vaccination at the hatchery injection - transmune€¦ · microbiological monitoring • intensive...

Carlos González Alonso

Global Technical & Marketing Equipment Manager

Carlos.gonzalez@ceva.com

Vaccination at the Hatchery

INJECTIONKey factors for process-control

Hatchery Injection Practices - 2012

51 bill.Broilers

Injection EquipmentMain Figures

What are the

Key Factors for Control

in SQ Vaccination?

CONCEPT SQ

Optimal Vaccination Efficacy +98%

Maximum Recommended Speed

2500-3000 DOCs/hour

Maximum Recommended Time of Operation

6 hours/operator

Maximum Output/Day 18.000 DOCs/operator/day

Recommended Maintenance 1.5 hour/SQ vaccinator/week

Sub-Cutaneous Injection

MAIN TOPICS TO CONSIDER Key Factors

Equipment Setting • Needle: length, orientation and size• Performance: Dosage, accuracy, etc.• Equipment maintenance

Operator Skills & Training • DOC handling technique• Speed impact and working hours• HR availability and turn-over

Supervision & Monitoring • Vaccination Efficacy per operator• Dosage control• Logistics & Organization

Vaccine Handling & Status • Vaccine preparation • Timing and vaccine stability• Impact of equipment on vaccine status

Biosecurity & Contamination • Monitoring of vaccine contamination• Crossed contamination between DOC• Environmental contamination

Self Injection

Low Accuracy

Unconsistent location

Equipment Setting • Needle: length, orientation and size• Performance: Dosage, accuracy, etc.• Equipment maintenance

Operator skills & training • DOC handling technique• Speed impact and working hours impact• HR availability and turn-over

VACCINATIONFAILURE

REFERENCEINCIDENCE

2012 DATA (avg.)

IMPACT

No Vaccine <0.5% 1.29% No protection in the fieldVaccine waste

Wet Fluff <0.5% 2.17% Low or no protectionVaccine waste

Mal-position <0.5% 3.81% Low absorption of the vaccineRisk of damages of vascular systemRisk of damages on digestive tract

Blood <0.25% 0.44% Infection of damaged tissuesHigher first week mortality

Bone-damage <0.25% 0.16% Injection at crane or back-spineCull chicks; Mortality

Vaccination Q > 98% 92.13%

10.00%

M ojado M od. 5.73% 4.83% 9.00% 7.90% 5.50% 3.54% 3.29% 2.56% 2.89% 3.18% 3.77% 2.14% 0.60% 2.06% 1.67%

M ojado Sev. 6.18% 3.83% 2.86% 2.80% 1.50% 2.12% 1.59% 0.78% 0.93% 0.30% 1.09% 0.36% 2.53% 0.50% 0.86%

Heridos 1.09% 1.25% 1.14% 0.80% 1.56% 0.92% 1.06% 0.56% 0.43% 0.57% 0.59% 0.50% 0.60% 1.33% 0.33%

M ala Posición 0.45% 0.58% 1.43% 0.60% 0.81% 0.19% 0.41% 0.00% 0.55% 0.27% 0.55% 0.14% 0.00% 0.39% 0.29%

No vacunados 0.00% 0.00% 0.86% 1.10% 0.31% 0.31% 0.47% 0.00% 0.05% 0.07% 0.09% 0.00% 0.33% 0.06% 0.14%

M uertos 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.04% 0.00% 0.00% 0.05% 0.05% 0.05% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

16-Oct 23-Oct 30-Oct 06-Nov 13-Nov 20-Nov 21-Nov 01-Dic 11-Dic 12-Dic 18-Dic 30-Dic 15-Ene 29-Ene 10-Feb

Data CollectionData Analysis

10.00%

M ojado M od. 5.73% 4.83% 9.00% 7.90% 5.50% 3.54% 3.29% 2.56% 2.89% 3.18% 3.77% 2.14% 0.60% 2.06% 1.67%

M ojado Sev. 6.18% 3.83% 2.86% 2.80% 1.50% 2.12% 1.59% 0.78% 0.93% 0.30% 1.09% 0.36% 2.53% 0.50% 0.86%

Heridos 1.09% 1.25% 1.14% 0.80% 1.56% 0.92% 1.06% 0.56% 0.43% 0.57% 0.59% 0.50% 0.60% 1.33% 0.33%

