antitrust in the pharmaceutical industry: an introduction to brand-generic competition scott...
TRANSCRIPT
Antitrust in the Pharmaceutical Industry: An Introduction to Brand-Generic Competition
Scott HemphillNew York State Office of the Attorney General
George Mason UniversityMay 3, 2012
Source: Frank and Hartman (2009)
Dol
lars
per
Ext
ende
d U
nit
Average price of fluoxetine before and after generic entry
GENERIC ENTRY LOWERS PRICES
Effective market life and nominal patent term by drug,for drugs with challenges
Source: Hemphill and Sampat, Evergreening, Patent Challenges, and Effective Market Life in Pharmaceuticals, Journal of Health Economics (2012)Note: NMEs with first generic entry 2001-2010
EVEN WITH A CHALLENGE, BRAND-NAME DRUGS ENJOY SUBSTANTIAL EXCLUSIVITY
Brand wins
34Active ingredient (AI) patent
34Non-AI patent
Outcome by patent type
Generic wins
5
57
Source: Hemphill, Sampat and Tilipman (working paper 2012)Notes: drugs first eligible for challenge 2000-2010; excludes pending cases
LITIGATION OUTCOMES VARY BY PATENT TYPE
brand only brand + generic
Entry
Patent expiresLitigation ends
brand + genericbrand onlyLitigation
Settlement
PAYMENT ALTERS THE SETTLEMENT BARGAIN
$
$$
$$$
Source: Hemphill, Paying for Delay: Pharmaceutical Patent Settlement as a Regulatory Design Problem, NYU Law Review (2006)
Brand wins
34Active ingredient (AI) patent
34Non-AI patent
Outcome by patent type
Generic wins
5
57
Settles
28[40%]
133[60%]
Source: Hemphill, Sampat and Tilipman (working paper 2012)Notes: drugs first eligible for challenge 2000-2010; excludes pending cases
FOR WEAK PATENTS, THE PAY-FOR-DELAY INCENTIVE IS STRONGER
FOR WEAK PATENTS, THE PAY-FOR-DELAY INCENTIVE IS STRONGER
Source: Hemphill, Sampat and Tilipman (working paper 2012)Notes: drugs first eligible for challenge 2000-2010; excludes pending cases
brand only brand + generic
CompetitionLitigation
Settlement
Source: Hemphill, Paying for Delay: Pharmaceutical Patent Settlement as a Regulatory Design Problem, NYU Law Review (2006)
SETTLEMENT WITH “RETAINED EXCLUSIVITY” PRESENTS A FURTHER HARM
CONCLUSIONS
Generic challenges shorten brand exclusivity, but only somewhat
Patent type matters: “non-AI” patents are where the action is
The 180-day bounty matters: its effect on incentives is central to any realistic theory of settlement