assessing sustainable development in the mining industry in ghana a question of corporate...

7
Journal of Economics and Sustainable Develo ISSN 2222-1700 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2855 (O Vol.3, No.10, 2012 Assessing Sustaina Ghana: A Q Department of Accounting S Abstract The main objective of this paper is provide some guidelines for mining literature that examines sustainable concerned with sustainability at glob these numerous perspectives on su management, and social performanc and what steps a mine must take in have the potential to impact a dive stakeholder groups, there is ample o improved planning, implementatio extended social responsibility to sta training, a mine can improve perf contribute enormously to sustainable Key words: Sustainable developmen 1. Introduction The main issues surrounding sustain gained considerable attention from a Our Common Future, defined s compromising the ability for future however, fails to outline an effective emphasizes that no single blueprin sustainable development will vary a 1995), prompting a number of a viewpoints on the applicability of su this subject now contains a wide-ra exactly mines can contribute to susta Although many have defined generally, is the combination of enh protection and pollution prevention strategy at the highly popularized commonly known as the “Earth Sum from 172 countries, and 3000 acc gathered to discuss practical strategi become a key focus of planning, academics and industrialists, in an frameworks, indicator sets, and man 2. Questioning sustainable deve As already indicated, the literature development. Theories pertaining to agenda for an operating mine since only as long as it is economically provided some perspective on mine socioeconomic issues into analysis, into practice. We maintain that commitment in continuous environm operation, to closure. Both the env in this section of the paper. opment Online) 113 able Development in the Mining I Question of Corporate Perspect Williams Kwasi Boachie Studies Education, University of Education, Winneba, P. O. Box 1277, Kumasi, Ghana. Email: [email protected] s to examine sustainable development in the corpora g companies seeking to operate more sustainably. The e development in the context of minerals and min bal and national scales. What is often challenging to as ustainable mineral extraction, minerals and metals re ce, is how sustainable development applies to mining n order to improve the sustainability of operations. S erse group of environmental entities, and are of inter opportunity for the industry to operate more sustainab on of sound environmental management tools and akeholder groups, the formation of sustainability partn formance in both the environmental and socioecon e development at the mine level. nt; Sustainability; Mining; Mines nable development in the mining industry is a drawn-o a wide range of parties. The Brundtland Commission sustainable development as “meeting the needs o e generations to meet their own needs” (WCED, 19 e sustainability framework for any industry to follow. nt for sustainability exists and that the ways in wh among the different economic and political systems ar academics, industrialists and government employee ustainable development to mining. Consequently, th ange of interpretations, and increasingly it is becom ainable development. and applied the concept differently (see Fig 1), su hanced socioeconomic growth and development, and im n, it first received global endorsement as a managem United Nations Conference on Environment and De mmit”, in Rio 1992, where 116 heads of state or gove credited individuals from nongovernmental organiz ies for tackling pressing global problems. Sustainable environmental protection, and remediation efforts w attempt to operationalize the concept, have develop nagement guidelines for use by governments and busin elopment in the corporate mining context e has failed to outline precisely how a mine can co o sustainable mineral extraction are not directly releva management invests knowing that it is a temporary pr viable to extract and process mineral from ore. Of e sustainability, few have integrated both key indust or explained what measures a mine must take to put su t sustainable development in the corporate minin mental and socioeconomic improvement, from miner vironmental and socioeconomic sustainability agenda f www.iiste.org Industry in tive Kumasi Campus ate mining context, and ere is now a burgeoning ning, most of which is scertain, however, from ecycling, environmental companies themselves, Since mining processes rest to a wide range of bly. Specifically, with d cleaner technologies, nerships, and improved nomic arenas, and thus out one, which has long n, in its landmark report of the present without 987). This definition, The Brundtland Report which countries achieve round the world (NRC, es to provide personal he body of literature on ming unclear as at how ustainable development, mproved environmental ment and developmental evelopment (UNCED), ernment, 8000 delegates zations (Pezzoli, 1997) e development has since worldwide, and several ped a number of policy nesses ontribute to sustainable ant to the sustainability roject that will function f the authors that have trial environmental and ustainable development ng context requires a ral exploration, through for mines are examined

Upload: alexander-decker

Post on 01-Sep-2014

619 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

International Journals Call for paper, http://www.iiste.org/Journals

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Assessing sustainable development in the mining industry in ghana  a question of corporate perspective

Journal of Economics and Sustainable DevelopmentISSN 2222-1700 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2855 (Online)Vol.3, No.10, 2012

Assessing Sustainable Development in the Mining Industry in

Ghana: A Question of Corporate Perspective

Department of Accounting Studies Educati

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to examine sustainable development in the corporate mining context, and

provide some guidelines for mining companies seeking to operate more sustainably. There is now a burgeoning

literature that examines sustainable development in the context of minerals and mining, most of which is

concerned with sustainability at global and national scales. What

these numerous perspectives on sustainable mineral extraction, minerals and metals recycling, environmental

management, and social performance, is how sustainable development applies to mining companies the

and what steps a mine must take in order to improve the sustainability of operations. Since mining processes

have the potential to impact a diverse group of environmental entities, and are of interest to a wide range of

stakeholder groups, there is ample opportunity for the industry to operate more sustainably. Specifically, with

improved planning, implementation of sound environmental management tools and cleaner technologies,

extended social responsibility to stakeholder groups, the formation of

training, a mine can improve performance in both the environmental and socioeconomic arenas, and thus

contribute enormously to sustainable development at the mine level.

Key words: Sustainable development; Sustain

1. Introduction

The main issues surrounding sustainable development in the mining industry is a drawn

gained considerable attention from a wide range of parties. The Brundtland Commission, in its landmark repo

Our Common Future, defined sustainable development as “meeting the needs of the present without

compromising the ability for future generations to meet their own needs” (WCED, 1987). This definition,

however, fails to outline an effective sustainabilit

emphasizes that no single blueprint for sustainability exists and that the ways in which countries achieve

sustainable development will vary among the different economic and political systems ar

1995), prompting a number of academics, industrialists and government employees to provide personal

viewpoints on the applicability of sustainable development to mining. Consequently, the body of literature on

this subject now contains a wide-range of interpretations, and increasingly it is becoming unclear as at how

exactly mines can contribute to sustainable development.

Although many have defined and applied the concept differently (see Fig 1), sustainable development,

generally, is the combination of enhanced socioeconomic growth and development, and improved environmental

protection and pollution prevention, it first received global endorsement as a management and developmental

strategy at the highly popularized United Nations Conf

commonly known as the “Earth Summit”, in Rio 1992, where 116 heads of state or government, 8000 delegates

from 172 countries, and 3000 accredited individuals from nongovernmental organizations (Pezzoli, 1997)

gathered to discuss practical strategies for tackling pressing global problems. Sustainable development has since

become a key focus of planning, environmental protection, and remediation efforts worldwide, and several

academics and industrialists, in an a

frameworks, indicator sets, and management guidelines for use by governments and businesses

2. Questioning sustainable development in the corporate mining context

As already indicated, the literature has failed to outline precisely how a mine can contribute to sustainable

development. Theories pertaining to sustainable mineral extraction are not directly relevant to the sustainability

agenda for an operating mine since management invests

only as long as it is economically viable to extract and process mineral from ore. Of the authors that have

provided some perspective on mine sustainability, few have integrated both key industrial

socioeconomic issues into analysis, or explained what measures a mine must take to put sustainable development

into practice. We maintain that sustainable development in the corporate mining context requires a

commitment in continuous environmental and socioeconomic improvement, from mineral exploration, through

operation, to closure. Both the environmental and socioeconomic sustainability agenda for mines are examined

in this section of the paper.

inable Development 2855 (Online)

113

Assessing Sustainable Development in the Mining Industry in

Ghana: A Question of Corporate Perspective

Williams Kwasi Boachie

Department of Accounting Studies Education, University of Education, Winneba, Kumasi Campus

P. O. Box 1277, Kumasi, Ghana.

Email: [email protected]

The main objective of this paper is to examine sustainable development in the corporate mining context, and

s for mining companies seeking to operate more sustainably. There is now a burgeoning

literature that examines sustainable development in the context of minerals and mining, most of which is

concerned with sustainability at global and national scales. What is often challenging to ascertain, however, from

these numerous perspectives on sustainable mineral extraction, minerals and metals recycling, environmental

management, and social performance, is how sustainable development applies to mining companies the

and what steps a mine must take in order to improve the sustainability of operations. Since mining processes

have the potential to impact a diverse group of environmental entities, and are of interest to a wide range of

s ample opportunity for the industry to operate more sustainably. Specifically, with

improved planning, implementation of sound environmental management tools and cleaner technologies,

extended social responsibility to stakeholder groups, the formation of sustainability partnerships, and improved

training, a mine can improve performance in both the environmental and socioeconomic arenas, and thus

contribute enormously to sustainable development at the mine level.

Sustainable development; Sustainability; Mining; Mines

The main issues surrounding sustainable development in the mining industry is a drawn-out one, which has long

gained considerable attention from a wide range of parties. The Brundtland Commission, in its landmark repo

, defined sustainable development as “meeting the needs of the present without

compromising the ability for future generations to meet their own needs” (WCED, 1987). This definition,

however, fails to outline an effective sustainability framework for any industry to follow. The Brundtland Report

emphasizes that no single blueprint for sustainability exists and that the ways in which countries achieve

sustainable development will vary among the different economic and political systems ar

1995), prompting a number of academics, industrialists and government employees to provide personal

viewpoints on the applicability of sustainable development to mining. Consequently, the body of literature on

range of interpretations, and increasingly it is becoming unclear as at how

exactly mines can contribute to sustainable development.

