army environmental quality budget updateppgb –planning program budget comm peg –program element...

Lisa J. Smith / DAIM-ISE / (703) 601-1563 / [email protected] 140014JUN2010

Army Environmental Quality

Budget Update

14 June 2010

Ms. Lisa J. Smith

Army Environmental Division

Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management

Headquarters, Department of the Army

Report Documentation Page Form ApprovedOMB No. 0704-0188

Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering andmaintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, ArlingtonVA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if itdoes not display a currently valid OMB control number.

1. REPORT DATE 14 JUN 2010 2. REPORT TYPE

3. DATES COVERED 00-00-2010 to 00-00-2010

4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Army Environmental Quality Budget Update

5a. CONTRACT NUMBER

5b. GRANT NUMBER

5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER

6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER

5e. TASK NUMBER

5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER

7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Army Ofc of the Assistant Chief of Staff for InstallationManagement,Army Environmental Division,600 Army Pentagon,Washington,DC,20310-0600

8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONREPORT NUMBER

9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S ACRONYM(S)

11. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S REPORT NUMBER(S)

12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited

13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Presented at the NDIA Environment, Energy Security & Sustainability (E2S2) Symposium & Exhibitionheld 14-17 June 2010 in Denver, CO.

14. ABSTRACT

15. SUBJECT TERMS

16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT Same as

Report (SAR)

18. NUMBEROF PAGES

15

19a. NAME OFRESPONSIBLE PERSON

a. REPORT unclassified

b. ABSTRACT unclassified

c. THIS PAGE unclassified

Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18


Agenda

Status of POM 12-17 for Environmental Quality

Current Army Planning Programming,

Budgeting and Execution (PPBES) Process

Changes to PPBES Process

Environmental Quality Requirements Building

Process

2 of 15


POM12-17 Results

Guidance allowed for NO GROWTH

Current numbers posted 8 JUN 10

Critical Requirements for Environmental Quality

(MDEP VENQ) were approved

– No issues with the requirements generation process

– Environmental Cost Standardization (ECS) output

generally accepted

– Staffing standard output was approved

– ACUB projects with Conservation compliance

drivers approved

– Non-recurring projects presented were approved

3 of 15


Environmental Quality (EQ)

0

100000

200000

300000

400000

500000

600000

700000

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

VENQ Requirements

VENQ Funding

Compliance Rqmts

Compliance Funding

Conservation Rqmts

Conservation Funding

Pollution Prev Rqmts

Pollution Prev Funding

VENQ Requirements and Funding by Program

$K

4 of 15


Environmental Quality (EQ)

0

100000

200000

300000

400000

500000

600000

700000

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

VENQ Requirements

VENQ Funding

OMA Rqmts

OMA Funding

OMNG Rqmts

OMNG Funding

OMAR Rqmts

OMAR Funding

VENQ Requirements and Funding by Appropriation

$K

5 of 15


Army PPBES Process

Army PPBE’s main objective is to establish, justify,

and acquire the fiscal and manpower resources

needed to accomplish the Army’s assigned

missions in executing the Defense Strategy

Planning

Programming and

Budgeting

Program

Execution

Budget

Execution

Size, structure, man equip, train

and sustain the Army force

Distribute projected manpower,

dollars, and materiel among

competing requirements Convert resource allocation

decisions into congressional

requests

Manage and account

for funds in approved

programs

Apply resources to

achieve approved

program objectives

6 of 15


Environmental Quality Reporting

DOD Financial Management Regulation (FMR)

– Volume 2A, Chapter 3 and Volume 2B, Chapter 19

– Requires detailed information on execution and

programmed funding amounts by program/media

President’s Budget Request

– Budget Justification Books

– Uses same information submitted above

Defense Environmental Programs Annual

Report to Congress (DEPARC)

– Chapter 1: Defense Environmental Funding


http://deparc.xservices.com/do/home

7 of 15


Environmental Quality Reporting

DUSD (I&E) POM 12-16 Installation and

Environmental Overview

– Detailed brief which includes detail by environmental

program and media


We must have accountability of how we plan, program,

budget, and execute our resources by program/media

and explain any variations

8 of 15


Current POM Timeline

ACC – Army Commander’s Conf SRG – Senior Review Group TAP – The Army Plan ACOM – Army Command

POM – Program Objective Memorandum BES – Budget Estimate Submission TAA – Total Army Analysis TGM – Tech Guidance Memo

PPGB – Planning Program Budget Comm PEG – Program Element Group DPG – Def Planning Guidance ARB – Army Resources Board

OSD – Office Sec of Defense P&F – Program and Financial J-Book – Justification Book

Source: How the Army Runs

9 of 15

* U.S.ARMY

Current POM Timeline

ACOM POMIBES to HODA

Major events PEG Rqmts

Build complete PEG POMIBES PPBC PEG BRP

complete POMIBESIAppn Rev Prlortlutlon POMIBES toOSD

ACC /

PPBC Sched8 Review

I

PPBC Rqmta Review

/

PPBC PEG I PPBC I PPBC

'- / Prlort;z.ation // ARB Prep j GDF TAA09

algned Reaulta

BRP)

