“translating concrete capability requirements into capability … · 2019-08-09 · nato...
TRANSCRIPT
1 NATO UNCLASSIFIED
COL George J. Beldecos, Hellenic Air Force
ACT IRM NSIP Branch
“Translating Concrete Capability Requirements into Capability Packages”
Supreme Allied Commander Transformation
NATO UNCLASSIFIED
2 NATO UNCLASSIFIED
ACT/IRM/NSIP Branch
Participate actively in the transformational effort
by delivering a wide range of capabilities,
through the development of Capability Packages,
in an approach commensurate
(in time, cost, and effectiveness)
with the concrete capability requirements
of a changing security environment,
in accordance with NATO’s Level of Ambition
and mission requirements.
3 NATO UNCLASSIFIED
Agenda
• Main CPs currently under development
• Air Basing, Maritime and POL CPs
• CPs to be derived from the NDPP process.
4 NATO UNCLASSIFIED
ACT/NSIP
Main CPs under development
Number/Title Part I (Requirements
Definition)
Part II (Consolidated
Resource
Proposal)
Estimated
Submission
Remarks
CP 0A1303 Rev1
Ballistic Missile Defence
Jul. 2012 Under devt Dec 2012
CP 9A0130
Satellite Communications
Transmission Services
Mar. 2007
Mar. 2011
Under devt Nov 2012 CP on hold (2007-11)
until SATCOM
Strategy approval by
MC.
CP 0A0149 R01
NATO Deployable C2
Assets
Under devt Feb. 2013
CP 9C0102
Service Management and
Control
Mar. 2012 Under devt TBD Awaiting for NATO
SMC Policy
5 NATO UNCLASSIFIED
CP 0A1303 Rev1
Ballistic Missile Defence
• Rev1 for BMD will expand the scope of NATO’s current Active Layered Theatre Ballistic Missile
Defence programme’s C3 capabilities beyond the protection of NATO deployed forces to also
protect NATO European populations, territory and forces, as decided by the Heads of State and
Government during the Lisbon Summit.
• The revised CP will provide the Battle Management C3I (BMC3I) capability. Only this part of the
programme is eligible for NATO common funding.
• The MCR for BMD were produced by ACT in 2011. The NATO Staff Requirements (NSR) are
expected to be approved by the CNAD in Nov 2012.
• Estimated date of submission: Dec 2012
• Estimated date of approval: Apr 2013
• Estimated NSIP Budget: 400 MEUR
6 NATO UNCLASSIFIED
CP 9A0130
SATCOM Services
• Estimated date of submission: Nov 2012
• Estimated date of approval: Apr 2013
• Estimated NSIP Budget: 1,000+ MEUR
(spread yearly up to 2034)
• CP 9A0130 will provide satellite communications services in support of NATO’s permanent missions and operations, as defined in the LoA, and according to the guidelines set forth in the Strategy for the provision of SATCOM (MC-576), approved in June 2011.
• The CP will provide space capacity in a mix of survivable, protected and assured wide band - narrow-band, and commercial services; static and deployable ground assets; management and control services; and life-cycle facilities.
• SATCOM is an enabling capability for some of the Lisbon Critical Capabilities
(AMN, JISR, AGS, ACCS, Bi-SC AIS, ALTBMD)
7 NATO UNCLASSIFIED
CP 0A0149 R01
NATO Deployable C2 Assets
• RO1 of the CP will provide comprehensive Deployable Communications and
Information System (DCIS) capability in order to satisfy the requirements to deploy and
sustain forces for NATO-led operations.
• The capability implementation must
be flexible and modular in order to
tailor the DCIS support to specific
mission needs.
• DCIS resources will need to be
available at the appropriate
readiness states and survivable and
able to operate in adverse electronic,
climatic, geographic, land or sea-
based operational environments.
• Estimated date of submission: Apr. 2013
• Estimated date of approval: Jul. 2014
• Estimated NSIP Budget: 168+ MEUR
8 NATO UNCLASSIFIED
CP 9C0102
Service Management and Control
• IAW the NATO LoA, there is a need to be capable of managing CIS service delivery
and support for multiple simultaneous missions, conducted at locations separated by
distances extending from NATO territory to strategic distances and beyond.
SMC Implementation
SMC Integration and Architecture
Process and Change Management
Support
Enterprise-Wide SMC Tool
Implementation
Domain-Specific SMC Tool
Implementation
Network Service Management
InfoSec Service Management
IS Infrastructure Management
System/Service-Specific SMC Tool
Implementation
Router
Management
IDS Management
Storage Management
Virtualisation Management
• This CP provides the capability to
deliver and sustain all required NATO
CIS services and rapidly restore
critical services in the event of failure
or disruption.
• Estimated date of Submission: TBD
(pending NATO SMC Policy, currently under development by NHQC3S)
9 NATO UNCLASSIFIED
IMSM-0248-2011, 25 May 2011
Request to resubmit AIR BASING CPs after CRR12
9A1301 “Air to Air Refueling Assets”
9A1304 “Multipurpose Air Assets in SACEUR’s AOR”
9A1385 “Defensive and Offensive Air Assets in SACEUR’ AOR”
9A0951 “Air Transport Assets in SACEUR’s AOR”
A0951A01 “Air Transport Assets in SACEUR’s AOR-Tactical”
Request to resubmit POL CPs after CRR12
9A0980 “Bulk Fuel Assets in the Northern Area of NATO”
9A0990 “Bulk Fuel Assets in the Southern Area of NATO”
Air Basing and POL CPs
12 NATO UNCLASSIFIED
Air Basing Selection is harmonised with NDPP.
