uso de las tic en fisioterapia y enfermería - uah
Post on 05-Aug-2015
449 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
@_RaulFerrer
Uso de las TIC y herramientas 2.0 en
Fisioterapia y ENFERMERÍA
#TICsFTPyENF
ASOCIACIÓN ESPAÑOLA DE
FISIOTERAPIA EN ATENCIÓN PRIMARIA
35%2.638 millones de personas
conectadas en 2014
S9%
30% nativos digitales
“la población de jóvenes conectados de 15 a 24 años de edad, con cinco o más años de experiencia en línea”
Unión internacional de Telecomunicaciones (UIT). Naciones Unidas
10 Abril 2015
#TICsFTPyENF
SV Estudio Anual de Redes Sociales de IAB Spain Enero 2014
76,2%de las Personas en España
entre 16 y 74 añosUsan internet
+26mill
10 Abril 2015
#TICsFTPyENF
10 Abril 2015
#TICsFTPyENFV Estudio Anual de Redes Sociales de IAB Spain Enero 2014
Usan redes sociales a diario
Los ciudadanos ante la e-sanidad. Instituto ONTSI. Julio de 2012
48,3%Internautas buscaron
sobre SALUD
#TICsFTPyENF
“Una Revolución no se produce cuando la sociedad adopta nuevas herramientas, ocurre cuando la sociedad adopta nuevos comportamientos”
Clay Shirky
#TICsFTPyENF
10 Abril 2015
#TICsFTPyENFHesse B, Moser R, Rutten L. Surveys of Physicians and Electronic HealthInformation. NEJM 2010 Mar 4;362(9):859-60
Lo primero que se consulta es internet.
10 Abril 2015
#TICsFTPyENFGráfico original de Los ciudadanos ante la e-sanidad. Instituto ONTSI. Julio de 2012
Tipos de INFORMACIÓN que buscan los pacientes
10 Abril 2015
#TICsFTPyENFJ Med Internet Res 2014 vol. 16 issue. 8
Original Paper
Representation of Health Conditions on Facebook: ContentAnalysis and Evaluation of User Engagement
Timothy M Hale1, PhD; Akhilesh S Pathipati2, BA; Shiyi Zan1, BS; Kamal Jethwani1, MD, MPH1Center for Connected Health, Partners HealthCare, Inc, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States2Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
Corresponding Author:Timothy M Hale, PhDCenter for Connected HealthPartners HealthCare, IncHarvard Medical School25 New Chardon Street, Suite 300Boston, MA, 02114United StatesPhone: 1 617 643 9852Fax: 1 617 726 7530Email: tmhale@mgh.harvard.edu
AbstractBackground: A sizable majority of adult Internet users report looking for health information online. Social networking sites(SNS) like Facebook represent a common place to seek information, but very little is known about the representation and use ofhealth content on SNS.Objective: Our goal in this study was to understand the role of SNS in health information seeking. More specifically, we aimedto describe how health conditions are represented on Facebook Pages and how users interact with these different conditions.Methods: We used Google Insights to identify the 20 most searched for health conditions on Google and then searched eachof the resulting terms on Facebook. We compiled a list of the first 50 Facebook “Pages” results for each health condition. Afterfiltering results to identify pages relevant to our research, we categorized pages into one of seven categories based on the page’sprimary purpose. We then measured user engagement by evaluating the number of “Likes” for different conditions and types ofpages.Results: The search returned 50 pages for 18 of the health conditions, but only 48 pages were found for “anemia” and 5 pageswere found for “flu symptoms”, yielding a total of 953 pages. A large number of pages (29.4%, 280/953) were irrelevant to thehealth condition searched. Of the 673 relevant pages, 151 were not in English or originated outside the United States, leaving522 pages to be coded for content. The most common type of page was marketing/promotion (32.2%, 168/522) followed byinformation/awareness (20.7%, 108/522), Wikipedia-type pages (15.5%, 81/522), patient support (9.4%, 49/522), and generalsupport (3.6%, 19/522). Health conditions varied greatly by the primary page type. All health conditions had somemarketing/promotion pages and this made up 76% (29/38) of pages on acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). The largestpercentage of general support pages were cancer (19%, 6/32) and stomach (16%, 4/25). For patient support, stroke (67%, 4/6),lupus (33%, 10/30), breast cancer (19%, 6/31), arthritis (16%, 6/36), and diabetes (16%, 6/37) ranked the highest. Six healthconditions were not represented by any type of support pages (ie, human papillomavirus, diarrhea, flu symptoms, pneumonia,spine, human immunodeficiency virus). Marketing/promotion pages accounted for 46.73% (10,371,169/22,191,633) of all Likes,followed by support pages (40.66%, 9,023,234/22,191,633). Cancer and breast cancer accounted for 86.90%(19,284,066/22,191,633) of all page Likes.Conclusions: This research represents the first attempts to comprehensively describe publicly available health content and userengagement with health conditions on Facebook pages. Public health interventions using Facebook will need to be designed toensure relevant information is easy to find and with an understanding that stigma associated with some health conditions maylimit the users’ engagement with Facebook pages. This line of research merits further investigation as Facebook and other SNScontinue to evolve over the coming years.
