appendix b - airport projects b - trc.pdfal torrico, senior planner, city of seatac oscar vela,...
TRANSCRIPT
-
SEATTLE-TACOMA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PART 150 NOISE COMPATIBILITY STUDY UPDATE FINAL
Landrum & Brown Appendix B – Technical Review Committee
October 2013
APPENDIX B TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
A Technical Review Committee (TRC) was established by the Port of Seattle (the Port) to assist the Port by actively contributing to, and reviewing, the technical products that are generated by the consulting team. The TRC was made up of
planning staff from the six cities that surround the airport, in addition to representatives from King County, Washington State Department of Transportation,
Boeing Field, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the Puget Sound Regional Council and representatives from the airlines. Members of the Port staff were also on the committee. The TRC did not make policy decisions, but rather provided
technical review and input regarding the analysis prepared for the study. Members of the TRC are listed below.
Roster of Technical Review Committee Members
Isaac Conlen, Planner, City of Federal Way
Lynae Craig, Manager, Air Traffic Operations, Alaska Airlines
Chip Davis, Planner, City of Burien
Ron Fincher, District Manager, Seattle District, Air Traffic Control, FAA – NW Mountain Region
JD Hood, ATC Liaison Pilot, Q400 Captain, Horizon Air
Tom Hooper, Aviation Planner, Aviation Planning, Port of Seattle
Stephen Kiehl, Principal Planner, PSRC
Rob Kikillus, Development Manager, Airfield, Aviation Operations Planning, Port of Seattle
Denise Lathrop, Planning Manager, City of Des Moines
Stacy MacGregor, Assistant Planner, City of Tukwila
Cayla Morgan, Environmental Protection Specialist, FAA
Sharyn Parker, Noise Officer ‐ King County International Airport, King County Dept of Transportation
Steve Rybolt, Environmental Management Specialist, Aviation Environmental Programs, Port of Seattle
John Sibold, Aviation Director, WSDOT
Al Torrico, Senior Planner, City of SeaTac
Oscar Vela, Technical Pilot, Alaska Airlines
Karen Wolf, Senior Planner, King County, Office of Strategic Planning and Performance Management
-
SEATTLE-TACOMA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PART 150 NOISE COMPATIBILITY STUDY UPDATE FINAL
Landrum & Brown Appendix B – Technical Review Committee
October 2013
Local Jurisdiction Contacts
City of Burien
Deputy Mayor Rose Clark
Councilmember Gordon Shaw
City of Normandy Park
Mayor George Hadley
Councilmember Shawn McEvoy
City of Des Moines
Mayor Bob Sheckler
City of SeaTac
Mayor Terry Anderson
City of Tukwila
Mayor Jim Haggerton
Councilmember Joan Hernandez
City of Federal Way
Mayor Linda Kochmar
Highline School District
School Board President Bernie Dorsey
Individuals and Stakeholder Groups that have Expressed an Interest in the Part 150 Study
City of Burien
City of Normandy Park
City of Des Moines
City of Medina
City of SeaTac
City of Tukwila
City of Federal Way
Highline School District
County Councilmember Julia Patterson
Senator Karen Keiser
Representative Dave Upthegrove
Representative Tina Orwall
Citizens Against SeaTac Expansion (CASE)
Regional Commission on Airport Affairs (RCAA)
-
SEATTLE-TACOMA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PART 150 NOISE COMPATIBILITY STUDY UPDATE FINAL
Landrum & Brown Appendix B – Technical Review Committee
October 2013
South Park Community Group (a neighborhood group)
Greater Duwamish District Council
Squire Park Community Group (a neighborhood group)
Technical Review Committee Meetings Eight TRC meetings were conducted throughout the study, including a Part 150
Data Review Session. Informal presentations were made at all of the TRC meetings followed by break-out sessions and open discussion. This format provided the
opportunity for group discussions about land use and noise issues, airport operations, and implementation strategies. Presentations, meeting materials, and summary meeting notes from each of the TRC meetings are provided at the end of
this appendix. The date, time, and location of each TRC meeting is provided below.
TRC meeting #1: January 19, 2010 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
TRC meeting #2: April 15, 2010 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
TRC meeting #3: July 29, 2010
10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Part 150 Data Review Session: July 29, 2010
12:30 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.
TRC meeting #4: September 23, 2010 1:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.
TRC meeting #5: March 24, 2011 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
TRC meeting #6: October 1, 2012 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
TRC meeting #7: June 11, 2013
10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
-
SEATTLE-TACOMA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PART 150 NOISE COMPATIBILITY STUDY UPDATE FINAL
Landrum & Brown Appendix B – Technical Review Committee
October 2013
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-
SEATTLE-TACOMA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PART 150 NOISE COMPATIBILITY STUDY UPDATE FINAL
Landrum & Brown Appendix B – Technical Review Committee
October 2013
Technical Review Committee Meeting #1
January 19, 2010
Agenda Presentation
Meeting Summary
-
SEATTLE-TACOMA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PART 150 NOISE COMPATIBILITY STUDY UPDATE FINAL
Landrum & Brown Appendix B – Technical Review Committee
October 2013
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-
SEATTLE-TACOMA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PART 150 NOISE COMPATIBILITY STUDY UPDATE
Technical Review Committee
January 19, 2010 1:30-4:00
What Room Are We In?
Meeting Agenda Meeting Facilitator: Margaret Norton-Arnold 1:30 Welcome – Let’s Get Started!
--Margaret
1:35 Thank You and Team Introductions --Stan Shepherd, Port of Seattle
1:50 Presentation of the Part 150 Process --History of Aviation Noise Abatement Planning --Part 150 General Overview
Process Major Elements Previous Study
--Roles of Participants
Port of Seattle Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Consultant Team Technical Review Committee (TRC) Public
--Important Facts about Part 150
Calculation of Noise Responsibility for Land Use Planning Requirement for Environmental Processing
-
--Kicking Off the Part 150 Goals of the Part 150 Review of Scope Overall Project Schedule Next 90 Days --Rob Adams, Part 150 Project Manager
2:45 Break 3:00 Hearing from the Committee --Questions on Rob’s presentation?
--What are your recommendations on the ways in which we can make this Part 150 process as effective as possible?
4:00 Adjourn
-
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y 1
Pro
ject
Kic
k-O
ff M
eeti
ng
Pro
ject
Kic
kP
roje
ct K
ick
-- Off
Meeti
ng
Off
Meeti
ng
Seatt
le T
aco
ma I
nte
rnati
on
al
Air
po
rt
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y 2
�W
elc
om
e a
nd
In
tro
du
ctio
ns
�H
isto
ry o
f A
via
tio
n N
ois
e A
bate
men
t P
lan
nin
g�
Part
15
0 G
en
era
l O
verv
iew
�R
ole
s o
f P
art
icip
an
ts�
Imp
ort
an
t Fact
s A
bo
ut
Part
15
0�
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0Ag
en
da
Ag
en
da
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y 3
�P
ort
of
Seatt
le-
Ow
ns
and o
per
ates
the
airp
ort
-Sponso
r of th
e Pa
rt 1
50 S
tudy
-M
ain c
onta
ct:
Sta
n S
hep
herd
�C
on
sult
an
t Team
-La
ndru
m &
Bro
wn w
ill lea
d t
he
Part
150 S
tudy
-60 y
ears
of
avia
tion p
lannin
g-
Exp
erts
in a
ircr
aft
nois
e an
d lan
d u
se p
lannin
g-
Mar
gar
et N
ort
on-A
rnold
and S
yner
gy
Consu
ltin
g w
ill
support
L&
B-
Mai
n c
onta
ct:
Ro
b A
dam
s
�Tech
nic
al
Ad
vis
ory
Co
mm
itte
e:
-Exp
erts
in y
our
indiv
idual
fie
lds
Welc
om
e a
nd
In
tro
du
ctio
ns
Welc
om
e a
nd
In
tro
du
ctio
ns
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y 4
�Je
t A
ge +
Rap
id E
xp
an
sio
n o
f A
irp
ort
s +
Su
bu
rban
Develo
pm
en
t/S
pra
wl =
Adve
rse
Nois
e Im
pac
ts�
Avia
tio
n N
ois
e A
bate
men
t P
oli
cy o
f 1
97
6�
Avia
tio
n S
afe
ty a
nd
No
ise A
bate
men
t A
ct
of
19
79
-FA
R P
art
150 (
1981)
esta
blis
hed
req
uirem
ents
for
airp
ort
ow
ner
s w
ho c
hoose
to s
ubm
it n
ois
e ex
posu
re
map
s an
d d
evel
op n
ois
e co
mpat
ibili
ty p
lannin
g
pro
gra
ms
to t
he
FAA for
revi
ew a
nd a
ppro
val.
