sd 1.1.2 ship dimensioning
Post on 04-Apr-2018
248 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 1/52
1
Ship Design I
Manuel Venturamventura@mar.ist.utl.pt
MSc in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 2
Summary
• Ship Dimensioning
• Owner’s Requirements
• Traditional approach
• Generic Ship Dimensioning Process
• Most common implementation methods:
– Systematic parametric variation– Optimization methods
• Some Optimization Software Tools– Excel Solver
– Matlab fmincon() function
Annex A. Ships Statistical Data Gathering and Processing
Annex B. Physical Limitations to ship dimensions
Annex C. Economical Measures of Merit
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 2/52
2
Ship Dimensioning
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 4
Preliminary Design Process
Yang & al (2006)
The determinationof the main
dimensions andcharacteristics ofthe ship is the firststep of thepreliminary designstage.
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 3/52
3
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 5
Owner’s Requirements
Example of requirements:
Type of ship: Container-carrier, with cell guides
Mission: Service Line Setubal - Antwerp
Deadweight: 9,500 dwt
Max. Draught: 8.0 m
Cargo capacity: 750 TEU, including 20 reefers
Service speed: 17 knots
Autonomy: 20,000 miles
Cargo Equipment: 2 cranes of 40 t x 26.5 m
Other: Accommodations for 15 people
The starting point is a set of Owner’s requirements definingmainly the ship type, cargo capacity and speed
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 6
Ship Dimensioning – Traditional Process
• DW (input)
• Assumed a (DW/ Displacement) ratio empirically
• Displacement = DW / (DW/ Displacement)
• Lpp = f (Displacement, Vs )
• Cb = f ( Fn, Displacement, Vs )• B, T, D are functions of:
– Space requirements (cargo and ballast volumes, max.dimensions)
– Intact stability
– Free Board
– Reserve of flotation
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 4/52
4
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 7
Selection of the Form Coefficients• Selection of the Cb
– In diagrams similar to the one in the figure, as a function of the FroudeNumber
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 8
Selection of the Main Dimensions
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 5/52
5
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 9
Ship Initial Dimensions• Watson and Gilfillan (1976) presented the following
procedure to obtain the main dimensions of a ship with therequired displacement ∆
( ) ( )( )
3
1
2
1025.1 ⎟⎟⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜⎜⎜
⎝
⎛
⋅+⋅
⋅⋅Δ=
BC s
T B
B L
L
( )
( )( )
T DT D
T B
BT
B L
L B
⋅=
=
=
• The ratios (L/B), (B/T)and Cb are obtainedfrom statistical data ofsimilar ships
• (D/T) is initially assumedas 1.20
• (1+s) is a coefficientrelated to the hullappendages
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 10
Generic ShipDimensioning
Process
Modern approach
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 6/52
6
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 11
Ship Model
Lpp, B, D, T, Cb
Etc.
Type of Propulsion System
Specific Fuel Oil Consumption
Etc.
Displacement
Cm, Cwl, Kb, Lcb, BMT, BML, SwLightship Weight, Kg, Lcg
GMtDW, CDWCargo Capacity
Ballast Capacity
Propulsion Power
Length of Engine RoomLength of Cargo Area
Etc.
Ship Model
Design
Variables
Possible
Solution
Technical
DesignParameters
Mission
Requirements
Type of ShipCDW, TEU, Lane Length
Vs
Autonomy
Etc.
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 12
Size Measures for Specific Ship Types
• Weight based design (Ex.: Tankers, bulk-carriers,..)– Cargo capacity depends mainly of the displacement
– Homogeneous cargoes
– CDW is the measure of cargo capacity
– Depth = f(Vcargo)
• Volume based design (Ex.: Container carriers)– Unitized or packed cargo
– Number of TEU is the measure of cargo capacity
• Area based design (Ex.: Ro/Ro ships)– Lane length for vehicle stowage is the most common measure of
cargo capacity
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 7/52
7
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 13
Constraints
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 14
Economical Assessment
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 8/52
8
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 15
Economical Measures of Merit• Initial ship cost
– The initial ship cost is not by itself a good indicator, somedesign options only become economically advantageous on thelong run
• Other criteria can be used to take into consideration therunning costs of the ship along its entire operational life
• The most common are:
– Required Freight Rate (RFR)
– Present Value (PV)– Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
• To evaluate these criteria the knowledge of the typical shipvoyage is required
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 16
Typical Voyage
• The specification of the typical ship voyage allows a morecomprehensive analysis of the economic aspects
• It may include:
– The number of ports visited during the round trip
– The distance between ports
– The cargo-handling capabilities available and the correspondinghandling rates and costs
– Port fees and taxes
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 9/52
9
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 17
Example of a Typical Voyage
SpecificationItinerário
1
23
Carga
1-2
2-3
Ritmos de carga/descarga
12
Termos de carga/descarga
Custos portuários do navio
1