Although many have defined and applied the concept differently (see Fig 1), sustainable development,

the combination of enhanced socioeconomic growth and development, and improved environmental

protection and pollution prevention, it first received global endorsement as a management and developmental

strategy at the highly popularized United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED),

commonly known as the “Earth Summit”, in Rio 1992, where 116 heads of state or government, 8000 delegates

from 172 countries, and 3000 accredited individuals from nongovernmental organizations (Pezzoli, 1997)

gathered to discuss practical strategies for tackling pressing global problems. Sustainable development has since

become a key focus of planning, environmental protection, and remediation efforts worldwide, and several

academics and industrialists, in an attempt to operationalize the concept, have developed a number of policy

frameworks, indicator sets, and management guidelines for use by governments and businesses

Questioning sustainable development in the corporate mining context

he literature has failed to outline precisely how a mine can contribute to sustainable

development. Theories pertaining to sustainable mineral extraction are not directly relevant to the sustainability

agenda for an operating mine since management invests knowing that it is a temporary project that will function

only as long as it is economically viable to extract and process mineral from ore. Of the authors that have

provided some perspective on mine sustainability, few have integrated both key industrial

socioeconomic issues into analysis, or explained what measures a mine must take to put sustainable development

into practice. We maintain that sustainable development in the corporate mining context requires a

vironmental and socioeconomic improvement, from mineral exploration, through

operation, to closure. Both the environmental and socioeconomic sustainability agenda for mines are examined

www.iiste.org

Assessing Sustainable Development in the Mining Industry in

Ghana: A Question of Corporate Perspective

on, University of Education, Winneba, Kumasi Campus

The main objective of this paper is to examine sustainable development in the corporate mining context, and

s for mining companies seeking to operate more sustainably. There is now a burgeoning

literature that examines sustainable development in the context of minerals and mining, most of which is

is often challenging to ascertain, however, from

these numerous perspectives on sustainable mineral extraction, minerals and metals recycling, environmental

management, and social performance, is how sustainable development applies to mining companies themselves,

and what steps a mine must take in order to improve the sustainability of operations. Since mining processes

have the potential to impact a diverse group of environmental entities, and are of interest to a wide range of

s ample opportunity for the industry to operate more sustainably. Specifically, with

improved planning, implementation of sound environmental management tools and cleaner technologies,

sustainability partnerships, and improved

training, a mine can improve performance in both the environmental and socioeconomic arenas, and thus

out one, which has long

gained considerable attention from a wide range of parties. The Brundtland Commission, in its landmark report

, defined sustainable development as “meeting the needs of the present without

compromising the ability for future generations to meet their own needs” (WCED, 1987). This definition,

y framework for any industry to follow. The Brundtland Report

emphasizes that no single blueprint for sustainability exists and that the ways in which countries achieve

sustainable development will vary among the different economic and political systems around the world (NRC,

1995), prompting a number of academics, industrialists and government employees to provide personal

viewpoints on the applicability of sustainable development to mining. Consequently, the body of literature on

range of interpretations, and increasingly it is becoming unclear as at how

Although many have defined and applied the concept differently (see Fig 1), sustainable development,

the combination of enhanced socioeconomic growth and development, and improved environmental

protection and pollution prevention, it first received global endorsement as a management and developmental

erence on Environment and Development (UNCED),

commonly known as the “Earth Summit”, in Rio 1992, where 116 heads of state or government, 8000 delegates

from 172 countries, and 3000 accredited individuals from nongovernmental organizations (Pezzoli, 1997)

gathered to discuss practical strategies for tackling pressing global problems. Sustainable development has since

become a key focus of planning, environmental protection, and remediation efforts worldwide, and several

ttempt to operationalize the concept, have developed a number of policy

frameworks, indicator sets, and management guidelines for use by governments and businesses

he literature has failed to outline precisely how a mine can contribute to sustainable

development. Theories pertaining to sustainable mineral extraction are not directly relevant to the sustainability

knowing that it is a temporary project that will function

only as long as it is economically viable to extract and process mineral from ore. Of the authors that have

provided some perspective on mine sustainability, few have integrated both key industrial environmental and

socioeconomic issues into analysis, or explained what measures a mine must take to put sustainable development

into practice. We maintain that sustainable development in the corporate mining context requires a

vironmental and socioeconomic improvement, from mineral exploration, through

operation, to closure. Both the environmental and socioeconomic sustainability agenda for mines are examined

Page 2: Assessing sustainable development in the mining industry in ghana  a question of corporate perspective

Journal of Economics and Sustainable DevelopmentISSN 2222-1700 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2855 (Online)Vol.3, No.10, 2012

2.1 Environmental agenda for mines

Minimizing adverse environmental impacts is an important goal for all industries keen on contributing to

sustainable development. Every industry, in addition to generic environmental complications, faces

industry-specific challenges and requires careful plann

overcome. In the case of mining, the environmental problems resulting from operations are well known (see

Table 1), particularly because the mining industry attracts considerable public attention with i

obtain planning permission to take land out of other uses and to extract minerals (Richards, 1996) as well with its

nuisance effects, such as noise, dust and traffic. To contribute to sustainable development, a mine must minimize

environmental impacts throughout its lifecycle, from exploration, through extraction and refining, to reclamation.

This is best accomplished through effective environmental management.

2.2 Socioeconomic agenda for mines

Principle 1 of the Rio Declaration procl

development” and “are entitled to a healthy and productive life in harmony with nature” (Epps, 1997). Thus,

another essential element of sustainable development is extended socioeconomic

& Mitchell (2000) define as “the internalization of social and environmental effects of operations through

proactive pollution prevention and social impacts assessment so that harm is anticipated and avoided and

benefits are optimized”. This simply requires industrial operations to address the needs of all stakeholder groups

throughout the various stages of operation. There is now a growing expectation for corporations to operate in

accordance with community groups that are

needs of stakeholder parties when devising corporate policies. In fact, since the success of so many industries

particularly those of the primary sector

parties, and the cooperation of surrounding communities, it makes practical business sense to account for the

needs of these groups through appropriate corporate policies.

For a mine, since a number of the cultural aesth

society can be adversely impacted by activity, it is crucial that the needs of secondary parties be addressed from

the outset. This can be a challenge of monumental proportions, since many external

activities as being heavily environmentally and ecologically damaging, in spite of what effective preventative

measures are in place. Further, accommodating the demands of a community can be highly costly and time

consuming, requiring that the mining company holds a number of public meetings and consultations, to issue

significant amounts of corporate literature, and to hire outside consultation assistance. Some recommended

strategies for managing the key socioeconomic issues in the

• Gathering local community perceptions on mine development

• Determining beforehand the likely effects of development on normal evolutionary process within the

community (way of life, relationships, behavior, and social resilie

• Identifying the possible effects of the project on religious on historic elements of the community’s way of life

• Determining the likely participation of local people in the mine project

• Assessing whether there is a need for relocation of the populatio

• Determining whether or not there is potential community conflict

• Calculating economic costs of protecting the community’s cultural values

• Identifying beforehand the potential project benefits and negative impacts to the comm

A mine can provide a number of economic benefits to a community, including providing employment to

residents, making use of local services and contributing funds to regional developmental projects (Dorian &

Humphreys, 1994). In terms of employment, i

residents seek alternative employment once extraction and mineral processing activities have ceased. This is

imperative considering that the livelihood of so many communities depends upon min

example, as McAllister et al (1990) explain, in Ghana, mining has long been regarded as the backbone of many

regional economics, particularly in rural and remote areas, where it often serves as the sole source of income.

Particularly required in situations like these is assurance that residents have alternative employment, or at a

minimum, the skills required to work in other industries following mine closure. To minimize such problems,

mines, while still in operation, can employ the f

• Implementation of re-skilling programs: the general functional literacy level of mine labourers is improved,

and workers are trained in additional industrial areas to ensure that they are marketable

mine has closed.

• Establishment of small and medium sized enterprises: to establish small

independent of the mine for the purposes of attracting entrepreneurial operations that will survive after the c

of the mine.

• Development of Education and Training Facilities: since every mine demands people with good technical

skills, the establishment of technical colleges thus provides key business opportunities; the mining company can

inable Development 2855 (Online)

114

2.1 Environmental agenda for mines

imizing adverse environmental impacts is an important goal for all industries keen on contributing to

sustainable development. Every industry, in addition to generic environmental complications, faces

specific challenges and requires careful planning, tactical investment, and strategic management to

overcome. In the case of mining, the environmental problems resulting from operations are well known (see

Table 1), particularly because the mining industry attracts considerable public attention with i

obtain planning permission to take land out of other uses and to extract minerals (Richards, 1996) as well with its

nuisance effects, such as noise, dust and traffic. To contribute to sustainable development, a mine must minimize

mental impacts throughout its lifecycle, from exploration, through extraction and refining, to reclamation.

This is best accomplished through effective environmental management.

2.2 Socioeconomic agenda for mines

Principle 1 of the Rio Declaration proclaims that “Human beings are at the centre of concerns for sustainable

development” and “are entitled to a healthy and productive life in harmony with nature” (Epps, 1997). Thus,

another essential element of sustainable development is extended socioeconomic responsibility, which Warhurst

& Mitchell (2000) define as “the internalization of social and environmental effects of operations through

proactive pollution prevention and social impacts assessment so that harm is anticipated and avoided and

optimized”. This simply requires industrial operations to address the needs of all stakeholder groups

throughout the various stages of operation. There is now a growing expectation for corporations to operate in

accordance with community groups that are potentially affected by industrial operations, and to address the

needs of stakeholder parties when devising corporate policies. In fact, since the success of so many industries

particularly those of the primary sector – depends so heavily upon the contributions and input from stakeholder

parties, and the cooperation of surrounding communities, it makes practical business sense to account for the

needs of these groups through appropriate corporate policies.