-Volu
nta
ry o
n t
he
par
t of th
e sp
onso
r an
d is
not
a re
quirem
ent
of th
e Fe
der
al g
ove
rnm
ent.
His
tory
of
Avia
tio
n N
ois
e
His
tory
of
Avia
tio
n N
ois
e
Ab
ate
men
t P
lan
nin
gA
bate
men
t P
lan
nin
g
-
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y 5
�A
irp
ort
No
ise a
nd
Cap
aci
ty A
ct o
f 1
99
0-
Est
ablis
hed
phas
e-out
tim
elin
e of Sta
ge
2 a
ircr
aft
(Com
mer
cial
aircr
aft
>75,0
00 lbs)
-Res
tric
ted a
irport
s fr
om
im
posi
ng loca
lly b
ased
, non-v
olu
nta
ry r
estr
ictions
without
firs
t co
mple
ting a
Par
t 161 S
tudy
�FA
A F
inal
Po
licy
on
Part
15
0 N
ois
e
Mit
igati
on
Measu
res
(Oct
ob
er
1,
19
98
)-
Indiv
idual
s build
ing a
hom
e w
ithin
an a
ppro
ved
and p
ublis
hed
nois
e ex
posu
re c
onto
ur
are
NO
T
elig
ible
for
rem
edia
l nois
e m
itig
atio
n.
His
tory
of
Avia
tio
n N
ois
e
His
tory
of
Avia
tio
n N
ois
e
Ab
ate
men
t P
lan
nin
gA
bate
men
t P
lan
nin
g
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y 6
�P
art
15
0 S
tud
ies
are
Pla
nn
ing
Stu
die
s-
Iden
tify
nois
e an
d lan
d u
se im
pac
ts t
hat
exi
st t
oday
an
d in t
he
futu
re-
Work
to d
evel
op s
olu
tions
within
the
FAA’s
fra
mew
ork
�P
art
15
0 S
tud
ies
can
op
en
fu
nd
ing
so
urc
es
-Fo
llow
ing P
art
150 g
uid
elin
es m
akes
airport
elig
ible
fo
r gra
nts
for
imple
men
ting r
ecom
men
dat
ions
of
the
study
-Fu
ndin
g is
not
guar
ante
ed-
Lim
ited
to a
reas
exp
ose
d t
o a
t le
ast
65 D
NL
�P
art
15
0 S
tud
ies
do
no
t:-
Rec
om
men
d c
losi
ng a
n a
irport
or
imple
men
ting
man
dat
ory
rest
rict
ions
on a
ircr
aft
-Pr
ovi
de
envi
ronm
enta
l ap
pro
val fo
r im
ple
men
ting
nois
e ab
atem
ent
or
land u
se p
rogra
ms
Part
15
0 G
en
era
l O
verv
iew
Part
15
0 G
en
era
l O
verv
iew
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y 7
Part
15
0 P
roce
ssP
art
15
0 P
roce
ss
Data
Col
lect
ion
Rada
r/M
onito
r
Exis
ting
Nois
e Ex
posu
re
Futu
re N
oise
Exp
osur
e
Impl
emen
tatio
n Pl
anLan
d Us
e M
anag
emen
t Alte
rnat
ives
Land
Use
Man
agem
ent P
lan
Nois
e Ab
atem
ent
Plan
Nois
e Ab
atem
ent
Alte
rnat
ives D
raft
Noi
se C
ompa
tibili
ty P
rogr
am
Draf
t Doc
umen
ts a
nd P
ublic
Hea
ring
s
Reco
mm
ende
d No
ise
Com
patib
ility
Pro
gram
Revi
ew a
nd A
ppro
val
Stud
y In
itiat
ion
Fore
cast
Val
idat
ion
We a
re h
ere
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y 8
Part
15
0 M
ajo
r Ele
men
tsP
art
15
0 M
ajo
r Ele
men
ts�
No
ise E
xp
osu
re M
ap
s (N
EM
s)
�N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity P
rog
ram
s (N
CP
s)
�P
ub
lic
Ou
treach
-
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y 9
Part
15
0 M
ajo
r Ele
men
tsP
art
15
0 M
ajo
r Ele
men
ts�
No
ise E
xp
osu
re M
ap
s (N
EM
s)-
Map
s dep
icting t
he
exis
ting a
nd t
he
futu
re n
ois
e le
vels
aro
und t
he
airp
ort
alo
ng w
ith r
esid
ential
an
d o
ther
nois
e-se
nsi
tive
lan
d u
ses
-Pa
rt 1
50 g
uid
elin
es p
rovi
de
direc
tion o
n t
he
size
, sc
ale,
and e
lem
ents
to b
e in
cluded
-Thes
e m
aps
are
the
star
ting p
oin
t fo
r id
entify
ing
wher
e th
ere
are
nois
e im
pac
ts
-Exi
stin
g c
onditio
n is
bas
ed o
n 1
2 m
onth
s of dat
a
-Fu
ture
conditio
n p
roje
cts
nois
e le
vels
fiv
e ye
ars
out
-Fu
ture
conditio
n s
hould
tak
e in
to a
ccount
any
chan
ges
(phys
ical
or
oper
atio
nal
) th
at m
ay h
ave
an a
ffec
t on t
he
nois
e le
vels
aro
und t
he
airp
ort
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
10
Part
15
0 M
ajo
r Ele
men
tsP
art
15
0 M
ajo
r Ele
men
ts�
No
ise C
om
pati
bil
ity P
rog
ram
s (N
CP
s)-
Rec
om
men
dat
ions
for
elim
inat
ing,
min
imiz
ing,
and/o
r m
itig
atin
g a
ircr
aft
nois
e an
d lan
d u
se
conflic
ts.
�N
ois
e Abat
emen
t
�La
nd U
se M
itig
atio
n
�Im
ple
men
tation M
easu
res
�P
ub
lic
Invo
lvem
en
t-
Critica
l to
the
succ
ess
and a
ppro
val of a
Part
150
-Typ
ical
ly c
onsi
sts
of Pu
blic
Work
shops,
Rev
iew
Com
mitte
es,
web
site
s, n
ewsl
ette
rs,
etc.