M ala Posición 0.45% 0.58% 1.43% 0.60% 0.81% 0.19% 0.41% 0.00% 0.55% 0.27% 0.55% 0.14% 0.00% 0.39% 0.29%

No vacunados 0.00% 0.00% 0.86% 1.10% 0.31% 0.31% 0.47% 0.00% 0.05% 0.07% 0.09% 0.00% 0.33% 0.06% 0.14%

M uertos 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.04% 0.00% 0.00% 0.05% 0.05% 0.05% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

16-Oct 23-Oct 30-Oct 06-Nov 13-Nov 20-Nov 21-Nov 01-Dic 11-Dic 12-Dic 18-Dic 30-Dic 15-Ene 29-Ene 10-Feb

97,25%

95,33%

98,67%

93,00%

84,00%

99,00%

82,00%

96,40%

98,00%

95,90%

96,33%

98,50%

98,33%

98,67%

Vaccinator A

Dates of Audits

Vaccin

ation Q

Vaccine handling & status • Vaccine preparation • Timing and vaccine stability• Impact of equipment on vaccine status

Vaccine titter

loss due to

vaccine tubes

set-up

BAG #1

BAG #2

BAG #3

BAG MACHINE - NEAR MACHINE - FAR

Vaccine titter loss due to vaccine tubes set-up

Biosecurity & Contamination • Monitoring of vaccine contamination• Cross contamination between DOC• Environmental contamination

SQ is a simple method, but it

demads skilled operators and

constant monitoring

What are the

Key Factors for Control

in In-Ovo Vaccination?

Monitoring In-Ovo Vaccination

Site of Location Test

Medium

Embryo development days2017 18 19

Microbiological Monitoring

• Intensive monitoring of the hatchery and the vaccination process.

• Aspergillus sp. incidence and all major production-related bacteria

(E.Coli, Pseudomonas sp., Salmonella sp., Staphilococus sp., etc…)

• Helps to improve the bio-sanitare status of the hatchery and

secures the in-ovo vaccination process.

Vaccination Micro Control

Regular micro monitoring evaluation of the

vaccination process

Hatchery Micro Control

Yearly monitoring of the hatchery plant

and all production processes

Concept

Young Flocks

(>30w)

Medium Flocks

(30-45w)

Old Flocks

(<45w)

Egg Breakage 0.4% 0.5% 0.5%

Upside-down Eggs 0.3% 0.2% 0.2%

Side Injections 0.25% 0.2% 0.2%

Abnormal Perforation <0.1% <0.1% <0.1%

Blocked Needles <8% 8% 8-10%

Contaminated Eggs 0.25% 0.3% 0.4%

Aspergillus sp. 0.5% 0.5% 0.8%

It is KEY to create your own

reference data sheet

Topic Recomended Frequency

Vaccine Prep. Daily

In-Ovo Checklist Daily

Dosage Control Daily

Microbiological Monitoring 15 days

Operator Training Continious

Embryo-diagnosis Daily2-3 flocks

Disinfection Mix Control Daily

Egg Cleaning & Sanitare Status Weekly

Hatchability Assessment Weekly 5-10 flocks

Summary

o Hatchery Injection represents 65-70% of

the total Broiler production world-wide with

a strong positive trend.

o Skilled operatos in equipment care and

vaccination technique are requiered for

success.

o Constant monitoring and data analysis

are key factors for improvement.

o The implementation of regular vaccination

services and monitoring activities is

mandatory.

Vaccination at the Hatchery

INJECTIONKey factors for process-control

Together, beyond animal health

vaccination at the hatchery injection - transmune€¦ · microbiological monitoring • intensive...

Documents

recombinant technology for nd and md vaccine...

mason valley fish hatchery -...

pas reform hatchery technologies home of hatchery ... ·...

poster # 0264 comparison of various elisa kits to assess...

sanitasi hatchery

hatchery management

vaccination and vaccination and vaccination and...

fish hatchery...

hatchery planning and management. hatchery design

hatchery design

medvejie creek hatchery and sawmill creek hatchery 2019...

hatchery management.doc

ford hatchery

laporan hatchery

hatchery and genetic management plan … hatchery and...

cobb-vantress · the cobb broiler management guide is part...

breder hatchery

bonneville hatchery

hatchery and genetic management plan...

hatchery standards