2Custos portuários da carga
1
2
Frete
Setúbal
AntuérpiaSines
600 teu’s x 14 t
400 teu’s x 16 t + 200 teu’s vazios
60 teu’s/hora shinc70 teu’s/hora shinc
Li-Lo
€10,000 + 0.5xGT
€30,000 + 0.5xGT
€100/teu cheio, € 50/teu vazio
€120/teu cheio, € 70/teu vazio
RFR (frete mínimo requerido)
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 18
Some Common Freight Conditions
• fio (free in and out )
• fiost (free in and out stowed and trimmed )
• li-lo (liner in and liner out )
• shinc (Sundays and holidays included )
• sshex (Saturdays, Sundays and holidays excluded )
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 10/52
10
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 19
Other Generic Requirements
Ship Registry (conventional flag/convenience flag) MAR
Duration of the Investment (ship economic lifetime) 20 years
Capital Interest Rate (bank loans) 10%
Working days /year (Off hire days/year) 355 d (10 d)
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 20
Generation Engine for Design Variables
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 11/52
11
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 21
Determination of the Design Variables• Parametric Studies
– The independent variables are obtained by variation betweenthe lower and upper limits assumed
– Require more computing time when the number of designvariables is high
– No guarantees that the solution found is the optimal
• Optimization Methods
– The independent variables are obtained from an optimization
algorithm
– Possible to find a better and faster solution
– Only provides information about the optimal point found (singleobjective methods)
Parametric Studies
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 12/52
12
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 23
Parametric Study Methodology
• System of 5 equations• 11 variables• 3 variables fixed based on
the Owner requirements(DW, CCAP, V)
Experience shows that these three relations,which are relatively stable for each ship type,
are suited for a good initial estimateIntroducing these additional three relations, the solution ofthe displacement equation it is transformed in the solution ofsystem of eight non-linear equations.
( )
( )
( )
, , , , ,
, , , ,
, , , ,
WT
WT MCR
MCR
MCR CAP
L B T Cb
L DW
L f L B D T Cb P
P f L B T Cb V
D f L B Cb P C
γ Δ = ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅
Δ = +
=
=
=
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 24
FunctionalDiagram of theDimensioning by
Systematic
Variation
The system of non-linear equations issolved by an iterativeprocess
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 13/52
13
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 25
Main Dimensions• The main dimension can be obtained from the ratios and
coefficients used as independent variables
• For example:
23
1 DW
k
T L B
Cb B T
B B T T
L L B
B
γ
⎛ ⎞Δ = ⋅⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
Δ=
⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞⋅ ⋅ ⋅⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠
⎛ ⎞= ⋅ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
⎛ ⎞= ⋅ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
DW k
⎛ ⎞= ⎜ ⎟Δ⎝ ⎠
The ratio k can be obtainedfrom statistics:
Optimization Methods
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 14/52
14
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 27
Types of Optimization Problems• Single-Objective
– Simplified process in which one only objective, considered themost important, is selected
• Multi-Objective– Closer to the reality– Several objectives can be in conflict between them
• Hybrid– A multi-objective problem is transformed into a single
objective– One of the objectives is selected as the most important andthe other are converted into a set of constraints that arevaried parametrically
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 28
Types of Methods and Algorithms
Linear Methods:• Linear Programming (LP)
• Newton
Non-Linear Methods:
• Gauss-Newton• Levenberg-Marquardt
• Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP)
• Artificial Neural Networks (ANN)
• Genetic Algorithms (GA)
• Simulated Annealing (SA)
• Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 15/52
15
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 29
Non-Linear Methods (1)• Linear Successive Approximations
– The process starts from an initial feasible point– The functions are expanded in Taylor series around the initial
point, considering only the linear terms– The constrains and the objective functions are linearized in a
similar way and the problem is solved as linear.
• Random Search– The values of the design variables are generated randomly
between the lower and upper limits.– The values that do not comply to the constrains are eliminated
and are not used in the next functions.
– The process stops when all the variables comply to the criteriadefined.
• Direct Search– The process starts from an initial point and generates a
sequence of point that converge to an optimal point where thefunction has a minimum.
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 30
Non-Linear Methods (2)
• Advantages/Disadvantages
– Linear Successive Approximations – Fast process but wherethe non-linear behavior of the relations is lost due to thelinearization of the initial stage.
– Random Search – Slow process where the optimum point can bemissed due to the contraction process. It can be applied tomulti-modal functions.
– Direct search – Based on local search and global movements.
