assessment of a cda rotary atomizer for weed control ouled taleb salah s., massinon m. and lebeau f....
TRANSCRIPT
Assessment of a CDA rotary atomizer for weed controlOuled Taleb Salah S., Massinon M. and Lebeau F.
Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech (University of Liege), Gembloux, BelgiumISOFAR / MOAN Symposium Sousse, Tunisia
Assessment of a CDA rotary atomizer for weed controlOuled Taleb Salah S., Massinon M. and Lebeau F.
Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech (University of Liege), Gembloux, BelgiumISOFAR / MOAN Symposium Sousse, Tunisia
Introduction Crop protection is mainly achieved by spraying pesticides using hydraulic nozzles. This can lead to environmental contaminations that can be minimized especially in the context of reduction application rates. The challenge is therefore to ensure a required level of protection in these conditions.
Controlled Droplet Application (CDA) has proved to be the most successful way of delivering pesticides at very low volume application. In the past, their use was found inefficient in arable crops essentially due to bad settings, such as inappropriate application rate, and problem of penetration of spray in cereal canopies. These spray generators may be, however, the best solution when treating small hydrophobic weeds because spray retention can be maximized and drift of smaller droplets minimized thanks to reduced droplet span.
This study deals with blackgrass control in cereals while limiting environmental losses using properly set rotary atomizers. The droplet size and velocity were measured to characterize treatment efficiency.
Results and discussionsRotary atomizers (Fig 2a) produce narrower droplet size distributions than hydraulic nozzles (Fig 2b) as it can be highlighted by a lower span defined by (V90-V10)/V50 (Table 1). V10, V50 and V90 indicates that 10, 50 and 90% of the volume of spray is in droplet diameters smaller than this value.
Material and MethodsA high-speed camera used in double exposure mode coupled to a LED backlighting records water droplets produced by a Micromax® 120 (Micron) at various flow rates and rotating speeds. Images were analyzed with a Particle Tracking Velocimetry Sizing (PTVS) algorithm developed in Matlab®. This atomizer was benchmarked to a flat fan nozzle.
0 100 200 300 400 500 6000
10
20
Volu
me r
ela
tif
corr
igé [
%]
Diamètre [µm]
Volume corrigé en fonction du diamètre
0 100 200 300 400 500 6000
50
100
Volu
me r
ela
tif
corr
igé c
um
ulé
[%
]
0 100 200 300 400 500 6000
10
20
Volu
me r
ela
tif
corr
igé [
%]
Diamètre [µm]
Volume corrigé en fonction du diamètre
0 100 200 300 400 500 6000
50
100
Volu
me r
ela
tif
corr
igé c
um
ulé
[%
]
Conclusion and perspectives PTVS allowed a good characterization of droplet size distributions required for application method efficiency assessment. Reaching an optimal spray retention on weed surfaces while reducing the proportion of smaller droplets to reduce drift potential is a challenge that should rely on a reduced droplet span. Retention and drift are currently under investigation as a function of flow rate and rotating speed.
Débit (ml/mn) V10 (µm) V50 (µm) V90 (µm) Span (V90-V10)/V50
2000 tours/mn560 302 404 519 0.53821 324 443 556 0.52
3500 tours/mn560 221 310 398 0.57821 249 367 474 0.61
5000 tours/mn560 181 271 347 0.60821 196 306 421 0.73
Teejet XR 11002 560 113 208 361 1.18Hardi Injet 015 560 177 325 514 1.03
0 100 200 300 400 500 6000
2
4
6
8
10
Volu
me r
ela
tif
corr
igé [
%]
Diamètre [µm]
Volume corrigé en fonction du diamètre
0 100 200 300 400 500 6000
20
40
60
80
100
Volu
me r
ela
tif
corr
igé c
um
ulé
[%
]
0 100 200 300 400 500 6000
2
4
6
8
10
Volu
me r
ela
tif
corr
igé [
%]
Diamètre [µm]
Volume corrigé en fonction du diamètre
0 100 200 300 400 500 6000
20
40
60
80
100
Volu
me r
ela
tif
corr
igé c
um
ulé
[%
]
Fig 3: Drop formation for a rotary atomizer
Satelite droplets were observed in the spectrum of CDA sprayer but their percentage is low compared to flat fan nozzle (Fig 3). This phenomenon is gradually reduced when rotation speed is rised.
Fig 2: Droplet size distributions: (a) Micromax (2000 rpm, 563 ml/mn), (b) Teejet (560 ml/mn; 1.4 bar)
a
b