an alternative to autogenous connective tissue grafting for root coverage

289
An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage Staten Island Periodontal Continuing Education Group ____________________________________________

Upload: edward-gottesman

Post on 13-Jul-2015

340 views

Category:

Healthcare


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

An Alternative to Autogenous Connective

Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Staten Island Periodontal

Continuing Education Group

____________________________________________

Page 2: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 4: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 5: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

218 East 61st Street, New York City

Page 6: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Periodontal Plastic Surgery

• Defined as the surgical procedures performed to correct or eliminate anatomic, developmental, or traumatic deformities of the gingiva or alveolar mucosa.

Page 7: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 8: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 9: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Recession Prevalence and Age

Prevalence of Recession % In US >30

58

41

22

136

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1 2 3 4 5

Recession Prevalence (%) by Age

18

30

4046

60

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

40 50 60 70 80

Recession (mm) Age

60% of 80 year olds have recession58% of population have at least 1mm of recession

Page 10: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Why is Prevalence of Recession Important?

• Since sites with previous recession are prone to additional recession, the aging U.S. population may have a large number of sites that need root coverage grafting.

Page 11: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

1. Prevention:• restoring or increasing marginal width of

keratinized gingiva and/or marginal soft tissue thickness may offer increased resistance to further recession caused

by inflammation secondary to plaque in patients with a thin periodontal phenotype (weak evidence)

may guard against factitial injury (faulty toothbrushing) (weak evidence)

pre-prosthetically may protect against iatrogenic dentistry (ie. invading biologic width) (weak evidence)

may offer “protection” to the alveolar bone from resorbing as a result of all of the above (weak evidence)

Purposes of Treating Recession

Page 12: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

1. Prevention:• restoring or increasing marginal width of

keratinized gingiva and/or marginal soft tissue thickness prior to orthodontic treatment may prevent or

minimize the formation of a dehiscence (strong evidence)

Purposes of Treating Recession

Page 13: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Purposes of Treating Recession

2. Root coverage:• bridging the soft tissue fenestration with

either keratinized or non-keratinized gingiva reduce risk of root caries (strong evidence) reduce root sensitivity following abrasion,

erosion, abfraction or prior to tooth bleaching (strong evidence)

Page 14: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Purposes of Treating Recession

2. Root coverage:• bridging the soft tissue fenestration with

either keratinized or non-keratinized gingiva improve esthetics (very strong evidence)

Pre-prosthetically• prior to crown placement or class V restoration enabling

the clinician to control the incis-ogingival dimension of the crown/restoration and to make crown/restoration height compatible with the height of the adjacent teeth

• prior to porcelain veneer placement can eliminate the difficult task of bonding to cementum

Page 15: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Purposes of Treating Recession

2. Root coverage:• bridging the soft tissue fenestration with

either keratinized or non-keratinized gingiva improve esthetics (very strong evidence)

Post-prosthetically• may be used to satisfy esthetic requirements such as

exposed crown margins or exposed implant abutments eliminating the need to replace existing crowns

Page 16: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

First step in treating recession defect(s) is to identify the etiology and correct it !

• What Caused the Gingival Recession?– Tooth malposition

• (rotated, tilted, facially displaced teeth)

– Faulty tooth-brushing technique

– Gingival inflammation

– Abnormal frenum attachment– Iatrogenic dentistry (tooth preparation, margin

placement, impression taking)– Occlusion? (weak controversial evidence)

Page 17: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 18: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Sullivan & Atkins, Per 68

• shallow or deep

• narrow or wide

• shallow-narrow, shallow-wide

• deep-narrow, deep-wide

Page 19: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Miller PD, IJPRD 85• Class 1: REC not to MGJ, no IP bone or

papilla loss, 100% coverage

• Class 2: REC past MGJ, no IP bone or papilla loss, 100% coverage

• Class 3: REC past MGJ, IP bone or papilla loss, malposition, partial coverage

• Class 4: REC past MGJ, severe IP bone or papilla loss, malposition, no coverage

