st peters/tempe latm study 2010 - marrickville assets... · 3.4 distribution and assignment 41 ......
Post on 16-May-2018
220 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
d r af
t
St Peters/Tempe
LATM Study 2010
© GTA Consultants (GTA Consultants (NSW) Pty Ltd) 2010
The information contained in this document is confidential and intended
solely for the use of the client for the purpose for which it has been
prepared and no representation is made or is to be implied as being made
to any third party. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part
without the written permission of GTA Consultants constitutes an
infringement of copyright. The intellectual property contained in this
document remains the property of GTA Consultants.
St Peters/Tempe
LATM Study 2010 Client: Marrickville Council
Reference: IS12550
GTA Consultants Office: Sydney
Quality Record
Issue Date Description Prepared By Checked By Approved By
A-Dr 05/11/10 Draft Rhys Hazell, Cameron Ward
Alan Stewart
A-Dr 2 18/11/10 Final Draft Rhys Hazell, Cameron Ward
Alan Stewart
Table of Contents
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report
dra ft
Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1
1.1 Background & Objectives 1
1.2 Purpose of This Report 2
1.3 Referenced Documents 2
2. Existing Conditions Assessment 3
2.1 Study Area 3
2.2 Road Hierarchy 3
2.3 Traffic Volumes & Speed Assessment 9
2.4 Through Traffic Routes 21
2.5 Intersection (SIDRA) Modelling 24
2.6 Accident Analysis 26
2.7 Public Transport Services 30
2.8 Marrickville PAMP 34
2.9 Car Parking (On-Street) 34
2.10 Garbage Collection 34
2.11 Initial Stakeholder Consultation 35
2.12 Summary of Key Traffic and Transport Issues in St Peters/Tempe 37
3. IKEA Traffic Impacts 38
3.1 Introduction 38
3.2 Development Site 38
3.3 Traffic Generation 38
3.4 Distribution and Assignment 41
3.5 Inbound & Outbound IKEA Traffic Routes & Traffic Levels 42
3.6 Previous IKEA Traffic Impact Assessment Reports 50
4. Community Consultation 51
5. St Peters/Tempe Proposed LATM Measures 52
5.1 Introduction 52
5.2 Key Objectives 52
5.3 Review/Audit of Existing LATM Measures 52
5.4 Proposed LATM Measures 54
5.5 Northern Section 54
5.6 Southern Section A 57
5.7 Southern Section B 60
6. Draft LATM Scheme Traffic & Access Implications 68
6.1 Northern Section 68
Table of Contents
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report
dra ft
6.2 Southern Section A 68
6.3 Southern Section B 68
7. Cost Estimates & Implementation Program 72
7.1 Cost Estimates 72
8. Conclusions & Recommendations 73
Appendices
A: Traffic Survey Data
B: SIDRA Intersection Analysis
C: Proposed IKEA Traffic Plan/IKEA Trade Area Figure/IKEA Traffic Count Figures
D: Initial Draft LATM concept scheme – 27th September 2010
E: Detailed Cost Estimate
Figures Figure 2.1: Study Area and its Environs (Source: Sydway Publishing Pty Ltd) 3
Figure 2.2: Road Hierarchy 5
Figure 2.3: Existing LATM Measures 8
Figure 2.4: Traffic Survey Locations 15
Figure 2.5: Peak Hour Volumes Thursday AM 16
Figure 2.6: Peak Hour Volumes Thursday PM 17
Figure 2.7: Peak Hour Volumes Saturday 18
Figure 2.8: 85TH Percentile Speed Thursday PM 19
Figure 2.9: 85TH Percentile Speed Saturday 20
Figure 2.10: St Peters/Tempe Identified Weekday AM Through Traffic Routes 22
Figure 2.11: St Peters/Tempe Identified Weekday PM Through Traffic Routes 23
Figure 2.12: St Peters/Tempe Total Accidents 2004-2009 26
Figure 2.13: St Peters/Tempe Local Area Accidents 2004-2009 27
Figure 2.14: Accidents by RUM Code 29
Figure 2.15: Accidents by time of Day 29
Figure 2.16: Accidents by Day of Week 30
Figure 2.17: Bus Network 32
Figure 2.18: Bicycle Network 33
Figure 2.19: Daytime Parking (Samuel Street) 35
Figure 2.20: Daytime Parking (Lymerston Street) 35
Figure 2.21: Evening Parking (Frederick Street) 35
Figure 2.22: Evening Parking (Sutherland Street) 35
Figure 3.1: IKEA Directional Traffic Distribution 42
Figure 3.2: IKEA Inbound Route Distribution 43
Table of Contents
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report
dra ft
Figure 3.3: IKEA Outbound Route Distribution 44
Figure 3.4: Thursday Inbound IKEA Traffic Volumes 46
Figure 3.5: Thursday Outbound IKEA Traffic Volumes 47
Figure 3.6: Saturday Inbound IKEA Traffic Volumes 48
Figure 3.7: Saturday Outbound IKEA Traffic Volumes 49
Figure 5.1: Single Lane Slow Point with Flat Top Speed Hump. 55
Figure 5.2: Watts Profile Speed Hump 55
Figure 5.3: Median Islands on Flat Top Road Hump 55
Figure 5.4: Bicycle Logos 55
Figure 5.5: Northern Section LATM Measures 56
Figure 5.6: Driveway link 58
Figure 5.7: Pedestrian Refuge Islands 58
Figure 5.8: Half Road Closure 58
Figure 5.9: Kerb Extensions 58
Figure 5.10: Southern Section A LATM Measures 59
Figure 5.11: Union Street 61
Figure 5.12: Union Street 61
Figure 5.13: Rumble Bar Median Islands 65
Figure 5.14: Raised Threshold with Driveway treatment 65
Figure 5.15: Gannon Street Diverted Traffic 66
Figure 5.16: Southern Section B LATM Measures 67
Figure 6.1: Effect of LATM Measures Thursday PM 70
Figure 6.2: Effect of LATM Measures Saturday 71
Tables Table 2.1: Existing Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Measures Locations 6
Table 2.2: Existing LATM Measures Street by Street breakdown 7
Table 2.3: Environmental Capacity and Speed Performance Standards 9
Table 2.4: St Peters/Tempe Streets (Approaching or exceeding standards) 11
Table 2.5: SIDRA INTERSECTION Level of Service Criteria 24
Table 2.6: Existing Operating Conditions 25
Table 2.7: Accident Summary – St Peters/Tempe Local Area 2004-2009 28
Table 2.8: Stakeholder Issues 36
Table 3.1: Victoria Gardens IKEA, Richmond, Victoria – Surveyed Customer Trip Generation Rates 39
Table 3.2: Springwood IKEA, Queensland – Trip Generation Rates 39
Table 3.3: Traffic Generation Table 40
Table 3.4: Proportion of Drop-In Trips 41
Table of Contents
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report
dra ft
Table 3.5: Local Road IKEA generated traffic routes (Inbound & Outbound) & estimated increased traffic levels 45
Table 3.6: Comparison of Total Traffic Generation 50
Table 5.1: LATM Audit Measures 53
Table 5.2: Northern Section Proposed LATM Measures 55
Table 5.3: Southern Section A Proposed LATM Measures 58
Table 5.4: Union Street Existing Traffic Volumes 61
Table 5.5: Estimated Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (Post IKEA Development) 62
Table 5.6: Southern Section B Proposed LATM Measures 65
Table 7.1: Summary of Proposed LATM Estimated Costs 72
Introduction
IS12550 17/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 1
dra ft
1. Introduction
1.1 Background & Objectives As GTA Consultants understands it, planning approval was granted by the New South Wales Department of Planning in July 2009 for the development at 630-726 Princes Highway, Tempe which includes an IKEA bulky goods retail store, warehouse and commercial offices including parking for a minimum of 1,775 vehicles.
A condition of this approval was that the applicant contributes to the preparation of a Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Study to be undertaken by Marrickville Council which is intended to identify the traffic and transport impacts of the proposed development and recommend ways in which any potential adverse impacts on local residential streets could be mitigated.
LATM studies, in general, address the need to reduce or restrict the amount of traffic using local streets within a particular area in an effort to improve safety and public amenity. The development of an IKEA store is a major trip attractor and although located on Princes Highway which provides good access to the site this road is often congested and there is a possibility that customers would seek alternative routes to the site via the local streets when this situation occurs.
It is therefore important to determine how the current traffic patterns (volumes and flow directions) would change in the local area as a result of IKEA and then to determine how best to accommodate this change, where warranted, to ensure that safety and amenity of the community is either maintained or improved.
GTA Consultants was commissioned by Marrickville Council in July 2010 to audit the existing LATM devices and identify locations within the St Peters/Tempe study area where additional LATM devices may be required. Central to this study was also consideration of proposals that would mitigate the changes brought about by the IKEA development and improve the safety and accessibility of all users.
In achieving this objective GTA Consultants were required to undertake the following:
• Conduct a literature review of existing Council reports, reports associated with the IKEA development and community correspondence.
• Undertake and analyse data from traffic volume and speed surveys.
• Conduct an audit of the existing LATM devices and determine maintenance or replacement LATM measures as required.
• Consult with stakeholders and the St Peters – Tempe Community.
• Develop new LATM measures where required.
• Consider the needs of pedestrians, cyclists, emergency vehicles and buses when developing traffic management devices.
• Satisfy all RTA requirements for LATM devices while minimising street clutter from excessive signage.
• Produce a prioritised implementation plan and broad cost estimate of all the proposals.
Introduction
IS12550 17/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 2
dra ft
1.2 Purpose of This Report This report sets out an assessment of the traffic conditions within the St Peters/Tempe study area and includes the following:
i Assessment of the traffic volumes and speeds
ii Analysis of the accident statistics for the 5 year period to June 2009
iii Assessment of the effectiveness of the existing LATM measures
iv Identification of further opportunities to reduce volumes and speed of traffic on local streets to address public amenity following the opening of IKEA
v Identification of pedestrian and cyclist improvements
vi Development of concept LATM proposals.
1.3 Referenced Documents In preparing this report, reference has been made to a number of background documents, including:
• Austroads Guide to Traffic Engineering Practice Part 8 - Local Area Traffic Management, 2008
• RTA Sharing the Main Street, A Practitioners’ Guide, 2000
• RTA Guidelines for Traffic Facilities, Parts 6 & 7.2, Local Area Traffic Management, 1986/7
• RTA NSW Bicycle Guidelines 2003
• RTA Road Design Guide 1991
• Austroads Guide to Road Design - Part 6: Intersections, Interchanges and Crossings
• Austroads Guide to Road Design - Part 6A: Pedestrian and Cyclist Paths
• RTA Guide to Traffic Generating Developments, 2002
• Australian Standard/ New Zealand Standard, Parking Facilities, Part 1: Off-Street Car Parking AS/NZS 2890.1:2004
• Australian Standard, Parking Facilities, Part 2: Off-Street Commercial Vehicle Facilities AS 2890.2:2002
• Australian Standard, Parking Facilities, Part 5: On-Street Parking AS 2890.5:1993
• Australian Standard / New Zealand Standard, Parking Facilities, Part 6: Off-Street Parking for People with Disabilities AS/NZS 2890.6:2009
• RTA-Technical Directions (Various)
• Marrickville Council Reports & previous studies associated with the IKEA development
• PAMP
• Sydenham LATM
• IKEA reports
• TAG comments
• Resident comments
• Stakeholders.
• Tempe IKEA, Sydney, Economic Impact Assessment, 2008
• Traffic surveys undertaken by GTA Consultants as referenced in the context of this report
• Several inspections of the study area and surrounds
• Other documents as nominated.
Existing Conditions Assessment
IS12550 17/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 3
dra ft
2. Existing Conditions Assessment
2.1 Study Area The St Peters/Tempe study area is bounded by the Eastern Suburbs and Illawarra railway line to the west, Campbell Street to the north, Alexandria Canal to the east and the Cooks River to the south. The study area is located north of Sydney Airport, south-east of the Marrickville Town Centre and effectively bisected by Princes Highway.
The location of the study area and the surrounding environs is shown in Figure 2.1.
Figure 2.1: Study Area and its Environs (Source: Sydway Publishing Pty Ltd)
2.2 Road Hierarchy The RTA Road Design Guide states that the purpose of a functional road hierarchy is to establish a logical integrated network in which roads of similar functional classifications are:
• Provided with the same general level of traffic service with regards to trip purpose, traffic composition, capacity and operational speed.
• Designed, constructed and maintained to the same general level of structure with regard to alignment, cross section, pavement strength and access control.
• Assigned to the appropriate administrative control.
Existing Conditions Assessment
IS12550 17/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 4
dra ft
2.2.1 Functional Classification
This classification includes arterial, sub-arterial, collector and local roads. Together the roads make up a road network. The functional road classifications in NSW are:
• State/Arterial – Predominantly carry through traffic from one region to another, forming principal avenues of communication for urban traffic movements.
• Regional/Sub-Arterial – Connects the arterial road to areas of development and carry traffic directly from one part of the region to another. They may also relieve traffic on arterial roads in some circumstances.
• Collector – Connects the sub-arterial roads to the local road system in developed area.
• Local – The sub-divisional roads within a particular developed area. These are used solely as local access roads.
The road hierarchy within and on the boundary of the study area is outlined below and illustrated in Figure 2.2.
The State/Arterial roads are:
• Princes Highway
• Railway Road/Gleeson Avenue
• Canal Road
The Regional/Sub-Arterial roads are:
• Unwins Bridge Road
• Richardsons Crescent
• Campbell Street/Bedwin Road
• Gannon Street (forms the function)
The Collector roads are:
• Mary Street
All other roads within the study area are classified as local roads.
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
ÛÛ
ÛÛ
Û
Û
j
j
PRINCES HWY
UNWINS BRIDGE RD
HENRY ST
SWAMP RD
EDITH ST
STATION STPARK RD
MARY STSILVER ST
RAILWAY RD
GEORGE ST
TERRY ST
MAY ST
GROVE ST
SOUTH ST
UNION ST
EDWIN ST
SAMUEL ST
BELMORE ST
REILLY LANE
HART ST
SMITH STGANNON ST
BAY ST
PARK LANE
CAMPBELL ST
FREDERICK ST
YELVERTON ST
FOREMAN ST
CANAL ROAD
BARDEN ST
SUTHERLAND ST
FANNING ST
LYMERSTON ST
GRIFF
ITHS S
T
WAY ST
FLORENCE ST
ALFRED ST
RAILWAY LANE
ROWE LANE
BROWN ST
HUTCHINSON ST
BURROWS RD S
BELMORE LANE
RAILWAY PARADE
BURROWS AVE
STANLEY ST
WENTWORTH ST
LACKEY ST
COOK
ST
OLD ST
CHURCH ST
BROOKLYN ST
BOLTON ST
BELLEVUE STJOHN ST
BRIDGE ST
STEWART LANE
GLEESON AVE
QUAR
RY ST
IXION LANE
COLLINS ST
VIEW ST
TRAMWAY ST
SWAIN ST
ROBERTS ST
WILLIAM ST
HILLCREST ST
WELLS AVE
ALBION LANE
ROLFE LANE
ST PETERS ST
HOGAN AVE
NICHO
LSON
ST
BRIAR LANE
VICTORIA ST
APPL
EBEE
ST
BAKERS LANE
EDGAR ST
YOUNG ST
TALBOT STGREEN ST
ZUTTION LANE
ALBERT ST
HOLBEACH AVE
WOOD ST
ROWE ST
CONWAY PL
LESLIE ST
BEDWIN RD
SAMUEL LANE
HENRY LANE
RICHARDSONS CRESCENT
BISHOP ST
BERNE ST
DAGMAR ST
HUDSON ST
SILVER LANE
SCHOOL LANE
HILTON AVE
CAMPBELL ST
BELLEVUE ST
Job No
IS12550Drawing No Issue
Figure 2.2 P1
Drawing Status
Scale at A3
Drawing Title
Job Title
Clientwww.gta.com.au
0 200 400100
Metres
Issue Date By Chkd Appd
P1 16-11-10 BL RHH AS
LegendState RoadRegional RoadLocal Road
Û One Lane Each WayÛÛ Two Lanes Each Wayj One Way
°
1:7,000
Marrickville Council
St Peters - Tempe LATM Review
Road Hierarchy
Existing Conditions Assessment
IS12550 17/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 6
dra ft
GTA Consultants prepared a detailed inventory of the existing LATM measures within the St Peters/Tempe study area primarily as the basis for developing new LATM measures for Tempe and St Peters. The existing LATM measures are detailed in Table 2.1 and Table 2.2 and broken down by location, type and number per street. These LATM measures were implemented by Marrickville Council to address past issues concerning traffic volume and speed within the local streets.
Table 2.1: Existing Local Area Traffic Management (LATM) Measures Locations
LATM Type Reduce Speeds
Reduce Traffic Volume
Increase Pedestrian Safety
Reduce Crash Risk Location
Raised Table
Unwins Bridge Road, Sutherland Street, Frederick Street, George Street, Park Road, Terry Street, Samuel Street, Lymerston Street, Edwin Street, Gannon Street
Speed Hump
Silver Street, Edith Street, Mary Street, Grove Street, Foreman Street, Union Street, Station Street West, South Street
Mid-block Slow Point N/A
Modified T-junction
N/A
Median Unwins Bridge Road, Burrows Avenue, Samuel Street
Turn Bans
Campbell Street, Unwins Bridge Road, Grove Street, Sutherland Street, Frederick Street, Yelverton Street, George Street, Swain Street, Park Road
One-way
Mary Street, Swain Street, Burrows Avenue, Foreman Street, Union Street, Station Street West
Road Closure Reilly Lane, Belmore Street
Existing Conditions Assessment
IS12550 17/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 7
dra ft
Table 2.2: Existing LATM Measures Street by Street breakdown
Street Name Total
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Raised Table
Speed Hump
Mid-block Slow Point
Modified T-
Junction Median Turn
Bans One-way
Road Closure
Campbell Street 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
Unwins Bridge Road 7 2 0 0 0 33 2 0 0
Silver Street 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Edith Street 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mary Street 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0
Grove Street 5 0 3 0 0 0 24 0 0
Sutherland Street 5 3 0 0 0 0 24 0 0
Frederick Street 5 3 0 0 0 0 24 0 0
Yelverton Street 3 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 0
Bolton Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hogan Avenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
George Street 6 3 0 0 0 0 34 0 0
Swain Street 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
Reilly Lane 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Railway Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Burrows Avenue 2 0 0 0 0 13 0 1 0
Park Road 3 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Belmore Street 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Terry Street 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Samuel Street 4 3 0 0 0 0130 0 0 0
Lymerston Street 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Foreman Street 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0
Union Street 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0
Edwin Street 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tramway Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gannon Street 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Station Street West 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0
Bay Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
South Street 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 80 25 21 0 0 5 20 6 3
The existing measures were also mapped by GTA Consultants and are shown in Figure 2.3.
3 Includes pedestrian refuge island 4 Includes ‘No Left Turn 6-10AM Monday-Friday’ at Princes Highway
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
ÛÛ
ÛÛ
Û
Û
�
�
6:00 - 10:00 AM3:00 - 7:00 PM
6:30 - 8:30 AM3:30 - 5:30 PM
PRINCES H
WY
UNWIN
S BRID
GE RD
HENRY ST
SWAM
P RD
ED
ITH
ST
STATION ST
PAR
K R
D
MA
RY S
T
SILV
ER
ST
RAILW
AY R
D
GE
OR
GE S
T
TER
RY S
T
MAY ST
GR
OVE
ST
SOU
TH S
T
UN
ION
ST
EDWIN
ST
SA
MU
EL S
T
BE
LMO
RE
ST
REILLY
LAN
E
HAR
T ST
SMITH
STGANNON ST
BAY ST
PAR
K LA
NE
CAMPBELL ST
FR
ED
ER
ICK
ST
YE
LVE
RTO
N S
T
FO
REM
AN
ST
CA
NA
L RO
AD
BARDEN
ST
SU
TH
ER
LAN
D S
T
FANNIN
G S
T
LYM
ER
STO
N S
T
GR
IFF
ITH
S S
T
WAY S
T
FLORENCE S
T
ALF
RE
D S
T
RAILW
AY LA
NE
ROWE L
ANE
BROWN S
T
HUTCHINSON ST
BU
RR
OW
S R
D S
BELM
OR
E LA
NE
RAILWAY P
ARADE
BURROWS AVE
STA
NLE
Y S
T
WEN
TWO
RTH
ST
LACKEY ST
CO
OK
ST
OLD
ST
CH
UR
CH
ST
BR
OO
KLY
N S
T
BOLTO
N ST
BELLEVUE S
TJO
HN ST
BR
IDG
E S
T
STEWART L
ANE
GL
EE
SO
N A
VE
QU
AR
RY
ST
IXIO
N LA
NE
CO
LLINS
ST
VIEW ST
TR
AM
WAY S
T
SWAIN
ST
RO
BER
TS S
T
WIL
LIAM
ST
HIL
LC
RE
ST S
T
ALBION L
ANE
ROLFE LANE
ST
PETER
S S
T
HO
GA
N A
VE
NIC
HO
LS
ON
ST
BR
IAR
LAN
E
VIC
TORIA S
T
AP
PLE
BE
E S
T
BAKERS LANE
YO
UNG
ST
TALB
OT S
TGREEN ST
ZUTTIO
N L
ANE
ALBERT ST
HO
LBE
AC
H A
VE
WO
OD S
T
ROW
E ST
CO
NW
AY P
L
LESLIE S
T
BE
DW
IN R
D
SAMUEL
LANE
HENRY LANE
RICHARDSONS CRESCENT
BISHO
P ST
BER
NE
ST
DAG
MAR
ST
HU
DS
ON
ST
SILVER LANE
SCHOOL
LANE
HILTON A
VE
CAM
PBELL ST
BELLE
VU
E S
T
Job No
IS12550
Drawing No Issue
Figure 2.3 P1
Drawing Status
Scale at A3
Drawing Title
Job Title
Client
www.gta.com.au
0 200 400100
Metres
Issue Date By Chkd Appd
P1 16-11-10 BL RHH AS
LegendÛ One Lane Each Way
ÛÛ Two Lanes Each Way
� One Way
Full Road Closure
Watts Profile Hump
Raised Table
Raised Table with Narrowing
Raised Table withPedestrian Crossing
Raised Table with Narrowingand Pedestrian Crossing
# Roundabout
��� Traffic Signals
Pedestrian Crossing
Overpass
Underpass
h� Banned Left Turns
>hBanned Left Turns(6AM - 10AM, Mon - Fri)
�� Banned Right Turns
°
1:7,000
Marrickville Council
St Peters - Tempe LATM Review
Existing LATM Measures
Existing Conditions Assessment
IS12550 17/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 9
dra ft
2.3 Traffic Volumes & Speed Assessment
2.3.1 Traffic Surveys
GTA Consultants undertook turning movement counts at 17 intersections within the study area on Thursday 05 August 2010 during the PM peak (4pm–6pm) and Saturday 07 August during the midday peak (11am-3pm). Additionally a total of 35, 7-day (10 August 2010 to 16 August 2010) 24-hour tube counts were undertaken on 30 roads (Some streets had more than one tube counter) within the study area to obtain mid-block volume and speed data. Details of the survey locations are provided in Figure 2.4 with more detailed traffic count data provided in Appendix A.
2.3.2 Environmental Capacity and Speed Performance Standards
The RTA Guide to Traffic Generating Developments specifies the environmental limits for each road class which are detailed in Table 2.3.
A further criteria specified by the RTA is that traffic volumes on local roads should not exceed a maximum of 2,000 vehicles per day5
These two sets of criteria have been used as the basis for identifying traffic speed and volume issues within the streets of St Peters/Tempe.
.
Table 2.3: Environmental Capacity and Speed Performance Standards
Road Class Road Type Maximum Speed (km/h) Max Peak hour volume (veh/hr)
Local Access way 25 1006
Street
40 200 (desirable) and 300 (absolute)
Collector Street 50 300 (desirable) and 500 (absolute)
(Source: RTA Guide to Traffic Generating Developments, 2002)
It is important to note that these Standards are based on RTA research relating to safety and amenity and consider ease of crossing the road, noise and delay.
In addition to the above, as a general guide, all local roads have a 50km/hr speed limit unless signed otherwise.
2.3.3 Traffic and Speed Assessment
GTA Consultants analysed the traffic survey data to determine the existing volume and speed conditions in St Peters/Tempe.
The assessment indicated that, on the whole, existing traffic speeds and volumes on the local roads within the St Peters/Tempe study area were within an acceptable range. It is important to note that although a large percentage of the local roads were functioning satisfactorily in relation to their 50th and 85th percentile speed and peak hour volumes, there were also a small percentage which were not7
Table 2.4 which are highlighted in
red in .
The figures highlighted in red in Table 2.4 indicate where the environmental performance standards for traffic volumes and speeds are being exceeded.
5 Reference: RTA Road Design Guide 1991 – Table 1.2.6 6 This figure can be used to calculate annual average traffic volumes by assuming a peak to daily ratio of 10%. 7 This is not an uncommon situation in Sydney and doesn’t necessarily warrant immediate action.
Existing Conditions Assessment
IS12550 17/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 10
dra ft
It is important to note that on the basis of the “mean” speeds recorded the existing devices have generally been effective in reducing speeds within the study area, but in relation to the 85th percentile speeds additional devices would assist in further reducing speeds in key locations.
Another important point to note from this assessment is the traffic volumes in the local streets between Princes Highway and Unwins Bridge Road are also within their environmental capacity. This is due, in part, to the significant number of existing LATM measures currently in place and the general limitations of available through route options for traffic using this area.
A summary of the Thursday AM and PM and Saturday midday peak hour volumes and 85th percentile speeds for each period are provided in Figure 2.4 to Figure 2.9.
Existing Conditions Assessment
IS12550 05/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr LATM Report Page: 11
dra ft
Table 2.4: St Peters/Tempe Streets (Approaching or exceeding standards)
Street Name Section Peak Period Survey
Functional Classification
Compliance
Volume (veh/hr)
Speed (85th % km/hr)
Speed (50th % km/hr)
Volume (veh/hr)
Speed (85th % km/hr)
Speed (50th % km/hr)
Campbell Street Florence Street – St Peters Street
Weekday AM 604
54 44 Sub-Arterial
No
No Yes Weekday PM 643 No
Saturday Peak 523 No
Unwins Bridge Rd Lymerston Street – Samuel Street
Weekday AM 1281
55 45 Sub-Arterial
No Yes Weekday PM 1210
Saturday Peak 1077
Unwins Bridge Rd Frederick Street – Sutherland Street
Weekday AM 1520
58 48 Sub-Arterial
No Yes Weekday PM 1604
Saturday Peak 1362
Silver Street Unwins Bridge Road – Florence Street
Weekday AM 48
37 28 Local
Yes
Yes Yes Weekday PM 34 Yes
Saturday Peak 38 Yes
Edith Street Unwins Bridge Road – Henry Street
Weekday AM 88
45 35 Local
Yes
No Yes Weekday PM 47 Yes
Saturday Peak 52 Yes
Mary Street Rolfe Lane – Bakers Lane
Weekday AM 311
40 34 Collector
No
Yes Yes Weekday PM 525 No
Saturday Peak 424 No
Grove Street Albion Lane – Rolfe Lane
Weekday AM 105
40 33 Local
Yes
Yes Yes Weekday PM 73 Yes
Saturday Peak 81 Yes
Sutherland Street Unwins Bridge Road – Henry Street
Weekday AM 50
45 36 Local
Yes
No Yes Weekday PM 75 Yes
Saturday Peak 84 Yes
Existing Conditions Assessment
IS12550 05/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr LATM Report Page: 12
dra ft
Street Name Section Peak Period Survey
Functional Classification
Compliance
Volume (veh/hr)
Speed (85th % km/hr)
Speed (50th % km/hr)
Volume (veh/hr)
Speed (85th % km/hr)
Speed (50th % km/hr)
Frederick Street Unwins Bridge Road – Henry Street
Weekday AM 91
46 36 Local
Yes
No Yes Weekday PM 130 Yes
Saturday Peak 129 Yes
Henry Street Frederick Street – Yelverton Street
Weekday AM 81
35 27 Local
Yes
Yes Yes Weekday PM 33 Yes
Saturday Peak 40 Yes
Yelverton Street Unwins Bridge Road – Henry Street
Weekday AM 30
48 37 Local
Yes
No Yes Weekday PM 28 Yes
Saturday Peak 39 Yes
George Street Unwins Bridge Road – Henry Street
Weekday AM 89
46 30 Local
Yes
No Yes Weekday PM 30 Yes
Saturday Peak 29 Yes
Railway Road Unwins Bridge Road – Henry Street
Weekday AM 1078
55 45 Arterial
No Yes Weekday PM 1460
Saturday Peak 1468
Park Road Unwins Bridge Road – Henry Street
Weekday AM 105
38 29 Local
Yes
Yes Yes Weekday PM 42 Yes
Saturday Peak 44 Yes
Terry Street Unwins Bridge Road – Henry Street
Weekday AM 110
50 41 Local
Yes
No No Weekday PM 63 Yes
Saturday Peak 68 Yes
Bellevue Road East of Princes Highway
Weekday AM 202*
29 17 Local
Yes
Yes Yes Weekday PM 207* Yes
Saturday Peak 168 Yes
Samuel Street Unwins Bridge Road – Henry Street
Weekday AM 67
50 42 Local
Yes
No No Weekday PM 81 Yes
Saturday Peak 82 Yes
Existing Conditions Assessment
IS12550 05/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr LATM Report Page: 13
dra ft
Street Name Section Peak Period Survey
Functional Classification
Compliance
Volume (veh/hr)
Speed (85th % km/hr)
Speed (50th % km/hr)
Volume (veh/hr)
Speed (85th % km/hr)
Speed (50th % km/hr)
Samuel Street Henry Street – Princes Highway
Weekday AM 63
44 35 Local
Yes
No Yes Weekday PM 53 Yes
Saturday Peak 62 Yes
Lymerston Road John Street – William Street
Weekday AM 148
44 35 Local
Yes
No Yes Weekday PM 78 Yes
Saturday Peak 89 Yes
Lymerston Road Henry Street – Milne Lane
Weekday AM 142
48 38 Local
Yes
No Yes Weekday PM 70 Yes
Saturday Peak 76 Yes
Foreman Street School Lane – Laneway
Weekday AM 108
39 32 Local
Yes
Yes Yes Weekday PM 28 Yes
Saturday Peak 39 Yes
School Lane Union Street – Brooklyn Street
Weekday AM 43
36 27 Access way
Yes
No No Weekday PM 53 Yes
Saturday Peak 25 Yes
Laneway Union Street – Brooklyn Street
Weekday AM 17
34 20 Access way
Yes
No Yes Weekday PM 10 Yes
Saturday Peak 17 Yes
Union Street School Lane – Laneway
Weekday AM 58
42 24 Local
Yes
No Yes Weekday PM 108 Yes
Saturday Peak 63 Yes
Edwin Street Stanley Street – Union Street
Weekday AM 43
36 21 Local
Yes
Yes Yes Weekday PM 93 Yes
Saturday Peak 33 Yes
Tramway Street Unwins Bridge Road – Edwin Street
Weekday AM 85
39 32 Local
Yes
Yes Yes Weekday PM 81 Yes
Saturday Peak 53 Yes
Existing Conditions Assessment
IS12550 05/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr LATM Report Page: 14
dra ft
Street Name Section Peak Period Survey
Functional Classification
Compliance
Volume (veh/hr)
Speed (85th % km/hr)
Speed (50th % km/hr)
Volume (veh/hr)
Speed (85th % km/hr)
Speed (50th % km/hr)
Gannon Street Edwin Street – Princes Highway
Weekday AM 1077
47 38 Sub-Arterial
No
Yes Yes Weekday PM 1169 No
Saturday Peak 1101 No
Gannon Street Unwins Bridge Road – Edwin Street
Weekday AM 1018
48 40 Sub-Arterial
No
Yes Yes Weekday PM 1140 No
Saturday Peak 975 No
Station Street East Princes Highway – South Street
Weekday AM 13
35 25 Local
Yes
Yes Yes Weekday PM 18 Yes
Saturday Peak 23 Yes
Hart Street Princes Highway – South Street
Weekday AM 23
34 25 Local
Yes
Yes Yes Weekday PM 27 Yes
Saturday Peak 37 Yes
Wentworth Street Princes Highway – South Street
Weekday AM 6
40 29 Local
Yes
Yes Yes Weekday PM 8 Yes
Saturday Peak 23 Yes
Fanning Street Princes Highway – South Street
Weekday AM 16
34 24 Local
Yes
Yes Yes Weekday PM 13 Yes
Saturday Peak 14 Yes
Barden Street Princes Highway – South Street
Weekday AM 9
29 21 Local
Yes
Yes Yes Weekday PM 13 Yes
Saturday Peak 12 Yes
Smith Street Princes Highway – South Street
Weekday AM 88
49 38 Local
Yes
No Yes Weekday PM 76 Yes
Saturday Peak 80 Yes
South Street Barden Street – Fanning Street
Weekday AM 72
41 24 Local
Yes
No Yes Weekday PM 46 Yes
Saturday Peak 66 Yes
Peak hour traffic flows were derived from 24 hour tube counts;
Ë
ËË
Ë
Ë
Ë
Ë
Ë
Ë
Ë
Ë
Ë
ËË
Ë
Ë
Ë
Ë
ËË
Ë
Ë
Ë
Ë
Ë
Ë
ËËË
Ë
Ë
Ë
Ë
Ë
Ë
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
ÛÛ
ÛÛ
Û
Û
j
j
PRINCES HWY
UNWINS BRIDGE RD
HENRY ST
SWAMP RD
EDITH ST
STATION STPARK RD
MARY STSILVER ST
RAILWAY RD
GEORGE ST
TERRY ST
MAY ST
GROVE ST
SOUTH ST
UNION ST
EDWIN ST
SAMUEL ST
BELMORE ST
REILLY LANE
HART ST
SMITH STGANNON ST
BAY ST
PARK LANE
CAMPBELL ST
FREDERICK ST
YELVERTON ST
FOREMAN ST
CANAL ROAD
BARDEN ST
SUTHERLAND ST
FANNING ST
LYMERSTON ST
GRIFF
ITHS S
T
WAY ST
FLORENCE ST
ALFRED ST
RAILWAY LANE
ROWE LANE
BROWN ST
HUTCHINSON ST
BURROWS RD S
BELMORE LANE
RAILWAY PARADE
BURROWS AVE
STANLEY ST
WENTWORTH ST
LACKEY ST
COOK
ST
OLD ST
CHURCH ST
BROOKLYN ST
BOLTON ST
BELLEVUE STJOHN ST
BRIDGE ST
STEWART LANE
GLEESON AVE
QUAR
RY ST
IXION LANE
COLLINS ST
VIEW ST
TRAMWAY ST
SWAIN ST
ROBERTS ST
WILLIAM ST
HILLCREST ST
WELLS AVE
ALBION LANE
ROLFE LANE
ST PETERS ST
HOGAN AVE
NICHO
LSON
ST
BRIAR LANE
VICTORIA ST
APPL
EBEE
ST
BAKERS LANE
EDGAR ST
YOUNG ST
TALBOT STGREEN ST
ZUTTION LANE
ALBERT ST
HOLBEACH AVE
WOOD ST
ROWE ST
CONWAY PL
LESLIE ST
BEDWIN RD
SAMUEL LANE
HENRY LANE
RICHARDSONS CRESCENT
BISHOP ST
BERNE ST
DAGMAR ST
HUDSON ST
SILVER LANE
SCHOOL LANE
HILTON AVE
CAMPBELL ST
BELLEVUE ST
Job No
IS12550Drawing No Issue
Figure 2.4 P1
Drawing Status
Scale at A3
Drawing Title
Job Title
Clientwww.gta.com.au
0 200 400100
Metres
Issue Date By Chkd Appd
P1 16-11-10 BL RHH AS
LegendFull Intersection Count
IKEA Count Data
Ë Tube CountÛ One Lane Each WayÛÛ Two Lanes Each Wayj One Way
°
1:7,000
Marrickville Council
St Peters - Tempe LATM Review
Traffic Survey Locations
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
ÛÛ
ÛÛ
Û
Û
j
j
PRINCES HWY
UNWINS BRIDGE RD
HENRY ST
SWAMP RD
EDITH ST
STATION STPARK RD
MARY STSILVER ST
RAILWAY RD
GEORGE ST
TERRY ST
MAY ST
GROVE ST
SOUTH ST
UNION ST
EDWIN ST
SAMUEL ST
BELMORE ST
REILLY LANE
HART ST
SMITH STGANNON ST
BAY ST
PARK LANE
CAMPBELL ST
FREDERICK ST
YELVERTON ST
FOREMAN ST
CANAL ROAD
BARDEN ST
SUTHERLAND ST
FANNING ST
LYMERSTON ST
GRIFF
ITHS S
T
WAY ST
FLORENCE ST
ALFRED ST
RAILWAY LANE
ROWE LANE
BROWN ST
HUTCHINSON ST
BURROWS RD S
BELMORE LANE
RAILWAY PARADE
BURROWS AVE
STANLEY ST
WENTWORTH ST
LACKEY ST
COOK
ST
OLD ST
CHURCH ST
BROOKLYN ST
BOLTON ST
BELLEVUE STJOHN ST
BRIDGE ST
STEWART LANE
GLEESON AVE
QUAR
RY ST
IXION LANE
COLLINS ST
VIEW ST
TRAMWAY ST
SWAIN ST
ROBERTS ST
WILLIAM ST
HILLCREST ST
WELLS AVE
ALBION LANE
ROLFE LANE
ST PETERS ST
HOGAN AVE
NICHO
LSON
ST
BRIAR LANE
VICTORIA ST
APPL
EBEE
ST
BAKERS LANE
EDGAR ST
YOUNG ST
TALBOT STGREEN ST
ZUTTION LANE
ALBERT ST
HOLBEACH AVE
WOOD ST
ROWE ST
CONWAY PL
LESLIE ST
BEDWIN RD
SAMUEL LANE
HENRY LANE
RICHARDSONS CRESCENT
BISHOP ST
BERNE ST
DAGMAR ST
HUDSON ST
SILVER LANE
SCHOOL LANE
HILTON AVE
CAMPBELL ST
BELLEVUE ST
Job No
IS12550Drawing No Issue
Figure 2.5 P1
Drawing Status
Scale at A3
Drawing Title
Job Title
Clientwww.gta.com.au
0 200 400100
Metres
Issue Date By Chkd Appd
P1 16-11-10 BL RHH AS
Legend< 50 vph50 - 99 vph100 - 199 vph300 - 499 vph> 500 vph
Û One Lane Each WayÛÛ Two Lanes Each Wayj One Way
°
1:7,000
Marrickville Council
St Peters - Tempe LATM Review
Peak Hour Volumes AM- 5 Days Average
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
ÛÛ
ÛÛ
Û
Û
j
j
PRINCES HWY
UNWINS BRIDGE RD
HENRY ST
SWAMP RD
EDITH ST
STATION STPARK RD
MARY STSILVER ST
RAILWAY RD
GEORGE ST
TERRY ST
MAY ST
GROVE ST
SOUTH ST
UNION ST
EDWIN ST
SAMUEL ST
BELMORE ST
REILLY LANE
HART ST
SMITH STGANNON ST
BAY ST
PARK LANE
CAMPBELL ST
FREDERICK ST
YELVERTON ST
FOREMAN ST
CANAL ROAD
BARDEN ST
SUTHERLAND ST
FANNING ST
LYMERSTON ST
GRIFF
ITHS S
T
WAY ST
FLORENCE ST
ALFRED ST
RAILWAY LANE
ROWE LANE
BROWN ST
HUTCHINSON ST
BURROWS RD S
BELMORE LANE
RAILWAY PARADE
BURROWS AVE
STANLEY ST
WENTWORTH ST
LACKEY ST
COOK
ST
OLD ST
CHURCH ST
BROOKLYN ST
BOLTON ST
BELLEVUE STJOHN ST
BRIDGE ST
STEWART LANE
GLEESON AVE
QUAR
RY ST
IXION LANE
COLLINS ST
VIEW ST
TRAMWAY ST
SWAIN ST
ROBERTS ST
WILLIAM ST
HILLCREST ST
WELLS AVE
ALBION LANE
ROLFE LANE
ST PETERS ST
HOGAN AVE
NICHO
LSON
ST
BRIAR LANE
VICTORIA ST
APPL
EBEE
ST
BAKERS LANE
EDGAR ST
YOUNG ST
TALBOT STGREEN ST
ZUTTION LANE
ALBERT ST
HOLBEACH AVE
WOOD ST
ROWE ST
CONWAY PL
LESLIE ST
BEDWIN RD
SAMUEL LANE
HENRY LANE
RICHARDSONS CRESCENT
BISHOP ST
BERNE ST
DAGMAR ST
HUDSON ST
SILVER LANE
SCHOOL LANE
HILTON AVE
CAMPBELL ST
BELLEVUE ST
Job No
IS12550Drawing No Issue
Figure 2.6 P1
Drawing Status
Scale at A3
Drawing Title
Job Title
Clientwww.gta.com.au
0 200 400100
Metres
Issue Date By Chkd Appd
P1 16-11-10 BL RHH AS
Legend< 50 vph50 - 99 vph100 - 199 vph300 - 499 vph> 500 vph
Û One Lane Each WayÛÛ Two Lanes Each Wayj One Way
°
1:7,000
Marrickville Council
St Peters - Tempe LATM Review
Peak Hour Volumes Thursday PM
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
ÛÛ
ÛÛ
Û
Û
j
j
PRINCES HWY
UNWINS BRIDGE RD
HENRY ST
SWAMP RD
EDITH ST
STATION STPARK RD
MARY STSILVER ST
RAILWAY RD
GEORGE ST
TERRY ST
MAY ST
GROVE ST
SOUTH ST
UNION ST
EDWIN ST
SAMUEL ST
BELMORE ST
REILLY LANE
HART ST
SMITH STGANNON ST
BAY ST
PARK LANE
CAMPBELL ST
FREDERICK ST
YELVERTON ST
FOREMAN ST
CANAL ROAD
BARDEN ST
SUTHERLAND ST
FANNING ST
LYMERSTON ST
GRIFF
ITHS S
T
WAY ST
FLORENCE ST
ALFRED ST
RAILWAY LANE
ROWE LANE
BROWN ST
HUTCHINSON ST
BURROWS RD S
BELMORE LANE
RAILWAY PARADE
BURROWS AVE
STANLEY ST
WENTWORTH ST
LACKEY ST
COOK
ST
OLD ST
CHURCH ST
BROOKLYN ST
BOLTON ST
BELLEVUE STJOHN ST
BRIDGE ST
STEWART LANE
GLEESON AVE
QUAR
RY ST
IXION LANE
COLLINS ST
VIEW ST
TRAMWAY ST
SWAIN ST
ROBERTS ST
WILLIAM ST
HILLCREST ST
WELLS AVE
ALBION LANE
ROLFE LANE
ST PETERS ST
HOGAN AVE
NICHO
LSON
ST
BRIAR LANE
VICTORIA ST
APPL
EBEE
ST
BAKERS LANE
EDGAR ST
YOUNG ST
TALBOT STGREEN ST
ZUTTION LANE
ALBERT ST
HOLBEACH AVE
WOOD ST
ROWE ST
CONWAY PL
LESLIE ST
BEDWIN RD
SAMUEL LANE
HENRY LANE
RICHARDSONS CRESCENT
BISHOP ST
BERNE ST
DAGMAR ST
HUDSON ST
SILVER LANE
SCHOOL LANE
HILTON AVE
CAMPBELL ST
BELLEVUE ST
Job No
IS12550Drawing No Issue
Figure 2.7 P1
Drawing Status
Scale at A3
Drawing Title
Job Title
Clientwww.gta.com.au
0 200 400100
Metres
Issue Date By Chkd Appd
P1 16-11-10 BL RHH AS
Legend< 50 vph50 - 99 vph100 - 199 vph300 - 499 vph> 500 vph
Û One Lane Each WayÛÛ Two Lanes Each Wayj One Way
°
1:7,000
Marrickville Council
St Peters - Tempe LATM Review
Peak Hour Volumes Saturday PM
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
ÛÛ
ÛÛ
Û
Û
j
j
PRINCES HWY
UNWINS BRIDGE RD
HENRY ST
SWAMP RD
EDITH ST
STATION STPARK RD
MARY STSILVER ST
RAILWAY RD
GEORGE ST
TERRY ST
MAY ST
GROVE ST
SOUTH ST
UNION ST
EDWIN ST
SAMUEL ST
BELMORE ST
REILLY LANE
HART ST
SMITH STGANNON ST
BAY ST
PARK LANE
CAMPBELL ST
FREDERICK ST
YELVERTON ST
FOREMAN ST
CANAL ROAD
BARDEN ST
SUTHERLAND ST
FANNING ST
LYMERSTON ST
GRIFF
ITHS S
T
WAY ST
FLORENCE ST
ALFRED ST
RAILWAY LANE
ROWE LANE
BROWN ST
HUTCHINSON ST
BURROWS RD S
BELMORE LANE
RAILWAY PARADE
BURROWS AVE
STANLEY ST
WENTWORTH ST
LACKEY ST
COOK
ST
OLD ST
CHURCH ST
BROOKLYN ST
BOLTON ST
BELLEVUE STJOHN ST
BRIDGE ST
STEWART LANE
GLEESON AVE
QUAR
RY ST
IXION LANE
COLLINS ST
VIEW ST
TRAMWAY ST
SWAIN ST
ROBERTS ST
WILLIAM ST
HILLCREST ST
WELLS AVE
ALBION LANE
ROLFE LANE
ST PETERS ST
HOGAN AVE
NICHO
LSON
ST
BRIAR LANE
VICTORIA ST
APPL
EBEE
ST
BAKERS LANE
EDGAR ST
YOUNG ST
TALBOT STGREEN ST
ZUTTION LANE
ALBERT ST
HOLBEACH AVE
WOOD ST
ROWE ST
CONWAY PL
LESLIE ST
BEDWIN RD
SAMUEL LANE
HENRY LANE
RICHARDSONS CRESCENT
BISHOP ST
BERNE ST
DAGMAR ST
HUDSON ST
SILVER LANE
SCHOOL LANE
HILTON AVE
CAMPBELL ST
BELLEVUE ST
Job No
IS12550Drawing No Issue
Figure 2.8 P1
Drawing Status
Scale at A3
Drawing Title
Job Title
Clientwww.gta.com.au
0 200 400100
Metres
Issue Date By Chkd Appd
P1 16-11-10 BL RHH AS
Legend< 40 km/h40 - 49 km/h50 - 59 km/h
Û One Lane Each WayÛÛ Two Lanes Each Wayj One Way
°
1:7,000
Marrickville Council
St Peters - Tempe LATM Review
85TH Percentile Speed Thursday
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
ÛÛ
ÛÛ
Û
Û
j
j
PRINCES HWY
UNWINS BRIDGE RD
HENRY ST
SWAMP RD
EDITH ST
STATION STPARK RD
MARY STSILVER ST
RAILWAY RD
GEORGE ST
TERRY ST
MAY ST
GROVE ST
SOUTH ST
UNION ST
EDWIN ST
SAMUEL ST
BELMORE ST
REILLY LANE
HART ST
SMITH STGANNON ST
BAY ST
PARK LANE
CAMPBELL ST
FREDERICK ST
YELVERTON ST
FOREMAN ST
CANAL ROAD
BARDEN ST
SUTHERLAND ST
FANNING ST
LYMERSTON ST
GRIFF
ITHS S
T
WAY ST
FLORENCE ST
ALFRED ST
RAILWAY LANE
ROWE LANE
BROWN ST
HUTCHINSON ST
BURROWS RD S
BELMORE LANE
RAILWAY PARADE
BURROWS AVE
STANLEY ST
WENTWORTH ST
LACKEY ST
COOK
ST
OLD ST
CHURCH ST
BROOKLYN ST
BOLTON ST
BELLEVUE STJOHN ST
BRIDGE ST
STEWART LANE
GLEESON AVE
QUAR
RY ST
IXION LANE
COLLINS ST
VIEW ST
TRAMWAY ST
SWAIN ST
ROBERTS ST
WILLIAM ST
HILLCREST ST
WELLS AVE
ALBION LANE
ROLFE LANE
ST PETERS ST
HOGAN AVE
NICHO
LSON
ST
BRIAR LANE
VICTORIA ST
APPL
EBEE
ST
BAKERS LANE
EDGAR ST
YOUNG ST
TALBOT STGREEN ST
ZUTTION LANE
ALBERT ST
HOLBEACH AVE
WOOD ST
ROWE ST
CONWAY PL
LESLIE ST
BEDWIN RD
SAMUEL LANE
HENRY LANE
RICHARDSONS CRESCENT
BISHOP ST
BERNE ST
DAGMAR ST
HUDSON ST
SILVER LANE
SCHOOL LANE
HILTON AVE
CAMPBELL ST
BELLEVUE ST
Job No
IS12550Drawing No Issue
Figure 2.9 P1
Drawing Status
Scale at A3
Drawing Title
Job Title
Clientwww.gta.com.au
0 200 400100
Metres
Issue Date By Chkd Appd
P1 16-11-10 BL RHH AS
Legend< 40 km/h40 - 49 km/h50 - 59 km/h
Û One Lane Each WayÛÛ Two Lanes Each Wayj One Way
°
1:7,000
Marrickville Council
St Peters - Tempe LATM Review
85TH Percentile Speed Saturday
Existing Conditions Assessment
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 21
dra ft
2.4 Through Traffic Routes As mentioned previously, there have been extensive traffic management measures implemented throughout the St Peters/Tempe area that have been successful in preventing widespread through traffic routes using the local streets. There remains however particular locations where general traffic still cuts through the local streets as a result of congestion on the arterial road network which appears to be more prevalent during the AM peak period.
