annual report of the district’s educational … report of the district’s educational performance...

30
Annual Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, 2017 DIVISION OF CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT

Upload: nguyenxuyen

Post on 05-May-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

1

Annual Report of the District’s Educational Performance and

the Texas Academic Performance Report

FEBRUARY 9, 2017DIVISION OF CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT

Page 2: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

What is the Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)?

• Annual report produced by Texas Education Agency that includes state, district, and school level data

• Data disaggregated by: – Ethnicity – Economically Disadvantaged– English Language Learner – Special Education

2

Page 3: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

Why a Public Hearing?

Required by Texas Education Code Chapter 39, Section 39.056. This requirement includes that each district’s board of trustees publish an annual report that includes the TAPR. A public hearing must be held within 90 days of release (released November 30, 2016) and notification to the public must be given.

3

Page 4: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

Spring ISD(N=36,813)

State(N=5,284,252)

SISD, Region 4, and State Enrollmentby Race/Ethnicity 2015-2016

4

African American(N=14,831)

40.3%

American Indian

(N=662)1.8%

Asian(N=1,189)

3.2%

Hispanic(N=15,888)

43.2%

Pacific Islander(N=148)

0.4%

Two or More

(N=536) 1.5%

White(N=3,559)

9.7%

African American

12.6%

American Indian0.4%

Asian4.0%

Hispanic52.3%

Pacific Islander

0.1%

Two or More2.1%

White28.5%

Region 4(N=1,190,725)

African American

(N= 223,680 ) 18.8%

American Indian

(N= 5,532 ) 0.5%

Asian(N= 80,056 )

6.7%

Hispanic(N= 598,419 )

50.3%Pacific

Islander(N= 1,452 )

0.1%

Two or More(N= 21,175 )

1.8% White(N= 260,411 )

21.9%

Page 5: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

59.0%

41.0%

70.6%

29.4%

Spring ISD

State

SISD, Region 4 , and State Enrollmentby Economically Disadvantaged Status2015-2016

5

58.3%

41.7%

Region 4

Economically Disadvantaged

Non-Economically Disadvantaged

Page 6: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

74 78

69

80 7873 76

69

79 77

65 66 62

71 72

63 64 60

68 7069

75

64

76 74

68 73

64

75 73

86 88

82

91 8884 85 80

88 8691 95 91 95 9391 94 90 94 92

0

20

40

60

80

100

Reading Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies

Perc

ent M

et S

tand

ard

All Students Region 4 All Students State African American Region 4 African American State Hispanic Region 4Hispanic State White Region 4 White State Asian Region 4 Asian State

62 64 59

69 69

56 56 51

63 6565*

68*

61* 71

*

68*73 76 70

81 7580 86 80 84 91*

0

20

40

60

80

100

Reading Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies

Perc

ent M

et S

tand

ard

All Students African American Hispanic White Asian

SISD, Region 4, and State STAAR and STAAR EOC Percent at Level II Satisfactory Standard or Aboveby Student Group, All Grades, 2016

6

Spring ISD

Region 4/State†

*Spring ISD value is within five points of Region 4 and/or state value†Darker colors represent Region 4 values, lighter bars represent values for the state

Page 7: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

SISD, Region 4, and State STAAR and STAAR EOC Percent at Level II Satisfactory Standard or Aboveby Student Group, All Grades, 2016

7

*Spring ISD value is within five points of Region 4 and/or state value

64

57

67*

75

84

33

62*

56*

76

66

72

87

93

40

68

56

75

64

70

85

92

39

67

57

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

All Students AfricanAmerican

Hispanic White Asian SpecialEducation

EconomicallyDisadvantaged

EnglishLanguageLearners

Perc

ent M

et S

tand

ard

SISD Region 4 State

Page 8: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

SISD, Region 4, and State STAAR and STAAR EOC Percent at Advanced Standardby Student Group, All Subjects, 2015 and 2016

