apwa – wa chapter casc...
TRANSCRIPT
11/9/2015
1
APWA – WA Chapter CASC Workshop
• Intro to PA Program and SRIA
• PA Contracting and Procurement Okanogan County – August 2015
Overview• Introduction to the Public Assistance (PA)
Program• Sandy Recovery
Improvement Act
• Contracting andProcurementEssentials
North Central Washington – August 2015
Public Assistance (PA) Grant Program
Assistance to Governments and Certain PNPs
To provide assistance to State, Tribal and local governments, and certain types of Private Nonprofit organizations so that communities can quickly respond to and recover from major disasters or emergencies declared by the President.
Response and Recovery activities as a direct result of an emergency or disaster event
11/9/2015
2
Federal Authority
Authorized by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act, as amended
Sandy Recovery Improvement Act
(SRIA) of 2013
Public Assistance Process
Subgrantee
PDADisasterEvent
Governor’sRequest
Declaration
Applicants’Briefing
Submissionof Request
Kick-offMeeting
Formulationof Projects
ProjectReview
Grantee
Approval
FundingClose Out
General Program Eligibility
• Criteria for Eligibility – Eligibility Pyramid
▫ Cost▫ Work▫ Facility▫ Applicant
Twisp River Fire – August 2015
11/9/2015
3
Who’s Eligible to Apply?
• Cities and Towns• Counties• State Agencies• Federally-recognized Indian Tribes• Special Purpose Districts• Private Non Profit (PNP) Organizations▫ Debris Removal and Emergency Work - All▫ Permanent Work – PNPs Providing Essential
Governmental Service
Critical Private Non-Profit Entities
• Fire• Emergency• Medical• Utilities• Educational• Custodial Care
Other Private Non-Profits
• Must first apply to Small Business Administration (SBA) for Permanent Repairs▫ Museums▫ Performing Arts Centers▫ Community Centers▫ Homeless Shelters▫ Zoos▫ Assisted Living▫ Food Programs
11/9/2015
4
Facilities• Damaged as the result of a declared event• Located within a declared county• In active use at the time of the event• Not under the authority
of another federal agency
North Central Washington – Aug 2015
Work Eligibility• Be disaster related
• Conducted in the designated
disaster area
• Be applicant’s legal responsibility
• Not funded by another
federal agency
SCL Penstock wooden support – Aug 2015
Types of Work
Emergency Work• A - Debris Removal• B - Emergency Protective
Measures
Permanent Work• C - Road Systems• D - Water Control
Facilities• E - Public Buildings &
Equipment• F - Public Utility
Systems• G - Parks and Other
Facilities
11/9/2015
5
Eligible Items – Emergency Work• Eligible activity must be essential to meeting an immediate
threat to life or property during or resulting from the declared event.▫ Category A - Regular & Overtime for Regular Employees to
include benefits. ▫ Category B - Overtime only to include benefits.▫ All Hours (Regular & Overtime) for Temporary Hires including
benefits▫ All Equipment Hours – Lower of FEMA or Applicant Rates▫ Rental Equipment▫ Engineering and Design Services▫ Materials▫ Contracts
Eligible Items – Permanent Work
• Repair, restore or replace damaged facilities to pre-disaster design, capacity and condition• Regular and Overtime (Including Benefits) of all employees• Equipment Costs - Lower of FEMA or Applicant Rates• Rental Equipment• Engineering and Design Services• Materials• Contracts
• Adopted Construction Codes and Standards• Cost Effective Hazard Mitigation (Damaged Element)• Federally-required Environmental Conditions
Cost Eligibility
• Reasonable and necessary cost to accomplish eligible work
• Complies with federal, state, and local laws and regulations – FEMA funds creates federal nexus
• Credits - Insurance proceeds, salvage value, purchase discounts – no duplication of benefits
• PWs must be a minimum of $3,050 (FFY-16)
11/9/2015
6
PA Program - starting point…
Preliminary Damage Assessments (PDAs)
Joint FEMA/State/Applicant teams
• A PDA identifies the initial cost estimate of damages for governmental agencies, private non-profits, and tribal governments.
• Damages are identified on PDA forms• Damage estimates are consolidated by county to
determine if federally mandated indicators for each County have been reached
• In addition to County indicator, a Statewide indicator must also be met to be considered for disaster aid
• Process pushes very hard – from end of the disaster event to Governor’s request to FEMA is 30 days
PDA Damage / Cost Indicators
As of October 1, 2015:
• State of Washington $9,481,602▫ $1.41 per capita based on 2010 Census
• County▫ $3.56 per capita based on 2010 Census
11/9/2015
7
Presidential Declaration !!!Now what?