Congestion for north bound vehicles on Princes Highway and congestion caused by the intersection with Canal Road together with bi-directional congestion on Unwins Bridge Road causes traffic to cut through the local streets north of Railway Road. The existing “no left turn” restrictions from these local streets onto Princes Highway do not appear to be operating as intended. It is also understood that the BP service station on the corner of Grove Street and Princes Highway is used to bypass the left turn ban to access Princes Highway.
Further delay for southbound vehicles on Unwins Bridge Road during the weekday PM peak period results in traffic turning left onto Foreman Street, right into the laneway behind Tempe Primary School, and onto Edwin Street via Union Street. Traffic either enters back into the congested traffic flow on Unwins Bridge Road to access Richardsons Crescent or continues through to Gannon Street to continue south along Princes Highway.
A summary of the main weekday AM and PM through traffic routes using the St Peters/Tempe area identified by GTA Consultants is provided in Figures 2.10 and 2.11.
Through routes- Weekday AM Peak Hour
MAIN ROUTES
THROUGH ROUTES
Figure 2.10
Through routes- Weekday PM Peak Hour
MAIN ROUTES
THROUGH ROUTES
Figure 2.11
Existing Conditions Assessment
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 24
dra ft
2.5 Intersection (SIDRA) Modelling The operation of the 17 intersections within the study area have been assessed using SIDRA INTERSECTION6
The commonly used measure of intersection performance, as defined by the RTA, is vehicle delay. SIDRA INTERSECTION determines the average delay that vehicles encounter and provides a measure of the level of service.
, a computer based modelling package which calculates intersection performance.
Table 2.5 shows the criteria that SIDRA INTERSECTION adopts in assessing the level of service.
Table 2.5: SIDRA INTERSECTION Level of Service Criteria
Level of Service (LOS) Average Delay per vehicle (secs/veh)
Traffic Signals, Roundabout Give Way & Stop Sign
A Less than 14 Good operation Good operation
B 15 to 28 Good with acceptable delays and spare capacity
Acceptable delays and spare capacity
C 29 to 42 Satisfactory Satisfactory, but accident study required
D 43 to 56 Near capacity Near capacity, accident study required
E 57 to 70 At capacity, at signals incidents will cause excessive delays
At capacity, requires other control mode
F Greater than 70 Extra capacity required Extreme delay, major treatment required
Table 2.6 presents a summary of the existing operation of the key intersections within the study area with full results of all intersections contained in Appendix B of this report.
6 Program used under license from Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltd.
Existing Conditions Assessment
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 25
dra ft
Table 2.6: Existing Operating Conditions
Intersection Peak Leg Degree of Saturation
(DOS)
Average Delay (sec)
95th Percentile
Queue (m)
Level of Service
(LOS)
Unwins Bridge Road/Mary Street
Thursday PM
North 0.556 11.9 88.5 B
South 0.461 11 72.1 A
East 0.908 26.4 54.2 B
Saturday Midday
North 0.785 16.5 147.4 B
South 0.770 15.5 141.2 B
East 0.882 27.3 54.2 B
Princes Highway/ Canal Road/ Mary Street
Thursday PM
North 0.875 39.9 282.9 C
South 0.837 31.2 264.4 C
East 0.831 42.8 250.4 D
Saturday Midday
North 0.886 50.8 177.5 D
South 0.874 37.5 202.9 C
East 0.858 48.9 75.8 D
Unwins Bridge Road/Terry Street
Thursday PM
North 0.527 0.2 0 A
South 0.238 15 47.9 B
East 0.145 27.9 3.5 C
Saturday Midday
North 0.325 0.3 0 A
South 0.303 5.8 37.7 A
East 0.097 18.3 2.5 B
Unwins Bridge Road/Lymerston Street
Thursday PM
North 0.526 0.1 0 A
South 0.283 16.2 40.7 B
East 0.130 21.4 2.9 C
Saturday Midday
North 0.352 0.2 0 A
South 0.345 7.8 47.4 A
East 0.146 19.7 3.7 C
Unwins Bridge Road/Union Street
Thursday PM
North 0.468 0 0 A
South 0.220 0 0 A
East 0.126 17 3.7 C
Saturday Midday
North 0.314 0 0 A
South 0.290 0 0 A
East 0.081 24.5 2.1 B
Unwins Bridge Road/Tramway Street
Thursday PM
North 0.494 0.1 0 A
South 0.171 0 0 A
East 0.209 16 4.9 B
Saturday Midday
North 0.328 0.3 0 A
South 0.299 2.9 37.2 A
East 0.051 12.6 1.5 A
Table 2.6 indicates that a select number of intersections currently experience delay on particular approaches during both the Thursday PM and Saturday Midday peak periods.
The intersections which experience delay are as follows:
• Princes Highway/Canal Road/Mary Street
The intersection is operating at a level of service C/D during the peak periods, which is an acceptable level of service for busy intersections. Delay and queuing is experienced on each approach and the intersection operates under tidal flows conditions during the respective PM peak periods.
Existing Conditions Assessment
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 26
dra ft
2.6 Accident Analysis GTA Consultants analysed the accident data for the five year period from July 2004 to June 2009 for the study area as provided by Marrickville Council.
A summary of the total accidents by year are provided in Figure 2.12.
Figure 2.12: St Peters/Tempe Total Accidents 2004-2009
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2004/2005 2005/2006 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009
Num
ber o
f Acc
iden
ts
Year
Annual Accident Breakdown
It is noted that the majority of accidents occurred on the main arterial road network surrounding the local streets of Tempe and St Peters. With this in mind, all accidents on Princes Highway and Canal Road have been excluded for the purposes of the St Peters/Tempe LATM study to maintain the focus on the local road network.
2.6.1 Local Streets Accident Analysis
The roads within the study area (excluding Princes Highway and Canal Road) experienced a total of approximately 212 accidents during the five year period ending June 2009 with 128 occurring along Unwins Bridge Road. The location of these accidents is shown in Figure 2.13.
A summary of the accidents and their locations within the study area is included in Table 2.7.
PRINCES HWY
UNWINS BRIDGE RD
HENRY ST
SWAMP RD
MAY ST
EDITH ST
STATION ST
PARK RD
MARY STSILVER ST
RAILWAY RD
GEORGE ST
TERRY ST
GROVE ST
SOUTH ST
UNION ST
EDWIN ST
SAMUEL ST
BELMORE ST
REILLY LANE
HART ST
SMITH STGANNON ST
BAY ST
PARK LANE
CAMPBELL ST
FREDERICK ST
YELVERTON ST
FOREMAN ST
CANAL ROAD
BARDEN ST
SUTHERLAND ST
FANNING ST
LYMERSTON ST
GRIFF
ITHS S
T
WAY ST
FLORENCE ST
ALFRED ST
RAILWAY LANE
ROWE LANE
BROWN ST
BURROWS RD S
HUTCHINSON ST
BELMORE LANE
RAILWAY PARADE
BURROWS AVE
STANLEY ST
WENTWORTH ST
LACKEY ST
COOK
ST
OLD ST
CHURCH ST
BROOKLYN ST
BOLTON ST
BELLEVUE STJOHN ST
BRIDGE ST
STEWART LANE
GLEESON AVE
QUAR
RY ST
IXION LANE
COLLINS ST
VIEW ST
TRAMWAY ST
SWAIN ST
ROBERTS ST
WILLIAM ST
HILLCREST ST
WELLS AVE
ALBION LANE
ROLFE LANE
ST PETERS ST
HOGAN AVE
NICHO
LSON
ST
BRIAR LANE
VICTORIA ST
BEDWIN RD
BAKERS LANE
APPL
EBEE
ST
EDGAR ST
YOUNG ST
TALBOT ST
GREEN ST
ZUTTION LANE
ALBERT ST
HOLBEACH AVE
WOOD ST
ROWE ST
CONWAY PL
LESLIE ST
SAMUEL LANE
HENRY LANE
RICHARDSONS CRESCENT
BISHOP ST
BERNE ST
DAGMAR ST
HUDSON ST
SILVER LANE
SCHOOL LANE
HILTON AVE
CAMPBELL ST
BELLEVUE ST
Job No
IS12550Drawing No Issue
Figure 2.13 P1
Drawing Status
Scale at A3
Drawing Title
Job Title
Clientwww.gta.com.au
0 200 400100
Metres
Issue Date By Chkd Appd
P1 16-11-10 BL RHH AS
Legend Cyclist Accidents Pedestrian Accidents Vehicular Accidents
°
1:7,000
Marrickville Council
St Peters - Tempe LATM Review
St Peters/Tempe Total Accidents2004 - 2009
Existing Conditions Assessment
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 28
dra ft
Table 2.7: Accident Summary – St Peters/Tempe Local Area 2004-2009
Location No. of Accidents
Vehicle-Vehicle
Vehicle-Pedestrian
Vehicle-Cyclist Other
Unwins Bridge Road 144 9 5 10 (vehicle-fixed object)
1 (pedestrian-motorcycle) 1 (cyclist-fixed object)
Railway Road 9 1
Campbell Street 4 1
Frederick Street 4
Grove Street 3
Gleeson Avenue 3 3
Mary Street 2 1 (vehicle-fixed object)
Florence Street 1
George Street 1
Park road 1
Brooklyn Street 1
Gannon street 1
Station Street 1 1 (vehicle-fixed object)
Burrows Avenue 1 1 (vehicle-fixed object)
Bolton Street 1
Roberts Street 1
Lymerston Street 1
Holbeach Avenue 1
Way Street 1 (vehicle-fixed object)
Total 176 14 6 16
It is important to note that approximately 80% of all accidents (i.e. 170 of the total 212 recorded within the study area occurred along Unwins Bridge Road between 2004 and 2009 of which 139 occurred at intersection locations along Unwins Bridge Road. Further details of these accident types are provided below:
• 33% of accidents on local streets within the study area were Right Through Crashes (RUM CODE 21). Of this 95% occurred on Unwins Bridge Road.
• 17% were Rear End Crashes (RUM CODE 30)
• 8% were Left Off Carriageway into Object (RUM CODE 71).
A RUM CODE is a standard code used to identify the type of Road User Movement (RUM) in accidents. For example, a “right through” type accident (RUM CODE 21) is classified as an accident between two vehicles from opposing directions with one vehicle turning right and colliding with the opposing vehicle.
Figures 2.14 to 2.16 indicate further characteristics of accidents within the St Peters/Tempe local area.
Existing Conditions Assessment
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 29
dra ft
Figure 2.14: Accidents by RUM Code
RUM 2133%
RUM 3017%RUM 71
8%RUM 10
6%
RUM 00 4%
RUM 133%
RUM 022%
RUM 732%
RUM 482%
OTHER 23%
Note: RUM 21: vehicles from opposing directions, right turn and thru accident, RUM 30: vehicles from same direction, rear end accident, RUM 71:
single vehicle accident, left off carriageway into object/parked vehicle, RUM 10: vehicles from adjacent directions (at intersection) cross traffic accident, RUM 00: near side pedestrian accident, RUM 13: vehicles from adjacent directions (at intersection) right turn near side accident, RUM 02: far side pedestrian accident, RUM 73: single vehicle accident, right off carriageway into object/parked vehicle, RUM 48: right turn off footpath accident.
Figure 2.15: Accidents by time of Day
0
5
10
15
20
25
0:00
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:0
0
11:0
0
12:0
0
13:0
0
14:0
0
15:0
0
16:0
0
17:0
0
18:0
0
19:0
0
20:0
0
21:0
0
22:0
0
23:0
0
Num
ber o
f Acc
iden
ts
Time
Figure 2.15 shows that most of the accidents occurred during the AM and PM peak periods with a fall during the middle of the day. This correlates with the traffic volume pattern along Unwins Bridge Road and Railway Road.
Existing Conditions Assessment
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 30
dra ft
Figure 2.16: Accidents by Day of Week
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
Num
ber o
f Acc
iden
ts
Time
Figure 2.16 shows that more accidents occurred on a Thursday than any other day of the week with approximately half the number of daily accidents occurring on the weekend than a typical week day. It should be noted that the number of accidents within the St Peters/Tempe local area is significantly lower on a Wednesday than any other weekday. However, when including Princes Highway and Canal Road accidents, Wednesday has an equivalent number of accidents as a normal week day.
2.6.2 Unwins Bridge Road
Unwins Bridge Road recorded 170 accidents between July 2004 and June 2009 which is significantly higher than any other road within the study area with the exception of Princes Highway. Unwins Bridge Road carries approximately 1,600 vehicles per hour north of Railway Street and 1,200 vehicles per hour south of Railway Street during the Thursday PM peak hour. These traffic volumes are close to the operating capacities for the lane configuration of Unwins Bridge Road, and when combined with the recorded 85th percentile speed of 55km/h, appears to contribute to high accident numbers. It is also important to note that there were 9 pedestrian accidents which occurred along Unwins Bridge Road of which a concentrated number occurred between Railway Road and Frederick Street.
2.7 Public Transport Services
2.7.1 Trains
Train services operate along the western boundary of the study area and provide services at both Tempe and Sydenham railway stations.
Sydenham Railway Station provides services to multiple suburban lines including the Eastern Suburbs and Illawarra line, Bankstown line, Airport and East Hills line (peak hours only) and the Intercity South Coast line.
Tempe station functions as a local station and provides connections to the Eastern Suburbs and Illawarra line.
There would be pedestrian and other traffic movements generated within the study area as a consequence of both Sydenham and Tempe train stations.
Existing Conditions Assessment
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 31
dra ft
2.7.2 Buses
Four main bus services run within the study area, all of which are operated by Sydney Buses. These services operate along the major routes of Princes Highway, Canal Road and Railway Road/Gleeson Avenue. The routes include only a short distance (around 200m) on other roads, which cover the one-way section at the western end of Railway Road and the southern end of Burrows Avenue. There is also a school route servicing Tempe High School which runs on Unwins Bridge Road, Way Street, Toyer Street and Collins Street.
A bus depot is located on the corner of Princes Highway and Gannon Street. While local routes terminate at this location, the depot serves Metrobus buses only. It is expected that in the future this depot will service articulated buses only. The depot can be accessed via Gannon Street however the primary bus access is from Princes Highway.
Details of the bus routes operating within the St Peters/Tempe study area are shown in Figure 2.17.
2.7.3 Bicycles
Information on existing and proposed bicycle facilities within the study area was collected on site and details of the cycle network obtained from the Marrickville Bicycle Strategy adopted in 2007. There are a number of existing and proposed routes. There is a range of off-road facilities through park and recreational areas at the southern end of the study area, including the Cooks River Cycleway, which forms part of the Bay to Bay Walk. There are also some facilities in Tempe Recreation Reserve and a proposed path along Alexandra Canal to Canal Road, potentially linking to Princes Highway via Bellevue Road.
Routes through residential areas are primarily on-road and run primarily north-south along local roads, although there are also links to local facilities including Sydenham railway station.
The existing bicycle facilities in the St Peters/Tempe study area are shown in Figure 2.18.
2.7.4 Pedestrians
Pedestrian activity on week days within the St Peters/Tempe study area on the whole was observed by GTA Consultants to be relatively low even though this area is predominantly residential. The exceptions to this were the pedestrian activity associated with and in the vicinity of Sydenham Green and Sydenham Railway Station. This is concentrated around the morning and evening peak periods. There are also large numbers of school students who walk along Unwins Bridge Road and surrounding streets. This heavy usage is concentrated around the start and finish times of the school. Students appeared to be primarily from Tempe High School.
Pedestrian activity is often associated with other transport modes, such as people walking to train stations or bus stops.
Pedestrian crossings located on Unwins Bridge Road south of George Street and on Griffiths Street provide access to Sydenham and Tempe railway stations respectively. A signalised mid-block crossing outside Tempe High School and a pedestrian crossing on Unwins Bridge Road near Way Street provide key crossing points for school students.
On weekends there is higher pedestrian activity at the southern end of the study area associated with the Tempe Recreation Reserve, and with recreational users of pedestrian and cycle paths.
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
ÛÛ
ÛÛ
Û
Û
j
j
PRINCES HWY
UNWINS BRIDGE RD
HENRY ST
SWAMP RD
EDITH ST
STATION STPARK RD
MARY STSILVER ST
RAILWAY RD
GEORGE ST
TERRY ST
MAY ST
GROVE ST
SOUTH ST
UNION ST
EDWIN ST
SAMUEL ST
BELMORE ST
REILLY LANE
HART ST
SMITH STGANNON ST
BAY ST
PARK LANE
CAMPBELL ST
FREDERICK ST
YELVERTON ST
FOREMAN ST
CANAL ROAD
BARDEN ST
SUTHERLAND ST
FANNING ST
LYMERSTON ST
GRIFF
ITHS S
T
WAY ST
FLORENCE ST
ALFRED ST
RAILWAY LANE
ROWE LANE
BROWN ST
HUTCHINSON ST
BURROWS RD S
BELMORE LANE
RAILWAY PARADE
BURROWS AVE
STANLEY ST
WENTWORTH ST
LACKEY ST
COOK
ST
OLD ST
CHURCH ST
BROOKLYN ST
BOLTON ST
BELLEVUE STJOHN ST
BRIDGE ST
STEWART LANE
GLEESON AVE
QUAR
RY ST
IXION LANE
COLLINS ST
VIEW ST
TRAMWAY ST
SWAIN ST
ROBERTS ST
WILLIAM ST
HILLCREST ST
WELLS AVE
ALBION LANE
ROLFE LANE
ST PETERS ST
HOGAN AVE
NICHO
LSON
ST
BRIAR LANE
VICTORIA ST
APPL
EBEE
ST
BAKERS LANE
EDGAR ST
YOUNG ST
TALBOT STGREEN ST
ZUTTION LANE
ALBERT ST
HOLBEACH AVE
WOOD ST
ROWE ST
CONWAY PL
LESLIE ST
BEDWIN RD
SAMUEL LANE
HENRY LANE
RICHARDSONS CRESCENT
BISHOP ST
BERNE ST
DAGMAR ST
HUDSON ST
SILVER LANE
SCHOOL LANE
HILTON AVE
CAMPBELL ST
BELLEVUE ST
Job No
IS12550Drawing No Issue
Figure 2.17 P1
Drawing Status
Scale at A3
Drawing Title
Job Title
Clientwww.gta.com.au
0 200 400100
Metres
Issue Date By Chkd Appd
P1 16-11-10 BL RHH AS
LegendBus Route No.
348357418422648Out of ServiceBus Stops
Train StationsÛ One Lane Each WayÛÛ Two Lanes Each Wayj One Way
°
1:7,000
Marrickville Council
St Peters - Tempe LATM Review
Bus Network
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
j
ÛÛ
ÛÛ
Û
Û
j
j
PRINCES HWY
UNWINS BRIDGE RD
HENRY ST
SWAMP RD
EDITH ST
STATION STPARK RD
MARY STSILVER ST
RAILWAY RD
GEORGE ST
TERRY ST
MAY ST
GROVE ST
SOUTH ST
UNION ST
EDWIN ST
SAMUEL ST
BELMORE ST
REILLY LANE
HART ST
SMITH STGANNON ST
BAY ST
PARK LANE
CAMPBELL ST
FREDERICK ST
YELVERTON ST
FOREMAN ST
CANAL ROAD
BARDEN ST
SUTHERLAND ST
FANNING ST
LYMERSTON ST
GRIFF
ITHS S
T
WAY ST
FLORENCE ST
ALFRED ST
RAILWAY LANE
ROWE LANE
BROWN ST
HUTCHINSON ST
BURROWS RD S
BELMORE LANE
RAILWAY PARADE
BURROWS AVE
STANLEY ST
WENTWORTH ST
LACKEY ST
COOK
ST
OLD ST
CHURCH ST
BROOKLYN ST
BOLTON ST
BELLEVUE STJOHN ST
BRIDGE ST
STEWART LANE
GLEESON AVE
QUAR
RY ST
IXION LANE
COLLINS ST
VIEW ST
TRAMWAY ST
SWAIN ST
ROBERTS ST
WILLIAM ST
HILLCREST ST
WELLS AVE
ALBION LANE
ROLFE LANE
ST PETERS ST
HOGAN AVE
NICHO
LSON
ST
BRIAR LANE
VICTORIA ST
APPL
EBEE
ST
BAKERS LANE
EDGAR ST
YOUNG ST
TALBOT STGREEN ST
ZUTTION LANE
ALBERT ST
HOLBEACH AVE
WOOD ST
ROWE ST
CONWAY PL
LESLIE ST
BEDWIN RD
SAMUEL LANE
HENRY LANE
RICHARDSONS CRESCENT
BISHOP ST
BERNE ST
DAGMAR ST
HUDSON ST
SILVER LANE
SCHOOL LANE
HILTON AVE
CAMPBELL ST
BELLEVUE ST
Job No
IS12550Drawing No Issue
Figure 2.18 P1
Drawing Status
Scale at A3
Drawing Title
Job Title
Clientwww.gta.com.au
0 200 400100
Metres
Issue Date By Chkd Appd
P1 16-11-10 BL RHH AS
LegendLocal RoutesCooks River CyclewayAlexandra Canal CyclewayPotential Future ExtensionOff_RoadOn_Road
Û One Lane Each WayÛÛ Two Lanes Each Wayj One Way
°
1:7,000
Marrickville Council
St Peters - Tempe LATM Review
Bicycle Network
Existing Conditions Assessment
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 34
dra ft
2.8 Marrickville PAMP At the end of 2009 Marrickville Council undertook a review of their Pedestrian Access and Mobility Plan. The PAMP focuses on the high pedestrian use areas within the Marrickville Council area. Of note to this study is the Marrickville Road section which includes Gleeson Avenue which is inside our study area.
Priority pedestrian routes identified within the PAMP in the St Peters/Tempe study area are:
High Priority
• Gleeson Avenue
• Unwins Bridge Road (between Belmore Street and George Street).
Low Priority
• Unwins Bridge Road
• Bedwin Road.
The PAMP review recommended minor improvement to footpath condition and installation of new kerb ramps along Unwins Bridge Road and Gleeson Avenue but did not make any recommendations for new formal crossings within the study area.
2.9 Car Parking (On-Street) The St Peters/Tempe study area is predominantly made up of residential dwellings, some providing access to off-street parking. In addition, a mix of commercial and industrial development is located along the Princes Highway corridor and on the western side of Unwins Bridge Road north of Railway Road. Mary Street also accommodates some mixed uses.
Observations indicate that there is an existing moderate day time demand for on-street parking within the study area. A number of residential streets within the study area provide rear lane access for off-street parking with overall on-street demand observed to be in the order of 60% to 70% during the weekday day time period. The area surrounding Sydenham railway station experiences higher demand during the weekday period where unrestricted parking is available.
Observations during the weekday evening peak period, where demand is at its highest, indicate that the overall on-street parking demand is approximately 85% to 90% with some local variation depending on land use. Occupancy rates were highest in those streets with higher density residential uses on both sides of the street with minimal access to off-street parking.
2.10 Garbage Collection Marrickville Council has indicated that garbage collection occurs in the St Peters/Tempe area typically between 5am – 12pm on Fridays. Typically, 10.5m garbage trucks are used and their routes are not fixed.
Existing Conditions Assessment
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 35
dra ft
Figure 2.19: Daytime Parking (Samuel Street) Figure 2.20: Daytime Parking (Lymerston Street)
Figure 2.21: Evening Parking (Frederick Street) Figure 2.22: Evening Parking (Sutherland Street)
2.11 Initial Stakeholder Consultation As an initial step in the consultation process and in order to identify some of the key traffic issues experienced by the community and stakeholders GTA Consultants prepared and sent out correspondence at the end of August 2010 via e-mail to the following key stakeholders:
• Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA)
• State Transit Authority (STA)
• NSW Police
• NSW Emergency Service (Fire & Ambulance Services)
• Sydney Airport Corporation Limited (SACL)
• Tempe Primary and High Schools
• Other interested community groups (Church, Clubs, etc).
Initial feedback received from a number of stakeholders is detailed in Table 2.8.
Existing Conditions Assessment
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 36
dra ft
Table 2.8: Stakeholder Issues Organisation Main Comments
RTA
1. In relation to the introduction of a right turn into Gannon Street.
• Modelling would need to be undertaken to assess the impact on Princes Highway
• Assessment of turn paths for all vehicles would need to be undertaken
• Median gap at Station Street would need to be closed.
• Possible conflicts with STA Depot Access would need to be investigated
2. The RTA is aware of heavy congestion of Railway Road and is looking into options for the area. These are still in the planning stage.
STA
1. Access and egress from the STA Depot near the intersection of Princes Highway and Gannon Street will be from Princes Highway. 2. Buses entering the Depot from the north will do so via a right turn from Princes Highway through an existing break in the median. Buses will also turn right onto Princes Highway to head south through this break. 3. Request that any measures proposed along known bus routes be designed to cater for bus movements
SACL
1. The main area of interest is the volume of traffic on Bellevue Street and the need to provide sufficient treatment at the signalised intersection of Princes Highway and Bellevue Street. 2. Princes Highway and Bellevue Street intersection should be considered to providing the capacity for B-signals to facilitate a possible north-south bus corridor through SACL land for STA buses accessing the Tempe Depot. Note that SACL is considering development of a bridge over the Alexandra Canal from Airport Drive to its land south of Swamp Road. 3. Swamp Road container truck traffic is currently an aviation (obstacle limitation surface penetration) hazard. There should be a no-transgression zone either side of the landing lights on Swamp Road to ensure that there are no intrusions into airspace (note that the road has been constructed at the incorrect level, and should be a minimum 4.8 metres below the light plane). 4. The preservation of a viable foot and bike path along the Bellevue Street corridor.
Tempe Primary School
1. The main concern centred on traffic congestion during the AM and PM school peaks and the interaction with on-street peak periods, particularly during the PM peak with ‘rat run’ vehicles using Foreman Street and the rear laneway to access Edwin Street. 2. Congestion at the intersection of Brooklyn Street and the rear laneway during the PM peak. 3. General safety for school children.
Tempe High School Concern for school student safety in the vicinity of Unwins Bridge Road.
Existing Conditions Assessment
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 37
dra ft
2.12 Summary of Key Traffic and Transport Issues in St Peters/Tempe The key traffic and transport issues resulting from the assessment of the existing conditions within the St Peters/Tempe area have been identified as follows:
2.12.1 Traffic Volumes
• Unwins Bridge Road – carries approximately 1,200 and 1,600 vehicles per hour during the PM peak period south and north of Railway Road respectively. These traffic volumes are close to the operating capacities for the lane configuration of Unwins Bridge Road in each location.
• Mary Street carries approximately 6,000 vehicles per day and approximately 550 vehicles per hour during the PM peak period. These numbers exceed the desirable volumes for a local or collector road as recommended by the RTA.
• Railway Road – Classified as an arterial road it carries bi-directional traffic flows of approximately 10,100 vehicles per day. Eastbound traffic on the approach to Princes Highway experiences extensive delays, particularly during the PM peak period.
• Gannon Street – eastbound traffic on approach to Princes Highway experiences extensive delays during the AM peak period.
2.12.2 Traffic Speeds
• The 85th percentile speed recorded in a number of local streets, including Yelverton Street, Terry Street, Samuel Street, Lymerston Road and Smith street, are above the desired 85% speed of 40km/h for local roads. It should also be noted that these speeds do not however exceed the posted speed limit of 50km/hr.
• The 85th percentile speed recorded along Unwins Bridge Road of 55km/h is above the posted speed limit of 50km/h.
• The existing levels of LATM devices are generally effective in limiting speed to the desired mean 50km/hr speed limit.
2.12.3 Accidents
• Unwins Bridge Road has a significant number of pedestrian accidents in the area between Fredrick Street and Railway Road. As Part of the Sydenham LATM a Mid-block Marked Foot Crossing is proposed to be installed near the intersection of Swain Street which should reduce the risk of pedestrian accidents.
2.12.4 Cyclists
• The existing LATM devices have not been designed to accommodate the needs of cyclists.
2.12.5 Maintenance
• A number of existing LATM devices require re-linemarking in order to ensure they are sufficiently visible.
• A number of existing LATM devices require new or repaired signage in order to ensure they are sufficiently signposted and visible.
IKEA Traffic Impacts
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 38
dra ft
3. IKEA Traffic Impacts
3.1 Introduction GTA Consultants undertook an independent traffic impact assessment of the proposed IKEA site at 630-726 Princes Highway, Tempe in order to quantify the levels of additional traffic which the IKEA site would generate and in order to determine which routes this traffic would potentially take in arriving at and departing from the IKEA site once it was fully operational.
3.2 Development Site As GTA Consultants understands it the approved IKEA development site consists of the following:
• IKEA Bulky Goods Retail – 32,616m2 GLFA
• ATECO Commercial Office Building (Existing) – 4,530m2 GFA (IKEA Administration)
• On-site parking for a minimum of 1,775 vehicles (at-grade and basement parking).
It was also indicated in the original traffic impact assessment report that the Sydney Airport Corporation Limited (SACL) freight forwarding facility should also be included in the assessment which would only have impacts during the weekdays.
3.2.1 Access
The main site access is proposed by way of a new signalised intersection on the eastern side of Princes Highway, directly south of Lymerston Street with a secondary access proposed on Bellevue Street which would also be used by loading vehicles. It has been indicated by IKEA that the majority of heavy vehicle goods deliveries would originate from the M5 where there is a distribution centre with goods dispatched to IKEA once they arrive from Port Botany. It has also been indicated that these heavy vehicles would access the IKEA site outside of the network peak periods.
There is also a third access point south west of the site which joins Smith Street but this is proposed to be used as an emergency access only.
The proposed traffic plan is contained in Appendix C of this report.
3.2.2 Staff
It is estimated that there would be a requirement for 69 administration staff with 100 store staff during weekdays and 200 store staff on the weekends.
It has been indicated that the administrative staff would work normal office hours of between 7:30am-5:30pm but that the store staff’s starting times would be staggered from 9:45am and increased towards the peak trading period of midday and early afternoon before tapering off into the late afternoon and evening.
3.3 Traffic Generation The forecast traffic generation of the approved IKEA Tempe store has been determined on the basis of the following:
• GTA Consultants empirical data relating to the existing IKEA at Victoria Gardens in Richmond, Victoria.
• GTA Consultants empirical data relating to the existing IKEA in Springwood, Queensland.
IKEA Traffic Impacts
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 39
dra ft
• Roads and Traffic Authority, Trip Generation and Parking Generation Surveys, Bulky Goods/Hardware Stores – Analysis Report 2009. (Latest Research Report).
It is important to note that research undertaken by the RTA for various bulky goods sites have determined that the peak periods for this type of development are on a Thursday PM and Saturday midday. These peak periods represent the worst case scenario so that the most robust measures can be formulated to mitigate these impacts.
3.3.1 Other IKEA Stores - Trip Generation Rates
GTA Consultants undertook surveys of the existing IKEA located at Victoria Gardens Shopping Centre in Richmond, Victoria as part of the transport impact assessment undertaken in 2007 for the proposed IKEA development at 917 Princes Highway, Springvale. The Victoria Gardens IKEA had a Gross Leasable Floor Area of 22,500m2 whilst the Springvale IKEA had a GLFA of 32,005m2, the latter being comparable in size to the IKEA in St Peters/Tempe.
Details of these surveys are included in a report prepared by GTA Consultants on the 29th August 2007 titled “917 Princes Highway, Springvale – Traffic and Parking Impact Assessment.”
These surveys were undertaken on a Friday, 16th March 2007 and Saturday, 17th March 2007 during the daytime and evening peak periods and in relation to traffic generation included the following:
i Customer mode split to car
ii Customer car occupancy
iii Customer person movements
iv Customer vehicle movements (by applying car occupancy)
v With (iii) and (iv) measured for both the store peak and the road network peak periods on each surveyed day.
vi Staff mode split
vii Staff vehicle movements during the road network peak
viii IKEA annual trading patterns
ix Statistics on IKEA primary purpose trips versus other associated development primary purpose trips.
In summary these surveys indicated trip generation rates for the IKEA development site at Victoria Gardens as indicated in Table 3.1.
Table 3.1: Victoria Gardens IKEA, Richmond, Victoria – Surveyed Customer Trip Generation Rates
Item No. Day of Week Trip Generation Rate (Road Network
Peak Period) Adjusted Trip Generation Rates
(Road Network Peak Period) 1. Friday 1.14 vehicles/100m2 GLFA 1.32 vehicles/100m2 GLFA
2. Saturday 3.74 vehicles/100m2 GLFA 3.53 vehicles/100m2 GLFA
Note: These rates include adjustments to represent the 85th percentile and an adjustment to reflect 100% primary trips to IKEA.
GTA Consultants also obtained Saturday trip generation data from IKEA for their store at Springwood in Queensland (Surveyed on 25th November 2006) as part of the Springvale assessment for comparison purposes in relation to the above which is detailed below in Table 3.2.
Table 3.2: Springwood IKEA, Queensland – Trip Generation Rates
Item No. Day of Week Trip Generation Rate (Road Network Peak Period) 1. Saturday 3.83 vehicles/100m2 GLFA
As indicated in Table 3.2 the Saturday trip generation rate for IKEA Springwood of 3.83 vehicles/100m2 GLFA compared favourably with GTA Consultants surveyed result of 3.74 vehicles/100m2 GLFA before any adjustments were applied.
IKEA Traffic Impacts
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 40
dra ft
3.3.2 Roads and Traffic Authority, Trip Generation and Parking Generation Surveys, Bulky Goods / Hardware Stores – Analysis Report 2009.
In addition to the above surveyed IKEA rates GTA Consultants also sourced the latest research undertaken by the RTA for Bulky Goods type development which is part of an on-going RTA program to update outdated trip and parking generation data contained within the RTA ‘Guide to Traffic Generating Developments, October 2002.
Information obtained from this research report indicated average road network peak period trip generation rates within the Sydney Metropolitan Area as follows:
• Weekday – 1.42vehicles/100m2 GFA
• Weekend – 2.24 vehicles/100m2 GFA.
It is also acknowledged that IKEA stores are unique and have different characteristics to normal bulky goods stores. Bulky goods stores are typically showrooms where goods are displayed but once purchased by the customer are dispatched from separate warehouses. At IKEA stores however the goods are stored on-site and collected on the day of purchase. For the purposes of this assessment GTA Consultants have not utilised the rates for bulky goods developments determined by the RTA.
3.3.3 Tempe IKEA Traffic Generation
The estimated traffic generation for the IKEA site at 630-726 Princes Highway has been based on IKEA rates described previously within this section of the report and are detailed in Table 3.3.