(J Med Internet Res 2014;16(8):e182) doi:10.2196/jmir.3275
J Med Internet Res 2014 | vol. 16 | iss. 8 | e182 | p.1http://www.jmir.org/2014/8/e182/(page number not for citation purposes)
Hale et alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
XSL•FORenderX
10 Abril 2015
#TICsFTPyENFJ Med Internet Res 2014 vol. 16 issue. 8
Original Paper
Representation of Health Conditions on Facebook: ContentAnalysis and Evaluation of User Engagement
Timothy M Hale1, PhD; Akhilesh S Pathipati2, BA; Shiyi Zan1, BS; Kamal Jethwani1, MD, MPH1Center for Connected Health, Partners HealthCare, Inc, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States2Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
Corresponding Author:Timothy M Hale, PhDCenter for Connected HealthPartners HealthCare, IncHarvard Medical School25 New Chardon Street, Suite 300Boston, MA, 02114United StatesPhone: 1 617 643 9852Fax: 1 617 726 7530Email: tmhale@mgh.harvard.edu
AbstractBackground: A sizable majority of adult Internet users report looking for health information online. Social networking sites(SNS) like Facebook represent a common place to seek information, but very little is known about the representation and use ofhealth content on SNS.Objective: Our goal in this study was to understand the role of SNS in health information seeking. More specifically, we aimedto describe how health conditions are represented on Facebook Pages and how users interact with these different conditions.Methods: We used Google Insights to identify the 20 most searched for health conditions on Google and then searched eachof the resulting terms on Facebook. We compiled a list of the first 50 Facebook “Pages” results for each health condition. Afterfiltering results to identify pages relevant to our research, we categorized pages into one of seven categories based on the page’sprimary purpose. We then measured user engagement by evaluating the number of “Likes” for different conditions and types ofpages.Results: The search returned 50 pages for 18 of the health conditions, but only 48 pages were found for “anemia” and 5 pageswere found for “flu symptoms”, yielding a total of 953 pages. A large number of pages (29.4%, 280/953) were irrelevant to thehealth condition searched. Of the 673 relevant pages, 151 were not in English or originated outside the United States, leaving522 pages to be coded for content. The most common type of page was marketing/promotion (32.2%, 168/522) followed byinformation/awareness (20.7%, 108/522), Wikipedia-type pages (15.5%, 81/522), patient support (9.4%, 49/522), and generalsupport (3.6%, 19/522). Health conditions varied greatly by the primary page type. All health conditions had somemarketing/promotion pages and this made up 76% (29/38) of pages on acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). The largestpercentage of general support pages were cancer (19%, 6/32) and stomach (16%, 4/25). For patient support, stroke (67%, 4/6),lupus (33%, 10/30), breast cancer (19%, 6/31), arthritis (16%, 6/36), and diabetes (16%, 6/37) ranked the highest. Six healthconditions were not represented by any type of support pages (ie, human papillomavirus, diarrhea, flu symptoms, pneumonia,spine, human immunodeficiency virus). Marketing/promotion pages accounted for 46.73% (10,371,169/22,191,633) of all Likes,followed by support pages (40.66%, 9,023,234/22,191,633). Cancer and breast cancer accounted for 86.90%(19,284,066/22,191,633) of all page Likes.Conclusions: This research represents the first attempts to comprehensively describe publicly available health content and userengagement with health conditions on Facebook pages. Public health interventions using Facebook will need to be designed toensure relevant information is easy to find and with an understanding that stigma associated with some health conditions maylimit the users’ engagement with Facebook pages. This line of research merits further investigation as Facebook and other SNScontinue to evolve over the coming years.
