searchlight wind energy project feis december 2012 no ... a-4... · microsoft word - searchlight...

Post on 25-Aug-2020

2 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

State Agency Comments | A

State Agency

  

 

 

 

 

State AAgency Commentss |1

  

 

 

 

   

State AAgency Commentss |2

 

State AAgency Commentss |3

 

State AAgency Commentss |4

Comment noted.

State AAgency Commentss |5

 

State AAgency Commentss |6

 

 

 

State AAgency Commentss |7

 

   

State AAgency Commentss |8

        MM-VIS-5 in Seto incorporate the

ection 4.9.4-Mitigaese suggestions, as

State A

ation Measures has s appropriate. 

Agency Comments

been updated

s |9

               Information on NOverdimensionalPotential Federal

Nevada Departmentl Vehicle Permit wl, State, and Local P

State Ag

t of Transportationwas added to Table

Permits for the Pro

gency Comments

n 1.6-2.

oposed Project. 

|10

                         Chuckwalla was corrected. Section 3.4.4-Spe Section 3.4.4-Spe Table 3.4-3 has b

added to the list. S

ecial-Status Wildli

ecial-Status Wildli

been corrected.

State Ag

Species name for s

ife Species updated

ife Species updated

gency Comments

shovel snake

d as suggested.

d as suggested.

|11

 Table 3.4-3 has b   Table 3.4-4 has b Refer to Section which has been asources. It is notthese sources. Access to the proAction – 96 WTGof increased traffResources Impac No effects to wilSection 4.4.5.15-mitigation measuan effect on a wa

been corrected. 

been corrected.

3.4.4.2-Existing Enamended to state tht anticipated that th

oject area is discussG Layout Alternatific are discussed thcts.

ldlife water develop-Mitigation Measurure (MM-BIO-8) shater development. 

State Ag

nvironment under Uhat NDOW maintaihe proposed project

sed in Section 4.7.2ive. Impacts to wilhroughout Section 4

pments are anticipares was updated to hould the proposed

gency Comments

Upland Game, ins such water t would affect

2.2-Proposed ldlife as a result 4.4-Biological

ated. However, include a

d project have

|12

Local Agency Comments | A

71BLocal Agency

Comments noted

d.

Local AAgency Commentss | 1

Local A

Agency Commentss | 2

Refer to Section Potential FederalProject.

Table 2.6-1. APMAir Quality/Dustrequirement.

4.6- Air Quality Iml, State, and Local P

Ms (common to act Control has been r

Local A

mpacts and Table 1Permits for the Pro

ction alternatives) urevised to include t

Agency Comments

.6-2. oposed

under APM-3 this

s | 3

top related