Table 3.3: Traffic Generation Table
Development Type Size Peak Hour Trip
Rates (Thur) Peak Hour Trip
Rates (Sat) Total Trips Thur
(In and Out) Total Trips Sat (In and Out)
IKEA Bulky Goods Retail 32,616m2 GLFA 1.32/100m2
GLFA 3.53/100m2
GLFA 431 1151
ATECO Office Building [1]
4,530m2 GFA (69 Staff) 35 -
Weekday IKEA Staff 100 Staff - - 10[2] -
Weekend IKEA Staff 200 Staff - - - 20[2]
SACL Freight Forwarding Facility[3]
81 -
Total 557 1171
Notes: 1. Assumes that 50% of administration staff would drive to IKEA based on 2006 Census journey to work mode split for Marrickville LGA. Assumes that no administrative staff work on a Saturday. 2. Assumes 20% of store staff arrives during the road network peak periods and that 50% drive to work based on 2006 Census journey to work mode split for Marrickville LGA. 3. Traffic generation figure extracted from the original IKEA traffic impact assessment report.
The traffic generation assessment indicated in Table 3.3 is a relatively conservative assessment and needs to consider the various trip types which are likely to occur as a result of the new IKEA. These trip types are described typically as follows:
• New trips (completely new trips generated by IKEA)
• Undiverted linked trips (Sometimes referred to as pass by or drop in trips which are those vehicles that are already on the Arterial road network and drop in to IKEA as part of their existing trip)
• Diverted linked trips (Those vehicles that are already on the local road network and are diverted to IKEA as part of their existing trip).
Research undertaken on behalf of the NSW Traffic Authority (RTA) in August 1987 and detailed further in the Queensland Department of Main Roads “Road Planning & Design Manual (2001), indicates that it is reasonable to discount the traffic generation to reflect trip linking provided that the discount is applied
IKEA Traffic Impacts
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 41
dra ft
correctly.
Table 3.4: Proportion of Drop-In Trips
Table 3.4 indicates the proportion of trips which can be discounted in relation to drop in/ undiverted linked trips and diverted linked trips.
Trip Type Discount Proportions
Thursday Saturday Drop-In Trip (Undiverted Linked Trip) 20% 12%
Diverted Linked Trips 30% 20%
As indicated it is important that these discounts are applied correctly. In the case of the pass by trips the correct application is to apply the 20% and 12% discounts to the existing through traffic on the arterial road network (i.e. Princes Highway) and to maintain the levels of generated traffic turning into and out of the site.
In the case of the application of the diverted linked trips there is a range of existing local network trip combinations which, without further detailed surveys, would be difficult to quantify. As such GTA Consultants have not considered the latter discounts which provides for a more conservative assessment which, in the case of a development of this scale, is important.
In order to obtain a comparable indication of the traffic generation in relation to the original IKEA traffic assessment GTA Consultants have applied the undiverted linked trips discounts to the total trip generation figures resulting in the following total peak hour traffic generation for the IKEA site:
• Thursday – 471 trips
• Saturday – 1033 trips.
3.4 Distribution and Assignment The directional distribution and assignment of traffic generated by IKEA is influenced by a number of factors including:
i The configuration of the arterial road network in the immediate vicinity of the IKEA site
ii The existing operation of intersections providing access between the local and arterial road network
iii The configuration of the access points to the IKEA site.
GTA Consultants also referenced the “Tempe IKEA, Sydney, Economic Impact Assessment, 2008” report which provided guidance on the main trade areas of the Tempe IKEA.
Having consideration to the above, for the purposes of estimating vehicle movements, the wider directional distributions have been assumed as follows:
• 35% North (Princes Highway, Railway Road/Marrickville Road/Sydenham Road, Bedwin Road/ Edgeware Road)
• 15% West (Bayview Avenue)
• 30% South & West (Princes Highway/M5)
• 20% East (Canal Road/Gardeners Road).
It has also been assumed that 70% of traffic entering and exiting the IKEA site would use the main Princes Highway access with the remaining 30% using the Bellevue Street access.
A 50/50 directional split of traffic (i.e. the ratio between the inbound and outbound traffic movements) has also been assumed for the IKEA site during the Thursday PM and Saturday peak periods.
Details of the directional distribution assumptions are indicated graphically in Figure 3.1.
IKEA Traffic Impacts
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 42
dra ft
Figure 3.1: IKEA Directional Traffic Distribution
3.5 Inbound & Outbound IKEA Traffic Routes & Traffic Levels In order to accurately assign IKEA generated traffic to the surrounding road network (State, Regional and Local roads) requires an understanding of the likely inbound and outbound routes that traffic would take when arriving and departing the IKEA site.
It is reasonable to assume that a large proportion of the IKEA customers would originate from outside of the local area would not be familiar with the local road network and as such would, on the whole, use the main arterial routes to and from IKEA.
It is also reasonable to assume that there would be those people that are more local and that are familiar with the local road network who would seek “short cuts” to access IKEA.
Based on this assumption and an assessment of the current road network operation and in the context of the proposed IKEA access locations GTA Consultants determined the key local routes and percentages of additional IKEA traffic likely to use these routes both on a Thursday and Saturday as indicated graphically in Figure 3.2 and Figure 3.3.
Primary Route
Secondary Route
Proposed IKEA access
Percent of IKEA Traffic
IKEA Traffic DistributionInbound Traffic
21 %
6.5%
.5%4
12%
20%53%
51%
%5
24%
30%
3%
1%5
15%
8%
47%
X%
Figure 3.2
Primary Route
Secondary Route
Proposed IKEA access
Percent of IKEA Traffic
IKEA Traffic DistributionOutbound Traffic
12%
5%
%3
10%
20%83%
51%
5%
42%
30%
%3
1%5
15%
8%
47%%3
3%
%2
X%
Figure 3.3
IKEA Traffic Impacts
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 45
dra ft
With regard to these distribution percentages and assuming existing conditions, GTA have determined the equivalent levels of traffic likely to occur on the road network both inbound and outbound on a Thursday and Saturday as a result of IKEA. Details of the existing peak hour traffic volumes together with the corresponding additional IKEA traffic and equivalent percentage increases are provided graphically in Figure 3.4 to Figure 3.7.
Further detail of the estimated traffic volume increases for the local roads only are summarised in Table 3.5.
Table 3.5: Local Road IKEA generated traffic routes (Inbound & Outbound) & estimated increased traffic levels
Item No. Street Name
Thursday PM Peak Hour Traffic Increase
Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Increase
Inbound Traffic
Existing Volume
Future Increase
% Increase
Existing Volume
Future Increase
% Increase
1. Foreman Street 40/hr 14/hr +35% 44/hr 33/hr +75%
2. Samuel Street 20/hr 9/hr +45% 23/hr 22/hr +96%
3. Gannon Street 669/hr 25/hr +37% 583/hr 61/hr +10%
Outbound Traffic 1. Union Street 112/hr 26/hr +23% 63/hr 61/hr +97%
2. Lymerston Street 48/hr 10/hr +21% 41/hr 25/hr +61%
3. Samuel Street 65/hr 6/hr +9% 50/hr 14/hr +28%
4. Terry Street 40/hr 6/hr +15% 36/hr 14/hr +39%
Primary Route
Secondary Route
Proposed IKEA access
IKEA Traffic ImpactThursday Inbound Traffic Volumes
235Vehicles/Hour
4.%2
5
):
115(+
88 5
.8%669
25): 3.%
(+
7
1
:
%
2900(+00) 3
.5
4
)2
269(+
74:
.8%
171(
) 2.4%
5+42
:
08(32
: 1.6%
20+
)
0(+1): 35
0%
4
4
.
(+94
20):
5.0%
1(+
39%
6726):
.
8): . %
869(+0 9
7) . %
409(+: 1 7
869(17):
2.0%
+
815(11
: 1.3%
+)
Figure 3.4
Primary Route
Secondary Route
Proposed IKEA access
235Vehicles/Hour
2.1%
290
89): 3.1
%
0(+
1226):
3
1(+
2.2%
5
1
:.6
%
115(+
00) 6
1
)5
159(+
80:
.3%
64(+4
: 6.5%
62)
2(2):
3.3%
98+3
IKEA Traffic ImpactThursday Outbound Traffic Volumes
(+120
8%
480):
.(+6
9
65):
.2%(
1
40+6):
5.0%
905(+20) 2
2%:
.
4(+1.
%
556):
18
6): . %
69(+0 7
32 3.7%
869(+):
409(16):
3.9%
+
474(4):
0.8%
+
8110) 1.2%
5(+:
Figure 3.5
Primary Route
Secondary Route
Proposed IKEA access
IKEA Traffic ImpactSaturday Inbound Traffic Volumes
10%
1445213):
17%
(+
4.583
61): 105%
(+
.
2
:
8
1850(+38) 1
2.%
2
7
187(+
17):
9.7%
1130(+101): .0%
9
34(76
: 6.2%
12+
)
4(+3): 75
0%
4
3
.
(+2
%
232): 96.0
7(+
80%
7561):
.
18 3.3%
632(+):
15 3.3%
495(+):
632(40):
7.3%
+
825(25):
3.0%
+
515Vehicles/Hour
Figure 3.6
Primary Route
Secondary Route
Proposed IKEA access
IKEA Traffic ImpactSaturday Outbound Traffic Volumes
515Vehicles/Hour
6.8%
180
212): 11
.5%
5(+
(+696
8%
631):
.
9
2
:.7
100(+
41) 12
%
3
2
198(+
19):
9.9%
92(+1
1): 11.0%
20
+:
7
1128(
76) 6. %
(+261
0%
415):
.(+1
80%
504): 2
.(
36+14): 38.8%
716(+49) 6
8%:
.
5(+
35%
4215):
.6
15) 2.4%
32(+:
6376) 12 0
2(+:
. %
495(37):
7.5%
+
117
(1
: 0.9%
3+
0)
2
1009(+25):
.5%
Figure 3.7
IKEA Traffic Impacts
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 50
dra ft
3.6 Previous IKEA Traffic Impact Assessment Reports Transport and Traffic Planning Associates (TTPA) completed a summary assessment of the potential traffic implications of the proposed IKEA in July 2008 as part of a Part 3A application to the Department of Planning submitted by Valad Pty Ltd.
In late 2008, Transport and Urban Planning (TUP) was commissioned by Marrickville Council to review the TTPA report with a focus on traffic generation and assignment with consideration for the local streets located within close proximity to the IKEA site.
Although there were differences in opinions between the two traffic consultants when it came to traffic generation levels the RTA ultimately approved the original traffic assessment undertaken by TTPA.
Details of the traffic generation levels calculated by TTPA, TUP and GTA Consultants are provided in Table 3.6 for comparison purposes.
Table 3.6: Comparison of Total Traffic Generation
Peak Period
TTPA TUP GTA
Rate
Peak Hour Trips
(Without Discount)
Peak Hour Trips
(With Discount)
Rate Trips/hr Rate
Trips/hr (Without
Discount)
Trips/hr (With
Discount)
Thursday PM
0.82 trips/10
0m2
GLFA
320 224
(+30+81) = 335
1.5 trips/100m2 GLFA
600
1.32 trips/10
0m2
GLFA
431 (+45+81) =
557 471
Saturday Midday
1.8 trips/10
0m2 GLFA
700 406 2.5
trips/100m2 GLFA
1000
3.53 trips/10
0m2
GLFA
1151 1033
Although it is not our role on this project to provide critique to the analysis undertaken in the past it is however worth noting that the design of the IKEA signal intersection on Princes Highway is influenced by the levels of traffic generation estimated as part of the assessment process.
In this regard it would be advisable for the RTA to undertake some traffic sensitivity analysis to ensure that the operation of this and other intersections along Princes Highway can sustain traffic volumes two and a half times more than what was originally estimated during the Saturday peak period.
IKEA should also be conscious of additional customer delay which could be experienced at the IKEA site as a result of this additional traffic generation.
Community Consultation
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 51
dra ft
4. Community Consultation Detailed stakeholder and resident consultation was undertaken as part of this study which, in summary included the following:
• Stakeholder Meetings with the Roads and Traffic Authority, State Transit Authority, NSW Police, Sydney Airport Corporation Limited (SACL) and the Tempe Action Group (TAG)
• Community Update Meeting
• Community group specific consultation letters (i.e. St Peters/Tempe Public and High Schools, Churches etc)
• Community Questionnaire (hard copy mail out and on-line)
• Community Presentation and Workshop.
It is important to understand that this consultation was based on an initial concept LATM scheme (Refer Appendix D) developed by GTA Consultants.
During the course of the consultation it became evident that this initial concept LATM scheme did not go far enough in addressing the communities concerns, regardless of the technical basis, and it was recommended that a more progressive approach be adopted for the St. Peters – Tempe area to primarily address the potential through traffic from IKEA. This approach was supported by Marrickville Council.
As such the feedback and analysis of the above consultation has been assessed and incorporated, where relevant, into the development of a more progressive concept LATM scheme for the St Peters/Tempe study area.
Further details of the consultation feedback are presented in a separate report prepared by KJA Consultants titled “St Peters – Tempe LATM Study Consultation Summary Report – Volume 1”.
St Peters/Tempe Proposed LATM Measures
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 52
dra ft
5. St Peters/Tempe Proposed LATM Measures
5.1 Introduction Sections one and two of this report have provided GTA Consultants with a very good understanding of the traffic situation within the St Peters/Tempe study area and in particular the existing issues which occur within the study area on a daily basis. This section of the report seeks to develop LATM proposals which address the existing issues together with potential issues associated with the IKEA development in order to further improve the safety and accessibility within the study area.
5.2 Key Objectives The key objectives for the framing of the LATM proposals to address the issues identified within this study were:
i To review effectiveness of the existing LATM measures and to identify any shortcomings which would affect the function they were intended to perform.
ii To reduce traffic speeds on local roads where warranted.
iii To investigate and implement measures to limit through traffic routes and maintain appropriate traffic volumes in all local streets.
iv To investigate and implement measures to limit potential inbound and outbound future IKEA traffic in all local streets.
v To investigate and implement measures to improve safety and operation of all traffic within the LATM area.
vi To identify measures to improve pedestrian and cyclist safety and accessibility through the study area.
5.3 Review/Audit of Existing LATM Measures The existing LATM devices within the St Peters/Tempe study area were introduced by Marrickville Council to manage traffic volumes and speed within local streets between Princes Highway and Unwins Bridge Road. In order to determine the location, type and condition of the LATM measures GTA Consultants undertook a comprehensive audit of all LATM devices within the study area.
The results of this audit are shown in Table 5.1 which sets out the maintenance requirements for each LATM measure. It is also noted that the height and dimensions of each road hump within the study area should be checked against RTA Guidelines with repair work to be carried out where necessary.
St Peters/Tempe Proposed LATM Measures
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 53
dra ft
Table 5.1: LATM Audit Measures
Item No. Treatment Type Location Quantity Maintenance Treatment
1 Speed Hump
Silver Street (west end) 1 Clean/replace advisory speed sign (westbound)
Mary Street 3 Repair humps, repaint line marking to Australian Standards
Grove Street 3 Repaint line marking to Australian Standards
Foreman Street 3 Repaint line marking to Australian Standards
Union Street (near school) 1 Repaint line marking to Australian Standards
South Street 2 Repaint line marking to Australian Standards
Station Street West (east end) 1 Repaint line marking to Australian Standards, repair fallen speed hump sign
Station Street West (middle) 1 Repaint line marking to Australian Standards
Station Street West (west end) 1
Repaint line marking to Australian Standards, clean/replace advisory speed sign
2 Raised Table
Sutherland Street 3 Repaint line marking to Australian Standards
Frederick Street (west end) 1
Repaint line marking to Australian Standards, replace missing westbound speed hump warning/advisory speed signs
Frederick Street (middle, east end) 2 Repaint line marking to
Australian Standards
George Street 3 Repaint line marking to Australian Standards
Samuel Street (west end, middle) 2 Repaint line marking to
Australian Standards
Lymerston Street (west end) 1 Correct upside down advisory speed sign at raised table
Edwin Street 2 Repaint line marking to Australian Standards
Griffith Street 1 Repaint line marking to Australian Standards
Unwins Bridge Road outside high school 1 Repaint line marking to
Australian Standards
3 Rumble Bar Median Island
Grove Street (at Unwins Bridge Road) 1 Replace missing rumble bars,
repaint line marking
Terry Street (at Unwins Bridge Road) 1 Replace missing rumble bars,
repaint line marking
Samuel Street (at Unwins Bridge Road) 1 Replace missing rumble bars,
repaint line marking
Edwin Street (at Union Street) 1 Replace missing rumble bars, repaint line marking
Edwin Street (at Gannon Street) 1 Replace missing rumble bars, repaint line marking
4 Median Island Yelverton Street 1 Repaint line marking leading into median island
5 Pedestrian Crossing
Unwins Bridge Road near Belmore Street 1 Repaint pedestrian crossing
Union Street outside school 1 Repaint pedestrian crossing
Griffith Street 1 Repaint pedestrian crossing
St Peters/Tempe Proposed LATM Measures
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 54
dra ft
5.4 Proposed LATM Measures In determining appropriate LATM treatments for the St Peters/Tempe study area which address the existing and potential issues identified within this report, GTA Consultants referenced a number of design guidelines, particularly the Austroads Guide to Traffic Engineering Practice Part 10 - Local Area Traffic Management, 2004. These guidelines provide a clear indication of the types of treatments available, which issues they best address, and the advantages and disadvantages of each treatment.
For the purposes of describing the proposed LATM measures, the study area has been divided into the following sections:
• Northern Section (Campbell Street to Railway Road)
• Southern Section A (Railway Road to Lymerston Street)
• Southern Section B (Foreman Street to Holbeach Avenue).
A discussion of the existing localised issues and proposed LATM measures with further supporting analysis are provided below.
5.5 Northern Section
5.5.1 Speed and Volume
The existing traffic speed within the Northern Section streets remain within their environmental performance standards. The majority of the existing LATM devices were working effectively though some areas have been identified as requiring updating or additional devices provided to ensure they comply with current standards.
A number of local streets experience through traffic during the AM and PM peak periods to access Princes Highway and Unwins Bridge Road. Although the existing LATM devices were working effectively to limit these, including a number of banned left turns onto Princes Highway during the AM peak, additional more effective devices at regular intervals are proposed. These include speed humps designed to also narrow the road width and a banned right turn from Unwins Bridge Road into Grove Street during the AM peak period.
5.5.2 Pedestrians/Cyclists
It is proposed to install bicycle logos along Henry Street and establish cyclist access to Sydenham Railway Station via Reilly Lane and Swain Street using the new Unwins Bridge Road pedestrian lights as approved by Marrickville Council under the Sydenham LATM. Pedestrian refuge islands proposed for Henry Street intersections slow traffic and reinforce pedestrian amenity in local streets.
5.5.3 Impact of Proposed Measures
The proposed LATM measures have been designed to minimise impacts on local streets while encouraging peak period through traffic to remain on the arterial road network. Treatments to address speed and volume along with a turn ban and cyclist/pedestrian facilities reinforce the local street environment.
A summary of the Northern Section measures are presented in Table 5.2 and illustrated in Figure 5.5.
St Peters/Tempe Proposed LATM Measures
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 55
dra ft
Table 5.2: Northern Section Proposed LATM Measures
LATM Type Plan Reference Location Quantity Watts Profile Speed Humps 1,2 Edith Street
Mary Street 2
Single lane slow point with Flat top speed hump
4,8 Fredrick Street Sutherland Street
3
Median Islands 5,7,9,11 Sutherland Street Frederick Street
4
Pedestrian Refuge Islands 6,10,12,13 Sutherland Street Frederick Street Yelverton Street George Street
16
Bike Pavement Logos 15,16,17 Swain Street Reilly Lane Henry Street
~
Right Turn Ban 3 Unwins Bridge Road into Grove Street 1
Bicycle Lanterns addition to marked foot crossing
14 Unwins Bridge Road 1
Kerb extensions and driveway works
19 Railway Road 1
Signal Phase adjustment 18 Railway road into Unwins Bridge Road 1
Figure 5.1: Single Lane Slow Point with Flat Top Speed Hump.
Figure 5.2: Watts Profile Speed Hump
Figure 5.3: Median Islands on Flat Top Road Hump Figure 5.4: Bicycle Logos
Proposed LATM DevicesNorthern Section
Figure 5.5
St Peters - Tempe LATM Review
Marrickville Council
Is12550
Install Bicycle lanterns on new mid-block crossing.
14
Install two watts profile speed humps and associated signage in Edith Street approximately 90m apart.
1
Amend kerb extensions at entrance to Railway Road at Gleeson Street to shorten length of existing pedestrian crossing.
19
Install watts profile speed hump in Mary Street approximately 20m from Princes Highway.
2
Install right turn ban in Unwins Bridge Road at Grove Street between 6:00am-10:00am Monday to Friday.
3
Install Bicycle logos along Henry Street and Reilly Lane.
17
15
Install Bicycle logos along Swain Street.
16 Install single lane slow point on existing flat top road hump with associated line marking and signage.
48
Install single lane slow point on existing flat top road hump with associated line marking and signage.
59
711
Install median island on existing flat top road hump with associated line marking.
Install median island on existing flat top road hump with associated line marking
Install pedestrian refuge islands at the intersections of Sutherland Street/Henry Street, Frederick Street/Henry Street, Yelverton Street/Henry Street and George Street/Henry Street.
6101213
Install right turn arrows on Railway Road for vehicles turning into Unwins Bridge Road.Install left turn arrow westbound along Railway Road for vehicles turning into Unwins Bridge Road southbound (for pedestrian protection).(Subject to RTA Agreement)
18
Northern Section
One Way
Two Lanes
Previously Approved Sydenham LATM Measures
C
Reduce the number of lanes from Mary Street to Unwins Bridge Road and widen the footpath on southern side(Subject to RTA Agreement)
C
Reduce the number of traffic lanes on Canal Road directed into Mary Street(Subject to RTA Agreement)
B
Hogan Avenue median island
D
Relocated pedestrian signalised crossing(Subject to RTA Agreement)
E
E
A
A
Road Hump
AAA
40km/h zone in Florence Street
St Peters/Tempe Proposed LATM Measures
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 57
dra ft
5.6 Southern Section A The proposed LATM measures are designed to address the following concerns:
• Existing traffic cutting through the local streets in an eastbound direction during the weekday AM peak period to access Princes Highway.
• Potential inbound and outbound traffic associated with IKEA.
• On-street parking demand.
The proposed LATM measures for local streets within Southern Section A are consistent and are designed to create an equal effect. Measures include turn bans, partial road closures, angled parking, pedestrian facilities and improving existing devices.
5.6.1 Speed and Volume
The existing traffic speeds and volumes within Southern Section A remain within their environmental performance standards. The majority of the existing LATM devices were working effectively though some areas have been identified as requiring updating or additional devices provided to ensure they comply with current standards.
It is proposed to alter the flat top speed humps at the western end of Lymerston Street, Samuel Street and Terry Street to incorporate a speed hump with single lane slow point to limit both speed and volume. Left turn bans enforced by kerb extensions and the median closure at Lymerston Street (part of IKEA development) and Samuel Street limit potential inbound and outbound IKEA traffic. Terry Street measures address similar concerns while maintaining access for the service station at its eastern end. Park Road measures are designed to address similar issues, though given its proximity (close to Railway Road) and variety of land use, the measures are less restrictive.
SIDRA Intersection analysis has been completed under expected volumes for the intersections of Unwins Bridge Road with Foreman Street, Lymerston Street and Terry Street with each intersection level of service and delay remaining at levels shown under existing conditions.
It is also recommended that appropriate signage be located at the intersection of Railway Road and Unwins Bridge Road to direct vehicles approaching from the north (southbound on Unwins Bridge Road) and the west (eastbound on Gleeson Avenue) to use Railway Road to access IKEA. These directional signs may be located on Unwins Bridge Road north of Railway Road (directing traffic to turn left at Railway Road) and on Gleeson Avenue west of Unwins Bridge Road (directing traffic to continue straight to Princes Highway).
5.6.2 Parking
Existing peak parking demand within the local streets is an existing concern. The proposed 45 degree parking in Terry Street between Unwins Bridge Road and Henry Street addresses this along with reducing traffic lane widths, traffic speeds and reinforcing the local street environment.
5.6.3 Pedestrians/Cyclists
The proposal to install bicycle logos along the existing Belmore Street bike route reinforces this route and provides improved cyclist amenity. This route would connect with the new pedestrian crossing and proposed shared path along the IKEA Princes Highway frontage and potential future bike routes east to Alexandria Canal. Pedestrian refuge islands, kerb extensions and pram ramps also improve and reinforce pedestrian facilities.
St Peters/Tempe Proposed LATM Measures
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 58
dra ft
5.6.4 Impact of Proposed Measures
The proposed LATM measures in Southern Section A have been designed to minimise impacts on local streets while encouraging peak period through traffic and potential future IKEA traffic to remain on the arterial road network. This is achieved by treating local streets with similar measures. The proposal to ban entry to local streets from Princes Highway effectively reduces two-way traffic volumes, with residents able to use Unwins Bridge Road to access their streets.
A summary of the Southern Section A measures are presented in Table 5.3 and illustrated in Figure 5.10.
Table 5.3: Southern Section A Proposed LATM Measures
LATM Type Plan Reference Location Quantity Kerb Extensions 27 Terry Street 4
Signal lane slow point with Flat top speed hump 21,26,30,33
Park Road Terry Street Samuel Street Lymerston Street
4
Raised Threshold with Driveway Treatment 23 Park Road 1
Pedestrian Refuge Islands 20,22 Park Road at Unwins Bridge Road Park Road at Henry Street
4
Bike Pavement Logos 24 Belmore Street ~
Half Road Closure 31,34
Samuel Street at Princes Highway (left out only) Lymerston Street at Princes Highway (left out only)
2
Bicycle Lanterns addition to marked foot crossing 29 Princes Highway at Terry Street 1
Driveway Link (one-way) 28 Terry Street (eastbound traffic only 1
45 Degree Angled Parking 25 Terry Street 1
Median Island 32 Princes Highway at Samuel Street 1
Figure 5.6: Driveway link Figure 5.7: Pedestrian Refuge Islands
Figure 5.8: Half Road Closure Figure 5.9: Kerb Extensions
25
33
27
22
20
Install pedestrian refuge islands at the intersection of Park Road and Henry Street.
Install pedestrian refuge island in Park Road at Unwins Bridge Road.
Install kerb extensions, pram ramps and associated line marking at the intersection of Terry Street and Henry Street.
Install single lane slow point on existing flat top road hump with associated line marking and signage.
Install single lane slow point on existing flat top road hump with associated line marking and signage.
30
26
Install half road closure and associated pram ramps, line markings and signage in Lymerston Street at Princes Highway. Allows for left turns out only.
Install half road closure and associated pram ramps, line marking and signage in Samuel Street at Princes Highway. Allows for left turns out only.
Close gap in existing median island along Princes Highway at Samuel Street.
Install 45 degree parking along the northern side of Terry Street with associated line marking and signage.
34
31
32
28
Install one way driveway link treatment in Terry Street approximately 20m from Princes Highway. To operate eastbound only.
Install raised threshold with driveway treatment in Park Road at Princes Highway.
Gap in existing median island along Princes Highway at Samuel Street to be closed as part of IKEA intersection works.
Install Bicycle logos along Belmore Street.
Install Bicycle lanterns on new pedestrian crossing as part of intersection upgrades.
24
29
23Proposed LATM DevicesSouthern Section A
Figure 5.10
St Peters - Tempe LATM Review
Marrickville Council
Is12550
IKEA
IKEA Access
Shared Path along the frontage of IKEA.
Southern Section A
One Way
One Lane
Two Lanes
21
Install single lane slow point with flat top road hump and associated line marking and signage.
Install single lane slow point with flat top road hump and associated line marking and signage.
Marked Foot Crossing to be installed on southern side of Bellevue Street (Across Princes Highway) as part of IKEA Works
St Peters/Tempe Proposed LATM Measures
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 60
dra ft
5.7 Southern Section B The proposed LATM measures are designed to address the following concerns:
• Existing traffic cutting through the local streets during the weekday AM and PM peak periods.
• Potential inbound and outbound traffic associated with IKEA.
The proposed LATM measures for local streets within Southern Section B are consistent and are designed to limit through traffic. Measures include turn bans, partial road closures, shared 10km/h zone and raised treatments to restrict access. Options concerning Union Street and Gannon Street access at Princes Highway are also discussed.
The proposed measures are described below and illustrated in Table 5.6 and Figure 5.16.
5.7.1 Speed and Volume
The existing traffic speeds and volumes within Southern Section B remain within their environmental performance standards. The majority of the existing LATM devices were working effectively though some areas have been identified as requiring updating or additional devices provided to ensure they comply with current standards.
It is proposed to install a number of raised threshold driveway treatments on Foreman Street to limit traffic volumes, particularly between School Lane and Princes Highway. These measures are proposed to address both existing AM through traffic and potential IKEA inbound traffic. Closure of Foreman Street to through traffic is not recommended for a number of reasons, primarily the anticipated flow on effects for the local streets to the north. Existing conditions show that although AM peak period traffic cuts through the local streets, this is distributed evenly across the whole study area and allows all streets to remain within their environmental capacities, including Foreman Street.
It is also recommended that appropriate signage be placed at the intersection of Unwins Bridge Road and Richardsons Crescent to direct vehicles approaching from the west (eastbound on Richardsons Crescent) to turn left and use Gannon Street to access IKEA. Directional signs may be located on Richardsons Crescent west of Unwins Bridge Road (directing traffic to turn right onto Unwins Bridge Road) and/or on Unwins Bridge Road opposite Richardsons Crescent (directing traffic to turn right onto Unwins Bridge Road).
Rumble bars to reduce speed and a left turn ban, limit the incentive for traffic to cut through using Edwin Street during the PM peak. Smith Street speed cushions are proposed to address an existing speed concern and are designed to accommodate trucks.
Station Street has also been treated to ensure improved resident access while limiting through traffic and maintaining on-street parking where practical. It is proposed to maintain Station Street one-way westbound (i.e. away from Princes Highway) as far as Cook Street where it will intersect with one-way eastbound traffic. Both approaches will be directed down Cook Street (to be made one-way southbound) where the road network is not proposed to change, permitting vehicles to turn left to access Princes Highway, or right to Quarry Street. In addition, it is proposed to install two-way traffic flow on Station Street between Quarry Street and Griffiths Street with a no stopping area to improve passing opportunities. These measures allow for efficient resident access to/from Princes Highway in the east and Unwins Bridge Road in the west. The circuitous nature of this local area would prevent through traffic and provide a local street environment.
In addition, options for the treatment of Union Street and Gannon Street are discussed in detail below.
St Peters/Tempe Proposed LATM Measures
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 61
dra ft
5.7.2 Union Street Assessment
Union Street is a narrow one-way westbound street (i.e. away from Princes Highway). It has a width of between 6.5-7.0m with parking on both sides as indicated in Figure 5.11 and Figure 5.12. It is predominantly residential along its length with Tempe Public School located at the western end.
Figure 5.11: Union Street Figure 5.12: Union Street
Existing traffic volumes recorded by GTA Consultants for Union Street are indicated in Table 5.4.
Table 5.4: Union Street Existing Traffic Volumes
Day & Time Period Traffic Volume 5 day Weekday Average AM 58/hr
5 day Weekday Average PM 108/hr
Thursday PM Peak 112/hr
Saturday Midday Peak 63/hr
The 85th percentile speed recorded on Union Street over the seven day Monday to Sunday period was 42 km/hr.
When compared against the RTA’s Environmental Performance Standards Traffic Volumes & Speed, which it should be noted are standards based on previous research relating to safety, accessibility and noise, even if these standards were halved to account for the one-way operation of Union Street then the current traffic volumes and speeds are currently within acceptable limits for this local street.
Given that Union Street presents the first opportunity for southbound traffic to turn right from Princes Highway and, in this case, under signal control it is inevitable that some traffic would use Union Street when leaving IKEA and travelling south-west.
5.7.3 IKEA Traffic Implications – Thursday & Saturday Peak Periods
GTA Consultants estimated the expected scale and distribution of traffic once IKEA is fully operational as detailed in section three of this report. To summarise, Union Street would be impacted by traffic departing IKEA to the south-west with an estimated 12% distribution of outbound traffic using Union Street during the peak Thursday and Saturday periods. These peak periods are typically assessed as they represent the worst case scenario and as such allow measures to be developed to cater for the worst case situation.
The corresponding traffic volumes based on a 12% distribution equates to 26 additional vehicles per hour during the Thursday peak period and an additional 61 vehicles per hour during the Saturday peak period. Detail of the respective increases, as a comparison to the existing traffic volumes, is included in Table 5.5.
St Peters/Tempe Proposed LATM Measures
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 62
dra ft
Table 5.5: Estimated Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (Post IKEA Development)
Street Name
Thursday PM Peak Hour Traffic Increase
Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Increase
Environmental Performance Standards
Outbound Traffic Local Road Union Street 112/hr 26/hr +23% 63/hr 61/hr +97% 200/hr (Ideal) 300/hr (Max)
Even though it is acknowledged that the traffic in Union Street during the Saturday peak period would almost double, Table 5.5 still indicates that Union Street traffic volumes on a peak Thursday (138/hr) and peak Saturday (124/hr) would still be within the RTA Environmental Performance standards for a local road following the operation of IKEA.
It is also recognised that the RTA environmental capacity standards relate to two-way traffic flow and in situations where the street operates as one-way there could be a case for reducing these limits but acknowledging that these limits relate to safety & amenity which aren’t always directly related to whether the street is one-way or two-way. i.e. 200 vehicles per hour is the ideal volume in relation to noise & pollution for a local road which is the limit regardless if the street is one-way or two-way whereas cross-ability and safety are impacted by whether or not the street is one-way or two-way.
5.7.4 Local Area Traffic Management Options
GTA Consultants have recognised that Union Street is likely to absorb the largest proportion of additional traffic resulting from IKEA and have also recognised the characteristics of Union Street, which is a narrow street with parking on both sides, and more significantly that Tempe Public School is located at the western end.
In addition, there was support from Union Street residents (both written and at the workshop) that they did not want any IKEA traffic using their street and would prefer measures which prevented access even if this resulted in a level of inconvenience when it came to accessibility.
In this regard GTA Consultants developed two options for Union Street which were discussed with the RTA as follows:
5.7.5 Option A – Ban right turn into Union Street/Re-introduce right turn at Gannon Street
The main aim of Option A is to remove all right turning traffic into Union Street and replace this with a right turn into Gannon Street. The re-introduction of the right turn at Gannon Street would compensate, to a degree, for the loss of inconvenience by providing an alternative access for residents. It should also be noted that Gannon Street currently carries significantly larger volumes of traffic than Union Street and as such is likely to be able to accommodate the additional traffic which would use Gannon Street as a result of this banned turn i.e. the existing traffic which turns right at Union Street currently and the additional IKEA traffic. Details of the diverted traffic as a result of this proposal are included in Figure 5.15.
Initial feedback received from the RTA in relation to Option A was that there could be road network benefits for the RTA on Princes Highway as a consequence of this proposal though further traffic modelling was required to ensure that the right turn into Gannon Street did not queue across the existing bus depot entry/exit and cause additional delays for buses and that the intersection of Gannon Street be assessed to ensure that the geometry allowed for right turning vehicles.
In conjunction with this the RTA also requested that the median on Princes Highway at Station Street be closed to improve safety at this location. The consequences of this closure, is that access to Station Street from the north is restricted to the following:
• undertaking a G-turn deviation via Smith Street, South Street and Holbeach Avenue
St Peters/Tempe Proposed LATM Measures
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 63
dra ft
• reconfiguring the western end of Station Street to permit two-way access between Griffith Street and Quarry Street
• providing a mini roundabout on Holbeach Avenue east of Princes Highway to permit u-turns.
It is estimated that this proposal would remove all associated IKEA traffic together with a proportion of existing through traffic currently using Union Street during the Thursday and Saturday peak periods which could equate to as much as a 65% reduction over existing traffic volumes. It is also important to note that Edwin Street, Stanley Street and Zuttion Lane would potentially become the alternative access for local Union Street traffic with this option.
In addition, the potential effects include a negligible increase in traffic flows along the local streets east of Princes Highway as a number of local residents have indicated that they perform the G-turn deviation under existing conditions. A Holbeach Avenue mini roundabout would also have a negligible effect on residents and traffic flows.
Tempe Public School were consulted on Option A and agreed, in principle, that this option would not adversely impact on school access routes and the set down/pick up arrangements but would limit the level of traffic using Union Street.
In addition to this Tempe Public School also highlighted an existing local speeding issue on Brooklyn Street associated with a local business activity.
5.7.6 Option B – Remove right turn signal phase into Union Street/Do not re-introduce right turn at Gannon Street
The aim of Option B is not to remove all right turning traffic but to lessen the impact of the existing and IKEA through traffic on Union Street by making the right turn into Union Street less attractive. The removal of the dedicated right turn signal phase, which operates as a leading controlled right turn for a few seconds before dropping out and becoming a right turn filter, would discourage right turning through traffic from using this location but still allow local access to occur. The removal of this right turn signal phase would however need to be implemented in combination with right turn ban restrictions during the AM (6:00am-10:00am) and PM (3:00pm-7:00pm) peak periods to improve safety. The result is that right turn movements into Union Street would only be permitted during the off peak periods.
Options A and B also need to consider potential additional traffic as a result of Samuel Street and Lymerston Street Princes Highway median closures. A percentage of southbound right turning vehicles would continue south and potentially turn right at Gannon Street in Option A and at Union Street outside of peak times and/or Station Street in Option B.
It is important to note that the above proposals are subject to further analysis and discussion with the RTA.
5.7.7 Option C – Union Street/Foreman Street Internal Road Closures
GTA Consultants also received an alternative proposal recommended by the residents of Union Street which included the full closure of Union Street between Edwin Street and School Lane and Foreman Street at its western end. This is a scheme which could be considered further if Option A is not supported, and ultimately not approved by the RTA.
A review of this proposal indicated that there would be relatively significant changes in relation to Tempe Public School access and set down/pick up operations.
Closing Foreman Street east of Unwins Bridge Road would result in a change in the arrival route for parents and impact on current operations. Foreman Street is also narrow and implementing a two-way operation would result in a loss of on-street parking for residents and parents equally. In addition, the potential
St Peters/Tempe Proposed LATM Measures
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 64
dra ft
increase in traffic volumes on adjacent streets to the north (Lymerston, Samuel and Terry Streets) resulting from the closure of Foreman Street would need to be carefully considered as part of this proposal.
The final scheme adopted for this part of St Peters/Tempe could become a combination of Options A, B and C following the outcomes of further RTA discussions and the formal public exhibition process.
It is important to note that all of the above options for Union Street would reduce traffic volumes sufficiently to allow a shared zone to be installed at the western end of Union Street adjacent to the school which would provide priority for pedestrians and reduce the overall speed limit to 10km/hr improving safety generally.
5.7.8 Tempe Public School Consultation
As Tempe Public School is a major vehicle generator in the Union Street local area, the various implications of Options A, B and C have been discussed in detail with the school. Approach and departure routes along with student set down/pick up requirements are central to an efficient operation during the AM and PM school peak times.
With this in mind, it is the opinion of the school that their preferred option is Option A as it best addresses Union Street traffic volumes whilst maintaining appropriate school access via Foreman Street and School Lane. It is also considered that Brooklyn Street traffic volumes would remain at similar levels under Option A conditions.
Option B and Option C were least preferred by Tempe Public School with Option B only providing limited benefits in restricting traffic flows along Union Street. Although Option C would reduce traffic volumes in Union Street, it would also result in significant changes to the school’s access and set down/pick up arrangements, with Brooklyn Street traffic volumes possibly increasing due to the closure of the western end of Foreman Street.
A summary of the Southern Section B measures are presented in Table 5.6 and illustrated in Figure 5.16.
St Peters/Tempe Proposed LATM Measures
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 65
dra ft
Table 5.6: Southern Section B Proposed LATM Measures
LATM Type Plan Reference Location Quantity Kerb Extensions 38.41,50 Unwins Bridge Road
Station Street at Cook Street Union Street at Princes Highway
4
Speed Cushions 42 Smith Street 4
Raised Threshold with Driveway Treatment
35,36,37 Foreman Street 3
Pedestrian Refuge Islands 47 Gannon Street 1
Safety Fence Replacement
39 Unwins Bridge Road at Union Street 1
Rumble Bar Median Islands
43 Edwin Street Tramway Street
3
Left Turn Ban 48 Edwin Street into Gannon Street 1
Right Turn Ban 41 Princes Highway into Union Street 1
No Stopping Signage 44,52 Unwins Bridge Road between Richardsons Crescent and Gannon Street Station Street at Nicholson Street and Quarry Street
3
Kerb Extension Removal 46 Gannon Street 1
Dual Lane Extension 46 Gannon Street 1
Raised Shared Zone 40 Union Street 1
Traffic Directional Change
50, 51,53 Station Street Cook Street
4
Median Island 49 Princes Highway at Station Street 1
Signal Phase adjustment 41,45 Princes Highway into Gannon Street Princes Highway into Union Street
2
Figure 5.13: Rumble Bar Median Islands Figure 5.14: Raised Threshold with Driveway treatment
Gannon Street Right TurnAssessment
BAN RIGHT TURN INTOUNION STREET
INTRODUCE RIGHT TURN ATGANNON STREET
WEEKDAYPM PEAK
SATURDAYPEAK
39*v/h
39+61=100v/h
76*v/h
76+23=99v/h
Right Turn Movements at Union Street
WEEKDAYPM PEAK
SATURDAYPEAK
63v/h
63+61= 124 v/h+97%
112v/h
112+23= 135 v/h+21%
Traffic Volumes Along Union Street
Northbound
Existing
with IKEA
WEEKDAYPM PEAK
SATURDAYPEAK
430v/h
430+100= 530 v/h+24%
500v/h
500+99= 599 v/h+20%
Traffic Volumes Along Gannon Street
WEEKDAYPM
SATURDAYPEAK
580v/h
580+61=641 v/h10%
680v/h
680+25=705 v/h+4%
Northbound
Existing
With Right Turn
Permitted
Southbound
Existing
with IKEA
Right Turn
Existing
with IKEA
Existing Through Route
Proposed Through Route
* Turning volumes calculated using counts undertaken by GTA Consultants along Union Street(2010) and Intersection counts conducted by Transport And Traffic Planning Associates at the intersection of Union Street and the Princes Highway(2008)
. of D
= 45
No
wellings
N.
fw
en
s=
o o
Dlli
g
55
Figure 5.15
37
Install raised threshold with driveway treatment in Foreman Street at Princes Highway.
