogen bonding with the substrate without loose ion-pair formation
Tetradentate P(V)Formation of a rigid ring structure
Prevent free rotation at of the P center
Transfer of stereochemical information to the substrate
Lewis basic phosphoryl moiety
Bifunctional catalysis (electophilic and nucleophilic activations)
Connon S. J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3909.
Catalyst t (h) Yield (%) ee (%)
1a 22 57 0
1b 20 100 27
1c 27 100 60
1d 46 99 52
1e 4 96 87
Phosphoric Acid Catalysis : Mannich-Type Reactions
Akiyama’s Work
1/ Ar-X, Pd0
2/ BBr3,
3/ POCl34/ HCl
B(OH)2
OCH3
OCH3
B(OH)2
Ar
O
O
Ar
PO
OH
1a: Ar = H1b: Ar = Ph1c: 2,4,6-Me3C6H41d: 4-MeOC6H41e: 4-NO2C6H4
HO
N
R1
+H
R2
OR3
OTMSCatalyst (10 mol%),
toluene, -78 °C
HO
HN
R1CO2R3
R2
+
HO
HN
R1CO2R3
R2
Akiyama T.; Itoh J.; Yokota K.; Fuchibe K. JACS 2007, 129, 6756. Akiyama T.; Itoh J.; Yokota K.; Fuchibe K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1566.
R1 R2 R3 Yield (%) Syn/ anti ee (%)
Ph Me Et 100 87:13 96
p-MeOC6H4 Me Et 100 92:8 88
p-FC6H4 Me Et 100 91:9 84
p-ClC6H4 Me Et 100 86:14 83
p-MeC6H4 Me Et 100 94:6 81
PhCH=CH Me Et 91 95:5 90
Ph Bn Et 100 93:7 91
p-MeOC6H4 Bn Et 92 93:7 87
Ph Ph3SiO Me 79 100:0 91
X t (h) Y(%) ee (%)
2-OH 13 98 89
4-OH 33 28 20
2-OCH3 46 56 3
H 43 76 39
X
Phosphoric Acid Catalysis : Mannich-Type Reactions
Akiyama’s Work: Mechanism and Transition State
OP
O
O OH*O
O*
O
O
+
HO
N
Ph
O
N
Ph
H
H
O
O
PO
O*
O
N
Ph
H
H
OP
O
O
O
O
N
Ph
H
H
OP
O
O
O
O
N
Ph
HO
O
PO
O*
H
OH
NH
Ph OMe
O
OSiMe3
OMeMonocoordinationpathway
Dicoordinationpathway
O
N H
H
Me3SiO OMe
O
O
P *
1.555
1.0051.488
1.335
1.726
2.0771.490
O
N
Me3SiO OMe
H
HO P O
O
O*
2.122
1.630
0.989
1.763
1.020
MonocoordinationPathway
(TS: + 3.4 kcal/ mol)
DicoordinationPathway
(TS: 0.0 kcal/ mol)
More crowded concave structure for the attacking nucleophileLonger forming bond C-C
Nine membered-cyclic TS
FAVORED
TSd
TSm
Phosphoric Acid Catalysis : Mannich-Type Reactions
Akiyama’s Work : Origin of Selectivity
O
OP
O
O
NO2
NO2
H
H
N
OSiMe3
OMe
O
H O
OP
O
O
NO2
NO2
H
H
N
O3.862
H
3.821
re facial attack
- stacking interaction
repulsive interaction
Phosphoric Acid Catalysis : Mannich-Type Reactions
Terada’s Work
Terada and coll. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 497.Terada and coll. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5356.
O
N
R1+
O
Catalyst (2 mol%),
DCM, r.t.
O
HN
R1Ac
Ac
O
OR2 OR2
92 - 99 % (90 - 98 % ee)R1 = 4-MeO-C6H4, 4-Me-C6H4, 1-Napht, 4-Br-C6H4, 4-F-C6H4, 2-Me-C6H4
R
O
O
R
PO
OH
1a: R = H1b: R = Ph1c: R = 4-biphenyl1d: R = 4-( -naphtyl)-C6H4
Catalyst Yield (%) ee (%)
1a 92 12
1b 95 56
1c 88 90
1d 99 98
O P
O
O H N O
OAc
Ac HN
OO
PhAc
Ac
HS
O
R2 Yield (%) ee (%)
tBu 88 90 (S)
Bn 76 26
Me 96 6
Formation of 1:1 adducts (catalyst: imine) sterically controlled by the bulky substituents of the phosphoric acid
One side of C=N shielded by one of the biphenyl substituents
Another side completely open for the approach of the nucleophile
re facial attack
Phosphoric Acid Catalysis : Mannich-Type Reactions
Akiyama: A New TADDOL-Based Catalyst
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347, 1523.
