as american regulations. for head injury, with which this ... · accordance with trrl note lf130...
TRANSCRIPT
-30-
HEAD AND NECK I NJURIES TO CAR OCCUPANTS
WEARING SAFETY BELTS I N FRONTAL COLL I S I ONS
G . GRI ME , Traf f i c S t udies Group , Hn ivers i ty Co l l e ge Lon don .
I t i s widely recogn i sed that restraint s yst ems f o r car occupan t s should be des i gned to protect at least three imoortant areas of the body - the head , the ehest , and the l e gs . As ye t , however , there are no gene r a l l y agreed inj ury c r i t e r i a in terms o f phy s i c a l quan t i t i e s ( e . g . force or acce l eration ) which , when measured on represen t a t ive dummies protected by res t r a i n t systems , shoul d n o t be excee ded under speci f i e d t e s t con d i t ions . The most import ant suggest ions for such c r i t e r i a were embodied in the proposed Ameri can Federal Mo tor Veh i c l e Safety S t andard No 2 0 8 and i t s amendments , and be cause of their probab le wor ldwide i n f luence i f f in a l ly con f i rme d , they have been extensively tried out i n veh i c l e crash tests , and , perhaps in modi f ie d form , are l i ke l y to form t h e b a s i s f o r future European a s we l l as Ameri can regulat ions . For head inj ury , with wh i ch this p aper is concerned , the proposed Ame r i can criteria are exp ressed in terms of resul t an t accelerat i on s , measured i n the he ads o f dummies , in 30 m i l e / h fron t a l b ar r i e r tests ; these acce lerat ions must not be exceede d , even when no impact o f the head with the i n t e ri o r o f the car o c curs .
However , expe rien ce o f the performance o f 3 p o i n t lapand-di agona l safety b e l t s in real accidents has raised doubts as to whether the r i sk o f head inj ury without head impact i s great enough t o j us t i f y t h e app l i cat ion o f a head i n j ury cri terion in such cases ; i n dee d , any such requirement may actua l ly ret ard the development of systems des i gned to be e ff e c t i ve at h i gher impact speeds than 30 mi l e / h . I n the present note , the inj uries suffered b y a s amp l e of b e l t wearers in fron t a l i mpacts are described , and the resul t s are d i s cussed with spe c i a l refere n ce to the probab i l i ty of head and n e ck inj ury .
I n an e a r l i e r p aper by t he author ( l ) an an a l y s i s was made of inj uries to be l t wearers in about 7 5 0 acciden ts ; nearly 90 per cent o f the b e l t s were o f the 3 point l ap-and-di agonal type . For the present note , spe c i a l attent ion has been paid to the data on fron t a l imp acts described in t he reports wh i ch formed the b a s i s o f the e a r l i er p aper , and to about 1 0 0 l ater report s . A l l these reports were returned to the safety belt manufacture r by mot o r i s t s who had been wearing safety b e l t s in acciden t s . Rough est imates o f v e l o c i t y change were made for a l l the fron t a l impacts which resul ted in inj ury t o a b e l t wearer , mak i n g u s e of t h e reported c i r cums t an ces o f the
- 3 1 -
acciden t s , t h e we i ghts and speeds o f the veh i cles , and the extent o f the damage to the cars . I n many o f t he more serious acci den t s the o r i g i n a l repor t s were supplemen t e d by more lengt hy accoun t s obtained by corresponde n ce . I n no case , however , was i t possible to examine veh i c les or acc i dent s i t e s .
The est imated ve locity changes ranged from 1 0 to 4 5 m i l e / h ( 1 6 to 72km/ h ) , and i n Tab les 1 and 2 the resu lts have been d i v i de d i n t o those above and be low 30 m i l e / h ( 4 8km/h ) .