Install raised threshold with driveway treatment in Foreman Street at School Lane and change priority into School Lane.
Install raised threshold with driveway treatment in Foreman Street at Unwins Bridge Road.
36
35
Install kerb extensions at existing mid-block crossing on Unwins Bridge Road.
38
Replace existing fence to improve sightlines from Union Street.
39
Install rumble bar median islands and associated line marking at the intersection of Edwin Street and Tramway Street.
43
Install No Stopping signage on both sides of Unwins Bridge Road between Richardsons Crescent and Gannon Street to allow for improved traffic flow. Reposition centerline accordingly.
44
Instate two-way traffic flow on Station Street between Griffiths Street and Quarry Street with associated linemarking and signage.
53
51
Reverse One-Way direction on Station Street between Quarry Street and Cook Street.
Install kerb extensions in Station Street at Cook Street to direct vehicles into Cook Street. Cook Street to be One-Way southbound.
49
Option A: Close gap in median island in Princes Highway at Station Street.
Option A: Install right turn arrow into Gannon Street from Princes Highway.
Option A: Ban right turn from Princes highway and through movement from Smith Street into Union Street. Install kerb extensions in Union Street at the Princes Highway to allow left turns from Princes Highway only.
Remove right turn signal phase from Princes highway into Union Street and ban right turn into Union Street during AM and PM peak periods. Right turn from Princes Highway and through movement from Smith Street remains possible outside peak periods.
Option B:
41
42
Install four speed cushions and associated line marking and signage in Smith Street. Speed cushions to be placed in pairs approximately 80m apart.
Install left turn ban in Edwin Street at Gannon Street between 3:30pm-6:30pm Monday to Friday.
48
47
46
Install pedestrian refuge island and associated line marking and signage on Gannon Street at Edwin Street.
Remove existing kerb extension on the northern side of Gannon Street and extend two trafficable lanes eastbound to approximately 150m from Princes Highway.
40
Install raised shared zone 10kph with associated line marking; signage and bollards.
Proposed LATM DevicesSouthern Section B
Figure 5.16
St Peters - Tempe LATM Review
Marrickville Council
Is12550
52
Install No Stopping signage on Station Street in the vicinity of Nicholson Street & Quarry Street to allow passing opportunities.
45
50
Southern Section B
One Way
One Lane
Consultation with Tempe Public School. Recommend LATM devices (such as speed cushions, speed humps and/or raised threshold treatment) to address local issue and reduce speed. Possible locations include 45m west of Princes Hwy, adjacent to No. 19 Brooklyn St and on Brooklyn St at School Ln.
Draft LATM Scheme Traffic & Access Implications
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 68
dra ft
6. Draft LATM Scheme Traffic & Access Implications
The LATM measures discussed in Section five have obvious implications on through traffic routes and resident access to local streets. The greatest impacts are on local streets in the vicinity of IKEA with consideration extending to all local streets in the St Peters/Tempe study area. Accessibility implications as a result of changes to traffic volume and distribution following completion of the LATM measures and IKEA are discussed below and shown in Figure 6.1 and Figure 6.2.
It is important to note that the traffic volumes shown in the figures are those anticipated following the IKEA opening and assuming no LATM measures in place.
The bracketed number shows the effect of the LATM measures and the subsequent percentage change.
6.1 Northern Section There are relatively few access implications for local streets in the northern section of the study area as a result of the draft LATM scheme. This is a result of the existing measures mostly performing their function with minor impacts anticipated from IKEA traffic.
The Grove Street AM peak right turn ban is designed to reduce through traffic volumes while maintaining acceptable resident access. Frederick Street eastbound volumes are expected to increase to approximately 110 vehicles per hour (up from 70 vph) during the AM peak to accommodate this.
6.2 Southern Section A There are a number of access implications for local streets in Southern Section A as a result of the draft LATM scheme. This is primarily as a result of the anticipated impacts of IKEA traffic.
Left turn bans and median closures proposed for Lymerston Street and Samuel Street, together with Terry Street closure to westbound vehicles, are expected to decrease westbound volumes by up to 80% (approximately 60 vph) west of Princes Highway. While this restricts PM peak through traffic routes, residents approaching from the north would need to use Unwins Bridge Road via Railway Road and Gannon Street (subject to RTA approval) to access their street.
On departure, residents would use Unwins Bridge Road and Gannon Street to access the south. As a result, traffic at the western end (Unwins Bridge Road) is expected to increase by up to 35%.
Overall, Lymerston Street, Samuel Street and Terry Street are expected to see lower traffic volumes as a result of the proposed LATM measures.
6.3 Southern Section B There are also a number of access implications for local streets in Southern Section B as a result of the draft LATM scheme. This is as a result of the anticipated impacts of IKEA traffic.
Union Street traffic is expected to decrease by up to 65% (approximately 90 vph) as a result of restricting access to left-in only via Princes Highway. Residents would need to use Gannon Street (subject to RTA approval), Edwin Street, Stanley Street and Zuttion Lane to access Union Street with traffic increases on these local streets expected to be up to 35 vph. Westbound Gannon Street traffic would also increase by up to 35% (approximately 180 vph). Conversely, traffic volumes on Edwin Street (southbound) and Tramway Street (westbound) are expected to decrease by up to 75% (approximately 50 vph).
Draft LATM Scheme Traffic & Access Implications
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 69
dra ft
Foreman Street proposed measures are intended to reduce incentive for use as a through traffic route, while maintaining resident and Tempe Public School access. Traffic volumes are expected to reduce slightly as a result of the proposed measures.
As discussed above, the potential impacts of Option C on the operation of Tempe Public School and, more generally, the streets within Southern Section B would require further analysis and consultation.
35(+10):+
29%
45(-30:-6
%
)7
0
30(+15):+
5%
670(-
0):-86%
51
)33%
4(+
5:+
60(-45):-75%
(+35)
140(9
:-4
-0)
6%
(+80)
35%
5201
:+
(695 +5):+1%
55(-5):-10%
+35
(
)
80(-50):-63%
105(-50
:-48%
)
+3
:+
10(5)
350%
60(-40):-67%
%
420(+5):+
1
875(+10):1
%
70(-65):- 39 %
Percentage Changein Traffic Volume
Effect of LATM Measures
Projected Traffic Volumes After IKEA Opening and Without LATM Measures
Direction of Travel
Effect of LATM MeasuresThursday PM Peak
Figure 6.1
30(+10):+
33%
50(-40:-8
%
)0
45(-5):-11%
65(-55):-85%%
01
)30%
5(+
5:+
70(-60):-86%
(+20)
125(8
:-4
-0)
6%
(+30)
33%
3951
:+
(645 +5):+1%
80(-5):-6%
+20
(
)
55(-40):-73%
470(-
0):-57%
+2
:+
15(0)
133%
65(-40):-62%
3
510(+15):+
%
650(+20):+
3%
70(-65):- 39 %
Percentage Changein Traffic Volume
Effect of LATM Measures
Projected Traffic Volumes After IKEA Opening and Without LATM Measures
Direction of Travel
Effect of LATM MeasuresSaturday Peak
Figure 6.2
Cost Estimates & Implementation Program
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 72
dra ft
7. Cost Estimates & Implementation Program Cost estimates were determined from information provided in Austroads Guide to Traffic Engineering Practice Part 10 - Local Area Traffic Management, 2004 and from rates obtained by GTA Consultants on previous projects.
The implementation program has been determined primarily on the basis of IKEA measures taking priority together with safety and public amenity improvements (i.e. priority given to those measures that if implemented would deliver the most benefit) but also taking into consideration the approval processes and costs of some of the measures.
7.1 Cost Estimates All cost estimates prepared by GTA Consultants are for broad level or initial feasibility planning only and must not be relied on for the purposes of quoting, budgeting or construction. Detailed cost estimates should be sought from a suitably qualified civil engineer or quantity surveyor in this regard. Table 7.1 provides a summary of estimated costs of the proposed LATM measures for the St Peters/Tempe study area. Detailed estimates are also included as Appendix E.
Table 7.1: Summary of Proposed LATM Estimated Costs
Item Description Section Total
Estimated Costs1 Northern Southern A Southern B Maintenance $35,100 $9,900 $17,200 $62,200
Proposed LATM Devices $172,400 $344,900 $296,400 $813,700
Cyclist Facilities $3,700 $3,000 $0 $6,700
Other Treatments $0 $0 $56,000 $56,000
Subtotal $211,200 $357,800 $369,600 $938,600
1 Estimated costs are inclusive of all Associated Drainage Works (10%) and Contingency (15%).
The proposed LATM measures have been prioritised for which Marrickville Council can use as the basis for the allocation of funding. This is shown on the detailed estimates which are provided in Appendix F.
Conclusions & Recommendations
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report Page: 73
dra ft
8. Conclusions & Recommendations • The existing LATM measures, on the whole, have been effective in reducing the speed and volume
within the local streets of St. Peters/Tempe which is reflected by the fact that the existing speeds and volumes are, in the main, within the RTA’s environmental performance standards for local roads.
• Future peak traffic volumes resulting from the IKEA development, anticipated to use local roads within the study area, are not estimated to be of a magnitude that would warrant full road closures. i.e. maximum increase in IKEA traffic for any one street is estimated to be 61 vehicles per hour or approximately 1 vehicle every minute.
• However there are specific streets within the St Peters/Tempe study area which have restrictive geometry and characteristics which could be more significantly impacted by the additional estimated levels of IKEA traffic.
• Community views have been mixed in terms of accepting the trade off between the loss of accessibility and convenience versus achieving a decrease in traffic volumes in the local streets by way of half or full road closures.
• GTA Consultants amended LATM concept plan provides a more robust scheme which, in the main, aims to re-direct IKEA traffic to the main arterial road network and should better reflect community views.
• Further detailed work on assessing the impacts of the right turn ban into Union Street, by way of traffic modelling of the Princes Highway, is required as a priority.
• Feedback received from Tempe Public school indicates that the resident alternative scheme (Option C) for Union Street and Foreman Street is not the preferred option as it would result in a fundamental change to access and set down/pick up arrangements.
• The Draft concept LATM proposals developed by GTA Consultants should be reported to Marrickville Council with a view to be placed on public exhibition.
Appendix A
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report
Ap
pen
dix A
Appendix A
Traffic Survey Data
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.A Reliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic Counts Ph.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
All All
Vehicles Vehicles
Time Per R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT Time Per R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT
1600 - 1615 0 394 18 0 0 0 25 176 215 352 118 29 1327 1100 - 1115 0 206 23 0 0 0 23 239 201 131 103 28 954
1615 - 1630 0 449 15 0 0 0 22 202 152 320 130 35 1325 1115 - 1130 0 200 25 0 0 0 26 228 176 174 65 25 919
1630 - 1645 0 383 20 0 0 0 19 210 199 337 87 34 1289 1130 - 1145 0 213 20 0 0 0 21 314 204 146 58 18 994
1645 - 1700 0 495 17 0 0 0 12 215 153 309 127 22 1350 1145 - 1200 0 250 34 0 0 0 26 258 230 181 85 25 1089
1700 - 1715 0 497 19 0 0 0 16 227 144 331 113 29 1376 1200 - 1215 0 255 20 0 0 0 17 281 186 163 73 29 1024
1715 - 1730 0 465 13 0 0 0 14 229 139 321 122 28 1331 1215 - 1230 0 257 19 0 0 0 17 245 201 175 73 30 1017
1730 - 1745 0 478 24 0 0 0 21 212 137 321 107 20 1320 1230 - 1245 0 285 26 0 0 0 17 289 202 165 74 31 1089
1745 - 1800 0 425 25 0 0 0 18 205 168 337 116 20 1314 1245 - 1300 0 272 25 0 0 0 13 252 235 188 87 15 1087
Period End 0 3586 151 0 0 0 147 1676 1307 2628 920 217 10632 1300 - 1315 0 285 30 0 0 0 25 278 183 175 55 24 1055
1315 - 1330 0 240 22 0 0 0 21 219 210 163 62 42 979
1330 - 1345 0 245 22 0 0 0 28 258 224 174 80 26 1057
1345 - 1400 0 296 42 0 0 0 37 265 212 135 68 35 1090
1400 - 1415 0 279 29 0 0 0 23 253 183 203 91 22 1083
1415 - 1430 0 293 28 0 0 0 25 248 182 202 73 21 1072
1430 - 1445 0 247 24 0 0 0 20 273 181 203 70 27 1045
1445 - 1500 0 312 31 0 0 0 17 219 185 206 83 19 1072
Period End 0 4135 420 0 0 0 356 4119 3195 2784 1200 417 16626
Peak Time R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT Peak Time R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT
1600 - 1700 0 1721 70 0 0 0 78 803 719 1318 462 120 5291 1100 - 1200 0 869 102 0 0 0 96 1039 811 632 311 96 3956
1615 - 1715 0 1824 71 0 0 0 69 854 648 1297 457 120 5340 1115 - 1215 0 918 99 0 0 0 90 1081 796 664 281 97 4026
1630 - 1730 0 1840 69 0 0 0 61 881 635 1298 449 113 5346 1130 - 1230 0 975 93 0 0 0 81 1098 821 665 289 102 4124
1645 - 1745 0 1935 73 0 0 0 63 883 573 1282 469 99 5377 1145 - 1245 0 1047 99 0 0 0 77 1073 819 684 305 115 4219
1700 - 1800 0 1865 81 0 0 0 69 873 588 1310 458 97 5341 1200 - 1300 0 1069 90 0 0 0 64 1067 824 691 307 105 4217
1215 - 1315 0 1099 100 0 0 0 72 1064 821 703 289 100 4248
1230 - 1330 0 1082 103 0 0 0 76 1038 830 691 278 112 4210
1245 - 1345 0 1042 99 0 0 0 87 1007 852 700 284 107 4178
1300 - 1400 0 1066 116 0 0 0 111 1020 829 647 265 127 4181
1315 - 1415 0 1060 115 0 0 0 109 995 829 675 301 125 4209
1330 - 1430 0 1113 121 0 0 0 113 1024 801 714 312 104 4302
1345 - 1445 0 1115 123 0 0 0 105 1039 758 743 302 105 4290
1400 - 1500 0 1131 112 0 0 0 85 993 731 814 317 89 4272
PEAK HOUR 0 1935 73 0 0 0 63 883 573 1282 469 99 5377 PEAK HOUR 0 1113 121 0 0 0 113 1024 801 714 312 104 4302
EAST
Princess Hwy Mary St Princess Hwy Canal Rd Princess Hwy Mary St Princess Hwy Canal Rd
Mary St Princess Hwy Canal Rd
NORTH WEST SOUTH EAST NORTH WEST SOUTH
EASTNORTH WEST SOUTH EAST
Princess Hwy Mary St Princess Hwy Canal Rd Princess Hwy
ClientJob No/Name
Day/Date
NORTH WEST SOUTH
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
2008 N 1234982 1128
0 73 0 121
0 646 0 9220 99 0 1040 469 0 3120 1282 0 714
532 1850 425 1130
63 573 113 8013217 1827
1519 1938
Princess Hwy Princess Hwy
Canal Rd Mary St
1067 3765 1556
Princess Hwy
TOTAL VOLUMESFOR COUNT
Princess Hwy PERIODS
4401
Mary St Canal Rd
0 1458
Princess Hwy Princess Hwy
Canal Rd Canal Rd
883 1024
1645 - 1745 1330 - 1430
1935 1113Mary St Mary St
ClientJob No/Name
Day/Date
Princess Hwy Princess Hwy
PM PEAK HOUR Sat PEAK HOUR
45554536
69197670
37371893
62143130
0 3615
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
All Vehicles All Vehicles
Time Per T L R L R T TOTAL Time Per T L R L R T TOTAL
1600 - 1615 210 2 1 5 5 198 421 1100 - 1115 146 8 3 10 11 276 454
1615 - 1630 245 9 0 1 4 231 490 1115 - 1130 155 6 3 7 10 201 382
1630 - 1645 215 6 2 3 2 150 378 1130 - 1145 142 8 1 4 7 238 400
1645 - 1700 260 7 2 2 6 196 473 1145 - 1200 169 6 4 5 1 241 426
1700 - 1715 248 8 0 9 3 210 478 1200 - 1215 164 12 1 5 6 198 386
1715 - 1730 226 1 1 6 2 199 435 1215 - 1230 177 5 3 6 6 214 411
1730 - 1745 263 7 1 4 4 194 473 1230 - 1245 162 6 4 9 12 230 423
1745 - 1800 221 6 1 6 4 181 419 1245 - 1300 172 6 2 11 12 238 441
Period End 1888 46 8 36 30 1559 3567 1300 - 1315 153 6 3 5 4 219 390
1315 - 1330 158 1 4 3 7 217 390
1330 - 1345 162 3 1 4 8 228 406
1345 - 1400 146 10 2 6 10 224 398
1400 - 1415 173 10 0 13 8 222 426
1415 - 1430 159 7 4 4 6 194 374
1430 - 1445 145 3 1 5 7 226 387
1445 - 1500 180 4 3 4 8 220 419
Period End 2563 101 39 101 123 3586 6513
Peak Per T L R L R T TOTAL Peak Per T L R L R T TOTAL
1600 - 1700 930 24 5 11 17 775 1762 1100 - 1200 612 28 11 26 29 956 1662
1615 - 1715 968 30 4 15 15 787 1819 1115 - 1215 630 32 9 21 24 878 1594
1630 - 1730 949 22 5 20 13 755 1764 1130 - 1230 652 31 9 20 20 891 1623
1645 - 1745 997 23 4 21 15 799 1859 1145 - 1245 672 29 12 25 25 883 1646
1700 - 1800 958 22 3 25 13 784 1805 1200 - 1300 675 29 10 31 36 880 1661
1215 - 1315 664 23 12 31 34 901 1665
1230 - 1330 645 19 13 28 35 904 1644
1245 - 1345 645 16 10 23 31 902 1627
1300 - 1400 619 20 10 18 29 888 1584
1315 - 1415 639 24 7 26 33 891 1620
1330 - 1430 640 30 7 27 32 868 1604
1345 - 1445 623 30 7 28 31 866 1585
1400 - 1500 657 24 8 26 29 862 1606
PEAK HR 997 23 4 21 15 799 1859 PEAK HR 664 23 12 31 34 901 1665
Edith St Unwins Bridge
Rd
Unwins Bridge
Rd
Edith St Unwins Bridge
Rd
Unwins Bridge
Rd
EAST SOUTH
Unwins Bridge
Rd
Edith St Unwins Bridge
Rd
NORTH EAST SOUTH
NORTH EAST SOUTH NORTH EAST SOUTH
ClientJob No/Name
Day/Date
NORTH
Unwins Bridge
Rd
Edith St Unwins Bridge
Rd
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
1020 68719 N 913
997 23 664 23
38 574 1221 31
25 43
799 15 901 341018 695
814 935
15671934 2664
15891924 2664
Edith St Edith St
Unwins Bridge Rd
44 140
3709
PERIODS
3625
76 224
Unwins Bridge Rd Unwins Bridge Rd
TOTAL VOLUMES
FOR COUNT
Unwins Bridge Rd Unwins Bridge Rd
Job No/NameDay/Date
Client
PM PEAK Sat PEAK
1645 - 1745 1215 - 1315
Edith St Edith St
Unwins Bridge Rd Unwins Bridge Rd
Unwins Bridge Rd
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.A Reliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic Counts Ph.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 12th & Saturday 7th August 2010
All All
Vehicles Vehicles
Time Per R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT Time Per R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT
1600 - 1615 13 20 1 4 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 46 1100 - 1115 2 3 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 9
1615 - 1630 19 6 0 6 1 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 38 1115 - 1130 4 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 11
1630 - 1645 15 8 0 0 0 2 0 5 0 0 0 1 31 1130 - 1145 4 12 0 4 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 23
1645 - 1700 10 11 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 1145 - 1200 2 6 0 2 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 18
1700 - 1715 17 8 0 0 1 4 1 3 1 0 0 0 35 1200 - 1215 4 5 0 5 0 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 22
1715 - 1730 13 11 0 0 1 3 1 3 0 2 0 0 34 1215 - 1230 1 4 0 6 0 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 18
1730 - 1745 18 10 0 1 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 36 1230 - 1245 4 4 0 2 0 9 1 2 1 0 0 0 23
1745 - 1800 14 6 0 2 0 4 1 2 0 1 0 0 30 1245 - 1300 4 4 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 17
Period End 119 80 1 16 3 33 3 14 2 4 1 2 278 1300 - 1315 6 4 0 3 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 19
1315 - 1330 4 7 0 1 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 17
1330 - 1345 4 6 0 1 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 16
1345 - 1400 1 4 0 3 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 13
1400 - 1415 4 4 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 0 1 0 17
1415 - 1430 1 3 0 4 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 13
1430 - 1445 4 9 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 19
1445 - 1500 3 7 0 6 1 3 0 1 1 1 1 0 24
Period End 52 84 2 45 3 50 17 18 2 3 3 0 279
Peak Time R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT Peak Time R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT
1600 - 1700 57 45 1 13 1 17 0 5 1 1 1 1 143 1100 - 1200 12 23 1 8 2 8 5 1 0 1 0 0 61
1615 - 1715 61 33 0 9 2 14 1 8 2 1 0 1 132 1115 - 1215 14 25 0 12 2 11 7 3 0 0 0 0 74
1630 - 1730 55 38 0 3 2 13 2 11 1 2 0 1 128 1130 - 1230 11 27 0 17 1 13 8 4 0 0 0 0 81
1645 - 1745 58 40 0 4 2 16 2 7 1 2 0 1 133 1145 - 1245 11 19 0 15 1 21 7 6 1 0 0 0 81
1700 - 1800 62 35 0 3 2 16 3 9 1 3 0 1 135 1200 - 1300 13 17 1 15 0 20 5 8 1 0 0 0 80
1215 - 1315 15 16 1 13 0 17 5 9 1 0 0 0 77
1230 - 1330 18 19 1 8 0 16 5 8 1 0 0 0 76
1245 - 1345 18 21 1 7 0 10 5 7 0 0 0 0 69
1300 - 1400 15 21 0 8 0 9 6 5 0 1 0 0 65
1315 - 1415 13 21 0 8 0 11 4 4 0 1 1 0 63
1330 - 1430 10 17 0 11 0 12 4 3 0 1 1 0 59
1345 - 1445 10 20 0 11 0 12 3 3 0 1 2 0 62
1400 - 1500 12 23 0 14 1 13 1 4 1 1 3 0 73
PEAK HOUR 57 45 1 13 1 17 0 5 1 1 1 1 143 PEAK HOUR 11 19 0 15 1 21 7 6 1 0 0 0 81
EAST
Edwin St Tramway St Edwin St Tramway St Edwin St Tramway St Edwin St Tramway St
Tramway St Edwin St Tramway St
NORTH WEST SOUTH EAST NORTH WEST SOUTH
EASTNORTH WEST SOUTH EAST
Edwin St Tramway St Edwin St Tramway St Edwin St
ClientJob No/Name
Day/Date
NORTH WEST SOUTH
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 12th & Saturday 7th August 2010
103 N 3019 21
57 1 11 0
31 3 37 213 1 15 0
1 1 1 017 1 21 0
58 3 18 0
0 1 7 163 40
6 14
32 200 63 138
19 117 37 137
98 7
Edwin St Edwin St
Tramway St Tramway St
123 7 72
Edwin St
TOTAL VOLUMESFOR COUNT
Edwin St PERIODS
6
Tramway St Tramway St
52 6
Edwin St Edwin St
Tramway St Tramway St
5 6
1600 - 1700 1145 - 1245
45 19Tramway St Tramway St
ClientJob No/Name
Day/Date
Edwin St Edwin St
PM PEAK HOUR Sat PEAK HOUR
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
All Vehicles All Vehicles
Time Per T L R L R T TOTAL Time Per T L R L R T TOTAL
1600 - 1615 194 14 0 0 6 104 318 1100 - 1115 100 7 0 0 2 121 230
1615 - 1630 218 9 0 0 7 103 337 1115 - 1130 123 8 0 0 7 96 234
1630 - 1645 223 7 0 0 7 84 321 1130 - 1145 122 8 0 0 2 134 266
1645 - 1700 225 14 0 0 8 104 351 1145 - 1200 127 8 0 0 7 124 266
1700 - 1715 207 10 0 0 12 97 326 1200 - 1215 135 7 0 0 4 125 271
1715 - 1730 200 16 0 0 6 103 325 1215 - 1230 159 9 0 0 4 124 296
1730 - 1745 190 15 0 0 2 87 294 1230 - 1245 137 7 0 0 8 132 284
1745 - 1800 210 12 0 0 6 108 336 1245 - 1300 144 2 0 0 4 142 292
Period End 1667 97 0 0 54 790 2608 1300 - 1315 121 7 0 0 6 125 259
1315 - 1330 125 3 0 0 4 120 252
1330 - 1345 147 2 0 0 4 135 288
1345 - 1400 159 9 0 0 7 109 284
1400 - 1415 138 4 0 0 8 105 255
1415 - 1430 145 8 0 0 3 106 262
1430 - 1445 159 9 0 0 6 102 276
1445 - 1500 148 5 0 0 7 100 260
Period End 2189 103 0 0 83 1900 4275
Peak Per T L R L R T TOTAL Peak Per T L R L R T TOTAL
1600 - 1700 860 44 0 0 28 395 1327 1100 - 1200 472 31 0 0 18 475 996
1615 - 1715 873 40 0 0 34 388 1335 1115 - 1215 507 31 0 0 20 479 1037
1630 - 1730 855 47 0 0 33 388 1323 1130 - 1230 543 32 0 0 17 507 1099
1645 - 1745 822 55 0 0 28 391 1296 1145 - 1245 558 31 0 0 23 505 1117
1700 - 1800 807 53 0 0 26 395 1281 1200 - 1300 575 25 0 0 20 523 1143
1215 - 1315 561 25 0 0 22 523 1131
1230 - 1330 527 19 0 0 22 519 1087
1245 - 1345 537 14 0 0 18 522 1091
1300 - 1400 552 21 0 0 21 489 1083
1315 - 1415 569 18 0 0 23 469 1079
1330 - 1430 589 23 0 0 22 455 1089
1345 - 1445 601 30 0 0 24 422 1077
1400 - 1500 590 26 0 0 24 413 1053
PEAK HR 873 40 0 0 34 388 1335 PEAK HR 575 25 0 0 20 523 1143
Foreman St Unwins Bridge
Rd
Unwins Bridge
Rd
Foreman St Unwins Bridge
Rd
Unwins Bridge
Rd
Unwins Bridge
Rd
Foreman St Unwins Bridge
Rd
NORTH EAST SOUTH
NORTH EAST SOUTH NORTH EAST SOUTH
ClientJob No/Name
Day/Date
Foreman St Unwins Bridge
Rd
EAST SOUTHNORTH
Unwins Bridge
Rd
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
913 60034 N 523
873 40 575 25
74 450 00 0
0 0
388 34 523 20873 575
422 543
7901764 2292
8441667 2189
1900
151 186Foreman St Foreman St
Unwins Bridge Rd
0 0
1983
Unwins Bridge Rd Unwins Bridge Rd
Job No/NameDay/Date
Client
Unwins Bridge Rd
1615 - 1715 1200 - 1300
Foreman St Foreman St
Unwins Bridge Rd Unwins Bridge Rd
Unwins Bridge Rd Unwins Bridge Rd
PM PEAK Sat PEAK
TOTAL VOLUMES
FOR COUNT
PERIODS
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.A Reliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic Counts Ph.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
All All
Vehicles Vehicles
Time Per R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT Time Per R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT
1600 - 1615 1 0 0 2 24 3 1 3 1 0 3 0 38 1100 - 1115 0 2 0 1 25 1 1 2 0 0 2 0 34
1615 - 1630 0 5 0 1 23 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 34 1115 - 1130 1 1 0 1 17 2 1 3 2 1 1 1 31
1630 - 1645 3 1 0 0 28 2 1 2 1 1 2 0 41 1130 - 1145 3 0 0 0 26 0 2 0 0 0 5 1 37
1645 - 1700 0 4 0 0 27 4 1 5 0 1 1 0 43 1145 - 1200 1 0 0 0 16 2 0 1 1 1 2 0 24
1700 - 1715 1 3 0 2 30 2 0 2 0 0 2 2 44 1200 - 1215 2 1 0 3 22 2 0 3 1 2 3 0 39
1715 - 1730 1 1 0 1 36 4 1 0 1 0 3 0 48 1215 - 1230 0 0 1 1 18 4 2 4 2 2 1 0 35
1730 - 1745 2 0 0 1 31 4 1 3 0 2 1 0 45 1230 - 1245 1 2 0 0 27 1 1 0 1 3 4 0 40
1745 - 1800 1 2 0 2 39 5 0 5 0 0 1 0 55 1245 - 1300 1 1 0 2 16 2 3 1 0 4 2 0 32
Period End 9 16 0 9 238 26 6 21 3 4 14 2 348 1300 - 1315 1 1 0 0 25 0 1 1 1 0 3 0 33
1315 - 1330 1 4 0 2 26 4 1 2 2 0 1 0 43
1330 - 1345 0 3 0 0 30 2 3 1 0 0 1 1 41
1345 - 1400 0 1 0 2 19 5 2 2 0 1 2 0 34
1400 - 1415 0 2 2 1 21 1 1 2 0 0 3 0 33
1415 - 1430 1 3 0 0 14 3 0 2 1 0 3 0 27
1430 - 1445 0 1 2 0 15 4 2 1 1 1 1 0 28
1445 - 1500 0 1 0 1 19 6 0 3 0 0 4 0 34
Period End 12 23 5 14 336 39 20 28 12 15 38 3 545
Peak Time R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT Peak Time R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT
1600 - 1700 4 10 0 3 102 11 4 11 2 2 7 0 156 1100 - 1200 5 3 0 2 84 5 4 6 3 2 10 2 126
1615 - 1715 4 13 0 3 108 10 3 10 1 2 6 2 162 1115 - 1215 7 2 0 4 81 6 3 7 4 4 11 2 131
1630 - 1730 5 9 0 3 121 12 3 9 2 2 8 2 176 1130 - 1230 6 1 1 4 82 8 4 8 4 5 11 1 135
1645 - 1745 4 8 0 4 124 14 3 10 1 3 7 2 180 1145 - 1245 4 3 1 4 83 9 3 8 5 8 10 0 138
1700 - 1800 5 6 0 6 136 15 2 10 1 2 7 2 192 1200 - 1300 4 4 1 6 83 9 6 8 4 11 10 0 146
1215 - 1315 3 4 1 3 86 7 7 6 4 9 10 0 140
1230 - 1330 4 8 0 4 94 7 6 4 4 7 10 0 148
1245 - 1345 3 9 0 4 97 8 8 5 3 4 7 1 149
1300 - 1400 2 9 0 4 100 11 7 6 3 1 7 1 151
1315 - 1415 1 10 2 5 96 12 7 7 2 1 7 1 151
1330 - 1430 1 9 2 3 84 11 6 7 1 1 9 1 135
1345 - 1445 1 7 4 3 69 13 5 7 2 2 9 0 122
1400 - 1500 1 7 4 2 69 14 3 8 2 1 11 0 122
PEAK HOUR 5 6 0 6 136 15 2 10 1 2 7 2 192 PEAK HOUR 1 10 2 5 96 12 7 7 2 1 7 1 151
EAST
Henry St Frederick St Henry St Frederick St Henry St Frederick St Henry St Frederick St
Frederick St Henry St Frederick St
NORTH WEST SOUTH EAST NORTH WEST SOUTH
EASTNORTH WEST SOUTH EAST
Henry St Frederick St Henry St Frederick St Henry St
ClientJob No/Name
Day/Date
NORTH WEST SOUTH
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
11 N 1318 13
5 0 1 2
157 137 113 1006 2 5 1
136 7 96 715 2 12 1
14 11 15 9
2 1 7 223 23
13 16
32 25 45 40
30 46 60 77
389 353
Henry St Henry St
Frederick St Frederick St
29 20 70
Henry St
TOTAL VOLUMESFOR COUNT
Henry St PERIODS
56
Frederick St Frederick St
273 241
Henry St Henry St
Frederick St Frederick St
10 7
1700 - 1800 1315 - 1415
6 10Frederick St Frederick St
ClientJob No/Name
Day/Date
Henry St Henry St
PM PEAK HOUR Sat PEAK HOUR
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.A Reliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic Counts Ph.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
All All
Vehicles Vehicles
Time Per R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT Time Per R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT
1600 - 1615 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 4 7 0 0 2 19 1100 - 1115 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 0 10
1615 - 1630 0 7 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 3 1 1 18 1115 - 1130 0 0 0 4 1 1 0 3 2 0 3 0 14
1630 - 1645 0 5 1 0 3 0 0 3 5 2 4 0 23 1130 - 1145 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 7
1645 - 1700 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 4 3 3 1 0 18 1145 - 1200 1 1 0 0 2 2 1 3 4 0 1 1 16
1700 - 1715 0 3 0 0 1 3 1 0 4 0 0 0 12 1200 - 1215 0 3 0 0 2 2 0 2 4 0 1 0 14
1715 - 1730 0 4 1 1 5 2 3 3 2 1 1 0 23 1215 - 1230 0 1 0 0 2 3 0 6 1 0 2 2 17
1730 - 1745 0 3 1 1 4 1 3 0 1 1 1 0 16 1230 - 1245 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 3 0 3 1 0 14
1745 - 1800 0 5 1 1 1 2 1 2 5 0 4 1 23 1245 - 1300 0 4 1 1 2 1 2 2 5 0 1 1 20
Period End 2 34 4 4 18 9 8 18 29 10 12 4 152 1300 - 1315 0 1 1 0 4 0 3 3 4 2 1 0 19
1315 - 1330 0 4 0 1 3 4 3 3 3 2 2 1 26
1330 - 1345 0 3 0 0 0 1 2 3 3 1 1 0 14
1345 - 1400 0 3 1 1 6 0 1 9 0 1 1 1 24
1400 - 1415 1 3 0 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 2 0 18
1415 - 1430 0 6 1 1 1 1 0 4 3 1 2 0 20
1430 - 1445 1 1 0 0 3 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 11
1445 - 1500 0 4 0 1 4 2 2 7 1 2 2 0 25
Period End 5 38 4 12 36 23 19 53 34 15 23 7 269
Peak Time R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT Peak Time R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT
1600 - 1700 2 19 1 1 7 1 0 13 17 8 6 3 78 1100 - 1200 2 3 0 4 6 5 2 8 8 0 7 2 47
1615 - 1715 0 21 1 1 5 4 1 9 14 8 6 1 71 1115 - 1215 1 5 0 4 6 6 2 8 11 0 6 2 51
1630 - 1730 0 18 2 2 9 5 4 10 14 6 6 0 76 1130 - 1230 1 6 0 0 7 8 2 11 10 0 5 4 54
1645 - 1745 0 16 2 3 10 6 7 7 10 5 3 0 69 1145 - 1245 2 7 0 1 7 8 2 14 9 3 5 3 61
1700 - 1800 0 15 3 3 11 8 8 5 12 2 6 1 74 1200 - 1300 1 10 1 2 7 7 3 13 10 3 5 3 65
1215 - 1315 1 8 2 2 9 5 6 14 10 5 5 3 70
1230 - 1330 1 11 2 3 10 6 9 11 12 7 5 2 79
1245 - 1345 0 12 2 2 9 6 10 11 15 5 5 2 79
1300 - 1400 0 11 2 2 13 5 9 18 10 6 5 2 83
1315 - 1415 1 13 1 4 11 7 7 16 7 7 6 2 82
1330 - 1430 1 15 2 4 9 4 4 17 7 6 6 1 76
1345 - 1445 2 13 2 4 12 4 4 16 5 5 5 1 73
1400 - 1500 2 14 1 4 10 6 5 14 6 6 6 0 74
PEAK HOUR 2 19 1 1 7 1 0 13 17 8 6 3 78 PEAK HOUR 0 11 2 2 13 5 9 18 10 6 5 2 83
EAST
Henry St George St Henry St George St Henry St George St Henry St George St
George St Henry St George St
NORTH WEST SOUTH EAST NORTH WEST SOUTH
EASTNORTH WEST SOUTH EAST
Henry St George St Henry St George St Henry St
ClientJob No/Name
Day/Date
NORTH WEST SOUTH
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
22 N 1317 22
2 1 0 2
9 25 20 251 3 2 27 6 13 51 8 5 6
8 17 14 13
0 17 9 1028 22
30 37
26 40 72 47
55 53 106 76
71 74
Henry St Henry St
George St George St
22 26 47
Henry St
TOTAL VOLUMESFOR COUNT
Henry St PERIODS
45
George St George St
31 51
Henry St Henry St
George St George St
13 18
1600 - 1700 1300 - 1400
19 11George St George St
ClientJob No/Name
Day/Date
Henry St Henry St
PM PEAK HOUR Sat PEAK HOUR
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
All Vehicles All Vehicles
Time Per R T L R T L TOTAL Time Per R T L R T L TOTAL
1600 - 1615 0 8 3 0 3 5 19 1100 - 1115 2 11 3 1 3 1 21
1615 - 1630 3 6 1 0 1 2 13 1115 - 1130 1 9 0 2 6 3 21
1630 - 1645 2 12 4 0 7 1 26 1130 - 1145 2 7 1 1 3 0 14
1645 - 1700 1 8 4 2 5 5 25 1145 - 1200 0 6 1 1 3 1 12
1700 - 1715 0 9 3 0 6 1 19 1200 - 1215 0 3 3 0 2 1 9
1715 - 1730 0 8 1 0 3 2 14 1215 - 1230 0 2 3 1 7 2 15
1730 - 1745 0 7 2 1 1 0 11 1230 - 1245 0 9 0 1 4 4 18
1745 - 1800 1 11 3 1 5 1 22 1245 - 1300 0 9 0 0 1 1 11
Period End 7 69 21 4 31 17 149 1300 - 1315 1 11 2 0 4 2 20
1315 - 1330 1 6 3 0 1 2 13
1330 - 1345 0 15 4 1 3 2 25
1345 - 1400 0 8 1 2 2 2 15
1400 - 1415 1 9 3 1 8 3 25
1415 - 1430 1 11 3 0 2 3 20
1430 - 1445 1 10 0 1 7 1 20
1445 - 1500 2 9 0 1 4 3 19
Period End 12 135 27 13 60 31 278
Peak Per R T L R T L TOTAL Peak Per R T L R T L TOTAL
1600 - 1700 6 34 12 2 16 13 83 1100 - 1200 5 33 5 5 15 5 68
1615 - 1715 6 35 12 2 19 9 83 1115 - 1215 3 25 5 4 14 5 56
1630 - 1730 3 37 12 2 21 9 84 1130 - 1230 2 18 8 3 15 4 50
1645 - 1745 1 32 10 3 15 8 69 1145 - 1245 0 20 7 3 16 8 54
1700 - 1800 1 35 9 2 15 4 66 1200 - 1300 0 23 6 2 14 8 53
1215 - 1315 1 31 5 2 16 9 64
1230 - 1330 2 35 5 1 10 9 62
1245 - 1345 2 41 9 1 9 7 69
1300 - 1400 2 40 10 3 10 8 73
1315 - 1415 2 38 11 4 14 9 78
1330 - 1430 2 43 11 4 15 10 85
1345 - 1445 3 38 7 4 19 9 80
1400 - 1500 5 39 6 3 21 10 84
PEAK HR 3 37 12 2 21 9 84 PEAK HR 2 43 11 4 15 10 85
WEST SOUTH EAST WEST
Grove St Grove StGrove St Henry St
SOUTH EAST
Henry St Grove St
Grove St Grove St
SOUTH EASTWEST SOUTH EAST WEST
Henry St Grove StGrove St Henry St
ClientJob No/Name
Day/Date
R.O.A.R DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
40 39 45 4737 21 43 15
3 9 2 1033 30 26 25
12 2 11 4
12 1214 N 15
91
25 4024 43
Job No/NameDay/Date
Grove St Grove St Grove St Grove St
148
Henry St Henry St
PM PEAK Sat PEAK
1630 - 1730 1330 - 1430
48 87
Grove St Grove St
Grove St
76 73 147
Client
Henry St Henry St
FOR COUNT
PERIODS
Grove St
52
TOTAL VOLUMES
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
All Vehicles All Vehicles
Time Per L T R L T R TOTAL Time Per L T R L T R TOTAL
1600 - 1615 2 8 4 0 9 0 23 1100 - 1115 2 12 1 1 7 1 24
1615 - 1630 0 5 1 0 8 0 14 1115 - 1130 0 9 0 0 4 1 14
1630 - 1645 2 9 0 1 6 0 18 1130 - 1145 1 8 1 1 10 2 23
1645 - 1700 1 6 2 2 8 0 19 1145 - 1200 0 14 0 0 12 1 27
1700 - 1715 0 6 0 0 6 1 13 1200 - 1215 0 10 0 0 12 0 22
1715 - 1730 0 6 1 1 6 1 15 1215 - 1230 2 16 2 0 6 1 27
1730 - 1745 0 10 0 0 11 1 22 1230 - 1245 0 3 0 2 4 0 9
1745 - 1800 2 9 0 3 5 1 20 1245 - 1300 0 12 1 0 10 0 23
Period End 7 59 8 7 59 4 144 1300 - 1315 0 9 0 0 13 2 24
1315 - 1330 0 9 0 0 7 0 16
1330 - 1345 0 12 1 0 11 1 25
1345 - 1400 2 10 2 0 6 0 20
1400 - 1415 0 5 1 0 12 1 19
1415 - 1430 0 4 1 0 7 0 12
1430 - 1445 2 7 0 0 7 1 17
1445 - 1500 1 13 0 1 13 1 29
Period End 10 153 10 5 141 12 331
Peak Per L T R L T R TOTAL Peak Per L T R L T R TOTAL
1600 - 1700 5 28 7 3 31 0 74 1100 - 1200 3 43 2 2 33 5 88
1615 - 1715 3 26 3 3 28 1 64 1115 - 1215 1 41 1 1 38 4 86
1630 - 1730 3 27 3 4 26 2 65 1130 - 1230 3 48 3 1 40 4 99
1645 - 1745 1 28 3 3 31 3 69 1145 - 1245 2 43 2 2 34 2 85
1700 - 1800 2 31 1 4 28 4 70 1200 - 1300 2 41 3 2 32 1 81
1215 - 1315 2 40 3 2 33 3 83
1230 - 1330 0 33 1 2 34 2 72
1245 - 1345 0 42 2 0 41 3 88
1300 - 1400 2 40 3 0 37 3 85
1315 - 1415 4 76 7 2 69 5 163
1330 - 1430 2 64 6 2 70 4 148
1345 - 1445 4 68 6 0 73 5 156
1400 - 1500 3 29 2 1 39 3 77
PEAK HR 2 31 1 4 28 4 70 PEAK HR 4 76 7 2 69 5 163
EAST WEST
EAST
Lymerston St Lymerston St Henry St
ClientJob No/Name
Day/Date
NORTH EAST
Lymerston St
Lymerston St
WEST NORTH
WEST NORTH EAST WEST NORTH
Lymerston St Henry St
Lymerston St Henry St Lymerston St Lymerston St Henry St
R.O.A.R DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
5 N 9
6 9
1 4 7 2
33 35 80 782 4 4 5
31 28 76 6929 32 76 74
N
11 22
15 15COUNTED
Lymerston St Lymerston St
Lymerston St
Henry St
Henry St Henry St
TOTAL VOLUMES
ClientJob No/Name
Day/Date
Sat PEAK
1700 - 1800 1315 - 1415
67 63 151 153
FOR PERIOD
Lymerston St Lymerston St
66 66 163 158Lymerston St
Henry St
PM PEAK
Lymerston St Lymerston St
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
All Vehicles All Vehicles
Time Per T L R L R T TOTAL Time Per T L R L R T TOTAL
1600 - 1615 225 2 1 12 9 104 353 1100 - 1115 119 4 1 11 12 151 298
1615 - 1630 225 3 0 12 3 96 339 1115 - 1130 123 2 2 4 10 92 233
1630 - 1645 214 8 4 5 4 91 326 1130 - 1145 124 5 5 8 8 134 284
1645 - 1700 236 8 1 8 8 98 359 1145 - 1200 116 5 4 8 11 111 255
1700 - 1715 238 3 4 7 6 106 364 1200 - 1215 152 3 5 7 11 127 305
1715 - 1730 211 6 3 6 6 103 335 1215 - 1230 159 5 6 6 9 118 303
1730 - 1745 202 3 4 8 13 87 317 1230 - 1245 146 4 1 4 4 138 297
1745 - 1800 200 9 1 5 5 90 310 1245 - 1300 150 6 9 8 12 137 322
Period End 1751 42 18 63 54 775 2703 1300 - 1315 122 1 5 7 11 118 264
1315 - 1330 131 2 2 10 8 127 280
1330 - 1345 140 5 5 10 8 125 293
1345 - 1400 148 4 5 11 12 100 280
1400 - 1415 122 1 1 12 5 106 247
1415 - 1430 144 6 2 8 6 107 273
1430 - 1445 164 3 6 7 6 92 278
1445 - 1500 140 7 2 7 11 95 262
Period End 2200 63 61 128 144 1878 4474
Peak Per T L R L R T TOTAL Peak Per T L R L R T TOTAL
1600 - 1700 900 21 6 37 24 389 1377 1100 - 1200 482 16 12 31 41 488 1070
1615 - 1715 913 22 9 32 21 391 1388 1115 - 1215 515 15 16 27 40 464 1077
1630 - 1730 899 25 12 26 24 398 1384 1130 - 1230 551 18 20 29 39 490 1147
1645 - 1745 887 20 12 29 33 394 1375 1145 - 1245 573 17 16 25 35 494 1160