1a: Ar = Ph1b: Ar = p-C6H5-C6H41c: Ar = p-F-C6H41d: Ar = p-CF3-C6H4
O
P
O
ArAr
ArAr
O
O
O
OH
N
R1+
Catalyst (5 mol%),
toluene,-78 °C
81-100 % (85 - 92 % ee)R1 = Ph, 4-Cl-C6H4, 4-Me-C6H4, 4-F-C6H4, 4-MeO-C6H4
HO
OTMS
OMe
NH
R1
OH
O
OMe
O
P
O
ArAr
ArAr
O
O
O
OHCO2Et
CO2EtO
O
Ar-MgBr, THF
49 % OH
OH
ArAr
ArAr
O
O
1/ PCl3 (2.2 equiv), Et3N, THF, 0 °C, 1 h
2/ Et3N,H2O,
3/ I2 (3.2 equiv), Py-H2O, r. t., 20 min
79 %
O
OP
O
O
H
H
N
O
HO
O
F
F FF3C
F
FF
Nu
Catalyst Time (h) Yield (%) ee (%)
1a 24 0 -
1b 66 47 31
1c 26 63 34
1d 21 97 73
R1 = Ph
re facial attack
Phosphoric Acid Catalysis : Aza-Ene Reaction
Terada’s Work
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2254.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10336.
O
N
Ar+
HN R2
O
1/ A (2 - 0.05 mol%),toluene, r.t.
2/ H3O+
O
NH
Ar
R1 R2
53-97 % (93-98 % ee)1a: R1 = Ph, R2 = Me1b: R1 = Ph, R2 = OtBu
Ph
1c: R1 = Ph, R2 = OBn1d: R1 = Ph, R2 = OMe
Ph
O
R
O
O
R
PO
OH
A: R = 9-anthrylB: R = 4-Ph-C6H4
PhN
O
ArH
H
OP
O
O
O
H
NCOR
Ph
PhN
O
Ar
H
OP
O
O
O
H
NCOR
Ph
O
P
O
O
O
H
Ph
O
N H
Ar NCOR
Ph
Ar Yield (%) ee (%)
p-Me-C6H4 90 95
o-Me-C6H4 61 93
p-MeO-C6H4 82 92
p-F-C6H4 89 95
p-CN-C6H4 97 98
2-naphtyl 91 95
Phosphoric Acid Catalysis : Aza-Ene Reaction
Terada’s Work
Angew. Chem; Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2254.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10336.
O
N
Ar+
HN R2
O
R1
1a: R1 = Ph, R2 = Me1b: R1 = Ph, R2 = OtBu
H
1c: R1 = Ph, R2 = OBn1d: R1 = Ph, R2 = OMe
N
HNCbz
Boc
Ar NHCbz
+ N
HNCbz
Boc
Ar NHCbz
1/ B (2 mol%),DCM, r.t., 30 min
2/ H3O+
R1 = OtBuR2 = OBn
> 99 % y, trans : cis = 95:5, > 99 % ee of trans, 40 % ee of cis
Ar Yield (%) trans:cisee (%)
of trans
ee (%)
of cis
p-Br-C6H4 > 99 94:6 99 23
pMe-C6H4 > 99 95:5 98 4
2-furyl 76 88:12 99 14
c-C6H11 68 94:6 97 40
R
O
O
R
PO
OH
A: R = 9-anthrylB: R = 4-Ph-C6H4
O
N
Ar+
HN R2
O
R1
H
N
HN
COR2
Ar NH
intermolecularaza-ene reaction
O
N R2
HAr
NHR1
O
2nd intermolecularaza-ene reaction
O
NH
R2
Ar
NHR1
O
H
N
O
R2
aza-ene cyclization
R1
O
O
R2
cascade transformation
O
OP
O
OH
CF3
CF3
CF3
CF3
A
Phosphoric Acid Catalysis : Addition on Activated Imine Derivatives
Hydrophosphonylation of Imines - Akiyama
+A (10 mol%),
m-Xylene, r.t.
