approximate analytical three-dimensional solution for

5
Approximate analytical three-dimensional solution for periodical system with rectangular fin, Part 1 ANDRIS BUIKIS, MARGARITA BUIKE Institute of Mathematics Latvian Academy of Sciences and University of Latvia 1, Akademijas lauk., Riga, LV1524 LATVIA [email protected] http://www. lza.lv/scientists/buikis.htm Abstract: - In this paper the approximate analytical three dimensional solution for one element in periodical system with rectangular fins is obtained by the original method of conservative averaging. Key-Words: - heat exchange, rectangular fin, steady state, three-dimensional, analytical solution, conservative averaging. 1 Introduction Obtaining sufficient cooling for the components of devices is a difficult challenge in modern industry. It is related to refrigerators, radiators, engines and modern electronics, etc. Usually its mathematical modeling is realized by one dimensional steady-state assumptions [1], [2], [8],[9]. In our previous papers [3] – [6] we have constructed two dimensional analytical approximate [3] – [5] and exact [6] solutions. In this paper we obtain approximate analytical three dimensional solution by the original method of conservative averaging and some its simplifications (special cases). 2 Mathematical Formulation of 3-D Problem We will start with accurate three-dimensional formulation of steady-state problem for one element of periodical system with rectangular fin. This mathematical formulation is similar to those which are given in our papers [3]-[7] for 2-D case. 2.1 Description of Temperature Field in the Wall We will use following dimensionless arguments and parameters [4]-[7]: , , , x y z x y z B R B R B = = = + + R + , R B + = δ , R B L l + = , R B B b + = , ) ( 0 0 0 0 k R B h + = β 0 0 ( ) , hB R k β + = , ) ( k R B h + = β , W w B R = + where - heat conductivity coefficient for the fin (wall), - heat exchange coefficient for the fin (wall), 2В – width (thickness) of the fin, L – length of the fin , ) ( 0 k k ) ( 0 h h - thickness of the wall, W width (length) of the wall, 2R – distance between two fins (fin spacing). The wall (base) is placed in the domain [ ] [ ] { } 0, , 0,1 , [0, ] x y z w δ and we describe the dimensionless temperature field in the wall with the equation: 0 (, ,) V xyz 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 0. V V V x y z + + = (1) We add needed boundary conditions as follow: 0 0 0 0 (1 ) 0, V V x β + = 0 x = , (2) 0 0 0 0, V V x β + = ) 1 , ( , b y x = δ , , (3) (0, ) z w 0 0 0 1 0, y y V V y y = = = = (4) 0 0 0, z V z = = 0 0 0 0, V V z β + = z w = . (5) We assume the conjugations conditions on the surface between the wall and the fin as ideal thermal contact - there is no contact resistance: Proceedings of the 3rd IASME/WSEAS Int. Conf. on HEAT TRANSFER, THERMAL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENT, Corfu, Greece, August 20-22, 2005 (pp381-385)

Upload: others

Post on 09-Feb-2022

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Approximate analytical three-dimensional solution for

Approximate analytical three-dimensional solution for periodical system with rectangular fin, Part 1

ANDRIS BUIKIS, MARGARITA BUIKE

Institute of Mathematics Latvian Academy of Sciences and University of Latvia

1, Akademijas lauk., Riga, LV1524 LATVIA

[email protected] http://www. lza.lv/scientists/buikis.htm

Abstract: - In this paper the approximate analytical three dimensional solution for one element in periodical system with rectangular fins is obtained by the original method of conservative averaging. Key-Words: - heat exchange, rectangular fin, steady state, three-dimensional, analytical solution, conservative averaging. 1 Introduction Obtaining sufficient cooling for the components of devices is a difficult challenge in modern industry. It is related to refrigerators, radiators, engines and modern electronics, etc. Usually its mathematical modeling is realized by one dimensional steady-state assumptions [1], [2], [8],[9]. In our previous papers [3] – [6] we have constructed two dimensional analytical approximate [3] – [5] and exact [6] solutions. In this paper we obtain approximate analytical three dimensional solution by the original method of conservative averaging and some its simplifications (special cases). 2 Mathematical Formulation of 3-D Problem We will start with accurate three-dimensional formulation of steady-state problem for one element of periodical system with rectangular fin. This mathematical formulation is similar to those which are given in our papers [3]-[7] for 2-D case. 2.1 Description of Temperature Field in the

Wall We will use following dimensionless arguments

and parameters [4]-[7]:

, , ,x y zx y zB R B R B

′ ′= = =

+ + R′+

,RB +

∆=δ

,RB

Ll+

= ,RB

Bb+

= ,)(

0

000 k

RBh +=β

00

( ) ,h B Rk

β += ,)(

kRBh +

=β ,WwB R

=+

where - heat conductivity coefficient for the

fin (wall), - heat exchange coefficient for the fin (wall), 2В – width (thickness) of the fin, L –length of the fin ,

)( 0kk)( 0hh

∆ - thickness of the wall, W − width (length) of the wall, 2R – distance between two fins (fin spacing). The wall (base) is placed in the domain

[ ] [ ]{ }0, , 0,1 , [0, ]x y z wδ∈ ∈ ∈ and we describe

the dimensionless temperature field in the wall with the equation:

