tem and ter projects’ master plan€¦ · unece tem and ter projects’ master plan unece...
Post on 27-Jun-2020
9 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
TEM and TER Projects’ Master Plan
Michalis Adamantiadis, Regional Adviser
UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE
1UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
2
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
The TEM and TER Master Plan
• Background• Objectives• Organization • Final Report • Conclusions / Recommendations
3
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
Background
• Work started in October 2003 • External consultants were engaged• IRU co-funded the road part • Finalized in September 2005
4
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
ObjectivesInvestment strategy for development of road, rail, combined transport infrastructure in CE & SEEC:
- Identification of core road and rail networks
- Assessment and prioritization of projects
- Availability of resources
- Intermodality, Border crossing facilitation
- Support extension of TEN-T, PETC
5
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
Organization of Work
• National Experts, Organizations, External Consultants, PCOs, UNECE
• 2 Expert Groups
• Coordination Group
• Work endorsed by TEM and TER Steering Committees
6
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005TEM – TER Master Plan invited countriesAustria, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, F.Y.R.O.M, Georgia, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Moldova, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia and Montenegro, Slovakia, Slovenia, Turkey, Ukraine
7
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
Final Report
• Method of work• Priority categories for projects• Main results• Benefits• Main follow-up directions
8
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
• Two growth scenarios: Moderate and Optimistic• 2000 was chosen as the base year• 1995-2000-2001-2002-2004 data was used to set trends• Countries were divided in 3 groups:
- Group I: Austria, Greece, Italy- Group II: New EU Member States and acceding - Group III: Non-EU, non-acceding countries
Socio-economic Framework and Growth Scenarios
9
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
• Population trends• GDP growth • Foreign trade trends • Transport trends
– For Group III, limited or no data available to support forecasts
Socio-economic Framework and Growth Scenarios (cont’d)
10
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
• Based on forecasted economic and traffic growth • Four Phases
A. Identification ( with three screening levels)B. Forecasting (using scenarios of growth)C. Evaluation (multi criteria analysis)D. Prioritization (in three levels)
Methodology on Evaluation and Prioritization
11
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
A. Identification• Level 1: Relevance
– Technical standards, TEM-TER goals, On main Axes, Connecting other regions
• Level 2: Readiness– Project well defined, Responsible agent, Time plan
• Level 3: Viability– 10 mill €, IRR, Environmental aspects, Justified need
Methodology on Evaluation and Prioritization (cont’d)
12
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
B. Forecasting• Performed on macro level• Using alternative scenarios of growth• With data provided by countries
Methodology on Evaluation and Prioritization (cont’d)
13
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
C. Evaluation (Multi-criteria analysis)• Socio-economic return of investment• Functionality and coherency of the network• Strategic / political concerns of the network• Direct application of evaluation providing the scores• Compliance with commitments• Financial capability of country (1.5% of GDP)
Methodology on Evaluation and Prioritization (cont’d)
14
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
• Priority I: May be funded and implemented rapidly, including on-going projects up to 2010
• Priority II: Require investigations for final definition before likely financing, or to be implemented by 2015
• Priority III: Require further investigations for final definition and scheduling before possible financing, or to be implemented by 2020
• Priority IV: To be implemented in the long run, including projects where insufficient data exist
Methodology on Evaluation and Prioritization (cont’d)
15
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
491 Projects of a total value of 102 billion €evaluated and prioritized
319 Road Projects - 49.5 billion €172 Rail Projects - 52.5 billion €
46 billion € of funding is secured (for 45 % of total implementation cost - 60% of projects)
Project Prioritization
16
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
Road (out of 319 Projects of 49.5 billion € )
• Category I: 152 projects, 25.3 billion € (only for 141)
• Category II: 93 projects, 23.2 billion € (only for 84)
• Category III: 1 project, 0.24 billion €
• Category IV: 73 projects, 0.9 billion € (only for 1)
15.3 billion € of funding is secured (31%) (For 92 Road projects, implementation cost is unknown)
Project Prioritization (cont’d)
17
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
Rail (out of 172 Projects of 52.5 billion € )• Category I: 128 projects, 32.8 billion €• Category II: 39 projects, 18.2 billion €• Category IV: 5 projects, 0.5 billion € (only for 2)
30.5 billion € of funding is secured (58%)(For 3 Rail projects, implementation cost is unknown)
Project Prioritization (cont’d)
18
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
19
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
20
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005UNECE
TER Master Plan - Projects over TER Network by Category
21
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
• Analysis of what may me considered as road and rail bottlenecks
• Full consideration of bottlenecks could not be made within set time-frame and available resources, particularly for TER
• TEM and TER Missing links and extensions identified and proposed
Bottlenecks and Missing Links
22
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
TEM Master Plan Missing Links and Extensions to the TEM
Network
23
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
TER Master Plan Missing Links and Extensions to the
TER Network
24
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
• Major parts of the TEM and TER Networks• EU TEN-T and High Level Group• Pan-European Corridors, MEDA• Euro-Asian Transport Links• Sections on which countries proposed projects• TIRS and REBIS studies• Interconnection and continuity of networks
Master Plan Backbone Network and Links
25
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
TEM Master Plan Backbone Network
26
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
TER Master Plan Backbone Network
27
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
Funding – Technical - Institutional Aspects
• Funding not secured for 40 % of projects:– identification of possible sources of funding– eligibility criteria to receive funds– required procedures
• Main sources of funding • Elements analyzed: Initial approach, legal framework, eligibility
criteria, appraisal, examination, monitoring, decision making, contract signature, etc.
• Possibility of private participation, via PPP
28
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
• Staged construction• National and international perspectives• Inter-country collaboration and interdependence• Shared cross-border infrastructure• Environmental perspective and planning • Harmonized tendering and construction laws• Interoperability and harmonized standards
Funding – Technical - Institutional Aspects (cont’d)
29
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
• Inventory of border crossing points made• Relevant GIS maps elaborated• Border crossing problems identified • Recommendations for problems alleviation
Border Crossing Issues
30
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
31
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
32
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
ConclusionsPresented a realistic investment strategy in the wider TEM and TER region, which supports the:
- Extension of TEN-T- Implementation of pan-European Corridors- Promotion of intermodal transport- Maximum effectiveness of transport infrastructure
Conclusions / Recommendations
33
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
Conclusions (cont’d)• Methodological framework for prioritisation• Wider TEM and TER region Backbone Network• Specific projects for implementation up to 2020• Cost estimates for implementation and available finance• Border crossing problems and ameliorative actions• Impacts of the EU Railway infrastructure• Truck and Coach transport infrastructure considerations• GIS background work
Conclusions / Recommendations (cont’d)
34
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
Recommendations• Ensure the necessary follow-up of the work • Complete missing or insufficient data • Regularly update the Backbone Network• Monitor the implementation of the Master Plan • Present status of Backbone Networks (2010 -2015 -
2020)
• Review of the strategy by 2008
Conclusions / Recommendations (cont’d)
35
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
• First TEM–TER attempt for an investment strategy • Assist the development of transport infrastructure• Useful to the work of the EC High Level Group • Implementation requires political will and commitment,
close coordination and monitoring• TEM and TER are ready to follow up this work
Remarks
36
UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN
UNECE Transport Division - 26 October, 2005
www.unece.org/trans
Thank you
top related