-G
oal
is
to g
ather
input
on t
he
findin
gs
and
pro
vide
reco
mm
endat
ions
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
11
Pre
vio
us
Part
15
0 S
tud
yP
revio
us
Part
15
0 S
tud
y�
Gen
era
l-
Stu
dy
was
com
ple
ted in 2
002
-It
was
the
3rd
Par
t 150 p
repar
ed for
SEA
-O
per
atio
n o
f th
e th
ird r
unw
ay w
as n
ot
incl
uded
due
to
the
tim
efra
me
�N
ois
e E
xp
osu
re M
ap
s-
Exi
stin
g N
EM
was
for
1998 c
onditio
ns
-Fu
ture
NEM
was
for
2004 c
onditio
ns
�N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity P
rog
ram
-Am
ended
4 a
nd c
reat
ed 5
new
nois
e ab
atem
ent
mea
sure
s-
Am
ended
4 lan
d u
se m
easu
res
-Am
ended
2 a
nd c
reat
ed 1
new
im
ple
men
tation m
easu
res
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
12
Pre
vio
us
Part
15
0 S
tud
yP
revio
us
Part
15
0 S
tud
y
-
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
13
Ro
les
of
Part
icip
an
tsR
ole
s o
f P
art
icip
an
ts�
Po
rt o
f S
eatt
le
�Fed
era
l A
via
tio
n A
dm
inis
trati
on
(FA
A)
�C
on
sult
an
t Team
�Tech
nic
al
Revie
w C
om
mit
tee (
TR
C)
�P
ub
lic
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
14
Ro
le o
f th
e P
ort
of
Seatt
leR
ole
of
the P
ort
of
Seatt
le�
Sp
on
sor
the P
art
15
0 S
tud
y
�M
an
ag
e t
he p
roce
ss
�C
ert
ify N
EM
s are
acc
ura
te
�S
ub
mit
Part
15
0 f
or
ap
pro
val
to F
AA
�P
rep
are
SEP
A r
evie
w o
f re
com
men
dati
on
s
�Im
ple
men
t re
com
men
dati
on
s
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
15
�P
rovid
e g
uid
an
ce o
n p
erf
orm
ing
Part
15
0
stu
die
s
�P
rovid
e f
un
din
g t
hro
ug
h A
IP f
or
the
stu
dy a
nd
po
ten
tiall
y t
he i
mp
lem
en
tati
on
o
f th
e r
eco
mm
en
dati
on
s
�R
evie
w/
acc
ep
t N
EM
S
�R
evie
w/
ap
pro
ve t
he i
nd
ivid
ual
measu
res
of
the N
CP
�Lead
NEP
A r
evie
w f
or
no
n a
ir t
raff
ic
measu
res
Ro
le o
f FA
A
Ro
le o
f FA
A --
Air
po
rts
Air
po
rts
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
16
�P
rovid
e a
n u
nd
ers
tan
din
g o
f exis
tin
g
air
space
an
d p
roce
du
res
�P
rovid
e t
ech
nic
al
gu
idan
ce o
n t
he s
afe
ty
an
d f
easi
bil
ity t
o i
mp
lem
en
t alt
ern
ati
ve
pro
ced
ure
s
�Lead
th
e N
EP
A r
evie
w o
f air
tra
ffic
m
easu
res
�Im
ple
men
t air
tra
ffic
no
ise a
bate
men
t p
roce
du
res
Ro
le o
f FA
A
Ro
le o
f FA
A --
Air
Tra
ffic
A
ir T
raff
ic
-
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
17
Ro
le o
f th
e C
on
sult
an
t Team
Ro
le o
f th
e C
on
sult
an
t Team
�En
sure
th
at
the p
roce
ss i
s b
ein
g f
oll
ow
ed
�P
rovid
e t
ech
nic
al
serv
ices
(no
ise
mo
deli
ng
an
d l
an
d u
se p
lan
nin
g)
�M
an
ag
e t
he o
utr
each
eff
ort
an
d p
rep
are
d
ocu
men
tati
on
�D
evelo
p n
ois
e a
bate
men
t an
d l
an
d u
se
alt
ern
ati
ves
for
revie
w b
y t
he P
ort
�P
rovid
e r
eco
mm
en
dati
on
s re
gard
ing
th
e
sele
ctio
n o
f alt
ern
ati
ves
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
18
Ro
le o
f th
e T
RC
Ro
le o
f th
e T
RC
�P
rovid
e t
ech
nic
al
exp
ert
ise
�R
evie
w d
ata
�A
id t
o i
mp
lem
en
tati
on
�Exp
ect
ati
on
s o
f th
e T
RC
-M
eet
8 t
imes
ove
r th
e co
urs
e of 2 y
ears
-M
eeting m
ater
ials
pro
vided
in a
dva
nce
-O
pport
unitie
s fo
r gro
up a
nd indiv
idual
dis
cuss
ions
-Enco
ura
ge
you t
o b
e pre
sent
at p
ublic
work
shops
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
19
Ro
le o
f th
e P
ub
lic
Ro
le o
f th
e P
ub
lic
�P
rovid
e s
ug
gest
ion
s
�P
rovid
e f
eed
back
on
exis
tin
g c
on
dit
ion
s
�P
rovid
e c
om
men
ts o
n t
he r
eco
mm
en
ded
m
easu
res
�O
ffer
ideas
an
d s
ug
gest
ion
s
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
20
Ro
le o
f th
e P
ub
lic
Ro
le o
f th
e P
ub
lic
�P
art
15
0 g
uid
eli
nes
are
cle
ar
that
pu
bli
c in
pu
t is
cri
tica
l an
d r
eq
uir
ed
�G
oal
is t
o b
e r
esp
on
sive t
o t
he p
ub
lic’
s d
esi
re f
or
info
rmati
on
�A
cco
mp
lish
th
is b
y p
rovid
ing
op
tio
ns
for
tho
se w
ith
dif
fere
nt
inte
rest
levels
Casu
al
Ob
serv
er
Very
Inte
rest
ed
-Webs
ite
-Requ
estsD
raft/
FinalD
ocume
nts
-Atte
ndPub
lic
Works
hop
-Requ
eststo
beon
mailin
glist
-Requ
estsS
pecial
Presen
tation
-
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
21
Calc
ula
tio
n o
f N
ois
e
�Ther
e ar
e a
num
ber
of
way
s to
des
crib
e nois
e le
vels
(m
axim
um
lev
el,
aver
age,
90
th
per
centile
, et
c.)
�Par
t 150 S
tudie
s ar
e re
quired
to u
se t
he
Day
–
Nig
ht
Ave
rage
Sound L
evel
(D
NL)
-24-H
our
aver
age
-Pen
alty
for
nig
htt
ime
(10 p
.m.–
6:5
9 a
.m.)
