antennas and receivers in radio astronomy2 eleventh synthesis imaging workshop, june 10-17, 2008...
TRANSCRIPT
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging WorkshopSocorro, June 10-17, 2008
Antennas and Receivers in
Radio Astronomy
Mark McKinnon
2
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop, June 10-17, 2008
Outline
• Context• Types of antennas• Antenna fundamentals• Reflector antennas
– Mounts– Optics
• Antenna performance– Aperture efficiency– Pointing – Polarization
• Receivers
3
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop, June 10-17, 2008
• Antenna amplitude pattern causes amplitude to vary across the source.
• Antenna phase pattern causes phase to vary across the source.
• Polarization properties of the antenna modify the apparent polarization of the source.
• Antenna pointing errors can cause time varying amplitude and phase errors.
• Variation in noise pickup from the ground can cause time variable amplitude errors.
• Deformations of the antenna surface can cause amplitude and phase errors, especially at short wavelengths.
Importance of the Antenna Elements
4
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop, June 10-17, 2008
VLA @ 4.8 GHz (C-band) Interferometer Block Diagram
Antenna
Front End
IF
Back End
Correlator
KeyAmplifier
Mixer
X Correlator
5
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop, June 10-17, 2008
Types of Antennas
• Wire antennas– Dipole– Yagi– Helix– Small arrays of the above
• Reflector antennas• Hybrid antennas
– Wire reflectors– Reflectors with dipole
feeds
m)1( >λYagi
Helix
m)1( <λm)1( ≈λ
6
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop, June 10-17, 2008
Basic Antenna FormulasEffective collecting area A(ν,θ,φ) m2
On-axis response A0 = ηAη = aperture efficiency
Normalized pattern(primary beam)A(ν,θ,φ) = A(ν,θ,φ)/A0
Beam solid angle ΩA= ∫∫ A(ν,θ,φ) dΩ
all sky
A0 ΩA = λ2
λ = wavelength, ν = frequency
ΔΩΔ= ννφθνφθνφθ ),,(),,(),,( IAP
7
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop, June 10-17, 2008
What determines the beam shape?
f(u,v) = complex aperture field distributionu,v = aperture coordinates (wavelengths)
F(l,m) = complex far-field voltage patternl = sinθcosφ , m = sinθsinφ
F(l,m) = ∫∫aperturef(u,v)exp(2πi(ul+vm))dudv
f(u,v) = ∫∫hemisphereF(l,m)exp(-2πi(ul+vm))dldm
For VLA: θ3dB = 1.02/D, First null = 1.22/D, D = reflector diameter in wavelengths
Aperture-Beam Fourier Transform Relationship
8
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop, June 10-17, 2008
Antenna Mounts: Altitude over Azimuth
• Advantages– Cost – Gravity performance
• Disadvantages– Zone of avoidance – Beam rotates on sky
9
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop, June 10-17, 2008
Parallactic angle
Beam Rotation on the Sky
10
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop, June 10-17, 2008
Antenna Mounts: Equatorial
• Advantages– Tracking accuracy– Beam doesn’t rotate
• Disadvantages– Cost– Gravity performance– Sources on horizon at
pole
11
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop, June 10-17, 2008
Prime focus Cassegrain focus
Offset Cassegrain Naysmith
Beam Waveguide Dual Offset
Reflector Optics
12
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop, June 10-17, 2008
Reflector Optics: Limitations
• Prime focus– Over-illumination (spillover) can increase system temperature
due to ground pick-up– Number of receivers, and access to them, is limited
• Subreflector systems– Can limit low frequency capability. Feed horn too large.– Over-illumination by feed horn can exceed gain of reflector’s
diffraction limited sidelobes• Strong sources a few degrees away may limit image dynamic range
• Offset optics– Support structure of offset feed is complex and expensive
13
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop, June 10-17, 2008
Prime focus Cassegrain focus(GMRT) (AT)
Offset Cassegrain Naysmith(VLA) (OVRO)
Beam Waveguide Dual Offset(NRO) (GBT)
Reflector Optics: Examples
14
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop, June 10-17, 2008
Feed Systems
VLA
EVLA
GBT
15
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop, June 10-17, 2008
Antenna Performance: Aperture Efficiency
On axis response: A0 = ηAEfficiency: η = ηsf × ηbl × ηs × ηt × ηmisc
ηsf = Reflector surface efficiencyDue to imperfections in reflector surfaceηsf = exp(−(4πσ/λ)2) e.g., σ = λ/16 , ηsf = 0.5