For a mine, since a number of the cultural aesthetic, and natural resources critical to the well being of

society can be adversely impacted by activity, it is crucial that the needs of secondary parties be addressed from

the outset. This can be a challenge of monumental proportions, since many external groups perceive mining

activities as being heavily environmentally and ecologically damaging, in spite of what effective preventative

measures are in place. Further, accommodating the demands of a community can be highly costly and time

ing that the mining company holds a number of public meetings and consultations, to issue

significant amounts of corporate literature, and to hire outside consultation assistance. Some recommended

strategies for managing the key socioeconomic issues in the industry include (Epps, 1997):

Gathering local community perceptions on mine development

Determining beforehand the likely effects of development on normal evolutionary process within the

community (way of life, relationships, behavior, and social resilience)

Identifying the possible effects of the project on religious on historic elements of the community’s way of life

Determining the likely participation of local people in the mine project

Assessing whether there is a need for relocation of the population as result of the mine project

Determining whether or not there is potential community conflict

Calculating economic costs of protecting the community’s cultural values

Identifying beforehand the potential project benefits and negative impacts to the comm

A mine can provide a number of economic benefits to a community, including providing employment to

residents, making use of local services and contributing funds to regional developmental projects (Dorian &

Humphreys, 1994). In terms of employment, it is critical not only for the mine to hire locally, but to help

residents seek alternative employment once extraction and mineral processing activities have ceased. This is

imperative considering that the livelihood of so many communities depends upon min

example, as McAllister et al (1990) explain, in Ghana, mining has long been regarded as the backbone of many

regional economics, particularly in rural and remote areas, where it often serves as the sole source of income.

required in situations like these is assurance that residents have alternative employment, or at a

minimum, the skills required to work in other industries following mine closure. To minimize such problems,

mines, while still in operation, can employ the following strategies (adopted from Rocha & Bristow, 1997):

skilling programs: the general functional literacy level of mine labourers is improved,

and workers are trained in additional industrial areas to ensure that they are marketable in the job market once the

Establishment of small and medium sized enterprises: to establish small-and medium

independent of the mine for the purposes of attracting entrepreneurial operations that will survive after the c

Development of Education and Training Facilities: since every mine demands people with good technical

skills, the establishment of technical colleges thus provides key business opportunities; the mining company can

www.iiste.org

imizing adverse environmental impacts is an important goal for all industries keen on contributing to

sustainable development. Every industry, in addition to generic environmental complications, faces

ing, tactical investment, and strategic management to

overcome. In the case of mining, the environmental problems resulting from operations are well known (see

Table 1), particularly because the mining industry attracts considerable public attention with its ongoing need to

obtain planning permission to take land out of other uses and to extract minerals (Richards, 1996) as well with its

nuisance effects, such as noise, dust and traffic. To contribute to sustainable development, a mine must minimize

mental impacts throughout its lifecycle, from exploration, through extraction and refining, to reclamation.

aims that “Human beings are at the centre of concerns for sustainable

development” and “are entitled to a healthy and productive life in harmony with nature” (Epps, 1997). Thus,

responsibility, which Warhurst

& Mitchell (2000) define as “the internalization of social and environmental effects of operations through

proactive pollution prevention and social impacts assessment so that harm is anticipated and avoided and

optimized”. This simply requires industrial operations to address the needs of all stakeholder groups

throughout the various stages of operation. There is now a growing expectation for corporations to operate in

potentially affected by industrial operations, and to address the

needs of stakeholder parties when devising corporate policies. In fact, since the success of so many industries –

ibutions and input from stakeholder

parties, and the cooperation of surrounding communities, it makes practical business sense to account for the

etic, and natural resources critical to the well being of

society can be adversely impacted by activity, it is crucial that the needs of secondary parties be addressed from

groups perceive mining

activities as being heavily environmentally and ecologically damaging, in spite of what effective preventative

measures are in place. Further, accommodating the demands of a community can be highly costly and time

ing that the mining company holds a number of public meetings and consultations, to issue

significant amounts of corporate literature, and to hire outside consultation assistance. Some recommended

industry include (Epps, 1997):

Determining beforehand the likely effects of development on normal evolutionary process within the

Identifying the possible effects of the project on religious on historic elements of the community’s way of life

n as result of the mine project

Identifying beforehand the potential project benefits and negative impacts to the community

A mine can provide a number of economic benefits to a community, including providing employment to

residents, making use of local services and contributing funds to regional developmental projects (Dorian &

t is critical not only for the mine to hire locally, but to help

residents seek alternative employment once extraction and mineral processing activities have ceased. This is

imperative considering that the livelihood of so many communities depends upon mineral production. For

example, as McAllister et al (1990) explain, in Ghana, mining has long been regarded as the backbone of many

regional economics, particularly in rural and remote areas, where it often serves as the sole source of income.

required in situations like these is assurance that residents have alternative employment, or at a

minimum, the skills required to work in other industries following mine closure. To minimize such problems,

ollowing strategies (adopted from Rocha & Bristow, 1997):

skilling programs: the general functional literacy level of mine labourers is improved,

in the job market once the

and medium-sized businesses

independent of the mine for the purposes of attracting entrepreneurial operations that will survive after the closure

Development of Education and Training Facilities: since every mine demands people with good technical

skills, the establishment of technical colleges thus provides key business opportunities; the mining company can

Page 3: Assessing sustainable development in the mining industry in ghana  a question of corporate perspective

Journal of Economics and Sustainable DevelopmentISSN 2222-1700 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2855 (Online)Vol.3, No.10, 2012

also provide financial assistance to locals in the form of academic scholarships and bursaries, offer certification

programs, or apprentice programs to further enhance skill levels.

The next section of the paper outlines a series of steps that would lead to improved sustainabi

case studies of Anglogold Ashanti and Anglo Platinum Limited are then presented illustrate how two of Africa’s

leading mining sustainable development practitioners have operationalize the concept.

3. Interrogating sustainable development g

Once mine managers and employees fully conceptualize the merits of operating sustainably, and how sustainable

development applies in the corporate mining context, the transition will not be difficult. What management must

not do is follow too closely the sustainability guidelines outlined in government mining documents, since many

do not clearly specify how mine properties can contribute to sustainable development, or outline the necessary

steps for improved mine sustainability. Often, g

wide range of mineral and mining activities such as extraction, processing, recycling, and substitution, each of

which has a significantly different contribution to sustainable development. T

Environmental Action Plan Volume 2, which, by building upon the Brundtland definition, attempts to define

sustainable development in the context of minerals and metals, and address a number of issues relevant to

mining such as reclamation, land access, protected area preservation, and aboriginal rights (Shinya, 1998). The

Policy, overall, is monumental in that it represents Ghana’s first national attempt to advance sustainable

development in the mining context, but it fails to prov

companies, despite one of its six major objectives being “to provide a framework for the development and

application of science and technology to enhance the industry’s competitiveness and environmental ste

(Government of Ghana, 1996). It supports pollution prevention, risk assessment, and life

does not identify which practices mines should adopt

3.1 Improved planning

The needs of the environment, communities, and stakeholders

contributing to sustainable development involves setting goals for continuous improvement, corporate policies

must be rewritten to accurately identify a mining company’s short and long

socioeconomic goals. Revamped corporate policies and improved goal setting is a fundamental starting point for

the mining company, because it demonstrates to stakeholders a clear corporate commitment, and helps motivate

mine employees to work toward new and i

policy is the first step to reconciling mining with the sustainable development agenda, as it helps align operations

with governmental objectives, create a basis for dialogue, and clarify corpo

operations progress, a policy can then be used to ascertain whether performance is consistent with the company’s

sustainable development goals. The mine could also have in place corporate statements and complementary

policies that address more specific areas of mine sustainability. Examples include an occupational health and

safety policy, a medical policy, mine reclamation policy, an environmental assessment policy for property

transfer, environmental health and safety po

Improved planning for sustainable development also requires a mining operation to develop practical plans

for closure, an issue often overlooked from the outset. Environmentally, a mine must p

Adequate water supplies, clean air, and productive land are left available to future operations; A health

environment is made available to future miners; Opportunities exist for future land owners; Post abandonment

risks are minimized. Further, since mines are typically located in areas where they represent the main economic

activity, following abandonment, staff must (Rocha & Bristow, 1997; Warhurst et al, 1999): Support local

training/educational institutions; Ensure ongoing training a

assistance with job search facilities; Account for compensating workers and families to cope with readjustment

and temporary unemployment. Addressing each of these environmental and socioeconomic considerations

be considered best practice for mine closure.

3.2 Improved environmental management

Once the important organizational groundwork has been laid, mine management can then focus on implementing

tools and technologies that lead to improved efficiency in

environmental management practices, which not only helps improve the effectiveness of operations but also

enables environmental technologies to be more readily implemented. This is accomplished by adopting

of environmental management tools, the most important of which include (Garrod & Chadwick, 1996):

Environmental reviews; Environmental accounting; Environmental reporting; Environmental audits;

Environmental policies; An environmental management

mine environmental audits and reviews can serve as an effective means for assessing risks (Bunch and Garr,

1990), including health, ecological and ecotoxicological impacts. In another case, an environme

system (EMS), which is a set of organizational procedures, responsibilities, processes and necessary means to

inable Development 2855 (Online)

115

l assistance to locals in the form of academic scholarships and bursaries, offer certification

programs, or apprentice programs to further enhance skill levels.