8

*Spring ISD value is within five points of Region 4 and/or state value

8 9

5* 6* 8* 10*

16 16

27

30

1* 5* 6* 8* 7* 9*

18 19

9 10 12 14

30 31

45

48

4

6

10 12

7 10

16 18

8 9 11 13

25 26

44

48

4

6

9 11

6

9

0

20

40

60

80

100

2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016

All Students AfricanAmerican

Hispanic White Asian SpecialEducation

EconomicDisadvantage

ELL

Perc

ent M

et L

evel

III A

dvan

ced

SISD Region 4 State

Page 9: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

SISD and State STAAR and STAAR EOC Percent Met or Exceeded 2016 Progress Measuresby Student Group, All Grades, 2016

9

*Spring ISD is within five points of the state**Spring ISD is at or higher than the state†Darker bars represent the percentage who met or exceeded the progress measure, lighter bars represent the percentage who exceeded the progress measure

59*

56 59**

54* 59

*

55 58* 62

* 64

69

16*

12* 16

**

10*

17**

13*

14*

13

18*

24

60

63

58 58 59 61 63

67

71

81

16 17 15 13

16 16 16

19

22

37

0

20

40

60

80

100

Reading Math Reading Math Reading Math Reading Math Reading Math

All Students African American Hispanic White Asian

Perc

ent M

et o

r Exc

eede

d Pr

ogre

ss

SISD Met or Exceeded SISD Exceeded State Met or Exceeded State Exceeded

Page 10: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

74 76 76 75 69

81 86

75 71 75 72 72 69

88 83 77

65

73 75 75 73 69

81 86

74 69 72 71 69 69

87 82 75

63

0

20

40

60

80

100

Rea

ding

Mat

hem

atic

s

Rea

ding

Mat

hem

atic

s

Writ

ing

Rea

ding

Mat

hem

atic

s

Scie

nce

Rea

ding

Mat

hem

atic

s

Rea

ding

Mat

hem

atic

s

Writ

ing

Rea

ding

Mat

hem

atic

s

Scie

nce

Soci

al S

tudi

es

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8Region 4 State

SISD, Region 4, and State STAAR 3-8 Percent Met Level II Satisfactory Standard or Aboveby Grade Level, 2016

10

Spring ISD

Region 4/State

Perc

ent o

f Stu

dent

s

*Spring ISD value is within five points of Region 4 and/or state value

62 61

67

61 61

73 78

62 61 62 61 59 56

80

77*

67

50

0

20

40

60

80

100

Page 11: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

*Spring ISD value is within five points of Region 4 and/or state value

SISD, Region 4, and State STAAR EOC Level II Satisfactory Standard or Aboveby Student Group, All Grades, 2016

11

65 67

78

87 91

57 58

67

82

87

60 62

75

85

90

78

83

88

95 96

88 87

96 97 97

65 67

78

87 91

56 57

67

81

86

60 61

75

85 89

80 81

86

94 95

87 85

95 96 96

0

20

40

60

80

100

Engl

ish

I

Engl

ish

II

Alg

ebra

I

Bio

logy

US

His

tory

Engl

ish

I

Engl

ish

II

Alg

ebra

I

Bio

logy

US

His

tory

Engl

ish

I

Engl

ish

II

Alg

ebra

I

Bio

logy

US

His

tory

Engl

ish

I

Engl

ish

II

Alg

ebra

I

Bio

logy

US

His

tory

Engl

ish

I

Engl

ish

II

Alg

ebra

I

Bio

logy

US

His

tory

All Students African American Hispanic White Asian

Perc

ent M

et S

tand

ard

Region 4 State

54 50

56

76

86

51*

47

52

72

83*

54 51

57

77

87*

65

60

68

85 92*

81

70

85 88

97

0

20

40

60

80

100

Perc

ent M

et S

tand

ard

SISD

Reg

ion

4/

Stat

e

Page 12: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

SISD, Region 4, and State AP/IB ResultsClass of 2014 and Class of 2015Percent Tested and Percentage of Scores ≥ Criterion

12

14.7 16.522.7 16.7

24.8 26.2

55.052.6

23.5 24.9

51.3 49.1

0

20

40

60

80

100

2014 2015

Perc

ent

SISD Percent Tested SISD AP/IB Scores ≥ CriterionRegion 4 Percent Tested Region 4 AP/IB Scores ≥ CriterionState Percent Tested State AP/IB Scores ≥ Criterion

Note. Solid lines represent the percentage of students who took the exam(s), dashed lines represent the percentage of students’ scores that are at or above criterion (for AP tests a 3 or higher, for IB tests a 4 or higher). Spring ISD does not currently offer International Baccalaureate (IB) testing.