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 16/52
16
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 31
Types of Optimization MethodsGlobal
• Is able to search through the entire design space to findthe optimal solution
Local
• Can converge to a local solution, missing possible solutions inother regions of the design space
Some Optimization Software Tools:Excel Solver
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 17/52
17
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 33
EXCEL Solver (1)• Available algorithms:
– LP - Linear Programming (assumed only if selected in <Options>)
– Non-Linear Programming (assumed by default)
• GRG2 - Generalized Reduced Gradient (Lasdom et al, 1998)
• The Solver approximates the Jacobian matrix (partialderivatives) using finite differences and re-evaluates it atthe beginning of each iteration
• Limits– 1 objective (Single Objective algorithm)
– 200 variables
– 100 implicit restrictions
– 400 simple restrictions (upper/lower limits)
• Usage:– <Tools>/<Solver>
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 34
EXCEL Solver (2)
• <Target cell> is the one where the objective function is evaluated
• <Equal To> define the type of problem (maximize, minimize, equal to)
• <Changing Cells> are the ones that contain the design variables (to beoptimized) and must be all in the active sheet
• <Constrains> list the constraints to be applied
Multiple range<Changing Cells> can beindicated separated bycommas:
$C$4, $C$6:$C$8
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 18/52
18
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 35
Example: Bulk Carrier Dimensioning• The simplified Model used on the example is based on the
one presented in Xuebin (2009)
Objective Function
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 36
Example: Problem Constraints
• The following set of 14 constraints is applied:
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 19/52
19
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 37
Example: Bulk Carrier Dimensioning
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 38
Notes on the Spreadsheet Design (1)
• In order to make the model formulas more readable andeasy to debug and maintain, cell and range names should beused instead of just references
• Cell names are created by:
<Insert/Name/Define>
• The use of cell names avoids the need to use absolute cellreferences (Example: ‘Lpp’ instead of C$4$)
• Define all the cell names BEFORE entering the formulas
• Define explicitly the units of all the values
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 20/52
20
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 39
Notes on the Spreadsheet Design (2)• Constraints associated to intervals must be split in two.
Example:
25000 <= DW <= 500000
To be split into:
DW >= 25000
DW <= 50000
• Use color codes to identify the different types of cells. Forexample:
– <yellow> input cells
– <orange> constraints
– <red> objective function
– <gray> values computed by the model
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 40
Notes on the Spreadsheet Design (3)
• Container Carriers have dimensions external (breadth of ship) andinternal (inner breadth of cargo hold) multiple of the width of thestandard container (8.0ft = 2.44m)
• These conditions can be converted into additional constraints
• For example for the Breadth of the ship:Module(B/2.46) < 0.01
NOTES:
• The value 2.46 results from taking into consideration the width ofthe container plus the interval between containers (abt. 25 mm)
• In Excel the expression will be:
mod(B; 2.46)
where the function mod(a;b) returns the remainder of the divisiona/b
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 21/52
21
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 41
Notes on the Spreadsheet Design (3)• Sometimes it is convenient to be able to use more than one
objective in the optimization process
• Although the <Solver> is a single objective method, multipleobjectives can be taken into consideration by creating an objectivefunction which is the result of a weighted sum of severalcontributions:
Fobj = w0xF0 + w1xF1 + w2xF2 …
• The weights wi will be assigned by the designer in accordance tothe relative importance of each contribution and their sum will bealways equal to 1.0:
w0 + w1 + w2 + … = 1.0
• The sign of each weight will be positive, if the corresponding
contribution is to me minimized, or negative, if it is to bemaximized
• It is convenient to scale the different contributions to the sameorder of magnitude. For example each contribution can be scaled tobe in the interval [0, 1]
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 42
Notes on the Spreadsheet Design (5)
• The initial values for the variable cells should berepresentative of the values expected at the optimalsolution, rather than arbitrary values such as all zeroes.
• The Excel Solver is a local optimizer -> different sets ofinitial variables values should be tested to check the
consistency of the results and to help to find a globaloptimum
• The process can be made automatic by creating a macro todefine the design variables, the constraints and theobjective function and to run the Solver
• The macro can be converted into a VBA (Visual Basic forApplications) function
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 22/52
22
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 43
VBA Programming in Excel• The first draft of a
program can be obtainedby recording a sequenceof commands (macro)using the macrorecorder:
<Tools/Macro/RecordNew Macro>