The next section of the paper outlines a series of steps that would lead to improved sustainabi

case studies of Anglogold Ashanti and Anglo Platinum Limited are then presented illustrate how two of Africa’s

leading mining sustainable development practitioners have operationalize the concept.

Interrogating sustainable development guidelines for mines

Once mine managers and employees fully conceptualize the merits of operating sustainably, and how sustainable

development applies in the corporate mining context, the transition will not be difficult. What management must

ow too closely the sustainability guidelines outlined in government mining documents, since many

do not clearly specify how mine properties can contribute to sustainable development, or outline the necessary

steps for improved mine sustainability. Often, governments have implemented sustainability policies that cover a

wide range of mineral and mining activities such as extraction, processing, recycling, and substitution, each of

which has a significantly different contribution to sustainable development. Take, for example, Ghana’s

Environmental Action Plan Volume 2, which, by building upon the Brundtland definition, attempts to define

sustainable development in the context of minerals and metals, and address a number of issues relevant to

lamation, land access, protected area preservation, and aboriginal rights (Shinya, 1998). The

Policy, overall, is monumental in that it represents Ghana’s first national attempt to advance sustainable

development in the mining context, but it fails to provide accurate sustainability guidelines for mining

companies, despite one of its six major objectives being “to provide a framework for the development and

application of science and technology to enhance the industry’s competitiveness and environmental ste

(Government of Ghana, 1996). It supports pollution prevention, risk assessment, and life-

does not identify which practices mines should adopt

The needs of the environment, communities, and stakeholders need to be addressed from the outset. Since

contributing to sustainable development involves setting goals for continuous improvement, corporate policies

must be rewritten to accurately identify a mining company’s short and long-term environmental and

ioeconomic goals. Revamped corporate policies and improved goal setting is a fundamental starting point for

the mining company, because it demonstrates to stakeholders a clear corporate commitment, and helps motivate

mine employees to work toward new and improved goals. As Cooney (2000) explains, a sustainable mining

policy is the first step to reconciling mining with the sustainable development agenda, as it helps align operations

with governmental objectives, create a basis for dialogue, and clarify corporate sustainability objectives. As

operations progress, a policy can then be used to ascertain whether performance is consistent with the company’s

sustainable development goals. The mine could also have in place corporate statements and complementary

cies that address more specific areas of mine sustainability. Examples include an occupational health and

safety policy, a medical policy, mine reclamation policy, an environmental assessment policy for property

transfer, environmental health and safety policy, governmental affairs audits, and a mining affairs policy.

Improved planning for sustainable development also requires a mining operation to develop practical plans

for closure, an issue often overlooked from the outset. Environmentally, a mine must p

Adequate water supplies, clean air, and productive land are left available to future operations; A health

environment is made available to future miners; Opportunities exist for future land owners; Post abandonment

Further, since mines are typically located in areas where they represent the main economic

activity, following abandonment, staff must (Rocha & Bristow, 1997; Warhurst et al, 1999): Support local

training/educational institutions; Ensure ongoing training and reskilling of workers; Commit to providing

assistance with job search facilities; Account for compensating workers and families to cope with readjustment

and temporary unemployment. Addressing each of these environmental and socioeconomic considerations

be considered best practice for mine closure.

3.2 Improved environmental management

Once the important organizational groundwork has been laid, mine management can then focus on implementing

tools and technologies that lead to improved efficiency in operations. The first step, however, is improving

environmental management practices, which not only helps improve the effectiveness of operations but also

enables environmental technologies to be more readily implemented. This is accomplished by adopting

of environmental management tools, the most important of which include (Garrod & Chadwick, 1996):

Environmental reviews; Environmental accounting; Environmental reporting; Environmental audits;

Environmental policies; An environmental management system (EMS) and Life-cycle assessments. For example,

mine environmental audits and reviews can serve as an effective means for assessing risks (Bunch and Garr,

1990), including health, ecological and ecotoxicological impacts. In another case, an environme

system (EMS), which is a set of organizational procedures, responsibilities, processes and necessary means to

www.iiste.org

l assistance to locals in the form of academic scholarships and bursaries, offer certification

The next section of the paper outlines a series of steps that would lead to improved sustainability at mines. Two

case studies of Anglogold Ashanti and Anglo Platinum Limited are then presented illustrate how two of Africa’s

Once mine managers and employees fully conceptualize the merits of operating sustainably, and how sustainable

development applies in the corporate mining context, the transition will not be difficult. What management must

ow too closely the sustainability guidelines outlined in government mining documents, since many

do not clearly specify how mine properties can contribute to sustainable development, or outline the necessary

overnments have implemented sustainability policies that cover a

wide range of mineral and mining activities such as extraction, processing, recycling, and substitution, each of

ake, for example, Ghana’s

Environmental Action Plan Volume 2, which, by building upon the Brundtland definition, attempts to define

sustainable development in the context of minerals and metals, and address a number of issues relevant to

lamation, land access, protected area preservation, and aboriginal rights (Shinya, 1998). The

Policy, overall, is monumental in that it represents Ghana’s first national attempt to advance sustainable

ide accurate sustainability guidelines for mining

companies, despite one of its six major objectives being “to provide a framework for the development and

application of science and technology to enhance the industry’s competitiveness and environmental stewardship”

-cycle management, but

need to be addressed from the outset. Since

contributing to sustainable development involves setting goals for continuous improvement, corporate policies

term environmental and

ioeconomic goals. Revamped corporate policies and improved goal setting is a fundamental starting point for

the mining company, because it demonstrates to stakeholders a clear corporate commitment, and helps motivate

mproved goals. As Cooney (2000) explains, a sustainable mining

policy is the first step to reconciling mining with the sustainable development agenda, as it helps align operations

rate sustainability objectives. As

operations progress, a policy can then be used to ascertain whether performance is consistent with the company’s

sustainable development goals. The mine could also have in place corporate statements and complementary

cies that address more specific areas of mine sustainability. Examples include an occupational health and

safety policy, a medical policy, mine reclamation policy, an environmental assessment policy for property

licy, governmental affairs audits, and a mining affairs policy.

Improved planning for sustainable development also requires a mining operation to develop practical plans

for closure, an issue often overlooked from the outset. Environmentally, a mine must plan to ensure that:

Adequate water supplies, clean air, and productive land are left available to future operations; A health

environment is made available to future miners; Opportunities exist for future land owners; Post abandonment

Further, since mines are typically located in areas where they represent the main economic

activity, following abandonment, staff must (Rocha & Bristow, 1997; Warhurst et al, 1999): Support local

nd reskilling of workers; Commit to providing

assistance with job search facilities; Account for compensating workers and families to cope with readjustment

and temporary unemployment. Addressing each of these environmental and socioeconomic considerations would

Once the important organizational groundwork has been laid, mine management can then focus on implementing

operations. The first step, however, is improving

environmental management practices, which not only helps improve the effectiveness of operations but also

enables environmental technologies to be more readily implemented. This is accomplished by adopting a number

of environmental management tools, the most important of which include (Garrod & Chadwick, 1996):

Environmental reviews; Environmental accounting; Environmental reporting; Environmental audits;

cycle assessments. For example,

mine environmental audits and reviews can serve as an effective means for assessing risks (Bunch and Garr,

1990), including health, ecological and ecotoxicological impacts. In another case, an environmental management

system (EMS), which is a set of organizational procedures, responsibilities, processes and necessary means to

Page 4: Assessing sustainable development in the mining industry in ghana  a question of corporate perspective

Journal of Economics and Sustainable DevelopmentISSN 2222-1700 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2855 (Online)Vol.3, No.10, 2012

implement environmental policies (Begley, 1996), can assist a company in identifying opportunities for more

effective use of resources, and to better address constraints and risks (Warhurst & Noronha, 2000

3.3 Addressing the needs of communities and stakeholders

Shifting to the socioeconomic arena of sustainable development, given the wide range of stakeholders that are

potentially affected throughout the life of a mine, in combination with the high degree of public awareness of

mine impacts, it is becoming increasingly important for mining companies to address the needs of stakeholder

groups in policy-making processes. In fact, imp

relations in all industries, and extended corporate responsibility is now a growing expectation within the public

domain. By demonstrating a commitment to community residents, shareholders, ext

employees, industry – in this case, mining

social responsibility can be achieved in the industry if individual mines concentrate on improving

communications, community relations, and internal management strategy.

3.4 Formation of sustainability partnerships

Finding cooperative approaches for engaging with the rest of civil society is a key to perpetuating improved

sustainable development in industry. This is best

influential groups and organizations such as academic establishments, churches, research institutions, NGOs,

non-profit organizations, governmental bodies, and voluntary associations. Labonne (1999)

strategies for mine management keen on forming sustainability partnership: Advocating good governance in

developing countries with potentially rich mineral endowments by supporting efforts to increase technical

assistance in the mineral resources field; Forming partnerships with government and external stakeholders, and

taking steps to reduce social exposure; and Creating a socially proactive culture within the industry by reaching

out to stakeholders.

