analysis of secondary data - shodhgangashodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/2071/29/14_chapter...
TRANSCRIPT
185
CHAPTER – VI
ANALYSIS OF SECONDARY DATA
In order to study the trends and patterns in the growth and
development of engineering education at the national level as well as
in the state of Punjab the investigator has collected the data from
various secondary sources and analysed it. This analysis of data
obtained from the secondary sources has been presented in this
chapter. Section one deals with the analysis of national level
secondary data whereas section two of this chapter deals with the
analysis of state level secondary data.
For the present study, the secondary data from the sources
mentioned below has been pooled up and analyzed by making use of
various statistical tables, line graphs, bargraphs and pie-charts, etc.
1. Policy documents and reports of various commissions and
committees on education
2. Annual Reports of MHRD of Government of India
3. AICTE (All India Csouncil of Technical Education) Annual
Reports
4. National Science Foundation (USA) Reports
5. Research Journals, Magazines and Newspapers.
6. NTMIS (National Technical Manpower Information System)
Publications of IAMR (Institute of Annual Manpower Research)
7. Statistical Abstracts of Punjab
186
8. Admission Brochures
9. Newsletters
10. Reference Books
11. Handbooks
12. Research Reports of various Researchers
13. Internet Sources
SECTION ONE
6.1 GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL
Formally, modern technical education started in India 1847
when an institution for the training of civil engineers was started at
Roorkee. A little later, in 1856, existing schools for training of
engineers at Poona and Guindy (Madras), were converted to colleges.
These originally offered licentiate programmes, which were upgraded
to degree programmes in 1880. Also, in 1856, an engineering college
was started at Sibpur near Calcutta. These four colleges offered
programmes in civil engineering. (Handbook on Engineering
Education, AIU 2008: xxix)
In 1887, the Victoria Jubilee technical Institute was started
in Bombay, under private initiative, with classes in mechanical and
electrical engineering, textile manufacture and technical chemistry.
During the Swadeshi movement, a technical college was established
in Bengal (later shifted to Jadavpur), which offered various
engineering courses including chemical and mechanical engineering.
Another technical institute was started in Ahmedabad in 1910, for
187
teaching textile manufacturing. Electrical engineering was first
taught at the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore which was
established in 1915. Degree classes, in mechanical and electrical
engineering, were first started in 1917, at the Banaras Hindu
University. Metallurgy was also first introduced at this university.
The Indian School of Mines and Applied Geology was established, in
1926, to train technical personnel in mining and geology. (Handbook
on Engineering Education, AIU 2008: xxx) Thus, by the time of
independence the foundation of technical education had been laid in
India. In 1945 the Sarkar Committee was appointed to suggest
options for advanced technical education in India. The Sarkar
committee recommended the establishment of higher technical
institutes based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the
four regions of India. This resulted in the setting up of the five
Indian Institutes of Technology at Kharagpur (1950), Bombay (1958),
Kanpur (1959), Madras (1960) and Delhi (1961) (Delhi was added on
to the original four). The All India Council for Technical Education
was set up in 1945, to oversee all technical education (Diploma,
Degree and Post Graduate) in the country.
Figure 6.1 provides a timeline showing the establishment of
some of the major engineering institutions in the country.
188
IIT Madras (1960) NIT Warangal Roorkee Engg. College (1848) Engg. Colleges-4 (1959) Survey & Technical Inst-20 IIT Kanpur Hindu College Bengal (1817) Industrial Schools-50 (1959) Poona Civil Engg. College IIT Bombay (1958) IIT Delhi IIT (1961) IIT Khargpur (1950) Elphinstone Institution 1947 Bombay (1844) IIT (1994) The Madras Survey University of School (1794) Bombay, Calcutta, Madras 1790 1810 1830 1850 1870 1890 1910 1930 1950 1970 1990
Independence Saharanpur School (1845) VJTI Women Students Permitted First Time
Figure 6.1: Time Line of Indian Engineering Education
There have been several official committees set up to review
and revitalize engineering education in the country. A brief summary
of these commissions and committees has been provided in table 1
(The detailed analysis of recommendations of these commissions &
committees has been discussed in ‘The Policy Perspective in
Engineering Education’ studied separately by the investigator).
Table 6.1 Summary of Major Committees on Engineering Education and
their Recommendations
Committee Title Year Recommendations
Sarkar
Committee
Higher Technical Institutions
for the Post-War Industrial
Development
1945 Setting up of Indian
Institutes of Technology
Thacker
Committee
Postgraduate Engineering
Education and Research
1959-61 Funding for 100 PhDs
annually
Nayudamma
Committee
Postgraduate Education in
Engineering & Technology
1979-80 PG minimum
qualifications for industry,
R&D, etc
Roorkee (2001)
New IITs 2008 Patna
Jodhpur Hydraba
d Ropar
Gandhinagar Indor
IISER Bhopal Kolkata Mohali Puna
189
Committee Title Year Recommendations
P. Rama Rao
Committee
Reshaping Postgraduate
Education in Engineering &
Technology
1995 21 months M.Tech,
Increased Scholarship
amount, Assured
employment for M.Techs,
National Doctoral
Programme
R.A. Mashelkar
Committee
Strategic Road Map for
Academic Excellence of Future
RECs
1998 Conversion of RECs Into
NITs with the status of a
Deemed to be University
and structural changes in
governance.
U.R. Rao
Committee
Revitalising the Technical
Education
2003 Regional inequity to be
removed, faculty shortage
to be addressed, need for
planning and coordination
in the working of AICTE.
P. Rama Rao
Committee
IIT Review 2004 Increase UG output of
IITs, increase funds for
infrastructure, increase,
Add new IITs, But
maintain quality.
Sampatroda National Knowledge
Commission
2008 Need to independent
(IRAHE)
Yashpal
Committee
To advise on Renovation and
Rejuvenation of higher
education
2009 To give autonomy to IITs
(Source: Reports of various commissions and committees on engineering education)
6.1.1 EXPANSION OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION
There has been a phenomenal growth in the number of
engineering institutions in the country after independence.
Especially ‘since early eighties, due to rapid industrialization and
economic growth, engineering education in India has been
developing faster than anywhere else in the world’. (Palit 1998: 317)
190
6.1.1.1 Increase in number of Engineering Institutions
At the time of Independence there were only 42 engineering
institutions in the country providing education at degree level.
Whereas the number has reached upto 1511 in the year 2006. The
pace of growth has been evident from the table 6.2.
Table 6.2 Growth of Degree Level Engineering Institutions
Year Number of Bachelor Degree Institutions
1947 42
1950 53
1955 74
1960 111
1965 144
1970 155
1975 169
1980 216
1985 347
1987 372
1997-98 562
1998-99 644
1999-2000 755
2000-01 821
2001-02 1057
2002-03 1195
2003 1208
2004 1265
2005 1346
2006 1511
(Source: 1. Sushil Kumar, 1993 2. GOI, Annual Report, 2002-03 3. Year, Reports)
191
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1947 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1987 1997-98
1998-99
1999-2000
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003 2004 2005 2006
Year
Fig. 6.2: Line Graph of Growth of Degree Level Engineering Institutions
6.1.1.2 Admission Procedure
Table 6.3 Admission Procedure for Engineering Institutions in Different
States of India
Name of the State
Entrance Test Courses Eligibility
All India Admissions
All India Engineering Entrance Examination (AIEEE), CBSE, New Delhi.
BE/BTech/BArch 10+2
Andhra Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh State Level Engineering, Agril & Medical Common Entrance Test (EAMCET) conducted by one of the State Universities for admission to Private as well as Minority Institutions
BE/B Arch/B Tech
(Agril/Engg/Dairy Tech
10+2 (Sc)
Assam Joint Admission Test (JAT) conducted by the Director of Technical Education, Assam.
BE/B Tech 2 yrs Pre University
Bihar Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive Exam (BCECE) conducted by Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive Examination Board.
B Sc (Engg)/BArch/
BTech (Agril Engg & Dairy Tech)
Inter (Sc)
Chandigarh Common Entrance Test (CET) conducted by Panjab University.
BE/BTech/BArch 10+2 (Sc)
Num
ber o
f Ins
titut
ions
→
192
Name of the State
Entrance Test Courses Eligibility
Delhi (i) Combined Entrance Test conducted by Delhi University. (ii) Combined Entrance Test (CET) conducted by GGSIP University for admission to Govemment and Private (Self Financing).
BE/BTech
BE/BTech/BArch
10+2 (Sc)
10+2 (Sc)
Goa Goa Common Entrance Test (GCET) conducted by Goa College of Engg, Padre, Conceicao College of Engg, Vema: Goa College of Arch.
BE/BArch 10+2 (Sc)
Gujarat State Level Admission Committee, C/o L D College of Engineering, Ahmedabad 380015 for admission to Government University/Private Engineering Colleges.
BE/B.Tech/BArch 10+2 (Sc)
Haryana Common Engg Entrance Test conducted by one of the state universities for admission to Government and Private Engineering Colleges.
BE/B.Tech/BArch 10+2 (Sc)
Himachal Pradesh
Combined Pre Entrance Test- NIT, Hamirpur.
B.Tech 10+2 (Sc)
Jammu & Kashmir
Jammu & Kashmir State Level Entrance Test (SLET) is conducted by Competent Authority for Entrance Exam.
BE/B.Tech/BArch 10+2 (Sc)
Jharkhand Jharkhand Combined Entrance Competitive Exam (JCECE) conducted by Jharkhand Combined Entrance Competitive Exam Board, Ranchi for admission to Government and Private Engineering Colleges.
BE/B.Tech/BArch 10+2 (Sc)
Karnataka Common Entrance Test (CET) is conducted by Govt of Karnataka for admission to University, Regional, Private, Aided and Unaided Engineering Colleges.
BE/B.Tech/BArch 10+2 (Sc)
Kerala Common Entrance Test (CET) is conducted by Commissioner for Entrance Exam at State Level.
BE/B.Tech/BArch/B Tech (Agril Engg/Dairy Sc & Tech)
10+2 (Sc)
Madhya State level Pre-Engineering Test (PET) is conducted by Madhya Pradesh Professional Exam Board for admission to Government, Private, Autonomous Institutions.
BE/B.Tech/BArch 10+2 (Sc)
Maharashtra Entrance Exam conducted by Competent Authority appointed by the Government of Maharashtra (MHCET).
BE/BTech/BArch/B Chem (Engg)
10+2 (Sc)
Orissa Joint Entance Exam (JEE) conducted by NIT, Rourkela.
BE/B.Tech. 10+2 (Sc)
Pondicherry Joint Entrance Test (JET) conducted by Pondicheny Engg College and Bharathiyar College of Engg & Tech, Karaikel.
B.Tech. 10+2 (Sc)
Punjab Combined Entrance Test (CET) conducted by Punjab Technical University. Jalandhar.
BE/B.Tech./ BArch
10+2 (Sc)
193
Rajasthan Rajasthan Pre-Engg Test (RPET) conducted by MNIT, Jaipur.
BE/B.Tech/BArch 10+2 (Sc)
Sikkim All India Basis Entrance Exam. BE/BTech 10+2 (Sc) Tamil Nadu Tamil Nadu Professional Courses
Entrance Exam (TNPCEE) conducted by Anna University for admission to Government Aided and Private Colleges.
BE/BTech/BArch 10+2 (Sc)
Tripura Joint Entrance Exam (JEE) conducted by Tripura Engineering College and NIT, Silchar.
BE 10+2 (Sc)
Uttar Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh State Engincering Admission Test (UPSEAT) is conducted by Institute of Engineering & Technology for admission to Government University/Private Engineering and Technological Institutions.
BE/BTech/BArch 10+2 (Sc)
Uttarakhand All India Engineering Entrance Examination conducted by CBSE, New Delhi.
BE/BTech 10+2 (Sc)
West Bengal Joint Entrance Exam (JEE) is conducted by West Bengal Joint Entrance Exam Board.
BE/BTech/BArch 10+2 (Sc)
IIT Conducted by IIT and CBSE (JEE) Eng. Techno (BHU), Varanasi and Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad.
BE/B.Tech. 10+2 (Sci)
(Source : AIU Handbook on Engineering Education, 2008) The analysis of table 6.3 clearly reveals that different states and
union territories depend on different entrance test for admission to the
engineering institutions. Even IITs conduct a separate entrance test for
admission to these institutions.
194
Table 6.4 Number of Institutions and Intake Approved for 2006-07
(as on Sept, 06). Engineering Degree
States Number of Institutions
Sanctioned intake
Average Intake per Institute
Madhya Pardesh Chhattisgarh Gujrat Mizoram Sikkim Orissa West Bengal Tripura Meghalaya Arunachal Pradesh
Andaman & Nicobar Assam Manipur Nagaland Jharkhand
84 15 43 0 1 48 54 1 1 1 0 4 1 0 9
30060 5130 14086
0 465
15033 15671 250 240 210 0
670 115 0
3198
358 342 328 0
465 313 290 250 240 210 0
168 115 0
355 Bihar Uttar Pradesh Uttranchal
6 110 13
1690 40418 3905
282 367 300
Chandigarh Haryana Jammu & Kashmir New Delhi Punjab Rajasthan Himachal Pradesh
5 45 6 16 47 47 6
788 16325 1401 6359
16961 16051 1282
158 363 234 397 361 342 214
Andhra Pradesh Pondicherry Tamil Nadu
280 5
268
107575 2295
105318
384 459 393
Karnataka Kerala
128 93
56542 29165
442 314
Maharashtra Goa Daman and Diu
171 3 0
58989 794 0
345 265 0
Total 1511 550986 365 (Source: AICTE, Handbook for Approval Process, 2008.)
Table 6.4 shows the number of engineering institutions and
intake approved till year 2006-07 as per AICTE Reports. As per the
data available upto 2006 maximum number of engineering
195
institutions are in the state of Andhra Pradesh (280) followed by
Tamil Nadu (268) with the intake of 107575 and 105318
respectively. In Maharashtra total number of institutions is 171 and
intake is 58989 followed by Karnataka which is having 128
institutions and intake is 56542. In Uttar Pradesh number of
institutions are 110 followed by Madhya Pradesh which is having 84
institutions and intake is 40418 and 30060 respectively.
6.1.1.3. Increase in Intake & Outturn of Graduates
Although the trend in the actual number of engineers
graduating has been relatively easy to quantify, yet the investigator
found has that this has not been easily available year wise to judge
the expansion at the national level. Thus to compensate three
variables have been considered by the investigator i.e. Sanctioned
intake (S), the Enrolment (E) and the Output or Out-turn (O).
Definitions of these variables have been given below:
(a) Sanctioned Intake – The sanctioned intake is the
number of seats approved by AICTE in different
engineering colleges. This is for a given year. The U. R.
Rao committee (2003) report has provided data on
sanctioned intake for 1990-2003.
(b) Enrolment - The actual number of students enrolled
(joining the course) represents the enrolment which may
differ from the sanctioned strength. In many institutions
all seats may not be filled. Enrolment data is available
196
for some years for some of the states in the Annual
Technical Manpower Reviews (ATMRs)
(c) Outturn/Output - The number of engineers that
graduate each year is the outturn. This is not reported
on an all India basis. In some of the state reports
(ATMRs) the annual output is reported for a few years.