1700 - 1800 851 21 12 26 30 386 1326 1200 - 1300 607 18 21 25 36 520 1227
1215 - 1315 577 16 21 25 36 511 1186
1230 - 1330 549 13 17 29 35 520 1163
1245 - 1345 543 14 21 35 39 507 1159
1300 - 1400 541 12 17 38 39 470 1117
1315 - 1415 541 12 13 43 33 458 1100
1330 - 1430 554 16 13 41 31 438 1093
1345 - 1445 578 14 14 38 29 405 1078
1400 - 1500 570 17 11 34 28 400 1060
PEAK HR 913 22 9 32 21 391 1388 PEAK HR 607 18 21 25 36 520 1227
ClientJob No/Name
Day/Date
Lymerston St Unwins Bridge
Rd
EAST SOUTHNORTH
Unwins Bridge
Rd
NORTH EAST SOUTH NORTH EAST SOUTH
Unwins Bridge
Rd
Lymerston St Unwins Bridge
Rd
NORTH EAST SOUTH
Lymerston St Unwins Bridge
Rd
Unwins Bridge
Rd
Lymerston St Unwins Bridge
Rd
Unwins Bridge
Rd
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
935 62530 N 541
913 22 607 18
43 549 2132 25
41 46
391 21 520 36945 632
412 556
7931793 2263
8291814 2328
PM PEAK Sat PEAK
TOTAL VOLUMES
FOR COUNT
PERIODS
Unwins Bridge Rd
1615 - 1715 1200 - 1300
Lymerston St Lymerston St
Unwins Bridge Rd Unwins Bridge Rd
Unwins Bridge Rd Unwins Bridge Rd
Client
Unwins Bridge Rd Unwins Bridge Rd
Job No/NameDay/Date
1939
96 207Lymerston St Lymerston St
Unwins Bridge Rd
81 189
2022
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
All Vehicles All Vehicles
Time Per T L R L R T TOTAL Time Per T L R L R T TOTAL
1600 - 1615 242 0 112 87 0 128 569 1100 - 1115 148 0 90 46 0 200 484
1615 - 1630 218 0 96 49 0 118 481 1115 - 1130 158 0 66 28 0 150 402
1630 - 1645 227 0 89 43 0 80 439 1130 - 1145 154 0 55 28 0 190 427
1645 - 1700 222 0 79 56 0 109 466 1145 - 1200 159 0 97 27 0 154 437
1700 - 1715 270 0 107 51 0 128 556 1200 - 1215 168 0 70 43 0 173 454
1715 - 1730 220 0 88 41 0 95 444 1215 - 1230 193 0 62 39 0 146 440
1730 - 1745 271 0 102 51 0 107 531 1230 - 1245 189 0 78 40 0 208 515
1745 - 1800 181 0 90 42 0 72 385 1245 - 1300 173 0 65 31 0 207 476
Period End 1851 0 763 420 0 837 3871 1300 - 1315 168 0 75 23 0 187 453
1315 - 1330 160 0 68 32 0 167 427
1330 - 1345 170 0 81 28 0 155 434
1345 - 1400 199 0 74 23 0 162 458
1400 - 1415 205 0 90 37 0 174 506
1415 - 1430 173 0 62 35 0 161 431
1430 - 1445 182 0 75 29 0 151 437
1445 - 1500 176 0 56 39 0 147 418
Period End 2775 0 1164 528 0 2732 7199
Peak Per T L R L R T TOTAL Peak Per T L R L R T TOTAL
1600 - 1700 909 0 376 235 0 435 1955 1100 - 1200 619 0 308 129 0 694 1750
1615 - 1715 937 0 371 199 0 435 1942 1115 - 1215 639 0 288 126 0 667 1720
1630 - 1730 939 0 363 191 0 412 1905 1130 - 1230 674 0 284 137 0 663 1758
1645 - 1745 983 0 376 199 0 439 1997 1145 - 1245 709 0 307 149 0 681 1846
1700 - 1800 942 0 387 185 0 402 1916 1200 - 1300 723 0 275 153 0 734 1885
1215 - 1315 723 0 280 133 0 748 1884
1230 - 1330 690 0 286 126 0 769 1871
1245 - 1345 671 0 289 114 0 716 1790
1300 - 1400 697 0 298 106 0 671 1772
1315 - 1415 734 0 313 120 0 658 1825
1330 - 1430 747 0 307 123 0 652 1829
1345 - 1445 759 0 301 124 0 648 1832
1400 - 1500 736 0 283 140 0 633 1792
PEAK HR 983 0 376 199 0 439 1997 PEAK HR 723 0 275 153 0 734 1885
Mary St Unwins Bridge
Rd
Unwins Bridge
Rd
Mary St Unwins Bridge
Rd
Unwins Bridge
Rd
Unwins Bridge
Rd
Mary St Unwins Bridge
Rd
NORTH EAST SOUTH
NORTH EAST SOUTH NORTH EAST SOUTH
ClientJob No/Name
Day/Date
Mary St Unwins Bridge
Rd
EAST SOUTHNORTH
Unwins Bridge
Rd
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
983 723376 N 1009
983 0 723 0
0 0376 275199 153
575 428
439 0 734 01182 876
439 734
16001851 2775
8372271 3303
3896
0 0Mary St Mary St
Unwins Bridge Rd
1183 1692
2732
Unwins Bridge Rd Unwins Bridge Rd
Job No/NameDay/Date
Client
Unwins Bridge Rd
1645 - 1745 1200 - 1300
Mary St Mary St
Unwins Bridge Rd Unwins Bridge Rd
Unwins Bridge Rd Unwins Bridge Rd
PM PEAK Sat PEAK
TOTAL VOLUMES
FOR COUNT
PERIODS
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.A Reliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic Counts Ph.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
All All
Vehicles Vehicles
Time Per R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT Time Per R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT
1600 - 1615 4 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 15 1100 - 1115 3 1 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 10
1615 - 1630 5 1 3 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 15 1115 - 1130 3 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 11
1630 - 1645 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 12 1130 - 1145 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 8 2 14
1645 - 1700 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 14 1145 - 1200 3 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 12
1700 - 1715 4 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 2 14 1200 - 1215 5 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 16
1715 - 1730 5 0 1 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 13 1215 - 1230 4 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 16
1730 - 1745 6 0 1 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 3 1 18 1230 - 1245 1 0 1 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 3 13
1745 - 1800 4 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 12 1245 - 1300 0 1 1 0 7 0 2 0 0 1 4 2 18
Period End 37 1 7 14 10 5 4 1 0 0 23 11 113 1300 - 1315 0 0 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 10
1315 - 1330 2 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 11
1330 - 1345 5 0 2 5 2 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 18
1345 - 1400 4 1 1 2 4 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 17
1400 - 1415 3 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 12
1415 - 1430 2 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 9
1430 - 1445 11 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 15
1445 - 1500 0 1 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 11
Period End 47 7 13 27 41 1 7 2 0 2 47 19 213
Peak Time R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT Peak Time R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT
1600 - 1700 18 1 4 7 3 2 1 0 0 0 13 7 56 1100 - 1200 10 3 1 4 8 0 1 1 0 0 12 7 47
1615 - 1715 18 1 5 6 3 3 1 0 0 0 11 7 55 1115 - 1215 12 3 2 5 7 0 0 1 0 0 16 7 53
1630 - 1730 18 0 3 6 7 1 1 0 0 0 10 7 53 1130 - 1230 13 2 1 6 6 0 0 1 0 0 23 6 58
1645 - 1745 17 0 3 8 9 2 2 1 0 0 12 5 59 1145 - 1245 13 1 2 9 7 0 2 0 0 0 16 7 57
1700 - 1800 19 0 3 7 7 3 3 1 0 0 10 4 57 1200 - 1300 10 2 3 7 12 0 4 0 0 1 17 7 63
1215 - 1315 5 1 5 6 13 0 4 0 0 1 14 8 57
1230 - 1330 3 1 5 6 14 0 6 0 0 1 8 8 52
1245 - 1345 7 1 6 8 14 1 4 0 0 2 9 5 57
1300 - 1400 11 1 6 10 11 1 2 1 0 1 9 3 56
1315 - 1415 14 1 5 9 11 1 2 1 0 1 12 1 58
1330 - 1430 14 1 6 9 11 1 0 1 0 1 11 1 56
1345 - 1445 20 1 4 5 11 0 0 1 0 0 10 1 53
1400 - 1500 16 1 3 6 10 0 0 0 0 0 9 2 47
PEAK HOUR 17 0 3 8 9 2 2 1 0 0 12 5 59 PEAK HOUR 10 2 3 7 12 0 4 0 0 1 17 7 63
ClientJob No/Name
Day/Date
NORTH WEST SOUTH EASTNORTH WEST SOUTH EAST
Henry St Park Rd Henry St Park RdHenry St
Park RdHenry St Park Rd Henry St
Park Rd Henry St Park Rd
NORTH WEST SOUTH
Henry St
EASTNORTH WEST SOUTH EAST
Henry StPark RdPark Rd
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
20 N 1514 14
17 3 10 3
19 12 19 158 5 7 79 12 12 172 0 0 1
31 17 31 25
2 0 4 02 3
3 4
26 45 48 67
5 6 9 10
Job No/NameDay/Date
Henry St
Park Rd Park Rd
Henry St
PM PEAK HOUR Sat PEAK HOUR
1645 - 1745 1200 - 1300
Client
Park Rd Park Rd
1 0
0 2
Henry St
TOTAL VOLUMESFOR COUNT
Henry St PERIODS
Henry St Henry St
68
Park Rd Park Rd
29 17 69 54
Henry St Henry St
Park Rd Park Rd
64 34 101
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.A Reliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic Counts Ph.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
All All
Vehicles Vehicles
Time Per R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT Time Per R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT
1600 - 1615 1 0 3 0 5 1 1 0 1 0 7 0 19 1100 - 1115 0 1 0 0 5 1 1 2 0 0 7 1 18
1615 - 1630 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 19 1115 - 1130 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 17
1630 - 1645 0 0 0 0 10 1 1 1 0 0 16 0 29 1130 - 1145 0 0 0 1 3 1 1 0 2 1 5 0 14
1645 - 1700 1 0 1 0 4 0 0 1 0 3 9 1 20 1145 - 1200 2 0 0 1 5 0 1 0 1 0 8 0 18
1700 - 1715 0 0 0 1 6 0 1 0 0 1 11 0 20 1200 - 1215 0 1 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 8 0 16
1715 - 1730 0 1 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 12 1 20 1215 - 1230 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 2 0 0 10 0 20
1730 - 1745 1 1 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 14 0 21 1230 - 1245 0 2 0 1 7 1 0 0 0 0 16 0 27
1745 - 1800 0 3 2 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 11 0 21 1245 - 1300 1 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 12 0 19
Period End 3 6 8 1 37 2 7 2 1 4 96 2 169 1300 - 1315 0 0 1 2 8 0 0 0 1 0 16 1 29
1315 - 1330 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 13
1330 - 1345 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 1 7 2 16
1345 - 1400 0 1 1 1 7 0 1 0 1 0 10 0 22
1400 - 1415 1 0 1 1 4 1 0 1 0 0 11 2 22
1415 - 1430 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 12 1 18
1430 - 1445 0 0 1 2 6 0 2 0 1 0 11 1 24
1445 - 1500 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 1 8 2 19
Period End 5 6 5 13 82 6 7 5 7 3 163 10 312
Peak Time R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT Peak Time R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT
1600 - 1700 2 1 6 0 19 2 2 2 1 3 48 1 87 1100 - 1200 2 1 0 2 17 2 3 2 3 1 33 1 67
1615 - 1715 1 1 3 1 20 1 2 2 0 4 52 1 88 1115 - 1215 2 1 0 2 18 1 3 0 3 1 34 0 65
1630 - 1730 1 1 1 1 25 1 3 2 0 4 48 2 89 1130 - 1230 2 1 0 3 21 1 3 2 3 1 31 0 68
1645 - 1745 2 2 1 1 19 0 3 1 0 4 46 2 81 1145 - 1245 2 3 0 3 25 1 2 2 1 0 42 0 81
1700 - 1800 1 5 2 1 18 0 5 0 0 1 48 1 82 1200 - 1300 1 3 0 2 24 3 1 2 0 0 46 0 82
1215 - 1315 1 2 1 4 26 3 0 2 1 0 54 1 95
1230 - 1330 1 2 1 4 22 3 0 0 1 0 53 1 88
1245 - 1345 1 0 1 3 20 2 0 0 2 1 44 3 77
1300 - 1400 0 1 2 4 23 0 1 0 3 1 42 3 80
1315 - 1415 1 1 2 3 19 1 1 1 2 1 37 4 73
1330 - 1430 2 2 3 2 18 1 1 1 2 1 40 5 78
1345 - 1445 2 2 4 4 19 1 3 1 2 0 44 4 86
1400 - 1500 2 1 3 5 18 1 2 1 1 1 42 6 83
PEAK HOUR 1 1 1 1 25 1 3 2 0 4 48 2 89 PEAK HOUR 1 2 1 4 26 3 0 2 1 0 54 1 95
ClientJob No/Name
Day/Date
NORTH WEST SOUTH EASTNORTH WEST SOUTH EAST
Henry St Samuel St Henry St Samuel StHenry St
Samuel StHenry St Samuel St Henry St
Samuel St Henry St Samuel St
NORTH WEST SOUTH
Henry St
EASTNORTH WEST SOUTH EAST
Henry StSamuel StSamuel St
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
3 N 45 7
1 1 1 1
27 26 33 281 2 4 1
25 48 26 541 4 3 0
52 54 55 55
3 0 0 16 5
5 3
5 17 28 16
10 12 19 15
Job No/NameDay/Date
Henry St
Samuel St Samuel St
Henry St
PM PEAK HOUR Sat PEAK HOUR
1630 - 1730 1215 - 1315
Client
Samuel St Samuel St
2 2
1 2
Henry St
TOTAL VOLUMESFOR COUNT
Henry St PERIODS
Henry St Henry St
176
Samuel St Samuel St
40 46 101 94
Henry St Henry St
Samuel St Samuel St
106 102 175
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
All Vehicles All Vehicles
Time Per T L R L R T TOTAL Time Per T L R L R T TOTAL
1600 - 1615 210 3 0 4 2 198 417 1100 - 1115 150 4 3 4 6 272 439
1615 - 1630 249 3 2 1 3 209 467 1115 - 1130 157 3 1 4 4 200 369
1630 - 1645 228 4 1 3 2 163 401 1130 - 1145 149 3 2 1 3 236 394
1645 - 1700 260 4 0 3 1 199 467 1145 - 1200 171 1 1 4 2 243 422
1700 - 1715 253 5 2 1 5 219 485 1200 - 1215 172 1 0 4 4 195 376
1715 - 1730 223 3 1 1 4 195 427 1215 - 1230 176 4 1 6 4 214 405
1730 - 1745 281 3 1 4 1 197 487 1230 - 1245 168 3 0 0 5 229 405
1745 - 1800 215 0 1 5 2 182 405 1245 - 1300 175 2 0 3 5 234 419
Period End 1919 25 8 22 20 1562 3556 1300 - 1315 154 5 2 2 6 219 388
1315 - 1330 158 2 0 1 2 219 382
1330 - 1345 163 1 2 3 8 218 395
1345 - 1400 153 1 2 3 9 219 387
1400 - 1415 180 5 3 3 3 228 422
1415 - 1430 154 1 3 7 8 189 362
1430 - 1445 146 9 6 2 3 224 390
1445 - 1500 177 4 0 7 4 219 411
Period End 2603 49 26 54 76 3558 6366
Peak Per T L R L R T TOTAL Peak Per T L R L R T TOTAL
1600 - 1700 947 14 3 11 8 769 1752 1100 - 1200 627 11 7 13 15 951 1624
1615 - 1715 990 16 5 8 11 790 1820 1115 - 1215 649 8 4 13 13 874 1561
1630 - 1730 964 16 4 8 12 776 1780 1130 - 1230 668 9 4 15 13 888 1597
1645 - 1745 1017 15 4 9 11 810 1866 1145 - 1245 687 9 2 14 15 881 1608
1700 - 1800 972 11 5 11 12 793 1804 1200 - 1300 691 10 1 13 18 872 1605
1215 - 1315 673 14 3 11 20 896 1617
1230 - 1330 655 12 2 6 18 901 1594
1245 - 1345 650 10 4 9 21 890 1584
1300 - 1400 628 9 6 9 25 875 1552
1315 - 1415 654 9 7 10 22 884 1586
1330 - 1430 650 8 10 16 28 854 1566
1345 - 1445 633 16 14 15 23 860 1561
1400 - 1500 657 19 12 19 18 860 1585
PEAK HR 1017 15 4 9 11 810 1866 PEAK HR 627 11 7 13 15 951 1624
ClientJob No/Name
Day/Date
NORTH
Unwins Bridge
Rd
Silver St Unwins Bridge
Rd
NORTH EAST SOUTH NORTH EAST SOUTH
EAST SOUTH
Unwins Bridge
Rd
Silver St Unwins Bridge
Rd
NORTH EAST SOUTH
Silver St Unwins Bridge
Rd
Unwins Bridge
Rd
Silver St Unwins Bridge
Rd
Unwins Bridge
Rd
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
1032 63815 N 9581017 15 627 11
26 264 79 13
13 20
810 11 951 151026 640
821 966
15701944 2652
15821941 2657
Unwins Bridge Rd
1645 - 1745 1100 - 1200
Silver St Silver St
Unwins Bridge Rd Unwins Bridge Rd
Client
PM PEAK Sat PEAK
Job No/NameDay/Date
TOTAL VOLUMES
FOR COUNT
Unwins Bridge Rd Unwins Bridge Rd
PERIODS
3584
45 125
Unwins Bridge Rd Unwins Bridge Rd
Silver St Silver St
Unwins Bridge Rd
30 80
3634
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.A Reliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic Counts Ph.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
All All
Vehicles Vehicles
Time Per R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT Time Per R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT
1600 - 1615 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 6 0 11 1100 - 1115 1 0 0 0 4 1 2 0 2 0 5 0 15
1615 - 1630 2 0 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 1 7 0 17 1115 - 1130 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 9
1630 - 1645 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 11 1130 - 1145 0 0 0 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 8
1645 - 1700 1 0 0 0 4 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 11 1145 - 1200 0 0 0 3 6 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 14
1700 - 1715 0 0 0 1 6 1 1 0 0 0 5 1 15 1200 - 1215 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 14
1715 - 1730 1 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 11 1215 - 1230 1 0 0 1 5 1 0 0 2 0 5 0 15
1730 - 1745 0 0 0 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 11 1230 - 1245 2 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 9
1745 - 1800 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 3 1 12 1245 - 1300 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 8
Period End 4 0 0 4 32 16 2 0 3 2 34 2 99 1300 - 1315 1 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 1 1 4 0 12
1315 - 1330 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 8
1330 - 1345 0 0 0 0 6 1 1 0 1 0 4 0 13
1345 - 1400 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 2 6 2 15
1400 - 1415 0 0 0 0 6 1 2 0 1 0 2 0 12
1415 - 1430 2 1 0 0 4 1 0 0 1 1 4 1 15
1430 - 1445 0 0 0 1 3 2 2 0 0 0 6 0 14
1445 - 1500 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 2 2 0 9 0 20
Period End 10 1 0 9 71 9 11 2 12 6 66 4 201
Peak Time R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT Peak Time R T L L T R L T R L T R TOT
1600 - 1700 3 0 0 3 12 7 1 0 2 2 20 0 50 1100 - 1200 1 0 0 4 21 3 3 0 3 0 11 0 46
1615 - 1715 3 0 0 4 17 5 2 0 2 1 19 1 54 1115 - 1215 0 0 0 5 22 2 1 0 1 0 14 0 45
1630 - 1730 2 0 0 4 17 4 2 0 3 0 15 1 48 1130 - 1230 1 0 0 6 20 3 1 0 3 0 17 0 51
1645 - 1745 2 0 0 1 21 6 2 0 2 0 13 1 48 1145 - 1245 3 0 0 5 19 3 1 0 3 1 16 1 52
1700 - 1800 1 0 0 1 20 9 1 0 1 0 14 2 49 1200 - 1300 4 0 0 3 16 1 1 0 2 2 16 1 46
1215 - 1315 5 0 0 2 15 1 2 0 3 3 12 1 44
1230 - 1330 5 0 0 2 11 0 3 0 1 3 11 1 37
1245 - 1345 3 0 0 2 14 1 3 0 2 2 14 0 41
1300 - 1400 2 0 0 1 15 1 3 0 3 3 18 2 48
1315 - 1415 1 0 0 1 17 2 4 0 3 2 16 2 48
1330 - 1430 2 1 0 0 20 3 3 0 4 3 16 3 55
1345 - 1445 2 1 0 1 17 4 4 0 3 3 18 3 56
1400 - 1500 3 1 0 1 19 4 4 2 4 1 21 1 61
PEAK HOUR 3 0 0 4 17 5 2 0 2 1 19 1 54 PEAK HOUR 3 1 0 1 19 4 4 2 4 1 21 1 61
ClientJob No/Name
Day/Date
NORTH WEST SOUTH EASTNORTH WEST SOUTH EAST
Henry St Terry St Henry St Terry St Henry St Terry St Henry St Terry St
NORTH WEST SOUTH EAST NORTH WEST SOUTH EAST
Henry St Terry St Henry St Terry St Henry St Terry St Henry St Terry St
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
3 N 45 4
3 0 3 0
26 19 24 234 1 1 1
17 19 19 215 1 4 1
24 21 28 23
2 2 4 46 6
4 10
6 4 15 11
5 18 25 16
ClientJob No/Name
Day/Date
Henry St Henry St
PM PEAK HOUR Sat PEAK HOUR
1615 - 1715 1400 - 1500
0 1Terry St Terry St
Henry St Henry St
Terry St Terry St
0 2
Henry St
TOTAL VOLUMESFOR COUNT
Henry St PERIODS
76
Terry St Terry St
52 35 89 83
Henry St Henry St
Terry St Terry St
40 38 87
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
All Vehicles All Vehicles
Time Per T L R L R T TOTAL Time Per T L R L R T TOTAL
1600 - 1615 202 5 6 2 1 93 309 1100 - 1115 118 6 8 1 3 142 278
1615 - 1630 208 10 4 4 2 101 329 1115 - 1130 143 6 5 1 4 108 267
1630 - 1645 228 7 3 2 1 102 343 1130 - 1145 116 6 6 1 3 139 271
1645 - 1700 241 4 1 5 1 102 354 1145 - 1200 130 8 2 0 2 118 260
1700 - 1715 225 9 6 3 2 98 343 1200 - 1215 148 3 4 2 1 126 284
1715 - 1730 223 5 2 1 1 95 327 1215 - 1230 161 8 3 6 1 120 299
1730 - 1745 185 9 2 2 1 91 290 1230 - 1245 139 4 6 3 2 140 294
1745 - 1800 234 10 1 2 1 112 360 1245 - 1300 136 6 3 3 3 138 289
Period End 1746 59 25 21 10 794 2655 1300 - 1315 133 6 4 1 2 141 287
1315 - 1330 137 3 5 2 1 126 274
1330 - 1345 144 4 3 3 3 135 292
1345 - 1400 139 4 3 2 3 104 255
1400 - 1415 118 5 4 1 3 104 235
1415 - 1430 144 5 2 2 1 113 267
1430 - 1445 159 10 13 3 1 100 286
1445 - 1500 146 6 6 5 4 98 265
Period End 2211 90 77 36 37 1952 4403
Peak Per T L R L R T TOTAL Peak Per T L R L R T TOTAL
1600 - 1700 879 26 14 13 5 398 1335 1100 - 1200 507 26 21 3 12 507 1076
1615 - 1715 902 30 14 14 6 403 1369 1115 - 1215 537 23 17 4 10 491 1082
1630 - 1730 917 25 12 11 5 397 1367 1130 - 1230 555 25 15 9 7 503 1114
1645 - 1745 874 27 11 11 5 386 1314 1145 - 1245 578 23 15 11 6 504 1137
1700 - 1800 867 33 11 8 5 396 1320 1200 - 1300 584 21 16 14 7 524 1166
1215 - 1315 569 24 16 13 8 539 1169
1230 - 1330 545 19 18 9 8 545 1144
1245 - 1345 550 19 15 9 9 540 1142
1300 - 1400 553 17 15 8 9 506 1108
1315 - 1415 538 16 15 8 10 469 1056
1330 - 1430 545 18 12 8 10 456 1049
1345 - 1445 560 24 22 8 8 421 1043
1400 - 1500 567 26 25 11 9 415 1053
PEAK HR 902 30 14 14 6 403 1369 PEAK HR 569 24 16 13 8 539 1169
ClientJob No/Name
Day/Date
Terry St Unwins Bridge
Rd
EAST SOUTHNORTH
Unwins Bridge
Rd
NORTH EAST SOUTH NORTH EAST SOUTH
Unwins Bridge
Rd
Terry St Unwins Bridge
Rd
NORTH EAST SOUTH
Terry St Unwins Bridge
Rd
Unwins Bridge
Rd
Terry St Unwins Bridge
Rd
Unwins Bridge
Rd
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
932 59320 N 555
902 30 569 24
36 3214 1614 13
28 29
403 6 539 8916 582
409 547
8191805 2301
8041767 2247
PM PEAK Sat PEAK
TOTAL VOLUMES
FOR COUNT
PERIODS
Unwins Bridge Rd
1615 - 1715 1215 - 1315
Terry St Terry St
Unwins Bridge Rd Unwins Bridge Rd
Unwins Bridge Rd Unwins Bridge Rd
Client
Unwins Bridge Rd Unwins Bridge Rd
Job No/NameDay/Date
2029
69 127Terry St Terry St
Unwins Bridge Rd
46 113
1989
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 12th & Saturday 7th August 2010
All Vehicles All Vehicles
Time Per T L R L R T TOTAL Time Per T L R L R T TOTAL
1600 - 1615 228 6 0 13 5 101 353 1100 - 1115 121 3 2 1 0 130 257
1615 - 1630 214 7 2 17 3 96 339 1115 - 1130 127 4 0 5 0 103 239
1630 - 1645 233 2 0 15 0 85 335 1130 - 1145 118 5 2 2 1 133 261
1645 - 1700 207 6 0 10 1 92 316 1145 - 1200 129 4 0 4 3 123 263
1700 - 1715 164 3 0 17 1 128 313 1200 - 1215 140 6 2 5 3 125 281
1715 - 1730 178 2 2 11 1 82 276 1215 - 1230 143 8 0 2 4 125 282
1730 - 1745 188 4 2 16 2 79 291 1230 - 1245 150 8 2 3 2 129 294
1745 - 1800 178 6 0 14 5 92 295 1245 - 1300 142 2 0 8 2 137 291
Period End 1590 36 6 113 18 755 2518 1300 - 1315 136 2 3 5 1 115 262
1315 - 1330 132 4 1 4 1 125 267
1330 - 1345 143 7 5 2 2 117 276
1345 - 1400 159 5 0 4 1 114 283
1400 - 1415 126 5 1 4 1 108 245
1415 - 1430 141 8 0 1 2 101 253
1430 - 1445 166 2 1 6 1 107 283
1445 - 1500 145 6 0 3 2 99 255
Period End 2218 79 19 59 26 1891 4292
Peak Per T L R L R T TOTAL Peak Per T L R L R T TOTAL
1600 - 1700 882 21 2 55 9 374 1343 1100 - 1200 495 16 4 12 4 489 1020
1615 - 1715 818 18 2 59 5 401 1303 1115 - 1215 514 19 4 16 7 484 1044
1630 - 1730 782 13 2 53 3 387 1240 1130 - 1230 530 23 4 13 11 506 1087
1645 - 1745 737 15 4 54 5 381 1196 1145 - 1245 562 26 4 14 12 502 1120
1700 - 1800 708 15 4 58 9 381 1175 1200 - 1300 575 24 4 18 11 516 1148
1215 - 1315 571 20 5 18 9 506 1129
1230 - 1330 560 16 6 20 6 506 1114
1245 - 1345 553 15 9 19 6 494 1096
1300 - 1400 570 18 9 15 5 471 1088
1315 - 1415 560 21 7 14 5 464 1071
1330 - 1430 569 25 6 11 6 440 1057
1345 - 1445 592 20 2 15 5 430 1064
1400 - 1500 578 21 2 14 6 415 1036
PEAK HR 882 21 2 55 9 374 1343 PEAK HR 575 24 4 18 11 516 1148
Tramway St Unwins Bridge
Rd
Unwins Bridge
Rd
Tramway St Unwins Bridge
Rd
Unwins Bridge
Rd
Unwins Bridge
Rd
Tramway St Unwins Bridge
Rd
NORTH EAST SOUTH
NORTH EAST SOUTH NORTH EAST SOUTH
ClientJob No/Name
Day/Date
Tramway St Unwins Bridge
Rd
EAST SOUTHNORTH
Unwins Bridge
Rd
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 12th & Saturday 7th August 2010
903 59911 N 520
882 21 575 24
30 352 455 18
57 22
374 9 516 11937 593
383 527
7611626 2297
7731703 2277
1910
54 105Tramway St Tramway St
Unwins Bridge Rd
119 78
1917
Unwins Bridge Rd Unwins Bridge Rd
Job No/NameDay/Date
Client
Unwins Bridge Rd
1600 - 1700 1200 - 1300
Tramway St Tramway St
Unwins Bridge Rd Unwins Bridge Rd
Unwins Bridge Rd Unwins Bridge Rd
PM PEAK Sat PEAK
TOTAL VOLUMES
FOR COUNT
PERIODS
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
All Vehicles All Vehicles
Time Per T L R L R T TOTAL Time Per T L R L R T TOTAL
1600 - 1615 191 0 3 11 0 90 295 1100 - 1115 102 0 4 9 0 120 235
1615 - 1630 205 0 4 10 0 99 318 1115 - 1130 119 0 3 5 0 100 227
1630 - 1645 221 0 2 12 0 86 321 1130 - 1145 119 0 8 8 0 132 267
1645 - 1700 228 0 0 11 0 108 347 1145 - 1200 122 0 1 7 0 127 257
1700 - 1715 206 0 4 11 0 102 323 1200 - 1215 134 0 3 9 0 127 273
1715 - 1730 201 0 3 15 0 106 325 1215 - 1230 158 0 5 5 0 123 291
1730 - 1745 188 0 2 8 0 86 284 1230 - 1245 138 0 3 13 0 136 290
1745 - 1800 208 0 6 18 0 110 342 1245 - 1300 145 0 3 13 0 145 306
Period End 1648 0 24 96 0 787 2555 1300 - 1315 118 0 2 10 0 124 254
1315 - 1330 125 0 3 8 0 121 257
1330 - 1345 147 0 4 10 0 135 296
1345 - 1400 149 0 4 14 0 112 279
1400 - 1415 131 0 5 7 0 104 247
1415 - 1430 192 0 10 8 0 108 318
1430 - 1445 158 0 7 5 0 98 268
1445 - 1500 149 0 2 8 0 104 263
Period End 2206 0 67 139 0 1916 4328
Peak Per T L R L R T TOTAL Peak Per T L R L R T TOTAL
1600 - 1700 845 0 9 44 0 383 1281 1100 - 1200 462 0 16 29 0 479 986
1615 - 1715 860 0 10 44 0 395 1309 1115 - 1215 494 0 15 29 0 486 1024
1630 - 1730 856 0 9 49 0 402 1316 1130 - 1230 533 0 17 29 0 509 1088
1645 - 1745 823 0 9 45 0 402 1279 1145 - 1245 552 0 12 34 0 513 1111
1700 - 1800 803 0 15 52 0 404 1274 1200 - 1300 575 0 14 40 0 531 1160
1215 - 1315 559 0 13 41 0 528 1141
1230 - 1330 526 0 11 44 0 526 1107
1245 - 1345 535 0 12 41 0 525 1113
1300 - 1400 539 0 13 42 0 492 1086
1315 - 1415 552 0 16 39 0 472 1079
1330 - 1430 619 0 23 39 0 459 1140
1345 - 1445 630 0 26 34 0 422 1112
1400 - 1500 630 0 24 28 0 414 1096
PEAK HR 856 0 9 49 0 402 1316 PEAK HR 575 0 14 40 0 531 1160
ClientJob No/Name
Day/Date
Union St Unwins Bridge
Rd
EAST SOUTHNORTH
Unwins Bridge
Rd
NORTH EAST SOUTH NORTH EAST SOUTH
Unwins Bridge
Rd
Union St Unwins Bridge
Rd
NORTH EAST SOUTH
Union St Unwins Bridge
Rd
Unwins Bridge
Rd
Union St Unwins Bridge
Rd
Unwins Bridge
Rd
R.O.A.R. DATA : G.T.AReliable, Original & Authentic Results : 3203 TEMPE Traffic CountsPh.88196847, Fax 88196849, Mob.0418-239019 : Thursday 5th & Saturday 7th August 2010
856 5759 N 545
856 0 575 0
0 09 1449 40
58 54
402 0 531 0905 615
402 531
8111648 2206
7871744 2345
PM PEAK Sat PEAK
TOTAL VOLUMES
FOR COUNT
PERIODS
Unwins Bridge Rd
1630 - 1730 1200 - 1300
Union St Union St
Unwins Bridge Rd Unwins Bridge Rd
Unwins Bridge Rd Unwins Bridge Rd
Client
Unwins Bridge Rd Unwins Bridge Rd
Job No/NameDay/Date
1983
0 0Union St Union St
Unwins Bridge Rd
120 206
1916
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
STATION STREET EAST, TEMPE : Between PRINCES HIGHWAY & SOUTH STREET (bidirectional) : Street
Between Young Street and Old Street, House No. 26, ELP KO20727Location Carriageway
6106 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
100Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
75321
15193565574847525671726691506027321614
1 1 1 0 0 3 4 7
13 11 10 9
10 11 14 14 13 18 10 12 5 6 3 3
2 1 1 0 1 2 4 6
11 10 9 9
12 13 15 14 12 16 10 12 6 6 3 3
1110434
162542807261668790
1059985
113688144392020
179 154 176 185 217 213 121
2 1 1 1 2 0 40 0 1 2 2 4 10 0 1 0 2 0 10 0 0 1 1 1 00 0 0 0 1 2 16 2 2 2 3 1 02 6 4 3 4 4 26 3 6 7 13 4 3
16 12 17 10 10 13 28 8 15 14 12 12 39 10 11 8 10 9 49 8 7 9 14 13 6
12 8 11 10 11 20 1516 11 11 12 6 23 119 9 9 17 27 23 11
12 17 10 15 18 21 610 14 15 11 16 10 918 15 15 23 20 11 118 8 9 10 15 8 10
18 3 8 17 14 13 86 6 5 5 5 11 65 5 12 5 5 4 34 4 4 0 4 1 33 4 2 3 2 5 1
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
911 1245182 177
35 182 178
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 25
UBD 275 B-3
9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 55 34.7 / E151 09 37.4
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
HART STREET, TEMPE : Between PRINCES HIGHWAY & SOUTH STREET (bidirectional) : Street
Mid Section, House No. 42, ELP KO20742Location Carriageway
6107 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
100Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
83325
222042
116113
8483749090
152119135
905236251724
2 1 1 0 1 4 4 8
23 23 17 17 15 18 18 30 24 27 18 10 7 5 3 5
2 1 1 0 1 3 3 7
20 23 18 19 17 19 18 29 23 23 15 9 7 5 3 4
119736
242247
143161126135116131126203162163104
6649342330
269 252 288 293 303 295 201
2 1 2 3 0 3 00 0 0 1 2 3 30 1 1 0 1 2 21 0 0 0 1 1 00 1 1 1 2 1 05 4 4 4 5 2 05 5 2 5 3 0 2
14 7 7 5 9 2 328 27 23 19 19 21 625 16 26 22 24 23 2514 14 20 19 17 30 1218 17 16 12 20 30 2212 17 12 18 15 22 2017 17 18 17 21 20 2113 18 15 17 27 19 1729 27 30 38 28 37 1417 18 34 23 27 27 1631 27 22 28 27 16 1216 12 21 22 19 10 44 8 13 16 11 10 4
10 4 6 9 7 5 82 3 9 4 7 4 53 6 3 1 4 2 43 2 3 9 7 5 1
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
1405 1901281 271
34 281 272
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 25
UBD 275 B-3
9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 55 34.0 / E151 09 40.4
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
WENTWORTH STREET, TEMPE : Between PRINCES HIGHWAY & SOUTH STREET (bidirectional) : Street
Mid Section, House No.30, ELP KO20595Location Carriageway
6108 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
100Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
92103
128
3831346454505752434538302316161510
2 0 0 0 1 2 2 8 6 7
13 11 10 11 10 9 9 8 6 5 3 3 3 2
1 1 0 0 1 2 2 7 6
10 14 12 11 12 10 9 9 7 6 4 3 3 3 2
105225
1212484069
10185748671646652412924221815
140 120 116 129 146 190 112
3 0 1 3 2 1 00 1 0 1 0 2 10 0 1 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 2 00 0 0 1 2 0 23 3 1 2 3 0 03 1 2 1 1 1 36 7 11 5 9 9 18 8 1 5 9 6 39 7 4 5 9 21 14
11 12 14 11 16 23 1411 11 8 13 11 18 1313 8 7 16 6 14 109 8 6 12 22 19 10
10 12 10 8 12 14 59 7 9 13 5 18 39 8 12 10 6 16 5
12 7 7 7 5 7 77 3 6 4 10 4 73 5 5 5 5 0 64 3 3 3 3 4 42 6 3 1 4 6 04 1 3 2 5 1 24 2 2 1 1 4 1
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
651 953130 136
40 130 136
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 29
UBD 275 B-3
9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 55 28.8 / E151 09 41.9
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
FANNING STREET, TEMPE : Between PRINCES HIGHWAY & SOUTH STREET (bidirectional) : Street
Mid Section, House No.63, ELP LE20581Location Carriageway
6109 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
100Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
33069
17164578392838373835354267512621151814
1 1 0 1 2 3 3 9
16 8 6 8 7 8 7 7 8
13 10 5 4 3 4 3
2 1 0 1 2 3 3 7
13 7 6 9 7 9 7 9 7
12 9 5 4 3 4 2
14718
1121234890524165526152635084653526182816
125 116 133 144 163 125 125
2 0 1 0 0 8 30 0 2 0 1 2 20 0 0 0 0 0 11 1 1 2 1 2 00 3 1 3 2 2 02 4 3 5 3 3 13 4 3 3 3 4 38 10 9 7 11 1 2
12 8 15 25 18 9 311 3 3 15 7 4 97 4 5 5 7 4 9
10 4 7 7 10 13 143 7 11 5 11 11 42 7 14 8 7 10 136 9 9 5 6 6 118 5 9 4 9 14 144 7 3 10 18 5 3
18 15 9 11 14 5 1211 9 9 10 12 6 87 3 5 6 5 4 53 6 2 3 7 2 32 4 2 3 4 2 12 2 7 2 5 6 43 1 3 5 2 2 0
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
681 931136 133
34 136 133
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 24
UBD 275 C-3
9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 55 29.0 / E151 09 41.8
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
BARDEN STREET, TEMPE : Between PRINCES HIGHWAY & SOUTH STREET (bidirectional) : Street
Mid Section, House No.55, ELP KO20575Location Carriageway
6110 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
100Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
310318
18374441384029303053663536301914163
1 0 0 1 0 2 4 7 9 8 8 8 6 6 6
11 13 7 7 6 4 3 3 1
1 1 0 1 0 1 3 6 8 7 7 7 6 6 6 9
11 7 7 5 4 3 3 1
66052
1022445748515243424061795050382518235
115 110 112 124 134 105 77
2 0 0 0 1 3 00 0 0 1 0 3 20 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 1 1 1 0 20 0 1 0 0 1 02 1 2 1 2 2 02 7 2 4 3 2 2
12 12 4 4 5 4 37 6 7 15 9 11 24 4 10 9 14 4 36 8 9 9 6 4 97 6 10 5 12 5 76 4 1 8 10 12 27 8 4 4 7 6 6
10 8 7 3 2 7 310 10 14 7 12 3 520 10 9 10 17 8 53 8 8 10 6 9 66 5 7 6 12 7 73 5 4 12 6 3 54 4 6 2 3 2 43 1 2 6 2 2 20 3 3 6 4 5 21 0 1 1 0 2 0
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
595 777119 111
29 119 111
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 21
UBD 275 C-3
9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
SMITH STREET, TEMPE : Between PRINCES HIGHWAY & SOUTH STREET (bidirectional) : Street
Mid Section, between Princes Highway and Wood Street, House No. 30, ELP KO20564Location Carriageway
6111 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
200Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
19133
1131
127202289438329349341377352372338431382251182
78747237
4 3 1 2 6
25 40 58 88 66 70 68 75 70 74 68 86 76 50 36 16 15 14 7
4 3 1 3 5
20 33 46 73 59 65 67 68 63 66 63 70 65 43 30 16 15 14 8
30248
2136
139232325511414453468479442459440487458303207110103100
57
1013 969 982 1010 1124 727 481
5 3 4 3 4 7 44 3 2 0 4 6 51 1 0 0 1 2 33 2 1 3 2 2 85 8 4 6 8 5 0
20 29 28 26 24 9 346 43 40 41 32 19 1158 60 57 46 68 22 1489 90 77 95 87 56 1761 45 74 64 85 53 3260 69 71 75 74 55 4974 54 68 67 78 80 4774 79 76 56 92 61 4167 64 65 76 80 53 3779 89 52 70 82 52 3577 74 56 64 67 57 4593 67 87 96 88 33 2375 64 72 84 87 52 2447 47 50 53 54 26 2637 29 40 36 40 14 1110 18 20 15 15 19 1314 14 21 11 14 16 139 12 11 12 28 10 185 5 6 11 10 18 2
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
5098 63061019 900
49 1020 901
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 38
UBD 275 C-2
16TH / 9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 55 26.7 / E151 09 47.5
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
GANNON STREET, TEMPE : Between UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD & PRINCES HIGHWAY (bidirectional) : Street
Mid Section, between Edwin Street and Bus Museum Entrance, House No. 54, ELPLocation Carriageway
6112 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
100Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
341196160224523
131232005174491839323247338735023848457951215270570242032829207317531235
758
68 39 32 45
105 262 640
1035 984 786 649 677 700 770 916
1024 1054 1140 841 566 415 351 247 152
87 53 53 53
106 236 527 842 847 758 691 734 759 800 894 975 986
1047 785 541 399 343 255 162
607371370369742
1650368658965929530848345135531656016260682669037329549437902794240317871134
13030 13092 13179 13913 14273 12881 10166
66 68 51 85 71 115 15133 39 41 36 47 73 10228 28 22 24 58 98 11246 43 39 42 54 63 8299 104 107 103 110 117 102
265 259 246 268 274 191 147604 640 656 642 658 303 183
1022 1045 1017 1050 1040 452 270981 1063 845 1030 999 664 347787 797 740 845 763 826 550672 654 572 650 699 955 632666 650 648 710 713 961 787712 665 662 687 776 975 839712 722 789 745 880 953 800838 907 840 995 999 960 721
1027 967 1028 1022 1077 960 7451025 972 1079 1125 1069 893 7401175 1086 1135 1188 1118 876 751
795 803 904 818 883 712 579539 507 599 579 605 523 438368 386 401 483 435 365 356295 322 385 375 376 315 335163 221 250 255 346 306 246112 144 123 156 223 225 151
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
67487 9053413497 12933
48 13497 12933
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 40
UBD 275 A-2
9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 55 24.7 / E151 09 27.8
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
GANNON STREET, TEMPE : Between UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD & PRINCES HIGHWAY (bidirectional) : Street
House No 18-20 ELP closer to Highway ELP K020282Location Carriageway
6209 GTARef :
16-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
1200Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
337202209263547
131732815150538642713309339736094026442053765488584344403075233720371400
854
67 40 42 53
109 263 656
1030 1077 854 662 679 722 805 884
1075 1098 1169 888 615 467 407 280 171
108 66 64 64
104 243 540 837 915 817 709 734 788 845 915
1029 1033 1072 817 582 437 394 302 192
758464447446731
1701377858596402572249605141551659166404720172327503571740753062276021151345
13385 13998 13958 14321 14912 13603 11078
63 65 58 72 79 140 28137 41 25 44 55 96 16638 37 36 40 58 92 14655 47 56 54 51 72 111
107 103 105 121 111 90 94256 271 259 266 265 194 190589 676 685 665 666 304 193986 1078 1049 1044 993 453 256
1051 1100 1055 1065 1115 666 350838 865 820 853 895 853 598655 668 600 703 683 953 698640 662 644 666 785 952 792671 672 709 750 807 1013 894755 835 728 759 949 1067 823817 878 879 835 1011 1101 883
1017 1044 1050 1093 1172 987 8381080 1108 1104 1098 1098 887 8571198 1146 1260 1149 1090 839 821
817 832 941 915 935 698 579564 600 644 674 593 535 465374 448 463 546 506 373 352390 389 384 452 422 385 338248 283 247 275 347 483 232139 150 157 182 226 370 121
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
70574 9525514114 13607
47 14115 13608
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 38
UBD 275 A-2
16TH / 23RD 17TH 18TH 19TH 20TH 21ST 22ND
Lat/Long : S33 55 28.6 / E151 09 34.3
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
LYMERSTON STREET, TEMPE : Between UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD & PRINCES HIGHWAY (bidirectional) : Street
Mid Section, between John Street and William Street, House No.39, 10m east of ELP LE25071Location Carriageway
6116 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
100Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
2540374663
223484694738471267300290285352372388372296215131116101
57
5 8 7 9
13 45 97
139 148 94 53 60 58 57 70 74 78 74 59 43 26 23 20 11
8 8 8
10 12 37 77
107 119 83 54 61 61 62 68 71 73 71 54 42 26 22 19 12
5456567281
257540751830582375428425435475500511496378291179157136
81
1187 1211 1307 1340 1318 993 790
5 4 11 3 2 17 125 7 9 9 10 6 107 5 4 8 13 8 117 11 10 8 10 14 12
10 12 11 15 15 7 1140 42 46 48 47 20 1491 82 104 96 111 38 18
137 133 138 151 135 35 22153 127 162 161 135 57 35
75 103 102 89 102 61 5042 65 48 53 59 61 4760 50 61 59 70 72 5652 51 69 57 61 66 6958 62 49 53 63 89 6164 63 62 83 80 68 5557 71 77 83 84 75 5372 80 73 93 70 68 5569 76 77 89 61 68 5666 49 77 54 50 46 3641 38 35 45 56 46 3021 22 28 30 30 20 2824 30 29 17 16 19 2222 20 19 21 19 21 149 8 6 15 19 11 13
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
6363 81461272 1163
44 1273 1164
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 35
UBD 255 C-16