3.5 Emphasis on training

Chapter 36 of Agenda 21 contends that training is “one of the most important tools to develop human resources”

and to “facilitate the transition to a more sustainable world” (Hale, 1995) for a mine to operate more sustainably,

awareness education is needed at all i

governments and other industries, through professionals, to machine users and operators. Mine employees must

be provided with information about key corporate environmental and socioeconomic

the mine development process. Mining companies must take initiatives to educate mine employees. The need for

increased educational resources is evident in several mining regions around the world. For example, in a number

of small-scale gold mining areas in developing countries, where mercury is still used as a leach reagent in spite

of its toxicity, a major information gap exists because miners, particularly those using rudimentary techniques,

have not been properly educated on me

Integrating these and similar coursework at mines would certainly lead to improved environmental and

socioeconomic conditions. By following the six guidelines outlined in this section of the pa

significantly improve environmental and socioeconomic performance and in turn improve the sustainability of

operations. A number of mining companies worldwide have already achieved sufficient environmental

socioeconomic improvement by foll

experiences in Ghana and South Africa are presented in the next and final section of this paper. Both have helped

set a precedent for sustainability in the mining industry, and repr

to improve the sustainability of operations.

4. Two case studies in Ghana and South Africa

Sanchez (1998) observed that many major mining companies in the world, in an attempt to improve

environmental performance, have integrated into their operations a number of highly effective environmental

policies and formal documents, a well

improved stakeholder communication tools, provisions for mine

and ecobalances. More recently, these companies have become active in promoting corporate socioeconomic

responsibility. Thus, there is now consensus building on both environmental and socioeconomic issues. In

the discussions to follow, case studies of two of the industry’s leading sustainable development practitioners in

Ghana and South Africa are presented to illustrate how sustainable development has been embraced at the

corporate level.

4.1 Case study 1: Anglogold Ashanti (Ghana)

Headquartered in Johannesburg, South Africa, AngloGokld Ashanti has 20 operations in 10 countries on four

continents, as well as several exploration programmes in both the established and new gold producing regions of

the world. The group’s operations are divided into the following regions: South Africa Region, Continental

Africa Region, Australasia Region, and the Americas Region. AngloGold Ashanti employed 61,242 people,

including contractors, in 2011 (2010: 62,046) and produced 4.3

inable Development 2855 (Online)

116

implement environmental policies (Begley, 1996), can assist a company in identifying opportunities for more

urces, and to better address constraints and risks (Warhurst & Noronha, 2000

3.3 Addressing the needs of communities and stakeholders

Shifting to the socioeconomic arena of sustainable development, given the wide range of stakeholders that are

affected throughout the life of a mine, in combination with the high degree of public awareness of

mine impacts, it is becoming increasingly important for mining companies to address the needs of stakeholder

making processes. In fact, improved communications is proving integral in enhancing business

relations in all industries, and extended corporate responsibility is now a growing expectation within the public

domain. By demonstrating a commitment to community residents, shareholders, external stakeholders, and

in this case, mining – will experience an increased ease with which to operate. Significant

social responsibility can be achieved in the industry if individual mines concentrate on improving

munity relations, and internal management strategy.

3.4 Formation of sustainability partnerships

Finding cooperative approaches for engaging with the rest of civil society is a key to perpetuating improved

sustainable development in industry. This is best accomplished through the formation of partnerships with

influential groups and organizations such as academic establishments, churches, research institutions, NGOs,

profit organizations, governmental bodies, and voluntary associations. Labonne (1999)

strategies for mine management keen on forming sustainability partnership: Advocating good governance in

developing countries with potentially rich mineral endowments by supporting efforts to increase technical

l resources field; Forming partnerships with government and external stakeholders, and

taking steps to reduce social exposure; and Creating a socially proactive culture within the industry by reaching

6 of Agenda 21 contends that training is “one of the most important tools to develop human resources”

and to “facilitate the transition to a more sustainable world” (Hale, 1995) for a mine to operate more sustainably,

awareness education is needed at all industrial levels, from the decision makers involved directly with

governments and other industries, through professionals, to machine users and operators. Mine employees must

be provided with information about key corporate environmental and socioeconomic issues, company goals, and

the mine development process. Mining companies must take initiatives to educate mine employees. The need for

increased educational resources is evident in several mining regions around the world. For example, in a number

scale gold mining areas in developing countries, where mercury is still used as a leach reagent in spite

of its toxicity, a major information gap exists because miners, particularly those using rudimentary techniques,

have not been properly educated on mercury use and its associated environmental and health impacts.

Integrating these and similar coursework at mines would certainly lead to improved environmental and

socioeconomic conditions. By following the six guidelines outlined in this section of the pa

significantly improve environmental and socioeconomic performance and in turn improve the sustainability of

operations. A number of mining companies worldwide have already achieved sufficient environmental

socioeconomic improvement by following guidelines similar to those outlined above. Case studies of two such

experiences in Ghana and South Africa are presented in the next and final section of this paper. Both have helped

set a precedent for sustainability in the mining industry, and represent an adequate benchmark for mines striving

to improve the sustainability of operations.

Two case studies in Ghana and South Africa

Sanchez (1998) observed that many major mining companies in the world, in an attempt to improve

ce, have integrated into their operations a number of highly effective environmental

policies and formal documents, a well-trained staff for environmental matters, periodic environmental audits,

improved stakeholder communication tools, provisions for mine decommissioning, and life

and ecobalances. More recently, these companies have become active in promoting corporate socioeconomic

responsibility. Thus, there is now consensus building on both environmental and socioeconomic issues. In

the discussions to follow, case studies of two of the industry’s leading sustainable development practitioners in

Ghana and South Africa are presented to illustrate how sustainable development has been embraced at the

logold Ashanti (Ghana)

Headquartered in Johannesburg, South Africa, AngloGokld Ashanti has 20 operations in 10 countries on four

continents, as well as several exploration programmes in both the established and new gold producing regions of

group’s operations are divided into the following regions: South Africa Region, Continental

Africa Region, Australasia Region, and the Americas Region. AngloGold Ashanti employed 61,242 people,

including contractors, in 2011 (2010: 62,046) and produced 4.33Moz of gold (2010: 4.52Moz), generating

www.iiste.org

implement environmental policies (Begley, 1996), can assist a company in identifying opportunities for more

urces, and to better address constraints and risks (Warhurst & Noronha, 2000

Shifting to the socioeconomic arena of sustainable development, given the wide range of stakeholders that are

affected throughout the life of a mine, in combination with the high degree of public awareness of

mine impacts, it is becoming increasingly important for mining companies to address the needs of stakeholder

roved communications is proving integral in enhancing business

relations in all industries, and extended corporate responsibility is now a growing expectation within the public

ernal stakeholders, and

will experience an increased ease with which to operate. Significant

social responsibility can be achieved in the industry if individual mines concentrate on improving

Finding cooperative approaches for engaging with the rest of civil society is a key to perpetuating improved

accomplished through the formation of partnerships with

influential groups and organizations such as academic establishments, churches, research institutions, NGOs,

profit organizations, governmental bodies, and voluntary associations. Labonne (1999) outlines three major

strategies for mine management keen on forming sustainability partnership: Advocating good governance in

developing countries with potentially rich mineral endowments by supporting efforts to increase technical

l resources field; Forming partnerships with government and external stakeholders, and

taking steps to reduce social exposure; and Creating a socially proactive culture within the industry by reaching

6 of Agenda 21 contends that training is “one of the most important tools to develop human resources”

and to “facilitate the transition to a more sustainable world” (Hale, 1995) for a mine to operate more sustainably,

ndustrial levels, from the decision makers involved directly with

governments and other industries, through professionals, to machine users and operators. Mine employees must

issues, company goals, and

the mine development process. Mining companies must take initiatives to educate mine employees. The need for

increased educational resources is evident in several mining regions around the world. For example, in a number

scale gold mining areas in developing countries, where mercury is still used as a leach reagent in spite

of its toxicity, a major information gap exists because miners, particularly those using rudimentary techniques,

rcury use and its associated environmental and health impacts.

Integrating these and similar coursework at mines would certainly lead to improved environmental and

socioeconomic conditions. By following the six guidelines outlined in this section of the paper, mines could

significantly improve environmental and socioeconomic performance and in turn improve the sustainability of

operations. A number of mining companies worldwide have already achieved sufficient environmental

owing guidelines similar to those outlined above. Case studies of two such

experiences in Ghana and South Africa are presented in the next and final section of this paper. Both have helped

esent an adequate benchmark for mines striving

Sanchez (1998) observed that many major mining companies in the world, in an attempt to improve

ce, have integrated into their operations a number of highly effective environmental

trained staff for environmental matters, periodic environmental audits,

decommissioning, and life-cycle assessments

and ecobalances. More recently, these companies have become active in promoting corporate socioeconomic

responsibility. Thus, there is now consensus building on both environmental and socioeconomic issues. In

the discussions to follow, case studies of two of the industry’s leading sustainable development practitioners in

Ghana and South Africa are presented to illustrate how sustainable development has been embraced at the

Headquartered in Johannesburg, South Africa, AngloGokld Ashanti has 20 operations in 10 countries on four

continents, as well as several exploration programmes in both the established and new gold producing regions of

group’s operations are divided into the following regions: South Africa Region, Continental

Africa Region, Australasia Region, and the Americas Region. AngloGold Ashanti employed 61,242 people,

3Moz of gold (2010: 4.52Moz), generating

Page 5: Assessing sustainable development in the mining industry in ghana  a question of corporate perspective

Journal of Economics and Sustainable DevelopmentISSN 2222-1700 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2855 (Online)Vol.3, No.10, 2012

$6.6bn in gold income, excluding joint ventures (2010: $5.3bn). Capital expenditure in 2011 amounted to $1.5bn

(2010: $1.0bn). As at 31 December 2011, AngloGold Ashanti had an attributable Ore Reserve of 75.6Moz (20

71.2Moz) and an attributable Mineral Resource of 230.9Moz (2010: 220.0Moz). The main objective of

AngloGold Ashanti’s Greenfield exploration team is to make significant, high

existing regions, while Brownfield explorat

discoveries in defined areas around existing operations. Total expensed exploration for 2011 amounted to $313m

of which $98m was spent on Greenfield exploration, $87m on Brownfield and $19m o

includes $109m spent on prefeasibility studies. The group's exploration programme, which covers Greenfield,

Brownfield, and more recently, marine exploration, is conducted either directly or in collaboration with partners.

