appendix d7: scoping meeting minutesseleka traditional council mr lesetja molokome, tc administrator...

Appendix D7: Scoping meeting minutes

1

LEPHALALE COAL AND POWER PROJECT (LCPP)

UPFRONT STAKEHOLDER MEETINGS HELD DURING THE SCOPING PHASE

DATE TIME MEETING VENUE

ORGANISATON/FARM PERSON ATTENDING TYPE OF MEETING TEAM MEMBERS

Wednesday, 15 March 2017

10:30 At their house Farm: Pretoria 483LQ Ptn 0 Oom Johannes Jacobs and Tannie Jacobs

One-on-one consolation Stephen Horak

Friday, 17 March 2017

15:00 His office Langriem Boerdery CC Mr Neels Alant One-on-one consolation Stephen Horak

Monday, 27 March 2017

09:30 Farm R/E Billiards 428 LQ

Mr Johann Beukes One-on-one consolation

Stephen Horak


10:30 Farm Portion 1 Billiards 428 LQ

Mr Bayers van der Westhusen One-on-one consolation

Stephen Horak


11:30 Farm Stutgard 420 LQ, Rondeboschje 429 LQ, Portion 1 Penton Villa 430 LQ, Eerstevley 204 LQ

Mr Japie & Jorrie Ellis One-on-one consolation Stephen Horak

Tuesday, 28 March 2017

09:30 Farm Pretoria 483 LQ Mr Phillip Pretorius One-on-one consolation Stephen Horak


10:30 Farm Sebright 205 LQ Mr George Sebastian Geringer One-on-one consolation Stephen Horak


12:30 Farm Marseilles 496 LQ Mr Dries de Ruder One-on-one consolation Stephen Horak


14:00 Farm Wellington 432 LQ Mr P T van Staden One-on-one consolation Stephen Horak

Wednesday, 29 March 2017

12:00 Committee Room Lephalale Municipality Mr Jack Maeko, Mayor Ms Edith Tukakgomo, Municipal Manager


Thursday, 30 March 2017

09:30 – 10:30

Boardroom Limpopo Department of Mineral Resources

Mr Happy Ramulondi Mr Nicholas Chavalala



10:00 Boardroom Limpopo Department of Economic Development Environment and Tourism (LEDET)

Mr Joel Ngoasheng Mr Masungi Tshuketani Mr Phuti Mabotha Ms Puledi Raboshaga Ms Lerato Maesela

Focus Group Meeting Stephen Horak

2

Ms Fatima Nkhwashu Ms Ntswaki Mailula


14:00 Municipal office Waterberg District Municipality Modimoli

Mr Mpheta Samuel Mabotja, Municipal Manger Ms Lindiwe Kgomo Nozi Mouteno Environmental Manger


Monday, 3 April 2017 10:00 His office in Pretoria

Honingshade 427 LQ Mr Kosie Robertse One-on-one consolation

Stephen Horak, Brad Thornton & Banzi & Banzi Giyose

Monday, 3 April 2017 14:00 Kempton Park Garibaldi 480 LQ Mr Mias Nortjie One-on-one consolation Stephen Horak

Thursday, 6 April 2017

12:30 Headman’s House Abbotspoort Headman

Chief Linah Langa Abbotspoort Headman Ms Julia Langa Secretary



10:00 Seleka Traditional Council Office

Seleka Traditional Council

Mr Lesetja Molokome,

TC Administrator Mr TA Thuhute Mr Gibakf Mrs Victoria Otsweleng Mr David Teloco Mrs Elizabeth Mokepe Mr James Moloamtoa Mrs Caroline Hlako

Mr Andrew Masheko

TC Security officer



13:30 Mapela Traditional Authority office

Mapela Traditional Authority

Headman Lina Langa One-on-one consolation

Stephen Horak

Monday, 24 April 2017

10:30 Municipal office Lephalale Local Municipality IDP Manager – Mr Frans Mabotja One-on-one consolation Pam Taylor

3

Monday, 24 April 2017

11:00

Shongoane Traditional Council (TC) Office

Shongoane Traditional Council (TC)

Acting Chief Herman Shongoane One-on-one consolation

Stephen Horak & Pam Taylor

Monday, 24 April 2017l

15:30 Office Joe Singh Group Mr Jorrie Jordaan One-on-one consolation Brad Thornton

Tuesday, 16 May 2017

09:30

R/E Grootgenoeg 426 LQ

R/E Weltevreden 482 LQ

Mr Cornelis Jacobus Alant Farm

Mr Cornelis Jacobus Alant Farm Workers

Mr Barnabas Shongwane

Mr Jan Motohelo

Mrs Annetjie Motohelo

Small Focus Group

Stephen Horak

Vanessa Viljoen


10:30

Portion 1 Weltevreden 482 LQ

Honingshade 427 LQ

Mr Koos Robertse Farm

Mr Koos Robertse Farm Workers Ms Leah Moloantoa

Mr Johannes Masongy Small Focus Group

Stephen Horak

Vanessa Viljoen


12:10

Garibaldi 480 LQ

Mr Mias Nortjie Farm

Mr Mias Nortjie Farm Workers Mr Stephen Horak n Ngoepe

Mr Ramkat Mabula Small Focus Group

Stephen Horak

Vanessa Viljoen


14:00 Comiphoria

Eco Estate Eco Estate at Vught Mr Jannie Pretorius One-on-one consultation

Brad Thornton.

Stephen Horak

Vanessa Viljoen

Michael

4

Nonuthula Ndala


17:00 Oasis Restaurant Lephalale Mall

Lephalale Municipality Nico Pienaar, Ward Councillor (Ward 3)

One-on-one consultation

Stephen Horak

Vanessa Viljoen

Wednesday,17 May 2017

09:30 – 11:30

Mogol Club Mogol Club All Public Meeting All

Wednesday, 17 May 2017

12:30 Mogol Club Mabula CPA

Miss Dorcas Mabula

Mr Samuel Kgatoane

Mr Robert Mabula

Mr Hendrik Mabula

Mr Moses Mabula

Mr Kemedu Mabula

Small Focus Group

Stephen Horak

Nonuthula Ndala

Vanessa Viljoen

Public Meeting Minutes Project: Lephalale Coal & Power Project (LCPP)

Project Proponent: Dedicoal (Pty) Ltd © 2017 Kongiwe Environmental (Pty) Ltd

1

Lephalale Coal and Power Project (LCCP) Public Meeting minutes

Date of meeting :17-05-2017

Time: 09:30-13:30pm

Venue: Mogol Club Lephalale

Agenda

• Prayer

• Languages

• Introductions

• Project Description

• Environmental Authorisations

• Specialist Studies

• Feedback from Stakeholders

• Questions & Answers

• Closing

Presentation: Please refer to attached presentation

Attendees: Refer to attached attendance register



2

Issues and responses

Stakeholder Issue Responses (Bradly Thornton and Stephen Horak)

Stakeholder Did not provide name

Can the meeting be chaired and presented in Afrikaans? The meeting and presentation is in English, however questions can be asked in Afrikaans and translation will be provided.