Joint Field OfficeApplicant Briefing
Request for Public Assistance Kick-off Meeting
Project FormulationRecovery
Key PA/PDA Milestones
• Request a disaster – State has 30 days from the end of the incident period to submit to FEMA
• Request Public Assistance (RPA) – Jurisdictions have 30 days from date of declaration to submit
• Report all damages to FEMA/State PACs–within 60 days from the Kick-off meeting
• Complete Category A & B emergency work – 6 months from date of declaration
• Complete Category C-G permanent repairs – 18 months from date of declaration
Project Worksheet Formulation
Capturing the costs for debris removal, emergency measures, and permanent work
This is where the documentation begins
11/9/2015
8
Project Worksheet Formulation
• The main elements for a Project Worksheet:▫ Facility or activity information – name, location,
facility▫ Damage Descriptions & Dimensions▫ Scope of work ▫ Cost Summary Force Account (Labor, Equipment, Materials) Contract (Purchases, Construction, Consultant) Mutual Aid Agreement
Project Worksheet Formulation
• Prioritized list of projects• Timelines for completion• Site visits – to be schedule at Kick Off• Damage Descriptions & Dimensions• Scope of work – What will it take to put it back?• Project Cost Estimates (Work to be Completed)
– Applicant Historical costs, Quotes, FA costs• Forms• Supporting documentation, photos, permits
Small and Large Projects
• Small Project• Minimum of $3,050 & equal to/less than $121,800• Payment made upon obligation
• Large Project• Greater than $121,800• Progress payment – Reimbursement less retainage
• Many considerations are looked at in determining dividing or combining projects – emergency or permanent work• EHP, Insurance, Mitigation reviews
11/9/2015
9
Reimbursements
• Projects▫ 75% Federal Share▫ 25% Non-Federal Share▫ State Participation Determined by State Legislature
• Direct Administrative Costs▫ Your cost for doing business with FEMA and State Project Specific Billable hours Auditable
PW Review Process
• PWs submitted for review▫ Public Assistance Coordinators▫ QA/QC▫ Environmental▫ Historical▫ Floodplain▫ Insurance▫ Mitigation▫ Final – FEMA & State
Kittitas County – January 2009
Sandy Recovery Improvement Act (SRIA) of 2013
11/9/2015
10
Sandy Recovery Improvement Act (SRIA) of 2013
Two New Pilot Programs in place:• Alternative Procedures for Debris Removal• Alternative Procedures for Permanent WorkSpecific Goals
Reduce costs to the Federal Government for providing PA
Increase flexibility Expedite Assistance Provide incentive/disincentive for timely, cost-
effective completion of projects
PA Alternative Procedures (PAAP) Pilot Program - Debris Removal
• Federal Share Sliding Scale• Recycling Revenues• Regular Time Reimbursement• Debris Management Plan
PA Alternative Procedures (PAAP) Pilot Program - Debris Removal
• Voluntary• Applies to large and small projects as well• Does not change review or final inspection requirements• To participate in the sliding scale procedure, debris
removal projects must include all debris for which a jurisdiction will be requesting FEMA assistance.
• Pilot program extended until July 2016
11/9/2015
11
Sliding Scale – Increased Federal Share
• Increased Federal share is for debris collection, hauling, processing and disposal when debris work is completed within a specified time frame.
• To participate in this procedure, debris removal projects must include all debris for which a jurisdiction will be requesting FEMA assistance.
• The PW will reflect actual costs for the quantity of debris removal completed from the incident’s start date until the ending time frame.
• Applies to large or small projects
Sliding Scale – Increased Federal Share
Regular Time - Reimbursable
• Jurisdictions need to track labor and equipment hours for each employee and additional temporary staff.
• Jurisdictions need to keep accurate hourly records for each employee and additional staff assigned to debris activities.
• This alternative procedure can be used with any other alternative procedure or on its own.
• Can be applied to both large and small projects for jurisdictions participating in the pilot.
11/9/2015
12
Debris Management Plans
• When a jurisdiction has a FEMA-reviewed debris management plan before the date of the disaster declaration incident period, FEMA will provide a one-time incentive of a 2 percent cost share adjustment applied to debris removal work completed within 90 days.
