analysis of cost optimization through crane quantity
TRANSCRIPT
Application of Scope, Schedule, Cost Modeling to:
Norbert Chang and Christopher Pickard3/2/2016
O P E N S I T E C O N D I T I O N S
Take Home Messages - Results
Insight 1: Diminishing returns on days reduced for each additional crane past 2 cranes
Insight 2: Level-by-level construction results in shorter schedule duration and reduced subsequent cost
Insight 3: Economic tradeoffs for reduced project duration
Baseline vs Optimized Result Comparison
** bold metrics are in comparison to baseline
Criteria Baseline 1 – Crane 2 – Crane 3 – Crane 4 – Crane
ScheduleDuration
60.15 days(including CIP Topping
& CIP Foundation)
48.42 days-20% duration
vs baseline
30.28 days-50% duration
vs baseline
24.34 days-60% duration
vs baseline
22.36 days-63% duration
vs baseline
Project Cost $8,231,268.39 $8,145,895.15-1.04% cost vs
baseline
$8,236,504.85+.06% cost vs
baseline
$8,321,867.74+1.10% cost vs
baseline
$8,435,893.74+2.49% cost vs
baseline
Cost per Day Reduced
- $(7,278.20)-.088% of total baseline cost
$175.31+.002% of total
baseline cost
$2,383.77+.03% of total baseline cost
$3,017.36+.04% of total baseline cost
Assumptions
Work Environment:• Unlimited site access / laydown space• Optimal weather conditions and site conditionsSchedule Durations:• Same day grout curing• Crane movement transition period negligible• CIP topping slab can begin after 2 level delay• Materials fabricated and delivered on-time Costs:• 1 time mobilization cost per crane and crew• Direct costs/productivities remain constant
Initial StrategiesLevel by Level ConstructionZone division By Level – Vertical Zones (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) Within Level - Horizontal Zones (A, B, C, and D)Construction Sequence 4 Primary Tasks
› Vertical Elements (Columns & Shearwalls)› Horizontal Elements ( Spandrels & Beams)› Deck Elements (Double and Single Tees)› CIP Topping (Full level with 1 level duration delay)
Cranes 1, 2, 3, and 4 Crane scenario
› Constrained by Construction Sequence
Initial Strategies
BASELINE
1 CRANE
2 CRANE
3 CRANE
4 CRANE
60.15 days
53.43 days
33.14 days
36.05 days
32.13 days
6.27 days--------------$85,373.24 Cost Reduction(-$13,616.14 per day)
17.38 days-------------+$90,609.70 Cost Increase($5,213.45 per day)
2.91 days-------------+$85,362.90 Cost Increase($29,334.33 per day)
1.01 days-------------+$114,026 Cost Increase($112,897.03 per day)
Schedule Durations vs Baseline
Cost Estimates
Baseline 1 Crane 2 Crane 3 Crane 4 Crane $8,000,000.00
$8,050,000.00
$8,100,000.00
$8,150,000.00
$8,200,000.00
$8,250,000.00
$8,300,000.00
$8,350,000.00
$8,400,000.00
$8,450,000.00
$8,500,000.00
$8,231,268.39
$8,145,895.15
$8,236,504.85
$8,321,867.74
$8,435,893.74
T o t al P r o j ect Co s t
60.15 days 48.42 days 30.28 days 24.34 days 22.36 days
Baseline 1 Crane 2 Crane 3 Crane 4 Crane $1,400,000.00
$1,450,000.00
$1,500,000.00
$1,550,000.00
$1,600,000.00
$1,650,000.00
$1,700,000.00
$1,750,000.00
$1,800,000.00
$1,850,000.00
$1,900,000.00
$1,646,054.59
$1,565,014.94
$1,658,688.98
$1,740,768.68
$1,850,409.07
I n d ir e ct Co s t Co m p ar is o n
Cost Estimates (cont.)
2 Crane 3 Crane 4 Crane $-
$2,000.00
$4,000.00
$6,000.00
$8,000.00
$10,000.00
$12,000.00
$4,995.02
$7,307.83
$11,128.11
C o s t P e r D a y S a v e d v s
1 - C r a n e
2 Crane 3 Crane 4 Crane
-60.00%
-50.00%
-40.00%
-30.00%
-20.00%
-10.00%
0.00%
10.00%1.11% 2.16% 3.56%
-37%
-50%-54%
C o m p a r i s o n t o 1 - c r a n e
Cost Increase Duration Reduction
Take Home Messages Revisited
Insight 1: Diminishing returns on days reduced for each additional crane past 2 cranes
Insight 2: Level-by-level construction results in shorter schedule duration and reduced subsequent cost
Insight 3: Economic tradeoffs for reduced project duration with additional cranes
1 Crane 2 Crane 3 Crane 4 Crane0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
20%
50%60% 63%
P r o j e c t D u r a t i o n R e d u c t i o n v s B a s e l i n e
Baseline 1 Crane
$8,100,000.00
$8,200,000.00
$8,300,000.00
$8,231,268.39
$8,145,895.15
T o t a l C o s t
Baseline 1 Crane0
20406080 60.15
48.42
T o t a l D u r a t i o n s ( d a y s )
1 Crane 2 Crane 3 Crane 4 Crane
-2.00%
-1.00%
0.00%
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
-1.04%
0.06%
1.10%
2.49%
T o t a l P r o j e c t C o s t I n c r e a s e v s b a s e l i n e
**Note: 1 crane shows decrease because of sequencing switch from bill-boarding to level by level construction
Open Site Approach Overview RevisitedCriteria Baseline 1 – Crane 2 – Crane 3 – Crane 4 – Crane
ScheduleDuration
60.15 days(including CIP Topping
& CIP Foundation)
48.42 days-20% duration
vs baseline
30.28 days-50% duration
vs baseline
24.34 days-60% duration
vs baseline
22.36 days-63% duration
vs baseline
Project Cost $8,231,268.39 $8,145,895.15-1.04% cost vs
baseline
$8,236,504.85+.06% cost vs
baseline
$8,321,867.74+1.10% cost vs
baseline
$8,435,893.74+2.49% cost vs
baseline
Cost per Day Reduced
- $(7,278.20)-.088% of total baseline cost
$175.31+.002% of total
baseline cost
$2,383.77+.03% of total baseline cost
$3,017.36+.04% of total baseline cost
** bold metrics are in comparison to baseline
Recommendations for the application of SSC ModelingWhat would do the following again…• Utilize LBS (location based scheduling)• Consistency between scheduling and cost nomenclature /
categorization• Adaptable tools / financial models• Resource load schedule
What we would do the following differently…• Encompass entire process from pre-fabrication to installation• Taken into consideration more detailed crane logistics• Indirect costs could be analyzed in greater detail
Main Personal Lessons LearnedChris• LBS / Pull Production System • 4D modeling / sequencing• CPM/ resource loaded scheduling
Norbert• Quick hand analysis / sequencing in the beginning shortens schedule
creation duration• Earned Value Analysis• Variability Analysis
AppendixWhich of the course concepts did you use?• LBS / Pull Production System • 4D modeling / sequencing• CPM/ resource loaded scheduling
Which of the course concepts do you wish you could have used?• Pull Planning outside workflow• Earned Value Analysis• Variability Analysis