Mr Marko Lucas Farm Manger Newcastle and Aurora

I manage the farms Aurora and Newcastle for an overseas owner, these farms are close to your project. There is an application for mining rights on the farm Aurora, does the Lephalale Coal and Power Project (LCPP) application form part of the Aurora application?

The farm Aurora does not form part of the application for mining rights which Lephalale Coal is undertaking, but we will investigate who is involved in this project and how it fits in.

Ms Elana Greyling Interested Party and concerned citizen

Am I to understand that this is the only meeting you will be undertaking and you refuse to have a meeting in Afrikaans.

This is the only public meeting we are undertaking in the Scoping Phase. Should there be enough requests for a separate meeting in Afrikaans or Sepedi this can be considered.

Mr Hendrick Nel Farm Manager for Mr Kosie Robertse Portion 1 Weltevreden 482 LQ and R/E Honingshade 427 LQ

According to your map we are 6 km away and our concern is that you are only looking at the impacts on the directly affected and neighbouring farms. But the fact is that the impacts will be experienced much more broadly and further away. We have free range Buffalo, and this will have a huge tourism and economic impact on us. A comprehensive cost benefit analysis should be undertaken in terms of water, ecology, economic, etc. every element should be considered, the areas between the Lephalale and Mogol rivers and between the R518 and Swartwater. Only when this has been done will the impacts be able to be determined.

This is what an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) does, it weighs up the economic impacts and costs of a project vs what is currently happening in the area. A cumulative impact assessment will be undertaken which will assess the broader impacts.

Ms Tracy-Lee Erasmus Anglo Operations (Pty) Ltd – Coal SA

The application area overlaps an exploration right area which Anglo holds and the seams which will be mined by this project will impact on the same seams which Anglo want to tap for gas. We must prevent sterilising the area, this project will have an economic impact on Anglo. This impact will need to be assessed.

Such a meeting can be arranged with the relevant people from Anglo. Noted



3

We propose that we have a focus group meeting with the Applicant. Let’s keep lines of communication open.

Mr Jannie Pretorius Farm owner Vught and Housing Development Comiphoria

A security /crime impact assessment needs to be undertaken as the mine will have an impact on the already bad security and crime in the area, for example poaching. The mine will draw people to the area which will worsen the security situation. This also needs to be looked at cumulatively.

Security will be addressed in the environmental impact assessment. Noted, we will consider this in the socio-economic assessment.

Mrs Vivien Ruiter Owner R/E Penton Villa 430 LQ

Will the mine fence the mining right area? If not, will the mine be using our fences?

The mining right area will not be fenced but the footprint area will be fenced. The farms in the mining right area are already fenced.

Mr Dirk Slykhuis Nieuwe Holland 206 LQ

Please could you provide some background to the Masimong Group - who are they and who are the shareholders? You also say that Kongiwe Environmental has a lot of experience, can you then give us an indication of which other mines your company has done an EIA for to show your experience and what were the outcomes of those projects.

Masimong Group is owned largely by Mike Teke who is a well respected person in the mining industry; he is also the Chairman of the Chamber of Mines. The LCPP is owned 49% by Masimong through Emerald Panther Inv 82 (Pty) Ltd and 46% by Tshimangadso, Surprise Nefolovhodwe and 5% Nefolovhodwe Family Trust. As per the slide in the presentation.

Kongiwe Environmental was established in 2016. But I ( (Bradly Thornton) personally have more than a decade of experience in the environmental mining field and have worked both in South Africa and in the continent. My CV is in the Scoping Report if you would like more detail.

Mr PT van Staden Wellington 432 LQ

In your experience do projects like this ever not get approved.

The government wants to bring in a law stating that we as white farmers will not be able to buy farms, so they will belong to the government or be sold to black farmers.

It varies, some are approved and some are not. The reasons for projects not being approved are sometimes environmental reasons and sometimes political reasons. At this stage, it is difficult to say whether the project will get approval because the studies have not been completed and we are at the start of the approval process.



4

Mr Oupa Modirwa Limpopo Department of Economic Development Environment and Tourism (LEDET)

On a scale of 1 – 10 what is the possibility of this project going ahead. The President has recently made a statement that the country should move away from coal as a way of addressing the energy shortage. Is there an evaluation tool that we can use where we can tick the boxes to make the mine comply with the environmental mitigation measures, because when you go to site it is a different story? Since Grootegeluk Mine has been built the wildlife in the area has decreased. We are trying our best in the Waterberg, but this project will also have an effect.

It is impossible to say at this point whether the project will go ahead or not. We cannot comment on the political environment as this falls outside of the scope of the environmental process. As part of the EIA, we do an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) which the mine would use to mitigate impacts and this plan is audited by independent consultants and checked by the DMR to ensure compliance.

Mr JC Dryer Local Geologist with 41 years’ experience in the Lephalale area

The coal products that the mine will produce need to be understood. If the coal is not burnt in the proposed power station and the coal is trucked off the property this will have other impacts such as traffic. If other products are produced this will also have an impact on the amount of water which will be needed. The Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) produced also needs to be understood particularly the discard from the Independent Power Plan (IPP). The area for the plant needs to be understood and the impacts from the plant are dependent on the type of product which will be produced. It is also not clear why the application for the IPP is separate from the mine, if this is going to be the end destination of the product it needs to be included. Ground water impacts need to be very clearly understood, there are regional geological faults where the ground water collects. If you use the water from these faults this can have an impact a long way from where you are abstracting the water. We also

The issues which are raised are very valid and will be investigated in the EIA. The reason for splitting the IPP application for environmental authorisation is that the detail design for the IPP is not yet complete. The Applicant is working closely with the Mokolo and Crocodile Water Augmentation Project 2 (MACWAP 2) project and is aware of these challenges. As a best practice, you would not stockpile coal for a later use. There are environmental issues with this approach.



5

know that MACWAP2 is probably still years away and if the mine is dependent on water from this scheme this will impact on timing and whether the project is viable. The MACWAP 2 pipeline is to Steenbok Pan. How are you going to get water to your project? If ESKOM will make agreements to take the power, this is another issue that will need to be sorted out.

Mr Hendrick Nel Farm Manager for Mr Kosie Robertse Portion 1 Weltevreden 482 LQ and Honingshade 427 LQ

We need clarity on how much coal will be produced and how much water will be used per ton to produce the coal.

The amount of coal at this stage is 6 million tons per year for 30 years (which could be extended to 35 years). We do not have the figures for water at hand at the moment. A water use licence will be applied for at a later stage and this will have a detailed water balance.

Mr Neels Alant Farm owner R/E Grootgenoeg 426 LQ, R/E Weltevreden 482 LQ

When will the specialist studies be completed? We are hoping that these will be completed in the next two weeks. We needed to get these done before the hunting season started.

