analysis of cost optimization through crane quantity

22
Application of Scope, Schedule, Cost Modeling to: Norbert Chang and Christopher Pickard 3/2/2016 OPEN SITE CONDITIONS

Upload: norbert-chang

Post on 14-Apr-2017

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Analysis of Cost Optimization Through Crane Quantity

Application of Scope, Schedule, Cost Modeling to:

Norbert Chang and Christopher Pickard3/2/2016

O P E N S I T E C O N D I T I O N S

Page 2: Analysis of Cost Optimization Through Crane Quantity

Take Home Messages - Results

Insight 1: Diminishing returns on days reduced for each additional crane past 2 cranes

Insight 2: Level-by-level construction results in shorter schedule duration and reduced subsequent cost

Insight 3: Economic tradeoffs for reduced project duration

Page 3: Analysis of Cost Optimization Through Crane Quantity

Baseline vs Optimized Result Comparison

** bold metrics are in comparison to baseline

Criteria Baseline 1 – Crane 2 – Crane 3 – Crane 4 – Crane

ScheduleDuration

60.15 days(including CIP Topping

& CIP Foundation)

48.42 days-20% duration

vs baseline

30.28 days-50% duration

vs baseline

24.34 days-60% duration

vs baseline

22.36 days-63% duration

vs baseline

Project Cost $8,231,268.39 $8,145,895.15-1.04% cost vs

baseline

$8,236,504.85+.06% cost vs

baseline

$8,321,867.74+1.10% cost vs

baseline

$8,435,893.74+2.49% cost vs

baseline

Cost per Day Reduced

- $(7,278.20)-.088% of total baseline cost

$175.31+.002% of total

baseline cost

$2,383.77+.03% of total baseline cost

$3,017.36+.04% of total baseline cost

Page 4: Analysis of Cost Optimization Through Crane Quantity

Assumptions

Work Environment:• Unlimited site access / laydown space• Optimal weather conditions and site conditionsSchedule Durations:• Same day grout curing• Crane movement transition period negligible• CIP topping slab can begin after 2 level delay• Materials fabricated and delivered on-time Costs:• 1 time mobilization cost per crane and crew• Direct costs/productivities remain constant

Page 5: Analysis of Cost Optimization Through Crane Quantity

Initial StrategiesLevel by Level ConstructionZone division By Level – Vertical Zones (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) Within Level - Horizontal Zones (A, B, C, and D)Construction Sequence 4 Primary Tasks

› Vertical Elements (Columns & Shearwalls)› Horizontal Elements ( Spandrels & Beams)› Deck Elements (Double and Single Tees)› CIP Topping (Full level with 1 level duration delay)

Cranes 1, 2, 3, and 4 Crane scenario

› Constrained by Construction Sequence

Page 6: Analysis of Cost Optimization Through Crane Quantity

Initial Strategies

Page 7: Analysis of Cost Optimization Through Crane Quantity

BASELINE

1 CRANE

2 CRANE

3 CRANE

4 CRANE

60.15 days

53.43 days

33.14 days

36.05 days

32.13 days

6.27 days--------------$85,373.24 Cost Reduction(-$13,616.14 per day)

17.38 days-------------+$90,609.70 Cost Increase($5,213.45 per day)

2.91 days-------------+$85,362.90 Cost Increase($29,334.33 per day)

1.01 days-------------+$114,026 Cost Increase($112,897.03 per day)

Schedule Durations vs Baseline

Page 8: Analysis of Cost Optimization Through Crane Quantity
Page 9: Analysis of Cost Optimization Through Crane Quantity
Page 10: Analysis of Cost Optimization Through Crane Quantity
Page 11: Analysis of Cost Optimization Through Crane Quantity
Page 12: Analysis of Cost Optimization Through Crane Quantity
Page 13: Analysis of Cost Optimization Through Crane Quantity
Page 14: Analysis of Cost Optimization Through Crane Quantity
Page 15: Analysis of Cost Optimization Through Crane Quantity
Page 16: Analysis of Cost Optimization Through Crane Quantity