Since the data on sanctioned strength (S), enrolment (E),
outputs (O) has been available from different sources for different
years. The investigator has attempted to correlate the parameters. It
has been expected that the output would be a fraction of the number
admitted four years earlier since the BE course has been of four
years duration. Hence a ratio (O/S) has been defined as the output
in the tth year O (t) to the sanctioned strength when that batch was
admitted S (t-4)
(O/S) = O (t) / S (t-4) (Banerjee and Muley 2007)
Where O (t) represents output of tth year
S (t-4) represents sanctioned intake of (t-4)th year
Table 6.5 E/S Ratio for Graduates from 1991 to 2004 Calculated from
Annual Technical Manpower Reports States 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Karnataka - - - - - - - - - - - 0.86 - - Tamil Nadu - - - - - - - - - - 0.82 0.89 - - Maharashtra - - - - - - - - 1.05 0.97 0.98 0.96 0.96 - Delhi - - - - 1.12 1.09 1.11 1.14 0.89 0.82 1.08 0.70 0.84 0.87 West Bengal - - 0.97 0.97 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.01 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.91 - - Himachal Pradesh
- - - - - - 0.99 0.99 0.93 0.94 0.87 0.80 0.93 0.89
Haryana - - - - 1.02 1.01 0.79 0.86 0.92 0.86 0.65 0.72 0.82 0.79 Assam - - - - - - 1.05 - - - 0.91 - - - Rajasthan - - - - - - - - - 0.95 0.99 0.97 - - Arunachal Pradesh
0.94 - - - 0.56 0.70 0.73 0.85 0.71 0.80 0.70 1.02 1.00 -
Manipur - - - - - - - - 0.76 1.00 0.44 0.57 - - Tripura 1.03 - - - 1.00 1.00 1.15 1.00 0.87 1.06 1.05 1.00 0.87 -
197
Since it has been easiest to get the sanctioned strength data
that has been used as the basis to compute the output. Data on
enrolment was relatively scarce. The ratio of the enrolment to
sanctioned strength (E/S) has been shown in table 6.5. The
weighted average of E/S was about 0.9. There seemed to be some
fluctuation/ uncertainty in the E/S ratios. Though there is some
uncertainty in the data, it seems that there has been a reduction in
the E/S ratio where there has been rapid increases in sanctioned
strength in the few years. However for instance the growth in
sanctioned strength for Maharashtra for last four years has been
about 1.2 % per year and the average E/S for 2005–06 was about
0.9. The E/S ratio has been maintained above 0.9 where the growth
in sanctioned strength has been low. Table 6.6 shows the O/S ratio
for different states. The O/S ratio is expected to vary over the years
due to failure rates. Therefore, the data was averaged out. Also the
data does not show any discernible trend or change in this ratio. The
weighted average of the available data for the different states and
over the different time periods provides an O/S ratio of 0.8. It has
been used to compute the output (wherever it has not been known)
O(T) = 0.85 (t – 4).
198
Table 6.6 O/S Ratio for Graduates from 1992 to 2004 Calculated from
Annual Technical Manpower Reports
States 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Karnataka - - - - - - 0.63 0.61 0.62 0.60 0.59 0.56 -
Tamil Nadu - - - 0.76 0.86 0.74 0.69 0.72 0.73 0.70 0.75 0.77 -
Punjab - - - - - - - - - - 0.67 0.67 0.73
Andhra Pradesh
- - - - - - - 0.97 0.94 0.93 0.75 - -
Kerala 0.84 0.82 0.78 0.90 0.86 0.92 0.86 0.91 0.86 0.81 0.75 - -
Delhi - - - - - - - 0.94 0.90 0.82 0.74 0.64 0.57
West Bengal - - - - - 1.01 1.01 1.02 1.01 1.06 0.88 - -
Himachal Pradesh
- - - - - - - - - 0.66 0.82 0.78 0.61
Chandigarh - - - - - - - - 0.85 0.75 0.83 0.80 -
Orissa - - - - - - - - - - - 0.89 0.98
Haryana - - - - - - - 1.09 1.2 0.53 0.83 0.37 0.32
Assam - - - - - - - - - 0.74 - - -
Gujarat - - - - - - - - - - - 1.03 -
Figure 6.3 shows the variation of the sanctioned strength for
B.E./ B.Techs in India from 1947 to 2007. The sanctioned intake
increased from 2500 in 1947 to 5.51 lakhs in 2007. The compound
annual growth rate (CAGR) for the 60-year period was 9.4%. In the last
ten years 1997-2007 the sanctioned strength grew from 1.15 lakhs to
5.51 lakhs (Compound Annual Growth Rate [CAGR] of 17% per year).
199
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
1947
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
Years
Sanc
tion
ed I
ntak
e
Figure 6.3: Line Graph of Growth of Sanctioned Intake of Graduates 1947-2007.
The number of Bachelors degrees in engineering (B.Tech, B.E.)
graduating every year has been computed using the O/S ratio based
on the sanctioned intake and has been shown in figure 6.4.
200
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
1947 1958 1968 1978 1986 1994 1998 2002 2006
Years
Out
put
Figure 6.4: Line Graph of Total Output of Engineering Graduates
1947 – 2006
The number has increased from 270 in 1947 to 2.37 lakhs in
2006 (corresponding to a compound annual growth rate of 12%). It
has been expected that the total number of engineers required in an
economy to be related to the population. The growth in India’s
engineering degrees has been compared with the trend in Bachelors
degrees in engineering in the U.S. per million population. This has
been shown in figure 6.5.
201
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
1945 1955 1965 1975 1985 1995
Academic Year
Figure 6.5: Line Graph of Engineering Bachelor’s Degree per
Million Population for US
The U.S. trend shows a cyclic pattern. The present value is
around 250. (Maximum of 350 during late 1940s – post World War II
and mid 1980s of 325). In India the number of engineers per million
populations has increased from about 1 in 1947 to 213 in 2006
which has been shown in figure 6.6 below.
202
0
50
100
150
200
250
1951 1958 1966 1974 1979 1986 1989 1996 1999 2002 2005
Years Figure 6.6: Line Graph of Engineering Graduates per Million Population in India (Source: AICTE Reports, 1999)
The average sanctioned intake per institution increased
from 74 in 1950 to 346 in 2006 (CAGR of 2.8% per year). Figure 6.7
shows this trend. An examination of the trend indicates a change in
the trend from 1995, with a larger number of degree granting
institutions being set up. The growth in sanctioned intake from
1995-2006 corresponds to a CAGR of 17.1% per year. The bulk of
this increase has been achieved by setting up of new institutions
(CAGR of new institutions during this period is 13.4%). The average
sanctioned intake per institution increased from 242 to 346 (CAGR
203
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Years
Ave
rage
San
ctio
ned
Inta
ke
of 3.3%). This has implications for quality since 1121 new degree-
granting institutions have been set up in the last ten years (Rao
2003: 54).
Figure 6.7: Line Graph of Average Sanctioned Intake per Institute 1950 – 2006
6.1.1.4 Postgraduate Output
The post-graduate degrees commonly offered in engineering
in India are the Master of Technology (M.Tech) and the Master of
Engineering (M.E) (both are equivalent). At present these courses are
of two-year duration and normally include a thesis (masters’ project)
component. In the past, the master’s programme was of one and a
half year duration. The sanctioned intake as per AICTE has been
204
about 30000 in 2005. However a large number of seats have
remained unfilled.
Table 6.7 Out-turn of Postgraduate Students
Intake Out Turn
Sanctioned Capacity
Actual
Percentage of Sanctioned Capacity Actual Percentage of
Sanctioned Capacity 6004 4734 79 2857 48
(Source: Rama Rao 1995)
The Rama Rao committee (1995) has indicated that the
ratio of the post-graduate output to the sanctioned intake varied
from 0.48 (AICTE 1995 Survey) to 0.6 (Shrivastava’s 1996 study).
This report has indicated that Tier I Institutions (IITs and IISc) had
an output to sanctioned strength O (t)/S (t-2) ratio of 0.9 while Tier
II and Tier III institutions (Technical University, University
Departments and Regional Engineering Colleges) had an O/S ratio of
0.6. The other institutions had lower O/S ratios (0.55). This data is
shown in table 6.7. The weighted average of all the institutions
except IITs and IISc (O/S 0.57) based on table 6.8 is used to
calculate the M. Tech output of these institutions. This is added to
the output of IITs and IISc to get the total masters’ output. (Rama
Rao 1995).
205
Table 6.8 Out-Turn /Sanctioned Capacity of Postgraduate Students.
Number (percentage of total out-turn)
Category of Institution
No. of Institutions
1987-89 1990-92
Out-turn / Sanctioned Capacity
I 6 5038 41% 5064 29% 0.9 II 11 1429 12% 3455 20% 0.6 III 12 1241 10% 1643 9% 0.6 IV V VI
102 4571 37% 7272 40% 0.55
Total 131 12279 100% 17434 100% Average Out-turn Per
year 4093 5811
(Source: Banerjee, R and Muley, Vinayak P 2007).
Figure 6.8 shows the variation in the Masters output with time
for India. The masters’ output has increased from about 30 in 1947
to almost 20000 in 2006 (CAGR of 11.6 %). In the last five years the
M Tech/ ME output has increased from about 14000 in 2001 to
almost 20000 in 2006 (CAGR of 7.5%). There has been some
uncertainty in this data since it has depended on the O/S ratio used.
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
1947 1950 1956 1960 1966 1970 1975 1979 1985 1987 1989 1995 2001 2003 2005
Years
Ou
tpu
t
Figure 6.8: Line Graph of Masters Output from 1947– 2006 (Source: AICTE Reports)
206
Figure 6.9 shows the percentage of Masters’ output to the
graduate engineers output. It is seen that the percentage increased
to a high of 15-17% in the 1980s and has now reduced to 8.5 %.
Compared to this, the US had about 70,000 engineering graduates
and 35,000 post-graduates (Masters) in engineering in 2002-03 (50%
of the graduate output).
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1947 1954 1958 1964 1968 1974 1978 1984 1986 1988 1995 2001 2003 2005
Years
Per
cent
age
Figure 6.9: Line Graph of Masters Output Percentage to Graduate Engineers Output (Source: AICTE Reports 2005)
6.1.1.5. Doctorates:
There is some uncertainty in the statistics on engineering
doctorates (Ph.Ds) granted annually. The difference in the estimates
available from various sources has been reported by Rai and Kumar
(2004). The investigator has relied on the statistics documented in
the Rama Rao Committee (1995) for review of the post graduate
207
engineering education in India and has added the recent data from
the UGC annual reports. The annual number of engineering PhDs
has been less than 1000.
Figure 6.10 shows the trend in the engineering Ph.D
degrees awarded in India. The overall growth rate from 1954 to 2005
has been 8% per year. However in the mid-80s the number of PhDs
has been around 600. Since then there has been a reduction in the
growth rate. The CAGR from 1985-2005 was only 2.9%. The
percentage of Ph.D. output to the graduate engineers’ output has
been shown in figure 6.11.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1954 1960 1968 1975 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005
Years
Doc
tora
tes
Figure 6.10: Line Graph of Engineering Doctorate Degrees Awarded in India. (Source: Rai & Kumar 2004)
208
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
1954
1958
1964
1968
1974
1978
1984
1986
1988
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
Years
Perc
enta
ge
Figure 6.11: Line Graph of Percentage of Ph.D. Output to Graduate Engineers Output (Source: Banerjee, R. and Muley, Vinayak P. 2007)
It is evident from the figure 6.11 that the percentage of Ph.Ds.
output to graduate engineers output has declined at a very fast rate
after 1986 and in 2004 it has approach the earlier rate of 1964.
6.1.1.6 International Comparisons
A comparison of graduates, masters and PhD outputs in
engineering for different countries shows some interesting trends.
Figure 6.12 shows the growth in graduate engineers for different
countries. It is evident from the graph that in year 2002, India has
crossed over Japan becoming second country in the world to
produce most number of engineering graduates after China.
209
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2002
Years
Eng
inee
rs
ChinaJapanSouth KoreaUSUKGermanyIndia
Figure 6.12: Line Graph of Growth in Graduate Engineers in
Different Countries (Source: National Science Foundation 2004)
The number of graduate engineers per million population
for recent years is shown in figure 6.13. It is evident from the graph
that number of engineering graduates per million population in India
compared to developed nations is comparatively low.
357
674
145246
331 397
1344
770
214 272
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
New
Zeal
and
Bra
zil
(200
1)
Uni
ted
Kin
gdom
Sou
thK
orea
Indi
a(2
006)
Countries
No.
of G
radu
ates
En
gine
ers
Figure 6.13: Bar Graph of Engineers per Million Population for
Different Countries (Source: National Science Foundation 2004)
210
The growth rate of graduate engineers for the period 1985-2002
has been shown in figure 6.14. India clearly has one of the highest
growth rates. The question arises that: Are these high growth rates
impacting quality and resulting in unemployment/ under employment
of fresh engineering graduates? It is estimated that about 30% of the
fresh engineering graduates remain unemployed even one year after
graduation (based on ATMRs of a few states). Several industry leaders
complain about the shortage of quality engineering graduates. Though
there is no conclusive statistics yet it seems that the present higher
rate of growth is impacting quality.
Figure 6.14: Bar Graph Representing Growth Rate of Graduate Engineers for Different Countries (2004) (Source: National Science Foundation 2004)
Figure 6.15 shows the engineering doctorates granted annually in
different countries.
211
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
Years
Eng
inee
rs
China
Japan
South Korea
US
UK
Germany
India
Figure 6.15 Line Graph Representing Engineering Doctorates for Different Countries (Source: National Science Foundation 2004)
The percentage of engineering PhDs to bachelors engineering
degrees granted annually is given in Table 6.9. The table shows the
country wise percentage of engineering Ph.Ds to bachelors engineering
degrees from the year 1983 to 2002. In the year 1983 the percentage of
highest Ph.Ds (4.41) were in Germany followed by UK (0.11), US (0.04).
But in the year 2002 the percentage was 9.17 in U.K. followed by 8.36
in US, 6.81 in Germany and was least in India.
Table 6.9 Percentage of Engineering Ph.Ds to Bachelor Engineering Degrees
Country 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2000 2001 2002 Germany 4.41 4.70 5.39 5.23 8.66 7.66 7.70 8.05 8.87 8.92 8.97 6.81 United Kingdom 0.11 11.11 12.84 13.75 14.89 7.66 6.02 7.65 8.22 9.78 9.08 9.17
United States 0.04 4.08 4.99 6.79 8.38 9.09 9.48 9.81 - 8.94 9.28 8.36
China - 0.09 0.15 0.65 0.67 0.88 1.11 1.51 1.67 2.11 1.98 - Japan 0.02 1.93 2.01 2.30 2.32 2.67 2.87 3.31 3.80 3.68 3.79 3.81 South Korea - 0.84 0.98 1.47 1.52 1.99 2.65 2.80 3.11 2.93 - 2.92
India - 2.21 2.13 2.03 - - 0.58 0.40 0.093 0.87 0.83 0.66 (Source: National Science Foundation 2004)
212
The Indian percentage is much less than that of Germany,
UK, US, Japan and South Korea. China has started increasing its
engineering Ph.D output significantly after 1989 in the last few
years. In the U.S. more than a third of all Ph.D. degrees are awarded
to non-US students.
Table 6.10 shows the growth rates of student output for
different countries for the most recent years available.
Table 6.10 Comparison of Growth Rates of Academic Output
Country Year Bachelors Masters Doctorates
(Engineering) 1996-2006 12.5% 10% 11.1% India 2001-2006 20.3% 7.5% 6.1% 1995-2006 1.4% 2.9% 3.1% USA 2001-2006 4.6% 8% 8.8% 1995-2004 0.1% - 5.2% Japan 2000-2004 -0.5% - -0.1% 1995-2004 10% - 18.9% China 1999-2004 12.5% - 13.2% 1993-2003 -0.2% - 2.9% UK 1999-2003 -3% - 2.8% 1993-2002 7.8% - 12.5% South Korea 1997-2002 9.5% - 10.4% 1993-2002 2% - 0.7% Germany 1997-2002 3.4% - 0.1% 1996-2005 3.4% 12.5% 5% Australia 2000-2005 3.9% 20.2% 6.2%
(Source: National Science Foundation 2004)
It is evident from the table 6.10 that during the past years
percentage of doctorates in engineering have increased in USA and
Australia whereas this percentage has fallen for India, Japan, China,
South Korea and Germany.