Ms Lerato Moeoela LEDET

Under which legislation will the waste applications be made and when will the licence applications be made, and who is the competent authority?

The applications are made in terms of the National Environmental Management Waste Act (NEMWA) and integrated applications were submitted with the application for environmental authorisation. The Department of Mineral Resources (DMR) is the competent authority. There are specific activities listed for the waste, which can be found in the Scoping Report.

Mr Cornell Represents Wolvefontein Farm Adjacent to the farms Pretoria and Garibaldi

What will happen if you drain all the ground water and we cannot give water to our animals? How will blasting impacts be managed, the vibrations, cracking of our houses etc.

The ground water specialist study will determine the impacts and a ground water model will be developed. For the blasting impacts these will be determined by the blasting study and management measures will be provided in the EMP.

Mr Jorrie Ellis Stutgard 420 LQ ,

What is the depth and height of the coal, how thick are the seams of coal and how much coal is there? What is the quality of the coal?

The coal is approximately 30m deep from surface and the seam thickness varies through the mining area. We will give



6

R/E Rondeboschje 429 LQ Portion 1 Penton Villa 430 LQ Melkboschkraal 431 LQ Eerstevley 204 LQ

information on quality of the coal within the EIA phase. But, at this stage the coal is suitable for a power station.

Mr Jorrie Ellis Stutgard 420 LQ , R/E Rondeboschje 429 LQ Portion 1 Penton Villa 430 LQ Melkboschkraal 431 LQ Eerstevley 204 LQ

Can one eat coal? How are we going to feed people if the farms are taken to develop coal mines? The land will never be the same after rehabilitation. How will rehabilitation be done?

People cannot eat coal. We will look at closure scenarios. Different rehabilitation options will be looked at in the rehabilitation plan.

Mr Jannie Pretorius Farm owner Vught and Housing Development Comiphoria

The proposed project is already having an impact on me directly. How am I going to be compensated? I cannot wait for over 300 days to find out what the impacts will be.

We agree that you have already been impacted and that this will need to be discussed further.


Will the mining company carry our losses which we will experience from the mine?

There are currently impacts and these will be discussed with the applicant.

Ms Elana Greyling Interested Party and concerned citizen

Thank you that you are including a climate change study. Will you also look at cumulative impacts? The impacts of the IPP needs to be considered together with the mine, these cannot be seen in isolation. The impacts on safety and security need to be understood. There are a lot of ‘ifs’ and ‘maybes’ around the project. We know nationally there is a move away from coal or a drive to move away from coal but you would not say this is true if you look at what is happening in Lephalale. In terms of cumulative impacts the other mining allocations and IPPs which

Cumulative impacts will be considered. The issues raised are important and will be considered in the EIA. We take note of your points that we need to consider other projects, not just current but approved recently, this will be fed through to specialists. Climate change will be assessed. Secondary impacts as well, like the burning of the coal will be looked at.



7

have been approved or are in the application process need to be considered. The cumulative impacts on health needs to be considered and the cost of the health issues need to be considered. The MACWAP 2 project is targeted for Steenbok Pan, how are you going to get water to your project?

We are doing a health impact assessment. As far as MACWAP2 this will be investigated in terms of getting the water to the project, but at this stage this falls outside of our scope

Mr Gawie Nel MM Aartappels Manager

My concern is that you do not have an offtake for the products which will be extracted from the mine, they are linked to the IPP but it is in two different EIAs. One needs to consider the broader impacts particularly in the ecosystem further downstream towards Lephalale. The IPP will be a rubber stamp once the mining licence has been granted. You cannot separate these two.

Thank you for your comments these will be considered in the EIA .

Mr Charl Viljoen FCL Security

If the coal is moved by trucks off the property the impacts of this will need to be considered.

There will be a traffic assessment and a separate study will need to be done should trucking the coal off the property become an option.

Mr Koen Nel Neighbouring Farmer

If you were to take a vote, 99% of the farmer’s present are against the project. But you have already applied for the mining licence on the 18 April, but you have no water. Do we not have a say? Have other documents (studies) on water aspects of the area been considered.

Please put your reasoned objections in writing. Water studies in the area will be considered.

Mr Johan Beukes R/E Billiards 428 LQ

We understand that the applications are made and the decisions taken are at the top structures of government and we don’t know how this happens. Nevertheless, one needs to consider the 3.5Km blasting radius, can this corridor be expanded to lessen the impacts. If the project goes ahead and the blasting has an impact on us how are we going to be compensated? We do not want the mine to go ahead.

The application will go to DMR Limpopo, they are the competent authority and they make the decision to approve the application or not. Once the decision is made there is an opportunity to appeal the decision. The decision and appeal process will be communicated to all stakeholders. We take note of your submission that the mine should not go ahead. Please give this to us in writing.



8

In terms of the blasting radius this is set at 3.5km and this will be refined in the EIA to see what the appropriate safety corridor will be.

Mr Oupa Modirwa LEDET – Dingala Nature Reserve – Waterberg

The impact on tourism needs to be understood. Has the Department of Tourism been consulted? Water will be an issue.

We have sent them all the information and we await their comment. If you can assist us in getting their comments we would be grateful.

Ms Alessandra Da Naya Portion 1 Alomfraai 484 LQ

What percentage do our comments make any difference? If we object to the mine.

Your comments are vital in the process and these are given through to the authorities to assist them in their decision making.

Jacques Snyman Lephalale Development Forum (LED) Asked some questions but also provided a list of questions after the meeting

What is the estimated size of the mine? What will the product be used for Power Station or Export? What will the product mix be? Will there be a need for rail or road, and will the impacts be assessed? Is there electricity available for the mine? Does the project have an allocation from MCWAP 2. How will the water get form Steenbok Pan to your project site? Road access will be a concern as there are only single line bridges over the Mogol River. Will there be a traffic specialist report? What is the size of the IP? Where will the electricity go?

Thank you for your comments and questions. These are noted and will be considered in the EIA.



9

How will the project deal with waste, domestic and hazardous waste?

Another specialist area to be investigated is health. Will you repeat the HIA that was done by Resgen in Steenbok Pan area?

Mr Jorrie Ellis Stutgard 420 LQ , R/E Rondeboschje 429 LQ Portion 1 Penton Villa 430 LQ Melkboschkraal 431 LQ Eerstevley 204 LQ

Of all the farms that are in the red area, do all of these farms have minerals on them? If not, why do you do an application on those farms that doesn’t have minerals on them.

The red area is the MRA, and this reflects the prospecting right area which was granted for the farms highlighted in red. Prospecting was done and the geological models indicate that in the footprint area is where the viable coal is, it is our understanding that to the west of this area it does not look like there is a viable resource. What has been done is that the application includes these areas, so that if in the future there should be some discovery of coal, these areas are already secured. The coal possibly extends south and north but to the west it does not seem that there is feasible coal for mining.

