an applicant’s experience

44
Trifolio-M An Applicant’s Experience NeemAzal ® -T/S A brief history of re-registration

Upload: others

Post on 09-May-2022

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

An Applicant’s Experience

NeemAzal®-T/S

A brief history of re-registration

Page 2: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

•Our aim is: the development of products for pest control on the basis of natural resources (natural a.i.’s from plants), which are compatible to organic farming... and the production and marketing of these products. They should be: biological efficient ecological non-toxic

Page 3: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

3

1985 Foundation of the

Company

1990-1992 First Patent application

for NeemAzal

1989 Start of R&D

Pheromones

1992 Agreement

EID Parry & Trifolio-M

1997 Start of technical extraction

of NeemAzal in India

1988

Start of R&D-Activities

in Neem ingredients

1996

Start of submission for

registration of NeemAzal-T/S in Germany

and in EU (Annex I) 2005

1995

(Preliminary) registration of

NeemAzal-T/S in Switzerland & India

1992 - 2004 14 Workshops with over 1.500 participants from more than 80 countries

2006

Submission of

biocide dossier for

Margosa extract

2001

Start of R&D of

biological fungicides

1998

1. Registration in Germany

and for open land 2000

2004 Start of R&D

of Biocides

1998 Start of R&D

of Quassia

2002 Registration

Quassia

The history...

Page 4: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

Requirements for plant protection products 1. Efficiency 2. Security in the success of application 3. Considerate influence on beneficial insects 4. Minimisation of the appearance of resistancies 5. Toxicological safety for the user 6. Toxicological safety for the consumer 7. Environmental safety (biodegradability, no accumulation) 8. Toxicologically and environmentally safe production 9. Inexpensive production* 10. World-wide availability of standard quality * including social cost (drinking water analysis and purification,

environmental pollution etc.)

Page 5: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M Azadirachta indica – Indian Neemtree

Page 6: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M Azadirachta indica – Indian Neemtree

Page 7: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

Neem Extraction Process yields NeemAzal technical

Neem fruit (100 kg)

Seed kernels (10 kg)

Neem seeds (20 kg)

Extraction Process

NeemAzal ®

(0,1 kg)

34% Azadirachtin A

Neem oil (4 kg)

Neem cake (5 kg)

Page 8: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

Page 9: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

O

O

OH

O O

O

MeOOC

OH

HOH

COOMeOH

O

AcO3

NeemAzal-T/S (EC):

• Active ingredient (a.i.): Azadirachtin – Standardised natural Neem extract (approx. 3% NeemAzal technical) – Containing Azadirachtins and other limonoids

• Analytical lead compound: – Azadirachtin A (AzA) (in NeemAzal-T/S standardised to 1%)

• 1H,7H-Naphtho[1,8-bc:4,4a-c´]difuran-5,10a(8H)-dicarbocylic acid,10-(acetyloxy)octahydro-3,5-

dihydroxy-4-methyl-8-[(2-methyl-1-oxo-2-butenyl)oxy]-4-(3a,6a,7,7a-tetrahydro-6a-hydroxy-7a-

methyl-2,7-methanofuro[2,3-b]oxireno[e]oxepin-1a(2H)-yl)-dimethylester,[2aR-[2aa, 3b, 4b(1aR*,

2S*, 3aS*, 6aS*, 7S*, 7aS*), 4ab, 5a, 7aS*, 8b(E), 10b, 10aa, 10bb)]

Composition of the formulation

Page 10: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

Composition of NeemAzal technical

Substance av. content in NeemAzal

By weight (%)

Azadirachtins:

Azadirachtin A 34

Azadirachtin B approx. 5.5

Azadirachtin D aprrox. 2.1

Azadirachtin E < 1

Azadirachtin F < 1

Azadirachtin G < 1

Azadirachtin H approx. 2.3

Azadirachtin I approx. 0.8

Azadirachtin K and other Azadirachtins < 2

Azadirachtinin approx. 2

Sum of Azadirachtins: 51,7

Page 11: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

Analytics

5 10 15 20 Time (min)

0

50

100

mExt

NeemAzal technical 0,1 mg/ml

5 10 15 20 Time (min)