72-97 % (52-90 % ee)
R
N
OMe
P
O
HO-iPr
O-iPr
R P(O-iPr)2
O
HN
OMe
O
OP
O
O
CF3
CF3
CF3
CF3
H O
H
POR
ORN
Ar
H
Ar
Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2583.
R Time (h) Yield (%) ee (%)
C6H5 24 84 52
o-Me-C6H4 46 76 69
C6H5CH=CH 101 92 84
p-CH3C6H4CH=CH 170 88 86
p-Cl-C6H4CH=CH 145 97 83
o-CH3C6H4CH=CH 171 80 82
o-Cl-C6H4CH=CH 70 82 87
1-naphtyl-CH=CH 168 76 81
re facial attack
P
O
HO-iPr
O-iPrP
OH
O-iPr
O-iPr
Phosphonate form(unreactive)
Phosphite form(reactive)
Phosphoric Acid Catalysis : Addition on Activated Imine Derivatives
Strecker Reaction - Rueping
+ HCN
A (10 mol%),
toluene, -40 °C, 6 h
53-97 % (85-99 % ee)
Ar
NBn
Ar CN
HNBn
O
OP
O
OH
A
75 % (97 % ee)
CN
HNBn
F3C
53 % (96 % ee)
CN
HNBn
H3CO
59 % (98 % ee)
CN
HNBn
F
F
85 % (99 % ee)
CN
HNBn
84 % (89 % ee)
CN
HNBn
O
85 % (92 % ee)
CN
HNBn
O
87 % (89 % ee)
CN
HN
OCH3
re facial attack
si face efficiently shieldedby the large phenanthryl group of the catalyst
O
OP
O
OH N
MeO
H
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006,45, 2617.
Phosphoric Acid Catalysis : Addition on Activated Imine Derivatives
Imine Amidation - Antilla
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1596.
+ H2NR
Catalyst
ether, r.t.Ar
N
Ar NHR
HNBoc
O
OtBu
Catalyst A: Tf2NH Catalyst B : PO
HOH
Ar R mol% acid Time Yield (%)
C6H5 SO2Me 0.5 mol% A 20 min 99
C6H5 SO2–C6H4-Me 5 mol% B 20 h 91
4-BrC6H4 C(O)CH=CH2 10 mol% B 2.5 h 94
4-MeOC6H4 C(O)CH=CH2 5 mol% B 14 h 91
2-furyl C(O)CH=CH2 10 mol% B 11 h 99
Catalyst CR = H
Catalyst DR = 4-(-naph)-C6H4
Catalyst ER = 4-(-naph)-C6H4
R
O
O
R
PO
OH
O
OP
O
OHPhPh
Catalyst F
Ar R mol% acidTime (h)
Yield (ee) (%)
Ph Ts 5 mol% C 16 95 (<5)
Ph Ts 4 mol% D 20 96 (60)
Ph Ts 5 mol% E 24 99 (71)
Ph Ts 5 mol% F 1 95 (94)
Ph Ms 5 mol% F 1 86 (93)
Ph 5 mol% F 1 89 (91)
4-BrC6H4 Ts 10 mol% F 13 96 (92)
4-CF3C6H4 Ts 10 mol% F 20 99 (99)
S OMe
O
O
89-99 %(73-99 % ee)
Phosphoric Acid Catalysis : Hetero-Diels-Alder Reactions
Akiyama’s Work
N
Ar
+
Catalyst (5 mol%),
CH3CO2H (1.2 equiv),
toluene,-78 °C
72-100 % (76-91 % ee)
HO
OTMS N
Ar
OH
MeO
O
R
O
O
R
PO
OH
1a: R = Ph1b: R = C6H4(p-NO2)1c: R = C6H2[2,4,6-(i-Pr)3]
Catalyst Time (h) Yield (%) ee (%)
1a 23 67 3
1b 21 90 5
1c 20 32 42
Ar Time (h) Yield (%) ee (%)
C6H5 18 99 80
p-I-C6H4 24 86 84
p-Br-C6H4 13 100 84
p-Cl-C6H4 35 72 84
p-F-C6H4 13 77 78
p-CF3-C6H4 21 82 81
o-Br-C6H4 10 96 80
o-Cl-C6H4 12 100 76
1-naphtyl 12 100 91
Synlett 2006, 1, 141.