The mining right preserves the prospecting right only in terms of coal and associated minerals, no other minerals.

Mrs Vivien Ruiter Owner R/E Penton Villa 430 LQ

The impacts from the IPP need to be considered in their totality. Please indicate the IPP on your maps for the next meeting. Could the Chamber of Mines also be part of the project?

The two proposed pits, the IPP will be situated on the eastern side of the footprint area, this is what is proposed at this stage.

The Chamber of Mines is purely a representative organisation, looking at the interest of the mining industry in South Africa. It never enters mining ventures in its own right, it is purely a liaison organisation. Mike Teke also happens to be a director of Masimong, but the two roles are completely divergent.

Mr Hendrick Nel We do not want a Gupta situation on this project or any corruption element or fraud on this project in any form. Is there

Fraud and corruption is outside of our scope, we look at the environmental and social impacts. I could not comment on



10

Farm Manager for Mr Kosie Robertse and owner of Farm Farm Portion 1 Weltevreden 482 LQ and Honingshade 427 LQ

any link to a politician? There should be proper research done and feedback given. How will you make sure of this?

anything else other than the environmental and social work that we are doing on the project.

We take note of your point.


What is the cost of this project as compared to a renewable energy project that would produce the same amount of power over the 35 years. Would it not be better to do a renewable energy project? I am convinced that it would be more cost effective. Could you please make this part of your studies?

The project is only a 600 MW plant, very small compared to other power stations such as Medupi and Matimba. The project costs are set out in the Scoping Report. No power project is free from environmental impacts.

Lephalale Coal & Power Project

Mining Right Application

Public Meeting: Scoping Phase

17 May 2017

‘To solve environmental challenges for a world driven towards a sustainable future.’

Meeting Agenda

© 2017

• Prayer• Languages• Introductions• Project Description• Environmental Authorisations• Specialist Studies• Feedback from Stakeholders• Questions & Answers• Closing (followed by tea and snacks)

Prayer

© 2017

• Opening the meeting in prayer

Thanks

We would like to extend our sincere thanks and appreciationto Landowners who have given us access to their propertieswhere relevant in order for us to have conducted our studies.

© 2017

Languages

© 2017

• Presentation has been prepared in English, but• Questions can be made by attendees, and will be answered in these

languages:o Afrikaanso Sepedio Tswanao Ndebele

Introductions

© 2017

Bradly Thornton – Project MangerStephen Horak – Stakeholder EngagementVanessa Viljoen – Stakeholder Engagement Michael Hennessy – Associate Advisor Nokuthula Ndala – GIS Specialist

Surprise Nefolovhodwe - Applicant

© 2017

About Kongiwe Environmental

Kongiwe Environmental (Pty)Ltd, established in 2016, is acontemporary problem-solvingconsultancy specialising insolving real-world environmentalchallenges.

About Kongiwe Environmental

Based in Johannesburg, SouthAfrica.

Our team of professionalEnvironmental Scientists arehighly trained in variousenvironmental disciplines,

We have significant, hands-onexperience in an array of projectsacross various industries.

© 2017

Kongiwe’s Role

As an independent Environmental Assessment Practitioner, itis our role to perform an objective assessment of what thepositive and negative environmental impacts of the proposedproject may be, to quantify these, describe possiblemitigations, collect public comment and supply theDepartment of Mineral Resources with the documentation sothat they can determine if the project should proceed or not.

© 2017

Project Proponent

© 2017

Applicant: Lephalale Coal Mines (Pty) LtdA subsidiary of Masimong Group Holdings

Project Description

© 2017

• Opencast Coal Mine, to supply an:

• Independent Power Producer.• Life of Mine in excess of 35

years.• Mining Method: Truck and

Shovel. Concurrent rehabilitation.

• Coal processing onsite, direct feed to onsite IPP.

• Other markets for the coal being investigated.

• If approved, later than 2020.

Project Location

© 2017

• Footprint Area:o Honingshadeo Botmansdrifto Grootgenoogo Weltevredeno Garibaldi

• Mining Right Application Areao Pretoriao Billiardso Forfarshire o Stutgardo Sebright o Franschhoek o Wellington

Project Infrastructure

© 2017

Environmental Authorisations

© 2017

Department of Mineral Resources (DMR) (competent authority) mining:

• Mining Right Application (MRA) in terms of the Minerals and Petroleum Resource Development Act, 2002 (Act No. 28 of 2002) (MPRDA);

• Application for Environmental Authorisation for listed activities triggered in Listing Notices GN R327, 325 and 324 and in accordance with the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations, 2017, promulgated in terms of National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998) (NEMA); and

• Application for listed waste activities in terms of GN R. 921 of the National Environmental Management: Waste Act, 2008 (Act No. 59 of 2008), as amended (NEM:WA).

Environmental Authorisations

© 2017

• Application for an Atmospheric Emission License (AEL), in terms of theNational Environmental Management: Air Quality Act, 2004, (Act 39 2004)(NEM: AQA) the Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA) is thecompetent authority;

• Integrated Water Use Licence (IWUL) in terms of the National Water Act,1998 (Act 36 of 1998), as amended (NWA). The Department of Water andSanitation (DWS) is the competent authority; and

• Relevant permit applications will also be made in terms of sections 34, 35and 36 of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999 (Act No. 25 of 1999)(NHRA). The South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) and or theLimpopo Heritage Resources Authority (LIHRA) will be the competentauthorities.

Environmental Impact Assessment

The EIA process, including stakeholder engagement, will beundertaken in line with the EIA Regulations (April 2017) andInternational Best Practice Guidelines (IFC PerformanceStandards)

EIA -identifies and provides mitigation measures for environmental and socio-economic impacts associated with a project

Specialist Studies

Soils, Land Use & Land Capability

Noise Socio-economic & Tourism

Closure & Rehabilitation Air quality & Dust Visual Impacts

Wetlands Heritage & Archaeology Traffic & Safety

Aquatic Ecology Fauna & Flora Blasting & Vibration

Climate Impacts & Sustainability

Hydrology Community Health

Hydrogeology

EIA Process & Timeframes

Regulatory process

© 2017

• Submission of Mining Right Application has been made, 18 April 2017.• MRA reference number has been supplied.• Acknowledgement of receipt of the application for Environmental

Authorisation has been made by DMR.• Acknowledgement of receipt of the application for mining right has not yet

been made by DMR. As soon as this becomes available it will becommunicated to land owners and interested and affected parties.

