analyzing the innovation value chain filefirst concept of an overall value chain rohstoffe...
TRANSCRIPT
Ricarda Bouncken Thorsten Teichert University of Greifswald University of Hamburg Prof. Dr. Thorsten Teichert • Universität Hamburg • Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation von-Melle-Park 5 • Raum 3078 (Sekretariat) • 20146 Hamburg Tel: (040) 42838 4643 • Fax: (040) 42838 5250
Analyzing the Innovation Value Chain
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 2
Outline
1 Research Impulse
2 Industry Case: Regenerative Energies
3 Empirical Findings
4 Discussion and Conclusion
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 4
„Why do Great Firms fail?“ Christensen´s Case
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 5
What happened?
- later 3.5“ - uses 3.5“ drive
- later 2.5“
Portable /
Notebook
- uses 5.25“ drive
Desktop
Computer
14“ drive
- uses 14“ drive
Mainframe
Computer
- later 8“ and smaller
- uses 8“ drive
Minicomputer
8“ drive
5.25“ drive 3.5“ drive
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 6
… System changes which led to a Restructuring of the entire Industry
IBM / Western Digital /
Micropolis / Seagate /
Fujitsu / Hitachi / NEC
Mainframe Computer Minicomputer
Portable / Notebook Desktop Computer
bv
clockwise: the evolution
of the computer
IBM / Diablo / Ampex /
Memorex / EMM/ Wang /
Western Digital /
Read Rite / Control Data /
Burroughs / Univac /
Micropolis…
Quantum / Connor /
Maxtor / Samsung /
Toshiba / Kalog /
Mitsumi / IBM /
Western Digital /
Seagate / Micropolis/
Fujitsu / Hitachi /
NEC
80 ´s 90 ´s
Excelstore / IBM-Hitachi /
Fujitsu / Maxtor /
Samsung / Seagate /
Toshiba / Western Digital
At first 129
companies
only 20
left
late
r
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 7
Innovation takes place above and beyond single organizations (companies)…
Powel et al. (1996): Innovation is rooted in networks of learning, rather than in individual firms in collaborations in the biotechnology industry.
Zaheer et al. (2005) assume innovative capabilities in focal firms and network members within networks of mutual fund companies. Innovative firms are able to bridge structural holes.
Laursen & Salter (2006) underline the importance of adopting open search strategies that involve the use of a wide range of external network sources of to improve innovation performance.
Dhanaraj & Parkhe (2006) view innovation networks as loosely coupled systems of autonomous firms. Hub firms orchestrate network activities and network members search for new solutions.
Lee (2007) researched the role of network resources for the timing of entry into an emerging product market. This research links network theory to market entry research.
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 8
Outline
1 Research Impulse
2 Industry Case: Regenerative Energies
3 Empirical Findings
4 Discussion and Conclusion
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 9
First Concept of an Overall Value Chain
Rohstoffe Zertifizierung/
Genehmigung F&E
Modul
Erzeugung
Komponenten/
Vorprodukte
System-
integration
Modul
Speicherung
erste Absatz-
stufe
(z.B. Vertrieb)
Projekt-
entwicklung Endkunde/
Betrieb
zweite Absatzstufe (z.B. Handel, Handwerk)
…
…
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 10
Multi-step Study Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses
17 in-depth interviews with industry experts
Written Questionnaire (100 responses out of
300 mailings)
One-Day Impulse workshop with regional
industry (15 participants)
Validation of results in final workshop
(80 participants)
Literature Review
Interview
Guidline
Initial
Model
Standardized
Questionnaire
Statistical
Analyses
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 11
Interview Partners
Dr. Martin Skiba (RePower, Windenergie)
Karl-Heinz Schlüter (EECH, Technology and Finance)
Christian Oliver Schulz (Commerzbank, Finanzierung)
Christian Renke (Commerzbank, Finanzierung)
Claudius Witzki (Need GmbH & Co. KG, Pflanzenöle etc.)
Georg Scholz (ad fontes Solartechnik Hamburg GmbH, Installation)
Jochen Springer (Loock Biogassysteme, Biogas)
Dr. Uta Reichmann (Marquard & Bahls AG, u.a. Holz)
Rudolf Huber (GEE mbH & Co. KG, Holz)
Reinhard Lampe (SunTechnics, Photovoltaik)
Bernhard Weyres-Borchert (Solarzentrum Hamburg, u.a. Solarthermie)
Stefan Hergott (Spilling Energie Systeme GmbH, BHKW)
Guido Gummert (BAXI Innotech, Brennstoffzellen-Technologie)
Christian Nath (Germanischer Lloyd, Windenergie)
Prof. Dr. Paul Scherer (HAW Hamburg, Biogas)
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 12
Refined Concept of an Innovation Value Chain
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 13
Sample for written Questionnaire
Handwerker
33%
geantwortet
18%
kein Bezug zu
erneuerbaren
Energien
15%
nicht mehr vor
Ort
7%
nicht
geantwortet
20%
kein Interesse
an Thematik /
keine Zeit
7%
Tochterunter-
nehmen
0%
Netto
46%
2 Follow-Ups (by phone / mail)
Short telephone survey of Non-responses
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 14
Company Descriptives
Umsatzentwicklung 2003 - 2006
30
9
6
10
28
8
5
16
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
bis 2 Mio. bis 10 Mio. bis 50 Mio. > 50 Mio.