O
OP
O
O
iPr
iPr
H
H N
OiPr
iPr
iPr
iPr
si facial approach
Additive Yield (%) ee (%)
None 29 34
MeOH 97 46
CF3CH2OH 88 41
PhCO2H 85 63
CH3CO2H 78 67
PhSO3H 87 15
Ar = Ph
OMe
TMSO
Terada’s Work : FC Reactions on Furan
Phosphoric Acid Catalysis : Friedel-Crafts ReactionsR
O
O
R
PO
OH
R =
+A (2 mol%),
DCE, -35 °C, 24 h
80-95 % (86-97 % ee)
R
NBoc
H
O
OMe
O
OMeR
NHBoc
Temp (°C) Yield (%) ee (%)
0 86 92
-20 89 95
-35 87 97
R Yield (%) ee (%)
C6H5 95 97
p-MeO-C6H4 84 94
o-Br-C6H4 85 91
p-Br-C6H4 86 96
p-Cl-C6H4 88 97
p-F-C6H4 82 97
p-CF3-C6H4 82 81
2-furyl 94 86
1-naphtyl 100 91 NBS, NaHCO3, Et2O/ H2O,
0°C, 30 min
90 %
O
OMePh
NHBoc
Ph
NHBoc
OO OMe
CeCl3.7H2O, NaBH4, MeOH,
-78 °C to r.t., 5h
95 % (syn/ anti: 85/ 15)
Ph
NHBoc
O
O
Synthetic Utility of Furan-2-ylamine
Uraguchi D.; Sorimachi K.; Terada M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11804.
+Catalyst (5 mol%), CHCl3
- 60 °C, 23-26 h
66-95 % (42-96 % ee)
N
HN
Ph
O
NHPh
O
R1
R2
R3
MeO MeON
R1
R2
R3
R1 = Me, CH2CH2Br, n-Pr, n-C6H13, allylR2 = H, n-BuR3 = H, Et
Antilla’s Work : FC Reactions on Indole and Pyrrole
Phosphoric Acid Catalysis : Friedel-Crafts Reactions SiPh3
O
O
SiPh3
PO
OH
O
OP
O
OHPh
Ph
A
B
+Catalyst (5 mol%), DCM,
- 30 °C, 4 A MA, 16 h
92-99 % (92-96 % ee)
N
HR1
NBn
Ph
O
R1
NHPh
O
NBn
R1 Temp. (°C) Catalyst Yield (%) ee (%)
H -60 B 89 86
H -60 A (10 mol%) 92 97
H -30 A (5 mol%) 99 94
R1 Yield (%) ee (%)
H 99 94
p-MeO 93 94
m-MeO 96 92
p-Br 92 96
p-Cl 97 96
p-F 97 95
p-NO2 99 94
1-naphtyl 99 95
Application to Pyrroles
Rowland G. B.; Rowland E. B.; Liang Y.; Perman J. A.; Antilla J. C. Org. Lett. 2007, 14, 2609.Li G.; Rowland G. B.; Rowland E. B.; Antilla J. C. Org. Lett. 2007, 20, 4065.
HR''O2C
N
PN
R R'
N
activator
NH
R''O2CN
R R'P
NH
O
PO N2
R''O2CR'
PHN R
NH
R''O2CR'
N R
N
P
N
P
HR''O2C
R'
R
O
H X
R R'
activatorO
HR'
XRaddition O
R'
HXRelimination
Phosphoric Acid Catalysis : Alkylation of -Diazoester
Friedel-Crafts adduct
Aziridine(usual fate)
« Friedel-Crafts type » adduct
+Catalyst (2 mol%),
toluene, r.t., 5 h
62-89 % (91-97 % ee)
HRO2C
N2
O N
R'
H Ar
OHN
R'
Ar
N2
RO2C
R = tBu, Et
R
O
O
R
PO
OH
R = 9-anthryl
Uraguchi D.; Sorimachi K.; Terada M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9360.
Phosphoryl oxygen = intramolecular basic site
« slow »
« fast »
A
B
C
Ar, R’ CatalystYield (%)
ee (%)
Ph A 70 -
Ph B 59 90
R’ Yield (%) ee (%)
C6H5 59 90
o-Br-C6H4 80 90
o-Me-C6H4 84 90
o-MeO-C6H4 77 92
m-MeO-C6H4 76 91
1-naphtyl 82 90
p-Br-C6H4 68 86
p-Me-C6H4 72 91
p-MeO-C6H4 73 93
p-Me2N-C6H4 81 97
+Catalyst (2 mol%),
toluene, r.t., 5 h
62-89 % (91-97 % ee)
HRO2C
N2
O N
R'
H Ar
OHN
R'
Ar
N2
RO2C
R = tBu, iPr,Et
R
O
O
R
PO
OH
R = 9-anthryl
O
OP
O
OH
A
B
PtO2, H2, EtOAc/ AcOH,r.t.