(J Med Internet Res 2014;16(8):e182) doi:10.2196/jmir.3275
J Med Internet Res 2014 | vol. 16 | iss. 8 | e182 | p.1http://www.jmir.org/2014/8/e182/(page number not for citation purposes)
Hale et alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
XSL•FORenderX
10 Abril 2015
#TICsFTPyENFJ Med Internet Res 2014 vol. 16 issue. 8
Original Paper
Representation of Health Conditions on Facebook: ContentAnalysis and Evaluation of User Engagement
Timothy M Hale1, PhD; Akhilesh S Pathipati2, BA; Shiyi Zan1, BS; Kamal Jethwani1, MD, MPH1Center for Connected Health, Partners HealthCare, Inc, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States2Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
Corresponding Author:Timothy M Hale, PhDCenter for Connected HealthPartners HealthCare, IncHarvard Medical School25 New Chardon Street, Suite 300Boston, MA, 02114United StatesPhone: 1 617 643 9852Fax: 1 617 726 7530Email: tmhale@mgh.harvard.edu
AbstractBackground: A sizable majority of adult Internet users report looking for health information online. Social networking sites(SNS) like Facebook represent a common place to seek information, but very little is known about the representation and use ofhealth content on SNS.Objective: Our goal in this study was to understand the role of SNS in health information seeking. More specifically, we aimedto describe how health conditions are represented on Facebook Pages and how users interact with these different conditions.Methods: We used Google Insights to identify the 20 most searched for health conditions on Google and then searched eachof the resulting terms on Facebook. We compiled a list of the first 50 Facebook “Pages” results for each health condition. Afterfiltering results to identify pages relevant to our research, we categorized pages into one of seven categories based on the page’sprimary purpose. We then measured user engagement by evaluating the number of “Likes” for different conditions and types ofpages.Results: The search returned 50 pages for 18 of the health conditions, but only 48 pages were found for “anemia” and 5 pageswere found for “flu symptoms”, yielding a total of 953 pages. A large number of pages (29.4%, 280/953) were irrelevant to thehealth condition searched. Of the 673 relevant pages, 151 were not in English or originated outside the United States, leaving522 pages to be coded for content. The most common type of page was marketing/promotion (32.2%, 168/522) followed byinformation/awareness (20.7%, 108/522), Wikipedia-type pages (15.5%, 81/522), patient support (9.4%, 49/522), and generalsupport (3.6%, 19/522). Health conditions varied greatly by the primary page type. All health conditions had somemarketing/promotion pages and this made up 76% (29/38) of pages on acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). The largestpercentage of general support pages were cancer (19%, 6/32) and stomach (16%, 4/25). For patient support, stroke (67%, 4/6),lupus (33%, 10/30), breast cancer (19%, 6/31), arthritis (16%, 6/36), and diabetes (16%, 6/37) ranked the highest. Six healthconditions were not represented by any type of support pages (ie, human papillomavirus, diarrhea, flu symptoms, pneumonia,spine, human immunodeficiency virus). Marketing/promotion pages accounted for 46.73% (10,371,169/22,191,633) of all Likes,followed by support pages (40.66%, 9,023,234/22,191,633). Cancer and breast cancer accounted for 86.90%(19,284,066/22,191,633) of all page Likes.Conclusions: This research represents the first attempts to comprehensively describe publicly available health content and userengagement with health conditions on Facebook pages. Public health interventions using Facebook will need to be designed toensure relevant information is easy to find and with an understanding that stigma associated with some health conditions maylimit the users’ engagement with Facebook pages. This line of research merits further investigation as Facebook and other SNScontinue to evolve over the coming years.
