assignment 2 – designing and appraising an instructional ... web viewassignment 2 –...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Assignment 2 – Designing and appraising an instructional resource
ASSIGNMENT 2 – DESIGNING AND APPRAISING AN INSTRUCTIONAL
RESOURCE4143EBL – INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN STRATEGIES
COURSE CONVENOR: DR. LEESA WHEELAHAN
SUBMITTED BY: DAVID MARTIN
STUDENT #2636349
DATE SUBMITTED: 23 OCTOBER 2008
David Martin Student #2636349 4143EBLInstructional Design Strategies
2
Assignment 2 – Designing and appraising an instructional resource
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction and Philisophical Orientation.....................................................................................3
Targeting Knowledge Development..............................................................................................5
Learning Goals and lesson objective.........................................................................................5
Learner characteristics...............................................................................................................6
Mode of Delivery/Session Plan..................................................................................................6
Instructional events....................................................................................................................7
The Need for the Resource........................................................................................................7
Resource design............................................................................................................................8
Information Processing..............................................................................................................8
Resource appraisal........................................................................................................................9
Alternatives to the resource.......................................................................................................9
Limitations of the resource.........................................................................................................9
Strengths of the resources.........................................................................................................9
Conclusion...................................................................................................................................10
References..................................................................................................................................11
Appendix 1: Observation Checklist..............................................................................................12
Appendix 2: Session Plan............................................................................................................13
David Martin Student #2636349 4143EBLInstructional Design Strategies
3
Assignment 2 – Designing and appraising an instructional resource
INTRODUCTION AND PHILISOPHICAL ORIENTATION
This report will show the detailed design and appraisal of an observation checklist used as
assessment for session one of an “Online Participation Skills” workshop. The proposed
workshop is designed to assist students who enrol, receive learning materials, submit
assessment and receive results via an online, computer based learning environment. Previous
planning has been done to identify that training is a suitable solution to a deficiency in
knowledge. It will now be shown how specific knowledge development has been targeted to
assist students to reach learning goals and the resource will be clearly presented, showing how
it is to be used, by whom and when. It will also be shown how the resource assists in achieving
the learning goals and targeted knowledge through use of information processing models.
The underlying philosophy of the instructional process used to design the resource is
empiricism, which Smith & Ragan describe (1999) as knowledge acquired through a sensory
experience. Smith & Ragan (1999) further describe empiricism as an attempt to reduce complex
items into simpler components and using associations to relate ideas that are not experienced
contiguously. The general learning theory behind the workshop and the specific resource
described here is behaviourism, but only in that evidence of successful cognitive learning is best
seen through the learners’ behaviour (Smith & Ragan, 1999, p. 19). Information processing
theory is further used to recognise that for successful learning is achieved through attention and
rehearsal information must pass through working memory, which has a limited capacity and
then transferred into long-term memory (Krause, Bochner, & Duchesne, 2006, p. 160).
The traditional instructional design process is made up of three main activities as described in
Smith & Ragan (1999); analysis, selection and evaluation. Analysis involved looking at the
learning task itself, the learners and the environment in which they will be trained. The selection
process is used to determine the way the instructional material will be presented, how it will be
David Martin Student #2636349 4143EBLInstructional Design Strategies
4
Assignment 2 – Designing and appraising an instructional resource
organised, and what learning activities are used. The evaluation activity involves both the
learners and the instruction. This traditional approach has been expanded to analyse, design,
develop, implement, evaluate (ADDIE) and can be used to describe the essential components
of any instructional design model (Molenda cited in Brown, Green, 2006, p.11-13).
The lesson and resource in this report is further based on nine events of instruction (Smith &
Ragan, 1999, p114) as shown below.
1. Gaining Attention
2. Informing the learner of the objective
3. Stimulating recall of prerequisite learning
4. Presenting stimulus materials
5. Providing learning guidance
6. Eliciting performance
7. Providing feedback
8. Assessing performance
9. Enhancing retention and transfer
David Martin Student #2636349 4143EBLInstructional Design Strategies
5
Assignment 2 – Designing and appraising an instructional resource
TARGETING KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT
There are two facets of knowledge that are required to complete the lesson objectives of the
lesson. Firstly, Declarative knowledge, often described as “knowing that something is the case”
(Smith & Ragan, 1999, p. 158) and secondly, Procedural knowledge, the steps necessary to
complete a task, which can also be executive subroutines for psychomotor skills (Smith &
Ragan, 1999, p. 214). Psychomotor skills are used where there is cognitive or thinking parts to
performing a physical task (Smith & Ragan, 1999, p. 273).
LEARNING GOALS AND LESSON OBJECTIVE
By analysing the types of target knowledge, and using task analysis to break down the
procedures and tasks that students use for participating in online courses, overall workshop
goals and then individual lesson objectives were written. For the session appraised here, the
lesson objectives are that the student, unaided will be able to:
1. Describe and demonstrate the procedure used to access the online
learning system using the student’s own username and password.
2. Explain and demonstrate the methods used to navigate through an
online course unaided, using hyperlinks to access course materials,
assessment details and communication pages.