Airbases required to meet MCR will be selected
by the SCs in a resource efficient manner and
presented to the MC for endorsement.
Offers
Requirements
Methodology Selected
Airbases
Output
MCR
Quantitative
Selection
Methodology
Comparison
CPs
Air Basing Selection
Qualitative
Data
15 NATO UNCLASSIFIED
“Logistic Support and Resupply Facilities for
Multinational Maritime Forces in the Southern Region”
• Piers
• Ammunition and fuel facilities
• Battle Damage Repair (BDR)
• NATO Naval Forces Sensor and Weapons
Accuracy Check Sites (FORACS)
CP 3A0013
16 NATO UNCLASSIFIED
MCM-0066-2010 on CP 3A0013
• Defer enhancements to the maritime
infrastructure.
• Defer all maritime POL-related projects.
• Over and above maritime infrastructure
requirements to be freshly assessed in the
NDPP and CRR 2012.
17 NATO UNCLASSIFIED
MCR Maritime Capabilities
• Quantitative requirements generally
unchanged from DRR07 (some exceptions).
• MCR did not produce requirements for
ashore logistics support to maritime forces.
• Further work needed to identify maritime
bases.
19 NATO UNCLASSIFIED
Existing POL CPs
Very Old (but still extant) Submitted, but stalled
since 2007 CP 2A0013 ‘Provide and Maintain Dedicated / Secure Bulk
Fuel Supply - Central Region (Less BALTAP) approved 12
Jan 1996
CP 2A0013 Add 1 approved 10 Dec 1997
CP 2A0013 Add 2 approved 29 Oct 1999
CP 9A0980 “Bulk Fuel Assets in the
Northern Area of NATO”
(submitted Sep 2007)
CP 2A0014 ‘Provide Dedicated / Secure Military Bulk Fuel
Supply to BALTAP Area of Northern Region’ approved 11
Feb 2000
CP 3A0023 ‘Restore NATO Pipeline Systems in the
Southern Region’ approved 7 Apr 1997
CP 9A0990 “Bulk Fuel Assets in the
Southern Area of NATO”
(submitted 6 Feb 2007)
CP 3A0023 Add 1 approved 1 Apr 2002
20 NATO UNCLASSIFIED
MCR POL Capabilities
• Further work required to support the re-validation of the
requirement currently being met by the bulk fuel CPs.
• Once the airbases and maritime bases have been
selected, the quantities of POL can then be identified
using the scenario analysis information.
• This will enable POL storage and transport
requirements to be determined.
21 NATO UNCLASSIFIED
• Type of Fuel
F-34: Aviation Fuel - NATO ‘Single’ Fuel
F-44: Maritime Aviation Fuel
F-76: Naval Fuel for ships
• Quantity of Fuel
Daily rate of Consumption
Storage required (according to logistic policy)
• Readiness of Fuel
Related to the NTM of the Assets requiring it
POL Requirements
22 NATO UNCLASSIFIED
NATO Bulk
Fuel Strategy
Military Logistic Resources
The Military Capability
Requirement :
How much fuel to be
stored and where
How much to be delivered
to:
Airbase locations
Maritime locations
Land locations
at what rate
Proposes the most
effective technical method
of meeting the Military
Requirement:
Adds to this additional
infrastructure for:
Alternate connections
and elements for
redundancy
System elements for
political Energy
Security
The most effective way
of paying for the system
proposed by Military and
Logistic pillars. Options
include:
NSIP, but with
greater efficiency
Host Nation
ownership with
NATO usage costs
Commercial
ownership and
operation
23 NATO UNCLASSIFIED
NATO Defence Planning Process
(NDPP) Establish
Political
Guidance
Determine
Requirements
Apportion
Requirements
Set Targets
Facilitate
Implementation
Review
Results Improving
Alliance
Capabilities
STEP 1
Establish
Political
Guidance
STEP 2
Determine
Capability
Requirements
STEP 4
Facilitate
Implementation
STEP 5
Review
Results
STEP 3
Apportion
Requirements/ Set Targets
24 NATO UNCLASSIFIED
NDPP Step 3
Apportion Requirements /
Set Targets
Distribute MCR throughout
Distribute MCR throughout
Alliance
Nations (individual &
multinational targets)
NATO – Collective capability
targets
Fair burden sharing
Emphasis on priority shortfalls
Nations review & discuss
Target packages revised to
account for reasonable
challenge
Approved in multilateral forum
via consensus “minus one”
Establish
Political
Guidance
Determine
Requirements
Apportion
Requirements
Set Targets
Facilitate
Implementation
Review
Results Improving
Alliance
Capabilities
26 NATO UNCLASSIFIED
CONCLUSION
Success in the complex endeavour
to deliver the required concrete capabilities
through the development of new Capability Packages,
may only be achieved
with the full involvement of Nations
in a collaborative, traceable and transparent manner.
27 NATO UNCLASSIFIED
NCS – related CPs
• CP 2A0180-REV1 “NATO Command Facilities for JF HQ Brunsum”
• CP 5A0148 “NATO Command Facilities for JF HQ Naples”
• CP 5A0149 “NATO Command Facilities for LANDCOM Izmir”
• CP 9C0101 “Relocation of NCIS from Latina (ITA) to Oeiras (PRT)”
Backed by a Political Decision
and the willingness of all Nations to support them,
they were approved in less than a year from their initiation.