assessment literacy sheboygan area school district staff development 2010-11

38
Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Upload: juniper-mclaughlin

Post on 20-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Assessment Literacy

Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development

2010-11

Page 2: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Thought for the Day…

A good teacher makes you think even when you

don’t want to.

Page 3: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Agenda for Tonight’s Inservice• Purpose of inservice: overview of assessments for

and of learning – 10 minutes

• Stiggins’ video presentation – 10 minutes

• PowerPoint presentation and discussion – 45 minutes

• Break – 15 minutes

• ‘Jigsaw’ an article – 25 minutes

• Assessment rubric – 15 minutes

• Samples of quality assessments/discussion – 30 minutes

• Your own assessment activity – 30 minutes

Page 4: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Current practicesin classrooms…

• Many students are engaged only in lower-order thinking; i.e. they receive, or recite, or participate in routine practice. In no activities during the lesson do students go beyond simple reproduction of knowledge.

• Or…many students are primarily engaged in routine lower-order thinking for a good share of the lesson. There is at least one significant question or activity in which some students perform some higher-order thinking.

• Or,…almost all students, almost all of the time are engaged in higher-order thinking. 

Page 5: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Why is good assessment essential?

To gather evidence of student learning that will inform instructional decisions in ways that maximize learning…

Page 6: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11
Page 7: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Wisconsin’s Balanced Assessment System

http://www.dpi.state.wi.us/oea/pdf/balsystem.pdf

Page 8: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

What are assessments for and of learning?

FOR LEARNING• Question to ask: What do my

students need to know and understand to be ready to show mastery of the standards?

• Assessments diagnose student needs

• Assessment is an ongoing process for student achievement

• Assessments help teachers and students watch things get better over time

• Used by students and teachers during the learning process

• Student motivation: success becomes its own reward

OF LEARNING• Question to ask: What have my

students learned and to what degree of proficiency?

• Assessments measure student knowledge

• State or district standardized assessments are used to determine what has been learned

• Classroom assessments are used for report card grades or other high stakes grading

• Used by students and teachers after the learning process

• Motivation is a result of a high stakes situation

Page 9: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

The Balanced Assessment Model

Formative Assessment Process: Assessment for learning

• Informal teacher questions• Conversation with student• Informal observation• Rough drafts of written work• Learning log ( in progress)• Reflective journals (multiple

drafts)• Mathematics problem-solving

sets• Practice science experiment

Summative Assessment Process: Assessment of Learning

• Formal oral interview• Conference with student• Formal observation• Final copy of written work• Final learning log entries• Final journal entries

• Mathematics final solution

• Final science experiment

Page 10: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Formative Assessment Process: Assessment for learning

• Rehearsal of presentation• Working portfolio• Practice checklist of do-overs• Practice rubrics (analytical)

• Homework, quizzes• Benchmark/interim tests

Summative Assessment Process: Assessment of Learning

• Final presentation• Showcase portfolio• Final checklist• Final rubrics

(analytical/holistic)

• Teacher made tests• High stakes standardized tests

The Balanced Assessment Model

Page 11: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Seven strategies of Assessment for learning

Where am I going?1. Provide students with a clear

and understandable vision of the learning target

2. Use examples and models of strong and weak work

Where am I now?

3. Offer regular descriptive feedback.

4. Teach students to self- assess and set goals

How can I close the gap?

5. Design lessons to focus on one learning target at a time

6. Teach students focused revision

7. Engage students in self-reflection, and let them keep track of and share their learning.

Page 12: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Remember…

Page 13: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

• How can ‘questioning’ inform assessment? What can we use from what we already know that will help us build quality assessments for and of learning?

Page 14: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Let’s use some of what we already know to help us in our discussion of assessment…

Page 15: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Remember BloomAnd his Taxonomy…??

• In 1956, Benjamin Bloom found that over 95 % of the test questions students encounter require them to think only at the lowest possible level...the recall of information.

• Bloom identified six levels within the cognitive domain, from the simple recall or recognition of facts, as the lowest level, through increasingly more complex and abstract mental levels, to the highest order which is classified as evaluation.

Page 16: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

1956-2001…

Bloom’s

original

taxonomy…

•Evaluation

•Synthesis

•Analysis

•Application

•Comprehension

•Knowledge

Page 17: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

The ‘New’ Bloom’s Taxonomy-

A Worthwhile Revision• In 1996 a revision was led by David Krathwohl, a cognitive psychologist who worked with Bloom on the original taxonomy. The revision was completed in 2001.

• The use of verbs in the new taxonomy, rather than nouns, is critical since theverbs represent the cognitive processes that students use on or with the content so that learning occurs.