(J Med Internet Res 2014;16(8):e182) doi:10.2196/jmir.3275
J Med Internet Res 2014 | vol. 16 | iss. 8 | e182 | p.1http://www.jmir.org/2014/8/e182/(page number not for citation purposes)
Hale et alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
XSL•FORenderX
29%(n=280)
No tenían nada que versobre la condición de
SALUD
10 Abril 2015
#TICsFTPyENFJ Med Internet Res 2014 vol. 16 issue. 8
Original Paper
Representation of Health Conditions on Facebook: ContentAnalysis and Evaluation of User Engagement
Timothy M Hale1, PhD; Akhilesh S Pathipati2, BA; Shiyi Zan1, BS; Kamal Jethwani1, MD, MPH1Center for Connected Health, Partners HealthCare, Inc, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States2Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
Corresponding Author:Timothy M Hale, PhDCenter for Connected HealthPartners HealthCare, IncHarvard Medical School25 New Chardon Street, Suite 300Boston, MA, 02114United StatesPhone: 1 617 643 9852Fax: 1 617 726 7530Email: tmhale@mgh.harvard.edu
AbstractBackground: A sizable majority of adult Internet users report looking for health information online. Social networking sites(SNS) like Facebook represent a common place to seek information, but very little is known about the representation and use ofhealth content on SNS.Objective: Our goal in this study was to understand the role of SNS in health information seeking. More specifically, we aimedto describe how health conditions are represented on Facebook Pages and how users interact with these different conditions.Methods: We used Google Insights to identify the 20 most searched for health conditions on Google and then searched eachof the resulting terms on Facebook. We compiled a list of the first 50 Facebook “Pages” results for each health condition. Afterfiltering results to identify pages relevant to our research, we categorized pages into one of seven categories based on the page’sprimary purpose. We then measured user engagement by evaluating the number of “Likes” for different conditions and types ofpages.Results: The search returned 50 pages for 18 of the health conditions, but only 48 pages were found for “anemia” and 5 pageswere found for “flu symptoms”, yielding a total of 953 pages. A large number of pages (29.4%, 280/953) were irrelevant to thehealth condition searched. Of the 673 relevant pages, 151 were not in English or originated outside the United States, leaving522 pages to be coded for content. The most common type of page was marketing/promotion (32.2%, 168/522) followed byinformation/awareness (20.7%, 108/522), Wikipedia-type pages (15.5%, 81/522), patient support (9.4%, 49/522), and generalsupport (3.6%, 19/522). Health conditions varied greatly by the primary page type. All health conditions had somemarketing/promotion pages and this made up 76% (29/38) of pages on acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). The largestpercentage of general support pages were cancer (19%, 6/32) and stomach (16%, 4/25). For patient support, stroke (67%, 4/6),lupus (33%, 10/30), breast cancer (19%, 6/31), arthritis (16%, 6/36), and diabetes (16%, 6/37) ranked the highest. Six healthconditions were not represented by any type of support pages (ie, human papillomavirus, diarrhea, flu symptoms, pneumonia,spine, human immunodeficiency virus). Marketing/promotion pages accounted for 46.73% (10,371,169/22,191,633) of all Likes,followed by support pages (40.66%, 9,023,234/22,191,633). Cancer and breast cancer accounted for 86.90%(19,284,066/22,191,633) of all page Likes.Conclusions: This research represents the first attempts to comprehensively describe publicly available health content and userengagement with health conditions on Facebook pages. Public health interventions using Facebook will need to be designed toensure relevant information is easy to find and with an understanding that stigma associated with some health conditions maylimit the users’ engagement with Facebook pages. This line of research merits further investigation as Facebook and other SNScontinue to evolve over the coming years.