213
6.1.1.7 Discipline wise Growth in Sanctioned Intake
For bachelors degrees the discipline wise growth of sanctioned
intake for 1990-2001 in India is shown in Table 6.11. In the year
(1990 – 2001), the CAGR of computer/ IT is highest (17.8%) as
followed by Electronics Engineering (10.0%), Electrical (8.3%)
respectively. While the total number of CAGR in all the disciplines is
9.1%. On the other hand in the year 1996 – 2004, this rate rose upto
17.4%.
The growth of sanctioned intake was mainly in computer
engineering and information technology (37.7% CAGR) followed by
electronics and electrical engineering. About 32% of the sanctioned
strength in 2001 has been in computer engineering and information
technology.
Table 6.11 Discipline Wise Growth in Sanctioned Intake in India
Year Chemical Engg.
Civil Engg.
Comp./ IT
Electrical Engg.
Electronics Mech. Engg.
Others Total
1990 4590 13546 12143 10155 17337 17696 11592 87059 1991 4590 13546 12263 10155 17547 17718 11912 87731 1992 4590 13606 12303 10275 17787 17928 10010 86499 1993 4690 13606 12693 10615 18297 18318 12382 90601 1994 4950 12606 13493 11295 19267 19218 12572 93401 1995 5440 13706 14793 12435 20747 20578 13272 88536 1996 5520 13706 14853 12495 20847 20698 13332 101451 1998 6472 13852 22623 18961 26707 33160 12920 134695 2001 7552 13806 73497 24498 49448 40044 17639 226484 CAGR 1990-2001 4.6% 0.2% 17.8% 8.3% 10.0% 7.7% 3.9% 9.1%
CAGR 1996-2004 6.5% 0.2% 37.7% 14.4% 18.9% 14.1% 5.8% 17.4%
(Source: AICTE Reports)
214
Figure 6.16: Pie Chart of Discipline wise break up of Sanctioned Intake of Engineering Bachelors in India in 2001
6.1.2 GROWTH IN FACULTY OF ENGINEERING INSTITUTIONS
There are three fundamental components of engineering
education – teaching, curricula and learning. Faculty is the most
important factor in combining the above three components in an
ideal system. It is the faculty that teaches a certain type of curricula
fixed by the university and standardized by the faculty itself to the
engineering students in a way that not only prepares them for the
examination but for inculcating the qualities of innovation,
industriousness and social responsibility.
The infrastructure required for the above mentioned
teaching – learning process is also coordinated in the most efficient
way by the faculty itself.
Indian Education Commission (1964–66) report shows the
shortage of teachers in the engineering institutions at national level
as per given below in the table 6.12.
215
Table 6.12 Number of Institutions, Sanctioned Strength, Number of
Teachers & Vacant Posts
Number of Institutions
Sanctioned strength
Teachers appointed as on
31.12.63
Vacant position as on 31.12.63
Percentage of Vacant Positions
83 4808 2936 1872 38.9
Nayudamma Committee’s report (1979-80) has also depicted
the shortage of faculty members in the engineering institutions.
Rao Committee’s (2003) report has revealed that there were
not enough engineers with high qualifications to teach in the
technical institutions.
The report of the Board on Faculty Development of the
AICTE (2004) has estimated a total faculty requirement of 95924
comprising of 13703 professors, 27407 Assistant Professors, 54814
lecturers on March 31, 2003. This ideally required 41110 Ph. D’s
and 54814. M.Tech’s but only 7536 Ph.D’s. and 11983 M.Tech’s
were available as faculty in engineering institutions, there was a gap
of 33,574 PhDs and 42,831 M.Techs.
Idichandy (2007) has been of the view that it has been hard
to maintain 1:14 ratio due to poor salary structure, stringent
selection procedure of the teachers. A report published in The Times
of India has stated that the teacher student ratio in engineering
colleges even institutions of excellence like IITs, has not been
216
satisfactory as compared to US and UK. The shortage in different
IIT’s has been given in the table below:
Table 6.13 Teacher–Student Ratio
Place Ideal Reality Crunch IIT Delhi 1:6 1:12 100 IIT Bombay 1:9 1:12 146 IIT Kharagpur 1:9 1:13 NA IIT – Kanpur 1:7 1:14 115 IIT – Guwahati 1:3 1:3 40 IIT – Roorkee 1:9 1:12 226 IIT –Madras 1:9 1:14 NA
(Source: Idichandy 2007)
A report published in Hindustan Times has reported by Tikku
(2007) stated that due to implementation of 27% OBC quota in
central institutions like IITs, NITs etc the central government gave
permission to increase the retirement age of teachers from 62 to 65.
A provisions has also been made to re-employ faculty members on
their retirement at 65 for another five years till they reach 70.
Banerjee & Muley (2007) have estimated the faculty
requirements in 2012 and 2017 under the different scenarios.
Although they have accepted that they can not have accurate
estimates of the faculty in engineering institutions. Yet according to
them the total number of faculty in the IITs in 2006 has been
approximately 2520 and IISc had a faculty strength of engineering
faculty of about 170. Since they have been considering only the
engineering enrolment, they multiplied the faculty strength of the
IITs by the ratio of the engineering enrolment to total enrolment of
217
the institutes. In order to obtain the faculty numbers for the NITs,
they have extrapolated the data obtained from the sample of five
NITs. To estimate the total faculty they estimated the gross
enrolment (based on the existing output and the growth rates) and
have considered a student to faculty ratio of 15:1 based on the new
AICTE norm. The actual numbers may be lower as many institutions
may have higher student-faculty ratios. Table 6.14 shows the total
faculty requirement.
Table 6.14 Estimated Faculty Scenario
2006 2012 2017 IIT 2150 2940 3270 NIT 2220 2330 2570
Other 75400 154000 233000 Total 79500 159270 238840
(Source: Banerjee, R. and Muley, Vinayak, P. 2007)
It is clear that there would be a severe shortage of faculty
under these scenarios. Considering the retirement of existing
faculty, the requirement for new faculty to meet the numbers has
been given in Table 6.14. We had assumed that the student–faculty
ratios of 9:1 for the IITs and 15 : 1 for other institutions is
maintained. The total additional faculty requirement of 1.85 lakhs
indicated an average requirement of 17,000 new engineering faculty
each year. This implies a growth of 10.6% per year in the faculty
numbers. Of the existing approximately 75,000-80,000 engineering
faculty in 2006, less than 10% would have PhDs (maybe about
5000). Hence, a need for quality upgradation of existing faculty was felt.
218
6.1.2.1 Incentives for Faculty
Several institutions plan financial rewards for performance
(e.g. cash incentives for international journal publications, payments
for course loads above the average). These are being tried in several
Indian Institutions. In most engineering colleges, there is no system
of annual performance appraisals for the faculty. The performance is
assessed only at the time of promotions viz. from Assistant to
Associate Professor and from Associate Professor to Professor.
During the promotions, faculty candidates have to demonstrate their
research output, teaching innovations to an external committee of
experts. Apart from these assessments, there is no regular
mechanism for performance assessment and feedback. The annual
salary increases are independent of performance. This provides for
significant academic flexibility for the faculty. However the overall
output of the faculty can definitely be improved. There is a need to
introduce systems of performance assessment and goal setting.
Research groups and departments need to be reviewed at a regular
frequency (once every five years), should set their future goals.
6.1.3. EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITIES IN ENGINEERING
EDUCATION
In order to assess the picture of equity related to regional
distribution, participation of women and schedule castes and
schedule tribes the related secondary data has been analysed.
6.1.3.1. Regional Distribution
Table 6.15 shows the sanctioned intake and the number of
engineering institutions and the compound annual growth rate in
219
sanctioned intake and number of institutions. The maximum
number of engineering institutions and the sanctioned intake was in
the Southern Region.
Table 6.15 Region Wise Distributions of Sanctioned Intake and Number of
Engineering Institutions (NOI) 1996 1998 2003 2004 2005 2006 CAGR
1996-2006 Region NOI Intake NOI Intake NOI Intake NOI Intake NOI Intake NOI Intake NOI Intake
Central 31 6565 8315 82 25914 112 37195 115 39434 147 49238 16.8% 22.3% Eastern 24 4547 3862 99 24019 114 34016 110 33343 121 36437 17.6% 23.1% North 37 5684 8597 99 26356 106 32298 107 34748 140 43613 14.2% 22.6%
North-West 45 7627 11294 119 32042 153 50645 155 51295 169 58304 14.2% 22.6%
South 112 28195 40884 471 145372 496 165757 502 178637 523 196013 16.7% 21.4%
South – West 68 23964 28869 184 58243 207 70788 206 72063 221 77972 12.5% 12.5%
West 99 24869 33074 154 47775 158 48990 160 49687 175 55441 5.9% 8.4% Total 416 101451 571 134895 1208 359721 1346 439689 1355 459407 1496 517018 13.7% 17.7%
(Source: AICTE Annual Reports 2007)
The compound annual growth rate of number of institutions
and intake in the year (1996-2006) related to North region was
14.2% and 22.6%. A break-up of the number of institutions and
sanctioned intake per million populations for the different states has
been shown in table 6.16.
Table 6.16 Region wise Number of Institutions and Sanctioned Intake per
Million Population (2006)
Region State Number of institutions
Intake Population Million
Intake per million
population
Central Madhya Pradesh Chhattisgarh Gujarat
84 15 43
30060 5130 14086
60.3 20.8 50.7
498 246 278
Eastern
Mizoram Sikkim Orissa West Bengal Tripura Meghalaya Arunachal Pradesh Andaman & Nicobar Assam Manipur Nagaland
0 1 48 54 1 1 1 0 4 1 0
0 465
15033 15671 250 240 210 0
670 115 0
0.9 0.5 36.8 80.2 3.2 2.3 1.1 0.4 26.7 2.2 1.2
0 860 408 195 78 104 191 0 25 53 0
220
Jharkhand 9 3198 26.1 119
North Bihar Uttar Pradesh Uttranchal
6 110 13
1690 40418 3905
82.1 166.2 8.5
20 243 460
North –West
Chandigarh Haryana Jammu & Kashmir New Delhi Punjab Rajasthan HImachal Pradesh
5 45 6 16 47 47 6
788 16325 1401 6359 16961 16051 1282
0.9 21.1 10.1 13.9 24.4 56.5 6.0
875 772 138 459 696 284 211
South Andhra Pradesh Pondicherry Tamil Nadu
280 5
268
107575 2295
105318
76.2 0.1 62.4
1412 2355 1688
South West
Karnataka Kerala
128 93
56542 29165
52.9 31.8
1070 916
West Maharashtra Goa Daman and Diu
171 3 0
58989 794 0
96.9 1.3 0.4
609 589 0
Total 1511 550986 1025.1 536 (Source: AICTE Annual Reports 2007)
11%
10% 7%
8%11%
38%
15%
W est C ent ral
Eastern N orth
No rth -W est So u th
So ut h-W est
Figure 6.17: Region Wise Distribution of Sanctioned Intake
Region wise distribution of sanctioned intake for 2005-06 is
shown in figure 6.17. Map 6.1 shows the distribution of sanctioned
intake per million population and number of institutions all over the
India for 2006. It is clear that there has been a disproportionate
growth in engineering colleges and output in a few states (Tamil
Nadu, Karnataka).
221
Map 6.1: Statewise Sanctioned intake per Million Population
6.1.3.2 Social Access to Disadvantaged Groups
The representation of scheduled caste and scheduled tribe
students in higher technical education is appauling. While
scheduled caste students constituted only 5.2 percent at the
undergraduate level, the scheduled tribe students have constituted
4.25 percent in 1996 – 97.
Even the Education Commission (1964-66) in its study of
socio-economic background of students in professional institutions
at various levels has observed that, in the IITs, 82 percent of the
students have came from urban areas and most of them have been
222
from families earning Rs. 500 per month. Further, as compared to
IITs, the proportion of rural students in the NITs has varied from
12.8 percent to 41.2 percent, that of agriculturists from 4.3 percent
to 23.9 percent, and that of persons with parental income less than
Rs. 150 from 6.9 percent to 32.9 percent. The same has trend
continued in other engineering colleges. The enrolment of the
disadvantaged groups in the elite institutions of engineering and
technology has been still low. The data on registrants in 1979-80
and 1982-83 has showed that there has been an increase in the
representation of scheduled caste from 3.2 to 4.3 percent, and of
scheduled tribe from 0.7 to 0.8 percent in the IITs, a very marginal
figure. Many seats in IITs have remained vacant for want of
candidates from these sections. For instance, only 132 of the 355
seats reserved for SCs and 20 out of 176 seats reserved for the STs
at the undergraduate level were filled in the academic year 1994-95.
In other words, the shortfall of seats in these categories has been
62.82 percent and 88.64 percent respectively. The enrolment of SCs
and STs in other technical institutions is more or less the same or
even worse. Thus, this marginal representation of students from
Scheduled Castes and Tribes in the institutes of excellence has been
an indicator of unequal educational opportunities. Various reasons
have been attributed to this inequality of educational opportunity.
Rajagopalan and Singh (1968) have argued that though
admission to IITs has been based on an all India competitive
223
examination and no artificial restrictions are imposed on any section
from seeking admission, in actual practice, it appeared to be
determined by a set of socio-cultural factors. Among these, the
awareness of the existence of technological education, appreciation
of its importance, the ability to afford that education as well as the
quality of education previously received have been crucial. The
following table 6.17 shows the status of enrolment of general SC and
ST candidates in engineering education for different years.
Table 6.17 Social Distribution of Indian Engineering Education
1978-79 to 2001-02
1978-79(%) 1988-89 (%)
1998-99 (%)
2001-02 (%)
Engineering Education General 93.8 92.8 87.1 78.9 SC 5.3 5.9 10.4 15.2 ST 1.0 1.3 2.6 5.9 Males in Engg. Education General 92.8 88.7 SC 5.9 8.9 ST 1.3 2.4 Females in Engg. Education General 92.8 68.3 SC 6.3 27.0 ST 1.0 4.7 (Sources:1. Karuna Chanana 1993 2. National Commission for Schedule castes and schedule tribes, 1996-97
and 1997-98 3. MHRD, and statistical abstract India 2000)
It is clear from the above table 6.17 that a considerable
improvement has been seen in the percentage enrolment of SCs and
STs from 1978-79 (5.3%, 1.0%) to 2001-02 (15.2%, 5.9%).
224
Table 6.18 Enrolment of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes in Selected
Areas in Higher Education in India (% of Total Enrolment)
Category Year Percentage of total enrolment
Schedule Castes 1990-91 5.7
2002-03 6.7
Scheduled Tribes 1990-91 1.1
2002-03 3.2
(Source: Selected Educational Statistics, 2003)
It is evident from the table 6.18 that participation of SC and
ST students in engineering education has increased from 5.7% and
1.1% to 6.7% and 3.2% respectively in higher education, in general.
Therefore on the whole the percentage of SC and ST student in
engineering education is though not satisfactory but is better than
their total percentage in the higher education in general.
6.1.3.3 Gender Participation:
Another cause of concern is the participation of women in
technical education. Though the enrolment of women in engineering
and technology courses has registered an increase, it is far behind
the enrolment of men.
Table 6.19 Enrolment of Women Students in Selected Areas in Higher
Education in India (% of Total Enrolment)
Women Students 1990-91 10.9
2002-03 22.6
(Source: Selected Educational Statistics, 2003)
225
It is evident from the table 6.19 that participation of females in
engineering education is far behind the males but it has increased
from 10.9% in 1990-91 to 22.6% in 2002-03 which is quite significant.
Parikh and Sukhatme (1992, 1994, 1997, 2002) conducted
two extensive studies on women engineers in India using data on
enrolment in engineering colleges, out-turn and other factors
according to the data available from these studies although there
has been a significant increase in outturn of women engineers, their
prospects of employment yet their career advancement profiles
remain a matter of concern.