To address emerging interrelated socioeconomic and environmental issues, the company has developed a

management framework and has produced an Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) policy that sets the

guidelines for an EHS management system designed to achieve

EHS improvement, and clearly set out expectations for joint ventures and partnership (Ashanti Goldfields

Company, 1998). More importantly, the policy addresses the company’s commitment to continuously improve

environmental management practices and socioeconomic relations, and outlines a number of methods it is

currently using to do so, including (Anglogold Ashanti, 1997):

• Implementing site-specific environmental, health, hygiene, safety and emergency response p

management programs, and practices, with the aim of continuing improvement.

• Designing, operating, decommissioning and evaluating facilities to ensure compliance with government

and company requirements, and to minimize risks to health, safety and

• Training and equipping employees with the stills to achieve an injury

fulfill their environmental obligations

• Educating employees on practices to improve the environment, wellness and safety on and off the j

• Requiring contractors to implement practices consistent with company health, safety and environmental

policies and procedures

• Encouraging conservation and pollution prevention measures

• Providing information and training for the safe handling, use, trans

• Communicating openly and on a timely basis with employees, the public, governments, and other

stakeholders on activities involving environment, health and safety

• Researching processes, practices and technologies that will le

safety performance

• Conducting regular environmental, health, hygiene, safety and emergency response audits, and

implement action plans called for these audits

• Reporting regularly to the Board of Directors on environ

preparedness.

The EHS has contributed significantly to the environmental management component of sustainable development

at operations, but to address key socioeconomic concerns, Anglogold Ashanti has developed a

Community Responsibility consisting of four core principles (Anglogold Ashanti, 2000): Respect the cultures,

customs and values of individuals and groups whose livelihoods may be impacted by mining activities;

Recognize local communities as s

economic and institutional development of local communities; and Respect the authority of national and regional

governments, and integrate activities with their development objective

5. Case study 2: Anglo Platinum Limited

Anglo Platinum Limited is the world’s largest primary producer of platinum, accounting for about 38% of the

world’s annual production. The company, based in South Africa, was previously called ‘Anglo American

Platinum Corporation Limited’. Anglo Platinum expects to produce approximately, 2.9 million ounces of refined

platinum in 2012. Most of the group’s operations lie to the northwest and north east of Johannesburg. The

majority of the company’s operations take plac

mineral commodities including chromium, vanadium, magnetite and platinum group metals. Anglo Platinum

Limited is one of the largest mining companies in South Africa. It has interests in a t

worldwide, each of which has advanced environmental safeguards in place, and has established positive relations

with stakeholder parties. As McAllister et al. (1999) explains, “Anglo Platinum Limited has gone a long way

toward defining sustainability at the mine site”. In February 1998, the company adopted a sustainability policy in

which is stated:

Sustainability means the exploration, design, construction, operation and closure of mines in a manner that

respects and responds to the social, environmental and economic needs of present generations and anticipates

that of future generations in the communities and countries where we work. We are committed to demonstrating

that through this policy we can contribute to long

inable Development 2855 (Online)

117

$6.6bn in gold income, excluding joint ventures (2010: $5.3bn). Capital expenditure in 2011 amounted to $1.5bn

(2010: $1.0bn). As at 31 December 2011, AngloGold Ashanti had an attributable Ore Reserve of 75.6Moz (20

71.2Moz) and an attributable Mineral Resource of 230.9Moz (2010: 220.0Moz). The main objective of

AngloGold Ashanti’s Greenfield exploration team is to make significant, high-value gold discoveries in new and

existing regions, while Brownfield exploration focuses on incremental additions to known ore bodies and new

discoveries in defined areas around existing operations. Total expensed exploration for 2011 amounted to $313m

of which $98m was spent on Greenfield exploration, $87m on Brownfield and $19m on marine exploration. This

includes $109m spent on prefeasibility studies. The group's exploration programme, which covers Greenfield,

Brownfield, and more recently, marine exploration, is conducted either directly or in collaboration with partners.

dress emerging interrelated socioeconomic and environmental issues, the company has developed a

management framework and has produced an Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) policy that sets the

guidelines for an EHS management system designed to achieve a consistency of approach, motivate continuous

EHS improvement, and clearly set out expectations for joint ventures and partnership (Ashanti Goldfields

Company, 1998). More importantly, the policy addresses the company’s commitment to continuously improve

environmental management practices and socioeconomic relations, and outlines a number of methods it is

currently using to do so, including (Anglogold Ashanti, 1997):

specific environmental, health, hygiene, safety and emergency response p

management programs, and practices, with the aim of continuing improvement.

Designing, operating, decommissioning and evaluating facilities to ensure compliance with government

and company requirements, and to minimize risks to health, safety and the environment

Training and equipping employees with the stills to achieve an injury-free and health workplace and to

fulfill their environmental obligations

Educating employees on practices to improve the environment, wellness and safety on and off the j

Requiring contractors to implement practices consistent with company health, safety and environmental

Encouraging conservation and pollution prevention measures

Providing information and training for the safe handling, use, transport, and disposal of materials

Communicating openly and on a timely basis with employees, the public, governments, and other

stakeholders on activities involving environment, health and safety

Researching processes, practices and technologies that will lead to improved environmental, health and

Conducting regular environmental, health, hygiene, safety and emergency response audits, and

implement action plans called for these audits

Reporting regularly to the Board of Directors on environment, health, hygiene, safety and emergency

The EHS has contributed significantly to the environmental management component of sustainable development

at operations, but to address key socioeconomic concerns, Anglogold Ashanti has developed a

consisting of four core principles (Anglogold Ashanti, 2000): Respect the cultures,

customs and values of individuals and groups whose livelihoods may be impacted by mining activities;

Recognize local communities as stakeholder groups and account for their needs; Participate in the social,

economic and institutional development of local communities; and Respect the authority of national and regional

governments, and integrate activities with their development objectives.

Case study 2: Anglo Platinum Limited

Anglo Platinum Limited is the world’s largest primary producer of platinum, accounting for about 38% of the

world’s annual production. The company, based in South Africa, was previously called ‘Anglo American

um Corporation Limited’. Anglo Platinum expects to produce approximately, 2.9 million ounces of refined

platinum in 2012. Most of the group’s operations lie to the northwest and north east of Johannesburg. The

majority of the company’s operations take place in the Bushveld Complex, a large region that contains a range of

mineral commodities including chromium, vanadium, magnetite and platinum group metals. Anglo Platinum

Limited is one of the largest mining companies in South Africa. It has interests in a t

worldwide, each of which has advanced environmental safeguards in place, and has established positive relations

with stakeholder parties. As McAllister et al. (1999) explains, “Anglo Platinum Limited has gone a long way

g sustainability at the mine site”. In February 1998, the company adopted a sustainability policy in

Sustainability means the exploration, design, construction, operation and closure of mines in a manner that

ocial, environmental and economic needs of present generations and anticipates

that of future generations in the communities and countries where we work. We are committed to demonstrating

that through this policy we can contribute to long-term improvements in quality of life while acting as stewards

www.iiste.org

$6.6bn in gold income, excluding joint ventures (2010: $5.3bn). Capital expenditure in 2011 amounted to $1.5bn

(2010: $1.0bn). As at 31 December 2011, AngloGold Ashanti had an attributable Ore Reserve of 75.6Moz (2010:

71.2Moz) and an attributable Mineral Resource of 230.9Moz (2010: 220.0Moz). The main objective of

value gold discoveries in new and

ion focuses on incremental additions to known ore bodies and new

discoveries in defined areas around existing operations. Total expensed exploration for 2011 amounted to $313m

n marine exploration. This

includes $109m spent on prefeasibility studies. The group's exploration programme, which covers Greenfield,

Brownfield, and more recently, marine exploration, is conducted either directly or in collaboration with partners.

dress emerging interrelated socioeconomic and environmental issues, the company has developed a

management framework and has produced an Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) policy that sets the

a consistency of approach, motivate continuous

EHS improvement, and clearly set out expectations for joint ventures and partnership (Ashanti Goldfields

Company, 1998). More importantly, the policy addresses the company’s commitment to continuously improve

environmental management practices and socioeconomic relations, and outlines a number of methods it is

specific environmental, health, hygiene, safety and emergency response policies,

Designing, operating, decommissioning and evaluating facilities to ensure compliance with government

free and health workplace and to

Educating employees on practices to improve the environment, wellness and safety on and off the job

Requiring contractors to implement practices consistent with company health, safety and environmental

port, and disposal of materials

Communicating openly and on a timely basis with employees, the public, governments, and other

ad to improved environmental, health and

Conducting regular environmental, health, hygiene, safety and emergency response audits, and

ment, health, hygiene, safety and emergency

The EHS has contributed significantly to the environmental management component of sustainable development

at operations, but to address key socioeconomic concerns, Anglogold Ashanti has developed a Statement on

consisting of four core principles (Anglogold Ashanti, 2000): Respect the cultures,

customs and values of individuals and groups whose livelihoods may be impacted by mining activities;

takeholder groups and account for their needs; Participate in the social,

economic and institutional development of local communities; and Respect the authority of national and regional