• Next the macro code can be run and edited in the VBA Editor<Tools/Macro/Macros/Run> or /Edit>
• The code should be extensively commented in order to make itsdebugging and maintenance easier
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 44
VBA Function for Dimensioning (1)
Sub OptimumShip()'' OptimumShip Macro' Macro recorded 2010-09-22 by Manuel Ventura'' Keyboard Shortcut: Ctrl+Shift+S'
' Clear Solver optionsSolverReset
' Minimize Objective FunctionSolverOk SetCell:="$K$17", MaxMinVal:=2, ValueOf:="0", _
ByChange:="$C$4:$C$9“
' Constraints' Lpp <=SolverAdd CellRef:="$C$4", Relation:=1, FormulaText:="$C$24"
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 23/52
23
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 45
VBA Function for Dimensioning (2)' T <=SolverAdd CellRef:="$C$7", Relation:=1, FormulaText:="$C$25“' T <=SolverAdd CellRef:="$C$7", Relation:=1, FormulaText:="$C$26"' L/B >=SolverAdd CellRef:="$C$11", Relation:=3, FormulaText:="$C$27"' L/D <=SolverAdd CellRef:="$C$12", Relation:=1, FormulaText:="$C$28"' L/T <=SolverAdd CellRef:="$C$13", Relation:=1, FormulaText:="$C$29"' Cb >=SolverAdd CellRef:="$C$8", Relation:=3, FormulaText:="$C$30"
' Cb <=SolverAdd CellRef:="$C$8", Relation:=1, FormulaText:="$C$31"' Fn <=SolverAdd CellRef:="$G$15", Relation:=1, FormulaText:="$C$32"
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 46
VBA Function for Dimensioning (3)
' GMT >=
SolverAdd CellRef:="$G$31", Relation:=3, FormulaText:="$C$33"
' DW >=
SolverAdd CellRef:="$G$20", Relation:=3, FormulaText:="$C$34“
' DW <=
SolverAdd CellRef:="$G$20", Relation:=1, FormulaText:="$C$35"
' Vs >=SolverAdd CellRef:="$C$9", Relation:=3, FormulaText:="$C$36“
' Vs <=
SolverAdd CellRef:="$C$9", Relation:=1, FormulaText:="$C$37"
' Run Solver and
‘ allow the user to decide to keep or not the obtained result
SolverSolve userFinish:=False
End Sub
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 24/52
24
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 47
Solver Options (1)• The Solver can be fine-tuned by changing the default
options
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 48
Solver Options (2)
• The <Max Time> and the <Iterations> edit boxes control theSolver’s running time.
• The <Show Iteration Results> check box instructs theSolver to pause after each major iteration and display thecurrent "trial solution" on the spreadsheet. In alternative
the user can simply press the ESC key at any time tointerrupt the Solver, inspect the current iterate, and decidewhether to continue or to stop.
• The <Assume Linear Model> check box determines whetherthe simplex method or the GRG2 nonlinear programmingalgorithm will be used to solve the problem.
• The <Use Automatic Scaling> check box causes the model tobe rescaled internally before solution.
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 25/52
25
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 49
Solver Options (3)• The <Assume Non-Negative> check box places lower bounds
of zero on any decision variables that do not have explicitbounds in the <Constraints> list box.
• The <Precision> edit box is used by all of the optimizers andindicates the tolerance within which constraints areconsidered binding and variables are considered integral inmixed integer programming (MIP) problems.
• The <Tolerance> edit box is the integer optimality or MIP-gap tolerance used in the branch and bound method.
• The GRG2 algorithm uses the <Convergence> edit box and<Estimates>, <Derivatives>, and <Search> option buttongroups.
Some Optimization Software Tools:Matlab Optimization Toolbox
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 26/52
26
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 51
MatLab Optimization Toolbox fmincon()
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 52
MatLab Optimization Toolbox fmincon()
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 27/52
27
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 53
Objective Function
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 54
Non-Linear Constraints
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 28/52
28
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 55
Example: Bulk Carrier Dimensioning (1)• The simplified Model used on the example is based on the
one presented in Xuebin (2009)
• This is a part of the Matlab code to call the optimizer:
% Initial pointLpp = 185.0;B = 26.0;D = 14.5;T = 10.5;Vs = 15.0;Cb = 0.70;
x0 = [Lpp B D T Vs Cb];
% Call optimizer[x, acc, exitflag, output] = fmincon( @CalcModel, x0, [], [], ...
[], [], [], [], @mycon, options );
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 56
Example: Bulk Carrier Dimensioning (2)
The file <CalcModel.m> defines the sequence of thecalculations required to compute the objective function:
function [annualCargoCost] = CalcModel( x )
% Design independent variables
Lpp = x(1);B = x(2);D = x(3);T = x(4);Vs = x(5);Cb = x(6);
displ = 1.025*Lpp*B*T*Cb;
% Froude NumberFn = 0.5144*Vs/sqrt(9.8065*Lpp);
…………
annualCargoCost = aoc/nvr/cdw;
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 29/52
29
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 57
Example: Bulk Carrier Dimensioning (3)The file <mycon.m> contains the definition of the constraints:
function [c, ceq] = mycon( x )
global Fn dw;
Lpp = x(1);B = x(2);D = x(3);T = x(4);Vs = x(5);Cb = x(6);
% Stabilitykb = 0.53*T;bmt = (0.085*Cb - 0.002)*B*B/T/Cb;kmt = kb + bmt;gmt = kmt - (1.0 + 0.52*D);
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 58
Example: Bulk Carrier Dimensioning (4)
% Inequality Constraints defined as% ax + b <= 0
c = [-Lpp/B+6.0 Lpp/D-15.0 Lpp/T-19.0 ...
