analysis of pharmaceuticals in food crops grown in urine...

1
Introduction There is interest in the agricultural field to recover and reuse nutrients in an energy efficient manner. Urine is a cost effective, renewable resource that can be used as a valuable source of fertilizer because it is rich in nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. However, urine may also contain high levels of pharmaceuticals, 1 which may be of concern due to the potential to introduce pharmaceuticals into the environment if urine is to be land-applied to fertilize agricultural soil. 2 Previous research has focused on pharmaceutical uptake in wastewater treated crops. 3 As fertilizers derived from urine become more widely used, it is important to understand the fate of the pharmaceuticals in the environment. The goal of this study is to utilize developed analytical methods to measure the levels of pharmaceuticals in urine, struvite, lysimeter water, and food crops. Figure 1. Urine collection, storage and application Fertilization with urine may be cause for concern. It may lead to further release of pharmaceuticals into the environment; thus, pharmaceutical levels needs to be determined in urine and related matrices, as shown in Figure 2. Figure 2. Matrices analyzed in project LC-MS/MS All spectra was acquired using a Agilent 6410 triple quad mass spectrometer equipped with an 1100 HPLC system. Separation is achieved using a beta basic column and ionization is achieved in positive mode using electrospray ionization. A representive separation of the pharmaceuticals in this study can be seen in Figure 3 below. Figure 3. Separation of pharmaceuticals in a 50 ppb standard. Separation is achieved using a Betabasic-18 (2.1x100 mm) column and a 0.3 % formic acid in water and acetonitrile gradient . Transport of Pharmaceuticals In order to assess the distribution of pharmaceuticals under the different treatment conditions the total mass of pharmaceuticals found in each matrix in each condition were summed. As shown in figure 11 below the pharmaceuticals from the urine fertilizer accumulate mostly in the water, while the pharmaceuticals from the struvite fertilizer accumulate mostly in the soil. Figure 11. Distribution of Pharmaceuticals per Treatment. Conclusion Using sample clean-up and LC/MS/MS methods developed in our lab the first part of the field study is completed and there has been successfully detection and quantification of many pharmaceuticals in the different sample matrices of interest. All target pharmaceuticals were detected in urine. Acetaminophen, caffeine, and ibuprofen were detected in all matrices. These results show that, in general, the higher the concentration of pharmaceuticals in urine, the higher their potential for plant uptake, as observed in lettuce. More in depth field study is necessary to better understand the fate, transport, and plant uptake behavior of pharmaceuticals from urine land-application. Future Work Complete the field study by analyzing the carrots exposed to the different fertilizers Assess the difference in uptake between the different fertilizers Assess the difference in uptake between the lettuce and carrots Do an untargeted study to observe what other pharmaceuticals may be present Potentially extend the study to other crops References 1. Theodoridis, G.; Aikaterini Lontou, M.; Michopoulos, F.; Sucha, M.; Gondova, T., Study of multiple solid-phase microextraction combined off-line with high performance liquid chromatography. Application in the analysis of pharmaceuticals in urine. Anal. Chim. Acta 2004, 516 (1-2), 197-204. 2. Smith, J. S., Jr. In Presence and fate of pharmaceuticals in the environment and in drinking water, CRC Press: 2014; pp 21-41. 3. Wu, X.; Conkle, J. L.; Ernst, F.; Gan, J., Treated Wastewater Irrigation: Uptake of Pharmaceutical and Personal Care Products by Common Vegetables under Field Conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48 (19), 11286-11293. 4. Cory, W. In When pharmaceuticals degrade in the environment, American Chemical Society: 2014; pp SERMACS-691. 5. Schuermann, B.; Everding, W.; Montag, D.; Pinnekamp, J., Fate of pharmaceuticals and bacteria in stored urine during precipitation and drying of struvite. Water Sci. Technol. 2012, 65 (10), 1774-1780. Acknowledgements This work was supported in part by the Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF)'s National Center for Resource Recovery and Nutrient Management (Grant RD835567) [email protected] Analysis of Pharmaceuticals in Food Crops Grown in Urine- and Struvite- Fertilized Soil by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Rachel A. Mullen 1 , Abraham Noe-Hays 2 , Kim Nace 2 , Rebecca Lahr 3 , Heather Goetsch 3 , Nancy Love 3 , Krista Wigginton 3 , and Diana S. Aga 1 1 University at Buffalo, 2 Rich Earth Institute, 3 University of Michigan Field Plot Treatments In order to explore the uptake of pharmaceuticals using urine derived fertilizer three different treatments were assessed. First, struvite precipitated from unspiked urine. Second, unspiked urine, and third, ~1 mg/L pharmaceutical spiked urine was applied as fertilizer to one set of field plots. Figure 4. Depiction of the three different treatments (from left to right): fertilization with struvite (precipitated from the unspiked urine), fertilization with unspiked urine, fertilization with urine spiked at 1 mg/L. Pharmaceuticals Levels in Each Matrix Figure 5. Pharmaceuticals in Struvite and Urine Figure 6. Pharmaceuticals in Spiked Urine Figure 7. Pharmaceuticals in Soil Treated with Struvite and Urine Figure 8. Pharmaceuticals in Soil Treated with Spiked Urine Figure 9. Pharmaceuticals in Lettuce Treated with Struvite and Urine Figure 10. Pharmaceuticals in Lettuce Treated with Spiked Urine Figure 11. Pharmaceuticals in Water Treated with Struvite and Urine Figure 12. Pharmaceuticals in Water Treated with Spiked Urine Struvite Soil Water Lettuce Urine Soil Water Lettuce Spiked Urine Soil Water Lettuce Urine Spiked at ~1 mg/L Pharmaceuticals Urine Unspiked Struvite 0 100 200 300 400 500 μg/L Struvite Urine 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 μg/kg 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 μg/kg Struvite Treated Soil Urine Treated Soil 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 μg/kg 0 50 100 150 200 250 μg/kg 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 ng/L Struvite Treated Lysimeter Water Urine Treated Lysimeter Water 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 ng/L 42% 28% 30% 27% 53% 20% 24% 47% 29% 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 ug/kg Struvite Treated Lettuce Urine Treated Lettuce

