the new logistics 4

Post on 16-Jan-2015

413 Views

Category:

Business

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Logistics Intensive Clusters

Yossi SheffiElisha Gray II Professor of Engineering Systems, MIT

Director, MIT Center for Transportation and Logistics

Head, MIT Engineering Systems Division

Clusters

Silicon Valley Hollywood Wall Street Napa and Sonoma Valleys “Bio-Cambridge”

2

Literature

Alfred Marshal, Principles of Economics (1920): “Positive externalities of co-location.”1. Knowledge sharing

2. Supply base

3. Labor pool Michael Porter, Economics of Competition,

Harvard Business review (1998)1. Increased productivity

2. Increased pace of innovation

3. High pace of new business formation

3

Types of Relationships

Company

Supplier

Customer

CompetitorComplement

4

Types of Relationships

Company

Supplier

Customer

CompetitorComplement

5

Economists are Asking:

1. Why cluster? Isn’t EDI, video-conferencing, visibility software, etc, enough for communications? (remember Tom Friedman?)

2. If this is not enough, why don’t companies in a cluster acquire each other more than we see?

6

Why Clusters?

Trust Tacit knowledge exchange Collaboration Research and education Supply base/customer base

7

Are clusters an optimal point between slow behemoths with scale and nimble competitors with not enough resources?

Logistics Clusters Singapore Holland Zaragoza Memphis Louisville Panama Jolliet

8

Logistics Clusters Classification Modal orientation

Air (Memphis, Schiphol, Changi…) Port (Rotterdam, LA/Long Beach, Singapore…) Rail/Intermodal (Chicago, Dallas, Kansas City…) Trucking

Scope-based International Regional Urban distribution

Functional classification FTZ/ Bonded/ Export processing Single commodity logistics parks (food, electronics, chemicals…) Special services (Haz Mat; Bulk distribution; Temp-controlled…)

9

Transportation: Economies of scope (I/B – O/B; containers) Economies of scale (capacity utilization; larger

conveyances; direct LTL) Economies of density Economies of frequency

Resource sharing Transportation capacity; warehouse space;

equipment Changing providers Expansion capabilities

Success factors:

Operational Advantages

10

Example: and

11

Success factors:

Natural Environment - Geography

Singapore Holland Zaragoza Memphis Panama Chicago

BradaLP

Venlo LP

Brabant LP

Memphis

Panama Canal

12

Independent, business-oriented management

Tax advantages (FTZ, tax deferments, bilateral trade agreements)

Other investments, educational institutions, business development

Support for cluster-wide IT applications

Success factors:

Government and Regulations

13

Exporting a 20’ container takes: In Kazakhastan: 93 days In Mali: 67 days In Sweden: 6 days

A typical export transaction requires: In Democratic Republic of Congo: 42 approval signatures In Nigeria: 39 approval signatures In Australia, Austria, Canada: 2 approval signatures In Germany: 1 approval signature

Independent, business-oriented management

Tax advantages (FTZ, tax deferments, bilateral trade agreements)

Other investments, educational institutions, business development

Support for cluster-wide IT applications

Success factors:

Government and Regulations

14

World Bank’s Logistics Performance Index

Value Added Activities

Postponement/customization Return and repair Outsourcing Medical “rental” Related competencies

15

Logistics clusters enable new multi-company offerings and operations

Impact -

31.2 Million ft2 of distribution space (by 2008)

28,000 jobs were created in the park (in addition to the 1,710 construction jobs)

63,388 indirect jobs total economic impact from 1990 through

2008 at $36.4 Billion Investment: $387 million from public

sources

$0

$20,000,000

$40,000,000

$60,000,000

$80,000,000

$100,000,000

$120,000,000

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

Northwest ISDKeller ISDTarrant CountyDenton CountyCity of RoanokeCity of HasletCity of Fort Worth

Return:11% though 2008; 19% of current trends continue

16

Thank you ? ??

Yossi SheffiSHEFFI@MIT.EDU

?

?

17

top related