T-0.45*dw^0.31 T-0.7*D-0.7 ...25000-dw dw-500000 ...0.63-Cb Cb-0.75 ...14.0-Vs Vs-18.0 ...Lpp-274.32 Fn-0.32 ...-gmt+0.07*B];
% NO equality constraintsceq = [];
The file <mycon.m> with the definition of the constraints:
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 30/52
30
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 59
Example: Bulk Carrier Dimensioning (4)Final results of the optimization :
Algorithm used : medium-scale: SQP, Quasi-Newton, line-searchNo. of iterations = 18No. function calls = 133
Optimum Ship:Lpp = 221.855 mB = 36.976 mD = 19.821 mT = 14.575 mVs = 14.000 knotsCb = 0.720
ACC = 7.972 US$/t
The results are quite similar to those obtained from the Excelspreadsheet using the Solver.
Linear Programming (LP) Methods Applied toShip Dimensioning
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 31/52
31
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 61
Introduction• Linear Programming (LP), is an Operations Research
technique that was first applied during the Second WorldWar to help solve troop-supply problems.
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 62
LP Software Tools Available
• MatLab Optimization Toolbox– Quadric and Linear Programming
• LP Solve (ANSI C)– Current version: 5.5 (CD-ROM#68)
• Clp - COIN-OR Linear Programming Solver (C++)– Current version: 1.10 (CD-ROM#68)
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 32/52
32
Bibliography
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 64
Bibliography (1)
9 Artana, Ketut Buda and Ishida, Kenji (2003), "The Determinationof Optimum Ship’s Design and Power Prediction Using SpreadsheetModel", Journal of the JIME Vol. 37, No. 6.
9 Artana, K.Buda and Ishida, Kenji (2003), "Spreadsheet Modeling toDetermine Optimum Ship Main Dimensions and Power Requirementsat Basic Design Stage", Marine Technology, Vol. 40, No. 1,Jan.2003, pp. 61–70. (CD-ROM#51)
9
Brinati, HL; Augusto, AO and Conti, MB (2007), “Learning Aspectsof Procedures for Ship Concept Design Based on First Principles”,International Conference on Engineering Education – ICEE’2007,Coimbra, Portugal.
9 Burgos, D. and Martins, M. (2008), "Projeto Preliminar deEmbarcações Usando Algoritmos Genéticos", SOBENA 2008.
9 Chao, Chen (2009), "The Container Shipping Network Design underChanging Demand and Freight Rates", The Eighth InternationalSymposium on Operations Research and Its Applications(ISORA’09) Zhangjiajie, China, September 20–22, pp. 245–262.(CD-ROM#68)
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 33/52
33
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 65
Bibliography (2)9 Chryssostomidis, Chryssostomos (1967), "Optimization Methods
Applied to Containership Design", MsC Thesis, MIT. (CD-ROM#67)
9 Cudina, Predrag (2008), "Design Procedure and MathematicalModels in the Concept Design of Tankers and Bulk Carriers",Brodogradnja, Vol.59, No.4, pp.323-339. (CD-ROM#70)
9 De, Abhijit and Kumar, Ashish (2006), "OPTI-MARINE-WARE(Optimization of Vessel's Parameters Through SpreadsheetModel)", Journal of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering.(CD-ROM#51)
9 Dobie, Thomas (2002), “The Importance of the Human Factors in
Ship Design”9 Frank, Darko; Klanac, Alan and Bralic, Svemir (2008), "A Concept
for Concurrent Group Design of Ships", Proceedings ofCOMPIT'08, Liege, pp.450-459. (CD-ROM#68)
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 66
Bibliography (3)
9 Frank, D.; Klanac, A. and Bralic, S. (2008), "ng.zine - A New DesignSystem for Naval Architecture", Proceedings of SORTA'08, Pula.(CD-ROM#68)
9 Ganesan, Vikram (2001), "Global Optimization of the NonconvexContainership Design Problem Using the Reformulation-linearizationTechnique", MSc Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
University. (CD-ROM#67)9 ISSC 2003, Technical Committee IV.2 Report
• Jensen, G. (1994), “Moderne Schiffslinien”, Handbuch der Werften,Vol.XXII, Hansa, pp.93.
