trust in science and local ‘science culture’ · the famous london ‘ roadmaster’: the...
Post on 07-Aug-2020
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Trust in Science and Local ‘Science Culture’
Martin W BauerDepartment of Psychology and Behavioural Science
London School of Economicsm.bauer@lse.ac.uk
Project MACAS, www.macas-project/
1UFRGS MBAUER7/2/2020
UFRGS MBAUER 2
Science in the Mass Media 1820-2010 [source: Bauer, 2012]
Darwin Einstein ‘White heat’ ?????
7/2/2020
7/2/2020 UFRGS MBAUER 3
The famous London ‘Roadmaster’: the ecology of driving a bus
Bus driver =workforce;Working conditions;Hardware of car;Driver style
Passenger access= society, valuesTrust in driversLoyalty, voice, exit
Street conditionsPetrol prices etc.
7/2/2020 UFRGS MBAUER 4
‘Bungee Jump Model’ or ‘Lighthouse Model’
Two models of the ‘authority of science’
Source: Bauer, Shukla & Pansegrau (2019)
7/2/2020 UFRGS MBAUER 5
Temple of Positivism in Porto Alegre
7/2/2020 UFRGS MBAUER 6
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
percentage
Ipsos MORI Veracity index 'telling the truth' (Britain, n=1000 pa)Scientists Professors climate scientists scientists during food scare BSA
7/2/2020 UFRGS MBAUER 7
‘The people of this country have had enough
of experts’Michael Gove, June 2016, refusing to name on TV any economist who was in favour of BREXIT
The end of a line? Hypothetical trends [after Gauchat, 2012] 1. Positivist Ascendancy: scientific authority is steadily increasing2. Declinism: scientific authority is in a secular decline 3. Groups specific tendencies: ‘social representations of science’4. Any other hypothesis?
7/2/2020 UFRGS MBAUER 8
Mazur (1977)
US data
Sounding the alarm for the US in the 1970s
7/2/2020 UFRGS MBAUER 9
US data NSF
7/2/2020 UFRGS MBAUER 10
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
3.7
3.8
3.9
4
4.1
4.2
4.319
58
1972
1974
1976
1979
1981
1983
1984
1985
1988
1990
1992
1995
1997
1999
2001
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
Axis
Title
On balance ‘science is beneficial’NSF Benefit > cost Withey series %benefits>costs
7/2/2020 BAUER FAPESP ROYAL Society 11
‘Science brings benefits as well as costs; what is your opinion?’• Only benefits• Benefits > costs• Costs > benefits• Neither-nor
Asked in 1987, 2005, 2010
Scientists
JournalistsScience writersMedia based
Public RelationsPublic AffairsMarketing
The changing structure of science communication in society(source: adjusted from Bauer, 2013)
1900 1950 200012UFRGS MBAUER
100%
0%
7/2/2020
Activism
?
1
6
7/2/2020 UFRGS MBAUER 13
Global surveys of ‘general attitudes to science and technology’ (Bauer & Falade, 2014)
Nationally representative survey of science literacy and attitudes across the Globecompiled: Martin W BAUER and Bankole Falade [m.bauer@lse.ac.uk]
year UK F G EU E Italy Iceland CH SW Bulg US Can Russia SAFRICA AUS NZ Jap Korea Malay India TWN China Brazil Argent Venzu CostaR Panama Uruguay Equador Paraguay Peru Chile Mexico TrinidadColum1957 Withey1958 Withey