Important time frames

© 2017

Dates Activity

18 April 2017 Submitted Application

20 April 2017 Announcement of Scoping Report for public comment

24 April 2017 – 25 May 2017 Public Comment Period

17 May 2017 Public Meeting

+-5th June 2017 Scoping Report Final Submission

+- 18 July 2017 Acceptance of Scoping Report

1 August 2017 – 30 August 2017 EIA/EMPr Report Review Period

23 August 2017 Public Meeting

+- 2 November 2017 Final EIA/EMPr Submission to Competent Authority

February 2018 Authorisation decision and potential appeals

Stakeholder Engagement

© 2017

Location Contact Person Contact Details

Lephalale Public Library (Cnr Joe

Slovo & Doewater, Lephalale)

Ms Hazel Tembo (014) 762 1453

Ga-Shongoane Community Library

(Ga-Shongoane One)

Ms Singita Cornelia Mashamba (083) 596 0455

CD copy Stephen Horak 082 331 4993

Website copy : http://www.kongiwe.co.za/publications-view/public-documents

The Scoping Report is available for public comment from Monday 24 April 2017 –Thursday 25 May 2017 at the following places:

Contributions from stakeholders will assist with informing decision-making forauthorities and providing information to be considered by the project team andspecialists

Preliminary Specialist Findings

© 2017

• Many of the specialist studies have progressed, and we would like to takethe opportunity to share some of the findings with you.

© 2017

Specialist Study Specialist QualificationSoils, Land Use and Land Capability

Bruce McLeroth B. Sc. Agriculture

Wetlands Amanda Austin M.Sc. Aquatic Health Pri. Sci. Nat.

Air Quality and Dust Dr Martin van Nierop PHd Chemical Engineering

Fauna and Flora Magnus van Rooyen M.Sc. Environmental Management Pri.Sci. Nat.

Hydrogeology Lucas Smith

Irene Lea

M.Sc. Hydrogeology

M.Sc. Hydrogeology Pri. Sci. Nat.

Climate and Sustainability

Brett Reimers MSc Applied Marine Science Pri. Sci. Nat.

Noise Dr Ben van Zyl PhD AcousticsHeritage and Archaeology

Wouter Fourie ASAPA

Socio-Economic and Tourism

Pamela Taylor BA (Hons) Geography

Visual Yonanda Martin MSc. (Env.) Pri. Sci. Nat.

Traffic and Safety Fanie Bouwer Dip (Civil)

Blasting and Vibration Danie Zeeman BA

GIS & Mapping Nokuthula Ndala BScCommunity Health Pamela Taylor BA (Hons) Geography

Closure & Rehabilitation Bradly Thornton BSc (Hons) Geography & EnvironmentalManagement

Noise Survey

© 2017

Nominal levels SABS 0103

© 2017

Type of district Day Night

Rural 45 35

Suburban – With little road traffic 50 40

Urban 55 45

Urban – Workshops, business, main rds 60 50

Central Business Districts 65 55

Industrial 70 60

LCPP Surroundings

Potential Sphere of Influence (Noise)

Potential Sphere of Influence (Blasting)

Soils

© 2017

• Fieldwork complete (300m grid)• Soils found include:

• RED APEDAL SOILS: e.g.Hutton form

• YELLOW-BROWN APEDALSOILS: e.g. Glencoe form

• PEDOCUTANIC SOILS: e.g.Swartland form

• CARBONATE SOILS: e.g.Brandvlei form

• LITHOSOL SOILS: e.g.Glenrosa form, Dresden form

• HYDROMORPHIC SOILS: e.g.Westleigh form

Air Quality Specialist Study

© 2017

Prevailing winds from the Northeast

WRPLOT View - Lakes Environmental Software

PROJECT NO.:

DATE:

2017/04/11

MODELER:

COMPANY NAME:

COMMENTS:WIND ROSE PLOT:

Station #66666

NORTH

SOUTH

WEST EAST

2.8%

5.6%

8.4%

11.2%

14% DATA PERIOD:

Start Date: 2014/01/01 - 00:00End Date: 2016/12/31 - 23:00

WIND SPEED (m/s)

>= 5.5

4.5 - 5.5

3.5 - 4.5

2.5 - 3.5

1.5 - 2.5

0.5 - 1.5

Calms: 33.75%

AVG. WIND SPEED:

1.09 m/s

CALM WINDS:

33.75%

TOTAL COUNT:

25578 hrs.

DISPLAY:

Wind SpeedDirection (blowing from)

Air Quality Specialist Study

© 2017

• Waterberg-Bojanala Priority Area for Air Quality• Large emitters of air pollution in the area:

o Grootgeluk, South Africa’s largest opencast coal mine o Matimba Power Stationo Medupi Power Station

• Main large receptors:o Lephalale towno Marapong

o Already exceedances in particulate matter and sulphur dioxide recorded.

Surface Water

© 2017

• The LCPP is in the A42J and A50H quaternary catchments –Limpopo Water Management Area.

• The area between the Mokolo River and Lephalala River,where the LCPP is located is described as an endoreic area(does not produce surface runoff) because the semi-aridclimatic conditions and shallow topographic gradient.

Groundwater Assessment

© 2017

The Objective:• Define the current groundwater use in the LCPP area;• Define the aquifers underlying the LCPP area, as well as current groundwater table depth, groundwater

quality, and flow characteristics;• Develop a numerical model that will be used to define groundwater related impacts and groundwater

inflow into the proposed open cast mining areas;• Define the radius of influence that may be created by mine dewatering, plus the extent of possible

contamination originating from the proposed open cast areas a mine infrastructure;• Define the acid rock drainage potential associated with the host rock material, the coal seams and the

discard material;• Assess whether pit decant will occur during the operational phase or post closure; and• Recommend a groundwater monitoring network that will effectively monitor the groundwater quality

and level changes during the operational and post-closure phases.


© 2017

Groundwater Baseline :• Land owner communication indicated low borehole yields for most of the area, but the farms

along the south have better yielding boreholes; includes the farm Pretoria. Relates to east-west trending faults identified in the area.

• Groundwater recharge is low and occurs towards the foothills of the Waterberg Mountains.• Waterberg formation has steep topography and shows generally poor capability to produce huge

amounts of groundwater.• Several rural communities are located along the Lephalala River; these include Ga-Seleka,

Witpoort, Mokuranyane and Ga-Shongwane. These communities reply on groundwater for water supply and are located approximately 10 km to 15 km east of the proposed mining development.

• Hydrocensus covered approx. 21 privately owned properties in and around mining footprint area.

• 47 boreholes were identified during hydrocensus:• 2 open exploration boreholes with small diameter steel casing inserted.• 3 not used.• 42 boreholes in use.


© 2017

Groundwater Baseline :• The farm portions located along the upper regions of the two quaternary catchments, i.e.

Pretoria and Sebright indicate deeper groundwater levels (26m to 43m bgl) compared to the other farms located deeper within the A42J catchment. Shallower groundwater levels (13m to 20 m bgl) have been identified on the farms Garibaldi, Weltevreden and Grootgenoeg Portion 1.

• Collection of 5 water samples for water quality analysis.• Area show chloride enriched groundwater; quality is variable; depending on whether the

borehole intercepted the coal horizons or not, but elevated sodium, chloride and fluoride concentrations are common.