0

50

100 Standard solution mixture approx. 0,01 mg/ml each Azadirachtin A = 0,015 mg/ml

AzH

AzA

AzB

DN

DS N S

mExt

Page 12: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M Azadirachta indica – Indischer Neembaum

mammals

mammals mammals

Insects

Insectcells react to Azadirachtin at a concentration of

10-11, but mamals only at 10-4 (Jabbar, Strang, R. (1997), WS VII)

Page 13: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

Mode of action & target pests: NeemAzal-T/S (ec)

Effects on the hormonal system of insects

1. feeding inhibition

2. moulting inhibition

3. fertility reduction

4. mortality

Page 14: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

Azadirachta indica

NeemAzal-T/S Mode of action: oral uptake by larvae:

- feeding inhibition

Page 15: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

Feeding inhibition

Typical Action of NeemAzal on larvae

with 2 ppm AzadirachtinA treateduntreated

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0 2 4 6 8 10day

Mor

talit

y (%

)

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

0 5 10

Ø L

arva

l Wei

ght

(mg)

Page 16: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M Mode of action: 2. moulting inhibition (after a few days)

Normal larva after treatment with NeemAzal-T/S

Page 17: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M Mode of action: 3. Fertility reduction (next generation)

Page 18: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

„Egg deposit“ after treatment Egg deposit (untreated)

Mode of action: 3. Fertility reduction (next generation)

Page 19: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

Cockchafer Melolontha hippocastani

NeemAzal-T/S Untreated

Control

Slow mechanism of action 3. Fecundity inhibition – adult (Wagenhoff)

Page 20: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

Neemzal-U

Kontrolle

Use of new NeemAzal-Formulations against Cameraria

ohridella (Lep., Gracillariidae) (Pavela, 2005)

Page 21: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

Nematus ribesii (Hym., Tenthredinidae) - Common gooseberry Saw Fly (Morgan, S., Trandem, N. 2004)

Anwendung im Obstbau an Beerenobst - Morgan, Sweden 2004 Gelbe Stachelbeerblattwespe Nematus ribesii (Hym., Tenthredinidae)

Behandlung: - 1-2x gegen jungen Larven

- 400 ml NeemAzal-T/S /100 l Wasser/ha

Kontrolle NeemAzal-T/S

biol

ogic

al

effic

ient

ec

olog

ical

Page 22: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M Mortality of adult beetles in the Lab (Schröter, FVFA, Freiburg)

Cochafer Melolonta hippocastani

Anteil toter Käfer, %

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Tage nach Ansetzen der Käfer

%

Rubitox NeemAzal-T/S Kontrolle

Page 23: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

Mode of action & target pests: NeemAzal-T/S (ec)

Especially control of sucking and biting insects as well

as mites

- aphids

– caterpillars – white flies – thrips – miners – beetles, and other insects and – mites

Page 24: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

Resistance management

Page 25: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M Resistance – Feng, Isman, 1995

Results:

- 40 generations Myzus persicae

(Hom., Aphididae)

-9x resistence of AzA pur

- NO after using of NSE

Page 26: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M Resistance – Abdullah, 1999

Results:

- 12 Generations of Spodoptera

exigua (Lep., Noctuidae) and use LD50-Dose

-Cypermethrin 95,8x

-Bacillus thuringiensis 5,6x

resistance rate

- 1,1-1,44x after using of NSKE

Page 27: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

Residue situation

Page 28: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

0

50

100

150

mEx

t

5 10Time (min)

0

50

100

150

Control, day 0

(directly after

application)

Treated with 0.5%

spraying solution, day

0

AzA residues in spinach

Azadirachtin

A

Page 29: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

050

100150

050

100150

6 7 8Time (min)