Page 18: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

•Evaluation

•Synthesis

•Analysis

•Application

•Comprehension

•Knowledge

•Creating

•Evaluating

•Analyzing

•Applying

•Understanding

•Remembering

Bloom’s TaxonomyOriginal Terms New Terms

Page 19: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

BLOOM’S REVISED TAXONOMYCreatingCreating

Generating new ideas, products, or ways of viewing thingsDesigning, constructing, planning, producing, inventing.

 EvaluatingEvaluating

Justifying a decision or course of actionChecking, hypothesizing, critiquing, experimenting, judging

  AnalyzingAnalyzing

Breaking information into parts to explore understandings and relationships

Comparing, organizing, deconstructing, interrogating, finding 

ApplyingApplyingUsing information in another familiar situationImplementing, carrying out, using, executing

 UnderstandingUnderstanding

Explaining ideas or conceptsInterpreting, summarizing, paraphrasing, classifying, explaining

 RememberingRemembering

Recalling informationRecognizing, listing, describing, retrieving, naming, finding

 

Page 20: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Cognitive Processes• Remembering

• Understanding

• Recognizing• Listing• Naming• Finding• Recalling• Retrieving

• Classifying• Summarizing• Inferring• Comparing• Explaining• Interpreting

Page 21: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Cognitive Processes• Applying

• Analyzing

• Evaluating

• Creating

• Executing/Using• Implementing

• Comparing• Differentiating• Organizing• Attributing

• Checking• Critiquing• Generating• Planning

• Producing

Page 22: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Questioning…

If you want a wise answer, ask a reasonable question.

Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe (1749-1832) German poet, novelist and dramatist.

Page 23: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Assessment questions to check for Remembering

(lowest level)

• What happened after...?• How many...?• What is...?• Who was it that...?• Can you name ...?• Find the definition of…• Describe what

happened after…• Who spoke to...?• Which is true or false...?(Pohl, Learning to Think, Thinking to

Learn, p. 12

Page 24: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Remembering, cont’• List• Memorize• Relate• Show• Locate• Distinguish• Give example• Reproduce• Quote• Repeat• Label• Recall• Know• Group• Read• Write• Outline

• Listen• Group• Choose• Recite• Review• Quote• Record• Match• Select• Underline• Cite• Sort

Recall or recognition of specific information

Assessments include:

• Quizzes

• Definitions

• Facts: true/false

• Worksheets

•Vocabulary quizzes

• Reproductions

• Label diagrams

• List facts

• Workbook pages

Page 25: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Assessment questions to check for Understanding

• Can you explain why…?• Can you write in your

own words? • How would you

explain…?• Can you write a brief

outline...?• What do you think could

have happened next...?• Who do you think...?• What was the main

idea...?

• Can you clarify…?• Can you illustrate…?• Does everyone act in

the way that …….. does?

(Pohl, Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn, p. 12

Page 26: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Understanding, cont.

• Restate

• Identify

• Discuss

• Retell

• Research

• Annotate

• Translate

• Give examples of

• Paraphrase

• Reorganize

Understanding of given information• Describe

• Report• Recognize• Review• Observe• Outline• Account for• Interpret• Give main

idea• Estimate• Define

Assessments include:

• Recitation

• Summaries

• Collections

• Explanations

• Examples

• Quizzes

• Lists

• Labels

• Outlines

Page 27: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Assessment questions to check for Applying

• Do you know of another instance where…?

• Can you group by characteristics such as…?

• Which factors would you change if…?

• What questions would you ask of…?

• From the information given, can you develop a set of instructions about…?

(Pohl, Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn, P 13)

Page 28: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Applying, cont’• Translate

• Manipulate

• Exhibit

• Illustrate

• Calculate

• Interpret

• Make

• Practice

• Apply

• Operate

• Interview

• Paint• Change• Compute• Sequence• Show• Solve• Collect• Demonstrate• Dramatize• Construct• Use• Adapt• Draw

Using strategies, concepts, principles and theories in new

situations

Assessments include:

• Photographs

• Illustrations

• Simulations

•Demonstrations

• Journal entries

• Presentations

• Interviews

• Performances

• Diary entries

Page 29: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Assessment questions to check for Analyzing

• Which events could not have happened?

• If. ..happened, what might the ending have been?

• How is...similar to...?• What do you see as other

possible outcomes?• Why did...changes occur?• Can you explain what must

have happened when...?• What are some or the

problems of...?• Can you distinguish

between...?

• What were some of the motives behind..?

• What was the turning point?

• What was the problem with...?