Data obtained in study I on the number and percentage of
women who obtained bachelor’s degrees from 13 institutions has
been given in table 6.20. This data is for the period 1975 to 1988
and is reasonably representative of the national picture.
Table 6.20 Year wise Distribution of Women Graduates from Some
Institutions Year No. of Women Total No. of
Graduates Percent of
Women 1975 13 1914 0.68 1976 27 2124 1.27 1977 23 2303 0.99 1978 30 2500 1.20 1979 38 2897 1.31 1980 41 2818 1.45 1981 90 3084 2.91 1982 87 2981 2.92 1983 147 3246 4.53 1984 165 3339 4.94 1985 187 3601 5.19 1986 205 3419 6.00 1987 184 3156 5.83 1988 298 3271 8.74
(Source: Parikh and Sukhatme 2002)
226
Similar data obtained in study II for the period 1994 to
1998 from 31 representative institutions is given in table 6.21. An
examination of table 6.22 shows the spectacular increase in
enrolment and out-turn of women engineers over the years. In the
1970s the percentage increased slowly from less than 1 percent to
about 1.5 per cent. Thereafter the percentage has been increasing
almost every year, crossing 15 percent in 1998.
Table 6.21 Yearwise Distribution of Women Graduates from Some
Institutions Year Number of
Women Total Number of
Graduates Percent of Women
1994 454 4641 9.78 1995 500 4865 10.28 1996 542 5111 10.60 1997 703 5037 13.96 1998 814 4276 15.43 (Source: Parikh and Sukhatme 2002)
The reliability of this data was checked by the investigator
comparing it with enrolment data published by UGC. The yearwise
variation of the number of women enrolled in engineering education in
the country and women as a percentage of total enrolment given in
table 6.22.
Table 6.22 Enrolment of Women in Engineering
Year Number of Women enrolled
Women as a percentage of total
enrolment 1974-78 1300 1.5 1979-82 4400 3.7 1983-86 12200 6.9 1987-90 15800 7.6 1991-94 24900 8.3 1995-99 63100 16.2
(Source: UGC 1999)
227
An year to year comparison between tables is not possible
because enrolment is the sum of four years of intake. However it has
been seen that the percentages for all years are in good agreement.
Table 6.23 Women Engineering Graduates as a Percentage of Outturn
Type of Institutions Study I (%) Study II (%) IITs 1.2 3.2 Regional Engineering Colleges 4.1 9.2 Government Engineering Colleges 4.4 17.2 Private Engineering Colleges 1.5 13.1 (Source: Parikh and Sukhatme 2002)
In contrast, the number of women passing out in the 1970s
ranged only between 100 and 200 every year. Finally, it is of interest
to study data on out-turn of women engineering graduates as a
percentage of the total passing out of various types of educational
institutes. This has been presented in the table 6.22. The
percentages are compiled from the detailed records of the 12
institutions in study I and 31 institutions in study II. The increase in
outturn during the ten year period from study I to study II is clearly
seen with regard to government engineering institutions and private
engineering institutions. However, it is disappointing to note that the
increase in IITs is insignificant and that even in RECs, it is rather small.
Table 6.24 Estimates of Actual Intake for Bachelor’s Degree Programme
Year Intake Capacity % filled Actual Intake 1951 4778 100 4778 1961 15499 100 15497 1971 18207 100 18207 1981 34835 90 31352 1991 70481 80 56385 1996 101451 75 76088 1998 134695 73 98327 2001 226484 70 158539
(Source: Parikh and Sukhatme 2002)
228
Table 6.24 forms the basis for estimating the number of
women graduating with degrees in engineering in the country as a
whole in recent years. As an example, we take the year 2000.
Students passing in 2000 would have been admitted in 1996. From
table 6.24 the actual intake in 1996 is 76088. We assume that the
percentage passing out in 70 percent of the actual intake. This is a
good assumption based on actual figures for out-turn for earlier
years. Assume that women constitute 17 percent of the out turn. We
obtain the number of women passing out in 2000 as 76088 x 70% x
17% = 9050.
Table 6.25 Enrolment in Engineering and Technology by Levels and
Sex (1971-2000)
Graduate Post Graduate Doctorate Total Men 84025 6704 878 91607 1971 Women 820 186 45 1051 Men 111064 10792 1995 123857 1981 Women 4942 567 169 5678 Men 215081 NA NA NA 1991 Women 26287 NA NA NA Men 325944 NA NA NA 2000 Women 63057 NA NA NA
(Source: IAMR, India 1995 and 2000)
The enrolment at the graduation level has increased from
84025 in 1971 to 325944 in 2000 for men and from just 820 in
1971 to 63057 for women. The enrolment of men has increased as
four fold over a period of three decades and that of women has
marked a quantum jump during the same period. Though it has
been a welcome development as far as the expansion of access has
been concerned, the gulf between the proportion of men and women
229
had been alarming. Enrolment in post graduate courses in
engineering & technology though had increased but it had not been
proportionate with the growth in the enrolment at the graduate level.
The percentages of women engineers at the IITs and the
NITs has been significantly lower than the national average. In 2005
at IIT Bombay the percentage of women graduates to the total has
been about 8% at the Bachelors (B.Tech) level, 9% at the Masters
(M.Tech) level and about 17% at the Doctoral level (including
science, humanities and management. Similar disparities have
existed in the faculty. As an example, about 10% of the IIT Bombay
faculty have been women.
Thus it can be concluded that engineering and technology
education in India has been highly selective in terms of providing,
regional access & social access to the disadvantaged sections of the
society such as scheduled castes and tribes, and women. The
representations of disadvantaged groups have been marginal and,
therefore, it suggests that the engineering and technology education
has contributed in a very limited way to the social mobility in the
Indian society. Especially, the elite Indian Institutions of Technology
have almost become out of reach for these groups. Hence, it further
substantiates the view that engineering and technology education is
engaged in producing what may be termed as a class of potential
elite from among the elite sections of the society, in terms of region,
caste, class and gender.
230
6.1.4. FINANCING OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION
The economic returns of technical education in India have
been estimated to be very high. For example, in a growth accounting
exercise Mathur (1987) has estimated the contribution of
technological change to economic growth in India to be quite
significant. Estimates of rates of return based on scientific and
technical education have varied between 17.4 percent (under
graduate Diploma) and 70.8 percent (Graduate degree). Similar high
rates of return of scientific and technical education have also been
reported by Nalla Gouden (1994). Despite high returns associated
with investment in technical education, the level and pattern of
financing technical education in the country has been far from
satisfactory.
6.1.4.1 Private Participation in Engineering Education
In the recent years the number of private institutions as
compared to that of government institutions have continuously
increased. Figure 6.19 shows picture of growth of private versus
public institutions at national level. Due to adoption of neo liberal
policies by the government of India after 1991, the private players
rushed to have also entered in the field of engineering education. As
a result of it a rapid increase in the number of engineering
institutions has been recorded. It is evident from the table 6.26 that
the percentage of private engineering institutions has increased at a
very fast rate after 1999-2000 and the figure of 85% in 2003-04
leaving behind only 15% of the engineering institutions of India to be
funded by the government.
231
Table 6.26 Number & Percentage of Private and Government Institutions at
the National Level
No. of Institutions (%) Year Private Government Total
510 159 669 1999-2000 (76%) (24%) (100%) 667 171 838 2000-01
(80%) (20%) (100%) 868 189 1057 2001-02
(82%) (18%) (100%) 1017 191 1028 2002 – 03 (84%) (16%) (100%) 1071 194 1265 2003 – 04 (85%) (15%) (100%)
(Source: Natarajan 2004)
510
667
868
1017 1071
159 171 189 191 194
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1990-2000 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004
No.
of I
nst
itu
tion
s Private
Government
Figure 6.18: Bar Graph of Number of Private & Government
Institutions at the National Level.
6.1.4.2 Public Expenditure on Technical and Engineering
Education
232
Table 6.27 Budget Expenditure on Technical and Engineering Education
in India
In Current Prices In 1993-94 Prices Year Plan Non Plan Total Plan Non Plan Total
1990-91 265.38 487.63 753.01 360.41 662.24 1022.65 1991-92 289.99 519.47 809.46 346.15 620.07 966.22 1992-93 313.87 593.25 907.12 344.61 651.36 995.97 1993-94 345.48 672.25 1017.73 345.48 672.25 1017.73 1994-95 471.40 717.86 1189.26 430.12 655.00 1085.12 1995-96 488.85 801.40 1290.25 409.01 670.15 1079.16 1996-97 554.05 895.96 1450.01 431.98 698.55 1130.53 1997-98 619.37 1003.19 1622.56 452.49 732.90 1185.39 1998-99 706.33 1366.81 2073.14 477.73 924.45 1402.18 1999-2000 874.18 1584.78 2458.96 569.23 1031.94 1601.17 2000-01 735.21 1792.81 2528.02 462.78 1128.48 1591.26 2001-02 789.35 1771.04 2560.39 480.52 1078.13 1558.65 2002-03 RE 832.14 2056.36 2888.50 486.45 1202.11 1688.56 2003-04 BE 1076.58 2105.73 3182.31 611.17 1195.41 1806.58
(Source: CABE Committee 2004)
Public expenditure on technical education does not seem to
have suffered major fluctuations during the 1990s. It increased
steadily from Rs. 753 crores in 1990-91 to Rs. 3182 crores in 2003-
04 (budget estimate) in current prices. However, in real terms it
increased only by about 75 percent during this period. Further, plan
expenditure has not increased as much as non-plan expenditure
during this period. While the union government meets only 30
percent of the total government expenditure on higher education, in
the case of technical education, the union and the state
governments share almost equally the total financial responsibilities.
In 2001-02, the share of the union government was 48 percent,
while the states funded the remaining 52 percent.
233
Table 6.28 Union Government Expenditure on Technical Education
(Rs. Crores in current prices)
Institutions 2003 – 04 BE %age IITs 589.0 38.13 IIMs 74.7 4.84 IISc 99.0 6.41
AICTE 130.0 8.41 RECs 216.7 14.03 Others 435.5 28.19
(Source: CABE Committee 2004)
It is evident from the table 6.28 that IITs generally got a lion’s
share in the Union Government’s budgetary expenditure on
technical Education. Whereas budgetary provisions are also made to
financially cater to the needs of IIMs, IISc, AICTE, RECs, and other
institutions.
IITIIMsIIScAICTERECsOthers
Figure 6.19: Pie Chart Showing Union Government Expenditure on Technical Education (in %)
234
Table 6.29 Allocation to Technical Education in the Five Year Plans (Crores)
Five Year Plans Amount % First Five Year Plan 20 13 Second Five Year Plan 49 18 Third Five Year Plan 125 21 Plan Inter-Regnum 81 25 Fourth Five Year Plan 106 13 Fifth Five Year Plan 107 12 Sixth Five Year Plan 324 12 Seventh Five Year Plan 1083 12 Annual Plans 848 16 Eighth Five Year Plan 2786 13 Ninth Five Year Plan 2373.51 9 Tenth Five Year Plan 4700 10
(Source: i. Tilak 1996 ii. http://www.planningcommision.nic.in)
The allocation for technical education in the second (1956-61)
and third (1961-66) five year plans has been respectively 18 percent
and 21 percent of the total allotment for education. During the
subsequent ‘Plan Holiday’ period of 1966 – 69 it has been raised to
25 percent. In order to ensure the quality of technical education, the
government set up, during the period of the first three five year
plans, five Indian Institutes of Technology and fifteen Regional
Engineering Colleges which are now re-designated as National
Institutes of Technology. It has been believed that these new
institutions would not only provide greater access to technical
education but would also be instrumental in giving new directions to
it in terms of quality and content.
By the close of the 1960s the government was finding it to be
increasingly difficult in meeting the growing demand for technical
235
education. It is symptomatic that in the fourth five year plan (1969-
74) the allotment to technical education has reduced to 13 percent.
In mid – seventies a decision was taken to grant permission to
private trusts and enterprises to start engineering colleges on a self-
supporting basis. The allocation for technical education has
remained constant in the fifth, sixth and seventh plans 12 percent.
Whereas after increasing to 13 percent in Eighth Five Year Plan it
felt to 9 percent in the Nineth Five Year Plan. However, the allocation
for technical education was 10 percent in the Tenth Five Year Plan.
6.1.5. DEMAND AND SUPPLY OF ENGINEERS
If supply and demand for engineering graduates is to be
balanced, it is expected that the number of engineering graduates
required would depend on the growth of the economy and the
population.
0500
100015002000250030003500
1951
1958
1966
1974
1979
1986
1989
1996
1999
2002
2005
Years
Val
ues
GDP in Thousand Crores Population in Million
Figure 6.20: Population and GDP Growth for India During 1947–2006
Figure 6.20 shows the population and real gross domestic
product (at constant 2006 prices) trend for India during 1947-06.
236
0
50
100
150
200
250
600 800 1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
2200
2400
2600
GDP/Population
En
gin
eers
Per
Mill
ion
Pop
ula
tion
Figure 6.21: Engineers per Million Population to Real GDP per capita
It has been attempted to correlate the number of engineering
graduates with the population and the GDP. A plot of the number of
engineering graduates (E) per million population to the real GDP per
capita has been shown in figure 6.21 and reveals a linear trend. It is
felt that there is an artificial increase (greater than the actual
demand for engineers). This is likely to show up in a number of
sanctioned seats remaining vacant. The ratio of E/S is likely to
decrease. This may also reflect in larger unemployment rates for
engineering graduates.
237
Table 6.30 Number of Total Unemployed Engineering Graduates by
Select States
Sr. No. State 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1. Assam 583 598 357 474 884 2. Orissa 832 2590 2063 3267 7677 3. West Bengal 1012 1307 1119 1616 1854 4. Chandigarh 223 196 177 239 NA 5. Delhi 619 643 414 440 371 6. Himachal Pradesh 118 212 219 333 527 7. Haryana - 944 811 1206 1029 8. Punjab 726 1318 1414 2038 3008 9. Jammu & Kashmir 540 515 469 768 378 10. Rajasthan 1126 1305 1926 1453 2291 11. Uttar Pradesh 662 - - - NA 12. Gujarat 2740 3302 4509 7642 NA 13. Madhya Pradesh 3224 2498 2279 2362 4780 14. Maharashtra - 24320 23373 27639 NA 15. Andhra Pradesh 5713 6213 7470 11865 NA 16. Karnataka 5919 7987 9519 12771 12146 17. Kerala 1171 1568 2211 2115 1129 18. Tamil Nadu 18181 16503 23184 49752 51831
Notes: The figures exclude the outturn of the year under consideration. (-) implies course does not exist in the state/ data not available. NA – Not Available (Source: NTMIS, AICTE, Government of India)
The table 6.30 provides the picture related to number of total
unemployed engineers (selected states) from the year 2001 to 2005.
In the year 2001, the lowest number of unemployed engineers (118)
were in the state of Himachal Pradesh and the same year the highest
number were in the Tamil Nadu state. In the year 2005, the lowest
number of unemployed engineers were in Delhi and Tamil Nadu
state again had the highest number of (51831) unemployed
engineers.
238
Table 6.31 Number of Unemployed Civil Engineers by Select States
Sr. No. State 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1. Assam 20 10 10 12 20 2. Orissa 9 79 83 69 225 3. West Bengal 92 137 100 212 112 4. Chandigarh 34 39 15 34 NA 5. Delhi 30 47 19 12 21 6. Jammu & Kashmir - - - 13 NA 7. Rajasthan 62 46 45 100 54 8. Uttar Pradesh 32 - - - NA 9. Gujarat 263 413 438 915 NA 10. Madhya Pradesh 102 22 14 64 149 11. Maharashtra - 1079 613 778 NA 12. Andhra Pradesh 181 415 401 619 NA 13. Karnataka 54 116 207 292 270 14. Kerala 42 320 61 66 47 15. Tamil Nadu 451 7531 242 2246 1374 16. Haryana - 28 24 37 25 17. Punjab 80 146 68 188 266
Notes: The figures exclude the outturn of the year under consideration. (-) implies course does not exist in the state/ data not available. NA – Not Available (Source: NTMIS, AICTE, Government of India)
The table 6.31 shows the situation of unemployed engineers by
selected states in the civil trade from the year 2001 to the year 2005.