Page 13: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

SISD and State SAT/ACT ResultsClass of 2014 and Class of 2015Percent Tested by Student Group

13

*Spring ISD value is within five points of the state value**Spring ISD is at or higher than the stateNote. According to TAPR, the SAT/ACT participation data for Asian students in the class of 2014 was outside of a normal range, therefore it was not reported.

97.6

**

95.9

**

99.6

**

96.5

**

95.1

**

95.2

**

97.1

**

94.0

**

0.0

100.

0**

66.3 68

.3

69.7 71

.9

60.9 63

.7 69.1

70.1

91.7

92.7

0

20

40

60

80

100

2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015

All Students African American Hispanic White Asian

Perc

ent o

f Gra

duat

es T

este

d

SISD State

Page 14: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

SISD and State SAT ResultsClass of 2015Average Test Scores by Student Group

14

Note. The maximum score possible for English Language Arts was 1600 (Critical Reading and Writing combined); the maximum score possible for Mathematics was 800.

764

399

737

379

754

397

853

443

852

477

912

482

813

422

839

447

1017

531

1059

583

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

ELA Math ELA Math ELA Math ELA Math ELA Math

All Students African American Hispanic White Asian

Ave

rage

SA

T Sc

ore

SISD State

Maximum ELA Score

Maximum Math Score

Page 15: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

SISD and State ACT ResultsClass of 2015Average Test Scores by Student Group

15

*Spring ISD value is within five points of the state value**Spring ISD is at or higher than the stateNote. The maximum score possible for each subtest on the ACT is 36.

17.4

*

18.3

*

18.4

*

15.9

*

16.9

*

17.3

*

17.9

**

18.7

*

18.5

* 21.2

*

21.6

*

21.4

*

20.5

* 22.0

*

21.0

*

20.1 20

.9

20.7

16.8 17

.8

17.8

17.6 19

.0

18.9

22.9

23.0

23.0 24

.5 26.2

24.8

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28

32

36

ELA Math Science ELA Math Science ELA Math Science ELA Math Science ELA Math Science

All Students African American Hispanic White Asian

Ave

rage

AC

T Sc

ore

SISD State

Page 16: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

Advanced Course/Dual Credit Course Completion2014-2015Grades 11-12, Any Subject

16

*SISD value is within five points of Region 4 and/or state value**Spring ISD is at or higher than Region 4 and/or the state

49.6

*

46.2

** 49.3

* 54.0

76.0

9.0

47.3

**

20.7

56.0

47.5 50

.9

63.2

82.6

15.0

49.1

28.2

54.5

45.2 50

.4

60.5

81.5

14.4

46.9

31.4

0

20

40

60

80

100

All Students AfricanAmerican

Hispanic White Asian SpecialEducation

EconomicallyDisadvantaged

EnglishLanguageLearners

Adv

ance

d/D

ual C

redi

t Cou

rse

Com

plet

ion

SISD Region 4 State

Page 17: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

(N=10,761) 15.7%

(N=54,311) 79.5%

(N=2,781)4.1%

(N=158)0.2%

(N=330)0.5%

SISD, Region 4, State Total Graduates by TypeClass of 2015

17

SISD(N=2,058)

Region 4(N=68,341)

State(N=313,397)

(N=167) 8.1%

(N=1,564)76.0%

(N=141) 6.9%

(N=135) 6.6%

(N=51)2.5%

(N=46,723) 14.9%

(N=251,524) 80.3%

(N=8,982)2.9%

(N=523)0.2%

(N=5,645)1.8%

Recommended/Distinguished Achievement ProgramMinimum HS Program

Foundation Plan (No Endorsement)

Foundation Plan (Endorsement)Foundation Plan (Distinguished Level of Achievement)

Page 18: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

4-Year Longitudinal Graduation RatesClass of 2014 and Class of 2015by Student Group, Grades 9-12