9 Klanac, A. and Jelovica, J. (2007), "A Concept of Omni-Optimizationfor Ship Structural Design", Advancements in Marine Structures,Guedes Soares & Das (eds), Proceedings of MARSTRUCT 2007, The1st International Conference on Marine Structures, 12-14 March2007, Glasgow, UK. p. 473-481. (Taylor & Francis: London). (CD-ROM#68)
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 34/52
34
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 67
Bibliography (4)9 Liang, Zheng Xuan; Yan, Lin and Shang, Ji Zhuo (2009),
"Collaborative Multidisciplinary Decision Making Based on GameTheory in Ship Preliminary Design", Journal of Marine Science andTechnology, Vol.1, pp.334–344. (CD-ROM#70)
9 Murphy, R.; Sabat, D. and Taylor, R., “Least Cost ShipCharacteristics by Computer Techniques” (CD-ROM#33)
9 Na, S-S and Karr, D. (2002), “Product-Oriented Optimal StructuralDesign of Double-Hull Oil Tankers”, Journal of Ship Production, Vol.18, No. 4, Nov. 2002, pp. 237–248. (CD-ROM#51)
9 Parsons and Scott (2004), “Formulation of Design Optimization
Problems for Solution with Scalar Numerical OptimizationMethods”, Journal of Ship Research, Vol.48, No.1, pp.61-76. (CD-ROM#51)
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 68
Bibliography (5)
9 Peri, D. and Campana, E. F. (2003), “Multidisciplinary DesignOptimization of a Naval Surface Combatant”, Journal of ShipResearch, Vol.47, No.1, pp.1-12. (CD-ROM#51)
9 Ross, J.; McNatt, T. and Hazen, G. (2002), “The Project 21 SmartProduct Model: A New Paradigm for Ship Design, Cost Estimation,and Production Planning”, Journal of Ship Production, Vol. 18, No. 2,May 2002, pp. 73–78. (CD-ROM#33)
9Schiller, T.R.; Daidola, J. C.; Kloetzli, J.C. and Pfister, J. (2001),"Portfolio of Ship Designs: Early-Stage Design Tools", MarineTechnology, Vol.38, No.2, April 2001, pp.71–91. (CD-ROM#51)
9 Schneekluth, H. e Bertram, V. (1998), “Ship Design for Efficiencyand Economy”, Butterworth-Heinemann.
• Watson, DGM and Gilfillan, AW (1976), “Some Ship DesignMethods”, RINA Transactions, Vol.119, pp.279-324.
• Whiton, Justin C. (1967), "Some Constraints On Shipping in LinearProgramming Models", Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, Vol. 14,Issue 2, pp.257-260.
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 35/52
35
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 69
Bibliography (6)9 Xinlian, Xie; Tengfei, Wang and Daisong, Chen (2000), "A Dynamic
Model and Algorithm for Fleet Planning", Maritime Policy &Management, Vol.27, Issue 1, pp.53-63. (CD-ROM#68)
9 Xuebin, Li (2009), “Multiobjective Optimization and MultiattributeDecision Making Study of Ship’s Principal Parameters in ConceptualDesign”, Journal of Ship Research, Vol.53, No.2, pp.83-92.
9 Yang, Y-S; Park, C-K; Lee, K-H and Suh, J-C (2007), “A Study onthe Preliminary Ship Design Method Using Deterministic andProbabilistic Approach Including Hull Form”, Journal of StructuralMultidisciplinary Optimization, Vol.33, No.6, pp.529-539. (CD-ROM#65)
9 Zanic, Vedran and Cudina, Predrag (2009), "Multiattribute DecisionMaking Nethodology in the Concept Design of Tankers and BulkCarriers", Brodogradnja, Vol.60, No.1, pp.19-43. (CD-ROM#70)
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 70
Bibliography
Linear Programming
9 Ferris, Michael C.; Mangasarian, Olvi L. and Wright, Stephen J.(2007), “Linear Programming with MatLab", Society for Industrialand Applied Mathematics and the Mathematical ProgrammingSociety.
9 Luenberger, D.G. anf Ye, Y. (2008), “Linear and Non-LinearProgramming ”, 3rdEd, Springer.
9 Matousek, Jiri and Gartner, Bernd (2006), "Understanding andUsing Linear Programming", Springer.
Linear Programming Applied to Ship Design
• Moyst, Howard and Das, Biman (2008), “A Linear ProgrammingApproach to Optimization of Ship Design and Construction Phases”,Journal of Ship Production, Vol. 24, No.1, pp. 1-6.
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 36/52
36
Annex A. Ships Statistical Data Gatheringand Processing
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 72
Ships Data Gathering (1)
• The common practice of single design or small series implies thatsome initial knowledge can be obtained from the analysis of theexisting ships
• To improve the efficiency of the process the information aboutexisting ships of the same type and in a similar range of cargocapacity should be structured in a small Data Base
• To improve the quality of the process, the Data Base should firstbe cleaned from:
– Incorrect data (from wrong sources or typing mistakes)
– Incomplete data (incomplete records with some missing fields)
– Repeated data (from identical ships produced in series)
• Keeping track of the ship identification (Name, IMO Number,building yard and year) and data source (journal, web site, etc.)will help to check and improve the data quality
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 37/52
37
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 73
Ships Data Gathering (2)• The registries of Lloyds Register and other classification
societies are good data sources
• A Spreadsheet can be used for data storage and for thestatistical analysis and graphic display of the results
• The main topics of interest are:
– Hull dimensions
– Propulsion machinery and electric generators
– Cargo capacity and equipment
– Others (ballast capacity, crew)
LwtIMO
No
MCRMain
Engine
Built
Year
Electr.Power
VsDWT DBLppName
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 74
Ships Data Gathering (3)
The measure(s) of the cargo capacity used depends of the ship type:
Ramps, liftsTotal lane length / number of cars/ number of trailers
Number of passengers
Ro/Ro
RoPax
Ferries
Number of passengersPassenger Ships
Cranes
Cell guidesTotal Number of TEUs (in holds,on deck, reefers)
Container carriers
Cargo pumps
Cranes
No. of Tanks / Holds
Volume cargo tanks/holds
Tankers
Bulk carriers
CargoEquipment
Measures of Cargo CapacityShip Type
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 38/52
38
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 75
Ships Data Gathering (4)• Other information also useful about ship systems, crew, etc.