The Orissa State shows lowest number in the mentioned trade in
2001. In the year 2001 the largest number of unemployed engineers
were in Tamil Nadu (451) whereas in the year 2005, the lowest
number of unemployed engineers were in the Assam state (20) and
largest number were in Tamil Nadu (1374).
239
Table 6.32 Number of Unemployed Electrical Engineers by Select States
Sr. No.
States 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
1. Assam 69 85 93 121 159 2. Orissa 282 556 502 768 1348 3. West Bengal 135 99 161 216 331 4. Chandigarh 26 27 51 31 NA 5. Delhi 102 69 35 92 54 6. Himachal Pradesh 36 46 63 118 162 7. Haryana - 191 173 196 102 8. Punjab 74 121 180 262 368 9. Jammu & Kashmir 99 155 71 140 104 10. Rajasthan 134 141 364 246 530 11. Uttar Pradesh 147 - - - NA 12. Gujarat 384 625 881 1490 NA 13. Madhya Pradesh 711 323 250 288 481 14. Maharashtra - 1282 859 1056 NA 15. Andhra Pradesh 992 1305 1224 2063 NA 16. Karnataka 1030 726 980 1169 1239 17. Kerala 229 320 322 381 288 18. Tamil Nadu 3628 753 4737 7791 455
Notes: The figures exclude the outturn of the year under consideration. (-) implies course does not exist in the state/ data not available. NA – Not Available (Source: NTMIS, AICTE, Government of India)
Table 6.32 shows the data related to unemployed engineers by
selected state in the Electrical discipline. In the year 2001, the
number of unemployed engineers in Electrical trade was lowest (26)
in Chandigarh followed by Himachal Pradesh (36), Assam (69),
Punjab (74), J & K (99) and on the other hand the table also depicts
the picture of lowest and highest number of unemployed electrical
engineers in the year 2005 that is 54 in Delhi and 1348 in Orissa.
240
Table 6.33 Number of Unemployed Electronics Engineers by Select States
Sr. No.
State 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
1. Assam 9 23 51 10 34 2. Orissa 163 506 358 675 1599 3. West Bengal 83 100 64 196 391 4. Chandigarh 8 19 8 11 NA 5. Delhi 50 76 59 41 122 6. Himachal Pradesh 18 86 56 59 147 7. Haryana - 70 53 279 343 8. Punjab 142 251 306 361 820 9. Jammu & Kashmir 147 139 37 184 173 10. Rajasthan 57 107 169 126 392 11. Uttar Pradesh 200 - - - NA 12. Gujarat 310 406 475 254 NA 13. Madhya Pradesh 737 722 535 120 306 14. Maharashtra - 5469 6587 2718 NA 15. Andhra Pradesh 1236 969 1282 1652 NA 16. Karnataka 1365 1484 1580 2646 3223 17. Kerala 175 165 100 224 162 18. Tamil Nadu 3998 3400 5006 9135 11808
Notes: The figures exclude the outturn of the year under consideration. (-) implies course does not exist in the state/ data not available. NA – Not Available (Source: NTMIS, AICTE, Government of India)
Table 6.33 shows number of unemployed engineers by selected
states in the electronics discipline from the year 2001 to 2005. The
Chandigarh region had only eight unemployed engineers. In Assam
the number of unemployed engineers was nine followed by 18 in
Himachal Pradesh. On the other hand, Tamil Nadu state had
maximum number of unemployed engineers i.e. 3998 followed by
Karnataka 1365, Andhra Pradesh 1236, etc. But in the year 2005
the number of unemployed engineers rose to 34 in Assam. But in
the Southern States like Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh,
the number of unemployed engineers increased up to a larger extent.
In 2005 due to increase in supply of engineers by the unprecedented
growth of private institutions.
241
Table 6.34 Number of Unemployed Mechanical Engineers by Select States
Sr. No.
State 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
1. Assam 221 203 76 173 293 2. Orissa 109 649 56 698 1750 3. West Bengal 224 171 118 541 243 4. Chandigarh 15 14 10 21 NA 5. Delhi 161 104 67 77 47 6. Himachal Pradesh - 26 63 37 68 7. Haryana - 184 110 246 166 8. Punjab 127 220 294 317 681 9. Jammu & Kashmir 163 112 48 193 36 10. Rajasthan 262 261 345 237 299 11. Uttar Pradesh 111 - - - NA 12. Gujarat 557 614 921 1627 NA 13. Madhya Pradesh 602 466 425 445 1015 14. Maharashtra - 3714 3515 4711 NA 15. Andhra Pradesh 1090 1259 1407 3383 NA 16. Karnataka 1399 2020 2307 3252 1196 17. Kerala 304 408 528 432 186 18. Tamil Nadu 4407 3370 4373 8676 8567
Notes: The figures exclude the outturn of the year under consideration. (-) implies course does not exist in the state/ data not available. NA – Not Available (Source: NTMIS, AICTE, Government of India)
As far as unemployment in Mechanical discipline is concerned
table 6.34 reveals that in the year 2001 Chandigarh had 15
unemployed engineers whereas this figure rose to 21 in the year
2004. It means that in this region the increase in unemployed
engineers in Mechanical discipline was very small. While by the year
2005 the number increased to 1196 in Karnataka and 8567 in Tamil
Nadu. Thus the number of unemployed engineers in Tamil Nadu was
maximum which doubled in four years from 2001 to 2004. The
overall picture reveals that no state could provide jobs to all the
successful engineering graduates.
242
Table 6.35 Number of Unemployed Metallurgy Engineers by Select States
Sr. No.
State 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
1. Orissa 10 47 56 33 52 2. West Bengal 47 71 65 39 8 3. Chandigarh 10 19 9 14 NA 4. Rajasthan 22 23 28 32 15 5. Gujarat 27 - 30 61 NA 6. Madhya Pradesh 56 - - - - 7. Maharashtra - - 273 225 NA 8. Andhra Pradesh 20 157 98 62 NA 9. Karnataka 5 12 6 8 22 10. Tamil Nadu 44 138 164 568 155
Notes: The figures exclude the outturn of the year under consideration. (-) implies course does not exist in the state/ data not available. NA – Not Available
(Source: NTMIS, AICTE, Government of India )
The table 6.35 shows that in the year 2001 the Karnataka
state had minimum number of unemployed engineers in metallurgy
trade. The Madhya Pradesh state had maximum number of
unemployed engineers in the same discipline which was 56 followed
by 47 in West Bengal, 44 in Tamil Nadu and 27 in Gujarat. But in
Tamil Nadu the number of unemployed engineers increased to 155
by the year 2005.
6.1.6 RESULTS & DISCUSSION
6.1.6.1 Results
The analysis of secondary data has led us to the following
results regarding growth and development of engineering education
at the national level:
1. At the time of independence there have been only 42
engineering institutions in the country providing education at
degree level. Whereas the number has reached upto 1511 in
243
the year 2006. This number has been only 216 upto 1980 but
it increased at a very fast rate in the succeeding years.
2. The sanctioned intake has increased from 2500 in 1947 to
5.51 lakhs in 2007. The compound annual growth rate (CAGR)
for this 60-year period has been 9.4%. In the ten years from
1997 to 2007 the sanctioned strength has been from 1.15
lakhs to 5.51 lakhs with a Compound Annual Growth Rate
(CAGR) of 17% per year.
3. The total output of engineering graduates has increased from
270 in 1947 to 2.37 lakhs in 2006 (corresponding to a
compound annual growth rate of 12%).
4. In India the number of engineers per million population has
increased from about 1 in 1947 to 213 in 2006 which shows a
considerable increase.
5. The average sanctioned intake per institution has increased
from 74 in 1950 to 346 in 2006 (CAGR of 2.8% per year). An
examination of the trend indicates a change in the trend from
1995, with a larger number of degree granting institutions
being set up. The growth in sanctioned intake from 1995-2006
corresponds to a CAGR of 17.1% per year. The bulk of this
increase has been achieved by setting up of new institutions
(CAGR of new institutions during this period is 13.4%). The
average sanctioned intake has increased from 242 to 346
(CAGR of 3.3%).
244
6. The post graduate output in engineering has increased from
about 30 in 1947 to almost 20000 in 2006 (CAGR of 11.6 %).
In the five years from 2001 to 2006 the M Tech/ ME output
has increased from about 14000 in 2001 to almost 20000 in
2006 (CAGR of 7.5%). (There is some uncertainty in this data
since it depended on the O/S ratio used.)
7. It has been observed that percentage of Master’s output to the
graduate engineers output has increased to a high of 15% to
17% in the 1980s and reduced to 8.5% in 2005.
8. The overall growth rate of Ph.D. degrees in engineering
awarded in India has been 8% from 1954 to the year 2005.
However in the mid-80s the number of PhDs has been around
600. Since then there has been a reduction in the growth rate.
The CAGR from 1985 to 2005 has been only 2.9%.
9. The percentage of Ph.Ds. output to graduate engineers output
has declined at a very fast rate after 1986 and in 2004 it has
approached the earlier rate of 1964.
10. A comparison of graduates, masters and PhD outputs in
engineering for different countries has shown that in the year
2002, India has crossed over Japan becoming second country
in the world to produce most number of engineering graduates
after China.
11. The number of graduate engineers per million population in
India compared to the developed nations has been
comparatively low.
245
12. The percentage of engineering Ph.Ds to bachelors engineering
degree granted annually in India has been much less than that
of Germany, UK, US, Japan and South Korea.
13. It has been found that during the recent years the percentage
of doctorates in engineering have decreased in India, Japan,
China, South Korea and Germany while it has increased in
USA and Australia.
14. The discipline wise growth rate of sanctioned intake in India in
the year (1990-2001), the CAGR of Computer/ IT has been
highest (17.8%) as followed by Electronics Engineering (10.0%)
and Electrical (8.3%) respectively. While the total number of
CAGR in all the disciplines is 9.1%. On the other hand in the
year 1996 – 2004, this rate has risen upto 17.4%.
15. In the year 2007, the estimated faculty crunch in IIT, Delhi
has been 100, in IIT, Bombay it has been 146, in IIT, Kanpur
115, IIT Guwahati 40 and in IIT Roorkee it has been 226 which
signifies a serious problem of shortage of faculty.
16. According to an estimate, in the year 2012 and 2017
respectively we will need 2940 and 3270 more teachers for the
IITs existing before 2006, 2330 and 2570 for the NITs existing
before 2006 and 15400 and 23300 for the other institutions.
Moreover, it has been also estimated that in 2006 less than
10% of the teachers were having Ph.Ds.
246
17. In the year 2006, the number of engineering institutions in the
central region has been 142, where as in the eastern region it
has been 120, in northern region 129, in north-west 172 and
in the south 553. In the south west this number has been 221
while it has been 174 in the west.
18. The percentage of SC and ST students has been only 5.7 and
1.1 in 1990-91 and 6.7 and 3.2 in 2002-03 respectively which
does not show any satisfactory improvement.
19. The participation of females in engineering education is far
behind the males but it has increased from 10.9% in 1990-91
to 22.6% in 2002-03 which is quite significant. The enrolment
at the graduation level increased from 84025 in 1971 to
325944 in 2000 for men and just 820 in 1971 to 63057 in
2000 for women. Even, in 2005 at IIT Bombay the percentage
of women graduates to the total has been about 8% at the
bachelors (B.Tech) level, 9% at the masters (M.Tech) level and
about 17% at the Doctoral level. Similar disparities have
existed in the faculty. About only 10% of the IIT Bombay
faculty have been women in the abovesaid year. Thus there
still has been a wide gender gap as far as engineering
education is concerned.
20. The percentage of private engineering institutions has
increased at a very fast rate after 1999-2000 and figured at
247
85% in 2003-04 leaving behind only 15% of the engineering
institutions of India to be funded by the government.
21. The percentage of expenditure on technical education of the
total expenditure on technical education has been 13% in first
five year plan, 18% in the second and 21% in third but after
this, it declined to 13% in the fourth plan and further 9% in
the ninth five year plan and 10% in the tenth plan.
22. It is estimated that about 30% of the fresh engineering
graduates have remained unemployed even one year after
graduation (based on ATMRs of a few states).
23. In the year 2001, the lowest number of unemployed engineers
have been in the state of Himachal Pradesh (118) and the
highest number have been in the Tamil Nadu (1818) whereas
in 2005, the lowest number of unemployed engineers have
been in Delhi (371) whereas Tamil Nadu again has the highest
number of unemployed engineers (51831).
24. Orissa has the lowest number of unemployed civil engineers
(9) in 2001 whereas Tamil Nadu has the most (451) whereas in
2005 the lowest number of unemployed civil engineers have
been there in Assam (20) whereas the largest number have
been in Tamil Nadu (1374) again.
25. In the year 2001, the number of unemployed engineers in
Electrical trade has been lowest in Chandigarh (26) whereas it
has been highest in Tamil Nadu (3628) again. But in the year
248
2005 the maximum number of unemployed electrical
engineers has been in Orissa (1348) whereas minimum
number has been in Delhi (54).
26. The number of unemployed electronics engineers in all the
states of Assam, Orissa, West Bengal, Chandigarh, Delhi,
Himachal Pradesh, Haryana, Punjab, Jammu and Kashmir,
Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and
Tamil Nadu has increased during 2001 – 2005 whereas this
number has decreased in the states of Gujarat, Madhya
Pradesh and Kerala during this period.
27. As far as mechanical discipline is concerned the number of
overall unemployed engineers have been low as compared to
the other branches but it has increased continuously from
2001 to 2005 in Orissa, Gujarat and Tamil Nadu, whereas it
decreased in West Bengal, Rajasthan and Maharashtra.
6.1.6.2 Discussion
Thus, there has been a phenomenal growth in the number of
engineering institutions in the country after independence especially
since early nineteen eighties. During this period the number of
engineering institutions in India has grown at a faster rate as
compared to other countries of the world. Moreover, there has been
a significant increase in the sanctioned intake, enrolment and
outturn of engineering graduates. The increase in number of
engineering graduates output has further contributed to the
249
increase in number of post graduate output. The percentage of post
graduate engineers output to the graduate engineers output has
been maximum in nineteen eighties which has started decreasing
after it and declined by fifty percent upto 2004. Similarly, the
number of engineering doctorates awarded in India has also
increased gradually after independence and nearly approached one
thousand in 2004. However the percentage of doctorates output to
graduate engineers output has declined at a very fast rate after 1986
and in 2004 it has approached the earlier rate of 1964.
The number of engineers per million population in India is still
behind South Korea, Australia, Germany, UK, New Zealand, USA,
Japan and China. Whereas the growth rate of academic output at
the bachelors level in India has been highest in the world. The
growth rate at the masters and doctoral level has also been
significantly high except in the discipline of Civil engineering.
Moreover the growth rate in most of the disciplines like Chemical,
Computer, Electrical, Electronics, Mechanical engineering and other
has been tremendous.
Furthermore, although the number of teachers in engineering
institutions have increased after independence continuously, yet
there is an acute shortage of faculty in all the institutions. Even IITs,
NITs are facing the faculty crunch severely. The future requirements
of faculty in the field of engineering education do not seem to be
fulfilled easily.