The resource is used to provide clear evidence that the lesson objectives have been reached.
In this way the resource and learning goals are directly linked.
David Martin Student #2636349 4143EBLInstructional Design Strategies
6
Assignment 2 – Designing and appraising an instructional resource
LEARNER CHARACTERISTICS
This workshop could be offered to a very wide demographic of students. It is aimed at assisting
anyone who is enrolled in a course that uses the online learning system as the primary method
of instructional delivery and assessment. Some students will know more than others and it is
necessary to choose where to start instruction (Gagné, Briggs, & Wager, 1988, p. 25). Students
could generally be expected to have some basic computer operation knowledge, how to use the
keyboard, mouse, operating system and web browser. However, the teacher should be
prepared for some of this knowledge to be limited and be able to explain underlying concepts
and operational procedures if necessary.
MODE OF DELIVERY/SESSION PLAN
The course will be delivered in a face to face classroom with each student having access to a
computer that is connected to the online learning system. The teacher will also use a computer,
connected to both the online system and a data projector that allows demonstration of the
procedures and operations. The lesson will be predominantly supplantive in nature, i.e. the
instruction will supply the majority of stimulus and information. A complete session plan is
shown in Appendix 2.
David Martin Student #2636349 4143EBLInstructional Design Strategies
7
Assignment 2 – Designing and appraising an instructional resource
INSTRUCTIONAL EVENTS
When this workshop was planned a draft delivery plan was written for the session. Appendix 2
shows the delivery plan alongside a description of the instructional event and the resources.
During the session students will be given time to practice during the eliciting performance
instructional event. This resource is used during this at the same time as the teacher is
performing the assessing performance event. The results from which assist in providing the
feedback instructional event. In this workshop the eliciting performance and assessing
Performance events generally coincide.
Assessing performance is used to “determine how successful the instruction has been” (Gagné,
Briggs, & Wager, 1988, p. 240), and determines the students progress at the end of the lesson.
THE NEED FOR THE RESOURCE
Instructional delivery requires a planned and deliberate approach to achieving the learning goals
and session objectives. There is a close relationship between the well designed assessment
and a successful instructional process (Gronlund, 2006, p. 3). Providing students with reliable
feedback and teachers with a written record of student performance allows a measurement of
success to be taken, both of the student’s performance and of the courses ability to deliver the
stated learning objectives.
This resource will provide formative evaluation, which “provides data for revising and improving
instructional materials” (Gagné, Briggs, & Wager, 1988, p. 30) as well as summative
assessment that shows that the student has attained all the learning goals.
David Martin Student #2636349 4143EBLInstructional Design Strategies
8
Assignment 2 – Designing and appraising an instructional resource
RESOURCE DESIGN
All training needs to be evaluated, both in terms of student achievement and a measure of the
actual delivery of training. Appendix 1 contains the observation checklist for session one, which
assists the teacher in identifying the behavioural conditions necessary for a student to meet the
lesson objectives.
The resource is a form that allows the recording of the students name, assessors name, date of
assessment as well as a checklist of behavioural objectives. Performance assessment can be
done through observation and judgement by using a checklist (Gronlund, 2006, p. 51) and it
would be used during the lesson, while the student completes set tasks using a real online
learning system. There is room allowed for comments and feedback, allowing for more than just
a tick and flick.
INFORMATION PROCESSING
The resource itself does not contribute to the information processing model, except in that it
occurs at the same time as the rehearsal process. It does not attempt to examine declarative
knowledge but addresses the procedural knowledge that the students need to store to
effectively use the online learning system. In the case of the student not meeting the
behavioural objectives, the resource then provides a means of feedback to students, allowing
further displacement of incorrect procedures.
David Martin Student #2636349 4143EBLInstructional Design Strategies
9
Assignment 2 – Designing and appraising an instructional resource
RESOURCE APPRAISAL
ALTERNATIVES TO THE RESOURCE
A rubric assessment matrix could be developed to appraise students’ ability to attain the
learning objectives. However, the workshop is not aligned to a national competency and is not
designed to be graded but to provide students with knowledge and skills to participate in further
learning. Computerised assessment could also be used, where a simulation is used to test
students’ procedural knowledge and psychomotor skills.
LIMITATIONS OF THE RESOURCE
This type of assessment tool is quite simplistic and is only able to assess procedural learning
objectives. In terms of use of paper and filing systems it is also slightly inefficient, only allowing
one student to be assessed at one time. A matrix allowing student names vertically and
observations horizontally would be more efficient.
STRENGTHS OF THE RESOURCES
The assessment checklist is easy to use and understand and because the outcomes have been
defined behaviourally, they can be easily observed. Further, the outcomes assessed are
directly related to the overall learning objectives. The simplicity of the resource allows teachers
to provide quick and accurate feedback to students.
David Martin Student #2636349 4143EBLInstructional Design Strategies
10
Assignment 2 – Designing and appraising an instructional resource
CONCLUSION
By using the empirical philosophy to underlay the theory of three main activities of instructional
design, analysis, selection and evaluation along with a well defined instructional design process
the appraisal of this resource has shown that it is able to target specific areas of knowledge
development. Lesson objectives, knowledge of learners’ characteristics and environment all
contribute to the effective design of a series of instructional events, which have been based on
the nine instructional events shown in Smith & Ragan (1999).