0 ( , , )V x y z

2 2 2

0 0 02 2 2 0.V V V

x y z∂ ∂ ∂

+ + =∂ ∂ ∂

(1)

We add needed boundary conditions as follow: 000 0(1 ) 0,V V

xβ∂

+ − =∂

0x = , (2)

00 0 0,V V

xβ∂

+ =∂

)1,(, byx ∈= δ , , (3) (0, )z∈ w

0 0

0 1

0,y y

V Vy y= =

∂ ∂= =

∂ ∂ (4)

0

0

0, z

Vz =

∂=

∂0

0 0 0,V Vz

β∂+ =

∂z w= . (5)

We assume the conjugations conditions on the surface between the wall and the fin as ideal thermal contact - there is no contact resistance:

Proceedings of the 3rd IASME/WSEAS Int. Conf. on HEAT TRANSFER, THERMAL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENT, Corfu, Greece, August 20-22, 2005 (pp382-386)

Page 2: Approximate analytical three-dimensional solution for

0 0,

x xV V

δ δ= − = +=

0 (6)

00

00 xx

V Vx x δδ

β β= += −

∂ ∂=

∂ ∂. (7)

2.2 Description of Temperature Field in the

Fin The rectangular fin of length l occupies the domain [ ] [ ]{ }, , , [0, ]0,x l y z wδ δ∈ + ∈ ∈b and

the temperature field fulfills the equation

( , , )V x y z

2 2 2

2 2 2 0.V V Vx y z

∂ ∂ ∂+ + =

∂ ∂ ∂ (8)

We have following boundary conditions for the fin:

0,V Vx

β∂+ =

∂,x lδ= + (9)

0,V Vy

β∂+ =

∂y b= , (10)

0,V Vz

β∂+ =

∂z w= , (11)

0 0

0x y

V Vx y= =

∂ ∂=

∂ ∂= , (12)

0

0z

Vz =

∂=

∂. (13)

Let’s mention, that almost all of the authors negligible the heat transfer trough flank surface z w= . We assume that this heat transfer is proportional to the temperature excess between the wall/fin and the surrounding medium and are given by second boundary condition (5) and condition (11). 3 Approximate Solution of 3-D Problem We will use the original method of conservative averaging. 3.1 Reduction of the 3-D Problem to the 2-D

Problem Similarly as in our previous papers [4],[5] we will use our original method of conservative averaging and approximate the 3-D temperature field

for the fin in following form: ( , , )V x y z

01

2

( , , ) ( , ) ( 1) ( , )

(1 ) ( , ),

z

z

V x y z h x y e h x y

e h x y w

σ

σ σ− −

= + −

+ − =1 (14)

with unknown functions For this purpose we introduce the integral average value of function in the - direction:

( , ),ih x y 0,1, 2.i =

( , , )V x y z z

0

( , ) ( , , )w

U x y V x y z dzσ= ∫ . (15)

This equality together with two boundary conditions (at 0z = and z w= ) allow us to exclude all unknown functions from the representation (13). The boundary condition (13) gives the equality:

( , )ih x y

2 1( , ) ( , )h x y h x y= − . The substitution of representation (14) in (15) gives expression:

01

( , ) ( , )( , )2(sinh(1) 1)

U x y h x yh x y −=

− (16)

and representation (14) takes form:

0

cosh( ) 1( , , ) ( , )sinh(1) 1

sinh(1) cosh( ) ( , ).sinh(1) 1

zV x y z U x y

z h x y

σ

σ

−=−

−+−

Finally, by the use of the boundary condition (11) we can exclude from last expression and represent the 3-D solution for the fin in following form:

0 ( , )h x y( , , )V x y z

( , , ) ( , ) ( )V x y z U x y z= Ψ . (17) It is easy to check that the function looks like ( )zΨ

sinh(1) [cosh(1) cosh( )]( )sinh(1) [cosh(1) sinh(1)]

w zzw

β σβ

+ −Ψ =+ −

. (18)

The second stage for the method of conservative averaging is the transforming of the differential equation (8) for the function to the differential equation for the function . To realize this goal we integrate the main differential equation (8) in the - direction:

( , , )V x y z( , )U x y

z2 2

2 20

( , ) ( , ) 0z w

z

U x y U x y Vzx y

=

=

∂ ∂ ∂+ +∂∂ ∂

= . (19)

Expressing from the boundary conditions (11) and (13) the first derivatives of the function at

( , , )V x y z0z = and z w= trough the function we

finally obtain following partial differential equation for two-dimensional temperature field in the fin:

( , )U x y

( , )U x y

2 22

2 2

( , ) ( , ) ( , ) 0U x y U x y U x yx y

µ∂ ∂+ −

∂ ∂= . (20)

Here 2 1 ( )w wµ β −= Ψ .

Proceedings of the 3rd IASME/WSEAS Int. Conf. on HEAT TRANSFER, THERMAL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENT, Corfu, Greece, August 20-22, 2005 (pp382-386)

Page 3: Approximate analytical three-dimensional solution for
Page 4: Approximate analytical three-dimensional solution for
Page 5: Approximate analytical three-dimensional solution for