flig
hts
(x1
0)
�N
atio
nal
sta
ndar
d f
or
all Fe
der
al a
gen
cies
-65 D
NL
thre
shold
for
signific
ant
impac
t
�Id
entifica
tion o
f im
pac
ts a
nd f
undin
g f
or
mitig
atio
n is
65 D
NL
Imp
ort
an
t Fact
s A
bo
ut
Part
15
0Im
po
rtan
t Fact
s A
bo
ut
Part
15
0
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
22
Calc
ula
tio
n o
f N
ois
e (
con
tin
ued
)
�Pre
par
ed u
sing t
he
FAA’s
Inte
gra
ted N
ois
e M
odel
(IN
M)
Ver
sion 7
.0a
�N
ois
e m
easu
rem
ents
are
use
d t
o v
erify
the
input
into
the
INM
, N
OT t
o c
alcu
late
nois
e
�N
ois
e m
easu
rem
ents
ver
sus
nois
e m
odel
-Cre
atin
g a
nois
e co
nto
ur
from
mea
sure
d d
ata
would
re
quire
thousa
nds
of m
onitors
24 h
ours
a d
ay for
a fu
ll ye
ar-D
ata
colle
cted
would
rep
rese
nt
that
one
year
per
iod
-N
ois
e m
odel
ing a
llow
s fo
r fu
ture
yea
rs t
o b
e an
alyz
ed-N
ois
e m
odel
ing a
llow
s fo
r al
tern
ativ
e co
nditio
ns
to
anal
yze
“what
if”
sce
nar
ios
Imp
ort
an
t Fact
s A
bo
ut
Part
15
0Im
po
rtan
t Fact
s A
bo
ut
Part
15
0
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
23
Est
ab
lish
ing
Im
pact
s
�FA
A h
as e
stab
lished
lan
d u
se c
om
pat
ibili
ty
guid
elin
es f
or
iden
tify
ing a
ircr
aft
nois
e im
pac
ts
�In
gen
eral
, <
65 D
NL
is c
om
pat
ible
with a
ll use
s
�N
ois
e-se
nsi
tive
use
s ar
e co
nsi
der
ed n
on-
com
pat
ible
at
or
above
65 D
NL
-Res
iden
tial
-Sch
ools
-Churc
hes
-H
osp
ital
s
-N
urs
ing h
om
es
-D
ayca
re fac
ilities
wher
e lic
ense
d e
duca
tion o
ccurs
Imp
ort
an
t Fact
s A
bo
ut
Part
15
0Im
po
rtan
t Fact
s A
bo
ut
Part
15
0
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
24
Imp
ort
an
t Fact
s A
bo
ut
Part
15
0Im
po
rtan
t Fact
s A
bo
ut
Part
15
0FA
A L
an
d U
se C
om
pati
bil
ity G
uid
eli
nes
-
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
25
Resp
on
sib
ilit
y f
or
Lan
d U
se P
lan
nin
g
�Port
of
Sea
ttle
does
not
hav
e zo
nin
g a
uth
ority
to
pre
vent
non-c
om
pat
ible
lan
d u
ses
�Lo
cal ju
risd
ictions
are
resp
onsi
ble
for
imple
men
ting p
reve
ntive
lan
d u
se c
ontr
ols
�Im
port
ant
for
the
loca
l ju
risd
ictions
to b
e in
volv
ed in t
he
pro
cess
Imp
ort
an
t Fact
s A
bo
ut
Part
15
0Im
po
rtan
t Fact
s A
bo
ut
Part
15
0
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
26
Req
uir
em
en
t fo
r En
vir
on
men
tal
Ap
pro
val
�Par
t 150 is
not
a su
bst
itute
for
form
al
envi
ronm
enta
l re
view
�The
reco
mm
ended
pla
n w
ill r
equire
SEPA
revi
ew/a
ppro
val prior
to im
ple
men
tation
�Som
e re
com
men
dat
ions
may
req
uire
NEPA
revi
ew/a
ppro
val prior
to im
ple
men
tation
Imp
ort
an
t Fact
s A
bo
ut
Part
15
0Im
po
rtan
t Fact
s A
bo
ut
Part
15
0
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
27
�Exp
ect
ati
on
s o
f th
e P
art
15
0
Conduct
Par
t 150 s
tudy
in a
n o
pen
and e
ngag
ing w
ay
Focu
s Pa
rt 1
50 s
tudy
on iss
ues
rel
ated
to t
he
third
runw
ay
Look
for
opport
unitie
s th
at h
ave
not
bee
n t
hought
of
vers
us
re-l
ooki
ng a
t old
iss
ues
65 D
NL
will
be
the
thre
shold
for
iden
tify
ing im
pac
ts
and e
ligib
ility
for
mitig
atio
n
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0 --
Go
als
Go
als
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
28
�M
ajo
r S
cop
e T
ask
s
-D
ata
colle
ctio
n-
Prep
arat
ion o
f fo
reca
st o
f ac
tivi
ty-
Cre
atin
g N
ois
e Exp
osu
re M
aps
-D
evel
opin
g a
nd e
valu
atin
g n
ois
e ab
atem
ent
alte
rnat
ives
-D
evel
opin
g a
nd e
valu
atin
g lan
d u
se a
lter
nat
ives
-Sel
ecting indiv
idual
mea
sure
s fo
r th
e N
ois
e Com
pat
ibili
ty p
rogra
m-
Prep
arin
g d
ocu
men
tation
-Pu
blic
invo
lvem
ent
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0 --
Sco
pe
Sco
pe
-
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
29
Data
Co
llect
ion
- G
en
era
l
�In
tensi
ve inve
nto
ry:
-Airport
dat
a-
Air t
raffic
dat
a-
Flig
ht
trac
king s
yste
m d
ata
-N
ois
e m
onitoring s
yste
m d
ata
-N
ois
e co
mpla
int
dat
a-
Eco
nom
ic d
ata
of
the
regio
n-
Exi
stin
g lan
d u
ses
-Zonin
g a
nd futu
re lan
d u
se p
lans
-Sta
tus
of
airp
ort
mitig
atio
n p
rogra
ms
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0 --
Sco
pe
Sco
pe
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
30
Data
Co
llect
ion
- N
ois
e M
on
ito
rin
g A
naly
sis
�Val
idat
e/ve
rify
the
input
dat
a in
the
INM
�O
bta
in “
real
-life”
nois
e m
easu
rem
ents
to a
ssis
t in
under
stan
din
g t
he
tota
l nois
e en
viro
nm
ent
�Colle
ct n
ois
e m
onitor
dat
a fr
om
26 e
xist
ing s
ites
�Conduct
additio
nal
monitoring a
s nee
ded
-
No c
ove
rage
by
exis
ting s
ites
-U
niq
ue
nois
e se
ttin
g t
hat
war
rants
monitoring
-Rec
om
men
dat
ions
from
the
Port
, FA
A o
r co
mm
unity
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0 --
Sco
pe
Sco
pe
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
31
Fo
reca
st o
f A
ctiv
ity
�Fo
reca
st b
eing p
repar
ed s
pec
ific
ally
for
Par
t 150
�Critica
l pie
ce o
f in
form
atio
n t
o h
elp u
nder
stan
d
the
futu
re a
ctiv
ity
at t
he
airp
ort
�Key
eff
ort
s:-
Inte
rvie
ws
with a
irlin
es-
Colle
ctio
n o
f his
toric
oper
atin
g d
ata
-Eco
nom
ic a
nal
ysis
of th
e Sea
ttle
mar
ket
-Anal
ysis
of av
iation indust
ry t
rends
�Fo
reca
st w
ill p
roduce
the
follo
win
g:
-Annual
oper
atio
ns
for
2016 a
nd 2
021
-Pe
ak h
our
oper
atio
ns
for
various
conditio
ns
-Ave
rage-
day
flig
ht
sched
ule
s w
ith a
ircr
aft
types
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0 --
Sco
pe
Sco
pe
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
32
Cre
ati
ng
No
ise E
xp
osu
re M
ap
s
�Exi
stin
g N
ois
e Exp
osu
re M
ap t
o r
efle
ct c
urr
ent
oper
atin
g c
onditio
ns
(2010/1
1)
�Fu
ture
Nois
e Exp
osu
re M
ap t
o r
efle
ct f
ive-
year
fu
ture
conditio
ns
(2016)
�D
ay-N
ight
Ave
rage
Sound L
evel
(D
NL)
conto
urs
of
65,
70,
and 7
5 D
NL
will
be
pre
par
ed
�Conto
urs
will
be
ove
rlai
d o
nto
a lan
d u
se
bas
emap
and n
on-c
om
pat
ible
lan
d u
ses
will
be
iden
tified
/quan
tified
�The
NEM
s an
d c