Page 20: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

All STG heal by New Attachment

• The union of connective tissue or epithelium with a root surface that has been deprived of its original attachment apparatus. This new attachment may be epithelial adhesion and/or connective tissue adaptation or attachment and may include new cementum

Page 21: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

ROOT COVERAGE PROCEDURES

1. Pedical flap (repositioning of “adjacent” attached gingiva)

• Laterally positioned (AKA repositioned) flap• Coronally positioned (AKA repositioned) flap

2. Coronal advancement of previously placed free gingival grafts

3. Gingival grafts placed directly over the root surface

4. Gingival grafting performed in conjunction with flap advancement for submersion (SECT graft)

5. Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR)

Page 22: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 23: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 24: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Cicatrization of the Free Connective Tissue Graft

Cicatrization: To heal or become healed by the formation of scar tissue.

Page 25: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 26: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

ROOT COVERAGE PROCEDURES

1. Pedical flap (repositioning of “adjacent” attached gingiva)

• Laterally positioned (AKA repositioned) flap• Coronally positioned (AKA repositioned) flap

2. Coronal advancement of previously placed free gingival grafts

3. Gingival grafts placed directly over the root surface

4. Gingival grafting performed in conjunction with flap advancement for submersion (SECT graft)

5. Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR)

Page 27: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Technique for Root Coverage by

Langer and Langer (1985)

A horizontal incision is placed at the level of the cementoenamel junction of both teeth. This is connected to vertical incisions on either side.

Page 28: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Technique for Root Coverage by

Langer and Langer (1985) A partial thickness flap

is elevated. Care is taken to preserve the periosteum apical to the area of recession. The flap is elevated to the mucobuccal fold. Convexities on the denuded roots are flattened with curettes.

Page 29: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Technique for Root Coverage by

Langer and Langer (1985)

A view of the palate showing the donor site. Two horizontal incisions are placed 2 to 3 mm apical to the free gingival margin. These are connected by vertical incisions which facilitate flap elevation and connective tissue graft removal.

Page 30: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Technique for Root Coverage by

Langer and Langer (1985) The donor tissue is

placed directly over the denuded area. The size of the graft permits it to extend onto the remaining periosteal covering on the nondenuded portion of both teeth. This will help supply circulation to the donor tissue.

Page 31: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Technique for Root Coverage by

Langer and Langer (1985) The donor connective tissue

and epithelium are sutured to the underlying connective tissue interproximally. The recipient flap is then sutured directly over the graft. If possible, the flap is pulled over a major portion of the graft to ensure temporary nourishment with an additional source of circulation.

Page 32: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 33: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 34: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 35: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 36: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 37: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 38: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

ROOT COVERAGE PROCEDURES

1. Pedical flap (repositioning of “adjacent” attached gingiva)

• Laterally positioned (AKA repositioned) flap• Coronally positioned (AKA repositioned) flap

2. Coronal advancement of previously placed free gingival grafts

3. Gingival grafts placed directly over the root surface

4. Gingival grafting performed in conjunction with flap advancement for submersion (SECT graft)

5. Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR)

Page 39: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Connective Tissue Graft Using an Envelope Flap by Raetzke (1985)

Perform root planning of the exposed root and use a finishing bur to recontour it.

Page 40: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Connective Tissue Graft Using an Envelope Flap by Raetzke (1985)

Envelope flap is prepared.

Page 41: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Connective Tissue Graft Using an Envelope Flap by Raetzke (1985)

Connective tissue is placed in envelope flap.

Page 42: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Connective Tissue Graft Using an Envelope Flap by Raetzke (1985)

Cover the exposed root with the connective tissue graft and perform compressive hemostasis. No suture is required. Cyanoacrylate may be used to hold the graft.

Page 43: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Connective Tissue Graft Using an Envelope Flap by Raetzke (1985)

• Advantages of this technique include minimal trauma to both donor and recipient sites with rapid healing, favorable healing over wide and deep areas of recession, and excellent esthetic results.

• A disadvantage is that the envelope flap cannot be displaced coronally.

