army transformation army signal command and the network … · 2011-05-13 · for the army's...
TRANSCRIPT
6/4/2002 1
Army Signal Command
4/17/2002 12:111
4/17/2002 12:11
The Army Signal CommandThe Army Signal Command
ByDr. Michael L. Gentry
Senior Technical Director/Chief EngineerU. S. Army Signal Command
April 24, 2002
Army Transformationand the
Network Enterprise Technology Command
(NETCOM)
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGEForm Approved
OMB No. 074-0188Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the dataneeded, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden toWashington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, PaperworkReduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503
1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leaveblank)
2. REPORT DATE4/24/2002
3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVEREDBriefing 4/24/2002
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLEArmy Transformation and the Network Enterprise TechnologyCommand (NETCOM)
5. FUNDING NUMBERS
6. AUTHOR(S)Gentry, Dr. Michael L.
7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER
U.S. Army Signal Command
9. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER
IATAC3190 Fairview Park DriveFalls Church, VA 22042
11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
12a. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENTApproved for public release; Distribution unlimited
12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE
A
13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 Words)
Breifing from the Phoenix Challenge 2002.
14. SUBJECT TERMSIATAC Collection, knowledge management, NETCOM, asymmetrical warfare
15. NUMBER OF PAGES
21
16. PRICE CODE
17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF REPORT
UNCLASSIFIED
18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE
UNCLASSIFIED
19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF ABSTRACT
UNCLASSIFIED
20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT
UNLIMITED
NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89)Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39-18298-102
# 2
Army Signal Command
4/17/2002 12:111
4/17/2002 12:11
The Army Signal CommandThe Army Signal Command
Transforming the Army . . .Transforming the Army . . .
• Processes
• Institutions
• Culture
• Philosophy
• Technology
Requires Evolutionary ChangesRequires Evolutionary Changes
2
Our Leaders are The Army’s Strategic Change Agents for achieving a
network centric, knowledge-based Objective Force
6/4/2002 3
Army Signal Command
4/17/2002 12:111
4/17/2002 12:11
The Army Signal CommandThe Army Signal Command
Army Knowledge ManagementArmy Knowledge Management
3
The Army strategy to transformitself into a network-centric,knowledge-based force. Thiseffort is an integral part of Army Transformation.
The Army strategy to transformitself into a network-centric,knowledge-based force. Thiseffort is an integral part of Army Transformation.
AKM is intended to improvedecision dominance by ourwarfighters and businessstewards – in the battlespace,in our organizations, andin our mission practices.
AKM is intended to improvedecision dominance by ourwarfighters and businessstewards – in the battlespace,in our organizations, andin our mission practices.
ASLC SCIO (18 MAR 02)
6/4/2002 4
Army Signal Command
4/17/2002 12:111
4/17/2002 12:11
The Army Signal CommandThe Army Signal Command
$5B FY02C4/IT BUDGET
$5B FY02$5B FY02C4/IT BUDGET C4/IT BUDGET
WarfightingCapabilities
BusinessOverhead
FunctionalArea Apps.
Comms
.
Infras
tructu
re
MILSATCOM
OfficeAutomation
Computing
Other
IAR
eservesS&
T
WarfightingCapabilities
BusinessOverhead
Traditional Transitional TransformedTraditional Transitional Transformed4
Reshaping the Investment StrategyReshaping the Investment Strategy
ASLC SCIO (18 MAR 02)
Leadershipwill change the
balance!
6/4/2002 5
Army Signal Command
4/17/2002 12:111
4/17/2002 12:11
The Army Signal CommandThe Army Signal Command
AKM Strategic Goals1. Adopt governance and cultural changes to become a
knowledge-based organization
2. Integrate knowledge management concepts and best business practices into Army processes to improveperformance
3. Manage the Infostructure as an Enterprise to enhancecapabilities and efficiencies
4. Scale Army Knowledge Online (AKO) as the EnterprisePortal to provide universal, secure access for the entireArmy
5. Harness our human capital for the knowledge-basedArmy
6/4/2002 6
Army Signal Command
4/17/2002 12:111
4/17/2002 12:11
The Army Signal CommandThe Army Signal Command
End
State
Final
Objective
Contracting Agency
Information Realignment
Installation Management
MACOM Redesign
Obj BObj A
Arm
y Transform
ation
Acquisition
Army Transformation
6/4/2002 7
Army Signal Command
4/17/2002 12:111
4/17/2002 12:11
The Army Signal CommandThe Army Signal Command
• Army CIO is the single corporate leader responsible for the Army Enterprise Infostructure (AEI)
• Provide policy and oversight at the HQDA level to insure consistent IM policy across the Army
• Realign operation and management functions under a single Operating Agency (NETCOM) responsible to
the Army CIO at the Enterprise Level
• Achieve IM resource equities across the Army
• Flatten the organizational structure of IM operations –clear chain of command
IM Realignment Background (Objectives)
6/4/2002 8
Army Signal Command
4/17/2002 12:111
4/17/2002 12:11
The Army Signal CommandThe Army Signal Command
CURRENT ARMY SIGNAL COMMAND MISSIONS
Provide a warfighting competent strategically
responsive Signal force support to:
§ Combatant CINCs
§ Army Service Component Commanders
§ Joint and Combined Operations
§ Establish, operate, protect, sustain, integrate, and manage the Army’s portion of the Global Information Grid
§ Protect and provide for the well-being of our people.