9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 55 10.4 / E151 09 49.9
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
RAILWAY ROAD, SYDENHAM : From PRINCES HIGHWAY to UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD : NORTH WESTStreet
Combined Counts 6129 and 6132 Northwestbound about 100 Metres east of Unwins Bridge Road, outside house No Location Carriageway
6128 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
100Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
472279311307573
115620062120207226162641282729923139334039764304438537322297168715161197
737
94 56 62 61
115 231 401 424 414 523 528 565 598 628 668 795 861 877 746 459 337 303 239 147
111 70 68 64
101 200 339 373 398 504 529 575 619 633 654 742 775 791 677 434 324 297 248 158
777490476448710
1397237226092783353037044028433444344575519254255534473930402268208217341106
9802 9720 10200 10172 10788 9422 7683
83 93 86 105 105 148 15756 56 46 58 63 104 10757 59 56 63 76 82 8355 57 61 73 61 76 65
113 108 120 118 114 85 52220 224 221 239 252 161 80397 390 432 396 391 234 132436 395 450 414 425 305 184408 375 419 425 445 433 278526 511 534 523 522 558 356522 501 537 497 584 614 449553 536 570 588 580 690 511568 584 570 619 651 693 649609 576 637 623 694 711 584680 684 672 602 702 716 519780 767 784 778 867 669 547831 835 887 869 882 589 532895 868 873 905 844 591 558672 678 789 746 847 533 474438 427 437 465 530 405 338318 326 327 348 368 273 308254 307 333 327 295 277 289209 224 242 243 279 261 276122 139 117 148 211 214 155
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
50682 6778710136 9683
55 10136 9684
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 45
UBD 255 E-16
9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 55 03.3 / E151 10 03.4
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
RAILWAY ROAD, SYDENHAM : From UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD to PRINCES HIGHWAY : SOUTH EASTStreet
Combined Counts 6131 and 6133 Southeastbound about 100 Metres east of Unwins Bridge Road, 15m west of ELP Location Carriageway
6130 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
100Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
344245318447783
228737103252291533223149319231893180319329862873291326672217173917221350
748
69 49 64 89
157 457 742 650 583 664 630 638 638 636 639 597 575 583 533 443 348 344 270 150
98 65 69 91
142 393 619 561 533 618 621 640 646 647 638 611 585 585 516 432 334 330 265 168
689457483634994
2749433339283732432643474479452345264467427640934094361030262341231318561175
10273 10273 10383 10876 10936 10461 8249
60 55 66 74 89 155 19046 47 44 55 53 94 11863 67 62 54 72 100 6583 84 86 94 100 104 83
167 155 157 151 153 123 88466 472 454 461 434 279 183755 701 746 767 741 413 210606 686 634 687 639 408 268553 605 575 537 645 518 299682 657 642 656 685 583 421616 630 614 636 653 695 503623 610 635 658 666 688 599645 607 643 642 652 733 601622 624 616 671 647 757 589650 623 622 629 669 708 566601 599 603 613 570 706 584537 575 538 642 581 633 587623 529 598 566 597 637 544498 510 522 571 566 518 425416 394 447 466 494 416 393322 312 342 382 381 298 304297 348 340 412 325 306 285229 267 246 281 327 291 215113 116 151 171 197 298 129
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
52741 7145110548 10207
55 10548 10207
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 44
UBD 255 E-16
9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 55 03.2 / E151 10 03.4
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD, SYDENHAM : From GANNON STREET to CAMPBELL STREET : NORTH EASTStreet
Northbound between Lymerston Street and Samuel Street, House No. 103, ELP 615/1Location Carriageway
6134 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
100Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
160103120184351
115027674438414629781981172317161701180619571810184415611120
796756541357
32 21 24 37 70
230 553 888 829 596 396 345 343 340 361 391 362 369 312 224 159 151 108 71
42 25 30 39 58
187 444 685 678 533 404 374 364 359 371 391 356 363 306 226 158 143 103 71
296175207270405
13113108479447493728282526182547251126002738248925402142158511051001
721495
6860 7129 7028 7510 7539 6130 4764
16 26 35 32 51 65 7122 14 16 24 27 29 4315 22 29 18 36 40 4730 41 40 34 39 50 3659 77 73 66 76 29 25
211 232 240 226 241 102 59547 544 538 568 570 226 115874 845 903 915 901 229 127802 830 814 860 840 388 215548 644 565 654 567 386 364386 395 385 396 419 449 395341 375 306 346 355 495 400328 361 319 366 342 445 386336 342 301 345 377 454 356322 361 336 386 401 445 349363 345 414 409 426 438 343367 351 361 378 353 372 307342 347 375 379 401 364 332281 311 320 309 340 348 233216 198 202 232 272 277 188138 137 173 165 183 172 137134 146 151 199 126 127 118116 126 80 113 106 109 71
66 59 52 90 90 91 47
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
36066 469607213 6708
56 7213 6709
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 46
UBD 255 B-15
9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 55 06.5 / E151 09 49.0
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD, SYDENHAM : From GANNON STREET to CAMPBELL STREET : SOUTH WESTStreet
Southbound between Lymerston Street and Samuel Street, House No. 300, 10m north of ELP LE25051Location Carriageway
6135 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
100Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
355229181123163344901
187322581728175219982169250932503863439242053651209914151243
946662
71 46 36 25 33 69
180 375 452 346 350 400 434 502 650 773 878 841 730 420 283 249 189 132
92 59 57 38 38 64
150 301 383 328 361 415 471 502 616 708 780 741 634 377 265 231 186 141
645413401265263451
10482109268222972525290632953517431249565461518744382639185216191302
986
8068 8173 8427 8671 8970 7431 5829
66 75 63 76 75 137 15333 41 46 54 55 72 11225 32 30 39 55 108 11224 16 23 27 33 80 6228 25 34 37 39 44 5672 68 64 67 73 62 45
156 183 199 175 188 89 58389 369 366 366 383 123 113425 441 454 470 468 265 159315 331 363 372 347 320 249334 339 326 375 378 478 295393 390 349 427 439 495 413411 399 432 431 496 610 516492 463 491 509 554 568 440653 607 628 669 693 632 430756 789 792 741 785 624 469859 884 872 868 909 584 485861 858 857 836 793 534 448690 682 750 721 808 447 340387 393 413 463 443 295 245246 269 272 326 302 241 196220 241 264 300 218 193 183142 159 209 193 243 212 144
91 119 130 129 193 218 106
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
42309 555698461 7938
54 8462 7938
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 44
UBD 255 B-15
9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 55 06.7 / E151 09 49.4
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD, SYDENHAM : From GANNON STREET to CAMPBELL STREET : NORTH EASTStreet
Combined Counts 6136 and 6137 Northbound between Frederick Street and Sutherland Street, House No.17-19 , opLocation Carriageway
6138 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
100Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
199135189208416
116328974800465132872339206821032150220921942080205217901208
865720613422
40 27 38 42 83
233 579 960 930 657 468 414 421 430 442 439 416 410 358 242 173 144 123 84
53 35 47 46 73
188 463 742 748 595 460 437 437 436 443 441 410 406 355 242 175 142 120 86
370245326322511
1315324151965239416332223061306030493102308428692843248616921224
997843599
7734 8033 7989 8381 8621 6995 5306
25 41 36 46 51 74 9722 21 26 28 38 49 6138 35 39 38 39 61 7634 38 40 47 49 61 5372 82 86 82 94 54 41
236 249 220 212 246 97 55598 576 584 557 582 237 107951 942 953 980 974 281 115922 921 926 921 961 365 223603 697 635 714 638 449 427416 459 460 485 519 488 395397 437 410 409 415 573 420427 432 382 429 433 537 420403 415 407 432 493 491 408394 449 421 474 471 491 402398 415 463 438 480 503 387401 376 398 454 451 438 351382 390 420 437 423 436 355331 347 363 362 387 409 287213 210 220 247 318 295 189142 173 187 182 181 208 151124 135 147 178 136 146 131123 125 107 137 121 137 93
82 68 59 92 121 115 62
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
40758 530598151 7579
58 8152 7580
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 48
UBD 255 E-14
9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 54 50.7 / E151 10 11.1
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD, SYDENHAM : From GANNON STREET to CAMPBELL STREET : SOUTH WESTStreet
Conbined Counts 6139 and 6140 Southbound between Frederick Street and Sutherland Street, House No. 176, ELPLocation Carriageway
6141 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
100Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
443267244181293456
12412328295024532510277129863205412050275672597042762543179316251234
891
89 53 49 36 59 91
248 466 590 491 502 554 597 641 824
1005 1134 1194 855 509 359 325 247 178
120 70 76 52 62 87
208 382 507 462 509 572 626 654 787 922
1004 1028 758 461 337 304 249 192
838487530362436610
145426713549323735654004438445815509645470257194530832262360212517461346
10648 10747 11083 11251 11750 9906 7616
74 80 88 106 95 192 20344 50 52 59 62 91 12936 39 38 57 74 136 15035 30 29 42 45 100 8149 50 61 69 64 73 70
100 87 84 91 94 97 57241 241 246 246 267 141 72474 498 453 439 464 196 147556 577 603 585 629 385 214477 479 501 472 524 458 326508 484 459 521 538 622 433571 546 519 559 576 673 560571 548 614 572 681 744 654635 617 628 653 672 818 558803 801 792 846 878 825 564998 977 1004 1020 1028 822 605
1076 1115 1163 1150 1168 713 6401231 1191 1204 1143 1201 666 558
799 845 870 870 892 568 464465 470 509 555 544 382 301315 319 378 393 388 321 246295 321 341 379 289 270 230172 230 268 242 322 309 203123 152 179 182 255 304 151
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
55479 7300111095 10428
57 11096 10429
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 48
UBD 255 E-14
9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 54 51.4 / E151 10 10.5
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
CAMPBELL STREET, ST PETERS : From UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD to BARWON PARK ROAD : EAST BOUNDStreet
Eastbound between Florence Street and ST Peters Street, opposite 120 and ELP LE31305Location Carriageway
6143 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
100Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
10976
119164315
11861908221422391803157115301637160916901498144514501118
825656617472230
22 15 24 33 63
237 382 443 448 361 314 306 327 322 338 300 289 290 224 165 131 123 94 46
30 20 31 34 56
192 300 353 367 319 299 299 315 310 324 288 283 275 212 157 125 115 92 49
209143216237392
134321002473257222302092209122032173226820191983192414851101
878802641342
5197 5058 5212 5442 5572 4147 3289
19 16 14 28 32 46 5412 8 17 21 18 39 2822 25 22 26 24 49 4828 36 32 30 38 40 3350 60 60 68 77 43 34
246 240 253 226 221 103 54384 376 365 385 398 136 56462 412 454 443 443 162 97443 411 454 462 469 218 115358 365 357 353 370 266 161283 297 312 341 338 286 235303 270 299 323 335 327 234322 302 341 315 357 316 250334 307 308 346 314 300 264331 333 306 345 375 318 260315 302 296 289 296 278 243276 303 285 275 306 276 262277 256 298 304 315 254 220246 207 206 238 221 194 173149 155 169 175 177 143 133116 108 106 160 166 90 132112 142 122 146 95 91 94
70 98 91 94 119 95 7439 29 45 49 68 77 35
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
26481 339175296 4845
54 5296 4845
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 43
UBD 255 H-13
9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 54 40.4 / E151 10 38.9
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
CAMPBELL STREET, ST PETERS : From UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD to BARWON PARK ROAD : WEST BOUNDStreet
Westbound between Florence Street and ST Peters Street, house No: 120, ELP LE31305Location Carriageway
6144 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
100Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
126104
914863
136382685782788723834883879
11471563149817661098
460276189206161
25 21 18 10 13 27 76
137 156 158 145 167 177 176 229 313 300 353 220 92 55 38 41 32
24 20 18 13 13 23 62
110 132 139 142 156 169 162 207 262 253 285 181 80 52 36 39 32
168139126
8993
160437768924973991
10921184113614501836176919931264
557363254276223
2934 2824 3019 3039 3072 1955 1422
23 26 22 29 26 23 1922 19 17 22 24 18 1714 16 27 13 21 24 115 10 11 8 14 25 16
15 11 13 9 15 15 1518 23 29 33 33 17 773 65 78 72 94 41 14
140 134 147 125 139 51 32159 142 159 158 164 95 47161 160 149 159 159 118 67122 124 152 164 161 166 102173 144 176 176 165 159 99167 156 170 186 204 159 142184 171 188 161 175 144 113242 219 206 240 240 205 98311 299 328 313 312 143 130312 304 297 297 288 139 132336 343 386 346 355 124 103211 224 228 243 192 91 75
93 83 81 97 106 52 4560 55 45 60 56 52 3527 35 48 47 32 27 3837 30 40 45 54 31 3929 31 22 36 43 36 26
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
14888 182652977 2609
53 2978 2609
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 44
UBD 255 H-13
9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 54 40.5 / E151 10 38.9
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
TRAMWAY STREET, TEMPE : Between UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD & EDWIN STREET (bidirectional) : Street
Around midblock, 1/2 way between Unwins and Edwin, 12m west of ELP KO20265Location Carriageway
6174 GTARef :
06-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
2000Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
1414556
3678
218424218154142152155274342350406258135
83806346
3 3 1 1 1 7
16 44 85 44 31 28 30 31 55 68 70 81 52 27 17 16 13 9
4 4 1 1 1 6
12 34 66 41 35 31 35 35 51 63 63 70 46 27 18 15 12 10
27261069
4484
239461289245219246248358443443489325190123102
8568
701 689 733 768 767 598 523
2 4 2 4 2 9 46 0 4 1 3 6 60 1 0 2 2 2 30 1 1 1 2 1 02 2 1 1 0 1 24 5 8 7 12 3 5
15 14 20 15 14 3 339 38 48 49 44 12 970 75 105 92 82 25 1245 40 50 41 42 38 3331 31 23 30 39 45 4626 27 29 34 26 37 4037 25 31 28 31 53 4138 22 24 41 30 45 4843 61 43 59 68 40 4461 72 63 71 75 53 4869 63 73 83 62 48 4585 72 77 78 94 42 4150 58 54 51 45 43 2429 26 23 24 33 31 2416 18 15 19 15 19 2114 17 14 17 18 14 814 10 12 11 16 12 105 7 13 9 12 16 6
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
3658 4779731 682
39 732 683
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 32
UBD 275 A-2
9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH / 6TH 7TH 8TH
Lat/Long : S33 55 21.0 / E151 09 31.2
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
UNNAMED LANE BEHIND SCHOOL, TEMPE : Between UNION STREET & BROOKLYN STREET (bidirectional) : Street
Around midblock House opposite ELP LE22920Location Carriageway
6175 GTARef :
06-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
2000Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
21012
1652
108213157
82788174
127267204205
803641211613
0 0 0 0 0 3
10 22 43 31 16 16 16 15 25 53 41 41 16 7 8 4 3 3
0 1 0 0 0 3 8
16 33 26 17 16 18 18 23 42 33 35 14 8 8 5 3 3
35032
2156
112233184116109124127161291231247
995459362419
370 320 387 402 398 246 193
1 0 0 1 0 0 10 0 0 1 0 1 30 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 2 00 1 1 0 0 0 01 4 5 3 3 1 4
10 14 9 10 9 4 022 19 25 17 25 3 137 44 39 42 51 10 1033 30 35 32 27 15 1220 11 15 20 16 21 1319 8 21 15 15 16 1511 13 16 18 23 20 239 10 11 20 24 25 28
14 24 29 33 27 20 1457 48 55 56 51 12 1242 23 52 47 40 17 1040 33 50 42 40 24 1820 14 9 18 19 15 411 6 4 7 8 12 610 7 5 10 9 10 88 6 1 4 2 8 74 3 2 4 3 6 20 2 3 2 6 4 2
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
1877 2316375 330
36 375 331
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 27
UBD 275 B-1
9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH / 6TH 7TH 8TH
Lat/Long : S33 55 17.7 / E151 09 40.7
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
UNNAMED LANE NEAR HIGHWAY, TEMPE : Between UNION STREET & BROOKLYN STREET (bidirectional) : Street
Around midblock House ELP KO20220Location Carriageway
6176 GTARef :
06-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
2100Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
333415
10508452332738354554545240251213134
1 1 1 1 0 1 2
10 17 10 7 5 8 7 9
11 11 10 8 5 2 3 3 1
1 1 0 1 0 1 2 8
13 10 8 8
10 8 8
11 10 10 8 5 3 2 2 1
743517
12579368575669545979696855341817177
129 116 137 142 136 154 102
1 0 1 1 0 2 20 1 1 1 0 1 00 2 1 0 0 0 00 1 1 1 1 1 00 1 0 0 0 0 01 1 1 1 1 1 13 1 1 2 3 2 09 9 12 11 9 5 2
14 17 15 20 18 6 313 12 9 12 6 7 94 6 7 6 10 17 76 2 7 2 10 17 127 5 9 7 10 17 149 3 12 5 6 8 114 8 10 14 9 9 5
10 7 10 15 12 12 1312 8 11 14 9 10 510 12 12 11 7 8 85 8 9 7 11 13 28 5 3 5 4 8 14 0 1 3 4 3 35 4 0 1 3 2 23 3 3 3 1 2 21 0 1 0 2 3 0
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
660 916132 130
34 132 131
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 20
UBD 275 B-1
9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH / 6TH 7TH 8TH
Lat/Long : S33 55 21.4 / E151 09 44.4
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
SOUTH STREET, TEMPE : Between STATION STREET & SMITH STREET (bidirectional) : Street
Between Barden and Fanning Streets, Opposite House No 3, ELP KO22175Location Carriageway
6208 GTARef :
16-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
1300Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
123398
49116233358267161162193180202228207230198120
86584832
2 1 1 2 2
10 23 47 72 53 32 32 39 36 40 46 41 46 40 24 17 12 10 6
4 1 1 2 2 8
19 37 59 48 36 37 40 38 40 47 41 42 35 22 16 11 9 7
2787
141253
132261410336249258279263283327285295248152110
786248
569 616 632 640 706 618 416
2 3 1 3 3 7 80 1 1 0 1 3 21 0 1 0 1 0 41 2 3 2 1 4 13 2 1 1 1 3 17 12 8 12 10 3 1
26 22 24 18 26 12 442 56 49 46 40 21 767 74 76 73 68 35 1752 48 51 50 66 42 2729 35 24 31 42 56 3224 31 33 37 37 66 3028 33 36 39 57 44 4238 36 32 31 43 55 2830 39 41 39 53 41 4054 46 34 48 46 61 3843 39 46 41 38 38 4044 39 37 56 54 40 2524 47 51 44 32 34 1623 17 33 19 28 15 179 10 29 15 23 10 148 9 7 22 12 8 12
10 9 5 7 17 9 54 6 9 6 7 11 5
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
3163 4197632 599
41 633 600
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 24
UDB 275 C-3
16TH / 23RD 17TH 18TH 19TH 20TH 21ST 22ND
Lat/Long : S33 55 33.8 / E151 09 47.2
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
SAMUEL STREET, TEMPE : Between UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD & PRINCES HIGHWAY (bidirectional) : Street
Between Henry and the Highway, about 1/2 distance, close to laneway, opposite House No.2A, 10m west and oppositLocation Carriageway
6180 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
1600Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
262012302337
125266313232169176199202238300271263251193139115111
52
5 4 2 6 5 7
25 53 63 46 34 35 40 40 48 60 54 53 50 39 28 23 22 10
8 5 4 7 4 7
21 43 54 44 36 39 45 42 51 58 53 51 46 37 26 23 24 12
543627462852
145298378311251273313293354403374360325259179161165
87
804 841 347 863 908 758 651
4 9 4 0 9 15 134 6 2 0 8 9 72 2 3 1 4 9 66 10 6 2 6 9 74 8 5 3 3 2 37 8 7 2 13 5 10
31 24 26 10 34 15 548 55 49 55 59 13 1971 55 62 64 61 42 2345 56 49 48 34 45 3437 35 30 36 31 41 4139 40 32 35 30 61 3642 44 25 43 45 62 5240 48 0 51 63 44 4748 55 0 60 75 61 5567 64 3 83 83 51 5265 66 1 73 66 57 4665 66 8 74 50 47 5061 66 4 60 60 47 2740 31 11 48 63 31 3523 33 7 44 32 16 2419 30 4 34 28 24 2227 20 6 25 33 28 269 10 3 12 18 24 11
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
3763 5172752 738
44 753 739
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 35
UBD 275 D-1
16TH / 9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 55 13.8 / E151 09 57.9
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
YELVERTON STREET, SYDENHAM : Between UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD & PRINCES HIGHWAY (bidirectional) : Street
Between Unwins Bridge Road and Henry St, about 1/3 distance from Henry to Unwins House No.74, ELP LE25518Location Carriageway
6181 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
1700Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
11864
165240
120152110115
9989
120125150122138110
9377683827
2 2 1 1 3
10 8
24 30 22 23 20 18 24 25 30 24 28 22 19 15 14 8 5
4 2 3 2 3 8 8
19 24 19 21 22 19 24 26 27 25 26 23 17 13 12 7 6
27111813215854
132170132149154133166181192173181158117
91875142
342 360 369 421 398 325 296
1 1 1 2 6 7 90 0 3 3 2 3 01 0 2 2 1 5 72 2 0 0 0 5 43 4 2 3 4 2 39 11 6 16 10 4 27 10 7 8 8 6 8
29 23 23 24 21 6 633 25 26 31 37 10 818 20 23 23 26 13 921 27 20 23 24 19 1521 16 17 30 15 25 3018 11 21 17 22 23 2126 24 22 20 28 25 2119 30 23 27 26 39 1725 28 36 28 33 21 2129 23 22 28 20 22 2919 25 27 39 28 21 2216 24 25 17 28 28 2019 17 21 20 16 11 137 15 13 27 15 4 10
10 11 11 19 17 12 77 10 12 4 5 3 102 3 6 10 6 11 4
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
1890 2511378 358
48 378 359
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 37
UBD 17 K-13
16TH / 9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 54 57.0 / E151 10 10.5
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
HENRY STREET, SYDENHAM : Between RAILWAY ROAD & GROVE STREET (bidirectional) : Street
Between Yelverton Street and Frederick, near Yelverton House No.48, ELP LE25514Location Carriageway
6182 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
1700Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
631017
94249405235122131158112145167171166139
8847463915
1 1 0 0 0 1
19 50 81 47 24 26 32 22 29 33 34 33 28 18 9 9 8 3
1 1 1 1 0 2
15 38 60 39 24 26 30 24 29 31 32 29 25 17 8 8 7 3
104443
13105263423270166185213166206215221206173116
54595021
498 459 533 502 555 330 273
2 1 2 0 1 2 20 0 1 0 2 0 11 0 0 0 0 1 20 0 0 0 0 3 11 0 0 0 0 0 20 2 1 2 2 3 3
15 20 16 17 26 5 656 45 54 45 49 12 282 78 77 81 87 13 548 41 53 43 50 13 2226 20 27 27 22 19 2529 18 31 31 22 32 2238 26 31 33 30 30 2524 13 23 21 31 31 2325 33 27 25 35 40 2129 29 35 30 44 29 1938 26 33 38 36 31 1926 31 35 37 37 16 2424 32 39 23 21 21 1315 20 21 12 20 13 155 5 9 12 16 1 63 10 10 14 9 8 59 9 5 6 10 4 72 0 3 5 5 3 3
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
2547 3150509 450
35 509 450
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 27
UBD 17 K-13
16TH / 9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 54 57.5 / E151 10 13.1
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
SILVER STREET, SYDENHAM : Between UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD & PRINCES HIGHWAY (bidirectional) : Street
Between Unwins Bridge Road and Florence, just less than 1/2 distance from Unwins to the Florence House No. 100, 1Location Carriageway
6183 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
1800Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
135549
3555
136240173145122129170157190155168150131101
993828
3 1 1 1 2 7
11 27 48 35 29 24 26 34 31 38 31 34 30 26 20 20 8 6
6 2 2 2 1 6 9
22 38 32 28 27 27 33 32 36 32 32 31 25 18 18 7 7
39131512104264
151268226199188187228221253222225216175129129
4746
497 462 398 534 567 443 404
4 4 0 1 4 11 152 1 0 2 0 6 21 0 0 3 1 6 40 1 0 1 2 5 33 3 0 0 3 1 07 7 0 13 8 5 2
15 16 0 9 15 4 532 34 0 33 37 9 655 54 0 68 63 22 633 31 25 41 43 27 2621 32 25 29 38 28 2626 18 25 28 25 28 3819 30 27 28 25 33 2531 33 31 30 45 32 2630 29 31 32 35 39 2535 34 41 46 34 30 3335 26 35 25 34 32 3534 36 30 28 40 31 2633 20 39 35 23 30 3624 26 22 31 28 22 2228 16 27 17 13 17 1124 11 21 17 26 13 174 0 9 12 13 3 61 0 10 5 12 9 9
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
2458 3305491 472
37 492 472
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 28
UBD 17 L-12
16TH / 9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 54 44.3 / E151 10 26.3
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
EDITH STREET, SYDENHAM : Between UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD & PRINCES HIGHWAY (bidirectional) : Street
Between Unwins Bridge Road and Henry St, about 1/4 distance from Unwins to the Highway House No.9, ELP LE310Location Carriageway
6184 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
1700Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
147785
43159415441209161135184179180210214234163110
87705223
3 1 1 2 1 9
32 83 88 42 32 27 37 36 36 42 43 47 33 22 17 14 10 5
3 2 3 1 1 7
25 63 69 35 29 29 35 34 35 38 40 46 31 23 16 14 9 5
201518107
48176439480246206203247240246264279320217163112
976634
606 662 674 669 699 467 376
0 3 2 5 4 0 61 2 2 0 2 2 60 1 3 2 1 6 53 2 1 1 1 1 11 1 2 0 1 1 1
12 6 4 10 11 4 133 25 29 32 40 10 774 80 88 89 84 13 1193 88 91 81 88 21 1839 50 40 43 37 17 2032 33 27 37 32 26 1933 24 24 18 36 36 3231 39 36 42 36 34 2927 45 42 33 32 32 2923 36 40 35 46 44 2237 34 53 40 46 25 2939 42 41 47 45 38 2736 50 44 47 57 52 3432 42 33 28 28 35 1915 18 23 33 21 26 2720 18 19 14 16 14 1110 10 19 14 17 15 128 9 7 14 14 8 67 4 4 4 4 7 4
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
3310 4153662 593
45 662 593
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 35
UBD 17 L-12
16TH / 9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 54 47.9 / E151 10 26.9
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
SUTHERLAND STREET, SYDENHAM : Between UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD & PRINCES HIGHWAY (bidirectional) : Street
Between Unwins Bridge Road and Henry St, about 1/3 distance from Henry to Unwins House No.13, 10m west of ELPLocation Carriageway
6187 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
1700Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
3522283225
100158230249228274273278297282347377364271218146106
9964
7 4 6 6 5
20 32 46 50 46 55 55 56 59 56 69 75 73 54 44 29 21 20 13
8 6 6 7 5
17 26 39 45 44 55 56 57 62 60 67 70 67 49 39 25 22 19 14
5640414937
118183271316311387394399432418466489471340274173155135
97
872 890 917 878 946 839 710
6 8 5 7 9 8 137 3 5 4 3 5 137 5 6 5 5 9 46 5 5 5 11 7 107 5 2 5 6 11 1
20 19 20 20 21 6 1227 31 26 33 41 16 942 44 62 38 44 29 1250 54 45 43 57 34 3333 46 48 48 53 43 4059 51 67 50 47 63 5054 68 52 45 54 55 6648 51 54 68 57 75 4643 63 65 57 69 79 5659 56 57 49 61 84 5267 64 71 73 72 63 5681 78 70 79 69 59 5383 68 68 68 77 58 4958 51 57 50 55 34 3553 40 40 42 43 20 3621 27 38 32 28 12 1516 22 21 26 21 30 1914 25 18 18 24 17 1911 6 15 13 19 22 11
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
4503 6052900 864
45 901 865
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 36
UBD 17 L-12
16TH / 9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 54 53.5 / E151 10 14.9
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
FREDERICK STREET, SYDENHAM : Between UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD & PRINCES HIGHWAY (bidirectional) : Street
Between Unwins Bridge Road and Henry St, about 1/3 distance from Henry to Unwins House No.77, 3m east of ELP LLocation Carriageway
6188 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
1700Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
3510264265
221156258453382457474490468491645669652432262203174
8973
7 2 5 8
13 44 31 52 91 76 91 95 98 94 98
129 134 130 86 52 41 35 18 15
7 4 7 8
12 37 30 44 80 78 88 96
104 99 98
119 117 119 80 52 36 32 19 16
5126475585
256210311560544619675730692683832820830562366254221130115
1405 1356 1418 1490 1558 1369 1078
6 7 8 6 8 11 52 3 3 1 1 12 47 5 6 4 4 11 108 4 10 7 13 8 5
10 10 12 15 18 13 750 43 43 43 42 22 1336 27 26 32 35 34 2053 39 58 45 63 25 2887 79 88 97 102 60 4777 74 74 73 84 93 6983 83 93 101 97 98 64
105 82 97 100 90 103 9895 89 88 107 111 129 11183 77 97 103 108 124 100
101 99 76 90 125 112 80116 108 137 143 141 117 70148 111 129 145 136 74 77134 139 123 139 117 95 83
88 97 97 85 65 75 5552 56 56 43 55 49 5530 42 40 42 49 25 2621 44 30 36 43 26 2110 29 15 14 21 21 203 9 12 19 30 32 10
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
7227 96741445 1382
46 1445 1382
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 36
UBD 17 L-12
16TH / 9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 54 55.1 / E151 10 12.3
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
EDWIN STREET, TEMPE : Between GANNON STREET & UNION STREET (bidirectional) : Street
Between Stanley Street and Union Street, House No.2 , ELP: LE22916Location Carriageway
6189 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
1600Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
20177
1241
156215219
9992
10291
225468435466218
8241282315
0 0 0 1 1 2 8
31 43 44 20 18 20 18 45 94 87 93 44 16 8 6 5 3
2 0 0 1 2 2 6
24 36 36 21 18 23 21 40 75 68 74 36 14 9 6 5 3
13219
111345
170250252144129159150279523474517255100
61413323
607 558 620 618 642 338 271
1 0 0 1 0 5 60 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 1 0 01 1 2 1 2 1 11 1 2 2 1 2 24 3 3 1 1 0 15 10 12 8 6 3 1
32 29 32 33 30 7 747 40 30 41 57 19 1654 40 50 41 34 20 1319 22 19 15 24 29 1624 17 13 14 24 25 1219 19 25 17 22 29 2823 10 12 22 24 26 3335 48 42 51 49 30 2488 80 93 101 106 33 2280 66 111 99 79 19 20
102 87 100 91 86 24 2738 55 40 40 45 23 1415 14 10 18 25 9 910 5 7 10 9 12 86 4 8 6 4 6 70 4 8 4 7 8 23 3 1 2 6 7 1
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
3045 3654609 522
36 609 522
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 21
UBD 275 B-1
16TH / 9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 55 19.2 / E151 09 36.4
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
GEORGE STREET, SYDENHAM : Between BURROWS ROAD & PRINCES HIGHWAY (bidirectional) : Street
Between Unwins Bridge and Henry Street, just West of Henry Street, House No.88, 6 m west of ELP LE25510Location Carriageway
6190 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
1700Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
3725
1217
109293446187123113
86135108118133151139
9253453524
1 1 0 1 2 3
22 59 89 37 25 23 17 27 22 24 27 30 28 18 11 9 7 5
2 1 1 1 2 3
17 44 67 32 22 22 19 25 22 23 26 25 23 16 10 8 7 4
121078
1320
117307468227155157130177153158181173163109
73585230
521 454 485 510 466 290 232
1 0 1 0 1 7 22 0 1 2 2 2 10 1 1 0 0 0 51 0 1 2 1 2 13 2 1 3 3 0 14 3 3 1 6 2 1
20 22 27 18 22 4 458 53 58 62 62 7 7
102 84 88 97 75 14 834 46 31 44 32 27 1318 14 32 37 22 17 1530 14 23 27 19 20 2423 18 15 18 12 23 2128 28 27 23 29 29 1323 20 19 26 20 23 2228 25 28 24 13 22 1833 18 33 28 21 22 2632 33 24 31 31 14 827 28 30 23 31 13 1122 19 15 14 22 11 69 11 5 14 14 12 8
12 9 6 7 11 10 38 4 11 5 7 7 103 2 5 4 10 2 4
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
2436 2958487 422
46 487 423
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 30
UBD 255 E-15
16TH / 9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 54 58.5 / E151 10 08.0
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
BELLEVUE ROAD, TEMPE : Between PRINCES HIGHWAY & SWAMP ROAD (bidirectional) : Street
Just East of Princes Highway, 10m east of ELP LE00489Location Carriageway
6191 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
1700Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
2066
2573
153521654658909980
10021033
873915764484150
311722453640
4 1 1 5
15 31
104 131 132 182 196 200 207 175 183 153 97 30 6 3 4 9 7 8
3 1 1 4
11 23 84
101 111 149 162 167 176 149 151 119 74 24 7 4 6 7 6 6
2368
2577
161587710775
104511321171122910411058
831516171
463039514040
1957 1801 1753 1936 1970 1169 226
2 2 14 2 0 0 30 4 1 1 0 0 02 0 3 0 1 0 28 4 1 6 6 0 0
15 22 3 19 14 4 024 23 23 48 35 8 0
110 96 97 104 114 66 0126 90 137 154 147 52 4131 111 106 159 151 111 6187 177 130 199 216 117 19203 159 188 217 213 132 20205 209 188 186 214 135 34231 190 201 202 209 168 28185 158 145 188 197 136 32189 200 186 175 165 122 21175 139 151 134 165 50 17113 85 109 94 83 22 10
34 28 34 30 24 8 134 13 4 8 2 13 22 10 4 1 0 5 83 6 8 1 4 13 46 18 15 4 2 3 30 27 3 2 4 4 02 30 2 2 4 0 0
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
9417 108121883 1544
29 1883 1545
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 17
UBD 275 E-1
16TH / 9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 55 15.0 / E151 10 04.6
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
PARK ROAD, SYDENHAM : Between UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD & PRINCES HIGHWAY (bidirectional) : Street
Just West of Henry Street, House No.63 ELP LE24728Location Carriageway
6206 GTARef :
16-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
1400Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
19171616153581
325525176123127168151195262239208186
9058453027
4 3 3 3 3 7
16 65
105 35 25 25 34 30 39 52 48 42 37 18 12 9 6 5
4 5 4 3 4 6
14 49 79 31 26 26 33 29 36 47 41 38 32 16 11 8 6 6
30322923254395
343554214185184230205250329287265224110
74544042
608 592 627 650 657 447 286
9 2 0 5 3 2 90 1 3 1 12 5 100 2 4 5 5 11 22 4 4 4 2 4 32 4 6 0 3 7 38 7 5 7 8 8 0
13 20 16 12 20 10 461 63 71 75 55 14 4
112 121 100 112 80 18 1134 24 31 40 47 23 1520 23 24 21 35 36 2623 21 20 35 28 22 3522 32 48 26 40 42 2032 28 27 27 37 33 2129 38 47 41 40 37 1852 41 54 62 53 44 2350 31 47 47 64 29 1949 39 40 37 43 37 2040 38 36 39 33 21 179 18 11 28 24 11 96 11 16 11 14 12 4
16 12 5 9 3 4 56 8 6 5 5 8 2
13 4 6 1 3 9 6
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
3134 3867626 552
43 627 552
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 32
UBD 255 D-16
16TH / 23RD 17TH 18TH 19TH 20TH 21ST 22ND
Lat/Long : S33 55 04.6 / E151 10 00.6
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
TERRY STREET, TEMPE : Between UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD & PRINCES HIGHWAY (bidirectional) : Street
Just West of Henry Street, House No.84, ELP LE25032Location Carriageway
6193 GTARef :
18-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
1400Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
11938
2045
153306441263190249216199205247299317248137
83875625
2 2 1 2 4 9
31 61 88 53 38 50 43 40 41 49 60 63 50 27 17 17 11 5
2 2 1 2 4 8
23 49 68 49 42 52 47 38 40 50 57 57 42 24 14 14 8 4
14126
152554
164341479345295363332265280348398396297166
98975625
854 816 761 781 605 682 372
4 4 1 2 0 3 04 1 4 0 0 3 00 0 1 2 0 3 02 1 2 3 0 7 05 3 7 5 0 5 0
11 17 9 8 0 9 034 41 39 39 0 11 071 81 70 84 0 35 0
114 108 112 105 2 38 054 45 55 62 47 54 2838 40 39 41 32 66 3943 60 37 52 57 66 4842 52 37 28 57 68 4837 44 36 29 53 37 2942 39 41 44 39 40 3553 38 47 57 52 49 52
124 45 42 40 48 54 4565 69 50 61 72 44 3544 61 41 45 57 36 1328 25 25 26 33 29 010 13 20 20 20 15 020 16 20 15 16 10 05 10 16 13 12 0 04 3 10 0 8 0 0
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
3817 4871763 695
50 763 696
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 41
UBD 255 D-16
23RD 24TH 18TH / 25TH 19TH 20TH 21ST 22ND
Lat/Long : S33 55 07.2 / E151 09 56.0
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
SAMUEL STREET, TEMPE : Between UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD & PRINCES HIGHWAY (bidirectional) : Street
Just West of Henry Street, House No. 66, ELP LE25061Location Carriageway
6194 GTARef :
09-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
1600Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
242417363161
153335335247197204268273353404351344338246185174133
56
5 5 3 7 6
12 31 67 67 49 39 41 54 55 71 81 70 69 68 49 37 35 27 11
7 7 5 7 5
11 25 54 59 50 41 48 57 57 72 75 70 66 63 46 31 32 26 13
484732503776
175375412347288335398397501527491464438322219221184
91
912 912 951 998 1016 936 750
2 9 3 2 8 11 134 6 3 3 8 12 112 3 4 5 3 6 97 8 5 9 7 10 46 6 7 7 5 3 3
12 13 11 10 15 9 636 29 27 30 31 17 562 69 61 70 73 19 2175 57 74 70 59 44 3351 52 55 47 42 68 3243 37 38 35 44 52 3944 46 42 39 33 82 4950 52 55 55 56 67 6351 56 45 56 65 74 5054 60 85 70 84 81 6782 75 63 94 90 68 5575 64 64 70 78 80 6066 68 74 81 55 55 6576 67 59 67 69 61 3935 39 54 54 64 32 4425 37 40 46 37 16 1826 28 42 39 39 22 2519 21 27 30 36 25 269 10 13 9 15 22 13
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
4789 6475957 925
50 958 925
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 42
UBD 255 D-15
16TH / 9TH 10TH 11TH 12TH 13TH 14TH 15TH
Lat/Long : S33 55 10.2 / E151 09 54.3
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
LYMERSTON STREET, TEMPE : Between UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD & PRINCES HIGHWAY (bidirectional) : Street
Mid Section, between William Street and Princes Highway, House No.8, ELP LE25083Location Carriageway
6195 GTARef :
18-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
1400Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