(J Med Internet Res 2014;16(8):e182) doi:10.2196/jmir.3275
J Med Internet Res 2014 | vol. 16 | iss. 8 | e182 | p.1http://www.jmir.org/2014/8/e182/(page number not for citation purposes)
Hale et alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
XSL•FORenderX
29%(n=280)
No tenían nada que versobre la condición de
SALUD
168 32,2% Del resto, sólo de MARKETING
10 Abril 2015
#TICsFTPyENFGráfico original de Los ciudadanos ante la e-sanidad. Instituto ONTSI. Julio de 2012
Barreras de INTERNET como fuente de información en SALUD
10 Abril 2015
#TICsFTPyENFGráfico original de Los ciudadanos ante la e-sanidad. Instituto ONTSI. Julio de 2012
Barreras de INTERNET como fuente de información en SALUD
83,1%
61%Pacientes de
Atención Primaria buscaron en Internet
Marin-Torres V, et al. Internet como fuente de información sobre salud en pacientes de atención primaria y su influencia en la relación médico-paciente. Aten Primaria.Volume 45, Issue 1, January 2013, Pages 46–53
92,4% encontró respuesta a sus dudas
#TICsFTPyENF
Marin-Torres V, et al. Internet como fuente de información sobre salud en pacientes de atención primaria y su influencia en la relación médico-paciente. Aten Primaria. 2012.
Cambios en el comportamiento entre los pacientes que utilizan internet como fuente de información de salud
53,5% Refiere haber cambiado algúna vez
la forma de pensar y en el 30% la de comportarse:
10 Abril 2015
#TICsFTPyENF
Systematic Review of Factors Influencing the Adoption ofInformation and Communication Technologies by HealthcareProfessionals
Marie-Pierre Gagnon,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department of Nursing,Laval University, Québec City, Canada, Centre de recherche du CHUQ, Hôpital St-FrançoisD’Assise, 10, rue de L’Espinay, D6-734, Québec City, QC G1L 3L5, Canada
Marie Desmartis,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada
Michel Labrecque,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department of Family andEmergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec City, Canada
Josip Car,Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London,London, UK
Claudia Pagliari,Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Pierre Pluye,Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
Pierre Frémont,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department ofRehabilitation, Laval University, Québec City, Canada
Johanne Gagnon,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department of Nursing,Laval University, Québec City, Canada
Nadine Tremblay, andQuebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada
France LégaréQuebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department of Family andEmergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec City, CanadaMarie-Pierre Gagnon: marie-pierre.gagnon@fsi.ulaval.ca
Abstract
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010Correspondence to: Marie-Pierre Gagnon, marie-pierre.gagnon@fsi.ulaval.ca.
PubMed Central CANADAAuthor Manuscript / Manuscrit d'auteurJ Med Syst. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 May 06.
Published in final edited form as:J Med Syst. 2012 February ; 36(1): 241–277. doi:10.1007/s10916-010-9473-4.
PMC
Canada Author M
anuscriptPM
C C
anada Author Manuscript
PMC
Canada Author M
anuscript
84MOTIVOS
en 101 estudios incluidos
se describen
10 Abril 2015
#TICsFTPyENF
Systematic Review of Factors Influencing the Adoption ofInformation and Communication Technologies by HealthcareProfessionals
Marie-Pierre Gagnon,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department of Nursing,Laval University, Québec City, Canada, Centre de recherche du CHUQ, Hôpital St-FrançoisD’Assise, 10, rue de L’Espinay, D6-734, Québec City, QC G1L 3L5, Canada
Marie Desmartis,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada
Michel Labrecque,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department of Family andEmergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec City, Canada
Josip Car,Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London,London, UK
Claudia Pagliari,Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Pierre Pluye,Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
Pierre Frémont,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department ofRehabilitation, Laval University, Québec City, Canada
Johanne Gagnon,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department of Nursing,Laval University, Québec City, Canada
Nadine Tremblay, andQuebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada
France LégaréQuebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department of Family andEmergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec City, CanadaMarie-Pierre Gagnon: marie-pierre.gagnon@fsi.ulaval.ca
Abstract
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010Correspondence to: Marie-Pierre Gagnon, marie-pierre.gagnon@fsi.ulaval.ca.
PubMed Central CANADAAuthor Manuscript / Manuscrit d'auteurJ Med Syst. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 May 06.
Published in final edited form as:J Med Syst. 2012 February ; 36(1): 241–277. doi:10.1007/s10916-010-9473-4.