Page 44: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 45: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 46: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 47: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 48: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 49: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 50: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 51: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 52: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 53: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 54: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 55: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 56: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 57: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 58: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 59: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 60: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

ROOT COVERAGE PROCEDURES

1. Pedical flap (repositioning of “adjacent” attached gingiva)

• Laterally positioned (AKA repositioned) flap• Coronally positioned (AKA repositioned) flap

2. Coronal advancement of previously placed free gingival grafts

3. Gingival grafts placed directly over the root surface

4. Gingival grafting performed in conjunction with flap advancement for submersion (SECT graft)

5. Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR)

Page 61: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 62: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 63: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 64: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 65: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 66: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 67: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 68: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 69: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 70: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 71: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 72: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 73: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 74: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

ROOT COVERAGE PROCEDURES

1. Pedical flap (repositioning of “adjacent” attached gingiva)

• Laterally positioned (AKA repositioned) flap• Coronally positioned (AKA repositioned) flap

2. Coronal advancement of previously placed free gingival grafts

3. Gingival grafts placed directly over the root surface

4. Gingival grafting performed in conjunction with flap advancement for submersion (SECT graft)

5. Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR)

Page 75: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

The Connective Tissue and Partial Thickness Double Pedicle Graft by

Harris (1992)

Page 76: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

The Connective Tissue and Partial Thickness Double Pedicle Graft by

Harris (1992)

Page 77: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

The Connective Tissue and Partial Thickness Double Pedicle Graft by

Harris (1992)

Page 78: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

The Connective Tissue and Partial Thickness Double Pedicle Graft by

Harris (1992)

Page 79: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

The Connective Tissue and Partial Thickness Double Pedicle Graft by

Harris (1992)

Page 80: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

The Connective Tissue and Partial Thickness Double Pedicle Graft by

Harris (1992)

Page 81: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 82: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 83: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 84: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 85: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

The Connective Tissue and Partial Thickness Double Pedicle Graft by

Harris (1992)

• The greatest advantage of this technique is that a pedicle graft can cover connective tissue grafts on root surfaces lacking a vascular supply.

• In addition to root coverage, the width of keratinized gingiva can be increased. Therefore, this technique may be used in areas of gingival recession with narrow keratinized gingiva.

Page 86: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

TRADITIONALLY

• Augmentation of the gingival complex at the time of root coverage has been performed with autogenous connective tissue (CT) harvested from the palate or edentulous ridge.

Page 87: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Limitations of autogenous CT grafts which have led to the search for non-autogenous

substitutes for palatal tissue

• Second surgical site morbidity

• Limited available quantity

Page 88: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Care must be taken not to damage the palatine artery.

• Potential Intra-operative bleeding

Page 89: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Knowledge of Donor Area Anatomy

Neurovascular bundle

Page 90: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Excision of Donor Tissue (Reiser/Bruno)

(Range 7-17mm)

Page 91: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

FGG Shrinkage (average 30%)

• Ward: 47% of A-C width

• Rateitschak: 25% of A-C width

• Soehren: 30% of A-C width

• James, McFall: 1.5 to 2X more if on periosteum instead of bone• Mormann:

– Very thin, 45% – Thin, 44% – Intermediate, 38% – If taken with scalpel 30%

• Rossman, Rees: 24% of graft surface area • Wei: 16%

Page 92: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 93: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 94: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 95: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 96: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 97: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 98: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 99: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 100: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 101: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 102: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 103: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 104: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Creeping Attachment

• Matter (1980) described a phenomenon of additional root coverage during healing which may be observed between 1 month and 1 year post-grafting. He reported an average of 1.2 mm of coronal creep at 1 year with no additional change.

Page 105: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Acellular Dermal Regenerative Tissue Matrix (ADM) Defined

ADM is an acellular dermal matrix derived from donated human skin tissue supplied by US AATB-compliant tissue banks utilizing the standards of the American Association of Tissue Banks (AATB) and Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) guidelines. Since ADM is regarded as minimally processed and not significantly changed in structure from the natural material, the FDA has classified it as banked human tissue.