The i n j uries t o the b e l t wearers were c l as s i f ied i n accordance w i t h TRRL n o t e LF1 30 ( I ssue 3 ) . There was sornet irnes di f f i cu l t y i n d i s t i n guishing between the three categories o f inj ury to t h e head an d face ; f o r exarnp le , a l l concus s i ons were c lassed as moderate i n j ur i es , whereas some rniRht have been rnore corre ct ly c l assed as rninor or severe ; s imi lar l y , alme s t a l l l acerated faces and heads were c l assed as rninor , when some rnight rnore accuate ly have been p laced in the moderate c l as s . None of the con clusions of the paper are affected by t h i s b lurr i n g of the boundaries ; and the d i f f i cu l t y d i d not arise for o ther parts of the body .
Tab l e 1 surnmarises the inj uries t o the d i f ferent regions o f the body , in terms o f mino r , moderat e , and severe i n j uries . There was o n l y one death , o f a p assenge r . I nj ury accured t o one o r both f ront seat o c cupan t s wearing 3 p o i n t lap-and di agonal b e l t s in 1 8 2 f ro n t a l i mp a ct s ; l � l were j udged t o have occurred at ve l o c i t y changes b etween 10 and 2 9 mi l e / h ( 1 6 and 47km / h ) and 5 1 between 30 and 4 5 rn i l e / h (4 8 and 72km/ h ) . In the 1 8 2 impacts t here were 7n head i n j uries , 1 8 o f whi ch were j udged to be of greater than minor sever i t y . As m i ght be expecte d , t he proportion o f the rnore serious inj uries was greater at ve loc i t y changes above 30 rni l e / h than b e low .
The he ad inj uries are con s i dered i n rnore d e t a i l i n Tab le 2 , i n whi ch descr i p t ions are given o f head inj uries o f greater than minor seve r i t y a n d i n Tab le 3 , w h i c h gives det a i l s o f a c c i dents i n wh i ch concus s i on occurred wit hout accornpanying head i n j ur i es such as cuts and hruises . I n the 5 1 accidents whi ch accurred at ve locity changes over 30 m i le / h , there were , of course , 5 1 drivers and , i n addi t ion , 2 7 front seat passengers , a l l weari n g 3 point l ap-and-di agonal b e l t s . 2 8 drivers had head i n j ur i es , 10 of wh i ch were j udged to be of greater than rninor sever i t y ; o f these more serious head inj uries 8 inc luded con cussion ; every case of con cussion was accornpan i e d by other inj uries ( cuts , bruises e t c ) to head or f ace , i n d i cating that the head had s t ruck sorne obj ect in front of the driver , probab l y p ar t o f t h e s t e e r i n g whee l . On l y 4 o f t h e 2 7 front seat passengers had head inj uries , in cluding one case of concussion wi thout any o ther head inj ury . This occurred in a very severe co l l i s ion ( see Tab le 3 , case No 3 3 5 ) , in whi ch the p assenger sust ained a f ractured spine as we l l as concuss ion , both
-32-
at t r ibuted to f ron t a l i ntrusion i n t o t he passen ger compartmen t .
I n the 1 3 1 imp acts at ve l o c i t y changes j udged t o be below 30 mi l e / h , 129 of the 1 3 1 drivers wore b e l t s ; t he y were accompanied by 70 front seat p assen gers wearinß b e l t s . 31 dr ivers had head inj uries of which 3 were j udged to be of greater than minor s everi ty ; only one o f these ( see Tab l e 3 , case No 5 1 4 ) involved concuss ion wi thout o ther head inj ury , and t h i s was repor t e d as due to impact w i t h the s i de win dow . The 7 0 f ront seat passengers also had 3 head inj uries j udged t o be o f gre ater than minor seve r i ty - a l l ins tan ces o f concuss ion wi thout other head i n j ury . I n 2 o f the 3 cases t he reports suggest that concussion was the resul t of impact o f the head against a s o l i d obj e ct . Case No 2 7 6 was a low speed i n tersect ion acc i dent ( ve lo c i t y change about 1 0 mi l e / h ) in which the car p robab l y rotat e d , resu l t i n g in concussion due to co l l i s ion of heads , as reported ; i n case No 6 9 7 , an a c c i dent at a h i gher ve l o c i t y change , both b e l t e d occup ants were l ike l y t o have been l oaded f rom behind by t he two passengers i n the rear seat , giving r i se to f a c i a l and knee inj uries to the driver , and caus i n g breakage o f the shoulder strap o f the p assenger ' s b e l t , w i t h resu l t i n g inj uries from j ackn i f ing over t he l ap strap . On l y an case No 559 was no exp l anat i on of the concuss ion gi ven i n the report or sugge sted b y the account o f the accirte n t , although i t i s worth n o t i n g t hat the dr i ver was u n i n j ure d . I t is s i gn i f i cant that no neck inj uries , even s l i ght ones , were men t ioned in any of the cases described in Tab l e 3 , and i t wou l d appear very un l ike l y that concussion due t o a j erk from a safety b e l t coul d o ccur wi thout any s i gn of neck inj ury .