PMC
Canada Author M
anuscriptPM
C C
anada Author Manuscript
PMC
Canada Author M
anuscript
1 Factores Relacionados con las TIC
Factores Individuales (conocimientos y actitudes)2
Factores del entorno humano (pacientes)
Factores relacionados con la organización
3
4
Systematic Review of Factors Influencing the Adoption ofInformation and Communication Technologies by HealthcareProfessionals
Marie-Pierre Gagnon,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department of Nursing,Laval University, Québec City, Canada, Centre de recherche du CHUQ, Hôpital St-FrançoisD’Assise, 10, rue de L’Espinay, D6-734, Québec City, QC G1L 3L5, Canada
Marie Desmartis,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada
Michel Labrecque,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department of Family andEmergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec City, Canada
Josip Car,Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London,London, UK
Claudia Pagliari,Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Pierre Pluye,Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
Pierre Frémont,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department ofRehabilitation, Laval University, Québec City, Canada
Johanne Gagnon,Quebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department of Nursing,Laval University, Québec City, Canada
Nadine Tremblay, andQuebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada
France LégaréQuebec University Hospital Research Centre, Québec City, Canada, Department of Family andEmergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec City, CanadaMarie-Pierre Gagnon: marie-pierre.gagnon@fsi.ulaval.ca
Abstract
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010Correspondence to: Marie-Pierre Gagnon, marie-pierre.gagnon@fsi.ulaval.ca.
PubMed Central CANADAAuthor Manuscript / Manuscrit d'auteurJ Med Syst. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 May 06.
Published in final edited form as:J Med Syst. 2012 February ; 36(1): 241–277. doi:10.1007/s10916-010-9473-4.
PMC
Canada Author M
anuscriptPM
C C
anada Author Manuscript
PMC
Canada Author M
anuscript
10 Abril 2015
#TICsFTPyENFInforme Janssen Top Ten en Salud 2.0 2015
¿Cómo estamos repartidos en Twitter?
10 Abril 2015
#TICsFTPyENF
Cuest. fisioter. 2014, 43(2):79-88
43,8%De los fisioterapeutas
encuestados (n=189) tenían perfil en Linked en 2012
10 Abril 2015
#TICsFTPyENF
!"#"$%&'()"(*+*&,%$',$#*-./0*)&,&%'(1"2,*3&*4(*'&3*)'$5&#"$,(4*6",7&3",*&,%'&*4$#*5"#"$%&'()&8%(#*&#)(9$4&#*
