april 2013 1 |1 | tessa tan-torres edejer health systems financing priority setting in universal...

14
April 2013 1 | Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer Health Systems Financing Health Systems Financing Priority Setting in Universal health coverage : Choosing services

Upload: clara-reynolds

Post on 31-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: April 2013 1 |1 | Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer Health Systems Financing Priority Setting in Universal health coverage: Choosing services

April 2013

1 |

Tessa Tan-Torres EdejerTessa Tan-Torres EdejerHealth Systems FinancingHealth Systems Financing

Priority Setting in Universal health coverage:

Choosing services

Page 2: April 2013 1 |1 | Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer Health Systems Financing Priority Setting in Universal health coverage: Choosing services

April 2013

3 |

The Three Dimensions (policy choices) The Three Dimensions (policy choices)

Universal Health

Coverage

Page 3: April 2013 1 |1 | Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer Health Systems Financing Priority Setting in Universal health coverage: Choosing services

April 2013

5 |

How does one choose needed services?How does one choose needed services?

What types of services to consider:– preventive, promotive, curative, rehabilitative, palliative– Across the life course– Across different levels of health facilities– procedures and pharmaceuticals and other medical goods– positive or negative lists

Main criterion:– Cost-effectiveness to maximize health; Getting the most out of the available

funding– Quantifying opportunity costs when choosing less cost effective interventions

Implementation issues:

Page 4: April 2013 1 |1 | Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer Health Systems Financing Priority Setting in Universal health coverage: Choosing services

April 2013

6 |

Page 5: April 2013 1 |1 | Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer Health Systems Financing Priority Setting in Universal health coverage: Choosing services

April 2013

7 |

Millions miss out on needed health servicesMillions miss out on needed health servicesPercentage of births by medically trained personsPercentage of births by medically trained personsMillions miss out on needed health servicesMillions miss out on needed health services

Percentage of births by medically trained personsPercentage of births by medically trained persons0

20

40

60

80

100

0 10 20 30 40 50

Q1Q5 Average

Source: Latest available DHS for each country (excl. CIS countries)

Q1, Q5 and Average - 22

Page 6: April 2013 1 |1 | Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer Health Systems Financing Priority Setting in Universal health coverage: Choosing services

April 2013

8 |

MDG Tracer Conditions: MDG Tracer Conditions: CEA threshold defined de facto? CEA threshold defined de facto?

MDG Tracer Conditions: MDG Tracer Conditions: CEA threshold defined de facto? CEA threshold defined de facto?

Antenatal care: 4+ visitsBirth attended by skilled health personnelMeasles, DTP3, Hib3, HepB3Children < 5: ARI visit; sleeping under ITN; ORT diarrhoeaART HIV; MCTC HIV + pregnant womenTB: case detection rateAdditional as possible (based on burden, CEA threshold,

budget, logistical feasibility)

Page 7: April 2013 1 |1 | Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer Health Systems Financing Priority Setting in Universal health coverage: Choosing services

April 2013

9 |

But cost-effectiveness is not that straighforward:

But cost-effectiveness is not that straighforward:

Cost-effectiveness might correlate with the other axes.– Many cost-effective interventions are for traditional diseases of the poor– But many cost-ineffective interventions are costly (trauma surgery, cancer

drugs, renal replacement therapy)

Cost-effectiveness may change:– Because of drop in prices due to national/global volume of sales /international

pressure (tiered pricing)– Because of bundling of services (economies of scope); – Start up costs- special problem

Even if cost-effective, it may still not be affordable (budget constraints)

Page 8: April 2013 1 |1 | Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer Health Systems Financing Priority Setting in Universal health coverage: Choosing services

April 2013

11 |

Shifting from pure cost-effectiveness to cost effectiveness ++

« Quantitative analysis for qualitative insight »

Shifting from pure cost-effectiveness to cost effectiveness ++

« Quantitative analysis for qualitative insight »

Begin from CHOICE results (cluster of disease or health sector as a whole)

Use checklist to identify excluded interventions of equity or priority setting interest

Use quantitative techniques to explore concerns & illustrate impact of alternative choices

– What resources will be released or foregone?

– What existing treatments will have to be displaced?

– What health benefits will be foregone?

– What is society willing to pay for a more equitable choice of interventions?

11

Page 9: April 2013 1 |1 | Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer Health Systems Financing Priority Setting in Universal health coverage: Choosing services

April 2013

12 |

Example: Mental health (cluster)Example: Mental health (cluster)

At a mental health budget level of $3.50 per capita (India), efficiency results from CHOICE suggest funding the following conditions:

– Epilepsy

– Alcohol treatment

– Depression treatment

No funding would be allocated to treatment of bipolar disorder or schizophrenia on efficiency grounds alone

However, equity & priority-setting considerations (checklist):– Conditions severe, chronic, lifelong

– Not curable, limited capacity to benefit

– Bad luck in the health lottery

– Interventions are the only means to help

12

Page 10: April 2013 1 |1 | Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer Health Systems Financing Priority Setting in Universal health coverage: Choosing services

April 2013

13 |

Example: Mental health (cluster)Example: Mental health (cluster)

13

Page 11: April 2013 1 |1 | Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer Health Systems Financing Priority Setting in Universal health coverage: Choosing services

April 2013

15 |

Implementation issuesImplementation issues

There are already pre-existing services being provided by governments of varying cost-effectiveness; e.g SHI providing coverage for hospitalization with a cap; no description of the disease or intervention being covered (subsidy).

Administrative ease

The patient does not know on consultation what diseases s/he has or what procedure/medication will be needed

Page 12: April 2013 1 |1 | Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer Health Systems Financing Priority Setting in Universal health coverage: Choosing services

April 2013

16 |

Page 13: April 2013 1 |1 | Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer Health Systems Financing Priority Setting in Universal health coverage: Choosing services

17

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Investigation of signs,symptoms and other contact

Infectious and parasitic

Injuries

Chronic respiratory disease

Respiratory infections

Cardiovascular

Digestive system

Skin diseases

Nervous system disorders

Genitourinary

Musculoskeletal

Malignant neoplasms

Diabetes mellitus

Nutritional deficiencies

Mental disorders

Neonatal causes

Oral health

Blood/Immune Disorders

Congenital anomalies

Endocrine and metabolic

Benign neoplasms

Maternal conditions

Expenditure per capita (Rupees)

Female

Male

Health expenditures by conditionSri Lanka 2005

Page 14: April 2013 1 |1 | Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer Health Systems Financing Priority Setting in Universal health coverage: Choosing services

April 2013

19 |

Fig. 2. Health care choices in a low-income and middle-income country. The vertical axis indicates the level of public subsidy, the right-side horizontal axis refers to the population volume classified as poor and non-poor, and the left-side horizontal axis represents clinical health services divided into the minimum and the essential packages. Public subsidies should be close to 100% for the minimum package for the poor. In low-income countries the subsidy should fall, perhaps quite sharply, as resources extend to the non-poor or to interventions outside the minimum package. In middle-income countries the subsidy could extend to the non-poor and can finance part of the essential package only if the minimum package is

assured for the poor and all cost-effective services are covered for the entire population (WDR93).

LOW-INCOME COUNTRY

iNCOME Minimumpackage Essential

package

Totalpopulation

S/DALY

Public fiannce share

MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRY

Income Minimumpackage

Essentialpackage

Totalpopulation

Poverty line

Public fiannce snare

S/DALY