250
Although there has been a tremendous growth of engineering
institutions in most parts of the country but it has been
disproportionate as far as the different regions of the country are
concerned. The growth in number of institutions and sanctioned
intake has been maximum in the Southern region whereas it has
been minimum in the Eastern region.
Besides, the representation of underprivileged groups of
society in the engineering field has not been satisfactory. In other
words the engineering education has contributed in a very limited
way to the social mobility in the Indian society. Though the
enrolment of female students at graduate level in engineering
courses has been continuously increasing and it has marked a jump
after 1971, yet the gulf between the proportion of men and women
has been alarming. It is also important to note that in the
institutions of excellence like IITs, the percentage of women
engineers has been significantly lower than the national level. On
the other hand, though enrolment of female students in post
graduate courses in engineering has increased but it has not been
proportionate with the growth in the enrolment of female students at
the graduate level.
Despite the high returns associated with investment in
technical education, the level and pattern of financing technical
education in the country has been far from satisfactory. The amount
of money spent on technical education has increased 235 times from
251
first plan to tenth five year plan whereas the allotment to technical
education has decreased from thirteen percent of the total allotment
in the first five year plan to ten percent in the tenth five year plan of
the total allotment for education. Moreover, the number of private
institutions has continuously increased after independence,
especially after the adoption of neo-liberal policies by Government of
India, after 1991. In the year 2003-04 the percentage of private
engineering institutions has risen to 85% leaving behind only 15% of
the total engineering institutions in India to be funded by the
Central and State Governments.
Furthermore, the growth in number of institutions of
engineering education has been out of step with the growth of
economy and the population. As a result there has been a greater
increase in the number of trained engineers than the actual
demand. This situation has led to unemployment among the
engineers in all the states of the country. But the problem of
unemployment of engineering graduates is most acute in the
southern states of Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and
Orissa. Moreover this problem has been more serious in case of
Civil, Electrical, Electronic and Mechanical Engineering trades as
compared to others.
252
SECTION - II
6.2 GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION IN PUNJAB
The Growth and Development of Engineering Education in
Punjab at degree level began in real sense after independence, when
Punjab Engineering College was established in 1953 at Chandigarh.
Prior to India’s independence it was called the ‘Maclagan
Engineering College’ and was located at Lahore. In 1947 it was
moved to the mountain town of Roorkee and functioned for
sometime out of the Thomson College’s campus. Guru Nanak Dev
Engineering College was established in Ludhiana in 1956 with an
initial intake of 45 students. Besides, regular full time post graduate
courses in production engineering, the college covered only three
areas of engineering studies at the initial stage i.e. Civil, Electrical
and Mechanical Engineering.
Further advances in engineering education were made in
Punjab with the establishment of Thapar Institute of Engineering
and Technology in Oct 1956 at Patiala. This institute was opened
with the joint efforts of Lala Karam Chand Thapar and Patiala
Technical Education Trust. This institute aimed at providing
engineering education at under graduate and post graduate levels.
Besides promoting industrial and scientific research in the state in
Dec 1985, TIET, Patiala attained the status of a Deemed University.
253
In 1962 yet advancement was made in the field of engineering
education with the establishment of Punjab Agriculture University at
Ludhiana. In 1964, the college of Agriculture Engineering came into
existence as one of the constituent colleges of Punjab Agricultural
University. The college aimed at catering the teaching, research and
extension needs of the state of Punjab in the fields of Agricultural
Engineering. Considerable contributions have been made by the
college through its six departments, namely:
1. Farm Power and Machinery
2. Soil and Water Engineering
3. Processing and Agricultural Structures
4. Mechanical Engineering
5. Civil Engineering
6. Computer Engineering
The Punjabi University at Patiala came into existence in the
year 1962 for promotion of Punjabi Language and culture. In 1987
the University opened the department of computer science and
engineering and introduced a four year B.Tech, course in the subject.
Guru Nanak Dev University was established on Nov. 24, 1969
at Amritsar to make provision for imparting education and for
promoting research in humanities, learned professions, sciences
especially of Applied Nature and Technology, etc.
Between 1972 to 1996, six departments emerged in GNDU to
provide technical courses at degree, post graduate and research level.
254
1. Guru Ramdas School of Planning (1972)
2. Department of Electronics Technology (1983)
3. Department of Architecture (1986-87)
4. Department of Computer Science and Engineering (1988)
5. Department of Food Science and Technology (1994)
6. Department of Applied Chemical Sciences and
Technology (1996)
The first technical institution established with the full financial
support of Punjab Govt. is the Giani Zail Singh College of
Engineering and Technology, Bathinda (1989). Another Institute was
established with the help of MHRD named Sant Longowal Institute
of Engineering & Technology at Longowal (Distt. Sangrur) in the
same year.
In 1987, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Regional Engineering College was
established at Jalandhar. In 2002 it was converted into NIT.
In 1993 another engineering college named Baba Banda Singh
Bahadur Engineering College at Fatehgarh Sahib was established.
Besides the two another Govt. Engineering Colleges: Beant College of
Engineering and Technology, Gurdaspur and Shaheed Bhagat Singh
College of Engineering and Technology, Ferozepur were opened.
Punjab Technical University was established at Jalandhar by
an Act of the State Legislature in 1997 to coordinate the functioning
of engineering institutions in the state.
255
The Department of Technical Education, Punjab formulated
‘Technical Education Policy (2003)’ with a number of objectives
including the development of technical education system on the
demandriven, market based and self sustaining bases and the
improvement in Technical Education System by strengthening, re-
organizing and reorienting the existing structure.
6.2.1. EXPANSION OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION
6.2.1.1 Increase in number of Engineering Institutions
At the time of independence, the number of engineering
institutions at the state level was two only while since independence,
there has been a tremendous increase in the number of engineering
institutions in the state of Punjab. This increase is represented by table 6.36.
Table 6.36 Year wise Number of Engineering Institutions in Punjab and
at National Level
Year No. of Institutions in New Punjab
No. of Institutions at National Level
1947 0 42 1950 0 53 1960 2 111 1966 3 130 1970 4 155 1980 5 216 1986 5 287 1990 7 337 2000 13 821 2003 45 1208 2004 53 1265 2006 56 1511
(Source: NTMIS, Punjab 2003, 2005 & 2007)
The figure 6.22 depicts that the growth of engineering
institutions in Punjab is linear i.e. it can be represented by
approximately a straight line upto the year 1992 i.e. there is a
256
steady growth. But after 1992 the growth was accelerated and after
2001, there has been quite a fast increase in the number of
engineering education institutions which is evident from the figure 6.22.
Figure 6.22: Growth in number of Institutions in Punjab and at National Level
During the period from 1947 to 1983 the pace of growth has
been very slow. The state has not been eager to create sufficient
opportunities for young students to get engineering education. In the
industrial and technological development the growth has tended to
evolve over a long period of time. Devices or technical systems
changed gradually. The leisurely industrial development pace of
technological changes has rarely demanded analytical capabilities
and the utmost skill of engineers. Hence the need of the new
engineering institutions of degree level has been felt only after 80s
when the state started attending the economic growth and
development of the state.
257
Table 6.37 Sanctioned intake in Punjab from 1947-2004
Year Student Intake 1947 0 1958 120 1960 240 1971 1383 1980 1707 1990 2111 1997 2645 1998 4200 1999 4380 2000 4865 2001 6215 2002 9125 2003 10565 2004 12225
(Source: NTMIS Punjab 2003 & 2005)
Table 6.37 shows the position of student’s intake in the state
of Punjab from 1947 to 2004. After independence the number of
intake has been 120 in 1958. In the year 1971 it has been to 1383,
whereas in the year 1980 it has reached 1707 in 1997 it has been
2645 and in 1998 it has been 4200. In subsequent years it has been
on further increasing. It can also be calculated from the above table
that the total CAGR (Compared Annual Growth Rate) for 2000 to
2004 has been 26.6%.
258
Table 6.38 Sanctioned Intake to Engineering Degree Course in Different
Years by Discipline Discipline 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 CAGR Civil 200 260 260 360 360 15.8 Electrical 480 600 1020 1180 1660 36.4 Mechanical 850 970 1600 2040 2420 29.9 Electronics 1080 1350 2130 2450 2750 26.3 Computer 1070 1400 2060 2380 2740 26.6 Agriculture 50 50 50 50 50 0.1 Production 110 110 110 110 110 0 Industrial 70 70 30 30 30 -19.1 Instrumentation 290 290 290 290 290 0 Textile 75 75 75 75 75 0 Chemical 300 300 300 300 300 0 Architecture 40 40 40 80 160 41.4 Food Technology 50 50 50 50 50 0 Leather Technology 20 20 20 20 20 0 Information Technology 180 630 1090 1150 1210 61 Total 4865 6215 9125 10565 12225 26.6%
(Source: NTMIS Punjab 2006)
Table 6.38 shows the discipline wise intake from the year 2000
to 2004. In the year 2000, the Electronics trade has highest intake
i.e. 1080 followed by Computers (1070), Mechanical (850) which has
increased to 2750, 2740, 2420 respectively in 2004. Every year it is
perpetually increasing by an average CAGR of 26.6 for all the
disciplines taken together.
259
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Civil
Electric
al
Mecha
nical
Electro
nics
Compu
ter
Agricu
lture
Produc
tion
Indus
trial
Instru
mental
Textile
Chemica
l
Archite
cture
Food &
Techn
ology
Leath
er Tec
hnolo
gy
Inform
ation
Techn
ology
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Figure 6.23: Growth of Sanctioned Intake of Engineering Graduates in Punjab (2001 – 04)
Table 6.39
Comparison of Student Intake with Neighbouring States
Year Punjab Haryana Himachal
1997 2645 2603 220 1998 4200 2837 220 1999 4380 4654 220 2000 4865 5804 220 2001 6215 5354 450 2002 9125 6809 650 2003 10565 8367 650 2004 12225 8064 650
(Source: Punjab Handbook & NTMIS, Himachal Pradesh and Haryana 2005 and 2006)
It is clear from the above table 6.39 that the student intake in
Punjab is highest as compared to its neighbouring states in the year 2004.
260
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Year
Stud
ent I
ntak
e
Student Intake Haryana Student Intake Himachal Student Intake Punjab
Figure 6.24: Comparison of Student Intake in Punjab with Neighbouring States
It is evident from figure 6.24 that the student intake in the
engineering institutions of Punjab has always been more than its
neighbouring states Himachal Pradesh and Haryana after 2001.
6.2.1.2 Output to Sanctioned Strength Ratio
Table 6.40 reveals the calculation of O/S (output to
sanctioned strength ratio for graduate engineers in Punjab. The O/S
ratio for students admitted in 1998 and passed in 2002 has been
0.670. For students admitted in 1999 and passed in 2003 has been
again 0.670. For students admitted in 2000 and passed in the year
2004, this ratio has been 0.73 whereas for the students admitted in
year 2001 and passed in the year 2005 it has been 0.74. It has been
noted that throughout this period the O/S ratio has been very low.
The desired ratio should be 0.9 or if possible higher than this. The
261
main reasons for this low O/S ratio are high failure rate of students
and leaving of the institution before completion of courses. An ideal
ratio would be 1.0 but normally ideal conditions are never possible
and O/S ratio of 0.9 is desirable for better utilization of country’s
resources. The low value ratio of O/S may be due to the following reasons:
1. Some of the students admitted to the institutions do not
possess the required aptitude and other personality
traits for getting engineering education i.e. this may be
the case generally with the students admitted through
payment seats.
2. Lack of proper infrastructure in the institution like
illequipped laboratories, hostels, canteens and dearth of
academic and co-curricular activities and shortage of
competent faculty lead to the fear in the minds of the
students about the standard of education and worth of
the degree. Therefore, they get admissions in other
institutions after leaving the course before completion.
6.2.1.3 Analysis of O/S Ratio Branch Wise
Table 6.40 also describes the O/S ratios for different
disciplines for different years for the students admitted in 2001 who
passed out in 2005. The mean of O/S ratio in agriculture
engineering is 0.92, in industrial branch it is 0.89, in chemical
discipline it is 0.89, in instrumentation trade 0.87, in food
technology stream it is 0.87 which is very near to 0.9. In branches
262
Table 6.40
O/S Ratio for Graduates from 1998 to 2001 (Punjab) calculated from ATMRs
Discipline Admitted in 1998
Passed in
2002
O/S Admitted in 1999
Passed in
2003
O/S Admitted in 2000
Passed in
2004
O/S Admitted in 2001
Passed in
2005
O/S Mean O/s ratio
Civil 200 93 0.465 200 117 0.585 200 115 0.57 260 104 0.4 0.505 Electrical 480 199 0.414 480 243 0.506 480 284 0.59 600 374 0.62 0.532 Mechanical 640 500 0.781 760 524 0.689 850 590 0.69 970 614 0.63 0.69 Electronics 1020 532 0.521 1020 582 0.570 1080 786 0.73 1350 1005 0.74 0.64 Computer 1070 746 0.697 1070 786 0.734 1070 890 0.83 1400 1229 0.88 0.76 Agriculture 50 50 1.000 50 45 0.900 50 48 0.96 50 42 0.84 0.92 Production 110 79 0.718 110 52 0.472 110 63 0.57 110 102 0.93 0.67 Industrial 85 82 0.964 85 70 0.823 70 71 1.01 70 55 0.78 0.89 Instrumentation 135 134 0.992 135 140 1.037 290 194 0.67 290 234 0.81 0.87 Textile 70 70 1.000 70 32 0.460 75 48 0.64 75 42 0.56 0.66 Chemical 170 193 1.135 170 177 1.040 300 206 0.69 300 213 0.71 0.89 Architect 40 38 0.950 40 32 0.800 40 18 0.45 40 21 0.52 0.68 Food Tech. 50 41 0.820 50 46 0.920 50 37 0.74 50 50 1.00 0.87 Leather Tech. 20 14 0.700 20 6 0.300 20 10 0.50 20 6 0.3 0.45 Information Technology 60 41 0.680 120 76 0.630 180 110 0.61 630 500 0.79 0.67
Total 4200 2812 0.670 4380 2928 0.670 4865 3470 0.73 6215 4591 0.74 0.67 (Source: NTMIS, Punjab 2006)
263
like computer it is 0.78, in mechanical trade it is 0.69, in production
technology it is 0.67, in information technology it is 0.67 and in textile it
is 0.66, and in electronics is 0.64 which is almost near the average of
0.67. Where again reasons of comparatively lower O/S ratio are same as
mentioned above in branches like electrical it is 0.532, in civil it is 0.505,
in leather technology it is 0.45 which is very low. The reasons behind
these low O/S ratio may be:
1. Very low merit of the student admitted to this branches and
hence high percentage of failure in the examination.
2. Leaving the course before completion by the students due to
under employment of graduates to these branches.
3. Shifting to other institutions or branches.
6.2.2 GROWTH IN FACULTY
An engineering institution has to be ranked or judged by its
capacity to produce world class professionals who have learnt their skills
under the guidance of highly competent, research oriented and skilled
faculty that is known for its innovation, imagination, synthesizing and
analytical competence, scientific intellect, business competency and
entrepreneur skills, etc. In the institutions the faculty has to perform
multi-farious activities. In the modern world especially in the period of
globalization it has become essential for an engineering institution to
have faculty which can enable it to compete with the contemporary
development requirements of the region, country and the world. But our
country is facing an acute shortage of such quality teachers in the field of
264
engineering education. This acute shortage of faculty has also been
observed in Punjab as well.