!"#$%&'"()*+#,*-.,/01,(-2%)&-3(-'$4,+(-(')*'%&-,&5,6%-7(.%-,+)&5($$%&-*8,-('9&)7,*3&-:,$+*-%$",+"#$%&'"()*+%$'$
:.*;(<2=>(?'(. !"#"$%&'()&*%(+,-$#)"%(.,/$#%(,0&.,1$.,234&56"(,1(5"%('"(,/$#%(,0&.,1$.7+,8$6(.,0&,/$9*5"6(6":5,;,<&0&#,1$=6"(.&#,&5,&.,>.*#%'&,/$.&4"$,?'$@&#"$5(.,0&,!"#"$%&'()&*%(#,0&,350(.*6A(+,BC.(4(+,D#)(E(
@.*!&''&'=:&9(. !"#"$%&'()&*%(+,/+1+,D5%'&FA(#,21D<B317+,?'&#"0&5%&,0&,.(,3#$6"(6":5,!"#"$%&'()"(,1"5,<&0+,?'$@&#$',G"%*.(',0&,.(,H5"F&'#"0(0,3*%:5$9(,0&,B(0'"0,/1DH=I(,1(..&+,B(0'"0+,D#)(E(
>$''&#)$,3&,1"(0 <&6"J"0$K,LM,N*5"$,OMLP
?(J.$,Q(F:,/(J'( 36&)%(0$K,OR,5$F"&9J'&,OMLP)(J.$0(F$6(J'(S49(".+6$9
A'"B",(4
/*&#%+,@"#"$%&'+,OMLTU,TP2O7K,VW=XX
CD
@EFGHEI
!"#$%&'(()*"+ &5,.(,(6%*(."0(0,&#,*5,Y&6Y$,Z*&,.$#,&5%$'5$#,O+M,;,.(#,'&0&#,#$6"(.&#,0&,*#$,)'$@&#"$5(.,#&,Y(56$5F&'%"0$,&5,*5,&.&9&5%$,9C#,0&5%'$,0&,.(,F"0(,0&,9*6Y$#,@"#"$%&'()&*%(#+,,-./#)0%1K,#&,)'$)$5&,'&(."[(',*5,&#%*=0"$,0'")%"F$,%'(5#F&'#(.,)('(,F&',.(,)&5&%'(J"."0(0,Z*&U,&5,5$F"&9J'&,0&,OMLOU,%"&5&,.(,'&0,#$6"(.,I"5\&0"5,2I]7,&5%'&.$#,@"#"$%&'()&*%(#,&#)(E$.&#+,23#/$)3456578#%&%K,#&,(09"5"#%'(,*5,6*&#%"$5('"$,0"#&E(0$,3&9:%(5(,POW,@"#"$%&'()&*=%(#,Z*&,(#"#%"&'$5,(,0$#,&F&5%$#,6"&5%A@"6$#,'&.(6"$5(0$#,6$5,&5%$'5$#,O+MU,&5,&.,Z*&,#&,.&#,)'&4*5%(J(,#$J'&,#*#YCJ"%$#,0&,*%"."[(6":5,0&,"5%&'5&%,;,'&0&#,#$6"(.&#U,;,&5,&#)&6"(.,#$J'&,I]+,;/1'4#3&%1+5&.,XOUV,^,#&,6$5&6%(J(,9C#0&,L,Y$'(,(.,0A(,(,"5%&'5&%U,&.,TPUX,^,%&5A(,)&'@".,0&,I]U,&.,XVUO,^,%&5A(,9&5$#,0&,LMM,6$5%(6%$#,0&5%'$,0&,#*,'&0+,H5VXUV,^,'&@"'":,_9&N$'(',#*,'&0,0&,6$5%(6%$#`,6$9$,)'"56")(.,'([:5,)('(,0('#&,0&,(.%(,&5,I]+,D.,aVUR,^,0&,.$#,#*N&=%$#,6$5,)&'@".,&5,I],@$'9(J(,)('%&,0&,(.4b5,4'*)$,&#)&6"(."[(0$U,)&'$,&.,VV,^,'&@"'":,5$,)('%"6")(',5*56(U,$,0&,@$'9(9*;,$6(#"$5(.U,&5,.$#,0&J(%&#,Z*&,#&,9(5%"&5&5,0&5%'$,0&,&#%$#,4'*)$#+,<%"(4'1)%"/1K,&c"#%&,*5,J*&5,5"F&.,0&,)&=5&%'(6":5,0&,)&'@".&#,0&,I],0&5%'$,0&,5*&#%'(,9*&#%'(,(*5Z*&,5$,&#,&c%'()$.(J.&,(,.(,)$J.(6":5,%$%(.,0&,@"#"$%&'()&*%(#&#)(E$.&#+,?('&6&,Z*&,I],#&,)$#%*.(,6$9$,*5(,J*&5(,Y&''(9"&5%(,)('(,&.,0&#(''$..$,)'$@&#"$5(.,0&,.$#,@"#"$%&'(=)&*%(#U,(#A,6$9$,)('(,&#%(J.&6&',*5(,J*&5(,'&0,0&,6$5%(6%$#,;,&#%(',"5@$'9(0$#,#$J'&,#*#,"5%&'&#&#,)'$@&#"$5(.&#+1$5,5&6&#('"$#,@*%*'$#,&#%*0"$#,)('(,4&5&'(',&F"0&56"(,#$J'&,.(,*%"."0(0,0&,.(#,'&0&#,#$6"(.&#,;,.$#,&5%$'5$#,O+M6$9$,Y&''(9"&5%(,0&.,0&#(''$..$,@"#"$%&'()d*%"6$+
!*8*;)*$,<8*2(4 6*&#%"$5('"$U,9&0"$#,0&,6$9*5"6(6":5,#$6"(.&#U,!"#"$%&'()"(+
=>?@A=B@
e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
Cuest. fisioter. 2014, 43(2):79-88
67,5%forman parte de algún
GRUPO
top related