Anglo Platinum Limited is the world’s largest primary producer of platinum, accounting for about 38% of the

world’s annual production. The company, based in South Africa, was previously called ‘Anglo American

um Corporation Limited’. Anglo Platinum expects to produce approximately, 2.9 million ounces of refined

platinum in 2012. Most of the group’s operations lie to the northwest and north east of Johannesburg. The

e in the Bushveld Complex, a large region that contains a range of

mineral commodities including chromium, vanadium, magnetite and platinum group metals. Anglo Platinum

Limited is one of the largest mining companies in South Africa. It has interests in a total of 16 operations

worldwide, each of which has advanced environmental safeguards in place, and has established positive relations

with stakeholder parties. As McAllister et al. (1999) explains, “Anglo Platinum Limited has gone a long way

g sustainability at the mine site”. In February 1998, the company adopted a sustainability policy in

Sustainability means the exploration, design, construction, operation and closure of mines in a manner that

ocial, environmental and economic needs of present generations and anticipates

that of future generations in the communities and countries where we work. We are committed to demonstrating

in quality of life while acting as stewards

Page 6: Assessing sustainable development in the mining industry in ghana  a question of corporate perspective

Journal of Economics and Sustainable DevelopmentISSN 2222-1700 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2855 (Online)Vol.3, No.10, 2012

for the environment. (Anglo Platinum Limited, 1998). The South African Government, under the Ministry of

Mines has set up a Mine Waste Management Act, generally, under which is also the South African Mining

Waste Control Regulation. In this regulation, a person or a company that carries out a class of operation,

activity, industry or work is required to hold a permit or approval under the Waste Management Act in respect of

that activity. This act manages and inc

assessment; oversight of facilities that generate air, water and hazardous waste pollution; air and water quality

monitoring; clean-up of contaminated sites; and providing education, outrea

businesses, local government agencies, and interested citizens. Anglo Platinum Limited has also made additional

changes that have enhanced the socioeconomic sustainability of its operations, primarily through working in a

collaborative manner with governments, the populous and non

through sustainable development reporting, the company has improved communications with government bodies

and external stakeholder parties on critical

sustainable development report in 1998 and published another in 1999 based on performance in 1998. Finally, to

further sustainable development research in its operations, Anglo Platinum

program on Environmental and Social Performance Indicators conducted by the Mining and Environmental

Research Network based at the University of Johannesburg (Cooney, 2000).

6. Implications from the case studies

It is clear from their activities that both Anglogold Ashanti and Anglo Platinum Limited have improved the

sustainability of mine operations, and in turn have helped set a precedent for sustainable development in the

mining industry. Like the Government of South Afri

in the operations of the mining firms in the country in areas of waste management and disposal, sustainability

could be achieved and the country, or the mining industry as a whole, can put sustaina

practice. Again, by following the sustainability guidelines presented earlier in this paper, and implementing

similar strategies to both Anglogold Ashanti and Anglo Platinum Limited, mines can sufficiently improve

performance in both the environmental and socioeconomic arenas, and hence contribute significantly to improve

sustainability in the mining industry.

7. Conclusion

This paper has attempted to bridge a major gap in the sustainable development and mining literature by

clarifying exactly how sustainable development can be applied in the corporate mining context. Since the

industry’s operations have the potential to impact a wide range of environmental and socioeconomic entities, by

committing to improved environmental performance an

groups from the outset, mines can put the concept of sustainable development into practice. The paper has also

offered guidance for mining companies interested in improving the sustainability of their op

recommendations were made – improved planning, improved environmental management, cleaner technology

implementation, increased stakeholder involvement, formation of partnerships, and improved training

followed, would help any mine improve and sustainability of its industrial practices. Finally, case studies of two

mining companies, Anglogold Ashanti and Anglo Platinum Limited, were represented to illustrate further how

governments mining companies can operationalize sustainable devel

it is becoming increasingly important that mines, for the benefit of ecology, surrounding communities,

governments, and its employees, continue to tackle pressing socioeconomic and environmental issues with

improved strategy, and help put sustainable development into practice in the industry.

References

Begley, R.. (1996). ISO 14000: A Step Toward Industry Self

Technology News 30 (7), 298-302.

Cooney, J.P.,( 2000). People, participation and partnership. CIM Bulletin 93 (1037), 46=48.

Epps, J.M., (1997). The social agenda in mine development. Industry and Environment 20 (4), 32

Garrod, B., & Chadwick, P., (1996). Environmental management and business strategy: towards

strategic

paradigm. Futures 28 (1), 37-50.

Ghana Environmental Action Plan

EPC,

Ghana Environmental Protection Agency, (1997). Annual Report

Ghana’s Mining and Environmental Gu

Government of Ghana, (1996). The Minerals and Metals Policy of the Government of Ghana: Partnerships for

Sustainable

Development. Government of Ghana, Ottawa, Ontario.

inable Development 2855 (Online)

118

for the environment. (Anglo Platinum Limited, 1998). The South African Government, under the Ministry of

Mines has set up a Mine Waste Management Act, generally, under which is also the South African Mining

e Control Regulation. In this regulation, a person or a company that carries out a class of operation,

activity, industry or work is required to hold a permit or approval under the Waste Management Act in respect of

that activity. This act manages and includes a broad range of activities, including environmental problem

assessment; oversight of facilities that generate air, water and hazardous waste pollution; air and water quality

up of contaminated sites; and providing education, outreach, and technical assistance to

businesses, local government agencies, and interested citizens. Anglo Platinum Limited has also made additional

changes that have enhanced the socioeconomic sustainability of its operations, primarily through working in a

llaborative manner with governments, the populous and non-governmental organizations. In another example,

through sustainable development reporting, the company has improved communications with government bodies

and external stakeholder parties on critical environmental and socioeconomic issues. It issued its first regional

sustainable development report in 1998 and published another in 1999 based on performance in 1998. Finally, to

further sustainable development research in its operations, Anglo Platinum Limited is supporting a research

program on Environmental and Social Performance Indicators conducted by the Mining and Environmental

Research Network based at the University of Johannesburg (Cooney, 2000).

Implications from the case studies

from their activities that both Anglogold Ashanti and Anglo Platinum Limited have improved the

sustainability of mine operations, and in turn have helped set a precedent for sustainable development in the

mining industry. Like the Government of South Africa, if the government of Ghana can actively invest heavily

in the operations of the mining firms in the country in areas of waste management and disposal, sustainability

could be achieved and the country, or the mining industry as a whole, can put sustaina

practice. Again, by following the sustainability guidelines presented earlier in this paper, and implementing

similar strategies to both Anglogold Ashanti and Anglo Platinum Limited, mines can sufficiently improve

he environmental and socioeconomic arenas, and hence contribute significantly to improve

sustainability in the mining industry.

This paper has attempted to bridge a major gap in the sustainable development and mining literature by

xactly how sustainable development can be applied in the corporate mining context. Since the

industry’s operations have the potential to impact a wide range of environmental and socioeconomic entities, by

committing to improved environmental performance and addressing the needs of stakeholders and community

groups from the outset, mines can put the concept of sustainable development into practice. The paper has also

offered guidance for mining companies interested in improving the sustainability of their op

improved planning, improved environmental management, cleaner technology

implementation, increased stakeholder involvement, formation of partnerships, and improved training

mprove and sustainability of its industrial practices. Finally, case studies of two

mining companies, Anglogold Ashanti and Anglo Platinum Limited, were represented to illustrate further how

governments mining companies can operationalize sustainable development. Now that we are in the 21

it is becoming increasingly important that mines, for the benefit of ecology, surrounding communities,

governments, and its employees, continue to tackle pressing socioeconomic and environmental issues with

oved strategy, and help put sustainable development into practice in the industry.

Begley, R.. (1996). ISO 14000: A Step Toward Industry Self-Regulation. Environmental Science and

, participation and partnership. CIM Bulletin 93 (1037), 46=48.

Epps, J.M., (1997). The social agenda in mine development. Industry and Environment 20 (4), 32

Garrod, B., & Chadwick, P., (1996). Environmental management and business strategy: towards

Environmental Action Plan –Vol. 2,1994. “Technical Background Papers by six Working Group”,

Environmental Protection Agency, (1997). Annual Report

Ghana’s Mining and Environmental Guidelines, ( 1994) EPC, Floent Publishers, Accra.