79 %
R = p-Me2N-C6H4(97 % ee)
O NH
R
Ph
N2
CO2tBu
1/ Tf2O, 2,6-lutidine,DCM, -78 °C to 0 °C
then MeOH, 0 °C to rt 70 %
2/ Pd/C, MeOH, r.t.60 %
O NH
R
PhCO2tBu
NH2
PhCO2tBu
Oxone, NaHCO3,H2O/ acetone/ DCM,
0 °C to r.t.R = Ph
(> 99 % ee)
NaBH4, MeOH, - 78 °C, anti/ syn = > 99/ < 1
95 % (over two steps)
O NH
R
Ph
O
CO2tBu
NH
PhCO2tBu
O
R
97 % ee
> 99 % ee
OH
Synthetic Utility of -Amino--Diazoesters
Ar Yield (%) ee (%)
p-F-C6H4 74 97
p-Ph-C6H4 71 97
p-Me-C6H4 74 97
p-MeO-C6H4 62 97
o-F-C6H4 89 91
o-MeO-C6H4 85 91
p-F-C6H4 84 93
Phosphoric Acid Catalysis : Alkylation of -Diazoester
Uraguchi D.; Sorimachi K.; Terada M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9360.
Phosphoric Acid Catalysis : Pictet-Spengler Reaction
40-96 % (62-96 % ee)
R2-CHO, catalyst (20 mol%),Na2SO4,
toluene, -30 °C, 3-5 dHN NH2
CO2Et
CO2Et
HN NH
R2
CO2Et
CO2Et
R1 R1
R
O
O
R
PO
OH
1a: R = H1b: R = p-NO2-C6H4
1c: 3,5-CF3-C6H3
1d: 2,4,6-Me-C6H2,
1e: 1-naphtyl1f: 2,4,6-( i-Pr)-C6H4
List’s Work
Et-CHO, TFA (1 equiv),DCM, r.t.
> 90 %HN NH2
H
H
HN
N
H
Et
Et-CHO, TFA (1 equiv),DCM, r.t.
> 90 %HN NH2
CO2Et
CO2Et
HN NH
Et
CO2Et
CO2Et
Aldol Condensation
Pictet-Spengler Reaction
R1 R2 Yield (%)
ee (%)
OMe Et 96 90
H Et 76 88
OMe n-Bu 90 87
H n-Bu 91 87
OMe Bn 85 72
H Bn 58 76
OMe p-NO2-C6H4 98 96
H p-NO2-C6H4 60 88
OMe p-CN-C6H4 60 80
H p-CN-C6H4 40 89
+ Toleration of aromatic aldehydes (especially electron-poor ones)
- Requirement of a geminal diester functionality (Thorpe-Ingold effect)
Seayad J.; Seayad A. M.; List B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1086.
Phosphoric Acid Catalysis : Pictet-Spengler Reaction
R'-CHO, catalyst (5 mol%),MS 3A, BHT
toluene, 0 °C, 3-5 dHN HN HN NS
R
R'
S
1a: R = o-NO2-C6H41b: R = CPh3
77-90 % (30-87 % ee)
HCl, PhSH
HN NH
R'
R = CPh3
2a: R = o-NO2-C6H4
31 % ee
3 (from 1b)
R
R
O
O
R
PO
OH
1a: R = H1b: R = p-NO2-C6H4
1c: 3,5-CF3-C6H31d: biphenyl1e: SiPh3
1f: 2,4,6-(i-Pr)-C6H4
Hiemstra’s Work
R R’ Time (h)
Yield 3 (%)
ee 3 (%)
CPh3 n-hept 2 87 84
CPh3 i-Pr 24 77 78
CPh3 Me 1 88 30
CPh3 c-hex 24 81 72
CPh3 CH2Bn 0.5 88 76
CPh3 Bn 4 90 87
CPh3 Ph 24 77 82
CPh3 p-NO2-C6H4 24 78 82
+ Easy preparation of Pictet-Spengler precursors Stabilization of th iminium ion by the sulfenyl substituent Easy removal of the sulfenyl group Fast reactions
- Unstability of N-tritylsulfenyl tetrahydro--carboline ⇒ Use of BHT Slightly lower yields and ees
Wanner M. J.; Van der Haas R. N. S.; de Cuba K. R.; Van Maarseven J. H.; Hiemstra H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7485.