NEW AKM MISSIONS:
U.S. Army Signal Command (USASC) is the Army'ssingle authority to operate and manage the enterprise level infostructure. USASC will have technical command and control and configuration management authority for the Army's critical networks and systems, and will have operational review/coordination authority for any standards, system, architecture, design, or device that impacts enterprise level Army infostructure and Network Operations (NETOPS).
18 September 2001 AKM Implementing Guidance
NETCOM/9th Army Signal Command Mission Statement
NETCOM is the single authority to operate, manage, and protect the Army’s enterprise level infrostructure. NETCOM will deliver seamless enterprise level C4/IM common user services and warfighting forces in support of the Commanders in Chief (CINC) and Army Service Component Commanders (ASCC). NETCOM operates, sustains, and protects the Army’s portion of the Global Information Grid, enabling force projection and the delivery of decisive combat power.
28 November 2001 Based Info Mgt Implementation Plan - Phase I
Evolving Missions
6/4/2002 9
Army Signal Command
4/17/2002 12:111
4/17/2002 12:11
The Army Signal CommandThe Army Signal Command
ArmyCIO/G-6
ACSIM
NETCOM/9thASCInstallation
Management Activity
MACOM
SA/CSA
NETCOM(NE, NW, SE, SW)
CommanderFt. WarfighterDOIM
Tenant
CommandStaff SupervisionDirect/General SupportRequirements/Staff SupervisionOPCONTECHCON
IMO
CIO/G-6
IntermediateHQ CIO/G-6
REG DIR
Army CIO/G-6 & MACOM CIOHave Normal
Staff Relationships
FORSCOM
OPCON of CONUS“Forces
For”
Theater Forces
USARRCIO
ActivityDOIM
WCF Installation
DOIM
COERCIO
ARNGRCIO
3 OCONUS
NETCOM/TIM Relationships for C4IM
6/4/2002 10
Army Signal Command
4/17/2002 12:111
4/17/2002 12:11
The Army Signal CommandThe Army Signal Command
Fort Belvoir
Aberdeen Proving Ground
Fort StoryFort Lee
Fort EustisFort Monroe
Ft. AP Hill
Radford AAP
Tobyhanna Army Depot
Letterkenny AD
Carlisle Barracks
Fort McNairFt. Meade
Fort Myer
Walter Reed
Ft Detrick
Adelphi Lab Ctr
Charles E. Kelly Spt Fac (USAR)
Fort Drum
West Point
Fort MonmouthPicatinny Arsenal
Watervliet ArsFt. Hamilton
Fort Dix (USAR)
Natick R & D Ctr
USA Cold Reg Lab
Fort Devens RFTA (USAR)
Fort McPherson
Fort Gordon
Fort Stewart
Hunter Army Airfield
Fort Jackson
Ft Buchanan, PR
Fort Campbell
Fort Knox
Redstone Arsenal
Fort Benning
Fort Rucker
Anniston AD
Ft. Gillem
Milan AAP
Holston AAP
Mississippi AAP
Blue Grass AD
Fort BraggMOT Sunny PointIV
Presidio of Monterey
Fort Irwin
Yuma Proving Ground
Fort Hauchuca
Riverbank AAP
Sierra Army Depot
Hawthorne ADCamp Parks (USAR)
Fort Hunter Liggett (USAR)
White Sands Missile Testing Center
Fort Sill
Fort BlissFort Hood
Fort Polk
Pine Bluff Ars
McAlester AAP
Red River AD
Lone Star AAP
Camp Stanley Storage Actv
Louisiana AAP
Fort Sam Houston
Corpus Christi AD
Detroit Ars
USAG Selfridge
Lima Army Tank Plt
Fort McCoy (USAR)
V
Fort Leonard Wood
Fort Riley Fort Leavenworth
Iowa AAP
Kansas AAP
Lake City AAP
Dugway Proving Ground
Pueblo Depot
Fort CarsonTooele AD
Deseret Chem Depot
Fort LewisYakima Training
Center
Vancouver Barracks
Northeast(23)
Southeast (19)
Northwest (20)
Southwest(19)
Fort ShafterSchofield
Barracks
Fort Wainwright
Fort Richardson
Ft. GreelyWest
(10)
V = Federal Region
III
II
VII
VIII
X -
IX -VI
I
Rock Island Arsenal
v Plus Europe Region and Korea Region
TIM Regions
6/4/2002 11
Army Signal Command
4/17/2002 12:111
4/17/2002 12:11
The Army Signal CommandThe Army Signal Command
FWD
ARMY CIO/G6
NETCOM/9TH ASC
DCG FWD
Sr Tech Dir