Government of Ghana, (1996). The Minerals and Metals Policy of the Government of Ghana: Partnerships for

Development. Government of Ghana, Ottawa, Ontario.

www.iiste.org

for the environment. (Anglo Platinum Limited, 1998). The South African Government, under the Ministry of

Mines has set up a Mine Waste Management Act, generally, under which is also the South African Mining

e Control Regulation. In this regulation, a person or a company that carries out a class of operation,

activity, industry or work is required to hold a permit or approval under the Waste Management Act in respect of

ludes a broad range of activities, including environmental problem

assessment; oversight of facilities that generate air, water and hazardous waste pollution; air and water quality

ch, and technical assistance to

businesses, local government agencies, and interested citizens. Anglo Platinum Limited has also made additional

changes that have enhanced the socioeconomic sustainability of its operations, primarily through working in a

governmental organizations. In another example,

through sustainable development reporting, the company has improved communications with government bodies

environmental and socioeconomic issues. It issued its first regional

sustainable development report in 1998 and published another in 1999 based on performance in 1998. Finally, to

Limited is supporting a research

program on Environmental and Social Performance Indicators conducted by the Mining and Environmental

from their activities that both Anglogold Ashanti and Anglo Platinum Limited have improved the

sustainability of mine operations, and in turn have helped set a precedent for sustainable development in the

ca, if the government of Ghana can actively invest heavily

in the operations of the mining firms in the country in areas of waste management and disposal, sustainability

could be achieved and the country, or the mining industry as a whole, can put sustainable development into

practice. Again, by following the sustainability guidelines presented earlier in this paper, and implementing

similar strategies to both Anglogold Ashanti and Anglo Platinum Limited, mines can sufficiently improve

he environmental and socioeconomic arenas, and hence contribute significantly to improve

This paper has attempted to bridge a major gap in the sustainable development and mining literature by

xactly how sustainable development can be applied in the corporate mining context. Since the

industry’s operations have the potential to impact a wide range of environmental and socioeconomic entities, by

d addressing the needs of stakeholders and community

groups from the outset, mines can put the concept of sustainable development into practice. The paper has also

offered guidance for mining companies interested in improving the sustainability of their operations. Six

improved planning, improved environmental management, cleaner technology

implementation, increased stakeholder involvement, formation of partnerships, and improved training – that if

mprove and sustainability of its industrial practices. Finally, case studies of two

mining companies, Anglogold Ashanti and Anglo Platinum Limited, were represented to illustrate further how

opment. Now that we are in the 21st century,

it is becoming increasingly important that mines, for the benefit of ecology, surrounding communities,

governments, and its employees, continue to tackle pressing socioeconomic and environmental issues with

Regulation. Environmental Science and

, participation and partnership. CIM Bulletin 93 (1037), 46=48.

Epps, J.M., (1997). The social agenda in mine development. Industry and Environment 20 (4), 32-35.

Garrod, B., & Chadwick, P., (1996). Environmental management and business strategy: towards a new

Vol. 2,1994. “Technical Background Papers by six Working Group”,

idelines, ( 1994) EPC, Floent Publishers, Accra.

Government of Ghana, (1996). The Minerals and Metals Policy of the Government of Ghana: Partnerships for

Page 7: Assessing sustainable development in the mining industry in ghana  a question of corporate perspective

Journal of Economics and Sustainable DevelopmentISSN 2222-1700 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2855 (Online)Vol.3, No.10, 2012

Hale, M., (1995). Training for envi

reduction 3 (1-2), 19-23.

Hilson, Gavin., & Murck, Barbara (2000). ‘ Sustainable development in the mining industry, clarifying the

corporate perspective, Resources Policy 26.

McAllister, M.L.,& Scoble, M., (1999). Sustainability and the Canadian mining industry at home and

abroad. CIM Bulletin 92 (1033), 85

NRC, (1995). Sustainable Development and Minerals and Metals. Mineral Strategy Branch, Minerals and Metals

Sector, Natural Resources, South Africa.

Pezzoli, K., (1997). Sustainable Development: a transdisciplinary overview of the literature. Journal of

Environment management in the minerals industry: theory and practice. Business Strategy and the Environment

5, 87-93.

Quarrie, Joyce.,( 1994). Earth Summit 1992 “ The UN Conference on Environment and Development” Held in

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. London: Regency Press.

Rocha, J., Bristow, J., (1997). Mine downscaling and closure: an integral part of sustainable de

Materials Report 12 (4), 15-20.

Sanchez, L., (1998). Industry response to the challenge of sustainability: the case of the South African

nonferrous mining sector. Environmental Management 22 (4), 521

Shinya, W., (1998). Ghana’s new min

Warhurst, A (1994). The limitations of environmental regulation in mining. In: Eggert, R. (Ed), Mining and

the Environment: International Perspectives on Public Policy. Resources for the

Warhurst, A., Macfarlane, M., & Wood, G., (1999). Planning for mine closure: socio

Minerals and Energy 14 (4), 21-26.

Warhurst A., Mitchell, P., (2000). Corporate social responsibility and the case of Summitiville

Policy 26, 91-102.

Warhurst, A., Noronha, L., (2000). Corporate strategy and viable future land use: planning for closure from the

outset of mining. Natural Resources Forum 24, 153

WCED, (1987). Our Common Future. World Commission on

Press, Oxford, UK.

Notes

Note 1

• Environmental care “married” to development.

• Improving the quality of human life while living within the carrying capacity of supporting ecosystems.

• Development based on the pr

• Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations

to meet their own needs.

• An environmental “handrail” to guide development.

• A change in consumption pattern towards more benign products and a shift in investment patterns

towards augmenting environmental capital.

• A process that seeks to make manifest a higher standard of living for human beings…that recognizes this

cannot be achieved at the expense of environmental integrity.

Figure 1: Examples of definitions of sustainable development found in the literature. (Source: Barrow, 1999)

Note 2. Table 1: Examples of common environmental impacts from mining operations

Activity

Water discharge

Dewatering

Smelting

Transportation

Mineral extraction

inable Development 2855 (Online)

119

Hale, M., (1995). Training for environmental technologies and environmental management. Journal of Cleaner

Hilson, Gavin., & Murck, Barbara (2000). ‘ Sustainable development in the mining industry, clarifying the

corporate perspective, Resources Policy 26.

McAllister, M.L.,& Scoble, M., (1999). Sustainability and the Canadian mining industry at home and

abroad. CIM Bulletin 92 (1033), 85-92.

NRC, (1995). Sustainable Development and Minerals and Metals. Mineral Strategy Branch, Minerals and Metals

Sector, Natural Resources, South Africa.

Pezzoli, K., (1997). Sustainable Development: a transdisciplinary overview of the literature. Journal of

Environment management in the minerals industry: theory and practice. Business Strategy and the Environment

Quarrie, Joyce.,( 1994). Earth Summit 1992 “ The UN Conference on Environment and Development” Held in

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. London: Regency Press.

Rocha, J., Bristow, J., (1997). Mine downscaling and closure: an integral part of sustainable de

Sanchez, L., (1998). Industry response to the challenge of sustainability: the case of the South African

nonferrous mining sector. Environmental Management 22 (4), 521-531.

Shinya, W., (1998). Ghana’s new minerals and metals and metals policy. Resources Policy 24 (2), 95

(1994). The limitations of environmental regulation in mining. In: Eggert, R. (Ed), Mining and

the Environment: International Perspectives on Public Policy. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.

Warhurst, A., Macfarlane, M., & Wood, G., (1999). Planning for mine closure: socio

Warhurst A., Mitchell, P., (2000). Corporate social responsibility and the case of Summitiville

Warhurst, A., Noronha, L., (2000). Corporate strategy and viable future land use: planning for closure from the

outset of mining. Natural Resources Forum 24, 153-164.

WCED, (1987). Our Common Future. World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University

Environmental care “married” to development.

Improving the quality of human life while living within the carrying capacity of supporting ecosystems.

Development based on the principle of intergenerational inter-species and inter=group equity.

Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations

An environmental “handrail” to guide development.

consumption pattern towards more benign products and a shift in investment patterns

towards augmenting environmental capital.

A process that seeks to make manifest a higher standard of living for human beings…that recognizes this

expense of environmental integrity.

Figure 1: Examples of definitions of sustainable development found in the literature. (Source: Barrow, 1999)

Table 1: Examples of common environmental impacts from mining operations

Common environmental impacts

Acid Mine Drainage

Heavy metals overloading

Ecological impacts, Sediment runoff,

Effluent contamination, and Impact upon water resources

Air pollution, Acidic deposition and

Heavy metals contamination

Noise pollution, Dust and sediment, Gaseous emissions

spills, and Soil contamination

Erosion, Landform changes, Alteration of water tables

Dust , and Vegetation and habitat destruction

Aesthetics

www.iiste.org

ronmental technologies and environmental management. Journal of Cleaner

Hilson, Gavin., & Murck, Barbara (2000). ‘ Sustainable development in the mining industry, clarifying the

McAllister, M.L.,& Scoble, M., (1999). Sustainability and the Canadian mining industry at home and

NRC, (1995). Sustainable Development and Minerals and Metals. Mineral Strategy Branch, Minerals and Metals

Pezzoli, K., (1997). Sustainable Development: a transdisciplinary overview of the literature. Journal of

Environment management in the minerals industry: theory and practice. Business Strategy and the Environment

Quarrie, Joyce.,( 1994). Earth Summit 1992 “ The UN Conference on Environment and Development” Held in

Rocha, J., Bristow, J., (1997). Mine downscaling and closure: an integral part of sustainable development. Raw

Sanchez, L., (1998). Industry response to the challenge of sustainability: the case of the South African

erals and metals and metals policy. Resources Policy 24 (2), 95-104.

(1994). The limitations of environmental regulation in mining. In: Eggert, R. (Ed), Mining and

Future, Washington, DC.

Warhurst, A., Macfarlane, M., & Wood, G., (1999). Planning for mine closure: socio-economic impacts.

Warhurst A., Mitchell, P., (2000). Corporate social responsibility and the case of Summitiville mine. Resources

Warhurst, A., Noronha, L., (2000). Corporate strategy and viable future land use: planning for closure from the

Environment and Development, Oxford University

Improving the quality of human life while living within the carrying capacity of supporting ecosystems.

species and inter=group equity.

Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations

consumption pattern towards more benign products and a shift in investment patterns

A process that seeks to make manifest a higher standard of living for human beings…that recognizes this

Figure 1: Examples of definitions of sustainable development found in the literature. (Source: Barrow, 1999)

Impact upon water resources

Gaseous emissions, Oil and fuel

Alteration of water tables