(Pohl, Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn, p. 13)

Page 30: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Analyzing cont’• Distinguish• Question• Appraise• Experiment• Inspect• Examine• Probe• Separate• Inquire• Arrange• Investigate• Sift• Research• Calculate• Criticize

• Compare• Contrast• Survey• Detect• Group• Order• Sequence• Test• Debate• Analyze• Diagram• Relate• Dissect• Categorize• Discriminate

Breaking information

down into its component elements

Assessments include:

• Graph

• Spreadsheet

• Checklist

• Chart

• Outline

• Survey

• Database

• Mobile

• Abstract

• Report

Page 31: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Assessment questions to check for Evaluating

• Is there a better solution to...?

• Judge the value of... What do you think about...?

• Can you defend your position about...?

• Do you think...is a good or bad thing?

• How would you have handled...?

• What changes to.. would you recommend?

• Do you believe...? How would you feel if. ..?

• How effective are. ..?

• What are the consequences..?

• What influence will....have on our lives?

• What are the pros and cons of....?

• Why is ....of value? • What are the

alternatives?• Who will gain & who will

loose? (Pohl, Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn, p. 14)

Page 32: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Evaluating, cont’• Judge• Rate• Validate• Predict• Assess• Score• Revise• Infer• Determine• Prioritize• Tell why• Compare• Evaluate• Defend• Select• Measure

• Choose• Conclude• Deduce• Debate• Justify• Recommend• Discriminate• Appraise• Value• Probe• Argue• Decide• Criticize• Rank• Reject

Judging the value of ideas, materials and

methods by developing and applying standards

and criteria.

Assessments include:

• Debates

• Panels

• Reports

• Evaluation

• Investigations

• Verdicts

•Persuasive speeches

Page 33: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Assessment questions to check for Creating

(highest level)• Can you design a...to...?• Can you see a possible

solution to...?• If you had access to all

resources, how would you deal with...?

• Why don't you devise your own way to...?

• What would happen if ...?

• How many ways can you...?

• Can you create new and unusual uses for...?

• Can you develop a proposal which would...?

(Pohl, Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn, p. 14)

Page 34: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Creating, cont’• Compose• Assemble• Organize• Invent• Compile• Forecast• Devise• Propose• Construct• Plan• Prepare• Develop• Originate• Imagine• Generate

• Formulate

• Improve

• Act

• Predict

• Produce

• Blend

• Set up

• Devise

• Concoct

• Compile

Putting together ideas or elements to

develop a original idea or engage in creative thinking.

Assessments include:

• Film

•Projects

• Plan

•Media products

• Song

• Newspaper

• Advertisements

• Paintings

Page 35: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Questions to think about when developing assessments…

• Did I decide on the purpose(s) of my questions?• Did I choose important--rather than trivial--material to

emphasize students' in-depth exploration of essential/key questions?

• Did I differentiate my questions to ensure that all my students reached my targets?

• Did I encourage discussion in my classroom by using open-ended questions?

• Did I avoid "yes" and "no" questions?• Did I use "probe" questions to encourage students to elaborate

and support assertions and claims?

Page 36: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

Questions to think about when developing assessments…

• Did I ensure that students clearly understood my questions--and avoided a "guessing game?”

• Did I avoid questions that "contain the answer"?• Did I anticipate students' responses to my questions, yet allow

for divergent thinking and original responses?• Did I use purposeful strategies for helping students deal with

incorrect responses?

Page 37: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

References• Bloom's(1956) Revised Taxonomy

http://rite.ed.qut.edu.au/oz-teachernet/training/bloom.html • Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy

http://coe.sdsu.edu/eet/articles/bloomrev/index.htm• http://www.fno.org/nov97/toolkit.html• http://rite.ed.qut.edu.au/oz-teachernet/training/bloom.html• http://serc.carleton.edu/introgeo/socratic/guiding.html• http://serc.carleton.edu/introgeo/socratic/third.html• http://changingminds.org/techniques/questioning/questioning.html• http://serc.carleton.edu/introgeo/socratic/second.html• http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&q=Questioning&um=1&ie=UTF-

8&sa=N&tab=wi• Duncan, D. (2008). Blooms’ Taxonomy in relation to Social Studies.

Powerpoint Presentation.• Pohl, Michael. (2000). Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn: Models

and Strategies to Develop a Classroom Culture of Thinking. Cheltenham, Vic.: Hawker Brownlow.

Page 38: Assessment Literacy Sheboygan Area School District Staff Development 2010-11

References• Stiggins, R. et al. (2006), Classroom assessment for student

learning: Doing it right. Portland, OR: Pearson Assessment Training Institute.

• Tarlinton, D. (2003) Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. bloomspres.ppt.Powerpoint Presentation.

• Balanced assessment (2010). Solution Tree Press. Go.solution-tree.com/assessment