(if available)
BallastPumps
Vol. DO CrewVol. FOVol.Ballast
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 76
Process the Compiled Data
• Based on the data compiled, a set of ratios can be computed
• These ratios help to characterize the ship class
• Allow the definition of the bounding limits to the variationof the design variables
• Support the estimative of values for which there is noinformation to support a computation, even if approximated
L/D %TEUdeck%TEU hold
CSR WB/DWB/T %TEUrefLWT/(L.B.D)CbT/DL/B
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 39/52
39
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 77
Ship Data Sources – Web Sites (1)
Data about ships built in Polish shipyards since 1992polship.cto.gda.pl
Lloyds Register Data about existing ships (paid)www.sea-web.com
DNV Registry of ships and characteristics. Free access.Search by Name or IMO Number
exchange.dnv.com
NotesData Source
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 78
Ship Data Sources – Publications (2)
Annual publication from RINA with good descriptions of themost representative ships of each year, including GeneralArrangement drawing and lightship weight information. Alsoavailable in CD-ROM.
Significant Ships
RINA Journal that contains some ship descriptionsNaval Architecture
Journal of the association of Spanish naval architects thatcontains some ship descriptions (in Spanish). Digital versionavailable only by subscription.
Ingenieria Naval
www.ingenierosnavales.com
Journal that contains some ship descriptions
Digital version available only by subscription.
Motor Ship
www.motorship.com
NotesData Source
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 40/52
40
Annex B. Physical Limitations to the MainDimensions of the Ship
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 80
Physical Limitations
• Physical limitations can be associated to the geographicalroute that the ship uses
• Limitations can be due to the existence of canals, straights,bridges, ports, locks systems
• The dimensions affected can be the Length, the Breadth,
the Draught and the Air Draught
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 41/52
41
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 81
Air Draught
• Designation given to thevertical distance measuredfrom the load waterline upto the upper extremity ofthe ship (top of the mast,chimney,..)
• Limited to 4.50 m in manyinland waterways in centralEurope due to the
existence of bridges
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 82
Some Physical Limitations in Canals
--
--
35.50
--
--
--
AirDraft
max [m]
12,00018.0055.00427.00Panama Canal(after 2014)
21.00
20.12
9.10
9.50
12.04
Tmax
[m]
300,000
240,000
65,000
DW Max.
[t]
18,000------Strait of Malacca
17,000-----Suez Canal
22.86222.50St. LawrenceCanal
40.00315.00Kiel Canal
4,00032.31294.13Panama Canal
TEU Max.Bmax
[m]
Lmax
[m]
Updated on Jan. 2010
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 42/52
42
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 83
Strategic Points for the Marine
Transportation
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 84
Panama Canal
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 43/52
43
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 85
Enlargement of the Panama CanalAdapted to Post-Panamax ships
Dimensions of the new locks (eclusas ):
L = 427 m
B = 55 m
T = 18 m
Cost: 5.5 billion US$
Beginning of work: 2007
Conclusion: 2014
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 86
Suez Canal – Navigation Chanel
Updated on Jan. 2010
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 44/52
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 45/52
45
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 89
Restrictions in Portuguese Ports
Petrol.= 23 m
Grain.= ?
Petrol.= 28 mGrain.= 17 m
Gen.Cargo= 5.5 m
Gen.Cargo = 125 mSines
Barra= 9.5 m(dep. on the tide)
250 mSetúbal
Barra= 10.5 m
(dep. on the tide)Liscont = 10 m
Sta.Apol. = 8 m
Trafaria = 12 mBarreiro = 9 m
Seixal = 5m
Trafaria = 235 mLisboa
4.7 m100 mFigueira da Foz
8 m140 m Aveiro
???Leixões/
Other ships
Station B = 9 mStation C = 5.8 m
Station B = 200 mStation C = 100 m
Leixões/
tankers
Air DraughtDraughtBreadthLength
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 90
Marine Ports in Portuguese Coast
• Viana do Castelo
• Leixões
• Aveiro
• Figueira da Foz
• Peniche
• Lisboa
• Cascais
• Sesimbra
• Setúbal
• Sines
• Lagos
• Faro
• V. R. Sto. António
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 46/52
46
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 91
Links – Portuguese Ports• www.portosdeportugal.pt
• www.portodeaveiro.pt
• www.portodelisboa.pt
• www.portodelisboa.pt
• www.portodesines.pt
• www.portodesetubal.pt
• www.apdl.pt
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 92
Links – Ports and Canals
• www.pancanal.com (Panama Canal)
• www.suezcanal.gov.eg (Suez Canal Authority)
• www.kiel-canal.org (Kiel Canal)
• www.greatlakes-seaway.com
• www.atlas.com.eg/scg.html• www.nnc.egnet.net/suezrules.htm
• www.portguide.com
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 47/52
47
Annex C. Economical Measures of Merit
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 94
Measures of Merit
• The type of measure of merit used depends on the previousknowledge of the earnings of the ship
• Known Results– Net Present Value (NPV)
– Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
• Unknown Results– Required Freight Rate (RFR)
– Present Value (PV)
– Average Annual Cost (AAC)
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 48/52
48
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 95
Net Present Value (NPV)• Often used when the funds for investment are limited and
the maximum income tax possible is required.