ounts
of
non-c
om
pat
ible
use
s w
ill h
elp g
uid
e th
e al
tern
ativ
es p
roce
ss
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0 --
Sco
pe
Sco
pe
-
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
33
No
ise A
bate
men
t A
ltern
ati
ves
�D
esig
ned
to r
educe
nois
e at
the
sourc
e
�Exa
mple
s in
clude:
-Fl
ight
trac
k ch
anges
-Runw
ay u
se p
rogra
ms
-Fa
cilit
y dev
elopm
ent
-Fl
ight
pro
cedure
chan
ges
�Sys
tem
atic
eva
luat
ion:
-Saf
ety
-Fe
asib
ility
-M
eanin
gfu
l nois
e re
duct
ion
-D
oes
not
shift
nois
e fr
om
one
area
to t
he
nex
t
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0 --
Sco
pe
Sco
pe
No
ise A
bate
men
t Evalu
ati
on
Pro
cess
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
34
Lan
d U
se A
ltern
ati
ves
�D
esig
ned
to p
reve
nt
or
corr
ect
land u
se
inco
mpat
ibili
ties
�Exa
mple
s in
clude:
-Zonin
g c
han
ges
-Build
ing c
ode
chan
ges
-D
iscr
etio
nar
y re
view
by
the
Port
of Sea
ttle
-Sound insu
lation
-Volu
nta
ry a
cquis
itio
n-
Sal
es a
ssis
tance
�Pre
ventive
lan
d u
se m
easu
res
require
loca
l ju
risd
ictions
to im
ple
men
t
�Corr
ective
lan
d u
se m
easu
res
can b
e im
ple
men
ted b
y th
e Port
of
Sea
ttle
, but
fundin
g
is s
ubje
ct t
o F
AA g
rants
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0 --
Sco
pe
Sco
pe
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
35
Develo
pin
g N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity P
rog
ram
�Rec
om
men
ded
nois
e ab
atem
ent
and lan
d u
se
mea
sure
s w
ill b
e ev
aluat
ed in v
ario
us
com
bin
atio
ns
to iden
tify
the
bes
t pro
gra
m
�Im
ple
men
tation m
easu
res
will
be
dev
eloped
to
support
the
reco
mm
ended
nois
e ab
atem
ent
and lan
d u
se m
easu
res
�Tim
efra
mes
, re
sponsi
bili
ties
, co
sts,
fundin
g
sourc
es,
and a
dditio
nal
ste
ps
will
be
iden
tified
as
par
t of
the
pla
n
�Entire
pro
gra
m w
ill b
e put
fort
h t
o t
he
public
, th
e Port
Com
mis
sion,
and t
he
FAA f
or
revi
ew
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0 --
Sco
pe
Sco
pe
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
36
Part
15
0 D
ocu
men
tati
on
�Tw
o f
orm
al d
ocu
men
ts w
ill b
e pro
duce
d:
-D
raft
Par
t 150
-Fi
nal
Par
t 150
�Tec
hnic
al a
nal
ysis
will
be
sum
mar
ized
and
pre
sente
d t
o t
he
TAC a
nd t
o t
he
public
in
work
shops
�Pro
ject
web
site
will
house
all
of
the
tech
nic
al
sum
mar
ies
and t
he
form
al d
ocu
men
ts
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0 --
Sco
pe
Sco
pe
-
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
37
Pu
bli
c In
vo
lvem
en
t
�G
oal
s in
clude:
-To e
ngag
e peo
ple
direc
tly
-Solic
it m
eanin
gfu
l in
put
-Pr
ovi
de
the
most
acc
ura
te d
ata
as p
oss
ible
-Conduct
the
study
in a
tra
nsp
aren
t w
ay
�O
utr
each
eff
ort
s in
clude:
-Pu
blic
work
shops
with b
reak
out
sess
ions
-Pr
ovi
din
g for
focu
s gro
up/s
pec
ial pre
senta
tions
-H
old
ing a
Public
Hea
ring
-D
edic
ated
pro
ject
web
site
-U
tiliz
ing t
he
Port
of Sea
ttle
’s e
mai
l dis
trib
ution s
ervi
ce-
Inco
rpora
ting info
rmat
ion into
the
Air M
ail new
slet
ters
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0 --
Sco
pe
Sco
pe
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
38
Pu
bli
c In
vo
lvem
en
t –
TR
C
�N
on-v
oting/a
dvi
sory
com
mitte
e�
Pla
nnin
g u
p t
o 8
TRC m
eetings
-Tim
ed t
o o
ccur
at k
ey m
ilest
ones
1.
Kic
koff
2.
Rev
iew
of nois
e in
put
dat
a3.
Rev
iew
of
fore
cast
s an
d d
raft
NEM
s4.
Rev
iew
and e
valu
ate
nois
e ab
atem
ent
alte
rnat
ives
5.
Rev
iew
and e
valu
ate
land u
se m
itig
atio
n a
lter
nat
ives
6.
Dis
cuss
eva
luat
ion o
f al
tern
ativ
es7.
Rev
iew
rec
om
men
dat
ions
of
the
study
8.
Final
mee
ting t
o d
iscu
ss a
ny
item
s-
Goal
is
to g
et m
eeting info
rmat
ion o
ut
to y
ou in
adva
nce
of th
e m
eeting (
not
alw
ays
poss
ible
)-
Som
e m
eetings
will
incl
ude
bre
akout
sess
ions
to
gat
her
im
port
ant
info
rmat
ion f
rom
par
tici
pan
ts-
Com
men
ts w
ill b
e ac
cepte
d for
up t
o t
wo w
eeks
aft
er
each
work
shop
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0 --
Sco
pe
Sco
pe
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
39
Pu
bli
c In
vo
lvem
en
t –
Pu
bli
c W
ork
sho
ps
�Pla
nnin
g u
p t
o 6
public
work
shops
-Tim
ed t
o o
ccur
at k
ey m
ilest
ones
-
Will
incl
ude
pre
senta
tion b
y Pa
rt 1
50 t
eam
-Bre
akout
sess
ions
will
be
conduct
ed w
ith fac
ilita
tors
to
gat
her
im
port
ant
info
rmat
ion f
rom
par
tici
pan
ts-
Entire
gro
up w
ill r
econve
ne
to s
har
e w
hat
eac
h g
roup
lear
ned
-O
pport
unitie
s to
lea
ve w
ritt
en c
om
men
ts w
ill b
e pro
vided
at
each
work
shop
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0 --
Sco
pe
Sco
pe
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
40
Pu
bli
c In
vo
lvem
en
t –
Sp
eci
al
Pre
sen
tati
on
s
�Pro
vidin
g f
or
spec
ial m
eetings
-W
ill o
ccur
when
nec
essa
ry t
o a
ddre
ss a
n iss
ue
-Pa
rtic
ula
rly
hel
pfu
l in
addre
ssin
g loca
lized
iss
ues
or
conce
rns
-Fo
rmat
and v
enue
will
be
det
erm
ined
as
nee
ded
-M
eeting m
ater
ials
and n
ote
s w
ill b
e publis
hed
to t
he
web
site
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0 --
Sco
pe
Sco
pe
-
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
41
Pu
bli
c In
vo
lvem
en
t –
Pu
bli
c H
eari
ng
�Public
Hea
ring w
ill b
e hel
d t
o o
bta
in f
orm
al
com
men
ts-
Hea
ring t
o b
e hel
d a
ppro
xim
atel
y 30 d
ays
afte
r th
e D
raft
Par
t 150 is
publis
hed
-Pr
esen
tation w
ill b
e giv
en b
y Pa
rt 1
50 t
eam
on t
he
reco
mm
endat
ions
of th
e st
udy
-Sep
arat
e ar
ea for
mak
ing c
om
men
ts w
ith a
court
re
port
er a
nd h
earing o
ffic
er w
ill b
e av
aila
ble
-W
ritt
en c
om
men
ts w
ill a
lso b
e ac
cepte
d a
t th
e hea
ring
and for
two w
eeks
aft
er t
he
hea
ring
-All
com
men
ts w
ill b
e re
sponded
to in t
he
Final
Par
t 150
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0 --
Sco
pe
Sco
pe
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
42
Pu
bli
c In