To sum up , i n a l l 1 8 2 fron t a l impact s , involving 2 7 7 car occup an t s wear ing s a f e t y b e l t s , there were 1 3 cases o f concuss ion , a n d o n l y i n one case i s there any probab i l i t y that concuss ion mi ght have occured wi thout head impact .
There was on l y one n e ck i n j ury of greater than minor sever i t y , - a b roken neck , probab ly caused b y imp act f rom the passenger in the rear seat , who was k i l l e d . S t i f f or s t r ained necks were reported i n 21 i n s t an ces ; and none o f these neck inj uries was associated with a head inj ury . I t appears that one f i n ds ei ther neck i n j u r i es or head inj uries , but very rarely both t o ge ther . Neck inj uri e s probab l y only o c cur when the res traint system o f b e l t an d car work corre c t l y together to restrain the occupant without head con t act ; when head con t act occurs the dece lerat i n g forces whi ch the neck i s capab le of exe r t i n g are not brought f u l l y into p l ay .
I n Tab l e 1 t he numbers o f head and f ace inj uries are given sep arate l y for the driver and the fron t seat p assenge r . I f inj uries o f a l l sever i t ies are counted , drivers suf fered 59 and p assengers 1 7 head an d f ace inj uries . S i n ce the numhers o f drivers and p assengers at risk were respe c t i v e l y 1 8 0 and 9 7 ,
- 33-
t he head inj uries per o ccup an t were 0 . 3 3 for the dri ver and 0 . 1 8 for the p assenger - a s i gn i f i cant d i f ference . Th i s ten den cy f o r the driver t o be inj ured more often i s also shown by the f i gures for greater than minor head and f ace i nj ury , - 1 4 for the driver and 4 for the passenger .
The obvious d i f f erence be tween the surroun di ngs of the d r i ver and f ront seat passenger is the p resence o f the steering assemb ly i n front o f the drive r , and many o f the reports men t i on the steering wheel as the obj ect wh i ch caused the dri ver ' s head inj ury . Whe ther the presen ce o f the whee l is enough in i t se l f to accoun t for the greater frequency o f head inj ury i n the dr i ve r , or whe ther the who l e steering assemb ly , by l im i t i n g the forward movement at the h i p , produces a greater tendency to j ackn i fe i n the driver t han the p assenger i s a que s t ion to wh i ch t he p resent in ves t i ga t i on does not provide an answer .
I t might pe rhaps be expected that the steering assemb ly wou l d also i ncrease the frequency o f ehest and rib inj ury . The f i gures in Tab le 1 , however , suggest that i f there is any e f fe c t at al l , it is in the oppo s i t e d i rect ion . For inj uries o f all severi t ies , the i nj uries per driver were 0 . 26 and for the passenger 0 . 3 2 ; for greater than minor inj uries the i n j uries per o ccup an t were respe c t i ve l y 0 . 0 7 and 0 . 1 4 , but the d i fference is not s i gn i f i can t at t he 5 per cent leve l .