Requirement•

/ BRP

ARB Prep EOH

BRP TAP

BRP ScheduleS

TGMI Stalking Guid

BRP PF1/PF2 EOH Review POM/BES Decisions

POMIBES Planning Coni -

Central processess

ACOM PEG Requirements POMIBES Build Build

PEG Prlorltutlon

PIF Statement a J·Book Preparation

OSD Prog/Bdgt Review begins


Current Program and Budget Review

POM – Program Objective Memorandum FYDP – Future Years Defense Program OSD – Office Sec of Defense DPG – Def Planning Guid

BES – Budget Estimate Submission PAE – Dir Program Analysis & Evaluation PDM – Program Decision Memo MBI – Major Budget Issue

SECDEF – Secretary of Defense OMB – Office of Management and Budget P&F – Program and Financial J-Book – Justification Book

PRG – Program Review Group DRB – Defense Review Board

Source: How the Army Runs

10 of 15

* U.S.ARMY

Current Program and Budget Review

POM FY DP Issue OuUines (start) to OSD to PAE

POMIBES\POMIBES la•ue OuHine Lock to OSD Disposition lllemo / l I

QDF complal~e laauiiS clreutatoo

Major events

Anal Preaidential declslons

Pre.klenta Budget To Congress

SECDEF Final PBDs

Oct Nov

OSDdatabaM ( lock

OSD final loci!/ Budget to OMS

DPG Compliance Brief to OSD

MBI eeaelon OSD-Army Prea.s conf'erence

Program and BudiJcl Exhibit• posted to oso Web Site

P&F statement & ) OSD Program J.Book Prep!lrotion Review

•

• PAE reconclllea

FYDP PIISS to OSO

Central processes

OSO Program/Budget RI!Vii!W

Oct Nov

PRG and ORB meetings

• Major Budget lsaUIIS

R""lew


PPBES Process Changes

9 APR 2010 OSD Memorandum, Subject: “Procedures

and Schedule for FY2012-2016 Integrated

Program/Budget Review”

Guidance for the Development of the Force and the

Joint Planning Guidance will be combined into the

Defense Planning and Programming Guidance (DPPG)

Department will submit single year budgets each year

Annual program/budget reviews will be 5 years

(POM12-16, POM13-17, POM14-18, etc.)

Department will conduct Front End Assessments to

address major issues which focus on strategic issues

that will impact resource allocations (summer/early fall)

11 of 15


Revised Timeline

30 JUL: Component POM/BES submission due

2-13 AUG: Component POM Briefs

3 SEP: Budget justification materials due to

OSD/OMB (POM Locked and exhibits due)

22 NOV: Program/budget review complete

7 FEB: Presidents Budget released

12 of 15


EQ Requirements Generation Process

13 of 15


NON-RECURRING & NON-ECS REQTS. FOR INSTALLATONS See NRJ

~;::::;:======::;:;------=-=::~ Det;oii Noo-ll~urrlng &

Non-ECS ftequhmffil Process

• ~lol·fiecurring

· Range IViUga!ion · A'M')' initiatives

· Recurring N(( ir ECS

Non-R.....nn, ~ ~on-ECS

Re:jllitemen:s 1 ,

fer ln•lall<lio./

~......._-1 ,

RECURRING REQTS. FOR INSTAL LA TONS See ECS J _ r.;::=::::::::::::::::;--..;....---..;...,=""" Del~ I

Envfronmenl.al Cost 6tandardlzatlon

IECS)Illodel

\

Command Budget

Requlremem Process (ll,AIM·ISE. USACE,

IMCCM. NGB, =les:erves1 AM:,

MEOCOM, SMDC;

I

¢ \

-Rf(Urrilg

Requfrerren:s for

lnllallati/

Re~uiremen:s for

Commands 1

./ -- _i

Roqulr01nonls Validation Process · OMJC

· Validatior • l'nal)"lisl

Adjustments - .Opprovat

.. Stakehdder

Meetings ~~=~ SeeCMD Bu~

Valida! on



Integrate data collection into existing processes

– AEDB-EQ – data for model

– PROBE (manpower authorizations)

– STEP or spreadsheets – non-recurring requirements

Quality Control of data

– Use existing processes to ensure quality data

– QA/QC important

– Data variance will affect model output

Establish a timeline to submission

– Backcast submission dates and data calls to be

used14 of 15


Questions???

ECS Documentation on AKO:

https://www.us.army.mil/suite/files/22613161

BRM website: http://brm.army.mil

Ms. Lisa Smith

Army Environmental DivisionAssistant Chief of Staff for Installation

ManagementHeadquarters, Department of the Army

703-601-1563

[email protected]

15 of 15

army environmental quality budget updateppgb –planning program budget comm peg –program element...

Documents