Table 6.41 Teacher-Student Ratio in Engineering Institutions of Punjab by Discipline
S. No. Description Total
Enrollment Teachers Student per
Teacher 1. Civil 754 53 14 2. Electrical 2063 126 16 3. Mechanical 4426 301 15 4. Electronics 5763 243 24 5. Computer Science 5638 315 18 6. Agriculture 202 6 34 7. Production 357 21 17 8. Industrial 106 9 12 9. Instrumentation 648 46 14 10. Textile 192 16 12 11. Chemical 707 44 16 12. Architecture 71 16 4 13. Food Tech. 208 22 9 14. Sugar Tech. 12 3 4 15. Planning 48 14 3 16. Information Tech 2123 40 53 17. Textile Chem. 72 7 10 18. Leather Tech. 26 4 7 19. Bio Tech. 117 19 6 20. Applied Sc. N.A. 275 0
Total 23533 1580 15 (Source: NTMIS Punjab 2006)
Student Teacher Ratio
Fig. 6.25: Teacher Student ratio in Engineering Colleges of Punjab by Disciplines
265
The figure 6.25 shows that in Punjab in seven disciplines of
engineering education the student-teacher ratio is less than that of
recommended by AICTE (1:15). It is also clear from the bar-graph that in
cases of Electronics, Agriculture and Information Technology the problem
of shortage of faculty is more acute as compared to other trades.
Table 6.42 Yearwise Student Teacher Ratio
Year Total Teachers Total Students Student Teacher
Ratio 1966 111 960 8.50 1971 160 1383 8.64 1980 245 1707 6.97 1990 268 2111 7.89 1999 993 10034 10.10 2000 1074 13231 12.30 2001 1188 13752 11.58 2002 1286 14284 11.10 2003 -- 17921 16.00 2005 1118 17921 16.00
(Official records of TIET (1966) (Punjab Handbook 2004, 28-29) (NTMIS Punjab 2003, 2005)
Table 6.42 shows the yearwise student teacher ratio in the year
1966 has been 8.5 which has increased upto 12.30 in year 2000. In the
year 2005 it rose to 16.00.
266
0 . 0 02 . 0 04 . 0 06 . 0 08 . 0 0
1 0 . 0 01 2 . 0 01 4 . 0 01 6 . 0 01 8 . 0 0
1 9 6 6 1 9 7 1 1 9 8 0 1 9 9 0 1 9 9 9 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 5
S tu d e n t T e a c h e r R a t i o
Figure 6.26: Student Teacher Ratio
Table 6.43 Distribution of Teachers with Highest Educational Qualifications at
Degree Level of Education in 2006
S. No. Discipline Unit Highest Educational Qualification Ph.D. M.Phil Post
Graduate Graduate Total
1 Agriculture No. 2 0 4 0 6 % 33.33 0.00 66.67 0.00 2 Architecture No. 0 0 7 9 16 % 0.00 0.00 43.75 56.25 3 Chemical No. 11 0 16 17 44 % 25.00 0.00 36.36 38.64 4 Civil No. 15 1 34 3 53 % 28.30 1.89 64.15 5.66 5 Computer Sc. No. 9 0 113 193 315 % 2.86 0.00 35.87 61.27 6 Electrical No. 8 0 67 51 126 % 6.35 0.00 53.17 40.48 7 Electronics No. 21 0 103 119 243 % 8.64 0.00 42.39 48.97 8 Food Tech. No. 11 0 11 0 22 % 50.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 9 Industrial No. 1 0 5 3 9 % 11.11 0.00 55.56 33.33
10 Instrumentation No. 5 0 24 17 46 % 10.87 0.00 52.17 36.96
11 Mechanical No. 29 0 167 105 301 % 9.63 0.00 55.48 34.88
12 Production No. 0 0 13 8 21 % 0.00 0.00 61.90 38.10
13 Textile Tech. No. 2 0 8 6 16 % 12.50 0.00 50.00 37.50
267
No. 11 1 6 31.58 1 5.26 19 14 Bio Tech. % 57.89 5.26
15 Leather Tech. No. 0 0 0 4 4 % 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
16 Sugar Tech. No. 1 0 2 0 3 % 33.33 0.00 66.67 0.00
17 Planning No. 0 0 13 1 14 % 0.00 0.00 92.86 7.14
18 Information Tech. No. 0 0 7 33 40 % 0.00 0.00 17.50 82.50
19 Textile Chemical No. 3 0 4 0 7 % 4.86 0.00 57.14 0.00
20 Applied Sc. No. 84 27 160 4 275 % 30.55 9.82 58.18 1.45 Total No. 213 29 764 574 1580 % 13.48 1.84 48.35 36.33
(Source: NTMIS Punjab 2006)
13.48%
1.84%
48.35%
36.33%Ph.D.
M.Phil
Post Graduate
Graduate
Figure 6.27: Faculty in Engineering Degree Institutions by highest Educational Qualification in 2006
The above pie-chart reflects the status of qualifications of teachers
of all the engineering colleges of Punjab and it displays a very dismal
picture of the situation in which only 13.48% were Ph. D. holders, merely
1.84% were having M. Phil. degree, whereas 48.35% were only post
graduates and 36.33 were just graduates.
268
6.2.3. EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITIES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION
6.2.3.1 Regional Distribution
The state of Punjab was reorganized on November 1, 1966. A major
part of its area went into Haryana & Himachal Pradesh. The remaining
part i.e. new Punjab has three main region: Majha, Doaba and Malwa.
Malwa is the biggest region area wise. This region developed at as faster
rate after the reorganization as the state government along with private
entrepreneurs paid their attention to the educational development of this
region. Out of total 53 engineering institutions Malwa has 47.16% while
Doaba has 30.12% and Majha has 22.64% institutions (upto 2004).
Moreover Mansa, Barnala, Tarntaran and Hoshiarpur districts have been
lagging much behind the other districts as far as the growth of
engineering education is concerned, as no engineering institutions has
been established in these districts upto 2004.
269
DISTRIBUTION OF ENGINEERING INSTITUTIONS IN PUNJAB
Map 6.2: District wise distribution of engineering institutions in Punjab
270
6.2.3.2. Social Access to Disadvantages Groups
Table 6.44 Outturn of Male and Female Schedule Caste Candidates
by Discipline at Degree Level Year Boys Girls Total 1971 25 - 25 1980 109 - 109 1990 308 6 314 2000 1110 153 1263 2003 1191 196 1387 2004 1006 193 1199 2005 1416 290 1706
(Source: Statistical Abstract of Punjab, 2006)
The table 6.44 shows that in 1971 the number of intake of SC boys
was 25 which increased to 1416 in the year 2005 but the number of SC
female students was 290 which is comparatively low as compared to the
male students.
Figure 6.28: Year wise Intake of Students at Graduate Level Engineering in Punjab
271
Table 6.45 Outturn of Male and Female Schedule Caste Candidates by
Discipline at degree level
2002 2003 2005 2006 Sr. No. Discipline B G T B G T B G T B G T
1. Civil 18 1 19 15 2 17 4 0 4 8 0 8 2. Electrical 14 3 17 15 3 18 18 3 21 22 1 23 3 Mechanical 19 - 19 18 - 18 51 - 51 83 - 83 4 Electronics 16 4 20 16 3 19 43 6 49 61 19 80 5 Computer Sci. 5 4 9 7 5 12 30 17 47 70 18 88 6 Agriculture 5 - 5 4 - 4 1 - 1 3 - 3 7 Production 4 - 4 3 - 3 6 - 6 8 - 8 8 Indl. Engg 2 - 2 1 - 1 10 - 10 5 4 9 9 Instrumentation 2 - 2 2 1 3 7 1 8 9 3 12 10 Textile Tech 4 - 4 2 - 2 5 4 9 5 7 12 11 Chemical 4 - 4 2 1 3 13 3 16 9 6 15 12 Arch. - - - - - - 2 1 3 - - - 13 Food Tech. - - - - - - 2 - 2 8 - 8 14 I.T. - - - - - - 5 3 8 - - - 15 Leather tech. - - - - - - - - - - - 4 16 Textile Chem. - - - - - - - - - - - 6 Total 12 105 15 100 197 38 235 58 359 (Source: NTMIS, Punjab, 2003 & 2005)
Table 6.45 shows discipline wise and sex wise distribution of
outturn of schedule caste candidates at degree level. The number of SC
students in 2002 was 105, out of which only 12 were girls. In 2006, we
find that the number of students rose to 359 and the number of girls also
increased to 58. It should also be noted that the number of students
increased in electronics and computer disciplines significantly. In other
words the number of scheduled caste students in engineering streams
has decreased from 14.87% in 1991-92 to 9.52% in 2000-01 and to
7.52% in 2005-06.
272
Table 6.46 B.E. (Engineering)/B.Arch./B.Tech.
Year Boys Girls Total 1971* 25 -- 25 1980 109 -- 109 1990 308 6 314 2000 1110 153 1263 2003 1191 196 1387 2004 1006 193 1199 2005 1416 290 1706
Source : (Statistical Abstract of Punjab, 2006) The table 6.46 throws light on year wise intake of male and female
students in the engineering institutions.
Table 6.47 Gender participation in Engineering, Technology and Architecture Year Total girls
enrolments in Engineering,
Technology, Arch.
Total boys enrolments in Engineering,
Technology, Arch.
Total Enrolment
%
1971 5 1378 1383 0.3 1980 31 1676 1707 1.8 1990 168 1943 2111 7.9 1999 1844 8190 10034 18 2000 2444 10787 13231 18.5 2001 2730 11022 13752 19.9 2002 2636 11348 14084 16.8
(Source: Statistical Abstract of Punjab, 2005)
Table 6.47 shows the picture of girls enrolment in engineering,
technology and architecture stream. In the year 1971, only 5 girls were
enrolled. But in the succeeding year 2001 and 2002 the enrolment of
girls was 2730 and 2636 respectively. If we compare it with the
enrolment of boys we can see that it is highly unsatisfactory. The
percentage of girl students in the engineering courses was 0.3% in the
year 1971. It rose to 1.8% in 1980, 7.9% in 1990, 18% in 1999, 18.5% in
the year 2000 and 19.9% in 2001. But in the year 2002 it fell to 16.8%
which again, does not show an encouraging trend.
273
Table 6.48 District-wise Intake of Students at Graduate Level in Punjab in 2005
District Boys Girls Total Gurdaspur 173 44 217 Amritsar 18 1 19 Kapurthala - - - Jalandhar 268 65 333 Nawan Shehar - - - Hoshiarpur - - - Rupnagar 165 47 212 Ludhiana 63 11 74 Firozpur 118 14 132 Faridkot 21 12 33 Muktsar 4 1 5 Moga - - - Bathinda 203 24 227 Mansa - - - Sangrur 147 26 173 Patiala 207 37 244 Fatehgarh Sahib 29 8 37
(Source : Statistical Abstract of Punjab, 2006).
The table 6.48 reveals the district wise intake of students of
graduate level in Punjab in the year 2005. The Jalandhar district has
highest intake (333) of students followed by Patiala (244), Bathinda 227
and Rupnagar (212).
274
6.2.4. FINANCING
Table 6.49
Approved Expenditure on Technical Education during 9th Plan in Punjab (Lakhs)
AP 1997-98 AP 1998-99 AP 1999-2000 AP 2000-01 Major heads/ minor heads
of Development
9th plan outlay Outlay Rev.
outlay Expend Outlay Rev.
outlay Expend Outlay Rev.
outlay Expend Outlay Rev.
outlay Expend
AP 2001-02 approved
Technical
education
21072.00 4484.87 3697.76 3073.16 4950.00 5053.52 2732.34 6799 6427.97 4363.04 3466.45 3549.77 1439.47 2038.67
The table 6.49 represents the approved expenditure on technical education during 9th plan in Punjab in lakhs of
rupees. It is clear from this table that the annual expenditure has decreased during this plan from 3073.16 in 1997-
98 to 1439.47 in 2000-01.
Table 6.50 Expenditure on Technical Education in Punjab during 10th Plan (Lakhs)
Year 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07
Actual Expenditure 938.41 264.35 407.36 284.42 278.00 238.04
% of total Expenditure 0.47 0.13 0.26 0.15 0.07 0.04
(Source: (i) Various Statistical Abstract of Punjab 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007) (ii) MHRD Reports)
275
The table 6.50 shows year wise actual expenditure on
technical education in Punjab in lakhs of Rupees. In the year 2001-
02 the actual expenditure was 938.41 which was 0.47% of total
expenditure whereas in the year 2002-03 the expenditure was
264.35 which was 0.13% of total expenditure while in the year 2004-
05 the actual expenditure was 282.42 which was 0.15% of the total
expenditure. It is evident from the table that the expenditure on
technical education in Punjab as the percentage to the total
expenditure on education has been continuously decreasing in the
recent years from 2001 to 2007.
Fig. 6.29 Bargraph of Expenditure on Technical Education
276
6.2.5 DEMAND AND SUPPLY OF ENGINEERS
Table 6.51 Total absorption during 2002, Estimated Unemployment at the End of 2002 and Annual Outturn (available for employment) of
Degree Holders by Discipline in Punjab Total Outturn
During S.
No. Discipline Total
Absorption during 2002
1999 2000 2001
Size of Unemployment at
end of 2002 (Excluding 2002
Outturn) 1 Civil 64 78 110 134 186
2 Electrical 99 54 72 158 121
3 Mechanical 289 185 341 324 220
4 Electronics 291 119 211 417 251
5 Computer Sci. 301 58 223 454 259
6 Agriculture 30 40 44 42 48
7 Production 58 14 79 50 17
8 Industrial 40 35 53 40 33
9 Instrumentation 60 37 64 66 32
10 Textile 60 41 20 63 5
11 Chemical 101 18 148 152 146
Total 1393 679 1365 1900 1318 (Source: NTMIS Punjab 2006)
The table 6.51 shows that the annual absorption of Civil
Engineering graduates in Punjab during 2002 was estimated to be
64 against an annual supply of 134 during 2001. Further a huge
backlog of unemployment for this category also existed which was
not expected to reduce significantly if the supply of this category was
maintained at the 2001 level.
The annual absorption of degree holders in Mechanical
engineering in the state during the year 2002 would be of the order
of 289 against an annual supply of 324 in the year 2001. However,
the estimated backlog of employment at the end of 2002 would be
277
lower as compared to the annual absorption and it was lesser than
the annual supply of 2001.
Whereas, the annual absorption of degree holders in Electrical
Engineering in Punjab was estimated to be 99 during 2002 against
the annual supply of 158 in the year 2001. The estimated size of
unemployment would be 121 at the end of 2002 of this category
which was less than the annual supply of 2001.
While the annual absorption of degree holders in Electronics
Engineering in the state was estimated to be 291 during 2002
against an annual supply of 417 in the year 2001. The estimated
size of unemployment was put at 251 at the end of 2002. The
annual supply was more than the annual absorption but the size of
unemployment was lower than the annual supply for the year 2001
so the admission for this discipline could be continued at the
present level.
Further, the annual absorption estimated for production
engineers at the end of 2002 was put at 58 which was more than the
annual outturn of 50 in the year 2001. The estimated size of
unemployment for this category as at the end of 2002 was 17 which
was not significant.
In case of textile technology estimated annual absorption at
the end of 2002 was put at 60 which was nearly equal to the annual
outturn of 63 in the year 2001. The estimated size of unemployment
278
for this category as at the end of 2002 was 15 which was not much
significant.
Table 6.52 Total absorption during 2003, Estimated Unemployment at the End of 2003 and Annual Outturn (available for employment) of
Degree Holders by Discipline
Total Outturn During S. No.
Discipline Total Absorption
during 2003 2000 2001 2002
Size of unemployment at
end of 2003 (Excluding 2003
outturn) 1 Civil 65 110 134 134 217
2 Electrical 108 72 158 158 180
3 Mechanical 300 341 324 324 294
4 Electronics 366 211 417 417 306
5 Computer Sci. 442 223 454 454 172
6 Agriculture 36 44 42 42 41
7 Production 56 79 50 50 47
8 Industrial 39 53 40 40 32
9 Instrumentation 63 64 66 66 44
10 Textile 62 20 63 63 13
11 Chemical 150 148 152 152 68
Total 1687 1365 1900 1900 1414 (Source: NTMIS Punjab 2006)
The table 6.52 shows that the annual absorption of Civil
Engineering degree during 2003 was estimated to be 65 against an
annual supply of 134 during 2002 further a huge backlog of
unemployment for this category also existed which was not expected
to reduce significantly if the supply of this category was maintained
at the 2002 level.