vo
lvem
en
t –
Pro
ject
Web
site
�D
edic
ated
Par
t 150 w
ebsi
te w
ill b
e m
ainta
ined
-Ser
ve a
s an
offic
ial si
te for
the
study
-Pr
ovi
de
notice
s of
upco
min
g m
eetings
-A r
eposi
tory
of al
l m
eeting s
um
mar
ies
and m
ater
ials
-Li
nks
to k
ey info
rmat
ion t
hat
would
be
hel
pfu
l to
the
public
-Allo
w for
emai
ls t
o b
e se
nt
to t
he
Part
150 t
eam
-D
raft
and F
inal
docu
men
ts w
ill b
e av
aila
ble
for
dow
nlo
ad w
hen
ava
ilable
-Site
will
continue
to b
e pre
sent
afte
r st
udy
is c
om
ple
te
to p
rovi
de
the
public
info
rmat
ion o
n t
he
study
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0 --
Sco
pe
Sco
pe
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
43
Pu
bli
c In
vo
lvem
en
t –
Ele
ctro
nic
New
slett
ers
�Port
of
Sea
ttle
’s E
mai
l D
eliv
ery
Sys
tem
-Pe
riodic
em
ails
will
be
sent
to t
hose
reg
iste
red o
n t
he
study
-Pr
ovi
de
notice
s of
upco
min
g m
eetings
-Pr
ovi
de
late
st n
ews
updat
es-
Direc
t peo
ple
to t
he
web
site
or
oth
er loca
tions
for
info
rmat
ion
�Air M
ail
-Po
rt o
f Sea
ttle
sen
ds
Air M
ail new
slet
ter
out
per
iodic
ally
-Pa
rt 1
50 w
ill b
e a
topic
of fo
ur
Air M
ail new
slet
ters
-Pr
ovi
de
notice
s of
upco
min
g m
eetings
-Sum
mar
ize
key
findin
gs
to d
ate
-D
irec
t peo
ple
to t
he
web
site
or
oth
er loca
tions
for
info
rmat
ion
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0 --
Sco
pe
Sco
pe
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
44
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0 --
Sch
ed
ule
Sch
ed
ule
2010
2011
2012
Task
Jan
Feb
May
Apr
Jun
May
Jul
Jun
Aug
Jul
Sep
Aug
Oct
Sep
Oct
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
Notic
e to
Proc
eed
Proj
ect K
ick-o
ff/Da
ta C
ollec
tion
Exist
ing
Noise
Exp
osur
e
Futu
re B
aseli
ne N
oise
Exp
osur
e
Noise
Aba
tem
ent A
ltern
ative
s
Land
Use
Miti
gatio
n Al
tern
ative
s
Noise
Com
patib
ility P
rogr
am
Publ
ic He
arin
g /D
raft
Docu
men
t
Subm
it Fi
nal t
o FA
A
FAA
Revie
ws N
EM/N
CP
Publ
ic In
volve
men
t- T
RC M
eetin
gs- P
ublic
Wor
ksho
ps- S
pecia
l Pre
sent
atio
ns
1
Nov
Dec
Jan
Prep
are A
viatio
n Fo
reca
sts
Affe
cted
Env
ironm
ent
Feb
Mar
Nov
12
352
34
45
66
78
on
dem
an
d- W
ebsit
e- A
ir Ma
il1
23
45
6
-
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
45
Fir
st 9
0 D
ays
(no
w t
hro
ug
h A
pri
l)
�D
ata
colle
ctio
n-
Gat
her
ing h
isto
ric
activi
ty d
ata
-Conduct
ing inte
rvie
ws
-Pr
oce
ssin
g r
adar
and n
ois
e m
onitoring d
ata
�Avi
atio
n f
ore
cast
-D
evel
opin
g a
lter
nat
e fu
ture
oper
atin
g s
cenar
ios
-Pr
epar
ing d
raft
Fore
cast
docu
men
t
�Public
outr
each
-Pu
blic
Work
shop #
1 –
Feb
ruar
y 24th
-
TRC #
2 –
mid
-April (f
ocu
s on d
ata
colle
ctio
n)
-Air M
ail #
2 –
April 14
th
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0
Cu
rren
t P
art
15
0 --
Sch
ed
ule
Sch
ed
ule
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y
46
Qu
est
ion
s/A
nsw
ers
Qu
est
ion
s/A
nsw
ers
-
Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study Update
Technical Review Committee
Meeting Report January 19, 2010
1:30 – 4:00
Committee Attendees Chip Davis Ron Fincher JD Hood Stephen Kiehl Stacy MacGregor Cayla Morgan Sharyn Parker John Sibold Al Torrico Karen Wolf
Port of Seattle Attendees Michael Carroll Mary Ann Chamberlin Tom Fagerstrom Tom Hooper Karen Kalanick Rob Kikillus Colleen Miller Steve Rybolt Marlys St. Laurent Stan Shepherd Kym Sullivan Diane Summerhays Michelle Taylor
Consultant Team Rob Adams, Landrum & Brown, Consultant Project Manager Margaret Norton-Arnold, Norton-Arnold & Company, Facilitator Fala Frazier, Norton-Arnold & Company, Committee Administrator
Introductions Diane Summerhays, Director of Community Development at Sea-Tac Airport, welcomed committee members and thanked them for their participation. She reminded those members representing neighbor cities to let the Port know if their city councils could benefit from Part 150 briefings.
Sea-Tac Airport Part 150 Study Update Page 1 Technical Review Committee Meeting #1 Report
-
Stan Shepherd, Port of Seattle Part 150 project manager, introduced himself. He has worked for the airport for about twenty years and was involved with the last Part 150 Study. This is the fourth Part 150 Update for Sea-Tac Airport. Rob Adams, consultant project manager with Landrum & Brown, specializes in these types of studies and has managed numerous Part 150 Studies, many of them controversial. Committee introductions included: Ron Fincher, FAA Seattle District Manager has been peripherally involved in several Part 150 studies, but this is the first time he has been directly involved in a Part 150 Study. Al Torrico is a Senior Planner with the City of SeaTac and served as a liaison to the Port. This is his first Part 150 Study. Chip Davis is a Planner with the City of Burien. This is his first Part 150 Study. John Sibold, Aviation Director for WSDOT, was involved in the Part 150 Study for the Port of Bellingham. Stacy MacGregor is an Assistant Planner with the City of Tukwila. This is her first Part 150 Study. Karen Wolf is a Senior Planner for King County, and this is her first Part 150 Study. Stephen Kiehl, Principal Planner with PSRC, has been working closely with the Port on 3rd runway issues for about 13 years. He wrote the Port of Bellingham’s Part 150 Update, and served on the advisory committee for the 2002 Part 150 Update for Sea-Tac. Cayla Morgan, Environmental Protection Specialist, has worked for the Federal Aviation Administration for the past twenty years. She was involved in the last Part 150 for Sea-Tac, and has been involved with other Part 150 updates for other airports. Sharyn Parker, Noise Officer with King County Airport, was involved recently with King County Airport’s Part 150 Study, and is currently engaged in implementing the results of that study. JD Hood is a pilot with Horizon Airlines; this is his first Part 150 process.