Our Vision
Enterprise SystemsTechnology Activity
Service Mgmt
Knowledge Mgmt
COP and Enterprise
Support
X
DCG
SES
ANOSC
C-TNOSC
X
Spectrum Mgmt
CTO
CoordinatingG-Staff (Rear)
Oversight(incl rating)
NETOPS Reporting
C2
Located in DC
EUR
SOUTHKOR
PAC
CENT
InfostructurePlans
OperationalEngineers
Governance &NETOPS
IA
XX
ATD
Personal Staff& Special Staff
NETCOMNE
NWSE
SW
6/4/2002 12
Army Signal Command
4/17/2002 12:111
4/17/2002 12:11
The Army Signal CommandThe Army Signal Command
• Stand up NETCOM Regions with the TIM RD– Same time– Same places
• Stand up NETCOM FWD and Rear– Incorporate new missions– Reorganize staff
• Continue to execute/implement new enterprise initiative– Gain visibility on health and security of all Army networks.– Issue Enterprise Systems Management CONOPS– Implement Active Directory/Exchange 2000 across the
enterprise– Establish networthiness process for additions to the
infostructure– Develop Service Level Agreements for common user services
across the Enterprise
Road Ahead
6/4/2002 13
Army Signal Command
4/17/2002 12:111
4/17/2002 12:11
The Army Signal CommandThe Army Signal Command
Infostructure Operations – Objective State• Enable universal (and secure) access to authorized infostructureservices to all Army customers within the Army infostructure – PKIenables single sign-on “plug & play” capability• Accurately display a total and integrated Situation Awarenessof the AEI
• Predict impacts on the AEI of new/changed systems and operational contingencies• Redirect and reallocate AEI resources in near real-time to supportArmy response to crisis or unplanned event anywhere within theArmy infostructure Area of Operations (AOR)• Provide a consistent, robust, base-level of infostructure services to all authorized Army customers at the least cost feasible withinArmy operational constraints
• Provide additional (above base level) infostructure services to Armycustomers on a reimbursable basis
• Perform continuing and non-intrusive technology insertion based on improving service levels or reducing cost of providing current base-level services
6/4/2002 14
Army Signal Command
4/17/2002 12:111
4/17/2002 12:11
The Army Signal CommandThe Army Signal Command
• Secure, reliable networks• Standard architectures• Joint interoperability• Real world situationalawareness • Strategic links to the National
Command Authority• Seamless Information Systems for the Unified CINCs and Army Component Commanders
Ø Worldwide, rapid deploymentØØ Tailored communication solutionsØØ Specialized comms engineeringØ Global Network Operations & Information Assurance ØØ Rapid technical insertion (COTS)Ø Integrated Enterprise OperationsArmy Network Common Operational
PictureØ Provide Single NETOPS Operational Crew Chief for all levels of war to ArmyØ Operationally focused, responsive
Enabling Strategic Dominance through Global and Regional Communications
AKM Enterprise Operations
Requires Single Voice:NETCOM added benefits:
40I I
86I I
59I I
504I I
63I I
67I I
7X
2X
11X
93X
235I
56I I
516X
1X
30I I
54I I
5
1108X
1110I I 1111
I I 307I I
58I I
41I I 304
I I
78I I
36I I
39I I
43I I
509I I
44I I
69I I
102I I
72I I
52I I
Global Nodal Network
ADDING CONTINUED VALUE TO OUR ARMYADDING CONTINUED VALUE TO OUR ARMY
6/4/2002 15
Army Signal Command
4/17/2002 12:111
4/17/2002 12:11
The Army Signal CommandThe Army Signal Command
Why NETOPS is Critical!
• NETOPS is a key enabler ensuring the proper operation and protection of the Information Environment (IE) supporting the warfighter.