3326423384
227445660710446230289240263337366489350279197109142
9642
7 5 8 7
17 45 89
132 142 89 46 58 48 53 67 73 98 70 56 39 22 28 19 8
7 6
10 7
15 37 70
103 112 76 47 58 53 56 66 67 86 63 51 34 20 25 18 9
52416848
103257490720786535332409368392463472603443355236141174123
66
1316 1197 1227 1228 1167 864 678
5 5 7 10 6 8 116 4 7 3 6 9 66 6 12 10 8 17 97 8 6 4 8 7 8
13 19 20 16 16 12 748 46 47 41 45 17 1384 92 88 100 81 28 17
134 124 146 132 124 39 21158 146 143 138 125 44 32
77 97 90 91 91 48 4145 43 44 49 49 62 4056 67 65 53 48 76 4444 48 48 59 41 73 5550 57 52 52 52 74 5583 49 69 69 67 63 6390 68 75 56 77 60 46
189 82 66 83 69 58 5680 64 61 62 83 51 4246 61 52 62 58 38 3825 41 45 35 51 21 1827 23 20 27 12 17 1522 25 29 41 25 14 1813 14 29 23 17 18 98 8 6 12 8 10 14
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
6135 76771227 1096
48 1227 1097
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 38
UBD 275 D-1
23RD 24TH 18TH / 25TH 19TH 20TH 21ST 22ND
Lat/Long : S33 55 13.0 / E151 09 52.9
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
UNION STREET, TEMPE : From UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD to PRINCES HIGHWAY : WEST BOUNDStreet
One Way West, Adjacent House No.31 ELP LE40179Location Carriageway
6202 GTARef :
16-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
1600Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
2812109
183399
216291271220238271275390469538496394173120
939048
6 2 2 2 4 7
20 43 58 54 44 48 54 55 78 94
108 99 79 35 24 19 18 10
6 3 3 3 4 6
16 34 50 49 44 48 55 55 72 83 91 83 65 31 23 18 16 10
422119182542
111240348346309337383382505580635583458217161124110
68
942 906 928 999 1027 713 549
2 6 7 7 6 7 75 2 2 1 2 5 43 1 0 2 4 3 63 1 1 2 2 4 53 5 3 4 3 3 46 8 5 6 8 4 5
20 18 19 20 22 9 340 45 43 49 39 19 561 57 67 58 48 39 1858 53 52 45 63 51 2435 44 45 47 49 63 2652 43 37 54 52 61 3849 49 50 59 64 57 5551 51 56 54 63 56 5182 67 62 82 97 60 5599 82 98 99 91 61 50
107 93 120 112 106 48 49101 105 87 101 102 44 43
74 85 80 82 73 36 2835 36 41 29 32 24 2020 16 22 32 30 18 2315 13 12 22 31 16 1514 18 15 18 25 7 137 8 4 14 15 18 2
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
4802 6064960 866
42 960 866
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 24
UBD 275 B-1
16TH / 23RD 17TH 18TH 19TH 20TH 21ST 22ND
Lat/Long : S33 55 18.6 / E151 09 39.3
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
GROVE STREET, SYDENHAM : Between UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD & PRINCES HIGHWAY (bidirectional) : Street
Between Unwins Bridge Road and Henry St, Adjacent No 92 ELP LE25565Location Carriageway
6204 GTARef :
16-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
1500Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
312520362683
220354523341230210270241293317307365261175151144111
74
6 5 4 7 5
17 44 71
105 68 46 42 54 48 59 63 61 73 52 35 30 29 22 15
9 7 6 7 6
15 34 56 84 61 48 44 59 50 58 62 60 67 49 35 28 25 23 15
6349405241
106239389588427335309414351407434417467344247195176158104
915 935 951 1009 998 844 700
10 4 9 5 3 13 194 7 5 5 4 9 153 4 4 5 4 6 142 8 7 9 10 7 95 4 5 7 5 7 8
18 18 13 15 19 16 739 45 36 50 50 13 670 72 68 75 69 19 1695 119 106 105 98 37 2866 58 65 77 75 45 4144 34 55 50 47 60 4546 33 42 45 44 53 4635 56 52 60 67 81 6354 42 53 47 45 59 5156 57 48 73 59 62 5271 54 64 58 70 57 6070 65 59 56 57 61 4969 73 69 77 77 66 3658 51 47 48 57 46 3725 35 34 40 41 44 2827 28 37 31 28 22 2221 34 35 33 21 18 1419 21 24 18 29 29 188 13 14 20 19 14 16
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
4808 6352961 907
40 962 907
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 33
UBD 17 L-12
16TH / 23RD 17TH 18TH 19TH 20TH 21ST 22ND
Lat/Long : S33 54 50.6 / E151 10 16.4
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
MARY STREET, SYDENHAM : From UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD to PRINCES HIGHWAY : WEST BOUNDStreet
Between Albion Lane and Rolf Lane House No. 50 ELP LE31024Location Carriageway
6205 GTARef :
16-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
1500Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
139125
96101178421
102315001555150913241380148915522394266626312625246315681127
965773425
28 25 19 20 36 84
205 300 311 302 265 276 298 310 479 533 526 525 493 314 225 193 155 85
36 28 26 23 33 76
168 247 276 264 240 253 269 282 399 434 428 427 382 252 180 154 127 72
249197184164229532
1178173219291848168117681884197627923041299529912672176712591076
892505
3373 6428 6567 6737 6924 5092 420
0 24 36 37 42 54 560 35 32 31 27 42 300 20 14 30 32 50 380 25 22 26 28 35 280 35 51 47 45 33 181 109 113 98 100 64 470 248 250 247 278 109 460 386 375 377 362 171 611 387 378 402 387 280 940 359 392 388 370 338 10 314 342 314 354 357 00 346 337 328 369 387 10 351 377 384 377 395 00 363 364 385 440 424 0
477 435 469 468 545 398 0526 514 515 554 557 375 0534 493 520 532 552 364 0521 504 544 541 515 366 0460 543 488 490 482 209 0272 286 324 343 343 199 0198 208 213 266 242 132 0181 203 192 195 194 111 0128 164 138 170 173 119 0
74 76 81 84 110 80 0
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
30029 355416005 5077
40 6006 5077
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 34
UBD 17 L-12
16TH / 23RD 17TH 18TH 19TH 20TH 21ST 22ND
Lat/Long : S33 54 48.8 / E151 10 21.8
Traffic Count Summary Report
Copyright 1996 Data displayed has been compiled from pneumatic traffic countprocesses and is subject to the documented limitations
CFE Information Technologies
CfeIT bob.white@cfeit.com (02) 9740 8600
Page : 1
Count Number
FOREMAN STREET, TEMPE : Between UNWINS BRIDGE ROAD & PRINCES HIGHWAY (bidirectional) : Street
Mid Section between Laneways, Adjacent House No.19 as far away from speed hump 15m east of ELP LE22935Location Carriageway
6207 GTARef :
16-AUG-10Start Date
7 DAYS1 HOURInterval
1400Start TimeDurationTOTAL COUNT MATRIX
Midnight - 1am1am - 2am2am - 3am3am - 4am4am - 5am5am - 6am6am - 7am7am - 8am8am - 9am9am - 10am10am - 11am11am - MiddayMidday - 1pm1pm - 2pm2pm - 3pm3pm - 4pm4pm - 5pm5pm - 6pm6pm - 7pm7pm - 8pm8pm - 9pm9pm - 10pm10pm - 11pm11pm - Midnight
MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
11731
2264
351503539317192154195163167203171140
987345562720
2 1 1 0 4
13 70
101 108 63 38 31 39 33 33 41 34 28 20 15 9
11 5 4
3 2 1 2 4
11 54 76 85 54 38 32 38 32 32 35 31 25 18 13 9
10 6 5
21128
112876
375531594377263223264227226247218176126
9164733938
691 695 702 754 680 455 331
6 0 2 1 2 3 70 2 1 1 3 1 40 0 0 1 2 1 40 0 0 0 1 3 73 3 6 4 6 4 2
11 14 10 17 12 6 670 69 72 76 64 17 7
113 99 109 93 89 21 7117 115 96 130 81 40 15
51 57 76 73 60 44 1640 38 31 37 46 44 2726 32 29 31 36 35 3445 37 43 38 32 34 3536 34 26 33 34 39 2534 36 33 33 31 29 3030 46 44 41 42 21 2326 36 34 37 38 25 2228 26 24 28 34 21 1514 14 18 22 30 17 1110 13 17 22 11 9 96 6 10 12 11 9 10
13 10 12 13 8 12 55 3 6 7 6 7 57 5 3 4 1 13 5
Total Average Total Average
Total
7 Day5 Day
3522 4308704 615
39 704 615
Weekly 85th Percentile SpeedFive Day AADTSeven Day AADT
Weekly 50th Percentile Speed 32
UBD 275 C-1
16TH / 23RD 17TH 18TH 19TH 20TH 21ST 22ND
Lat/Long : S33 55 17.5 / E151 09 46.8
Appendix B
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report
Ap
pen
dix B
Appendix B
SIDRA Intersection Analysis
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Thurs PM
Unwins Bridge Road/Tramway StreetThursday PMExisting ConditionsGiveway / Yield (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Unwins Bridge Road (South)
2 T 403 2.0 0.209 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 50.0
Approach 403 2.0 0.209 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 50.0
East: Tramway Street (East)
4 L 58 0.0 0.171 16.0 LOS B 0.7 4.9 0.78 0.92 36.1
6 R 2 0.0 0.175 16.1 LOS B 0.7 4.9 0.78 0.92 36.1
Approach 60 0.0 0.171 16.0 LOS B 0.7 4.9 0.78 0.92 36.1
North: Unwins Bridge Road (North)
7 L 22 0.0 0.491 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.91 43.3
8 T 928 2.0 0.494 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 50.0
Approach 951 2.0 0.494 0.1 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.02 49.8
All Vehicles 1414 1.9 0.494 0.8 NA 0.7 4.9 0.03 0.05 49.1
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS B. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Friday, 27 August 2010 1:46:40 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100818sid - IS12550 - 01 - Unwins Bridge Rd-Tramway St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Sat
Unwins Bridge Road/Tramway StreetSaturdayExisting ConditionsGiveway / Yield (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Unwins Bridge Road (South)
2 T 543 2.0 0.299 5.8 LOS A 5.2 37.2 0.80 0.00 41.4
3 R 12 0.0 0.297 12.3 LOS A 5.2 37.2 0.80 1.03 40.5
Approach 555 2.0 0.299 5.9 LOS A 5.2 37.2 0.80 0.02 41.4
East: Tramway Street (East)
4 L 19 0.0 0.051 12.6 LOS A 0.2 1.5 0.63 0.78 38.4
6 R 4 0.0 0.051 12.7 LOS A 0.2 1.5 0.63 0.86 38.3
Approach 23 0.0 0.051 12.6 LOS A 0.2 1.5 0.63 0.80 38.3
North: Unwins Bridge Road (North)
7 L 25 0.0 0.328 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.90 43.3
8 T 605 2.0 0.328 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 50.0
Approach 631 1.9 0.328 0.3 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.04 49.7
All Vehicles 1208 1.9 0.328 3.1 NA 5.2 37.2 0.38 0.04 45.2
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS A. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Friday, 27 August 2010 1:47:10 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100818sid - IS12550 - 01 - Unwins Bridge Rd-Tramway St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Thur PM
Unwins Bridge Road - Union StreetThursday PMExisting ConditionGiveway / Yield (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Unwins Bridge Road (South)
31 T 423 2.0 0.220 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 50.0
Approach 423 2.0 0.220 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 50.0
East: Union Street (East)
21 L 52 0.0 0.126 14.3 LOS A 0.5 3.7 0.74 0.90 37.2
23 R 9 0.0 0.073 32.1 LOS C 0.3 1.8 0.88 0.96 28.1
Approach 61 0.0 0.126 17.0 LOS C 0.5 3.7 0.76 0.91 35.4
North: Unwins Bridge Road (North)
25 T 901 2.0 0.468 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 50.0
Approach 901 2.0 0.468 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 50.0
All Vehicles 1385 1.9 0.468 0.8 NA 0.5 3.7 0.03 0.04 49.1
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS C. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Friday, 27 August 2010 1:47:54 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100818sid - IS12550 - 02 - Unwins Bridge Rd-Union St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Sat
Unwins Bridge Road - Union StreetSaturdayExisting ConditionGiveway / Yield (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Unwins Bridge Road (South)
31 T 559 2.0 0.290 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 50.0
Approach 559 2.0 0.290 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 50.0
East: Union Street (East)
21 L 42 0.0 0.060 9.9 LOS A 0.3 1.9 0.55 0.77 40.4
23 R 15 0.0 0.081 24.5 LOS B 0.3 2.1 0.83 0.94 31.4
Approach 57 0.0 0.081 13.7 LOS B 0.3 2.1 0.62 0.81 37.6
North: Unwins Bridge Road (North)
25 T 605 2.0 0.314 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 50.0
Approach 605 2.0 0.314 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 50.0
All Vehicles 1221 1.9 0.314 0.6 NA 0.3 2.1 0.03 0.04 49.2
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS B. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Friday, 27 August 2010 1:48:12 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100818sid - IS12550 - 02 - Unwins Bridge Rd-Union St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Thur PM
Unwins Bridge Road/Foreman StreetThursday PMExisting ConditionsGiveway / Yield (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Unwins Bridge Road (South)
2 T 408 2.0 0.312 14.6 LOS B 7.0 49.5 1.00 0.00 34.9
3 R 36 0.0 0.311 21.3 LOS B 7.0 49.5 1.00 1.09 34.8
Approach 444 1.8 0.312 15.2 LOS B 7.0 49.5 1.00 0.09 34.9
North: Unwins Bridge Road (North)
7 L 42 0.0 0.501 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.90 43.3
8 T 919 2.0 0.500 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 50.0
Approach 961 1.9 0.500 0.3 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.04 49.7
All Vehicles 1405 1.9 0.501 5.0 NA 7.0 49.5 0.32 0.05 43.8
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS B. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Wednesday, 18 August 2010 2:32:19 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100818sid - IS12550 - 03 - Unwins Bridge Rd-Foreman St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Sat
Unwins Bridge Road/Foreman StreetSaturdayExisting ConditionsGiveway / Yield (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Unwins Bridge Road (South)
2 T 551 2.0 0.318 6.6 LOS A 5.9 42.2 0.83 0.00 40.9
3 R 21 0.0 0.319 13.2 LOS A 5.9 42.2 0.83 1.06 40.0
Approach 572 1.9 0.318 6.8 LOS A 5.9 42.2 0.83 0.04 40.9
North: Unwins Bridge Road (North)
7 L 26 0.0 0.342 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.90 43.3
8 T 632 2.0 0.342 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 50.0
Approach 658 1.9 0.342 0.3 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.04 49.7
All Vehicles 1229 1.9 0.342 3.3 NA 5.9 42.2 0.38 0.04 45.2
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS A. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Wednesday, 18 August 2010 2:35:08 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100818sid - IS12550 - 03 - Unwins Bridge Rd-Foreman St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Thur PM
Unwins Bridge Road/Terry StreetThursday PMExisting ConditionsGiveway / Yield (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Unwins Bridge Road (South)
2 T 424 0.0 0.238 14.9 LOS B 6.8 47.9 1.00 0.00 34.9
3 R 6 0.0 0.234 21.3 LOS B 6.8 47.9 1.00 1.04 34.8
Approach 431 0.0 0.238 15.0 LOS B 6.8 47.9 1.00 0.02 34.9
East: Terry Street (East)
4 L 15 0.0 0.045 16.2 LOS B 0.2 1.3 0.78 0.91 36.0
6 R 15 0.0 0.144 39.5 LOS C 0.5 3.5 0.91 0.97 25.6
Approach 29 0.0 0.145 27.9 LOS C 0.5 3.5 0.85 0.94 29.9
North: Unwins Bridge Road (North)
7 L 32 0.0 0.526 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.91 43.3
8 T 981 2.0 0.527 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 50.0
Approach 1013 1.9 0.527 0.2 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.03 49.8
All Vehicles 1473 1.3 0.527 5.1 NA 6.8 47.9 0.31 0.04 43.7
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS C. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Friday, 27 August 2010 1:44:37 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100818sid - IS12550 - 04 - Unwins Bridge Rd -Terry St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Sat
Unwins Bridge Road/Terry StreetThursday PMExisting ConditionsGiveway / Yield (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Unwins Bridge Road (South)
2 T 567 0.0 0.303 5.7 LOS A 5.4 37.7 0.81 0.00 41.3
3 R 8 0.0 0.301 12.2 LOS A 5.4 37.7 0.81 1.03 40.6
Approach 576 0.0 0.303 5.8 LOS A 5.4 37.7 0.81 0.02 41.3
East: Terry Street (East)
4 L 14 0.0 0.026 9.8 LOS A 0.1 0.6 0.54 0.71 40.5
6 R 17 0.0 0.097 25.2 LOS B 0.4 2.5 0.84 0.94 31.1
Approach 31 0.0 0.097 18.3 LOS B 0.4 2.5 0.71 0.84 34.7
North: Unwins Bridge Road (North)
7 L 25 0.0 0.324 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.90 43.3
8 T 599 2.0 0.325 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 50.0
Approach 624 1.9 0.325 0.3 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.04 49.7
All Vehicles 1231 1.0 0.325 3.3 NA 5.4 37.7 0.39 0.05 45.0
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS B. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Friday, 27 August 2010 1:44:16 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100818sid - IS12550 - 04 - Unwins Bridge Rd -Terry St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Thurs PM
Unwins Bridge Road - Lymerston StreetThursday PMExisting ConditionGiveway / Yield (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Unwins Bridge Road (South)
2 T 412 2.0 0.283 15.9 LOS B 7.1 50.7 1.00 0.00 34.2
3 R 22 0.0 0.283 22.5 LOS B 7.1 50.7 1.00 1.08 34.1
Approach 434 1.9 0.283 16.2 LOS B 7.1 50.7 1.00 0.06 34.2
East: Lymerston Street (East)
4 L 34 0.0 0.130 16.4 LOS B 0.4 2.9 0.79 0.92 35.8
6 R 9 0.0 0.094 39.2 LOS C 0.3 2.3 0.91 0.97 25.7
Approach 43 0.0 0.130 21.4 LOS C 0.4 2.9 0.82 0.93 33.0
North: Unwins Bridge Road (North)
7 L 23 0.0 0.526 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.91 43.3
8 T 984 2.0 0.524 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 50.0
Approach 1007 2.0 0.524 0.1 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.02 49.8
All Vehicles 1484 1.9 0.526 5.5 NA 7.1 50.7 0.32 0.06 43.4
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS C. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Friday, 27 August 2010 1:50:40 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100818sid - IS12550 - 05 - Unwins Bridge Rd-lymerston St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Sat
Unwins Bridge Road - Lymerston StreetSaturdayExisting ConditionGiveway / Yield (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Unwins Bridge Road (South)
2 T 547 2.0 0.345 7.3 LOS A 6.7 47.4 0.87 0.00 40.2
3 R 38 0.0 0.344 13.9 LOS A 6.7 47.4 0.87 1.08 39.4
Approach 585 1.9 0.345 7.8 LOS A 6.7 47.4 0.87 0.07 40.1
East: Lymerston Street (East)
4 L 34 25.0 0.132 13.8 LOS A 0.3 2.8 0.65 0.86 38.1
6 R 22 0.0 0.146 28.7 LOS C 0.5 3.7 0.87 0.95 29.5
Approach 56 15.1 0.146 19.7 LOS C 0.5 3.7 0.74 0.90 34.2
North: Unwins Bridge Road (North)
7 L 19 0.0 0.351 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.91 43.3
8 T 658 2.0 0.352 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 50.0
Approach 677 1.9 0.352 0.2 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.03 49.8
All Vehicles 1318 2.5 0.352 4.4 NA 6.7 47.4 0.42 0.08 44.2
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS C. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Friday, 27 August 2010 1:51:02 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100818sid - IS12550 - 05 - Unwins Bridge Rd-lymerston St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Thurs PM
Unwins Bridge Road/Mary StreetThursday PMExisting ConditionsSignals - Fixed Time Cycle Time = 60 seconds
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Unwins Bridge Road (South)
2 T 462 2.0 0.461 11.0 LOS A 10.1 72.1 0.70 0.60 38.0
Approach 462 2.0 0.461 11.0 LOS A 10.1 72.1 0.70 0.60 38.0
East: Mary Street (East)
4 L 209 1.0 0.581 23.4 LOS B 5.8 40.7 0.72 0.76 32.0
6 R 396 1.0 0.908 28.0 LOS B 7.7 54.2 0.79 0.82 29.8
Approach 605 1.0 0.908 26.4 LOS B 7.7 54.2 0.77 0.80 30.5
North: Unwins Bridge Road (North)
8 T 1035 2.0 0.556 11.9 LOS A 12.4 88.5 0.76 0.66 37.2
Approach 1035 2.0 0.556 11.9 LOS A 12.4 88.5 0.76 0.66 37.2
All Vehicles 2102 1.7 0.908 15.9 LOS B 12.4 88.5 0.75 0.69 35.2
Level of Service (Aver. Int. Delay): LOS B. Based on average delay for all vehicle movements. LOS Method: Delay (RTA NSW).
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS B. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all vehicle movements.
Movement Performance - Pedestrians
Average Back of QueueMov ID Description
Demand Flow
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop RatePedestrian Distance
ped/h sec ped m per ped
P1 Across S approach 53 13.3 LOS B 0.1 0.1 0.67 0.67
P3 Across E approach 53 7.5 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.50 0.50
All Pedestrians 106 10.4 0.58 0.58
Level of Service (Aver. Int. Delay): LOS B. Based on average delay for all pedestrian movements. LOS Method: Delay (HCM).
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS B. LOS Method for individual pedestrian movements: Delay (HCM).
Processed: Wednesday, 18 August 2010 3:44:30 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100818sid - IS12550 - 06 - Unwins Bridge Rd-Mary St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Sat
Unwins Bridge Road/Mary StreetSaturdayExisting ConditionsSignals - Fixed Time Cycle Time = 60 seconds
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Unwins Bridge Road (South)
2 T 773 2.0 0.770 15.5 LOS B 19.8 141.2 0.86 0.82 34.8
Approach 773 2.0 0.770 15.5 LOS B 19.8 141.2 0.86 0.82 34.8
East: Mary Street (East)
4 L 161 1.0 0.235 22.3 LOS B 3.8 26.8 0.66 0.73 32.5
6 R 289 1.0 0.882 30.1 LOS C 7.7 54.2 0.81 0.86 29.0
Approach 451 1.0 0.882 27.3 LOS B 7.7 54.2 0.75 0.81 30.1
North: Unwins Bridge Road (North)
8 T 761 2.0 0.785 16.5 LOS B 20.7 147.4 0.88 0.86 34.2
Approach 761 2.0 0.785 16.5 LOS B 20.7 147.4 0.88 0.86 34.2
All Vehicles 1984 1.8 0.882 18.6 LOS B 20.7 147.4 0.84 0.83 33.4
Level of Service (Aver. Int. Delay): LOS B. Based on average delay for all vehicle movements. LOS Method: Delay (RTA NSW).
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS C. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all vehicle movements.
Movement Performance - Pedestrians
Average Back of QueueMov ID Description
Demand Flow
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop RatePedestrian Distance
ped/h sec ped m per ped
P1 Across S approach 53 13.3 LOS B 0.1 0.1 0.67 0.67
P3 Across E approach 53 7.5 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.50 0.50
All Pedestrians 106 10.4 0.58 0.58
Level of Service (Aver. Int. Delay): LOS B. Based on average delay for all pedestrian movements. LOS Method: Delay (HCM).
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS B. LOS Method for individual pedestrian movements: Delay (HCM).
Processed: Wednesday, 18 August 2010 3:52:19 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100818sid - IS12550 - 06 - Unwins Bridge Rd-Mary St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Thur PM
Unwins Bridge Road/Edith StreetThursday PMExisting ConditionsGiveway / Yield (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Unwins Bridge Road (South)
2 T 841 2.0 0.477 18.9 LOS B 15.0 106.4 1.00 0.00 32.6
3 R 16 0.0 0.478 25.4 LOS B 15.0 106.4 1.00 1.24 32.6
Approach 857 2.0 0.477 19.0 LOS B 15.0 106.4 1.00 0.02 32.6
East: Edith Street (East)
4 L 22 0.0 0.240 40.0 LOS C 0.9 6.1 0.90 0.98 25.4
6 R 4 0.0 0.248 40.1 LOS C 0.9 6.1 0.90 0.98 25.4
Approach 26 0.0 0.241 40.1 LOS C 0.9 6.1 0.90 0.98 25.4
North: Unwins Bridge Road (North)
7 L 24 0.0 0.278 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.90 43.3
8 T 1049 2.0 0.279 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 50.0
Approach 1074 2.0 0.279 0.1 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.02 49.8
All Vehicles 1957 1.9 0.478 9.0 NA 15.0 106.4 0.45 0.03 40.1
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS C. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Monday, 30 August 2010 10:48:08 AMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100826sid - IS12550 - 07 - Unwins Bridge Rd-Edith St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Sat
Unwins Bridge Road/Edith StreetSaturdayExisting ConditionsGiveway / Yield (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Unwins Bridge Road (South)
2 T 948 2.0 0.547 11.3 LOS A 15.1 107.2 1.00 0.00 37.1
3 R 36 0.0 0.551 17.8 LOS B 15.1 107.2 1.00 1.26 37.0
Approach 984 1.9 0.547 11.5 LOS B 15.1 107.2 1.00 0.05 37.1
East: Edith Street (East)
4 L 33 0.0 0.351 39.2 LOS C 1.4 9.9 0.87 1.01 25.7
6 R 13 0.0 0.351 39.3 LOS C 1.4 9.9 0.87 1.00 25.7
Approach 45 0.0 0.351 39.2 LOS C 1.4 9.9 0.87 1.01 25.7
North: Unwins Bridge Road (North)
7 L 24 0.0 0.063 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.83 43.3
8 T 699 2.0 0.313 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 50.0
Approach 723 1.9 0.313 0.2 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.03 49.7
All Vehicles 1753 1.9 0.551 7.6 NA 15.1 107.2 0.58 0.06 40.9
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS C. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Monday, 30 August 2010 10:49:48 AMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100826sid - IS12550 - 07 - Unwins Bridge Rd-Edith St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Thur PM
Unwins Bridge Road/Silver StreetThursday PMExisting ConditionsGiveway / Yield (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Unwins Bridge Road (South)
2 T 853 2.0 0.473 19.2 LOS B 15.2 108.3 1.00 0.00 32.5
3 R 12 0.0 0.482 25.8 LOS B 15.2 108.3 1.00 1.24 32.4
Approach 864 2.0 0.473 19.3 LOS B 15.2 108.3 1.00 0.02 32.5
East: Silver Street
4 L 9 0.0 0.211 60.8 LOS E 0.7 5.0 0.94 0.99 20.3
6 R 4 0.0 0.211 60.9 LOS E 0.7 5.0 0.94 0.99 20.2
Approach 14 0.0 0.210 60.8 LOS E 0.7 5.0 0.94 0.99 20.3
North: Unwins Bridge Road (North)
7 L 16 0.0 0.282 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.91 43.3
8 T 1071 2.0 0.282 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 50.0
Approach 1086 2.0 0.282 0.1 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.01 49.9
All Vehicles 1964 2.0 0.482 9.0 NA 15.2 108.3 0.45 0.02 40.0
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS E. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Friday, 10 September 2010 4:26:45 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100826sid - IS12550 - 08 - Unwins Bridge Rd- Silver St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Sat
Unwins Bridge Road/Silver StreetSaturdayExisting ConditionsGiveway / Yield (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Unwins Brideg Road (South)
2 T 1001 2.0 0.543 10.0 LOS A 15.4 109.5 1.00 0.00 38.0
3 R 16 0.0 0.544 16.6 LOS B 15.4 109.5 1.00 1.25 37.9
Approach 1017 2.0 0.543 10.1 LOS B 15.4 109.5 1.00 0.02 38.0
East: Silver Street
4 L 14 0.0 0.187 36.7 LOS C 0.7 4.6 0.86 0.95 26.5
6 R 7 0.0 0.189 36.8 LOS C 0.7 4.6 0.86 0.96 26.5
Approach 21 0.0 0.188 36.7 LOS C 0.7 4.6 0.86 0.95 26.5
North: Unwins Bridge Road (North)
7 L 12 0.0 0.058 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.87 43.3
8 T 660 2.0 0.291 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 50.0
Approach 672 2.0 0.291 0.1 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.02 49.9
All Vehicles 1709 1.9 0.544 6.5 NA 15.4 109.5 0.61 0.03 41.7
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS C. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Monday, 30 August 2010 10:51:27 AMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100826sid - IS12550 - 08 - Unwins Bridge Rd- Silver St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Thurs PM
Edwin Street/Tramway StreetThursday PMExisting ConditionGiveway / Yield (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Edwin Street (South)
2 T 5 0.0 0.004 0.2 LOS A 0.0 0.2 0.15 0.00 48.0
3 R 1 0.0 0.004 6.7 LOS A 0.0 0.2 0.15 0.74 43.0
Approach 7 0.0 0.004 2.0 LOS A 0.0 0.2 0.15 0.20 46.5
East: Tramway Street (East)
4 L 1 0.0 0.004 7.1 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.19 0.56 42.7
6 R 1 0.0 0.004 7.2 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.19 0.61 42.6
Approach 3 0.0 0.004 6.7 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.19 0.54 42.9
North: Edwin Street (North)
7 L 1 0.0 0.066 6.4 LOS A 0.4 2.8 0.04 0.68 43.2
8 T 47 0.0 0.067 0.0 LOS A 0.4 2.8 0.04 0.00 49.4
Approach 108 0.0 0.067 3.7 LOS A 0.4 2.8 0.04 0.40 45.6
West: Tramway Street (West)
10 L 14 0.0 0.036 7.0 LOS A 0.2 1.2 0.04 0.59 42.8
11 T 1 0.0 0.036 5.7 LOS A 0.2 1.2 0.04 0.47 43.9
12 R 18 0.0 0.036 7.1 LOS A 0.2 1.2 0.04 0.63 42.7
Approach 33 0.0 0.036 7.0 LOS A 0.2 1.2 0.04 0.61 42.7
All Vehicles 152 0.0 0.067 4.4 NA 0.4 2.8 0.05 0.44 45.0
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS A. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Wednesday, 8 September 2010 10:47:57 AMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100818sid - IS12550 - 09 - Edwin St-Tramway St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Sat
Edwin Street/Tramway StreetThursday PMExisting ConditionGiveway / Yield (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Edwin Street (South)
1 L 7 0.0 0.008 6.5 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.11 0.63 43.0
2 T 6 0.0 0.008 0.1 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.11 0.00 48.4
3 R 1 0.0 0.008 6.6 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.11 0.68 43.0
Approach 15 0.0 0.008 3.7 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.11 0.36 45.2
East: Tramway Street (East)
4 L 1 0.0 0.003 6.7 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.11 0.58 42.9
5 T 1 0.0 0.003 5.4 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.11 0.46 43.9
6 R 1 0.0 0.003 6.8 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.11 0.61 42.8
Approach 3 0.0 0.003 6.3 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.11 0.55 43.2
North: Edwin Street (North)
7 L 1 0.0 0.019 6.5 LOS A 0.1 0.8 0.06 0.71 43.2
8 T 20 0.0 0.019 0.0 LOS A 0.1 0.8 0.06 0.00 49.1
9 R 12 0.0 0.019 6.6 LOS A 0.1 0.8 0.06 0.75 43.1
Approach 33 0.0 0.019 2.6 LOS A 0.1 0.8 0.06 0.29 46.6
West: Tramway Street (West)
10 L 16 0.0 0.040 6.7 LOS A 0.2 1.4 0.07 0.58 43.0
11 T 1 0.0 0.040 5.4 LOS A 0.2 1.4 0.07 0.46 44.1
12 R 22 0.0 0.041 6.8 LOS A 0.2 1.4 0.07 0.61 42.9
Approach 39 0.0 0.041 6.7 LOS A 0.2 1.4 0.07 0.59 43.0
All Vehicles 89 0.0 0.041 4.7 NA 0.2 1.4 0.08 0.44 44.6
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS A. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Wednesday, 18 August 2010 4:08:57 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100818sid - IS12550 - 09 - Edwin St-Tramway St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Thurs PM
Henry Street/Lymerston StreetThursday PMExisting ConditionGiveway / Yield (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hEast: Lymerston Street (East)
5 T 29 0.0 0.034 5.2 LOS A 0.2 1.2 0.03 0.50 44.4
6 R 4 0.0 0.034 6.9 LOS A 0.2 1.2 0.03 0.74 42.9
Approach 34 0.0 0.034 5.4 LOS A 0.2 1.2 0.03 0.53 44.2
North: Henry Street (North)
7 L 4 0.0 0.003 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.60 43.3
9 R 1 0.0 0.003 6.8 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.69 42.9
Approach 5 0.0 0.003 6.5 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.62 43.2
West: Lymerston Street (West)
10 L 2 0.0 0.033 6.4 LOS A 0.2 1.3 0.04 0.64 43.2
11 T 33 0.0 0.033 5.2 LOS A 0.2 1.3 0.04 0.50 44.3
Approach 35 0.0 0.033 5.2 LOS A 0.2 1.3 0.04 0.51 44.2
All Vehicles 74 0.0 0.034 5.4 NA 0.2 1.3 0.03 0.52 44.1
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS A. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Wednesday, 18 August 2010 4:22:02 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100818sid - IS12550 - 10 - Henry St-Lymerston St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Sat
Henry Street/Lymerston StreetSaturdayExisting ConditionGiveway / Yield (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hEast: Lymerston Street (East)
5 T 73 0.0 0.078 5.2 LOS A 0.4 3.0 0.05 0.49 44.2
6 R 5 0.0 0.079 6.9 LOS A 0.4 3.0 0.05 0.75 42.8
Approach 78 0.0 0.078 5.3 LOS A 0.4 3.0 0.05 0.51 44.1
North: Henry Street (North)
7 L 2 0.0 0.005 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.58 43.3
9 R 7 0.0 0.005 6.8 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.67 42.9
Approach 9 0.0 0.005 6.7 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.65 43.0
West: Lymerston Street (West)
10 L 4 0.0 0.081 6.5 LOS A 0.5 3.2 0.07 0.63 43.1
11 T 80 0.0 0.081 5.2 LOS A 0.5 3.2 0.07 0.49 44.2
Approach 84 0.0 0.081 5.3 LOS A 0.5 3.2 0.07 0.50 44.1
All Vehicles 172 0.0 0.081 5.4 NA 0.5 3.2 0.06 0.51 44.1
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS A. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Wednesday, 18 August 2010 4:22:04 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100818sid - IS12550 - 10 - Henry St-Lymerston St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Thurs PM
Hanry Street/Samuel StreetThursday PMExisting ConditionStop (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Henry Street (South)
1 L 3 0.0 0.005 9.5 LOS A 0.0 0.2 0.15 0.88 40.8
2 T 2 0.0 0.005 9.1 LOS A 0.0 0.2 0.15 0.89 41.1
3 R 1 0.0 0.005 9.3 LOS A 0.0 0.2 0.15 0.94 41.0
Approach 6 0.0 0.005 9.3 LOS A 0.0 0.2 0.15 0.90 41.0
East: Samuel Street (East)
4 L 4 0.0 0.031 6.6 LOS A 0.3 2.2 0.16 0.73 43.2
5 T 51 0.0 0.031 0.2 LOS A 0.3 2.2 0.16 0.00 47.9
6 R 2 0.0 0.031 7.0 LOS A 0.3 2.2 0.16 0.87 42.9
Approach 57 0.0 0.031 1.0 LOS A 0.3 2.2 0.16 0.09 47.3
North: Henry Street (North)
7 L 1 0.0 0.002 9.5 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.12 0.89 40.8
8 T 1 0.0 0.002 9.1 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.12 0.90 41.1
9 R 1 0.0 0.002 9.3 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.12 0.95 41.0
Approach 3 0.0 0.002 9.3 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.12 0.91 41.0
West: Samuel Street (West)
10 L 1 0.0 0.015 6.9 LOS A 0.2 1.1 0.24 0.67 43.1
11 T 26 0.0 0.015 0.5 LOS A 0.2 1.1 0.24 0.00 47.0
12 R 1 0.0 0.015 7.2 LOS A 0.2 1.1 0.24 0.85 43.0
Approach 28 0.0 0.015 0.9 LOS A 0.2 1.1 0.24 0.06 46.7
All Vehicles 95 0.0 0.031 1.8 NA 0.3 2.2 0.18 0.16 46.4
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS A. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Wednesday, 18 August 2010 5:01:29 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100818sid - IS12550 - 11 - Henry St-Samuel St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Sat
Hanry Street/Samuel StreetSaturdayExisting ConditionStop (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Henry Street (South)
1 L 1 0.0 0.003 9.6 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.17 0.86 40.8
2 T 2 0.0 0.003 9.2 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.17 0.87 41.1
3 R 1 0.0 0.003 9.4 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.17 0.92 41.0
Approach 4 0.0 0.003 9.3 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.17 0.88 41.0
East: Samuel Street (East)
4 L 1 0.0 0.032 6.7 LOS A 0.3 2.4 0.17 0.74 43.2
5 T 57 0.0 0.032 0.3 LOS A 0.3 2.4 0.17 0.00 47.8
6 R 2 0.0 0.032 7.0 LOS A 0.3 2.4 0.17 0.89 43.0
Approach 60 0.0 0.032 0.6 LOS A 0.3 2.4 0.17 0.04 47.6
North: Henry Street (North)
7 L 1 0.0 0.003 9.5 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.13 0.88 40.8
8 T 2 0.0 0.003 9.1 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.13 0.90 41.1
9 R 1 0.0 0.003 9.4 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.13 0.95 41.0
Approach 4 0.0 0.003 9.3 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.13 0.91 41.0
West: Samuel Street (West)
10 L 4 0.0 0.020 6.9 LOS A 0.2 1.4 0.24 0.63 43.0
11 T 27 0.0 0.020 0.5 LOS A 0.2 1.4 0.24 0.00 46.9
12 R 3 0.0 0.020 7.2 LOS A 0.2 1.4 0.24 0.80 42.9
Approach 35 0.0 0.020 1.9 LOS A 0.2 1.4 0.24 0.15 46.0
All Vehicles 103 0.0 0.032 1.8 NA 0.3 2.4 0.19 0.15 46.4
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS A. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Thursday, 26 August 2010 7:12:12 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100818sid - IS12550 - 11 - Henry St-Samuel St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Thur PM
Henry Street/Terry StreetThursday PMExisting ConditionsStop (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Henry Street (South)
1 L 2 0.0 0.004 9.4 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.10 0.92 40.9
2 T 1 0.0 0.004 9.7 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.10 0.93 40.7
3 R 2 0.0 0.004 9.4 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.10 0.93 40.9
Approach 5 0.0 0.004 9.5 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.10 0.93 40.8
East: Terry Street
4 L 1 0.0 0.002 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.81 43.3
5 T 22 0.0 0.011 0.2 LOS A 0.1 0.8 0.12 0.00 48.5
6 R 1 0.0 0.011 6.7 LOS A 0.1 0.8 0.13 0.85 43.1
Approach 24 0.0 0.011 0.7 LOS A 0.1 0.8 0.11 0.07 48.0
North: Henry Street (North)
7 L 1 0.0 0.004 9.4 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.10 0.90 40.8
8 T 1 0.0 0.004 9.7 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.10 0.91 40.6
9 R 3 0.0 0.004 9.4 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.10 0.93 40.9
Approach 5 0.0 0.004 9.4 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.10 0.92 40.8
West: Terry Street
10 L 4 0.0 0.003 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.66 43.3
11 T 18 0.0 0.015 0.2 LOS A 0.1 0.8 0.12 0.00 48.4