Sea-Tac Airport Part 150 Study Update Page 2 Technical Review Committee Meeting #1 Report
-
Presentation of the Part 150 Study Process Rob Adams provided the Technical Review Committee with an introduction and overview of the Part 150 process. His presentation included background information on airport noise regulations; the elements of the Part 150 Study; a description of the various agencies, parties and their roles associated with the process; and an overview of the public participation program related to the Part 150. A copy of Rob’s presentation was provided to all committee members and is also available on the project website at: www.airportsites.net/sea-part150
Committee Questions and Discussion Rob had noted that the Federal Airport Noise and Capacity Act prohibits airports from imposing locally-based restrictions such as closing runways at specific times of the day. In response to a question, however, Rob said that a few airports – for example, Burbank and John Wayne – do have local restrictions that were in place prior to 1990, and were grandfathered in at those locations. Group members had questions about the noise exposure maps, and wondered if Landrum & Brown might be looking beyond a five year planning horizon. Rob responded that the study would likely be expanded to a ten-year noise exposure/forecast to be used for land use planning purposes only. During the discussion a TRC member wondered about the FAA’s role in the forecast, and Rob responded that the forecast is submitted to FAA for approval before it is used to guide the remainder of the Part 150 Study. Rob further noted that, while this Part 150 will certainly include a study of noise impacts from the third runway, any and all physical changes, such as new taxiways and holding pads, will also be examined. A member wondered how long a Part 150 Study maintained its validity, and Rob responded that the FAA suggests updating the Part 150 every five years or if significant changes in the operating environment occur. In response to a question, Rob said that Sea-Tac’s Fly Quiet Program is a good example of a measure that has been implemented as part of a noise compatibility program. There was some discussion about “Next Generation” technology for aircraft, and for newer landing approaches, etc. that are designed to create less noise impact. Stan responded that Sea-Tac was working on these technologies, but that they were unlikely to be integral to the Part 150 process because they generally do not benefit the 65 DNL. A committee member wondered why Stage 3 aircraft (quieter technology) would still generate peak noise above 65 DNL. Rob responded that
Sea-Tac Airport Part 150 Study Update Page 3 Technical Review Committee Meeting #1 Report
-
while Stage 3 aircraft are an improvement over older technology, they are not completely silent, and can still be the source of noise impacts. A group member wondered about single event analysis (the impacts of just one plane vs. multiple flights), and Rob responded that the measurement of single events would be a question to the public at the scoping meeting in late February. Rob’s presentation included information on the role of the FAA, the Port of Seattle, the consulting team, and the Technical Review Committee (TRC). The TRC will review elements of the Part 150, providing data to the study, reviewing the analysis, and offering technical feedback on noise mitigation measures. Although it is not a voting body, the comments of the TRC are important to the Part 150, and will be considered very carefully as the plan is being put together. The TRC will meet eight times throughout the course of the study. The consultant team will be in touch with TRC members soon (especially those who represent surrounding cities) to get comprehensive plans and zoning documents. The Port already has 25 noise monitors in place, and the team will be asking TRC members, as well as the general public, where temporary noise monitors should be placed. A robust public participation program is not only required by Part 150 regulations, but is critical to the overall success of the Part 150. A written public involvement plan will be developed over the next two weeks, and will include public meetings, briefings with small groups, interaction with the Highline Forum, a website, newsletters, and email updates to the general public. Six public meetings are scheduled throughout the Part 150 Study. In response to a TRC member question, Port staff said that the focus of the advertising for public meetings would be communities within the 65 DNL. The “Air Mail” newsletter is mailed to 33,000 households, an email listserv will be used for notification, advertising will be placed in the Seattle Times and Highline Times, and elected officials will be notified. The intent is to conduct the Part 150 Study in as open, transparent, and engaging way as much as possible. During the discussion, Rob made the point that the noise compatibility program would not pit one neighborhood against another, that is, we are not going to shift noise from one community to another.
Sea-Tac Airport Part 150 Study Update Page 4 Technical Review Committee Meeting #1 Report
-
Technical Review Committee Feedback The primary discussion question at this first Technical Review Committee meeting was: What are your recommendations on ways to make this Part 150 process as effective as possible? How do we achieve success? TRC members made a number of constructive suggestions: It is really difficult to have to explain the constraint about the 65 DNL to the
public. It is a very hard pill for the public to swallow, and it seems like such a narrow corridor. You really need to explain it well, and I recommend that you have a larger study area in the background as a companion to the Part 150. Please don’t have the “it’s not my problem” type of answer when you are trying to define and defend this with the public.
The Port has a very good story to tell about its noise mitigation program. The
public does not have a lot of awareness about this, for example, the effectiveness of the Fly Quiet program and the millions of dollars spent on noise insulation. You need to get this information out. Perhaps you could describe the Port of Seattle in comparison with other airports around the country, and share information about the programs you have put in place.
Be very clear at the outset of the study what you can and cannot do. Describe
the “box” that we live in, for example, we can’t just decide to close down the airport. It’s really important to manage expectations in this type of process –get that framework established early. Here’s what we can do given the data, the timeframe, and the money available.
Use the public participation program to provide the public with an education.
How do air traffic controllers operate, for example? Provide the bigger picture.
A lot of valuable information was provided in today’s presentation. This same
information should be provided to the public in a quick and concise manner. Recognize in the public process that there will be a great deal of anger about
the 3rd runway. It will be important to try to separate this from the Part 150. You do need to recognize that many of the issues that will be raised are outside the 65 DNL.
You’ll need to set a firm tone and groundrules at the very first public
meeting.
Sea-Tac Airport Part 150 Study Update Page 5 Technical Review Committee Meeting #1 Report
-
Sea-Tac Airport Part 150 Study Update Page 6 Technical Review Committee Meeting #1 Report
Don’t look beyond a 5-year framework. Too much can change in that time. For example, King County drew boundaries based on more than five years. Everything changed due to the bad economy, and now that airport has a boundary that doesn’t make any sense. Deal with the realities of the next five years.
In the noise remedy program, don’t distinguish between a rental unit and a
home or condo. We should be treating everyone equally – why should apartment dwellers be worse off because they can’t replace their windows?
Next Steps The first public workshop on the Part 150 is scheduled for February 24. TRC members will be receiving information about that meeting, as well as the detailed public participation plan that will be in place throughout the study. TRC members are strongly encouraged to attend the workshop. The website will also be activated soon. The next meeting of the Technical Review Committee will be held in mid-April; specific date to be announced.
-
SEATTLE-TACOMA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PART 150 NOISE COMPATIBILITY STUDY UPDATE FINAL
Landrum & Brown Appendix B – Technical Review Committee
October 2013
Technical Review Committee Meeting #2
April 15, 2010
Agenda Presentation
Meeting Summary
-
SEATTLE-TACOMA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PART 150 NOISE COMPATIBILITY STUDY UPDATE FINAL
Landrum & Brown Appendix B – Technical Review Committee
October 2013
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-
SEATTLE-TACOMA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PART 150 NOISE COMPATIBILITY STUDY UPDATE
Technical Review Committee
April 15, 2010 10:00 am - Noon
Seoul Conference Room --Meeting Agenda--
Meeting Facilitator: Margaret Norton-Arnold 10:00 Welcome – Let’s Get Started!
--Margaret
10:05 Review of February 24th Public Workshop --Rob Adams, Part 150 Project Manager
--Meeting Overview --Feedback on the Issues --Action Items
--Feedback on the Format of the Workshop
Question back to group: --Questions/comments about the public workshops?
10:30 Review of Baseline Operations Data --Rob Adams, Part 150 Project Manager --Vince Mestre, Landrum & Brown
--Description of Existing Condition Scenarios - Scenario 1: 2009 Actual (2 & 3 runway configurations) - Scenario 2: 2009 Extrapolated 3 runway configuration --Description of Operations Data
-
- Operating Levels and Aircraft Types - Noise Levels by Aircraft Type - Flight Track Data
- Runway Use Data - Ground Noise/Run up Data Question back to group: -- Are there other data sources that we should utilize to supplement what we have already?