Final l y , i t i s emphas ised that no deduct i ons as to the ove r a l l e f f i ciency o f safety b e l t s should b e made from the dat a g i ven i n this p aper , s i n ce all the impacts con s i dered were ones wh i ch resulted i n inj ury t o one o r more b e l t e d f ront seat occupan t s . The numerous i n ves t i ga t i on s wh i ch h ave been made of the e f f i c ie n cy of s af e t y b e l t s i n p reven t i n g i n j ury almost a l l show that substan t i a l reduct i ons in inj ury , p a r t i cularly in serious inj ury , resul t when b e l t s are worn .
Con c lusions
1 . Th i s survey of 1 8 2 fron t a l impacts suggests that when a car occup ant wearing a 3 point l ap - an d- d i agonal safety belt suffers concuss ion i n an accident of this type , i t is almost always the result o f impact o f the head with the i n s i de o f the car .
2 . There was also e v i dence t hat t he neck inj uries that occur in such imp acts are i n f requent and usu a l l y minor one s , and are un l ike ly to be accomp an i e d b y head inj ury .
3 . The resu l t s do not p ro v i de any support for a head inj ury c r i terion for wearer s of safety b e l t s o f the type cons i dere d , except in cases where the head s t r ikes the i n s i de o f the vehi cle .
-34 -
Acknowle dgeme n t s
Thanks are due t o Bri t ax L t d for mak i n g t h e data ava i l ab l e , and to the Transport and Road Research Laboratory for the f inancial support which enab led the p aper to be prepare d .
Re f erences
1 . Grime , G. ' A ccidents and i n j ur i es to car occup an t s we ari ng safety b e l t s ' . Automob i l e Engineer 1 9 n 8 ( Ju l y ) .
Ve
loc
ity
ch
ang
e
(mil
e/h
)
10-
29
(1
6-
47
k
m/h
)
30
-4
5
(48
-7
2 k
m/h
)
10-
45
(1
6-
72
km
/h)
Tab
le
1.
Inju
rie
s
to w
ea
re
rs
of
se
at
be
lt
s
in
fro
nt
al
im
pa
ct
s.
Nu
mb
er
Se
ve
rit
y
of
o
f
imp
ac
ts
inj
ury
Se
ver
e
Mo
de
ra
te
131
Min
or
Sev
er
e
Mo
de
ra
te
51
�in
or
Sev
er
e
Mo
der
ate
182
Min
or
Hea
<l
Ne
ck
an
d
f ac
e
0 i<
6 C 3
I :3 ) 1 1
0 0
38
(28
/10
)16
3(3
/0
) 1
9(8
/1)
0
20
(17
/3)
5
3(3
/0
) 1
15
(11
/4
) 0
1 1 5
8(4
5/1
3)2
1
1
PA
RT
S IN
JU
RE
D
Sh
ou
lde
r
Ch
est
[
nte
rn
a
an
d
br
ga
ns
rib
s
0 0
0 *
3
14
(6/8
) 2
·· -n
33
(22
/11
) 0
0 4
(1/3
) 3
+
7 9
(6/
3)
0
2 1
8(1
2/6
) 0
0 4
(1/
3)
3
10
23
(12
/11
2
8 5
1(3
4/1
7
0
* (3
/3
) e
tc
. d
en
ote
(D
riv
er
/Pa
ss
en
ger
) in
jur
ies
+
O
ne
pa
ss
en
ger
ki
lle
d
Arm
s
0 4 '-
·---
--1
3
0 7 -
--
10
0 11
23
Le
gs
an
d
kn
ee
s
0 7 -
---
-72
3 6 �
-- 32
3
13
104
Cu
ts,
bru
ise
s
an
d b
elt
b
ru
ise
s
0 0
60
(30
/30
)
0 0
25
(15
/10
)
0 0
85(4
5/4
0)
1 w
Ül
1
Ve
loc
ity
ch
an
ge
(m
il
e/h
)
10-
29
(l
ß-
47
k
m/h
)
30-
45
(48
-7
2
km
/h)
Tab
le
2.