12 R 5 0.0 0.015 6.8 LOS A 0.1 0.8 0.12 0.78 43.0
Approach 27 0.0 0.015 2.4 LOS A 0.1 0.8 0.10 0.25 46.5
All Vehicles 62 0.0 0.015 2.9 NA 0.1 0.8 0.10 0.30 46.0
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS A. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Thursday, 26 August 2010 4:28:55 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100826sid - IS12550 - 12 - Henry St-Terry St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Sat
Henry Street/Terry StreetSaturdayExisting ConditionsStop (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Henry Street (South)
1 L 4 0.0 0.008 9.4 LOS A 0.0 0.3 0.10 0.92 40.9
2 T 2 0.0 0.008 9.7 LOS A 0.0 0.3 0.10 0.93 40.7
3 R 4 0.0 0.008 9.4 LOS A 0.0 0.3 0.10 0.93 40.9
Approach 11 0.0 0.008 9.5 LOS A 0.0 0.3 0.10 0.93 40.8
East: Terry Street
4 L 4 0.0 0.004 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.73 43.3
5 T 22 0.0 0.022 0.1 LOS A 0.2 1.1 0.09 0.00 48.7
6 R 12 0.0 0.022 6.7 LOS A 0.2 1.1 0.11 0.74 43.0
Approach 38 0.0 0.022 2.9 LOS A 0.2 1.1 0.09 0.31 46.2
North: Henry Street (North)
7 L 1 0.0 0.004 9.5 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.11 0.89 40.8
8 T 1 0.0 0.004 9.8 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.11 0.91 40.6
9 R 3 0.0 0.004 9.4 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.11 0.93 40.9
Approach 5 0.0 0.004 9.5 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.11 0.92 40.8
West: Terry Street
10 L 1 0.0 0.003 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.83 43.3
11 T 20 0.0 0.013 0.2 LOS A 0.1 0.8 0.11 0.00 48.5
12 R 4 0.0 0.013 6.8 LOS A 0.1 0.8 0.14 0.79 43.0
Approach 25 0.0 0.013 1.5 LOS A 0.1 0.8 0.11 0.17 47.3
All Vehicles 79 0.0 0.022 3.8 NA 0.2 1.1 0.10 0.38 45.3
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS A. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Thursday, 26 August 2010 4:31:38 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100826sid - IS12550 - 12 - Henry St-Terry St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Thur PM
Henry Street/Park RoadThursday PMExisting ConditionsStop (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Henry Street (South)
1 L 2 0.0 0.004 10.0 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.06 0.95 29.0
2 T 1 0.0 0.002 10.3 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.14 0.90 28.9
3 R 1 0.0 0.002 10.2 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.14 0.90 29.0
Approach 4 0.0 0.004 10.1 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.10 0.92 28.9
East: Park Road (East)
4 L 1 0.0 0.002 7.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.93 33.0
5 T 13 0.0 0.009 1.2 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.06 0.09 48.4
6 R 5 0.0 0.009 7.5 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.07 0.86 32.9
Approach 19 0.0 0.009 3.3 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.06 0.35 42.0
North: Henry Street (North)
7 L 3 0.0 0.006 10.0 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.06 0.95 29.0
8 T 1 0.0 0.022 10.3 LOS A 0.1 0.7 0.14 0.90 28.9
9 R 18 0.0 0.022 10.2 LOS A 0.1 0.7 0.14 0.90 28.9
Approach 22 0.0 0.022 10.2 LOS A 0.1 0.7 0.13 0.91 28.9
West: Park Road (West)
10 L 8 0.0 0.005 7.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.65 33.0
11 T 9 0.0 0.006 1.2 LOS A 0.0 0.3 0.06 0.10 48.4
12 R 2 0.0 0.006 7.5 LOS A 0.0 0.3 0.06 0.96 33.0
Approach 20 0.0 0.006 4.5 LOS A 0.0 0.3 0.04 0.42 39.0
All Vehicles 65 0.0 0.022 6.4 NA 0.1 0.7 0.08 0.60 34.9
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS A. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Thursday, 26 August 2010 4:43:16 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100826sid - IS12550 - 13 - Henry St-Park Rd.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Sat
Henry Street/Park RoadSaturdayExisting ConditionsStop (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Henry Street (South)
1 L 4 0.0 0.008 10.0 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.07 0.94 29.0
2 T 1 0.0 0.002 10.4 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.16 0.89 28.9
3 R 1 0.0 0.002 10.2 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.16 0.89 28.9
Approach 6 0.0 0.008 10.1 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.10 0.92 28.9
East: Park Road (East)
4 L 1 0.0 0.002 7.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.99 33.0
5 T 18 0.0 0.012 1.2 LOS A 0.1 0.5 0.06 0.09 48.3
6 R 7 0.0 0.012 7.5 LOS A 0.1 0.5 0.08 0.85 32.9
Approach 26 0.0 0.012 3.2 LOS A 0.1 0.5 0.06 0.34 42.2
North: Henry Street (North)
7 L 3 0.0 0.006 10.0 LOS A 0.0 0.1 0.07 0.94 29.0
8 T 2 0.0 0.015 10.4 LOS A 0.1 0.5 0.16 0.89 28.8
9 R 11 0.0 0.015 10.3 LOS A 0.1 0.5 0.16 0.89 28.9
Approach 16 0.0 0.015 10.2 LOS A 0.1 0.5 0.14 0.90 28.9
West: Park Road (West)
10 L 7 0.0 0.004 7.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.65 33.0
11 T 13 0.0 0.007 1.3 LOS A 0.0 0.3 0.08 0.10 48.0
12 R 1 0.0 0.007 7.5 LOS A 0.0 0.3 0.08 1.04 33.1
Approach 21 0.0 0.007 3.7 LOS A 0.0 0.3 0.05 0.34 40.8
All Vehicles 69 0.0 0.015 5.6 NA 0.1 0.5 0.08 0.52 36.6
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS A. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Thursday, 26 August 2010 4:43:18 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100826sid - IS12550 - 13 - Henry St-Park Rd.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Thur PM
Henry Street/George StreetThursday PMExisting conditionsStop (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Henry Street (South)
1 L 1 0.0 0.036 9.6 LOS A 0.2 1.2 0.12 0.89 40.8
2 T 14 0.0 0.036 9.7 LOS A 0.2 1.2 0.12 0.90 40.7
3 R 18 0.0 0.036 9.5 LOS A 0.2 1.2 0.12 0.93 40.9
Approach 33 0.0 0.036 9.6 LOS A 0.2 1.2 0.12 0.92 40.8
East: George Street (East)
4 L 8 0.0 0.005 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.61 43.3
5 T 6 0.0 0.005 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.2 0.05 0.00 49.3
6 R 3 0.0 0.005 6.6 LOS A 0.0 0.2 0.05 0.79 43.1
Approach 18 0.0 0.005 4.2 LOS A 0.0 0.2 0.02 0.43 45.2
North: Henry Street (North)
7 L 1 0.0 0.023 9.5 LOS A 0.1 0.8 0.11 0.91 40.9
8 T 20 0.0 0.023 9.6 LOS A 0.1 0.8 0.11 0.92 40.8
9 R 2 0.0 0.023 9.4 LOS A 0.1 0.8 0.11 0.95 40.9
Approach 23 0.0 0.023 9.6 LOS A 0.1 0.8 0.11 0.92 40.8
West: George Street (West)
10 L 1 0.0 0.001 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.69 43.3
11 T 7 0.0 0.004 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.2 0.06 0.00 49.2
12 R 1 0.0 0.004 6.6 LOS A 0.0 0.2 0.07 0.85 43.1
Approach 9 0.0 0.004 1.5 LOS A 0.0 0.2 0.06 0.17 47.7
All Vehicles 83 0.0 0.036 7.5 NA 0.2 1.2 0.09 0.73 42.4
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS A. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Thursday, 26 August 2010 4:58:16 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100826sid - IS12550 - 14 - Henry St-George St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Sat
Henry Street/George StreetSaturdayExisting conditionsStop (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Henry Street (South)
1 L 9 0.0 0.040 9.5 LOS A 0.2 1.4 0.08 0.92 40.8
2 T 19 0.0 0.040 9.6 LOS A 0.2 1.4 0.08 0.94 40.7
3 R 11 0.0 0.040 9.4 LOS A 0.2 1.4 0.08 0.97 40.8
Approach 39 0.0 0.040 9.5 LOS A 0.2 1.4 0.08 0.94 40.8
East: George Street (East)
4 L 6 0.0 0.003 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.61 43.3
5 T 5 0.0 0.004 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.2 0.07 0.00 49.0
6 R 2 0.0 0.004 6.6 LOS A 0.0 0.2 0.07 0.79 43.1
Approach 14 0.0 0.004 4.0 LOS A 0.0 0.2 0.04 0.40 45.3
North: Henry Street (North)
7 L 2 0.0 0.015 9.5 LOS A 0.1 0.5 0.11 0.90 40.9
8 T 12 0.0 0.015 9.6 LOS A 0.1 0.5 0.11 0.92 40.8
9 R 1 0.0 0.015 9.4 LOS A 0.1 0.5 0.11 0.95 40.9
Approach 15 0.0 0.015 9.6 LOS A 0.1 0.5 0.11 0.92 40.8
West: George Street (West)
10 L 2 0.0 0.002 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.71 43.3
11 T 14 0.0 0.010 0.0 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.05 0.00 49.3
12 R 5 0.0 0.010 6.6 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.06 0.79 43.1
Approach 21 0.0 0.010 2.3 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.05 0.27 46.9
All Vehicles 88 0.0 0.040 7.0 NA 0.2 1.4 0.07 0.69 42.8
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS A. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Thursday, 26 August 2010 5:00:33 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100826sid - IS12550 - 14 - Henry St-George St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Thur PM
Henry Street/Frederick StreetThursday PMExisting ConditionsStop (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Henry Street (South)
1 L 1 0.0 0.015 10.5 LOS A 0.1 0.5 0.15 0.87 40.1
2 T 11 0.0 0.015 10.6 LOS A 0.1 0.5 0.15 0.93 40.0
3 R 1 0.0 0.015 10.5 LOS A 0.1 0.5 0.15 0.95 40.2
Approach 13 0.0 0.015 10.6 LOS A 0.1 0.5 0.15 0.92 40.1
East: Frederick Street (East)
4 L 2 0.0 0.001 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.61 43.3
5 T 7 0.0 0.005 0.5 LOS A 0.0 0.3 0.26 0.00 46.6
6 R 2 0.0 0.005 7.1 LOS A 0.0 0.3 0.26 0.74 42.9
Approach 12 0.0 0.005 2.8 LOS A 0.0 0.3 0.21 0.25 45.3
North: Henry Street (North)
7 L 1 0.0 0.016 10.7 LOS A 0.1 0.6 0.33 0.81 40.3
8 T 6 0.0 0.016 10.8 LOS A 0.1 0.6 0.33 0.84 40.2
9 R 5 0.0 0.016 10.6 LOS A 0.1 0.6 0.33 0.86 40.3
Approach 13 0.0 0.016 10.7 LOS A 0.1 0.6 0.33 0.85 40.3
West: Frederick Street (West)
10 L 6 0.0 0.015 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.82 43.3
11 T 143 0.0 0.073 0.0 LOS A 0.5 3.5 0.05 0.00 49.4
12 R 16 0.0 0.073 6.6 LOS A 0.5 3.5 0.06 0.87 43.1
Approach 165 0.0 0.073 0.9 LOS A 0.5 3.5 0.05 0.11 48.4
All Vehicles 202 0.0 0.073 2.2 NA 0.5 3.5 0.08 0.22 47.0
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS A. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Thursday, 26 August 2010 5:43:06 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100826sid - IS12550 - 15 - Henry St-Frederick St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Sat
Henry Street/Frederick StreetThursday PMExisting ConditionsStop (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Henry Street (South)
1 L 7 0.0 0.018 9.9 LOS A 0.1 0.6 0.06 0.94 40.4
2 T 7 0.0 0.018 10.0 LOS A 0.1 0.6 0.06 0.97 40.4
3 R 2 0.0 0.018 9.9 LOS A 0.1 0.6 0.06 0.99 40.5
Approach 17 0.0 0.018 10.0 LOS A 0.1 0.6 0.06 0.96 40.4
East: Frederick Street (East)
4 L 7 0.0 0.004 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.61 43.3
5 T 7 0.0 0.009 0.4 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.21 0.00 47.1
6 R 7 0.0 0.009 6.9 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.21 0.68 42.8
Approach 22 0.0 0.009 4.6 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.14 0.43 44.3
North: Henry Street (North)
7 L 8 0.0 0.022 10.1 LOS A 0.1 0.7 0.25 0.85 40.6
8 T 11 0.0 0.022 10.2 LOS A 0.1 0.7 0.25 0.87 40.6
9 R 1 0.0 0.021 10.0 LOS A 0.1 0.7 0.25 0.90 40.7
Approach 20 0.0 0.022 10.1 LOS A 0.1 0.7 0.25 0.86 40.6
West: Frederick Street (West)
10 L 5 0.0 0.011 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.81 43.3
11 T 101 0.0 0.053 0.0 LOS A 0.4 2.5 0.06 0.00 49.2
12 R 13 0.0 0.053 6.6 LOS A 0.4 2.5 0.07 0.86 43.1
Approach 119 0.0 0.053 1.0 LOS A 0.4 2.5 0.06 0.13 48.2
All Vehicles 178 0.0 0.053 3.3 NA 0.4 2.5 0.09 0.33 45.9
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS A. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Thursday, 26 August 2010 5:44:25 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100826sid - IS12550 - 15 - Henry St-Frederick St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Thurs PM
Henry Street/Grove StreetThursday PMExisting ConditionsStop (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Henry Street (South)
1 L 13 0.0 0.011 9.4 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.08 0.93 40.8
3 R 2 0.0 0.011 9.2 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.08 0.99 41.0
Approach 15 0.0 0.011 9.4 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.08 0.94 40.9
East: Grove Street (East)
4 L 9 0.0 0.016 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.80 43.3
5 T 22 0.0 0.016 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 50.0
Approach 32 0.0 0.016 1.9 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.24 47.8
West: Grove Street (West)
11 T 39 0.0 0.024 0.3 LOS A 0.2 1.7 0.18 0.00 47.7
12 R 3 0.0 0.024 7.1 LOS A 0.2 1.7 0.18 0.87 43.0
Approach 42 0.0 0.024 0.8 LOS A 0.2 1.7 0.18 0.07 47.3
All Vehicles 88 0.0 0.024 2.6 NA 0.2 1.7 0.10 0.27 46.3
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS A. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Thursday, 26 August 2010 5:54:29 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100826sid - IS12550 - 16 - Henry St-Grove St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Sat
Henry Street/Grove StreetThursday PMExisting ConditionsStop (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Henry Street (South)
1 L 12 0.0 0.011 9.4 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.07 0.93 40.8
3 R 4 0.0 0.011 9.2 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.07 1.00 41.0
Approach 16 0.0 0.011 9.3 LOS A 0.1 0.4 0.07 0.95 40.9
East: Grove Street (East)
4 L 11 0.0 0.014 6.4 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.76 43.3
5 T 16 0.0 0.014 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 50.0
Approach 26 0.0 0.014 2.6 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.31 47.1
West: Grove Street (West)
11 T 45 0.0 0.026 0.3 LOS A 0.3 1.8 0.17 0.00 47.9
12 R 2 0.0 0.026 7.0 LOS A 0.3 1.8 0.17 0.90 43.0
Approach 47 0.0 0.026 0.6 LOS A 0.3 1.8 0.17 0.04 47.6
All Vehicles 89 0.0 0.026 2.7 NA 0.3 1.8 0.10 0.28 46.1
LOS (Aver. Int. Delay): NA. The average intersection delay is not a good LOS measure for two-way sign control due to zero delays asso-ciated with major road movements.
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS A. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on the worst delay for any vehicle movement.
Processed: Thursday, 26 August 2010 5:55:50 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100826sid - IS12550 - 16 - Henry St-Grove St.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Thur (alt)
Princes Highway/Canal Road/Mary StreetThursdayExisting ConditionsSignals - Fixed Time Cycle Time = 120 seconds
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Princes Highway - South
30 L 66 0.0 0.627 18.3 LOS B 25.5 185.7 0.58 0.97 41.6
31 T 929 5.0 1.043 32.8 LOS C 39.4 287.8 0.66 0.70 30.2
32 R 603 5.0 1.043 133.9 LOS F 39.4 287.8 1.00 1.29 12.9
Approach 1599 4.8 1.043 70.3 LOS E 39.4 287.8 0.79 0.93 20.2
East: Canal Road
21 L 1349 5.0 0.856 46.5 LOS D 39.1 285.2 0.97 0.94 26.4
22 T 494 2.0 0.798 53.7 LOS D 19.0 135.2 1.00 0.93 23.2
23 R 104 2.0 0.798 61.8 LOS E 18.8 133.9 1.00 0.93 22.9
Approach 1947 4.1 0.856 49.1 LOS D 39.1 285.2 0.98 0.93 25.3
North: Princes Highway - North
24 L 77 2.0 0.829 42.1 LOS C 37.9 269.8 0.95 0.94 29.1
25 T 2037 2.0 0.831 34.1 LOS C 38.2 272.2 0.95 0.90 29.5
Approach 2114 2.0 0.831 34.3 LOS C 38.2 272.2 0.95 0.90 29.5
All Vehicles 5660 3.5 1.043 49.6 LOS D 39.4 287.8 0.91 0.92 24.9
Level of Service (Aver. Int. Delay): LOS D. Based on average delay for all vehicle movements. LOS Method: Delay (RTA NSW).
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS F. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all vehicle movements.
Movement Performance - Pedestrians
Average Back of QueueMov ID Description
Demand Flow
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop RatePedestrian Distance
ped/h sec ped m per ped
P9 Across E approach 53 17.6 LOS B 0.1 0.1 0.54 0.54
P11 Across N approach 53 37.6 LOS D 0.1 0.1 0.79 0.79
P13 Across W approach 53 17.6 LOS B 0.1 0.1 0.54 0.54
All Pedestrians 159 24.3 0.63 0.63
Level of Service (Aver. Int. Delay): LOS C. Based on average delay for all pedestrian movements. LOS Method: Delay (HCM).
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS D. LOS Method for individual pedestrian movements: Delay (HCM).
Processed: Wednesday, 25 August 2010 2:25:09 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100825sid - IS12550 - 17 - Princes Hwy-Canal Rd.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Thur
Princes Highway/Canal Road/Mary StreetThursdayExisting ConditionsSignals - Fixed Time Cycle Time = 110 seconds
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Princes Highway - South
30 L 66 0.0 0.784 20.9 LOS B 36.3 264.4 0.75 0.96 40.2
31 T 929 5.0 0.786 12.7 LOS A 36.3 264.4 0.75 0.70 42.0
32 R 603 5.0 0.837 60.8 LOS E 18.5 135.1 1.00 0.94 22.6
Approach 1599 4.8 0.837 31.2 LOS C 36.3 264.4 0.84 0.80 31.6
East: Canal Road
21 L 1349 5.0 0.831 40.3 LOS C 34.3 250.4 0.94 0.92 28.5
22 T 494 2.0 0.763 47.2 LOS D 17.3 122.9 1.00 0.90 24.9
23 R 104 2.0 0.763 55.3 LOS D 17.1 121.7 1.00 0.91 24.5
Approach 1947 4.1 0.831 42.8 LOS D 34.3 250.4 0.96 0.91 27.3
North: Princes Highway - North
24 L 77 2.0 0.873 47.6 LOS D 39.4 280.4 0.99 1.00 27.2
25 T 2037 2.0 0.875 39.6 LOS C 39.7 282.9 0.99 0.99 27.4
Approach 2114 2.0 0.875 39.9 LOS C 39.7 282.9 0.99 0.99 27.4
All Vehicles 5660 3.5 0.875 38.4 LOS C 39.7 282.9 0.94 0.91 28.4
Level of Service (Aver. Int. Delay): LOS C. Based on average delay for all vehicle movements. LOS Method: Delay (RTA NSW).
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS E. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all vehicle movements.
Movement Performance - Pedestrians
Average Back of QueueMov ID Description
Demand Flow
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop RatePedestrian Distance
ped/h sec ped m per ped
P9 Across E approach 53 17.5 LOS B 0.1 0.1 0.56 0.56
P11 Across N approach 53 33.6 LOS D 0.1 0.1 0.78 0.78
P13 Across W approach 53 17.5 LOS B 0.1 0.1 0.56 0.56
All Pedestrians 159 22.9 0.64 0.64
Level of Service (Aver. Int. Delay): LOS C. Based on average delay for all pedestrian movements. LOS Method: Delay (HCM).
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS D. LOS Method for individual pedestrian movements: Delay (HCM).
Processed: Wednesday, 25 August 2010 2:01:12 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100825sid - IS12550 - 17 - Princes Hwy-Canal Rd.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Existing - Sat
Princes Highway/Canal Road/Mary StreetSaturdayExisting ConditionsSignals - Fixed Time Cycle Time = 100 seconds
Movement Performance - Vehicles
95% Back of QueueMov ID Turn
Demand Flow HV
Deg. Satn
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Average Speed Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m per veh km/hSouth: Princes Highway - South
30 L 119 0.0 0.874 30.9 LOS C 47.1 334.7 0.90 1.00 34.1
31 T 1078 2.0 0.874 25.9 LOS B 47.1 334.7 0.91 0.91 32.9
32 R 843 5.0 0.874 53.2 LOS D 28.0 202.9 1.00 0.99 24.6
Approach 2040 3.1 0.874 37.5 LOS C 47.1 334.7 0.95 0.95 28.9
East: Canal Road
21 L 752 5.0 0.858 56.1 LOS D 21.1 154.2 1.00 0.96 23.6
22 T 328 0.0 0.465 34.7 LOS C 11.0 76.8 0.90 0.75 29.2
23 R 109 2.0 0.465 42.7 LOS D 10.7 75.8 0.90 0.83 28.3
Approach 1189 3.3 0.858 48.9 LOS D 21.1 154.2 0.96 0.89 25.3
North: Princes Highway - North
24 L 127 2.0 0.886 58.1 LOS E 24.5 174.7 1.00 1.06 23.9
25 T 1172 2.0 0.886 50.0 LOS D 24.9 177.5 1.00 1.05 24.2
Approach 1299 2.0 0.886 50.8 LOS D 24.9 177.5 1.00 1.06 24.2
All Vehicles 4528 2.9 0.886 44.3 LOS D 47.1 334.7 0.97 0.96 26.4
Level of Service (Aver. Int. Delay): LOS D. Based on average delay for all vehicle movements. LOS Method: Delay (RTA NSW).
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS E. LOS Method for individual vehicle movements: Delay (RTA NSW).
Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all vehicle movements.
Movement Performance - Pedestrians
Average Back of QueueMov ID Description
Demand Flow
Average Delay
Level of Service
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop RatePedestrian Distance
ped/h sec ped m per ped
P9 Across E approach 53 26.6 LOS C 0.1 0.1 0.73 0.73
P11 Across N approach 53 27.4 LOS C 0.1 0.1 0.74 0.74
P13 Across W approach 53 26.6 LOS C 0.1 0.1 0.73 0.73
All Pedestrians 159 26.9 0.73 0.73
Level of Service (Aver. Int. Delay): LOS C. Based on average delay for all pedestrian movements. LOS Method: Delay (HCM).
Level of Service (Worst Movement): LOS C. LOS Method for individual pedestrian movements: Delay (HCM).
Processed: Monday, 30 August 2010 1:15:30 PMSIDRA INTERSECTION 4.0.19.1104
Copyright ©2000-2010 Akcelik & Associates Pty Ltdwww.sidrasolutions.com
Project: C:\Documents and Settings\Chris Garven\Desktop\Sidra & Scates\100825sid - IS12550 - 17 - Princes Hwy-Canal Rd.sip8000056, GTA CONSULTANTS, FLOATING
Appendix C
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report
Ap
pen
dix C
Appendix C
Proposed IKEA Traffic Plan/IKEA Trade Area Figure/IKEA Traffic Count Figures
retail
CIV
IL E
NG
INE
ER
TA
YLO
R T
HO
MS
ON
WH
ITTIN
G (N
SW
)
STR
UC
TU
RA
L E
NG
INE
ER
ISS
UE
FO
R A
PP
RO
VA
L
TR
AN
SP
OR
T A
ND
TR
AFFIC
PLA
NN
ING
AS
SO
CIA
TE
S
TR
AFFIC
EN
GIN
EE
R
SIT
E IM
AG
ELA
ND
SC
AP
E A
RC
HIT
EC
T
TR
-102D AM
AP
11.07.081:500
KE
Y P
LA
N (n
ot to
scale)
Section 3: Trade area analysis
Tempe IKEA, Sydney
Economic Impact Assessment 19
�������������������������������������������������
��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
�������������������������������������������������
�������������������������������������������������
�������������������������������������������������
�������������������������������������������������
�������������������������������������������������
�������������������������������������������������
�������������������������������������������������
�������������������������������������������������
�������������������������������������������������
�������������������������������������������������
Tertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary NorthTertiary North
Tertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary SouthTertiary South
Secondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary SouthSecondary South
Secondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary WestSecondary West
Secondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary NorthSecondary North
Secondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary EastSecondary East
PrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryPrimaryTempe Site (p)
Rockdale
Lidcombe
Auburn
Canterbury
Villawood
Five Dock
Drummoyne
Annandale
Sydney
Rhodes
Alexandria
Moore Park
Bondi Junction
Eastgardens
Hurstville
Bankstown
Illawong
Miranda
Caringbah
Map 3.2: Tempe
Main Trade Area & Competitive Context
0 4.5 9
Kilometres
Bunnings
Home Hardware
Mitre 10
Thrifty Link Hardware
True Value Hardware
Domayne
Fantastic Furniture
Freedom
Harvey Norman
Ikea
Nick Scali
Oz Design
Barbeques Galore
Beacon Lighting
Betta Electrical
Bing Lee
Bing Lee Superstore
Clive Peeters
Dick Smith Electronics
Dick Smith Powerhouse
JB Hi-Fi
Light Up Australia
Retravision
Tandy
The Good Guys
Auto One
Autobarn
Autopro
BabyCo
Jaycar Electronics
Officeworks
Rebel Sport
Repco
Strathfield Car Radios
Super Cheap Auto
Toys 'R' Us
Adairs
Carpet Call
Carpet Choice
Carpet Court
Carpet One
Forty Winks
Lincraft
Pillow Talk
Rise & Shine
Sleep City
Sleepy's
Snooze
Solomons Flooring
Spotlight
The Sleeping Giant
Clark Rubber
Dare Gallery
Deco Rug
Easy Living
Everyday Living
������������������������������������������������� Anaconda
������������������������������������������������� BCF
������������������������������������������������� Curtain Wonderland
������������������������������������������������� Harris Technology
������������������������������������������������� Howards Storage World
������������������������������������������������� Outdoor Furniture Specialists
������������������������������������������������� Vast Interior
Appendix D
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report
dra ft
Ap
pen
dix D
Appendix D
Initial Draft LATM concept scheme – 27th September 2010
222.5m two-way separated cycleway along the northern side of Terry Street (no loss of parking)
34 New flat top road hump with kerb extensions
32Shared zone (10km/h)
31Modified T-intersection
(priority change)
28Raised threshold driveway treatment
Half Road Closure (entry only)
26 Half Road Closure (left out only)
25Diagonal Road Closure
37Rumble bar median islands
23 Pedestrian refuge with kerb extensions
33Remove right turn signal phase(Subject to RTA Agreement)
29Raised threshold driveway treatment
30
Kerb extensions at signalised crossing(Subject to RTA Agreement)
18
Raise existing pedestrian crossing27
Raise existing pedestrian crossing
24 Pedestrian refuge with kerb extensions
20Single lane slow point with road hump
35 New flat top road hump with kerb extensions
17
2.5m Shared Path
Parking in these streets to be investigated as part of a separate study
ST
TIO
N S
T
A
IKEA ACCESS 1
IKEAACCESS 2
36
TempePublic School
TempeHigh School
IKEA
BusDepot
St. Peters-TempeLocal Area Traffic Management Study
Draft Concept Plan
Southern Section of Study AreaStation Street to Park Road
19 Threshold treatment
21 Kerb extensions
1 Proposed New St.Peters-Tempe LATM Measures
Key St.Peters-Tempe LATM Access Changes
7Pedestrian refuges with kerb extensions along Henry Street
1 Road hump
2
3 Road hump
4 Road hump
Road hump
Kerb extensions at existing device9
Kerb extensions at existing device10
Kerb extensions at existing device11
12Replace existing device with Single lane slow point
13 Replace existing device with Single lane slow point
14Replace existing device with Single lane slow point
15 Pedestrian refuges at intersection
16 Single lane slow point with road hump
8Threshold treatment
St. PetersPublic School
Reduce the number of lanes from Mary Street to Unwins Bridge Road and widen the footpath on southern side(Subject to RTA Agreement)
Reduce the number of traffic lanes on Canal Road directed into Mary Street(Subject to RTA Agreement)
B
C
Hogan Avenue median island DRelocated pedestrian signalised crossing(Subject to RTA Agreement) E
A
1 Proposed New St.Peters-Tempe LATM Measures
Approved Sydenham LATM measures
5 Road hump
St. Peters-TempeLocal Area Traffic Management Study
Draft Concept Plan
Northern Section of Study AreaPark Road to Campbell Street Key St.Peters-Tempe LATM Access Changes
No right turn into Grove Street. 6-9AM (Mon-Fri)6
ARoad hump
A
Road hump
ARoad hump
A
Road hump
40km/h zone in Florence Street
Appendix E
IS12550 18/11/10 St Peters – Tempe LATM Review Issue: A-Dr 2 LATM Report
dra ft
Ap
pen
dix E
Appendix E
Detailed Cost Estimate
ST PETERS/TEMPE LATM STUDY - CONCEPT PROPOSALS SUMMARY - 2010
COST ESTIMATE TABLE
Item No. Ref No. Stage Location Actions Quantity Cost Estimate [1]
Maintenance (Signs, Lines)1 Silver Street (west end) Clean/replace graphitised advisory speed sign (westbound) 1 $225 32 Mary Street Repair humps, repaint line marking to Australian Standards 3 $16,200 33 Grove Street Repaint line marking to Australian Standards 3 $2,250 34 Foreman Street Repaint line marking to Australian Standards 3 $2,250 35 Union Street (near school) Repaint line marking to Australian Standards 1 $750 36 South Street Repaint line marking to Australian Standards 2 $1,500 37 Station Street West (east end) Repaint line marking to Australian Standards, repair fallen speed hump sign 1 $1,125 38 Station Street West (middle) Repaint line marking to Australian Standards 1 $750 39 Station Street West (west end) Repaint line marking to Australian Standards, clean/replace graphitised advisory speed sign 1 $1,125 3
10 Sutherland Street Repaint line marking to Australian Standards 3 $2,250 311 Frederick Street (west end) Repaint line marking to Australian Standards, replace missing westbound speed hump warning/advisory speed signs 1 $1,125 312 Frederick Street (middle, east end) Repaint line marking to Australian Standards 2 $1,500 313 George Street Repaint line marking to Australian Standards 3 $2,250 314 Samuel Street (west end, middle) Repaint line marking to Australian Standards 2 $1,500 315 Lymerston Street (west end) Correct upside down advisory speed sign at raised table 1 $225 316 Edwin Street Repaint line marking to Australian Standards 2 $1,500 317 Griffith Street Repaint line marking to Australian Standards 1 $750 318 Unwins Bridge Road outside high school Repaint line marking to Australian Standards 1 $750 319 Grove Street (at Unwins Bridge Road) Replace missing rumble bars, repaint line marking 1 $1,185 320 Terry Street (at Unwins Bridge Road) Replace missing rumble bars, repaint line marking 1 $1,185 321 Samuel Street (at Unwins Bridge Road) Replace missing rumble bars, repaint line marking 1 $1,185 322 Edwin Street (at Union Street) Replace missing rumble bars, repaint line marking 1 $1,185 323 Edwin Street (at Gannon Street) Replace missing rumble bars, repaint line marking 1 $1,185 324 Yelverton Street Repaint line marking leading into median island 30 $750 325 Unwins Bridge Road near Belmore Street Repaint pedestrian crossing 1 $1,500 326 Union Street outside school Repaint pedestrian crossing 1 $1,500 327 Griffith Street Repaint pedestrian crossing 1 $1,500 3
$49,200
New LATM Devices28 1 Edith Street Watts Profile Road Hump 2 $10,800 229 2 Mary Street 20m from Princes Highway Watts Profile Road Hump 1 $5,400 230 3 Intersection of Unwins Bridge Road and Grove Street right turn ban 6-10am M-F 2 $450 231 4 Sutherland Street 60m east Unwins Bridge Road single lane slow point on existing flat top road hump with linemarking and signage 1 $21,000 232 5 Sutherland Street 155m east Unwins Bridge Road median island on existing flat top road hump with linemarking 0.05 $1,263 233 6 Intersection of Sutherland Street and Henry Street pedestrian refuge islands 4 $9,870 234 7 Sutherland Street 100m west of Princes Highway median island on existing flat top road hump with linemarking 0.05 $1,263 235 8 Frederick Street 35m east of Unwins Bridge Road single lane slow point on existing flat top road hump with linemarking and signage 1 $21,000 236 9 Frederick Street 160m east of Unwins Bridge Road median island on existing flat top road hump with linemarking 0.05 $1,263 237 10 Intersection of Frederick Street and Henry Street pedestrian refuge islands 4 $9,870 238 11 Sutherland Street 100m west of Princes Highway median island on existing flat top road hump with linemarking 0.05 $1,263 239 12 Intersection of Yelverton Street and Henry Street pedestrian refuge islands 4 $9,870 240 13 Intersection of George Street and Henry Street pedestrian refuge islands 4 $9,870 241 18 Intersection of Railway Road and Unwins Bridge Road signal phasing with additional lanterns 1 $20,000 242 19 Intersection of Railway Road and Gleeson Avenue kerb extension with driveway redesign 0.5 $13,125 243 20 Park Road at Unwins Bridge Road pedestrian refuge island 1 $2,468 244 21 Park Road at Rowe Lane single lane slow point with flat top road hump 1 $26,400 245 22 Intersection of Park Road and Henry Street pedestrian refuge islands 4 $9,870 246 23 Park Road at Princes Highway raised threshold with driveway treatment 1 $23,750 147 25 Terry Street, Unwins Bridge Road to Henry Street (northside) 45 degree angle parking for 130m west of Henry Street 380 $9,500 248 26 Terry Street 45m east of Unwins Bridge Road single lane slow point with flat top road hump 1 $26,400 249 27 Intersection of Terry Street and Henry Street kerb extensions with pram ramps 0.6 $15,750 250 28 Terry Street 20m west of Princes Highway driveway link treatment with one-way eastbound directional access 1 $60,000 151 30 Samuel Street at Samuel Lane single lane slow point on existing flat top road hump with linemarking and signage 1 $21,000 252 31 Samuel Street at Princes Highway half road closure with pram ramps, linemarking and signage 1 $25,750 153 32 Princes Highway at Samuel Street closure of median island 0.2 $5,050 154 33 Lymerston Street at John Street single lane slow point on existing flat top road hump with linemarking and signage 1 $21,000 255 34 Lymerston Street at Princes Highway half road closure with pram ramps, linemarking and signage 1 $25,750 156 35 Foreman Street at Unwins Bridge Road raised threshold with driveway treatment 1 $23,750 157 36 Foreman Street at School Lane raised threshold with driveway treatment and priority change 1 $23,750 158 37 Foreman Street at Princes Highway raised threshold with driveway treatment 1 $23,750 159 38 Unwins Bridge Road mid block crossing 55m south of Foreman Street kerb extensions with pram ramps 0.2 $5,250 260 39 Unwins Bridge Road north of Union Street safety fence replacement 30 $14,250 261 40 Union Street Edwin Street to Unwins Bridge Road raised shared zone 10km/h 0.8 $96,000 262 42 Smith Street flat top speed hump with kerb extensions, linemarking and signage 2 $23,000 263 43 Intersection of Edwin Street and Tramway Street rumble bar median islands with linemarking 3 $3,555 264 44 Unwins Bridge Road Richardson Crescent to Gannon Street no stopping signage with linemarking 1 $4,000 265 46 Gannon Street at Princes Highway kerb extension removal with dual lane extension and linemarking 1 $3,230 266 47 Gannon Street east of Edwin Street pedestrian refuge islands 1 $2,468 267 48 Edwin Street at Gannon Street left turn ban 1 $225 268 50 Station Street at Cook Street kerb extensions with pram ramps 0.2 $5,250 269 51 Station Street Cook Street Quarry Street one-way linemarking with signage 6 $1,350 270 52 Station Street at Nicholson Street and Quarry Street no stopping signage 8 $1,800 271 53 Station Street Quarry Street to Griffiths Street two-way linemarking and signage 12 $2,700 2
$643,320
Bicycle Treatments72 14 Intersection of Reilly Lane and Unwins Bridge Road bicycle lanterns on new mid block crossing 1 $2,000 173 15 Reilly Lane, Henry Street to Unwins Bridge Road bicycle logos on roadway at 70m intervals 8 $240 174 16 Swain Street bicycle logos on roadway at 70m intervals 6 $180 175 17 Henry Street south of Reilly Lane bicycle logos on roadway at 70m intervals 16 $480 176 24 Belmore Road bicycle logos on roadway at 70m intervals 12 $360 177 29 Intersection of Bellevue Street and Princes Highway bicycle lanterns on new marked footcrossing 1 $2,000
$5,260
Union Street Treatments - Option A78 41 Intersection of Princes Highway and Union Street Ban Right turn into Union Street and through movements into Union Street 1 $20,000 179 45 Intersection of Princes Highway and Gannon Street Introduce Right turn into Gannon Street from Princes Highway 1 $20,000 180 49 Princes Highway at Station Street closure of median island 0.17 $4,293 1
$44,293
Union Street Treatments - Option B81 41 Intersection of Princes Highway and Union Street Remove Right Turn Phase into Union Street from Princes Highway 1 $20,000 1
$20,000
Sub-total $742,073Associated Drainage Works 10% $74,207
Contingency 15% $122,442Total $938,722
[2]Ref No 41 - Union Street Option B is not included in total cost estimate
[1] All cost estimates prepared by GTA Consultants are for broad level or initial feasibility planning only and must not be relied upon for quoting, budgeting or construction purposes. You should seek a detailed cost estimate from a suitably qualified civil engineer or quantity surveyor.
P:\IS12000 - 12990\IS12550 St Peters - Tempe LATM Review\Cost Estimates\101101xls-IS12550 Cost Estimates.xls
www.gta.com.au
Brisbane
GTA Consultants (QLD) Pty Ltd t/a
GTA Consultants
ABN: 98 137 610 274
A Level 6, 269 Wickham Street
PO Box 555
FORTITUDE VALLEY QLD 4006
P +617 3113 5000
F +617 3113 5010
E brisbane@gta.com.au
Sydney
GTA Consultants (NSW) Pty Ltd t/a
GTA Consultants
ABN: 31 131 369 376
A Level 2, 815 Pacific Highway
CHATSWOOD NSW 2067
PO Box 5254
WEST CHATSWOOD NSW 1515
P +612 8448 1800
F +612 8448 1810
E sydney@gta.com.au
Melbourne
GTA Consultants (VIC) Pty Ltd t/a
GTA Consultants
ABN: 34 137 610 381
A 87 High Street South
PO Box 684
KEW VIC 3101
P +613 9851 9600
F +613 9851 9610
E melbourne@gta.com.au
Canberra
GTA Consultants (ACT) Pty Ltd t/a
GTA Consultants
ABN: 51 137 610 452
A Level 11, 60 Marcus Clarke Street
CANBERRA ACT 2601
PO Box 1109
CIVIC SQUARE ACT 2608
P +612 6243 4826
F +612 6243 4848
E canberra@gta.com.au
Adelaide
GTA Consultants (SA) Pty Ltd t/a
GTA Consultants
ABN: 66 137 610 514
A Level 30, 91 King William Street
ADELAIDE SA 5000
P +618 8113 5383
F +618 8233 5858
E adelaide@gta.com.au
top related