- Measured Data from Port’s Noise Monitoring System
Question back to group: -- Suggestions for noise measurement locations or conditions?
Question back to group: -- Suggestions for improving the way we are displaying/presenting data?
11:30 Question and Answer
Noon Adjourn
-
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y 1
Part
15
0 P
rese
nta
tio
n
Tech
nic
al
Revie
w C
om
mit
tee
Ap
ril
15
, 2
01
0
Part
15
0 P
rese
nta
tio
nP
art
15
0 P
rese
nta
tio
n
Tech
nic
al
Revie
w C
om
mit
tee
Tech
nic
al
Revie
w C
om
mit
tee
Ap
ril
15
, 2
01
0A
pri
l 1
5,
20
10
Seatt
le T
aco
ma I
nte
rnati
on
al
Air
po
rt
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y 2
�W
elc
om
e a
nd
In
tro
du
ctio
ns
�R
evie
w o
f Feb
ruary
24
th P
ub
lic
Wo
rksh
op
�R
evie
w o
f B
ase
lin
e O
pera
tin
g D
ata
�Feed
back
fro
m C
om
mit
tee
Ag
en
da
Ag
en
da
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y 3
Revie
w o
f Feb
ruary
24
Revie
w o
f Feb
ruary
24
ththW
ork
sho
pW
ork
sho
p�
Hel
d a
t M
t. R
ainie
r H
igh S
chool in
Des
Moin
es-Appro
xim
atel
y 150 p
eople
att
ended
-Beg
an w
ith a
pre
senta
tion o
n P
art
150
-15 B
reak
out
stat
ions
wher
e peo
ple
wer
e in
vite
d t
o
pro
vide
direc
t in
put
to a
ssis
t in
ref
inin
g t
he
scope
-Bre
akout
sum
mar
y pro
vided
inst
ant
feed
bac
k-Ended
with a
Q&
A s
essi
on
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y 44
Bre
ako
ut
Sess
ion
Su
mm
ary
Bre
ako
ut
Sess
ion
Su
mm
ary
Way
s to
Red
uce
Noi
se
•Li
mits
on C
argo
•D
eal w
ith R
unups
•N
ew w
ays
to fund m
itig
atio
n o
uts
ide
65 D
NL
•Bet
ter
com
munity
pla
nnin
g e
ffort
•In
crea
se a
ltitudes
on a
rriv
al•
Curf
ews
on f
lights
•N
ois
e Ber
ms/
veget
atio
n•
Buyo
ut
or
sale
s as
sist
ance
•Sound insu
lation
•M
ove
airport
•Im
ple
men
t nois
e ab
atem
ent
•In
sula
tion b
y hom
eow
ner
s•
Quie
ter
airc
raft
at
nig
ht
•H
ush
house
•H
om
e im
pro
vem
ents
the
Port
can
mak
e•
Shar
e m
ore
info
rmat
ion a
bout
new
te
chnolo
gy
•N
ew m
onitors
for
3rd
runw
ay•
Tra
nsp
aren
cy a
bout
3rd
runw
ay•
Flig
ht
sched
ulin
g d
uring n
ightt
ime
•Bet
ter
adve
rtis
ing o
f outr
each
eve
nts
•Pl
ace
tax
on n
ightt
ime
pas
senger
s•
Look
at t
axiw
ay e
xits
•Allo
win
g d
ata
colle
cted
to b
e sh
ared
with
Port
/air
lines
•In
sula
ting t
o 5
5 D
NL
02
46
8
Nigh
ttim
e No
ise
3rd
Runw
ay
Runu
ps/g
roun
d no
ise
Heal
th is
sues
65 D
NL n
ot v
alid
Prop
erty
Val
ues
Mul
tiple
Ai
rcra
ft
Sing
le-
even
ts
Mos
t peo
ple
wer
e co
ncer
ned
abou
t...
Sing
le e
vent
noi
se v
s. m
ultip
le a
ircra
ft...
-
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y 55
Revie
w o
f Feb
ruary
24
Revie
w o
f Feb
ruary
24
ththW
ork
sho
pW
ork
sho
p�
Feed
bac
k on M
ain C
once
rns
-W
hat
conce
rns
peo
ple
-W
hat
info
rmat
ion t
hey
wan
t to
com
e fr
om
the
Stu
dy
-Sugges
tions
on w
ays
to r
educe
nois
e-W
ays
to b
ette
r co
mm
unic
ate
with t
hem
�Act
ion I
tem
s-D
evel
oped
a M
eeting S
um
mar
y-Rev
iew
ing t
he
input
to d
eter
min
e w
hat
can
or
can’t b
e im
ple
men
ted a
nd r
eport
ing b
ack
to t
he
public
-Pu
blis
h o
n t
he
web
site
and d
iscu
ss a
t th
e nex
t w
ork
shop
(June
9th)
�Fe
edbac
k on M
eeting F
orm
at-O
verw
hel
min
gly
posi
tive
-La
ter
star
t tim
e an
d incr
ease
adve
rtis
ing/n
otifica
tion
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y 6
�Exis
tin
g C
on
dit
ion
s:
-Sce
nar
io 1
: Act
ual
2009 C
onditio
ns
-Com
bin
atio
n o
f 2 a
nd 3
runw
ay c
onfigura
tions
-Rep
rese
nts
what
act
ual
ly o
ccurr
ed d
uring 2
009
-Sce
nar
io 2
: 2009 E
xtra
pola
ted 3
Runw
ay C
onfigura
tion
-Rep
rese
nts
what
would
hav
e hap
pen
ed in 2
009 w
ith a
3
runw
ay c
onfigura
tion
-Pro
vides
a b
ette
r in
dic
atio
n o
f w
hat
the
‘typ
ical
’ oper
atin
g
mode
will
be
�Fu
ture
Base
lin
e C
on
dit
ion
s:-
2016 O
per
atin
g lev
els
and a
ircr
aft
types
-O
ther
fac
tors
, su
ch a
s lo
cation o
f flig
ht
trac
ks a
nd h
ow
oft
en e
ach r
unw
ay is
use
d,
will
be
the
sam
e as
exi
stin
g-
Provi
des
a 3
runw
ay b
asel
ine
with f
utu
re o
per
atin
g lev
els
to
beg
in d
evel
opin
g w
ays
to r
educe
nois
e.
Base
lin
e O
pera
tio
ns
Data
Base
lin
e O
pera
tio
ns
Data
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y 7
�Exis
tin
g C
on
dit
ion
s:
-S
ou
rce:
Cal
endar
yea
r 2009 d
ata
from
Airport
Nois
e an
d
Oper
atio
ns
Monitoring S
yste
m (
AN
OM
S)
and F
AA
-A
nn
ual
Op
era
tio
ns:
318,6
00 (
873 a
vera
ge
annual
day
)-
Fle
et
Mix
:-
Boei
ng 7
37 “
Nex
t G
en”
are
the
most
com
mon a
ircr
aft
-Boei
ng 7
47-4
00 is
the
larg
est
airc
raft
�Fu
ture
Base
lin
e C
on
dit
ion
s:-
Fore
cast
of Avi
atio
n A
ctiv
ity
under
way
-W
ill incl
ude
chan
ges
in o
per
atin
g lev
els
and f
leet
mix
Base
lin
e D
ata
: O
pera
tio
ns
Base
lin
e D
ata
: O
pera
tio
ns
SEA
Part
15
0 N
ois
e C
om
pati
bil
ity S
tud
y 8
Base
lin
e D
ata
: O
pera
tio
ns
Base
lin
e D
ata
: O
pera
tio
ns
050
100
150
200
250
300
Tota
l Ope
ratio
ns in
200
9: 3
18,6
00A
vera
ge O
pera
tions
per