18

*Spring ISD value is within five points of Region 4 and/or state value**Spring ISD is at or higher than Region 4 and/or the state

89.3

**

87.7

*

88.4

**

88.8

**

89.0

**

84.9

* 89.7

*

89.8

* 98.2

**

97.2

**

68.0 72

.7*

88.8

**

88.8

**

45.0

64.1

*

87.8

88.5

83.6 85.1

85.1

86.0

93.0

93.2 96

.2

96.5

73.5

74.1

85.3

85.7

50.1

65.6

88.3

89.0

84.2

85.2

85.5

86.5

93.0

93.4 94.8

95.4

77.5

78.2

85.2

85.6

60.3

71.5

0

20

40

60

80

100

2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015

All Students AfricanAmerican

Hispanic White Asian SpecialEducation

EconomicallyDisadvantaged

EnglishLanguageLearners

Four

-Yea

r Lon

gitu

dina

l Rat

e

SISDRegion 4State

Page 19: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

4-Year Longitudinal Dropout RatesClass of 2014 and Class of 2015by Student Group, Grades 9-12

19

*Spring ISD value is within five points of Region 4 and/or state value**Spring ISD is at or lower than Region 4 and/or the state

7.9*

7.5* 9.2*

*

7.0*

*

7.7*

*

9.3*

*

6.8*

6.3* 0.

9**

0.9 15

.6*

12.8

*

8.5*

*

8.0*

*

47.5

25.0

*

7.0

6.6 10

.5

9.8

8.4

8.0 3.

4

3.4

1.7

1.3 12

.9

12.3

9.2

9.1

30.9

21.1

6.6

6.3 9.

8

9.5

8.2

7.7 3.

6

3.4

2.4

2.2

11.2

10.4

9.0

8.7

25.7

18.0

0

20

40

60

80

100

2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015

All Students AfricanAmerican

Hispanic White Asian SpecialEducation

EconomicallyDisadvantaged

EnglishLanguageLearners

Four

-Yea

r Lon

gitu

dina

l Rat

e

SISD Region 4 State

Page 20: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

Percent Enrolled in Texas Higher Education

Percent Completed One Year of Texas Higher Education Without Remediation

SISD, Region 4, and State Graduates in Texas Higher Education2012-2013 and 2013-2014

20

**Spring ISD is at or higher than Region 4 and/or the stateNote. Institutes of higher education are Texas public two- or four-year institutions.

59.6

**

59.6

56.9

56.2 60

.0

57.5

0

20

40

60

80

100

Spring ISD Region 4 State

Perc

ent E

nrol

led

2012-2013 2013-201447

.9

70.2

70.8

49.2

71.7

70.5

0

20

40

60

80

100

Spring ISD Region 4 State

Perc

ent W

ithou

t Rem

edia

tion

2012-2013 2013-2014

Page 21: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

Spring ISD, Region 4, and State Staff2015-2016

21

4.9

31.6

46.8

13.0

2.6

1.1

8.2 27

.8

49.7

10.6

2.8

0.9

9.6

26.1

50.5

9.8

2.9

1.1

0

20

40

60

80

100

Educational Aides Auxiliary Staff Teachers Professional Support CampusAdministration

CentralAdministration

Perc

ent

Spring ISD Region 4 State

Educational Aides Include Paraprofessionals, reported in PEIMS as Educational Aides or Certified Interpreters

Auxiliary Staff Include staff who are reported in PEIMS but who have no PEIMS Staff Responsibility record (ex: Food Service, Bus Drivers, Secretaries, and Custodial Staff)

Teachers Include Teachers and Substitute Teachers

Professional Support Include Therapists, Psychologists, Counselors, Diagnosticians, Physicians and Nurses, Librarians, Department Heads, and other support staff

Campus Administration Include Assistant Principals and Principals

Central Administration Include Superintendents, Assistant Superintendents, Business Managers, Tax Assessor-Collectors, Directors of Personnel, and other roles such as Instructional Officers and Athletic Directors