He
ad
in
ju
rie
s o
f g
rea
ter
th
an
min
or
se
ve
rit
y
Num
be
r
Nu
mb
er
Ca
se
In
jur
ies
o
f
imp
ac
ts o
f
inj
ur
ies
No
. c
au
sin
g
of
g
rea
ter
D
riv
er
F
ro
nt
se
at
pa
sse
ng
er
in
ju
ry
than
m
ino
r
�P.VP.ritv
1
85
Lo
st
se
ve
ra
l te
eth
; B
rok
en
left
c
lav
icle
; eh
es
t b
ru
ise
s.
ehe
st
br
uis
es
. 2
7f'
TJ
nin
jur
ed
C
on
cus
sio
n;
br
uis
ed
le
ft
sh
ou
lde
r;s
ea
t b
elt
cu
ts
.
131
32
43
7
Lo
st
fr
on
t te
eth
; cu
t c
hin
.
55
9
Un
inju
red
. 8
lig
ht
con
cuss
ion
.
69
7
Fa
cia
l la
ce
ra
tio
ns
; C
on
cuss
ion
a
nd
se
ve
re
b
ru
ise
d k
ne
es
. b
ru
isin
g.
514
C
on
cus
sio
n;
inju
re
d
ste
rn
um;s
pin
al
inju
rie
s
169
F
ac
ial
lac
er
at
io
ns
Fa
cia
l la
ce
ra
tio
ns
. an
d co
ncu
ss
ion
. .
28
2
Co
ncu
ss
ion
; b
ro
ke
n
tee
th
; c
uts
a
nd
a
br
asi
on
s to
s
ca
lp
an
d
kn
ee
s;
br
uis
ed
ha
nd
s,
arm
s a
nd
rib
s;
cra
cke
d b
on
e
in
lef
t h
and
. 5
1 30
30
2 S
ev
er
e
fac
ial
inj
ur
ies
a
nd
br
ok
en
n
os
e.
33
5
Fr
act
ur
ed
c
lav
icle
; C
on
cus
sio
n
and
fra
ctu
re
d
gr
aze
d
leg
. s
pin
e.
--
1 w
°'
1
Ve
loc
ity
Nu
mb
er
ch
ang
e
of
imp
act
s (m
ile
/h)
cau
sin
g
inju
ry
30-
4f)
(co
nt
.)
Ta
ble
2
. (c
on
tin
ue
d)
Nu
mb
er
Ca
se
Inju
rie
s
of
in
ju
rie
s N
o.
of
gr
ea
ter
D
riv
er
F
ro
nt
se
at
pa
ss
en
ge
r
tha
n m
ino
r
se
ve
rit
v
390
C
on
cu
ss
ion
and
la
cer
at
ion
s.
40
1 C
ut
he
ad
; s
li
ght
Be
lt
br
uis
es
. co
ncu
ssio
n;
inj
ure
d
lef
t k
ne
e.
40
9
Fa
cia
l i
nju
rie
s;
Br
ok
en
cl
avic
le
and
sl
igh
t
con
cus
sio
n;
wr
ist
. s
ev
er
e
ehe
st
bru
isin
g.
fl4
4
He
ad
in
ju
ry
; u
nc
ons
cio
us
.
1012
F
ac
ial
inj
ur
ies
to
jaw
In
jur
ies
to
jaw
a
nd
te
eth
; a
nd
te
eth
; r
igh
t
leg
fr
ac
tur
ed
c
lav
icle
a
nd
b
ro
ke
n
in
3 p
lace
s.
an
kle
. 10
16
Fa
cia
l b
ru
isin
g a
nd
B
lack
e
ye
; b
ru
ise
d k
ne
es
. c
on
cu
ss
ion
; b
rok
en
ri
ght
th
igh
&
left
s
hin
.