• The Information Environment is a center of gravity for US Military Operations.
• The IE is a prime target of Asymmetric Warfare.
6/4/2002 16
Army Signal Command
4/17/2002 12:111
4/17/2002 12:11
The Army Signal CommandThe Army Signal Command
RCERT-E RCERT-P RCERT-K RCERT-S RCERT-SWARCERT-C
TNOSC SWATNOSC
ANOSC – Army Network Operations and Security Center (NETCOM/9 th ASC)TNOSC – Theater Network Operations and Security Center (Signal Command/BrigadeRNOSC – Regional Network Operations and Security Center (Battalion/Deployed Units/Others)ACERT – Army Computer Emergency Response TeamRCERT – Regional Computer Emergency Response Team
S-TNOSCP-TNOSCTNOSC E-TNOSC
CINCTCCCRNOSC
CINCTCCCRNOSC
CINCTCCCRNOSC CINC
TCCCRNOSCCINCTCCCRNOSC
CINCTCCCRNOSC
C-TNOSC
Army / Joint NETOPS / CND
K-TNOSC
ANOSC
GNOSC
JTF-CNO
ACERT
6/4/2002
Army Signal Command
4/17/2002 12:111
4/17/2002 12:11
The Army Signal CommandThe Army Signal Command
Asymmetrical Warfare and NETOPS
• Defeated: Maginot Line, Berlin Wall, US Borders (and the INS), and the National Transportation System on 9/11
• Not (yet) Defeated: The Al Queda and The Drug Trade
• Reason: Symmetric vs. Asymmetric Offensive and Defensive actions
• Basic Questions to Consider: • Do we treat our networks Symmetrically or Asymmetrically?• Does our enemy treat cyber warfare Symmetrically or
Asymmetrically?• If the enemy uses Asymmetric Offenses, can our Symmetric
Defense defeat the enemy?
6/4/2002 18
Army Signal Command
4/17/2002 12:111
4/17/2002 12:11
The Army Signal CommandThe Army Signal Command
Friendly Asymmetrical NETOPS Warfare• Facts:
• The networks (military and civilian) are battlefields TODAY.• Our greatest strength (Information Superiority) can also be our greatest weakness.• DoD currently has a Symmetrical “Defense in Depth” strategy for our networks.• We depend on COTS products (created by US and foreign nationals) in our defense. • Skilled people are at the heart of our success.• Asymmetric NETOPS threats are a reality each day.• Cultural, legal and doctrinal barriers inhibit our NETOPS.
• Assumption: To battle the Asymmetrical threat to our infostructure, we must think• in terms of asymmetrical defenses; remember – the best defense is a good offense.
6/4/2002 19
Army Signal Command
4/17/2002 12:111
4/17/2002 12:11
The Army Signal CommandThe Army Signal Command
Enemy Asymmetrical NETOPS Warfare• The Threat:
• Knows that we are dependent on military and commercial networks during peace and war.
• Will adjust to focus on where we are least defended. • Attacks just under our detection thresholds, with more powerful
tools and techniques.
• Enemy Cyber-Attack: High payoffs, little expenditure. Examples: Solar Sunrise, Moonlight Maze, etc.Melissa Virus - $80 million SirCam - $1.15 billionNimda – $635 million Love Bug - $8.75 billionCodeRed – $2.62 billion
Pentagon 9/11 Repairs - $700 million
6/4/2002 20
Army Signal Command
4/17/2002 12:111
4/17/2002 12:11
The Army Signal CommandThe Army Signal Command
Possible Friendly Asymmetrical Warfare NETOPS Mitigating Solutions
• TLA-Redesign • Variable reactions to keep the enemy guessing • Coordinated NETOPS between military, government, private,
and allies / coalitions• Decrease reliance on the commercial world’s infostructure• Develop / resource contingency capabilities• Use of deception techniques (“honey pots”)• Recon of the Enemy “AO” BEFORE they attack• Develop and legalize the use of asymmetrical offensive
capabilities• Don’t treat our infostructure like a business – treat it like a
weapon system.
6/4/2002 21
Army Signal Command
4/17/2002 12:111
4/17/2002 12:11
The Army Signal CommandThe Army Signal Command
Friendly Asymmetrical NETOPS Warfare Improvements
• Improved Event Correlation Across Data Sources
• ACERT and ASC LNO Exchanges
• Enhanced Information Dissemination Management (IDM):- NETOPS COP at theater and global levels: provides
relevant reports, status, directives, guidance, queries, and IA information.
- Vertical and horizontal information sharing
• Standup of NETCOM