table of contents aira2
Post on 03-Apr-2018
215 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 Table of Contents Aira2
1/11
ii
Approval Sheet
This thesis entitled PEOPLES PARTICIPATION IN THE SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IN DUMALAG, CAPIZ, prepared and submitted
by Aira May Atanas and Noli Santural, in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the subject Environmental Science, has been examined
and hereby recommended for acceptance and approval.
Engr. Joel C. Villaruz Ph. D
Instructor
-
7/29/2019 Table of Contents Aira2
2/11
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The researchers would like to express their heartfelt appreciation to
those people who are in one way or another helped to make this study a
success.
To the parents and family of the researchers for their untiring moral
and financial support.
To the research professor, Engr. Joel C. Villaruz for his advises all
throughout the conduct of this study.
To the Department head, Engr. Arnel Abagatnan for his fatherly
encouragements for the accomplishments of this study.
To the classmates and friends of the researchers especially to Angie,
Ele, Ai-Boon, Titin, Leo and Lloyd for the wonderful friendship and their time
to help the conduct of this study.
To the Barangay officials and residents of Brgy. Poblacion,
Dumalag, Capiz for their warm welcome and cooperation during the
conduct of the survey.
And most especially to Lord Almighty for without Him no one would
be mentioned above and nothing would be possible.
-
7/29/2019 Table of Contents Aira2
3/11
iv
ABSTRACT
The primary objective of this study was to determine the level of
participation and awareness of the residents of Brgy. Poblacion, Dumalag,
Capiz in solid waste management program. The specific questions were:
1. What is the respondents socio-economic characteristic such as
age, sex, educational attainment, number of household members, and
monthly income?
2. What is the respondents level of awareness on the solid waste
management program of the Municipality of Dumalag?
3. What is the respondents level of participation on the solid waste
management program of the Municipality of Dumalag?
4. Is there a significant difference in the respondents level of
awareness when they are group according to age, sex, educational
attainment, number of household members, and monthly income?
5. Is there a significant difference in the respondents level of
participation when they are group according to age, sex, educational
attainment, number of household members, and monthly income?
There were 50 residents from Brgy. Poblacion, Dumalag, Capiz who
were used as respondents of the study. Its main goal is to know the level of
-
7/29/2019 Table of Contents Aira2
4/11
v
participation and awareness of the residents toward solid waste
management program.
This study used survey and correlation technique of the descriptive
method of research. The instrument used was questionnaire. The statistical
tools were frequency, percentage, mean, t-test and analysis of variance.
Findings
For the socio-demographic characteristic of the residents in terms of
sex, females are more dominant than males. In terms of age, the mean
age was 40 and the number of respondents who belong to the mean age
and above is higher than those residents who belong to below mean.
College graduates are also dominant in terms of highest educational
attainment and mostly of the respondents earn Php. 10, 302.02 and below
in terms of the estimated monthly income. In terms of the household size,
majority of the respondents belong to the 5 household size and above
bracket.
The level of awareness of the residents resulted to slightly aware trait
and the level of participation on solid waste management was
moderately participated behavior.
In terms of level of awareness of the residents toward solid waste
management, it is dependent on their sex and their highest educational
attainment. The t-value for the sex was 3.10 which is higher than the
-
7/29/2019 Table of Contents Aira2
5/11
vi
tabular t-value of 2.0096 at 0.05 level of significance. While the F value for
the highest educational attainment was 7.10 and is higher than the
tabular F value of 2.87 at 0.05 level of significance. This meant that there is
a significant difference in the level of awareness of the respondents when
grouped according to age and highest educational attainment.
In terms of the level of participation of the residents toward solid
waste management, it is dependent on their highest educational
attainment. The F value for the highest educational attainment was 9.12
which is higher than the tabular F value of 2.87 at 0.05 level of
significance. This all meant that there is a significant difference in the level
of participation of the residents toward solid waste management when
grouped according highest educational attainment.
-
7/29/2019 Table of Contents Aira2
6/11
vii
Table of Contents
Titlte Page no.