Page 106: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

What is Acellular Dermal Regenerative Tissue Matrix?

• A human soft tissue

• Used in various applications since 1995– Burns

– Head and Neck Reconstructions

– Dental, 1997

– Urology – bladder slings & pelvic floor reconstruction

– Orthopedics – rotator cuff repair & periosteal replacement

– Hernia repair

Page 107: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Grafting Burns

Page 108: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

The Learjet 60 crashed on takeoff at 11:53 p.m. Friday, Sept. 19, 2008

Former Blink-182 drummer Travis Barker Celebrity disc jockey Adam Goldstein

The two men were in critical condition with extensive burns Saturday. The crash killed four other people on board, authorities said.

Page 109: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Multiple Applications

AlloDerm®

Reconstructive

Repliform®

Urogynecology

GraftJacket®

Orthopedics

Page 110: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

ADM – Safe Tissue

» Over 13 years

» Over 900,000 cases

Safe History

Page 111: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 112: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 113: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 114: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 115: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 116: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 117: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Procurement of Alloderm

• AlloDerm is a processed tissue that comes from donors who are extensively screened and tested for presence of diseases including HIV and hepatitis. The processing procedure has been demonstrated to reduce HIV and hepatitis C surrogate virus to non-detectable levels. Additional testing for presence of pathogens is performed prior to and following processing to ensure that Alloderm is disease-free before release for patient care.

Page 118: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Processing of Alloderm

• A buffered salt solution removes the epidermis, and multiple cell types within the dermis are then solubilized and washed away using a patented series of non-denaturing detergent washes that rapidly diffuse into the dermis.

Page 119: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

ADM Processing• Acellular Dermal Matrix is of human

origin.

• It has been especially processed to remove both the epidermis and the cells that can lead to tissue rejection and graft failure, without damaging the matrix.

• The processed tissue matrix is preserved with a patented freeze-drying process that prevents damaging ice crystals from forming.

Page 120: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 121: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Regenerative Tissue Martix

The processed regenerative human tissue matrix is then preserved using

LifeCell’s patented amorphous freeze-drying process, thereby

retaining the critical biochemical and structural components needed to

maintain the tissue’s natural regenerative properties. The matrix

has a two-year shelf life.

Cryopreservation

Page 122: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 123: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

AlloDerm® Preserved Tissue

AlloDerm

LifeCell patented freeze-drying

Commercially available dermis

Conventional freeze-drying

Page 124: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIXACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX

Page 125: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

ADM works like an Autograft

Provides a bioactive matrix consisting of collagens, elastin, blood vessel channels, and bioactive proteins that support natural revascularization, cell repopulation, and tissue remodeling.

Page 126: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Healing by “Repair” (fibrous encapsulation) or “Regeneration” (incorporation)

Inflammation Matrix & Stem Cells

Scar Tissue Normal Tissue

Fibrosis

Intrinsic Tissue

Regeneration Process

Page 127: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Regenerative Tissue MatrixUnique Outcome

Rapid revascularization and repopulation

The vascular architecture is endothelialized, and host

stem cells migrate and bind specifically to protein

components of the matrix. Host cells respond to the

three-dimensional architecture and adapt to the

local environment.

Page 128: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Regenerative Tissue Matrix

Remodeling to the patient’s own tissue

The matrix is now fully revascularized,

repopulated and integrated into the host

tissue. Proteins undergo normal breakdown and regeneration.

Unique Outcome

Page 129: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Regenerative Tissue Matrix

Transitioning into the host tissue

Host cells continue to respond to the local

environment, and the matrix transitions into the tissue it is

replacing at the site of the transplant.