Umsatz
Hä
ufi
gk
eit
de
r N
en
nu
ng
en
Nennungen 2003
Nennungen 2006
Anteil der Vorleistungen am Umsatz
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Windkraft
Photovoltaik
Solarthermie
Pflanzenöle
Biogas
Holz
BHKW
Brennstoffzelle
Bra
nc
he
Anteil
Vorleistungen
Eigenleistungen
Entwicklung Beschäftigtenzahl 2003 - 2006
40
15
119
30
23
11 11
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0-9 10-49 50-249 250 und mehr
Anzahl Beschäftigte
Hä
ufi
gk
eit
de
r N
en
nu
ng
en
Nennungen 2003
Nennungen 2006
Entwicklung Beschäftigtenzahl 2003 - 2006
40
15
119
30
23
11 11
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0-9 10-49 50-249 250 und mehr
Anzahl Beschäftigte
Hä
ufi
gk
eit
de
r N
en
nu
ng
en
Nennungen 2003
Nennungen 2006
Anteil der Vorleistungen am Umsatz
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Windkraft
Photovoltaik
Solarthermie
Pflanzenöle
Biogas
Holz
BHKW
Brennstoffzelle
Bra
nc
he
Anteil
Vorleistungen
Eigenleistungen
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 15
Outline
1 Research Impulse
2 Industry Case: Regenerative Energies
3 Empirical Findings
4 Discussion and Conclusion
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 16
Actors´ Possible Contributions at a First Glance Positionierungsmöglichkeiten für Hamburg
F&E
Rohstoffe
Modul Speicherung
Zertifizierung...
Komponenten/Vorprodukte
Modul Erzeugung
Systemintegration
Projektentwicklung 1. Absatzstufe
2. Absatz
Endkunde...
Finanzierung... Logistik
1,5
2,25
3
2 3 4
Importance
Po
ten
tial
Importance of Regional neighbourship
Core actors Positioning
Potential
Peripheral Areas
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 17
Network of the Innovation Value Chain (IVC)
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 18
Summary of Network Dependency Measures
Logistik
F&E
Vorprodukte
Erzeugung
Speicherung Systemintegration
Projektentwicklung
erste Absatzstufe
zweite Absatzstufe
Endkunde / Betrieb
Finan./Vers./Recht
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Impulse Seeker
Imp
uls
e P
rovid
er
Research & Development
Certification Agencies
Raw Materials
Components
Energy Generation
Storage Modul
System integration
Project development
1th sales tier
2nd sales tier
Final customer
Finance/Insurance/Law
Logistics
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 19
Subbranches of the Industry for Regenerative Energies
Wind Energy
Photo Voltaic Systems
Solar Thermic Systems
Biogas Business
Wood Energy
….
Block Heat and Power Plants
What are the Value-Chain Implications of their technological differences?
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 20
IVC of Wind Energy
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 21
IVC of Photo Voltaic Systems
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 22
IVC of Solar Thermic Systems
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 23
IVC of the Biogas Business
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 24
IVC of the Wood Energy Business
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 25
IVC of the Block Heat and Power Plant Business
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 26
Outline
1 Research Impulse
2 Industry Case: Regenerative Energies
3 Empirical Findings
4 Discussion and Conclusion
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 27
Preliminary Findings
Findings provide a detailed picture of the industry´s innovation value chain (IVC).
We get the impression of a complex innovation network.
Project developers who combine the diverse components are of great importance for the long term innovativeness.
Our analyses showed different generic patterns of IVC.
From the different generic patterns we can deduce some generalizations.
Technology complexity and uncertainty is mirrored in the network.
Actors in subbranches that have to cope with many and even unsolved questions of the technology are much stronger interconnected.
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 28
Implications
Company point of view
How to position oneself strategically in dynamic settings of innovation?
We recommend to develop social skills and communication devices in those sub-branches that face stronger technology challenges.
Improved social relationships and communication might transfer the information and knowledge with the innovation process lacks.
The options of pursuing either an innovator or an imitator strategy are contingent upon the company positioning along the IVC.
Industry point of view
How to design policy initiatives of regional development (e.g. cluster initiatives)?
Identification of “dominant actors” who may serve as nucleus for regional development
Highly interconnected actors need to be joined locally to foster continuing innovative dynamics
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 29
Thank you for your kind attention!
Source: Economist, „Small Wonders“, 12/29/04
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 30
Questionnaire (1/2)
12.10.2011 © Arbeitsbereich Marketing und Innovation 31
Questionnaire (2/2)