Title i
Approval Sheet . ii
Acknowledgement . iii
Abstract .. v
Table of Contents . x
List of Tables .. xii
List of Figures xiii
CHAPTER I
Introduction 1
Background of the Study ... 1
Statement of the Problem . 5
Hypothesis .. 6
Theoretical Framework... 6
Conceptual Framework .... 7Significance of the Study ... 7
Scope and Delimitation of the Study . 8
Definition of terms 9
CHAPTER II
Review of Related Literature.... 12
Foreign Literature ... 12
Local Literature ... 22
CHAPTER III
Research Design and Methodology. 24
Research Design 24
Respondents of the Study ... 25
1
1
5
6
6
77
8
9
12
12
226
67
24
24
25
-
7/29/2019 Table of Contents Aira2
7/11
viii
The Research Instrument .. 26
Scoring the Variables 27
Gathering of Data . 27
Statistical Tools Used .. 28
CHAPTER IV
Presentation Analysis and Interpretation of Data. 30
Distribution of Respondents . 30
Distribution of Respondents by Sex ... 31
Distribution of Respondents by Age . 31
Distribution of Respondents by Civil Status . 32
Distribution of Respondents by Occupational Status .. 33
Distribution of Respondents by Household Size...34
Distribution of Respondents by Monthly Income .. 35
Distribution of Respondents by Highest Educational
Attainment ... 36
Level of Awareness of the respondents toward
The Implication of Poultry Raising and effects .. 37
Difference in the Level of Awareness on Poultry
Raising and its Effect between the DemographicProfile of the Respondents .. 38
Difference in the Level of Awareness between Sexes..38
Difference in the Level of Awareness between Ages . 39
Difference in the Level of Awareness between
Civil Statuses .....40
Difference in the Level of Awareness between
Occupations..41
Difference in the Level of Awareness between HouseholdSizes .42
Difference in the Level of Awareness between Monthly
Incomes 43
Difference in the Level of Awareness between
Highest Educational Attainments ..... 44
26
27
27
28
30
30
31
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
-
7/29/2019 Table of Contents Aira2
8/11
ix
CHAPTER V
Summary, Conclusion and Recommendation .. 46
Summary ....46Findings . 47
Conclusion........... 52
Recommendation . 52
Bibliography 54
Appendices
Appendix A . 56
Appendix B .. 58
Curriculum Vitae 63
List of Tables
Page no.
Table 1. Distribution of Respondents by Sex 25
Table 2. Distribution of Respondents by Age 26
Table 3. Distribution of Respondents by Household Size
27
Table 4. Distribution of Respondents by Monthly Salary
Income 27
Table 5. Distribution of Respondents by Highest
46
4647
52
52
54
56
58
62
-
7/29/2019 Table of Contents Aira2
9/11
x
Educational Attainment 28
Table 6. Level of Awareness by the Residents towards
Solid Waste Management
29
Table 7. Level of Participation by the Residents
towards Solid Waste Management 31
Table 8. T- test for the mean difference in
level of awareness toward Solid Waste
Management considering Sex 33
Table 9. T- test for the mean difference in
level of participation toward Solid Waste
Management considering Sex 34
Table 10. T- test for the mean difference in
level of awareness toward Solid Waste
Management considering Monthly Income 35
Table 11. T- test for the mean difference in
level of participation toward Solid Waste
Management considering Monthly Income 36
Table 12. T- test for the mean difference in
level of awareness toward Solid Waste
Management considering Household Size 37
Table 13. T- test for the mean difference in
level of participation toward Solid Waste
Management considering Household Size 38
Table 14. T- test for the mean difference in
level of awareness toward Solid Waste
Management considering Age 39
Table 15. T- test for the mean difference in
level of participation toward Solid Waste
Management considering Age 40
Table 16. ANOVA for mean difference in
-
7/29/2019 Table of Contents Aira2
10/11
xi
level of awareness toward Solid Waste
Management considering Highest
Educational Attainment 41
Table 17. ANOVA for mean difference in
level of participation toward Solid WasteManagement considering Highest
Educational Attainment 42
-
7/29/2019 Table of Contents Aira2
11/11
xii
top related