• It seems likely that for the Project water demand will have to be imported from the MCWAP project. Groundwater could potentially supply the operation during start-up – being assessed.

• Drilling indicated good water strikes (up to 25,000L/h) in south – along east west trending fault zones.


© 2017

Groundwater Baseline :• During the operational phase negative impacts to the groundwater quality could

arise from the formation of Acid Rock Drainage (ARD) from expose waste rock, discard dumps and coal stockpiles. Exposing the pyrite minerals commonly found in coal seams to oxygen and water during excavation could lead to water quality deterioration.

• Pit dewatering and groundwater abstraction could potentially influence the local groundwater system and may have a negative impact on the local groundwater users.


© 2017

Remaining Tasks:• Percussion Drilling programme completed. Core drilling in next

week.• Aquifer testing – due to start within next week.• Geochemistry / ARD assessment – core from drilling programme to

be submitted this week.• Numerical groundwater model.• Impact assessment report.

Terrestrial Ecological Assessment

© 2017

Observations:

Flora:• Vegetation on the Portions of Grootgenoeg 426 dominated by Combretum Veld in the south• Vegetation on Ptn 1 Weltevreden 482 and Ptn 0 of Honingshade relatively pristine and

dominated by Acacia nigrescens (Knobthorn) and Boscia foetida (Stink Shepard’s Tree)• Southern section of Ptn 1 of Weltevreden 482 dominated by Commiphora edulis (Rough-leaved

Corkwood)• Dominant grass – Aristida stipitata subsp. Gracilifolora (Long-awned Three-awn), typical of

open bushveld and disturbed overgrazed areas


© 2017

Fauna:• Approximately 80 bird species during the site visit• Approximately 30 butterfly species• Large mammals – Kudu, Sable, Impala, Steenbok, Nyala• Carnivores – Jackal, Hyena, Lion• Small mammals – two veld mice trapped during site visit• Snakes – Western Stiped-bellied Sandsnake, Spotted Bush Snake and Puff Adder• Spiders – Golden Orb Spider and Trapdoor Spider


Boscia foetida (Stink Shepard's Tree)Danaus chrysippus (African Monarch Butterfly)

© 2017


Nephila spp. (Golden Orb Spider) Hippotragus niger (Sable Antelope)

© 2017


Psammophis subtaeniatus (Western Stiped-bellied Sand Snake)

Philothamunus semivariegatus (Spotted Bush Sanke)

© 2017

Aquatic & Wetland Assessment

© 2017

Observations:• Several ephemeral pans – fed by rainwater run-off• Several dams (excavated depressions) – fed by groundwater and run-off• One borrow pit – stormwater run-off from the nearby gravel road• Pans – of ecological and biological importance for this semi-arid area.• Active for ± 6 months of the year.• Low capacity. Depth < 1m. Surface area < 20 m². Can contain about 5m to 400

m³ water.• Very limited to no riparian vegetation present• The Giant Bullfrog (Pyxicephalus adspersus) is Near Threatened and relies on

temporary wetlands and pans• No fish were sampled.

Aquatic & Wetland Assessment

© 2017

Ephemeral pan Dams

Visual Impact Assessment

© 2017

Landscape Character:

Typical view from local road

Typical view from farms

Typical view from the R 518


© 2017

Potential Sensitive Viewers:

• Game farms/lodges,

• Commiphora Eco Estate

• Farmers,

• Local roads

Sunset view from OpiKopi Game Lodge

View from Commiphora Eco Estate


© 2017

Visual Concerns:

• Degradation of visual resource,

• Impact on sensitive viewers,

• Impact of lights on sensitive viewers,

• Change in ‘sense of place’

Typical view from game farms

Climate Change Assessment- Carbon footprint

© 2017

Introduction• Anthropogenic greenhouse gases are changing earth’s climate, burning fossil

fuels releases greenhouse gasses.

• Carbon footprint definition: Determination of the amount of carbon dioxide equivalent gas released by an activity, product or company over a given time frame.

• Desktop scoping study: It is predictive and will be based on assumptions that may change during construction phase.

Climate Change Assessment- Carbon footprint

© 2017

The Objective:• Defining the carbon footprint of the coal mine• Provide mitigation options• Investigate offsetting• Define scale of the carbon footprint in relation to other coal mines, it’s

contribution to South Africa’s emissions, international emissions.

Demographics

© 2017

Population 115 767

Urban population 39,8%

Rural population 45,2%

Working age (15-64) 69,7%

Elderly population (65+) 4,1%

Unemployment 22,2%

Youth unemployment 26,9%

Average household size 3,3

Growth rate: 3.06%

Demographics

© 2017

• Urban versus rural nature• 50% of household located in rural

focus areas• Average annual household income for

Ellisras/Marapong (R275 00) far exceeds household income in the rural areas (R47 000)

• Mining by far most important sector regards GVA. Agriculture, wholesale and retail, catering and accommodation sectors employs more people than the mining sector.

• + 40.9% of population depend on Social Grant as income

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00%

6.00%

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Population and households growth rates

Household Growth Rate Population Growth rate

Source: Draft SDF 2017

Spatial Development

• Provincial Growth Point –Lephalale / Onverwacht/Marapong

• Municipal Growth Point –Thabo Mbeki

• Rural Service Delivery Points– Ga-Seleka and Shogoane

Heritage – Proposed management

© 2017

1. Structures:▪ None of heritage significance▪ Possible infants burials could occur ▪ Further consultation to identify possible next of kin▪ Grave relocation▪ Monitoring during site clearing

2. Burial Grounds and Graves▪ Keep 100 meter mining buffer as per mining regulations▪ Fence if not to be relocated▪ Avoid as far as possible, if not possible▪ Grave relocation process with comprehensive Stakeholder

Engagement

© 2017

Key Issues raised by stakeholders for specialists to consider in their studies:

Landowners (Water) • Water is scarce already• Water pollution is a concern• Reduced ground water and pollution of ground water may impact

on farming• If the mine uses the deep groundwater aquifers this may drain the

shallower aquifers which the farmers use

Critical feedback from Stakeholders

© 2017

Landowners (Impacts)• Visual impacts (ash heaps and stockpiles will be unsightly)• Cumulative impacts (visual from other mines and power stations)• Sulphur smell from power station• Air pollution• Increase in asthma• Noise pollution• Blasting impacts on structures, boreholes, dams and soil stability• Impact on roads, maintenance and increased traffic• Impact of the project on grazing• Impacts on game


© 2017

Landowners (Biodiversity)• The farm is natural habitat of bat-eared fox, cheetah, leopard,

pangolin, tsesebe, antelope (PTN 0 PENTON VILLA 430 LQ)• Vulture species, the farm is registered with the Endangered Wildlife