Upload: others

Post on 19-Oct-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Analysis of Pharmaceuticals in Food Crops Grown in Urine ...richearthinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Pharmaceuticals-in... · All spectra was acquired using a Agilent 6410

Pharmaceuticals in Urine and Related ProductsRachel A. Mullen, and Dr. Diana S. Aga*

University at Buffalo, The State University at New York, Buffalo, NY 14260 *[email protected]

IntroductionThere is interest in the agricultural field to recover and reuse nutrients in an energy

efficient manner. Urine is a cost effective, renewable resource that can be used as a

valuable source of fertilizer because it is rich in nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium.

However, urine may also contain high levels of pharmaceuticals, 1 which may be of

concern due to the potential to introduce pharmaceuticals into the environment if urine

is to be land-applied to fertilize agricultural soil.2 Previous research has focused on

pharmaceutical uptake in wastewater treated crops.3 As fertilizers derived from urine

become more widely used, it is important to understand the fate of the

pharmaceuticals in the environment. The goal of this study is to utilize developed

analytical methods to measure the levels of pharmaceuticals in urine, struvite,

lysimeter water, and food crops.

Figure 1. Urine collection, storage and application

Fertilization with urine may be cause for concern. It may lead to further release of

pharmaceuticals into the environment; thus, pharmaceutical levels needs to be

determined in urine and related matrices, as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Matrices analyzed in project

LC-MS/MSAll spectra was acquired using a Agilent 6410 triple quad mass spectrometer equipped

with an 1100 HPLC system. Separation is

achieved using a beta basic column and

ionization is achieved in positive mode

using electrospray ionization. A representive

separation of the pharmaceuticals in this study

can be seen in Figure 3 below.

Figure 3. Separation of pharmaceuticals in a 50 ppb standard. Separation is achieved

using a Betabasic-18 (2.1x100 mm) column and a 0.3 % formic acid in water and

acetonitrile gradient

.

Transport of PharmaceuticalsIn order to assess the distribution of pharmaceuticals under the different treatment

conditions the total mass of pharmaceuticals found in each matrix in each condition

were summed. As shown in figure 11 below the pharmaceuticals from the urine

fertilizer accumulate mostly in the water, while the pharmaceuticals from the struvite

fertilizer accumulate mostly in the soil.

Figure 11. Distribution of Pharmaceuticals per Treatment.

ConclusionUsing sample clean-up and LC/MS/MS methods developed in our lab the first part of

the field study is completed and there has been successfully detection and

quantification of many pharmaceuticals in the different sample matrices of interest.