Unique Outcome

Page 130: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 131: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 132: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 133: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 134: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 135: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 136: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 137: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 138: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 139: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Advantages of ADM

1. Equivalent to “gold standard” – Provides effective and predictable root coverage

compared to connective tissue

1. Unlimited supply– Multiple sites can therefore be treated with a single

procedure (sextant, quadrant, full arch)

1. Excellent tissue color match obtained as the graft is repopulated with the recipient’s cells and the final gingival color exactly matches the recipient’s pre-treatment gingiva

Page 140: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 141: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 142: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 143: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

#1/2 Orban DE Knife, ModifiedModified with a flattened surface on one side and a domed surface on the other, plus a reduced cutting edge at the shank. Ideal for intrasulcular sharp, supraperiosteal dissection. Used after the initial blunt dissection (using the HF-PPAEL or HF-PPAELA) to complete the preparation of the pouch recipient site. The flat side is positioned against the bone and the domed side faces the soft tissue facilitating dissection without perforation. Reduced cutting surface lessens the possibility of inadvertently incising the pouch margin during dissection.

Page 144: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Allen Micro Periosteal ElevatorDesigned for elevation of a mucoperiosteal pouch with an intrasulcular approach (following an intrasulcular incision from the base of the sulcus to the alveolar crest). May be used with the curve angled inward as well as outward. Especially useful for papilla elevation using the curved end angled outward. Also placed between the pouch and the graft to prevent needle penetration of the graft during suturing.

Page 145: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Allen Micro Periosteal Elevator, AnteriorSimilar in design but smaller than the HF-PPAEL (above), with a reduced curvature. Designed for use in the mandibular anterior region where the tooth diameter is smaller. It is also useful in more delicate dissections where the tissue is thin and/or the bony topography is irregular.

Page 146: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

#7/8 Younger-Good Curette, #6 Handle Used for root planing prior to root coverage grafting. Also used for passing the AlloDerm into the tunnel.

Page 147: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Micro Suture Pliers Allows better visibility of small tissue margins for precise suture placement.

Page 148: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Diamond Dusted Micro-pickups for assistant.

Page 149: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Micro Non-Serrated Castroviejo Perma Sharp 7” Str. Round Handle A smaller diameter jaw allows retrieval of the needle tip in tight quarters. For use with 6-0 and smaller sutures.

Page 150: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Perma Sharp Goldman Fox Scissors Perfect for cutting sutures.

Page 151: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

ADM and the Alternate Papilla Tunnel Technique

1. Local anesthetic by local infiltration using Lidocaine 1:100, 000 epi.

2. Root planing with #7/8 younger good curette to remove any existing resin or irregularities in root suface assuring the line angles of the root surface are smooth as they meet the buccal surfaces.– Root planing is “A definitive treatment procedure designed

to remove cementum or surface dentin that is rough, impregnated with calculus, or contaminated with toxins or microorganisms.

3. Interproximal flossing of teeth

Page 152: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

EDTA

Dentinal surface of a sample covered with debris and smear layer. SEM

1500X magnification.

Dentinal surface of a sample covered with less than 25% debris. SEM

1500X magnification.

30-60 sec.

4. Application of a chelating agent EDTA (Ethylenediaminetetracetic acid) for 30-60 sec with cotton tip applicator to remove smear layer and produce canals with patent dentinal tubules obstructed by root planing; this doesn’t harm blood supply of marginal tissue due to neutral pH

ADM and the Alternate Papilla Tunnel Technique

Page 153: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 154: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

ADM and the Alternate Papilla Tunnel Technique

5. Alternating papilla are incised

6. Split thickness dissection is performed to create a pouch adjacent to involved teeth using the flat side of a modified #1/2 Orban DE knife which is positioned against the bone and the domed side faces the soft tissue facilitating dissection without perforation

Page 155: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 156: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 157: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 158: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

ADM and the Alternate Papilla Tunnel Technique

7. Remove from outer foil pack and drop graft into saline bath directly from inner package.

Page 159: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Important:

Before use, clinicians should review all risk information, which can be

found on the packaging and in the “Information for Use” attached to the packaging of each AlloDerm

graft.