• This one-time incentive will not be available to the same jurisdiction again during the course of the pilot. This procedure can be used with any of the other pilot procedures or on its own.
• Must have at least one or more pre-qualified debris contractors and must comply with Federal procurement requirements
PA Alternative Procedures (PAAP) Pilot Program - Permanent Work
• Fixed Estimates (required)• Consolidated projects• Excess funds• Cost Estimates• Independent Expert Panel
PA Alternative Procedures (PAAP) Pilot Program - Permanent Work
• Voluntary. • Alternative procedures are only for large projects, on a
project by project basis.• To participate, jurisdictions must agree to participate in
the grants based on fixed estimates procedure before having access to other alternative procedures.
• FEMA does not require all features to be selected to participate in the pilot program.
• Eliminates the mandatory Federal cost share reduction for alternate projects
11/9/2015
13
MAP 21 – FHWA & FEMA• MAP 21 agreement applies only to debris removal
from Federal-aid roads• MAP 21 will not fund permanent repair of federal-
aid roads• FHWA ER program will not fund debris removal
when the county is declared for PA Program• Jurisdictions still need to track;
• Location and quantity of debris• Temporary staging areas• Final disposal locations
Procurement & ContractingMaintaining Eligibility for FEMA Funding
Naches Landslide - October 2009
Costs & Reasonable Reimbursement
• Normal procedures must not be altered because of the potential for reimbursement from Federal funds
• Reasonableness Criteria▫ Must be fair and equitable▫ Applicable to type of work▫ “Prudent” person decision ▫ Is cost ordinary and necessary for facility and type of work?▫ Were actions taken in prudent manner?
• Reasonable costs can be established through▫ Applicant’s historical documentation for similar work▫ Average costs for similar work in the area▫ Published unit costs (RS Means/CostWorks)▫ FEMA cost codes (national composite averages)
11/9/2015
14
Accepted Procurement Methods
• Micro-purchase procedures• Small purchase procedures• Sealed bids• Competitive proposals• Non-competitive
proposals
• Super Circular applies2 CFR 200.318-326
Nisqually Earthquake - March 2001
Small Purchase Procedures
• Small purchase procurement is an informal method for securing services or supplies that do not cost more than $150,000 by obtaining several price quotes from different sources
Always use the most restrictive limit in effect for your jurisdiction
Sealed Bids
• This is a formal contracting method where:▫ The bids are publicly advertised and solicited▫ Cost analysis is required▫ The contract is awarded to the lowest responsible
bidder and lowest price▫ This method is the preferred method for procuring
construction contracts
11/9/2015
15
Competitive Proposals
• Similar to sealed bid procurement • Cost analysis is required• Contracts are awarded on the basis of contractor
qualifications instead of on price• This method is generally used for procuring
architectural or engineering professional services
Note: Consultant agreements and Personal Services contracts fall into this category
Non-Competitive Proposals
• A proposal is received from only one source• Document why you chose this type of contract• Cost-analysis is required• Only use when the award of a contract is not feasible
under small purchase procedures, sealed bids, or competitive proposals, and one of the following circumstances applies:▫ The item is available only from a single source▫ There is an emergency requirement that will not permit delay▫ FEMA may authorize noncompetitive proposals▫ Solicitation from a number of sources has been attempted, and
competition is determined to be inadequate.
