table of contents aira2

7/29/2019 Table of Contents Aira2

1/11

ii

Approval Sheet

This thesis entitled PEOPLES PARTICIPATION IN THE SOLID WASTE

MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IN DUMALAG, CAPIZ, prepared and submitted

by Aira May Atanas and Noli Santural, in partial fulfillment of the

requirements for the subject Environmental Science, has been examined

and hereby recommended for acceptance and approval.

Engr. Joel C. Villaruz Ph. D

Instructor


2/11

iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The researchers would like to express their heartfelt appreciation to

those people who are in one way or another helped to make this study a

success.

To the parents and family of the researchers for their untiring moral

and financial support.

To the research professor, Engr. Joel C. Villaruz for his advises all

throughout the conduct of this study.

To the Department head, Engr. Arnel Abagatnan for his fatherly

encouragements for the accomplishments of this study.

To the classmates and friends of the researchers especially to Angie,

Ele, Ai-Boon, Titin, Leo and Lloyd for the wonderful friendship and their time

to help the conduct of this study.

To the Barangay officials and residents of Brgy. Poblacion,

Dumalag, Capiz for their warm welcome and cooperation during the

conduct of the survey.

And most especially to Lord Almighty for without Him no one would

be mentioned above and nothing would be possible.


3/11

iv

ABSTRACT

The primary objective of this study was to determine the level of

participation and awareness of the residents of Brgy. Poblacion, Dumalag,

Capiz in solid waste management program. The specific questions were:

1. What is the respondents socio-economic characteristic such as

age, sex, educational attainment, number of household members, and

monthly income?

2. What is the respondents level of awareness on the solid waste

management program of the Municipality of Dumalag?

3. What is the respondents level of participation on the solid waste

management program of the Municipality of Dumalag?

4. Is there a significant difference in the respondents level of

awareness when they are group according to age, sex, educational

attainment, number of household members, and monthly income?

5. Is there a significant difference in the respondents level of

participation when they are group according to age, sex, educational

attainment, number of household members, and monthly income?

There were 50 residents from Brgy. Poblacion, Dumalag, Capiz who

were used as respondents of the study. Its main goal is to know the level of


4/11

v

participation and awareness of the residents toward solid waste

management program.

This study used survey and correlation technique of the descriptive

method of research. The instrument used was questionnaire. The statistical

tools were frequency, percentage, mean, t-test and analysis of variance.

Findings

For the socio-demographic characteristic of the residents in terms of

sex, females are more dominant than males. In terms of age, the mean

age was 40 and the number of respondents who belong to the mean age

and above is higher than those residents who belong to below mean.

College graduates are also dominant in terms of highest educational

attainment and mostly of the respondents earn Php. 10, 302.02 and below

in terms of the estimated monthly income. In terms of the household size,

majority of the respondents belong to the 5 household size and above

bracket.

The level of awareness of the residents resulted to slightly aware trait

and the level of participation on solid waste management was

moderately participated behavior.

In terms of level of awareness of the residents toward solid waste

management, it is dependent on their sex and their highest educational

attainment. The t-value for the sex was 3.10 which is higher than the


5/11

vi

tabular t-value of 2.0096 at 0.05 level of significance. While the F value for

the highest educational attainment was 7.10 and is higher than the

tabular F value of 2.87 at 0.05 level of significance. This meant that there is

a significant difference in the level of awareness of the respondents when

grouped according to age and highest educational attainment.

In terms of the level of participation of the residents toward solid

waste management, it is dependent on their highest educational

attainment. The F value for the highest educational attainment was 9.12

which is higher than the tabular F value of 2.87 at 0.05 level of

significance. This all meant that there is a significant difference in the level

of participation of the residents toward solid waste management when

grouped according highest educational attainment.


6/11

vii

Table of Contents

Titlte Page no.

Title i

Approval Sheet . ii

Acknowledgement . iii

Abstract .. v

Table of Contents . x

List of Tables .. xii

List of Figures xiii

CHAPTER I

Introduction 1

Background of the Study ... 1

Statement of the Problem . 5

Hypothesis .. 6

Theoretical Framework... 6

Conceptual Framework .... 7Significance of the Study ... 7

Scope and Delimitation of the Study . 8

Definition of terms 9

CHAPTER II

Review of Related Literature.... 12

Foreign Literature ... 12

Local Literature ... 22

CHAPTER III

Research Design and Methodology. 24

Research Design 24

Respondents of the Study ... 25

1

1

5

6

6

77

8

9

12

12

226

67

24

24

25


7/11

viii

The Research Instrument .. 26

Scoring the Variables 27

Gathering of Data . 27

Statistical Tools Used .. 28

CHAPTER IV

Presentation Analysis and Interpretation of Data. 30

Distribution of Respondents . 30

Distribution of Respondents by Sex ... 31

Distribution of Respondents by Age . 31

Distribution of Respondents by Civil Status . 32

Distribution of Respondents by Occupational Status .. 33

Distribution of Respondents by Household Size...34

Distribution of Respondents by Monthly Income .. 35

Distribution of Respondents by Highest Educational

Attainment ... 36

Level of Awareness of the respondents toward

The Implication of Poultry Raising and effects .. 37

Difference in the Level of Awareness on Poultry

Raising and its Effect between the DemographicProfile of the Respondents .. 38

Difference in the Level of Awareness between Sexes..38

Difference in the Level of Awareness between Ages . 39

Difference in the Level of Awareness between

Civil Statuses .....40


Occupations..41

Difference in the Level of Awareness between HouseholdSizes .42

Difference in the Level of Awareness between Monthly

Incomes 43


Highest Educational Attainments ..... 44

26

27

27

28

30

30

31

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

38

39

40

41

42

43

44


8/11

ix

CHAPTER V

Summary, Conclusion and Recommendation .. 46

Summary ....46Findings . 47

Conclusion........... 52

Recommendation . 52

Bibliography 54

Appendices

Appendix A . 56

Appendix B .. 58

Curriculum Vitae 63

List of Tables

Page no.

Table 1. Distribution of Respondents by Sex 25

Table 2. Distribution of Respondents by Age 26

Table 3. Distribution of Respondents by Household Size

27

Table 4. Distribution of Respondents by Monthly Salary

Income 27

Table 5. Distribution of Respondents by Highest

46

4647

52

52

54

56

58

62


9/11

x

Educational Attainment 28

Table 6. Level of Awareness by the Residents towards

Solid Waste Management

29

Table 7. Level of Participation by the Residents

towards Solid Waste Management 31

Table 8. T- test for the mean difference in

level of awareness toward Solid Waste

Management considering Sex 33


level of participation toward Solid Waste

Management considering Sex 34



Management considering Monthly Income 35



Management considering Monthly Income 36



Management considering Household Size 37



Management considering Household Size 38



Management considering Age 39



Management considering Age 40

Table 16. ANOVA for mean difference in


10/11

xi


Management considering Highest


Table 17. ANOVA for mean difference in

level of participation toward Solid WasteManagement considering Highest



11/11

xii

table of contents aira2

Documents