ηbl = Blockage efficiencyCaused by subreflector and its support structure
ηs = Feed spillover efficiencyFraction of power radiated by feed intercepted by subreflector
ηt = Feed illumination efficiencyOuter parts of reflector illuminated at lower level than inner part
ηmisc= Reflector diffraction, feed position phase errors, feed match and loss
rms error σ
16
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop, June 10-17, 2008
Primary Beam
l=sin(θ), D = antenna diameter in contours:−3,−6,−10,−15,−20,−25,wavelengths −30,−35,−40 dB
dB = 10log(power ratio) = 20log(voltage ratio)VLA: θ3dB = 1.02/D, First null = 1.22/D Voltage radiation pattern, |F(l,m)|
πDl
Antenna Performance: Aperture Efficiency
17
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop, June 10-17, 2008
Subreflectormount
Quadrupod
El encoder
Reflector structure
Alidade structure
Rail flatness
Az encoder
Foundation
Antenna Pointing: Practical Considerations
18
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop, June 10-17, 2008
Pointing AccuracyΔθ = rms pointing error
Often Δθ < θ3dB /10 acceptable,because A(θ3dB /10) ~ 0.97
BUT, at half power point in beamA(θ3dB /2 ± θ3dB /10)/A(θ3dB /2) = ±0.3
For best VLA pointing use Reference Pointing. Δθ = 3 arcsec = θ3dB /17 @ 50 GHz
Δθ
θ3dB
Primary beam A(θ)
Antenna Performance: Pointing
19
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop, June 10-17, 2008
Antenna can modify the apparent polarization properties of the source:
• Antenna structure– Symmetry of the optics – Reflections in the optics– Curvature of the reflectors
• Quality of feed polarization splitter– Constant across the beam
• Circularity of feed radiation patterns– No instrumental polarization on-axis,– But cross-polarization varies across the beam …
Antenna Performance: Polarization
20
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop, June 10-17, 2008
VLA 4.8 GHz cross-polarizedprimary beam
Off-Axis Cross Polarization
Cross-polarized aperture distribution
Cross-polarizedprimary beam
Field distribution in aperture of paraboloid fed by electric dipole
21
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop, June 10-17, 2008
• Reference received power to the equivalent temperature of a matched load at the input to the receiver
• Rayleigh-Jeans approximation to Planck radiation law for a blackbody
Pin = kBT Δν (W)
kB = Boltzman’s constant (1.38*10-23 J/oK)
• When observing a radio source, Ttotal = TA + Tsys– Tsys = system noise when not looking at a discrete radio source– TA = source antenna temperature
Receiver
Gain GB/W Δν
Matched load @ temp T (oK) Pout=G*Pin
Pin
Receivers: Noise Temperature
22
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop, June 10-17, 2008
TA = ηAS/(2kB) = KS
S = source flux (Jy)
SEFD = system equivalent flux density
SEFD = Tsys/K (Jy)
129078.3440-5083658.3926-4060655.5118-2638537.5412-1831131.568-1226228.604-824527.622-423621.501-2 SEFDTsysηBand (GHz)
EVLA Sensitivities
Receivers: SEFD
23
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop, June 10-17, 2008
EVLA Q-Band (40-50 GHz) Receiver
LO
Ref
35dB
RC
P IF
Out
8-18
GH
z
40-50GHz
NoiseDiodePol
LNA
Old
New
x3
Dewar
NRAOCDL
35dB
LNA
NRAOCDL
Dorado4IWC45-1
PamtechKYG2121-K2
(w/g)
Noise/COMNC 5222
ENR > 20 dB
LC
P IF
Out
8-18
GH
z16
-19.
5 G
Hz
IsolatorMica
T-610S1010-20 GHz
PA8207-2F16.0-19.3 GHz
Magic-TMDL
22TH12B
RCP
LCP
TCal
0∀3
dBmVariable
AttenuatorNRAO
DC-BlockInmet8055H
0.01-18 GHz
IsolatorMICA
T-708S408-18 GHz
24dB
AtlanticMicrowaveAMC 1233
Septum Polarizer& Cal Coupler
IsolatorDorado
4IWN45-1A(UG38 → UG599)
Tripler/Mixer Assembly Spacek
3XM45-8.4-0.1L/RRF=40-50 GHz
Post-AmpModuleCaltech
3XM45-8.4-0.1L/RRF=40-50 GHz
Limiting LO AmplifierNorden
N03-4010
16.0-19.5 GHzPOut = 21.0 ± 0.5 dBm
for ±6 dBm input
x3
DC-BlockInmet8055H
0.01-18 GHz
IsolatorMICA
T-708S408-18 GHz
24dB
IsolatorDorado
4IWN45-1A(UG38 → UG599)
Tripler/Mixer Assembly Spacek
3XM45-8.4-0.1L/RRF=40-50 GHz
Post-AmpModuleCaltech
3XM45-8.4-0.1L/RRF=40-50 GHz
IsolatorDitom
D3I75107.5-10 GHz
Integrated
18 dBm
LO SplitterMAC Tech
40-50 GHz
Remove
Some New
TCal
24
Eleventh Synthesis Imaging Workshop, June 10-17, 2008
Equation 3-8: replace u,v with l,mFigure 3-7: abscissa title should be πDl
Corrections to Chapter 3 of Synthesis Imaging in Radio Astronomy II