the wrong way and right way of retaining a testing laboratory

Post on 07-Jul-2015

325 Views

Category:

Technology

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Counterfeit Avoidance

TRANSCRIPT

1

Keith GregoryGreenberg & Bass

kgregory@greenbass.com

Kristal SniderERAI Inc.

ksnider@erai.com

December 1, 2010

2

Counterfeit Overview

3

Counterfeit Overview

2001 – China Admitted to WTO

4

Counterfeit Overview

5

Counterfeit Overview

6

Counterfeit Overview-Portals of Entry

• Rapid access to millions of parts

• Minimal membership requirements

• Quick & easy access to a large audience of buyers

• Burn customer and re-register using a new name

7

Counterfeit Overview-Impact

Impact of using counterfeit parts or materials• Potential loss of life• Espionage• Monetary loss• Liability• Lack of availability of products for customer use• Loss of customer/public trust• Brand damage

8

Accountability is not an option

9

What We Know

• There is a lack of dialogue between all organizations in the U.S. supply chain.

• Companies and organizations assume that others in the supply chain are testing parts.

• Lack of traceability in the supply chain is commonplace.

• There is an insufficient chain of accountability within organizations.

• Recordkeeping on counterfeit incidents by organizations is very limited.

• Stricter testing protocols and quality control practices for inventories are required.

10

Communication is Key

11

Communication is Key

Parts Availability

Purchasing Process

Supply Chain Traceability

Procurement Contract Requirements

Product Assurance

Material Control

Reporting

12

Product Assurance

It should be established prior to procurement which party is responsible for product authenticity verification – Burn-In!

13

What NOT to Do

The Wrong Way: Distributors and their customers should ensure that none of the following five methods are followed by them when choosing a testing facility:

The Distributor alone selects the testing facility;

The tests that are conducted are not sufficient to ensure whether the parts are valid;

The testing facility limits its liability;

The testing facility that is used is the only one that is used by the Distributor or its customer; and

The Distributor agrees to the testing facility’s terms and conditions without first reviewing them and then not trying to negotiate changes to them.

14

What TO DoThe Right Way: In order to ensure that Distributors and their customers are protected from a testing facility’s negligence and to further reduce the possibility of consummating a transaction involving counterfeit or mismarked components, Distributors and their customers should adhere to the following five rules:

Distributor and Customer work together to select the testing facility and the type of testing;

The Customer is advised upfront that the costs of the components are at least somewhat dependent upon the cost of the testing;

Multiple testing laboratories are considered;

Terms of agreement with testing laboratory are negotiated and no limitations of liability are agreed upon; and

Discover the type of insurance maintained by testing laboratory and its level of certification.

15

REVIEWProcurement contract language should include requirements which will help ensure that conforming, authentic material be provided!

• Traceability• Inspection and Test• Liability• Insurance requirements• Warranty• Specific product

specifications• Penalties• Confiscation/destruction

16

Thank You!

QUESTIONS?

Keith GregoryGreenberg & Basskgregory@greenbass.com

Kristal SniderERAI Inc.ksnider@erai.com

top related