( ) ( ) ( )0
1
N
N P V P W Q F R P W A O C P W C = ⋅ − −⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦∑
where:N - No. years of ship’s lifePW() - Present WorthQ - Total quantity of cargo carried annuallyFR - Freight TaxAOC – Annual Operating CostsC 0 - Initial ship cost
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 96
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
• Represents the tax of return which originates equal valuesfor the Present Value of the results and of the costs, i.e.,for which NPV = 0.
• Allows more effective comparisons between entirelydifferent alternatives
• While NPV is expressed in currency units (Euro, US$), theIRR is expressed in percentage (%)
• One advantage of the IRR is that it can be computed withoutthe need to estimate the cost of the capital
• When the IRR is used, the criterion is to select the projectswhose IRR exceeds the cost of the capital
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 49/52
49
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 97
Required Freight Rate (RFR)• Used when the data necessary to determine accurately the
exploitation results is not available.
• Specially advantageous when comparisons are made betweenships of different sizes.
• Represents the cost per unit of cargo, necessary to coverentirely the operation costs and to guarantee the specifiedincome tax from the capital invested.
Q
C AOC RFR i+
=
where Ci is the annual cost of the capital and V R is theresidual value of the ship
( )0i RC CRF C PW V = − ⋅CRF = Capital Recovery
Factor
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 98
Permissible Price (PP)
• Represents the maximum admissible price of the ship thatstill guarantees a specified income tax.
• With the exception of the cases where the ship is paid in asingle installment, it is determined by an iterativeprocess.
• Can be used to evaluate prices in proposals of new buildingsor in the acquisition of second-hand ships, and in thecomparison of those prices with the current ship prices andfreight values.
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 50/52
50
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 99
Some Elementary Concepts• Capital Recovery Factor - is factor that converts a present
value into a stream of equal annual payments over a specifiedperiod of time at a given interest rate.
( )
( )
1
1 1
N
N
i iCRF
i
+=
+ −
• Present Worth Factor - is a multiplier which converts a
future amount into a present amount
( )PW iN
= +−
1
where:N No. years of ship’s lifei Interest rate
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 100
Bibliography
9 BTE (1982), “An Estimate of Operating Costs for Bulk, RoRo andContainers Ships”, Bureau of Transport Economics, Camberra.
9 Watson, D.G.M. (1998), “Practical Ship Design”, Vol.1, Elsevier.
9 Y-S Yang, C-K Park, K-H Lee and J-C Suh (2007), “A Study on thePreliminary Ship Design Method Using Deterministic Approach andProbabilistic Approach Including Hull Form”, Structural andMultidisciplinay Optimization, Vol.33, No.6, pp.529-539. (CD-ROM#50)
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 51/52
51
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 101
Some Relevant Links (1)
Ship search by IMO Numberwww.equasys.org
BRS Barry Rogliano Salles Shipbrokers – statisticsabout the marine transport market
www.brs-paris.com
Updated prices of the different types of Fuel Oil.
Historic record and trends.www.bunkerworld.com
Prices of second-hand shipswww.priyablue.com
Routes and distances between portswww.dataloy.com
CESA – Committee of European Shipyards’Associations
www.cesa-shipbuilding.org
AWES – Association of European Shipbuilders andShiprepairers
www.awes-shipbuilding.org
Description / NotesWeb Site
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 102
Some Relevant Links (2)
Ship search by IMO Number, Name, Owner (freeregistration)
www.shippingdatabase.com
World Shipping Register (subscription)
Search by Name, Type, DW, etc.e-ships.net
Description / NotesWeb Site
7/30/2019 SD 1.1.2 Ship Dimensioning
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/sd-112-ship-dimensioning 52/52
M.Ventura Ship Dimensioning 103
Some Portuguese Links• www.imarpor.pt (Instituto Portuário dos Transportes Marítimos)
• www.ancruzeiros.pt (Lista de Legislação Náutica de Recreio)
• www.fpvela.pt (Federação Portuguesa de Vela)
• www.hidrografico.pt (Instituto Hidrográfico)
• www.isn.org.pt (Instituto de Socorros a Náufragos)
top related