Cost Estimates

Baseline 1 Crane 2 Crane 3 Crane 4 Crane $8,000,000.00

$8,050,000.00

$8,100,000.00

$8,150,000.00

$8,200,000.00

$8,250,000.00

$8,300,000.00

$8,350,000.00

$8,400,000.00

$8,450,000.00

$8,500,000.00

$8,231,268.39

$8,145,895.15

$8,236,504.85

$8,321,867.74

$8,435,893.74

T o t al P r o j ect Co s t

60.15 days 48.42 days 30.28 days 24.34 days 22.36 days

Baseline 1 Crane 2 Crane 3 Crane 4 Crane $1,400,000.00

$1,450,000.00

$1,500,000.00

$1,550,000.00

$1,600,000.00

$1,650,000.00

$1,700,000.00

$1,750,000.00

$1,800,000.00

$1,850,000.00

$1,900,000.00

$1,646,054.59

$1,565,014.94

$1,658,688.98

$1,740,768.68

$1,850,409.07

I n d ir e ct Co s t Co m p ar is o n

Page 17: Analysis of Cost Optimization Through Crane Quantity

Cost Estimates (cont.)

2 Crane 3 Crane 4 Crane $-

$2,000.00

$4,000.00

$6,000.00

$8,000.00

$10,000.00

$12,000.00

$4,995.02

$7,307.83

$11,128.11

C o s t P e r D a y S a v e d v s

1 - C r a n e

2 Crane 3 Crane 4 Crane

-60.00%

-50.00%

-40.00%

-30.00%

-20.00%

-10.00%

0.00%

10.00%1.11% 2.16% 3.56%

-37%

-50%-54%

C o m p a r i s o n t o 1 - c r a n e

Cost Increase Duration Reduction

Page 18: Analysis of Cost Optimization Through Crane Quantity

Take Home Messages Revisited

Insight 1: Diminishing returns on days reduced for each additional crane past 2 cranes

Insight 2: Level-by-level construction results in shorter schedule duration and reduced subsequent cost

Insight 3: Economic tradeoffs for reduced project duration with additional cranes

1 Crane 2 Crane 3 Crane 4 Crane0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

20%

50%60% 63%

P r o j e c t D u r a t i o n R e d u c t i o n v s B a s e l i n e

Baseline 1 Crane

$8,100,000.00

$8,200,000.00

$8,300,000.00

$8,231,268.39

$8,145,895.15

T o t a l C o s t

Baseline 1 Crane0

20406080 60.15

48.42

T o t a l D u r a t i o n s ( d a y s )

1 Crane 2 Crane 3 Crane 4 Crane

-2.00%

-1.00%

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

-1.04%

0.06%

1.10%

2.49%

T o t a l P r o j e c t C o s t I n c r e a s e v s b a s e l i n e

**Note: 1 crane shows decrease because of sequencing switch from bill-boarding to level by level construction

Page 19: Analysis of Cost Optimization Through Crane Quantity

Open Site Approach Overview RevisitedCriteria Baseline 1 – Crane 2 – Crane 3 – Crane 4 – Crane

ScheduleDuration

60.15 days(including CIP Topping

& CIP Foundation)

48.42 days-20% duration

vs baseline

30.28 days-50% duration

vs baseline

24.34 days-60% duration

vs baseline

22.36 days-63% duration

vs baseline

Project Cost $8,231,268.39 $8,145,895.15-1.04% cost vs

baseline

$8,236,504.85+.06% cost vs

baseline

$8,321,867.74+1.10% cost vs

baseline

$8,435,893.74+2.49% cost vs

baseline

Cost per Day Reduced

- $(7,278.20)-.088% of total baseline cost

$175.31+.002% of total

baseline cost

$2,383.77+.03% of total baseline cost

$3,017.36+.04% of total baseline cost

** bold metrics are in comparison to baseline

Page 20: Analysis of Cost Optimization Through Crane Quantity

Recommendations for the application of SSC ModelingWhat would do the following again…• Utilize LBS (location based scheduling)• Consistency between scheduling and cost nomenclature /

categorization• Adaptable tools / financial models• Resource load schedule

What we would do the following differently…• Encompass entire process from pre-fabrication to installation• Taken into consideration more detailed crane logistics• Indirect costs could be analyzed in greater detail

Page 21: Analysis of Cost Optimization Through Crane Quantity

Main Personal Lessons LearnedChris• LBS / Pull Production System • 4D modeling / sequencing• CPM/ resource loaded scheduling

Norbert• Quick hand analysis / sequencing in the beginning shortens schedule

creation duration• Earned Value Analysis• Variability Analysis

Page 22: Analysis of Cost Optimization Through Crane Quantity

AppendixWhich of the course concepts did you use?• LBS / Pull Production System • 4D modeling / sequencing• CPM/ resource loaded scheduling

Which of the course concepts do you wish you could have used?• Pull Planning outside workflow• Earned Value Analysis• Variability Analysis