All target pharmaceuticals were detected in urine. Acetaminophen, caffeine, and

ibuprofen were detected in all matrices. These results show that, in general, the higher

the concentration of pharmaceuticals in urine, the higher their potential for plant

uptake, as observed in lettuce. More in depth field study is necessary to better

understand the fate, transport, and plant uptake behavior of pharmaceuticals from

urine land-application.

Future Work• Complete the field study by analyzing the carrots exposed to the different

fertilizers

• Assess the difference in uptake between the different fertilizers

• Assess the difference in uptake between the lettuce and carrots

• Do an untargeted study to observe what other pharmaceuticals may be present

• Potentially extend the study to other crops

References1. Theodoridis, G.; Aikaterini Lontou, M.; Michopoulos, F.; Sucha, M.; Gondova, T., Study of multiple solid-phase

microextraction combined off-line with high performance liquid chromatography. Application in the analysis of

pharmaceuticals in urine. Anal. Chim. Acta 2004, 516 (1-2), 197-204.

2. Smith, J. S., Jr. In Presence and fate of pharmaceuticals in the environment and in drinking water, CRC Press: 2014; pp

21-41.

3. Wu, X.; Conkle, J. L.; Ernst, F.; Gan, J., Treated Wastewater Irrigation: Uptake of Pharmaceutical and Personal Care

Products by Common Vegetables under Field Conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48 (19), 11286-11293.

4. Cory, W. InWhen pharmaceuticals degrade in the environment, American Chemical Society: 2014; pp SERMACS-691.

5. Schuermann, B.; Everding, W.; Montag, D.; Pinnekamp, J., Fate of pharmaceuticals and bacteria in stored urine during

precipitation and drying of struvite.Water Sci. Technol. 2012, 65 (10), 1774-1780.

Acknowledgements This work was supported in part by the Water Environment Research Foundation

(WERF)'s National Center for Resource Recovery and Nutrient Management

(Grant RD835567)

[email protected]

Analysis of Pharmaceuticals in Food Crops Grown in Urine- and Struvite-

Fertilized Soil by Liquid Chromatography- Tandem Mass SpectrometryRachel A. Mullen1, Abraham Noe-Hays2, Kim Nace2, Rebecca Lahr3, Heather Goetsch3,

Nancy Love3, Krista Wigginton3, and Diana S. Aga1

1University at Buffalo, 2Rich Earth Institute, 3University of Michigan

Field Plot TreatmentsIn order to explore the uptake of pharmaceuticals using urine derived fertilizer three different treatments were assessed. First, struvite

precipitated from unspiked urine. Second, unspiked urine, and third, ~1 mg/L pharmaceutical spiked urine was applied as fertilizer to one set of

field plots.

Figure 4. Depiction of the three different treatments (from left to right): fertilization with struvite (precipitated from the unspiked urine),

fertilization with unspiked urine, fertilization with urine spiked at 1 mg/L.

Pharmaceuticals Levels in Each Matrix

Figure 5. Pharmaceuticals in Struvite and Urine Figure 6. Pharmaceuticals in Spiked Urine

Figure 7. Pharmaceuticals in Soil Treated with Struvite and Urine Figure 8. Pharmaceuticals in Soil Treated with Spiked Urine

Figure 9. Pharmaceuticals in Lettuce Treated with Struvite and Urine Figure 10. Pharmaceuticals in Lettuce Treated with Spiked Urine

Figure 11. Pharmaceuticals in Water Treated with Struvite and Urine Figure 12. Pharmaceuticals in Water Treated with Spiked Urine

Struvite

Soil Water Lettuce

Urine

Soil Water Lettuce

Spiked Urine

Soil Water Lettuce

Urine

Spiked at

~1 mg/L

Pharmaceuticals

Urine

UnspikedStruvite

0

100

200

300

400

500

µg

/L

Struvite Urine

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

µg

/kg

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

µg

/kg

Struvite Treated Soil Urine Treated Soil

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

µg

/kg

0

50

100

150

200

250

µg/k

g

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

ng

/L

Struvite Treated Lysimeter Water Urine Treated Lysimeter Water

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

ng

/L

42%

28%

30% 27%

53%

20%

24%

47%

29%

05

10152025303540

ug

/kg

Struvite Treated Lettuce Urine Treated Lettuce