The resource that has been designed and evaluated is an observation checklist, used in the first
session of a four session workshop. The assessment checklist is needed to ensure correct
targeting behavioural objectives of the lesson, and shows that transfer of knowledge has
occurred within an information processing model. Further, it will provide evidence of student
learning and be able to be used to evaluate the training itself.
David Martin Student #2636349 4143EBLInstructional Design Strategies
11
Assignment 2 – Designing and appraising an instructional resource
REFERENCES
Brown, A., & Green, T. D. (2006). The essentials of instructional design: Connecting
fundamental principles with process and practice. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1988). Principles of instructional design (3rd ed.).
Sydney: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Gronlund, N. E. (2006). Assessment of student achievement (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson
Education.
Krause, K.-L., Bochner, S., & Duchesne, S. (2006). Educational psychology for learning and
teaching. Melbourne: Thomson.
Smith, P., & Ragan, T. (1999). Instructional design (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
David Martin Student #2636349 4143EBLInstructional Design Strategies
12
Assignment 2 – Designing and appraising an instructional resource
APPENDIX 1: OBSERVATION CHECKLIST
Session 1 Observation checklist Candidate name:
Assessor name:
Course name: Online Participation Skills
Date of assessment:
Brief description of task and assessor instructions:
Students will be able to, without aid log onto and navigate through the learning system to access course information, study guides, assessment information and other learning resources
Can the student, without aid: Yes No Comments
Log onto the online learning system using their own username and password
Demonstrate how to navigate through the online learning system to access course information
Demonstrate how to navigate through the online learning system to access study guides, and
Demonstrate how to navigate through the online learning system to access assessment requirements
Demonstrate how to navigate through the online learning system to access other learning resources
The candidate’s performance was: Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Feedback to candidate
This signature confirms candidate agreement that the above record is a true reflection of the task performed.
Candidate signature: Date:
This signature confirms that the candidate has demonstrated competence in the practical performance and theoretical understanding of the observed task.
Assessor signature: Date:
David Martin Student #2636349 4143EBLInstructional Design Strategies
13
Assignment 2 – Designing and appraising an instructional resource
APPENDIX 2: SESSION PLAN
Session Plan Course Name Online Participation Workshop
Lesson 1 of 4 Duration 2 hours
Instructional Event Description Resources
Gaining Attention
Informing the learner of the objective
Introduce course, overall learning outcomes, and lesson objectives
Students to complete start of course survey
Workshop study guide
Printed course survey
Teachers computer with data projector
Stimulating recall of prerequisite learning
Presenting stimulus materials
Provide learning guidance
Enhancing retention and transfer
Discuss and question students about other online systems that require username and passwords or other security measures
Outline details needed for logon procedure (web address, username, password) and need for secure passwords and information
Demonstrate logon procedure
Discuss common problems and trouble-shooting techniques (incorrect address, caps lock, resetting passwords). Ask for examples from students
Demonstrate common trouble-shooting techniques
Teachers computer with access to online learning system and connected to data projector
Teachers logon details
Workshop study guide with written instructions of details, procedures and common troubleshooting techniques
Eliciting Performance
Assessing Performance
Providing feedback
Students to logon to online learning system
Students to identify common problems and trouble-shooting techniques
Students computer with access to online learning system
Students logon details
Workshop study guide
Observation Checklist
Enhancing retention and transfer
Summarise important steps and information needed to logon to the
Workshop study guide
David Martin Student #2636349 4143EBLInstructional Design Strategies
14
Assignment 2 – Designing and appraising an instructional resource
learning system.
Gaining Attention
Stimulating recall of prerequisite learning
Presenting stimulus material
Introduce navigation tools as next topic.
Discuss, identify and demonstrate common navigational tools/buttons/links and procedures of the online learning system and how generic or similar the layout is to other web sites
Discuss, identify and demonstrate specific procedures to access course materials, assessment details and communication pages
Teachers computer with access to online learning system and connected to data projector
Teachers knowledge of navigation system
Workshop study guide with written instructions of details, procedures and common troubleshooting techniques and examples of other layouts
Eliciting Performance
Assessing Performance
Providing feedback
Students to indentify common components of web pages/learning environment
Students to navigate through learning system to find course materials, assessment details and communication pages
Discuss and identify other logon procedures, navigation systems and problems that strategies and procedures could be applied to.
Students computer with access to online learning system
Students access to an online course that they are enrolled in
Workshop study guide
Observation Checklist
Enhancing retention and transfer
Summarise and review navigation techniques and sections of information found on the online learning system
Summarise and review procedures, required information and troubleshooting techniques for logging onto the learning system.
Preview next lesson, the focus will be on assessment creation and submission requirements.
Teachers computer with access to online learning system and connected to data projector
Teachers knowledge of navigation system
Workshop study guide with full details of procedures, information and troubleshooting guides.
David Martin Student #2636349 4143EBLInstructional Design Strategies