applying analytics to population health...
TRANSCRIPT
Applying Analytics to Population Health Management
April 15, 2015
Kori Krueger, MD, MBA / Marshfield Clinic
Kate Konitzer, MMI / Marshfield Clinic Information Services
DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily represent official policy or position of HIMSS.
Kori Krueger, MD, MBA Has no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report.
© HIMSS 2015
Kate Konitzer, MMI Salary: Yes Receipt of Intellectual Property Rights/Patent Holder: Pending
© HIMSS 2015
Explain the Population Health Management lifecycle
Demonstrate the use of analytics applied to population health
Discuss concepts applied throughout the lifecycle
Analyze gaps for population health advancement
• Satisfaction from providers in better understanding their patient panels.
• Treatment is based on evidenced based medicine guidelines and measured to the guidelines.
• Electronic information is key to understand your patient populations and using the data to define new strategies.
• Prevention is assessed by improving compliance rates and encouraging screening tests for early detection. Managing patient outcomes prevents adverse events associated with the disease states.
• Savings are being demonstrated by improving quality, and lowering utilization by better managed care.
Value Steps
Marshfield Clinic Health System
• Formed 1916
• Physician led – 501(c)3
• 750 physicians in 86 specialties
• 6,450 employees
• 56 regional sites
• 375,000 unique patients/year
• 3.7 million patient encounters/year
• >$1 billion in annual revenue
• Security Health Plan 228,000 member HMO
• Division of Laboratory Medicine
• Education Foundation
• Research Foundation
• Family Health Center – FQHC (76,000 patients, 443,000 encounters/ year)
• Integrated Dental Clinics in underserved areas
• An Academic Campus of UW School of Medicine and Public Health
Attribution
Define Population
Identify Care Gaps
Stratify Risks
Engage Patients
Manage Care
Measure Outcomes
Feedback Loop
Define Population
HTN
Objective – Ability to identify any population cohort
Challenges – Extract information from your EHR – Terminologies/Codes
Implementation – Enterprise Data Warehouse – Structured data collection – Terminology groupers
Results – Reliable, longitudinal cohort
Gaps Strategy – QA of problem lists – Care plans attached to problem lists
Data Mart
Transactional Data Sources
Atomic Level Data Warehouse
Staging Area
Data Mart
Portal
Extr
act,
Tran
sfor
m, L
oad
Extr
act,
Tran
sfor
m, L
oad
DW Development DW Analytics
Analytics Environment
Attribution
Primary Care and Specialty
Care
Define Population
HTN
Objective – Identify patient / provider relationship
Challenges – Self-reported data – Place of service visits
Implementation – Self-reported – Attribution rules
Results – Accountability – Actionable
Gaps Strategy – Quality Assurance – track at time of care
Attribution
Blood Pressure Control
Primary Care and Specialty
Care
Define Population
HTN
Identify Care Gaps
Blood Pressure Control
Objective – Identify gaps given evidenced based care guidelines
Challenges – Conflicting guidelines – Lack of evidenced based care – Accurate data (device, home monitoring, place of service)
Implementation – Consistent specifications – Instrumentation of devices
Results – Governance of best practices – Patient level detail
Gaps Strategy – Guideline consensus
Attribution
Blood Pressure Control
Primary Care and Specialty
Care
Define Population
HTN
Identify Care Gaps
Blood Pressure Control
Stratify Risks
HTN/DM, At Risk
Objective – Identify risk
Challenges – Determine risk categories – Risk assessment – Determine future risk
Implementation – Multiple co-morbidities – Predictive modeling
Results – Defined populations
Gaps Strategy – Revision and refinement of risk model
Attribution
Blood Pressure Control
Primary Care and Specialty
Care
Define Population
HTN
Identify Care Gaps
Blood Pressure Control
Stratify Risks
HTN/DM, At Risk
Engage Patients
Patient Portal Secure
Messaging
• Objective – Engage patient activation
• Challenges – Differing levels of patient engagement – Disparity and access to resources – Care management programs under-funded or not funded
• Implementation – EMR and patient care tools – Identification of the ‘At Risk’ population
• Results – Informed consumer of healthcare
• Gaps Strategy – Engage community
Attribution
Blood Pressure Control
Primary Care and Specialty
Care
Define Population
HTN
Identify Care Gaps
Blood Pressure Control
Stratify Risks
HTN/DM, At Risk
Engage Patients
Patient Portal Secure
Messaging
Manage Care
Care Plans
• Objective – Develop multi-faceted approach
• Challenges – Adherence to care plan – Communication outside of visit between patient and provider – Variation of care
• Implementation – Care management programs – Evidence based care guidelines
• Results – Improved outcomes
• Gaps Strategy – Integration of best practices with EMR
Attribution
Blood Pressure Control
Primary Care and Specialty
Care
Define Population
HTN
Identify Care Gaps
Blood Pressure Control
Stratify Risks
HTN/DM, At Risk
Engage Patients
Patient Portal Secure
Messaging
Manage Care
Care Plans
Feedback Loop
Dashboard
• Objective – Provide consistent and timely feedback
• Challenges – Accessible, meaningful, timely results
• Implementation – PDSA’s – Dashboard – Actionable information
• Result – Dashboard utilization – Departmental meetings
• Next Steps – Point of care integration
Attribution
Primary Care and Specialty
Care
Define Population
HTN
Identify Care Gaps
Blood Pressure Control
Stratify Risks
HTN/DM, At Risk
Engage Patients
Patient Portal Secure
Messaging
Manage Care
Care Plans
Measure Outcomes
Feedback Loop
Dashboard
Reduce Strokes
and Heart Attacks
• Objective – Develop consistent approach to measuring outcomes (stroke, heart
attacks)
• Challenges – Manage variation – Incomplete data
• Implementation – Quality/Process improvement – Integrated clinical / claims data
• Results – Number needed to treat - NNT
• Gaps Strategy – Proactive vs. Reactive approach
Measure 2004 2014
HTN blood pressure control 49.8% 77.3%
Pneumococcal vaccination 57.4% 89.1%
Asked if use tobacco 11.7% 97%
Diabetic LDL control 37.1% 62.6%
Diabetic foot exam N/A 77%
All-cause hospitalizations per 1,000 diabetes patients 399 365
Breast cancer screening 60.8% 76.1%
Colorectal cancer screening 49% 71.3%
Hypertension Example:
– BP control rate has increased from 49.8% controlled to 77.3% of patients controlled
– Resulting in additional 15,182 patients now at goal that would not have been at goal in past
– Need to treat 18 patients for 5 years to goal in order to prevent one heart attack or stroke
Results: • Additional 674 heart attacks avoided
– Savings over 10 years (2010 $): $56,953,000 • 169 strokes avoided
– Savings over 10 years (2010 $): $31,045,000 – Total Savings*: $87,998,000
*Estimated using the CDC Chronic Disease Cost Calculator for State of Wisconsin including only direct medical expenses, not indirect societal costs
• Clinical and Analytic teams partnering • Clinical
– Manage what you can measure – Optimize resource allocations – Develop regional teams – Define processes to share with clinical teams
• Toolkits – PDSA’s – Care Plan development
• Analytics – Define processes with the Clinical teams – Provide insights into delivery of care
• Dashboards • Predictive modeling
Kori Krueger, M.D., M.B.A. Medical Director Institute for Quality, Innovation & Patient Safety Office 715-389-3188 [email protected]
Kate Konitzer, MMI Chief Informaticist Office 715-221-8311 [email protected]