Trust as a protected area (NIEUWE HOLLAND 206 LQ)• Hardwood trees (NIEUWE HOLLAND 206 LQ)• Reedbuck, impala, brown hyena, badger, rock python, leopard

cheetah (PTN 0 WELLINGTON 432 LQ)• Bat-eared foxes and pangolins in the area (PTN 1 BILLIARDS 428 LQ)• Bat-eared foxes pangolins and leopard on the farm (PTN 0

BILLIARDS 428 LQ)


© 2017

Landowners• Two seasonal wetlands on the farm (PTN 0 PENTON VILLA 430 LQ)• There is a grave site of a child of a previous employee on the farm

(PTN 0 STELLENBOSCH 203 LQ)• Project has a tremendous impact on our future plans for our farm

(PTN 1 GROOTGENOEG 426 LQ)


© 2017

Landowners• Reduction / increase in land values• Property devaluation cannot be managed or avoided• Loss of sense of place• Neighbourliness will be affected by those who sell their property

and those who don’t or can’t sell


© 2017

Landowners• Reduction of the workforce (tourism)• The mine must not accommodate workers at the mine• Influx of people is a concern • Squating is a concern • Security (increase in crime)• A positive is the use of facilities (e.g. lodge accommodation)


© 2017

Landowners• Hunting with oversees hunters will be negatively impacted• Disturbance of animals and their breeding• Current mining activities are on the west side of the Lephalale and

all the infrastructure is in place• Acid from the power station will rust fences and other metal farm

infrastructure (X 2)


© 2017

Farm workers • Where will we get work if the mine is developed?• Where will we go if the mine takes this farm?• When will the mine be developed?• When will they start employing people to work on the mine?• When the time comes to develop the mine they will come and

speak to us.• We don’t have many questions we will see what happens.


© 2017

Municipality • Within Spatial Development Framework (SDF) the LCPP falls outside

the zone identified by the municipality for mining development. The area between Lephalale and Ga-Shogoane has been zoned for agriculture and tourism, not mining.

• The Magol and Lephalale rivers are important and the impacts on these rivers needs to be considered

• Impacts on the ecosystem needs to be considered• The Waterberg District is an air quality priority area• Maloto Monate, is an endemic plant.


© 2017

Traditional leaders • Development needs in the villages (Ga-shongoane) are schools, tar

roads, lighting and clinics. • There is concerned about dust (Ga-shongoane)• Water shortage • Accommodation is a big problem in Lephalale • Skills training • Lack of employment • What social responsibility will there be from the mine’s side?• Blasting impacts • Influx of people (foreigners and crime)• Employment is positive


Questions and Answers

© 2017

• Please state your name and organization / farm you represent clearly beforeyou speak and every time you speak for recordkeeping

• Direct questions through the facilitator• One person to speak at a time• Please consider the following :

✓ How do you think the project might impact (affect) you?✓ How do you think the project might impact (affect) your socio-economic conditions?

(livelihoods, farm, business, household, infrastructure)✓ How can these impacts be managed, avoided and /or mitigated?✓ Are there any environmental aspects which we need to be aware of? (water courses,

rare plants or animals etc.)✓ Are there any cultural heritage sites such as, graves, initiation sites, ancestral sites etc.

Contact Us

© 2017

[email protected] or

You can call or SMS, Stephen Horak at 082 3314 993 he will take your comments

and register you as an I&AP.

Further information regarding the project will be found on the Kongiwe

Environmental website

http://www.kongiwe.co.za/publications-view/public-documents/

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.kongiwe.co.za/publications-view/public-documents/

Land Claimants Meeting Minutes Project: Lephalale Coal & Power Project (LCPP)


LCCP Mabula – Mosima Land Claimants meeting minutes 17-05-2017

Date of meeting :17-05-2017

Time: 13:30 - 2:00pm

Attendees: Mabula Family, Kongiwe representatives (refer to attendance list)

Note: The meeting took place directly after the public meeting

Agenda

• Welcome

• Explanation of current farms being claimed

• Verification of claimed farms (read from claim list) and confirmation of the claimant

• Offer for Question to be asked about the presentation or clarification on the project

Question and answers

Name Question/Comment Response

Mr Steve Horak Please can we confirm that you have made claims on the following farms:

• Ptn 1 Grootgenoeg 426LQ

• Garibaldi 480 LQ

• Wellington 432 LQThe farm Rotterdam 488 LQhas been transferred to you.

Mr Pontius Mabula: This is correct.

Mr Pontius Mabula Where did Kongiwe get the land claim list from?

A request was sent to the land claims commissioner asking whether there are any land claims on the farms which fall within the mining right area.

Mr Pontius Mabula Our main concern is water. How is the project planning to get water? Will the Ga-Shongwoane community be affected since they use Boreholes as water sources?

The possibility of using some Groundwater to start up the mine is being investigated, but this will not be enough to sustain the mine long term. It is proposed that the mine gets water from Mokolo and Crocodile Water Augmentation Project 2 (MCWAP2). More investigations still need to be undertaken.



Mr Robert Mabula Have you undertaken any water research on the affected farms? Will the findings of the studies be made available to us?

A hydro census has been undertaken of the proposed mining area and surrounding farms. A determination of the depth of some of the boreholes and the quality of the water in those BHs has been made, this will be followed by pump tests. Yes, the report will be made available to the public.

Mr Pontius Mabula What steps will be taken regarding the farms that are currently being claimed and have not finalised yet which fall within the mine area?

The Applicant will be notified of the issue and they will need to address this issue.

Mr Pontius Mabula We understand that there is a clause in terms of the claimed farms: That there cannot be any development or mining on the farms unless claimants agree. If the mining rights are awarded prior to the claims being finalised and the mine buys out the farms that are currently being claimed, what will be the procedure once the claims are finalised and awarded to the claimants?

Applicant will be made aware of this clause and a legal investigation will be undertaken in terms of the claimant’s rights.

Mr Pontius Mabula We would like clarity on who the Applicant is? Please email the Mabula family the details of the company

The company Organogram was presented in the public meeting. Details are included in the presentation which will be sent to the stakeholders.

Mr Steve Horak Mr Horak went through the claimants list with the Mabula family and confirmed the family’s land claims

Mr Pontius Mabula Confirms farms and requests the claim list

I will email the correspondence received from land affairs to you.

Mr Steve Horak Are there any other questions or anything else you would like to know?



Mr Robert Mabula What was your question regarding the farm Rotterdam 488.

We understand that this farm has been transferred to you. I spoke to Piet Mabula and please will confirm with him that we have had this meeting with you.

Mr Steve Horak What are your plans for the farm (Rotterdam 488 LQ)?

Ploughing and possibly solar power

Mr Robert Mabula Once the farm Grootgenoeg 426 LQ has been transferred to the Mabula family how are we going to agree with the mining company?

I can’t answer this question but it is something which will need to be addressed legally.

Mr Pontius Mabula Please email the minutes of the meeting.