The annual absorption of degree holders in Mechanical
engineering during the year 2003 was of the order of 300 against an
annual supply of 324 in the year 2002. However, the estimated
279
backlog of employment at the end of 2003 was lower as compared to
the annual absorption and it was lesser than the annual supply of
2002. The annual absorption of degree holders in Electrical
Engineering was estimated to be 108 during 2003 against the
annual supply of 158 in the year 2002. The estimated size of
unemployment was 180 at the end of 2003 of this category which
was more than the annual supply of 2002. The annual absorption of
degree holders in Electronics Engineering was estimated to be 366
during 2003 against an annual supply of 417 in the year 2002. The
estimated size of unemployment was put at 306 at the end of 2003.
The annual supply was more than the annual absorption but the
size of unemployment was lower than the annual supply for the year
2002 so the admission for this discipline could be continued at the
existing.
The annual absorption estimated for Chemical Engineers at
the end of 2003 was put at 150 which was almost equal to the
annual out of 152 in the year 2002. The estimated size of
unemployment for this category as at the end of 2003 was the 68
which was not much significant.
The annual absorption estimated for Production Engineers at
the end of 2003 was put at 56 which was more than the annual
outturn of 50 in the year 2002. The estimated size of unemployment
for this category as at the end of 2003 was the 47 which was
significant. The annual level of absorption of Textile Engineers
280
estimated for this category as at the end of 2003 was put at 62
which were almost equal to the annual outturn of 63 in the year
2002. The estimated size of unemployment for this category as at the
end of 2003 was 13 which was not much significant. The annual
level of absorption of Computer Engineers estimated for this
category as at the end of 2003 was put at 442 against the annual
supply of 454 in the year 2002. The estimated size of unemployment
for this category as at the end of 2003 was 172 which was less than
the annual absorption.
Table 6.53 Total absorption during 2005, Estimated Unemployment at the End of 2005 and Annual Outturn (available for employment) of
Degree Holders by Discipline
Labour Force During S. No.
Discipline Total Absorption
during 2005
2002 2003 2004 Size of
unemployment at end of 2005
(Excluding 2005 outturn)
1 Agriculture 24 31 28 30 22
2 Chemical 112 151 139 161 266
3 Civil 47 65 82 81 163
4 Computer Sci. 747 654 389 786 355
5 Electrical 127 154 188 219 368
6 Electronics 504 486 532 718 820
7 Industrial 63 74 63 64 37
8 Instrumentation 167 126 132 182 64
9 Mechanical 380 438 459 517 681
10 Production 46 62 41 49 66
11 Textile 28 52 24 36 50
12 Architecture 27 36 30 45 65
13 Food Tech. 29 30 33 27 23
14 Leather Tech. 3 14 6 10 28
Total 2304 2373 2146 2925 3008 (Source: NTMIS Punjab 2006: 92)
281
The table 6.53 shows that the annual absorption of Civil
Engineers during 2005 was estimated to be 47 against an annual
supply of 81 during 2004 further a huge backlog of unemployment
for this category also existed which was not expected to reduce
significantly if the supply of this category was maintained at the
2004 level.
The annual absorption of degree holders in Mechanical
discipline during the year 2005 was of the order of 380 against an
annual supply of 517 in the year 2004. However, the estimated
backlog of employment at the end of 2005 was higher as compared
to the annual absorption i.e. 681 and it was also higher than the
annual supply of 2004.
The annual absorption of degree holders in Electrical
Engineering was estimated to be 127 during 2005 against the
annual supply of 119 in the year 2004. The estimated size of
unemployment was 368 at the end of 2005 of this category which
was more than the annual supply of 2004.
The annual absorption of degree holders in Electronics
Engineering was estimated to be 504 during 2005 against an annual
supply of 718 in the year 2004. The estimated size of unemployment
was put at 820 at the end of 2005. The annual supply was more
than the annual absorption. The size of unemployment was also
higher than the annual supply for the year 2004.
282
The annual absorption estimated for chemical at the end of
2005 was put at 112 which was lesser than the annual supply of
161 in the year 2004. The estimated size of unemployment for this
category as at the end of 2005 was the 266 which was significant.
The annual absorption estimated for production engineers at
the end of 2005 was put at 46 which was less than the annual
supply of 49 in the year 2004. The estimated size of unemployment
for this category as at the end of 2005 was the 66 which was
significant.
The annual level of textile technology estimated for this
category as at the end of 2005 was put at 28 which were almost
equal to the annual outturn of 36 in the year 2004. The estimated
size of unemployment for this category as at the end of 2005 was 50
which was significant.
The annual level of computer engineering estimated for this
category as at the end of 2005 was put at 747 against the annual
supply of 786 in the year 2004. The estimated size of unemployment
for this category as at the end of 2005 was 355 which was less than
the annual absorption.
283
Table 6.54 Total absorption during 2006, Estimated Unemployment at the End of 2006 and Annual Outturn (available for employment) of
Degree Holders by Discipline Labour Force During S.
No. Discipline Total
Absorption during 2006
2003 2004 2005
Size of unemployment at end of 2006
(Excluding 2006 outturn)
1 Agriculture 25 25 27 24 22
2 Chemical 140 124 144 149 126
3 Civil 73 77 75 68 64
4 Computer Sci. 811 584 661 913 419
5 Electrical 220 177 207 273 253
6 Electronics 591 407 550 703 488
7 Industrial 41 52 53 41 54
8 Instrumentation 165 112 155 187 114
9 Mechanical 468 413 465 484 279
10 Production 57 37 45 72 56
11 Textile 35 27 40 35 22
12 Architecture 10 16 9 11 6
13 Food Tech. 46 46 37 50 15
14 Leather Tech. 6 6 10 6 0
15 Textile Chem. 14 16 14 14 4
Total 2702 2119 2492 3030 1922 (Source: NTMIS Punjab 2006)
The table 6.54 shows that the annual absorption of Civil
Engineering degree holders during 2006 was estimated to be 73
against an annual supply of 68 during 2005 further a huge backlog
of unemployment for this category also existed which was not
expected to reduce significantly if the supply of this category was
maintained at the 2005 level.
The annual absorption of degree holders in Mechanical
engineering during the year 2006 was of the order of 468 against an
annual supply of 484 in the year 2005. However, the estimated
284
backlog of unemployment at the end of 2006 would be lesser as
compared to the annual absorption i.e. 279 and it was also lesser
than the annual supply of 2005.
The annual absorption of degree holders in Electrical
Engineering was estimated to be 220 during 2006 against the
annual supply of 273 in the year 2005. The estimated size of
unemployment would be 253 at the end of 2006 of this category
which was less than the annual supply of 2005.
The annual absorption of degree holders in Electronics
Engineering was estimated to be 591 during 2006 against an annual
supply of 703 in the year 2005. The estimated size of unemployment
was put at 488 at the end of 2006. The annual supply was more
than the annual absorption. The size of unemployment was also
lower than the annual supply for the year 2005.
The annual absorption estimated for chemical at the end of
2006 was put at 140 which was lesser than the annual supply of
149 in the year 2005. The estimated size of unemployment for this
category as at the end of 2006 was the 126.
The annual absorption estimated for production engineers at
the end of 2006 was put at 57 which was less than the annual
supply of 72 in the year 2005. The estimated size of unemployment
for this category as at the end of 2006 was the 56.
The annual level of textile technology estimated for this
category as at the end of 2006 was put at 35 which were almost
285
equal to the annual outturn of 35 in the year 2005. The estimated
size of unemployment for this category as at the end of 2006 was 22
which was not significant.
The annual level of computer engineers estimated for this
category as at the end of 2006 was put at 811 against the annual
supply of 913 in the year 2005. The estimated size of unemployment
for this category as at the end of 2006 was 419 which was less than
the annual absorption.
Table 6.55 Discipline wise Absorption of Engineering Graduates during the
Year from 2002 to 2006
Discipline Absorption during 2002
Absorption during 2003
Absorption during 2005
Absorption during 2006
Absorption during 2007
Agriculture 30 36 24 25 34 Chemical 101 150 112 140 120 Civil 64 65 47 73 71 Computer Sci. 301 442 747 811 1173 Electrical 99 108 127 220 332 Electronics 291 366 504 591 1051 Industrial 40 39 63 41 26 Instrumentation 60 63 167 165 160 Mechanical 289 300 380 468 633 Production 58 56 46 57 43 Textile 60 62 28 35 25 Architecture - - 27 10 18 Food Tech. - - 29 46 38 Leather Tech. - - 3 6 5 Textile Chem. - - - 14 15 Total 1393 1687 2304 2702 3744
(Source: NTMIS Punjab 2002-07)
It has been evident from the table 6.55 that the annual
absorption in the trades of Computer Science, Electronics and
286
Mechanical has increased at a very fast rate as compared to five other
trades. Whereas the rate of annual absorption in case of agriculture,
industrial, textile, architecture and leather technology does not show
an encouraging trend.
Figure 6.30 Discipline wise Absorption of Engineering Graduates
6.2.6 RESULTS & DISCUSSION
6.2.6.1 Results
The analysis of secondary sources has led us to the following
results regarding the growth and development of engineering
education in Punjab:
1. If we take the geographical area of present Punjab into
consideration, there has been no institution of engineering
education in the state at the time of Independence, but this
287
number has increased upto 13 in the year 2000 whereas it has
risen to 53 in 2004.
2. The student’s intake in engineering institutions of Punjab has
risen from nil in 1947 to 120 in 1958. Which has further risen
to 12225 in 2004 with a CAGR of 26.6%.
3. The compound annual growth rate of sanctioned intake during
2000-2005 has been highest in IT followed by Electrical,
Mechanical, Computer and Electronics whereas the growth
rate in production, instrumentation, textile, chemical, food
technology, and leather technology has been zero.
4. The student intake in the engineering institutions of Punjab
has always been more than its neighbouring states: Himachal
Pradesh and Haryana.
5. The output to sanctioned strength ratio (o/s) for graduate
engineering students in Punjab who have been admitted in
1998 and passed in 2002 has been 0.67. For the students
admitted in 1999 and passed in 2003 it has been again 0.67
whereas for the students admitted in 2001 and passed in the
year 2005 it has been 0.74. It has been noted that throughout
this period the O/S ratio has been very low as compared to the
desired ratio of 0.9.
6. During 2001-2005 in Punjab the O/S ratio for agriculture
engineering has been 0.92, for industrial engineering it has
been 0.89, for chemical discipline 0.89, for instrumentation
288
0.87, for food technology 0.87, for computer 0.78, for
mechanical 0.69, for production 0.67, for IT 0.67 and for
textile it is 0.66, whereas it is of the order of 0.532 for
electrical, 0.505 for civil and 0.45 for leather technology.
7. According 2007 figures, the teacher student ratio in Punjab
has been less than that recommended by AICTE (1:15) in all
other branches except IT, Agriculture, Electronics, Computer
Science, Electrical, Production and Chemical Engineering.
8. It has been observed that in 2006 the percentage of faculty
holding Ph.D. degree has been only 13.48% in Punjab,
whereas only 1.84% faculty has been holding M.Phil degree.
While 8.35% have been holding post graduate degrees and
36.33% of the teachers have been just graduates.
9. Out of the total 53 institutions of engineering in Punjab in
2004, 47.16% have been situated in Malwa region while
30.12% have been in Doaba region whereas Majha has only
22.64% of the engineering institutions. Moreover upto 2004 no
engineering institutions has been established in the districts of
Mansa, Barnala, Tarntaran and Hoshiarpur.
10. In 1971 there has been no SC girl student enrolled in
engineering education in Punjab whereas only 25 SC boys
have been found to be enrolled during this year. It has started
with the six SC girls admitted in 1990 and this number rose to
290 in 2005 as compared to 1416 SC boys.
289
11. The percentage of girl students in the total students in
engineering courses has been 0.3% in the year 1971 which has
risen to 1.8% in 1980, 7.9% in 1990, 18% in 1999, 18.5% in
the year 2000 and 19.9% in 2001. But in the year 2002 it has
fallen to 16.8% which does not show an encouraging trend.
12. In the year 2001-02 the actual expenditure on technical
education in Punjab has been 938.41 lakhs which has been
0.47% of the total expenditure whereas in the year 2002-03
the expenditure has been 264.35 lakhs which has been only
0.15% of the total expenditure while in the year 2004-05 the
actual expenditure has been 282.42 lakhs which has been
0.15% of the total expenditure. Moreover for the year 2005-06
the expenditure has been only 278.50 lakhs being 0.07% of
the total expenditure which further decreased to 238.04 lakhs
being only 0.04% of the total expenditure of Punjab
Government’s budget in the year 2006-08.
13. The total size of unemployment at the end of 2002 (excluding
2002 outturn) has been 1318, at the end of 2003 it has been
1414, whereas at the end of 2005 and 2006 it has been 3008
and 1922 respectively. Whereas the total number of
engineering graduates absorbed during 2002 – 2007 has been
4034.
14. Although the rate of absorption of engineers during 2002 to
2006 in Punjab has been maximum in case of computer
290
science, electronics, and mechanical yet the size of
unemployment in these branches has also been more.
Alongwith these branches the size of unemployment during the
above period has also been comparatively bigger in Civil,
Electrical and Chemical disciplines.
6.2.6.2 Discussion
The growth in number of engineering education institutions in
Punjab after independence has been almost linear upto the end of
the last century which shows a steady increase. During this period
some new branches have also been added to the old ones. But after
nineteen ninety, there has been a very fast growth in the number of
institutions of engineering education in Punjab and the growth of
private institutions have been much more than the public
institutions. The intake of students has significantly increased in the
electronics, computers and mechanical branches of engineering. It is
also important to note that the student intake in the engineering
institutions of the state have always been more than its
neighbouring states like Himachal Pradesh and Haryana. It has also
been found that output to sanctioned strength ratio (o/s) for
graduate engineers has been comparatively low in the disciplines
like computer science, production, IT, electrical and leather
technology etc.
But, there has been no institution of excellence like IIT or IIM
or IISC in Punjab till 2008. The only IIT sanctioned for Punjab is IIT,
291
Ropar which has started working at IIT Delhi. The education is being
offered in it only in three branches viz. Computer Science and
Engineering, Electrical Engineering and Mechanical Engineering
with strength of 40 students in each branch.
As far as discipline wise faculty student ratio in the state is
concerned, it has not been satisfactory especially in the branches of
electronics and communication, information technology and
computer science. The survey of qualifications of teachers employed
in various institutions displays a dismal picture as unqualified
faculty has been recruited due to shortage of qualified candidates.
Moreover, the growth of engineering institutions in the state
has been disproportionate. Malwa region of the state has the largest
number of engineering education institutions, where as Majha has
the least. Further, no engineering institution has been established in
the districts of Barnala, Mansa, Hoshiarpur and Tarntaran.
Besides this, although the total enrollment of female students
at graduate level in engineering courses has increased over the years
after independence, yet it has been far behind the attainment of the
ideal of ‘gender equality’. The participation of scheduled caste
students in engineering education, even in the recent years, has not
been satisfactory. It is almost negligible except for Electrical,
Mechanical, Electronics and Computer Science branches.
The expenditure on technical education in the state as the
percentage to the total expenditure on education has continuously
292
decreased during the recent years (2001-02 to 2006-07). Which is
not an encouraging trend.
Though unemployment of all types of engineering graduates is
a common phenomena in Punjab. This problem of unemployment
has been more serious in Computer Science Engineering,
Mechanical Engineering and Electronics and Communication
Engineering as compared to the other branches.