Phosphoric Acid Catalysis : Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation with Hantzsch Esters
General Mechanism: Reduction of C=N Bonds
Ar
O
O
Ar
PO
OH
Ar
O
O
Ar
PO
O
N
R2R3
H R1 NH
H HRO2C CO2R
N
RO2C CO2R
Ar
O
O
Ar
PO
O
N
R2R3
H R1
HHN
R2R3
R1
N
R2R3
R1
I
II
III
You S.-L. Chem. Asian J. 2007, 2, 820.
Hantzsch method vs H2 or metal hydride process
1/ Mild Reaction Conditions (r.t. or slight heating in conventional solvents)
2/ Operational simplicity (no HP apparatus or air-free conditions)
3/ Availability of Hantzsch Esters
4/ Safe handling
5/ Compatiblity with Organocatalysts
1/ Poor atom economy
2/ Problematic removal of pyridine by-products
+
-
O
OP
O
OH N
CH3
OCH3
R R’ CatalystYield (%)
ee (%)
Napht PMP
1a 20 rac
1b 42 38
1c 37 44
1d 54 40
1e 59 48
1f 57 62
Phosphoric Acid Catalysis : Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation with Hantzsch Esters
Reduction of C=N Bonds: Rueping’s Work
Ar
O
O
Ar
PO
OH
1a: Ar = mesityl1b: Ar = 9-phenantryl1c: Ar = 1-naphtyl1d: Ar = 2-naphtyl1e: Ar = 4-biphenyl1f: Ar = 3,5-(CF3)-C6H3
Rueping M.; Sugiono E.; Azap C.; Theissmann T.; Bolte M. Org. Lett. 2005, 17, 3781.
amine Yield (%) ee (%)
82 70 (94)*
R = CF3: 71
R = Ph: 71
R = OMe: 76
72
74 (98)
72
76 74
82 84
46 82
91 78
R = PMPNHR
NHR
R NHR
NHR
F
NHR
CF3
NHR
si face selectivity
* In parenthesis, ee obtained after one recrystallization from MeOH
catalyst (20 mol%),benzene, 60 °C
46-86 % (70-98 % ee)
N
CH3R'
R
NH
EtO2C CO2EtHH
HN
CH3R'
R
R t (h) Yield (%)ee (%)
t (d) Yield (%) ee (%) t (h) Yield (%) ee (%)
Ph 45 96 88 3 76 74 19 93 96
42 85 84 3 82 94 - - -
45 95 85 3 82 84 - - -
71 91 93 3 74 78 22 98 96
71 88 92 3 91 78 - - -
- - - 3 71 72 21 98 96F3C
Catalyst (10 mol%), A (1.4 equiv),
toluene, 35 °C
PMPHN
R
NPMP
R
Phosphoric Acid Catalysis : Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation with Hantzsch Esters (A)
Ar
O
O
Ar
PO
OH
List's CatalystAr = 2,4,6-(i-Pr)-C6H2
Ar
O
O
Ar
PO
OH
Rueping's CatalystAr = 3,5-(CF3)-C6H3
Antilla's Catalyst
O
OP
O
OHPh
Ph
List B. and coll. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7424. Rueping M. and coll. Org. Lett. 2005, 17, 3781. Antilla J. C. and coll. JACS 2007, 129, 5830.
F
CH3
Catalyst (20 mol%), A (1.4 equiv),
benzene, 60 °C
PMPHN
R
NPMP
R
Catalyst (5 mol%), A (1.4 equiv),
toluene, 50 °C
PMPHN
R CO2Et
NPMP
CO2EtR
Phosphoric Acid Catalysis : Enantiomeric Reductive Amination with Hantzsch Esters (A)
Catalyst (10 mol%), A (1.4 equiv),
benzene, 24 h.Me
O
+
NH2
OMe
Me
HN
OMe
NMe2
NH
NH
S
CF3
CF3
O
OOH
OH
Ph Ph
Ph Ph
O
OP
O
OH
1, 0 % yield
Jacobsen, Takemoto
2, 0 % yield
Rawal
3a, 6 % yield, 37 % ee
Akiyama, Terada
R
R
Storer R. I.; Carrera D. E.; Ni Y.; MacMillan D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 84.