We will send you the minutes of this meeting

1

LEPHALALE COAL AND POWER PROJECT (LCPP)

PUBLIC MEETING ATTENDANCE REGISTER

I&AP Sector Organisation Title First Name Last Name Position

Business & Commerce

FCL Security Mr Charl Viljoen General Manger

Business & Commerce

NAFCOZ Mr AB Ramulongo Chairperson

Business & Commerce

Benchmark Photography

Mr TCT Seleka Managing Director

Business & Commerce

Diphuthi Environmental

Mr Keleboaile Emmanuel

Motlaleng Director

Business & Commerce

Newcastle 202 LQ Mr Marco Lucas Manager

Business & Commerce

Digivex Technologies

(Pty) Ltd Mr Godifrey Mokgonyama Member

Business & Commerce

MM Aartappels Mr GP Nel Manager

Business & Commerce

Wolvendraai 481 LQ Uit Kyk 476 LQ

Mr HC Pretorius Owner

Business & Commerce

BV Breeding Ventures Portion 1

Alomfraai 484 LQ

Mrs Alessandra Da Waya Owner

Community Member

Mr Kgantshi Makubelo

Community Member

Witwatersrand University

Ms Thembi Luckett Student

Environmental NGO's

WEJF Mr Andries Mocheko

Environmental NGO's

Lebudikgatelofelo SMME

Mr Tebogo Lebudi Directors

2

Environmental NGO's

Lebudikgatelofelo SMME

Mr Gomlemo Lebudi Directors

Environmental NGO's

Waterberg Environmental Justice Forum

(NPO)

Mr HJ Letlhgka Secretary

Environmental NGO's

WFJ Mrs Dimala PA Member

Environmental NGO's

Mabula CPA Mr Kemedu Mabula Chairperson

Environmental NGO's

Waterberg Women Advocacy

Organisation Ms Francina Nkosi Chairperson

Concerned Citizen CCL Ms Elna Greyling

Ward 13 Apology Ms Astrid Basson

Farmers Association

Ellisras District Farmers

Association Mrs Juanita Swanevelder Secretary

Interested Party Geologist Mr JC Dreyer Private

Landowner R/E Penton Villa

430 LQ Mr Marco & Vivien Ruiter Owners

Landowner Nieuwe Holland

206 LQ Mr Dirk Jan Slykhuis Owner

Landowner Vucht 436 LQ

Portion 27 Mr Jannie Pretorius Owner

Landowner

Vucht 436 LQ Portion 46 /

Commphora Eco Estate

Mr Barry Van Rensburg Owner

Landowner Portion 1

Eerstevley 204 LQ Mr NM Oosthuizen Owner

Landowner Portion 1 Paradys

209 LQ Mr JS Van der Merwe Owner

3

Landowner R/E Vucht 436 LQ Ms Lydia Daffue Owner

Landowner

R/E Grootgenoeg 426 LQ & R/E

Weltevreden 482 LQ

Mr Neels Alant Owner

Landowner Rondeboschie

429LQ Mr Paul van Niekerk Owner


206 LQ Mrs Cecile Nortjie Owner


206 LQ Mr Dirk Slykhuis Owner

Landowner Annexatie Mr Kobus Nel Owner

Landowner Mr Willam Nel Owner

Landowner Farm Bellzaeds Mr Chris Van der

Westhuezen Land Owner

Landowner Mr CJ Nel Land Owner

Landowner Portion 2

Alomfraai 484 LQ Mr Piet Wolfvaard (014) 7633094

Landowner Farmer in the

area Dr Hendrik Nel Owner

Landowner Robbertse

BeSigheidstrust Mr Kosie Robertse Owner

Landowner Kromhoek Farm Mr Willem Nel Farm Manager

Landowner Wellington LQ

199 Mr Willie & Tienie Nel Owner


199 Mrs Tienie Nel Owner

4

Landowner Vucht LQ436 Mr Antonie Coetzee Owner

Landowner Barbosa 201 LQ Mr H Troskie Owner

Landowner Ramusio 418 LQ Mr WO Nortjie Owner

Landowner Forfarshire 419

LQ Mr JJ Nortjie Owner

Landowner Commiphora -Vucht 436 LQ

Portion 27 Mr Jannie Pretorius Owner

Landowner R/E Billiards 428 LQ CID Prop Inv

CC Mr

Johannes Albertus

Beukes Owner

Landowner Melkboschkraal

431 LQ Mr Japie Ellis Owner

Landowner Commiphora Eco Park -Vucht 436 LQ Portion 27

Mrs Dalida Coetzee Owner

Landowner Commiphora Eco Park -Vucht 436 LQ Portion 27

Mr Erik Visser Owner

Landowner R/E Sebright 205

LQ Mr ORG Gerincep Owner

Landowner Portion 1 Billiards

LQ428 Ms S

Van der Westhuzen

Owner

Landowner Portion 1 Billiards

LQ428 Mr Beyers

Van der Westhuzen

Owner

Landowner FAURESMITH 487

LQ Mr Hein Senekal Owner

Landowner Stutgard Mr Jorrie Ellis Owner

Attorney Kosie Robbertse

Attorney Mr Sylvester Peverelle Attorney

5


199 Mr PT Van Staden Owner

Landowner Alonfraai Mr Jan Vermaak Owner

Mining & Industry Anglo Operations (Pty) Ltd - Coal SA

Ms Tracy-Lee Erasmus Legal Department

Mining & Industry Ledjadja Coal (Pty) Limited

Ms Louise van den Berg-

Nicolaï

Environmental Manager:

Boikarabelo Coal Mine

National Government

Department of Rural

Development and Land Reform

(DRDLR)

Mr Fumani Mkhabela DPM

Project Team Kongiwe

Environmental Mrs Vanessa Viljoen



Environmental Mr Steve Horak



Environmental Mr Bradly Thornton Project Manager


Environmental Mr Nokuthula Ndala GIS Technologist


Environmental Mr Michael Hennessy Legal

Provincial Government

Limpopo Department of

Economic Development

Environment and Tourism (LEDET) -

Dingala Nature Reserve

Waterberg

Mr OW Modirwa Reserve Manager

Provincial Government

Limpopo Department of

Economic Development

Environment and Tourism (LEDET)

Ms Lerato Maesela Environmental

Officer

Tourism Lephalale

Development Forum (LDF)

Mr Jacques Snyman LDF Co-ordinator

6

Tourism Middelboomspun

t Simba Safaris Dr JP Van Staden Owner

Land claimants Mabula CPA Ms Dorcas Mabula Deputy Secretary

Land Claimants Mabula CPA Mr Samuel Kgatoane Ex official

Land Claimants Mabula CPA Mr Robert Mabula Member

Land Claimants Mabula CPA Mr Hendrick Mabula Member

Land Claimants Mabula CPA Mr Moss T Mabula Secretary

Land Claimants Mabula CPA Mr Kemedu Mabula Chairperson

appendix d7: scoping meeting minutesseleka traditional council mr lesetja molokome, tc administrator...

Documents