1019
F
ra
ctu
re
d
jaw
; d
am
ag
ed
.Br
uis
ed
. te
eth
; c
ut
chi
n;
conc
us
sio
n;
cut
rig
ht
k
nee
.
1 w
'..J
1
Tab
le
3.
Ac
cid
en
ts
in
wh
ich
con
cus
sio
n w
as
·re
pö
rte
d w
i th
ou
t o
the·
r h
e·a
d
inj
ur
ies
.
Ca
se
V
eh
icle
s
· De
sc
rip
tio
n
of
Inj
urj.
es
No
. ··a
cc
ide
nt
Dr
ive
r
Fro
nt
se
at
pa
ss
en
ge
r
27
6
196
5 T
riu
mph
Oth
er
ca
r cr
os
sin
g
Un
inj
ur
ed
. B
ru
ise
d
lef
t s
ho
uld
er
; H
er
ald
12
00
. tr
af
fic
lig
hts
a
t s
ea
t b
elt
cu
ts;
Ca
r.
re
d w
as
hit
by
co
ncu
ss
ion
due
to
Tr
ium
ph
at
rep
or
te<l
co
ll
isio
n
of
he
ad
s.
sp
ee
d o
f
20
mil
e/h
.
55
9
Mo
rr
is M
ini
He
ad
-o
n
coll
isio
n
Un
inj
ur
ed
. S
lig
ht
co
ncu
ssio
n,
196
4.
to
of
fs
ide
fro
nt
; N
o e
x-pl
ana
tio
n.
Ca
r.
es
tim
ate
d v
elo
ci
ty
cha
ng
e
20
-29
mil
e/h
.
69
7
Ren
au
lt
10
Ja
gua
r
swer
ved
r
ou
nd
Fa
cia
l l
ac
er
at
ion
s;
Co
ncu
ss
ion
; se
ve
re
19
6�
. a
pa
rk
ed
ca
r,
los
t b
ru
ise
d k
ne
es
. b
ruis
ing
. S
ea
t b
elt
J
ag
ua
r.
con
tro
l an
d h
it
fa
ile
d a
t t
op
a
nch
or
ag
e.
Ren
au
lt
he
ad
-o
n;
es
tim
ate
d v
elo
cit
y
cha
ng
e
20
-29
mil
e/h
. T
wo
pa
ss
en
ger
s in
r
ea
r s
ea
ts
.
51
4
Va
uxh
all
V
iva
19
65
. V
iva
sk
idd
ed
an
d h
it C
on
cuss
ion
-'b
y so
me
ob
jec
t (u
nk
now
n s
pin
nin
g t
ow
ar
ds
on
fr
on
t o
ff
sid
e,a
nd
o
ff
sid
e fr
on
t w
indo
w
the
n
'sp
un'
; es
tim
ate
c s
tern
um
in
ju
re
d b
y
ve
loc
ity
ch
ang
e s
tee
rin
g a
sse
mb
ly;
20
-2
9mi
le/h
. s
pin
al
inj
ur
y.
1 w
CO
'
Ca
se
V
ehi
cle
s
No
.
335
Au
st
in
Min
i 1
964
. C
ar
.
Tab
le
3.
(co
nt
inu
ed
)
De
sc
rip
tio
n
of
In
ju
rie
s
ac
cid
en
t D
riv
er
F
ront
s
ea
t p
ass
en
ge
r
On
com
ing
ca
r
swe
rv
ed
F
ra
ctu
re
d
cla
vic
le;
Co
ncu
ss
ion
an
d
fra
ct
ur
ed
o
ve
r
cen
tr
e l
ine
an
d
gr
aze
d
leg
. s
pin
e;
bo
th
att
rib
ute
d
hit
Min
i h
ea
d-o
n;
to
fr
on
tal
intr
us
ion
. e
st
ima
ted
ve
loc
ity
ch
ang
e 40
-4
5�i
le/h
.
1 w
'°
1