Catalyst R Additive Temp. (°C) Conv (%) ee (%)
3a 2-naphtyl - 80 6 37
3a 2-naphtyl 5 Ǻ MS 80 41 45
3b H 5 Ǻ MS 80 43 7
3c 3,5-NO2-Ph 5 Ǻ MS 80 45 16
3d 3,5-CF3-Ph 5 Ǻ MS 80 39 65
4 TBDPS 5 Ǻ MS 80 35 61
5 SiPh3 5 Ǻ MS 80 70 87
5 SiPh3 5 Ǻ MS 40 85 94
Me
HN
OMe
87 % yield94 % ee
Me
HN
OMe
81 % yield95 % ee
Me
HN
OMe
79 % yield91 % ee
Me
HN
OMe
60 % yield83 % ee
F
F
Me
HN
OMe
77 % yield90 % ee
Me
HN
OMe
73 % yield96 % ee
MeO
Me
HN
OMe
71 % yield95 % ee
HN
OMe
75 % yield85 % ee
O2N
Me
HN
OMe
75 % yield95 % ee
Cl
HN
OMe
70 % yield88 % ee
F
Me Et
87 % 27 %
Phosphoric Acid Catalysis : Enantiomeric Reductive Amination with Hantzsch Esters (A)
Storer R. I.; Carrera D. E.; Ni Y.; MacMillan D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 84.
Chemoselectivity StudySiPh3
O
O
SiPh3
PO
OH
Selectivity for the reduction of iminium ions derived from methyl ketones
Catalyst (10 mol%), A (1.4 equiv),
benzene, 24 h.
Me
O
+
NH2
OMe
Me
NHAr
Et
O
Et
O
18 : 1 Methyl vs Ethyl ketone selectivity 85 % yield, 96 % ee
Catalyst (10 mol%), A (1.4 equiv),
benzene, 40 °C, 72 h.Et Me
O
+
NH2
OMe
Et Me
NHAr
butanone71 % yield, 83 % ee
Viable conditions for substrates containing substituents of similar steric and electronic character
Me
HN
OMe
71 % yield83 % ee
Me
HN
OMe
72 % yield91 % ee
Me
HN
OMe
75 % yield94 % ee5
Ph
Catalyst anion R’ Conv (%) er (%)
CF3CO2 - 23 75:25
CF3CO2 - 66 77:23
CF3CO2 - 72 76:24
1a 25 87:13
1b 81a 97:3
Phosphoric Acid Catalysis : Enantiomeric Reduction of ,-Unsaturated Ketones with Hantzsch Esters (A)
Catalyst salt (20 mol%),
1,4-dioxane, 60 °C, 48 h+
NH
H HEtO2C CO2Et
O O
S
Development of Ammonium Phosphates
CO2tBu
NH3
iPr CO2tBu
NH3
tBu CO2tBu
NH3
iPr CO2tBu
NH3
R
O
O
R
PO
O
1a: R = Ph1b: R = 2,4,6-(i-Pr)3-C6H2
iPr CO2tBu
NH3
a in Bu2O
EnoneYield (%)
er (%)
R = Me 99 97:3
R = Et 98 98:2
R = CH2CH2Ph 99 98:2
R = Ph 99 92:8
R = Me 78 99:1
R = Et 71 98:2
R = CH2CH2Ph 68 98:2
R
O
O
R
EnoneYield (%)
er (%)
> 99 98:2
R = CO2Et 99 92:8
R = Ph 81 85:15
O
O
R
(E)
Martin N. J. A.; List B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 13368.
Conclusion
Difficulties previously thought to hinder Bronsted acid catalysis overcome in three ways: bidentate hydrogen bonding, supramolecular architecture and bifunctional hydrogen bonding
Large variety of Brønsted acid catalysts presented, but many not discussed (proline, Fu’s PPY, ammonium salts…) and more that I’ve missed (I’m sure…)
Strong Brønsted acid catalysts = easy to handle (stable toward water and oxygen), easy to prepare, non toxic, potentially recoverable and recyclable
Significant expansion of the scope of asymmetric nucleophilic additions to carbonyl and carbonyl derivatives
New applications and advances in terms of both catalyst design and the expansion of substrate scope for Brønsted acid catalysts and particularly for Phosphoric Acids