197019711972 Bon Harvard19731974197519761977 EB7 EB7 EB71978 EB10a EB10a EB10a1979 NSF198019811982 Boy1983 NSF19841985 NSF1986 MORI/KC1987 CNPq1988 ESRC Boy/<17 NSF1989 EB31 Boy EB31 EB31 MST YomiGallup1990 NSF1991 SAASTA NISTEP1992 EB38.1 EB38.1 EB38.1 EB38.1 EB38.1 STS NSF NISTED CAST1993 SAASTA1994 Boy CAST ColSci1995 NSF HSE STAP1996 OST/Well STS HSE CAST1997 NSF HSE MST NISTEP Conacyt19981999 NSF HSE2000 BIS Boy STIC2001 EB55.2 EB55.2 EB55.2 EB55.2 EB55.2 NSF SAASTA NISTEP CAST SENACYT2002 EB East FECYT EB East Kofac Conacyt2003 HSE CRISP FAPESP RiCYT RepUni Conacyt2004 BIS FECYT NSF Kofac NCAER FAPESP MCT ColSci2005 RCENG EB63.1 EB63.1 EB63.1 EB63.1 EB63.1 EB63.1 CRISP Conacyt xxx2006 FECYT NSF Kofac MCT SeCyt MCT SENACYT2007 (EB) Boy (EB) Ibero Observa (EB) NISTED CRISP Ibero Ibero Ibero Ibero Ibero CON/IbeConacyt Ibero2008 BIS Observa GSS Kofac SunYa FAPESP SENACYT2009 WELL Ibero Observa PEW NYRead Ibero Ibero ANII/ibero Ibero Ibero Conacyt Ibero2010 EB73.1 EB73.1 EB73.1 FECYT Observa UNI/EB EB73.1 GSS SAASTA NUA Kofac CRISP MCT SENACYT2011 BIS Boy Observa Conacyt2012 WELL FECYT Observa UNI VA GSS Kofac SunYa PPSUS MCT/Redes IDESP xxx ColSci2013 BIS EB792 EB792 EB792 Observa EB792 EB792 MST NiSTEP NISTED [CRISP] [MCT]2014 WiBaro Observa GSS/PEW Kofac SunYa2015 WELL WiBaro Observa VA Khahabus CRISP MCT MCT Conicyt2016 WiBaro Observa CH-Baro GSS Kofac2017 acatech Observa JST2018 BSA WiBaro Observa GSS NUA Kofac [CRISP] MCT2019 acatech CH-Baro2020 Nancy EU2020 GSS PRICE CRISP
Europe N America Asia Latin AmericaOther
7/2/2020 UFRGS MBAUER 14
Wellcome Global Monitor 2018 (144 countries; preliminary explorations)
[Vaccination hesitancy]
K-familiarity
Promise of science
Attention
7/2/2020 UFRGS MBAUER 15
Trust in Science in Sweden, 2003-2018https://v-a.se/english-portal/projects/studies/the-public/va-barometer/
7/2/2020 UFRGS MBAUER 16
Authority of Science in USSource: Gauchat, 2011, GSS
7/2/2020 UFRGS MBAUER 17
US General Social Survey, 1970- 2015: ‘having a great deal of confidence in people running science …’
7/2/2020 UFRGS MBAUER 18
PEW data 2016
Republicans vs democrats: Differential knowledge effects
7/2/2020 UFRGS MBAUER 19
Confidence in MedicineUS GSS surveys, 1973-2015
7/2/2020 UFRGS MBAUER 20
7/2/2020 UFRGS MBAUER 21
7/2/2020 UFRGS MBAUER 22
7/2/2020 UFRGS MBAUER 23
84 84
78
72
6570758085
2016
2016
60
70
80
90
2011 2011 2013 2014 2016
AB C1 C2 DE
IPSOS Mori Veracity ‘%YES’
Professors scientists60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
2011 2013 2014 2016
scotland Wales England
7/2/2020 UFRGS MBAUER 24
‘Scientists’ in the IPSOS Mori Veracity Index
7/2/2020 Brunel May 2017 25
Ellis et al (2017) PLOS One on girls’ lack of ‘math confidence’ [US data]
7/2/2020 Brunel May 2017 26
Image of Sciences: a hierarchy [EB 1992, 2001, 2005]‘how scientific is ….. ‘? [degree of prototypicality]
Hard sciencesSoft sciences
7/2/2020 Brunel May 2017 27
7/2/2020 UFRGS MBAUER 28
British Attitude to Science 2005-2014: one very interesting item ………
THE, 3/2011
Children’s play: ‘Chinese whispers’‘Telefone’
Bartlett (1930s):Serial reproduction
The process ofremembering by retelling a story
Decay function orenrichment of meaning ?
7/2/2020 29UFRGS MBAUER
7/2/2020 BAUER FAPESP ROYAL Society 30
III. Teaching for Science
IV. Science communication
II. Teaching of Science and training of scientists
I. Production and dissemination of science
Polysemic discourse; Polyphonic
Monosemic-educational discourse; Monophonic
EsotericProduction/Reproduction
Exoteric Appropriation
Source: Carlos Vogt (2011) The spiral of scientific culture, PUS
7/2/2020 BAUER FAPESP ROYAL Society
‘Will be working in 5 years’CA D1 = 87%
CA D1=92%‘would recommend the career’
31
The SciDev.Net Study Bauer et al. 2012
UFRGS MBAUER 327/2/2020
2012 2019
top related