050

100150

HPLC chromatogram details of spinach, treated with

NeemAzal-T/S

Day 0 after treatment

Day 1 after treatment

Day 4 after treatment

Azadirachtin

A

Page 30: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

0,0

0,1

0,2

0,3

0,4

0,5

0 50 100 150

time [h]

ppm

AzA

0,1

10,1

20,1

30,1

40,1

0 50 100 150 200 250

time [h]

ppm

AzA

AzA on/in

tomatoes

t1/2 = 3 days

AzA on/in tomato

leaves

t1/2 = 1 day

Degradation of Azadirachtin A (AzA) after 10fold

application of NATS

Page 31: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M Residues

Page 32: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M Rückstände

Page 33: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M Rückstände

Page 34: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M Developmental cost of Biological Plant Protection Products (estimated) in Comparison to Synthetics (IVA Data 2006)

Years 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 million EuroExtraction/Fermentation

- Synthesis

Lab-scaleProcess development

Production*Development

Development of Packing

Activeingredient

Chemistry

Formulation

Production*

2

ScreeningLab/Greenhouse

Small plot trials

Research

Biology

Development Field trials

Registration 2

DEGRADATIONANDRESIDUES

plant, animal, soil, water, air

TOXICOLOGYacute u. chronic toxicity, cancerogenicity,mutagenicity, teratogenicity, reproduction

Registration 8

ECO-TOXICOLOGY

algae, daphnia, fish, birds,micro-organisms, bees, beneficials

Registration

MILLION EURO 2 (102) 10 (98) 12 (200)NUMBER OF

SUBSTANCES 5 – 10 (140000) 1 (1)* without cost for production plants

Page 35: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

Risk Estimation

„For NeemAzal technical or its commercial formulation NeemAzal-T/S, no evidence of neither acute toxicity nor reproductive effects was obtained in valid studies. However, in no way can it be concluded that other neem products are generally devoid of a significant risk since NeemAzal is considered as safe.“ Niemann,L. (2001): Regulatory Data Requirements for Health Evaluation of Biological Plant Protection Products in: ‚Practice Oriented Results on Use of Plant Extracts and Pheromones in Integrated and Biological Pest Control‘, Proceedings of the 10th Workshop, p 95

Page 36: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

Timeline of registration in Germany

19th September 2012, very very last extension until 31st October 2012

27th June 2012, very last prolongation until 30st

September 2012

30st May 2012, last prolongation until 30st June 2012

5th December 2011 next extension until 31st May 2012

28th August 2011 Acaricides are missing on Annex I inclusion, thanks to EFSA

16th September 2010 NeemAzal-T/S receives another prolongation until 31st December 2011

17th November 2008 NeemAzal-T/S registration is extended until 31st December 2010

14th Mai 1998 NeemAzal-T/S is registered until 31st December 2008

Start

24th July 1996 application for registration of NeemAzal-T/S

Page 37: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M Registration dossier

1995

2007

Page 38: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

Estimation of Price - Turnover Relation

05

101520253035

0 0,5 1 1,5 2

€ per g AzA

turn

over

in to

ns A

zA/a

Page 39: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M Quassia-MD

Quassia-MD (0,7% Quassin)

Requested for EU/91/414 Annex I

(RMS Italien; SANCO 10472)

Page 40: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

Bitterwood: chemical structure of lead compounds

O

O

OCH3

H3COH

O

OH

Neoquassin

O

O O

OCH3

H3COH

O

Quassin

1

2 10

14

16

1811

Page 41: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M Efficacy against the Apple saw fly Hoplocampa testudinea (Ludger Linnenmannstöns)

1. Untreated 2. Quassia (3,6 g/l Quassia), 1,5 l/ha per m of crown hight, treatment at 14.05. 3. Quassia + NeemAzal T/S (3,6 g/l Quassia), both 1,5 l/ha per m of crown hight, application at 14.05. 4. NeemAzal T/S, 1,5 l/ha per m of crown hight, application 14.05. Observation 30.05.2000 Variety: Roter Boskoop Topaz Untreated 28,5 % infestation 53,0 % Quassia: Efficacy % 91,1 94,8 Quassia + NeemAzal-T/S: Efficacy % 91,1 95,7 NeemAzal-T/S: Efficacy % 69,3 80,2

Page 42: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

Glycyrrhiza glabra leave extract

Page 43: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M

Late Blight Control on Tomatoes

Copper-standard

Liqorice Untreated Control

Page 44: An Applicant’s Experience

Trifolio-M Thank you for your kind attention!