Page 160: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

PRODUCT SAFETY

Page 161: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

ADM and the Alternate Papilla Tunnel Technique

8. Re-hydrate in two consecutive 10-20 minute sterile saline baths.

9. Remove paper backing from AlloDerm between first and second baths.

Page 162: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 163: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 164: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

ADM and the Alternate Papilla Tunnel Technique

8. ADM is secured against the buccal root surface(s) with 7.0 Polypropylene interupted sling sutures with all knots placed on palatal margins

Page 165: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 166: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

ADM and the Alternate Papilla Tunnel Technique

5. Flaps/pouch are coronally advanced over the graft with 6.0 Polypropylene interupted sling sutures with all knots placed on palatal margins

Page 167: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 168: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

When performing a CAF + ADM, the following measures have to be taken to prevent flap retraction and exposure

of the ADM as described by Bernimoulin et al.

• A double sling suture (as described by Dodge et al.)

Page 169: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Overcorrect for more severe recession defects by 1mm when using CAF because there is no

creeping attachment

• Pini Prato et al.

Page 170: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Post-op Medications

1. Analgesics• non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents • steroids (ie. methylprednisolone )

1. Doxycyclin Hyclate (ie. Peridex®)

2. NO ANTIBIOTICS• RISK OF INFECTION POST PERIODONTAL

SURGERY IS LESS THAN 1%(Pack and Haber)

Page 171: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 172: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

2 MONTH POST-OP

Page 173: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 174: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

POST-OP

PRE-OP

2

WEEKS

Page 175: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

CLINICAL CASE I

Page 176: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 177: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 178: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 179: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 180: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 181: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 182: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

PRE-OP

POST-OP

Page 183: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

CLINICAL CASE II

Page 184: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 185: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 186: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 187: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 188: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 189: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

PRE-OP

POST-OP

2

WEEKS

Page 190: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 191: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 192: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 193: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 194: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 195: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

PRE-OP

POST-OP

2

WEEKS

Page 196: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

CLINICAL CASE III

Page 197: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 198: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 199: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 200: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

PRE-OP

POST-OP

Page 201: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

CASE IV

Page 202: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 203: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 204: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 205: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 206: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 207: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

5/29/08

5/17/08PRE-OP

2 WEEK POST-OP

Page 208: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

CASE V

Page 209: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 210: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 211: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 212: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 213: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 214: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 215: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 216: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 217: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

PRE-OP

POST-OP

6/19/08

2

MONTHS

8/14/08

Page 218: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

CASE VI

Page 219: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 220: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 221: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 222: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 223: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

PRE-OP

POST-OP

Page 224: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

CASE VII

Page 225: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 226: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 227: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 228: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 229: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 230: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

PRE-OP

POST-OP

2

WEEKS

Page 231: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

CASE VIII

Page 232: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 233: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 234: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 235: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 236: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 237: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 238: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 239: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 240: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

PRE-OP

POST-OP

2/8/08

3/5/08

1

MONTH

Page 241: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

CASE IX

Page 242: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 243: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 244: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 245: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 246: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 247: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

PRE-OP

POST-OP

7/7/08

8/4/08

4

WEEKS

Page 248: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 249: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

CASE X

Page 250: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 251: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 252: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 253: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 254: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 255: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 256: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

PRE-OP

POST-OP

7/7/08

4

WEEKS

8/4/08

Page 257: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

CASE XI

Page 258: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 259: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 260: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 261: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 262: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 263: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 264: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 265: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 266: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

PRE-OP

POST-OP

12/21/07

3/5/08

3

MONTHS

Page 267: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

CASE XII

Page 268: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 269: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 270: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 271: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 272: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 273: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

PRE-OP

POST-OP 03/27/08

12/6/07

Page 274: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

Please don’t do this!

Page 275: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

CASE XIII

Page 276: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

12/29/06

Page 277: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

12/29/06

Page 278: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

12/29/06

Page 279: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

12/29/06

Page 280: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

12/29/06

Page 281: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage
Page 282: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

1/18/07

Page 283: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

2/5/07

Page 284: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

5/14/07

Page 285: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

8/27/07

Page 286: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

8/27/07

12/29/06PRE-OP

POST-OP

8

MONTHS

Page 287: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

8/27/07

Page 288: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

Page 289: An Alternative to Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafting for Root Coverage