Emergency Contracting• Emergency Proclamation must waive the
competitive bid process and be in place prior to signing any emergency contracts
• Document all contract procurement actions• Ensure Cost Analysis is performed• Get your contracting office involved ahead of time• Follow up within a short period with open,
competitive process
11/9/2015
16
Acceptable Contracts
• Lump Sum Contracts• Unit Price Contracts• Cost Plus a Fixed
Fee Contracts
Lewis County - December 2007
Lump Sum Contracts
• Competitive process• Can be either sealed or competitive negotiation▫ Sealed Bid: Contractors bid a firm fixed price bid
including all labor, equipment, materials, overhead, & profit
▫ Competitive: Contractors submit proposals based on pre-stated factors
• Well defined & reasonable scope of work• Amendments or Change Orders are by exception• Except for rare amendments, contract price will
not change
Unit Price Contracts• Often used when quantities needed to do the
work are not known in advance• Units of work determined in advance by unit of
measure; i.e. CY, LF• Competitive process• Bid price is “in place” cost including labor,
materials, equipment, overhead, & profit• Bid price is all-inclusive - not broken out• Often awarded on an annual basis to multiple
firms to insure availability & price competition• Prices must be deemed reasonable
11/9/2015
17
Cost Plus a Fixed Fee
• Used when full extent of scope cannot be fully predicted in advance
• Contractor is reimbursed for reasonable, with-in scope costs
• Contractor bids a fixed fee for the contract to include overhead & profit
Generally Unacceptable Contracts
• Time & Materials Contracts• Time & Equipment Contracts• Piggyback Contracts• Intra-agency charges
FEMA strongly discourages these types of contracts
Time & Materials Contracts
• Local & State procurement guidelines must be followed• Accepted only in very limited situations• Generally not more than 70 hours for work that is necessary
immediately after a disaster when a clear scope of work cannot be developed
• Requirements▫ Must have a written scope▫ Must have a cost ceiling or “not to exceed” provision▫ Strict monitoring & documentation of expenses▫ Cost must be reasonable & work must be approved and within scope ▫ Prescribed duration for emergency work only
11/9/2015
18
Time & Materials Contracts
• Cost structure for labor to include overhead & profit▫ Overhead and profit must not be broken out
separately• Use FEMA approved equipment rates• Competition still a requirement unless emergency
occurs that requires immediate response or there is no available competition
• Check on debarred/suspended status
Piggyback Contracts
• A concept of expanding a previously awarded contract.
• Does not meet the requirements of 2 CFR 200 ▫ it is non-competitive ▫ may have an inappropriate price structure
• This type of contract is not eligible. ▫ However, FEMA may separately evaluate and
reimburse costs it finds fair and reasonable. This is extremely rare!
▫ Limited dollar amount
Unacceptable Contracts
• Costs plus a percentage of Cost▫ Specifically disallowed under 2 CFR 200.323(d)
• Contingency Contracts▫ Specifically disallowed under federal procurement
guidelines▫ There is never an advance assumption of federal
reimbursement• Verbal Contracts
11/9/2015
19
Verbal Contracts• No verbal contracts• Specifically prohibited under federal procurement
regulations• On an emergency basis, an agency may grant an on-
site, verbal authorization of a contract. This must be followed up immediately (within 3 days) by a written contract that meets all federal procurement regulations.
• Occurs frequently during emergency activities▫ Take positive actions to put in place procedures to
transition verbal contracts to written contracts
Consultant Contracts
• Applicants utilizing consultant agreements administered and paid with a cost plus percentage of cost methodology ▫ Cost plus percentage contracts are not eligible for
reimbursement▫ The OIG has questioned these contracts and
issued audit findings▫ Use of these types of contracts jeopardizes the
eligibility of the contracted consultant engineering services and the entire project
Consultant Contracts (cont)
• It is acceptable to utilize consultant engineering services on projects funded with monies from FEMA’s Public Assistance Program for:▫ Special engineering services (such as surveying or
geotechnical studies)▫ Design & construction inspection▫ Project management in the design or construction
phases of a project• FEMA’s regulations for procurement of consultant
engineering services are established in 2 CFR 200
11/9/2015
20
Consultant Contracts (cont)• Contract arrangement - Cost plus fixed fee
Correct Methodology:Estimated consultant contract cost is $500,000, with a negotiated 25% fixed fee. This means the fee is $100,000 and the cost for work is $400,000 since profit and overhead are built in. The fee stays static regardless of final actual costs.
Unacceptable Methodology: For the same scope of work, the costs for the work comes in at $500,000. The consultant bills the jurisdiction $125,000 for the fixed fee. This is not a fixed fee. This is a cost plus percentage of cost contract.
Consultant Contracts (cont)
• Applicants may use competitive proposals for qualifications-based procurement of architectural & engineering professional services:▫ Applicants must perform a cost or price analysis ▫ Types of contracts allowed Fixed-price or lump sum Cost reimbursement - unit price or cost plus a fixed fee Fixed fees are to be negotiated as a separate element of
the price▫ Cost plus a percentage of cost and/or percentage of
cost methods of contracting are not allowed
Force Account (FA) Contracts• Other federal agencies administering other grants may
have allowed FA line items with this structure: Labor plus a set percentage for profit Equipment plus a set percentage for profit Materials plus a set a percentage for profit
• Avoid adding Force Account as a line item to contracts• Some jurisdictions have greatly expanded this line item
structure and applied this structure to the entire contract making it a FA Contract▫ FEMA views this as a Cost Plus Percentage of Cost
contract – prohibited by 2 CFR 200.323(d)