Page 22: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

Ethnic Composition of SISD Teachers Ethnic Composition of SISD Students

Ethnic Composition of SISD Teachers and Students2015-2016

22

African American

34.5%

American Indian0.5%

Asian2.3%

Hispanic19.4%

Pacific Islander

0.1%

White42.6%

Two or More0.6%

African American

40.3%

American Indian1.8%Asian

3.2%

Hispanic43.2%

Pacific Islander

0.4% White9.7%

Two or More1.5%

Page 23: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

Spring ISD, Region 4, and State Teaching StaffHighest Degree Held2015-2016

23

11.8

64.5

22.9

0.81.5

73.4

24.2

0.9

1.0

74.7

23.6

0.6

0

20

40

60

80

100

No Degree Bachelors Masters Doctorate

Perc

ent

SISD Region 4 State

Page 24: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

Spring ISD, Region 4, and State Teaching StaffYears of Experience2015-2016

24

12.4

32.5

23.6

22.9

8.5

8.8

29.6

22.7 25

.5

13.4

8.1

27.3

21.7 27

.3

15.7

0

20

40

60

80

100

BeginningTeachers

1-5 Years 6-10 Years 11-20 Years Over 20 Years

Perc

ent

SISD Region 4 State

Page 25: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

Spring ISD, Region 4, and State Teaching StaffAverage Salaries2015-2016

25

$50,351

$55,260

$58,149

$61,950

$70,625

$49,117

$52,023

$54,444

$57,583

$65,770

$45,507

$47,996

$50,459

$53,794

$60,613

Beginning Teachers

1-5 Years

6-10 Years

11-20 Years

Over 20 Years

Year

s of

Exp

erie

nce

SISD Region 4 State

Page 26: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

Other Required Reporting

• Presented in Today’s Public Hearing:– Accreditation Status– Report on Violent or Criminal Incidents– PEIMS Financial Standard Reports – Paper Copy

Provided

• Previously Presented in the September 2016 Public Hearing:– Campus Performance Objectives

26

Page 27: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

District Accreditation Status

27

• 2016 Accountability Rating: Met Standard (same as last year)

• 2016 Special Education Determination Status:Needs Intervention (same as last year)

• 2015-16 Accreditation Status:Accredited

• 2015 First Rating:Superior Achievement

Page 28: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

Violent or Criminal Incidents2015-2016

Violent or Criminal Incidents PEIMS 425 Action Reason Codes

Incident Total (District-Wide)

Incident Percent (District-Wide)

02 – Conduct Punishable as a Felony 8 0.6%04 – Controlled Substance/Drugs 146 12.0%05 – Alcohol Violation 11 0.9%12 – Illegal Knife 0 0.0%26 – Terroristic Threat 49 4.0%27 – Assault-District Employee 31 2.5%28 – Assault-Non District Employee 69 5.7%30 – Aggravated Assault on Someone Other than a District

Employee/Volunteer2 0.2%

33 – Tobacco 35 2.9%34 – School-Related Gang Violence 9 0.7%35 – False Alarm/False Report 10 0.8%41 – Fighting/Mutual Combat 848 69.6%50 – Non-Illegal Knife 0 0.0%Total 1,218 100.0%

28

Page 29: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

<HIDDEN SLIDE>Violent or Criminal Incidents, 2014-2015

Violent or Criminal Incidents PEIMS 425 Action Reason Codes

Incident Total (District-Wide)

Incident Percent (District-Wide)

02 – Conduct Punishable as a Felony 5 0.3%04 – Controlled Substance/Drugs 124 7.9%05 – Alcohol Violation 11 0.7%12 – Illegal Knife 2 0.1%26 – Terroristic Threat 21 1.3%27 – Assault-District Employee 28 1.8%28 – Assault-Non District Employee 35 2.2%30 – Aggravated Assault on Someone Other than a District

Employee/Volunteer1 0.1%

33 – Tobacco 59 3.8%34 – School-Related Gang Violence 11 0.7%35 – False Alarm/False Report 7 0.4%41 – Fighting/Mutual Combat 1,175 75.2%50 – Non-Illegal Knife 84 5.4%Total 1,218 100.0%

29

Page 30: Annual Report of the District’s Educational … Report of the District’s Educational Performance and the Texas Academic Performance Report FEBRUARY 9, ... 16 18 8 9 11 13 25 26

30

Questions?